Company Claims New Chip Converts Heat To Electricity

Dster76 writes to tell us that the startup, Eneco, has invented a solid state energy conversion chip which they claim will be able to convert heat directly into electricity or reach temperatures of -200 C when given an electrical current. While such a device could revolutionize many aspects of computing I'll keep my skeptic hat on for the time being.

Comments

Energy conversion devices

[erroneus]

I don't know why the notion should be so foreign. If someone told you they created a solid state device that could convert light energy directly into electrical energy would you believe them? Yeah, probably, because you have seen these in action already. They are on just about every calculator out there now. But there was a time when they were just an idea and the topic of fiction.

The notion of using heat is so different? Surely the technology is quite different I'm sure, but I would not be quite so quick to be skeptical.

Re:Energy conversion devices

[Anonymous Coward]

Nobody doubts it can be done, see Peltier. They're not terribly efficient (I thought they were 15% efficiency capable, but I guess not..)

Re:Energy conversion devices

[Zork the Almighty]

There is nothing that this chip could do that could not be done by simply making current designs more efficient. In fact, the use of such a chip necessarily wastes energy.

Re:Energy conversion devices

[russ1337]

Almost right - its actually the Seebeck effect

Thermoelectric effect
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Peltier-Seebeck effect)
Jump to: navigation, search
The Peltier-Seebeck effect, or thermoelectric effect, is the direct conversion of heat differentials to electric voltage and vice versa. Related effects are the Thomson effect and Joule heating. The Peltier-Seebeck and Thomson effects are reversible (in fact, the Peltier and Seebeck effects are reversals of one another); Joule heating cannot be reversible under the laws of thermodynamics.

Seebeck effect:
The Seebeck effect is the conversion of temperature differences directly into electricity.

Re:Energy conversion devices

[rolfwind]

People are quite right to be skeptical or they will be fleeced every time a con artist announces a promises a great sounding technology. (BTW, this isn't the first time I read about someone promising similiar solid state chips on /.)

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

That said, just because someone is a skeptic doesn't mean we are impossible to convince. Just show us the tech - put up or shut up, that simple. I think that is a fair test.

Afterall, it's good enough for skeptic James Randi with paranormal claims, it's good enough for me.

Re:Energy conversion devices

[Nos.]

True to a point. Until we find a way to make our CPUs run cooler, isn't it better to have something like this chip to at least recover some of that wasted energy than to use more energy (a fan) to cool it?

Re:Energy conversion devices

[kfg]

Something just sounds fishy about this; like a scheme to power your car with it's own exhaust.

No, you can't run your car that way, but you can use the exhaust to turn a fan to turn a compressor to force induction to increase power.

Well call this a "turbocharger."

KFG

Re:Energy conversion devices

[MillionthMonkey]

If someone told you they created a solid state device that could convert light energy directly into electrical energy would you believe them? Yeah, probably, because you have seen these in action already. They are on just about every calculator out there now. But there was a time when they were just an idea and the topic of fiction. The notion of using heat is so different? Surely the technology is quite different I'm sure, but I would not be quite so quick to be skeptical.

The Earth receives high energy, low entropy photons from the sun. It reradiates low energy, high entropy photons back into space. These reradiated photons are not very useful in a 300 K environment, which is in thermodynamic equilibrium with them. This is similar to how you'd find it much harder to extract work from sunlight if you were on the surface of the sun, an environment in thermodynamic equilibrium with that light. (Yes I know everything would melt you nitpickers but the point remains.)

The reason those calculators work is because they are exchanging energy with the sun's surface and they are not in thermodynamic equilibrium with it. On the earth's surface, if you try to make a solar cell to catch low infrared from objects on our own planet, you'll find that your cell radiates away the photons you are trying to capture, just by being at room temperature.

Re:Energy conversion devices

[kiatoa]

Sorry. Doesn't work that way. The application of this chip will push the temp of the device being cooled up even higher. If you care about the life of your semiconductor devices you will be trying to get them to run as cool as possible. Yes, even semiconductors wear out. Look up electromigration. Take any scenario and apply the thermoconversion device to it (heat direct to elec. is not new btw, don't all geeks make a copper/iron thermoelectric candle powered radio as a kid?) and compare with an equivalent cost best of breed heat sink and the theroconversion device will lose because the chip being cooled will be running hotter. It is the same thing as those guys who think they can put a steam or stirling engine into their cars and get better gas mileage. Sure you can do it but it doesn't make economical sense.

Re:Energy conversion devices

[squiggleslash]

If you expect me to believe number two, you must not only prove that the interstellar traveller ate the cookie, but you must also prove that you did NOT eat the cookie. And you must prove that you are not an interstellar traveller.

Now, hold on a moment. _Proving the first and the last of these should prove the second...

...unless you're trying to claim that it's possible to eat your cookie and have it eaten by an interstella travelled. That's an extraordinary claim to make, and I hope you have some extraordinary evidence to back it up!

Re:Energy conversion devices

[kfg]

Well sure you do. The stoichiometry of the combustion doesn't change. You don't get more motive power out of a given volume of fuel.

I don't think you caught that in the above post I was comparing energy taken from the flow of exhaust gases to energy taken from the turning of the crankshaft.

I can bake potatoes on my exhaust header. When I do so the potato becomes part of the system. It does not decrease my fuel milage or require an increase in engine efficiency. It is the inefficiency of the engine that does the job. If, however, I drove a generator from the output shaft and used that to power a heating element in an electric oven it would require the burning of more fuel.

In the former it is not "free" energy. It came from the burning of my fuel, but it is energy that I would have otherwise thrown away without doing anything with it.

And that is what these people are talking about when they say their device could be used to turn a computer's cooling fans. It isn't something for nothing, but it is more something without anything more. It doesn't increase the efficiency of the CPU, but it does increase the efficiency of the system.

KFG

Re:Energy conversion devices

[Plutonite]

Or you could use the "recovered" energy to power the processor fan, thus creating an automatic temp.control(if it is hot, fan will get juice, otherwise fan dies).

I still doubt they will ever produce enough power for a nice 3000RPM bad boy like the one buzzing in my case now.

Re:Energy conversion devices

[Ungrounded Lightning]

Peltiers are just thermocouples/thermopiles made of semiconductors. They are inefficient mainly because the material they're made of is a good enough heat conductor that it conducts most of the heat they've pumped back across the temperature gradient. Absent that they should be able to reach carnot cycle efficiency. Meanwhile, if you are willing to feed 'em the extra power (or accept that they generate

You can get cooling down to cryogenic temperatures just by building a pyramid of peltier cells (with progressively fewer couples in each layer), all interconnected electrically. This was done 'way back when they were first invented.

This device is a more efficient vacuum-tube version, using nanostructure field-emission needles for the cathodes and built in a microscopic form-factor using integrated-circuit manufacturing techniques. It does the same thing, but using electrons in vacuum. (The heat kicks them off the emitter with a momentum high enough for them to pass through a field to a more-negative collector plate.) A vacuum is a GREAT insulator, so the efficiency is much better. (Or pump heat by applying a voltage to encourrage the electrons to jump off the needles at thermal vibration peaks, cooling them, and smack into the collectors, heating them.)

Also: Since it is apparently built of metals and ceramics rather than semiconductors you can run it very hot - like at the focus of a solar concentrator. That can beat photovoltaics by a bunch.

I've seen reports of this device before. I presume this one means either they need more funding or they've just solved a manufacturing problem, bringing them a step closer to commercial rollout.

Re:Energy conversion devices

[Ungrounded Lightning]

On deeper reading of this I see that they've "solved the problem" of maintaining a vacuum by "replacing the vacuum with a properly selected semiconductor material". (The reporter seems to have hashed things up so it's hard to be sure what they're talking about - as usual. B-( )

That sounds like they're trying to build a semiconductor equivalent of the true-vacuum device I described above. Perhaps something like a field-effect transistor using bulk, undoped, semiconductor material for the "vacuum" and perhaps a schottky barrier junction (or a doped region) for the "thermionic emission cathode". A "P-I-P" diode perhaps, with the thermal agitation lifting the electrons from the potential well to launch them into the undoped region?

(I should stop guessing and look up their patents.)

Much of the heat conduction in solids is done by electron motion rather than mechanical vibration transfer. So a bar of undoped semiconductor should be a better insulator than the heavily-doped P and N type silicon that makes up the structure of a peltier cell, leading to higher efficiency in a "semconductor thermionic" device.

Darn. I thought these guys were working on true cold-cathode vacuum tubes at integrated circuit scales, and had solved the three big problems blocking them (cathode construction, ion erosion, and maintaining a clean vacuum).

Vacuum tubes and their close relatives, gas-discharge (plasma) tubes, have great properties (like radiation and EMP resistance) and can do a lot of amazing stuff - some of which semiconductors still can't do, or do well. It was mainly the need to heat the cathode that let semiconductors displace them - and the strucutral shrinkage and continued breakthroughs that let them hold their lead. While the size of the electron wave function means nano-scale vacuum ICs will probably hit a density wall at a slightly larger feature size than semiconductors, vacuum ICs still have a lot of potential. If somebody had solved those three problems I mentioned I can imagine a partial revival, with vacuum ICs leveraging the semiconductor manufacturing processes and displacing semiconductors in at least some applications where their properties give significant advantages.

Re:Energy conversion devices

[Vellmont]

They would all restrict the flow of heat from the CPU to the heatsink, rendering it ineffective.

That's why you'd need a different design. I'm not a thermal engineer, and I presume you aren't either. But it's not really that unbelieveable that a cooling design could be implemented that would be able to do both at the same time.

Re:Energy conversion devices

[mrchaotica]

Of course after reading the article I noticed there is a cooling mode for the chip where rather than generating electricity, you actually feed it electricity, and it cools down the chip a lot more. That might be more efficient (and practical) than current heatsink-fan technology, but I'll wait till I see it with my own eyes.

You'll still need a heat sink because the temperature on the other side of the device (the one not cooling the CPU) will increase more than the amount the cool side decreases (because both the CPU and the electricity applied to the device contribute to the total energy of the system). In other words, let the temperature of your CPU when cooled by a heat sink be t0. If you use this device to cool the CPU to t0 - x degrees, then the temperature on the other side (cooled by the same heat sink that was attached to the CPU before) will be t0 + x + y degrees, where y represents the less-than-100% efficiency of the device itself.

However, there is a reason to do this: you can get the CPU cooler than it's possible to do with a heat sink alone. In particular, it can get the CPU to run cooler than ambient temperature (which a heat sink can only approach asymptotically). Extreme overclockers use this technique sometimes, but the downside is that you have to start worrying about condensation killing your electronics.

Re:Energy conversion devices

[ceoyoyo]

Suppose you have a CPU with a heat sink on it. Now you add a power generating chip between the CPU and the heat sink. Since this chip generates electricity it must be opposing the flow of heat. Therefore, heat will flow less well when the chip is present. Thus, heat will build up more on the CPU side than it would without the chip.

You can think of it like a hydroelectric dam (or water wheel) if you like. Water flows, then you stick something in the way -- in order for the paddle wheel or turbine to generate electricity it must oppose the flow of the water -- forcing it to do work.

Re:Energy conversion devices

[I Like Pudding]

I don't see any reason why you can't do both.

Thermo FUCKING dynamics.

Computing?

[PreacherTom]

Revolutionize computing? How about revolutionizing LIFE. If true, this would be larger than controlled fusion.

Re:Computing?

[BoberFett]

Heat to electricity? Bring on global warming!

Re:Computing?

[c-reus]

everybody get yourselves a Prescott and that will generate all the electricity you will need.

Brilliant!

[PsyQo]

If we all implanted such a chip in our handpalms we could watch pr0n and save the world at the same time!

Long term plan ... what were they thinking?

[Josh Lindenmuth]

The device sounds legit (it certainly doesn't break any laws of physics), but Eneco's plan for its longterm usage is just loopy. They say they'll initially try to improve battery life by coupling it with processors to recoup energy lost as heat. Great startup plan, but then it goes downhill ... from the article:

Brown also sees the chips ultimately replacing batteries altogether. He argues that by linking the modules to a microburner - a catalytic burner that produces between 275 and 600 degrees centigrade you can heat the chips and generate enough power to run the device.

In theory this approach would be far cleaner as the burners that Eneco is planning to employ use Ethanol

So in other words, Eneco plans to replace our laptop batteries with small Ethanol burning stoves that run hotter than a car engine? How would this ever fly, given people are worried about their current laptops catching fire? Also, who wants to fill up their laptop with gas every couple days? Energy coming from the grid at least in theory can be from renewable sources (wind, solar, tides, etc.). Why push Ethanol, a fuel which cannot be used on a large scale (and arguably requires more energy to produce than it provides)? The only reason I can think of is that they are trying to ride the "Ethanol investing wave" that hit markets over the past couple years (and appears to be waning).

Hopefully investors will see through the zany longterm plan and focus on the merits of the product, it really does appear to be valuable across a wide range of industries.

Re:Long term plan ... what were they thinking?

[anonimouskiller]

actually ethanol from soy or sugar cane is a very clean energy source, and it doesn't require more energy to produce than it provides. Brazil has been using ethanol for more than 2 decades now, it's still cheaper then gasoline and polutes less. although the 'stoves in the lap' idea seems kinda dumb.

Where is the energy going?

[jandrese]

Ok, so it converts latent heat into electricity, presumably working like a heat engine with the cold side fixed at absolute zero somehow? If you add energy, it gets even colder and produces...more energy? Is it just me or does this thing sound a lot like a perpetual motion machine component? Either this thing is bogus or the article is misleading as to what it actually does.

Re:Where is the energy going?

[lhbtubajon]

No, you misunderstood. There are two apparent functions that are totally separate:

1) Extract heat and use heat differential to generate electricity.

2) Use electricity supply to cool down to -200.

Either one or the other, but not both at the same time.

Re:Where is the energy going?

[wsherman]

Use electricity supply to cool down to -200 C.

That's not exactly a fundamental science discovery but if it's true it's actually pretty neat.

Oxygen condenses at -183.0 C and nitrogen condenses at -195.8 C so if these things became widely available you could make your own liquid oxygen and liquid nitrogen.

Unfortunately, liquid hydrogen is down at -252.8 C so you wouldn't be able to condense the hydrogen gas you got from electrolysis of water to make your own liquid hydrogen and oxygen rocket engine.

Peltier?

[Deflatamouse!]

The description sounds like a peltier to me. Apply some current, and the device generates a temperature differential.

Can a temperature differential cause the device to operate in reverse?

Re:Peltier?

[mcnut]

yes, The reverse is a well studied application, though the materials used are slightly different for optimal current instead of optimal temperature difference

Thermocouple

[gus goose]

Solid-state device that converts heat to electricity....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermocouple

Invented 1821 - Prior art?

gus

P.S. Yes, I know that TC's rely on a temperature differential, not just a temperature... ;-)

Re:Thermocouple

[Goaway]

Do you have any idea what "prior art" even means?

What?!

[Anonymous Coward]

I read the article and it says you need a heat sink! I was hoping this damn think broke the laws of thermodynamics!

Dupe

[Ancil]

Dupe from at least 2002. Both the slashdot article and the technology.

Similar work been done before

[davidmcn]

A few years ago (6 I believe) a company called Cool Chips LLC (which was traded on PinkSheets.com back then) claimed to have done the same thing. Unfortunately outside of the first round of announcements (which may have even been on Slashdot), nothing more was mentioned. In the comments back then it was hypothesized that an energy conglomerate or oil company would buy Cool Chips out to keep the technology from ever coming to the market. Me wonders if that might have happened, or if some of the primaries from Cool Chips are now a part of this venture.

Re:Similar work been done before

[Anonymous Coward]

They're still there - http://www.coolchips.gi/ - and they hold some patents on the process. They seem to perpetually be about 100 days away from shipping product - have been for years.

Their parent company http://borealis.com/ has lots of technologies that are equally world-changing, and almost equally vaporous.

Woohoo I have two options

[McNihil]

Burn a fiery death of an exploding battery.

OR

Massive Freezer burn on my lap and thus gonads.

This is truly astonishing.

I do not believe a word of this.

Carbon Neutral? Really??

[Freestyling]

I would also point out, that even if they were to deploy large numbers of ethanol burning "batteries" the amount of ethanol, and the purity required would mean that the only way to produce the ethanol would be through hydration of ethene. This involves reacting the ethene gas with steam at a high temperature and pressure, needing large amount of energy as well as the ethene as a raw ingredient from crude oil. I really don't see how that can be carbon neutral in any way.

Intel announces new chip

[Anonymous Coward]

Intel announces new chip to turn electricity into heat, I believe it's called Pentium or something like that. It's apparently very very VERY very good at it.

Peltier-Seebeck

[tigre]

See wikipedia for more. Seebeck is the reverse effect.

The summary is bogus

[paladinwannabe2]

This does not violate the second law of thermodynamics. What it does is turn a heat differential (i.e. two objects of different temperatures) into a source of electricity as heat flows between them. Its purpose is to make systems more efficient- for instance, your laptop produces a lot of waste heat, and if we could recapture some of that lost energy it would improve your laptop's battery life. It also has the reverse effect of pumping heat (like an air conditioner) when electricity is applied to it.

Very silly idea

[Ancient_Hacker]

"Thermionic energy" sounds really wizzy, until you think about it a bit. You are trying to get electrons to boil off a hot surface and plonk themselves onto a cooler collector plate. Which means you need a hot emitter, a cool colector, and in between something that will pass electrons, but not too much heat. Basically, a losing proposition, as anything that passes electrons is almost by definition an excellent conductor of heat. Try to think of somethign that conducts electricity but insulates heat. Hard to come up with isnt it?

There are thermionic devices already around, you're probably looking at one. Vacuum tubes and CRT's are thermionic devices. Not very powerful ones--a typical tube only boils off microamps of current at under a volt, while requiring several watts of electrical power to heat the emitter. Not very impressive.

Thermocouple

[steveo777]

This is slashdot, so by the time I've typed this it may be redundant, but we've been using thermocouples for a long time to measure temperture based on the electricity they generate. Mostly they go into thermostats in homes and also are used in digital thermometers.

I read part of TFA but it just sounds like a better thermocouple.

Show me a production, working product. Otherwise, I'll wait for someone to come up with a way to 'catch' entropy.

Re:-200C ?

[SEMW]

What? No you wouldn't. Ever heard of... Well, a freezer? That's a device capable of turning electricity into a temperature differential, and as far as I know, doesn't break any laws of Thermodynamics. It's called a heat pump. The device in TFA can also act as a heat pump, probably using the Peltier effect.

Manufacturing costs will make or break this

[Orange Crush]

Hey, if they can manufacture lots and lots of these things (and cheaply) this will make a really big splash. The Peltier Effect is one of the Really Neat Things(tm) in thermodynamics, IMHO. I wonder how well this would work in a solar-power setting. There's one project currently in the works with big reflector dishes aimed at sterling generators. This can allow the same sort of rig, but with entirely solid state equipment.

Peltier

[Peet42]

It's called a Peltier device, and has been around for decades.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peltier-Seebeck_effec t

thermodynamics

[bcrowell]

According to the laws of thermodynamics, the conversion of heat to other forms of energy requires access to thermal reservoirs at two different temperatures, and there's a limit on the possible efficiency of the process, which is 1-T(low)/T(high). Their press release doesn't seem to be claiming anything that violates this, so it's not obviously voodoo science or anything. However, any such heat engine is only going to be useful when (a) you have cheap access to hot and cold reservoirs, (b) the temperature difference is fairly high, and (c) the efficiency of the heat engine is superior to the other practical heat engines that you have to choose from, or there's some other practical reason why this particular heat engine is better for your application.

Human battery

[MECC]

"Brown also sees the chips ultimately replacing batteries altogether."

Especially if implanted in people. From birth. In vast crops...

Second Law of Thermodynamics

[paladinwannabe2]

The problem is that converting heat energy directly into electricity violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics, not unlike perpetual motion machines. Thus anyone claiming that they can convert heat into electricity is lying, stupid, or discovering new laws of the universe. What this device does is convert heat differentials into electricity- similar to a steam generator, but without the moving parts. In order to make electricity it needs something hot on one side of it and something (relatively) cold on the other. It makes electricity while heat flows through it.

Re:Second Law of Thermodynamics

[kfg]

The problem is that converting heat energy directly into electricity violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics. . .What this device does is convert heat differentials into electricity. . .It makes electricity while heat flows through it.

You are confusing heat with temperature. Temperature is the energy content. Heat is its flow. This device converts temperature differentials into electricity; with heat.

KFG

Re:Second Law of Thermodynamics

[djh101010]

The problem is that converting heat energy directly into electricity violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics, not unlike perpetual motion machines.

Can you explain how heat (infrared photons, right?) is different in this regard than visible light (as in a photovoltaic cell)? I'm not busting your chops here, I just don't understand why the wavelength of the light matters in this context.

Re:Second Law of Thermodynamics

[k1773re7f]

Thermocouples definiately do not violate SLoT. I in fact have used thermocouples and thermopiles to power low drain electronic circuits. It does require a bit of heat. And not all heat is converted. But it can happen and *does not* violate Second Law of Thermodynamics.

Re:Second Law of Thermodynamics

[LWATCDR]

No this device doesn't.
I read the link. It looks like an improved thermocouple. It uses a heat-sink and a heat source just like an RTG.
As one person said to discredit the story "it is like powering your car with it's exhaust". A gas turbine engine does exactly that.
This wouldn't be a perpetual motion machine since it would still require a power source. What this device does is simply recovers some of the wasted energy from the hot chip and feed it back into the battery.
The only "questionable" part is this mystery semiconductor that conducts electrons a lot better than it conducts heat.

Re:Second Law of Thermodynamics

[Moofie]

Just ask MC Hawking.

Entropy, how can I explain it? I'll take it frame by frame it,
to have you all jumping, shouting saying it.
Let's just say that it's a measure of disorder,
in a system that is closed, like with a border.
It's sorta, like a, well a measurement of randomness,
proposed in 1850 by a German, but wait I digress.
"What the fuck is entropy?", I here the people still exclaiming,
it seems I gotta start the explaining.

You down with entropy?
Yeah, you know me!
Yeah, you know me!
Yeah, you know me!
Who's down with entropy?
Every last homey!

Re:Second Law of Thermodynamics

[volpe]

Agreed on the temperature differentials part, but I don't think I agree with the characterization of temperature as energy content and heat as its flow. Heat is the thermal energy content. It need not flow. An object that isn't at absolute zero contains "heat". Temperature is the average kinetic energy of the constituent particles. A brick at 100 degrees C contains more heat than a grain of sand at 100 degrees C, even though they are the same temperature. And that statement about heat is a statement about a static condition, with no flow involved.

Re:Second Law of Thermodynamics

[hacksoncode]

Because infrared radiation is not heat, it's infrared radiation. It can be produced by hot things, and it can make other things hot, but it is not, itself, "heat".

Heat is the energy contained in random motion of particles. The key here is *random". If you extract energy from pure heat that's just sitting somewhere, you're reducing the entropy of the hot thing, practically by definition. In order for this to not be a violation of the Laws of Thermodynamics, you would have to create even more entropy somewhere else. The easiest way to do this would be to generate more heat than you removed, but then you're up against conservation of energy. There are other ways to create entropy, though, so it's not technically impossible.

The reason you can grab energy out of heat moving from a hot location to a cooler location is that that net motion is not random, so you can increase the entropy of the system by randomizing the non-random element.

Note: yes, all the above is a dramatic over-simplification.

Re:Second Law of Thermodynamics

[ozbird]

The only "questionable" part is this mystery semiconductor that conducts electrons a lot better than it conducts heat.

Their patent on the solid state energy converter mentions that they have been experimenting with indium antimonide (InSb).
They also hold a patent for a way to make N-type semiconducting diamond, which may hint to where they're heading with this (or not.)

Re:Second Law of Thermodynamics

[Thomas Miconi]

Heat is the thermal energy content. It need not flow. An object that isn't at absolute zero contains "heat".

In everyday language, sure. But not in scientific language.

From the wiki article: "In physics, heat, symbolized by Q, is defined as energy in transit."

Heat is the amount of thermal energy that is flowing between two bodies at different temperatures. The "thermal energy content" (roughly) is temperature itself. GP was quite correct.

ahh that's nothing

[lubricated]

I've had a chip in my computer that converted electricity into heat. It was called a p4.

Re:eno2001 Claims Stomach...

[Jeremiah Cornelius]

That's a T4$ Hangover!

Heat to electricity? It's like my Powerbook, only in reverse!

not bogus, not necessarily "disruptive technology"

[jetpeach]

So the technology is definitely hyped up in the article, but this is not bogus like oh so many of these types of articles on slashdot are. I'm in an electrical engineering PhD program and the ideas presented in the article are sound (i.e. there isn't any breakage of the 1st law of thermodynamics and no magic magnets involved!). The obvious question is what is this material that replaces a vaccum, this "properly selected semiconductor thermoelectric that is thick enough to support a significant temperature differential between the emitter and the collector in order to achieve efficiencies of practical interest" as this is the key to the technology. If they indeed have found a material to do this this is a very interesting technology that probably will make it into our consumer products, and possibly "soon".

I'm sceptical

[sinij]

If these guys are so brilliant to invent this solid state device why are they not so brilliant to see it potential uses. Let's see - portable nuclear generators since you no longer need to worry about turbines and cooling, combustion engine efficiency will skyrocket if you can recoup even portion of 60% of combustion energy wasted on heat , refrigeration and air conditioning will be trivial.

This chip, if it works = free energy for everyone, everywhere, and they work about battery life for laptops... wtf?

Prior Art

[The Mighty Buzzard]

IANAL but I'm fairly certain the patents held by Borealis Technical Limited for their Power Chips line already covers this.
Have a look: http://www.powerchips.gi/

Re:Amd vs Intel

[hAckz0r]

Lets just think about this for a minute. CPU's generate heat, which is not a 100% efficient process. The device is 20-30% efficient even then. To get by on using an inefficient power source the CPU would have to be as efficient as possible. Once it is efficient enough to run on reduced power it will generate less heat, and thus less electrical power. See where this is going? It can't be a perpetual device if it runs at a net loss. If it can't be the only power source for the CPU why build it in? At best it will only convert SOME of the waste heat to run some other part of the computer. Cooling comes to mind because the power to run the cooling is directly related to the heat generated, but turning a mechanical fan would take perhaps more energy than the device could generate at that given temperature. The device itself needs cooling to work. It does not sound to me to be practical even for running that. At best it will require an external source of BTU's and cooling to power the device for a small payback in terms of electrical power.

What would make a difference if such a device could work for all wavelengths of radiation converting all nearby sources of light, radio, static RF, and heat into usable power. Not just a "solar cell" but a radiation rectifier. Even at 20% efficiency there would be plenty of energy to harness if the spectrum was wide enough.

Re:eno2001 Claims Stomach...

[Warg! The Orcs!!]

then it's a Koobrewop

Re:Yes but...

[Technician]

how long will it be before The Machines start using us to produce electricity?

Already hapening..

http://www.haimei.com/mobile_phone_accessory/manua l_charger.htm

http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/review/shakelight_nig htstar_led_flashlight_review

http://www.jakeludington.com/gadget_envy/20050707_ hand_crank_led_flashlight.html

http://www.ambientweather.com/emra.html

Aha!!! here's the killer application

[goombah99]

Okay now I'm replying to my own post. what I said was right. But the application is not for computer chips but for much hotter systems. Namely the application is for burining propane at 600 degrees C and converting that to electricity. In theory the themodynamic efficiency would be max of 50%. They claim that inpractice they might achieve 20 to 30%.
"The result is a solid state energy conversion chip that can operate at temperatures of up to 600 degrees celcius and deliver absolute efficiencies in terms of how much heat energy is converted to electricity of between 20 and 30 percent."

Now 20 to 30% conversion of a stored chemical fuel to electricity RIGHT ON A MICRO CHIP without any mechinaical engine is great. Good energy density even if you are giving up 80% of the energy. The only trick is figuring out how to chill the backside. But if you are only looking for small amounts of power maybe ambient chilling or convection is not so bad. Maybe you could even burn a little more chemical enerfy to power a turbine to cool it off.

Anyhow the uses for this are not microchips but very hot systems. And that's what makes it different from conventional peltier coolers: it's compact, monlithic, and runs so hot it can get good efficiency.

Re:eno2001 Claims Stomach...

[WilliamSChips]

Turn e-e-electricity! into h-h-heat!

HERE's the real story:

[Ungrounded Lightning]

HAH! Found it on their web site!

Re:It can and does work.

[ChrisMaple]

If they are actually getting efficiencies near 40%, and the devices aren't too bulky or heavy, you don't use it to enhance an internal combustion engine, you use it to replace an internal combustion engine. Burner, converter, electric motor, and the job's done. No more catalytic converters, mufflers, mandatory pollution tests. No periodic oil changes, starter motors, or alternators.