Slashdot Mirror


Flash Drives Go To Work

feminazi writes "USB drive capacity is outpacing Moore's Law by doubling every year, evolving from tchotchkes to devices capable of addressing corporate needs ranging from mobile computing platforms to files stores with encryption and biometrics protection. SanDisk and M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers launched a thumb drive with an intelligent U3 chip that can store and launch applications. Lexar's premium JumpDrive Lightning thumb drive has the fastest data-transfer rates at 18MB/sec write and 24MB/sec read. And some are strong on the outside, too. SanDisk touts a drive built to withstand 2,000 lbs. of pressure. Computerworld tested that claim by repeatedly driving a Volkswagen Beetle over the ruggedized thumb drive. While the drive's body came away with a few scratches, there were no dents, and not a single lost file."

59 of 264 comments (clear)

  1. Beetle by 42Penguins · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure you can drive a Beetle over it, but so you know the bandwidth of a Beetle full of thumbdrives on the highway?

    1. Re:Beetle by just_another_sean · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bases on this post I vote for a new moderator category: Perplexing.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    2. Re:Beetle by jamie · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's an old joke. Not even a joke. More sort of a thing that some computer programmers say sometimes and nod wisely to make their point.

    3. Re:Beetle by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a joke based on an old measure of bandwidth- from back in the day when modems were so slow that the fastest way to transfer a megabyte from LA to San Francisco was to load a station wagon with tapes and drive there.

      Given a rough guess of 30,000 thumb drives, at 4GB per, on an 8 hour drive, you get 4GB/sec, give or take a GB, as the bandwith of a Beetle full of thumb drives.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:Beetle by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > Sure you can drive a Beetle over it, but so you know the bandwidth of a Beetle full of thumbdrives on the highway?

      Not bad. But it's nothing compared to what you get if you start by feeding a bunch of thumbdrives to a bunch of in order to get 'em past the security checkpoint, and fill a 777 with 'em. Never underestimate the bandwidth of a muthafuckin' 777 full of muchta*BLAM BLAM BLAM*

      (That's IT! I have HAD IT with these MUTHAFUCKIN' memes on this MUTHAFUCKIN' website!

    5. Re:Beetle by Scaba · · Score: 5, Funny

      From TFA:

      Computerworld tested that claim by repeatedly driving an employee's car over the ruggedized thumb drive. While the drive's body came away with a few scratches, there were no dents, and we didn't lose a single file.

      The article doesn't go on to mention how they then put the thumb drive in the employees car, set the car on fire and pushed it over a cliff. Miraculously, the thumb drive survived! Boy, was that guy pissed when he found out what they did to his car...

    6. Re:Beetle by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bases on this post. . .

      But you obvioudly workes it out. You appear to have perplexes your other redponsentd do far though. :)

      KFG

    7. Re:Beetle by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you use modern tapes or hard disks (who the hell still uses *sequential media*), then that's still more bandwidth than any backbone link on the net.

      Especially if you use the Boeing 737 version of old saying.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    8. Re:Beetle by RobertLTux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      depends on the following

      1 size and capacity of the drives
      2 useable volume of said beetle (rip seats out? boxes/bags the drives are in)
      3 current sanity/skill level of driver (adjust for injested chemicals/aural enhancements)

      Rip the beetle down to the shell and bag the drives , load the driver, put some good rock and roll in the tape deck and you could get some massive bandwidth

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    9. Re:Beetle by ePhil_One · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's an old joke.

      First, its not a joke, its an observation.

      Second, the grammar is scrambled, yielding a mixed up Metaphor. We know what he was trying to say, he just did a really bad job of saying it. Dubyaspeak

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    10. Re:Beetle by Peganthyrus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bandwidth of a 737 full of tapes: 100% data loss when the TSA hears a rumor about a plot to blow up planes via bombs concealed in fake thumbdrives, and makes you throw every single one of them away at the security checkpoint.

      --
      egypt urnash minimal art.
    11. Re:Beetle by inKubus · · Score: 2, Funny

      We know what he was trying to say, he just did a really bad job of saying it

      I guess you're saying we mean what he knows.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    12. Re:Beetle by nedaf7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      [SamuelLJackson]I'm sick of all these motherfucking thumbdrives on this motherfucking plane![/SamuelLJackson]

  2. Comdex 2000 by boristdog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I first saw these at Comdex 2000, I thought "These things will replace all removable media someday."

    Looks like they'll do even more.

    1. Re:Comdex 2000 by couchslug · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They are already large enough to hold usable operating systems like Linux.
      Damn Small Linux and CPXmini (a slick little Kanotix remaster) run fine from USB sticks. If you have the space, you can install a full distro and keep a storage partition for files you wish to save.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  3. Standard Flash Drive Durability by GeffDE · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's a great feature that SanDisk has a flash drive that can be driven over. However, I can't think of the number of times I have forgotten those little buggers in my pockets when they've gone in the wash and the number of time they've come out and still worked perfectly normally. I have got to say, in a day and age when things break if you look at them wrong, it's great that we have invented the 21st century's response to the swiss army knife.

    --
    It has been a nervous year, with people beginning to feel like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.
    1. Re:Standard Flash Drive Durability by stunt_penguin · · Score: 2, Funny

      BTW has anyone *seen* mine? It was small...... about thumb sized.

      I want one with GPS and a transmitter so i can track it's whereabouts :|

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  4. Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressure by steven94585 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Running the drive over with a car is at most going to be only 20-40 psi(pounds per square inche), the tire pressure. Maybe if the whole car was balanced on one wheel and then drove over it.

  5. Re:Why so much of USB? by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    USB = UNIVERSAL Serial Bus

    Point is, just about every remotely modern laptop and desktop in the world has USB ports, a redesign or different format without backwards compatability would defeat the purpose of it.

  6. 2000 lbs of pressure? by AaronPSU777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nitpicky I know, but pounds is not a unit of pressure. What you probably meant is pound-force.

    1. Re:2000 lbs of pressure? by Durrok · · Score: 2, Funny

      Farva: Gimme a litre o' cola. Dimpus Burger Guy: What?
      Farva: [Annoyed] A litre o' cola.
      Dimpus Burger Guy: [into mic] Litrecola? Do we sell litrecola?
      Thorny: Will you just order a large, Farva?
      Farva: I don't want a large farva. I want a goddamn litre o' cola!
      Dimpus Burger Guy: [to Farva] I don't know what that is!
      Farva: [slowly starts shouting] Litre is French for...
      [grabs burger kid by shirt]
      Farva: ... give me my fuckin' cola before I break VOUS FUCKIN' LIP!

      Heart supertroopers

      --
      I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
    2. Re:2000 lbs of pressure? by Moofie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Um, pound force isn't a measure of pressure either. It's a measure of force. It says so right in the unit.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  7. I hated the U3 Cruzer until I got rid of the U3. by Kyeo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A thumbdrive is nice, but the U3 software is one of the most godawful things in existence, and not uninstallable without an internal Best Buy program until recently. Ick.

  8. Swiss Army Thumbdrive by LunaticTippy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Surely you've seen this?

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  9. PSI, pounds, etc. by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Informative

    2,000 lbs. of pressure

    2,000 lbs is not a pressure; there's no area. It's weight. This is basic high school physics...

    Computerworld tested that claim by repeatedly driving a Volkswagen Beetle over the ruggedized thumb drive. While the drive's body came away with a few scratches, there were no dents, and not a single lost file."

    A Neu VW beetle weighs about 3000lb. If the entire force applied against the road by one tire was applied to the device (for example, by putting a piece of thick metal on either side of the device and then running the car over the plate of metal), that's only 750LB. This is basic grade school math (3000/4.)

    I'd guess your average thumb drive has perhaps 1-2 square inches of surface area. The amount of pressure between tire and road is exactly equal to the inflation pressure of the tire, which is often around 30-35 PSI (Pounds Per Square Inch.) So the thumb drive never had more than 60-70lb put on it...

    1. Re:PSI, pounds, etc. by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Insightful
      2,000 lbs is not a pressure; there's no area. It's weight.
      No it's not. It's a unit of mass. If you want a unit of weight I suggest the pound-force.
      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    2. Re:PSI, pounds, etc. by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      In that case, according to your 'basic grade school' math/physics. . .

      Which is correct. A tire is a spring. When a car drives over something small all the something feels is the force required to depress the spring, because the opposing force is all it is applying to the tire. The weight of the car is actually borne by the rest of the contact patch of the tire with the ground, because the tire deforms around the something.

      Softer tire, less force on the drive, which can never be more than the spring rate of the tire at its contact point with the drive. For the sake of argument let's say 50 lbs./in. How thick is a drive? What is its area? That's the pressure on the drive.

      What happens if you put a softer spring on one wheel of a car? That corner of the car weighs less (and so does the diagonally opposite corner). You can test this yourself with a couple of postal scales and an R/C car. Or just sit on a stool with one short leg and think very hard about what you are experiencing.

      . . .the amount of pressure between the tire and the road would be the inflation pressure of the tire (120psi) a 14lb road bike would exert about 240 pounds of pressure on the thumb drive!

      Now you're being silly, but a bike with a rider on it would exert a much higher pressure on the drive, yes. Higher spring rate, less deformation around the drive, thus more of the weight of the bike/rider being borne by the drive, but never exceeding the spring rate until the tire is crushed against the rim.

      . . . with nearly solid rubber tires inflated at 5psi. . .

      A nearly solid rubber tire has a high spring rate of its own.

      . . .we could make cars nearly float off the road

      The very point of using pnuematic tires in the first place. With a nondeformable solid tire the drive exerts a force on the car equal to the weight of the car on that tire. Thus the drive lifts the corner of the car that distance. With a pnuematic tire the tire deforms around the drive, the drive only exerts a lifting force on the car equal to the spring rate of the tire, and feels an equal and opposite force, and the car remains firmly planted on the road.

      KFG

    3. Re:PSI, pounds, etc. by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thats why I deflat my tires to 3 psi. them I can pick lift one side up with only a few fingers

      I just went out to the 4 door Accord in the parking lot. I was able to lift the front (heaviest) corner by about an inch with only three fingers.

      Because. . .the only force I have to apply is that required to compress the diagonally opposite spring. Go try it yourself. You do not have to lift the car against gravity, the tires and springs are doing that. You only have to rotate the car around its center of mass.

      Then go get yourself an RC10, a box of different springs and four postal scales. You'll find it's perfectly easy to set up a car that it would only apply a pressure of a few pounds per square inch on a run over thumbdrive.

      Got a bicycle? Make sure the tires are pumped up to recommended rate. No deform the tire by pinching it between your thumb and finger. That is how much force the tire can apply. Now deflate it to half pressure and pinch again. That is how much force the can apply now. Notice how much easier it is to pinch it now?

      It ain't rocket science, it's . . .well, spring science. If you compress a spring with rate of 100 lbs per inch one inch, it is exerting an opposing force of 100 pounds.

      Ever notice that bigger cars have bigger tires, or that skinny road racing bike tires run at higher pressures?

      To support the weight of the vehicle you either need to add more square inches or increase the spring rate by adding pressure, or the tires will not exert enough force to hold the vehicle off the ground.

      KFG

  10. Real world Lexar Jumpdrive numbers by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is from the 512MB model /dev/sdb1:
      Timing cached reads: 2324 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1161.93 MB/sec
      Timing buffered disk reads: 76 MB in 3.01 seconds = 25.26 MB/sec

    Fast little thing

    Ask for other benchmarks and I will run them.

  11. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by hamfactorial · · Score: 2, Informative

    Once again it's the attack of bad science! Not to mention a lack of regard for units.... Assuming all four wheels carry the same load (bad assumption) and the point of application of the load on the tire is constrained to a point (another horrible assumption), the pressure on the top face of the micro drive would be .25 * W_car (lbs) / A_disk (in^2). Note that this completely ignores St. Venant's principle, which is a nifty thing that explains how shear and normal stress is distributed along any given member. In reality, the stress wouldn't be uniform throughout the disk and would likely puncture the top of the drive before damaging the middle section.

    Forgive me for the pedantry, but being a mechanical engineering student, I'm always irritated when people talk about pounds of pressure or use a kilogram as a measurement of weight. Argh!

    --
    Did you know subscribers can see articles in the future? Holy shit!
  12. God, I hate that U3 chip. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On some drives, like the ones my college bookstore carries, you can't access the writable portion of the drive until after the U3 software is loaded into Windows. Hell, I couldn't even get past it using my Linux laptop.

    And the U3 software fails on virtually every computer on campus, because the computers are locked down in such a way that one cannot install device drivers using a normal student account.

    The real kicker? They're replacing all the PCs in the campus labs with ones without floppy drives. So even those poor kids with only a few hundred KB of data will have to use a flash drive, and us student assistants will have to support them.

    Already, I've had to tell too many students that yes, they can access their data from home with that flash drive. No, they won't be able to use that flash drive here. Yes, I realize their assignment is due in twenty minutes. No, there's nothing I can do about it; I don't have any greater a degree of access than they do.

    1. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by NMThor · · Score: 2, Informative

      I must agree. After mistakenly buying a flash drive with a U3 chip, I've sworn never to go back. I've had very similar issues using these drives in work computers. Another issue: at least on the flash drive I bought, the 1 GB is the sum of the writable part of the drive AND the practically unusable U3 partition! ARG...

    2. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    3. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by xenocide2 · · Score: 2

      The real kicker? They're replacing all the PCs in the campus labs with ones without floppy drives. So even those poor kids with only a few hundred KB of data will have to use a flash drive, and us student assistants will have to support them.

      Frankly, this is a good thing. Floppies are shitty. They havent improved as a consumer technology since like 1987; they're prone to failure and painfully slow. Ideally, students using your campus labs should be using something like a network drive, which has the benefits of large storage, redundancy, protection against power failures, and periodic backups. But even if that isn't available, easily accomplished or part of student practices, USB drives are still a generally better alternative than floppies. I just bought a gigabyte of USB thumb drive for 20 dollars online. You can purchase 128M for under 10 dollars, and I suspect your campus bookstore could get a bulk discount to get them even cheaper (whether they decide to share that with students is best rated "unlikely"). Point is, for about the same price as a pack of disks you could get a hell of a lot more storage that runs faster, less prone to failure, and easier to carry around. And if your school wasn't backwards ass, students would have easy access to network storage, both from home and on campus.

      Google searching suggests that there are removal tools for that u3 software stuff. I'm not sure if they work or if they'll work for you in an environment where no software is allowed to be installed. It might be easier to file a trouble report asking for the u3 drivers to be installed (assuming this isn't really device/vendor dependent). AFAIK, u3 only requires drivers for programs on the drive and password protected volumes.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    4. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Millenniumman · · Score: 2, Funny

      they're prone to failure

      That's why you always use floppies in a RAID array.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    5. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why doesn't your product work under Linux or OSX? By work I mean support all features supported on XP.

  13. Flash drive news by Strix+Varia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this really news? Flash drives have been around a while now, and I seem to remember hearing about cars being driven over them almost a year ago. Didn't Corsair do that already?

  14. U3 or portableApps.com by Lord+Prox · · Score: 2, Informative

    U3, huh. Why, when we have got Open Source goodness recompiled to run on flashdrives. ProtableApps.com. Fresh baked ClamWinAV Firefox OpenOffice Gimp Gaim and more.



    Bless PortableApps.com

  15. GP is correct by LunaticTippy · · Score: 5, Informative
    so if i ride over something on my bike (50psi in the tyres) I'll be exerting more pressure ?
    Yep. Think about it.

    If a unicycle tire is at 50 psi with 100 lbs on it then there has to be 2 square inches touching the road, assuming the tire is flexible. A rigid tire could have less area in contact, but tires are flexible.

    If you still don't understand, try googling or take a look at how to weigh a car by measuring surface area here

    Oh, and a 100 lb woman in stiletto heels can exert over 1000 psi if she balances on her heel. We're talking about weight per unit area. Even though it is counterintuitive, you will exert more force per unit area on your bike than a bigrig full of i-beams, assuming you have higher pressure tires.
    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  16. Re:Who's got a what in the where now? by BobNET · · Score: 2

    I thought most /. readers would recognize it as the name of the restaurant where Joanna worked in Office Space (except there it was spelled Chotchkie's).

  17. Hmmmm .... by powerlord · · Score: 4, Funny
    Not bad. But it's nothing compared to what you get if you start by feeding a bunch of thumbdrives to a bunch of in order to get 'em past the security checkpoint, and fill a 777 with 'em. Never underestimate the bandwidth of a muthafuckin' 777 full of muchta*BLAM BLAM BLAM*


    Thats a great idea for a movie!

    ThumbDrives On a Plane!

    That's IT! I have HAD IT with these MUTHAFUCKIN' memes on this MUTHAFUCKIN' website!


    That's what I'm talking about! :D
    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  18. Does Moore's "law" even apply here? by Inverted+Intellect · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Moore's famous "law", previously a handy rough predictor for the maximum obtainable complexity of ICs (integrated circuits, e.g. CPUs) is often unappropriately applied to fields which it has nothing to do with, e.g. the maximum capacity of HDDs. Does it apply in this case?

  19. For those that missed it, and need speed by RootWind · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is Anandtech's last year USB Flash Drive Roundup: http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=2549&p=3
    It seems to be still relevant almost a year later. No faster models have come out from any of the major brands that I am aware of.

  20. New File Compression Scheme by pkiesel · · Score: 5, Funny

    No word on how much compression was achieved by driving the Beetle over it? A rather inefficient method in any case.

  21. pain in the rear by p51d007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    BB had the 1 gig's on sale so I bought a few to add to my toolbox. I found reformatting didn't get rid of U3, then went to the sandisk website and downloaded the uninstaller. Must be hidden somewhere on the drive, but at least the uninstaller trashed U3 for good :)

  22. Re:Why so much of USB? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Firewire has less cpu over head and firewire 400 is faster then usb 2.0 480 megabits in testing.

    How long in till we start to see E-SATA drives and firewire drives? Hard disks will come with flash ram on them soon likely runing at speeds that use the full SATA 300 bus.

    Windows vista use of usb keys for VM sound like a bad idea when hard disks are faster and have less cpu over head. Some one should make internal SATA flash drives for that.

    Is there any work being done on usb 3?

  23. Yes by arrrrg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Moore's law is often stated regarding the decreasing cost of a single transistor, or (equivalently) about the number of transistors per device of a given cost. Since flash RAM is constructed using a particular form of transistors (with an additional isolated gate that will hold a charge or lack thereof), Moore's law seems to (roughly) apply. In any case, flash is much closer to an ordinary IC than a hard drive.

  24. It's still often faster in the real world by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    We have a research group here that does JPEG 2000 compression research. As you might guess, this generates staggering amounts of data. They don't transfer it over the network to other places, they FedEx harddrives. Turn out, with the amount of bandwidth the campus has and the slice they can easily get, 1TB is about the crossover point where FedEx overnight becomes faster. They usually FedEx a box with like 2-4TB worth of external harddrives in it, and get a similar box in return.

    Sounds kinda silly, but really works out better overall. It's cheaper too, than it would cost to get the university to buy more bandwidth and dedicate it specially to them.

  25. Re:Why just USB (2.0)? Also: What I'd like to see. by generic-man · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's one FireWire flash drive. Although the speeds might be faster, I like USB better just because *everything* has a USB port nowadays, but many computers (like my Dell desktop and Dell work laptop) lack FireWire ports.

    The idea of a home server that doesn't need any computer per se is in its infancy: 160 GB HD, iTunes sharing, BitTorrent client, all self-contained so you can set it and take your laptop with you while your home connection continues to download all your favorite Creative Commons licensed Ogg Tarkin video files. I like it!

    --
    For more information, click here.
  26. If you want to get rid of U3 by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Informative
    You can get the official instructions for removing U3 here. Click "support" and scroll down to question #6.

    One thing this is annoying about that--they recognize that Mac and Linux users might want to get rid of U3 (their survey that asks why you are getting rid of it includes using Mac or Linux among the answers), but the software to remove U3 only runs on Windows.

    It did not work under Parallels on my Mac. I had to really boot Windows to run the U3 remover.

  27. Sandisk Cruiser Titanium by acidrain69 · · Score: 4, Informative

    STAY AWAY FROM THIS DRIVE IF YOU ARE GOING TO KEEP ANYTHING REMOTELY IMPORTANT.

    We purchased 3 of them for our IT staff in the local office. All 3 failed within 3 months of ordering, and 2 of the replacements failed after that (within a month of replacement). We had them switched out for some Cruzer Micro and Minis, and have been fine ever since (several months now).

    My theory is the metal on the case. While strong, I think the metal in the case conducts static and shorts into the flash chips or USB controller inside. I don't even know if titanium conducts or not, and Sandisk denies there is a widespread issue with these drives, but go read the amazon.com forums on this product and you will be scared off.

    It's a shame. They are a wonderful design, no caps to loose and the drive slides inside the case to protect the USB connector. But it's useless if you can't trust it. One of mine worked one second when I had it plugged into a laptop, then I dismounted it, walked 10 ft to my computer, plugged it in and it was DOA. I think it may have been the static from the carpet, I had it hanging around my neck. You're better off with a plastic one and just back it up periodically to protect against loss or damage.

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  28. burning out USB? by louzerr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At work we're seeing a larger number of motherboards where the USB suddenly fails. It only seems to happen to those using drives or palm sync devices.

    If the enterprise uses flash drives more, will we end up replacing more motherboards as well?

    --
    "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away" -- "Step Right Up", Tom Waits
    1. Re:burning out USB? by smart_ass · · Score: 2, Informative

      We've seen this too, but only with specific chip sets, and only ever on the "extra" USB ports. The ones on the back that are directly attached to the motherboard have all been fine, however the ones on top and front of case have the problems. I believe it is some sort of grounding problem. As such we have blanked out / disconnected those other ports and have yet to have any fail.

      --
      Ouch ... did I just say that.
  29. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most of the "engineers" reading here are not the "engineers" you (or I) consider to be real engineers. People typing at a keyboard and causing a display to show something are not engineers. 'Architect' might be a better description.

  30. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Running the drive over with a car is at most going to be only 20-40 psi(pounds per square inche), the tire pressure.


    No kidding. I once saw a puppy get rolled over by a jeep/SUV thing.

    This pup was, unbeknowst to me, following me down the road. By the time I heard it, we were a considerable distance from its home. So I began to walk back, as the pup would not take a hint. After a few metres, I heard the sound of the oncoming jeep. So did the pup. He wasn't too bright, and, spooked and leashless, panicked and began tearing down the road as fast as possible, towards home and away from the jeep.

    He just kept running, and the jeep just kept coming. The pup was zigzagging back and forth all over the single lane country road. The jeep continued onwards, straight and steady, not altering its course in the slightest. The driver must have been a grade-A asshole. Anyway, as I watched, the jeep finally caught up with the puppy. He was right in the middle of the road, but at the last second dived right just in time to be firmly rolled over the the jeeps right front tire. The jeep continued on its way, without altering speed.

    As I watched, transfixed, the pup rolled to its feet, staggering and wobbling, its neck craned rather sickenly to its right, head pointing upwards. It let out these awful drawn yelps, over and over, its eyes looking right at me, head still craned upwards. It slowly began to stagger back towards me, neck still crooked, looking like the living dead.

    Anyway, after a few seconds, it stopped yelping, turned its head back into a normal position, and padded back over to me, tail a little droopy, but wagging. I must have gawped at it for about ten minutes, fully expecting it to suddenly and theatrically resume its death agonies and loudly expire. It just sniffed at the ground.

    Taking that dog back to its owner to tell them their puppy had just been run over was one of the most surreal expieriences of my life. True story.
    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  31. Encryption? by rrohbeck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yup, a truck full of tapes (or disks, it you have *good* packaging) is still the standard way of doing high volume data vaulting. If you need to move multiple TB per day (nothing special for a large datacenter), you don't want to pay for that amount of bandwidth unless you absolutely have to, i.e. you need online access.

    That's why tapes keep falling off the back of a truck and get lost every now and then. Bummer if there's credit card records on those tapes. That's why hardware encryption is getting a lot of attention recently.

    TFA mentions encryption is passing; are there any standard USB drives with encryption yet? How is the password transmitted to the drive? I sometimes have a bad feeling carrying company data and sources around all the time. I keep the USB stick attached to the company badge so I won't lose is easily, but still...

    1. Re:Encryption? by cb0nd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that truecrypt does a very good job at this.

      I haven't used it all that much (ya know, while thumbdrives are easy to lose, I don't really care if someone sees how bad my assignments for the Operating Systems class really are), but I think it does a pretty decent job even in different environments.

  32. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My wife backed our Jetta onto my foot once, and then stopped it there when I yelled at her. (She claims it was accidental :) It wasn't comfortable, but it didn't break my foot either.

  33. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by Skynyrd · · Score: 2, Informative

    My wife backed our Jetta onto my foot once, and then stopped it there when I yelled at her. (She claims it was accidental :) It wasn't comfortable, but it didn't break my foot either.

    There's a large difference in teh weight on the front tires vs the weight on the rear tires of a front engine/front wheel drive vehicle. Assuming you care, you could find an old car magazine or road test, and itt'll list the weight balance, as well as the weight of the car. Being run over by the back wheels of a 80's econo-box (not saying that's what the Jetta is) is nothing.

    On th eother hand, I have a heavy duty truck with tools, equipment, a utility bed and a Diesel engine. On DOT certified scales, theh front end (front wheels on the scale) weighs 4300 pound, while th erear wheels only put 3200 on the ground. Yup, each front tire is putting a ton onto the ground. That would hurt your foot.