Slashdot Mirror


January Game Sales Explode, Wii Dominates

njkid1, as he does from time to time, passed us a link to a story on the GameDaily site. Today they're discussing the January NPD numbers for the games industry. In short, they're terrific. Software sales totaled $549 million for the month, up a staggering 53 percent over last year. Hardware sales were brisk as well, with the Wii selling around 436,000 units. Trailing behind were Microsoft and Sony, with 360 hitting 294,000 units sold and the PS3 selling 244,000 units. January had an extra week, which resulted in 'inflated' sales, but even after normalizing the data things were tremendous for the games industry in a month where there's normally a post-holiday slump.

71 of 478 comments (clear)

  1. Troubling for Sony by Itchyeyes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sales wise, Sony has a problem. They've sold fewer units than either of their competitors and they're selling them at a slower rate, which means that gulf will only increase. If this continues, more and more franchises that were exclusive to Sony will move to become multi platform. Assassin's Creed, GTA, and VF have already done so. The PS3 may be a great system with great games, but from a sales perspective their situation is dire.

    If Nintendo keeps numbers like this up though, the PS3/360 debate becomes moot. They would be the undisputed sales leader by the middle of next year. Even the PS2 rarely broke 400,000 units during a non-holiday-season month. And who knows what they Wii sales figures would be if they could keep up with demand.

    1. Re:Troubling for Sony by Lane.exe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most games I've seen on Gamespot and IGN that I am interest in are listed as coming out for the PS3 have X360 versions as well (Armored Core 4, Bladestorm, etc.). In fact, if Square will move Final Fantasy XIII to the X360 (or even the Wii) then I would have absolutely zero reason to buy a PS3. A developer shift to other platforms would devastate Sony in the console market.

      --
      IAALS.
    2. Re:Troubling for Sony by jackharrer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sony thought that PS2 will sell PS3. And that would happened if not that they put prices well over the limit.
      Wii is a winner because people CAN afford it. Exactly the same happened with "inferior" Nintendo DS. Strange that Sony didn't learn the lesson.

      --

      "an experienced, industrious, ambitious, and often, quite often, picturesque liar" - Mark Twain
    3. Re:Troubling for Sony by Sacrelicious2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As far as the 'low' sales figure for the xbox 360, remember, unlike the wii/ps3, it has already been out for about 16 months, compared to 3-4 months. The fact that the Xbox 360 is STILL outselling the PS3 is quite amazing

    4. Re:Troubling for Sony by Itchyeyes · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, I considered it. These numbers are US and Canada only, so the comparison is perfectly apt. NPD does not monitor oversees sales figures. In Japan, the numbers are actually worse for Sony. I think this article sums up the situation well. As for Europe, the fact that they haven't released yet there is a bad thing, not an excuse. It would be better for the PS3 to be selling poorly in Europe at this point rather than not selling at all.

    5. Re:Troubling for Sony by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sony has a problem. They've sold fewer units than either of their competitors and they're selling them at a slower rate It's not that bad. They make a loss on each one they sell, so the fact that they are selling fewer of them means they aren't making as much of a loss as they could be...
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Troubling for Sony by trdrstv · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Dude, you have to be insane if you think Square is going to move Final Fantasy XIII to the Wii.

      Yeah, it would be as crazy/ impossible as them moving Dragon Quest to the DS.

      oh, wait.

    7. Re:Troubling for Sony by trdrstv · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The FF series from 7 onward have had a pretty huge focus on eye-candy. Its pretty hard for me to imagine the main line of FF games moving to any console that doesn't support HD resolutions from this point onward.

      ROFLOL. Sorry, that's been one of my pet peeves for some time now. Check the box again. As pretty as they look none of the FF games (or Kingsdom Hearts) run in progressive scan (at least on the PS2). Some run in 16:9 widescreen, but they are all 480i.

      FFXI is 480p on the X-box 360, and if you run Kingdom Hearts "Chain of Memories" through the Gameboy player you can get 480p on that.

      The Wii at 480p seems right in line with the focus they've been given in the past.

    8. Re:Troubling for Sony by dank+zappingly · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I guess I don't see it the way you do. I would argue that for a $600 console with one exclusive title worth playing, it is selling pretty darn well. After they iron out the bugs and more titles start to come out, I think that they'll easily overtake Microsoft. Although the Blu Ray format is virtually worthless right now, as more people get HDTV's and more Blu Ray's are released the feature will be more valuable to consumers. The system is supposed to be able to last for a while. The 360 has been out for a year and they're already discussing releasing a new one in May with a bigger hard drive. Microsoft's Xbox came out after the PS2 and died out way before it. Although people keep saying that it is sitting on store shelfs, I still can't find one in my area (Manhattan), and every time Amazon gets a shipment they sell out immediately. I see posts all the time from people on the internet saying that their Walmart in the middle of nowhere has had them on the shelves for ages, and it really isn't surprising given the price point, but they are selling like hotcakes over here, and if Sony had twice as many of them, they would have sold them. Even if Nintendo does keep up these sales figures, it still won't have the graphics and gameplay that some people want. I don't think the 360/PS3 debate will become moot any time soon.

    9. Re:Troubling for Sony by Mr2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hardly anyone owns an HDTV, even today. The companies will go where the customers are.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    10. Re:Troubling for Sony by trdrstv · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well yeah, because all the consoles in the past have been designed to put out images on an SD television set. Now that there are 2 consoles out there with HD as their focus, the state-of-the-art in terms of graphics is HD resolutions. For a series that has sold out to the eye candy, its pretty hard to imagine them passing up two systems with superior graphical power for the Wii.

      The PS2 had a handfull of 720p games and 1 1080i game (GT4) so if they were about pushing the boundries... why didn't they? Others proved higher resolutions were possible. Hell 480p from 480i should have been dirt simple to do by comparison.

      its pretty hard to imagine them passing up two systems with superior graphical power for the Wii.

      Actually it's pretty easy to imagine. If they wanted superior graphics, FF would never have been on a Sony Platform. There were more powerful systems competing with both the PS1, and the PS2.

      Square went where the market was. The same logic that got them on the Sony boat to begin with; was the same logic used to move the Dragon Quest Series off the PS2 and onto the DS. It is the same logic that can be used to move FF to the Wii. They aren't about pushing graphical boundries, they are about pushing units of software.

    11. Re:Troubling for Sony by king-manic · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually it's pretty easy to imagine. If they wanted superior graphics, FF would never have been on a Sony Platform. There were more powerful systems competing with both the PS1, and the PS2.

      They also had a high profile falling out with nintendo too. They have since reconciled.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    12. Re:Troubling for Sony by Rycross · · Score: 2

      Excellent points, I don't really have a response. I guess I'll have to concede.

    13. Re:Troubling for Sony by keithburgun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Final Fantasy 6 is arguably the greatest RPG ever created, you idiot. The graphics are in fact beautiful, but most of that is because of one thing: Good art, not raised technology. FF6 is where the era of an epic, powerful, meaningful RPG began and the "dragon warrior1-ish" old-style RPG ended. Most lovers of RPGs will agree with me that FF6 and/or FF7 belong in the top 5 RPGS of all time. That was the height of Square's artistic accomplisments, especially 6. For 7 they got a new art director who was not quite as good. But Uematsu's scores for 6 and 7 are un-beaten by any game before or since. I suggest you give FF6 a try and not just judge it because they used some Mode 7. However, I will agree that 10 and on have been lacking in the "other-than-graphics" department and your main point does stand, that future FFs may choose to be on the PS3 due to screenshot-minded decision-making. -Keith

    14. Re:Troubling for Sony by nanoDaveF · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree completely. The only reason I bought my wii is that I thought it would be much more fun to play than the other consoles. Even my wife loves it and she hates video games. Nintendo has hit a home run and they know it. The data is proving it. Soon, all of the companies that weren't 'bothering' with porting their games to Nintendo consoles will be concentrating on them. The innovation that Nintendo is introducing will expand the bounderies of games as more and more game companies put their ingenuity to work. If you have to pick between games that are more fun or more pretty, more fun wins most of the time. Pretty is cool, but it gets old. Fun never does.

      --
      -- Dave
    15. Re:Troubling for Sony by hjf · · Score: 2, Informative

      That just sucks, you'll need to upscale 720 to 1080 (1:1.5), that means interpolating 1 line every 2 from the original image. What's the point of HDTV? I thought it was to have "crisp clear" image, but that just won't work if you need to interpolate.

      The same thing happens downscaling 1080 to 720: you need to throw away a lot (33%) of information. Sure, interpolation algorithms can take care of it, but it's just not the same.

      So what? I don't think I want to buy 2 TVs, one for 720 and one for 1080, but neither do I want to watch 720 upscaled to 1080, nor 720 "windowed" to fit 1080 (black bars all around).

      If at least they would have made it an integer number such as 720 to 1440 (that is 2560x1440), you could at least fit 720 to 1440 just repeating every pixel twice, and it would look just as good.

    16. Re:Troubling for Sony by MeanderingMind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The difference betweena 720p or 1080i HDTV and a 1080p one is at least $1000, usually more. My 1080i set was ~$1700 including a stand, but would have cost me ~$2900 for the 1080p model without a stand.

      I asked to be shown a 1080i set versus a 1080p set, and though each had a video feed native to its resolution I wasn't able to see enough of a difference to warrant spending nearly twice as much.

      720p and 1080i are beautiful. I'm sure people with the eyes of a hawk will be able to see stark differences between those resolutions and 1080p, but I don't.

      It is important to note I was looking at movies/video feeds rather than video games. Something with more obvious pixels might make the difference a little less obscure.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    17. Re:Troubling for Sony by nbehary · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but the PS2 came out before the GC by a bit, and the price difference was comparatively much smaller. The PS3 and Wii were 2 days apart here in the States....I know other markets were longer, but still Japan was just a few weeks. I'm sure there was some sort of shortage when the GC came out, but I know it's nothing like what we're seeing with the Wii.

      I guess my point is comparing PS2/GC to PS3/Wii really doesn't make sense. The situation is very different this time.

    18. Re:Troubling for Sony by trdrstv · · Score: 2, Informative
      you can't be talking about the Saturn, with its horrible 3D, or the N64, which had comparable 3D but horrible storage capacity. Which systems are you talking about?

      Of that Era The Saturn was a better 2D machine (it's a shame, it could have been a contender), and the PS1 didn't have 'comparable graphics' to the N64 (unless you feel the PS2 had 'comparable graphics' to the X-box). The N64 was much better at 3D modeling.

      The rosey colored glasses come on though with the PS1 since we all remember the Pre-rendered CG cut scenes of FFVII (which was allowed by the greater capacity of the CD's) and forget how primitive the actual game was (graphically).

    19. Re:Troubling for Sony by Mr2001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wouldn't say hardly anyone. All the gamers I know either have one or are looking for one, and HDTVs were one of the hottest selling items this hoilday season. Prices are dropping a LOT, and 32" 720p LCD HDTVs can regularly be found for $500. Congratulations on finding a bargain - in the stores around here, 32" LCDs start around $600-$700. One of my gamer friends was thinking about buying an HDTV, but snapped back when he realized $500 would buy a screen not much bigger than his computer monitor.

      Even $500 is too much, though: I paid about $250 for my TV, and in my mind that's how much TVs cost. Judging from the installed base, I'm not the only one with that opinion. I've seen HDTVs in lobbies, casinos, bars, and electronics stores, and I've been bombarded with advertising for them, but I've only ever seen one HDTV in an actual house, and it was a rear projection unit that looked awful.

      The prices will only drop, and the install base will only rise in the future.

      Why are so many people so shortsighted? HDTV is the future. I'm sure it will be... but it isn't the present. Until HDTV is affordable, not many people are going to care about HD quality graphics, Blu-Ray or HD-DVD, because they won't be able to use them anyway. By the time HDTV has been adopted widely, it'll be time for a new round of consoles anyway.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    20. Re:Troubling for Sony by shimage · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the HDTV standard includes 720p and 1080i, but not 1080p. As was already mentioned 1080i->1080p is going to work better than 1080i->720p for obvious reasons, but 720p on a 720p set will look marginally better than 1080i on anything. I don't get HD cable, so I have no clue what the distribution is like WRT what resolution broadcast stations like to use. But I do read gaming news, and it looks like the one resolution every game supports on both the Xbox360 and the PS3 is 720p. Oh, they can upsample all they want, but that isn't terribly different than just sending a 720p signal to your 1080i/p TV without the upsampling.

      On the other hand, you might be better off just picking up a 1080p set anyhow (and just so you know, in the US it's closer to a $500 premium [and not $1k]). I have seen 1 (one) 720p set that actually had a native 720p resolution. All the other sets were native WXGA (1366x768), which pretty much need to rescale everything that isn't coming out of a computer. Sets that market themselves as 1080p, however, have uniformly had 1080p native resolution. And can someone please explain to me why plasma TV pixels aren't square? Maybe I'm not understanding something, but every plasma set I've seen is 1024x768, even though they're all widescreen (16:9), which implies 4:3 aspect pixels. In short, most HDTVs will require rescaling a large fraction of the time, so ... yeah. It's all kind of a wash. Personally, I wouldn't buy a new TV until the industry gets its act together.

    21. Re:Troubling for Sony by dcam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is doubly troubling for Sony. The developers are likely to build cross platform games, which means they won't be taking full advantage of the cell processor. In other words most games will look similar on the PS3 and Xbox 360, which removes one of the major advantages of the PS3.

      --
      meh
  2. A story in itself... by KingSkippus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hardware sales were brisk as well, with the Wii selling around 436,000 units. Trailing behind were Microsoft and Sony, with 360 hitting 294,000 units sold and the PS3 selling 244,000 units.

    This in itself is good story. Keep in mind that Sony PS3's and Microsoft Xbox 360's are widely available and on stores shelves everywhere, while the Wii's are still in short supply. In spite of that, the Wii is still outselling both. If you're Microsoft, you can always claim that it's because the 360 has been out for a year, and it's total sales are (of course) much higher at this point.

    But if you're Sony, that's just got to hurt.

    /still wants a Wii...

    1. Re:A story in itself... by Leviance · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, the biggest story is the differential between the 360 and the ps3. Sony can't be liking that the gulf between the ps3 their self-proclaimed "competitor" is getting even wider.

      On a positive note, the PS3 has passed up the 3DO in sales (*thumbs up!*)

      Another hidden story, from the article:
      "And the PS2 also continues to outperform the PS3; Sony's six-year-old system sold 299K units."

    2. Re:A story in itself... by aborchers · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I resist my temptation to ignore AC...

      "Oh give the fanboy bullshit a rest!"

      What is it with this "fanboy" ad hominem nonsense? It must really sting to see wimpy Nintendo kicking your techno-powerhouse asses all over the schoolyard.

      I have owned a PSX and PS2 and loved both. I considered myself a dedicated Sony customer until they tried to sell Blu-ray to me through an incremental-improvement (don't start citing the specs, I'm taking playability) game platform. If I was in the market for a Blu-ray player, I would consider PS3 a bargain. I'm not, though, so it looks to me like an overpriced boondoggle offering no real gains. I probably will buy a PS3 some day to get a bargain blu-ray player and keep my PSX/PS2 library playable. Plus there's bound to be some must-have game for the platform (probably the next Wipeout) that will drive me. Right now I simply have no reason.

      I bought a Wii and I love it. I owned the original NES until around 1990, bought a GC to play Godzilla Destroy All Monsters Melee (before it was ported) but other than that have never been particularly partial to Nintendo. I bought a Wii because it looked like *fun* for me and my wife and kids to play together and it is!

      So, if anyone needs to give the "fanboy bullshit" a rest, it's all you jackasses claiming the Wii is a fan phenomenon. It is winning because it is selling to fans and to new customers of all kinds, whether they are existing gamers or not. It is winning because it is a blast to play, just like Pac Man or Doom are still fun, in all their pixelated glory.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    3. Re:A story in itself... by niconorsk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You've got a fair point there. I know the PS3 has potential for some fantastic games. That is, if a publisher fully takes advantage of its capacity. Thing is, I think you underestimate just how big of a market kids and people wanting good party games are.

      --
      Nothing is impossible. We just haven't quite worked out how to do it yet.
    4. Re:A story in itself... by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are right, but you are also arguing against a zealot.

      Wow! Did I just get called a Nintendo zealot?

      I don't even own a Nintendo! I own an Xbox 360 which is pretty neat, an old PS2 that I don't play any more, and a PSP which I haven't played after the first couple of months of getting it. (Talk about unfulfilled expectations!)

      The last piece of Nintendo equipment I owned was an old—THE ORIGINAL!—Nintendo Entertainment System console, which I sold used over 15 years ago.

      The reason I want a Wii so badly is because 1) I have an Xbox 360, and though it's fun to play with sometimes, it's really not that special, 2) I have seen absolutely nothing from the PS3 that merits any attention whatsoever (let alone $600 of my hard-earned cash!), and 3) the Wii looks like a lot of fun and a lot different from the ho-hum games that I'm so bored with now. Maybe I'm wrong, but according to what my friends who have managed to procure one say, I'm not.

      Heh. A guy who hasn't owned a Nintendo console in over a decade and a half gets called a zealot because he wants a Wii and points out how well they're selling. That's a good one.

    5. Re:A story in itself... by ElleyKitten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are right, but you are also arguing against a zealot. The Nintendo fans are diehards and they exult in any Nintendo success. Also, they seem weirdly convinced that great graphics and fantastic gameplay are mutually exclusive.
      Actually, it's more that great graphics and an affordable system are mutually exclusive. I don't have $500 or $600 to spend on a game system. Even if I get a 360 (I like it, but it's still a little too expensive) it doesn't look all that impressive on a standard TV (I've heard some games don't even size the text to be legible on SD) and I just do not have the money for an HDTV. However, the Wii is perfect for my old TV. That's why I'm a Nintendo fan. I still play my ps2, though.
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    6. Re:A story in itself... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are about 20-30 games out of the gigantic Playstation library of games, some 8000-9000, that don't function properly on the PS3.

      Correction: There are 20-30 games (see sibling who disputes this figure) that don't function on the PS3. During the month of January, there was a far higher number of games (easily over 50%) that didn't function properly. To be specific, the PS2 emulation wasn't providing the full graphical quality of the PS2. As a result, the games were looking outright terrible when played on a PS3.

      Sony recently fixed this problem with the release of the 1.5 patchset for the PS3.
    7. Re:A story in itself... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not news because it means demand is high (that's an acceptable excuse the first month and a half). It's news because it means Nintendo has dropped the ball.

      When was the last time Nintendo sold 500,000 consoles per month during a non-holiday season in just North America? Dude, that is a LOT of consoles. So many that the Wii has sold almost half as many units as the XBox 360 has sold in its entire lifetime. So many that Nintendo has already sold about 1/4 of the units that the Gamecube sold in its entire lifetime.

      Think about that. 1/4 the number of Gamecubes in 1/4 of a year. Wow. I'd hate to be the guy who management is leaning on to improve Nintendo's production capacity.
    8. Re:A story in itself... by coren2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting. I haven't yet seen one of these mythical Wii's (never any in stock). So I don't truly know if the graphics are so terrible. Also, what is a mature game? Call of Duty is on Wii right? I'm sure that some sort of sword fighting game is on Wii, right? As a personal thing, I don't need a whole wack of crappy 'mature' games. I need 3 or 4 great games (which could, or could not be 'mature'). Does the Wii lack 'great' games? Perhaps the Wii's lack of power is stopping games like Oblivion? Man Oblivion would be awesome with the Wii controler... "Total Immersion!"

    9. Re:A story in itself... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      You dumbfuck

      Back atcha!

      you tried to save face by linking to a fucking zdnet.com article?

      I'm sorry. Did that hurt your fanboy feelings?

      Run PS2 game on pre-1.5 on 480p set - perfect image quality.

      BZZT! That is incorrect, sir! Running a 480p game at 480p works fine. Running a 480i game on the PS3, period, causes the issue. Specifically, there's a horizontal scaler that resamples the 480i output to the PS3's native 480p resolution. The problem was that this appears to have been done with naive line doubling, creating massive graphical problems. This has nothing to do with scaling 480p output to 1080p.

      Since ZDNet hurts your fanboi feelings, here's a nice Beyond3D post about the issue. I hope they don't use too many technical terms for you. We wouldn't want you to hurt yourself.

      There was no change to PS1 or PS2 emulation with any firmware update - due to the fact that PS2 emulation is DONE IN HARDWARE.

      Not quite. The Wii does Gamecube "emulation" in hardware, because it's bascially the same hardware with higher specs. The PS3 is a bit more complex in that PS2 programs would not be able to interact with the hardware correctly. As such, it uses a combination of emulation and original PS2 chips to provide PS2 compatibility. Things can and do break because of this.

      Don't bother replying dimwit.

      Who knew that feeding the trolls could be so much fun? Just keep digging your hole, friend. One bit 'o dirt at a time!
    10. Re:A story in itself... by BoyIHateMicrosoft! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Could I have you define "mature" for me. I guess "mature" would mean going around stealing cars, banging hookers and beating up cops. Mature is really a subjective kind of thing. I think you may be relating mature to FPS games and I would rather play kiddie games than those and apparently a lot of people feel way so say the numbers.

    11. Re:A story in itself... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      First of all, who rounds 436,000 to 500,000?

      436,000 is only for the U.S. I said North America.

      Second of all, adding your inflated 500,000 to the 1.1 million* they sold from launch to December puts them at 1.6 million. Adding MS' 300,000 to their 4.5 million* in NA puts them at 4.8 million.

      I was speaking of total units worldwide at that point. Sorry, I should have clarified. Estimated worldwide units of XBox 360 are ~10 million while Wii sales are currently estimated to be approching 5 million units. If you lowball the figures, the estimates come out to about 9 million vs. 4 million respectively. That's still a LOT of units. Of course, lack of Japanese sales are really hurting the 360.

      Despite the optimistic math, your point is solid. Good month for Nintendo.

      Indeed. :-)
    12. Re:A story in itself... by Rycross · · Score: 2, Funny

      The black knight always triumphs!

  3. Wii Games Need More Selection by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I was fortunate enough to get a Wii at launch (hour and a half in line at Costco), but I have become someone disappointed at the selection of games thus far. In my opinion there's too many mini-games (Wii Sports, Wii Play, Rayman, Wario, Mario Party, etc.), and not enough full fledged ones like Zelda. Now I'm not saying the mini-games are horrible (they're excellent for when you have multiple people over), however they are starting to make the Wii feel more like a gimmick.

    I picked up Madden over Christmas, and I was quite impressed; in fact it's the first Madden that's impressed me since the 16 bit era (I always liked the NFL 2K/ESPN sports more). I wish more sports titles come out and are able to execute as well. I'm definitely interested in a dedicated tennis/golf game, and I'm a bit concerned that I haven't heard of any coming out. I hope it's not due to the lack of accuracy of the wiimote. The Wii has a ton of potential, I just hope the Wii lives up to it.

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    1. Re:Wii Games Need More Selection by AbsoluteXyro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree completely, but buying any console at launch is going to leave you feeling the bite of scarce game variety. When a console has only been out a number of months you can count on one hand, there just hasn't been time for the breadth and depth of software we like to choose from to reach the market.

      Right now is a ripe time to pick up a 360 however, I'd imagine that has something to do with the stronger-than-PS3 sales. For many, I'm betting the marginal utility of a PS3 is far smaller than the price. That makes the 360 look pretty tasty to those in the market for a more traditional graphics powerhouse gaming machine.

      Things could be looking different give a year or so. As is always, only time will tell.

      For now though, I wouldn't want to be Sony.

    2. Re:Wii Games Need More Selection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tiger Woods is coming out in the next month. I'm very happy for him, but to be honest I never would have suspected he was that way inclined.
    3. Re:Wii Games Need More Selection by R3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      ....not that there's anything wrong with that. :P

  4. The killer stat by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Wii's total software sales reached almost a million units at 977,225, while total PS3 software sales came in at 662, 847."

    Sony loses money on each PS/3, in the hopes that they'll make it up with licensing fees from the games they sell.

    Nintendo doesn't. AFAIK, they've yet to sell any of their consoles at a loss in an effort to gain marketshare.

    So Sony is losing money to Nintendo on the front end (hardware) and the back end (software).

    That's gonna hurt...

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
  5. Troubling for Sony? Doubtful by TheJerg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nintendo might be by the middle of next year, but how about 4 years from now? It's way too early to be predicting a victory for any company, or defeat for that matter.

    1. Re:Troubling for Sony? Doubtful by tuffy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If Nintendo's ahead by the middle of next year, they're going to stay there. Console sales are a matter of momentum. Selling a lot of consoles attracts developers, which make the console more attractive to customers, which sells more consoles. While it's certainly possible for one to come from far behind and take the lead with some killer app that appears long after launch, I can't remember any instances of that happening.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    2. Re:Troubling for Sony? Doubtful by Itchyeyes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It might be to early to predict the exact outcome, but the positioning in this first year is crucial for all companies involved. If Sony can't reach a critical mass with the PS3 fast enough, then developers will stop making exclusive games since they can't make a profit without a large enough install base. As I've stated we've already seen this with VF and GTA. Without exclusive games, the incentive to buy a PS3 diminishes and their sales lag even further behind the competitors. As sales lag more, even more exclusives flee the console to recoup their investments on other systems. It's circular. It's exponentially more difficult to reclaim ground you've lost than it is to keep ground you've already made. At this point, I don't think Sony's fate is written in stone. The margins are still narrow enough that they could come out on top. However, it's going to require a significant price drop or a plethora of excellent exclusive games to regain the ground that they have already lost, neither of which is on the horizon any time soon.

    3. Re:Troubling for Sony? Doubtful by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who says there can only be one winner?

      I think the Wii is something entirely different and if done correctly Sony could still retain their core gamer generation market who like fast action zillions of polygons and l337 skills whilst Nintendo will exist happily with their more family oriented gaming set.

      Its capturing an entire class of gamers which just wouldn't even have purchased a console before, its a similar story with the DS - you have people playing on these things that wouldn't even consider another game system.

      I cannot ever imagine my parents owning any playstation or xbox, but I think Nintendo might just have themselves another sale based upon their reaction to our Wii when they played last night.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:Troubling for Sony? Doubtful by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's exactly it for me.

      I want a game that's fun. I don't really care about how it looks. If there's a great storyline with a reasonable interface, that's fun.

      It's got to be a "droppable" game, too. I don't want to have to run around for another 30-60 minutes trying to find a save point. That stops being fun pretty damned fast. It's one of the reasons I've cut down on playing video games and moved to mostly playing board games.

      My wife and I are getting a Wii next December, once all the plebeians have found the bugs. Sure, it doesn't have the HD power of the PS3. Who cares? Nintendo decided to stop chasing the eye-candy tech and go back to the core of games.

      Games should be fun.

      If you want pretty, then watch a movie. Oh, wait. You are, since the ads and the box art are usually stills or pre-rendered video that looks nothing like the actual game.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  6. Hopefully... by KenshoDude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With the Wii's success, one could only hope that developers will start paying more attention to gameplay innovation rather than graphical innovation. I think the success of Nintendo's new console underscores a revolution that has been waiting to take place in the gaming industry: an emphasis on playability and fun over impressive visuals. Now, if we could just combine next-gen visuals with next-gen gameplay -- a gamers' nirvana!

    1. Re:Hopefully... by evilbessie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think Nintendo have it right, not everybody has a HDTV just yet, but they do have a TV and the Wii is by all accounts FUN for all the family. So By using old tech comparitively they have developed a system people want. And by not spunking all that money on HD graphics this generation they can spend the time and money developing the console for a Wii 2 with HD graphics in 4 or 5 years time when more people will have the capability to use them to the full potential. Meanwhile the 360 and PS3 spent huge amounts of money developing new tech which will be old tech by the time the HD Wii comes out, saving Nintendo huge amounts of development costs. Plus the format war will either be all over or dual format players will be cheap enough to include these on the next console.

    2. Re:Hopefully... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it was inevitable that the usefulness of multimedia capabilities would plateau after a certain point, and some of us have been publicly expecting it to happen soon. There's not enough return on investment for a game to have high-quality HD graphics when the gameplay is the same or crippled. Look at the backlash against Oblivion. I'm tired of playing games with the exact same gamepad. After getting used to the Wii remote, my hands feel weird being cramped together on a gamepad.

      I think this is also an issue being experienced in the PC world, where people just don't see a need to buy new PCs with Windows Vista. Their current 512MB RAM, 2Ghz computers can handle sending email, word processing, running iTunes, and surfing the web. At least Apple has an advantage here in that they can drive new hardware sales with things like built-in cameras, thinner designs, bundled iLife apps, and so forth (i.e., the software sells the hardware and the hardware sells the software).

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
  7. Thank you Sony shill by Itchyeyes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are you seriously trying to spin the fact that Sony has fewer units on the market than both the Wii and the 360 and is selling them at a slower pace as a good thing? Are you really lumping in PS2 units with PS3 units to inflate the numbers? Are you actually stating that Naughty Dog's game, the one that has only one screenshot available and no name, is "insane" and "people are going nuts over right now"? I call shill

  8. Publishers by HappySqurriel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Something that a lot of Sony fans miss is that publishers hold the purse strings (and determine what games get made) and the only performance they care about is sales performance. Certainly, the outcome can not be determined after 3 months but (unless something changes soon) things will snowball out of controll and the PS3 will be in serious trouble.

    The fact is that (if the Wii continues to sell like it has been) the Wii will be the best selling platform in the World by Christmas 2007, and probably will be the best selling platform in every region by Christmas 2008; if this happens every publisher who has worldwide interests (think every major publisher) will focus on the Wii by Christmas 2007, and every publisher will be focusing on the Wii by Christmas 2008.

  9. The most telling number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The most interesting number to me in this report is that the Wii beat out the real 800 pound gorilla, Sony's PS2. While I've been a proponent of not calling off the console race until after the next holiday season, I'm surprised that the Wii is already outselling the PS2. If they keep this up over the next couple of months, I'll be ready to declare the Wii the winner and champion of this round of console sales. Sony has yet to move more PS3s off the shelves than PS2s for a single month. Not even the XBOX 360 has managed to outsell the PS2 on a regular basis despite being out for over a year and having what now amounts to a good catalog of games.

    February's numbers should be interesting.

  10. They're dominating even more in Japan by FleaPlus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From Kotaku:

    http://kotaku.com/gaming/nintendo/hardware-wars-ds -wii-continue-to-print-yen-237481.php

    Here are the current hardware sales in the land of the rising sun for the week of February 4th to the 11th.

            * Nintendo DS Lite - 201,177
            * Wii - 78,550
            * PSP - 32,175
            * PLAYSTATION 3 - 23,431
            * PlayStation 2 - 16,033
            * Xbox 360 - 4,811
            * Game Boy Advance SP - 980
            * Game Boy micro - 884


    I rather like the comment which noted the following:

    Wii Sales > PSP sales + PS3 sales + PS2 sales + 360 sales + GBA sales + Micro sales

    DS Sales > Wii Sales + PSP sales + PS3 sales + PS2 sales + 360 sales + GBA sales + Micro sales


  11. Re:Numbers Not Really Surprising by Rycross · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are you basing the 4:1 ratio on some total number? Because based on the NDP numbers its a bit less than 2:1. Of course, doing an assessment based on total sales isn't exactly fair at this point, since PS3 has yet to launch in Europe.

    It's a bit too early to call the game altogether. We're talking millions and tens of millions in an industry where the biggest player last round sold over 100 million consoles. We'll start seeing real indications when more exclusive games start comming around.

  12. It is not that they sold twice as many Wiis by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is far more important how dramatic the drop in xBox360 and PS3 sales was.

    In other words, those stacks of boxes you see in gameshops are not an illusion, but just the tip of the stockroom iceberg.

    Now if I could only find a Wii LAN adapter and WiiPlay ... at least I am starting to see one or two Wii consoles at various stores in Seattle, but they tend to disappear quickly. Can't even get the LAN adapter or Wii Play if I drive to the store when they say they have them - gone by the time I get there.

    Guess people really don't care that much about Talladega Nights ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  13. Re:Amazing Sony Sales For January by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > There has to be a bunch of gloating Sony execs at their headquarters right now.

    For now.

    You don't know any PS3 game devs, do you. I don't know any that are praising the system. Gee, wouldn't want it _easier_ for the devs now, would we!

    Sony has really alienated its PS2 game devs -- that the guys you want to IMPRESS, not dissuade from the hardware. As much as I love developing for the PS2, one really has to wonder what the crack the Sony Engineers were smoking.

  14. Not Troubling for Sony by fistfullast33l · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is not troubling for Sony - let's check Xbox 360 last year at this time. Gamasutra reports that last January 2006 Xbox 360 sold approximately 250,000 units, about the same as PS3 this year. That's without a competitor with an excellent games library or a competitor which is the newest fad and phenomenon that outsold you 2:1. In fact, this January the Xbox only sold 40,000 more than last January. And that's without the supply issue that last year's sales displayed. So basically, the 360 isn't exactly red hot either. If the 360 was so amazing, it'd be killing the PS3. As it is, it's barely holding on.

    1. Re:Not Troubling for Sony by Itchyeyes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People make this comparison a lot, and I don't think it applies. The 360 had pretty bad launch, but they didn't have to have a good launch. They launched in a vacuum with a whole year to get their crap together. They didn't have to worry about exclusives fleeing to other consoles or pressure to drop the price. They were the only game in town. That's why they did it so soon.

      The PS3 is in an entirely different environment. It doesn't matter if it's selling better than the 360 did at launch. It's not competing against the 360 one year ago. It's competing against the 360 (and the Wii) now. It has to sell better than the 360 is selling now, not last year. If two people are racing, and one is given a head start, it doesn't make much sense for the second person to say, "well I'm running faster than he was when he started out". It might be a nice consolation, but he's still going to lose the race. The PS3 has a lot of ground to make up and they're not doing it. In fact they're losing ground.

      Sony is in a bad position. They need to make some corrections to their plan. A price drop is the most obvious, but a good library would help too. It can't just be a good library though. It has to be a better library than the 360's, and they have to remember that that's a moving target. The Titanic is sinking and Sony's on deck playing classical music. All this spinning the numbers and looking at things through rose colored glasses isn't helping. It's just keeping people from seeing the problems.

  15. ...well... by Rev+Jim+(AKA+Metal+F · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't think anyone can predict exactly which console will be the most dominant (short of the DS and it's successor wink wink nudge nudge) in a year and a half's time from now. These figures showing the wii so far out in front have to get under Sony's collar, and were probably part of their 'worst case scenario' or something like that amounting to miscalculating their launch and the power of Nintendo to surge ahead in the initial leg of this race. It's all going to come down to titles, in the long run, if Sony can get them developed over the wii and 360, they can be the winner and depending a bit on the blu ray debacle with them being the most powerful system of the three if they can get the titles and the inevitable price drop, people will buy it. It's all too early to tell though. Initially with the wii's low point cost and appeal with their controller, and support of their DS in sales to support the wii win or lose - they're the winner right now. Remember the PS usurped control over the 64 a one time and became the heir apparent, now thing are starting to come full circle except it remains to be seen whether the big N can keep the dominance with a lack of exclusive titles. Nintendo are going to need a lot more quality exclusive titles than they did with the Gamecube to stay on top IMO. That's been their problem since the 64, a lack of titles really. Essentially right now, there's (3)800 pound gorillas in this ring and anything is possible right here and now looking a year off down the road.

    --
    Gaming for over 25 years
  16. Using your bad math, Sony still loses by not-enough-info · · Score: 3, Informative

    About 300k PS2s and 244k PS3s - just wow. That's almost 550k consoles Sony sold in January alone. Man, last place never looked so good!

    Nintendo
            Wii - 436K
            DS - 239K
            GBA - 179K
            GC - 34K
    total: 888K consoles.
    Oops, I forgot ridiculous rounding... OMGz! Nintendo sold about 1 Million consoles!

    Sony
            PS3 - 244K
            PS2 - 299K
            PSP - 211K
    total: 754K consoles. Did I even need to mention the GameCube?

    And, use some common sense and these numbers look insane:

    Sony is losing money for every PS3 sold based on manufacturing costs alone, never mind all those units sitting on store shelves. Sony won't even see respite from the bleeding until the 65nm process-shink slated for late this year.
    Nintendo makes a profit on every console they sell.
    --
    ---k--
    </stupid>
  17. Wii LAN Adapter by zCyl · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now if I could only find a Wii LAN adapter

    You can get identical functionality with certain Non-Nintendo LAN adapters. As the thread describes, it appears that you simply need one with matching vid/pid numers, and there appear to be several matching brands.

    (I have used one of these with my Wii, and it works flawlessly, but at less expense and with fewer supply shortages.)
  18. PS3/360 vs WII by king-manic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It should be noted that while Wii is smacking around the PS3/360, it may not actually be competing for the same customers. Wii's target a "casual" gamer. Who enojoyed playing it at an earlier adopters hosue wante done for themselves. PS3/360 target the existing market. Generally gamers will get 2. I have a Ps2/GC, the last gen I had a PS1/N64. We might see the core gamer market go Ps3/Wii or 360/wii.

    Casual gamers are likely to have a lower attach rate for games because it takes them longer to go through them. Mario Galaxy might only last a gamer a weekend but a casual three months. So we may see a 3:1:1 install base and still have PS3/360 get more exclusives because they can still sell more games. Hard to say. I myself spend between $100-$225 (a new games costs $69.99 CND for the ps2 on avg) CND a mo for games. I'm not sure what a casual gamer will spend.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    1. Re:PS3/360 vs WII by iago-vL · · Score: 2, Informative
      I myself spend between $100-$225 (a new games costs $69.99 CND for the ps2 on avg) CND a mo for games. I'm not sure what a casual gamer will spend.

      I typically spend between $0 and $40/month for games, depending on whether or not I feel like picking one up. I typically stick with tried-and-true games for older systems. I'm working on PS2 right now.

      Of course, it depends how casual you're looking.

  19. Re:Amazing Sony Sales For January by king-manic · · Score: 2, Funny

    I noticed 1 sony fanboy this thread, a half dozen of obvious 360 fanboys and a few dozen Wii fanboys. Although the Wii fanboys are hard to tell from people who know the situation well. The Wii has been a smashing success of marketting and good timing. I think the 360 fanboys are more numerous on slashdot but there has been a mass conversion recently.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  20. HDTV is the future, but not the Present. by trdrstv · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I wouldn't say hardly anyone. All the gamers I know either have one or are looking for one, and HDTVs were one of the hottest selling items this hoilday season. Prices are dropping a LOT, and 32" 720p LCD HDTVs can regularly be found for $500. The prices will only drop, and the install base will only rise in the future.

    Why are so many people so shortsighted? HDTV is the future.

    HD may be the future, but the issue is it isn't the present. Currently I own an HDTV, and an HD DVD player. I enjoy them immensely, but I am (by having them) in the minority. About 17% of households in the US have 1 or more HDTVs. That means 83% don't, and our adoption rates have been better than either Japan and Europe. Now HD is a niche (albeit growing) market. It will take several more years for it to hit mainstream adoption. DVD only surpassed VHS sales after the players hit the $50 and under price point.

    In 5-10 years it may be mainstream, but Nintendo has banked that it won't hit 'critical mass' within the 4-6 year life expectancy of the Wii. I'll bet that the next Nintendo will push HD, but in the interest to cater to the largest possible market they have chosen SD.

  21. My Perspective by Riquez · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I own a PS3, an xBox360 & a Wii. I also play them on a 720p TV. Here is my perspective...

    I bought the PS3 first (11th Nov 2006) & was pretty impressed from day one. Of the few games I owned back then, I felt that gameplay & atmosphere was superior to that on the xBox360 (that I had played at friends houses)
    When I talk about "gameplay & atmosphere" I mean this - the way that a game can draw you in, inspire you to play, leave you wanting more, a compelling story with rewarding/challenging gameplay.
    I consider Resistance to have a moderate amount of this, CoD3 lots, Halo very little.

    Some months later I bought an xBox360. I was disappointed at range of games available on the PS3 & their slow appearance. I expect this to pick up in the next few months, but at the moment only MGS has me drooling.
    I was pleasantly surprised with the xBox360. I picked up a few decent games right away & at the moment I play the xBox360 much more that the other two consoles. Deadrising is fiendishly difficult, but very addictive & compelling. It even inspired me to watch "Dawn of the Dead" on a saturday morning before diving into some zombie chopping action.
    xBox live is a great feature, despite my previous opinion that it wasnt something I would use - the demos etc are a real bonus.
    My 2 small gripes about the xBox360 are the subscription fee for online play & the noise of the xbox fans. It is very noisy compared to the silent PS3.
    Otherwise, I put the xBox360 above the PS3. More games & more fun. But I wouldnt rule out the PS3 yet, I think there will still be some nice things to come.

    The Wii was a bit of a novelty buy. I didnt expect it to form a big part of my gaming life - & I was right. The innovative control system is indeed inspired & great fun, but the games are just time fillers. Wii sports is, erm, well not much more than a demo. I can see it being nice for children aged 3-8, but beyond that it's not really for serious games.
    I have this great Marble game though, you are a marble & you roll around on various floating mazes to reach the goal. This game really does get addictive & I often play it for 10 mins or so to warm up before getting into some real hi-def arcade action on the xBox360 or PS3.
    The Wii is selling well. It's cheap. I put this down to: people don't look beyond the price for their purchase / or / they are crap at games

    --
    * Game Over * High Score: 264,846,927 -- Your Score: 14
  22. The big story people won't mention by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative

    When was the last time Nintendo sold 500,000 consoles per month during a non-holiday season in just North America? Dude, that is a LOT of consoles.

    And here's the fact you don't see in the press--combined with the sales of the DS and GBA, that makes Nintendo the #1 console manufacturer in the world.
    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  23. Subtle? by cheftw · · Score: 2, Funny

    "January Game Sales Explode, Wii Dominates"

    Somebody's been playing Quake

    --
    Always back up, never back down. ---- Think you're cool 'cos your uid is prime? Take mine, modulo the one digit integers
  24. What Sony needs by kahrytan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is a new PS3 console.

      Remove the hard drive and bluray drive. Replace blu-ray with a Sony DVD drive and make the HDD optional add on if possible.

      If Sony removed those two components with lower cost solutions, they could knock off $100-$200. They could easily sell a PS3 at $299-$399 instead. That is a much better price point. PS3 could compete with both 360 and Wii better.

    --
    \
  25. 'Dominates'? by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't think it's fair to say that Wii is 'dominating'. They are playing for a different core audience (while there is crossover between 'casual' and 'hardcore' gamers, they are not the same market). In terms of sales they've got a leg up for January of about 40% over MS and 45% over Sony, but it's worth keeping in mind that the Wii retails for close to 40% less than 360 and 60% less than PS3. Anyone can flog a product that's less than half the price of the competition. Additionally there's a massive amount of media hype surrounding it, which won't be sustained. There is continued demand because they were unable to manufacture enough over Christmas - people who missed out on one to put under the tree are likely still trying to grab one. Finally, Nintendo systems have always sold well out of the blocks. Wake me up in six months and we'll see if they've kept their momentum. They're going to need some substantial third-party support too, something which they've really shown no signs of having at all. The hardware sales aren't nearly as important as the software sales, and on that front Wii only had one of the top 5, and it wasn't close to the top-seller for the month (Lost Planet).

    Personally, I'm skeptical as to whether Nintendo can keep the same momentum going given the lack of software in the pipeline. And additionally, as a gamer I hope that everyone is dead wrong about them dominating the market. I'm not a casual gamer, and while a few fun gimmicky toy games like Wii sports are great, I would die if everything was like that. For me, the games Nintendo seem to be pushing are like candy - they taste great, but they burn away pretty quickly and in the end you can't sustain yourself on them.

  26. Sony Australia tries "Sweeteners" to soften blow by Guzzitza · · Score: 3, Informative
    The PR campaign is gearing up here in Aus for the launch, theres an article in todays paper trying to tell me how Sony is giving us Aussies special treatment by giving us a free Bond DVD and free download of GT:HD (both things that as far as I was aware were available to all regions)

    FTA: The launch of Sony's PlayStation 3 next month will be accompanied by a host of freebies that Sony hopes will take the sting out of the game console's $999 price tag. The James Bond film Casino Royale will be offered free to the first 20,000 buyers who register their PS3 online. Additionally the game Gran Turismo: HD will be available to all PS3 buyers as a free download from the PlayStation Network.

    Article: http://www.smh.com.au/news/games/sony-unveils-play station-sweetners/2007/02/22/1171733923601.html

  27. Wii had better improve quickly by nbahi15 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wii has issues in my opinion. The wii is novelty and if doesn't get some decent games soon it is screwed. I already prefer my Demo of Gran Turismo HD (PS3) to anything I have played on my Wii. Initially I was sucked in by the novel game play but somewhere around the 60th hour of Zelda I was done with it. I only enjoy playing with the weather globe at this point. The key issue with the Wii is that most of the people that come over and play with it want to play Super Mario Brothers. That is not exactly the group of people that buy $60 games by the cart load.

    So my feeling is that PS3, and 360 may lose the early rounds this year, but based upon the kind of games on the gamecube, the wii games so far, and my boredom with controller, Nintendo should be moderately successful but never enjoy numeric dominance of the market. PS3 has the best platform, and once it gets some more games under its belt will begin to dominate the game market for yet another generation. 360 will come in second, once again hampered by the kind of dumb design decisions Microsoft makes, and Nintendo will be the console that kids and parents like but never buy enough games to matter. But Nintendo likes its niche, so I can't say that it is a bad thing for them.