Slashdot Mirror


Fish Work as Anti-terror Agents

sdriver writes "San Francisco's bluegills went to work about a month ago, guarding the drinking water of more than 1 million people from substances such as cyanide, diesel fuel, mercury and pesticides. "There's no known manmade sensor that can do the same job as the bluegill." The New York City Department of Environmental Protection reported at least one instance in which the system caught a toxin before it made it into the water supply."

227 comments

  1. I don't feel safe! by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    *mumbles something about preferring sharks with frikkin' laser beams*

    --
    I hate printers.
    1. Re:I don't feel safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sharks, pfft. NO ONE expects the bluegill invasion!

    2. Re:I don't feel safe! by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      Something seems fishy about the whole thing!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    3. Re:I don't feel safe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because the fish are actually anti-terrorIST agents. They aren't at all effective against terror, just terrorism.

    4. Re:I don't feel safe! by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      All your bass are belong to us

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
  2. The question is by Monkeys!!! · · Score: 4, Funny

    How do we know this isn't a red herring by some terroist group?

    *ducks and runs*

    1. Re:The question is by bobscealy · · Score: 1, Funny

      Only 7 posts old and someone has already made a carp joke.

    2. Re:The question is by Frogbert · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Because when we tried to cut down the tallest tree in the forest with it and simply couldn't.

    3. Re:The question is by telchine · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've haddock up to here with terrorists and their shellfish behaviour.

    4. Re:The question is by morie · · Score: 1

      Blue herring?

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    5. Re:The question is by presearch · · Score: 1

      What a bunch of heartless bass turds.

  3. Fishing? by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean that if you go fishing you're aiding terrorism?

    1. Re:Fishing? by ultranova · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does this mean that if you go fishing you're aiding terrorism?

      Yes. You should get your fish from a market. Preferably fish imported from Japan. If you are self-sufficient in some respect, you are destroying the pillars of mutual dependence on which current capitalism and world economy are built.

      Besides, the fish are not privately owned. You are benefiting from public property. Which means that:

      When you're fishing, you're catching communism !

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    2. Re:Fishing? by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 4, Funny

      Communism and Terrorism? All we need now is a flimsy excuse for protecting our fish from the horrors of child pornography and we'll be set!

    3. Re:Fishing? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Besides, the fish are not privately owned. You are benefiting from public property. Which means that:

      When you're fishing, you're catching communism !


      I pay a special, very capitalist, tax for the right to fish, even though I let the little buggers go.

      Hell, I'm working as an anti terrorist by training the bluegills not to try to eat little bits of fur tied to a hook . . .the slimey little idiots.

      I even tried putting some laser beams on the heads of a few of them before I let them go. How was I supposed to know that a simple laser pointer would pin the poor little things to the bottom of the pond? What we need is a new breed of genetically engineered anti-terrorist bluegills the size of sharks.

      But I'd have to crack out the 10 weight to fish for those . . .and I might need a bigger boat.

      KFG

    4. Re:Fishing? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Not if you fish in O'Neill's pond...*rewatches Moebius*...CRAP!

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    5. Re:Fishing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Communism and Terrorism? All we need now is a flimsy excuse for protecting our fish from the horrors of child pornography and we'll be set!

      I have heard that hardcore fishermen like to assault fish in schools.

    6. Re:Fishing? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I pay a special, very capitalist, tax for the right to fish, even though I let the little buggers go.

      And... ?

      Paying taxes is no capitalist but socialist. After all, in pure capitalism market decides absolutely everything, so state has absolutely no tasks - no, not even enforcement of contracts or laws; if the market forces don't provide police, courts and army, then obviously they aren't needed - and therefore no operating expenses either, so it won't need taxes. Which gets to my next point:

      When you're paying taxes, you're paying for communism !

      But wait ! We've forgetting something ! Air is free to all, and certainly an important means of production - just try to make something while not breathing if you don't believe me. So:

      When you're breathing, you're inhaling communism !

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    7. Re:Fishing? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Paying taxes is no capitalist but socialist.

      As I said, it's a special tax. Hardly even a tax at all, since it's opt in. More of a purchase really, since it has unit a limit. Kinda like unlimited Internet access.

      Oh my God! The Internet is a social democracy under oligarchic control. I'd better opt out to preserve my politcal purity.

      And I'll buy a plastic bag to put over my head.

      KFG

    8. Re:Fishing? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      As I said, it's a special tax. Hardly even a tax at all, since it's opt in. More of a purchase really, since it has unit a limit. Kinda like unlimited Internet access.

      As long as it's paid to the state, as opposed to a private person or organization, my point stays: it defracts from the ideal purity of true capitalism and helps communism.

      And unlimited Internet access (by which I presume you mean no transfer cap) has nothing to do with this, as long as it's purchased from a private entity. It has nothing to do with communism.

      But keep up your explanations; you can't hide the desperation from shining through, you taxpaying, law-abiding, socially functional communist ! Soon you'll be talking about finding "fishermen's clubs" as a cover to your commie cell... You might even (gasp, horror) use shared equipment there ! Communist !

      Oh my God! The Internet is a social democracy under oligarchic control. I'd better opt out to preserve my politcal purity.

      The Internet is mostly privately owned. It is certainly not a democracy - or when did you last vote about ICANN's decisions ? And oligarchy is perfectly compatible with capitalism, in fact capitalism inevitably leads to oligarchy since in it money is power and concentrates soon in few hands.

      And I'll buy a plastic bag to put over my head.

      Now what did I say about self-sufficiency ? Think of the starving hitmen !

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    9. Re:Fishing? by johansalk · · Score: 1

      Ah. This at last explains "I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully".

    10. Re:Fishing? by coopex · · Score: 1

      I think you might get your point across clearer by referring to pure capitalism as anarcho-capitalism, if that's what you mean.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
  4. good idea! by Wizzerd911 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well when you think about it, they're really just super complex biological machines that built themselves so they're the perfect solution...except in my area that is. We may have the 2nd most terror targets in the US but the only thing the fish are telling us so far is that you "should not exceed eating two in one year." Looooots of PCB's in there. Terrorists could dump all sorts of stuff in there and we could be pulling up two headed fish without thinking anything was out of the ordinary :P

    --
    Is it just me or is it not going to upgrade to Vista in here?
    1. Re:good idea! by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Printed Circuit Boards? Wow you guys not only have robotic fish, but you catch and eat them too?

      --
      I hate printers.
    2. Re:good idea! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      We may have the 2nd most terror targets in the US

      According to the DHS system of accounting for targets, that means you have the world's largest fair along side the world's largest petting zoo?

    3. Re:good idea! by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think there may be a little extra Mercury in the fish supply. All the fish have grown little moustaches and started singing about champions and radios.

    4. Re:good idea! by Wizzerd911 · · Score: 0

      the funny thing is we actually might...but anyway, I think the definition is more like "any place where people are" and we have a lot of places where people are...I've seen them!

      --
      Is it just me or is it not going to upgrade to Vista in here?
    5. Re:good idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      polychlorinated biphenyl.
      In case you weren't joking.

    6. Re:good idea! by ArwynH · · Score: 1

      They're a tad bit expensive for my taste though, those frikkin' laser beams on their heads make them a hard catch... :)

  5. This is hardly guarding by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The bluegills are just sensors not guards. It's as dumb as saying one of those stupid "dogs" that bimbos like Paris Hiton carry around are guard dogs.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:This is hardly guarding by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's as dumb as saying one of those stupid "dogs" that bimbos like Paris Hiton carry around are guard dogs.
      They could be if you put frikkin' laser beams on their heads!
      --
      I hate printers.
    2. Re:This is hardly guarding by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      It's as dumb as saying one of those stupid "dogs" that bimbos like Paris Hiton carry around are guard dogs.

      Its actually way less dumb than that metaphor. I agree with your first sentence, but the second is a perfect example of quitting while you're ahead.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    3. Re:This is hardly guarding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Australia, we have stingrays guarding us from pests.

    4. Re:This is hardly guarding by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      That wasn't fair.

      It's an insult to bimbos.

    5. Re:This is hardly guarding by bluekanoodle · · Score: 1

      OK, that was really low. :0

    6. Re:This is hardly guarding by tomatensaft · · Score: 1

      Then they would be much more dangerous to their owners, not thugs or smth. :)

    7. Re:This is hardly guarding by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      In Australia, we have stingrays guarding us from pests.

      In Korea, only old people use stingrays as guards.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    8. Re:This is hardly guarding by initialE · · Score: 1

      Too early for the jokes man, that was in poor taste.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    9. Re:This is hardly guarding by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >stupid "dogs" that bimbos like Paris Hiton carry
      I think you'll find Paris is the dog's pet, not the other way around.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    10. Re:This is hardly guarding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Australia, we have stingrays guarding us from pests.
       
      ...and silly twits posting on /.

    11. Re:This is hardly guarding by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      And that would be a bad thing?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    12. Re:This is hardly guarding by tomatensaft · · Score: 1

      If it was Mrs. Paris Hilton, then yeah, definitely! :)

    13. Re:This is hardly guarding by inviolet · · Score: 1
      In Australia, we have stingrays guarding us from pests.

      In Korea, only old people use stingrays as guards.

      In Soviet Russia, fish use you to guard for toxins.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    14. Re:This is hardly guarding by TempeTerra · · Score: 1

      Ouch! Where's my "+1, Poor Taste" mod option?

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
    15. Re:This is hardly guarding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or an Orgazmo gun.

    16. Re:This is hardly guarding by jizziknight · · Score: 1

      You mean an Orgazmorator? Geez, get it right.

      --
      Everything I say is a lie. Except that... and that... and that, and that, and that, and that... and that.
    17. Re:This is hardly guarding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      one of those stupid "dogs"


      The are called puntables.
    18. Re:This is hardly guarding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Nature, fishes use toxins to guard against you.

      Ha!

    19. Re:This is hardly guarding by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 1

      Get out of the basement, she's a 'Miss'.

    20. Re:This is hardly guarding by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Get out of the basement, she's a 'Miss'.


      In British English she's a "proper little madam", and probably has been since some time before birth. No, it's not a compliment.
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  6. 007 by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

    The name is Pond. James Pond.

    1. Re:007 by eis271828 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Limpet beats Pond any day! http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058230/

  7. Fish caught a turd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the fish caught someone pooping in the resovoir. that's awesome.

    1. Catch jihadist pooping in drinking water
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of bluegills! That would be amazing! Goatse man and Cowboyneal will quiver with anticipation! Meatspin will go back to 5rpm due to the awesomeness of this post!

  8. nerdy enough? by Mydron · · Score: 2, Funny
    [Blugills] are no use against other sorts of attacks -- say [...] an attack by computer hackers on the systems that control the flow of water.
    So, is this news for nerds or not?
    1. Re:nerdy enough? by mcc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Clearly what we need to do is just release fish into the computer systems as well.

    2. Re:nerdy enough? by Wizzerd911 · · Score: 1, Funny

      *turns off his firewall and on the fish screensaver* well, I'm set now :) No talliban viruses are coming in this baby :D

      --
      Is it just me or is it not going to upgrade to Vista in here?
    3. Re:nerdy enough? by Deathbane27 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That should unclog the tubes too!

      --
      If it ain't broke, it needs more features!
    4. Re:nerdy enough? by unboring · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Clearly what we need to do is just release fish into the computer systems as well. You mean send them through the tubes?

    5. Re:nerdy enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly what we need to do is just release fish into the computer systems as well.


      I'd prefer bugs.
    6. Re:nerdy enough? by fabioaquotte · · Score: 1

      You can get them from here ;)

      --
      Fabio Aquotte
    7. Re:nerdy enough? by cno3 · · Score: 1

      That only works for the water-cooled models.

    8. Re:nerdy enough? by lostboy2 · · Score: 1

      Then we'd get Bluegills of Death instead of BSODs? Cool -- let me see if I can dig up that old fishy screensaver...

    9. Re:nerdy enough? by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      I've sent a few fish through the tubes in my day. But by then they weren't in much shape to do any anti-terror work.

    10. Re:nerdy enough? by shroomling · · Score: 0

      hmm... maybe they need blowfish to guard against the ev1l h@x0rz

  9. Definate improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Gotta be better than the sheep dealing with it now.

    1. Re:Definate improvement by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Gotta be better than the sheep dealing with it now.

      It's worse than that... we've got wolves guarding this henhouse...

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  10. Could you speak up please? by hullabalucination · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm hard of herring.

    1. Re:Could you speak up please? by AGMW · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'm hard of herring.

      You appear to be a dab hand at these fish jokes, and I don't want to carp and knock you off your perch, but maybe you didn't do it on porpoise?

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    2. Re:Could you speak up please? by MisterSquiddy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Keep the noise down please. I have a terrible haddock.

    3. Re:Could you speak up please? by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh my Cod that was awful. I would never bream of lowering myself to punning, but it's about what I'd expect in this plaice

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    4. Re:Could you speak up please? by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 1

      Oh Cod, it makes me eel listening to you guys carp and whale with your tales of roe. But whatever. I'll throw my own in for the halibut.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    5. Re:Could you speak up please? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Halibut you quit floundering about, take these two aspirin and call me in the marlin.

  11. And what about the fish themselves? by VorpalEdge · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the amounts that get through are tiny, but I bet people are glad to know that each glass of tap water they drink has more fish feces in it than before.

    1. Re:And what about the fish themselves? by saxoholic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It sounds like they're in a seperate tank that is being filled with water from the reservoir prior to purification, since the chlorine and other chemicals used to purify the water would kill the fish pretty quickly. so, 1) It doesn't sound like they're physically in the water source and 2) Even if they were, there's naturally going to be fish in a reservoir anyway, and any of their feces are going to be taken care of during the purification process. So, don't worry about fish poop in your ice water.

    2. Re:And what about the fish themselves? by monsted · · Score: 1

      Don't drink the water! Fish are having sex in it.

    3. Re:And what about the fish themselves? by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      Don't drink the water! Fish are having sex in it.

      OMFG! My daughters are drinking fish sex water? Won't someone please think of the children!

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    4. Re:And what about the fish themselves? by monsted · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm, i wonder if this is why the sea is so salty...

  12. Not likely method by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Using cyanide to poison drinking water for a major city? It would be easy to catch the guys, they'd be the ones dumping the tanker truck full of cyanide.

    Plutonium would work much better.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Not likely method by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      If they had plutonium, would they use it to poison a water supply?

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    2. Re:Not likely method by AWeishaupt · · Score: 1

      The Myth of Plutonium Toxicity: http://russp.org/BLC-3.html

    3. Re:Not likely method by arivanov · · Score: 2, Informative

      Using it as a poison does not require any technical knowledge and is quite effective. While not as poisonous as some mercury compounds or pesticides, it is still poisonous enough to have effect. In addition to that, the howling of the media about Pu discovered in drinking water will provide the terrorists with what they want even if nobody dies. Go and try to explain Joe Average that the concentration is so low that it will not do a thing. As far as he is concerned it is plutonium. Scary stuff.

      On the subject of the article - many phosphorganic, pyrethroids and other insecticides are temperature specific. Many will kill fish and insects only under specific temperature. They are harmless to warm blooded animals for this exact reason - the target is outside the optimal thermal range. Now, I have not followed advanced in this area, but what exactly will these fish do if someone pours a tanker of something that is the opposite in thermal specificity. Something harmless for coldblooded animals which kills warm blooded only?

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    4. Re:Not likely method by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Now, I have not followed advanced in this area, but what exactly will these fish do if someone pours a tanker of something that is the opposite in thermal specificity. Something harmless for coldblooded animals which kills warm blooded only?

      Keep the water temperature in the test tank around 37 degrees Celsius ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    5. Re:Not likely method by arivanov · · Score: 1

      The bluegills from the setup in the article will not survive it. In fact very few species of fish will. Even tropical swamp species like Gurami prefer to have the temperature under 32 for most of the time.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    6. Re:Not likely method by morie · · Score: 1

      Also, the water supply would probably spread low level radioactivity over a lager area than any bomb could. And the radiation effects are far worse if the radioactive compound is ingested. It will be impossibly hard to clean the area. I should stop before anyone actually thinks this is attractive.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    7. Re:Not likely method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plutonium isn't particularly toxic. It also doesn't radiate. It has a half life of 25000 years. So eating plutonium is about as bad as chewing on a nail - you'll chip your teeth, that's all. Anyhoo, if you dump plutonium in water, it'll just fall to the bottom into the mud...

    8. Re:Not likely method by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 1

      Using cyanide to poison drinking water for a major city? It would be easy to catch the guys, they'd be the ones dumping the tanker truck full of cyanide.

      Plutonium would work much better.


      I still think it would be pretty easy to spot the guys dumping a tanker truck full of plutonium.

    9. Re:Not likely method by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Bullshit, its a very heavy metal. It has the same type of effects as lead but with much less plutonium needed than lead. The reason people say its not actually dangerious is because its so dense it would sink to the bottom of the water supply and would never get through the pipes in the first place.

    10. Re:Not likely method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish you'd cited a source that wasn't full of flamingly rabid right-wing propaganda. Bush uber alles!

    11. Re:Not likely method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cyanide is a problem in water, but not from terrorist. Even if it's from natural sources, I still don't want to drink too much of it.

    12. Re:Not likely method by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Plutonium would work much better.

      Or not at all.

      It is not very toxic when ingested with food or drink because of its very small probability of passing through the intestine walls into the bloodstream. Pu forms large molecules, which have great difficulty in passing through membranes.

      or http://www.ccnr.org/plute_tox.html

      Early studies showed that plutonium is poorly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and through the intact skin. From these data, inhalation or penetrating skin wounds were clearly the most important exposure routes for potential human exposure.

  13. OH MY GAWD! by BLAG-blast · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fish are peeing in our water supply!!!!

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
    1. Re:OH MY GAWD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, so much worse than you and your kid.

    2. Re:OH MY GAWD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Obligatory W.C Fields quote: "I don't drink water, because fish f*sk in it!",

      and "There be worse things than poison in tha water, yanno", leered Drippy Dick the Pirate, backing away from the ship's water barrel and closing his fly.

  14. E-Mail, eh? by MrNonchalant · · Score: 5, Funny
    The computerized system in use in San Francisco and elsewhere is designed to detect even slight changes in the bluegills' vital signs and send an e-mail alert when something is wrong.
    From: The Bluegills <bluegills@tank1.resevoir2.dopw.sf.ca.us>
    To: Bob Thompson <bthompson@dopw.sf.ca.us>
    Subject: Our Contract

    Dear Bob,

    We don't want to seem ungrateful and we appreciate all you've done. However, it has just come to our attention, and our solicitor's attention, that our job is to test the water for poison. In light of this we'd like to renegotiate. We're looking forward to hearing back from you ASAP concerning this issue.

    Sincerely,
    Tim, Ed, and Bill
    The Bluegills
    1. Re:E-Mail, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it funny that we're only JUST getting around to doing
      what the dolphins have been doing all along.

      We're just starting to use the fish to test for water quality,
      but the dolphins have been using people to test for AIR quality
      for centuries!

      They have advanced detection systems biologically tuned to
      the human nervous system to detect abnormal breathing patterns.

      To illustrate my point, notice that there are no dolphins
      living in any major cities. And the ones who ARE crazy enough
      to live near coastal/port cities tend to come up for air as
      infrequently as possible.

  15. Animals as agents of terror. by hullabalucination · · Score: 3, Informative

    At the other end of the issue, we've used animals as agents of destruction in some pretty weird ways. Probably everybody here has heard of the U.S. Navy's experiments using dolphins or porpoises as a delivery system for below-the-water-line bombs targeting ships. The weirdest I've ever heard of was the Army's Bat Bomb project during WWII:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_bomb

    Does anyone here watch the History Channel (North America)? Didn't they run a documentary on this project a couple of years ago?

    * * * * *

    My goal is to someday be the person my dog thinks I am.
    --Unknown

    1. Re:Animals as agents of terror. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      During the American Revolutionary War, enemy spy would head toward a powder house with a squirrel in hand-- tie a piece of paper to a squirrel's tail, set the paper on fire and release the squirrel near the powder house. At this point the squirrel would go running for cover into one of the powder house air vents, and ignite the gun powder in the powder house.

      (Or so I recall from history class)

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:Animals as agents of terror. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does anyone here watch the History Channel (North America)? Didn't they run a documentary on this project a couple of years ago?

      They actually re-ran this over the past weekend - which is how I know what you're talking about. :) Good documentary though - it actually worked, it was just obsoleted by the nuclear bomb.

    3. Re:Animals as agents of terror. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In WW2, the Russians trained dogs by penning them up until they got hungry and feeding them only under tanks. Then they'd release them with mines on their backs, so they'd crawl under enemy tanks and explode. Results were mixed, as the dogs would crawl under any tank, including the Russian ones that were nearby (and which were just like the ones they had been trained to run underneath).

      In Roman times, war elephants were combatted by pouring oil on pigs and setting them afire, causing them to run squealing, sometimes even toward the elephants to disrupt them.

      In WW1, dogs were used to lay copper telephone wire through no-man's-land, as well as messengers and supply runners.

      For the current war in Iraq, Morocco offered the US its brigade of 2000 monkeys trained to detonate land mines -- presumably the hard way.

      This is of course in addition to the "normal" uses of animals you'd expect: dogs sniffing out mines and enemies in Vietnam, pigeons used as messengers, horses used to ride or to haul carts, cats used to kill rats in trenches, and so on.

      As far as I know, the US Navy has trained sea mammals (dolphins, sea lions) to _spot_ mines and mark them by releasing a buoy, but as a delivery mechanism.

  16. I can't believe this... by s-twig · · Score: 0

    "And they are no use against other sorts of attacks -- say, the bombing of a water main, or an attack by computer hackers on the systems that control the flow of water."

    Really? Stupid fish

  17. Cheap Labor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait until the U.S. Department of Labor hears of this!

  18. Well, Bushie predicted this one by Durandal64 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully."
    -George W. Bush, Saginaw, Mich., Sept. 29, 2000

    Give credit where credit's due.

    1. Re:Well, Bushie predicted this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was going to say something about having devised a perfect plan for insuring this happened (global warming/climate change and dismantling the apparatus defending us from terrorism starting the first day he got into the White House). Then I saw the quote is real:

      On Friday, 29 September 2000, Governor Bush was on the stump in Saginaw, Michigan, and deviated from his prepared speech to reassure the business community that he would not support the tearing down of energy-producing dams merely to protect threatened fish species, an issue he had recently covered while campaigning in the Pacific Northwest:

      . . . on Friday, feeling the need to explain his statement during a speech on energy policy that he intended to maintain dams in the Pacific Northwest, he departed from his text and added, "I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully." He did not elaborate.

      George Bush, Junior, will say and do anything for political power. Too bad we, the American people, have to suffer for his idolatry (and just plain doltishness).
    2. Re:Well, Bushie predicted this one by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      Well, you could say that, but only if you consider using fish the way kings and emperors used slaves to test their food for poison to be "coexisting peacefully". ;-)

  19. Oblig. Penny Arcade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We don't want to seem ungrateful and we appreciate all you've done. However, it has just come to our attention, and our solicitor's attention, that our job is to test the water for poison. In light of this we'd like to renegotiate. We're looking forward to hearing back from you ASAP concerning this issue.
    "A bee stung my mouth"?

    Yeah, because you took a job eating bees!

    Love,
    Bob
    1. Re:Oblig. Penny Arcade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be "mouf"?

  20. Geeks at work as counterterrorists, too by !splut · · Score: 5, Funny

    That reminds me of a similar article:

    SAN FRANCISCO, California (AP) -- A type of person so common that practically every American who ever attended grade school has probably harassed one is being enlisted in the fight against terrorism.

    San Francisco, New York, Washington and other big cities are using computer geeks -- also known as computer nerds or slashdotters -- as a sort of canary in a coal mine to safeguard the internet.

    Small numbers of the geeks are kept in cubicles supplied with Mountain Dew and a broadband internet connection from local internet service providers (ISPs), and sensors in each cubicle work around the clock to register changes in the breathing, heartbeat and browsing patterns of the geeks that occur in the presence of internet attacks.

    "Nature's given us pretty much the most powerful and reliable early warning center out there," said Bill Lawler, co-founder of Intelligent Automation Corporation, a Southern California company that makes and sells the geek monitoring system. "There's no known manmade sensor that can do the same job as the computer nerd."

    Since September 11, the government has taken very seriously the threat of attacks on the U.S. internet. Federal law requires nearly all internet service providers to assess their vulnerability to terrorism.

    Big cities employ a range of safeguards against chemical and biological agents, constantly monitoring, testing and treating the water. But protection systems for electronic networks can trace only the hacks they are programmed to detect, Lawler said.

    Computer geeks -- a hardy species about the size of a normal human being, but thinner and paler -- are considered more versatile. They are highly attuned to internet integrity, and when exposed to even brief internet outages, they experience the geek version of coughing, compulsively reloading browser windows and pinging gateways to determine the source of the congestion.

    The computerized system in use in San Francisco and elsewhere is designed to detect even slight changes in the geek's vital signs and send an e-mail alert when something is wrong.

    --
    The angel in the oatmeal.
    1. Re:Geeks at work as counterterrorists, too by fxxkin$ · · Score: 1

      The computerized system in use in San Francisco and elsewhere is designed to detect even slight changes in the geek's vital signs and send an e-mail alert when something is wrong.

      I wonder what will happen to these "geeks" vital signs when they find some particular good pron on the internet?

    2. Re:Geeks at work as counterterrorists, too by KZigurs · · Score: 3, Funny

      You realise that internet outage that would force common //homo nerdus// to shut off would make any e-mail notifications futile.

      Idiotic government contractors.

    3. Re:Geeks at work as counterterrorists, too by God+Of+Atheism · · Score: 1

      "Nature's given us pretty much the most powerful and reliable early warning center out there," said Bill Lawler, co-founder of Intelligent Automation Corporation, a Southern California company that makes and sells the geek monitoring system. "There's no known manmade sensor that can do the same job as the computer nerd." Isn't the computer nerd a manmade sensor?

    4. Re:Geeks at work as counterterrorists, too by brianerst · · Score: 3, Funny
      Computer geeks -- a hardy species about the size of a normal human being, but thinner and paler -- are considered more versatile.
      Only in California are computer geeks thinner. Out here in the Midwest, we grow 'em big.
    5. Re:Geeks at work as counterterrorists, too by Fhqwhgadss · · Score: 1

      True. We need to train the beat cops to recognize a higher than average concentration of pasty-faced cave-dwellers outside as a warning sign and radio in to the Department of Internet Police Secure Homeland Infrastructure Task Squad.

      --
      How does a 7-person democracy cut a pie? Into 4 pieces.
    6. Re:Geeks at work as counterterrorists, too by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Only problem is they would get bored eventually and start hacking the system.

  21. PETA & SPCA by aalu.paneer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Won't PETA & SPCA complain?

    --
    where did my sig go? where's my sig at?
    1. Re:PETA & SPCA by Techman83 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No.. eco extremists only care about "cute" animals....

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    2. Re:PETA & SPCA by luder · · Score: 1

      So true... Same goes for saving electricity. If I leave a lamp turned on in winter for a few moments in an empty room I'll get an eco bitch screaming about wasting power. Yet, they seem to have no problem when they leave their computer on for a long time when it is not being used (sleep mode? Or maybe at least turn off the monitor?), and don't even mention to turn off the power connection when it is turned off.

    3. Re:PETA & SPCA by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Probably only PeTA. The ASPCA is generally concerned with fish, and as they are an animal welfare organization, rather than an animal rights organization, generally have no problem with legitimate uses of animals for the overall good as long as there is no undue suffering. You won't find the ASPCA blanket-protesting animal research or eating meat. That's for PeTA, just like protesting fishing.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    4. Re:PETA & SPCA by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, should read the ASPCA is generally less concerned with fish. Doh.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    5. Re:PETA & SPCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have they ever stopped?

    6. Re:PETA & SPCA by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      Where is that edit button when you need it?

  22. FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First Post Bitches!

  23. The idea's not exactly new. by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Informative

    Using animals as sensors to detect contaminants isn't exactly a new idea. Coal miners have been using canaries to detect coal damp and other noxious gases for at least a century. The only new thing is using fish instead of birds. Nice idea, though, and a lot more cost effective than trying to design something sensative enough to be useful.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:The idea's not exactly new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, right? Canaries! That's amazing!

      It's also mentioned in the second paragraph of the article. Reading the material before commenting on it is fun! :D

    2. Re:The idea's not exactly new. by ComaVN · · Score: 1

      What's more, this technique has been in use in the Netherlands for decades.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    3. Re:The idea's not exactly new. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      Reading the material before commenting on it is fun! :D


      You must be really new here!

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re:The idea's not exactly new. by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1
      It's also not exactly new when it comes to water processing plants.

      The city of Zurich. uses trouts to check for problems with the processed water for (literally) decades. A few hours before the processed water hits the distribution system and the pipes it is piped through a fish tank with said trout. The fish tank is under constant stream and the trout swims against the stream.

      If something , er! fishy occurs the dead or knocked out trout passes a sensor and raises alarm.

      This of course is not the only means to test water quality, but it's a time tested, reliable alarm system to warn hours in advance if something goes awfully wrong.

      As a side remark: Tap water here has Evian quality.

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

    5. Re:The idea's not exactly new. by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      As a side remark: Tap water here has Evian quality.

      That depends very much on the local quality of your pipes. Especially if you are renting a room in a particularly old building. :-)

    6. Re:The idea's not exactly new. by fatmal · · Score: 3, Funny

      The only new thing is using fish instead of birds

      Yeah, when they tested the water using birds the only conclusion was 'That must be REALLY poisoned water!'

    7. Re:The idea's not exactly new. by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for allowing me to actually find out whether I can swallow my false teeth. The experience was not as bad as I had imagined it though, but I am REALLY not looking forward to "passing" them in a day or so, but that will give me something to ponder as I clean the coffee from my keyboard and monitor.

      LOL! Thanks for starting my day off with a good laugh! :-)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    8. Re:The idea's not exactly new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course its not new...

      However, this is an elegant and simple solution to a fairly complex problem, which is the point of the article. DHS probably would have commisioned a $100 million dollar study on the problem and awarded a $2 billion dollar contract to Diebold or someone similar that would have been delayed 2 years and over budget, and probably would not have worked that well.

      This may not be "news" but it is definitely "stuff that matters." I thought it was cool and enjoyed the article.

  24. Probably by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Just let them volunteer to replace the bluegills. Then we can let the bluegills go.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Probably by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      Or we could pretend like we're letting them go and then eat them.

      Also if they volunteer to replace the bluegills can we get a webcam setup?

  25. test by iecompat · · Score: 0

    test comment

    --
    test sig
  26. Still Don't Trust The Fish by ArizonaKid · · Score: 5, Funny

    As someone who grew up in New Jersey, there were many lakes that had those little guys swimming all over the place...

    And there isn't a change in hell that I would drink any of the water in those lakes. Those fish are survivors, and although I am not a scientist, I could only conclude that the fish in the lakes nearby had to have gone through some type of resistant mutation... That really doesn't help my confidence in the safety of the water.

    I say use goldfish. Those little bastards take one day of me forgetting to feed them to go belly up.

    --
    -- The Arizona Kid
    1. Re:Still Don't Trust The Fish by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1
      Still Don't Trust Fish

      "I've never trusted fish, and I never will. I can never forgive them for the death of my worms."

      /Kirk
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  27. Yay for biodiversity! by Truth_Quark · · Score: 1

    This is another example of a solution to a real problem best solved with a biological system.

    These are the reasons that you can argue to the most right-wing of dextrophiles of at least the economic value in preserving biodiversity.

    But still we lose 50 species per day, forever. If you don't have the technology to fix it, you should be trying not to break it.

  28. "Fishkill" test by Barbarian · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is also pretty standard for treated industrial wastewater--take a sample from the outflow on a regular basis, send it to a lab, and they stick fish in it and see how many die within 24 hours. Some setups even have a small side stream so that you can get results in real time.

    1. Re:"Fishkill" test by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      They do that in South Florida, the outflow goes into the ocean and they see how many fish will die.

    2. Re:"Fishkill" test by druxton · · Score: 1

      I used to work in a university lab that did these tests using rainbow trout as the test species. The relevant EPA standards are here, in case anyone is interested in how the tests are conducted.

  29. I wonder ... by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

    whether the municipal water people can tell if a bluegill is tripping on LSD?

    Or, for that matter, viagra.

    (If anyone feels like responding "your can't trip on viagra" - that depends on how big the pill is, and whether you're looking where you're walking.)

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:I wonder ... by kfg · · Score: 1

      That lyric page doesn't credit the author, who happens to be an old friend of mine, so I feel obligated to stick up for her. That's a Camille West song.

      There's a chance I'll bump into her at an open mic tonight. If I do I'll let her know she's finally made the big time -- posted on Slashdot. Actually, I think I've done that a few times myself over the years, but I don't count.

      Come to think of it I've posted the line "I see Volvos, inside of Volvos, inside of Volvos, inside of Volvos. . .", which happens to be the closing line of another song written by an old friend, Dave Hitt, who cowrote "I'm Dyslexic" with Camille.

      The song is "Yuppies on LSD."

      Why do all of my friends seem to have this fascination with dumping chemicals in public water supplies?

      KFG

  30. Not the first by ross.w · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This was done in Sydney 15 years ago, when they still drew their water supply via an open canal. The Water Board had identified a risk fronm the canal that wound its way through teh suburbs and was very easy to get access to, so they put in a fish tank connected to the canal to pick up anything toxic that might have found its way into the water. In this cas the fish were Macquarie perch (I think).

    There was a video camera trained on the tank and the operators in the control room could cut off the canal if they noticed the fish were dead.

    There was a guy whose job it was to feed the fish and run the dechlorination system that removed the chlorine from the water going into the tank, since that's also toxic to fish.

    One weekend , he forgot to top up the sodium thiosulphate solution that was used for this purpose, and all the fish died from chlorine poisoning some time on Sunday night when it ran out.

    That was bad enough, but it was Monday morning before the operators noticed.

    They don't use that system anymore. The canal has been filled in and there is a pipeline and a fully filtered treatment plant.

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    1. Re:Not the first by ForestGrump · · Score: 2, Informative

      Slightly off topic, but a related story.

      I took an environmental law class once, and the guy who taught it used to work county health or something.

      In California, there are a few ways of determining if somethning is toxic, and one of the ways is to put the suspected agent into a fish tank with an "indicator species" of fish and wait a few days to see if the fish live or die. If the fish die, then the suspected agent is thus toxic.

      Well, one time he was infront of a judge explaining the test, and presenting that the fish died.
      The judge then asked if the were any of these fish wild in the county.
      No, there are none of these fish wild in the county.
      Then why do we care about this test then?

      Well, some people just don't understand the importance of indicator species.

      Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    2. Re:Not the first by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1

      yeah, we all know, it's been done before.

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
  31. bluegills? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would have picked piranas and crocodiles. The bluegills just let you know the water is poisend after which you have the large expence of finding and trialing the terrorist. My system makes it very easy: The terrorist are the little pieces of pirana feces floating in the water. Or the guy stuck in the tree above the crocodiles. Either way we save at lot of money.

  32. Animals against terror? by SendBot · · Score: 2, Funny

    This thing with the fish sounds great and all, but I'm worry about my 4th amendment rights being eroded by little birds telling my government things.

    At least I can count on moles to uphold le resistance.

  33. Probably urban legend by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    Have you ever tried to hold a conscious squirrel even using two hands?

    If we're talking about a fully grown gray squirrel, this looks to me to be wayyyy into urban legend territory.

    Tell the guy who thought this up to change it to "lighting the tail of a flying squirrel and then launching it by catapult". Seems more reasonable to me.

    [[Yes, I know the details can be changed to make the story more reasonable, but then this post would be boring, no?]]

    1. Re:Probably urban legend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I know the details can be changed to make the story more reasonable, but then this post would be boring, no?

      Too late.

    2. Re:Probably urban legend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is DARPA. Clearly you know a great deal about squirrels, and I'm sure you are aware of the widening gap in this crucial area of America's future defense capabilities. We'd like to give you a substantial grant to investigate these intriguing advanced squirrel-based weapons systems(ASBWS), particularly the advanced ballistic flying squirrel delivery system (ABFSDS) innovations described in your recent work. We look forward to working with you and the patriotic death-squirrels of the future.

    3. Re:Probably urban legend by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is an urban legend... although it's a common legend, since I heard it from a couple sources, including Colonial Williamsburg. Maybe it was a rat or a cat.

      I seem to remember a part about subduing the animal with formaldehyde or alcohol.

      But I like the catapult.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    4. Re:Probably urban legend by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried to hold a conscious squirrel even using two hands?

      You have to actually catch them first.

  34. My Dear American Friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd like to humbly bring to your attention the little known fact that the threat to your water supply hardly comes from terrorism, but rather from industrial toxic spills. The fish are not fighting terrorism but protecting environment (please read the cited case for a good example). I am very sorry, I'm not trying to diminish the heroic efforts of your patriotic fish in anyway, they are still doing an important job. But dear allies, please try to remember that not all the bad things come from abroad in a form of bearded fundamentalist menace.

    1. Re:My Dear American Friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The fish are not fighting terrorism...

      I think it's a good idea to be testing the water supply but I have to agree that they don't add that much protection against terrorists.

      Any agent that is immediately toxic to humans will be detected very quickly by the humans farther up the water supply ystem which will alert humans farther down the water supply system. Granted, the fish might save the lives of a few humans living way at the beginning of the water supply but no way are all one million people on the water supply going to be drinking the tainted water at once.

      Given that the humans farther up the water supply system will be serving as detectors for humans farther down the water supply system, any but the most incompetent terrorists would use an agent that caused lethal damage that only became apparent after a few days. Then you're left with the question of whether the lethal damage would become more apparent more quickly in the fish than in the people. It might and it might not. A person can be like "Whoa, dude, I don't feel so good." but a fish is just going to swim around the tank more slowly.

    2. Re:My Dear American Friends by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'd like to humbly bring to your attention the little known fact that the threat to your water supply hardly comes from terrorism, but rather from industrial toxic spills. The fish are not fighting terrorism but protecting environment (please read the cited case for a good example). I am very sorry, I'm not trying to diminish the heroic efforts of your patriotic fish in anyway, they are still doing an important job. But dear allies, please try to remember that not all the bad things come from abroad in a form of bearded fundamentalist menace.

      Hey, no one said terrorists necessarily had to be bearded fundamentalists. To misquote Forrest Gump, "terrorism is as terrorism does". If any companies pollute the water supply, I think they should then be regarded as terrorists, and their corporate executives locked up in Guantanamo and tortured indefinitely.

  35. Wonderful news by Frantactical+Fruke · · Score: 1

    Polluters are equated to terrorists now? Brilliant! So we won't need any Erin Brockovitches to get some justice to these bastards - we can just ship them off to Guantanamo when a bluegill dies. About time, too.

  36. DHS screws up again by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Apparently the Department of Homeland Security failed to realized that they just put British bluegills in charge of our national security. (No red-blooded American bluegill would refer to their personal pondscum as a "solicitor" -- sharks are "lawyers" here, except when they're sharks) Ahh well, could have been worse... at least when the going gets tough I'd trust the British with my back. But if DHS' next bright idea is poison-sensing frogs, well, I'm marching on Washington.

    1. Re:DHS screws up again by MrNonchalant · · Score: 1

      Well I originally wrote lawyer but it didn't work in the sentence in terms of diction.
      "It has come to our attention, and our lawyer's attention,"
      versus
      "It has come to our attention, and our solicitor's attention,"

      As it was the whole thing could have been much better but I wanted to get in before the moderators all moved to the next story.

  37. so polluters are terrorists now? by petes_PoV · · Score: 3, Insightful
    OK, I'm fine with the idea of protecting people's water supply. But to say this is part of the fight against terrorism frankly, is ridiculous.

    ISTM that each time "terrorism" is included as a reason to improve public safety, it's just assisting the terrorist agenda by keeping them inthe news and instilling fear where it didn't previously exist.

    Better to celebrate the improvements that progress brings, rather than trying to keep everyone cowering in fear with cheap, sensationalist news copy.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:so polluters are terrorists now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Amen!
      Every time someone mentions the word "terrorist" these days I have an urge to either laugh, cry, or subject said person to violence. Generally the latter, which for me is rather unusual. *sigh* The world is going to hell faster than expected...

  38. Clams deserve credit too by archeopterix · · Score: 3, Funny
    I've read an article about clams used for the same purpose - they might be even better than fish, because they speak binary (clam open/clam clammed up) and don't move so much, so it's easier to monitor them automatically. The system in question raised alarm if more than a preset percentage of the clams clammed up. I cannot find the original article, but here's a short press note about a similar system that I found:
    Delta Consult, a Dutch company, markets a water pollution monitor that uses live zebra mussels as sensors.

    The product uses changes in mussels behavior - as determined by monitoring shell movement through electromagnetic induction - to detect water quality changes. The mussels are glued to the device.

    Delta Consult reports that the system can detect low concentrations of tributyl-tin oxide, chlorine, crude oil and such heavy metals as copper, cadmium, selenium, zinc and lead.

    The best part of the system is that the mussels are replaceable - but you must supply your own.

    1. Re:Clams deserve credit too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The system in question raised alarm if more than a preset percentage of the clams clammed up. I cannot find the original article...

      ooh... check out that really hot clam!

    2. Re:Clams deserve credit too by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      Hey, stop trying to mussel in on the fish!

    3. Re:Clams deserve credit too by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Plus, we should be more understanding of clams than fish, since we humans descended from clams, according to Scientology.

  39. Fitted with Laser on Head? by mahesh_gharat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are these fitted with Laser on their heads? :-)
    By the way this news is too old. I read it in print media couple of daze ago.

    1. Re:Fitted with Laser on Head? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read it in print media couple of daze ago.
      Oh my, you must be new here ..

  40. Just a new application by tomatoguy · · Score: 3, Informative

    of a technique used by water-testing labs. Trout and Daphnia are used in the lab I consulted to once. For things with a higher ppm range trout were used, and for lower ppm concentrations Daphia (which are barely naked-eye visible) are used. The waterborne equivalent of canaries in coal mines.

  41. Flaw in the plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The plan to use fish to detect poisons is all well and good, but ignores the very possible possibility that The Terrorists will just infiltrate fish hatcheries, use off-the-shelf DNA splicing machines to create a breed of fish which are extra-fertile and do not show signs of poisoning, and populate the waterways and resevoirs with their nefarious aquatic fish of evil. Clearly, the government must immediately initiate a program of DNA testing of all fish in all waterways to counter this threat!

  42. very difficult to make that effective by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 4, Informative

    Plutonium is toxic, that's true.

    But the descriptions you hear all the time about how one gram can kill a bazillion people assumes that each person gets exactly a lethal dose and no more.

    In reality, this is difficult to do. Plutonium, for example, is not soluble in water and is very heavy. So distributing it through the water supply would be very difficult.

    If you drop a bit in the water supply, it'll just sink to the bottom in the first eddy it reaches and sit there, killing only things that come near it instead of the intended targets. It might kill nothing except a few rats.

    http://www.llnl.gov/csts/publications/sutcliffe/

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:very difficult to make that effective by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think it's unfortunate. I think Ralph Nader was perpetrating that statement. I think he was trying to shut down a mission to Saturn or something like that that had a nuclear reactor. The problem is that the general scientific consensus is that the nuclear reactor in the deep space probes would have survived the Challenger explosion intact.

    2. Re:very difficult to make that effective by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...one gram can kill a bazillion people...

      Plutonium, for example, is not soluble in water and is very heavy...
      ... So, does a gram of plutonium way more, or less, than a gram of feathers?

      --
      sig?
    3. Re:very difficult to make that effective by debrain · · Score: 4, Funny
      It might kill nothing except a few rats.


      Or turning them and four baby turtles into ninjas, heros in a half-shell so to speak, which grow up to be a crime-fighting team of pizza-loving mutants.
    4. Re:very difficult to make that effective by tehcyder · · Score: 4, Funny
      So, does a gram of plutonium way more, or less, than a gram of feathers?
      I think the standard of scientific knowledge displayed recently on slashdot is absolutely appalling, and a terrible indictment of the failings of our education system in modern society.

      I mean, what sort of an idiot needs to even ask this question - obviously the plutonium weighs more.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:very difficult to make that effective by chato · · Score: 1

      [T]he descriptions you hear all the time about how one gram can kill a bazillion people assumes that each person gets exactly a lethal dose

      This is equivalent to the fact that a healthy man, in theory, can get over 20 million women pregnant with 1 ml of semen. The problem is not the quantity of sperms, the problems are the transportation and the logistics :-)
    6. Re:very difficult to make that effective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, does a gram of plutonium way [sic] more, or less, than a gram of feathers?
      Which planet are you from?
      (no really, it determines the answer)
  43. Animal cruelty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats what this is, animal cruelty, putting them in harms way, using them as a shield.

    How different is this from Human Shields that the government cried about with Saddam in the first Iraq war? No different.

  44. Offtopic, name by morie · · Score: 1

    What an extremely stereotypical name you have to have been on /. for so long!

    for those who don't speak dutch

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  45. Terrorism? Factories and stupid neighbours first by Raindeer · · Score: 1

    The entire terror angle is complete crap. Chances of terrorism causing problems in the water supply are infinitely smaller than those that happen through other conscious and unconscious human action and the so-called Acts of God/Nature. Diesel spills are an environmental problem. Raw sewage in the water intake because of excessive rain are Acts of God/Nature etc etc. These things will be the majority of your problems. The great thing is that if you can detect these, you can detect terrorism.

  46. Not new by oglueck · · Score: 1

    The city of Zurich (Switzerland) has been guarding its drinking water for the last 30 years with trouts.

    1. Re:Not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, trouts are great. I use them to guard me on IRC for years.

    2. Re:Not new by procrastinatos · · Score: 1

      I remember a school trip to the water treatment plant of the city of Antwerp some 20 odd years ago where they also used trouts to guard against contaminants. The trouts had to swim up an artificially created stream in a fish tank. Whenever two of the three trouts made contact with the back of the tank more than a predefined number of times per hour, the system went into a state of alert.

  47. Has to be said by cheros · · Score: 1

    "I cannot find the original article"

    - because, they, um, have, er, clammed up? :-)

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  48. Why the terror link? by houghi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is this some lame attempt to link terorism to the problems cause by the farming and other industry? "Anti-terror" It soubds as if somebody is crying "Wolf" all the time.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  49. Sounds like a job for the FCPD by NickFortune · · Score: 1

    Where's Inspector Gill now that we need him?

    --
    Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    1. Re:Sounds like a job for the FCPD by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      He died in 2003.

  50. Surely you mean "Pesterers"? by Flying+pig · · Score: 1

    And yes, it was funny. I realise he was some kind of Australian national hero, but so was Ned Kelly. If winding up alligators while holding your child is the way naturalists normally behave, I would be extremely surprised. He was certainly no Dian Fossey, and if plenty of taseless jokes encourage people to just leave stingrays alone, instead of (as some Australians seem to be doing, for some sick reason) maltreating them - well, it would be a good thing. At least Australia will now have a high profile Darwin Award winner.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
    1. Re:Surely you mean "Pesterers"? by Hucko · · Score: 1

      He wasn't an Australian national hero. Universally we groaned at the mention of him, until his death. Since his death, I have only been able to get roughly (estimate) 1 in 5 people i have spoken regarding him to acknowledge the apathy we had towards the unaustralian hype he eminated. friggen hypocrites As for the stingray thing, it is probably hype itself as it was not that uncommon to see a stingray mutilated on a beach (I've seen probably 3 in 20 odd years, and I hate the beach. don't think I'm that 'lucky')... just authoritories associating antisocial behaviour with the last important event. Idiots.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  51. Re:Bushisms starting to make sense? by nephridium · · Score: 1

    Agh, I was paraphrasing there; imho the quote actually warrents an accurate citation. What he said was more refined: "I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully." - see what he did there? He actually used 'human being' instead of 'human beings' as the plural as an artistic device to express the harmony between fish and men (since the plural of fish is also dindistinguishable from its singular form) thus building a symbolic linguistic bridge between both our species.

    The quote is on the video at 2:22.

    --


    And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
  52. The fish can't do everything though ... by The+Sith+Lord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did anyone else find this line funny ?

    <i>... hey are no use against other sorts of attacks -- say, the bombing of a water main, or an attack by computer hackers ... </i>

  53. Really, and what about a mass spectrometer? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Can detect a very wide range of compounds, can be completely automated.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Really, and what about a mass spectrometer? by KillerBob · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem with a spectrometer is that the more you have in the substance you're testing, the harder it is to detect a single substance. It's not like every chemical has a single line that shows up on a spectrometer scan... actually, everything has several lines that show up. The more complex a substance is (and the heavier the atoms that make it up), the more lines appear. Pure Iron (Fe), for example, has 43 lines that show up on its spectrum. And drinking water isn't pure H2O. Not by a long shot... pure H2O tastes soapy, bland. Like there's something wrong with it. Our tap water has lots of stuff in it already that isn't harmful. Mineral content, and additives like chlorine and fluoride.

      Now... they could establish a baseline and subtract that, but there's so much stuff already in drinking water that you'd probably have a hard time telling one thing from the next. What you think could be cyanide may actually be a higher than normal silica content. There's really no way to be sure that what you're seeing on a spectrometer is dangerous without doing a proper series of tests on it, and there's no way to do those tests fast enough to cut off the water supply. The result is that you would need to set the sensitivity *way* too high and end up getting a lot of false positives... when you're dealing with contaminated water supply, a false positive is far more desirable than a false negative.

      But here's a system that costs a *lot* less to implement, and because you're using living beings that are much more sensitive to poisons than humans are, you'll see the effect of a toxin long before the concentration is high enough to seriously harm a human.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  54. I wonder why... by Ice.Saoshyant · · Score: 1

    ...I'm being reminded of this.

  55. Only mercury? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1
    I think there may be a little extra Mercury in the fish supply. All the fish have grown little moustaches and started singing about champions and radios.

    It's way worse than that. I just met GWB on the White House lawn. He said the CIA is reporting unusually many sightings of fishy A'rab looking fellas in San Francisco sporting goods stores buying scuba gear. The CIA, FBI and the NSA are now convinced that task-force 'Bluegill' has been infiltrated and that the terrorists infiltrators plan to spike the San Francisco water supply with massive amounts of LSD.
    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  56. Re:Support Our Fish! by value_added · · Score: 1

    The fish are not fighting terrorism but protecting environment

    If you were American, you would be accused of being unpatriotic for suggesting such a thing.

  57. heavy metal by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    Much of the damage from plutonium comes from it being a heavy metal. Being radioactive just makes it extra nasty. Look at the low concentrations of non-radioactive isotopes of cadmium, mercury, lead, arsenic, and so on needed to cause severe organ or neurological damage: Plutonium is in the same league. But it would be much harder to work with because of the radioctivity. Odds are that the mules used to transport, process into something water soluable, or deliver to target would suffer and die in a what that does not go unnoticed. Kind of like that East European fellow found dying a few years ago along a W European motorway with the radioactive cargo that killed him still in the trunk. Or the empty trucks returning to Russia with very hot cargo beds...
    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  58. Water Test Results 21-09-2006 13:01 by flickwipe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bluegill A: HEARTBEAT nil, BREATHING non-existant, SWIMMING PATTERN bobbing along the top of the tank

    Bluegill B: HEARTBEAT lub but still waiting for the dub, BREATHING laboured due to lungs hanging out of mouth, SWIMMING PATTERN thrashing about madly next to the castle

    Bluegill C: HEARTBEAT n/a, BREATHING n/a, SWIMMING PATTERN n/a
    Please note: Bluegill C exploded


    Conclusion: Possible contamination of drinking supply? Will ask for second opinion when Shift Manager returns from holiday

  59. Has been done for decades ... by gweihir · · Score: 1

    ... in many cities in Europe. This is reliable, cheap, and very, very sensitive.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  60. much worse than I feared by misanthrope101 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are you kidding? There is sea life that not only mates under 1 year of age, but sometimes actually changes gender! I'm expecting a Focus on the Family talking paper any day now. Don't tell them that some frogs are transexuals as well. It all started with Janet Jackson's nipple. I don't remember any of this crap happening before we had aureolas on the boob tu... well, on the television.

    1. Re:much worse than I feared by MrFebtober · · Score: 1

      I just know there was an Onion article about the moral implications of sex changing sealife, but I couldn't find it in the archives.

  61. Aha! by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

    Judging by Bluegill B's lungs, I'd say it drowned.

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
  62. It was on again last week by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

    This is not an urban legend

    I saw the episode that you're talking about last week. The idea seemed crazy at first, but after some research they were able to craft incredibly effective incindiary devices that were small and light enough for the bats to carry. They were so effective that when several experimental bats escaped, they promptly flew towards some of the buildings at the test facility (in Arizona or New Mexico, I belive) and wound up burning most of it down.

    The idea was to outfit the bats with the devices, then induce hibernation by keeping them cool and dark so they could be transported. They also came up with this ingenious method of delivering them target which was essentially multiple layers of trays that would expand as it was parachuted near the earth allowing the bats time to warm and wake up and then wreak havoc on the target area. As another poster has said, although this idea held promise it was eventually scrubbed in favor of nuclear research.

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  63. The modern equivilant of a soup taster! by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    I love this. It's the modern equivalent of having a soup taster for the King. We think we're sooo clever.

    I also like the article's forced effort to explain how the fix cannot stop the bombing of a water main or the release of germs which target humans. Clearly, the system is insufficient due to those limitations and must be replaced with a hundred million dollar project. LOL.

    It's the canary in the coal mine.

    Hazmat team joke: "How do you know if a scene is IDLH? (Immediately Dangerous to Live or Health).... Simple, when you get there all the cops are horizontal instead of vertical.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  64. Marketers strike again! by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1
    Still, Lawler said more than a dozen other cities have ordered the anti-terror apparatus, called the Intelligent Aquatic BioMonitoring System, which was originally developed for the Army and starts at around $45,000.
    It's obvious that they have good marketers. Bream are not known for their wiles and will nibble just about anything in the water. But they are tasty!
    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  65. Bluefish on a plane? by griffjon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does this mean we can carry water bottles on planes again -- if they have bluefish swimming in them?

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  66. San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I have to say that the fish probably take the threat of an attack a lot more seriously than most of the people in San Francisco do.

  67. Look carefully by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

    It's right after "+1 Old Joke That Refuses To Die".

  68. Wrong by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Actually it's toxicity comes from it being treated by the body like calcium. So that it gets sequestered into your bones where it sits and bombards your bone marrow with alpha particles until you die of leukemia and/or anemia.

    As far as it precipitating to the bottom you are only considering metallic particles I assume. Have you ever seen silt? It stays in suspension. I'm sure there are Pu compounds that are water soluable.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  69. Getting the Pu would be the hardest part by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Are you sure there are no Pu compunds that are water soluble? I strongly doubt it. Even lead coumpounds can be absoarbed into the bloodstream. You could even attach Pu to nanoparticles so they sit in suspension.

    Pu's toxicity comes from it being treated by the body like calcium. So that it gets sequestered into your bones where it sits and bombards your bone marrow with alpha particles until you die of leukemia and/or anemia. Since it accumulates you wouldn't have to get a single dose, it could build up over days or months.

    I think making it partially soluable would be even worse than 100% soluble. That way it sits in the system constantly leaching a steady stream of poison. Try to clean it up and you will create a plume of Pu. This is the same issue environmental cleanups have to face when cleaning up waterbodies that have been used as chemical dumps. The silt at the bottom acts like a chemical sink.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  70. Domestic Terrorists by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    At last we've managed to find the real terrorists: polluters who dump poison into our water all the time. We should catch Osama at the next board meeting of Dow Chemical.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  71. "Other Sorts of Attacks" by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    FTA:
    They do have limitations. While the bluegills have successfully detected at least 30 toxic chemicals, they cannot reliably detect germs. And they are no use against other sorts of attacks -- say, the bombing of a water main, or an attack by computer hackers on the systems that control the flow of water.

    Seriously people, did the author have to cover this base? I mean, who has ever heard of precognition in bluegills? Who would ever expect precognition in a fish? The purification process is designed to kill germs ... so it is useless to state that. This is just continuing the fear mongering.

    I personally think they have precognition, but its that we are incapable of understanding their attempts to communicate that is the problem. We need to fund research into this, else the terrorits win!!!

    Fish are actually very skilled white-hat hackers. Their only problem is a lack of an adequate input device(they have no fingers!!)

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  72. Wait, wait, wait by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    I thought it was foxes...

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  73. Rome's aquaduct trout by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    I can't find a reference, but some show several years showed trout (fingerlings?) being used in Rome to test the quality of the water coming from aquaducts. Can anyone confirm or refute?

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  74. where are my Glofish? by smchris · · Score: 1

    I thought Glofish, that serve a similar purpose, (see ancient /. reference somewhere) were a dynamite product. What nerd could resist a home aquarium of genetically-mutant glowing fish?

    But you can hardly find them in my metro, California made them illegal and it seems like large chains like PetSmart aren't carrying them. I guess either it's a good thing I'm not in marketing or PetSmart is stupid.

  75. "Anti-terror"? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Anti-terror fish? Fish that keep me from freaking out in horror flicks? Are they narcotic? How do they keep fear at bay? Do they fire darts full of tranqullizer? Do they sing happy songs? Do I get a hug when I'm feeling scared?

    How exactly do you keep water free of fear, then?

    Isn't the "terror" in your own heads? Hard for even a very small fish to get into your actual head. Must be bio-engineered to get in through the sinus cavity.

    1. Re:"Anti-terror"? by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1
      Hard for even a very small fish to get into your actual head. Must be bio-engineered to get in through the sinus cavity.
      Not true. It was created by God himself and it goes in through the ear.
      --
      This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  76. CNN must be catering to people with down syndrome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else find it interesting that the following statements were made in TFA.

    "They do have limitations. While the bluegills have successfully detected at least 30 toxic chemicals, they cannot reliably detect germs. And they are no use against other sorts of attacks -- say, the bombing of a water main, or an attack by computer hackers on the systems that control the flow of water.

    Still, Lawler said..."

    Really? Fish can't detect the bombing of water mains? AMAZING I THOUGHT THE FISH COULD DO IT ALL!

    Good job CNN on your dedication to high quality journalism.

  77. Absurd, exaggerated claims by nasor · · Score: 2, Informative

    "There's no known manmade sensor that can do the same job as the bluegill."

    This claim is absurd on its face. Who told him that? The guy who sold him the fish? He's obviously not an analytical chemist. Things like high-resolution mass spectrometry can detect cyanide, diesel fuel, mercury and pesticides at parts-per-trillion levels, far lower than anything that could ever possibly have any sort of detectible biological effect on a fish. There is no way that a fish is going to be effected by a nanogram/liter concentration of mercury, but a good mass spec would be able to see it.

    1. Re:Absurd, exaggerated claims by Kaktrot · · Score: 1

      No, the statement "There's no known manmade sensor that can do the same job as the bluegill" is absurd on its face because you can't have an unknown manmade sensor. :D

      --
      BSD: The most efficient way of subsidizing the enemy.
    2. Re:Absurd, exaggerated claims by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's incorrect. Dr. Evil's scientists could have come up with superior sensor technology, and then kept it secret so that Dr. Evil can use it to help take over the world.

  78. Like canaries in the mine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most animals and insects have extereme sensitivty to nano amounts of chemicals. We just need to understand them make the best use of those senstivity for us.

  79. The next step... by jmcwork · · Score: 1

    Cross breed pirannah and flying fish. The ultimate water supply defense system!

  80. Phishing by raatti · · Score: 1

    So, one has to do some "phising" before spoiling the drinking water..

  81. My concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much are we paying these "defense contractors" and who's getting the money?

  82. Pig Use and Abuse by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    In process piping projects like refineries and petroleum transmission, pigs are often used to clean out pipelines before startup (in order to detect and remove possible debris or forgotten, hungover pipefitters left over inside the pipes during construction). They are also often used to seperate two different products sent down the same pipeline.

    Thankfully, most of them survive intact and unharmed (the pigs, that is).

    Many of these pigs display great intelligence, so there are pig spies employed to detect and transmit their whereabouts should any of them decide to "go missing".

    It's true!

  83. I misunderstood by bobcote · · Score: 1

    I thought the San Francisco Bluegills were a minor league baseball team...