Slashdot Mirror


No 3rd Party Online Support for Wii Until Next Year?

Via Joystiq, a preview for Tony Hawk's Downhill Jam at IGN. Such a thing isn't really news, of course, but down at the bottom of the article there is some distressing information. According to IGN, third party online support for the Wii will have to wait until next year. Joystiq points out that this could mean launch titles like Monkey Ball, Blazing Angels, and Call of Duty 3 may be offline-only.

85 comments

  1. Re:That's okay. by hansamurai · · Score: 1

    Good thing we'll have Friend Codes to keep our online experience pollution-free.

  2. IGN's accuracy by chrismcdirty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IGN also reported that the release date and price would be revealed at the Leipzeig Games Convention. They also throw so much hype into untrue stories, I'd take this story with a grain of salt until it is confirmed by multiple sources.

    --
    It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    1. Re:IGN's accuracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can't spell ignorance without IGN!

    2. Re:IGN's accuracy by goodenoughnickname · · Score: 1

      People have already updated Wikipedia pages with this "fact", linking to the IGN page for reference. One section about expected launch titles already states that "None of the launch titles will have online play."

      Personally, I can't see this happening. With their experience with the DS, Nintendo should be prepared for online games, and with their experience with third party developers (Vicarious Visions, Taito), Nintendo should be prepared to get third-party games online. Can they get away with split-screen CoD3? I thought we were beyond the days of GoldenEye.

      That said, regardless, it will still be FUN, it just means that I have to clean up my dirty underwear when I invite friends over to play.

    3. Re:IGN's accuracy by famikon · · Score: 1

      I no longer take anything IGN says to heart. Especially if its about the Wii. They've been tossing out some retarded unconfirmed news this year.

  3. I don't care by dalmiroy2k · · Score: 1

    I won't be able to get it before 2007 anyway. Demand will be huge and even people who lives in USA and preorder it may not get it before Christmas (Remember Xbox 360, that cost twice as much).
    On the other hand, Wiimote's innovative gameplay and the training complex games will demand may be enough for you to ignore online playing, at least for a few months.

    1. Re:I don't care by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't go making assumptions until we know the release date, and see how well Nintendo can perform. With the low (relative) cost of the Wii, Nintendo can make many more of them - and so should be able to get many more Wii's than PS3s into stores. I wouldn't be surprised if the Wii is only the only "next-gen" console that consumers can just walk in and buy off the shelf come mid-December.

    2. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, they announced that they'd have shipped 6 millions Wii by the end of the year


      Hoping that they won't be late, that's a lot of Wiis. In fact, that's more Wii shipped between October and December (no, no one knows when they'll ship yet, but it's likely to be between mid october and mid november if they don't get late and decide to ship next year) that the number of Xbox360 sold between it's launch and today.

    3. Re:I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's the end of the fiscal year, when ends in march.
      6 million units by end of march is what PS3 promises as well.

  4. Re:That's okay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's pretty much idiotic, no one cares about what EA will do, but this means that launch lineup third party titles such as Rayman 4, Super Monkey Ball or BWii, which could provide awesome online fun, may (note that this is still a rumor) not be playable online ever. Would suck. I'd still buy the Wii, but it would still suck.

  5. Re:That's okay. by RoadDoggFL · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nintendo's just in no rush to take a bite of the shit sandwich MySpace has been eating recently thanks to pedophiles and the like. If they end up catching flak for their online system, it might as well be through their own actions rather than those of a third party. And hell, they're probably just taking some time to define what guidelines they'll give third parties when designing the online component of their games.

    Yea, it sucks. There should at least be LAN play on all of these games, but if Nintendo feels comfortable giving this fight up for more security then more power to them. Too bad nobody can just get this console thing right.

    --
    "This is considered plagiarism."
  6. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1, Insightful

    According to your logic, we shouldn't expect an Xbox to "deliver something like Xbox Live" either...

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  7. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by neo8750 · · Score: 1
    You can't expect it to deliver something like Xbox Live at $200. It's a fun little console, designed for simple gameplay. It's not meant for those looking for all the perks of a more sophisticated system.

    Wow and here i was thinking that Nintendo may just be making a console that the average joe can buy and not have to wait 2-3 years for it to drop to a price he can afford.

  8. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True That! The DS is like $150 and it can't go online to play!


    Wait... it can... and even my fucking phone, my 6 years old DreamCast or my 7 years old P-fucking-500 piece of crap can use online service.


    Online is for "sophisticated system"? I don't know what the hell you're smoking, dude, but I'd sure like some.

  9. Audience by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think people overestimate how many people take advantage of online services to begin with. How many of the million Xbox live users are only there because they got it for free and are no longer active once they have to pay? And, having to wait until next year? That's what, four months away at this point with the console's release date not even announced yet? So you might have to wait 2 whole months for third party online games and that's supposed to be a deal breaker? No, a $600 price tag on a console not in production with only marginally better graphics for the next year or two is a deal breaker, this is not.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Audience by pl1ght · · Score: 1

      This generations success will be built upon a good online foundation. Just look at the Xbox 360, its online has been successful beyond imagination. This is definitely not positive news for Nintendo any way you try to put it.

    2. Re:Audience by brkello · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wow. Something that could be perceived to be negative about the Wii is reported and the highly moderated posts are the ones who rush to defend their actions. Not a surprise but it still bugs the living heck out of me. What this is saying is that third party launch titles will not be online. Yeah, games in the future will have it...but still it sucks that the Wii will be limited for those initial games.

      Listen, companies you love can do bad things. Companies you hate can do good things. If what IGN is reporting is true (big if), then this is a dumb move by Nintendo. The only good thing you can say about it is that at least it isn't something they plan to be permanent.

      As far as the whole "myspace" comment goes...saying that Nintendo is doing this to avoid pedophiles...give me a break. If there is a post in here where the government is trying to protect children from adult content, everyone runs around in circles screaming how terrible that is and how parents should be responsible (and I agree). But as soon as Nintendo does it, it is a good thing? I don't think so. I sincerely hope they don't force a similar "friend code" system on the Wii. It just makes it a pain in the butt to maintain friends and set up games.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    3. Re:Audience by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      PErspective does not equal defense. I'm not saying that Nintendo is doing the right, I'm saying that the negatives of no 3rd party support till early next year is are overblown. My basic point is that the Online gaming crowd is overrepresented online: as shocking as that may be. Xbox Live is great and doing well... but the Xbox 360 has yet to sell up to the levels it was projected to. Sony went from the wonderkid of NexGens in a heart beat over price. Nintendo has not only stated that they are targetting a different audience than MS and Sony, but but their actions have followed it up. So if the MS and Sony audience are all flustered by this, then maybe, just maybe, since they aren't the target audience anway, this will not be as bad as people would have it be.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    4. Re:Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, to pick a Nintendo counter-example, didn't ~50% of people who bought MarioKart DS play it online? I sure did... though I actually quit after 15 or so games because I don't feel like playing people who snake. That might might be what most people did too, but it shows people are at least interested in online.

    5. Re:Audience by NereusRen · · Score: 1
      If there is a post in here where the government is trying to protect children from adult content, everyone runs around in circles screaming how terrible that is and how parents should be responsible (and I agree). But as soon as Nintendo does it, it is a good thing? I don't think so.

      It really didn't cross your mind that there's a meaningful distinction?

      Government: I must pay for their censorship. I have no choice about whether I am affected by it: It applies to my actions taken with my (and others') private property.
      Private Company: I choose whether to pay fo their censorship. I choose whether I am affected by it: It only applies on Nintendo's property (network).

      No cognitive dissonance required. It is possible to disagree with the government forcing something, even if you think the end result is good for the typical person. For example: I think it is immoral to force someone to wear a seatbelt, so I disagree with seatbelt laws. I also think it is idiotic for anyone to not wear a seatbelt, and I express that opinion to anyone who rides in my car and doesn't buckle up. If a private bus company required passengers to use a seatbelt as a condition of riding, I would have no objection, because the bus is private property and I don't have to pay for it if I don't use it.
    6. Re:Audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Governments aren't monopolies. If you seriously dislike something you can emigrate (unless it's the emigration procedure you have a problem with, of course :)

  10. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by kryogen1x · · Score: 3, Informative

    It has nothing to do with the hardware, if you RTFA. It says that the online libraries aren't being made available to 3rd party developers.

  11. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by p0tat03 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nintendo fanboys can have it both ways: First it's "Wii is innovative, online is free, and cheap for developers!". After this much hype and justification of the Wii with online being a major bullet point, you can't turn around and claim that, because of the price point, lack of multiplayer (for 3rd parties) is somehow justifiable.

  12. Re:That's okay. by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 2, Funny

    And making sure we can't talk to anyone we don't already know.

    Wait....isn't that how you make friends irl?

  13. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So the DS at $130 does not have online play?

  14. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by Leffe · · Score: 1

    It could indeed have something to do with hardware -- the servers used for online play. Perhaps Nintendo needs some time to test and expand them before letting other developers do whatever they like.

    (Assuming there is some kind of master server.)

  15. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by anti-human+1 · · Score: 0

    Sure its a $200 system, but Nintendo won't be selling them at a loss, unlike their competition. Microsoft sunk a huge chunk of money to launch the Xboxen, and I'd bet the 360 still sells at a loss.

    Maybe I'm missing your point. Do you mean that a $200 console can't run a lobby + marketplace like XBL due to technical issues? If the original Xbox could do Xbox live, then the Wii can.

    Your argument about (as I interpreted) having to shell out more money to get an advanced machine with features like XBL is terrible. Multiplayer lobby services and online marketplaces don't require sophisticated hardware. They only require forethought in design and reliable functionality to be successful. If Nintendo is making money selling the console as well as the usual games and peripherals, what would motivate them to look away from a competent online component?

  16. Re:That's okay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'IRL', you also get to SEE what they look like (and verify that your new 12 year old best friend is indeed a 12 year old, etc).

    Bit different. Nice try though, thanks for playing.

  17. Re:That's okay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Straight from Nintendo BWii will have online multiplayer; this means either it is not a launch title or IGN is full of crap (I think both are plausable).

  18. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by hal2814 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't see how it can't be justifiable. X-Box live didn't launch with the X-Box but Microsoft kept plugging it as a major selling point. The 360 is gung ho HD-DVD even though it's not being offered right now and it made a big deal out its backwards compatibility that is still a work in progress. And one day, you'll be able to turn your Colecovision into a computer with a keyboard module. Ok, maybe the last one was a stretch but they were telling us that at launch and it did help sell units. Not every piece of hardware or piece of functionality in general is available at launch.

  19. Ok by Kelbear · · Score: 1

    This is bad news, no need for any commenters to try to spin it. I'm still going to buy a Wii.

    There's no reason to expect the Wii to be perfect. I hope this information is false. But if not, I'll just deal with it.

  20. um after the wii is released its only 2 months to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    new year...

    who cares, gives the 3rd party more time to hammer out bugs.... and zelda/mario will hold the masses for that little gap.

  21. More like underestimated by the+computer+guy+nex · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Xbox Live downloads have exceeded iTunes downloads. I have a 360, and the only game I have that I don't play online is Oblivion.

    1. Re:More like underestimated by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      Xbox Live downloads have exceeded iTunes downloads

      Really? Around E3 Xbox Live announced they had surpassed 24 million downloads. This came several months after someone one the iTunes 1 billionth download content. 24 million is certainly a lot, but it is still 1/40 of iTunes.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  22. Re:um after the wii is released its only 2 months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mario won't as it won't be part of the launch lineup (assuming you're talking about Mario Galaxy).


    And I think Metroid Prime 3: Corruption has been demoted from launch lineup as well.


    I'll still get Zelda, Rayman Raving Rabbids, and probably Wii Sports, Super Monkey Ball and BWii (Batallion War II, I don't know if it'll be part of the launch lineup though).

  23. Distressing? by sycomonkey · · Score: 1

    Why is it distressing? The Gamecube managed quite well without any online to speak of, and it didn't have the luxery of Sony constantly shooting itself in the foot.

    --
    --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
    1. Re:Distressing? by grumbel · · Score: 1
      Why is it distressing? The Gamecube managed quite well without any online to speak of, and it didn't have the luxery of Sony constantly shooting itself in the foot.

      Well, third place in a race of three, not very exciting. The reason why no Third Party online is important, is because it shows that Nintendo still has a problem with Third Party developers and in the end that is the only thing that will decide if a console is successfull or not. Nintendo can do the greatest Marios and Zeldas of all times, but unless there is also a GTA and a MetalGear it simply won't matter.

  24. Re:That's okay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I can't meet people over Wii, because Nintendo needs to protect children with irresponsible parents?

  25. So long as it's available when Spore is out by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    So long as the Wii has Net capability by the time that Spore comes out, I'll be happy.

    I've got a cable modem and a b/g wireless base station and I'm dying to put those to the test ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  26. Re:That's okay. by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Good thing we'll have Friend Codes to keep our online experience pollution-free.

    I agree. I got tired of playing Diablo II when all the spam bots and gold miners and cursing teens started showing up.

    I kept having to use my Mute capability way too often.

    It's part of why I'm not that interested in WoW. But I'm looking forward to Animal Crossing and Spore on the Wii, and the ability to talk and share with real friends I know, not total strangers who cuss at the drop of a shovel.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  27. Re:That's okay. by oberondarksoul · · Score: 1

    LAN play may well be a possibility. Mario Kart: Double Dash was one of the few GameCube games that supported the Broadband adaptor, but not for net play - just for LANs. Since it's already been implemented by Nintendo before, it could well end up as an option in the Wii.

    --
    And tomorrow the stock exchange will be the human race
  28. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by elrous0 · · Score: 0, Troll
    Hey, why the Hell did I get modded Flamebait?!?! I was making a serious point. A $200 console is a great bargain in a world of $400+ consoles. Why should people bitch when they don't get all the same perks (HDTV/Online) right away?

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  29. Non-issue by 7Prime · · Score: 1
    Folks, this is really a non issue, for a number of reasons:
    1. Nintendo's primary hits are always first party, especially at launch... especially at THIS launch. Zelda, Metroid, Red Steel, Wii Sports, Excite Truck, all first party. The first party list makes up a good 98% of the games sold at or around launch. Some of these games (Zelda), won't offer online play, because they're not the kind of game that would in the first place. 2% of sold titles not offering online play at launch is nothing to get worked up about.
    2. PS2 had, what, 4 online games in its entire lifespan... only one of those (FF11) being anything close to a hit, and the system still cleanly won the last generation of console wars. This isn't going to change overnight, come some day in October.
    3. Consoles + Online is a PROCESS, as my boss commonly says, "evolution, not revolution," its going to take time and a shift in priorities (among consumers) for online play to become a major bullet point.
    4. The demographic that has commonly played Nintendo systems is not typically one that's too keen on online play. Nintendo has been trying to change that, with the DS, but the consumer market, itself, has been resisting this. So many DS games have online play, some even have pretty good online play... yet the DS mainly sells for its single-player value. The Wii will as well, online play will be just an additional feature.
    I, for one, am hoping for as LITTLE online emphasis as possible. I've seen way too many games (Metroid Prime 2, Metroid Prime Hunters) crippled by a drive for them to have multiplayer or online play, with not enough emphasis on single-player fun. Single-player is the meat of the console gaming market, followed by party-style play. I hope that online play never takes hold in the console market, because it tends to do more harm then good to single-player efforts. Unfortunately, it seems that online play is here to stay. I just hope that game manufacturers don't feel pressured into doing online play when it's not in their original adjenda.
    --
    Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    1. Re:Non-issue by CronoCloud · · Score: 1
      PS2 had, what, 4 online games in its entire lifespan... only one of those (FF11) being anything close to a hit,


      Someone apparently hasn't been paying attention.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PlayStation_2 _network_games

      Of all the PS2 online games, FFXI was not really considered a hit. The real hits were the SOCOM games (three of them) , or perhaps Star Wars Battlefront games (theres two of them)

    2. Re:Non-issue by Manmademan · · Score: 1
      # PS2 had, what, 4 online games in its entire lifespan... only one of those (FF11) being anything close to a hit..

      Only 4 titles? Ps2 online is bigger than you think. SOCOM 1, 2, or 3 ring any bells? That series is huge. Other titles off the top of my head- Everquest Online Adventures, Monster Hunter, Metal Gear Solid 3: Subsistence, Frequency, Amplitude, Splinter Cell 2 and 3, Killzone, Madden NFL 2003,2004,2005,2006 (This is a BIG deal, as the Ps2 was the only way to get online with madden for several years) Resident Evil Outbreak 1 and 2; Ratchet and Clank: up your Arsenal; Ratchet: Deadlocked...and I'm sure there's a LOT more that I didn't think of, and ALL of those sans everquest were free to play.

    3. Re:Non-issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nintendo's primary hits are always first party, especially at launch...

      Which led to the GameCube being dead last in the current/previous generation, passed even by the Xbox (21M versus 24M)

      especially at THIS launch. Zelda, Metroid, Red Steel, Wii Sports, Excite Truck, all first party.

      Duh... Metroid is not part of the launch lineup anymore, and Red Steel is not first-party (unless Ubi Soft's been bought by Nintendo without me knowing about it).

      On the other hand, there will actually be quite a lot of third party titles at or near launch, some of them quite strong (Ubi Soft will launch 7 games at or near launch, including Rayman 4: Raving Rabbids, and EA will also have some games in the launch lineup... even though i'm not sure the latter is a good thing)

      The first party list makes up a good 98% of the games sold at or around launch. Some of these games (Zelda), won't offer online play, because they're not the kind of game that would in the first place. 2% of sold titles not offering online play at launch is nothing to get worked up about.

      Made up, as I said there will be many third part titles for the Wii (at least from 2 or 3 companies), and them not having online abilities at all would utterly suck.

      Nintendo has been trying to change that, with the DS

      No they've not, the first online DS game was Mario Kart DS, released 12 months after the DS fat... They've added online abilities for those who want, and included them in most of their multiplayable games, but they've not been trying to push it a lot (see the friend-code required architecture instead of free for all centralized service type)

    4. Re:Non-issue by 7Prime · · Score: 1
      Duh... Metroid is not part of the launch lineup anymore

      You make some good points, but this is wrong. Metroid is still in the launch day lineup, unless something's changed in the last 24 hours since I last checked.

      When I said 2% of all games sold... I meant that, not 2% of all titles. Obviously, more than 2/3rds of the games released at launch are 3rd party. But a huge majority of the sales will be for Zelda, Metroid, Wii Sports, and Mario Galaxy (I know, not a launch DAY title, but still within the launch window). But I am mistaken, Red Steel is NOT 1st party, so that percentage does change a bit. I'll still stick with that at least 80% of all the games sold within the first few months after launch will be those first party titles.

      Oh, and the first Nintendo DS online game was Animal Crossing, NOT MarioKart, and still, a fairly early release, not a year.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    5. Re:Non-issue by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Actually the friends codes are not required in mario kart DS....

  30. Irresponsible parents vote. by tepples · · Score: 1
    So I can't meet people over Wii, because Nintendo needs to protect children with irresponsible parents?

    Parents, including irresponsible parents, buy consoles. Parents, including irresponsible parents, also vote.

  31. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was making a serious point.

    No you weren't, the DS Lite is $130 and you can play online with it you goddamn idiot, you weren't making a serious point you were spouting nonsense.

    captcha: cavern, crawl back in yours

  32. Re:That's okay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dammit!--I dropped my fucking shovel. Burn in hell, you shitface of Madison, you son of a bitch Ben Affleck relative!

  33. Not a big deal by autoacat · · Score: 1

    It took Xbox Live about a year before it even showed up on the Xbox and with the exception of the original Halo, that wasn't too much of a loss for the original Xbox. Or more recently, take a look at the DS taking a year before Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection came into play. Not many titles were really lost in the long-term.

    As long as Nintendo takes notes from Microsoft and Sony when launching their online service, the extra time spent should be a good sign. It's not like there isn't room for delays in the Wii's launch line-up. Launch titles like Call of Duty 3 and Far Cry could probably have better sales in a month like February with added online play instead of choosing to compete with the likes of Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess and Metroid Prime 3: Corruption without online play.

  34. Re:That's okay. by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 1

    Yeah, we need to protect kids.

    No, adults who buy a Nintendo console shouldn't be treated like kids. However, I'll admit that I can't think of a quick way to have a happy medium. Nonetheless, if the Wii has the same online "service" as the DS it won't help Nintendo shed their "kiddy" image.

  35. Other online features still available ... right? by jchenx · · Score: 1

    First of all, regarding online functionality, it's hard for me to go back to other consoles, which don't have the same level of features as Xbox Live. If it weren't for the free demos, I never would have realized how kick ass Dead Rising is. I'm also a big fan of the Xbox Live Arcade games and the whole achievement system. Granted, a lot of these ideas come from the PC-side of things, but to finally have them in the console space is very exciting.

    That said, this announcement only said that 3rd party online support will be missing. I'm assuming that this only means multiplayer, and that you'll still get a lot of the "awareness" features and marketplace stuff that Nintendo is (hopefully) working on. To be honest, I don't actually play multiplayer games that much (listening to whiny kids curse while they kick my butt? No thank you!), so I don't think I'll miss that too much from the Wii.

    --
    -- jchenx
  36. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by Dorceon · · Score: 1

    Not at launch.

    --
    What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
  37. Re:That's okay. by MilenCent · · Score: 0

    It's third party games that won't be able to use Nintendo Wi-Fi right away. First- and second-party games are not so encumbered.

  38. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    The DS Lite doesn't require anywhere NEAR the hardware and software overhead of the Wii. Nintendo is wisely putting off the online component to concentrate on gameplay. Obviously THEY don't think that's nonsense.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  39. Mixed feelings. by justchris · · Score: 1
    My feelings are mixed on this. I am a very hardcore gamer, playing on all consoles and PC. I have played various MMO's as well, and have generally found that online play doesn't really add that much to the experience for me.

    This certainly isn't a dealbreaker on the Wii for me. Honestly, the only game I care that has online is Super Smash Bros. Brawl. I don't really need online play for anything else. And it's not like this will affect demo downloads or the virtual console, so no worries there.

    On the other hand, this might affect 3rd party support for the Wii. And as much as I like Nintendo's 1st & 2nd party offerings, theres a lot of games you miss out on with no 3rd party support. That part is certainly worrying.

    --
    just some guy
  40. Re:um after the wii is released its only 2 months by hords · · Score: 1

    I hadn't heard anything about Metroid Prime 3 slipping from the launch lineup. It was confirmed as one a few weeks ago I thought. I did some searching and found a rumor about it slipping in a forum, but nothing concrete. Anyone know more?

  41. Would Nintendo even do online play correctly? by Oscar_Wilde · · Score: 1

    If the way multiplayer on the DS is anything to go by it wont be as much fun as it could be. Go read about the "friend codes" business then tell me if you still care.

    Lets not forget the other silly choices Nintendo has made for wi-fi. Hopefully they'll fix them though and we might actually see WPA support in the Wii.

    1. Re:Would Nintendo even do online play correctly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hopefully they'll fix them though and we might actually see WPA support in the Wii."

      Earth to Slashdot: NO ONE CARES BUT YOU.

    2. Re:Would Nintendo even do online play correctly? by Oscar_Wilde · · Score: 1

      They will as more and more access points stop using WEP in favour of something less brain-dead.

    3. Re:Would Nintendo even do online play correctly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello? The Wii is a home console, you control the access point, you can set it to WEP. No-one will ever sell a wireless AP without this mode, because it would be denying the consumer a desirable option and breaking compatibility with older equipment. People still use 386-compatible CPUs, almost every motherboard has a floppy drive connector, and WEP is here to stay.

  42. In other news... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    The Wii will still have third-party online support before the PS3's price is dropped to something acceptable.

  43. Not silly, just another target audience by LKM · · Score: 1

    Using friend codes isn't a silly choice. It's something Nintendo did to protect younger players. It's also something I like. I use online play as a kind of "hardest" setting for games after I've beaten them offline. I don't care who I'm playing against.

    Obviously, there's lots of room for improvement for people who want different things from online games, but that doesn't make Nintendo's decision "silly". They're simply not aiming their online service at hardcore gamers, and that works for me.

    1. Re:Not silly, just another target audience by grumbel · · Score: 1
      but that doesn't make Nintendo's decision "silly"

      It is stilly because it cripples the online experience a lot without a good reason. Nothing wrong with Nintendo doing some child-protection, but then please do so without pissing of all the older gamers around. Online play on DS for me is pretty uninteresting, because its really no different then playing against some intelligent bots, better then nothing, but lightyears behind of what true online gaming is all about.

    2. Re:Not silly, just another target audience by LKM · · Score: 1
      It is stilly because it cripples the online experience a lot without a good reason.

      There is a good reason. Apple doesn't want children to be contacted by strangers online.

      Nothing wrong with Nintendo doing some child-protection, but then please do so without pissing of all the older gamers around.

      As I already said, they don't piss of all the older gamers. I'm definitely an older gamer, and I like friend codes and anonymous online gaming because I don't want to be harassed by 15-years-olds who have nothing better to do than scream swear words and tell me how gay I am if I beat them in Mario Kart.

      its really no different then playing against some intelligent bots

      First of all, this is exactly what I want. Second, you're wrong: This is not an inherent issue with friend codes. Animal Crossing uses friend codes and is nothing at all like playing against intelligent bots.

    3. Re:Not silly, just another target audience by grumbel · · Score: 1
      There is a good reason. Apple doesn't want children to be contacted by strangers online.

      For protection a small portion of the user based, crippling online for *everyone*, is not a good reason, its simply lazyness to implement proper messures.

      As I already said, they don't piss of all the older gamers. I'm definitely an older gamer, and I like friend codes and anonymous online gaming because I don't want to be harassed by 15-years-olds who have nothing better to do than scream swear words and tell me how gay I am if I beat them in Mario Kart.

      They are pissing of lots of old gamers, heck, also a lot of younger gamers as well. You know, if you don't want to chat, simply don't chat, but don't force everybody else to stop chatting just because you don't like it.

    4. Re:Not silly, just another target audience by LKM · · Score: 1
      For protection a small portion of the user based

      That's where you're wrong. They're not protecting "a small portion of the user base", they're protecting themselves. And unless you're Nintendo, you simply do not know how small (or, most likely, big) the amount of children using their service is.

      You know, if you don't want to chat, simply don't chat, but don't force everybody else to stop chatting just because you don't like it.

      There's no connection between friend codes and chatting. As I've said, Animal Crossing (which uses friend codes) allows for chatting. And no, you can't just not participate in the communication if you're playing a game which provides it.

  44. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, why the Hell did I get modded Flamebait?!?!

    Because you are trying too hard spreading the opinion you've made up yourself in order to justify your non-nintendo purchase.

    That's pretty pathetic and shows a character deficit of yours.

  45. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by Nivoset · · Score: 1

    Im gonna get a Wii (or if they decide to change the name, whatever, i heard something about it before) because it looks to be fun, and also doesn't look to be the wallet buster that 360, or PS3 want to me

    --
    Movies made by a crazy person

    http://www.youtube.com/marginalpro
  46. Tired of Online Games by SSGamer · · Score: 1

    I am tired of hearing about friggin online games, I want some good games to play online once in a while.

    --
    FF7 Fans Fight Back, Vote against FF7 sucks and Pass it on.

    http://ff7sucks.blogspot.com

    1. Re:Tired of Online Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're tired of hearing about online games or you want some online games to play? You don't make any sense.

  47. There were implications of this a year ago.. by Gideon+Fubar · · Score: 1
    The first title that was announced to have online content for the wii was Super Smash Bros Brawl.
    From the page:
    There was a reason Smash Bros. was announced at the meeting.
    That was because when it was asked what product Nintendo would want to use to help it unveil its Wi-Fi Network, the first title
    on the list in both America and Japan was Smash Bros. So it was first decided to talk about Smash Bros. as an example of a Wi-Fi
    title, resulting in the game being announced before the development structure was finalized.
    This information is backed up here. While it does not specifically state that SSBB would be the first wifi enabled wii title, it does say that it WILL be wifi enabled, and implies that it should be a release title.. Since it appears to have been pushed back by a few months, it is likely that we will, in fact, have to wait until 2007 for wifi enabled titles. i know the logic is shaky, but the implication is there. Of course, this isn't taking into account the possible changes to the launch lineup, and any wifi demo games that may ship with the console.
    If i were nintendo, i'd certainly be shipping something small with the console, just to give people something to do while they waited for the big name titles, and for 'value added' credit.
    --
    http://www.xkcd.com/354/
    1. Re:There were implications of this a year ago.. by Gideon+Fubar · · Score: 1

      arr.. just reread the article and noticed the '3rd party' part. my bad.

      --
      http://www.xkcd.com/354/
  48. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    Actually, I'm defending Nintendo, you dip. And I am planning on buying a Wii. As to why everyone is so up-in-arms about Nintendo not having an online component at launch, I guess YOU'LL have to explain that.

    And, as to my character, I'm not the one hiding behind "Anonymous Coward" postings here.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  49. Re:Geez, it's a $200 system! by Wyrd01 · · Score: 1
    As to why everyone is so up-in-arms about Nintendo not having an online component at launch, I guess YOU'LL have to explain that.
    It does not say there will be no online component at launch. The article says that 3rd party companies will not have access to the online code at launch. The first party games, arguably the most popular (Zelda, Metroid, Red Steel, etc...) will all have the possibility of being online on launch day.

    Plus it says no 3rd party online access until next year. The Wii is expected to release near the end of Sept. or in Oct. That's all of 2-3 months before "next year" hits, so it could be a very short wait indeed.
  50. Correct me if I'm wrong... by tarun713 · · Score: 1

    But I thought Red Steel was being developed by Ubisoft and is NOT a first party title.

  51. Re:That's okay. by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

    easy. Have friend codes for kids and napkins with phone numbers written in lipstick for adults.

    In all seriousness, I think it could work in such a way that people younger than 18 get friend codes and may only communicate with other friends. Anyone older than 18 may freely communicate with other adults. The only thing is you have to trick people into entering the right age data because if you ask for an age the pedos will just say they're 12. . . Possible solution would be to have to have a legal guardian cosign or something. . .Either that or bundle Brain age with each system and determine their age that way :P

    --
    disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.