Slashdot Mirror


10th Annual Wacky Warning Labels Out

autophile writes "It's official: M-Law's 10th Annual Wacky Warning Label Contest is over. First prize has gone to a washing machine label urging not to put people in washers. Started to promote awareness of excessive litigation, the contest highlights common sense warning labels, such as the one that warns not to dry cellphones in microwave ovens. Companies find it necessary to stick crazy warnings on their products because of previous insane lawsuits: 'A front loader (washing machine) is just at the right height — speaking now as a mother and not a corporate spokeswoman — for a four-year-old,' said Patti Andresen Shew of Alliance Laundry Systems. Personally, I think a four-year-old precocious enough to read and understand all the warning labels hidden all over a product probably doesn't need those labels."

71 of 445 comments (clear)

  1. Well she has a point... by packeteer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The labels are pretty rediculous but they are for the parents not the kids. Nobody thinks a 4 year old is going to read the labels and to make it sounds like thats what the company thinks is going to happen is silly. You don't need to be deceptive to make your point that the label to not put people in the washer is silly.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    1. Re:Well she has a point... by thewils · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The labels are pretty rediculous but they are for the parents


      Well, actually the labels are there for the manufacturers. They don't give a crap what you do with their product, if there's a warning label then your chances of successfully suing them are minimal.
      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    2. Re:Well she has a point... by IdleTime · · Score: 5, Insightful

      These warning labels are a social curiosity found in USA.

      When I first moved here I was totally cracking up at all the stupid warnings you have on everything. Why are they there? Because of a horrible justice system and not because you want to warn people about the obvious but to avoid paying millions and millions to idiots.

      Your justice system is long overdue for a total overhaul, it is horrific at best.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    3. Re:Well she has a point... by legirons · · Score: 2, Funny

      but i noticed this on a Pineapple: "Suitable for vegetarians"

      In Tesco supermarkets in the UK, the red peppers have a label "as seen on TV"

    4. Re:Well she has a point... by Jester6641 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I totally agree. Recently I was on the highway with some Belorussians and they asked what I though was a very silly question.

      "What are the bumps on the side of the road for?"

      I told them they were there to warn drivers when they were wandering over the side of the road. We drove over some to show them how they worked. They were even more confused.

      "Why would you wander off of the road?"

      I had to explain that it could happen if you were tired, or maybe if you weren't paying attention or something like that. Then they got me.

      "You Americans are so worried about being safe. Why not just not drive tired and pay attention to driving?"

      Because that, my friends, would not be the American way.

      --
      Jester

      Warning: This sig may be legally binding in England.
    5. Re:Well she has a point... by adrianmonk · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Well, actually the labels are there for the manufacturers. They don't give a crap what you do with their product, if there's a warning label then your chances of successfully suing them are minimal.

      Yes, I think that much is clear. The point that the contest is trying to make is that your chances of successfully suing them should already be minimal without the labels. They are trying to remind people of that by showing the existence of some really stupid warning labels, thus showing the absurdity and brokenness of a justice system that makes the labels necessary.

      On a side note, I happen to partially disagree with them that the existence of these warning labels proves our justice system is broken (at least in this particular way). It's all about the level of risk vs. the cost of eliminating the risk. If I owned a home in an area that was well above the nearest body of water (or creek, river, etc.) and thus had very low chances of flooding, and if a reputable insurance company offered me a legit flood insurance policy good for 50 years for a one-time premium of $1, I would probably buy that insurance. Any kind of flood damage is pretty unlikely, but I won't miss the $1, and if something did happen, I'd be covered.

      In the same way, if you're a lawyer for a manufacturer and there is any kind of warning label you could put on the product that describes a real event that could happen, even if it requires the user of the product to be dumb as dirt for it to happen, and even if it requires the judge and jury to act in a ridiculous manner for the lawsuit to succeed, the fact is, you don't know that those two things won't coincide and bite you in the butt. They probably won't, but given that it costs you very little to prevent it, and given that you could lose millions of dollars if it does happen (say, in a wrongful death lawsuit), why not do it?

      So, the fact is that warning labels are cheap insurance. It's almost always a good idea to opt for cheap insurance, where that means insurnce that actually costs significantly less than it "should" if the cost were based on doing the math. But cheap insurance can be made cheaper in two ways: either hold the cost as a constant and increase the risk being insured against, or hold the risk constant and reduce the cost. So how do we know that these stupid warning labels really indicate anything about the justice system and its tolerance of frivolous lawsuits? Isn't it also possible that all they indicate is that with modern manufacturing techniques, it's really, really cheap to put warning labels on things?

    6. Re:Well she has a point... by dbIII · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not necessarily. A shallow waterhole next to a walking track in an Australian National Park had the sign "no swimming" mainly to stop idiots diving in without checking the depth and breaking their necks. On idiot dove in, broke his neck, and successfully sued the government on the grounds that the sign did not say "no diving" and on the grounds the sign showed awareness of danger but the danger was inadequately managed.

  2. Excessive litigation better than the alternative by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although a few libertarian Slashdotters seem to want Social Darwinism.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  3. Slashdot... by SeanMac · · Score: 3, Funny

    Slashdot: Remove Intellect Before Posting

  4. bash.org says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oblig. bash.org quote:
    <xterm> The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?

    1. Re:bash.org says: by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?

      Because the product would be recalled due to absence of a warning label saying "warning: this product has no warning labels".

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    2. Re:bash.org says: by waveclaw · · Score: 4, Interesting
      FTA:
      a warning he found on the cover of his local Yellow Pages book which cautions users: "Please do not use this directory while operationg [sic] a moving vehicle."


      I'm sorry. When I'm driving a car, I am driving a car. Much like any technology that can kill people (e.g. chainsaws) you really should be multitasking only two things: do your job and don't kill people (unless it's a gun, which is meant to kill people anyway.)

      When driving a car I am not:
      1. Drinking Booze like I'm at a frat party
      2. Taking a nap like I'm in bed at home
      3. Having a four-course lunch as if I'm at a restaurant
      4. Yacking on my cellphone like I'm at the salon getting my hair done
      5. Reading the bleeding Yellow-pages to call someone on my cellphone


      No. You are not good enough of a driver to do these either. If you are, why aren't you a professional race-car driver? (And many pro race-car drivers will tell you not to do these things either.) If you want to eat, drink, yack and read take the bus or a train that serves breakfast. Voice mail exists so you don't have to carry on a 5-way conference call while swerving down Interstate 40 on your way to hell.

      (This rant has been brought to you by the letters G, E, T, A and the word 'clue.')

      I suspect this is not people being clueless, though. It's people willing playing a deadly game to 'be productive' and make up for playing WoW / serfing pr0n at 4am.

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
    3. Re:bash.org says: by fuzzix · · Score: 2, Informative
      Oblig. bash.org quote:
        The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?

      Like much of bash.org that's actually a Bill Hicks quote.

      As for the article... The warning "Do not iron" on the lottery ticket is pretty funny as my mother did just that to a winning ticket a couple of weeks ago. My brother won some money and she said she'd cash it in for him - he handed her a crumpled up sliver of a ticket. She thought "They'll never take this!" and slapped it on the ironing board... ...well, these things are printed on thermal paper (as many of you may know) so you can guess what happened next.

      Good thing it was only for 9 euro :)
  5. My personal favourite by JanneM · · Score: 5, Funny

    My first bike (a ten year old Honda CM400T) had the warning, prominently placed on the tank, not to engage the steering lock while you're riding it.

    The steering lock itself was located to the left and below the trunk bundle of wires going to the front panel and instrumentation, and needed the key that presumably is in the ignition (or you would not be driving it) or the backup key. Fair enough.

    But the steering lock would only engage when the front wheel was engaged fully in one direction or the other. Which was a seriously tight turning radius. If you are able to actually keep your balance and keep the bike moving while gong full tilt to the right, and at the same time find and push-twist the key sitting under a bundle of cables below your line of sight and to the left then you do not need a warning label - you need a contract to perform at a motor circus, as you have just found your true calling.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:My personal favourite by Potor · · Score: 3, Funny

      I once had a toy gun made in China with the warning: Do Not Aim at the People. I always loved that one.

    2. Re:My personal favourite by Nethead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn! I hate to admit this but I did just that on a CM400T (I miss that bike.) I got on my bike and got into a long chat with my friend, started up the bike, eased out the clutch and went right down. I think he's still laughing. Really, this happened to me. The label was looking me right in the face as I pulled the bike back up.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    3. Re:My personal favourite by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      My favorite was on a Dewalt nailgun. One of the warnings was not to use the gun for "horseplay" (no bestiality jokes, please). It was accompanied by an illustration - a guy in a hardhat shooting another guy in the ass, with the victim holding his ass with "pain rays" shooting out of it, all with a big circle and slash through it.

      In other words, "Don't shoot your coworker in the ass with this device". Did this really need to be said? And was Black and Decker ever sued by the perpetrator? "Ladies and Gentleman of the jury, my client would have never landed in prison if it wasn't just so darn tempting to shoot someone in the ass with this device. It is obviously defective, so please give my client money so he can get drugs in prison and I can take my cut and roll around in it."

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  6. Knowledge is Power by El+Torico · · Score: 4, Insightful

    stupid people + clever lawyers = trouble

    Should there be warning labels? Of course.
    Should there be warning labels as a replacement for a basic level of education? Of course not.

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
  7. Lawyers aren't the entire problem by gravesb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The law generally is that the company must warn against unintended uses that a reasonable person would forsee. The problem is the reasonable person standard is determined by a jury. If juries would stop awarding such verdicts, then lawyers would stop suing. As long as juries continue to say a reasonable person would forsee someone putting a wet cell phone in a microwave, lawyers will continue to file suit. Talking to one juror about a malpractice case, they said they really didn't see that the doctor was negligent, but the plaintiff was suffering, the insurance was the only one who was going to pay, the insurance company had money, so why not give the plaintiff $400,000? The thing they didn't see (other than their conduct being against the law) was that everyone pays increased medical costs to cover the increase in malpractice insurance that the doctor must pay. If jurors were more responsible and more intelligent as to the consequences of their actions, the legal culture would have to change. Don't expect the lawyers to change the system, they have too much of a vested interest, and they are legally bound to look after their client's best interests within the law. People need to change the system.

    --
    http://bgcommonsense.blogspot.com
  8. We've had this for a while ... by richg74 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Personally, I think a four-year-old precocious enough to read and understand all the warning labels hidden all over a product probably doesn't need those labels.

    About twenty years ago, I bought an electric pencil sharpener for my office. It came with a set of safety warnings, prominently including "Do not attempt to sharpen ball-point pens." My thought at the time was that someone stupid enough to do that most likely had a problem that wasn't going to be solved by reading warning labels.

  9. Re:Nice by Matt+Edd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not all cat litter is safe for all animals.

    http://rabbit.org/faq/sections/litter.html

  10. Re:Warning: by DarkSarin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't have children if you are not prepared to be responsible for them for a couple of decades. And just exactly WHERE do you propose to place that warning label? And once you've got that idea, HOW do you plan to make sure that every device that would be used to produce children has the label?

    Good Luck!
    --
    "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
  11. Crazy...or not? by Alioth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Before you think how these warning labels - such as "Do not use iron on clothes you are wearing", a couple of years ago, a Slashdotter admitted to have burned himself while ironing the shirt he was wearing.

    My favorite warning label is on a set of fairy lights: "For indoor or outdoor use only".

  12. So why is it bad to put a cell in the microwave? by notthepainter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, that is a rehtorical question because if you read /. you know why.

    The real question is, how would an average person know? Most look like they are made of plastic which is of course microwave safe. If you've immersed your phone, drying it out with heat can fix it. (I know, I baked a friend phone in my oven at 150 degrees to bring it back to life.)

    So no, I don't think we need labels, there are so many they aren't read anyhow.

    How can we make it obvious that this is a bad idea? Or better yet, how can we make it possible that no damage will occur to either device then this happens?

    This is one of the challenges that engineers face. How do you make your products work well, be bulletproof, be easy to use, do what the customer needs doing, and yet not cost a fortune.

  13. Re:Crowbar by s20451 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Many crowbars today are printed with the warning label: "Do not use to pry."

    Does that mean we're only supposed to use them for their other intended purpose, to beat?

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
  14. Best floppy disk labels ever by hugg · · Score: 4, Funny
  15. Reason for this kind of warning by DavidV · · Score: 5, Informative

    An under-evolved hairless ape recently put an infant in the clothes dryer in Sydney because he thought it would be fun for the child. It may have been for the few seconds before the 3rd degree burns started developing. This kind of cretin is the reason for this kind of warning.

    --
    !sig
    1. Re:Reason for this kind of warning by MisterBuggie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Erm, why is this modded troll? This actually happened...
      Article here: http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/wet-baby-in-tu mble-dryer-man-charged/2006/05/30/1148754978203.ht ml

      We need better warning labels on the /. mod system ;-)

  16. Re:Excessive litigation better than the alternativ by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Interesting

    s/lower priced/dangerous/
    That's how. Think asbestos and tobacco being sold as recommended by doctors. (Yes, that second one really happened--there used to be cigarette commercials saying "4 out of 5 doctors recommend [brand] cigarettes")
    I guess you want anybody who doesn't research every single fucking product they buy for seven years to die.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  17. Do not iron? Good idea! by adenied · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The do not iron warning on the lottery ticket makes a lot of sense. How many people (outside of computer geeks) really know that most lottery tickets are printed on thermal paper? Get that warm and all of a sudden you have a black ticket that's pretty much ruined. Combine that with the fact that some people like to iron their crumpled up money and I can totally see how some people might need this warning.

  18. Not your usual warning label... by IpSo_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    This isn't your usual warning label on a pair of jeans.

    --
    Open Source Time and Attendance, Job Costing a
  19. Re:I don't iron my lottery tickets by TheQwe · · Score: 2, Informative

    It looks like to me that the lottery ticket is printed on thermal transfer paper- in which case ironing it would turn the side with the number on it completely black. That one makes the most sense to me- I could almost see someone trying to iron out a crumpled ticket.

  20. Re:Excessive litigation better than the alternativ by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm glad you brought up the hot coffee suit. I have something you'll need to agree to. A plaintiff sued McDonald's for selling him a milkshake, which he placed between his legs while driving (sound familiar?) Because of this, he temporarialy lost his ability to drive (so he testifies) and crashed his car, causing injuries and costs to the plaintiff. Now, he never won the case, but it seems to me anyone who is in beleif of hot coffee lady needs to write that judge RIGHT NOW and explain their absolute disappointment with him for not awarding several million dollars to the plaintiff for his injuries.

    After all, the situation is identical to hot coffee lady, except this time the drink is too cold.


    Hardly. The plaintiff was not driving, nor was the car moving when she got burned. She held the cup between her legs and was opening it to put in sweetener when it spilled.

    McDonald's had reports of injuries before this event; they even knew it was being served too hot to be consumed. McD's refuised to settle, and eventually lost to the tune of $500,000 - then they settled.

    This case is not, despite the FUD, a stellar example of lawsuit abuse; rather it highlights what the court system should do - hold people accountable on both sides. (The award was reduced 20% due to the plaintiffs actions being viewed as partly responsible)

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  21. Re:What happens when the warning negates the purpo by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Insightful

    what was it that I bought??

    You bought a cheap bike for an activity that would need good, heavy-duty gear (i.e., not cheap)

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  22. It's a warning sign rather than a label... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...but it is the funniest one ever.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:It's a warning sign rather than a label... by guywcole · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have to relate a shameful story to you. I was walking across campus with a friend of mine a couple years ago. He grabbed me all of a suden and pulled me back, right as a parking gate lowered in front me. Sure enough, there was a warning sign on the gate (right where it would have hit me, too) with a man being cracked over the head by the gate.

      Now, I think that warning could be useful, except for one problem:
      It's hard to read when the gate is about to hit you on the head.

  23. Labels for the manufacturers by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Parent has a good point.

    The most extreme example I've seen is a box of Q-tips. So far, most of the labels menioned have been to prevent stupid use of a product. In this case, the manufacturer puts on a label to allegedly prevent the intended use.
    Everybody knows what Q-tips are used for: to clean the ear canal. They were designed for that. Yet the box currently has a warning in bold block letters: DO NOT USE SWAB IN EAR CANAL. The label also lists - with pictures! - all the things that their lawers think they should be used for: removing makeup, cleaning your keyboard, etc.
    This is all done just to protect themselves from lawsuits.

    1. Re:Labels for the manufacturers by MrHanky · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, you shouldn't use a Q-tip to clean your ear. It shoves the earwax further in, and does far more damage than good. No doctor would ever recommend Q-tips for ear cleaning. Yes, it's probably the originally intended use, but good intentions don't always give good results. Q-tips are still kind of neat for other uses, though.

    2. Re:Labels for the manufacturers by chameleon3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      most extreme example I've encountered is lighter fluid that has WARNING: FLAMMABLE written all over it. Well, it BETTER be flammable, right?

    3. Re:Labels for the manufacturers by reanjr · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's bullshit. After getting an ear infection for the first time, my doctor told me stop using Q tips. I did so and I got 4 more ear infections over the following year. I started using Q Tips again and haven't had one since. Perhaps if used improperly they could push gunk down the canal, but not if you know how to use it. Think of a dentist who tells you never to scrape your teeth, especially with metal. You go in for a cleaning and they take out a metal hook and scrape your teeth. It's all about proper use and idiots who don't know how to do it properly.

    4. Re:Labels for the manufacturers by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's why I use my house keys. Gets in, gives the old ear canal a good scraping, gets rid of any ear wax without leaving behind any lint, and it feels SOOOoooo goooOOOoooood!

    5. Re:Labels for the manufacturers by Bertie · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a Dremel man myself. Is there nothing they can't do?

  24. Prying with a Crowbar by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps they meant "Do not use to be nosey", as in "Me and my crowbar Guido would likes to know when yous'll be giving Mr. Angelino his money back.".

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  25. Re:What happens when the warning negates the purpo by smurfsurf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, Suzuki markets the R-1000 with "own the racetrack". But they refuse any warranty if you indeed use it on for racing. KTM also refuses any warranty if you use their competition-ready enduros (and they are) in competition.

  26. How to make stupid lawsuits go away. by andol221 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The problem in America is that the plaintiff is awarded what the respondent able to pay. In Sweden there are almost the same possibilities to sue as in the US, but practically no lawsuits of "I burnt my self on Mc Donald's coffee, they must pay me $$$$$" because the courts only award whats the injury is supposed to be worth, in a by law established way. In this reasoning a burning your self on a cup of coffee is probably worth $2 or $3, but not more. Law suite problem gone!

  27. Spin cycle=120 G's by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 3, Informative
    A friend of mine's father was an E.R. doctor who occasionally worked with the county coroner's office. More than once, he told me, he's had to deal with the remains of a six-year-old boy who evidently thought something along the line of,
    1. Spinning is fun
    2. The washing machine spins
    3. I should go for a ride.
    So they set the dial, climb in and close the lid. Within seconds the G-forces are so intense they can't move their arms to open the lid. Seconds later they can't breathe. Seconds after that the blood is forced out of their brain and they're unconscious. This is an incredible blessing because in less than a minute the skin on their back has ruptured and all the blood and bile and lymph is being flung out of their bodies and pumped away by the washer. The sixty pound unbalanced load is chump change compared to the hundred and sixty pounds of water a washer usually has to spin out. And those sixty pound boys, he told me, get spun down to about thirty pounds of bones and mush.

    18 G's is fatal. Washers subject their load to several minutes G's forces comparable to driving into a concrete wall at 100MPH. So yeah, a little label reminding the grownups that a washing machine will kill the shit out of anything or anybody put in it is a bad idea.

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
    1. Re:Spin cycle=120 G's by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Funny
      This is an incredible blessing because in less than a minute the skin on their back has ruptured and all the blood and bile and lymph is being flung out of their bodies and pumped away by the washer.
      Whiter than white. As advertised.
      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:Spin cycle=120 G's by labnet · · Score: 3, Informative

      I very much doubt this could ever happen.

      Have you ever tried spinning an out of ballance load in a washing machine.
      You won't get it past about 100rpm.
      Myth Busters also tried this (albiet with an Adult) and is was way busted.

      --
      46137
    3. Re:Spin cycle=120 G's by Brandybuck · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bullshit.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  28. Re:Excessive litigation better than the alternativ by jc42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    McDonald's had reports of injuries before this event; they even knew it was being served too hot to be consumed. McD's refuised to settle, and eventually lost to the tune of $500,000 - then they settled.

    Indeed. And a number of articles on the case have pointed out that McDonald's also served hot chocolate at the same scalding temperature as their coffee. Hot chocolate is mostly drunk by children. McDonald's management knew this, had reports of injuries from both the coffee and the hot chocolate, but failed to lower the temperature. Endangering children like this is a level of irresponsibility that's a bit much for even the most rabid Social Darwinists.

    Also, followups have pointed out that the lawsuit had the desired effect. McDonald's lowered their serving temperature for both coffee and hot chocolate to a more reasonable 140F (60C).

    Another footnote was that most of the settlement went to pay the victim's lawyers; she reportedly got less money than her hospital bills.

    [I tried to get a degree symbol into those temperatures, but none of the standard HTML "entity" encodings worked. ;-]

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  29. My two favourites by HappyHead · · Score: 2, Funny

    My second favourite warning label that I've seen is on the fire starting logs you can buy at the local grocery store - the front says "Start fires easily! Burns fast and clean!", and the back says "Warning: Contents are flammable". Well I should certainly HOPE so!

    The absolute best I've seen though, in the same store even, was something I deeply regret not buying and taking home to show people as proof right then. It was the store's brand of peanut-brittle (a candy made mostly of peanuts) and the warning label said "Warning: MAY contain peanuts" (You mean they're not SURE? I think they need to re-check their manufacturing process if they think there's a chance that there might not be peanuts in the peanut brittle.) Sadly, that one went off the shelves a week later and hasn't been back since...

  30. I have a client who manufactures ladders... by Panaqqa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And we talked about warning labels at one point because some of the ones on his products are so silly. For example, "Do not rest top of ladder against power line(s)."

    He was telling me that within a few years, nobody will be manufacturing ladders in the United States anymore, and it will become impossible to buy a ladder. The reason? There are so many frivolous lawsuits against manufacturers, distributors and retailers of ladders that the cost of defending them and/or insurance against claims will make it a money losing proposition.

  31. Bad engrish is contained generously by ameline · · Score: 2, Funny


    My favorite label warns about the following;

    A dangerous toy. This toy is being made for the extreme priority the good looks. The little part which suffocates when the sharp part which gets hurt is swallowed is contained generously. Only the person who can take responsibility by itself is to play.

    I'm not sure how they arrived at this translation from Japanese, but there it is.

    --
    Ian Ameline
  32. Large Appliance Entrapment Deaths of Children by westlake · · Score: 2, Informative
    The labels are pretty ridiculous but they are for the parents not the kids.

    Not so ridiculous as you might think:

    The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has received reports of numerous suffocation deaths involving children who crawled inside latch type freezers, clothes dryers, combination washer/dryer units, picnic coolers, iceboxes in campers, and old-style latch type refrigerators. Most of the victims were 4 to 7 years old. In all cases, the doors could not be easily pushed open from the inside. In some of the incidents associated with clothes dryers, the appliance was accidentally turned on while the child was inside.

    Frequently, the children were playing "hide-and-seek" and the appliance or chest provided a deceptively good place to hide. When the door slammed shut, the tight fitting gasket on most of the appliances cut off air to the child. This, along with the insulated construction of the appliance, also prevented the child's screams from being heard. But abandoned appliances are not the only items involved with accidents like these. Entrapment deaths have been reported in products in use or stored in the kitchen, laundry room, basement, or garage. Deaths also have occurred in iceboxes located in campers parked outside the home. Preventing Large Appliance Entrapment Deaths to Children

    1. Re:Large Appliance Entrapment Deaths of Children by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, it's a real risk, but putting a label on it in no way reduces that risk.


      Putting a label on it enables the manufacturer to claim that they did what was practical to warn people of the risk, and thus presents some defense against lawsuits based on their being aware of the risk but concealing it. Now, its unlikely that most such lawsuits would succeed, and its not all that clear that such a warning would necessary actually adequately protect them against any that would. But its extremely cheap to put the warning on, and it might have some utility in either discouraging lawsuits from being filed or in defeating ones that are filed, so they'll do it.

      Whether it actually reduces risk to other people is about the last thing manufacturers care about.
    2. Re:Large Appliance Entrapment Deaths of Children by Yez70 · · Score: 2, Funny

      From my own experience, when I did play hide and seek with my little brother, I must correct this statement.

      "In some of the incidents associated with clothes dryers, the appliance was accidentally, turned on while the child was inside.

      Frequently, the children were playing "hide-and-seek" and the appliance or chest provided a deceptively good place to hide. When the door slammed shut,....
      " ....and I turned the dryer on, to show my stupid little brother it was a stupid place to hide. I then laughed hysterically after I let him out and he continued to spin.

    3. Re:Large Appliance Entrapment Deaths of Children by orkysoft · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm afraid that, in America, that will attract a whole new class of lawsuits...

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  33. Re:Excessive litigation better than the alternativ by jsprat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sad but true. Check out this ad.

    "More doctors smoke camels than any other cigarette..."

  34. Warning.. by Kreigaffe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do not taunt HappyFunBall

    --
    ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
  35. Re:On your next 1040 by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $9k was an arbitrary number, but probably close to the US average spent per student in public schools. I won't argue over 10%.

    I'm not saying you could hire an educator for minimum wage. I'm saying that as compensation, the government should at least allow you to claim the federal minimum wage for the required contact hours, adjusted for class size (you're kids get the benefit of a low instructor-student ratio at your expense). Since there are no special federal education requirements, licensing exams, or annual education requirements for home educators, a reasonable compensation is FMW - it's the lowest common denominator. You're not doing it to save money - you're doing it because you want them to get a "better" education (however it is you define better - eveyone does it differently).

    Expenses are deductible, I just suggested a statutory labor deduction for home school instructors who do not get paid. If you want to pay your spouse $40,000 per year, along with the payroll taxes and such, you can deduct up to $9,000 of the expense. Be my guest. Just remember that you'll pay income, employment, FUTA, and local taxes on that money. Books are deductible. Buildings and electricity must be carefully justified, just as in a home based business - if you use that space for any other purpose, it's probably not deductible. If you sell your house with a dedicated addition, you must claim the proceeds (as a portion of your basis) as a capital gain for any deduction you've taken.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  36. Re:Excessive litigation better than the alternativ by ericlondaits · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While McDonald's and Starbucks can afford to make the effort to find the perfect temperature at which to sell their hot beverages, it's a sad sad life if the only hot liquids you place in your mouth come from a fast food corporation.

    From the first sips of hot home-made tea I took in my life my mother taught me to be careful and check the temperature least I burn my tongue or mouth. I never attempted to chug down hot coffee like it was coke... the only way I can think of to get third degree burns in the stomach.

    The ability to sue is a poor replacement to knowing how to get around in life.

    --
    As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
  37. Some of mine favourites by xtracto · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some nice instructions labels:
    On a bag of Fritos: You could be a winner! No purchase nesessary. Details inside.

    On a bar of Dial soap: Directions: Use like regular soap.

    On some Swanson frozen dinners: Serving suggestion: Defrost.

    On a hotel provided shower cap in a box: Fits one head.

    On Tesco's Tiramisu dessert:(printed on bottom of the box) Do not turn upside down.

    On Marks & Spencer Bread Pudding: Product will be hot after heating.

    On packaging for a Rowenta iron: Do not iron clothes on body.

    On Boot's Children's cough medicine: Do not drive car or operate machinery.

    On Nytol sleep aid: Warning: may cause drowsiness.

    On a Korean kitchen knife: Warning keep out of children.

    On a string of Chinese-made Christmas lights: For indoor or outdoor use only.

    On a Japanese food processor: Not to be used for the other use.

    On Sainsbury's peanuts: Warning: contains nuts.

    On an American Airlines packet of nuts: Instructions: open packet, eat nuts.

    On a Swedish chainsaw: Do not attempt to stop chain with your hands or genitals.

    On a childs superman costume: Wearing of this garment does not enable you to fly.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  38. Re:Crowbar by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 3, Funny

    Intended purpose? To kill headcrabs?

  39. Scientific labels by Rashdot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Copied from news:rec.humor.funny.reruns

    From the RHF archives as selected by Brad Templeton, Maddi Hausmann and Jim Griffith. This newsgroup posts former jokes from the newsgroup rec.humor.funny. Visit http://www.netfunny.com/rhf to browse the RHF pages and archives on the web.

    WARNING: This Product Warps Space and Time in Its Vicinity.

    WARNING: This Product Attracts Every Other Piece of Matter in the Universe, Including the Products of Other Manufacturers, with a Force Proportional to the Product of the Masses and Inversely Proportional to the Distance Between Them.

    CAUTION: The Mass of This Product Contains the Energy Equivalent of 85 Million Tons of TNT per Net Ounce of Weight.

    HANDLE WITH EXTREME CARE: This Product Contains Minute Electrically Charged Particles Moving at Velocities in Excess of Five Hundred Million Miles Per Hour.

    CONSUMER NOTICE: Because of the "Uncertainty Principle," It Is Impossible for the Consumer to Find Out at the Same Time Both Precisely Where This Product Is and How Fast It Is Moving.

    ADVISORY: There is an Extremely Small but Nonzero Chance That, Through a Process Know as "Tunneling," This Product May Spontaneously Disappear from Its Present Location and Reappear at Any Random Place in the Universe, Including Your Neighbor's Domicile. The Manufacturer Will Not Be Responsible for Any Damages or Inconvenience That May Result.

    READ THIS BEFORE OPENING PACKAGE: According to Certain Suggested Versions of the Grand Unified Theory, the Primary Particles Constituting this Product May Decay to Nothingness Within the Next Four Hundred Million Years.

    THIS IS A 100% MATTER PRODUCT: In the Unlikely Event That This Merchandise Should Contact Antimatter in Any Form, a Catastrophic Explosion Will Result.

    PUBLIC NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY LAW: Any Use of This Product, in Any Manner Whatsoever, Will Increase the Amount of Disorder in the Universe. Although No Liability Is Implied Herein, the Consumer Is Warned That This Process Will Ultimately Lead to the Heat Death of the Universe.

    NOTE: The Most Fundamental Particles in This Product Are Held Together by a "Gluing" Force About Which Little is Currently Known and Whose Adhesive Power Can Therefore Not Be Permanently Guaranteed.

    ATTENTION: Despite Any Other Listing of Product Contents Found Hereon, the Consumer is Advised That, in Actuality, This Product Consists Of 99.9999999999% Empty Space.

    NEW GRAND UNIFIED THEORY DISCLAIMER: The Manufacturer May Technically Be Entitled to Claim That This Product Is Ten-Dimensional. However, the Consumer Is Reminded That This Confers No Legal Rights Above and Beyond Those Applicable to Three-Dimensional Objects, Since the Seven New Dimensions Are "Rolled Up" into Such a Small "Area" That They Cannot Be Detected.

    PLEASE NOTE: Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest That When the Consumer Is Not Directly Observing This Product, It May Cease to Exist or Will Exist Only in a Vague and Undetermined State.

    COMPONENT EQUIVALENCY NOTICE: The Subatomic Particles (Electrons, Protons, etc.) Comprising This Product Are Exactly the Same in Every Measurable Respect as Those Used in the Products of Other Manufacturers, and No Claim to the Contrary May Legitimately Be Expressed or Implied.

    HEALTH WARNING: Care Should Be Taken When Lifting This Product, Since Its Mass, and Thus Its Weight, Is Dependent on Its Velocity Relative to the User.

    IMPORTANT NOTICE TO PURCHASERS: The Entire Physical Universe, Including This Product, May One Day Collapse Back into an Infinitesimally Small Space. Should Another Universe Subsequently Re-emerge, the Existence of This Product in That Universe Cannot Be Guaranteed.

    (The above is from Volume 36, Number 1 of The Journal of Irreproducible Results. Copyright 1991 Blackwell Scientific Publications Inc. 3 Cambridge Center, Cambridge MA 02141 Individual US Subscriptions $12.00 Reproduced with permission.)

    --
    This is not the sig you're looking for.
  40. Re:Excessive litigation better than the alternativ by coredog64 · · Score: 2, Informative
    McDonald's had reports of injuries before this event; they even knew it was being served too hot to be consumed. McD's refuised to settle, and eventually lost to the tune of $500,000 - then they settled.

    The root cause behind McDonald's loss was a poor legal strategy and the stupidity of the jury. McD put boring experts on the stand that put the jury to sleep. When the jury was awake they heard phrases like "statistically insignificant" and thought someone was insulting poor Stella Liebeck.

    FWIW, there have been other cases similar to the McD case like McMahon vs. Bunn-O-Matic that have found for the defendants because of information like this:


      little digging on our own part turned up ANSI/AHAM CM-1-1986, which the American National Standards Institute adopted for home coffee makers. Standard 5.2.1 provides:

    On completion of the brewing cycle and within a 2 minute interval, the beverage temperature in the dispensing vessel of the coffee maker while stirring should be between the limits of 170 degrees F and 205 degrees F (77 degrees C and 96 degrees C).

    The upper finished brew temperature limit assures that the coffee does not reach the boiling point which can affect the taste and aroma. The lower temperature limit assures generally acceptable drinking temperature when pouring into a cold cup, adding cream, sugar and spoon.

    (emphasis mine)
  41. Public Transportation... by AnotherUsername · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am sick of people saying that public transportation is the Holy Grail of this country's transportation/pollution/whatever else problems. Here's a big secret that all these pro-public transportation people don't seem to realize:

    Not every place has public transportation.

    Believe it or not, people commute from small towns and small cities to bigger cities. And, believe it or not, these small towns and small cities don't always have a public transportation system that can get them from point A to point B and back again. In the town that I grew up in, the only time a bus was ever seen, other than school buses, was when a charter bus would pull off the interstate to get gas or pass through the town.

    In the small city I live in now, there is a bus line for around the city, but it only goes to the college and a strip mall. There are several buses that go to the surrounding cities. However, they don't operate at the times necessary for people to get to and from work, and there are no buses that get around those cities.

    There is no rail line. There are no taxis. How do people get around? Cars.

    There is a bike path that stretches from the college to the strip mall area. But there is no bike path on the major streets. How are people supposed to get where they are going without spending a hour to get from one end of the city where they live to the other? Again, personal vehicles.

    So, next time that you think that public transportation is the be all, end all of our transportation and pollution woes, think again. Not everyone in this country lives in a major metropolitan area with a squeaky clean public transportation system.

    /rant

    --
    I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
  42. By someone who knows what they are doing by Roy+Ward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ears are supposed to be self cleaning if left alone, but for some people that is not the case.

    - One method is to go to a doctor, and the nurse will clean your ears out with hot soapy water.

    - A better method is to find a hearing clinic that has a special machine that vacuums the wax out.

    - There's also earwax dissolving drops, but I don't think they are really recommended.

    The problem with trying to do anything to mechanically clean them is that you _will_ push some of the wax further in.

  43. The best one I have seen by BandoMcHando · · Score: 2, Funny

    The funniest one I've seen was from a thermometer, and it said:

          "Once used rectally, do not use orally."

  44. Re:Excessive litigation better than the alternativ by jeff4747 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The kid who never burns the roof of his mouth while young enough to have rapid cell regrowth in his mouth and sensitive pain receptors

    Sorry, humans of all ages have rapid cell regrowth in their mouths, which contain sensitive pain receptors.

    (Very young children mouth everything they pick up because their mouth is more sensitive than their fingers. As they age, their fingers get more sensitive, their mouth remains the same)

    I don't think protecting people from common sense is a good thing

    Common sense says that I will get scalded if I spill hot coffee on my lap. That's a first degree burn. In the McDonalds case the coffee caused 3rd degree burns, thus defying common sense.

    Common sense also says that a restaurant wouldn't be so stupid that they would sell a beverage that was so hot it could not be consumed without injury. Much like common sense would tell you that a restaurant wouldn't sell coffee made with concentrated sulphuric acid.

  45. Re:how to clean ears by bhiestand · · Score: 3, Funny

    Have a friend use a tweezers for the hard black chunks.
      Thanks, I haven't been that scared in years. I can't imagine how anything could possibly go wrong with such a procedure. I'd rather trust my friends to give me a colonoscopy with a long, rusty nail.

    Have you considered that the hard, black chunks in your ears might actually be dried blood from previous cleaning attempts?

    Yes, I'm fairly confident you were joking, but... I couldn't resist taking it seriously and replying. Sorry.
    --
    SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling