DirecTV's New HD-DVR
Earl Bonovich writes to tell us that he recently had a chance to take a look at DirecTV's new HD-DVR, the HR20-700. His results are posted over at DBSTalk including several pictures and videos. Some of the features include high definition output, dual SAT tuners, dual ATSC tuners, wired RJ-45 ethernet port, external SATA connection, and a 300GB SATA internal hard drive that can hold 30 hours of MPEG-2 HD, 50 hours of MPEG-4 HD, or 200 hours of standard definition video.
Or Tivo will Smack you down! look at what happened to Dish Network yesterday...
It's a good start to get a peek at this new DVR. Unfortunately, if consumers were to base their choice on listed features, capacities, and pictures of the unit (they already barely do that, the DirectTV would be another DVR with really beefy meaty specs... and would be a top candidate for a great addition to the Home Entertainment Center. But, this isn't really the review I'm looking for.
I want to know (after using TiVo now for almost ten years, happily ever after):
This is just a partial list... but virtually none of which are really covered by the review in enough depth... too much to ask of one reviewer. I've been burned by the "wow" factor of a Comcast box (from a review), and now would wait for more concensus.
And, as an aside, does anyone else find it really annoying technology is going the way of PVR's becoming the providers' commodities rather than manufacturers? Assuming this new PVR is the greatest thing since sliced bread, it still wouldn't be enough of a draw to switch providers -- it's more than a little annoying to find that if you like x, y, or z about some PVR, you have to switch to that provider? WTF?
Interoperability with EVERYTHING (including over the air (OTA)) broadcast has been and continues to be one of the biggest draws for me with TiVo, though there's many indications of providers trying to shut TiVo out. Sigh.
This isn't EchoStar, but could they nab DirecTV, too? It'd be a shame to launch something just to have it shot down. (that said, the EchoStar case *did* take EONS before a ruling.... and it's already been temporarily suspended...)
For this reason alone, I think Sony's DVR is preferable.
The question on my mind is what penalty might exist for bringing your own video data storage along. Do hard drives attached to the external SATA ports suffers any penalties? Can they be swapped back and forth without losing any access to content? That is, are external SATA hard drives like VHS tapes so far as flexibility of swapping media?
Another question: Does DirecTV pull a TiVo and make content you have recorded on your purchased hardware expire?
IIRC, the terms of Directv's contract with Tivo is that they don't have to worry about being sued by Tivo for DVR tech.
It doesn't say in the article, but I wonder if any of the outputs actually work. On my DVR (a Motorola), there is an ethernet jack, SATA port, USB ports and Firewire ports. The only one that works is one of the (two) Firewire ports.
This post climbed Mt. Washington.
DirectTV and TiVo came to an agreement earlier this year where DirectTV agreed to support the DirectTV TiVos until 2009. In return TiVo and DirectTV agreed not to sue each other for any DVR patent infringements.
So DirectTV won't suffer the same fate as Dish.
As an owner of both a DirecTV Tivo unit and a DirecTV Plus DVR, I can attest to the fact that the Tivo's interface is miles ahead of DirecTV's homegrown option in terms of usability and features. My hope is this will improve over time.
This will be a nice DVR once they get all the features active and working. After that I may just have to reconsider getting the service with HD...At least until this HD-/BD-DVD drama plays out.
Now that this box is out is seems that many a DirecTV customer (including myself) is weighing their options and it seems to be coming down to two things:
... and they say no?
... well if they are effectively going to force folks away from the well loved Tivo enabled hardware and only allow people to use the "one true hardware" that comes down to them from DirecTV, then they are going to force me and many others away as customers. As with many things it's about choice. The world of cable has choice, DirecTV does not. No Tivo choice, then it really starts to add up to a great big 'screw'em' sort of result for DirecTV as they switch over to MPEG4 and sunset their older hardware.
1) Switch to cable and *HAVE* a choice of series 3 Tivo / build a Myth, etc....
or
2) Stick with DirecTV on hardware that's dictated to the customer, offered by a company with a less than stellar reputation for customer satisfaction.
Hmm is it any surprise that #1 seems to be the popular choice?
Looking at it deeper, when customers of DirecTV who have Tivo systems have been utilizing the programming, Tivo is effectively the interface to the TV for them now. It is well put together. It works. It's intuitive. Universally they like the interface. Even my non-technical wife is the same, and way back when we sunset our series 1 tivo I was told spot on, the only acceptable upgrade was something with Tivo, so getting an HR10-250 was a no brainer. (o darn!)
But as time went forward and the features of the series 2 Tivo have been kept out of DirecTV Tivo offerings, my displeasure with DirecTV has risen. I've always found it amazing that direcTV never enabled any of the home media capabilities even tho the Tivo hardware in our direcTV box could have done it. Customers begging for it, begging to pay for it even
When it comes down to it, one can get the same programming as DirecTV over cable. The cable companies on account of the FCC and the cable card standard effectively have to play nice with the Series 3 Tivo or other hardware. The cable card standard has enabled choice.
DirecTV
Companies that take this sort of brutal approach and ignore their customers like that just don't survive for long in today's world. It's another great example of open vs closed, and yet again, open wins.
Hell, an HD-PVR with an ethernet jack could ITSELF be considered a piracy device. Better watch for the MPAA as well.
An ethernet port gives all sorts of interesting possibilities.. I wonder what they have planned for this?
How about:
- Content sharing to other DirecTV devices. My primary TV is downstairs, I would like a small satellite HD playback unit that can access content on the main DVR (don't the Moxi DVRs do this?).
- PC integration, access music and photos from my PC for display/playback through my HDTV+Stereo.
- Basic internet access via unit, WWW browser for display on HDTV.. sometimes this could be handy.
- Access guide data, firmware updates, PPV requests, and other DirecTV content via the Internet. This could eliminate the need for a phone connection to the unit.
- Additional storage on network (NFS, SMB) drives. Store content encrypted.
Somehow, I doubt they will be as aggressive as I'm hoping.
I got an HD-DVR from my cable company months ago (Scientific Atlanta 8300HD). Plus I can add an external hard drive to mine (400 GB).
- Having to reboot at least once a week because of system freezes
- Losing the ability to select between first run, re-run, or all episodes of a series
- A lagging and unresponsive playback interface
- No ability to see the title of a series episode unless you have more than one recorded
- Frequently being told that you can't ask for something to be recorded because the 'list is full' of things automatically set to record in two weeks
- Tech support whose only answer is 'press reset'.
Maybe they will update the software on our boxes to fix these (finally) if they have done it in their HD box. My advice is - get the Tivo HD DirecTV box if it's still available before DirecTV sticky you with only their own proprietary choice.The feature set does not sound any different than the HDTivo that I've had for years. It does sound like the user interface has been upgraded, but nothing that would make me or anyone else that has an HDTivo upgrade. Even the capacity is the same. How is this news?
It looks like this will be the only option to record the MPEG4 HD shows on Directv. Looking at the back of the Tivo Series 3 - http://www.zatznotfunny.com/PSN/Series3-back-3.JPG - there is no way to bring in an existing high definition signal. Directv is moving to MPEG4, and are slowly squeezing Tivo out of existence with them.
If I were Tivo, I would make sure that my Tivo Series 3 box can have a HD input (HDMI input?) so all the Tivo diehards (which I am one - I have 3 Tivos in my house all networked together on a HAN (Home area network - hah!)) can still have the Tivo interface they've come to love, while supporting Directv as they evolve.
Tivo forever! ... (unless it doesn't work with the MPEG4 Directv equipment... *cry*)
Anyone else have an idea how we can feed Directv w/ HD into the Tivo Series 3's?
How did you get ahold of the Vista speech recognition technology? I thought that was still in internal trials at Microsoft...
I just moved and was evaluating between the big three and I was a DirectTV customer for 8 years and a DirectTV (low def) Tivo customer for 3 years.
I would LOVE to have stayed with DirectTV, but the fact that they severed their deal with TIVO and will NEVER upgrade their current HD/TIVO box killed the deal. I honestly don't care what this guys says in his review, the difference is significant and it is like comparing a Honda to a BMW. Yes they both have similar features, but you are either a Honda guy or not. The Honda guys will say all day long that their car is feature for feature as good, but they don't own a BMW.
So that left me with Cable and their DVR; in hopes that the Series 3 will be out soon. After working with this giant piece of crap for a month now, I can say that I am counting the days until the new Tivo series 3 comes out.
Now as far a cable VS sat goes, I can say that even Digital cable isn't near the quality of signal that my DirectTV signal was. The cable "fans" seem to disagree saying that "digital is digital" but that isn't the case for me. In my opinion, and I am willing to show just about anyone this; the quality kind of breaks down like this. (10 being the best).
1080P signal with BluRay input = 10
1080i or 720p signal input = 7
HD station on cable in standard format, normal DirectTV signal or good DVD (LOTR) = 6
Digital Cable = 4
Standard Cable = 3
Again, this is my opinion, but EVERYONE I have had over to look at this tends to agree. I still have my old TIVO and some stuff on it to compare so it makes it somewhat easy to compare the signals. What would have made me happy and I would have paid far more money for it would have been if DirectTV would not have killed their deal with TIVO. Also, it would have been great if they would have started to offer more HD content. But for some reason they decided to partner with Microsoft... I hope that works out for them as well as it has for every other company that has partnered with Microsoft...
Lastly, I don't want to hear how this "new" device is "just like or better" than a TIVO. That is your opinion, and if so then that is great for you. DirectTV just lost me as a customer for it, and everyone I can influence will never use them for service again.
The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
He's running Mac OS 9.
Don't sweat it ... I have a brand new DirecTiVo now because my old one died last week. When I went through customer service they noticed I'm a TiVo customer and offered me another one. It only works if you already have TiVo though.
Isn't the fantastic interface a TiVo thing and not DirecTV?
This login name for sale.
Well each cable company many do something different with regards to how it handles digital, but with Comcast Digital Cable in my area, the quality of the standard def digital stations is just as good as Directv or better; blocking and artifacts are evident on both (usually dependant on the channel as some channels are better than others on both systems. When it comes to HD content, Directv and its not so hi-def signals are left way behind with what I can get OTA and via cable. If it were not for NFLST, there would be no need for Directv IMHO.
"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
That is 5C-enabled firewire ports to allow archiving contents off the DVR.
What good is a 500? or whatever GB box when the only way to add new content to it is delete old recordings.
What if you want to save a show, the only choice is analog (SD) output, what a waste.
come on, for something nice and expensive get some better designers. it looks like some cheap chinese knockoff product.
take all he has to say with a grain of salt.
l y_released
e does review not to help, nut to further hisown hidden ambitions, vveeerrryyy low.
http://digg.com/hardware/New_Directv_HD_DVR_final
take all he has to say with a grain of salt.
l y_released [digg.com]
does review not to help, but to further his own hidden ambitions,(free stuff job etc) vveeerrryyy low.
if was honest about his agenda then it be ok, but he is not, so it is not ok
http://digg.com/hardware/New_Directv_HD_DVR_final
I would think this most basic feature of my old TIVO would be "cloned" on the HR20. I like to just type in the name of my favorite sports team and have the box collect all the specials, games, and news I want. I also like typing in Robert DeNiro and have it go out and find all his movies, then also capture all shows that review cars. Huge let down it doesn't have this. Minor let down is they STILL haven't included Picture in a Picture like the Ultimate TV boxes had years ago.
A friend has a comcast (I have 2 DTivos). He regularly complains of things (shows being recorded that he did not ask for, shows not being recorded that he did ask for). He's one of the smartest people I know, so I doubt it's user error. He called customer support one evening. They said they'd look into it. What they did was remotely reset his box. Problem was, he already did it before and he was in the middle of recording some programs.
When I called DirecTV, they told me that this unit was currently only available in Los Angeles, and sometime "soon" elsewhere, though they did not have a date.
"Waste not one watt!" - CZ
To me, one of the most important factors in a DVR is if I can expand the capacity. I've done it with my Tivo and my DirectTivo. What are the chances of being able to install a larger SATA drive in this unit? Also, having a single 'live' buffer would probably be a deal killer for me; dual live buffers are an essential feature in my DirecTivo.
I know MythTV (http:llwww.mythtv.org) isn't for everyone, but nowadays just about any linux n00b can get one running perfectly without all too much effort. Take a look at KnoppMyth (http://www.mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html). For me it ran/installed straight off the CD and gave me a working ASTC MythTV box in a couple of hours. I've never paid for cable or sattelite, I just use a rooftop antenna and get all my local channels in HD. I like the complete lack of DRM with MythTV. I can burn anything in full quality to DVD if I want to. Automatic commercial skipping works very well for me.
Hahaha. I just looked at that jpeg of the series 3. The only input is coax?! Not even yellow RCA? They must have done that on purpose.
The short answer to how do you do "HD-in" is that you don't. I'm not aware of any consumer-grade offering that can take a raw, uncompressed HD signal like you get with component video, DVI, or HDMI going to you TV and do anything useful with it. All the existing boxes I've ever seen worked with compressed signals. I think the data-rate on raw DVI video is still prohibitive.
The manuals are online right now. I don't know if it's by mistake or not but they're at:
i de_LR.pdf
d ev1_0b.pdf
Quickstart Guide:
http://www.directtv.com/see/pdf/DTV007522_HDVR_Gu
User Manual:
http://www.directtv.com/see/pdf/060508HR20UserGui
Its probably a mistake so who knows how long they will last.