Slashdot Mirror


Ionic Cooling For Your Computer

master0ne writes, "We (the folks over at InventGeek) have produced the first ionic cooling system for your high-end gaming system. This system produces absolutely no noise and in fact has no moving parts at all. While this is a proof of concept, it demonstrates that you can get the CFM you need to cool a system efficiently with no moving parts and no increase in power consumption."

202 comments

  1. laptop use by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This could be great for laptop uses. Desktop replacements could probably run a heck of a lot cooler now.

    --
    -gjr
    1. Re:laptop use by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      Look again, the cooler would be bigger than the laptop.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    2. Re:laptop use by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, seeing as it's just a proof-of-concept, I'm sure much smaller systems will be developed.

      --
      -gjr
    3. Re:laptop use by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Why would you want high voltage in a flimsy platic box on your lap?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    4. Re:laptop use by lewp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Baby, my lap is high voltage.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    5. Re:laptop use by BRTB · · Score: 3, Informative

      You already do. The backlight inverter in the LCD screen produces several thousand V(rms) initially to fire up the fluorescent tube, and somewhere in the high hundreds of volts while in operation.

      http://www.ecnmag.com/article/CA602416.html

    6. Re:laptop use by Compu486 · · Score: 1

      How is this diffrent than a sony battery?

    7. Re:laptop use by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember something like 'it's not the volts, but the AMPS that will kill you' in reference to electrical appliances. Is this correct?

    8. Re:laptop use by Vihai · · Score: 1

      Neither. In first approximation it's the current by time with a lower limit on the current (30 mA).

      When you feel a static discharge, you are actually feeling a lot more current than the one needed to kill, just for not enough time.

    9. Re:laptop use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Not for laptops but I use the stack (or chimney) effect to cool my PC.

      I build a small fire in the case to get it going - call it ironic cooling.

    10. Re:laptop use by Jay+Carlson · · Score: 1
      Not for laptops but I use the stack (or chimney) effect to cool my PC.

      I build a small fire in the case to get it going - call it ironic cooling.

      You didn't own a CRT iMac then, or you wouldn't be laughing. The CRT never went into full powersave mode. The conventional wisdom was that Apple designed it that way so that the tube heater convection would pull cool air through the bottom of the case, cooling the motherboard underneath it.
    11. Re:laptop use by mazarin5 · · Score: 3, Informative
      current by time with a lower limit on the current (30 mA).

      By that I presume you mean charge by time, which is current.

      By introducing a large amount of charge to your body, you get a large difference in potential, which will have to discharge somewhere. However, more charge discharging in a short amount of time can be very damaging to meatbags like us, if for no other reason than the thermal excitation it causes along its path. Very high voltages can cause other problems, but as long as there's a low current, it's not really a problem.

      I think a proper analogy would be to use heat as an example. Holding a warm cake in your lap for a couple hours while it cools off isn't going to cause you serious harm, although it may make you hungry. A small drop of molten lead with the same amount of heat would cause very severe damage when dropped in your lap, because the energy is transferred in a very short amount of time.

      --
      Fnord.
    12. Re:laptop use by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Because this cools the computer, as opposed to setting it ablaze.

    13. Re:laptop use by jcgf · · Score: 1

      Do you go up to chicks and ask them to ground you out through their resistor while winking at them?

    14. Re:laptop use by DirtBag99 · · Score: 1

      Captain's log, stardate 5431.4. For 15 hours and 20 minutes, we have been following the ion trail of the spaceship that has Spock's brain. ...

    15. Re:laptop use by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      Just without moving parts.

      --
      /* No Comment */
  2. I don't get it by vlad_petric · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Would someone enlighten me? What is the principle behind ionic cooling? The article shows how to build it, but not why it works :).

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:I don't get it by Mahali · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Consumer Reports rated the Ionic Breeze the worst of all the ones tested. They said it didn't change the particle count of contanimates in the air because it didn't move air.

      It was (by far) the quitest of them though.

    2. Re:I don't get it by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 1, Informative

      Ionic cooling "uses an electrical charge to create a cooling air jet right at the surface of the chip." (from digg)

      Basically, it charges the ions at or very close to the surface of the chip to act as a "magnet" for air.

      --
      -gjr
    3. Re:I don't get it by macz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Basically the ions move the air instead of a rotating fan.
      http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/283716_coolchi ps04.html

      --
      ...But I digress. TREMBLE PUNY HUMANS!ONE DAY MY SPECIES WILL DESTROY YOU ALL!
    4. Re:I don't get it by man_ls · · Score: 1

      I own one, it has to be doing something since the collection grid fills up with lint and so forth every couple of weeks. I just tested the "no air flow" thing by putting a piece of tissue paper over the output and it blew around like their was air moving, so it seemed to be doing something.

      Granted, it's not a great amount of air flow, but I've noticed an improvement in the indoor air quality of my room since installing the thing.

    5. Re:I don't get it by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      Don't you watch infomercials?

      The EPA certifies "it's a newer way to clean air!" (this is an actual quote)

      Call now, and we'll give you a second one, free.

    6. Re:I don't get it by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Funny

      You've succeeded, but the success was in not answering the question. The question wasn't about the IB so your reply was completely out of place.

    7. Re:I don't get it by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Except that he ripped apart a knockoff Ionic Breeze to build his cooler. If the real thing doesn't move air, why would his jerry-rigged version?

    8. Re:I don't get it by ZakuSage · · Score: 1

      Obviously, liquid cooling is SOOOOOOOO 2005.

    9. Re:I don't get it by flyingfsck · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yup, they actually work, due to two reasons. The ions are generated at the tip of a bunch of needles and accellerates away, causing an air stream, so that incoming air can be filtered. Also, the negative ions causes dust particles in the air to clump and settle onto the floor of the room, where your vacuum cleaner can get them.

      The best devices use a combination of these effects and use a fan to force air through an electrostatic filter and inject negative ions into the outgoing airstream, to spread around the room and make dust clump and settle and get stuck in the electrostatic filter better.

      I have two Bionair units in my home and it really helps to control my cat allergy - my solution to my wife's love of a gawddam cat...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    10. Re:I don't get it by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      since when does the real thing "not move air" you do realize it's called the ionic _BREEZE_ If you actually RTFA you'd notice he estimated to CFM to be over 300.

    11. Re:I don't get it by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you actually THOUGHT (or read my other post), you'd realize that the claim of 325 CFM is utterly ridiculous, even without considering that he made no mention of his testing methods. 325 CFM would be a wind tunnel, and he most definately would have heard something (a vague howling sound perhaps?) if that number was accurate.

    12. Re:I don't get it by Living+Ghost · · Score: 0

      Isn't it just an ozone generator?

    13. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      His ionic system would be roughly the length of the entire case if he bought an Ionic Breeze knockoff. With that size, it's possible he has that much airflow, versus, say, a standard 120mm fan which can do maybe 50CFM but covers a small fraction of the entire case.

      Moving a large volume of air (CFM) over a large surface area is not going to cause a howling wind.

    14. Re:I don't get it by TheGavster · · Score: 2, Informative

      The device is actually nowhere near the processor. He took the innards of an Ionic Breeze, built a shielded box around them, and put them up front where you normally have your drive cages. The only mod to the processor heatsink was a grounding strap.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    15. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh I see you were confused by the units of measure. When he wrote CFM he meant cubic feet per milenia.

    16. Re:I don't get it by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the exit path for the air is pretty small. Maybe 40 square inches. (A 120mm fan hole is about 17 square inches). No way there is as much air movement as he claims without an audible "whoosh". My guess is his estimate is on the optimistic side.

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    17. Re:I don't get it by cool_arrow · · Score: 1

      I agree. Couldn't possibly be 325 CFM. Perhaps the misspelling of CFM as CMF was deliberate. Could it be Cubic Millimeters per Fortnight?

  3. Not ionic, just passive by Zouden · · Score: 0, Troll

    All they really did is replace the fans with passive heatsinks (and a heat pipe). The 'ionic' part is one of those negative ion generators which do very little and cost a lot.
    Really, this is nothing to get excited about.

    --
    "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    1. Re:Not ionic, just passive by Valacosa · · Score: 1

      That, and most of the things the creators praise this system for have been done (and better) before. No moving parts? No noise? Sounds to me a lot like liquid metal cooling. Hardly a first.

      --
      "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
    2. Re:Not ionic, just passive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be right. I am perplexed by the claim of 350 CFM.

    3. Re:Not ionic, just passive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  4. Let the infomercials begin! by evilneko · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can't wait for the Ionic Breeze PC Edition! Available now for only 3 easy payments of 39.99!

    --
    Slashdot - where to disagree, is to be a troll
    1. Re:Let the infomercials begin! by 1310nm · · Score: 1

      $39.99?? How 'bout I give you a quarter and you just send the free Ionic Life Vegetable Chopper gift?!

  5. Ionic Breeze by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 1

    It doesn't just move air! It purifies air! It traps the dirt 'n dust particle right onto the collection plate, keeping it out of the air you breath!

    Anyone else see that infomercial? Makes me wonder, is this thing going to trap more dust than a regular fan or is the infomercial a bunch of marketing bull? I'm betting on marketing bull, but it would be nice if cleaning it were as simple as removing the "collection plate" and wiping it.

    --
    Demented But Determined.
    1. Re:Ionic Breeze by MBCook · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't comment on the Ionic Breeze, but I can tell you the principal is perfectly sound. At my house we had an Electrostatic Air Filtration System installed, which is basically the same thing but attached to the duct work. The thing does make a noticeable difference with allergens and such (which is why we bought it).

      What they show on the commercial (about wiping one off and it being filthy) is absolutely true. About once a month (for our system) you are supposed to pull out the two filters (each about the size of the average desktop PC) and the two screens (just simple mechanical filtration for the large stuff). You stick 'em in a utility sink with some dishwashing powder shake 'em around, and then let 'em soak.

      You put in perfectly clear water, and when you lift the two filters out the stuff is a very solid grey color. It also leaves a hideous ring in the sink.

      Electrostatic air filtration really does work. I have no doubt that the Ionic Breeze systems do work (to some degree). But the principal is absolutely sound.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Ionic Breeze by MBCook · · Score: 1

      I just remembered (right after I posted, of course) how they move air. If I remember correctly the charge on the plates in the system causes the air (which was already charged on it's way in) to accelerate. The plates have one charge (negative?) and the air is charged the opposite way (positive?). They are naturally attracted to each-other, but since the big plates aren't going anywhere the air gets pulled in. When it gets close enough it loses it's charge but now has momentum and keeps going through (also gets pushed out by more air being pulled in). Combine this with the dust and such that gets sucked in (only gets stuck to the plates) and you get air movement.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:Ionic Breeze by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      That sounds reasonable, although I question his quoted 325.00 CFM, which I saw no mention of how he measured. By comparison, most computer fans rate in the 10s of CFM, and this guy does 265 CFM.

    4. Re:Ionic Breeze by flyingfsck · · Score: 0

      Electrostatic and ionic filters really do work. They are commonly used to clean up the smoke stacks of factories. However, to be effective, you probably need something a lot bigger than an Ionic Breeze, unless you put one in each and every room of your home.

      You can actually buy electrostatic furnace filters at any hardware store. Those things are just a mesh and foam combination of an electrostatic plastic - a kind of plastic that is always charged - similar to a permanent magnet, but of the electrical kind. The result is that fine dust particles that would normally pass through a filter, will stick to the thing. They are good at removing tobacco smoke, pollen and cat dander. Cleaning them is hard though - need to let them soak in a bathtub with dishwasher and rinse with lots of water.

      The negative ions generated by an Ionic Breeze unit, also causes dust in the air to clump and settle on the floor, where your vacuum cleaner can get it, so it removes more dust from the air, than is apparent from just looking at the collection plates.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    5. Re:Ionic Breeze by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Informative

      I had an Ionic breeze, and it definitely works. It moves a fair bit of air, and it definitely takes dust out. Those plates get dirty pretty quickly, and you do just have to wipe it off.

            However, I found that it while it's silent to start with, it doesn't stay "silent. As it gets dirty, it start to buzz a little bit. Wiping the plates doesn't entirely fix it, because stuff also sticks to the other pole of the circuit. There are 4 long wires suspended in the case from top to that ionize the dust, and then the plates attract it. Eventually, the wires get dirty too, and to clean them you need to wipe them somehow. I used a bit of paper towel taped to the end of a piece of arrowshaft tubing. It's a pain to do, and while I never did it, it would be easy to break the wire.

            My ionic breeze blew the internal fuse one day, when one of the capacitors in the high-voltage power supply spewed it's guts out, and I never bothered to fix it.

              There's probably a lot better ways to cool off computer chips, I would think. A heat sink with a thermionic cooler would seem a lot more practical.

                Brett

    6. Re:Ionic Breeze by not-enough-info · · Score: 1

      So, if I have this in my PC cooling system, does that mean that once a month I have to open my box and wipe the grime off my cooler? I'm all for dual purpose but this really can't be all that great for dust levels inside my box.

      --
      ---k--
      </stupid>
    7. Re:Ionic Breeze by Animats · · Score: 1

      Electrostatic precipitators work fine at pulling particles out of air, but they don't provide air movement. They need a fan to push the air through them.

      Large versions of this technology are used at coal fired power plants to remove the particulates from the flue gases. (Doesn't help with sulfur; that takes another process.) The resulting powder is used to make cement.

    8. Re:Ionic Breeze by triffid_98 · · Score: 1
      Speaking of dual use, coming soon, the George Foreman heatsink! It's the Quad Core rated heatsink that doubles as a fat free grilling machine! Need those burgers done in a hurry? Time to start cooking with the power of Unreal Tournament.

      So, if I have this in my PC cooling system, does that mean that once a month I have to open my box and wipe the grime off my cooler? I'm all for dual purpose but this really can't be all that great for dust levels inside my box.
  6. It cost 14$? wtf? by growse · · Score: 1, Troll

    It cost $9-15? Isn't that just because most of the stuff was donated?

    Sucks.

    --
    There is nothing interesting going on at my blog
    1. Re:It cost 14$? wtf? by AP2k · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes and no. The purifier they used obviously was not included in the cost. But to make an ionic purifier for yourself would cost next to nothing just the same.

      Its just a high voltage transformer, its driver circuit, and some plates.

  7. Fixed. by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 1

    "We (the folks over at InventGeek) have produced the first (and last) ionic cooling system for your high-end gaming system"

    TLF

    --
    I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    1. Re:Fixed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, the ionic breeze is not silent. It does not have a fan but you can hear it hum after it has been on for a while in a quite room. When it is near time to be cleaned it is quite loud. Really this thing would suck to clean the way they have made it. I know that unit they used was donated but sharper image, makes short ones that would have fit with out all modding.
      You can get a similar unit now at walmart too.

  8. oblig contrast by Digitus1337 · · Score: 5, Funny

    My current cooling system blows by comparison!

  9. Ionic Breeze for your CPU! by breeder · · Score: 1

    Buy an Ionic Breeze Heatsink right now, and we'll throw in the famous OWL Card, the flashlight/magnifying glass credit card for FREE!!!!1!!! Buy now! Only 29.99.

    1. Re:Ionic Breeze for your CPU! by breeder · · Score: 1

      Crap, only 30 some people beat me to it. Oh well..

    2. Re:Ionic Breeze for your CPU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would rather have Oxy Clean, for when I get really daring and attempt to browse more than one window using only one hand (the other free to hold my *coughie* cup), than the OWL card.

    3. Re:Ionic Breeze for your CPU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Buy an Ionic Breeze Heatsink right now, and we'll throw in the famous OWL Card

      O RLY?

  10. Alanis Morissette flashback . . . by geekwithsoul · · Score: 4, Funny

    For a second, I thought it said "Ironic cooling . . ."

    Hmm, I wonder if that would involve a black fly and some super-cooled chardonnay.

    Oh, wait, that wasn't ironic after all.

    1. Re:Alanis Morissette flashback . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Heh. I read it as coming from InventGreek and wondered when the Doric PC cooling system was coming out.

    2. Re:Alanis Morissette flashback . . . by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I thought these days everyone uses aluminiumic cooling?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    3. Re:Alanis Morissette flashback . . . by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      You could get fly-back, if you used it to cool a CRT. Chardonnay, I'd recommend keeping that well clear.

    4. Re:Alanis Morissette flashback . . . by kram2598 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Corinthian!

    5. Re:Alanis Morissette flashback . . . by xav_jones · · Score: 1

      And I, for a second, thought it said "iconic cooling ..." And I thought of Marilyn Monroe with a palm leaf fan... Hey I could have thought of worse things!

  11. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My brother uses an ionic cooling system. His system was overheating, so he took off one of the sides, added some mosquito blocking metal mesh for porches and pointed his ionic breeze at the case. Works well enough.

  12. That's nothing. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    I've got a machine with the Alanis Morisette Signature-Series Ironic Cooling System. Of course, just like the unit in TFA isn't really "ionic," her's isn't ironic, either. Which makes this actually ironic! Yeah, I really do think.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  13. 325 CMF? by bjackson1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    On the final page it indicated that this ionic system can do 325 CMF. The rest of the units are in CFM, so I am assuming it's a typo. However, how can a fanless system do 325 cubic feet per minute? I've seen ionic systems before and they have never put out anything near that amount (at least from my non scientific estimations). If so, than this is much more than just a passive solution. Unless it is 325 CMF, and it's cubic minutes per feet, but then I think that I just went crosseyed trying to think of cubic minutes.

    1. Re:325 CMF? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Well a 120mm fan does about 112cfm. This ionic breeze jobby is about 3x the height, and 1x the width, so it's plausable that it could do 3x the cfm. Unfortunately the way computer cases are designed is that 66% of the airflow is blocked by the disc drive and hard drives, with a tiny inlet (usually 80x80mm) at the bottom for the rest of the case. The apple G5 sorta gets around that by moving the drives to the back and putting 4-5 ~60mm fans on the front (some zelot will correct me with the exact specifics), which combined, probably do about 325cfm, too.
       
      So yeah, his system does 325cfm, but only maybe half of that is making it in to the interior of the case at a velocity worth cooling anything. Still pretty genius.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:325 CMF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you know not of the Time Cube!

    3. Re:325 CMF? by flyingfsck · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hmm, lessee. The earth is about 24000km in circumference, so an hour is about 1000km and a minute would be about 17km. So 325 cubic minutes (5000 cubic kilometers) per foot would result in a rather high compression ratio. I can feel a big bang coming on... ;)

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    4. Re:325 CMF? by imboboage0 · · Score: 1

      I think it's completely feasible. Think about it. If this can put out 78CFM@2000RPM, why is it so hard to imagine? For our purposes, let's say we can fit 6 fans (go with me) on the back of this case. that is 468CFM, with the fans on silent. Imagine if you sped them up. Take the same concept, make it use ions to move the air instead, and call it a day. These ionic devices have been shown to move air, however minimal. I think it can be done, unless someone else has something to show me otherwise.

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    5. Re:325 CMF? by MadEE · · Score: 1

      Having used one of these air doesn't come out of these things anywhere near as fast as a fan of the same size.

    6. Re:325 CMF? by itwerx · · Score: 0, Redundant

      ROFLMAO!
            Mod parent funny! (Or maybe insightful)

    7. Re:325 CMF? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      I don't buy it.

      It's not that I don't believe this thin can push air, but the claim that this pushes the same or more air that a fan using an equal amount of energy just doesn't seem right.

      Were are the pictures or even a simple description of their test setup?

      It's not just the 325 CMF [sic] rating, there are other other genreally sloppy things about this story, like a listed project cost of $9-15. Bullshit. ONE of those "fanless" heatsinks they used would cost more than that.
      And then there's also the issue that they use FANLESS heatsinks. As in NOT NEEDING A FAN.
      This means their system would probably work with a magic 8 ball crammed int here for "cooling".

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    8. Re:325 CMF? by qbwiz · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, you should be thinking in terms of space-time. 1 minute = 60 seconds. 60s*c = 5.90142634*10^10 feet. Cubing that, we get 2.05527989*10^32 ft^3/ft, or the surface area of 4*10^16 earths, rather larger than what you got.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    9. Re:325 CMF? by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      On second thought, maybe they meant 325 cubic meters per fortnight, giving us a somewhat less impressive figure of .57 CFM.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    10. Re:325 CMF? by Havenwar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually fanless is as not having a fan attached... it still needs adequate airflow, as in for instance produced by... a fan. Usually a casefan.

      But I do agree the article in general is subpar when it comes to needed data. In order for me to take them seriously I'd have to see how they measured the airflow, a temp over time test readout, and since they included a project cost - a good breakdown of it. Also I'd like to see them adress the cleaning issue which would obviously be a bit ardous with such a system.

      Cool proof of concept though. What it mostly points to is the fact that the usual way to do things doesnt have to be the only one. There are plenty of room for innovation in how one builds a system.

    11. Re:325 CMF? by Petersson · · Score: 1

      Hmm, 325CMF might as well be 325 cubic miles per fortnight...

      --
      I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
    12. Re:325 CMF? by csimicah · · Score: 1

      325 cfm would be changing out the air inside the case 2-5 times per SECOND. There would be howling, things flying around the room, wicked witches floating by, etc.

      If this system runs well cooled by the knockoff ionic breeze, I have a strong feeling it would also cool just fine with wishes and hopes.

    13. Re:325 CMF? by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clearing it out for me...

      Cubic Feet per Minute... now, this is a strange unit of mesure, I can't help myself, imagine tiny square feet flowing trough the breeze, weird.

      Oh, man... why can't USA people use the metric system like every other nation in the world?

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    14. Re:325 CMF? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Some of us do. In fact, the really clever ones know how to convert back and forth without too much puzzling. It's not that complicated.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    15. Re:325 CMF? by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      The problem for me is that I never heard of the most obscure units... so I realy dont know what they stand for. Some I know, because they theached me them at school, Farenheit for an example... but I seldon hear of inches, feet and miles on my everyday life, so when I see a unit like CFM I try to correlate it to the metric system.

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    16. Re:325 CMF? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      OK, so because you're ignorant, we should go buy all different measuring tools? Look, I like the metric system too, but it's not my fault that you're not familiar with the jargon.

      CFM is the basic standard measurement in air handling in the United States, which you might have noticed is a fairly large industrialized nation. It's OK if you don't know that, but try not to be a jerk about it.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  14. How about a real price estimate? by r_jensen11 · · Score: 2

    They state a rediculously low price. How about an estimate for everything; case, PSU, memory (both for RAM and disk space), VGA heatsink, video card, etc?

    It sounds fantastic, but also, I would not be able to have a functioning computer with only 8GB of disk space. Possibly if I had it running solely as a client, but then I wouldn't even need any disk space, only lots of ram.

    Besides, who can honestly fit all of their porn onto 8GB these days?

    1. Re:How about a real price estimate? by master0ne · · Score: 1

      you completly missed the point of the article, its ment more as a gaming PC at the moment, install UT2k4 on it, or Quake 4 etc, and frag away in unbeleavablely quiet bliss on a lightning fast machine. I do agree the price is redicously under quoted though, however it could possibly be a bit cheeper if you like most geeks already have some of the stuff lyinge around... an old P4 board / proc, a passivlt cooled nvidia card, ddr ram, case..... ur still looking at the ionic system and the nice power supply and the ram drives, however it just fell from a few thousand dollars to maby a few hundred :)

      --
      Noone writes jokes in base 13!
    2. Re:How about a real price estimate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's RIDICULOUS, just like your spelling. (And, to be fair, the parent poster's as well).

    3. Re:How about a real price estimate? by mackyrae · · Score: 1

      I can fit all my porn on 0 bits.

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    4. Re:How about a real price estimate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can people just not spell ridiculous these days? This is freaking rediculous-- twice in one thread.

      DAMMIT-- it's contagious!!!

  15. Ozone anybody? by Ucklak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't this a generator of ozone?

    Doesn't this seem dangerous or is the output the same as one of those stand alone units?
    What about cleaning it?

    --
    if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    1. Re:Ozone anybody? by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do believe you are correct. Ozone isn't terribly good for people and it rots rubber and a number of other things. Goto the chemistry department at your local university -- you won't find a copier machine anywhere near the labs. The ozone generated by them rots the stoppers and seals and what not.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:Ozone anybody? by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Informative

      and it rots rubber and a number of other things

      It oxidizes copper. I wouldn't want it anywhere near my motherboard.

    3. Re:Ozone anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How bad could it be? Doesn't your motherboard have conformal coating on it?

    4. Re:Ozone anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeap... That's why Sharper Image had a class action suit and now their Moronic Breeze has a filter for ozone.

      The ozone generation can be controlled by lowering the current. Unfortunately that affects the air flow.

  16. Price by Doomstalk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What baffles me about this mod is that he says it costs $9 to $15, but everything including the ion generator costs more than that. If he can't get the price right, what's to say its as effective has he claims? Especially since he gives us a CFM figure, but doesn't tell us how he measured it, or give us any concrete numbers on how cool it runs.

  17. 325.00 CMF? by Lisandro · · Score: 1

    Can that be a typo? I don think you can push that ammount of air with a simple ionic setup like the one described in the article...

    Anyway, it's a neat idea, but the system is setup so all the heat generating elements irradiate inside the case with a large ionic fan providing airflow. Unless the setup blows a LOT of air through the case, i'm guessing the large passive heatsinks are doing their work without a lot of help from the ionic setup. I'd also watch out for ozone generation (which can become a problem with HV setups in enclosed enviroments) and safety - most probably the HV generator is current limited to a few milliamps, but still.

    1. Re:325.00 CMF? by Raxxon · · Score: 1

      CMF.... Cubic Meters/Fortnight?

      ~0.0161 Cubic Meters/Minute?

      ~16.1 Cubic Milimeters/Minute?

      ~0.0009824 Cubic Inches/Minute?

      I dunno. Converting those wacky units of measure always give me decimal problems.

    2. Re:325.00 CMF? by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you can, I'm waiting for the ionic leafblower. Finally you can blow your yard trash into the neighbors yard at night without waking him up. Mwa Ha hah!

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  18. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This system produces absolutely no noise and in fact has no moving parts at all."

    Methinks the hard drive has moving parts... :-P

    1. Re:Bah by arb · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have a HD.

    2. Re:Bah by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      It has no hard drive. Read the article.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    3. Re:Bah by siodine · · Score: 1

      They're not using a harddrive because they're trying to achieve a completely silent computer, instead they use a ram drive.

  19. Dunk it in salt water by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The sea is full of ionic coolant.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Dunk it in salt water by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      That would be ironic cooling.

  20. Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but where can I find out about ironic cooling for my computer?

  21. Ionic systems don't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They simply don't push around enough air. The Sharper Image even tried to sue Consumer Reports because they said so. Of course, they lost.

  22. DAW computers by Datamonstar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This would be GREAT in a audio production PC. Fans are noisy and so are liquid cooling solutions to a degree. If this could be affordable and effecient, then I could see this becoming the standard for the studio PC.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    1. Re:DAW computers by Cprossu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No it would totally suck for audio production- could you imagine the transients caused by the high frequency HV system in that ionic air cleaner? It should play hell with the circuit and make groundings unclean- plus with a audio production pc, the pc and other equipment that makes noise (not including the one's and their equipment which is actually making noise to be recorded) is isolated from the actual interior of the recording studio in the first place... but I can just see high freq wines and switching being forced back through amplifiers and pickup equipment- correct me if I am wrong here

    2. Re:DAW computers by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly, I've only recorded in a REAL studio once, and I didn't exactly get the chance to tour the place so I really wouldn't know how it'd work for a pro. For my home studio PC, however, I'd be quite willing to test it out and I'm pretty sure it's quieter than the monstrosity I have right now.

      --
      The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  23. liquid nitrogen? by Desolator144 · · Score: 0, Insightful

    You know, liquid nitrogren doesn't exactly have moving parts either and it uses no electricity unless you want to run it through a radiatior and I believe if it's under pressure, it will go back down to a cold temp quickly by itself.

    --
    now stop reading and go play Dance Dance Revolution!
    1. Re:liquid nitrogen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. Liquid nitrogen gets cold by itself.

      I think I figured out a way to harness this phenomenon to solve the world's energy problems.

  24. Will do more harm by Venik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the project they use elements of a consumer air ionizer. These devices create negatively-charged ions. These are attracted by dust and smoke particles, causing the latter to fall to the ground or be attracted to positively-charged surfaces.

    "All the affected airborne particles ultimately wind up on surfaces close to the ioniser, making the area immediately surrounding the ioniser dirty..." (Wikipedia). The more dirt sticks to the ionizer, the less air it is able to move. anufacturers of Ionic Breeze and other such devices recommend cleaning the metal plates every couple of days. This is probably not a very practical solution for a PC. However, it's an interesting experiment.

    1. Re:Will do more harm by A+Brand+of+Fire · · Score: 1

      In the article, he stated his concern about the generation of negatively-charged ions moving across the surface of delicate electronic components, so he took a cue from the neutral ionic HVAC filtration systems used by companies with dedicated server rooms and removed one of the diodes from the driver circuit; this (supposedly) greatly reduced the number of negatively-charged ions passing through the system.

      This is quite an interesting idea, the use of such a device as a means of moving air inside a computer case. If a properly developed system were created by engineers with the intent of such an application, I'm sure it would be as neutral charge-wise as those systems already in use in server HVAC setups. I'd love to see such a system hit the market.

      --
      [End of Line]
    2. Re:Will do more harm by A+Brand+of+Fire · · Score: 1

      My mistake. In my sleep-deprived consciousness, I somehow read your comment as a concern about the negatively-charged ions wreaking havoc with the computer's internal components and sought to clarify that. My apologies.

      However, your concern about the amount of gunk that forms on the collection grid of these devices is very well-founded. I own one of the IB knock-offs and it requires a great deal of cleaning on a very regular basis, at least once a week--made all the more difficult by living in an apartment in which three of the other tennants are heavy smokers (which was why I bought it). That stuff is a right bitch to get off those collection plates, I tell you what, and it does impact both air flow rates and the device's ability to remove contaminants from the air.

      --
      [End of Line]
    3. Re:Will do more harm by novus+ordo · · Score: 1
      FTFA:
      While products like this produce more negative ion than positive and thus impart a overall negative charge to whatever they blow on, its is possible to buy a neutral ion generating power supply from Amazing1.com for instance. These types of ion generators are used in server rooms and clean rooms all over the world as they are designed to remove pollutants from the air as well as neutralize any static buildup at all on any surface. With our ionic filter system, we need to just remove a single diode to remove the negative ion production.
      Doesn't mention any diodes later though. I would keep one hand in your pocket when testing this one..
      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
  25. just what we all need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    more ozone in our homes....

  26. What about ozone danger? by mTor · · Score: 4, Informative
    These cooling systems use the same principle as ionic air purifiers. Consumer Reports did several studies and they have issued several warnings about dangerous ozone levels that these machines might create. This is the reason why I ditched my Ionic Breeze air "purifier".

    The magazine also said that people with asthma or respiratory allergies are especially sensitive to indoor ozone, an irritant that can worsen asthma, deaden sense of smell, raise sensitivity to pollen and mold, and may cause permanent lung damage.

    Read more here: Danger: Ionizing air purifiers impure

    1. Re:What about ozone danger? by Spikeles · · Score: 0

      And we all know that CNN can be trusted to tell the unbiased truth!

      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
    2. Re:What about ozone danger? by value_added · · Score: 1

      Read more here: Danger: Ionizing air purifiers impure

      There may indeed be negative health effects from using such products, but I haven't seen any conclusive research, and the link you provided is little more than a CNN blurb about a Consumer Reports article.

      I'd suggest that there may be health benefits from these products, aside from the obvious "cleaner air" benefit.

      I've never owned one, but a few years ago I came across someone selling ionic purifiers who agreed to let me trial one of his units for a couple of weeks. I ran it 24-7 on High (whatever that meant) and was impressed with the results. What was most notable (at least to me), was that the air in the entire house had a distinctly clean "feel" to it, I felt more alert or "refreshed", and most definitely didn't experience any burning in my lungs, loss of smell, or an increased sensitivity to allergens. Again, I don't know whether long-term exposure to high indoor concentrations of ozone are good or bad, but I do know that anyone who has grown up in a part of the world where there's rain would agree that the "after-thunderstorm" air smells as good as it feels, and that's what the ionic unit recreated.

      Maybe someone else has more to say on the subject.

    3. Re:What about ozone danger? by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      When you technically think about a thunderstorm and the ionic purifier ... you should find some very basic similarities :) The scale ofcourse is slightly different, but the overall idea ...

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    4. Re:What about ozone danger? by hb253 · · Score: 1

      Here's something from the EPA http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/ozonegen.html/

      Also, do you live in or near a big city? If yes, you may have heard of ozone warnings on hot hazy days when it is strongly recommdended that kids and the elderly stay indoors.

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
  27. Ionic Breeze does not perform as advertized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    A lot of law suits flew around as a result of the Ionic Breeze, here is some information about it.

    Anyway, it does pull dust out of the air. The amount it actually pulls looks impressive, but is actually so insignificantly small as to almost be immeasurable (as Consumer Reports found). You need like 20 of them in your room to make a noticable difference.

    Further, they produce ozone, which then fills the room. Ozone can be harmful to people with some breathing disorders, so in some cases it actually makes things worse.

    I don't know if the system mentioned by the poster also produces ozone, or if it also removes an insignificantly small amount of pollution, but the Ionic Breeze is simply not worth the money.

    Further, the things are *NOT* silent. They make static-electricity noises. They don't start making them instantly..you have to run them for a few weeks. Then they start making zappy/poppy noises. They aren't hurt-your-ears loud or anything, but you do hear them, and they do just go on and on (even after you clean the plates).

    Lastly, the darn things outright break after a few months.

    The HEPA air filters are bulky and loud, but they actually get the job done. If you need clean air, go with that instead.

    1. Re:Ionic Breeze does not perform as advertized by MBCook · · Score: 1

      Our house system does make those pop sounds, but since it is located next to the heater in the basement it doesn't bother anyone. I can tell you it does work, but each filter (and there are two of them) is the size of a desktop PC and is nothing but tons of fins to provide surface area. I don't know how much ozone it produces (if any) though.

      I know about those lawsuits, which is why I always get a chuckle out of the new Ionic Breeze commercials where they talk about how they added their new "Ozone Guard Technology" or whatever it's called.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  28. Obligatory Silly. by twitter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My current cooling system blows by comparison!

    Current eh? How about plasma? My Jackob's Ladder spark gap chimney effect is a real blast, though it's not quiet or very good at cooling.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  29. wikipedia link about the technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  30. No moving parts? by jd · · Score: 1

    I sure hope the ions are moving, at least! Otherwise, things'll get fun when the charge causes the resistance of the air to break down.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  31. Ozone is bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These things are known to put out a considerable amount of ozone. This ozone attacks rubber and some plastics making them quite brittle.

  32. How an 'ionic wind' works. by The+Raven · · Score: 5, Informative

    A strong negative electric charge is put into one side of the system. This side should have many sharp points angled toward the positive side to be the most efficient. Negative charge builds up in this grid, concentrated at those points. The charge is not enough to actually arc across the air and make a spark, but it is high... high enough that electrons leap across, one by one. Actually, they're leaping across in the millions and billions per second, but they're so tiny that the effect is imperceptible.

    This 'leaping' across has always seemed like how ice sublimates into a gas... it doesn't melt into water, then evaporate, an ice cube in dry air can evaporate directly. In the case of the electrons, they don't melt and flow across (spark) they just imperceptibly leap off one by one. Yeah, it's a bad analogy, but it's the best I can think of. :-)

    As the electrons leap across the gap, they sometimes run into air molecules. When they strike, they can merge with that molecule, and turn it into an ion... this air ion now has a negative charge, and it gets drawn toward the posotive side too... pulled across, the air molecule bumps and shoves other air molecules, and you get a current of air, many of them negatively charged ions.

    This 'other side' happens to be big flat metal plates in the 'ionic breeze', but it doesn't have to be. It could be a simple grid of metal, like chicken wire or something. Anything that can carry a current, and let air blow past it.

    The charge between the two can be thousands of volts, but the current is very small. However, something getting in that gap, like a bug, could get zapped. Yeah, bug zappers are technically 'ionic breeze' machines too, but the voltage and their shape is not optimized to blow air.

    As to where I learned this... all hail Popular Mechanics. An article way back in the late 70's demonstrated these, but not to make ions... they demonstrated a grid powerful enough to take off. Imagine a perfectly silent helicopter with no moving parts, trailing a thick heavy power cable (because they couldn't generate enough electricity onboard to lift it on its own). Definitely a nifty idea.

    The Raven

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    1. Re:How an 'ionic wind' works. by lostguru · · Score: 2, Interesting

      why do i not like the idea of something designed to fall just short of a static generator built in to my computer?



      Me, I'll stick to fans. My fans are quiet enough and my computer doesn't run that hot anyway

      --WAM

      --
      Jayne: "These are stone killers, little man. They ain't cuddly like me."
      98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smok
    2. Re:How an 'ionic wind' works. by The+Raven · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think the ionic breeze actually uses a pretty low voltage... it's not thousands of volts like it was in the PopMech article, because the breeze is a lot slower. Chances are, to save on wiring, they just have a simple 120 volts in a rectified AC pattern. That, incidentally, is also another difference with bug zappers... I'm pretty sure that bug zappers alternate which side is negative and which is positive, which means there's no breeze because it flips between pushing and pulling 60 times a second.

      For anyone who cares... making an ion wind generator is dead simple. Smooth out the AC power into DC current, pump the voltage up to around 1000 volts, and embed the negative and positive grates into a plastic fan case. The ionic breeze costs a lot, but it's pure profit for the Sharper Image. An ionic wind is cheaper to make than a normal fan.

      It is, I think, less efficient electrically than a normal fan. Not certain. It's been nearly 30 years since I made one. Mine did NOT smooth out the current, and did NOT hop up the voltage, so it was about what I think an ionic breeze is. To get the fastest breeze though I put the negative and positive sides pretty close together, so it would zap if bugs got between. My biggest problem was I didn't have any plastic spacers in it, to keep the sides apart... if it tipped over, or someone pushed on the mesh (I had nothing to prevent that either) it would short out. And, since I had no built in fuse... well. Two house outages later, my parents threw it away. :-)

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    3. Re:How an 'ionic wind' works. by weasel5i2 · · Score: 1
      Thanks, Raven, for your informative reply. I believe I read a reprint of the same article not too long ago, during the whole Ionic Breeze furor.

      As to where I learned this... all hail Popular Mechanics. An article way back in the late 70's demonstrated these, but not to make ions... they demonstrated a grid powerful enough to take off. Imagine a perfectly silent helicopter with no moving parts, trailing a thick heavy power cable (because they couldn't generate enough electricity onboard to lift it on its own). Definitely a nifty idea.
      I once stumbled across these 'lifter' thingies which seem to be a similar topic, and a smaller scale version of the helicopter you mentioned. They apparently operate around 24 kilovolts, and consume about 70 watts of power. (WARNING: potential crackpot alert at the above site.. Don't flame me; you were duly warned.)

      Do they make an "Ibonic Breeze" for the African-American markets? (Joke, sheesh!)

      --Weasel
      --
      [BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY]: X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIR US-TEST-FILE!$H+H*
    4. Re:How an 'ionic wind' works. by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 0

      Please excuse me from my dim memory of high school chemistry, but wouldn't you have to replenish the ions in order to keep the breeze coming? I know that in electrolysis, eventually the ions will all be oxidised or reduced and the reaction is completed. Where do the ions come from?

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    5. Re:How an 'ionic wind' works. by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I am somewhat fuzzy on the principle of operation but a very similar setup is used on laminar flow tables and is suppose to significantly reduce any ESD hazard. On the ones I have used, there is a bar at the back of the table within the airflow that has a multitude of insulated sharp charged emitters.

    6. Re:How an 'ionic wind' works. by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      They come from the conductor itself initially, but since the ion emitter is a conductor, the electrons are constantly being replenished from whatever current source is powering the device. They move freely throughout the conductor's crystal lattice, which is, well, why it's called a conductor...

    7. Re:How an 'ionic wind' works. by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      After reading your post I started looking to see if there were any examples of DIY ionic fans on the internet. So far I can't find any.

      I think I can infer your instructions from your post:

      1. Rectify househould current. (I assume you used American 120VAC, 60hz?)
      2. Mount two screens mere milimeters apart. They must be made of an electrically conduting material.
      3. Connect current to each screen.

      So, what are my chances of electrocuting myself?

  33. Short pages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God, I hate these ridiculously short pages. God forbid you have long pages.

  34. Ironic cooling by i_like_spam · · Score: 1

    I bought an Ironic Cooling system for my PC awhile back.

    With a power rating of 500 Watts, I found that the Ironic Cooler actually heated up my PC, so I'm not using it anymore.

  35. um by pretorious · · Score: 1

    With no moving parts, it looked like he opted to go without an optical drive... I suppose you could install windows over network, but what about your games? looks like he romoved the CFM claim on it

    1. Re:um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what Alcohol 120% is for.
      Image your disks, run em on a virtual drive.

  36. Temps by siodine · · Score: 1

    Why the hell wouldn't they list the idle/load temps? Are they trying to hide something?

  37. ESP use in Coal fired power plants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A better link describing how they are used can be found at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4468076. stm, and some photos can be seen at http://www4.ncsu.edu/~frey/apcespph.html>.

    Very large equipment sizes are required to be effective on a power plant scale.

  38. Will do more harm Being Hand-y by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Doesn't mention any diodes later though. I would keep one hand in your pocket when testing this one.."

    Isn't that were most geeks keep theirs?

  39. TF"A" is spam by clang_jangle · · Score: 1
    From TF"A"
    "The case we chose to use for this project is the Thermaltake Armor case...t just so happened that they offered us this case with the sponsorship. So I suppose a free armor case was the icing on the cake... but it was not what made us choose this product...we chose to use this Thermaltake power supply in our project because Thermaltake was kind enough to donate it."
    And the ionic breeze? A gimmick of course, without a fan you are not moving air. Period. So, not just spam -- really stupid spam! Oh well, there goes my karma...
    --
    Caveat Utilitor
    1. Re:TF"A" is spam by ChildeRoland · · Score: 1

      That is simply not true. There are many ways to move air without fans. Try wikipedia on this one, 'cause I don't feel like explaining how this works to a moron.

      --
      The mark of a mature person is not creating arbitrary criteria for considering others mature.
    2. Re:TF"A" is spam by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

      Uh, you refer people to wikipedia for science answers and you call *me* a moron? mmmkay, maybe you can move some tiny volune of air but certainly nothing significant. Nothing approaching "325 CFM" as claimed in the original spammish blogpost. Of course my primary point was that TF"A" is spam, and it is.
      Really stupid spam.

      From Consumer Reports:"
      Market leader Sharper Image's Professional Series Ionic Breeze Quadra SI737 is among the ionizing room models that did a poor job of cleaning dust and smoke"
      They go on to say the reason for that is the LACK OF AIR MOVEMENT, so there you have it.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
  40. Cubic meters per fortnight by abpend · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps CMF is cubic meters per fortnight. By my math, that's about 0.57 cubic feet per minute... they may have fooled lesser souls by using two-week -long measures of time, but we at Slashdot are much cleverer than that. Fanless, indeed.

    1. Re:Cubic meters per fortnight by Bloater · · Score: 1

      Google agrees:

      Term: 325 cubic meters per fortnight in cubic feet per minute

      Result: 325 ((cubic meters) per fortnight) = 0.569308863 (cubic feet) per minute

      The last time I felt an ionic breeze it was barely perceptible, so that's probably right. I think you got 'em

    2. Re:Cubic meters per fortnight by Hockney+Twang · · Score: 1

      It's cubic meters per femtosecond. Which is roughly 2.1*10^18 CFM.

  41. Cat Allergy - You need the Michelin Mallet by germansausage · · Score: 5, Funny

    A 10 inch square by 18 inch long block of wood mounted on a sledge hammer handle. Staple a piece of car tire tread to one end of the block. One good swat, and then leave the cat at the end of the driveway.

    "Oh noes! Mr Mittens has been run over by a car!

    1. Re:Cat Allergy - You need the Michelin Mallet by Vario · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where is the "gruesome but effective" moderation when you need it. :-)

    2. Re:Cat Allergy - You need the Michelin Mallet by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      Good luck hitting my cat with that thing...

    3. Re:Cat Allergy - You need the Michelin Mallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Know how to make a cat go "woof"?

      Lighter fluid and a match

    4. Re:Cat Allergy - You need the Michelin Mallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How do you make a dog go 'MREEEOOOWW'?

      Freeze it then push it through a table saw.

    5. Re:Cat Allergy - You need the Michelin Mallet by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      What? Your cat doesn't sleep 18 hours a day?

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    6. Re:Cat Allergy - You need the Michelin Mallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NEDM

    7. Re:Cat Allergy - You need the Michelin Mallet by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      hehe, only on top of the garage roof... on the black tar shingles, in the sun... not really sure how he didn't cook, you could fry an egg on that roof.

  42. They work the same way as ionic lifters... by chaboud · · Score: 1

    So, I know that doesn't say much. Here's the gist of it:

    - A couple of wires that are positively charged charge the air and the particles in the air.
    - A couple of plates that come after the wires and are negatively charged pull on the positively charged air and the particulate waste in the air.
    - The air goes whizzing by (inertia, pressure, etc.), and the particles get stuck on the plates.

    That last step is where the problem will be for a computer application. These guys get covered in fuzzy, nasty, dust, and that dust makes the blades less effective. Be prepared to clean your fan replacement at least once a week.

    No thanks.

    1. Re:They work the same way as ionic lifters... by The+Raven · · Score: 1

      Correct, but backwards... the negative side 'blows' towards the positive side.

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    2. Re:They work the same way as ionic lifters... by operagost · · Score: 1

      But the air will be clean and fresh in your mother's basement! You'll hardly be able to smell your pile of dirty socks in the corner!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  43. Iconic by verloren · · Score: 3, Funny

    I read the story as 'iconic' cooling system, and was looking forward to details of one of the all-time great cooling systems, one that history would long remember. Ah well.

    1. Re:Iconic by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      I've got an iconic cooling system - I get RMS over, and while he's puffing air over the heatsink, I can overclock an extra 25Mhz. You may think 25Mhz is nothing, but my 486 has never been faster! Emacs compiles a lot quicker!

      I did try ESR, but even when he was going flat out, it just got hotter. Too much hot air to start with I think. Kept getting a lot of build errors and segfaults with Emacs as well. I don't think Emacs is compatible with ESR cooling.

      (ducks and runs :P )

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    2. Re:Iconic by PermanentMarker · · Score: 1

      that's rather Ironic :) So next the ironic cooling system

      --
      I know you're out there. I can feel you now. I know that you're afraid. You're afraid of us. You're afraid of change.
  44. CPU choice? by Cprossu · · Score: 2, Informative

    "The main reason we chose the Intel CPU is if for some reason there was a thermal issue it will self-protect the CPU unlike AMD's" Has he been living in a cave?, it hasn't been that way since the release of the Kt333 and Nforce chipsets for socketA, and never has had any issue on socket 754 and over Also he does mention the core 2 duo, but I am still surprised that he didn't build it around one in the first place, or at least something which puts out less heat than a pentium D at 3.2ghz..... and certainly he didn't think about building it around a mobile cpu like the older pentium M's or core duo's, turion or mobile sempron, or even a low energy X2.... and another little gripe--- the CFM's he is reporting seem wayyyy out of proportion, I don't think he knows how to differentiate a CFM from his ass.... I mean, look, the very expensive ones I see barely have enough flow to make a 5" long ribbon attached to it float...

  45. easy final step by erikdotla · · Score: 1

    He needs to remove the Ionic cooling system and see if the temperatures and CPU speeds change.

    --
    # Erik
    1. Re:easy final step by Cprossu · · Score: 1

      I was thinking that too- I wonder if his temps would decrease or increase without the ionizer in the way- speaking of which he still has not yet put any solid temps up there to at least make us believe that it functions.

  46. How hot was it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why am I not seeing a temperature reading anywhere?

    Something smells fishy.

    No, wait...that's the ozone.

  47. ionizer in my computer? by Pe_Ell · · Score: 1

    That just seems like a horrible idea since they just make it so dust will stick to everything. Not to mention having a high frequency circuit shoved into my case which could be leaking RF into the motherboard seems like a horrible idea as well.

    So potentially I would have curruption of the signal on the high speed buses of the mobo (runs slower due to error correction) and dust stuck to everything in my computer to where I'd actually have to wipe the surfaces down.

    Silliness...

    --
    Midget Tosser
  48. Obligatory by syousef · · Score: 1

    "Damnit Scottie, there's no time to explain. We need more cooling!".
    "But cap'n she canno take any more".

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  49. It should be 1st April... by andrewmmc · · Score: 1

    This can never work to cool a computer - the only thing this would be useful for is to pull charged dirt particles out of the air and capture them. That might cause some incidental 'breeze' but never enough to cool hundreds of watts of computer power. Also, did anyone notice how he's using RAM drives, but with nothing to install software on them in the first place?

    1. Re:It should be 1st April... by drunkahol · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of PXE boot?

      If not - give it a google. No reason to have ANY drives in a machine really.

    2. Re:It should be 1st April... by andrewmmc · · Score: 1

      He talks in the article about installing Windows, hence the comment I made. When networks are able to provide the same bandwidth to all users as each of them having local disks, then I suppose there wouldn't be a reason to have any drives.

    3. Re:It should be 1st April... by frickendevil · · Score: 1

      1. Ion "fans" do exist, I have made one, but it made nowhere near 325 CFM, made about 50, which is still impressive silent. (works by jumping electrons from an anode onto a cathode, but not by arcing. If you move them far enough away (and increase the voltage so it can jump that far) then you will be able to generate wind, as the electrons ionise things like O2 in the air (and dust, which by moving to the cathode will also move other particles to cause a breeze), to eventually form O3 (bad) and the negatively charged particles move to the cathode as well. All this movement, if controlled, causes a breeze)
      2. There is the option of a network install, using a flash drive to install, or install it using another computer, or use a cd drive, and remove it later.

      Suprisingly i would like to suggest he use a different heatsink, the one he used has the fins too close, and with the fairly undirected air, it would have trouble flowing through, so use a better spaced copper heatsink could be better.

  50. Long gaming sessions - wake up on Pluto by freddled · · Score: 1

    So if you play too long, you find yourself somewhere in the outer reaches of the solar system due to your diy ionic propulsion drive :)?!

    1. Re:Long gaming sessions - wake up on Pluto by gafisher · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough that's actually relevant. Ionic propulsion was proposed as early as the 1950s for long-range spacecraft, and is actually used in some space-based systems today. Ionic drives (obviously) need to work in a vacuum, which means they have to move something besides air. In most ionic drive designs that's cesium or some other metal that shoots, atom by atom, off the emitter into space. In a computer, whatever metals erode off the emitters will wind up plating the interior of the system. How much conductive plating does it take to mess up a motherboard?

  51. Fabrication Rooms by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    Would one of these still work in a fabrication room setting, where there's less than 1 dust particle per million or so... or does it require a "dirty" air supply to actually move any air by itself?

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Fabrication Rooms by gafisher · · Score: 1

      As long as the air contains molecules -- you know: oxygen, nitrogen, that sort of stuff -- the ionic principle will work. Dust, pollen, etc. just go along for the ride, but without those the system would undoubtedly work better simply because it wouldn't have to be cleaned as often.

    2. Re:Fabrication Rooms by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I was under the impression it required conductive impurities in the air itself to function. (Kind of like trying to "boil" distilled water in a microwave vs standard tap water. The tap water releases the energy gradually due to conductive impurities, while the distilled water will simply continue to store the energy applied until a conductive material comes into contact with it, creating a violent release of all the stored energy instantly.)

      I figured this was one of the key reasons why they remove air impurities from fabrication rooms in the first place.

      --


      8==8 Bones 8==8
    3. Re:Fabrication Rooms by gafisher · · Score: 1

      You might be thinking of megnetohydrodynamics (MHD), which makes a pretty good oceanic propulsion system but won't work in fresh water. By the way, distilled water is the "gold standard" for measuring water's boiling point; at sea level it boils at 100 degrees centigrade, just as expected. It's actually quite good for cooking, even in a microwave. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distilled_water#Myths _about_distilled_water/ gives a little more detail on that "exploding water" story.

  52. applications.. by jovius · · Score: 2, Funny

    The applications of an intergalactic drive seem plentiful.

  53. Copiers by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    Shop equipment like saws, sanders and such have mounts for an exhaust to take away dust. You'd think that more photocopiers would have similar mounts to vent the ozone and gases from the inks.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  54. No Temperatures? Kinda Silly Stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have some excellent swamp land to sell you all!

    The question is really whether the system works well without
    the *ionic cooling*. No hard drives to cool, and in general
    fanless designed parts prolly means it doesn't need a fan.

    At least lets see

    "Temperature without the ionic cooling" versus "Temperature with ionic cooling"

    and a particularly idiotic CFM estimate?

    LOL!!!!!!

  55. Sure, but what I'd like to have is by hey! · · Score: 2, Funny

    Corinthian or Doric cooling.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Sure, but what I'd like to have is by Stalin · · Score: 1

      Awesome. Too bad I don't have any mod points to mark that as hilarious.

  56. This ain't science, proves nothing. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
    Er, um, how's about a little bit of the scientific method?

    IHMO it's unlikely the "ionic breeze" does much if anything useful here. Natural convection (remember "hot air rises"?) is probably the main heat-moving factor at work here.

    A real simple test: unplug the ionic "cooler" and see how much the motherboard and CPU temperatures change. My guess, very little.

  57. 0db indeed by mumrah · · Score: 1

    With no hard drive or cd-drive, my computer would be perfectly silent as well. ;p

  58. Hot air moves up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe this is causing the air to move... the heatsinks are huge so that'll easily move air exiting from the back of PSU (where there is also a heatsink in the outside).

  59. So Cool! by AnonymousDivinity · · Score: 0

    Now my dual-core processor can sport Twin Ion Engines! *screeeeeeech!*

    --
    --- To each of us a Truth is given.
  60. Dangerous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My friend, what is dangerous is to imagine a world without O-Zone. Never before have so much of humanity been able to join together in healthy, gut-level laughfest as when witnessing the Numa Numa phenomenuma.

  61. 325 CFM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, I don't understand ...

    According to his chart on the last page the air flow output of this Ionic Breeze-gone-Frankenstein is:
    Ionic Cooling System Coustom 325.00 CMF 0.00 dBA

    Compared to:
    EVERCOOL SFF-12 120mm Ever Lubricate bearing 120mm 80.00 CFM 25.00 dBA
    Thermaltake Silent Wheel A2330 130mm 120mm 54.40 CFM 16.00 dBA

    I had an Ionic Breeze ... the airflow isn't anything NEAR the output of a CPU fan, let alone a factor of 4 greater.

  62. Good gods, man, be careful! by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    I think that I just went crosseyed trying to think of cubic minutes..

    Do you realize what that can do to your brain?

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  63. oh sure, you accept their submission by brunascle · · Score: 1

    but when i submitted it last month, NOBODY LISTENED.

    1. Re:oh sure, you accept their submission by treeves · · Score: 1

      And you didn't listen when they said not to whine about having your submission rejected.
      "grousing about rejected submissions is Offtopic and usually gets moderated that way. It happens, don't take it personally."
      http://slashdot.org/submit.pl

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  64. Ozone filters... by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    Shop equipment like saws, sanders and such have mounts for an exhaust to take away dust. You'd think that more photocopiers would have similar mounts to vent the ozone and gases from the inks.

    Many of them have an activated charcoal ozone filter; I know because I've worked on laser printers and copiers and replaced a lot of these filters myself, although I seem to see fewer of them on newer models - I think the manufacturers have figured out how to make the printing process work with lower voltage coronas.

    Ozone production is only a problem above a certain voltage; it's entirely possible to build an air ionizer (which this is) that doesn't produce very much ozone at all.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  65. Convective cooling by VonSlatt · · Score: 1

    With a little re-working of interior air flow I'll bet that you could dispense with the ionic cooler entirely.

    My pumpless thermosiphon water cooled PC works in essentially that way. Jake.

  66. Convection? by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    Most of my consumer electronics that generate heat use convection for cooling. (TV, reciever, DVR, refrigerator, monitor...) They are designed so that hot air can easily rise out of the machine and be replaced by cooler air.

    Has anyone ever used convection to cool a computer? It doesn't make any noise, and it'll never wear out.

    1. Re:Convection? by Hamusutaa · · Score: 1

      The Apple G4 Cube, of course!

      Aside from the optical and hard drives, it's totally silent.

  67. dubious claims by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

    TFM claims both (a) no increase in power consumption (Project Overview page) and (b) an increase in air moved (CFM) relative to fan systems by a factor of anywhere between 3.8 and 28.8 (comparison table on Final Thoughts page).

    Anyone besides me find these claims difficult to believe? There are no figures presented to support the former at all and no indication as to how the latter was measured. It sounds like a fun project, but that's about it; I don't think it's been established that it can stand by itself as a technical improvement.

    --
    licet differant, aequabitur
  68. There's no CDROM drive - no XP? by LuminaireX · · Score: 1

    How did you install Windows XP or any other motherboard utility for that matter? I doubt you Ghosted it... good luck getting Ghost to run with that spiffy little RAM drive of yours.

    For that matter, a system without a CD-ROM drive isn't very useful unless you dedicate the machine to one game, and don't mind jumping through hurdles to install the next one, but at that point, it's really not a system with no moving parts is it?

    I guess it's all a moot point. Your power button still moves.

  69. hopefully not in Ionic Breeze tradition... by eliot1785 · · Score: 1

    The Ionic Breeze is an incredibly bad product. I know, I own two of them (I bought them at the same time, it's not like I hated one and bought another anyway). It uses a lot less power and has no moving parts, but the sacrifice you pay is that its actual ability to move air is greatly diminished. Which begs the question - if not having moving parts is your primary goal, why not just get a wet paper towel and hang it up in the room, hoping that dust particles will bump into it and cling to it? That's the (not so) extreme version of the Ionic Breeze approach. The reason you don't do that, of course, is that results matter, which is why fan-based systems are still far superior to the Ionic Breeze.

    Likewise, if I only cared about not having a moving fan in my laptop, maybe I would just work outside and let the breeze take care of everything. But that would obviously be insufficient. Assuming you want to use your computer and also not fry it, the ionic wind idea will not be viable until it can be at least as effective as fans. I wouldn't hold my breath.

    Besides, if you want to do away with fans in laptops, a better idea would be to add additional heat sinks to the vicinity and use a combination of that and liquid cooling to disburse the heat so widely and quickly that a fan would be unnecessary. This would add a lot of build complexity and some weight, however, and I suspect that is the reason this is not done. Besides, fans in laptops are not a huge concern. They are pretty resilient and effective.

    (As for anybody who says that the main reason to pursue ionic cooling is that fans cause a lot of noise - you obviously haven't heard the Ionic Breeze's signature "crackle," which is basically impossible to eliminate after a month or two, unless you void your warranty by taking the entire unit apart and cleaning the sensitive parts thoroughly.)