Slashdot Mirror


The First Robotic Musician

eldavojohn writes, "A new robot named Haile (pronounced hi-lee), which 'listens' to what musicians are playing and play along with them, has been developed at the [corrected] Georgia Institute of Technology. There are some videos at the GATech site. From the article: "If the musicians change the beat or rhythm, Haile is right there with them. 'With Haile there are two levels of musical knowledge... The basic level is to teach it to learn to identify music, to imitate,' Weinberg said. 'The higher level is stability of rhythm, to be able to distinguish between similar rhythms. In essence, Haile has the ability to recognize if a rhythm is more chaotic or stable, and can adjust its playing accordingly.' I don't know about the rest of Slashdot, but I can't wait for the day when I have my very own Robo Puente to play along with."

128 comments

  1. GA Tech != UGA by MustardMan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Jesus, is is that hard to get the university right? Not only is UGA not the same as GA Tech, they are bitter rivals.

    1. Re:GA Tech != UGA by Xshare · · Score: 1

      Yea... a new innovation in robotics at UGA! Hah! What a joke! Actually, I'm friends with one of the students working on this project, and yea, it's really cool if you can get a hold of a video of it in action. /me is posting from the GT Library, working late hours... again. As much as I love this school, I freakin hate it.

    2. Re:GA Tech != UGA by Erich · · Score: 1
      Indeed.

      Example college at GT: School of Electrical and Computer Engineering

      Example college at UGA: School of Poultry Science(sic)

      You can't get an Engineering degree from UGA. Similarly, you can't get a Literature degree from Georgia Tech.

      Time to continue ramblin'.

      --

      -- Erich

      Slashdot reader since 1997

    3. Re:GA Tech != UGA by rhizome · · Score: 1

      Well obviously the story was submitted by an envious UGA student or alum!

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    4. Re:GA Tech != UGA by metlin · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      As a GT alumni, the comparison is almost insulting. :)

    5. Re:GA Tech != UGA by Xshare · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can get a literature degree at Georgia Tech. LCC - Literature, Communication and Culture.

    6. Re:GA Tech != UGA by sakti · · Score: 1

      A more appropriate comparison might be to UGA's AI Center which is quite a good program, just more oriented toward logic and AI than engineering.

      --
      "It is better to die on one's feet than to live on one's knees." - Albert Camus
    7. Re:GA Tech != UGA by icebrain · · Score: 1

      LCC is the _school_ that offers the degree (like the "School of Mechanical Engineering" does ME and NRE). The degree itself is called Science, Technology, and Culture (STAC)... and even that's not really a "literature" degree, per se. The general idea is that you study how science and technology have affected society and culture (including such things as literature, art, communications, etc). You end up taking a fair number of science and CS courses, and I'd say that graduates probably have a better science education than just about all other non-engineering/science majors. They may be artsy people--but at least they're geeky artsy people that understand computers and know Newton's laws.

      (disclaimer--I'm not a STAC major, I've just been dating one for five years)

      Also, a further clarification on who Georgia Tech is (and is not):

      Georgia Tech's "full name," so to speak, is the "Georgia Institute of Technology." It is NOT "Georgia Tech University." The word "university" appears nowhere in any part of our name, so do not use it.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    8. Re:GA Tech != UGA by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if it got out that you'd been around girls while in college, it might do irreperable damage to your nerd cred.

    9. Re:GA Tech != UGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I are an Engineer, and proud of it. And it's not just annoying that they couldn't catch the difference between what the submission says and what the source(CNN) says, but they managed to mix up two blatantly different schools.

      What's wrong with being around girls in college? We have some very nice ones here. Some are even nerds themselves (Gasp!).

      Ramblin, Gamblin, Helluva Engineer (EE, to be precise).
      What's The good Word?

      P.S. if U(sic)GA has a "good" school for literature, liberal arts, etc. why can't any of them spell "dog" or "dogs" correctly?
      ------------ ...
      Mine eyes have seen the glory of the NCAA,
      They're investigating Georgia Players to see how much they're paid
      After counting all the cars, and the loans alumni made,
      they outpaid F$U! ...

    10. Re:GA Tech != UGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, don't confuse us with them, just because we have the "University of Georgia Library" sign stashed away on campus somwhere...

      (Posted anonymously cause I dont' wanna get interrogated on that one - and it a huge frikkin sign)

    11. Re:GA Tech != UGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Tech does have girls, but they are animals compared to the sweet, nubile, horny, slightly dim, sperm dumpsters at UGA. Go, Dawgs!

      /English Lit degree, 1994

    12. Re:GA Tech != UGA by Tsa05 · · Score: 1

      Yay! Thanks for plugging my major!

      I should also add that Computational Media, GaTech's version of a video game design bundled with a couple other design fields, has recently been added to LCC.

      To Hell With Georgia!!!

    13. Re:GA Tech != UGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UGA used to offer a doctorate in AI. Not sure if they still do. I thought it was part of that program at first until I read the GT part.

  2. OLD NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Re:OLD NEWS by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Don't DO THAT! I almost spewed lemonade out my nose....

      :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:OLD NEWS by shawb · · Score: 1

      More Prior Art is available elsewhere.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  3. Wow by The_Black_Rabite · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Crazy whatr they can do now....

    1. Re:Wow by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Crazy whatr they can do now...."

      Let's all welcome Haile's first post on Slashdot!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  4. how long.. by Bob+The+Mutant+Hamst · · Score: 1, Funny

    ..before computer generated music becomes better than anything that could possibly be created by a person?

    1. Re:how long.. by jpardey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depends on what you mean by better. In terms of musical response by humans, the point won't be until emotions and thought are codified and corelated with music theory much more so than they are now. By then, we will have run out of fossil fuels to power our computers, and that guy at your college who always played accoustic guitar by the parking lot will have groupies cooking him dinner over an open fire. However, if by better you mean more harmonic, or more complex, then I guess you can program an alogorthm to make incredible soulless compositions right now.

      --
      I have freaks! I did something right...
    2. Re:how long.. by ergo98 · · Score: 1
      ..before computer generated music becomes better than anything that could possibly be created by a person?

      I guess it's all how you perceive it. I would always seen a person (or rather many people) behind that hardware/software combination, so ultimately it comes down to people just using different tools. A piano is a better instrument than punching yourself in the testes (presumedly), but there's still people using the piano (directly or indirectly) who are responsible for the music.
    3. Re:how long.. by pennyher0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is less like computer-generated music, and more like machine-learning, only through music. Seems hella awesome.

      And for the record, art/music is often about context, and the artist is a big part of what makes music "good". An unknown musician doesn't ever make it into the top 20 without the help of producers, promoters, radio spots, stories, etc. This is basic marketing. The product itself rarely sells--it's the story or the artist behind it or the context or just plain mob-consumer mentality that was initially triggered by one of those things that accumulates together to make the thing popular.

      if a robot made cool music, and was intelligent, neat. it might be popular, but not because it is good music... more because it was ROBOT-made music.

      Otherwise, I'd be a fangirl of the engineer who made the robot... just like I'm getting all woozy thinking about the people who made this software.

    4. Re:how long.. by Samah · · Score: 1

      > ..before computer generated music becomes better than anything that could possibly be created by a person?

      Well, better than Britney Spears at least. :)

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    5. Re:how long.. by gameforge · · Score: 4, Interesting
      how long....before computer generated music becomes better than anything that could possibly be created by a person?

      Could you imagine a digital device, maybe like an iPod, that composed music on the fly, which intelligently complemented your mood? I could see this being addictive for certain people and causing them to lose touch with human music. I mean, in my reality, not yours.

      Anyway... if you could write a program that simulated heroin or acid (or even just pot), it would probably write some pretty cool stuff. But it wouldn't remember to save it and would get the munchies and fall asleep for half a day... and would still be an improvement on current mainstream music, most of which is just the results of marketing formulas anyway. But, no robot could fuzz down a guitar like Jimi Hendrix, or yelp like Kurt Cobain, or offend like Frank Zappa (or name your gangster rap artist).

      Here's a question: what happens when you start jamming with two of these robots, and then you stop playing? Do they just duet until you unplug one of them or what?
    6. Re:how long.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go fucking die in the night

    7. Re:how long.. by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      In the Musical Turing Test recently, judges were unable to tell the difference between Britney Spears and a vocoder reading spam. I rest my case.

    8. Re:how long.. by jpardey · · Score: 1

      There already is such a device. It is called a "guitar."

      --
      I have freaks! I did something right...
    9. Re:how long.. by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that beauty can only be man-made? If so, you haven't been out much lately... or ever.. ;)

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    10. Re:how long.. by avapex · · Score: 1

      Computers have the ability to manipulate finite datasets. This could be applied to anything (music included).

      If a hard drive is loaded with lots of music from many genres, a program could analyze the scale and chord progression for every song. After the program is finished analyzing and categorizing all of the musical trends, pseudo-random output within a specified statistical variance could be presented as new music.

      However, music is the result of priceless human creativity from the following genras: Medieval, Renaissance, Baroque, Classical, Romantic, Expressionistic, Impressionistic, Modern, Jazz, Pop, Rock & Alt, etc. It is completely unlikely, at this point in time, that a computer could have the ability to create an entirely new genre and sound good at the same time.

    11. Re:how long.. by shotgunsaint · · Score: 1

      But how many will be as complex and soulless as music by, say, Yngwie Malmsteen?

      --
      The future isn't here until I can type "car keys" into Google and have it say "You left them in your pants last night."
    12. Re:how long.. by ghyd · · Score: 1

      >> Actually some people (but apparenly not in the /. demographics) don't relate "good music" to "top 20 music". Shocking, I know.

    13. Re:how long.. by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Which is probably why the GP made a distinction between music having the quality of being good and music having the quality of being "good" (i.e. on the top 20 list).

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    14. Re:how long.. by joto · · Score: 1
      Probably never. Because when a human uses a computer to create music, it's not "computer-generated", but "computer-assisted". On the other hand, the thought of a computer using a human to create music, is something we are not willing to accept. So it would be called "computer-assisted" as well. So, basically, our unique perspective makes us always win over the machines.

      By the way, if a future society someday becomes ruled by compuers (or robots), I'm pretty sure we would call it "computer-assisted government", or "computer-assisted administration". It sure sounds a lot better than simply "ruled over by computers".

    15. Re:how long.. by ghyd · · Score: 1

      Well my bad then.

  5. Musical Anime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big "O"'s Maestro.

  6. Hooray for robots! by bmetz · · Score: 3, Funny

    We'll know robots are truly evolved when they build their own museum :)

    --
    What did you eat today? http://www.atetoday.com/
    1. Re:Hooray for robots! by kfg · · Score: 0

      We'll know robots are truly evolved when they build their own museum. . .

      . . .where they display the people they've designed.

      KFG

  7. GA Tech, not UGA by theguru · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Bitter, instate rivals... get those confused in the wrong company in this town, and you'll regret it :)

    Randy Farmer
    Atlanta, GA

  8. There's trouble ahead by Centurix · · Score: 1, Funny

    I smell protests from the drummer and bass guitar unions. First the industrial revolution replaced workers with robots, now the entertainment industry is being targetted.

    Wait, if the robotic drummer/bass guitar player invents a new riff, who takes the royalties? Maybe it could use the money for new servo motors or a replacement oil pan.

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:There's trouble ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it DRM enabled?

    2. Re:There's trouble ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not protesting, because the robot lacks, and will probably always lack musical taste. Besides, there's all sorts of synth keyboards and drum machines out there, and human bassists and drummer are still in high demand. However... it would be nice if I could program the robot to play like I do. Then I could take more than one gig at a time! HA!

      P.S. Bass players and drummers rarely get royalties from riffs. If they write the lyrics or the entire song... different story.

    3. Re:There's trouble ahead by instagib · · Score: 1

      > the robot lacks, and will probably always lack musical taste

      Yeah, just like 80% of humans.

  9. Had one when I was a kid by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think we had one of those when I was a kid, though it was usually out of tune and you had to feed it Kibbles 'n Bits.

  10. It's not a musician... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a percussionist, most of them are pretty robotic anyway.

    1. Re:It's not a musician... by kfg · · Score: 1

      What do you call someone who likes to hang out with musicians?

      A drummer.

      Ba-roomp-boomp!

      What do you call a robot who likes to hang out with drummers?

      Plywood.

      KFG

    2. Re:It's not a musician... by wired_LAIN · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right. The problem is that nearly all other types of instruments require so much dexterity (look at the violin for instance) that we wouldn't be able to build a robot that could mechanically produce decent sound.

      I think it would be much easier to create better synthesizers and just have the robots use the synths... I mean the guy says a lot of stuff about how its important that the robot is able to use audio and visual cues, but I dont think that has anything to do with actually playing the music mechanically.
      Synthesizers are getting much better, and I think for some musicals they dont even bother with a pit orchestra.

      --
      It is better to light one candle than to curse the darkness.
    3. Re:It's not a musician... by srugbeer · · Score: 1

      What do you call a robot who likes to hang out with drummers?

      Um, Haile?

    4. Re:It's not a musician... by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      I don't think you could achieve the same type of expression using a synth to replicate string instruments.

      Think about bending a note or sliding into the next note. Hard to do with a keyboard unless there are a variety of sliders/knobs/pedals etc. to allow those effects.

      At that point it might be that the synth becomes so complex that you need a robot to operate all of the controls at once. But would that robot be able to supply his own expression or would have to be programmed in.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    5. Re:It's not a musician... by psalm33 · · Score: 1

      Q: How many drummers does it take to change a light bulb?
      A: None! They have machines to do that now!

      Q: What is the difference between a drummer and a drum machine?
      A: A drum machine can keep a steady beat and won't steal your girlfriend!

      Q: What do you call the girl that's always hanging on the drummer's arm?
      A: A tattoo.

      Q: Why do bands have bass players?
      A: To translate for the drummer.

      Q: What did the drummer get on his IQ test?
      A: Drool.

      Did you hear about the bass player who locked his keys in the car?
      He had to break a window to get the drummer out!

    6. Re:It's not a musician... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are such a thing as violin-quartet music boxes. Very rare (antique), but purely mechanical.

      Sorry for no reference; I saw it on tv once.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    7. Re:It's not a musician... by user2048 · · Score: 1

      > Synthesizers are getting much better, and I think for some musicals they dont even bother with a pit orchestra.

      That's not so much because synthesizers are better, but because they're cheaper than musicians and some audiences will accept the substitution.

      Synthesizers aren't all that good at duplicating traditional instruments and players, if you look (listen) at all the musical aspects. Synthesizers are great at doing things that can't be done with traditional instruments and players.

  11. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    "And for our next robot".... "drumroll please"....

  12. I heard Disaster Zone are using these by Scoldog · · Score: 2, Funny

    after the lead singer thought he was a fish and the drummer went of to live on an island with a rock as a friend.

    --
    This space for rent
    1. Re:I heard Disaster Zone are using these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I s'pose you mean Disaster Area.

    2. Re:I heard Disaster Zone are using these by Scoldog · · Score: 1

      Dang it, you are correct sir.

      --
      This space for rent
  13. Oh yeah? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can they show up to practice drunk and/or stoned? Do their girlfriends get jealous of the other musicians' girlfriends and start drama for no reason? Do they forget spare strings at the gig and have to borrow a bass from the other band? Do they need a place to crash one night and you come to find three months later that they still haven't left?

    They can't be REAL musician robots until those conditions can be fulfilled.

    1. Re:Oh yeah? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      they do change strings on bass?

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    2. Re:Oh yeah? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      no idea. My bass guitar is 32 years old and still has its original strings...might explain why it's a bit on the wobbly side though ;-)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    3. Re:Oh yeah? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1
      Do they need a place to crash

      It looks like that's been covered...

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  14. Not the first one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else get forced into the creepy dark room at Chuck E. Cheese's as a kid?
    That robotic band would still scare the bejesus out of me today. Hope GATech has improved on the technology a bit.

  15. Am I the only one by Arceliar · · Score: 1

    who'd like to take two of these things, put them in the same room, start to play something, then stop and see how the two work off eachother?

    1. Re:Am I the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who'd like to take two of these things, put them in the same room, start to play something, then stop and see how the two work off eachother?

      I think the results would be like the old SCI-FI convertion of presenting a paradox to a robot.

    2. Re:Am I the only one by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      No, it would just be a normal feedback loop.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Am I the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out Brian Eno's Discrete Music, side 2 it was the first few notes of Pachabel's Canon in D played through loop tapes of varying legnths

  16. first? well, maaaybe by radarsat1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Of course, musical accompaniment systems have been around since the 80's and earlier. It's been a research topic in artificial intelligence nearly since its inception!

    Robert Rowe published a book on the topic in 1992, on his Cypher system. Here's another good article on the topic by Chris Dobrian. For an open-source system, check out Bob van der Poel's MMA.

    Additionally, there's been plenty of work done on robotics for playing instruments, particularly for percussion.

    So, admittedly, this is the first time I've personally heard of a project combining the two, so I'll give it that credit for innovation. But I'd be sorta surprised if it hasn't been done previously. When you think about it... all these musical accompaniment systems react in real-time to MIDI input. Simply make a couple of motors respond to MMA's ouptut, for example, adjust timing according to latency and inertia, and you could probably have this project done in a few days.

    Not to play it down, I always love to see fun projects like this.. :) And the physical design is quite beautiful for a drum-playing robot.
    But "first".. well, give credit where it's due. I think the summary is over-reacting. (I scanned the article.. don't believe it makes any such claims.)

    1. Re:first? well, maaaybe by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

      Whoops.. says so in the first paragraph. My bad. :)
      But is it accurate..
      Like I said, it might well be the first to actually combine robotics and musical accompaniment. I'm not sure. I guess I'll give the article the benifit of the doubt!

    2. Re:first? well, maaaybe by Saxophonist · · Score: 1
      When you think about it... all these musical accompaniment systems react in real-time to MIDI input.

      Minor nit-pick here... MIDI is by definition computer-generated, sometimes in response to direct human input (like a human playing a MIDI keyboard, for instance). SmartMusic, for example, takes microphone input from a live performer and "follows" the performer with a predefined accompaniment. If I play my saxophone into the microphone, MIDI is not the result, but the computer can somewhat follow me, so long as I am playing something for which it has an accompaniment program. Recent versions of Finale can supposedly generate such an accompaniment. (I give these products as examples only, not as software I would endorse; for a number of reasons, I really don't care for this company's software.)

      The robot in the article, if it is taking input from a microphone, is not directly taking MIDI input.

    3. Re:first? well, maaaybe by JuzzFunky · · Score: 1

      If you are interested in finding out more about the sort of algorithms that are used, you may want to check out Gödel, Escher, Bach by Douglas Hofstadter.
      Hofstadter is inspired by the links between the Music of Bach, Escher's art and Gödel's incompleteness theorems. IMHO, it should be on the required reading list for all computer science courses.

      --
      Unexpect the expected!
    4. Re:first? well, maaaybe by doom · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yes, I was just stopping in to complain about that "first" business.

      Matt Ingalls, a clarinetist/improviser/composer in the SF Bay Area, did some work with computerized accompaniment that was pretty impressive. His "Recent Works" release had some tracks where you'd swear there was a live pianist following the clairinet improvisations.

      Ah, and if you look under "Sounds" on his homepage, he has some mp3 samples up of the work I was talking about... look down for the information about "claire":
      claire is a virtual improviser program i wrote in hmsl. i have no control over claire other than through my clarinet playing [claire listens through a pitch-to-midi converter.] although claire can play any midi device, in these two examples she is playing a disklavier.

      I also know that Carl Stone was at least trying to do some work in this direction (at one performance he commented that in a recent attempt the latencies in the system made it sound like the computerized pianist was drunk... I don't know if he ever took it any further than that).

  17. A Long Time Ago... by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

    Are we not men? We are Devo!

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  18. Hardly The First Robotic Musician by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WABOT-2 could interpret human singers and organ players back in 1985. Hardly the first musical robot:

    http://www.humanoid.waseda.ac.jp/booklet/kato02.ht ml

  19. Next stop Robot Devil! by definate · · Score: 1
    Now that we have a robotic musician, we're ever more closer to a Robot Devil and then one step away from Robot Hell. Then we're going to have fidling contests and sing excellent songs. I can picture it now... *wanders off singing and dancing*

    Fencing diamonds, fixing cock fights
    Publishing indecent magazines,
    You'll pay for every crime,
    Knee deep in electric slime,
    You'll suffer til the end of time,
    Enduring tortures most of which rhyme,
    Trapped forever here in robot hell!
    --
    This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  20. oblig drummer by Digitus1337 · · Score: 1

    It's the first robot that hangs out with a bunch of musicians.

    1. Re:oblig drummer by Gleng · · Score: 1

      Q: What's the difference between a drummer and a drum synthesiser?

      A: You only have to punch the information into a drum synthesiser once.

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  21. The Rolling Stones? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    No, wait. My bad.

    I am always confusing robotized with fossilized.

    Sorry.

    Still, someday every band will be robotic...

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  22. Simpso^H^H^H^H^H^H Media Lab did it. by jpellino · · Score: 1

    I'll have to go spin up my trusty Media Lab laserdisc, but I recall Barry Vercoe demo-ing this or something very much like it. They had a virtual performer (piano, IIRC) that could follow / learn / accompany live individual human performer (violin, again IIRC) and cope with changes in phrasing. So this would date to when laserdiscs were cool. Of course there was probably a Cray at the other end of a telltale cable, but hey.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  23. RIAA! Who ya gonna call? by Simonetta · · Score: 4, Funny

    So who is the RIAA going to sue? They have to sue someone. After all, that's all they do nowdays since the equalization of the vinyl records is no longer as profitable as extortion. (and because there aren't as many gold records to award as in previous years).

        Any time a robot plays something, it is going to sound like something that the RIAA holds 'rights' to. So the robot is 'infringing' on 'their' copyrights. But, uh, sueing a robot is hard. They don't respond to threats. They ignore injunctions. Robots don't give a shit about human law, man, they just wanna rock'n'roll.

        So are they going after the programmer?

      "Your Honor, Let it be known that after 2.345 hours of playing a 130 beats per minute tempo, in the key of G#, if the human misses the beat by 0.256 seconds, the robot under inditment will consistently and 'knowingly' play the first three notes of "Free Bird". This is a willfull violation of copyright. We want $100,000,000,000.00; payable in monthly installments."

      But the great thing about robots is no only can they now play music, but, with a little tweaking, they can also tear the fingers and toes off of entertainment lawyers. Accidently, of course, but AI routines can get a little unpredictable when clogged with human legal chaos. Shit happens.

      Personally, when I want to play along with a machine I use a Zoom 900x series guitar effects DSP with the early 1970's Rolling Stones fed into the analog mix channel. Mix your guitar with lots of reverb, overdrive, a touch of delay, and a dollop of attitude.

      When you get a robot to do what Keith Richards does, let me know.

    1. Re:RIAA! Who ya gonna call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, if it can drink, do drugs and sleep with jailbait groupies then the rock world had better watch out!

    2. Re:RIAA! Who ya gonna call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Keith was the first "musical" robot.

  24. "We Are The Robots" - Kraftwerk by bowlman · · Score: 3, Funny

    We're charging our battery And now we're full of energy We are the robots We are the robots .... We're functioning automatic And we are dancing mechanic We are the robots We are the robots ....

    1. Re:"We Are The Robots" - Kraftwerk by joeme1 · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, but Kraftwerk is great!

  25. Robot loops by CrimsonBadger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How does the robot analyze what's being played? Are all the musicians playing instruments hooked up to a MIDI interface? If not,it's pretty amazing that he can analyze the pure sound. It would be pretty neat to have two of these robots play together. I suppose you'd have to start things off with a few notes from one of them, but it would be interesting to hear after that.

    1. Re:Robot loops by kfg · · Score: 1

      How does the robot analyze what's being played?

      It's called a "microphone."

      . . .it's pretty amazing that he can analyze the pure sound.

      Like a digital tuner, some of which, yes, have metronome functions that will match a beat.

      KFG

    2. Re:Robot loops by CrimsonBadger · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why everyone on messageboards seems to get off on shutting down total strangers. No need to be sarcastic about it. If it was just a silly question, you can answer it straightforwardly without getting bitchy. It wasn't just a silly question, though. Unfortunately, I made the post before reading the article and watching the videos, so I didn't see the robot in action. Turns out it's just playing a drum. But if it had been a pitch-based playing along, using the equivalent of a digital tuner would not be enough. First of all, live instruments are not consistently in tune. Second, no tuner I've seen can accurately pick up note after note in quick succession. Third, if there were multiple musicians playing, adequately miking them and then analyzing the mix would be very difficult. Some of these problems would be averted, however, if this was done through MIDI.

    3. Re:Robot loops by kfg · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why everyone on messageboards seems to get off on shutting down total strangers.

      Because they don't RTFAs. :) S'Ok, I've been guilty myself. But really, sensing sound isn't a difficult proposition. It simply takes a diaphram of sufficient sensitivity to vibrate.

      I made the post before reading the article and watching the videos. . .

      Haven't been able to watch the videos myself.

      . . .if it had been a pitch-based playing along. . .

      I would be more suitably amazed, but it's not, so arguments base on that premise are missplaced; however:

      First of all, live instruments are not consistently in tune.

      I play fiddle. There's no such thing as consistently in tune on a fiddle, which, as it happens, is one of the reasons I play fiddle. Being able to play "out of tune" is the only way to be able to consistently play in tune. Or to consistenly play "out of tune" on purpose. Which is just in tune in a different frame of reference.

      . . .no tuner I've seen can accurately pick up note after note in quick succession.

      If I had to do that to improvise with other musicians I probably wouldn't be able to do it. In any case, tuners are optimizing for tuning. This doesn't imply that the same technology can't be optimized for other purposes. I only brought up tuners as an example of the basic technolgy being extant.

      . . .if there were multiple musicians playing, adequately miking them and then analyzing the mix would be very difficult.

      Miking is easy. I make do with two less than a foot apart. I can place them anywhere in the room. Sometimes I can place them out of the room and halfway down the block. In such cases I actually prefer to do so. I could make do with only one if I had to. Analyzing is hard and what this robot is actually all about. The robot part is kinda cool, but it's the AI that's the interesting part.

      KFG

  26. no chance by Rooked_One · · Score: 1
    and I can say no chance with 100% accuracy becuase of one event that we all know and love. Ashley Simpsons' lip sync on SNL.

    People want to see people playing instruments - we can hear a synthesizer anywhere... chances are about 10% of the people who read this will use some sort of synthesizer along with their guitar playing or whatever. I really don't feel the need to say more...

  27. If I get my hands on one of these by Centurix · · Score: 1

    I'll play it some Autechre.

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:If I get my hands on one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..or some senetian vnares ;)

    2. Re:If I get my hands on one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, kaboom

  28. First robotic musician, indeed! by ml10422 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What about Phil Collins?!

  29. How dare you... by DarrylKegger · · Score: 1

    Me play Drums! Me offended!!

  30. The First Robotic Musician?!?!? by malahoo · · Score: 1
    --


    If you're not wasted, the day is.
  31. To Hell with Georgia by JoshJ · · Score: 1

    U[sic]GA couldn't even come close to accomplishing this. Nice try, OP.

  32. Build something useful by Venik · · Score: 1

    What a waste of time and cash. If this is about machine learning, this guy is years behind. If this is about a computer playing drums, just buy a drum machine from Yamaha and be happy. The most impressive piece of technology in these video clips is that big Apple monitor on this dude's desk. As to a machine playing drums, I've seen one in a museum. It was made in 1800s and will give this computerized plywood wonder a run for its money.

    1. Re:Build something useful by joto · · Score: 1

      Well, did you listen to it? It does not sound anything like a drum machine from Yamaha. And it serves a totally different purpose than a drum machine from Yamaha. And it sounds, and interacts with the user in a totally different way than the 1800-era machine. And it serves a totally different purpose than the 1800-era machine.

      Just because there have been other mechanical and/or electronic contraptions that serve the purpose of (or have part of their purpose to be) providing drum-like sounds, doesn't mean that all of these contraptions are equivalent, and that any new such contraption must just be a rehash of the same old thing. Such a view would be equally stupid as to say that all mechanical and/or biological contraptions for human transportation are equivalent, and that any such new contraptions must just be a rehash of the same old thing. Therefore, we don't need cars, jet-planes, submarines, or bicycles, since they all serve the same purpose as the donkey.

  33. I believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've located their inspiration.

  34. It has to be said by Pancake+Bandit · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new robot musicians.

  35. I KNEW IT! by bky1701 · · Score: 1

    The RIAA is training an army of robots to take over the world since they lost the war with the internet! Bastards!

  36. oh great... by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Funny

    a glorified metronome that can't keep time... just like our current drummer...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  37. Only the robotic aspect is new: check out Jamstix by friartux · · Score: 2, Informative

    For a really nifty AI drummer, see Jamstix. It is a VST plugin that listens to what you play (either audio or MIDI input), and plays drums along with you.

    It is incredible fun to play guitar with -- rock, jazz, blues stuff for me -- and the demos and songs that people have created with it are impressive. Rather than playing unlike a human, it has algorithms to mimic a human drummer's limb movements and such. The sounds and rhythms are all tweakable -- you can describe what you want, and leave the actual playing and variances to Jamstix.

    Very cool stuff IMHO, and highly recommended for any musician out there.

  38. Why is a robot drummer better? by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. he doesn't get tired.
    2. he doesn't show up an hour late for practice, completely drunk.
    3. he doesn't ask stupid questions when the rest of the band gets into strategy and show planning.
    4. he won't eat all th efood i nthe fridge at the band house.
    5. he won't choke to death on someone else's vomit.

    But if he is using Sony batteries, he might spontaneously combust...

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Why is a robot drummer better? by big+ben+bullet · · Score: 1

      "But if he is using Sony batteries, he might spontaneously combust... "

      This sound like a perfect Spinal Tap drummer candidate ;-)

    2. Re:Why is a robot drummer better? by joto · · Score: 1

      4. he won't eat all th efood i nthe fridge at the band house.

      I'm pretty sure a robot drummer would eat all the efood. Probably drink all the edrinks as well, at least if they contained ealcohol.

  39. Oh, this brings sweet memories by wolf369T · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Never saw the sun shinin' so bright Never saw things goin' so right (Cmdr. Data, Encounter at Farpoint Captain Picard and B4, ST: Nemesis)

  40. software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do believe they're using Max/MSP for the programming.

  41. Well by adwb · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new robotic musician overlords.

  42. Oh that's old news... by Ligur · · Score: 1

    ...she's been on One tree hill for years now.

    --
    Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
  43. Drummer != Musician by Instine · · Score: 1

    Muse all you like about what a robot can be considered as being. But a drummer is not a musician.


    ;)

    --
    Because you can - or because you should?
  44. Deerhunter ;-) by big+ben+bullet · · Score: 1

    "Here's a question: what happens when you start jamming with two of these robots, and then you stop playing? Do they just duet until you unplug one of them or what?"

    Here's an idea!

    You should give one of them a guitar, and the other one a banjo!
    Then start playing C C F C and add a bit of yankee doodley into the mix...

  45. This already exists... by Tjeerd · · Score: 1

    ...for a long time? What about street organs? And what about instruments like the Hupfeld Phonoliszt Violina Orchestrion? This apparatus uses some mechanism to play violins. And that is almost 100 years old and was at that time regarded as the 7th World Wonder.

    --
    To repeat what others have said, requires education, to challenge it , requires brains.
  46. About the pun by ericlondaits · · Score: 1
    I don't know about the rest of Slashdot, but I can't wait for the day when I have my very own Robo Puente to play along with
    Can somebody explain the pun to me?
    To my best understanding it seems like a mixup between argentine comedian/actor "Rolo Puente" and musician "Tito Puente"... but that would be a mistake only an argentinian would make. Is there some other explanation for the pun?
    --
    As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
  47. Been there done that by Milktoast · · Score: 1

    I hate to break it to you, but there already are robotic musicians. The County Bear Jamboree. Those robots have been pickin and a grinnin for years!

  48. Short Circuit did it by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    Anyone else remember the robot hand keyboardist that flipped off Steve Gutenberg in the 1980s?

  49. Good news for bass players everywhere! by maximthemagnificent · · Score: 1

    Now the robot can be the un-cool member of the band!

  50. Same country; close enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus, is is that hard to get the university right? Not only is UGA not the same as GA Tech, they are bitter rivals.

    At least it's in the right country!

    If you read the fortune file, an entire series of quotes are misattributed.

    The professors that are quoted as being from the "University of Washington" (USA) are really from the "University of Waterloo" (in Canada). Someone assumed there was only one UW in the world, and didn't bother to even check the online faculty listings to see if they matched the people quoted.

    At least they got the continent right, so I guess I shouldn't complain...

  51. Not quite what I call AI by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1
    This may be an experiment with AI but it shows we have a long way to go.

    This robot follows a rhythm section - and not much else. It still requires the human mind to lead it. It still requires the human mind to originate the rhythm or the music.

    Most if not all musical AI experiments involve a robot using a preprogrammed piece of music. Human composers create the music and/or arrangement.

    Humans create music when their emotions respond to life events. Blues music was an outlet for the oppressed or the broken hearted. Most popular music evolved from rebellious adolescents. Classical music evolved from highly intelligent minds.

    Many original compositions are derivatives of music that composers have acquiesced into their conscious or their sub-conscious. Inspiration can be totally spontaneous, and can pop into your mind at any time without any stimulus. In your car. At work. At recreation. Even while sleeping. Ed King of Lynyrd Skynyrd wrote "Sweet Home Alabama" in his sleep - the song came to him in a dream, and he immediately woke up and wrote it down. That happens to a lot of composers.

    Every style of music and every composition you can name has evolved from human emotions. AI still has to advance to teach robots to respond to emotions and to have spontaneous inspiration. That is the stimulus for them to lead, not follow. Until we accomplish that milestone, AI has a long way to go.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  52. Re:first? well, maaaybe - no!! by jibberia · · Score: 1

    This is certainly not the first. The CNN article even mentions LEMUR, who made GuitarBot years ago (~2003 from memory, their site doesn't say). In addition to performing many pieces composed for it, GuitarBot has also been controlled by interactive software. There were a few notable performances with violinist Mari Kimura in 2003, a few months after it debuted. Interactivity wasn't its specialty, but it's been done.

    Still, though, Haile this is a neat thing. You could have it done in a few days - but not the nifty laser-cut wood!

  53. When robots can fall in love, maybe by ghyd · · Score: 1

    Seriously in my opinion, the day a robot, an animal or whatever can intentionally play music, it's not a robot anymore but a human being. Can anyone imagine a robot Glenn Gould ? a robot Debussy ? a robot Ali Farka Touré ? a robot Duke Ellington ? and then not give them full human rights ? And does this robot run on booze ? I think not !

    1. Re:When robots can fall in love, maybe by ghyd · · Score: 1

      I'm sad that people can relate inanimate things and music. Musicians don't just play music, they relate their experiences, thzeir loves, their travels, their discovers of other civilization. So, are robot civilized ? If there's one activity that represent the fabulous complexity, the hopes, or the death, or emotions, it is music. When do robots have experienced that, when ? I understand that if a robot flips a burger at MC Donalds it can be called a cook, and THEN this robot can be called a musician. But I have the unsuitable un-modern un-ipodishcool reflex, that is to think that when one talks of cooking or making music, he thinks of putting a little, little of his heart in it.

  54. Just what the RIAA needs... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    Once the RIAA realizes that they won't have to pay these things any royalties, cybersupergroups will be the order of the day...

  55. so technically by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    so technically this thing is able to reproduce any song it hears, right?

    just wait until the RIAA finds out... not even bill gates will be able afford one of them

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  56. Not Useful To Me by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    ...until they make one that looks like the Corrs...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  57. Oh great... by TheLoneGundam · · Score: 1

    it will learn to improvise off others melodies, leading to it being classified as one of those "crazy" jazz musicians and anyone who's ever lifted a soldering gun will be vilified in a movie called "Resistor Madness"

  58. Re:When you get a robot to do what Keith Richards by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    When you get a robot to do what Keith Richards does, let me know.

    I think I can build a coconut-harvesting robot that falls out of trees, are you interested?

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.