Slashdot Mirror


The Tale of Wal-Mart, Jack, and Bully

GamePolitics is reporting on something that seems like a simple decision: Wal-mart is no longer accepting pre-orders for unrated games. As a 'family-friendly' establishment, it makes a certain amount of sense. The catch is that, in the eyes of many, one of the U.S.'s largest retailers is bowing to pressure from Jack Thompson. The company denies these claims, with Kotaku running a short discussion with John Simley, Wal-mart spokesperson. From that article: "Simley says it has nothing to do with Bully, but rather is the outcome of discussions that the company has been in for 'weeks if not months' about how to handle rating pending titles. Bricks and mortars stores have never accepted pre-orders for RP titles, he added. 'I'd like to give credit to Jack Thompson, but there are a lot of Jack Thompsons out there and we are just listening to our customers,'"

138 comments

  1. What's the big deal? by Enoxice · · Score: 1

    I don't understand the problem here.

    --
    Anyone else think the comments just weren't rendering right before they turned off ABP and saw ads?
    1. Re:What's the big deal? by digitrev · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is that it appears that Thompson managed to influence one of the larger companies in the States towards his agenda.

      --
      Cynical Idealist
    2. Re:What's the big deal? by Enoxice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Walmart has always been on that side of the fence.

      --
      Anyone else think the comments just weren't rendering right before they turned off ABP and saw ads?
    3. Re:What's the big deal? by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      The deal is that, if you cede ground to an asshat, you are an asshat. "For evil to succeed, it is only necessary that..."

    4. Re:What's the big deal? by Soygen · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree. I don't see this a big deal at all and probably has little to do with Jack(off). Wal-Mart is notorious for selling the clean/edited/lame version of everything. ;)

    5. Re:What's the big deal? by ZephyrXero · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem here is that Walmart is THE largest retailer, so if they don't carry something, there's almost half as much chance for it to be sold. Walmart generally doesn't carry anything rated over Teen, BUT it carries all the R rated, if not even Unrated DVDs for some reason..... So this makes publishers/investors less likely to put their money behind M rated games, and does affect the industry in the long run...

      However, last time I checked Bully was probably only gonna get a Teen rating, but with Rockstar's past, the ESRB may just give it an R out of spite. This whole situation sickens me :(

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    6. Re:What's the big deal? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The problem here is that Walmart is THE largest retailer, so if they don't carry something, there's almost half as much chance for it to be sold.

      I understand your concern but I do not think it is as serious as you think it is. If anything this will lead to more business for independent games stores (and chains that sell adult games, although they're generally in the minority anyway.) Sure, less copies of some games will be sold because kids won't be able to talk their parents into buying it - they won't be there. Ultimately this is good because we'll have less of this save the children kind of crap - the adults can go where the good games are.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:What's the big deal? by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      Why not only allow pre-orders for unrated games to be sold to those 17+, since that is the highest rating walmart will sell anyway?

    8. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      First off, Walmart has not said they will stop stocking games based off of ratings (with the obvious exception of Adult Only games; all Walmart said is that they would stop allowing people to pre-order games where the rating is pending. I have to agree with their decision on this one.

      Ultimately Rating Pending is a bad rating for a company to deal with mainly because they don't know what rating it will get so how do you handle a 14 year old that wants to pre-order the game? If the game gets a Mature rating and the child asks his mother to pick up a game he pre-ordered the mother may assume that the content was appropriate because they allowed her child to pre-order it; in a way, this means that you could violate the spirit of policies you set up to prevent Mature games from getting into the hands of minors (even though you would face no legal liability, you could still see public outrage from this).

      Beyond the censorship issues, I think it makes good sense not to allow a pre-order until the ESRBs give a rating (or more appropriately, within 6 weeks of a game/system launching); if you allow pre-orders before that you're setting yourself up for headaches because you have copies of a product in your store which will sell quickly (but only for the first couple of weeks) and you can't sell them because you "promised" not to (possibly with money down, but usually only a small ammount down).

    9. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, don't you see how this outrageous behavior stands against the tradition of free speech in our Hoyl Constitution ((C) the Christian God)?

      First they take away our freedom to spend money on games featuring blood, gore and rape, next they take away our freedom to use real guns and rape real women. Can't you see this is a slippery road?

    10. Re:What's the big deal? by Enoxice · · Score: 1

      Because it is unrated. What if the 17 year old is still under strict parental control for some reason? As an alternative answer: "Because it's Walmart."

      --
      Anyone else think the comments just weren't rendering right before they turned off ABP and saw ads?
    11. Re:What's the big deal? by westlake · · Score: 1
      The problem is that it appears that Thompson managed to influence one of the larger companies in the States towards his agenda.

      The problem is that Walmart had to pull product off its shelves.
      The problem is that pissing off the world's largest retailer was not good business for Take Two and Rockstar.

    12. Re:What's the big deal? by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1

      walmart has no concern over whether a 17 year old's parents don't want them to play a game, but whether or not its legal to sell that game to a 17 year old. Honestly if a 17 year old lets his parents treat him like a 12 year old, then I don't think there's any hope for that kid in any case.

    13. Re:What's the big deal? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Wal-Mart is notorious for selling the clean/edited/lame version of everything. ;)"

      It is? I purchased OZ dvds from there. If those are the clean/edited/lame versions... ugh.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    14. Re:What's the big deal? by Total_Wimp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That was my first thought too. Then I remembered that the ESRB had raised the rating of GTA: San Andreas to "Adults Only" after the Hot Chocolate mod was released.

      Yeah, I know, RockStar would rip out scenes of Bully right and left if necessary to get it down to a "Mature" rating. However, theorectially it could still get rated "Adults Only". Wal Mart doesn't want to be put in the position of having presold a game that it would like to turn around and not sell at all due to company policy. They don't want surprises like San Andreas.

      Now, as to why Slashdoters care, that's another issue. I can understand them not wanting speech infringed, etc, but I'm pretty much completely failing to see how this could either infringe free expresion or even provide a "slippery slope" to infringing free expression.

      I think this is actually kind of smart for Wal Mart. They're waiting to see the exactly what the product will be before they start to sell it. I'd want to know if a game called "Pleasant Dreams" was a title for 5 year-olds, a soft core pornography game or a game where you hack up bloody nightmare monsters before selling it too.

      TW

    15. Re:What's the big deal? by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      It won't be unrated forever. Once it's rated, even if it's rated M, Wal-Mart can sell it to a 17 year old. Not just legally (legally they can sell it to whoever they want) but by normal standards of appropriateness it's ok to sell a game rated for 17 and up to 17 year olds.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    16. Re:What's the big deal? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Your argument is lame. The parent should do more research into the game's rating (or lack thereof) and not rely on Walmart to do their parenting for them. Would you just assume that candy given at Halloween is safe?

    17. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd like to give credit to Jack Thompson, but there are a lot of Jack Thompsons out there.
      That is one fuckin scary thought....
    18. Re:What's the big deal? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      our Hoyl Constitution

      The government already has to provide a number of documents in foreign languages for everyone's benefit. A spanish translation of the Constituion isn't all that outlandish.

    19. Re:What's the big deal? by DarkDragonVKQ · · Score: 1

      Slight correction..it's hot coffee not hot chocolate (that'd work for a porno though :P). I agree, it's a smart stategy for Walmart. It's not like they're going outright ban selling it. Just wait for its rating to be nailed completly. Though I'll never understand why a year matters (M to AO). Or for that matter why a person can fight in wars when 18 yet not drink till 21 (legally :P).

      --
      "I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes" ~ Laughing Man - GITS:SAC
    20. Re:What's the big deal? by andrewman327 · · Score: 1
      The government already has to provide a number of documents in foreign languages for everyone's benefit. A spanish translation of the Constituion isn't all that outlandish.
      Constitución de los Estados Unidos de América
      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
    21. Re:What's the big deal? by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      Vote with your dollars. It is very simple. If you don't like a store, don't shop there.
      Anyhow, the parent makes a good point- Wal Mart affects other companies stock (as in inventory)- everything seems crappier. My fave example is paper towels. Wal mart demands cheap prices, so my favorite paper towel maker lessens the quality. Which I wouldn;t care about, if they had a cheaper line sold only at Wal Mart. The problem is, all their paper towels have gotten crappier/cheaper, even the ones sold elsewhere are the crappier ones.
      So if Wal Mart chooses not to sell certain games, will it be worth making them, or will it be like the paper towels- i.e. one size fits all for the manufacturers to sell to retailers...
      On the flip side- I like Wal Mart b/c of their hours- I would postulate that this is why they have taken over small towns, the hours. The mom and pops in my area are closed on Sundays and most of saturday, as well as after my workday. Wal Mart is open at the times I am not at work. Which was nice last night at 10 pm when I had to run out and get a plunger. (I've been eating a lot of cheese lately...)

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    22. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      greatest. troll. ever.

    23. Re:What's the big deal? by Elemenope · · Score: 1

      For example, Asshat has gun. Asshat points gun at cute child (tm). Asshat threatens cute child (tm) with gun unless you give him all your money. You comply. Therefore, YOU are an Asshat, too!

      Now, I know this hypothetical (but not unreasonable) example is far from the current situation (Walmart is not a cute child, nor cares about cute children, and no cute children had to be threatened for it to fold like a cheap envelope. Secretly, it wanted to fold like a cheap envelope and all it needed was a strong brute man to give it an excuse...[ahem!]), but the point is, nutshell morality like your statement is unworkable. Sometimes, concessions to evil, while unfortunate and distatsteful, can prevent or mitigate greater potential evils.

      --
      All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    24. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walmart didn't have to pull product off its shelves.
      Walmart chose to.

    25. Re:What's the big deal? by m0rph3us0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the whole rating system is by honour. In most place you can sell an M rated game to whoever you want.

    26. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think a plunger is the medically recommended way to cure cheese blockage.

    27. Re:What's the big deal? by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
      Well, that may be true, but the thing about Wal*Mart is they were already partly onboard with Jack's agenda. Two things I know about Wal*Mart:

      1. The underrated game Sacrifice from Shiny had to have a rated 'T' cut made for Wal*Mart, even though the game was 'M' everwhere else.

      2. The Comics Code Authority was on it's last legs. It was gasping its last breath and heading toward the dustbin of irrelevence... and the Wal*Mart decided to require it on comics that would be sold in its stores.

      Another thing, that I'm hazier on not being a music fan or a Wal*Mart shopper, is that cleaned up versions of pop CDs get sold at Wal*Mart. (Censoring CDs is what Jack Thompson was about in his previous incarnation as a right wing wacko gadfly).

      In fact, rather than Jack Thompson influencing Wal*Mart, it's much more likely that Wal*Mart influenced Jack Thompsons career.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  2. That's great, Walmart... by tacarat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... now get the rest of the RP games out there off the preorder list. If you're going to do it for violent or racier games, then I expect to see every unrated, family safe Disney game get the same treatment before release.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    1. Re:That's great, Walmart... by westlake · · Score: 1
      If you're going to do it for violent or racier games, then I expect to see every unrated, family safe Disney game get the same treatment before release.

      Disney has been in publishing and the toy business for eighty years without making politically-charged headlines in The Daily News and The Miami Herald.

    2. Re:That's great, Walmart... by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the reason they're holding back on these games until they're rated is to avoid carrying games with mature ratings, then there's no point in them holding Disney games where it's 100% positive the game will get child-friendly rating like EC or E. If you don't want to carry any "A" games, then it makes sense not to accept pre-orders on any "RP" games that are known to be shooting for an "M" rating until they are actually rated. If the ESRB really plays hardball and requires dramatic changes to meet "M," the company may decide to go ahead and release it as "A," leaving Walmart in a pickle.

      But Disney isn't going to "accidentally" include a sequence where you murder prostitutes and bathe in their blood in the next "Learning With Nemo" title, and then refuse to take it out and accept an "A" rating when they were shooting for "EC." Walmart has no reason to wait on allowing pre-orders, because there' no realistic scenario in which games everyone knows are aiming for a rating of "E10" at the highest get released as "A."

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    3. Re:That's great, Walmart... by illspirit · · Score: 1

      But, err, if you read TFA, they're also pre-selling other violent, sure-to-be-M-rated games. Like Crackdown, which is being made by the team who made the first two GTAs.

    4. Re:That's great, Walmart... by soft_guy · · Score: 0

      I'm not a fan of disney. However, what you are propsoing is that before they are rated "The Little Mermaid's Undersea Adventure" should be treated exactly the same as "Grand Theft Auto: Anarchy in the UK". From a business perspective, if I'm Wal-Mart, I clearly know which one of these games is more likely to cause me PR problems.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    5. Re:That's great, Walmart... by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1

      Sure, so they should treat all unrated games expected to be near their borderline rating the same. If you'll notice, I was just replying to a parent saying "then I expect to see every unrated, family safe Disney game get the same treatment."

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    6. Re:That's great, Walmart... by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      Ummm... They've been the target of a Baptist boycott and the ire of many minority groups whenever "Song of the South" is uttered. Disney doesn't make a habit of it but they have their politically-charged headlines from time to time. On that same note, I imagine if Wal-Mart were looking over a list of upcoming games and a yet-to-be-rated Disney game called "Song of the South" were on the list, Wal-Mart might also decline to take pre-orders on that one.

    7. Re:That's great, Walmart... by cjb909 · · Score: 1

      No, the point is not that everyone knows Disney won't make graphic games. Its that no one would ever preorder a Disney game.

    8. Re:That's great, Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Disney isn't going to "accidentally" include a sequence where you murder prostitutes and bathe in their blood in the next "Learning With Nemo" title

      And by that logic they shouldn't carry Unreal Tournament games either. You can mod GTA to see sex and you can mod UT to see sex.

    9. Re:That's great, Walmart... by SendBot · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Disney, in the movie second hand lions there is a scene where everyone grabs their guns to run out to the cornfield and meet the lion menace. Protrayed humorously are two children (like 6-7) handling a rifle at the same time with many unconcerned adults present. They are shown again later "hunting" in the grass again again handling the rifle simultaneously.

      I'm not really the offendable type, but I am concerned about gun safety - unloading my landlord's guns in the house and whatnot. I think such a presentation is highly irresponsible for a movie intended to be fam friendly. At least GTA gives you an idea that guns can hurt people (although personally I wish it could give *more* of that idea, they need to license gibs from id soft).

      Why hasn't JT or any other concerned parent group addressed this with Disney, or offered to have the movie re-edited or pulled from stores?

  3. I agree by CodemasterMM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I actually agree with this. I wouldn't necessarily allow a kid to preorder a game that might be rated M or above (unless it was named 'Elmo's Adventure' or the such). Similar to movies, I wouldn't want a young kid to get a R or higher rated movie just because when the preorder was out it was "unrated." At least they finally take the ESRB seriously for what they were created for.

    1. Re:I agree by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Hopefully more retailers will take steps like this. I think the games industry has already done plenty with setting up ESRB. Retailers follwing their initiative and being more responsible about who they sell games to is probably the best way to avoid more attempts at enacting draconian legislation.

    2. Re:I agree by Gags · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but what about "Elmo's Adventure in hooker land."? Would you let a kid pre-order that?

      --
      Very funny scotty... Now please beam down my PANTS!
    3. Re:I agree by punkr0x · · Score: 1

      Well they would have to go pick up the game at some point, and then their little scam would be exposed.

  4. Terror by spoonboy42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The most terrifying words ever uttered: "There are a lot of Jack Thompsons out there."

    --
    Anonymous Luddite: "What do you think of the dehumanizing effects of the Internet?"
    Andy Grove: "Not Much."
    1. Re:Terror by tacarat · · Score: 1

      That's what happens in a world of "Jack Thompson's Grand Theft Hot Coffee Bully Clone" games.

      Ph43r!

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    2. Re:Terror by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
      "There are a lot of Jack Thompsons out there."

      How much ammo do we have left?

      --
      OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    3. Re:Terror by Anarcho-Goth · · Score: 1
      Wal-mart is no longer accepting pre-orders for unrated games.

      If I can no longer pre-order unrated video-games at Wal-mart then the terrorists have already won!!!

      Or the snakes on a plane have already one?

      I think I'll be rooting for the snakes.
      --
      I hate Liberals and Conservatives.
      If you are a Liberal or a Conservative, then HAVE A NICE DAY!
      Courage.
  5. Not really... by steveo777 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wal-Mart has always had this stance. I doubt Jack has anything to do with it. I still remember back when Mortal Kombat came out and they didn't carry the Genesis version because there was blood in it. But they had the SNES version becuase it was colored gray (sweat).

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    1. Re:Not really... by Rxke · · Score: 1

      >But they had the SNES version becuase it was colored gray (sweat)

      Oh.

      Aaaah...

      I thought that was brain-tissue :s

    2. Re:Not really... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      abacabb on the Worlds of Honor screen, baby.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  6. Preorder is a scam anyway by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do people fall for the whole preorder scam? Giving a store your hard earned money months in advance for something you have yet to recieve is foolish - once you factor in interest you are paying *more* for the game than you would if you just waited until release day - and there are *never* shortages of games on release day.

    1. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by WageDomain · · Score: 1

      I guess I forgot to pay interest that time I preordered Civ IV.

      If not for that preorder, I wouldn't have had the game on release day, and since I love the series I wanted it as soon as I could get my grubby hands on it. It's not always a scam, the only scam associated with preordering is the jerks at gamestores who try to pressure you into it because they have a quota to fill.

    2. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      Seems to me it's mainly a hangover from the cartridge days when there were often shortages on game launch day. Doesn't make a lot of sense these days as I can usually walk into my local supermarket and pick up new launches with no hassle.

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    3. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This is why preorderers are typically compensated with a poster, or some other freebie (I got a free $10 link cable when I ordered Crystal Chronicles) worth the 90 day interest on your $10 deposit.

    4. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No: they forgot to pay you interest, while they held your money. Learn some economics.

    5. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      You did pay interest. Any time you give money for something in advance while recieving nothing in return, you are indirectly paying interest because in 7 months the money you paid out will be less valueable than it is now due to inflaction. Basic economics.

      You can think of it another way, you could have placed that money in a high-interest savings account and earned 3% or more interest on it during the period you had the game on pre-order. Since you did not, that difference is how much the pre-order cost. (it's actually a percent or two more than that due to inflation, but you get the idea).

    6. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just download it...

      Sure it is illegal, but if you are going to absolutely buy it, it is not immoral in the least.

    7. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They packaged the link cable with that game. It's not a pre-order bonus, although they do sometimes offer them.

    8. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by dctoastman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A game costs $50.
      Doesn't he gain money then?
      Because if he paid $10 a year ago, and if that $10 is worth $8 when the game is released, then he only needs to come up with the last $40, instead of $42.
      In a way, that $10 did earn him interest because it was protected from deflation by being held in a private trust.
      And if he prepaid for the game, then he really paid $40 adjusted for inflation.

      Hell, you convinced me, I'm preordering my PS4 now so I'll only be paying $200 after adjusting for inflation.

    9. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      "and there are *never* shortages of games on release day."

      Where on earth do you live? I've had to drive all over town to find games on release day, and I live in a city of 3/4 million people.

    10. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by milkman_matt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Giving a store your hard earned money months in advance for something you have yet to recieve is foolish

      NOW you tell me... stupid DNF pre-order.. I've been waiting for years :(

    11. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Seems to me it's mainly a hangover from the cartridge days when there were often shortages on game launch day.

      Yeah, I was at GameStop the day Godfather came out, which they were taking pre-orders for months for. I was able to get my copy without a pre-order, -and- they tried to upsell me to the special edition... If you've still got 'em in stock, you didn't need to take pre-orders. They tried to get me to pre-order Scarface last time I went in there just to browse around (everyone I know's been getting those damned DSs and they look so fun..!)

      Anyhow, when Scarface comes in, I'll get my copy, and I'm not going to pay for it beforehand either..

    12. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Doesn't make a lot of sense these days as I can usually walk into my local supermarket and pick up new launches with no hassle.

      Pre-orders are popular with retailers for the same reason gift cards are: it's money in the bank. Even better than gift cards, pre-orders show concrete data on which particular products are going to be popular or sell well.

    13. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by nojomofo · · Score: 1

      You've got it backwards. The $10 that he spent a year ago had MORE buying power than the $10 that he didn't spend today, assuming inflation. Inflation makes yesterday's dollars more valuable than today's dollars. An odd way of looking at it: suppose he invests in marbles. Any money that he doesn't spend on games, he spends on marbles. He could have bought n marbles with $10 a year ago, so in opportunity cost, he paid n marbles a year ago. So the total cost of the game is $40 + n marbles. Today, those $10 could buy .97 * n marbles (assuming 3% inflation). So if he were to pay the whole $50 today, it would cost him .97 * n marbles + $40. In the pre-pay scenario, he pays money when it's worth more. In the second scenario, he pays all of the money when they money is worth less anyway.

    14. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by dctoastman · · Score: 1

      Actually in terms of video games, that $10 is still $10 no matter when he spends it. The game is $50 now, it is $50 then. That is 0% inflation. Inflation is only relative to cost of goods. This is the first generation in a while where we have seen inflation in the costs of goods. Usually, the video game market deflates, making purchasing video games during the early part of the life cycle retarded since the price will go down eventually. But that is the definition of a luxury item: retarded purchase. And nothing can make money you didn't spend worth more. Holding on to $10 for a year, doesn't allow you to buy $12 worth of stuff later. No, you can buy $10 worth of stuff. Now if that stuff costs more now than before, then your purchasing power has just decreased. It would've been wiser to buy that stuff then, when $10 would've gotten you more. But if that stuff costs less now, then waiting was a wise move, because his $10 can be used to buy more. Inflation isn't an overall thing, you can calculate the aggregrate to note the trend, but it still comes down to relativity.

    15. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by Kredal · · Score: 1

      I got two link cables with FF:CC... the one in the box, and one on a cardboard backer.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    16. Re:Preorder is a scam anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First i thought DNF?

      Then i thought DNF= did not finish

      Then I realized "Duke Nukem Forver'" thinking about it for a second, I stand by my orginal answer.

  7. Walmart supplies the heartland by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I understand that this seems incredibly bogus, and I agree. However, you have to understand where Wal-mart does the bulk of its business, in my experience. This decision didn't come down to affect scientifically enlightened locations like Silicon Valley or New York City. These are areas where if the local church objects, there will be mass boycotts and negative media attention, because EVERYONE in town goes to that church. And, of course, the local church will object to anything that sounds like it's not a) conservative, b) WWJD, c) wont someone think of the children, etc.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Walmart supplies the heartland by InsaneGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Umm... since Walmart regularly carries "R" rated movies, and "M" rated games, etc that's probably not the reason.

      More likely the reason is that because the game hasn't been given an "official" rating yet, they feel they could be a civil case risk. If some 12 year old pre-orders the game now, but upon delivery it actually has a "M" rating; in our sue-happy society someone is going to go after the big-money Walmart. And it will cost them millions to just fight the case, or multiple tens of thousands to simply settle it. Theoretically they could possibly be even held legally liable by the government, it's not passed yet but look at Clinton & Liberman's "The Family Entertainment Protection Act", which would make it illegal to sell adult games to minors. (Clinton's made direct complaint's about Walmart's selling of games to minors, so they know they are the politician's crosshairs)

      This is simply a CYA move, why would any large company take preorders on a game in limbo like this assuming the significant amount of possible risk associated to it with not much to gain?

    2. Re:Walmart supplies the heartland by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

      I agree that the lawsuit risk is big, but there's more to it. If you want to see what I'm talking about, take a look at this article:
      http://www.firingsquad.com/news/newsarticle.asp?se archid=10518
      Minnesota will FINE you if you're a minor and purchase a M/AO rated game. These are the type of people you see in the movie Footloose, just with a more modern cause.

      --
      stuff |
    3. Re:Walmart supplies the heartland by krell · · Score: 1

      "Minnesota will FINE you if you're a minor and purchase a M/AO rated game. These are the type of people you see in the movie Footloose, just with a more modern cause."

      Except they speak in slow, folksy and sonorous tones, and have a head like a rumpled bag of flour.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
    4. Re:Walmart supplies the heartland by jhutch2000 · · Score: 1

      You ever actually been out here in the heartland? We rarely have a single church. More like 2-3 churchs for a medium sized village. (And usually at least 1 bar for every church, though that is supposedly just coincidence....)

      Plus, it is usually a politician that stirs up morale outcry, not a preacher (unless the politician IS a preacher...) The preachers are usually too busy actually, you know, PREACHING morality IN their church.

    5. Re:Walmart supplies the heartland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Law has already been overturned. No worries, sanity does exist at some levels.

    6. Re:Walmart supplies the heartland by MBCook · · Score: 1

      I understand that this seems incredibly bogus, and I agree. However, you have to understand where Wal-mart does the bulk of its business, in my experience. This decision didn't come down to affect scientifically enlightened locations like Silicon Valley or New York City. These are areas where if the local church objects, there will be mass boycotts and negative media attention, because EVERYONE in town goes to that church. And, of course, the local church will object to anything that sounds like it's not a) conservative, b) WWJD, c) wont someone think of the children, etc.

      Wow! A bigot! Who'd have guessed.

      Allow me to give you a clue. I've lived everywhere from Salt Lake City to Ohio to my current home in Kansas. Life isn't like that. I have never experienced that. Now if you get out into the middle of Kansas into some little town of 120 people, that my be true. But anywhere near a decent sized city it is pretty much like any other decent sized city. A single church may do that kind of thing, but by and large you don't hear about it.

      I lived in Salt Lake City when Mortal Combat came out. Most of the kids in school were Mormon. You know what? Tons of them bought it. You could rent it at Blockbuster. As I remember, I think you could even buy it at ZCMY (a big department store based there).

      It's nice you put in "Scientifically Englightened" like the people in the center of the country are brain-dead cavemen. Grow the hell up.

      Wal-Mart had good reason to do this. It makes perfect sense with their standard stance. You don't like their stance? Well obviously many people do.

      Now I could make arguments about why us "WWJD think of the children" middle-of-nowhere-unenlightened-idiots are better than people in NYC, but I'm not going to.

      This is a good decision. They are free to make it. They aren't saying they wont sell those games. They just want to make it so a parent doesn't reserve a game and later find out it became AO.

      I can't believe you got modded up. I know it's common on /. to be liberal and look down on conservatives, but you comment is just such blatant biggotry.

      Please, mod that troll down.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    7. Re:Walmart supplies the heartland by taustin · · Score: 1

      It's rather more complicated than that in "the heartland," which is to say, rural America. First of all, most of the population of the US lives in urban and suburban areas, which are far, far less subject to that sort of nonsense.

      But rural America is Walmart's core market, and always has been. But . . . their normal tactics are to drive all local competition out of business as quickly as possible. So within a few years of a Walmart opening, no matter how much they hack you off, if you want to boycott them, for the goods most people buy there, you'll have to drive 50 miles or more to find another store with everything you need. And that may well be another Walmart.

    8. Re:Walmart supplies the heartland by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      You're correct as far as stating that Wal-Mart serves the Bible belt and doesn't want the perception that they sell the Devil's games (or the Devil's videos or whatever media). However, that's due more to the general culture in these areas than any direct church influence. Around here there's simply not as much demand for violent or explicit video games. No pastor is going to directly condemn Bully; he'd have only marginally more success than those who tried to condemn Harry Potter (some tried, but I can't remember anyone seriously believing those pastors).

      Most decent church-going people are not going to be interested in any of these media that Wal-Mart refuses to stock - or if they are, they don't want such a well-known place as Wal-Mart stocking these items and giving them to half the community. The Church itself has about as much influence as Gail Wynand from The Fountainhead: so long as it preaches what the congregation thinks is appropriate to preach, it has (vacuous) influence. People have left and will leave congregations en masse because of a single sermon.

    9. Re:Walmart supplies the heartland by westlake · · Score: 1
      ZCMY

      ZCMI, the Zion Cooperative Mercantile Institution.
      Founded by Brigham Young in 1868, and generally regarded as the first american department store. The Mormon Church held 51% of the stock when the store was sold to the May chain in 1999.

    10. Re:Walmart supplies the heartland by MBCook · · Score: 1

      Dang, so close. Thanks for the info. I haven't lived there in 14 years or so. I just got rid of a couch I bought there last year.

      I remember going there quite a bit while we lived there. They had a good toy department, as I remember.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    11. Re:Walmart supplies the heartland by Evro · · Score: 1

      This seems like such a non-issue. You can...

      A) Wait for the game to be released and get it at Wal Mart.
      B) Preorder the game elsewhere.

      So what if they listened to the retard? This is a decision with a net impact of zero. Worst case scenario, you get the game a couple days later because you choose to get it at Wal Mart.

      --
      rooooar
    12. Re:Walmart supplies the heartland by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Theoretically they could possibly be even held legally liable by the government, it's not passed yet but look at Clinton & Liberman's "The Family Entertainment Protection Act", which would make it illegal to sell adult games to minors. (Clinton's made direct complaint's about Walmart's selling of games to minors, so they know they are the politician's crosshairs)

      Oh yeah, there it is again why I voted for Bush rather than Gore. The more that I listened to Lieberman, the more that I reliazed that he wanted to remove the video game industry. I've been playing "violent" video games since before I was 12. The graphics have gotten better, but the stimulated violence has been the same. I'm not going to vote for some one that is making it a big part of his platform to change what I've happily been enjoying.

    13. Re:Walmart supplies the heartland by shawb · · Score: 1

      From the rural America I know of, AO and M video games will just be sold at porn stores. Probably be some of the least expensive merchandise in the store. Granted, I don't know Bible Belt rural America to well, more grain belt.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    14. Re:Walmart supplies the heartland by Kyrka · · Score: 1
      Well, let's not also forget that the "Media" definition of Liberal and Conservative aren't realistic. If you believe them, Liberal's are nothing short of queer pinko commie hippies, while Conservatives are the very upstanding "church folk" you mention.

      In reality (and politics) they are completely different animals. If a piece of legislation is on the table for me to vote on, and let's just say it would put about $2600.00 more tax dollars back in my pocket - it might interest me, and I may even want to vote for it. If, however, I find out that in order for this $2600.00 to come my way, my neighbors (or total strangers for that matter) are gonna take it in the ass financially, then a _Conservative_ will vote against it. The Liberal will merely look at the benefit to themselves and vote without much further thought.

      It really annoys me that these terms are diametrically opposed depending on which view you happen to be taking advantage of. I too live in Kansas - and I'm nearly ready for one of those "Kansas, as Biggoted as you think" bumper stickers... Fred Phelps, the Temperance Movement, and all other such loons out in Topeka can suck my big toe.

      "Let every Christian ask himself this question: "How can I think to understand the Old Testament if I be ignorant of the construction put upon it by that nation whose sacred book it formed; and if I know not the meaning of the Old Testament, how can I expect to understand the New?"
      -- S.L. McGregor Mathers

  8. Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by thedogcow · · Score: 1

    Who cares if Wal*Mart is the largest retailer. God, what is with men and size?! Look, I live in Texas where Wal*Marts are a plenty, but I rarely shop there. I shop at the local HEB (Texas only grocer). HEB has much higher quality fruits and veggies. Yes, I know I could get better prices at Wal*Mart, however, the quality is crap since Wal*Mart bids at the lowest bidder.

    You see, the great thing about this country is the freedom to choose where you go to buy food (or in this case - video games). Size means nothing, contrary to what most men and some (okay, most women) think.

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    1. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by allenw · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The problem is that there are many parts of the country where Wal*Mart is the only local retailer. The mom and pop shops were driven out a long time ago. You're not going to get a Target or whatever in a city with a population of ~9000.

      On the plus side, Internet shopping has really taken off in small-town America. So hopefully it will become increasingly irrelevant what Wal*Mart does.

    2. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by chromatic · · Score: 1
      Who cares if Wal*Mart is the largest retailer.

      Publishers, without whom it's difficult to fund game production. If a publisher doesn't think your game will sell enough copies to make its investment worthwhile, it won't invest in your game.

      If your game won't make it onto Wal*Mart's shelves, cut your expected sales in half. Good luck with your publisher then.

    3. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by krell · · Score: 1

      "The mom and pop shops were driven out a long time ago"

      Who do you blame when the mom-and-pop shops are gone and there is no Wal-Mart anywhere near?

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
    4. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I keep hearing this, but really, how many places are there in which WalMart is absolutely the ONLY store? I've never seen a place like that. I mean, I'm sure they exist, but I'm equally sure they are few and far between, and insignificant in the grand scheme of things.

      The bottom like is WalMart is allowed to sell whatever it wants to (or not sell, in this case). You don't like it, shop somewhere else. I don't shop there, but the sad thing is that I really doubt that every single person who complains about WalMart has, in fact, stopped shopping there. If that were the case, it would seem that no one at all would shop there. They wouldn't be making the bucketloads of cash they do.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    5. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I find that hard to believe, but then I suppose people do pretty stupid things like buying a game they don't want simply because it's on sale at WalMart. I mean, that's like going to a movie theater and picking from the movies that are showing instead of picking a movie and going where it's playing. Who does that? I know there are people who do that, but they're a tiny minority...

      You want to see a particular movie, you go where it's playing.
      You want a game, you go where it's being sold.

      Now how about this one for Walmart... kid goes and buys a game at Target instead of Walmart, and also buys some candy, maybe a new controller and memory card, maybe a strategy guide. All sales you lost.

      I'm not ever going to rail on against WalMart's business practices. They are successful because the people of this country made them successful. If everyone who bitched about WalMart actually never shopped there, things would be different.

      Back on topic, this might "suck", but what's the point in even arguing about it? You going to lobby congress to pass a law forcing WalMart to sell products it doesn't want to?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    6. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by chromatic · · Score: 1
      I find that hard to believe...

      Work in gaming for at least two weeks, or even just make friends with people who make or publish games.

      I know there are people who do that, but they're a tiny minority...

      I think you severely overestimate the numbers and influence of hardcore gamers and dramatically underestimate the effect of the majority of other gamers.

      I really recommend talking to someone who's actually sold games. The numbers might not be exactly 50% for Wal*Mart, but they'll be close and I think they'll surprise you.

    7. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by Psmylie · · Score: 1
      Maybe they aren't the only store, but they can sure reduce the number of local businesses a lot. I've seen it happen where my wife is from, which is a small town that has had many grocery stores and hardware stores close down since WalMart moved in. I've heard rumors (sorry, too lazy to find a source at the moment) about WalMart moving into a new area, usually a smallish town, and having prices so low that they're barely breaking even or even working at a loss. Local businesses can't compete, because they don't have a multi-billion-dollar international chain backing up their losses. Once enough of the local businesses go under, WalMart raises the prices again, having signifigantly reduced competition. If this is true, it's very dirty and underhanded.

      The ultimate blame falls on those who shop there, though, instead of supporting local business. These same morons then wonder why their quaint little town suddenly lost all it's charm, sighing in regret about the closing of the old hardware store that had been around since their great-grandfather was a kid. If it's important to you, pay the extra cost and support the local guys. That's what I do where I live. Of course, in Minneapolis, there is pretty much no way for any one company to dominate the entire retail scene, so it's easier for me.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    8. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by allenw · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, I keep hearing this, but really, how many places are there in which WalMart is absolutely the ONLY store? I've never seen a place like that. I mean, I'm sure they exist, but I'm equally sure they are few and far between, and insignificant in the grand scheme of things.

      I've always heard that this was part of Sam Walton's plan: sell to the consumers who didn't have a major department store nearby. By saturating the market, you can undercut your competitors because you can buy in bulk and they can't. You have a (theoretically) more impressive store front AND cheaper prices to boot. As soon as the small stores close, you've got the area by the balls.

      An example might show how this works:

      Enter in 52241 Iowa City, IA on http://www.walmart.com/. Now compare that listing to say Target. Target has 3 stores. Wal*Mart has 10. Notice the locations of those stores in correlation to the population.

      Here, let's do my hometown: 62298. Waterloo, IL. Or go farther south: 62233 Chester, IL. Now we're talking literally hours of driving to get to a Target. Don't like Target? Try Best Buy, Circuit City, or EB. It all looks pretty much the same.

      I agree that Wal*Mart can sell whatever it wants to sell. My point was that what Wal*Mart does really does matter in the big scheme of things.

    9. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best Buy? Target? Amazon?

      Unless the community has no money to spend, mom-and-pop shops don't usually go out of business when there's no competition. It sounds like you want to defend Wal-Mart with a hypothetical scenario that doesn't really happen.

    10. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by krell · · Score: 1

      "It sounds like you want to defend Wal-Mart with a hypothetical scenario that doesn't really happen."

      There's no need to "defend" Wal-Mart. They're doing nothing wrong with they provide better service and prices than certain poorly-run businesses. They aren't to blame when these other businesses run themselves into the ground. However, I was thinking of the situations where many a downtown has dried up and blown away long before Wal-Mart was in the area. Or Target, or Best Buy. As for "mom-and-pop shops don't usually go out of business when there's no competition", well hey, of course you are the BEST option possible when you are the ONLY option.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
    11. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      But your annecdotal story makes my point - I never said that WalMart didn't matter in the grand scheme of things, I'm talking about those heart wrenching stories about how all the mom and pop shops had to shut down because of WalMart, I'm talking about these supposed towns where there is absolutely no choice but to shop at WalMart... if they exist, THEY are inconsequential compared to the other 99.99% of stores in areas with a lot of competition.

      And I honestly believe that if all these people who complain about Walmart (and yeah, I'm one of them) actually STOPPED SHOPPING THERE, they wouldn't have grown into such a beast.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    12. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I'm not disagreeing that Walmart sells half the games sold, but that doesn't mean that if they decide not to carry a particular game that that game will only sell 50% of what it would have... if someone regularly shops at Walmart because it's cheap, or convenient, but they actually want that game, they will go where it's sold.

      It's not like 50% buy their games at Walmart because they HAVE to. If WalMart completely stopped selling any video games at all, do you really think the sale of video games would drop to half?

      Only an idiot would buy a game they don't want because Walmart is selling it and that's where they happen to be at the moment. Now, I never underestimate the power of idiots, there's more than enough to go around, but what I'm saying is this; people go to Walmart because it's cheap. Games, though, are not significantly cheaper at Walmart because of how the system works. So people are buying their games there because it's either convenient (close), or because they go there to do other shopping anyway. People don't buy games at Walmart because they are cheaper there (if they are, it's usually only by a few cents, like 19.88 instead of 19.95 or 19.99 for a "classic" game).

      So yes, there are a lot of people who want a new game, go to the local Walmart, and simply pick one of the ones available. I'm not saying these games won't suffer sales (although, really, if you read the article, Walmart is not saying they won't sell these games anyway). I'm sure they will. It's just not by the same margin that WalMart holds over the industry.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    13. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1

      "Maybe they aren't the only store, but they can sure reduce the number of local businesses a lot."

      What? You mean people choose to shop at Wal*Mart and not the other stores, and that has some kind of economic effect? That's crazy talk!

      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
    14. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      how many places are there in which WalMart is absolutely the ONLY store?

      Hundreds. Possibly thousands. It is impossible for any "small business" to compete with a company that has annual sales of one quarter of a TRILLION dollars.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    15. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Wrong, though. You're making these numbers up. I'm not saying Walmart hasn't caused the demise of many smaller stores, I'm saying it's very rare that every single other store near a WalMart has had to close.

      In fact, where I am, there's so many damn Walmarts... and most of them corner a strip mall that contains a lot of other stores that sell similar products to what you can get in WalMart. There's a shoe store next to the newest one that opened nearest me. There's a Game Stop less than a mile up the road. I don't even know what other stores are in the WalMart complex, but it's about 15 more and I don't even know what they are selling (because I refuse to go anywhere near it).

      There's a thrift store about a tenth of a mile up the road, an automotive parts store right across the street.

      Again, I'm not arguing it doesn't happen, I'm saying the number of places where every other store HAD to close are few and far between. According to Wikipedia, there was a combined total of about 3200 WalMart discount and supercenter stores in the US. You are actually arguing that a third of them are the sole source of products in their locations. That's just plain wrong. You're looking at annecdotal evidence of a few stores here and there and extrapolating where it's not appropriate - the vast majority of those stores are in metropolitan areas. There's at five WalMarts within a 10 mile radius of my house (sadly), and I haven't seen any stores closing.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    16. Re:Largest Retailer! Well stop the presses! by krell · · Score: 1

      "It is impossible for any "small business" to compete with a company that has annual sales of one quarter of a TRILLION dollars"

      It's easy, if the company decides to serve the customer and also not to overcharge for what it sells. Wal-Mart does not kill any businesses. However, some businesses decide to run themselves into the ground with their own poor decisions.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
  9. Lizzy Faire here, setting you straight by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    Disney won't get held to the same treatment; they're a big corporation with lots of money.

    Just so you know... rules, such as they are, are meant to keep you little people in your place. The wealthy and the corporate elite are above the rules because if they weren't, they would lose money and then they would take their business to other, more cronyi^H^H^H^H^H^Hfriendly nations overseas.

    It's time we put an end to this "fairness" crap and put the needs of the herd aside for the needs of the alpha dogs in the pack. Rules stifle profits, innovation and progress.

    Sincerely,
    Your friendly neighborhood satirist

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Lizzy Faire here, setting you straight by punkr0x · · Score: 1

      Oh and Take-Two interactive is a poor little independant publisher? I don't think so, this has nothing to do with influence. Wal-Mart is probably one of the only retailers out there who cares about the age limits on M rated games, and a game from Take-Two certainly has a higher chance of landing that rating than a game from Disney. Call it censorship, call it ridiculous, but don't call it favoritism.

    2. Re:Lizzy Faire here, setting you straight by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      Compared to Disney, they're poor and little. Your example doesn't disprove favoritism; Take Two is not a market mover like Disney is. Who outside the gaming community has even heard of Take Two?

      Lemme explain something to ya. Society is kept in check by providing them food and circuses; it's an old Roman Empire saying. Disney is one of the biggest circuses in town. Mess with Take Two and some gamers will grouse about it; mess with Disney and you've got a big problem. Disney could open up their own stores and say screw Wal Mart, and Wal Mart would hang their execs publicly for it.

      So yes, Take Two is a very bad example.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    3. Re:Lizzy Faire here, setting you straight by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      this has nothing to do with influence

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!

      Have a nice day.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  10. Or... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Best game premise ever.

    No one knows how the army of Jack Thompson clones were formed. It is up to you to destroy them using whatever weapons you can get ahold of before they destroy the video game industry forever. Dodge lawsuits and incoherent rantings while fighting your way through an undending army of Jach Thomsons on your quest to take out the person or persons behind this evil plot! Fun for the entire family!

    Seriously though Wal Mart was already pretty much guaranteed to not have the game you were looking for anyway. I don't see this affecting the game industry at all.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  11. Technically correct, technically wrong by WageDomain · · Score: 1

    See, your whole point is invalidated by you saying that I *could* have put it in an account somewhere and earned extra money. I didn't. Therefore you cannot say that I paid more money than I should have in the scam. I was going to spend $50 + tax. I spent exactly $50+tax, and I did not take it from my savings account to do so, I took it from my non-interest-earning checking account. Also, you can't just pull numbers like 7 months out of thin air, I preordered it two days before release. The time it would take to calculate how much was "lost in inflation" in those two days is insignificant. Your theory is a sound one if you mention that it is potentially costing more, but you cannot deal in absolutes like that.

  12. Not the size of the ship but how you (ab)use it by raitchison · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem with Wal-Mart being the largest is that they, all by themselves control sizable portion of the retail market.

    It's extremely common for companies to make special versions of products specifically tailored to Wal-Mart's specifications, probably the most visible example of this is sanitized versions of music CDs but it also occurs in other product segments.

    For many companies who can't or don't want to make a special version of a product just for Wal-Mart they may opt to just make all of their product to Wal-Mart specifications.

    Without a doubt, even if you never shop at Wal-Mart, they have some control over what you are able to buy.

  13. GoatLover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A birthday party went horribly wrong yesterday when a goat at the Winnipeg Zoo was killed by its herd in front of the birthday girl.
    from http://winnipegsun.com/News/Winnipeg/2006/08/16/17 58119-sun.html

    I've always said, we need background checks on all goats entering the zoo! Somebody please think of the children.

    1. Re:GoatLover by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a Baaaaad day was had by all. Especially the goat that got mauled. Although truth be told, it was not a domestic goat but a wild Alpine Ibex.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  14. Not nice to compare by dtfinch · · Score: 4, Funny

    He might as well have said, "I'd like to give credit to that asshole, but there are a lot of assholes out there and we are just listening to our assh^H^H^H^H customers."

  15. no effect by dlc3007 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I really couldn't care less what Wal-Mart does or does not sell. I refuse to shop there for anything anyway.

    1. Re:no effect by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. Seriously, does anyone here in games.slashdot.org preorder games at Wal-Mart?

    2. Re:no effect by krell · · Score: 1

      "I really couldn't care less what Wal-Mart does or does not sell. I refuse to shop there for anything anyway."

      I try to get as much stuff as I can there. Games are a big exception, however.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
    3. Re:no effect by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I guess I didn't know there were people who enjoyed destroying their local economy...

    4. Re:no effect by krell · · Score: 1

      They help the economy, and don't put anyone out of business. Other businesses, however, might choose to run themselves into the ground with bad customer service and high rip-off prices.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
    5. Re:no effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if destroying the economy means buying something from a store that has decent prices and will take it back no questions asked if I don't like it then.... KABLOOY!!!! I don't need that stinkin old high priced no refunds economy anyway.

    6. Re:no effect by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart matters to everyone, even those who dont shop there.
      No mainstream games company is going to produce a game unless Wal-Mart will sell it.

    7. Re:no effect by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, wal-mart is the paragon of customer service. Oh wait.

      And the reason they can charge so little is that they pay their workers far below what a local "rip-off" store would.

    8. Re:no effect by krell · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, wal-mart is the paragon of customer service. Oh wait."

      The most important part of customer service is the willingness to serve the customers. You can go to a mom-and-pop store and bang on the door for 3 hours at 7 AM (until it opens at 10:00). Or you can go to Wal-Mart, which is already open at that time....and it will be open for hours after the crummy main-street store closes.

      "And the reason they can charge so little is that they pay their workers far below what a local "rip-off" store would"

      Actually, the little small businesses tend to pay the bare minimum (minimum wage). Wal-Mart tends to pay 20% or more above this.

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
    9. Re:no effect by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      I guess I'd like to say thanks for all the economic and consumer surveys you linked to in this post. I am grateful for them.

  16. No biggie currently, but it can kill the industry by kinglink · · Score: 1

    Walmart may sells pre-orders for games early on their website, but Walmart as a whole doesn't really have a pre-order system, that's why guys were camping out for 2 days in my local walmart last November for a 360.

    The fact is this news is a nothing but a news story that signifies a "win" for Thompson. It's a pretty sad thing too because it will hurt the industry if everyone did this.

    First how many games get their ratings in the last weeks of development? The game my company is releasing in weeks got it's rating about two monthes ago. I've personally had preorders for over a year or two in advance at some stores, back when it's RP.

    However even worse is this. Now there's legislation in the works detailing how the ESRB needs to handle the game. They want to play through the game in such a variety of ways to such an extent that it will be impossible to even get a rating before the game goes gold, because a minor change in the code may cause them to rerate the game. So if those rating system changes go into effect and major retailers (Gamestop for instance) choose to do the same thing, the pre-order window will decrease significantly or games will go gold and be held back for 2-3 monthes because they need time to get pre-orders.

    The bottom line is that while Walmart doesn't really do preorder in store and loss of online pre-orders probably won't kill it, it could start to strangle the industry if major retailers (I'm thinking Best buy, EB and gamestop) adopt the same stance. Not that they would, but if it happens....

  17. Acronyms by posterlogo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I wish there was a footnote when acronyms are used. This is an ongoing problem with Slashdot. What does "RP" stand for -- can someone please define it? I tried to trace the articles but that cleared up nothing.

    1. Re:Acronyms by dlc3007 · · Score: 1

      Rating Pending, I believe. Just a guess and I could be wrong.

    2. Re:Acronyms by DarkDragonVKQ · · Score: 1

      Your correct. It stands for Rating Pending.

      --
      "I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes" ~ Laughing Man - GITS:SAC
    3. Re:Acronyms by illumin8 · · Score: 3, Informative
      I wish there was a footnote when acronyms are used. This is an ongoing problem with Slashdot. What does "RP" stand for -- can someone please define it? I tried to trace the articles but that cleared up nothing.
      RP stands for "Rating Pending", and is the term used by the software company to indicate that the game has not yet been rated by the ESRB (Entertainment Software Ratings Board). It's pretty much the equivelant of that big "This film has not yet been rated" message you get when you're watching a film trailer of a film that's still in production or far in the future.
      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    4. Re:Acronyms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your correct.

      My correct? You're incorrect.

  18. Typo alert! by PinkPanther · · Score: 1
    ...and we are just listening to our customers

    He misspelled "lawyers".

    --
    It's a simple matter of complex programming.
  19. Ignoring Consumer Demand by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

    Walmart is neglecting to realize that a large percentage of the market is over 21 and they are usually the one buying the games; dad buys the game for junior because he wants to play TOO!

    This is a dumb move by Wal-Mart. If there is a consumer demand for something, why limit yourself? They are a company and as a company (especially retailers), they have to listen to consumer demand. Regardless of their ability to artificially create a consumer demand just by CARRYING a product, do they honestly think consumers will just start buying 'Mickey Mouses Big Adventure' instead of going elswhere for 'GoreFest 3000: The Revenge'??

    Honestly, this move will cause consumers to look elsewhere or purchase online. The consumer demand will move to other markets and eventually ignore Walmart entirely (over time). Why purchase my Playstation for Christmas at Walmart when I have to go to Gamestop for the games?? Consumers are lazy and they want to be able to get everything in one place... this was the Walmart ethic. When they start limiting their video game stock, they will be limiting their video game console sales. This is also bound to affect other electronic sales as well as a result of impulse electronic purchases lost.

    Ignore Walmart and just start going to Fry's.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  20. How great is it... by MojoBox · · Score: 2, Funny

    That Wal-Mart's PR guy is nimed "Simley". I look at that and immediately think Smiley, and picture them interviewing that big flying smiley face. Gives me a chuckle.

    1. Re:How great is it... by krell · · Score: 2, Funny

      "That Wal-Mart's PR guy is nimed "Simley". I look at that and immediately think Smiley, and picture them interviewing that big flying smiley face. Gives me a chuckle.

      Since he's in PR, I immediately thought of the other close anagram, "Slimey".

      --
      Where were you when the voynix came?
  21. Re:No biggie currently, but it can kill the indust by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

    I don't really see anything in your post about how will it kill the industry. Sounds to me like it will just kill pre-ordering. People who want the game will still buy it, pre-order or not.

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  22. And I do not care. by Vistaer · · Score: 1

    Who the heck preorders their games from Wal-mart anyway? Wal-mart sometimes takes up to a week to get "new" games in stock. All this does is make Wal-mart lose some sales to Gamestop, EB Games, Gamecrazy, Best Buy etc.

  23. No by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I'd pre-order every single copy myself.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  24. Re:No biggie currently, but it can kill the indust by kinglink · · Score: 1

    Many companies rely on pre-orders for expected sales number. In addition stores like Gamestop order and distribute games based almost soley on preorder numbers. A store that gets 5 pre-orders gets something like 7 total games, a store that gets 1 preorder will likely see 2 games.

    In addition if games don't get the word out fast (first week), many stores start cutting down on copies shown. If game X sells 1 million copies, and game Y sells 500,000 copies, game X will retain more shelf space longer.

  25. Months or weeks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Months or weeks? I mean which is it? It's either one or the other. On the one side, months, it means that it hasn't been affected by Bully. On the other, it means that they have.

  26. Will the real Jack Thompson please stand up? by identity0 · · Score: 1

    To the tune of... well, you figure it out:

    Will the real Jack Thompson please stand up? I repeat, will the real Jack Thompson please stand up? ...

    We're gonna have a problem here.

    You all look like you've never seen a censor before, jaws all on the floor, like that time John Romero burst through your door and started making you his bitch worse than before he made Quake, putting his Daikatana in you,

    it's the return of the, oh wait, no way, he didn't just say what I think he did, did he?

    And Dr. Suess said, nothing you idiot! Dr. Suess is dead, locked in my basement!

    Gamer boys love Jack Thompson (chigga chigga chigga), "Jack Thompson, I'm sick of him look at him, grabbing the media's you-know-what, sucking the press's you-know-who", "Yeah, but he's so cute, though!"

    Yeah, I probobly got a couple of screws in my head loose, but no worse, than what's going on in your parent's GameCubes. Sometimes, I just wanna get on TV and ban everything, but can't, but it's cool for Joe Lieberman to put stickers on your music "My warning's on your album, My warning's on your album, and if I'm lucky, I can ban evil music"

    And that's the message we deliver to lazy teens, and expect them not to know what a prostitute's business is. Of course they gonna know what whoring is, by the time they hit tenth grade, they get C-Span don't they?

    "We ain't nothing but columnists" well, some of us communists, who cut away other people's (snip) content
    But if we can cut shots of cleavage and gore, then there's no reason why we can't stop a man and another man from marrying (ewww!)
    If you hate the constitution, I got the antidote,
    women put your burkhas on, sing the chorus and it goes,

    I'm Jack Thompson, I'm the real Thompson, All the other Jack Thompsons are just imitating,
    so will the real Jack Thompson please stand up, please stand up, please stand up.
    (repeat 3x)

    Will Smith don't gotta cuss in his rap to sell his records.
    Well, neither do you. So sit down and shut up.
    You think I give a damn about your rights? Half of you gamers can't stomach me, let alone stand me "But Jack! What if you win, wouldn't it be fascist?"
    So? You think the fatherland needs your internet-tubes?
    So you can, download your Britney Spears? Shit, Christina Aguilera better put some clothes on, so I can watch my NFL with Michael Powell and Tipper Gore, and hear them argue about who censored Janet Jackson first,
    You little bitch, put half-time to shame, "Oops, my wardrobe popped, tee hee", I should make it legal to download her audio on MP3, and show the world you can't make money without your PR machine.

    I'm sick of you little boy and girl gamers, all you do is annoy me, so I have been sent to destroy you
    And there's a million of us just like me,
    Who preach like me, who don't give a fuck about your rights like me,
    Who dress like me, walk, talk and censor like me,
    And just might be the next best thing but aren't quite me!

    I'm Jack Thompson, I'm the real Thompson, All the other Jack Thompsons are just imitating,
    so will the real Jack Thompson please stand up, please stand up, please stand up.
    (repeat 3x)

  27. One of the larger companies in the States? by AmigaBen · · Score: 1

    "One of the larger companies in the States" ? Eh?

    Or maybe the number 1 or 2 largest company in the world, depending on the day?

    --
    +5 Insightful, really!
  28. New Line Cinema != Disney n/t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no text here

  29. Disney not include secret scenes?! by brandonY · · Score: 1

    But Disney isn't going to "accidentally" include a sequence where you murder prostitutes and bathe in their blood in the next "Learning With Nemo" title

    No, you're right. They're going to "accidentally" include photographs of naked women in their animated movies:
    http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/rescuers.htm

    So it's good to give Disney the benefit of the doubt and not Rockstar.