Slashdot Mirror


Exclusive GTA IV Content for PS3 Too

One of Microsoft's happy announcements at this year's E3 was exclusive content for Grand Theft Auto IV on the Xbox 360. Eurogamer is now reporting that the PS3 will get its own exclusive content for Rockstar's next chapter in the GTA series. From the article: "How many additional areas or episodes Rockstar is planning is anyone's guess at this juncture, but it seems the game is at least being structured to accommodate a number of expansive new content releases in the weeks and months after release, while also satisfying platform holder - and console owner - demand for exclusive material. Though with 'exclusive' being a somewhat elastic term these days, especially where Grand Theft Auto is concerned, we wouldn't be remotely surprised if you end up playing 'exclusive' 360 episodes on your PS3, and vice versa. One thing's for sure - there's nothing more certain to piss off the fanboys than a level playing field. "

52 comments

  1. WTF?!? by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    You mean to kill ALL the hookers, I'm going to have to buy two consoles?!?! This is bullshit!

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:WTF?!? by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 1

      No no, I think it's clear from the size of the PS3 that you could beat as many people to death with it as you wished.

      --
      "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    2. Re:WTF?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You don't have to BUY two consoles. Just kill someone who has both and take it from him.

    3. Re:WTF?!? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      It's the Nintendo/Pokemon strategy applied to GTA! Coming soon: GTA Perl and Silver, each with their own exclusive populations of hookers. "Gotta beat 'em all!"

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:WTF?!? by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      GTA Perl

      All that will do is inspire people to see how many cars they can pile in the smallest area possible.

    5. Re:WTF?!? by sethstorm · · Score: 1


      All that will do is inspire people to see how many cars they can pile in the smallest area possible.


      That doesnt mention what size the cars could be, since you could have a car that would be 1 cubic pixel but be like driving a cement slab at someone. That doesnt even deal with the details of mass object manipulation with a rocket, either.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  2. Link, Spawn, and Heihachi Mishima by sottitron · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think its just like Soul Calibur II. On Wii, you can play as Link and steal chariots and horses. On XBox, you'll get Spawn who will get Seth McFairlane designed rides to steal. And on PS3, you'll get Heihachi Mishima who doesn't need to steel a car because he has grown out his righteous hair into WINGS!

    1. Re:Link, Spawn, and Heihachi Mishima by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seth McFarlane --> Family Guy
      Todd McFarlane --> Spawn and awesome action figures.

    2. Re:Link, Spawn, and Heihachi Mishima by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seth McFarlane --> Family Guy
      Todd McFarlane --> Spawn and awesome action figures.


      Ever seen them in a room together?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Link, Spawn, and Heihachi Mishima by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Wait a minute, you mean Seth MacFarlane wasn't the one who screwed over Neil Gaiman?!?!

      Ah jeez...Ah jeez...this is really embarrassing. I'd like to apologize for the car, Seth. On the upside, this could be a great opportunity to try out a new paint color.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Link, Spawn, and Heihachi Mishima by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute... Dick York... Dick Seargent... Seargent York!

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  3. I'd be pissed off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I can't stand GTA on consoles anyway - the aiming doesn't work very well. Hopefully the PC version will get all the extra bits.

    1. Re:I'd be pissed off... by nxtw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Played San Andreas? On the PS2, aiming was a simple click of R1 and then fire. Nice and easy.

    2. Re:I'd be pissed off... by Dev59 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's easy to lock on and fire, but it's not so easy to lock on to exactly whom you want to shoot. The over the shoulder camera combined with mouse-aiming does make the combat much more enjoyable on the PC... but the game is just better suited to a console. Something about the driving and the running around just makes the game more enjoyable with a game pad while sitting on the couch.

    3. Re:I'd be pissed off... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      It's easy to lock on and fire, but it's not so easy to lock on to exactly whom you want to shoot.

      And it's impossible to lock on to what you want to shoot. If your quarry is in a car, you can't auto-aim at the car. Or aim at the tires, which they bothered to model allowing you to shoot out but gave you no easy way to target. The only times this is really even feasible is in the on-rails parts where you're riding in a vehicle someone else is driving and you can use the left analog stick to aim.

      The whole control scheme for GTA is a mess. There are redundant functions, functions that either move to a different part of the controller or vanish entirely depending on what kind of vehicle you are using (can't move the camera up while driving a motorcycle or the 4wd truck). Worst is that the auto-fire, your only hope of hitting anything, is bad itself. I've died before because while my target had a green rectangle on him as I held down R1, CJ decided that he'd much rather fire bullets straight up.

      That said, it does still just feel right with a game pad when just driving around causing mayhem from the comfort of your couch.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:I'd be pissed off... by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1
      CJ decided that he'd much rather fire bullets straight up.
      Just because he's from the inner city, don't assume he's as well versed in armed combat tactics as your average CS player. Jeeze.
      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    5. Re:I'd be pissed off... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Just because he's from the inner city, don't assume he's as well versed in armed combat tactics as your average CS player. Jeeze.

      ObSimpsons: "You went to public school, so I assume that you're proficient in small arms..."

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  4. A level playing field? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since when have we ever had a level playing field? Every console has it's ups and it's down (from graphics to joypad config). Each one is rather unique in this way. So you will never find two consoles on a truely level playing field.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:A level playing field? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Speaking of joypads, I wonder how long it will take for somebody to hack the PS3 & Wii controllers to work with other Bluetooth devices.

  5. You'd think that Rockstar learned their lesson... by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 1

    ... with the hot coffee content. Now they're marketing it as "exclusive content?!" Goodness, they must be gluttons for punishment!

    =P

  6. Makes sense by the+dark+hero · · Score: 1

    I guess, since they have all that extra space on the blu-ray discs...

    --
    You constantly struggle for self improvement - and it shows.

    Hooray for bad Engrish on fortune cookies

    1. Re:Makes sense by jpardey · · Score: 1

      It does seem ridiculous that Xbox 360 uses a DVD player rather than something of a higher capacity. By the end of the 4 year cycle, that is going to seem really small...

      --
      I have freaks! I did something right...
  7. Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I'd have to buy BOTH consoles if I wanted to experience all the story! Woo!

  8. Who would be angry? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It only makes sense that with all of the consoles offer online downloads of game content, any cross platform game is going to eventually have all content on all platforms. After all, they loose money not doing so and frankly I think gamers would be more pissed to see content withheld for no reason. Would anyone really be happy if the new Obvlivion quest were only for the PS3 instead of being made availiable to all platforms?

    Gamers should rejoice that at last we are seeing the end of exclusive game content for different platforms, it was just rediculous to do this.

    "Fanboys" will still have plenty of other things to fight about, like Halo vs. whatever. Meanwhile us gamers can enjoy games to a fuller extent.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Who would be angry? by Verunks · · Score: 1

      it's not a bad thing because if you develop a game just for one console you can use all the power of the console instead if you make a game for all platform you have to make a mid-quality game because you can't spend money and time on bettering the game on all platform

    2. Re:Who would be angry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So long as there is a multiplayer platform independant of hardware platform for allowance of cross platform multiplayer.

    3. Re:Who would be angry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a lot of platforms in one sentence

    4. Re:Who would be angry? by dlim · · Score: 1

      I don't think this marks the end of exclusive content for different platforms. It marks the beginning of exclusive content for each of the game platforms.

      And yes, it is ridiculous to buy 2-3 different copies of the same game because there are extra levels or features in each of them. But it's also ridiculous to buy the same movie over and over again on DVD (think "special edition", "ultimate edition", "remastered").

      The goal here is not to sell one or more consoles, it is to sell more than one copy of the same title per gamer.

  9. Re:You'd think that Rockstar learned their lesson. by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Honestly, I don't see that having sex in a game (while clothed no doubt) is a first, or pushing a huge boundary. The Leisure Suit Larry games featured sex as the main premise in the game.

    And it saddens me to think that having sex is worse than killing a cop in this society.

    The Hot Coffee thing was a media creation. They missed the boat initially on going after Rockstar. People have targeted violent video games for ages. This just gave them a new excuse, but the actual backlash that occurred was far from warranted.

    This news is far from surprising. Rockstar has been Sony-first in the past. The second they announced exclusive content for one console, I figured it would come on the PS3 and possibly Wii as well. Unfortunately with what they are talking about with GTAIV, I'm not sure the Wii hardware will handle it.

    Rockstar makes money for every copy sold. If they can double their sales by getting people to buy two copies with minimal effort (making a small ammount of content exclusive for each console) then it would be silly not to do this.

    You also have to realize that GTA:SA purportedly had a budget of 80-90 million dollars to make. Figure it the recall, possible lawsuits, etc. that each GTA game while in the past a success, can be a huge risk in the future. If they are spending 80 million dollars or more on the next title, they have to do everything in their power to maximize profit potential on that investment.

    It doesn't take long for a publisher or developer to go under in this day and age.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  10. Hot microtransactions. by cno3 · · Score: 1

    Nope. But wait until you see how many Microsoft Points an hour alone with one will cost.

  11. Exclusive bullshit by Psykechan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It used to be that if you wanted to play any game you merely had to purchase every console. Yes, it was expensive but we did it for the exclusive games that were only available on a single system.

    Now they are trying to make it so that if you want to play every bit of a cross platform game you have to buy multiple copies? Screw that. When Soul Calibur II came out with exclusive characters on each system, I responded by not buying the damn game. Here it looks like Rockstar is trying to generate artificial demand for downloadable content; something else designed to extract money from gamers.

    Yea, yea, feed me the line about games costing so much money to produce now. I don't care. Movies cost several million dollars to produce and you can buy the DVD for a single Andrew Jackson. Gamers are being charged three times that much for something that only cost a fraction of the price. Yes I understand that there are other factors here... I'm not that dense, it's just that they don't need to nickel-and-dime us afterwards.

    I'm tired of companies raising prices and then charging more for the "privelidge" of playing online. I'm tired of companies cramming questionable tech down our throats that only raises cost and causes delays. I'm tired of games that are strictly service based even though you still have to pay full retail price. I'm tired of companies charging me yet again for games that I already own; I mean I already have two copies of Super Mario World, two copies of Super Mario 64, and three fricking copies of The Legend of Zelda and for only 23 more dollars, I can play them all on one console. Hooray for shovelware.

    Yes I'm ranting. Sorry about that. The whole thing just makes me wonder why I play games anymore. Can I at least get an "amen"?

    1. Re:Exclusive bullshit by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      No amen from me. As far as I'm concerned, tightly integrated online is the current killer feature in gaming consoles. Prior to that, I'd never consider not gaming on my home PC. Now I'm considering buying a Mac for my next box.

      I agree with you on questionable tech, but nobody's forcing you to buy the PS3, and they're not doing you a disservice by delaying it. They're arguably doing themselves a disservice by not putting it out there for you to buy, but it's not like they owe you.

      Most real-life services have an "install" or some other start-up fee. Failing that, they have a contract with a disconnection charge. Both of these are ways to be able to recoup a guaranteed amount of expense. But if you don't like that, then why not wait until after the startup expenses are fully recouped, the box costs the same as a month of service, and includes a free month?

      Nobody's making you buy "shovelware". There's legitimate value in a Super Mario World rerelease for people who didn't have a Super Nintendo. You had one, so why buy the game again? Oh, it's portable. But...that sounds like value for your money! Horrors!

    2. Re:Exclusive bullshit by hollismb · · Score: 1

      Wow, you definitely put a lot of effort into that rant though. Good job.

    3. Re:Exclusive bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm tired of companies raising prices and then charging more for the "privelidge" of playing online.
      Is "privelidge" in quotes because you don't think it is one, or just because you don't know how to spell privilege? :-)
    4. Re:Exclusive bullshit by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      When Soul Calibur II came out with exclusive characters on each system, I responded by not buying the damn game.

      Or you could have done what I did: Buy the game for the console of your choice, and not give a rats ass about the exclusive characters. Same with "exclusive content" for GTA. Who cares? If the main game + whetever content you get for your console is fun, then it's fun. Why would you need to go and beat another version of the game? Besides, much like the exclusive Soul Calibur character, the exclusive content is probably going to be relatively half-assed compared to that which defines the game for every console.

      Still, I'll throw you an "amen".

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Exclusive bullshit by Nalanthi · · Score: 1

      Was DVD questionable tech when Sony "shoved it down our throats"? Lord knows it was an immature technology that gave them tons of problems. I'm betting that two years down the road the Xbox360 will be dammed sorry that its developers have neither a next gen drive or a hard drive to work with since neither are standard features for the system.


      I've always thought this "What the?!?!? they expect me to pay money for mario again!!" stuff to be... rather short sighted. The industry has several choices on what to do with old games. They can just leave them to collect dust forever and become forgotten and unavailable as the original hardware and emulators become broken and obscure. This requires neither them or us to spend money but you will eventually lose your ability to play these games unless you are extremely technicaly inclined like oh say.. some old DOS games. They can give away the rights to emulate it to a company that can monetize those rights in such away as to ensure that the game remains playable. This means that you can continue to play the game but you must pay for it in order to compensate the company for format shifting the content. They can build legacy hardware or emulators into their current products. Hardware is expensive and could easily be labled "questionable tech shoved down our throats." Sony had to include a PS2 chip in the PS3 to enable backwards compatability and I don't intend to chunk my PS2 so I don't really need this. Either way you have to pay either for the hardware to continue to play the game or the software develepment of the emulator and any space shifting of content that must be done.

      The bottom line is that you are paying money for services rendered. If you want to play Mario on your NES no one is going to charge you a dime. But if you want to play Mario on a different system don't you think the people that did the work to make this possible and distributed it deserve some compensation.

      As gamers we have proved that we are not happy with any of the possible options.

      The Xbox360 was lambasted for there lack of complete backwards compatibility. They tried to keep costs down by only emulating easy and desired games. The gaming community judges them for not providing what they want.

      The PS3 includes a PS2 chipset to ensure complete backwards compatibility with the PS2 and PS1. Gamers applaud. Then we judge them for providing a console that costs 500 dollars (IMHO the 600 dollar version really only adds bells and whistles unlike the differences between the Xbox360s)

      The Wii bases itself on the current hardware to ensure for backwards capability and low costs and they get lambasted for not being next-gen. THEN they provide an emulator and download service for almost all of the consoles they have ever produced and gamers fuss because we are expected to pay again for games we have already bought as if writing the emulator, format shifting the content, setting up the distribution channel and the bandwidth don't cost Nintendo anything.

      We don't like No backwards compatibility. We don't like free but incomplete backwards compatibility. We don't like expensive consoles with perfect backwards compatibility. We dont like cheap consoles with good backwards compatibility. We don't like paying for backwards compatibility.

      --
      I can't find my .sig file!
    6. Re:Exclusive bullshit by nephillim · · Score: 0
      Movies cost several million dollars to produce and you can buy the DVD for a single Andrew Jackson.


      except.... what they do is release the movie I used to buy.
      For 2 weeks or so it cost me maybe 15$.
      Then the price actually goes UP to 20$ for some unspecified amount of time.
      And then the final insult... they then release a new "uncensored extreme extended +50 hours of video footage" version which cost the same amount as the initial movie I might have bought...

      It is even worse if you bought collectors editions of some movie... only to have a cooler version of the DVD come out a few months late...
    7. Re:Exclusive bullshit by Cutriss · · Score: 1

      I'm tired of companies charging me yet again [wikipedia.org] for games that I already own; I mean I already have two [gamefaqs.com] copies [gamefaqs.com] of Super Mario World, two [gamefaqs.com] copies [gamefaqs.com] of Super Mario 64, and three [gamefaqs.com] fricking [gamefaqs.com] copies [gamefaqs.com] of The Legend of Zelda and for only 23 more dollars, I can play them all on one console. Hooray for shovelware.

      And I'm tired of people complaining because they're being loyal consumers and failing to restrain their own wallets. Your N64 copy of Super Mario 64 probably still works. I don't know why you felt the need to buy another one. If you're hung up about the new levels and mini-games, then sell your old version first and put it toward the price, or factor it into the cost of the game. You already have SM64, therefore the value of SM64DS is strictly based on the new levels, the multiplayer, and the minigames. Is that worth $30 (or less used) to you?

      No?

      Then quit whining.

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    8. Re:Exclusive bullshit by MooseMuffin · · Score: 1

      You sir, get my amen. amen

    9. Re:Exclusive bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only ranting, but ranting foolishly. If you can't get a system yet because of questionable tech, how can you possibly complain the company if forcing questionable tech down your throat?

    10. Re:Exclusive bullshit by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Well said! I bought a couple of the classic games for GBA because I liked the games enough to want to play them years after I moved on from the older console. Nothing forced me to get rid of my old console. I am happy - even grateful - that Nintendo recognized there was a market for their older games ported/updated/emulated on newer systems. (I don't actually know what tech is being used, and don't really care that much.)

      At worst, the Wii's Virtual console is something I will ignore. At best, it will offer me a few games with nostalgic value for a lot less effort than trying to find a used console/game.

    11. Re:Exclusive bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You've already been mostly pwned by the replies, but one more fun note:

      Movies cost several million dollars to produce and you can buy the DVD for a single Andrew Jackson.


      As long as you brought it up...DVDs are a single platform...and yet the same movie will be released anywhere from 2 to 4+ times, each with a slight variation on extras. While the occasional "Deluxe Edition" will include all the extras so you only need that one copy, I'm sure there are Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, and Matrix fans who would love to ask DVD-release decision makers WTF. As gamers, we're somewhat lucky that we aren't yet to the point of (frequently) buying the same game multiple times on the same system.

      The response to the DVD problem is easy: every time I have to buy multiple copies of a movie I already own in order to have a complete combination of extras, I download another movie instead of buying it. It's voting with my dollars, but it sends the studios entirely the wrong message. With games, piracy is so rampant that doing that wouldn't really make any difference.
    12. Re:Exclusive bullshit by Dacmot · · Score: 1
      I'm tired of companies charging me yet again for games that I already own; I mean I already have two copies of Super Mario World, two copies of Super Mario 64, and three fricking copies of The Legend of Zelda and for only 23 more dollars, I can play them all on one console. Hooray for shovelware.


      I don't get this argument. If you already own them, why don't you play them on the original console?

      Obviously, this service is targetted at people who have broken or lost legacy hardware and/or games and want to play the game again. Or to people who never owned it and always wanted to play it because of [insert reason here].

      Don't go ruin the fun for everyone else. Do us a favour: stop bitching and go back to your old (S)NES/N64. That way you don't spend $23 bucks and we don't have to listen to your whining.
    13. Re:Exclusive bullshit by brkello · · Score: 1

      You are acting as if you are forced to do all of these things. That just because there was an exclusive character on each version of the console you would have to buy all three. I don't want to be mean...but that sounds a tad bit crazy to me. So you don't have access to two characters...oooooh, big deal. It isn't going to significantly change the game.

      Your rant is just silly. Blu-Ray is a gamble by Sony that they hope will pay off. You don't have to buy the console. There are other consoles already out that will be cheaper. You don't need to own every game on every console. WoW adds a lot of content periodically and they need to be reimbursed for it. You give one example of a game that has a different model...then play that game. If you want to miss out on WoW, that's your choice. Millions of people don't care what you think and will happily play a good MMORPG. You are the person who decided to buy multiple copies of the game. Are you some sort of sheep unable to control yourself when a new version of a game you like comes out?

      If you don't like it, don't buy games. It seems like you lack self control when it comes to your purchasing.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  12. And also by StocDred · · Score: 1
    In related news: the new, next-gen Splinter Cell is totally and forever a 360 exclusive! You will be able to play it ONLY on the 360! This is so true! And there will be downloadable content that will be exclusive to the Xbox! You can definitely believe Microsoft in this one, everybody! The Xbox is your only place for the intense excitement of Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell!

    *Disclaimer: all mentions of exclusivity are valid for only three months.

  13. Re:You'd think that Rockstar learned their lesson. by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm sure that this has been said, but Rockstar didn't get in trouble for having sexual content; the problem was that they did not announce that such content existed on the game discs. Sure some user gained access to the content by unusual means (so I'm told) but it was still accessible and undeclared to the ESRB, which resulted in the backlash.

    Anyone who's heard of the GTA series knows there is cop killing and hookers, but until the whole 'Hot Coffee' fiasco, I'm sure no one thought there was a minigame designed around the premise of pleasuring a woman.

    Anyway, I was just being facetious; don't take me too seriously ;-)

  14. Re:You'd think that Rockstar learned their lesson. by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    The content did exist on the disc, but it could only be accessed via a mod to unlock it.

    Most any game has content that is cut from release, and fairly often these orphaned data files still ship with a game.

    I don't think you should be held accountable for something that can be only accessed via third-party tools, or added to a game after release by third parties.

    Hell, there are nude sprite patches for Super Mario Bros.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  15. Meh by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

    Thanks, but I think I will wait until the version on the PS6 for.

    --
    -
  16. Re:You'd think that Rockstar learned their lesson. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    I don't think you should be held accountable for something that can be only accessed via third-party tools, or added to a game after release by third parties.

    I agree, and the thing that I always found so freaking amusing about this was that the only way to unlock this material was to go on the internet, in the case of a child presumeably unsupervised, and download the patch to apply to the game.

    Oh noes!!! You mean there is a way for a child to see nudity if he goes onto the internet without adult supervision! My god! Those Rockstar bastards have a lot of nerve acting all innocent when they are directly responsible for this situation. Before this, it would have been impossible for a kid to see pornography just by browsing around the internet! Erm...

    It still makes me chuckle to think about it. So damn clueless, some people are...

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are