Slashdot Mirror


5 Strangest Materials

MattSparkes writes to tell us that NewScientist recently posted a quick look at five interesting materials with some very strange properties. There are liquids you can walk on, liquids that will escape containers by creeping up the sides, and magnetic liquids that can easily show you the shape of magnetic fields. The story also offers video links to display some of more amazing properties described.

51 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. I have one for you by heauxmeaux · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would like to nominate whatever the hell Wonder Bread is made from.

    One tiny loaf can turn an entire nation into disgusting bloated sacks of lazy crap.
    Truly a mystery of the ages.

    --
    Beat 'Em and Eat 'Em
    1. Re:I have one for you by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

      What about transparent aluminum?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:I have one for you by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would like to nominate whatever the hell Wonder Bread is made from.

      I believe that would be high fructose corn syrup. Yes. Mostly high fructose corn syrup.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:I have one for you by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have a feeling I'm missing a reference to something, but in case I'm not, Wonder Bread isn't that bad. It's 60 calories a slice. 70 is about average for white bread. Most whole wheat breads are around 90. The best you can buy around here is 35, and it tastes like recycled toilet paper that came out too moist and delicious so they ran a hairdryer over it for a week. If you're trying to be less of one of those bloated lazy crap sacks, switching to Wonder Bread isn't a bad place to start.

    4. Re:I have one for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm scared of foods that mold won't grow on. It's just not right.

    5. Re:I have one for you by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Absolutely. Unless you're trying to stop the "bloated, lazy crap"-ness mentioned. Unless that was literal bloating and non-fatness-related laziness. Since it was country-wide in scope and water-retention is hardly a national epidemic, I assume the OP meant, "it makes you fat." In which case, 99% of the time, the only number you need to worry about is calories.

    6. Re:I have one for you by acherusia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have mod points, but I'm commenting instead because you kind of hit a pet peeve of mine. I used to feel the same way about low calorie foods. The lower the calories were per serving, the better it was for me, even if it tasted like someone had put dog turds in it.

      Only I was never satisfied after that, because everything was so bloody tasteless. I want food with flavor and texture and interest, damnit. So I ate more because I was craving something that resembled real food. I gained a lot of weight following that advice. Then I switched to cooking more from scratch (which I enjoy anyway), to paying more attention to the flavor of the food than the caloric content, and to enjoying what I ate. And to not eat crap food when I wasn't hungry simply because it was time to eat. Didn't lose the weight I gained (partially, I'll admit, because a hobby of baking desserts, especially when bored or stressed, just never helps on any diet), but didn't gain any more. And I was a hell of a lot happier with myself than when I was eating cardboard for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.

      I'm not saying you should always only eat high calorie foods, just don't eat low-calorie food if you think it tastes like crap. Life's too long to waste on bad food every day.

    7. Re:I have one for you by imdx80 · · Score: 3, Funny

      i can also think of a object that gets bigger (like an auxetic material), when beaten or (repeatedly) stretched

    8. Re:I have one for you by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wonder Bread, which is neither...

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
  2. Finally an answer! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always wondered why I kept sliding out of the bath.
    Now I know its just because my atoms all have the same quantum state.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  3. Magnetic Fluid by sporkme · · Score: 5, Informative
    4. Ferrofluids - magnetic fluids that can look spectacular. They're made from nanoscale magnetic particles suspended in a liquid. The spectacular sculpture in the video below is made using a ferrofluid and electromagnets.
    You can get this stuff from United Nuclear (about 2/3 of the way down the page, sorry no anchors), as well as some fun looking "super magnets" and some radioactive ores.

    When I read about the fluid that can flow up the sides of a container, all I could think about was THE BLOB!
    1. Re:Magnetic Fluid by barry99705 · · Score: 5, Funny

      DO NOT!!! Put one of those magnets within two feet of the bottle of ferro fluid while the lid is off. That stuff stains paint, on the ceiling....

  4. Superfluid temperatures by Tx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According to TFA, "To make a superfluid you must cool helium down to a couple of a degrees below zero - not one to try at home."

    Now I'm no physicist, but I'm pretty sure a couple of degrees below absolute zero isn't possible, and on any other scale I can think of, it's a bit warm for superfluids. I guess he meant "above zero", although a unit would still have been useful. Funnily enough, I was just bitching about scientific faux pas in the mainstream media, but New Scientist?

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
    1. Re:Superfluid temperatures by TheManifold · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you know that the Editor of New Scientist is a biologist?

      Food for thought.

    2. Re:Superfluid temperatures by Mursk · · Score: 2

      A quick Google search reveals that Helium acts as a superfluid at a temperature of ~5 K, so the most likely explanation is that the author did, in fact, mean a few degrees above (absolute) zero.

      --
      "This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
    3. Re:Superfluid temperatures by shimage · · Score: 3, Informative

      My recollection was that it (the HeI/HeII phase transition) was in the neighborhood of 2.2 K. Now, you can say, "that's pretty close to 5 K", but keep in mind that at 1 atm, the boiling point is just over 4 K, so 0–5 K covers all of hydrogen's interesting low-T behavior.

    4. Re:Superfluid temperatures by Khashishi · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is possible to have negative temperatures under certain circumstances, using the thermodynamic definition of temperature, but these negative temperatures are actually hotter than any positive temperature. (Positive) absolute zero is still the coldest something can be, while negative absolute zero is the hottest anything can possibly be. Negative temperatures are only possible in a system where the number of quantum states available decreases as energy is added to the system.

    5. Re:Superfluid temperatures by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Funnily enough, I was just bitching about scientific faux pas in the mainstream media, but New Scientist?
      Dude, have you seen New Scientist lately? Their cover story a few months ago was a levitation device for flying cars. Which would have been great, if the basic operating principle weren't one that could have been debunked by a sharp high school student. Lo, behold the mighty EmDrive.

      New Scientist's response is just embarrasing. From editor Jeremy Webb (emphasis added):

      "It is a fair criticism that New Scientist did not make clear enough how controversial Roger Shawyer's engine is. We should have made more explicit where it apparently contravenes the laws of nature and reported that several physicists declined to comment on the device because they thought it too contentious.

      But should New Scientist should have covered this story at all? The answer is a resounding yes..."

      New Scientist is fun to read, but it's definitely not a good idea to mistake it as a source of solid science reporting.
      --
      ~Idarubicin
    6. Re:Superfluid temperatures by Mursk · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're correct. 5 K is when the Helium becomes (ordinary) liquid. It becomes a superfluid at ~2 K. Guess my Google search was a bit too quick. ;)

      --
      "This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
  5. Does it include the ever mysterious ethyl alcohol by HMC+CS+Major · · Score: 5, Funny

    The simple liquid capable of making clothes come off, cars swerve, and random impregnation?

  6. Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Fall heavy towards the moon, and the moon falls also towards you." -- Nietzsche

    Hammer and feather are dropped simultaneously from equal heights (as measured by distance from the center of the moon), separated laterally by a distance substantially less than the moon's diameter. Both hammer and feather experience force from the moon's gravity proportional to their mass, and hence both accelerate at the same rate. Meanwhile, the moon is also accelerating towards the other two objects, but unevenly so: the hammer exerts a greater gravitational pull due to its greater mass. The moon is therefore subject to a torque, causing it to accelerate more rapidly towards the hammer.

    The hammer is first to hit the ground.

    Anyone who denies this truth is a spatially absolutist lunocentric whose refusal to recognize the validity of hammer/feather mechanics places him wholly beyond the help of Galilean metaphysics. Such hammer/feather rejectionists ought to be banished to the stars, for their own good and for the good of not only hammers and feathers but all subjugated smaller objects, everywhere, who find themselves victims of this scientifically perpetrated emassculation.

    --
    a756f345ec354225c08ff1a10a43162a

  7. "There are liquids you can walk on..." by EXMSFT · · Score: 5, Funny

    Really? Jesus!

    <sorry - had to do it.>

  8. Re:Does it include the ever mysterious ethyl alcoh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Funny you should say that as I read this today:

    "...Yesterday, government scientists suggested that men should take a look at their beer consumption, considering the results of a recent analysis that revealed the presence of female hormones in beer. The theory is that drinking beer makes men turn into women. To test the finding, 100 men were fed 6 pints of beer each. It was then observed that 100% of the men gained weight, talked excessively without making sense, became overly emotional, couldn't drive, failed to think rationally, argued over nothing, and refused to apologize when wrong. No further testing is planned..."

  9. Slashdotted by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unfortunately, it does not include the mysterious liquid that prevents servers from being slashdotted.

    Coral cache link

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  10. Re:What? no mention of silly putty!? by palndrumm · · Score: 2, Informative

    From TFA:
    1. Dilatants - fluids that get more solid when stressed.

    That pretty much covers silly putty, doesn't it?

  11. Yes but can they change shape into Robert Patrick by spaceramblings · · Score: 3, Funny

    and go looking for 'that boy'?

  12. They forgot Aerogel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Aerogel is a low-density solid-state material derived from gel in which the liquid component of the gel has been replaced with gas. The result is an extremely low density solid with several remarkable properties, most notably its effectiveness as an insulator. It is nicknamed frozen smoke, solid smoke or blue smoke due to its semi-transparent nature and the way light scatters in the material; however, it feels like extruded polystyrene to the touch.

  13. Superfluid Helium video by tha_rippa1be · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At the end of this video there is a short part about the fluid going upwards. http://web.ujf-grenoble.fr/PHY/FOREXPER/TPhelium/p ages/Presentation%20film.html

  14. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by Mattcelt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm embarrassed to admit this, but I can't tell if your post is hyperbole or not.

    So straight up - does the hammer really hit the ground first? Replacing the hammer and feather with larger bodies - say, one (as the hammer's stand-in) which is the same mass as the moon, and the other (the feather's double) which is 1/10th the mass of the moon, it seems obvious that the more massive body will impact first, as it does have a significantly larger bearing on the moon.

    ...HOWEVER...

    Does the hammer's insignificant size relative to the moon negate any realistic gravitational influence it may have? Or for that matter, does the term 'significantly larger' really apply to the hammer and feather?

    I think the 3-body dynamics may be so small at that scale as to be nearly nullified - I would suspect that the gravitational pull of the hammer on the moon would move it less than the diameter of an atom required to change the timing of the impact of the two objects. [Unless one is counting the impact of the electron shells prior to the impact of the nucleus, in which case I suspect the preponderance of heavier (atomic weight-wise) elements in the hammer, with correspondingly more electrons, necessitating population of the "larger" d- or f-shells, would be first. But again, it's not the gravitational influence of the mass of the hammer that would be the deciding factor...]

    So.... anybody care to do the math?

  15. Number 6 - Elastic fluids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They left out elastic fluids, such as a mixture of high molecular weight polyethylene oxide in water. Once the fluid begins to pour out of its container, it will partially empty the container, even if righted. This is the open siphon effect. If while pouring out the fluid, you cut it with scissors, the fluid will snap back into the beaker like a rubber band. This can all be done at room temperature.

    What makes this happen is the high molecular weight polyer. The molecules become entangled, and when poured, they pull each other along, resulting in the emptying of the container.

    These fluids also exhibit other interesting behaviours, such as the Weissenberg effect, where when rotating rod is placed in the fluid, the fluid climbs up the rod. Also, add some particles (or bubbles), start stirring, then suddently remove the stirring rod, you will see the fluid snap back when it comes to rest.

  16. 5 strange materials by robyannetta · · Score: 2, Funny

    Alas, Taco Bell was left off the list again, coming in at number six.

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
  17. One More I would inlcude: Plutonium by Gat0r30y · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Funny note: as i was looking for the thermodynamic properties of plutonium, ebay promised to make me a great offer on it. Seriously, like ice it will expand and get less dense as it drops in temperature. Only, instead of just the one phase change, there are many. Unfortunately, this is the best I can find for a phase diagram. In thermo, my prof put up a much nicer one, just trust, the phase diagram is pretty crazy looking.

    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    1. Re:One More I would inlcude: Plutonium by whitehatlurker · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wikipedia has a nicer version of the same diagram. It appears that only the delta phase (or delta prime phase) exhibits this expansion on cooling phenomena.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  18. Re:What? no mention of silly putty!? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 4, Informative
    Actually, no; Silly Putty expands when stressed, it doesn't get more solid.

    I've always known dilatants as Newtonian Solids (for instance, cornstarch mixed with water, which you can sink your hand into, but which can also withstand the force of a sledgehammer [as can your hand if it's submersed at the time]).

  19. I love stuff like this! by markbt73 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I was a kid I had a book called "Scientific Experiments You Can Eat." I seem to remember there being something like the "Oobleck" in there.

    I'd love to try it out, but I get the feeling my wife would kill me if I started cooking up stuff like that in the kitchen...

    --
    "Oh boy! Are we going to try something dangerous?"
  20. Try this at home - if... by jpellino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... you have to mix the non-newtonian fluid pretty accurately - too thin and it won't support you, too thick and it's trivial... you'll notice they have a stirrer of some sort in the pool video - this is important - this stuff can settle in short time so you end up with mostly water above and mostly cornstarch below. Jearl Walker once lept over tables into a feed trough full of this stufff on his show. He didn't splash a drop. He did, however lose his balance, and tipped the whole thing which slowly flowed into the audience...

    And they mention conrflour - I'd stick with cornstarch. One time going France and Hungary to teach science, I figured I'd forego the big containers of white powder on the international flights... and getting to Nice, I found that you can only buy boxes of cornflour, not boxes of cornstarch in French grocery stores. You could get sugar-packet sized envelopes of it, which were labeled in French with something I could not read but I imagine said "You are in France. We are famous of our sauces. If you need cornstarch to make a sauce, then go away!."

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  21. Re:So Did Jesus walk on water using cornstarch? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, except for the fact that corn was no known in the old world at the time of JC's walkabouts.

    That's why it's a miracle.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  22. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by Mattcelt · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's ok, David Scott did it for him:
    http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/a15.clsout3.html

    So what you're saying is while there's a theoretical difference between the impact timings, the practical effect likely couldn't be measured. Makes sense.

  23. Ummm... by dangitman · · Score: 4, Funny
    LSD is a pretty strange material.

    Hey! Who moved the submit button? And what are all these ponies doing here?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  24. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by Brandybuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm embarrassed to admit this, but I can't tell if your post is hyperbole or not.

    This is Slashdot. He was probably being completely serious.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  25. Re:Water comes to mind by Dadoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah, but water is one of the few (only?) materials whose liquid is denser than its solid and, as a result, freezes from the top down, rather than the bottom up. That's pretty strange, in my book.

    It also has one of the highest specific heats of any material. (Highest of any common material.)

    --
    Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
  26. Re:Does it include the ever mysterious ethyl alcoh by Landshark17 · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're doing plenty of casual studies on it at my college.

    --
    This sig is false.
  27. Re:What? no mention of silly putty!? by Foehg · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe you mean 'non-Newtonian'.

    Oh, and "Slow down, cowboy!"

  28. Re:Aerogel by kaszeta · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I always thought aerogel was some pretty cool stuff. If you insulated your house with it, you would only need one candle to keep the entire house warm. :)

    It's not quite that magical. A two inch layer of aerogel will keep things about as insulated as a really good vacuum thermos, however.

    I know, I work with the stuff on a regular basis, we use it as insulation, by the 400 liter barrel. See some of my pics of some of the solid slabs I have in the office.

  29. Re:why are the only interesting materials only flu by scottv67 · · Score: 2, Informative

    They don't make it, they sell it. The guy that runs United Nuclear works at Los Alamos, and has for years, and has contacts that get him some scraps that he can sell.

    Bob Lazar used to work at Area 51. I'm sure he has contacts who can make practically anything. It's a safe bet that only the "tame" stuff shows up in the United Nuclear catalog...

  30. Water not on list? by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder which are safe to drink?

    Which makes you wonder why water isn't on the list. It may be ubiquitous, but it's weird. Think about it - how many other materials become less dense (ie. expand) when they freeze? I think there are about two or three known. How many others dissociate on their own in their liquid state? How many others have as big a specific heat? Think about the myriad things which are a result of those properties, some of which are a pain in the ass (cracked engine blocks if no antifreeze); some of which are boons (life in general - dissociation, frog hibernation - whole lakes don't freeze solid because ice is weird enough to float, water is one of the best coolants there is - specific heat).

    Water is truly a strange chemical. Think about that next time you blithely pour it down your throat.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  31. Re:Water comes to mind by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, and it self-dissociates in its liquid state - hence pH, easy ionization required for cell behavior, etc. As I stated in an earlier post, it's weird stuff, common and "familiar" or not.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  32. Re:More than five things... by trentblase · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can also suspend a frog in a strong magnetic field because water is diamagnetic. http://www.hfml.ru.nl/froglev.html

  33. 1. Dilatants by _newwave_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    fluids that get more solid when stressed. The classic example is a mixture of cornflour and water - it's runny until you hit it when it becomes solid.

    I remember playing with this mixture in grade school and since then I have always wondered why materials like this could not be used to make protective/bullet proof armor. Could someone explain this to me?

  34. empty calories by ukemike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    60 calories and 0 nutritional value. How is that a good thing? Wonder bread is to wheat as high fructose corn syrup is to corn. Wonder has almost no fiber. It is almost pure starch which is quickly converted into sugar in you digestive system. If you have low blood sugar and need a boost NOW eating a slice of wonder is faster than eating a powered sugar donut.

    --
    -- QED
  35. Re:why are the only interesting materials only flu by TheLink · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nah.

    Dry ice is sublime ;).

    --