Slashdot Mirror


Goldfish Smarter Than Dolphins

flergum writes "While dolphins may have big brains, laboratory rats and goldfish can outwit them. It appears that the large brains are a function of their environment rather than intelligence. From the article: 'Dolphins have a superabundance of glia and very few neurons... The dolphin's brain is not made for information processing it is designed to counter the thermal challenges of being a mammal in water.' I guess this means that the Navy will start recruiting and training goldfish for those mine search and destroy missions."

62 of 530 comments (clear)

  1. Smart is one thing... by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but don't goldfish only have a 3 second memory?

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    1. Re:Smart is one thing... by FromageTheDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      What are we talking about, again?

    2. Re:Smart is one thing... by MustardMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know what really disturbs me? The number of people I've met who actually believe that idiotic myth. We really live in a pathetic state of education when this type of nonsense is accepted without question.

    3. Re:Smart is one thing... by Splab · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well they did say it in a movie... And we all know that what we see in movies are real, don't we?

    4. Re:Smart is one thing... by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In a goldfish's behavior when you approach it for feeding. Believe me, they remember what your behavior indicates is about to happen.

      KFG

    5. Re:Smart is one thing... by DrSkwid · · Score: 3, Informative

      My goldfish certainly display this behaviour, and it is not just the Pavlovian response to someone walking near the tank.

      My three fish will swim to the end of the tank I am sat nearest to and badger me into feeding them, but only when the light in the tank is on.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    6. Re:Smart is one thing... by arduous · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey! Where did that cool plastic castle come from?

      --
      "It's the smell! If there is such a thing." Agent Smith - The Matrix
    7. Re:Smart is one thing... by Hawkxor · · Score: 5, Funny

      doo...doo...doo...
      Hey! Where did that cool plastic castle come from?

    8. Re:Smart is one thing... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then there is this obsevation from another researcher in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

      But measuring intelligence by glia and cortex ratios could be just as unreliable as the big-brain theory, said the head of Vancouver Aquarium's cetacean research program, Lance Barrett-Lennard.

      Wading into the debate, Barrett-Lennard said the highly social networks of dolphins indicates they have strong social intelligence.

      ''A dolphin could have a brain the size of a walnut and it wouldn't affect the observations they live very complex and social lives,'' Barrett-Lennard said. ''They keep account of who their friends are, with very complicated hierarchies and allegiances.

      "The other thing is they have spatial maps. They know exactly where to go when they need to look for certain food.''

      And another thing... goldfish jump out of their bowls and *die*. Yep, self destructing is sure a smart thing to do. NOT! It's not like a Dolphin can jump out of the tank, catch a bus to the ocean and take off. Or maybe it might want to stop at a Starbucks on the way. Have to think on that a while. Anyway, it is probably a smarter thing to stay put for them. Glad I figured that out.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    9. Re:Smart is one thing... by iapetus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How about here?

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    10. Re:Smart is one thing... by Pooua · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Heir Of The Mess: Why do highly instinctive creatures need memory to survive?

      Because environmental conditions that are unique to each generation of animal cannot be solved by instinct.

      Heir Of The Mess: Ants probably don't have much memory, but their programming enables them to function effectively, as well as enabling the group to act as a whole.

      Ants need good memory to find their way back home from food. No, not all ants simply follow a chemical trail.

      "Biologist Thomas Collett of the University of Sussex in England and his colleagues trained wood ants to walk along a wall to test if the insects also use visual clues.

      "Like honeybees, ants stick to familiar routes but are flexible in choosing between routes.

      "When ants were placed in a Y-shaped maze with a walls on each side, unfed ants also learned to choose the food path."

      http://www.cbc.ca/story/science/national/2005/11/1 6/ants-051117.htmlCBC: Empty stomach, visual memory guides ants to food

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    11. Re:Smart is one thing... by flumps · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dr. Evil: You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have dolphins with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads! Now evidently my cycloptic colleague informs me that that cannot be done. Ah, would you remind me what I pay you people for, honestly? Throw me a bone here! What do we have?

      Number Two: Gold fish.

      Dr. Evil: [pause] Right.
      Number Two: They're mutated Gold fish.
      Dr. Evil: Are they ill tempered?
      Number Two: Absolutely.
      Dr. Evil: Oh well, that's a start.

      --
      "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
    12. Re:Smart is one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It seems you simply don't understand what "memory" means in the technical sense. "Memory" is not required for learning, training, or routines.

    13. Re:Smart is one thing... by Carewolf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mythbusters... They trained some goldfish to navigate a labyrinth.

      Though I think part of the confusion here is, that I always thought goldfish had 3 seconds of short term memory. A short short-term memory does not exclude the ability to learn specific behavior, what learned can just not be constructed from facts with many seconds in between.

    14. Re:Smart is one thing... by u38cg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Goldfish jump out of water to escape predators - probably when you've got a pike snapping at your tail, trying to learn to breath real quick seems like a good option. When they jump out of tanks, it's because they are highly stressed, and that usually is down to the environment you keep them in. I've left the lid off my tank all day (accidentally) and they haven't succumbed to the Marco Polo instinct.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    15. Re:Smart is one thing... by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Informative

      My boyfriend suffered a stroke which crippled his short-term memory. For example, one time when I was talking to Andy on the phone, he was distracted by something and put the phone down, and I had to yell to get his attention and remind him that I was still on the line. "Hi there! What's up?" Nonetheless, his therapists succeeded in teaching him some adaptive behaviors, and could still learn some new information with a lot of repetition (what year it is, where I was going to school, the fact that I'd moved). Furthermore, there are some kinds of learning which don't depend upon short-term memory; someone with no short-term memory may not remember why he avoids the place where he burned his hand on a hot pan, or why he prefers to be around one person but not another... but he does. For a good demonstration of short-term-memory deficiency, see "Finding Nemo"; Dory is a remarkably good example. I even used the "P. Sherman, 42 Wallaby Way, Sydney" method (asking him to repeat it over and over) to get Andy to remember the name of the restaurant where we'd had dinner.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    16. Re:Smart is one thing... by Jackmn · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Of course, you need evidence to dismiss a claim.
      If the claims is unsubstantiated then you can safely dismiss it.

      The burden of proof lies with the individual making the claim. 'Prove me wrong' is not a valid substitute for evidence.

      It's unscientific thinking like yours
      Placing the burden of proof on the individual making the claim is scientific.
    17. Re:Smart is one thing... by bcattwoo · · Score: 4, Funny
      You seem to be awfully sure about what your fish are thinking.

      And easily persuaded, too. Badgered by some fish? My dog would make this guy his bitch and have him outside throwing the frisbee all day long.

    18. Re:Smart is one thing... by Sigl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey what's this...a glass wall?...I'm trapped!...AAHHHH!!...Hey what's this...a glass wall?...I'm trapped!...AAHHHH!!...Hey what's this...a glass wall?...I'm trapped!...AAHHHH!!...

    19. Re:Smart is one thing... by jack1323 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, back in the day, movies used to be reel.

    20. Re:Smart is one thing... by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Funny

      Congratulations: your hippocampus is intact; I probably told the same story the last time a discussion of memory and learning came up here.

      You're surprised by a dupe on Slashdot? :)

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    21. Re:Smart is one thing... by Lactoso · · Score: 5, Funny
      HA!! You've got to love the mod on the parent! Clearly shows that 4 times = funny. 5 times = too much.

      What were we talking about again?

    22. Re:Smart is one thing... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 3, Funny

      It seems that 3 times was funny, four times was 50% funny, and five times is redundant.

    23. Re:Smart is one thing... by adolfojp · · Score: 4, Funny

      doo...doo...doo... Hey! Where did that cool plastic castle come from?

    24. Re:Smart is one thing... by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes. That's called "classical conditioning". There's another type of conditioning, slightly more complicated but which many animals are recognised to learn, called "operant conditioning", in which the subject learns to do a behavior (perhaps in response to outside conditions) to improve their situation (for example, a dog that learns going to the back door and scratching will get it let outside).

      The big question in animal intelligence is, "Are any animals other than humans capable of more than operant conditioning?" Interestingly enough, among the best scorers, possibly better than the non-human primates, is Alex, an African Grey parrot. Alex can understand and accurately (80-90%) answer questions like "How many blue trucks" (in a set of mixed toys) without prior practice of a particular question, combining his understanding of the question "How many", the color "blue", and the object "truck". He can use numbers reasonably well on fixed quantities, but has trouble counting events. He also knows the concept of "zero". Still, some consider this just to be complex operant conditioning. BTW, I've read their methodology, and it seems quite sound. The person who determines what Alex says, for example, is unaware of what he's being asked)

      One big criticism of primate studies, as well, is that most primates either don't form languages in the wild, or form very simple languages. Deaf human children whose parents never teach them sign language will actually make up sign languages and do meta-discussion (conversing about their language using their language). Parrots will make up languages (wild parrot populations even tend to have regional dialects, while different areas have different "language families", with loanwords, just like in human linguistics), but their invented languages tend to be simpler than what they can be taught. Without rigid training, parrots will often display what one may consider "clever" conditioning (such as, if a person doesn't respond to their requests for attention, making the sound of a phone ringing to draw a person into the room), but still conditioning. Also, both in primates and parrots, there's relatively little meta-conversation; it's mostly requests, things with immediate purposes. Even young human children tend to converse about things that are not for a specific purpose frequently.

      Complicating studies of intelligence that rely on language is that it's not the only measure of intelligence. For example, corvines (crows, ravens, jays) are more adept toolmakers than psitticines (parrots) and even most primates. They both teach their children how to make/use tools and invent them on their own. Yet, they don't do nearly as well in language tests as psitticines. Are they more or less intelligent?

      Anyways, my main point is: this is a complex topic that scholars get into heated debates over, so lets not expect a resolution here. :)

      --
      Did you really name your son "Robert');DROP TABLE Students;--"?
  2. But who will rise up... by LuminaireX · · Score: 5, Funny

    And thank us for all the fish? Surely goldfish don't eat themselves.

  3. Goldfish smarter? by BigZaphod · · Score: 4, Funny

    I doubt it. I think this is just exactly what the dolphins want us to think. Perhaps they are hoping that we'll leave them alone if we think they're all idiots and they can get back to the heavy schedule of light swimming and intricate whistling they had planned.

    Well I'm on to you, dolphins! I'm putting the word out! I know you're smarter than goldfish and .. er.... wait.. a dolphin just called me and asked how long I could hold my breath. I think this worries me...

  4. The only thing smarter than a goldfish by puddpunk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is a person that can figure out how to train an animal with a 3 second attention span:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bt6K521o3Y

    1. Re:The only thing smarter than a goldfish by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 4, Funny

      What do you mean, magnets? Everyone knows gold's a non-ferrous metal.

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
  5. Smarter or more suicidal? by DoctaWatson · · Score: 5, Funny

    FTA: "If you don't put a lid on top of the bowl a goldfish it will eventually jump out to enlarge the environment it is living in,"

    Truly an astounding display of cognition.

  6. Douglas Adams will need to change the title to by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 4, Funny

    So long, and thanks for all the flakes

  7. Evolution says otherwise by aktzin · · Score: 4, Funny
    This is nonsense. The Onion, America's Finest News Source, clearly proved this claim is totally without merit in this informative scientific article:

    http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28315

    So as you can see, Douglas Adams was right all along!
    --
    Quantum mechanics: the dreams that stuff is made of.
  8. Bizzaro science by Kawolski · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "You put an animal in a box, even a lab rat or gerbil, and the first thing it wants to do is climb out of it. If you don't put a lid on top of the bowl a goldfish it will eventually jump out to enlarge the environment it is living in," he said. "But a dolphin will never do that. In the marine parks, the dividers to keep the dolphins apart are only a foot or two above the water between the different pools," he said. Manger says the thought to jump over would simply not cross their unsophisticated minds.

    So because the dolphin isn't brainless enough to jump out of its tank and beach itself and die in the process, that makes them stupid? I suppose by comparison the child that plays away from road isn't as smart as the kid that plays in traffic, you know, the one that's seeking to "enlarge his environment" by becoming road pizza.

    1. Re:Bizzaro science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sure, okay, maybe they don't comprehend the concept of going over something out of water. But consider that they probably have no space-escape instinct. In other words, dolphins have no reason to have developed claustraphbia, because it would be a very rare case indeed where getting stuck in a small space would even come up for a dolphin. They just plain don't run into closed spaces much. Considering this we realise they that probably concieve of space in a completly different way from how we do. I mean, they move in 3D, and rarely have any restrictions, but with constant forces pushing them one way or another. So I think this tell us alot about how dolphins conceive of the concept of free space, paths, and obstacles. It could be that the concept of being "blocked" from something isn't very inate. So they are bad at solving one type of problem but it doesn't tell us that they are "dumb" in any general sense.

      There is another issue at hand. Their brain is certainly different from ours, and they have followed a different evolutionary path, with a different set of problems. There is no telling what problems they might be GOOD at solving, evidence of one that they are bad at is not evidence that they are dumb. Consider many of the people in history who have been considered the most "intelligent". Many were schitzofrenic, which is fundamentally an inability to tell fact from fiction, and basically properly asses a situation in a rational way. The results of this can look extremly "stupid". Many have had social disorders as well, such that they did stupid things which caused them much pain in their lives... that's pretty "dumb". Still we consider them smart because they could solve problems no-one else could solve. There are many types of intelligence, and lack of one does not imply a low sum of them all.
      Basically, we think of intelligence as someone who can solve a problem we can't. Often this implies they can't solve some problems that we can. The differences between humans and dolphins are much larger than within our species, it seems likely that they are good at a fairly disparate class of problems from what we're good at. It has oft been speculated by AI theorists that problems we consider hard are actually fairly easy compared to the problems we consider easy. The one's we consider easy are just the one's evolution needed to get 99.9% right, I.E. walking, learning language, etc. Consider abstract algebra. There are only a few axioms, and that's all there is to learn. From then on it's just a few theorems. learning Abstract math is really quite simple compared to learning natural language, with it's thousands rules and idioms, we're just not wired for it.

  9. Having dived with dolphins in exotic places by ynotds · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am reminded of the counter argument which noted that the enlarged part observed in Einstein's brain was due to the extra glia cells needed to support the higher activity of the same number of neurons.

    I've also dived with many varieties of fish, but our interaction with dolphins off Tiputa Pass and Trousers Point (you can find both easily on Google) was qualitatively different from any with fish.

    It basically sounds like Japanese propaganda to me. Might be time to make that donation to Sea Shepherd.

    --
    -- Our systemic servants do not good masters make.
  10. Uhmm. serious article? by bm_luethke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not anything close to the people who think dolphins are really really intelligent (though Douglas Adams makes a pretty good case), but IRTFA and I can not see how this is a serious article.

    It ends: "Manger also points to the tuna industry, which under consumer pressure has gone to great lengths to prevent dolphins from being caught and killed by accident in nets.

    "If they were really intelligent, they would just jump over the net because it doesn't come out of the water," he said."

    Umm, yea, they would if they ware smart? *sigh* - how did this make *any* news at all. Even assuming that the gist of the article is true (about the different types of brain material) the rest is crap - was it "peer reviewed" (as the article points out) by other idiots? Maybe it is all a Rovian plot to discredit Aljazeera.net? I can not take the article and it's contents with any real sense of belief - it is so idiotic that I can not trust the rest of it. That's not to say they are incorrect - just that this individual article is is pure crap and one should not use it to base any belief on.

    --
    ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    1. Re:Uhmm. serious article? by shellbeach · · Score: 4, Informative
      I can not see how this is a serious article.

      Well, Paul Manger is a real scientist who's published 50 articles, most if not all in neuroscience areas, some with pretty high numbers of citations, and quite a few of those articles are on cetaceans. The article that the story is based upon was published in Biological Reviews, which has an impact factor of 6 - it's clearly not a tin-pot cruddy journal which publishes any old crap. (and while IFs aren't as good a guide to a journal's credibility as our esteemed granting bodies would like us to believe, they do give some measure of an article's worth)

      The news story, although bizarely linked to Aljazeera (!), is attributed to Reuters down the bottom. So it's not quite as "pure crap" as you might think - the odd comments about dolphins not jumping over nets are probably more a result of the journalist trying to make a snappy story out of it all, rather than being the sole basis of Paul Manger's research!
  11. Think I prefer dolphins by vinsci · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...and that's just a few of the top results from a quick Google search.
    --

    Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
    1. Re:Think I prefer dolphins by mano_k · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm quite sure goldfish would be equaly heroic, if they only got the opportunity!

  12. Bugs and rats smarter than people???? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I just spent about 10 minutes with a fly swat trying to kill **one** fucking fly that is buzzing around indoors. Does that make the fly smarter than me?

    A fly has pretty much a hard-wired brain, but it is highly effective at finding food and keeping it alive.

    Some while ago, some researchers managed to get a dish of 1500 (or 15000??) rat brain cells to fly a 747 simulator -- including handling complex actions like landing with wind shear. I bet it took less time to train the rat brain than it takes for a human to attend flight school. I guess a rat brain in a pilot's uniform doesn't pick up as much skirt though.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Bugs and rats smarter than people???? by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does that make the fly smarter than me?

      Who won?

      I guess a rat brain in a pilot's uniform doesn't pick up as much skirt though.

      No, but I'd hazard that a rat brain in a rat picks up a fair bit of tail.

      KFG

  13. Somebody has to say it by scarlac · · Score: 4, Funny

    I for one welcome our new Goldfish Overlords

  14. Goldfish Anomolies by umbrellasd · · Score: 4, Funny
    In a related story, goldfish have also been found to be smarter than the scientists that came up with this very inconclusive study.

    . o o O ( Where are all the giant-brained goldfish? )

  15. Fish are so passe... by null+etc. · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd take an octopus any day of the week! Not only are they excellent problem solvers, they give good massages.

  16. Gee, it's an organic Intel vs AMD comparison. by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can count the number of neurons vs glia all day long, but at the end of the day dolphins seem to have MUCH better results than goldfish. Just because a certain feature normally has a certain result doesn't mean you can rewrite reality when it doesn't!

    If the word "intelligence" was defined as a certain ratio of neurons to glia, he'd have a point. Of course, "intelligence" wouldn't matter so much, because it would only matter in certain situations. Much like "clock speed".

    I also don't see how the "jumping out of the bowl/over the net" even deserves a mention...unless we now have a way of interviewing dolphins and goldfish.

  17. Why not use fat by Alain+Williams · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It is surely much more energy efficient to surround the brain with a layer of fat/blubber and so retain the heat that the brain generates rather than have special cells to generate extra heat -- which is then lost.

    Nature (evolution) tends to take the most efficient solution -- natural selection will favour the animals that don't need to expend so much energy to achieve the same result.

  18. Sounds like nonsense by jopet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While it is obvious and quite dated knowledge that the sheer size of a brain is no indicator for "intelligence" (let us avoid the discussion what intelligence is in the first place for the moment), it is provably wrong that dolphins just do what they are "conditioned" to do. There have been many experiments that show that dolphins are capable to do a lot more than just demonstrate conditioned reflexes, including understand a several-word sign language and coming up with what could be called creative solutions.

    Nothing of that sort has been demonstrated for goldfish yet, but that does not mean it cannot be done, just that we simply do not know yet.

    It has been shown for other species that they show surprisingly intelligent behaviour when trained and it is probably impossible to defined what "more intelligent" should mean for non-humans (it is already quite arbitrarily defined for humans). So the bottom line is - more animals are more intelligent than most people think. And dolphins have shown a quite surprising range of abilities that was not observed in any other marine animal yet.

  19. Another successful disinformation campaign .. by cheros · · Score: 3, Funny

    #23: Delude humans. Check.

    You guys have obviously already forgotten about the mice then? :-)

    = Ch =

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  20. Furthermore by kripkenstein · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. Dolphins have a cognitive sense of self, as shown in their ability to recognize that they are seeing themselves in mirrors. This is an ability only found in dolphins and higher primates (including humans). This is related to their extremely complex social structures, which implies high intelligence. And this is just one area in which dolphins seem to show high intelligence.

    2. Glia are no longer considered 'noncomputational' by neuroscientists. Recent research seems to show that glia, and not just neurons, may perform computational tasks. This is highly controversial at present, but we are far from being able to say that just because an animal has lots of glia that that does not indicate a potential for high brain functions.

    1. Re:Furthermore by xigxag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Academic B.S. Every cat I've had has recognized itself in the mirror. I can make eye contact with my cat _in_the_mirror_ and have it turn and look me in the face.

      Your example doesn't constitute the proof you think it does. If you are staring at each other through a mirror, that means YOU recognize its mirror image, and in return it recognizes YOUR mirror image. It doesn't have to recognize its own mirror image to pass that test. In fact if you stand off to the side while staring at someone in the mirror, you'll notice that you don't even have to see your own image at all to stare at someone else.

      The issue is not whether cats can recognize the existence of other objects in a mirror. Clearly they can. The question is whether it can recognize that the cat-shaped object is itself, and use that information in some intelligent fashion.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
  21. What's your point? by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 4, Funny

    People dumber than fish have been known to become presidents....

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  22. What a crock by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Dolphins get trapped in nets because they can't detect them, not because they're too stupid to know what to do. Aside from the obvious fact, as someone else has already pointed out, that a goldfish that jumps out of it's bowl and dies isn't nessearily very smart, there are could also be complex psychological factors at play as to why dolphins might not attempt to escape.

    Dolphins are one of the few creatures that play games, such as playing tag with a peice of seaweed, or blowing bubble rings. This type of behaviour is often an indicator of high intelligence. To say that a Dolphin isn't much smarter than a Goldfish is an insult to both Dolphins and any human with half a brain to realise this article is a crock.

  23. I don't like this article by azbot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I disagree that jumping out of ones environment is a smart move, especially if you don't know what's on the other side. I disagree that dolphins are dumb because they get caught in nets because: a) how do you jump over a net if you find your self in the absolute center? b) maybe most do 'just jump over' and the ones caught are the dumb few. c) if a dolphin doesn't jump over a net it will become sushi, a dolphin probably doesn't know that it should jump over a net unless it knows it's dangerous, if a dolphin knows the net is dangerous - it's probably already been caught (see sushi statement). d) nets (i think) are designed to be fairly invisible, dolphins aren't known for having excellent eyesight and I don't know if their echo location is good enough to spot a net... Let's have a fish off and stick a dolphin and a goldfish in a tank and see who wins... actually to make it fair lets stick quite a few goldfish in there...

  24. The study author is not an animal behaviorologist by kitzilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Clearly it was a slow news weekend. This report got a ton of coverage, which seems unwarranted given some of the abitrary standards of "intelligence" put forward by the researchers. The Wikipedia article on dolphin intelligence provides a far better balanced view of the subject.

    I had a quick look at the University of the Witwatersrand website. Dr. Manger is a lecturer at the School of Anatomical Sciences. He is not an animal behaviorologist.

    While Dr. Manger is no doubt qualified to discuss the structure of a dolphin's brain, he is in no better qualified to draw conclusions about dolphin intelligence than any of us here on Slashdot. Perhaps this explains some of his eccentric statements, or why his opinions contrast so sharply with other research indicating a high level of social complexity in dolphin behavior.

    That Dr. Manger's study is "peer-reviewed" is really neither here or nor there, since peer review usually occurs within an author's specialty and Manger's most controversial findings transcend his field.

    Dr. Manger's comment that dolphins should be smart enough to jump out of tuna nets would seem simply bizzare if they weren't so outright callous.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  25. Another problem with this claim... by gilroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Glial cells apparently aren't really just placeholders and heaters. Scientific American ran a really good article a while back called "Did Scientists Miss Half the Brain?". (There is what appears to be a summary at this location.) It details a modern understanding of brain structure, which has overturned the former conception of glial cells as "just" structural elements supporting neurons. It would seem that glial cells can both sense and emit neurotransmitters, and those neurotransmitters can affect the operation of neurons. So linked to the electrochemical network we usually think of as the brain is another purely chemical one as well.

    Also, even in humans, there is a "superabundance" of glial cells, in that there are approximately 10 glial cells for every neuron.

  26. The really disturbing part... by perrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is really disturbing about this story is not how wrong it is, but how it spread like wildfire through the echo chamber that is the web pages of the "respectable" news media. There seems to be zero interest in vetting stories anymore. Anything that sounds like a sensation and be linked to some other news page somewhere, is worth publishing, without a critical word added.

    Back on topic, did you know that as far as we know, only three animals understand the concept of 'pointing at something'? These three are humans, chimpanzees and dolphins. Try it with your cat or dog. It will continue to look at your hand, not where you want it look, until the cows come home. Understanding symbols that stand for vectors in space require a greal deal of abstract thinking.

  27. Obligatory Simpsons quotation by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bart and Lisa are doing some recycling of those plastic ring things that hold six-packs of beer together.

    Lisa: And, you have to cut these up first. Otherwise, animals get caught in them.

    Bart: Only the stupid ones.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  28. But can a goldfish do this? by Phoenix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They have shown that dolphins have pattern recognition, the ability to learn and to anticipate the next part of a sequence. Dolphins have a language in which they commnicate with others of thier species. They have complex social structures. They can solve puzzles, they can be trained to do complex tasks.

    I'm not saying that they're as smart as me, but they are at least as smart as other higher order animals, and certainly smarter than my goldfish who keeps trying to commit suicide.

    --
    -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
  29. Reason behind dolphins swimming alongside boats by cciRRus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just to add on. I remember watching this in the Discovery Channel. Most people assumed that the dolphins are intelligent and friendly such that when boats sail in the ocean, they swim alongside the boat or even in front of the boat just to mingle with their human friends. However, this was not the *real* reason. Apparently, they noticed that there are a bunch of smaller, baby dolphins swimming in the opposite direction away from the boat, while those that mingle with the humans are the adult dolphins. This can be seen that the adults are distracting the humans while their youngs can swim off to a safer place. Such altruistic behaviour is hard to find in the aquatic world.

    --
    w00t
  30. Different environments by kahei · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Carp (eg goldfish) live in an environment in which jumping from one body of water to another offers a real chance of accessing a new environment, e.g. a new pond or stream. It also offers the ONLY chance of survival for carp trapped in small, evaporating puddles of water, which may well be how goldfish register their surroundings.

    By contrast, a dolphin has only a fairly low chance of being able to jump into a whole new ocean. A zero chance, in fact.

    Therefore, the tendency to jump may be more a reflection of the chance that jumping will do a given creature any good, rather than a sign of intelligence.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  31. And so are CNN and FOX. What's your point? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Insightful
    They are notorious propaganda-mongers with no validity as a real news source.

    You may as well post an article about how scientists have discovered life on the moon and use the Weekly World News as a source.


    CNN and FOX News are any better?

    Come on. ALL major news sources are propaganda outlets. That's how it works. The problem only arises when people think that their own country's news agency are above corruption.

    As for the article, I'm sure the guy interviewed really believes his studies. How does that reflect on Aljazeera? All they're doing is reporting on recent claims from academia. All newspapers report stupid science news. So what?


    -FL

  32. Re:Trolls by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just to clear things up, for the record:

    "Lesser women" is a contradiction in terms in this context: I'm a man. :)

    I can only take credit for being willing to stick with Andy after his stroke. It's a long and ugly story, but following an argument with his custodial parent several years ago, they won't let me see him. To avoid making the story even longer and uglier and dragging the rest of the family into it, I've chosen not to fight it. The "up" side of his memory loss is that he doesn't realize that I haven't been 'round to see him in a long time.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/