Slashdot Mirror


Weird Al Says 'Don't Download This Song'

Kazzahdrane writes "Known geek and comedy singer/songwriter Weird Al Yankovic has released the first song from his new album 'Straight Outta Lynwood' for free on his MySpace page. The track is entitled 'Don't Download This Song' and tells of the dangers of illegally downloading music from filesharing sites." His MySpace page is most excellent. "Hi. Al here. No, really, it's Al. Seriously. What, you don't believe me? Go ahead, check weirdal.com. Hit the MySpace link. See if it brings you right back to this page. Go ahead. I'll wait. See? It's really me. I should point out... this means that conversely, all those other people on MySpace who are claiming to be me or implying that they are me... are definitely NOT me. I'm sure they're very nice people... they're just not 'Weird Al' Yankovic. I assure you."

42 of 353 comments (clear)

  1. E-Card & Video by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative
    What a great song. My favorite lyric is:
    Don't download this song
    Even Lars Ulrich knows it's wrong
    Also mentionable is:
    Cause you start off stealing songs
    Then you're robbing liquor stores
    And selling crack and running over school kids with your car!
    You can send this song in an e-card at the URL of the song (which also hilariously allows you to download this song). You can also listen to it there for those of you who have a proxy blocking MySpace at work or where ever.

    I look forward to the music video that is supposed to air on Yahoo music at 10:00 PM Pacific Time tonight (August 22nd).

    Enjoy one of the last artists that is still concerned about his fans and music no matter how hilarious and campy it may be. He has the sense to realize that he's very well off compared to his fans and jokes about solid gold humvees and diamond studded pools.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:E-Card & Video by RonnyJ · · Score: 5, Informative
      You can send this song in an e-card at the URL of the song [dontdownloadthissong.com] (which also hilariously allows you to download this song).

      It's worth noting that it's also better to download the song from http://www.dontdownloadthissong.com/, as opposed to the MySpace linked to in the summary (where the MP3 is 96kbps/22khz, as opposed to 160kbps/44khz).

    2. Re:E-Card & Video by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 4, Funny

      Link to lossless torrent?

      --
      http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    3. Re:E-Card & Video by Shadyman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why, didn't you get the memo? More isn't always better.

      Ok, ok. I lied. It is.

    4. Re:E-Card & Video by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do we seriously care about the difference audio quality between 96 and 160 kbps versions of a Weird Al Yankovic song?! I'm envisioning someone huddled over the controls on their $70,000 147.1 X-TREME SURROUND(tm) system, manually adjusting over 600 level sliders until "Don't download this song" is played in such perfect harmony angels are envious of the orgasmic bliss they experience. Hopefully no one links to a 128 kbps version of "Amish Paradise" lest our heads exploded in fury.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    5. Re:E-Card & Video by damiam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Something is seriously wrong with your ears if you can't hear artifacts in 96kbps MP3. Sure, it's probably acceptable, but if you're actually gonna listen to it why not go for the better version?

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    6. Re:E-Card & Video by Mr2001 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, we do. There's a significant difference in quality between properly encoded 96 kbps and 160 kbps; you don't have to be an audiophile to hear it.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    7. Re:E-Card & Video by Surt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Where the heck did you get a 148 speaker setup for only $70K? Because I paid almost $200k but I'm not out of the remorse period yet, and I could still return it if I could get a better deal.

      Also, it's not all it's cracked up to be, because you'll find yourself replacing air filters like crazy to unclog all the angels that commit envy-suicide in your house when they see how much you are enjoying your sound system. I don't care how many fit on the head of a pin, it takes only a few trillion to completely block the airflow on a Filtrete.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    8. Re:E-Card & Video by strider44 · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Enjoy one of the last artists that is still concerned about his fans and music no matter how hilarious and campy it may be. He has the sense to realize that he's very well off compared to his fans and jokes about solid gold humvees and diamond studded pools.

      Is it ironic that the song makes me want to go out and buy his new record, giving Weird Al the money I think he deserves? I do believe it is!

    9. Re:E-Card & Video by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That much, at least, makes sense: Most people generally believe they deserve wealth, as a rationalization for wanting it. If they don't have it, the rationalization goes "The rich assholes have all the money, and Bush is an idiot, or the economy sucks for Reason X, and so I don't have the money I should." The wealthy rationalize it like this: "Well, that wasn't so hard. Any idiot can be wealthy if they really try, after all, I did it -- which must mean any cretin who isn't wealthy is a lazy bum who doesn't deserve wealth."

      And me? Technology is the only expensive hobby I have. If I suddenly had a fortune, I'd probably still eat ramen, and I'd probably wear the same clothes, live in about the same amount of space, ride a bicycle in a small town or own a sensible car, and so on. I'm told all of this is rare.

      Basically, if I was paid more per hour, then past a certain point, I'd simply work fewer hours.

      I don't understand the point of working long hours at a high-paying job to support a family you rarely see living in an awesome house you're barely in except to sleep and a cool car you drive to and from work in.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    10. Re:E-Card & Video by DuckDodgers · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know the comment was made as a joke, but in all seriousness Weird Al is a decent musician.

      The lyrics often sound like they came from a couple of bored teenagers, but his music has a wide variety including a lot of original songs that are not simply knockoffs of a specific song. Since You've Been Gone is an original in a barbershop quartet style. Swap a few lyrics, and Germs could seamlessly fit into a Nine Inch Nails album. Hardware Store is a brilliant rock and ska parody with a four part harmony I've wasted an embarassing amount of time listening to.
      Good Old Days easy listening.
      One More Minute 60s music.
      Nature Trail to Hell metal.
      Trigger Happy Beach Boys.
      You Don't Love Me Anymore soft rock/ love songs.
      And of course, an impressive collection of Polkas. Why not enjoy it all with a good sound system?

    11. Re:E-Card & Video by rolandog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps we could call them Independent... or 'Indie' for short.

    12. Re:E-Card & Video by orangesquid · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bought it with that 2000" TV. It was a double-package. ;)

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    13. Re:E-Card & Video by Sj0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I want Wierd Al's vocal chords in a tupperware container!

      --
      It's been a long time.
    14. Re:E-Card & Video by Sj0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No evidence indicates that great artists are EVER healthy and alert while making their best works.

      For example, I point you to Saint Anger by Metallica; their "Ok, we're getting old and gave up drinking and drugs" album.

      If there was ever a reason to support music sharing, it's the 25 bucks I wasted on that terrible album.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  2. Speaking of Weird Al by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder if SCO has licensed his "Dare To Be Stupid" song yet?

    1. Re:Speaking of Weird Al by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      I wonder if SCO has licensed his "Dare To Be Stupid" song yet?


      What do you mean his song? We're talking about SCO here. The real question is "Has Weird Al paid the license fee SCO demanded for his use of their song?"

  3. Ascii illustration by Bobdoer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Joke:   ->
    You:     O
            /|\
            / \

  4. And in other news... by PixieDust · · Score: 4, Funny

    The RIAA begins researching ways to silence this insolent artist who seems hellbent on allowing people to access music (even if it IS his music) for free. They've been cheated out of their share. The following were just decided on by the super secret RIAA meeting on financial vengeance. Step 1. Get Angry Step 2. Talk about how you're cheated. Step 3. Sue Wierd Al and anyone who downloads the song (it says explicitly do NOT download the song,. it's in the title!) Step 4. ???? Step 5. Profit!

  5. Weird Al vs MC Lars by therpham · · Score: 5, Funny

    Weird Al and MC Lars should have a rap battle about music piracy. They'd sell millions of records. Or have millions of downloads. Or soemthing.

    1. Re:Weird Al vs MC Lars by Shads · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Lars... yah, what an asshat. I used to be a big metalica fan, then the whole mess with napster and live recordings and etc... I lost all respect for them as a band, they're trying to get rid of everything that initially 'made' them as a band. F'that.

      Napster BAD! (as if you haven't seen it)

      I can understand that artists want to get the money for the work they're doing... I respect that. Hell, I've even mailed artists money in the mail when I've downloaded songs I really liked (prior to itunes mostly) and I've had some good responses back from them doing that and some interesting t-shirts and signed stuff too I might add. Shrug, the whole drm, screw our fans, etc... it just gets on my nerves.

      In the end the fans aren't the only ones hurt the bands are too.

      --
      Shadus
  6. Re:No problem by Charcharodon · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I will down load it twice, just to show you.

    Really if you don't like Weird Al then you must have been unloved as a child.

  7. Keanu? Is that you? by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    His MySpace page is most excellent.

    Was this summary written by Keanu Reeves?

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  8. Re:No problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pfft, yeah. He only has 6 platinum records, and 3 gold. You told him!

  9. Another free song by RyoShin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Looks like his actual site server is getting trashed, but the last time I was there you could download another song, "You're Pitiful".

    It's pretty app when thinking about the steretypical Slashdot person. :o

    From what I can remember, he put it online because some copyright/trademark thing kept him from using it on the next album. Not sure what it was, though. It looks like you can at least listen to it on his MySpace page.

    One thing I love about Weird Al's songs is that he does his research. In the song from this "article", he mentions such things as Kazaa. In "All about the Pentiums", he throws out a lot of technical terms.

    Weird Al is one of my favorite people ever. He's pretty good to his fans, he fights the true fight, and is hilarious to boot. I can't wait for this next album.

    1. Re:Another free song by RonnyJ · · Score: 5, Informative
      There's an overview of what happened over 'You're Pitiful' here.

      Basically, James Blunt approved the parody, so Weird Al went ahead and did the track, but then James Blunt's record label objected - so Weird Al released it for free on his website.

      "I have a long-standing history of respecting artists' wishes," Yankovic writes. "So if James Blunt himself were objecting, I wouldn't even offer my parody for free on my Web site. But since it's a bunch of suits -- who are actually going against their own artist's wishes -- I have absolutely no problem with it."

    2. Re:Another free song by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh my gods! Making people buy the album by actually MAKING IT WORTH BUYING instead of at RIAA gunpoint?!

      Who the hell is the label behind this?

    3. Re:Another free song by bigbigbison · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    4. Re:Another free song by braque · · Score: 4, Funny
      One thing I love about Weird Al's songs is that he does his research. In the song from this "article", he mentions such things as Kazaa. In "All about the Pentiums", he throws out a lot of technical terms.
      But that's of course because Weird Al is Larry Wall!
  10. Pfft by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Weird Al doesn't tag his MP3s when he rips them. For shame.

  11. A link to MySpace... hmm... by ewl1217 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somebody please tell me that got Slashdotted...

    1. Re:A link to MySpace... hmm... by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sooo... If someone were to link to Slashdot from Myspace.... Slashdot might get Myspaced? That would be an act of humiliation. I don't know what I would do a that point.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  12. Re:I bought his last album by pezpunk · · Score: 5, Informative

    like the other commenters, i too had no trouble with Poodle Hat.

    in addition, as for Al's supposed anti-downloading stance, it should be mentioned that he is in a somewhat unique position: literally hundreds of songs that AREN'T his are constantly attributed to him on file sharing systems, just because they're (ostensibly) "funny". Al maintains a relatively innocent, upbeat personna, but many of the songs misattributed to him are stupid, mean spirited, or far raunchier than anything Al would want to be associated with. it's a significant problem for the guy that goes much deeper than simple lost royalties.

    that said, every time i've heard him asked about file sharing, that is how he has framed his response. he doesn't want people to think he wrote "smoke a bowla"

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
  13. Re:Best commentary on downloading since Tapster by Megane · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Crap. I hit submit by accident.

    Back in 2000, Spinal Tap (sorry, I don't have a n-umlaut key on my keyboard) borrowed the domain tapster.com from some sort of brewery interest web site to put up a parody of Napster. Contrary to Nigel's comment, they actually had a lot of songs up there, mostly Spinal Tap, but they did have at least one "mislabeled" song, which was Zappa's "I am the Slime".

    But the Tapster curse lives on, and even the "orignal" tapster.com is no more.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  14. Re:I bought his last album by RonnyJ · · Score: 4, Informative
    I'm just wondering where you got this previous 'anti-download' stance of his from? Weird Al does an 'Ask Al' page and here's a quote from 2000 (it's on his website, but it's down at the moment so I can't link):

    I have very mixed feelings about [Napster]. On one hand, I'm concerned that the rampant downloading of my copyright-protected material over the Internet is severely eating into my album sales and having a decidedly adverse effect on my career. On the other hand, I can get all the Metallica songs I want for FREE! WOW!!!!!

    He's previously said that his biggest problem with internet downloading is that many files on the internet are incorrectly labelled with him as the artist, some of these being much more offensive than his actual material.

  15. Re:Blackened by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 4, Informative

    Try turning off your flashblocker -- it's played as a flash file, with the actual mp3 being available at http://www.dontdownloadthissong.com/tracks/DDTS.mp 3

  16. Speaking of myspace by hmccabe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since we're already spending so much time here and acting like junior high kids, I want myspace style slashdot profiles. Imagine what this would do to the community. When you read a post and think to yourself "Overweight, Undersexed Wow junkie" you can click the link and see their photos to confirm your suspicions. Plus, think of the fun we'd all have writing the CSS code to design our pages. Instead of harping on people for their grammar, we could point out how their profile page isn't XHTML compliant.

    Taco would be everybody's friend by default, but if you're friends with the real CowboyNeal (or a girl) you would totally put that in your top eight.

    Our mail system would be IMAP though

  17. Direct Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  18. OMFG - the label! by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Weird Al is distributed under a faux independent label, Volcano Records, which is owned by Sony BMG, who brought us intrusive DRM and is a proud part of the RIAA intellectual "property" lawsuit cartel. Now I have to get a new goddamned movement for my irony meter!

    --
    I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    1. Re:OMFG - the label! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Weird Al is distributed under a faux independent label, Volcano Records, which is owned by Sony BMG, who brought us intrusive DRM and is a proud part of the RIAA intellectual "property" lawsuit cartel. Now I have to get a new goddamned movement for my irony meter!

      Weird Al was originally on a very obscure indie label called "Scotti Brothers." Its name was changed to "Volcano" when another label bought them out, then that label was co-opted by Sony BMG. So yes, he is distributed by Sony, but it's not exactly a diabolical plan on Weird Al's part. Actually I have friends who were in another band on the "Scotti Brothers" label, and found themselves in effect Sony artists. Which is not a good thing, because Sony won't honor the Scotti Bros. terms or release them from the contract-- so their first few CDs are basically buried forever.

      This actually happens quite a bit with Indie bands, they sign contracts with small labels (which are usually somewhat vague, as neither have access to top-notch entertainment lawyers) and the labels are bought out by the majors-- and the bands find themselves having to deal with exactly the people they were trying to avoid.

  19. Better call Alanis. by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The (semi-ironic) twist here?

    The album, according to Amazon, is being released as a DualDisc, and that means that some computers and players won't be able to handle the album. Of three computers in my dorm room last year, none of them could play the newest Springsteen album.

    Because of the format choice, there might be some people that don't have any choice but to download the song, either legally (assuming iTunes sells it like they do some of his other albums) or through other means.

    --
    Goo goo g'joob.
  20. Argh! A Geek tragedy, complete with DeusExMachina. by Workaphobia · · Score: 5, Funny

    Our story begins with a skim over the day's Slashdot headlines. The regulars are all present: Government X adopts OSS/ODF, Mr. Nobody gives a loose overview of security problem Y, and SCO does transparently underhanded deed Z. Yet one topic in particular grabs my attention...

    Being a Weird Al fan, and well-aware of the problems he has collecting from his label, my mind registers the topic both as a must-Read-More and as another chapter to take note of in the long saga of digital music rights. With significant anticipation, I add it to my other fifteen or so open tabs and proceed to work my way through my article reading queue.

    I (grudgingly) visit myspace, but something's amiss. There is no download link! Nothing in the navigation menu, the news posts, or the comments make mention of where I can obtain the song, yet visitors proceed to comment on how much they enjoyed it. Looking for an alternate link, I return to Slashdot, only to find more reactions without mention of any download difficulties. And so I begin to worry irrationally: "I'm the only one in the world who can't listen to Weird Al!" I've had usability issues with myspace before, but normally after a minute or so of misguided clicking I'm able to stumble upon something that hints at actual content. I try two other domains, weirdal.com and dontdownloadthissong.com, only to find the former hopelessly slashdotted and the latter unusable. My frustration continues to build.

    I reflect that perhaps it is a browser compatability issue - I am using Konqueror after all - and try my luck with firefox. After configuring it to *not* attempt DNS queries over IPv6, that I might reach the content I so desperately seek this century, I find that myspace persists to mock me. It is as if some divine administrative force knows my IP address and has modified the web server specifically to torment me.

    I search for torrent files - first through links from kind slashdotters looking to boost their karma, and when that fails, via KTorrent's integrated search plugin. Bittorrent.com? No matches. Isohunt.com? Nada. Mininova? Bytenova? Torrentspy?! My heart races as I continue to exhaust the list of built-in known search engines, until... Aha! The Pirate Bay has found one match, uploaded a mere twenty-two minutes ago.

    But to use a torrent from the most infamous peer-to-peer site in existence, what would that make me? Is the torrent legal? Just because Weird Al chooses to distribute it on his webpage doesn't mean he releases that right to others. I'm sure under these circumstances he couldn't possibly mind, but not having heard of the song's existence prior to reading Slashdot, I simply do not know the record label's stance on the matter, or whether they even have partial rights over this particular mp3. But it does not matter - I must have the song!

    The irony - that I am bittorrenting a free-as-in-beer song that possesses a satirical name mocking filesharing litigation, and am potentially committing a copyright violation in the process - is not lost on me. My idealistic side taunts the RIAA, "I just DARE you to try to sue me over this, my only infringement!" My pessimistically pragmatic side notes that the unusual circumstances would make no difference, as I would be forced to settle, and never see my day in court anyway.

    I emerge from my digression to the present.
    No peers or seeders. For the moment, the music industry and other enemies of Peer-to-Peer breathe a sigh of relief.

    Then it occurs to me that the song might be unreachable to those who have not installed the dreaded Flash Plugin. But why? A slashdot commenter mentions that the song is indeed in the mp3 format, so it is not as if my lack of such a player could possibly prevent me from obtaining this song. For what kind of sick madman would consign a publically-downloadable mp3 to the clutches of a proprietary system and that system alone?

    As a rule, I have abstained from using Flash on my desktop's Gentoo installation. This self-denial is due to a combination of fac

    --
    Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.