Slashdot Mirror


Ball Lightning Created In the Lab

EWAdams writes to point us to a New Scientist report that the mysterious phenomenon of ball lighting has now been created in a Brazilian research lab. The phenomenon has long been reported anecdotally but never explained or understood. Scientists have devised numerous possible explanations, including mini black holes left over from the Big Bang, but have had little success in producing working examples. From the article: "A more down-to-earth theory... is that ball lightning forms when lightning strikes soil, turning any silica in the soil into pure silicon vapor. As the vapor cools, the silicon condenses into a floating aerosol bound into a ball by charges that gather on its surface, and it glows with the heat of silicon recombining with oxygen. To test this idea, a [Brazilian] team... took wafers of silicon just 350 micrometers thick, placed them between two electrodes and zapped them with currents of up to 140 amps. Then... they moved the electrodes slightly apart, creating an electrical arc that vaporised the silicon. The arc spat out glowing fragments of silicon but also, sometimes, luminous orbs the size of ping-pong balls that persisted for up to 8 seconds." Here is a movie of the phenomenon.

190 comments

  1. Slashdotted Video? by gbulmash · · Score: 5, Informative

    Looks like the video link is already Slashdotted. But the video also seems to be all over YouTube (particularly since the story is a few days old). Here's a link to it at YouTube.

    Is ball lightning supposed to bounce around the ground like that? I thought it floated. 'Course, I could be mistaken.

    - Greg

    1. Re:Slashdotted Video? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Ball lightning is also said to have an odd motion such as looping and the appearance of bouncing along the ground." (wikipedia)

    2. Re:Slashdotted Video? by Cyberax · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think, it will fly if there's a significant potential difference between the ground and air, as it can be during a thunderstorm when the earth and clouds become like capacitor plates.

      In this case a conducting plasma ball will move along the lines of resulting electric field, but because earth landscape is not flat, it will move in rather strange trajectories.

    3. Re:Slashdotted Video? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think there's some ball lightning coming out of that server.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Slashdotted Video? by Arker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It can bounce around, fly through the air, float serenely across the room... it has a very broad repertoire of movements. The behaviour in the video is within the range of reports, so you can't rule it out because of that. The visual appearance of the balls is consistent with the ball lightning I've seen personally, and reports vary widely so far as colour as well as behaviour.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    5. Re:Slashdotted Video? by obender · · Score: 3, Informative

      Non Flash version on Google video is here

    6. Re:Slashdotted Video? by marcello_dl · · Score: 3, Funny

      > I think there's some ball lightning coming out of that server.

      Wouldn't it be a great way to signal excessive load on a server? Except that then microsoft would embrace and extend the idea with ballMer lightning, which also throws chairs at you if it spots license irregularities.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    7. Re:Slashdotted Video? by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 4, Funny

      IS the scientist in this video wearing flip flops with this ball lightning scurrying around the floor by hiw feet? Is it just me or is this not a good idea. I want to see the blooper reel of this video.

      --
      quis custodiet ipsos custodes
    8. Re:Slashdotted Video? by rucs_hack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A friend of mine was swimming in a lake in the eighties and some ball lightening appeared. It bounced along the surface of the lake near him, scaring him and others on the lake beach somewhat as he raced to the shore.

      It dissipated shortly after he got out, and he went straight to the lakeside bar to get a drink, touched the proffered glass, and it exploded. Other than that and a healthy dose of 'holy fuck', he had no ill effects.

    9. Re:Slashdotted Video? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ooooh Balmer Lightning - it bounces up and down, shouting "Developers! Developers!"

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    10. Re:Slashdotted Video? by Mike89 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Is it just me or is this not a good idea
      Reminds me of an Australian website about Tesla coils - I can't find the original picture that used to give everyone on the forums a laugh, but it was this Aussie guy standing in a shed with boxers and a pair of thongs on infront of a Tesla coil. This is the closest picture I can find to demonstrate what I mean.
    11. Re:Slashdotted Video? by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Good ad for Calvin Klein, but what's with the leaf blower?

    12. Re:Slashdotted Video? by Mike89 · · Score: 1
      Good ad for Calvin Klein, but what's with the leaf blower?
      Yeah, I'm sure that guy is really their target-market. Not sure about the leaf blower, drop him an email ;-)
    13. Re:Slashdotted Video? by bronzey214 · · Score: 1

      So was he swimming in a lake during a thunderstorm, or did it just appear, Pokemon-style?

    14. Re:Slashdotted Video? by rucs_hack · · Score: 3, Interesting

      it was, according to him, a very hot day, not a storm in sight. He didn't see where it came from, but he said it seemed to be moving towards him till he got out of the water.
      Not being too conversant with electromagnetism I couldn't say whether this was because he represented an electrical 'hot spot' on the water or just that he was so freaked he thought it was following him.

      It was, so far as he could tell, about a foot across.

    15. Re:Slashdotted Video? by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember an article in Radio Electronics magazine from the 1980's where someone created ball lightning in not-so-lab conditions; IIRC, it was on an old train because there had been reports of ball lightning being produced due to some switch that controlled the generators. Anyone else geeky and old enough to remember this?

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    16. Re:Slashdotted Video? by Cousin+Scuzzy · · Score: 5, Funny
      A friend of mine was swimming in a lake in the eighties and some ball lightening appeared.

      That's not ball lightening, that's just shrinkage. Happens to men when they're swimming all the time. Usually not when the water's in the eighties though.

      It dissipated shortly after he got out

      Yeah, that's typical too.
    17. Re:Slashdotted Video? by bigdavesmith · · Score: 1

      This looks like what I have seen, but these balls are fairly small and didn't appear to last very long. Would a larger ball, say, 30 times that size, last significantly longer, or would it burn itself out just as fast, or even faster?

    18. Re:Slashdotted Video? by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      you're not a well man.... :-)

    19. Re:Slashdotted Video? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It looks like weld spatter to me.

    20. Re:Slashdotted Video? by Arker · · Score: 1

      A very good question. I can't answer it though. Will have to wait for the experiments to be reported more formally I expect.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    21. Re:Slashdotted Video? by BronsCon · · Score: 0

      Yes, I know it's offtpoic - no need to waste mod points to tell me so.

      Anyway, the ytmnd page (since taken down) was Developers developers developers developers developers developers mushroom mushroom.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    22. Re:Slashdotted Video? by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      I've heard of that. Weirdly, the only casualties seemed to be Linux hackers and chairs.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    23. Re:Slashdotted Video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's summer here in the southern emisphere... And those are http://www.havaianas.com/, a tipical beach footwear common on Brazil and it's limiting countries. I sould say they are pretty safe to deal with electric stuff, cause they are entirely made of rubber.

      Also maybe the guy's trying to get some tan with those ball lighting thingies.

    24. Re:Slashdotted Video? by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1
      IS the scientist in this video wearing flip flops with this ball lightning scurrying around the floor by hiw feet? Is it just me or is this not a good idea. I want to see the blooper reel of this video.
      Yep I can see a Darwin award in the making here, just upscale the whole thing using the same great safety standards.
      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    25. Re:Slashdotted Video? by OhMeatball67 · · Score: 1

      Wow - great little video! I thought it was interesting how each ball would 'hop' over the cable and go across the floor... When I was a child, my brother & I were watching TV (on a school day, and DEFINATELY not allowed by Mom!) and I went to the kitchen to get a snack. Just then, the house was hit by lightening. I was thrown back against the fridge but out the window, both my brother and I could see a ball (what we think was the lightening) roll off the roof and come straight down. After, the tv was fried. My brother and I went out on the back porch and saw that there was no mark (similar to the video) on the cement. Watching the video & how it behaved in a similar fashion was very interesting...

  2. Re:Obligatory statement by Joebert · · Score: 1

    May they never attempt to light a fart bare-assed again.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  3. Re:Obligatory statement by anagama · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't worry, this is ball lightening, not ball lighting.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  4. Fascinating by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I find it fascinating that it displays almost no friction to the floor as it moves about. Plus, the gas jets tell of a very complex combination of structure and chemical process occurring.
    It will be interesting to read more research on the subject when it becomes available.

    --
    All rites reversed 2010
    1. Re:Fascinating by Circlotron · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It reminded me of drops of water that float around on a thin cushion of vapour when they are dropped onto a hot metal surface.

    2. Re:Fascinating by ari+wins · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, wait, they've recreated a 6/1 creature with Trample, that takes one red mana to cast, and is placed in the graveyard after this turn is completed?

      Just don't tell me when they create a Lord of the Pit, the U.S. has a hard enough time preserving marshland's as it is.

      --
      Don't worry if you're a kleptomaniac, you can always take something for it.
    3. Re:Fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ball Lightning is 3 red....1 would just be broken!

    4. Re:Fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > it displays almost no friction to the floor as it moves about.

      However, it will be a long time before we get ball lightning bearings.

  5. Hmm? Something is missing by Werrismys · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These things stay on ground... when I was a kid I once saw a ball of lightning and it danced along a barbed wire fence. This is a start but not the whole truth...

    --
    'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
    1. Re:Hmm? Something is missing by WaZiX · · Score: 2, Funny

      The whole truth? Man you've been watching X-files too much!

      Try "explanation".

    2. Re:Hmm? Something is missing by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Informative

      It could have been St. Elmo's fire, since barbed wire has sharp edges.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:Hmm? Something is missing by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      He said nothing about seeing Emilio Estevez on the fence.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    4. Re:Hmm? Something is missing by erich_knight · · Score: 1

      After reading your site,I thought your readers would be interested in looking at these energy technologies and EPS's theoretic base for ball lighting.

      Aneutronic Fusion: Here I am not talking about the big science ITER project taking thirty years, but the several small alternative plasma fusion efforts.

      There are three companies pursuing hydrogen-boron plasma toroid fusion, Paul Koloc, Prometheus II, Eric Lerner, Focus Fusion and Clint Seward of Electron Power Systems

      Vincent Page (a technology officer at GE!!) gave a presentation at the 05 6th symposium on current trends in international fusion research , which high lights the need to fully fund three different approaches to P-B11 fusion

      He quotes costs and time to development of P-B11 Fusion as tens of million $, and years verses the many decades and ten Billion plus $ projected for ITER and other "Big" science efforts

      Here are the links:

      http://www.electronpowersystems.com/

      A resent DOD review of EPS technology reads as follows:

      "MIT considers these plasmas a revolutionary breakthrough, with Delphi's
      chief scientist and senior manager for advanced technology both agreeing
      that EST/SPT physics are repeatable and theoretically explainable. MIT and
      EPS have jointly authored numerous professional papers describing their
      work. (Delphi is a $33B company, the spun off Delco Division of General
      Motors)."
      and
      "Cost: no cost data available. The complexity of reliable mini-toroid
      formation and acceleration with compact, relatively low-cost equipment
      remains to be determined. Yet the fact that the EPS/MIT STTR work this
      technology has attracted interest from Delphi is very significant, as the
      automotive electronics industry is considered to be extremely demanding of
      functionality per dollar and pound (e.g., mil-spec performance at
      Wal-Mart-class 'commodity' prices)."

      EPS, Electron Power Systems seems the strongest and most advanced, and I love the scalability, They propose applications as varied as home power generation@ .ooo5 cents/KWhr, cars, distributed power, airplanes, space propulsion , power storage and kinetic weapons.

      It also provides a theoretic base for ball lighting : Ball Lightning Explained as a Stable Plasma Toroid http://www.electronpowersystems.com/Images/Ball%20 Lightning%20Explained.pdf
      The theoretics are all there in peer reviewed papers. It does sound to good to be true however with names like MIT, Delphi, STTR grants, NIST grants , etc., popping up all over, I have to keep investigating.

      Recent support has also come from one of the top lightning researcher in the world, Joe Dwyer at FIT, when he got his Y-ray and X-ray research published in the May issue of Scientific American,
      http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&colI D=1&articleID=00032CE5-13B7-1264-8F9683414B7FFE9F
      Dwyer's paper:
      http://www.lightning.ece.ufl.edu/PDF/Gammarays.pdf

      and according to Clint Seward it supports his lightning models and fusion work at Electron Power Systems

      lightning produces thermonuclear reaction
      This new work By Dr.Kuzhevsky on neutrons in lightning: Russian Science News http://www.informnauka.ru/eng/2005/2005-09-13-5_65 _e.htm is also supportive of Electron Power Systems fusion efforts .

      Vincent Page (a technology officer at GE!!) gave a presentation at the 05 6th symposium on current trends in international fusion research , which high lights the need to fully fund three different approaches to P-B11 fusion (Below Is an

      --
      Erich J. Knight
    5. Re:Hmm? Something is missing by Caffeinate · · Score: 1

      Truth? You can't HANDLE the truth! {/Jack Nicholson}

      --
      Godless heathen.
  6. Having seen 'ball lightning'... by rindeee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...that isn't it. The most accurate description I can give based on the one time I witnessed it is that it looked very similar to the luminescent jellyfish that you might see when boating at night (soft glow, bluish, semi-translucent). That 'look', and the fact that what I saw seemed to 'float' (the video shows something that is most definitely not weightless as it drops and bounces about)leaves me unimpressed. I don't know what causes ball lighting (I'm sure it's rather anticlimactic whatever it is), but this isn't it. Just my two cents.

    1. Re:Having seen 'ball lightning'... by noigmn · · Score: 1, Funny

      You may not have witnessed ball lightning. Many species of extra terrestrial life have been said to look like jellyfish. An alien encounter seems far more likely by my reasoning.

      --
      Slashdot is powered by your submission.
    2. Re:Having seen 'ball lightning'... by sucker_muts · · Score: 2, Informative

      The most accurate description I can give based on the one time I witnessed it is that it looked very similar to the luminescent jellyfish that you might see when boating at night (soft glow, bluish, semi-translucent).

      Perhaps because these are tiny lab expirment ones, a real one created with an actual lightning might indeed look quite different. The substance where a real one comes from is normally not a pure silicon based thing.

      But I fear this is one of these things that are difficult to recreate accurately...

      --
      Dependency hell? => /bin/there/done/that
    3. Re:Having seen 'ball lightning'... by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of COURSE, it isn't. Because they use energies far less than involved in a real lightning, but they may have found a plausible mechanism for ball lightning.

      As I can see in the video, their fireballs move along equipotential curves, i.e. along the lines with the equal electric field. But the electric charge of concrete floor is almost zero, so ball lightning doesn't float too high. In a real thunderstorm there may be potential differenced in ranges of thousand volts per meter.

    4. Re:Having seen 'ball lightning'... by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      I believe you have witnessed his Noodliness.
      http://www.venganza.org/

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    5. Re:Having seen 'ball lightning'... by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be a bit strange if there were two entirely separate ways to cause this bizarre phenomenon? I'm sure as they experiment more they'll be able to reproduce all the variations people see.

      Hopefully we'll soon see an interesting application of this phenomenon too! (Let's just hope the military don't put it to some nasty use)

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    6. Re:Having seen 'ball lightning'... by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      There's a third option as well; maybe there are two different phenomena at work. On one had we have what these Brazilians have demonstrated, and on the other we have what you have seen.

      It could still be that with a different chemical composition the balls would behave in a different way, and lightening isn't known for being picky about where it hits. Limestone, granite or trees. - Doesn't really matter.

      Maybe analyzing the soil and comparing it to the nuances of the reports of ball lightening would yield some insight into the matter. Certainly would be enough to get a research grant. ;)

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    7. Re:Having seen 'ball lightning'... by bjelkeman · · Score: 1

      And vapourised silicate wouldn't explain ball lightning which has been seen inside aircraft which are flying. There may be more than one phenomena here as the descriptions vary quite a lot.

      --
      Akvo.org - the open source for water and sanitation
    8. Re:Having seen 'ball lightning'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As I can see in the video, their fireballs move along equipotential curves, i.e. along the lines with the equal electric field.
      As any elementary physics book can tell you, this is called the Firey Mario Effect.
    9. Re:Having seen 'ball lightning'... by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you weren't wearing flipflops like the people in the video -- yikes!

    10. Re:Having seen 'ball lightning'... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the same mechanism operating on different materials? Vaporised aluminum? Of course, if lighting is vaporizing parts of your aircraft, you'd think that'd be more noticeable. :)

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    11. Re:Having seen 'ball lightning'... by cathector · · Score: 1

      i dunno about equipotential electric field curves. i think it's far more likely the things in the video are just being batted about by random air currents. the cameraman for example is obviously running all over the place, and i'd be surprised if a flip-flops-okay 'lab' didn't have several windows open.

  7. Bigger! Like a rabbit! by skeldoy · · Score: 1

    They should have made them bigger. Much bigger. Imagine one the size of a dog/dog-rabbit, bouncing around the countryside. Hail to the ball of vaporizing silicon!

    1. Re:Bigger! Like a rabbit! by Dance_Dance_Karnov · · Score: 2, Funny

      But could Koreans eat them?

    2. Re:Bigger! Like a rabbit! by skeldoy · · Score: 1, Funny

      The Koreans could worship them! The bouncing rabbit-size balls could help Men Tah Lee iLL (or whats his name) run the country!

  8. More info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  9. I've seen ball lightening by Centurix · · Score: 2, Funny

    I recommend not using nylon sheets, an hours worth of charge really hurts.

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:I've seen ball lightening by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      So, what were you doing under the sheets?

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  10. Did that in a fireplace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A couple of years ago I tested the fireplace in our just build new house. It is a fireplace which has a glass door to prevent smoke from entering the living room. Between the door and the frame there is a gap of two millimeter wide. I had put in tropical wood, leftovers of a bridge build in our neighborhood. I had set the lever to the extreme and lots of air (oxygen) was flowing in. Suddenly there was an impressive explosion and about a dozen of these pearls flowed through the fireplace. Three of them moved towards the glass door and actually seemed to move through the glass door near the edge of it. The glass door remained intact. I wrote some reports about it and have send them to some scientists working in this field. One of the possible explanations was that the balls might have been fast rotating strings, capable of moving through the gap. It was a wonderful experience which I have not been able to recreate. It very much looks like these balls in the video

    1. Re:Did that in a fireplace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is nonsense attempting to get moderated up by the unwary. Apparently the reference to string theory was too subtle. And no it wasn't me who wrote.

      Still Anonymous Coward after 6 years.

    2. Re:Did that in a fireplace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Can you post your report/s somewhere so we can read?

    3. Re:Did that in a fireplace by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      One of the possible explanations was that the balls might have been fast rotating strings, capable of moving through the gap.

      Oh, now I suppose you'll be telling me that EVERYTHING is made of strings!

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
  11. Agrees well with some observations by rumith · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why do we suppose that all ball lightnings are generated the same way? This is a pretty strong statement as far as I can tell, without the appropriate grounds to make it. However, this particular theory definitely has a reason to live in my eyes, since it would explain generation of lightning balls at large altitude [Caucasus mountains, where they pose a threat to mountain climbers; at least one group has perished to a ball lightning-like object with only one injured survivor remaining], since silicates [particularly olivine] are abundant in Caucasian rock.

    1. Re:Agrees well with some observations by Caverock · · Score: 1

      Hi I'm the author of the theory which was being tested in the Brazilian work. They have picked on the earlier version of the theory which talked about silicon, and their test seemed to work. However the extended later theory (in Trans Roy Soc 2002) included metals also as the starting materials, and not only lightning strikes as heating events. regards John Abrahamson NZ

  12. Arc welding by Pouic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It very much looks like liquid metal balls bouncing on the floor, these are produced very often when using an electric arc welder.

    1. Re:Arc welding by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      It very much looks like liquid metal balls bouncing on the floor, these are produced very often when using an electric arc welder.

      That was my thought too - all the 'balls' dropped straight to the ground and skittled along it. Behavior perfectly consistent with sparks such as those produced by a welder - and not at all consistent with that of ball lightning which is almost always described as 'floating'.
    2. Re:Arc welding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having spent a number of years doing structural welding for a living, I have to agree that this appears to be a side effect of arc welding. Silicon is a component in the coating of many welding filler rods. Since all they are showing is the "balls" bouncing around on the floor, not showing the actual production of them and they look oddly familiar, I call shenanigans.

    3. Re:Arc welding by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You can get a very similar effect by placing a short U-shaped piece of solder into a 110 volt outlet and switching it on.

      We used to do that in electronics class in high school. We'd kill power at the breaker panel, and since all the workbenches had multiple A.C. outlets we'd put solder in all of them. When the instructor came in he'd notice the power was off and go flip the breaker. *POW* there'd be a room-filling flash of blue-white light and there would be a dozen or more hot white balls dancing across the table tops. The breaker would immediately pop of course, after multiple short circuits. Oddly, the instructor never remembered to go check the benches first before hitting the breaker: I think he liked to watch the display too.

      Still, it would be nice to see the experiment in the article run with a few hundred thousand amperes instead of only 140. And rather than using silicon wafers, use some dirt or rock from areas known to produce ball lightning. Throw some serious current at it and see what happens: silicon may or may not be a component of ball lightning but it probably isn't the only one.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Arc welding by Tatarize · · Score: 1

      Well, perhaps arc welding commonly produced balls of lightning and you never realized it. So no credit. Ever wonder why those damned arc welding balls jumped around?

      --

      It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
  13. Occupational health and safety? by DeathElk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Check out the dude's footwear! Flip flops/thongs/whatever you call 'em don't seem appropriate!

    1. Re:Occupational health and safety? by Traf-O-Data-Hater · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine who has horses calls them 'Japanese riding boots'.

    2. Re:Occupational health and safety? by dohzer · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing it was a dare.

    3. Re:Occupational health and safety? by Instine · · Score: 1

      damn. My points just expired. I would have marked you up. I was going to post this. Off Topic my arse! The guy's wareing Flip Flops while super hot gasseous structures are bouncing around at toe hight. He's clearly insane. The madder the scientist the better, is my usual take :)

      on the side note of the science involved, I don't think these things would float if they had more anergy. They seem to drop at 10m/s/s ish, regardless of size (tho admittedly they don't vary that much).

      I heard one account of a ball no bigger than these floating through a window. These don't have that kind of energy. Could they contain that much in a similar sized ball? Lots of unknowns. The only thing we do know, is if you're going to do these experiments, and you don't ware flip flops, you're a pussy! THIS is extreme science at its most radical! ;)

      --
      Because you can - or because you should?
    4. Re:Occupational health and safety? by anakin876 · · Score: 1

      People wear those things ALL the time in Brazil. They are the national default footwear. The fact that one of the researchers in the video is wearing flip flops (chinelas) in the video while throwing around super heated (and vaporized) silica is just evidence that this is really from Brazil.

    5. Re:Occupational health and safety? by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      In a lightning storm you have all sorts of crazy electrostatic fields, which could cause the strange motions and floating of ball lightning. Remember, these balls are lightweight.

    6. Re:Occupational health and safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was the default footwear in Hawaii even before that, at least since the early 80s... and probably before, it's just that I didn't move to Hawaii till 81'. I'm sure some surfers traveling between Brazil/Hawaii propagated the style. Heck, a lot of us kids wore our flipflops on our hands (and ran around barefoot, thus giving us the infamous "Hawaiian feet")) cause "they made us run faster". After running track though, I think there was merit to that because it caused you to run with proper hand/arm form.

  14. Big deal by iamdrscience · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They've been selling lightning balls at Radio Shack for years now.

    1. Re:Big deal by Falladir · · Score: 1

      har har har.

  15. ...Only different by Genda · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This isn't ball lightning, what's happening here is mostly oxidation...
    I remember as a kid, attaching some extra thin solder wire between a couple nails in a small piece of scrap wood attached to a power cord. Plug the cord into the outlet and the solder would explode in a shower of sparks. I'd do this on sheets of butcher paper, because the solder sparks would hit the paper, incandescent white, and bounce around just like the silicon in this demonstration (probably burning both the flux and some of the lead in the solder) leaving behind these intricate little trails all over the paper. At the end, you'd find these tiny little balls of solder (typically 0.4-0.8 mm.) Point is, you'd ionize a little metal, and get that metal (lead or silicon it doesn't matter) to oxidize, and there's clearly a ball of vaporized metal surrounding the burning bit at the middle, but this is not by any stretch anything like ball lightening.

    1. Re:...Only different by daveling · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought the same, ball lightning is supposed to fly, this looks much like sparks from a TIG or MIG welder, albeit a little more sophisticated, it also doesn't have the properties described of ball lightning, i.e. attracted to electrical sources (sometimes).

      When I was young my Mum saw ball lightning and described it, it flew across the backyard and zeroed in on our power board. The next morning I had a look and there were no scorch marks on the board, very odd.

      I always thought the best possibility for ball lightning was a plasma ball (ionized air), no weight, whereas this has weight, the silicone in the ball and so can't fly. The silicone is ionized though so it probably qualifies as a plasma?

    2. Re:...Only different by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      Did you just claim silicon was a metal?

      It's not, that's why electronic circuits are printed to it, it's a good insulator. The circuits themselves are copper.

    3. Re:...Only different by fxxkin$ · · Score: 1

      "It's not, that's why electronic circuits are printed to it, it's a good insulator. The circuits themselves are copper."

      Umm.... No, silicon is a semiconductor. Your transistors, diodes IC's etc are made from it. The interconnects may be made from copper tho

    4. Re:...Only different by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      It's still not a metal.

    5. Re:...Only different by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      actually its not a good insulator, it is a semi-conductor, which is the reason it is used to make transistors, because its conductivity can be modified to give it a switching effect.

    6. Re:...Only different by Amonnil · · Score: 1

      You're right. Silicon is a metalloid.

    7. Re:...Only different by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      BTW, silicone and silicon are not the same thing.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    8. Re:...Only different by Caverock · · Score: 1

      Hi, I am the author of the theory being tested by the Brazilian work. Yes your comments about the balls being like liquid balls of molten metal are good ones, except that the observed balls are up to 40 mm in diameter, well above any molten metal balls anyone has seen. We think that these balls are much lighter, and the expected oxidation is spread throughout the ball, on small particles, in this case of silicon. John Abrahamson, NZ

  16. this is NOT it... by Brane2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Judging from published photos and descriptions of ball lightning phenomena and copy of the video on youtube, this is far from ball lighting.

    These things hover over the concrete floor and look like sizzling droplets that can spray around sometimes when welding. It is not unusual to see such hovering drops as they vaporize water in the floor beneath them and so create some kind of gas cushion- hovercraft effect.

    Genuine ball lightnings has been reported able to hover in the air, sometimes at considerable height and it was not always blindingly bright...

    1. Re:this is NOT it... by javaxjb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wouldn't be so quick to discount this as a major source of many instances of ball lightning. For starters, Silicon is the most common solid element on Earth, so there is plenty around. And I see no reason to think that Silicon would be the only element or molecule that could produce this effect. Also, the experimenters are also dealing with much less energy than a real lightning strike and much purer silicon than lightning would hit. Given higher energy (heat) and less silicon you might see something that would float more. This reminds me of something I saw years ago that wasn't quite ball lightning but had similarities. My wife and I were driving along some major power lines in Bloomington, IN, when lightning struck a transformer behind us (I saw it in the rear view mirror). A glowing, greenish ball streaked down one of the lines and passed our car leaving a long, thick trail behind. It was much like a cross between a phaser and photon torpedo effect in Star Trek... very cool. I'm not sure if there's much silicon in a transformer, but copper might explain the green color.

      --
      Programmers in mirror are brighter than they appear
  17. I want names by lohphat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Scientists have devised numerous possible explanations, including mini black holes left over from the Big Bang"

    I want their names -- show me a scientist who would publicly postulate this.

    1. Re:I want names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had actually read the article they have a link to the article about it.

    2. Re:I want names by Quelain · · Score: 4, Informative

      That sounds like this New Scientist article:

      http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/m g19225831.700

      The same guy also talks about ball lightning due to neutrinos here:

      http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=88edua 1k

      --
      Cthulhu loves you.
    3. Re:I want names by phyruxus · · Score: 1

      Stan Lee comes to mind.

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
      "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  18. inventing things out of order by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Magic Missile should've been invented first! It's gonna take forever for me to get enough experience to get this...

    1. Re:inventing things out of order by Barny · · Score: 4, Funny

      What amazed me was that they cast it without using any red mana!

      Bloody type one decks :/

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:inventing things out of order by Arker · · Score: 1

      Magic missile was invented LONG ago man, where you been?

      Here is one of the earliest versions.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    3. Re:inventing things out of order by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Actually this DID coinside with a minor earth quake in the rocky mountains, which some speculate is due to three seperate mountains twisting.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  19. Very simple by davros-too · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "To test this idea, a [Brazilian] team... took wafers of silicon just 350 micrometers thick, placed them between two electrodes and zapped them with currents of up to 140 amps. Then... they moved the electrodes slightly apart, creating an electrical arc that vaporised the silicon". Translation: using standard arc welding equipment with the current turned to max, the team zapped the crap out of some bits of silicon which were lying around and took a *very* amateur video, not even bothering to put on sensible footwear...

    Having said that, the NewScientist article says the results will appear in the high-prestige journal Physical Review Letters, which gives this work credibility - if true.

    --
    In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice; in practice there is.
  20. How big is it? by JonathanR · · Score: 1

    I guess it depends on how big your micrometer is.

  21. I'm pretty sure by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Informative

    that no scientist has ever proposed singularities as the source of ball lightning.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:I'm pretty sure by Simetrical · · Score: 1

      [I'm pretty sure] that no scientist has ever proposed singularities as the source of ball lightning.

      I'm pretty sure that Dr. Pace VanDevender, Vice President Emeritus of Sandia National Laboratories, with a Ph.D. in physics from the Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London, counts as a scientist. He also has proposed singularities as the source of ball lightning, although he's not exactly confident (source requires subscription):

      VanDevender himself knows it's on the wild side. "This is a long string of what-ifs," he admits, "it's very loosey-goosey." He reckons the odds of mini black holes existing are 1 in 10, the odds of catching one, maybe 1 in 1000, if he's optimistic. And that's what he wants to do: catch a black hole. "After stewing on it for years, I decided I did not want to die without knowing whether it was or was not real," he says.
      --
      MediaWiki developer, Total War Center sysadmin
    2. Re:I'm pretty sure by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      He thinks he can "know [they're] not real" by... failing to find them? Well, a lot of people go from science into entertainment these days.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  22. Old hat? by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

    I was surprised that artificial ball lightning is considered so elusive. I thought it could be done in a Microwave oven. I'm sure I can remember some more serious experiments being reported on Slashdot too. Maybe someone can find them.

    1. Re:Old hat? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I saw it on TV 20 years ago. It's really easy - if you simulate lightning (there are whole warehouses built that can do this) then occasinally you will get something exactly like the effect shown.

    2. Re:Old hat? by madaxe42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yep - easiest way to make ball lightning - light a wide based candle, without any metal in it (no tea-lights!), place it in the microwave, in the middle of the plate. Nuke. Plasma ball appears, candle goes out, and plasma ball remains. Turn off microwave, the plasma stays a few seconds, before descending back into the candle.

  23. Hmmmm... by 8ball629 · · Score: 1

    Lightning gun time!!!

  24. Still not right by mustafap · · Score: 4, Interesting


    This is no explaination for the phenomenon. Soil? Lasting 8 seconds?

    I have a personal experience of ball lighting and it completely contradicts the results suggested.

    I was 10 years old ( 32 years ago ) living in an urban town in Crawley, UK. There was a heavy thunderstorm - which I should point out would be a minor storm relative to other countries. It was about 9pm at night.

    My brother and I had been in bed in our rooms when my mother came up to us and brought us downstairs. She saw visibly upset by something ( I still recall the event clearly now, for that reason ).

    Her explaination was that she had been reading when she saw a ball of light, about the size of a grapefruit, arise slowly from the telephone. It hovered at about chest height for a while and hen slow drift towards the closed kitchen door. It dissipated when it came into contact with the door.

    That description doesn't tie up with a bit of soil igniting and burning for a few seconds.

    I don't believe there is anything mystical about this phenomenon but I don't buy this work as being an explaination for it.

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    1. Re:Still not right by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 1

      My friend's parents saw something similar to this happen during dinner at the family dinner table. Like you said, I recall being told it was about the size of a grapefruit and it floated about, hovering over the table in front of the two of them. I think it descended from overhead light and returned after several seconds, but I don't remember the details clearly.

      --
      +0 Meh
    2. Re:Still not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it could still be correct. A strong enough electrical field could lift dust or even a small amount material from the surface of the phone (which likely has a wired connection to something that easily could have been hit by lighting and/or a lighting strike generated a current in the phone wiring via induction). Similar in nature what they did.

      Puffs of dust will tend to scatter because of browning motion but they also may stay semi-coherent due to static charges between dust particles. With a small of light hitting the particles they could visually appear to glow.... heck they could even be heated enough to glow on there own however I doubt that happened in that case you described.

    3. Re:Still not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I have a personal experience of ball lighting and it completely contradicts the results suggested.

      How is your mother's story "personal experience"?

    4. Re:Still not right by mustafap · · Score: 1

      Because I was in the room next door, and the same room 30 seconds later.

      Would you like me to draw a picture for you?

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    5. Re:Still not right by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I understand what you mean about it being a personal experience with ball lightning, but he has a (technical) point.

      Wish I'd seen it. I bet it's an inspiring sight.

    6. Re:Still not right by mustafap · · Score: 1

      >Wish I'd seen it. I bet it's an inspiring sight.

      Yea. I'd imagine the temptation to touch it would be enormous. So maybe it was better I hadn't seen it :o)

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    7. Re:Still not right by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      Because I was in the room next door, and the same room 30 seconds later. Would you like me to draw a picture for you?

      Right. You were in the next room. In bed. You had no personal experience with the ball lightning. So I assume it would be difficult for you to draw a picture.

      On a similar note, stories abound wherein people are visited by ghosts. Many times these stories begin with "I was lying in bed, almost asleep, when all of a sudden a figure appeared..." Very rarely do they begin with, "I was in the basement, working out with weights and listening to loud music, when all of a sudden..." The only evidence of the ghost episode is anecdotal. Occam's razor would suggest that, despite protestations to the contrary, the witness was in fact asleep.

      So I'm not saying that your mother made up her story, or that it didn't happen the way she said it did. It may have taken place exactly as you describe. Because you're not an eyewitness, however, you can't really say.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    8. Re:Still not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct that what was offered here is not evidence of ball lightening. Your experience is more in line with what I witnessed that was clearly a natural phenomena. The year was 1962 and like your encounter - it was just after/during a strong thunderstorm. I was at my cousin's house at the New Jersey shore - we were watching this great thunderstorm from the safety of the enclosed porch when a bolt of lightening came crashing down and split a willow tree in two about 300 yards from us.

      We were so amazed by this sight of a 200 year old tree being split in two from top to roots in a bright flash of steam, flame and smoke and with such a large crash it shook the house and our confidence.

      We retreated to the 'safety' my cousin's bedroom only to observe some minutes later this glowing sphere, about the size of a basketball bouncing along the neighbor's roof some 10 meters away along the gutter - no sound, just the eerie glowing light. Well, the ball bounced along the gutter for about 20 seconds until it reached the front corner of the house where it found the downspout at which time it shot down the downspout, raced across the lawn and straight up a telephone pole and took out a pole-keg power transformer with a huge explosion.

      When I described the scene to my Dad, who was a B-17 and B-29 pilot in WW-II, he said - you saw St. Elmo's fire...
      Now _that_ is ball lightening!

    9. Re:Still not right by NTesla · · Score: 1

      You've seen one of the biggest ball lightnings...and were lucky that it didn't flow into or through your window. From what I've read, it could be plasma (superheated gas) that can do a lot of damage.
      I saw one when I was around 11 at a resort on the Black sea in Russia. Shortly after a storm we went outside to play and were shocked to see a reddidh-yellow sphere and about basketball-size floating at 60 feet in the air. We were afraid it was heading for us but fortunately there was a lightning rod to the left of its descent. It curved towards it at about one foot per second and made contact with the rod. Explosion followed and was so loud that the entire camp heard it. We weren't able to find any residue but we did smell molten iron at the bottom of the lightning rod.
      I've heard stories of ball lightning bouncing on the streets before but didn't think it was true since I thought it would explode on contact.

  25. *cough* *cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    since silicates [particularly olivine] are abundant in Caucasian rock.

    I'd call it more of a mulatto.

    1. Re:*cough* *cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he's half black, half Samoan.

  26. right... by fester2001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the real question is why would you be waring thongs with burning balls running around your feet

  27. Dude! by JohnnyOpcode · · Score: 1

    It's a quantum space-time effect, you people just don't know it yet! Once you figure this out, the human race will finally be a spacefaring species. Go back to sleep, nothing to see here except ball lightning videos.

  28. Re:Brazil? Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And just how are we supposed to know that [...] the results were not influenced by the Third World filth [...]

    [...] get these results reproduced in America. [...]
    For your information, Brazil is in America, more precisely in South America. You may have been thinking of the USA. Oh, by the way, "in 2004, according to the official measure, 12.7 percent of the total U.S. population lived in poverty", according to the Institute for Research on Poverty. See Who was poor in 2004?
  29. Re:Obligatory statement by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    I guess you eunux greybeards knew all about that...once.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  30. America by mangu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, Brazil is part of the original America, the USA isn't. Amerigo Vespucci, for whom the continents are named, never visited North America, his travels were limited to the coast of what is now Brazil, Uruguay, and Argentina. In the first maps of the "new world" only the southern continent had a name and it was "America".

  31. Safety shoes by ocp · · Score: 1

    Did anyone notice the 'safety shoes' that one of the researches is wearing in the lab (see video) while doing experiments with molten silicon??????

  32. Oo by Konster · · Score: 1

    Light + crappy lens = why bother?

    Slashdot hoping to be Digg now?

  33. Re:Brazil? Give me a break by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1
    For your information, Brazil is in America, more precisely in South America.
    As much as I disagree with the racist asshole, I think he's right about America. Although Americo Vespucio named the continent America (in spanish), the custom in English is to call the continent "the Americas" and the country "America". It's just a convention.
    --
    Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  34. This has been done for over 2 decades already by InterGuru · · Score: 3, Informative
    Twenty years ago I visited Paul M. Koloc in his garage in College Park Md., watching his Plasmak machine produce ball lightning. He is still working on and improving it.


    Check it out at here .

    1. Re:This has been done for over 2 decades already by marleyboy · · Score: 1

      Visited the site, some very interesting stuff. I see that he's sent stuff to NASA regarding his technology, and that there's lots of work being done. I guess my question is, how much of this is being pursued by people with money and making it a reality? How long until the basics of the plasma state is taught in elementary schools?

      --
      Neutiquam erro
  35. Not Ball Lighting by mrshowtime · · Score: 1

    Ball lightning has nothing to do with soil, or the earth, in any way. There have been reports of ball lightning passing through Jumbo Jet airliners like an errant ghost and just about every report has heralded ball lightning's ability to hover or simply pass through objects. What the Brazilian labs have done seems to me to have created "Jumping Jacks."

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
    1. Re:Not Ball Lighting by Warshadow · · Score: 1

      Ball lightning has nothing to do with soil, or the earth, in any way. There have been reports of ball lightning passing through Jumbo Jet airliners like an errant ghost and just about every report has heralded ball lightning's ability to hover or simply pass through objects. What the Brazilian labs have done seems to me to have created "Jumping Jacks."

      Yep, when my father was still flying with the Navy he mentioned this happening to them and other crews.

  36. Recreate on bigger scale! by Nappa48 · · Score: 1

    Haha, i can't believe they were wearing sandals! You ..oh wow what the hell...
    Maybe if they recreate this on a bigger scale using those "lightning generators" used to test things. Maybe we will get floaters then! haha..oh damnit.


    Anyway, screw this wannabe ball-lightning, i want to know what that flash in the sky was that turned 2.30AM into 11.30AM and killed the power to my town!
    And this lasted for like 3 seconds as well! I can't put it into any category of "lightning"...

    1. Re:Recreate on bigger scale! by Brianwa · · Score: 1

      Anyway, screw this wannabe ball-lightning, i want to know what that flash in the sky was that turned 2.30AM into 11.30AM and killed the power to my town! And this lasted for like 3 seconds as well! I can't put it into any category of "lightning"... Probably a major power line arcing out - it can take the breakers several seconds to kill it. I live a mile or two away from a major substation, so I occasionally get to witness such events.
  37. OMG by robinvanleeuwen · · Score: 1

    OMG It's intelligent! See that at 20 seconds into the movie tries to go over the
    cable but bumps back he tries again but this time it jumps over! It has learned!!!

    I for one... nah... i don't...

    --
    If you don't like my sig then don't read it.
  38. Re:Obligatory statement by Joebert · · Score: 1

    I don't know what's worse, the smell of singed hairs, or the embarrassment of coloring them blonde.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  39. Appropriate Footwear? by Freddles · · Score: 1

    Hmm, flip flops. I'm thinking a more conservative approach to footwear might have been appropriate. What with all that vaporized silicon bouncing around his toes.

  40. Nikola Tesla... by Warshadow · · Score: 1

    Nikola Tesla is documented to have done this 'round about the turn of the century. He used to black out a goodportion of Colorado when he started playing around in his Colorado Springs lab.

  41. Not ball lightning by TheCoop1984 · · Score: 1

    This isn't the ball lightning as created by proper thunderstorms. Silicon vapour can't pass through glass without breaking it, as far as I know...

    --
    95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)
  42. It's what the girls say to me : You got some balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's what the girls say to me : You got some ball lightning !!!!!!

  43. The Boxen by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am just a Sun Blade and my story's seldom told
    I have squandered my existence on some packets full of numbers such are data files
    All porn and jest
    Still the NAT hears what it wants to hear
    and access denies the rest
    Oh yes, access denies the rest

    In the NOC there stands a boxen
    and a server by its trade
    and it carries the reminders
    of every luser guest that logged on
    and downloaded till it cried out
    in its full Slashdotted shame
    "My CPU is burning, but the hard drive still remains"
    Yes, the data still remains . . .

    Dee oh Ees *kissssssh*
    Dee oh, Dee oh, Dee oh Ees
    Dee oh Ees *kissssssh*
    Dee oh, Dee oh, Dee oh, Dee oh, Dee oh Ees

    KFG

    1. Re:The Boxen by Auntie+Virus · · Score: 1

      And me without mod points.

      --
      Why yes, I *AM* new here. Why?
    2. Re:The Boxen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice, is this based on some other lyric?

    3. Re:The Boxen by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .is this based on some other lyric?

      You must new here; and I don't mean at Slashdot.

      It's a parody of Paul Simon's "The Boxer":

      The Boxer Lyric

      Normally I just toss these things out as stream of conciousness fragments and then forget about them, but I might save this one and do a proper workup of it. It seems to have potential.

      KFG

    4. Re:The Boxen by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Really, Really well done. Thanks

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  44. Flipflops?! by guywcole · · Score: 1

    Who the hell wears FLIP FLOPS (aks- sandals/click-clacks/slippers) in a physics lab? let alone a lab where there's super-hot materials bouncing around?

    1. Re:Flipflops?! by gbulmash · · Score: 1

      Brazilians, apparently.

    2. Re:Flipflops?! by kayditty · · Score: 2, Funny

      how many is a brazilian?

    3. Re:Flipflops?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "how many is a brazilian?"

      Yes, and How Long is a chinaman.

  45. Other obligatory comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call one of mine ball lightning, the other testicular thunder.

  46. one throught the house in Margate, FL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These balls are real. My wife had one come through their house, right down the hall. She was a teenager in Margate, FL (would have been in the late '70s). She's not here so I can't get a better description but it scared the heck out of them.

  47. not ball lightning by eagl · · Score: 0, Troll

    The stuff in that movie isn't ball lightning... It's just burning stuff bouncing around on the floor.

  48. it reminds me of... by Eto_Demerzel79 · · Score: 1
    ...liquid nitrogen scurrying around the floor, which may indicate that it depends on vapors being emitted from the "ball."

    also, anyone else find this funny:
    He said the surfaces emitted little jets that seemed to jerk them forward or sideways, as well as smoke trails that formed spiral shapes, suggesting the balls spun. The balls were hot enough to melt plastic and burn a hole in his jeans .

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/index.php?feed=Sci ence&article=UPI-1-20070112-15001500-bc-brazil-bal llightning.xml
  49. that's the real reason Brazil blocked Youtube: by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

    They didn't want this technology to reach greedy foreigners hands. Mwahahahah! Now that the blockade is lifted everyone will be able to develop his own ping-pong sized electric ball of death and... humm... do something with it.

    --
    Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
  50. Re:Brazil? Give me a break by 313373_bot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ok, the experiment will be performed and properly validated, in a North-American (Usian) university, by super-intelligent and hard-working Indian and Chinese graduate students.

    --
    ^[:q!
  51. Re:Obligatory statement by anagama · · Score: 1

    your right but cut me some slack -- it was well after midnight.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  52. This happened to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    during love-making and it upset my girlfriend, so I had to shave.

  53. The next obvious step by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Funny

    A ball lightning gun!

  54. Interesting conversion by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Funny

    True. An interesting side effect of all of this is that we now know that 3 red mana = 140 amps.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  55. Fireballs from burning tin by AndreyFilippov · · Score: 1

    You can make nice fireballs about 5mm in diameter that live for several seconds and bounce. I did that in two ways:
    - lit the tin foil (tin, not aluminum) with electrical arc and
    - melt tin in a piece of glass tube, hit it so the glass is really liquid an then shake off the drop of tin so far protected from the air by melted glass - it will ignite when exposed to air.
    In both cases you will get a nice jumping fireball. If you release it over paper slope it will leave brown spots with varying distances between them demonstrating the acceleration.

  56. Google Slashdotted by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 0

    Doesn't seem to want to buffer.. but maybe it's just my connection?
    Definitely seems like Google video has been slashdotted as well.

  57. Groundbreaking discovery by pi8you · · Score: 1

    They sure did figure out how to recreate it, only you might not want to watch for it in the sky

  58. sandals by highacnumber · · Score: 1

    Its awesome that those lightning balls are running around the floor, over wires, past the sandaled feet (!) of the researchers.

  59. Nobody says this *is* ball lightning by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    TFA says "... similar to ball lightning...". TFH (TF headline) gets it wrong and says this is ball lightning. Yet another case of a hyping headling. I'm getting pretty tired of these lame hypes which make claims in excess of what the people in the lab are. We crap on stupid printed media journalists, why should we tolerate the same from /.?

    Just because someone in a lab makes a ball of feathers that quacks does not mean that they have made a duck!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Nobody says this *is* ball lightning by gbulmash · · Score: 1
      Just because someone in a lab makes a ball of feathers that quacks does not mean that they have made a duck!


      If it passes the duck test, it would be pretty reasonable to call it a duck, even if it were a cygnet that merely resembled an ugly young duck.

      - Greg
    2. Re:Nobody says this *is* ball lightning by timeOday · · Score: 1

      In what way is this not ball lighting? AFAIK, ball lightning exists only as a description and not a specific cause... until now.

  60. Ball of Lighting Pt 2 by madsheep · · Score: 1

    Now imagine when they create a version of this with a twenty-foot long circumference and they test it on your neighborhood! That would be shocking to see. :P

  61. Pace VanDevender by brian0918 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Pace VanDevender, a plasma physicist who used to be the VP of the organization I worked in at Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque, NM. He gave a fascinating talk on ball lightning a couple summers ago, and he seems like an all-round brilliant guy. As for the ball lightning created in the Brazilian lab, this doesn't seem to have any of the physical properties of observed ball lightning (except that it's a glowing ball). The ball lightning that has been observed is much larger (up to a meter or more wide), lasts for much longer (minutes/hours), seems to float or move in *any* direction at "will" (unlike this stuff, which just moves like a marble dropped on the floor), and most importantly, is capable of seemingly passing through some objects while completely obliterating others. One possibility is that there are multiple classes of what we would call "ball lightning", each with their own unrelated cause.

  62. Mod above offtopic astroturf by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Electricity too cheap to meter too! In all those off topic links you forgot the important one about using the oil from snakes.

  63. Flight EA539 by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Nothing new...

    There have ALWAYS been numerous theories, and numerous tests, which could explain a FEW of the properties of ball lightning, but never ALL of them.

    A gas ball sounds good, except for numerous accounts of ball lightning traveling THROUGH solid objects (comming out the other side) all without causing ANY damage to the stationary object at all. How does burning silicon gas do that?

    How does this burning gas ball slowly float inches away from people, and not cause them to feel the intense heat from the object?

    And how does silicon gas (from a ground lightning strike) suddenly appear floating down the isle of a commercial aircraft in-flight?


    March 19, 1963
    Eastern Airlines Flight EA539
    From New York to Washington

    Five minutes past midnight, the plane encountered a storm. There's a loud bang and a bright flash. Seconds later a glowing ball emerges from the pilots cabin. The blue light ball hovers above the isle and floats slowly towards the rear of the plane. It reaches the back of the plane and vanishes. Remarkably, the plane continues unharmed.
    (National Geographic: Naked Science)

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  64. 8 seconds by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    The 8 seconds the balls in this experiment lasted is 8 seconds more than they have lasted in previous experiments (where the lifetime has been measured in milliseconds).

  65. Your observation and others too by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    I've seen reports of ball lightning seen from airplanes, and some witnesses claim to have seen it move through solid objects. A theory of ball lightning either has to propose a different mechanism from the silicon hypothesis or else dismiss the reports as mistaken.

  66. ball lightening by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Is ball lightning supposed to bounce around the ground like that? I thought it floated. 'Course, I could be mistaken.

    From what I recall Nikola Tesla was able to get ball lightning to both float and bounce around. Then again he was able to do a lot of different "amazing" things, like getting people to think an earthquake was hitting New York.

    Falcon
  67. St. Elmo's fire by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    He said nothing about seeing Emilio Estevez on the fence.

    How about Rob Lowe, Andrew McCarthy, Demi Moore or any of the others?

    Falcon
  68. Re:Brazil? Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it isn't. "The Americas" is two continents: North America and South America. So Brazil is in the Americas, and in South America, but not in America.

  69. How Appropriate by pln2bz · · Score: 0

    I love the fact that people believed that ball lightning was caused by mini black holes. It's such a sign of the times that people would look at something that's obviously some sort of plasma phenomenon and imagine that it's a black hole ... that people would use their idealized non-resistive mathematical magnetohydrodynamic plasma models that lead to concepts like black holes and dark matter in space to try to describe real world objects that clearly have more to do with plasma. People don't realize that we can describe the entire universe with just the non-idealized properties of plasma *without* the need for things like black holes. Black holes are the result of *ignoring* electricity over plasma in space. In order to compensate for the idealization that plasma in space is not conducting electricity, you have to assume a virtually infinite mass to describe some objects in space. But if you drop the assumption that plasma in space is an ideal conductor with frozen-in magnetic fields, you end up with plasma that can exert electrical forces upon matter in space. And since plasma represents the state of 99%+ of all observable matter in space, this idealization leads to a very significant error term -- in fact, around 95%.

    Anybody who is interested in space today needs to learn about plasma. You cannot understand the universe without understanding plasma because the universe basically *is* plasma. The only parts that are *not* plasma are the rocky bodies in space like the planets and the asteroids. If you see articles about space that are not referring specifically to plasma, then it is likely bullshit. There is nothing important happening in space that has anything to do with gases or collections of gas and dust because plasma acts differently than those things. Namely, it includes ions and electrons, which obviously can conduct electricity. It is our (unfortunate) choice to ignore this fact in astrophysics and space articles today.

    If people were in the mood to learn from their mistakes, they'd see that it was silly that anybody ever even proposed that mini black holes were causing ball lightning and they might reflect on whether or not this same type of mistake might be happening for bigger balls of plasma in space. As is, it currently appears that people are in denial about plasma's role in the universe. So long as that represents the mood of amateur and professional scientists, there will continue to be mysterious forces and dark particles within the universe and we will continue to be surprised by our observations of electricity over filamentary plasmas in space.

    People are getting far too caught up in blacklisting theories because they are out of the mainstream. It's not important that it's called Electric Universe Theory or Plasma Cosmology, or that there aren't many other people who believe in it. Science should not be a popularity contest. What's important is the science that it is based upon. EU Theory and Plasma Cosmology are based upon non-idealized plasma physics. Traditional astrophysics today is based upon an idealized form of plasma physics called magnetohydrodynamics. There is no good reason to assume that electricity does not flow in space over plasma. However, there are decades of research in plasma physics that suggest that in fact electricity can and does flow over plasma in space, and once you take this into consideration, things like black holes are unnecessary. When people call EU Theory a pseudoscience like creationism or UFO's, they're basically stating that they do not believe that astrophysics should have to pay any attention to plasma physics when it doesn't suit their gravity-centric conceptions for the universe. We do not in fact have the luxury of cherry-picking the laws of nature. The laboratory tells us how plasma operates and our job is to learn from it and apply what we learn in the laboratory to our observations of space. Just because astrophysicists currently like the idea of black holes and don't like the idea of electricity over plasma in space doesn't mean that they are right to choose the black hole explanation. Many intelligent people have warned that this is a huge mistake. Time will prove them right.

    --
    "A man cannot begin to learn that which he thinks he already knows." --Epictetus, 1st Century A.D.
  70. This reminds me of something... by TropicalCoder · · Score: 1
    Star Trek - The Next Generation, Episode 27: The Child (1987)

    With a scene that's much sexier than it has any right to be, a Tinkerbell-like spark enters the ship, finds a sleeping Deanna Troi (Marina Sirtis), moves under her covers, and impregnates her. The alien baby starts to grow much faster than a normal gestation period, shrinking the time frame down to a couple of days. Worf wants to terminate the pregnancy, Data wants to study the life form, and Troi decides to keep the baby no matter what anyone thinks. Once born, the boy continues its rapid growth, but is discovered to have an adverse effect on the specimens of a dangerous plasma plague they are carrying to a scientific research facility. None too subtly, the whole episode explores ideas about family.

    While preparing to transport samples of a lethal plasma plague, the crew receives some startling news: Counselor Troi (Marina Sirtis) is pregnant.

    According to Troi, she was impregnated by a glowing white light. The ship's new Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Kate Pulaski (Diana Muldaur), watches in amazement as Troi gives birth to Ian, a half-human, half-Betazoid boy who ages eight years in one day.

  71. Re:Brazil? Give me a break by 313373_bot · · Score: 0

    To the anonymous moderator: troll? Maybe. Flamebait? No. Ironic? Yes.

    --
    ^[:q!
  72. Previous Examples of Lab-Created Ball Lightning by Pooua · · Score: 1

    "Scientists have devised numerous possible explanations, including mini black holes left over from the Big Bang, but have had little success in producing working examples." Really? Hmm...

    "Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics and the Humboldt University, both in Berlin, have used underwater electrical discharges to generate luminous plasma clouds resembling ball lightning that last for nearly half a second and are up to 20 centimetres across."

    Physicists create great balls of fire 07 June 2006

    "Now, however, researchers in Israel have built a system that can create lightning balls in the lab."

    Great balls of lightning 9 February 2006

    --
    Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  73. Re:Brazil? Give me a break by electronspiraltoroid · · Score: 1

    Hmm. I'm also looking into this, and the phenomenon seen here does seem to be unusually luminous even for burning silicon.

    Its possible that there are several forms of "ball lightning" and what they have discovered is one of those forms.

    However, charging the floor with a high voltage (say 8KV) would be a logical next step to see if the free floating type can be duplicated, given that an electrostatic repulsion effect may be in operation.

    Also, an additional improvement would be to rapidly spin the vaporised silicon using an axial magnetic field, in the same way as a plasma cutter does.

    -A

    --
    "Bother" said Pooh, as he was dipped in bees...
  74. Japanese folks know this for a long time... by Godkar · · Score: 1

    Hadouken!

    --
    Is "no" the answer to this question?
    1. Re:Japanese folks know this for a long time... by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Ha.

  75. Re:Brazil? Give me a break by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1
    So Brazil is in the Americas, and in South America, but not in America.
    That's what I said. Unless you disagree in that the Americas are a continent rather than many. Since that discussion has been proven futile in slashdot, may I suggest we discuss something else, like the gender of angels or whether the Gioconda should be displayed in Italy?
    --
    Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  76. Re:Obligatory statement by Arker · · Score: 1

    Dude, I wasn't ragging on you, I was making riffing off you. It's a joke. Read it again.

    And check out the -1 redundant. Some moderators really seem to have no clue. Troll or flamebait I could see, given that the joke seems to have flown right over everyone's head. But redundant? Whoever moderated that should be forced to write the definition of redundant on the blackboard a few hundred times so maybe they'll remember it.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  77. Sandals by wsanders · · Score: 1

    I like it that the experimenters appear to be wearing sandals while their white-hot spicy balls fizzle around on the floor. Sacrifice for Science!

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  78. Summer Camp by ruben.gutierrez · · Score: 1

    This phenomena has been demonstrated for years at summer camps all over the world. It's called a Wintogreen Lifesaver.