Slashdot Mirror


A Spaceport In Ohio?

UglyTool writes to alert us to an initiative by the state of Ohio and the city of Columbus to lure Canadian rocketeers PlanetSpace to launch from an area airport (the former Lockbourne Air Force Base, now called Rickenbacker International Airport). A decision on the incentives could be made by January. From the article: "Such a package could include tax credits, financing programs and training grants amounting to millions of dollars... PlanetSpace's chairman, Indian-American entrepreneur Chirinjeev Kathuria, told MSNBC.com he expected the incentives to amount to 'somewhere in the neighborhood of $20 million.'" Five other states have spaceports approved or planned.

107 comments

  1. Saddle Up! by El+Torico · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I always like reading about efforts to get humanity off this ball of rock and water. One thing about the location though, I thought that the closer to the equator, the better. How does that compare against tax breaks?

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    1. Re:Saddle Up! by wasted · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I thought that the closer to the equator, the better. How does that compare against tax breaks?

      The ship out of Ohio will be sub-orbital, so the extra velocity gained by being near the equator isn't useful. The tax-breaks will be useful, though.
    2. Re:Saddle Up! by antispam_ben · · Score: 5, Informative

      As the other poster said, it doesn't matter for a sub-orbital flight. But even for orbital flights, taxes are a lot larger percentage of a commercial entities expenses than the equator's speed is a percentage of orbital velocity.

      But it also depends on what orbit you want. For a polar orbit it doesn't matter where you launch from, as an east-west speed differential won't help you go north-south. The big problem with a polar launch for an equatorial orbit surely isn't the lack of equator velocity boost, but rather the fuel used to go from the pole to the equator and then making that 90-degree turn at the equator.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
    3. Re:Saddle Up! by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      To go where? To another ball of rock without water?

      If you think "terraforming" is realistic you've been reading too much science fiction.

    4. Re:Saddle Up! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

      Captain Kirk was born in Ohio. Go figure.

    5. Re:Saddle Up! by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Feh. Terraforming is easy. If the Bush administration did it shortly after 9/11 with little effort, ANYONE can do it. Oh... not THAT "terra". ;P

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    6. Re:Saddle Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yore a fucking idiot. Terraforming can easily be done in a few minutes. All you need is a molecular seed bomb to start a chain reaction in the atmosphere guided by pre-programmed nanosystems. Using calculations of the target planet's current atmospheric conditions (gas mix, climatology, etc...) vs. the desired results, you would program the molecular seeds to bring the gas mix into balance, rebuild the outer layers of the atmosphere to either let in or keep out the desired amount of UV and Infrared radiation in both directions, etc... The technology to do this has existed for at least the past 75 years in the U.S. If we wanted to, we could put an atmoshpere on the moon by the end of the week (a lot more work to do due to the lack of any atmosphere) and obviate the need for moonbases. The reason it's not being done is two fold. One, the initial financial risk is too great for the investors. Two, the long term return would eat away at potential profits to said investors. Would people who were made super wealthy by the companies that designed the best buggies in the pre-automobile world have ever invested in the automobile at the outset knowing that it would kill off the buggy industry? Unlikely.

    7. Re:Saddle Up! by pipingguy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Insert sound of laughter into reader's brain. You misspelled "your", you moron.

    8. Re:Saddle Up! by arpajian · · Score: 1

      Gee... Hmmm... Lets get an IPO going! We would need to find an subluna grotto where we could perform controlled tests. We could call the initial offering/ teaser: "Space Seed". Hey! How about getting Ricardo Montalban for a PR spokesman?

      BTW: the parent post didn't spell "your" incorrectly! ("You're" is the contraction of "You are"; e.g.: "No. You're the moron!")

      --
      -dean
      -----------------------
      hey, well, its just my $0.02us
    9. Re:Saddle Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least he was original. I think that the first time I've seen "yore" used in place of "you're". Your mistake, however, is much, much more common.

    10. Re:Saddle Up! by PopeJM · · Score: 1

      Living in Ohio (at least in Cleveland) I can say that we have a huge amount of cloudy, rainy days so I wonder how they hope to ever get anything off the ground.

  2. Never happen - you'll fly E over Washington, DC by Gothmolly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Spaceships launch east, preferably from the equator. This will mean basically that a private company can launch ballistic payloads up into the air over DC. Nobody there will let this happen.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Never happen - you'll fly E over Washington, DC by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Spaceships launch east, preferably from the equator

      But north of the equator they launch south east. Would that be safer? would it go south of Washington.

    2. Re:Never happen - you'll fly E over Washington, DC by balsy2001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Back in 1999 I had an internship at a "spaceport" in idaho competing to be the home of Lockheed's failed Venture Star (X-33). The advantages in Idaho are you start at about 5000 feet elevation and if you want a polar orbit the farther north the better. Since the plan was to pick 2 sites idaho (like about 30 other sates) thought they could have a compelling reason to be the second, every one assumed florida would be one. Based on my experience there and the problems we were facing because we would have to fly close to calgary and edmonton I have to say flying over DC is definately a very long shot. The population density of the east coast will be very problematic for anyone trying to launch east that is not on the coast. If you launch from the mid west by the time you get to the coast your rocket will have enough velocity to bring many more cities into play during an error/failure than those you fly directly over (Boston, NYC, Phili, Baltimore, DC). I am not saying it is impossible but you will have a very hard time proving to the FAA and the public that there is a 10E-9 or even 10E-6 chance of killing someone during an error (these were the kinds of numbers we were trying to show for launching north from idaho). For reference population densities of canada can be seen at http://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca/site/english/maps/peoplea ndsociety/population/population2001/density2001 and population densities of america can be seen at http://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca/site/english/maps/peoplea ndsociety/population/population2001/density2001.

      --
      GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    3. Re:Never happen - you'll fly E over Washington, DC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      The population density of the east coast will be very problematic for anyone trying to launch east that is not on the coast.
      Take I-70 east from Columbus sometime. The only thing dense you'll see for a long, long way is cow shit.
    4. Re:Never happen - you'll fly E over Washington, DC by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      The acceptable casualty rates for the FAA are 30E-6. There is currently no accepted fatality rates, though given an accident that is purely a debris event (instead of an explosion on the ground), a casualty expectation of 30E-6 will provide a fatality expectation around 5 - 25E-6.

      There's little extra for a polar orbit to be further north, except that there's probably less population to fly over. A launch from the midwest flying east will bring many more cities into play, but the key is that it will have more velocity, reducing the time during the trajectory where the vehicle endangers large densities of population. Still, the risk is going to be higher than from Cape Canaveral, Vandenberg or Wallops.

      The comparison is launches out of Florida that go over Europe. The Shuttle always launches that direction for the ISS. The good news is that the Shuttle has a lot of speed when the instantaneous debris field is over Europe and the dwell time is only a few seconds, similar to launches that go over Africa. This however is rarely true for expendable launch vehicles out of Florida heading north. Dwell times are typically an order of magnitude higher. The saving point is that the mass involved is much smaller than the shuttle making risks similar. Then it comes down to is the debris field over 5 big cities or just 2.

      A midwest launch site could be done and without excessive risk, but it might require a lot of trajectory shaping and avoiding certain azimuths. Another concern is staging events. Canada rose a HUGE stink over planned drops of solid rocket boosters 20 miles away from their Hibernia oil platforms. Risks were EXTREMELY low (less than 10E-11) but Canadian public opinion was in an outrage over 'American hubris'. Imagine a midwest launch that intended to stage a drop 20 miles off the coast of DC. In the Canadian case, the concern was crossrange, which has much smaller uncertainty than downrange for drops. In a drop off the coast, downrange uncertainty is the greater concern.

      In the end, Central US space ports may want to restrict themselves to polar orbits and leave lower inclinations launches to (southern) coastal sites, island sites or the Sea Launch idea.

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    5. Re:Never happen - you'll fly E over Washington, DC by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Even aside from that, all it will take is 1 Challenger-type catastropic failure raining debris all over populated areas to sway public opinion decidedly against an inland spaceport. Coastal launch sites have the distinct advantage of a (mostly) empty ocean right next to them. Likewise Arizona has vast expanses of undeveloped land. Granted Ohio has plenty of farmland, and the odds of hitting a farmhouse are low, but if such an accident happened early on it would cripple the project.

  3. Strange ship, and why in Ohio? by Salvance · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd be more than happy to ride on Burt Rattan's SpaceShipOne, but PlanetSpace's rocket looks more like an ICBM with a stealth fighter attached than something destined for sightseeing. I'm sure it's fine, but it doesn't have that "Cool" factor for me.

    I wonder why a Canadian team is paying that much money to fly from Ohio ... it seems like the vast Canadian tundra would be a far cheaper alternative, and the Canadian government would probably even lend some of their military airports to support Canada's image worldwide (not that it really needs much support).

    --
    Crack - Free with every butt and set of boobs
    1. Re:Strange ship, and why in Ohio? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Funny
      doesn't have that "Cool" factor for me.

      an ICBM with a stealth fighter attached isn't cool?

    2. Re:Strange ship, and why in Ohio? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      A giant pyramid is even cooler. Especially if you(not Lord Yu, you) are the one impersonating the god.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Strange ship, and why in Ohio? by Ironsides · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The equator is the ideal place to launch something into orbit from. Ther further north you are, the more energy it takes to reach orbital velocity. This is due to the lower rotation of the earth at that latitude.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    4. Re:Strange ship, and why in Ohio? by farrellj · · Score: 1

      The Earth's equator is indeed the best place for launching into an equatorial orbit, but it really doesn't matter where you launch if you are going for a polar orbit. That is why the secondary Space Shuttle launch site was in California at Vandenberg, as it didn't matter.

      ttyl
      Farrell

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    5. Re:Strange ship, and why in Ohio? by Salvance · · Score: 1

      If this is the case, why not Mexico then? $20 Million would probably go a lot further in Mexico than Ohio, and it's not exactly like Ohio is a whole lot better than Canada if you're looking to be close to the equator.

      --
      Crack - Free with every butt and set of boobs
    6. Re:Strange ship, and why in Ohio? by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Vandenberg is a great place for polar launches. You launch south, and you're over ocean. None of those nasty populated landmasses to worry about dropping stuff on.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    7. Re:Strange ship, and why in Ohio? by spazekaat · · Score: 0
      I wonder why a Canadian team is paying that much money to fly from Ohio ... it seems like the vast Canadian tundra would be a far cheaper alternative, and the Canadian government would probably even lend some of their military airports to support Canada's image worldwide (not that it really needs much support).

      I haven't really been keeping up on what's happening there, but we do (used to) have a "Spaceport" in Churchill, Manitoba. It is/used to be the launch site for sounding rockets like the Black Brandt and the Nike-Orion.

      Apparently, it would be a good site to launch (sun-synchronous) polar-orbiting payloads from....you don't need to be near the equator to do that.
    8. Re:Strange ship, and why in Ohio? by farrellj · · Score: 1

      One reason...Security.

      In a place where allegiance is constantly for sale, you cannot secure a space launch site.

      ttyl
                Farrell

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    9. Re:Strange ship, and why in Ohio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One reason...Security.

      In a place where allegiance is constantly for sale, you cannot secure a space launch site.


      Which is why I cannot imagine thse guys deliberately landing their primary launch vehicle in the USA. I could, however, envision an amusement park ride made from an obsolete vehicle which is what this proposal seems to be all about.

    10. Re:Strange ship, and why in Ohio? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      an ICBM with a stealth fighter attached isn't cool?

      Seriously, that sketch is neat looking. Very Dyna Soar-esque, and I have a soft spot for cancelled aerospace projects.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  4. I would not launch from there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disregard the fact that they are at the wrong lat, and that they are down low, but that they can not even run an honest election.

  5. Obligatory "The Simpsons" Reference by StefanJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    MONORAIL!

    Um, this is a dumb idea

    As others have already noted, Ohio has two strokes against it:

    It is substantially farther from the equator than Florida (and other proposed SW "spaceports").

    There are heavily populated areas around and to the east of it it. Falling lower stages and strap-on boosters could end up mashing a house or highway or city block.

    I wonder if there's a bandwagon effect in action. Cities in the SW are starting to get publicity for hosting space ports, so why not Ohio?

    I can picture charming hucksters selling cities on space ports the way that con artist sold Springfield on thier monorail.

    1. Re:Obligatory "The Simpsons" Reference by khallow · · Score: 1

      As others have mentioned, it sounds like Ohio is angling for the manufacturing.

  6. Ohio story by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Funny
    As an Ohioan, let me relay this narrative to you:
    • The Wright brothers, who developed and flew the first airplane, were from Ohio.
    • John Glenn, the first man in orbit, is an Ohioan.
    • Neil Armstrong, the first man on the moon, is an Ohioan.
    • Now, they are talking about building a spaceport in Ohio.
    It just shows what length men will go to to get the hell out of Ohio!
    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Ohio story by 42Penguins · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the "The OSU" football team flying all the way to Arizona in January!

    2. Re:Ohio story by lawpoop · · Score: 2

      Nice!!1!!

      Go Bucks!!!

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:Ohio story by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

      sigh. Whatever. At least we have the MTV spaceman on the Ohio quarter. Rickenbacker, as a foreign trade zone, and a bigass flat open space besides, has financial and public support advantages in attracting travel facilities (never mind that several regional airlines have tried and failed while based there). I'm doubtful, however, that this idea will (shoot down this pun if you care to) get off the ground. Main Reason: the weather. Can a suborbital rocket ignore the usual NASA precautions and launch through our 200+ days of cloud cover?

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    4. Re:Ohio story by stonedcat · · Score: 1, Funny

      I tried to leave ohio once... only made it to southern dayton before I ran out of gas and ended up on someone's couch for a year and a half.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me.
    5. Re:Ohio story by Robot+Randy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the first man to orbit the Earth was the Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, who orbited on April 12, 1961.

      John Glenn was the first AMERICAN to orbit the Earth, which he did on February 20, 1962.

      Alan Shepard was the first American into space. He was aboard Freedom 7 on a suborbital flight on May 5, 1961.

    6. Re:Ohio story by bmgoau · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your facts are inherintly flawed for one very basic reason. See Yuri Gagarin couldn't have orbited the earth because...

      In Soviet Russia Earth orbits you!

    7. Re:Ohio story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Wright brothers, who developed and flew the first airplane, were from Ohio.


      Developed and flew the first _powered_ airplane.
    8. Re:Ohio story by wasted · · Score: 1
      The Wright brothers, who developed and flew the first airplane, were from Ohio.


      Developed and flew the first _powered_ airplane.


      You mean _powered_and_controllable_ airplane. Ader built a powered airplane before the Wright brothers, but the controls were not up to par. I seem to remember Lilienthal was also on the way to a powered craft, but it also would not have been as controllable as the Wright Brothers' craft. More here, if it helps.
    9. Re:Ohio story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but if Gagarin was from the States, he would have been from Ohio!

    10. Re:Ohio story by Zerbs · · Score: 1

      what length men will go to to get the hell out of Ohio

      sounds like my new Sig line...

      --
      "22 astronauts were born in Ohio. What is it about your state that makes people want to flee the Earth?" Stephen Colbert
    11. Re:Ohio story by Black-Man · · Score: 1

      I think its great all you stupid Ohioians revel in your buckeyes while all around you, your state is going down the drain. I think the ultimate national championship game would be Michigan versus Ohio State. Two states whose fortunes rival each other in futility.

      Maybe if Ohio was concerned about EDUCATION and JOBS rather than a stupid football team, things wouldn't be so dire.

    12. Re:Ohio story by Black-Man · · Score: 1

      You forgot one... rate of increase of jobs leaving Ohio equivilent to the speed of a rocket.

    13. Re:Ohio story by slightlyspacey · · Score: 1

      The Wright brothers, who developed and flew the first airplane, were from Ohio.

      The Wright brothers were way ahead of their time -- they knew that Ohio was no place for a spaceport. So they launched their first vehicle from KittyHawk, North Carolina for multiple reasons:

      1) They knew that since it was closer to the equator, it would be easier to go orbital. They only lacked the funding to make it happen.
      2) They knew that the radar and telemetry tracking capabilities were much superior in North Carolina.
      3) They performed a flight safety analysis and determined that it would be less dangerous to launch over the sea than to launch where their flight may take them over densely-populated areas.

      But most importantly,
      4) Credibility. No one from Ohio has accomplished anything of note without first moving out of state :):):).

    14. Re:Ohio story by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Actually, the first man to orbit the Earth was the Soviet Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, who orbited on April 12, 1961.

      Not many people know this, but Yuri Gargarin was a proud Ohioan.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    15. Re:Ohio story by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      As an Ohioan, let me relay this narrative to you

      All kidding aside, Ohio was meant to play a bigger role in space than it has.

      When the space program was initially conceived, the Cleveland NASA center was the obvious choice for being the technical operation headquarters.

      However, dim-witted Ohio politicians (an unfortunately trend of the last 50 years) didn't know how important it was to make sure that Cleveland got the center (so they didn't bother to fight for it.)

      Texas Senator Lyndon Johnson said that there would be no funding for the space program unless a major operation was set in Texas.

      And that's why the line is "Houston, we have a problem" instead of "Cleveland, we have a problem."

    16. Re:Ohio story by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      AMEN! Go Bucks! Beat Florida!

      --

      Gorkman

    17. Re:Ohio story by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Son of a b*tch.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  7. Well.. by stonedcat · · Score: 0

    I'm so glad I live on the west side. I'll get to laugh at all the idiots on east campus and in reynoldsburg who get smashed by the rocket's excess baggage.

    --
    You can't take the sky from me.
  8. Exotic Ohio... the obvious choice by surfcow · · Score: 0

    ... due to it's closeness to the equator.

  9. Go Bucks! by winningham.2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    First off Columbus, Ohio is the perfect place for this spaceport. Everyone knows they want to see the new crafts launch and why travel all the way to Florida. More people from the Eastern US and our friends in Canada will be able to see the fireworks display. Remember, to the Canadians, Ohio is like Florida to them so it all makes sense.
    Finally, THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY not only has the best football team in the nation, their hospital system is good enough to handle the certain disaster that will befall said spaceport should it ever happen. It disaster ever strikes, hopefully it will fall far enough east that it will take out the Pittsburgh Steeler's stadium while the are playing the Ravens (while Art Model is there). So yes, please add my reasons to why Columbus, OH and our $20 Million USD should be #1 on your list.
    In closing I would like to say that Ohio State Football rocks, and that School up North sucks. Go Bucks!

    1. Re:Go Bucks! by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Congratulations! You are a winner! Here's your free ticket for the "B" Ark!

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:Go Bucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, crawl into a hole somewhere and die. Idiots like you are the reason I want to leave this city immediately.

    3. Re:Go Bucks! by spiderbitendeath · · Score: 1

      I would just like to say something to deflate your huge sense of self worth. Slashdot was started by guys from Michigan. :P

      And... cmdrtaco lives really close to School Up North :P

      I feel better now.

      --
      Sometimes when I'm working on projects things disappear, I suspect gremlins.
    4. Re:Go Bucks! by popsicle67 · · Score: 1

      The Ohio State University is only considered the best because they haven't played the Beavers yet. Go Beavs!!! And they only get a spaceport because our governor is a jackass.

    5. Re:Go Bucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Remember, to the Canadians, Ohio is like Florida to them so it all makes sense. I think you spelled Alberta wrong, eh?
    6. Re:Go Bucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you have a couch to burn or a car to overturn?

  10. It's been there the whole time... by SaDan · · Score: 1

    Where do you think Jerry Springer comes from? The former mayor of Cincinnati is obviously not from this planet, and that's where he's been hiding his intergalactic pimp ride.

    He's just found another way to cash in the general masses!

  11. Not even close. by camperdave · · Score: 1

    These are suborbital craft. They go straight up, and come straight down. The only way they'll leave Ohio airspace is by going high enough to be out of the atmosphere.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  12. Of course by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 0, Troll

    Good to see the state has a firm grasp of physics, as they do most sciences - like creationism - and .... creationism.

  13. Landing in Ohio, launching from unknown location by Andrew+Penry · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article mentions that the site for launching and landing could be different. Ohio seems to be bidding for a landing and manufacturing site, with launching as a possiblity only if it's approved by the FAA. The article even mentions the idea of launching off of a barge and landing in Ohio.

  14. Ohio vs New Mexico... by aapold · · Score: 1

    Remember New Mexico was going to build one too...

    offhand I'd think Ohio, being farther north, would be at a disadvantage.

    Ideally you'd want the highest altitude closest to the equator. Meaning Ecuador would be the logical place to put it.

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
    1. Re:Ohio vs New Mexico... by Ramirozz · · Score: 1

      Former Argentina's president Carlos Menem was going to do the same in the province of Cordoba (he even announced it on a speech)... I think he was drunk or something :D

      Maybe this is another "politicians school" thing they must do from time to time.

      --
      http://www.quasarcr.com/
  15. Re:Strange ship by camperdave · · Score: 1

    The "stealth aircraft" part of the system is not part of the original rocket (I've seen the original). It had a proper nose cone and looked very much like the V2 rocket that was the design's inspiration (See here).

    Besides, you have the story backwards. Canada is not looking to fly out of Ohio. Ohio is trying to enice them to come. As you noted, we have plenty of launch sites available here in the Great White North.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  16. Obligatory Star Wars Quote by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    "Cincinnasty...You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious"

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
    1. Re:Obligatory Star Wars Quote by stonedcat · · Score: 0

      But on the plus side we had a really good rave scene there for years.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me.
    2. Re:Obligatory Star Wars Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Havent been to toledo much ?

    3. Re:Obligatory Star Wars Quote by DonnieD701 · · Score: 1

      I'm there now, and I agree completely... How do you get to Toledo? Travel north until you smell it and then a little west till you step in it..

      --
      A witty saying proves nothing. Voltaire (1694-1778)
  17. You forgot by plopez · · Score: 2, Informative

    Devo, the coolest nerds ever!

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  18. Rocket Science eludes Slashdot. by camperdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why all the comments about being close to the equator? This is a SUBORBITAL craft. It goes up, and then comes down. It travels no more than 50 miles horizontally. It makes no difference whatsoever where on the planet the craft is launched from. There are many places in Canada from which they can launch. Ohio just wants to grab a slice of the pie. In fact, the suggested airbase is actually not viable, because the first stage (the red and white rocket shaped part) is designed to splash down. There is no major lake near Rickenbacker.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Rocket Science eludes Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of square footage do we need for a spaceport? Is there any reason we couldn't launch from, say, an abandoned oil rig? It starts in the middle of nowhere, and will not be required to pass over any high-density populations on it's way to another middle of nowhere.

    2. Re:Rocket Science eludes Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In Norway, the launch platform comes to you

  19. safety by fermion · · Score: 1
    Ignoring the fact that the launch site is far away from the equator, which is probably not that big of deal, there is still the issue of safety and the fact that rockets still blow up quite dramatically. To compensate for this eventuality, it seems common practice to launch over the ocean where the area can be cleared of humans and all that get killed are is the presumably non-sentient marine life. If the craft tracks toward the northeast, it could get over the ocean in several minutes, but that still seems a long time to be over land. OTOH, A Texas launch can probably get over ocean, presuming a southeast ground track, in a few minutes and not pass over an densely inhabited real estate.

    I also wonder what all the commercial air traffic is going to do for the couple minutes it is going to take for the craft to get out of the way. I am sure the FAA computers are up to the task of managing that situation.

    Overall I think it is not a bad idea. More spaceports will eventually be needed, and they will have to be spaced throughout the country. At this point, however, it would seem that testing would be better done on the coasts or in the desert.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  20. This is not for launching. by damiangerous · · Score: 4, Informative
    This proposal isn't for launching. It's for support facilities and landing.

    State and local officials in Ohio are considering an incentive package that would lead the Canadian-American rocket venture PlanetSpace to put the manufacturing and landing facilities for its suborbital spacecraft at a former military air base near Columbus
    The article does discuss that it's conceivable that at some point in the future this site could be used for suborbital launches, but that's even further off than this "very preliminary" plan.
    1. Re:This is not for launching. by Tychon · · Score: 1

      Way to ruin my dream of being an hour from a spaceport.

    2. Re:This is not for launching. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It doesn't sound like a plan with much of a future. If it's only for suborbital, then that's it, you get suborbital, no shot at orbital.

      But that's not my only concern. Because of the immense amount of energy needed to do a good suborbital launch, I am skeptical that it would ever be affordable to anyone but the wealthy. Energy isn't getting cheaper.

  21. Spelling Error by wasted · · Score: 4, Informative
    Captain Kirk was born in Ohio. Go figure.


    I think it is spelled I O W A.
    1. Re:Spelling Error by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      You mean he was a member of the Intersteller Ohio Workers Association? :P

    2. Re:Spelling Error by spazekaat · · Score: 0
      I think it is spelled I O W A.

      Careful....the "Village People" may be watching..... :-))
      Now, how did that dance go.....??? :-)
    3. Re:Spelling Error by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      And if you've driven through them, you'll realize the difference is moot. We could save a lot of effort by channeling the Bruces sketch in the Midwest. "This is Ohio where we grow soybeans, Ohio where we grow wheat, Ohio where we grow corn, and Ohio where we play Big-10 Football and also schedule our major flooding".

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    4. Re:Spelling Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is spelled N E R D :P

    5. Re:Spelling Error by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1
      And if you've driven through them, you'll realize the difference is moot.



      Excepting that Iowa is landlocked and flat as a pancake, and Ohio is next to one of the Great Lakes and part of it is in the Appalachian Mountains, yeah. I guess there's also a five-fold difference in population density, which would probably affect what they would look like to drive through.

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    6. Re:Spelling Error by blincoln · · Score: 1

      And if you've driven through them, you'll realize the difference is moot.

      I drove through both of them last month, and they seemed very different to me. Now, Iowa and Nebraska, those were pretty similar IMO.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    7. Re:Spelling Error by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      And if you've driven through them, you'll realize the difference is moot.

      The state's could not be any more different. Iowa is a mostly agricultural state with low population that sincerely earns the term "midwest."

      Ohio has the 25th largest economy in the world. The northeastern part of the state is culturally and demographically like the east coast, whereas the southern parts of the state are just as southern as you would expect below the Mason-Dixon (this explains why Ohio is such a violent swing state.)

      In essence, Ohio is one part New Jersey and one part Tennessee. There's little about it that's truly midwestern (notwithstanding your experience on I-70 or I-80.)

    8. Re:Spelling Error by wasted · · Score: 1

      Well, I have to try to get my geek card back. I had to turn it in after admitting that I had only seen one episode of Star Wars all the way through, and snippets of the other episodes.

    9. Re:Spelling Error by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      My experience is on both I-70 and I-80, where the terrain doesn't become interesting until around Youngstown. Before that, yes, there are signs that there are cities somewhere over the horizon, but my memory of 10 years of I-80, Illinois-NJ, and of first moving out there, where at Dawn I stopped at a Denny's somewhere along I-70, only because it was the only sign of anything that I'd seen in a couple of hours. I remember seeing the dawn breaking over the flat to the east, and the featureless dark to the west, with the only sign of habitation being that Denny's and gas station, and my truck, which had to have come from somewhere.

      I'm sure that the inhabited parts of Ohio are very nice, but the transition from Indiana to it is pretty seamless.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  22. Re:Landing in Ohio, launching from unknown locatio by Gothmolly · · Score: 1, Funny

    HAHA, you RTFA'd!

    -1, Nerd

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  23. missed one! by ILuvRamen · · Score: 0

    Either Steven's Point or Sheboygan, Wisconsin (I forget which) is missing from that pic. Nasa said it's a better site than any existing one and plans to built a launch site there. w00t Wisconsin ownz!

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  24. Re:Indians With "Solutions" for West, not India. W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dr. Kathuria, who was born in India, has lived in Illinois since he was eight months old. He is now 38. That makes him 98% American by time lived. Perhaps he wants to fix up his home nation before tackling his birth nation. Oh wait! He does.

  25. WKRP by camperdave · · Score: 1

    WKRP in Cincinnati, with more news and Les Nessman

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  26. OSU by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    I wonder if an Ohio location has anything to do with Ohio State University. OSU has a top-notch engineering program and is the second-largest school in the US (and bigger than anything in Canada). If there were a space port in Ohio, OSU engineering students would be lining up to volunteer (for free) to help with the space program.

    That's gotta make the deal look juicy to the Canucks.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:OSU by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      ...and is the second-largest school in the US.
      Make that first largest.
      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    2. Re:OSU by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

      How is this good?

    3. Re:OSU by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Not that I give any credence to US News & World Report, but twenty-sixth isn't all that impressive if they were placing something in a location solely to leech good students.

      And exactly why would being a large university have anything do with it at all?

      --
      What?
    4. Re:OSU by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Larger schools have more and better resources (both equipment and staff) available to motivated students. Average/lazy students might do better at smaller schools where they get individual attention basically forced on them. But self-motivated students will have far more opportunities to learn at a larger schools.

      Want to get involved with a robotics team at a small school? It might be possible--if you're lucky. At a big school? Which team would you like to join?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  27. Russians by Quadraginta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Russians launch over land all the time. But it's been said that there have been occasional problems with this.

  28. Don't forget Alaska by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought that Alaska was the only non-federally owned launch site in the US. It is the only location not in Florida that can lauch east and still be over water. It's the farthest north of any sites ever proposed (good for polar launches). It is good for launching test rockets for the missile defense (the other site approximates what would happen if New Zealand would attack the US, Alaska approximates a Russian, Chinese, or North Korean launch). And, it's a great place to hunt bears or fish if weather delays your launch. Not to mention it is cheaper than any other launch site for launch fees, thought getting the rocket there (and fuel for non-polar launches) might be more. Oh, and unlike other proposed non-federal sites, it's been operating for years.

    Go Alaska!

  29. Airport name? by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

    The last time something called the rickenbacker got involved in space travel, she got involved.

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  30. Another Spaceport Not Listed: Van Horn, Texas by zafo · · Score: 1

    Jeff Bezos (founder of Amazon.com) has Blue Origin in Kent, Washington and has chosen an area near Van Horn in West Texas for the spaceport. He has bought 290,000 acres of desert ranch land. They tested the rocket at the spaceport on November 13th and plan 10 suborbital tests in the next year. There have been articles in AP, The Wall Street Journal, MSNBC and other sources.

  31. Uh oh, System Shock 2 flashback... by Phoenixhunter · · Score: 1
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_Shock_2/

    System Shock 2 starts in 2114, forty-two years after the events in System Shock, with the TriOptimum starship Von Braun serving as its main setting. The Von Braun is on its maiden voyage as the first faster-than-light starship in human history, and is joined by a Unified National Nominate (UNN) military starship, the Rickenbacker, an armed escort for the journey into the unknown.

  32. Redneckistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh...I used to work at that "airport". Most of the people there are hardcore rednecks. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

  33. Scam by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    A port is, in transportation terminology, a place where commerce occurs and goods or people are transshipped. This isn't a port - it's an amusement park.

  34. Nothing wrong by tocs · · Score: 1

    "There is nothing wrong with Ohio,
    except the snow and the rain."

  35. Rickenbacker Air Force....NOT lockbourne.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    It's almost ALWAYS been Rickenbacker Air Force Base. At least since WWI as Eddie Rickenbacker, a Ohio Native, was a ace during WWI. Not sure where in hell they got Lockbourne unless that was what it was named before it was Rickenbacker.

    --

    Gorkman

  36. Spapeport scams- not just for banana republics now by dbIII · · Score: 1
    I can picture charming hucksters selling cities on space ports the way that con artist sold Springfield on thier monorail.

    This happened in Queensland, Australia. A two person company supposedly backed by a consortium of many others got an undisclosed amount out of the taxpayers to plan a spaceport. The same corrupt politician who fell for this also was taken in by a perpetual energy car that ran on water - although it is possible he made something on the deal himself in both cases - he liked getting brown paper bags full of cash according to what came out in court.