Slashdot Mirror


Flexible, Plastic Sheets of Power

bethr writes "Imagine never having to plug in an electronic device to get power? Researchers at the University of Tokyo have demonstrated prototype plastic sheets with copper coils that wirelessly supply power to any device that touches its surface. You just put down your laptop and the pad sends it power: 'An array of organic transistors that detect the position of the gadget and direct current flow.' Apparently, the researchers had enough time to create a spiffy video of their doll house model, complete with a mini Christmas tree, showing off the technology."

127 comments

  1. Slashpads? by soleblaze · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Isn't this kind of like Slashpads?

    1. Re:Slashpads? by Pooua · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The difference appears to be that this prototype only applies power to the section of the sheet on which the device is placed, instead of to the entire device. Supposedly, this results in a greater amount of power able to reach the device being charged. I am wondering how much of an improvement in performance this really is?

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    2. Re:Slashpads? by InfiniteZero · · Score: 1

      The sheet form factor allows for seamless integration with floors, walls, and furnitures.

    3. Re:Slashpads? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative
      This kind of technology has been around for a while. The problem is not the technology, it's the lack of standards. If someone like the IEEE published a standard for induction charging that specified power and some kind of handshaking protocol between the charger and the device, it would be great. Imagine just putting your laptop down on the table in a coffee shop or in work, and having power and networking automatically work.

      Without standards, however, the situation is the same as for mobile telephone chargers.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Slashpads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How efficient are these things? I would imagine it takes more watts to do it wirelessly than it would if you used a normal wire.

    5. Re:Slashpads? by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mouse-powering mouspad

      Also, you'd only need to place the power-catching end of this tech on the battery itself. Nifty.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    6. Re:Slashpads? by cbacba · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Improvement?

      It sounds like a massive increase in ambient EM noise just so a few lazy SOBs don't have to plug a power cable into a plug - not to mention another point of power loss (and waste) on the energy scene.

  2. Wow! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Funny

    They have reinvented the transformer, except this time there is an open end on it.

    They had better paint it bright red and put warning signs over it, or it will start melting anything placed upon it.

    (I assume I am not the only one to throw my keys and change and the rest of my pocket crap out when I get home)

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Wow! by GoulDuck · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, one of the things about this project is that the system detects if an object needs power and only send power to where the object is. Thats one of the reasons they can pump even more power into the object, because they can concentrate power around the object.

    2. Re:Wow! by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Forgive my sophomoric understanding of the science involved here, but I have a few questions to throw out there for the grad students and pedagogues:

      First, how does one define the abstraction of the pad detecting, as the parent puts forth, if an object "needs" power? What's to stop it from sending just as much power to a piece of conductive metal, say, a penny, as opposed to a cellular phone?

      [As I'm sure someone will naturally assume I'm supposing that a penny is comprised entirely of highly-conductive copper and get didactic on my ass by posting the actual metallurgic composition of a penny, I'll let Wikipedia save us all the trouble: "Copper-plated Zinc: 97.5% Zn, 2.5% Cu".]

      The obvious difference, anyway, between a penny and a cell phone battery is that though both have potential to carry a current, one already holds some charge and the other does not. Can this wireless power technology be made to be "smart" enough to unerringly detect the presence of an existing discrepancy in the electromagnetic field and send power in that specific direction? Aren't there several scenarios in which one could confound the machine? For instance, what's to stop someone to foolishly place, say, a bar magnet on the pad? What effect would this have?

      Anyway, I'm throwing these questions out there in curiosity, and if anyone can lob a pearl or two back, much appreciated.

      --
      Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
    3. Re:Wow! by EvanED · · Score: 3, Funny
      From TFA:
      The power sheet, says Takao Someya, professor of engineering at the University of Tokyo, relies on the well-known physical principle of electromagnetic induction, used to charge electric toothbrushes and some RFID tags. (Emphasis mine)

      So the device more or less tells the pad that it wants power.
    4. Re:Wow! by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 3, Informative

      Read again. It doesn't say that there's any sort of communication involved, what they're saying is that RFID tags use the principle of electromagnetic induction.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    5. Re:Wow! by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      That's not to be read as RFID-bearing electric toothbrushes.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    6. Re:Wow! by Psion · · Score: 2, Funny

      WAIT! Toothbrushes have RFID tags?! No wonder my dentist always knows I haven't been brushing my teeth!

    7. Re:Wow! by Eon78 · · Score: 1

      You bring your electric toothbrush with you when you go to the dentist?

    8. Re:Wow! by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Oops. I think that computers should come with some sort of lock where you have to pass a simple mental function test before you can use them to prevent things like posting to /. when you're dead tired. ;-)

      Yeah, I can't read; my original post should probably be modded down, and/or you up. (/. needs a -1, misinformative rating...)

    9. Re:Wow! by Psion · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no, no. This was an effort at self-deprecating humor by juxtaposing the conclusion that the dentist knows I haven't brushed my teeth through the use of Orwellian technology with the very simple and obvious realization that had I not been brushing my teeth, the dentist should be able to deduce this from a simple observation. The joke relies on inverted parsimony to jab at the intellect of the author.

      Jokes just go so flat when one must explain them. Just ... laugh politely next time and pretend you got it.

    10. Re:Wow! by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

      The article says that the object receiving power from these pads has to be equipped with a power-harvesting coil or some such. So I think it doesn't so much sense what's on it as just require the right kind of object to be placed on it.

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
    11. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From TFA:

      Gadgets would need to be equipped with a coil and special power-harvesting circuitry to use the power pad. As the gadget gets closer to the pad, the electrical resistance of the pad's coils decreases. The array of transistors detects the exact position of the change in resistance and effectively directs the subsequent power flow, which is provided by devices on the second sheet of plastic. Yeah, anything that's going to get power from the pad has to be specificially designed to use it.
    12. Re:Wow! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Will magnetic induction hurt a penny or set of keys? I would assume they have taken into account things like disk drives being placed near the device since they mention laptops. Just being metal wouldn't necessarily mean it'd be detected as needing power.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  3. Cost? by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Last time I was buying them at home depot, a socket was 79 cents and a cord was a few bucks. Why should I want to replace an already mature, tested, cheap, reliable technology with something that costs a whole lot more, and may direct power to where it is not wanted?

    1. Re:Cost? by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why should I want to replace an already mature, tested, cheap, reliable technology with something that costs a whole lot more, and may direct power to where it is not wanted? Because it's cool? Inefficient? Expensive? Conspicuous consumption and all that.
    2. Re:Cost? by djupedal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Concept...you know - an idea that prompts another idea, as an example?

      Your .79c socket matured decades ago, and will willingly flow power to any conductor able to penetrate one of the hot slots. And despite your very rigid non-stated Edwardian beliefs and desire to put-down something that falls outside that dormant little box you live in, these sheets won't be available @ HD any time soon at any price, so put away the fud and go back to reading by candle light :)

      They are simply another proof-of-concept...something the Japanese love to put on display, of course. I can imagine being able to lay devices on such a device to charge my cell-phone, etc. - anything needing charging...flashlite; iPod; bluetooth headphones; police radio; personal vibrator; PDA...a circuit to detect and communicate with whatever is in contact would be trivial, and an obvious part of any marketable product. You could drop conductors on it all day long, including water, and without a controller to initiate power to the contact zone, nada. Lick it for all it cares.

      Recall the topic here recently about China and South Korea moving to standardized chargers? This falls into the same area, being concept-driven, as it seems to be. Additional/separate & wired chargers would be 'standardized' (as in gone) because they would not be needed with something like this around. The charger-less product would then sell for less, since your home or apartment or hotel room or office desk or car/boat/plane/train armrest would already have one of these built-in.

    3. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a version of this demoed on tv a couple of years back. The version I saw was a rubber mat (mouse pad sized) with metallic dots on it. The back of the device had 2 similar but large dots on it that connected to the charger circuit. The chareger circuit would communicate thru the connected dots to determine the type of power to be delivered thru those dots, as you might have several devices on the mat at once, each needing different recharge characteristics.

      You keys wouldn't know to communicate with the dots, and so current would never be delivered to them.

    4. Re:Cost? by GoulDuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Last time I was buying them at home depot, a socket was 79 cents and a cord was a few bucks. Why should I want to replace an already mature, tested, cheap, reliable technology with something that costs a whole lot more, and may direct power to where it is not wanted?

      Why should I have X different chargers for my wireless devices? Imagine your desk if this was build into the table... your phone don't need a wire, wireless mice charge no matter where they are located, your keyboard always works, your PDA is charged when placed on the table and so is your laptop. You could have wires for all these things, but if I could avoid having x numbers of cradles and loose wires on my table, I would like that even more. And as I type this, I could imagine other things: Wireless hard disk (with wireless USB) and wireless desktop speakers, just to keep it in the nerd world and what about your desk lamp and the LCD picture frame :-) And you thought that I was done there? When a friend comes over and discovers that his phone is low on battery and your phone charger doesn't fit? Imagine your friend to be able bring "anything" without having to bring any wires at all.

      This will also solve allot of the cable clutter under the table. Just think of all the things on your table that needs power and then imagine them without wires... Imagine this build into the walls - your speakers, tv and lights didn't need wires! Well, I don't know how it reacts to a nail, but there might be solutions for this too, like having a device that can sense where these things are placed, so you can go around them with your nails and screws.

      Surely I can't be the only one excited about the possibilities with this kind freedom you can have?

    5. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just hope you don't short a circuit, unless you want to see a few thousand dollars worth of electronics spontaneously combust!

    6. Re:Cost? by pakar · · Score: 1

      Wireless Mouse - Just have a capacitor that could power it for a few houres since you move the mouse around and could make it difficoult to charge.
      Wireless Keyboard - Just have a capacitor that could power it for a few hours since you might have it in your lap from time to time.
      Wireless speakers - Same as for the mouse/keyboard but should only need a capacitor that can last for a few minutes since they should be quite stationary.
      Monitor - No need to connect a powercord to it ie less cables
      Computer - No need for a powercord (if now the tech can provide that much power)

      And for the ones with laptops that brings the mouse/keyboard with them a easy way to solve this could be to have something to charge the mouse/keyboard via the laptop...

      Maybe even combine this tech with some type of data-transfer capability so you could put down a combination of computer/monitor/speakers/mouse/keyboard/video-gra bber/network-adapter/cellphone/PDA/USB-hub and have simple communication via the 'power-pad' without any cables.. That would be a really nice thing to have... No cables and instant charging/communication between your devices...

      *looking for a new innovative job that could benefit from all my strange ideas* =)

    7. Re:Cost? by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thing I don't get is why manufacturers don't move to a USB standard charger connector. Even allows data transfer if you want to let the phone do that (no stupid assed, weird serial cables). Motorola for one has been using those on their phones for a while, and other mobile devices. It's nice China & South Korea are showing some initiative though. It'll take time for us to see though as to if manufacturers will actually do it. A penny more for a licensed connector vs something you build yourself for a penny less causes stupid decisions.

    8. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, the reason phone manufacturers are not doing this is because then they couldn't sell the data cable for another $50. They figure if you want to pirate ring tones, unlock the phone to any network carrier, etc, then you are going to at least have to pay for the hardware.

    9. Re:Cost? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      These wouldn't exactly be cheaper, but I paid $30 for a charger for my cell phone a couple weeks ago. (Don't shop at the Cingular store for stuff like.) Even the 3rd party one that Best Buy or Circuit City was like $22...

    10. Re:Cost? by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      You're right. Some people never think outside their box. Even if it doesn't make it to HD anytime soon for house use, my daughter would LOVE that little dollhouse thing they made. This could make cool board games too, or like you said, a desk that powers small DC devices.

    11. Re:Cost? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      You should look behind my home theater system (which includes not just the 5-speaker stereo and DVD, but a HTPC, game consoles... you get the picture). I was just yesterday thinking how cool it would be if I could somehow eliminate that rat's nest of wires.

    12. Re:Cost? by magicchex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I got my last charger shipped to my door for $3 on eBay... works great.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    13. Re:Cost? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know how it reacts to a nail, but there might be solutions for this too, like having a device that can sense where these things are placed

      Anything that can draw power from it would be suitable, as long as it informed the user that it was currently doing so; you wouldn't necessarily even need a special device for it. Eg hold your laptop/mp3 player up to the wall, move it around and wait for the "coupled to charger" light to go off.

    14. Re:Cost? by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      Is USB a good charging mechanism? USB only provides 5 volts, and according to Wikipedia it may only give 500 mA to a device. Isn't that a bit too little to charge mobile phones and laptops?

    15. Re:Cost? by CristalShandaLear · · Score: 1

      Seems like we've been asking (and answering) this question for a long time. (Eras are rough but you'll get the idea)

      1700 - Candles or Kerosene
      Lots of folks didn't see the need to upgrade to kerosene lamps. Kerosene cost money whereas, if you didn't mind getting stung a little, you could always make plenty of your own beeswax candles for nothing but the cost of your own time and effort.

      1800 - Fireplace or Cookstove
      Many people thought that cooking and heating a home with a stove was a pale comparison to gathering around the family hearth and that the stove would never replace the fireplace as the gathering place of the family (little did they know that T.V. was going to make the kitchen the last place anyone would ever hang out anyway). Not to mention the additional cost of coal. Why would anyone want to spend more on coal when you could just chop some wood, right?

      1900 - Kerosene or Electricity
      Again lots of folks couldn't see the need to upgrade to the more expensive electricity when kerosene and candles did the job pretty well save for the occasional pesky house fire.

      2000 - Electricity/Batteries or Flexible Plastic Pads
      Which brings us to your question
      Why should I want to replace an already mature, tested, cheap, reliable technology with something that costs a whole lot more, and may direct power to where it is not wanted?

      Well....

    16. Re:Cost? by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 1

      I charge my Nintendo DS off USB constantly. It's only marginally slower than using the normal mains, as far as I can tell. You can only supply so much electrical (I don't know whether to say "charge" or "power" here) to a device at once, I guess.

    17. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason you have a shitload of chargers right now is that manufacturers are too damn selfish to agree on a standard, because they make too much money selling their own oddball chargers. You think after introducing this tech they'll all suddenly decide to use the same design? Fat chance. If they get their way they'll force you to have as many charging pads as you have charging cradles right now.

    18. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T.V. was going to make the kitchen the last place anyone would ever hang out

      Except for parties, where the kitchen is where everyone hangs out.

    19. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Desk - bad idea. You have the pad (either standalone or built-in), you have a couple sheets of paper which have fallen over onto it, and then someone tosses a cellphone down on the paper without looking.

      I'd suggest a closed box of some kind, that isn't likely to get used as a temporary holding location for random stuff.

    20. Re:Cost? by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      USB works just fine charging phones. My Treo 650 for example has a max charge rating of 5.2v over 1A. Normal USB would just take twice as long to charge. Chargers however that use the USB connector can, and do deliver a higher amount of power. Just because they use the connector, does not require they deliver 5v over 500mA.

  4. Great idea! by tehSpork · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nicola Tesla would be proud...

    1. Re:Great idea! by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nicola Tesla would be proud...

      Indeed. He wanted to "charge up" the entire planet such that you didn't need wires. I don't think they worried much about environmental movements back then.

    2. Re:Great idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But according to various sources, Tesla had quite a different view of electronics than we have now. It has been said he has been working on 'Cold Electricity' and hooking up machines 'to the very wheelwork of nature' (i.e. zero point energy like ideas).

      He was a genius and, if I judge him right, for his time also someone who was far more concerned about environmental impacts than many of this collegues.

      Google keywords:

      Nikola Tesla
      Dynamic theory of gravity
      Cold Electricity
      Radiant Energy
      Warden Clyffe
      James Clerk Maxwell (his EM theory used quaternions and was more complete than the most EM theory taught today, which leads to:)
      Tom Bearden (34 Flaws in Classical EM Theory)
      Edmund Whittaker
      Konstantin Meyl

    3. Re:Great idea! by spiderbitendeath · · Score: 1

      Tesla's device for wireless transmission worked with the natural oscillating frequencies of the earth. He always tried to work with nature, not against it.

      He also was working on an etheric/zero point based energy source so we could get rid of all this enviromentaly damaging power plants.

      --
      Sometimes when I'm working on projects things disappear, I suspect gremlins.
  5. Safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How safe is it to have an open source of electricity? It says devices need a special coil to receive charging, but does this stop a stray hand from getting zapped?

    1. Re:Safety? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      It says devices need a special coil to receive charging, but does this stop a stray hand from getting zapped?

      This isn't electricity, this is an alternating magnetic field that can *induce* an AC current in a large coil. Your hand isn't a multi-turn coil, so I wouldn't worry. Anyway, no more dangerous than being near an AC motor.

      -b.

  6. Cool but.. by William+Robinson · · Score: 1
    Might be expensive..

    I know some doctors, who feel that wires (to power/recharge their equipments) is a big distraction when they want to focus on examination. This could be a good news for them.

    1. Re:Cool but.. by CookieOfFortune · · Score: 1

      Well, they'd have to be extremely careful in the operating room. The leakage currents on these pads could be enough to hurt someone who's been opened up.

  7. Cut them into three triangles...... by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 1

    And you'll have the Triforce of Power. haha, i'll be here all my life!

    --
    Restore the madness of youth's lechery
    1. Re:Cut them into three triangles...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'll be here all my life! Please tell me you will do something better with your life than being on Slashdot all the time...

    2. Re:Cut them into three triangles...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this "better" you speak of?

  8. But will it... by Landshark17 · · Score: 0

    ... power a laptop that can play Duke Nukem Forever?

    --
    This sig is false.
  9. Efficiency? by Frogular · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How efficient are these compared to regular adapter + cable? The lack of a magnetic core may mean your utilities bill goes up x2.

    1. Re:Efficiency? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      It really depends what you intend to use the tech for. No, going from something drawing 500W to 1kW is not good. However, going from a 1W draw to 2W may well be worth it if the convenience factor is great enough, at least individually (on the scale of a society, it may still be less than desirable, of course).

    2. Re:Efficiency? by Xayma · · Score: 1

      But if it also reduces the number of devices (phone chargers and the like) drawing small amounts of power when not in use it may be better for the environment.

  10. Ease of use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If they can make this cheap (a few bucks?) then I would prefer it to having to plug my cell phone in. Much easy to lay my cell phone down flat than plugging it in (and sometimes breaking the connector after n uses). Same with laptop (cause I move around with it a lot).

    I agree not everyone is willing to pay a few extra dollars for ease of use. But there are some who do. For example, I know people who bought the iPod over cheaper competing products with equal capacity because they preferred the click wheel navigation that saves time measured in seconds.

  11. Someone tell me... by bucketoftruth · · Score: 1

    Is this the same principle as how my wife charges her vibr... ahem... Sonicare toothbrush?

    1. Re:Someone tell me... by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      The concepts are identical.
       
        At the most basic level this is just a high powered antenna/receiver. (sort of like a super RFID chip with a battery)

    2. Re:Someone tell me... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Hm ... I didn't realize that women could be sensitive to vibrations in that range.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  12. Now you're playing with power! by geniusj · · Score: 0, Redundant

    n/t

  13. Combine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That and this together could make for an interesting tent one day, amongst other things. Add in flexible displays etc and you could be applying for research grants from DoD and DHS. Portable command centers anyone? Portable geek huts?

  14. I assume this works by Inductance by HateBreeder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So.. wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that it would cause serious electrical interference to sensitive devices, such as laptops?

    --
    Sigs are for the weak.
  15. I can see the warning labels by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Remember the scene in A Christmas Story where the kid licks a metal pole? I keep getting this picture of a kid licking the power strip and the electronics deciding his tongue was an electronic device badly in need of a 120 volts. I can hear the chanting now, "you'll blow your eye out, you'll blow your eye out."

  16. i don't understand by name*censored* · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How does it differenciate between the different wattages that all my devices take? I don't want to start cooking my ipod because this thing is giving it laptop voltages...

    --
    Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    1. Re:i don't understand by cathector · · Score: 1

      uh.. you plug the laptop and the ipod into the same wall outlet now, don't you ? think of this as just removing the cord which goes between the wall and whatever device. of course, with this, now you have to put the device right at the outlet, which sorta blows. eg, you couldn't have a cordless lamp getting power while standing on a plain antique table. ps, differentiate.

    2. Re:i don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPod and the laptop have different transformers connecting them to the outlet. He doesn't understand how the device can supply 30W to one thing sitting on it and 5W to another thing on a different spot. Nor do I. I don't think you do either.

  17. Practical Applications by Joebert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's a few things I'd like to apply this stuff too.

    1) Wireless mouse pad
    2) Magnetic track-type lighting
    3) Stove top -- Pots/pans/ect would have their own unique heating elements & the entire stove top would be usable

    I'm sure there's plenty of practical applications for somthing like that plastic power...
    4) Power strips with 100% usable surface area.
    ... power strip stuff.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:Practical Applications by Sparr0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      inductance-using Wireless mouse pad

    2. Re:Practical Applications by drawfour · · Score: 2, Informative
      3) Stove top -- Pots/pans/ect would have their own unique heating elements & the entire stove top would be usable
      There's already something similar to this -- induction cookers.
    3. Re:Practical Applications by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Man, it's starting to look like this stuff is good for nothing more than fancy track lighting & power strips with plugs that come loose all the time.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    4. Re:Practical Applications by NiceRoundNumber · · Score: 2, Funny

      1) Wireless mouse pad

      Q: "Sure, but where does the mousepad gets its electricity?"

      A: "It's mousepads all the way down."

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of letting other people have your way.
    5. Re:Practical Applications by Joebert · · Score: 1

      I think you'll agree that the mouse pad plugging into the USB port & sporting a wire would be better than the mouse having the wire.
      Wouldn't need to place a mouse in a charger either, just leave it sit on the pad.

      But, as an earlier replier already pointed out, there's an alternative.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    6. Re:Practical Applications by Yetihehe · · Score: 1
      3) Stove top -- Pots/pans/ect would have their own unique heating elements & the entire stove top would be usable
      Your stove has detected new hardware - ShinyPot 2007. Please insert drivers into oven.
      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    7. Re:Practical Applications by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Man: Is that a new set of pots and pans ?
      Woman: Oh theese old things ? Heavens no.
      Stove 3000 : *coughbullshitcough*

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    8. Re:Practical Applications by repvik · · Score: 2, Informative

      "3) Stove top -- Pots/pans/ect would have their own unique heating elements & the entire stove top would be usable"

      Those are called "Induction tops", and are readily available (Atleast here in Norway). You buy special pots/pans/etc for your special stove. Induction heats the pots/pans/etc, and *only* those. Advantages are amongst others rapid heating, rapid cooling of the stove, no restrictions on placement on the stove.

    9. Re:Practical Applications by repvik · · Score: 1

      Ok, they're apparently caleld "Induction cookers", http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induction_cooker

    10. Re:Practical Applications by rancher+dan+3 · · Score: 1

      The only induction stove requirement for cookware is that it needs to be iron or steel. Aluminum cookware won't heat.

    11. Re:Practical Applications by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      I don't know, it seems that mouse + mousepad + wire is more annoying than mouse + wire. There is also the additional need to keep the mouse on the mousepad, so if I need to make room for a coffee mug I need to move everything.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    12. Re:Practical Applications by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Silly consumer, in the retail world, you would simply buy a bigger desk, one with a coffee holder, to solve that problem. :)

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    13. Re:Practical Applications by igny · · Score: 1

      1) wireless mouse's wired pad

      There, I fixed that one for you.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
  18. Looks like a rich man's toy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Physicists Promise Wireless Power is cooler.... Check the article also to preempt the cancer paranoia comments (aka toxoplasma talk ) and tesla refferences. This looks more like a demo of the organic, flexible transistors. It could be done with more conventional electronics. I don't quite see the point over a magnetic connector or something, either. The mention of "resistance" in TFA should be replaced with "reactance", should it not?

  19. Hrm by umbrellasd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would be neat if we could put something like this in roads. Vroom! There's already a lot of power near roads. Electric cars that charge as you drive. Refueling is automatic; cars check in at a pay station once a month for a meter read.

    1. Re:Hrm by Dwedit · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Hrm by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      Which also reminds me, I wish we had a way to convert all the heat that the black asphalt roads absorb during the summertime into energy we can use in cars. Have you ever put a bare foot on the street at 8pm after a 103F day in the summer?

    3. Re:Hrm by JeffAMcGee · · Score: 1

      Thermodynamics makes this almost impossible. The second law says that it is hard to do useful work with energy that is spread out like the heat on an asphalt road. If you try to get energy from heat, you can not do any better than Carnot efficiency. A machine that transfers heat from a 100F road to 60F air will be less than 7% efficient.

      --
      This sig cannot be proven true.
  20. A power supply for your computer implants by dfoulger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Obviously the Tesla effect is not what's interesting here. Its the direction of power to the device that is interesting. You have this big power sheet and it only sends power where there is a device that needs it.

    The obvious place for this power supply is your chair and bed. You can sit down with your cell phone in your pocket and have it recharge while you work at your computer.

    The big deal application of this kind of technology is probably computer implants. Its hard to change the batteries of a computer that's embedded in your thigh, but now it can recharge while you sleep.

    I see a big market for upholstery and bedding growing out of this device. ... maybe ...

    --
    Davis http://davis.foulger.net
  21. Must give off a good chestwarming EMF as well by viking80 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You can easily try this at home yourself. Just disable the safety switch on your microwave, and run it with the door open.

    You can induce up to a kW in things like forks and aluminium foil.

    It even warms up my hands and head on the inside while I hold my devices near the oven.

    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
    1. Re:Must give off a good chestwarming EMF as well by argent · · Score: 1

      You're trying to get RF burns, then?

  22. Next by mr_beanz · · Score: 0

    Power Over WIRELESS Ethernet. Wake me up when it's done.

  23. peat repeat? by maskedavenger · · Score: 1

    This has actually already been invented but not lasted because of multiple reasons. Maybe vaporware, maybe not but the waiting game is still a factor for them too. Good luck though. I have a lot of wires that I don't like to plug in all this electronic crap that gives me tumors.

    --
    Who is that masked man?
  24. Turn blue by jamesl · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is me not holding my breath.

  25. fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > 3) Stove top -- Pots/pans/ect would have their own unique heating elements & the entire stove top would be usable

    I liked your other ideas but this one is terrible. Every pot & pan in your kitchen would heat differently than the other, and not in that minor way that can be attributed to shape and thickness and easily judged at a glance.

    If you're at all into cooking then the only heat on your stove top should come from actual bare flame that you can see with your eyes. All other options are inferior and seem to be the result of making cooking and food secondary considerations to things like energy supply and easy cleanup.

    Install gas. Clean accordingly.
    After you've cooked over flame you'll hate anything else.

    1. Re:fire by Gnavpot · · Score: 3, Informative
      3) Stove top -- Pots/pans/ect would have their own unique heating elements & the entire stove top would be usable

      I liked your other ideas but this one is terrible. Every pot & pan in your kitchen would heat differently than the other, and not in that minor way that can be attributed to shape and thickness and easily judged at a glance.


      For all known stove technologies, the heating depend somewhat on characteristics of the pots and pans used.

      As others have mentioned, this induction technology is already on the market. We bought our induction stove 8 years ago. It is faster up and down than any other technology, including gas.

      As long as we are using induction enabled pots and pans, the heat difference between each pot and pan is very small, and most important:

      The differences are similar to the differences experienced with the same pots and pans on any other stove. As an example, a thick pan bottom will not change the heat effect, but temperature will change a little slower due to the extra heat capacity, while heat is distributed better due to the larger cross-sectional area.

      Gas was once the best available stove technology. Today, it is only the best technology if you do not know induction or like to cling to old technology.
    2. Re:fire by hotsauce · · Score: 1

      Gas was once the best available stove technology. Today, it is only the best technology if you do not know induction or like to cling to old technology.

      Or like being able to use whatever pots and pans you want, or like cost-efficiency (amonst other things).

  26. Whoaa by malkir · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice the second LED turn on while the little model laptop was close to it, but NOT making contact? Energy in the air, mang!

    1. Re:Whoaa by Mr+Silly · · Score: 0

      Yes, it looks like a hoax to me. Look at the reflection in the plastic behind the laptop. See the projection light? Notice that the laptop lights up before it is even set down on the table. With the christmas tree, did anyone notice that it remains lit when no longer in contact with the 'floor'.

    2. Re:Whoaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, from at most a quarter inch away. The power is weak, but I could still observe it on the christmas tree. I am a skeptic of this stuff and kept clicking to rewind the vid about a dozen times. If you watch the guy's finger while rewinding you'll see how light reflects from it that gets progressively brighter as he is about to move the thing that single quaerter inch down.

      This is only "wireless energy transfer" as much you get, say, "heat transfer" into a rice pot AFTER you remove it about an inch off the flames & stove grill area.

  27. Go back to physics class by Shaiku · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apparently a lot of readers don't understand what induction is, and that this power pad works off that principle. Power isn't routed to a device on top of the pad like many people seem to think. There's no electrical contact between the power source and the device on top of the pad. The device in need of power will have a coil of wire. The power pad will detect where on the pad the device is and then create a virtual coil of wire underneath the device. The two coils of wire do not touch, but they are near enough each other that they create and air-core transformer. In other words, AC current traveling in the pad's coil will electro-magnetically INDUCE an AC current in the device's coil. This is really, really old science. The problem is that in order to transfer a significant amount of power efficiently, the two coils have to be closely coupled to one another. This means that the power pad's coil has to have a small cross-section and be located directly under the device to be powered. By detecting where the device is with, say, a pressure sensor, and then using semiconductors to dynamically route a current in a virtual coil directly underneath the device, this power pad allows for the device to be placed haphazardly in virtually any location on top of the pad. This is the same principle that Sonicare toothbrushes use to charge, but imagine now being able to put the toothbrush anywhere on the counter to charge instead of inside a dedicated charging station.

    1. Re:Go back to physics class by Lupu · · Score: 1

      Instead of a simple pressure sensor I would see a lot more potential in the technology if it paired with a wireless verification protocol, to ensure that the device indeed is capable and willing to accept the charge. This would help avoid misbehavior in cases such as throwing your keys on the pad(which was used as an example of concern in an earlier post).

    2. Re:Go back to physics class by loki_tiwaz · · Score: 0

      micro induction surfaces is a very cool idea. it does need a fairly close point of contact though i'd say.

      here's something nobody's even thought to mention - the device could communicate directly through the contact point as well! have this on your floor and anywhere you set your wirelessly powered speakers the signal can also be sent to it so no need for a wireless link. the obvious uses on a workstation are obvious in this respect. quite possibly one could put video signals through the wires as well and no more cable for the monitor either. just a nice little mat and you put it on your desk and nothing needs wires or extra radio transmitters unless they frequently are parted. integrated into a house power line network these sheets of power plastic would be very cool. no more new wires for anything and no problems with radio shadows if the object is going to mostly just sit on the ground.

      the only issue would be how resilient the wiring in it is, would suck if it couldn't be installed and work glitch free for a decade. making a version one can put laminating or vinyl flooring over top would be preferable so effective operation with about an 1/8th inch gap. i don't see why it shouldn't be possible especially if this material were laminated and on a rigid surface with hard covering.

    3. Re:Go back to physics class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while you are in physics you will learn that magnetic field drops off with distance 1/d^3. Even a couple of mm will hurt. The efficiency of these things will be poor compared to a charging cradle.

    4. Re:Go back to physics class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Air gap induction would be EXTREMELY inefficient with an 1/8th inch gap.

    5. Re:Go back to physics class by cas_edi · · Score: 1

      i concur that the FUD on this slashdot topic is contemtable i would also like to add that you would not require a pressure sensor, just placing a coil object that has a load would be enough for the pad to initiate power. the other thing some people seemingly have no clue about it that every piece of cabling and transformer in your home generating a magnetic field when the 240V/110V travels through it (basic physics again) and to claim this device with generate dangerous EMF levels is just ludicrous. with regards to the lower power efficiency claims this device would be more efficient because it would only use power when objects are placed on the pad and saves having many inefficient transformers plugged into wall sockets drawing power even when not charging. oh and finally and to the person who mentioned about leaving the microwave open, do you realise that it actually produces radio waves in 2.4ghz range, the same as your cordless phone and wifi equipment just with much higher power output, in the 600-1000w range. a little research found this from the standards manufactures build to: 'The microwave leakage at any point 50 millimetres or more from the external surface of the appliance shall not exceed 50 watts per square metre'. So a normally working microwave is more dangerous than any other equipment and this pad is for charging (when in direct contact only) phones and ipods that use a hundredth of a microwaves power and even a television would only draw 60-150w power.

    6. Re:Go back to physics class by loki_tiwaz · · Score: 0
      Air gap induction would be EXTREMELY inefficient with an 1/8th inch gap.
      i might be mistaken but those induction charger couplers used in toothbrushes and such have gaps around 3-4mm between the coils.

      regarding efficiency, the power is not lost, it simply does not travel across. power is lost through resistance in the wire and from loading. it would be very simple to simply crank up the voltage to get a longer gap transfer by using proper coil ratios and a step-up transformer in the control circuit. this may increase the thickness of wire and therefore thickness of matting to do it

      also i think the whole idea of having it sense before delivering current is to reduce losses from resistance. in the possible scenario i envision the entire floor of a room has coils spaced across the entire floor, but power doesn't flow through any of the coils unless the device sends a 'gimme' signal through which switches the circuit on. then you could get power anywhere in the room simply by either placing it on the floor or connecting an induction unit on the floor. wiring a larger area would introduce complexity in the wiring if one wanted to stick with the on-demand activation of the coils. the switching mechanism would be annoying too, i picture solenoids but maybe some kind of resonance system can be used so that regions can be powered simply by summing the proper set of ac frequencies at the proper amplitudes.

      something else that I think is being forgotten here is these induction units operate via ac and on the receiving end there must be an ac-dc converter if the device requires dc power, which does add to the bulk of the device receiving this power.

      it just struck me also that there does need to be a normally off state to these devices because it would fuse rfid devices that come into contact with it, and other devices with coils could be affected adversely also.

      in any case this sort of technology will be expensive until it is clear the market is there. i know, personally i would love to be able to dispense with potentially life-threatening open contact junctions as much as possible, and to be able to power devices simply by placing them on a surface.
  28. Just the thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just the thing I need for the walls of my torture chamber. (For reality TV, of course.)

  29. Pressure by marx · · Score: 1

    Nowhere in the article does it say there are pressure sensors. It says it uses resistance changes to detect a target. The keys example is also fud, there's no support from the article that keys would be detected as a target, or even used as a target.

  30. Tesla by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    He did that decades ago, and actually had the idea instead of recycling it. Wasnt practical then either.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  31. Why is sensing required... by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    As they note in the article, this is a refinement on Inductive Charging. I used to love my inductively charged toothbrush; place it on it's stand (just a smooth white bump), and it charged, no physical electrical contact required.

    Does anyone know why they need to actively sense the location of the object, and route the energy specifically to it? Inductive energy isn't "consumed" unless there's a draw on it. For example, a common example of induction is in a wall-wart transformer; one set of windings goes between the 120v from your wall, which is inductively coupled to an (ummmm, larger, I think) winding on your 12v side; as long as there's no load on the 12v side, there won't be a draw on the 120v side (aside from losses; transformers aren't perfectly efficient, which is why a wall transformer might be slightly warm, even when not being used).

    Is it the inefficiency of such losses that require active routing, or another reason?

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Why is sensing required... by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The coils do need to match up, and there are losses for coils running without a primary load (resistance in the coils themselves, for example). For a really large sheet of coils (there are multiple small coils in the sheet), that could add up, and add a thermal load to the space that might not be insignificant.

      There are certainly some interesting applications, but the cost will likely be prohibitive for the "electrified wall/floor" in the foreseeable future. Working in the building industry, I can say for certain that the ability to correctly apply this product in a residential setting would require more care that exists in an entire job crew, including the cabinet, trim, and electricians combined. It's taken 10-15 years to get electrical floor heaters - simple resistance lines - to the point where you can trust a tilesetter to put them in, and they still have a pretty good failure rate (better then 1:100, if I had to guess). I'll admit one of my first thoughts after reading the moveable TV was to embed this in drywall. Then I instantly flashed back to how drywall is hung. Yikes.

      Still, it would be nice to eliminate docking stations for all my gadgets, and be able to just drop the cell phone/ipod/pda/whatever onto a surface with embedded powered (desk/nightstand) or get it in close contact with the furniture to keep th charge up.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  32. Emission/radiation? by cheros · · Score: 1

    Although I like the idea I'm wondering about radiation/emission issues. We're already surrounded by quite a lot of emissions which are to a degree shielded.

    In this case shielding is obviously not possible , and it's also not exactly lossless. I'd stick with a cable.

    Having said that, I'm looking for something to get 12V 30mA on the other side of a 10mm glass sheet so I haven't decided yet if that's better done magnetically or via capacity.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  33. Wireless Better Than Contact Req.? by sublimewb · · Score: 1

    Is this not more useful? wireless extension cord The contact requirement of the pad almost seems as much of a tie down as a wire. Plus, with the wireless you can probably reheat your coffee while on the laptop by just raising you mug in the air...

  34. OB: Southpark/Simpsons by Fishbulb · · Score: 1

    "Tesla did it!"

  35. Am I The Only Slashdotter To Own... by gidds · · Score: 1
    ...an electric toohbrush?

    Mine sits on a stand which recharges its internal battery by induction, so such a thing is hardly a big surprise to me! It's an ideal case for inductive power: a device which gets wet in use, needs to be hygienically sealed, recharging uses very little power, and there are no sensitive electronic devices nearby for it to interfere with.

    Mind you, electric kettles are a similar case, yet modern cordless kettles seem to have worked out how to do safe direct electrical connection even when there's likely to be splashes of water around. But then I doubt you could transfer that amount of power inductively. (Laptops may be power-hungry, but not yet to that degree!)

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  36. Good idea. Needs standards by Animats · · Score: 1

    The whole-house idea is overambitious, but, on a smaller scale, it would be a great way to recharge portable devices. You'd have a pad, or maybe a shallow tray, where, at night, you put your small portable devices - phone, music player, PDA, electric razor - for recharging. It would need to be standardized, so that all the gadgets could use a common system. You'd have one tray at home, probably in the bedroom. A travel version roll-up pad with a cord and wall transformer would be necessary. Deployment in business hotels would be useful.

  37. Credit cards? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
    If you accidentally put a credit card down on the pad and then put your laptop down to charge, will it damage the card? I could see this as being a problem with magnetically sensitive things. Also, will it interfere with CRT monitors? (Yes, some people still use them.)

    -b.

  38. Let me be the first to say... by Saikik · · Score: 1

    Wiiiiii

  39. Re:Someone tell me...how off-topic this is.. by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

    Not sure if this is an urban legend or not, but 33Hz is supposed to BE their frequency. Can someone recommend a MS-Winblows pure tone-generator app so my girl and I can test this? F'r the science, o' course!

    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  40. How to use this with existing devices... by argent · · Score: 1

    Sell a pad like a big mousepad and compatible replacement batteries for an existing laptop. Since most laptops have batteries on the bottom, you could have your laptop continually trickle-charged while it's sitting on the pad.

  41. Insoluable chicken/egg by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Nobody will buy this unless it works with most devices. Would you pay (say) $129.95 to eliminate two cords out of the dozen on your desk?

    For it work with most devices, device makers would need to be willing to standardize on it.

    If device makers were WILLING to standardize, we wouldn't HAVE umpteen different kinds of wall-wart transformers with different voltage and current requirements... and different DC plug configurations.

    If every device used the same DC voltage and the same kind of low-voltage DC plug, we could have multi-outlet low-voltage power supplies in a single compact box, or built in behind the faceplace. That would achieve 90% of the convenience of this technology at 10% of the cost.

    That doesn't happen because nobody voluntarily standardizes the low-voltage power inputs on their devices, and nobody will. (The only reason our vacuum cleaners and refrigerators do is because they were pushed to by electrical wiring codes, which don't exist for low-voltage electronics).

    Since nobody will standardize their low-voltage power inputs, this is a nice idea that will never happen.

  42. Thermowhatsit by umbrellasd · · Score: 1
    Not very practical from a materials perspective, but some efficiency gain might be possible if the underside of the driving surface was insulated and heat was piped through that layer to the cooler earth below it. Again, not very practical from a material costs perspective (probably), but TD might not entirely kill the idea.

    On the other hand, if you can make the driving surface out of thin film voltaics or have a transparent driving surface with a voltaic layer below it, you wouldn't have much of that heating because the solar cells would convert the radiant energy to electricity directly.

    The number one reason that this idea is not practical is that the oil companies would go apeshit and lobby it into the ground like the EV1 in Cali. Wee! I think most of these innovations are currently limited by politics rather than the scientific feasibility. I mean, suppose you did fab these voltaic/battery roads and had cars drawing power from them. Well, that's an economic "No, no" since the extremely powerful petroleum companies would take a big hit on revenue and the government hates it when that happens to big business. We can't suddenly have cars running around on renewable energy that is free after the build costs. No gas stations, huge loss of maintenance revenue for automotive companies because eletric engines have far fewer parts and far lower maintenance costs (no gas processing components at all--exhaust, combustion engine, filters, etc.). Even if I had the brains to explicitly spell out a cost-effective and totally viable method of making this idea work, it would die horribly before becoming a reality. Sure the gas/automotive companies could consolidate and decide to go into the business of building this new solution, but that's effort. And big, powerful, very wealthy, companies are done with their "effort" stage unless they are forced into it by legislation or some factor that it even bigger than they are.

  43. 30 watts != Any Device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, I want to power my flat panel TV with this stuff!

  44. Wireless Energy... by Herr_Skymarshall · · Score: 1

    Didn't Nikola Tesla do this about 100 years ago?

  45. Here's a true power pad with feedback by smartalix · · Score: 1

    Introduced in 2002, the Wire-Free Electricity Base by Mobilewise was the first device to interrogate loads placed upon it in order to deliver tailored power. Sadly, there were no takers and it faded away.

    --
    Read a preview of my novel CYBERCHILD at www.smartalix.com/cyberchild
  46. technology's march by race_k2 · · Score: 1

    Very cool development but I'm still holding out for my devices (and robots) to run on energon cubes