Slashdot Mirror


No More GameCube, Wii 2.0 On the Far Horizon

The little purple machine that could is no longer being manufactured. Hardware revisions are in store for the Nintendo Wii eventually. These announcements aren't terribly shocking, but they're still interesting admissions from Perin Kaplan, Vice President of Marketing & Corporate Affairs for Nintendo of America. GameDaily has the interview, which also discusses Wii sales, the lull in games, new IPs, and some details on plans online. Don't worry, you won't have to buy a new Wii anytime soon. Kaplan is immediately talking about the planned Japanese version with DVD Playback capability, but does say 'Sure, absolutely' to the question of whether we'll eventually see hardware changes on the order of the DS/DS Lite.

153 comments

  1. Wii 2.0 will need a new name by Gerocrack · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about "Vagoo"?

    1. Re:Wii 2.0 will need a new name by owyn999 · · Score: 1

      If only I had a mod point... LICD FTW

      --
      Where's that cap to the Decanter of Endless water???
    2. Re:Wii 2.0 will need a new name by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Wiiwoaded"?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:Wii 2.0 will need a new name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wii-todded?

    4. Re:Wii 2.0 will need a new name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like "wii ii" or just "wiiii".

    5. Re:Wii 2.0 will need a new name by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1
    6. Re:Wii 2.0 will need a new name by TitusC3v5 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of something along the lines of "Wii-wii" myself...

      --
      And the masses cried out, "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0!"
    7. Re:Wii 2.0 will need a new name by kahanamoku · · Score: 5, Funny

      Being that doing wii in a toilet is considered as "number 1's" when speaking to children... I'd suggest that to increment to "number 2's" they should call it the Nintendo Pü

      --
      ----- Concentrate on promoting more than demoting.
    8. Re:Wii 2.0 will need a new name by Vaticus · · Score: 1

      I wish I mod points, as that made me laugh incredibly hard! Nintendo Pü... well done!

      --
      John 3:16. Know it.
      Drink Yourself Healthy: MonaVie
    9. Re:Wii 2.0 will need a new name by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      *snort* thanks :)_ that was a good chuckle....

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    10. Re:Wii 2.0 will need a new name by kahanamoku · · Score: 1

      Actually.... I just strolled over to Babelfish and did a translation of 'pu' (must be lower case) from French to English (this was my first choice as a translation attempt) and surprisingly it came back with: "been able"... surely they could market that!!!

      --
      ----- Concentrate on promoting more than demoting.
    11. Re:Wii 2.0 will need a new name by master_p · · Score: 1

      ...and maybe use this as a maskot???

    12. Re:Wii 2.0 will need a new name by Nalgas+D.+Lemur · · Score: 1

      Clearly it should be Wii 2: Electric Boogaloo.

  2. Wait a minute... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would be happy if the Wii was available in the stores.

    1. Re:Wait a minute... by jonfromspace · · Score: 1

      I hear ya! I finally got mine this afternoon... after waiting for two hours at an EB Games in Calgary.

      For those in the Calgary who are Wii hunting, redflagdeals.com has a very usefull thread tracking Wii deliveries. clicky

      --
      I am become Troll, destroyer of threads
  3. Where's My Zapper??!!! by ObiWanStevobi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm anxiously waiting for my Wii Zapper. I think that will bring a whole new level of fun to muliplayer shooters. Before worrying about Wii 2.0, they need to get the zapper out and relase a new bond title for the Wii.

    1. Re:Where's My Zapper??!!! by st3v · · Score: 1

      Hopefully the next Zapper looks like this.

      I think it might be a little overkill for Duck Hunt, though.

    2. Re:Where's My Zapper??!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless somebody wrestles the Bond license away from EA and lets the original team from Rare that worked on GoldenEye do the new Bond, I don't think there should *ever* be a new Bond title for any platform.

    3. Re:Where's My Zapper??!!! by cmowire · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The Wii Zapper is almost enough to make me want to pick it up when it's on sale a few years from now for $69.

      Till then, I'll stick with having no consoles whatsoever.

    4. Re:Where's My Zapper??!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? What's so different about their gun handle and using the regular wiimote w/o controlling the joystick. It seems redundant to me.

    5. Re:Where's My Zapper??!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to reality, where Goldeneye was a mediocre game at best, and Everything Or Nothing is the best Bond game to date.

    6. Re:Where's My Zapper??!!! by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      Wow, you bring an aweful lot ot this conversation, don't you?

      Why are you even reading / posting to a thread like this then?

    7. Re:Where's My Zapper??!!! by ObiWanStevobi · · Score: 1

      Zapper would give a more natural wrist angle

    8. Re:Where's My Zapper??!!! by pNutz · · Score: 1

      Probably have some more of those "your controller broke my TV" claims...

      --
      Death and danger are my various breads and various butters.
    9. Re:Where's My Zapper??!!! by Firefly1 · · Score: 1

      ...and Everything Or Nothing is the best Bond game to date.
      Which makes one wonder why the lessons learned there (read, 'what was done right') were apparently not applied to things like Rogue Agent. My only real gripe with EoN is that it would've been nice if there was more than one usable environment for the survival challenge...
      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
  4. Wii-tf by JoshJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    New hardware? Gah. The abominable hardware upgrade tactics they used on the game boy (2-3 versions of each!) really shouldn't be taken to the console market.

    1. Re:Wii-tf by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      New hardware? Gah. The abominable hardware upgrade tactics they used on the game boy (2-3 versions of each!) really shouldn't be taken to the console market.

      What tactics? They brought out hardware, saw what people liked and what they didn't like, and brought out new software. This continued over time. GB was a winner, but they eventually made it smaller, and we got pocket. 100% compatibility. GB Color had a flat design so GBA got one. Both units have incredible back-compatibility. People bitched about the screen being exposed, so they made a flip unit. Then they made the DS, it was still flip. Then later they did a shrink of the DS and we got a DS Lite. And still, backwards compatible.

      In other words, what we got was a sort of hardware version of release early, release often. And at no time did anyone from Nintendo come to your head and hold a gun to your head and force you to buy it, nor did they ever invalidate your software library. The game I play most often on my GBA SP is Tetris... the cart that I used to stick into my original paperback-book-sized Game Boy.

      Who cares if they bring out new consoles with new functionality? No one made you buy a Wii. I still don't have one - of course, many people have trouble just finding them, but I haven't actually even tried because I like to wait and see what games are coming out before I buy anything and there's not a lot available right now.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Wii-tf by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      As long as it doesn't break compatibility why would it matter?

      I suspect Nintendo will be changing the system dramatically to lower-cost (65nm process in 2007, 45nm process in 2008), minor upgrades (2/4 GB built in flash), and make it more pleasant looking.

    3. Re:Wii-tf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were never forced to upgrade though. All the GBA games worked on every version of the GBA hardware. The same applies to the DS and DS Lite.

    4. Re:Wii-tf by Umbrel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are pissed because they improve the hardware every 2 years instead of say 5? >_>

      --
      Ave Maria
    5. Re:Wii-tf by Oirad · · Score: 1

      Dear lord.

      Would you like some cheese with your whine?

    6. Re:Wii-tf by DesertBlade · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think people are getting screwed with a minor update every 2 years. I had a Game Boy advance and a first edition of the DS (still) and I have no need to upgrade either of them. As long as I don't need to upgrade and most of the revisions are minor so what.

      Now if they release an updated platform every 3-6 months then it is a different story

      --
      Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    7. Re:Wii-tf by JoshJ · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call the GB Color over the GB Pocket minor. I wouldn't call a properly-lit screen (SP) over the GBA's terrible screen "minor"- portablemonopoly existed for a reason. They're not even telling us what Wii 2 is going to have as an update- if it's simply HDTV support, that's tolerable (for me at least). If it's something that drastically improves the Wii- something on par with the color graphics or the SP light- then Nintendo can fuck off for screwing over everyone that bought one this year. They could at least have had the decency to say "we're considering changing the wii hardware" ahead of time so people could make an informed decision rather than get pwned after spending approx $400 on the system, controllers, and games.

    8. Re:Wii-tf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here's a tip: Technology gets better constantly. It will only be a short period of time before what's current is no longer so.

      There. Now you have no excuse for ever being pissed again.

    9. Re:Wii-tf by Lightwarrior · · Score: 1

      Minor correction: certain hardware revisions lack backwards compatibility. Namely, the DS can't play GB or GB Color games - only DS and GBA.

      --
      Mods: Disagreeing with me != my post Offtopic / Flamebait.
      World without hate or war, invaded. Tragic?
    10. Re:Wii-tf by Soygen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you always waited for the best version of everything, you would never own anything. That's the price of early adoption.

    11. Re:Wii-tf by trdrstv · · Score: 2, Funny
      People who got a GB Advance had no idea Nintendo would release a version that not only was rechargeable but had a light in less than two years. DS, late 2004. People had no idea that they would make a version with better brightness in early 2006.

      So basically, people are getting screwed over because Nintendo releases a better version in less than 2 years, and they have no way to anticipate it.

      Thank GOD I read this post. Otherwise I would have been completely off guard with no means of anticipating any further hardware revisions despite (as you said) they have a habit of releasing new hardware in less than 2 years. I wonder when the next one will hit?

    12. Re:Wii-tf by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      Nintendo should be telling us this stuff to start with, and letting the consumer make an informed decision.


      someone needs to read their history.
      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    13. Re:Wii-tf by maxume · · Score: 1

      Do you get pissed at the restaurant when your friend's meal looks tastier than yours?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    14. Re:Wii-tf by Skreems · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Basically it sounds like you're angry that you aren't selective enough about what you're willing to pay money for, and it has nothing to do with Nintendo.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    15. Re:Wii-tf by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      They could at least have had the decency to say "we're considering changing the wii hardware" ahead of time so people could make an informed decision rather than get pwned after spending approx $400 on the system, controllers, and games.

      If they do that, then less people buy the system up front, the developers defect to other platforms, and the platform fails.

      They are treating consumers the way they want to be treated. Consumers demonstrate the way they want to be treated by spending money (or failing to) in response to stimulus.

      In particular the Dreamcast debacle really proves that words can kill. Of course, those words didn't harm Sony, even though they were provably fraudulent and uttered by a Sony Exec.

      The simple fact is that revisions are the norm, not the exception. There's three versions of Atari 2600 (VCS, 2600, 2600 revision 2, the slim one) that I recall. There's two NESes. There's two SNESes. There's two Genesis systems, and even two Sega CD addons. Two Playstations. Two PS2s. Two fucking colecovision systems. Two TurboGrafx16 systems, not counting TurboXpress, and two different TurboCD addons. Really, anyone who doesn't expect a system to be redesigned should have their head examined.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Wii-tf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The game I play most often on my GBA SP is Tetris... the cart that I used to stick into my original paperback-book-sized Game Boy.

      It's a good thing you didn't buy the next GBA system, since the Micro is not backwards compatible with GB or GBC games.

      So much for your argument.

    17. Re:Wii-tf by owyn999 · · Score: 1

      Whoa whoa whoa there joshie, what you are going on about here is a bit over board here, first 400$ on the system would be bloody rediculous and if you did so then you deserve this shock.

      Next so what if nintendo releases something that does a little bit more, note A LITTLE BIT, you bought a 250$ system that came with a game SANS the classic nintendo systems, what does this mean, you pretty much paid 200$ for the system, great, so they add in a DVD/HD DVD/BluRay PLAYER and an HDMI out on it and drop it for 300$ with no game, guess what, they can do that... it's called an upgrade for a reason, they aren't releasing a NEXT GEN system in 2-3 years, they are releasing another revision of the system, that your CONTROLLERS AND GAMES will still work on, so that they can add in a few features that may have prevented a few people from buying it in the first place, but to me it seems like you aren't going to be satisfied no matter what nintendo does.

      What I would be more pissed at is that in the 5 year cycle of the other systems, that you just paid 500-600$ for that you are only getting 5 years out of them, consider that in 2-3 years Nintendo is going to release a slight upgrade, that means that you have paid 100$ a year for a system that added a completely new interface, where as the other systems seem to be charging you 500-600$ for the same thing revised with prettier graphics.

      --
      Where's that cap to the Decanter of Endless water???
    18. Re:Wii-tf by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my bad. Is there a flash cart + emulator solution for that? I don't even know where to look for that kind of stuff anymore since the evil bastards at Sony summoned Satan all over Lik-Sang.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Wii-tf by ProppaT · · Score: 1

      Really, if you criticize the "Game Boy" for having too many revisions, you're really only criticizing it's popularity as a platform over the years. As it has been stated before, every revision and new product (discounting the Micro, which was never planned to replace the GBA SP...merely be an alternate version to appeal to the trendy crowd) has been due to consumer demand. I'm sure making more money has something to do with it, but even the new DS Lite was put out 1) Because consumers complained the LCD screen wasn't as good as the PSP's screen and 2) It looked like a cross between a UFO and a Fisher Price toy and 3) Because Nintendo had a hit on their hands and decided that they would put out the product revision before the system hit critical mass. Nintendo could have kept peddling the old DS only to release the DS Lite a year or two down the road to make even more money and maximize "double purchases" if they had wanted to. I'm pretty sure Nintendo didn't plan on releasing the new version of the DS in a little over 2 years after release from the start, but what would you do if your competitor released a system with a better screen and a sleeker look, even if you were clearly in the lead?

      I mean, come on, if you're holding out for the ultimate "Game Boy" experience, wait 20 years for the 10 screen, surround sound version. We all know that...

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    20. Re:Wii-tf by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm a bit pissed that I had no way of knowing Nintendo would release a better Wii in a couple years instead of the usual 5 or so for consoles, and not only that, we're not even being told what new features it's going to have.

      Um, are you completely ignoring that the usual 5 years between consoles is for completely new consoles, like PS1 -> PS2 or N64 -> Gamecube, right? DS -> DS Lite is nothing like that, because it's the same platform. Any game that plays on the DS Lite also plays on the DS just as well. Games are no different for the GBA SP than the GBA.

      The only thing in your list that is even comparable to a new console release is the Game Boy Color, because games were written differently to take advantage of it. Of course people were complaining that the gameboy platform hadn't changed in about a decade, and it's true it was overdue for some change. A lot of people welcomed it, but apparently some people don't like progress.

      I mean each of these minor revisions fixed problems with the previous one. Why is that "screwing" you, again? Because Nintendo should have had the better screens and the smaller form-factors to begin with? As if they strategically held back these advances to "force" you to upgrade again... In reality, they did it because at the time they launched the consoles, that was what they could afford to have. Releasing the "better" version of the console two years earlier would have meant that it cost much more, and then I'm certain you would be bitching about that.

      Actually, that's a good question... Do you bitch about price drops in consoles, because you got "screwed over" when they didn't tell you in advance that they'd be dropping the price on such and such day by such and such amount? Or do you instead take the approach that the console was worth what you paid for it when you got it? In which case, why is that not true with your DS/GBA/Wii? Your console didn't get worse when the newer version came out.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    21. Re:Wii-tf by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      The game boy pocket was quite a few years after the original game boy, so I'll pass on that. However, people who got it had no idea there was a GB Color upcoming. People who got a GB Advance had no idea Nintendo would release a version that not only was rechargeable but had a light in less than two years. DS, late 2004. People had no idea that they would make a version with better brightness in early 2006.
      When they release upgraded systems they make them compatible with the original system, so you're still able to play all the new games with your old silver DS as you could if you bought a pretty black DS lite. If your old silver DS is really that bad, then why did you buy it in the first place? When you got it you knew you'd be able to play new games on it for several years, and you're still able to play new games on it. The same goes for the GB Pocket, GBA SP, GBA Micro, and possibly a new Wii. What's the problem? Are you jealous that people have a spiffier looking DS than you? You got to play it two years before them. I don't understand the issue. As long as Nintendo keeps making games for the consoles I have I don't mind.
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    22. Re:Wii-tf by Splunge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude, have you ever bought a computer?

      It's not hard to figure out that if you wait 6 months, you can get a better computer at the same price from Dell/Apple/HP. People don't go whining nearly as much about that and computers can cost up to $3,000.

      Meanwhile, you're slagging Nintendo for upgrading their $200 or less hardware every 2 years?

      --
      "Brown University? We have one of those in Providence!" -- Outside Providence
    23. Re:Wii-tf by tepples · · Score: 1

      Or do you instead take the approach that the console was worth what you paid for it when you got it? In which case, why is that not true with your DS/GBA/Wii? Your console didn't get worse when the newer version came out. Unless the new games don't correct for the problems with the old system. Racetrack too dark on the original GBA? Tough shit; use a GBA SP or a Game Boy Player.
    24. Re:Wii-tf by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      They could at least have had the decency to say "we're considering changing the wii hardware" ahead of time so people could make an informed decision rather than get pwned after spending approx $400 on the system, controllers, and games.

      You do realize every single one of those games and controllers will work with the future version. So at most you might have to rebuy the $250 base console, which by the time the new version is out could cost $200 or less.

    25. Re:Wii-tf by miyako · · Score: 1

      You make it sound like people are SHOCKED to see nintendo releasing incremental updates to their hardware. The fact is that nintendo has been doing this for a long time. It has been mostly in the gameboy line, and I expect a few more revisions of the DS as well, but the N64 got colours, and they released the top loading nes and the new version of the SNES as well.
      It's not like you have to buy every version that comes out. You can buy a Wii now, and when Wii 1.5 comes out, you can upgrade if it's worth the money, or not, historically the hardware upgrades have not lead to incompatible games - so you're not going to be forced to upgrade to run the newer games.

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    26. Re:Wii-tf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Probably within two years. Glad I could help.

    27. Re:Wii-tf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not to be pedantic, but there were actually four sega genesis systems :P

      http://www.computercloset.org/SegaGenesis1.jpg
      http://akamai.edeal.com/images/catalog3091/folder2 0963/img2422571.jpg
      http://www.emulationgalaxy.co.yu/images/systems/MD 2_Genesis3.jpg
      http://di1.shopping.com/images/di/47/74/30/3339453 66e5f6349324f7a4b50395932735241-150x188-0-0.jpg

      (ok ok, that last one is not a console exactly, as it doesn't come with the ability to swap carts, but it does use the exact same chip as the 3rd real console, same manufacturer even - you can rewire it to accept controllers and games!)

      The first genesis lacked some of the output options that the second one had. So this is nothing new!

    28. Re:Wii-tf by jdigriz · · Score: 1

      Didn't you hear? Corporations have a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders to pwn consumers.

    29. Re:Wii-tf by bnenning · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I hate it when corporations release improved products. Those bastards.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    30. Re:Wii-tf by Jonavin · · Score: 1

      With all the great games out there for the DS/DSL, I still can't put down Tetris DS. Too addictive playing online.

      Call me crazy, but I think they need a version of Tetris for the Wii :)

    31. Re:Wii-tf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you'd just keep playing River City Ransom.

    32. Re:Wii-tf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They could at least have had the decency to say "we're considering changing the wii hardware" ahead of time so people could make an informed decision rather than get pwned after spending approx $400 on the system, controllers, and games."

      Seems to me, they just did. Already. Now. You have been warned.

      So shut up.

      $400 on the system, controllers, and games? The freakin console base is $250, $40 for an extra controller...what did you do, buy 2 games so far? Do you even own a Wii? Do you realize you could probably sell your Wii USED now on ebay and get that full price back? Better hurry up.

      Oh, but you'll be playing and using it, won't you, and STILL BITCH about it.

      Oh, and CNBC had a report in *December* about the Wii likely coming out with the DVD version late next year (which would be this year). I don't even check gaming sites but if CNBC got wind of this, the forums knew about it by then too. So again, Nintendo did warn you. 2 months before you heard about it on /. and bought it for Christmas. Meaning, you didn't even bother to check elsewhere; the DVD movie playback version has been known for a couple months now at the very least publicly.

      btw, software easily outweighs the cost of hardware upgrades. You're spending $30-40 at least usually for a Wii game. On the DS, it's probably $20-35. I buy a game a month. I MUCH prefer Nintendo's handling of their hardware, and it works. Even though I bought a DS Lite, I still have found reason to buy GBA games, esp. since I finally got around to checking out the Final Fantasy series, and I'm damn pleased I can buy GBA games, as I believe only FF3 (or is it 4? I forget now) is DS specific.

      Hell, even Sony and MS knows this; the only reason I'm looking at PS3 is because I want PS2 games, and upgrade path, and I generally dislike the Xbox (both for being an MS product as well as how they've handled themselves in the console region, although Sony ups them presently). I figure a PS2 slim is $130 or so, which makes a PS3 more like $370 in my mind.

    33. Re:Wii-tf by Megane · · Score: 1

      If you're going to be pedantic about the Genesis, then the 2600 had six Atari-branded hardware versions:

      6-switch
      4-switch (with woodgrain and black case color variations)
      5200 adapter (plays 2600 games on a 2-port 5200 and on the last revision of the 4-port 5200)
      2600 Jr.
      Atari 7800 (included the 2600 chipset for backwards compatibility)
      Flashback 2 (2600 on an ASIC)

      ...and maybe a couple more if you don't count Atari-branded gear (I think Jakks came out with a joystick and a paddle unit with a real 2600-on-a-chip and not a famiclone chip)

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    34. Re:Wii-tf by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Actually those hardware upgrades in consoles are quite common, Sony did that almost every year with the playstation, the core engine remaind the same, but changes in form factors, added features etc.... Nintendo does that with the gameboy and DS line, and probably is moving towards it in the Wii realm as well, as long as it is not an entire machine upgrade so that no new games come out for your old console, this is a perfectly viable way.

    35. Re:Wii-tf by mockchoi · · Score: 1

      The wild card here, though, is the virtual console. Those games are locked on to the system they were purchased on. If you get a new one, can you transfer them? Right now, no one knows.

    36. Re:Wii-tf by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Your VC games are locked to your account that is registered to the shop. So currently if you're Wii gets a replacement due to warranty concerned they transfer your account and you can redownload or put them on SD cards to transfer them. So the issue there is will Nintendo let you transfer your shop account, my guess would be yes, assuming you unassociate your account on the original Wii. I don't see why they wouldn't as it could cost them a lot of sales from people not wanting to lose their stuff.

    37. Re:Wii-tf by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      Sadly this seems to be the trend. I can see a real problem with this though. You won't get as many early adopters if this keeps up. No one wants to buy the latests and greatest Xbox if they are going to make a better one with a larger harddrive and less problems if they can just hold out for a year and half. The thing that upsets me is that the original DS came with no backlighting, but Nintendo has been making handheld units for years and knows damn well that those things need to have a back light to be seen in the sunlight. Why wasn't this installed before the DS Lite?

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    38. Re:Wii-tf by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      So basically, people are getting screwed over because Nintendo releases a better version in less than 2 years, and they have no way to anticipate it.

      How is that getting screwed over? You still have the hardware you bought. It still works with the games you bought, as well as new games being produced. You obviously thought the hardware was worth $XXX when you bought it, with that particular set of specs in that particular year - it doesn't retroactively lose value (as in, it was still worth the same when you bought it). You've gotten two years of play out of it, which you would have lost had you waited. If you're really desperate, you can sell it on eBay for a small loss and buy the next one. Regular DSes go for $80-90 on eBay - do you think that $50 (or less) loss is worth the 2 years of gameplay people got on them before deciding to upgrade to a Lite?

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    39. Re:Wii-tf by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

      The DS isn't a Hardware Revision. Nintendo has stated in the past that it's a different beast than the Gameboy. I believe they referred to the Gamecube/Wii, the GBA and the DS as their "three pillars" or some similar term.

      That the DS plays GBA games is just icing on the cake apparently.

      Although we can probably expect at some point support for original Gameboy/GBC carts drops off even from the direct Gameboy line.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    40. Re:Wii-tf by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      Another minor correction/addition: The DS can play GBA games in single-player mode only. This is mainly because the DS lacks a GBA game link port.

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    41. Re:Wii-tf by aliquis · · Score: 1

      If it was good enough to buy in the first place what is the problem?

      Noone forces you to upgrade and why shouldn't they get rid of any bugs and annoyencies later noticed?

      Who knows, maybe even xbox360 will get hd-dvd builtin and hdmi, or ps3 will get hd-dvd support if bluray fails, or whatever.

      Maybe even Microsoft releases a better OS, OHNO, I HAVE TO PAY FOR THAT!?! (Ok, it sucks for OS X since the updates are so small.)

    42. Re:Wii-tf by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Well in that case can't the just fuck off already for not releasing the wiimote for the Gamecube? Considering how minor the hardware upgrade is for the Wii anyway.

      I would have wished that it got more powerful, but I doubt that will happen since Nintendo isn't likely to leave the old units without new titles == therefor they can't rely on better hardware == no hw upgrades.

  5. Good. by Boogaroo · · Score: 1

    I would love to get DVD playback and I'd buy. I'd send my old Wii to my brother as a Bday gift or something. As long as a game doesn't REQUIRE you to get one of the new Wii versions, then I'll be fine with it.

    1. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck DVD playback. Get Adobe to license the Flash 9 player for the Wii so I can finally stream some decent looking video to it. Hell, anything's better than Flash 7.

      That's really the only thing holding it back from becoming a seriously cheap little media center. /me crosses fingers

  6. DVD Playback + Wii 2.0 by ernest.cunningham · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have read elsewhere rumblings that the complete hardware setup in the Wii is ready to support DVD playback but Nintendo are waiting on software from a third party that is being developed to enable such a feature. Muck like the Wii browser being developed by Opera. I think this is more rumor than fact at this stage.

    I am sure any Wii 2.0 will be much like the Playstation2/Plastation 2 Slim, or the Playstation/PS One type of upgrade. You know, CPU and GPU manufactured with a 60nm of 45nm technolgy resulting in lower power consumption and lower heat dissipation resulting in smaller headt sinks etc. I doubt the feature spec will be much, if at all different.

    1. Re:DVD Playback + Wii 2.0 by Osty · · Score: 1

      I have read elsewhere rumblings that the complete hardware setup in the Wii is ready to support DVD playback

      Duh? The Wii has a DVD drive. It can read DVDs. It can also play movies (which you can do right now if you load them up in the right format on an SD card). Thus I would say it's pretty obvious that everything is in place to be able to play DVDs. I'd guess the only thing missing is MPEG2 decoder software and a nice interface. The former requires licensing fees that could increase the price of the Wii (see the original Xbox with its special dongle to enable DVD playback since Microsoft didn't want to roll the cost of licensing into the base price). The latter just requires time, whether that's from a third-party building the software or from Nintendo doing it in-house.

      That the Wii will eventually get DVD playback is a no-brainer, and there's no reason why you should have to buy a new Wii to do so (though who knows what Nintendo will do?).

    2. Re:DVD Playback + Wii 2.0 by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have read elsewhere rumblings that the complete hardware setup in the Wii is ready to support DVD playback but Nintendo are waiting on software from a third party that is being developed to enable such a feature.

      The drive is basically a DVD drive with custom firmware that reads disks encoded at Constant Angular Velocity rather than Constant Linear Velocity. (Basically, the disc always spins at the same speed in the Wii/Gamecube while regular DVDs slow down as the laser approaches the edge of the disc.) A simple firmware update would probably "fix" the drive to be able to read both types of discs. Unfortunately, drives that aren't rated for movie use are more likely to burn out early. (Something that happened to a lot of PS2s.) So Nintendo will probably release a different console with a sturdier drive. Something for which they'll pass the cost along to the consumer.
    3. Re:DVD Playback + Wii 2.0 by tjansen · · Score: 1

      So Nintendo will probably release a different console with a sturdier drive.

      And hdmi output PLEASE.... I certainly won't buy another console with that component mess. The PS2 looks bad enough..

    4. Re:DVD Playback + Wii 2.0 by trdrstv · · Score: 1
      And hdmi output PLEASE.... I certainly won't buy another console with that component mess. The PS2 looks bad enough..

      Wii through (first party) component looks great. Just FYI...

    5. Re:DVD Playback + Wii 2.0 by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      The Wii's already pretty small, and I don't think DVD playback alone will be worth a revision.

      I think what we're looking at here is nothing short of HD capabilities. What this would mean is more beefed-up specifications to handle the improved resolution. Then, when an "old" Wii game or one without HD capabilities is loaded, the HDWii downscales its specs to the originals. But for new games with HD support, the HDWii plays them in HD and uses its beefed-up specs to keep the frame rate up.

      I give this an 80% chance of being the case. I can't think of anything else worth a hardware revision.

      (Maybe 8 remote support, but that would be frustrating for current Wii owners)

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    6. Re:DVD Playback + Wii 2.0 by greed · · Score: 1

      You're noticing a dramatic difference between HDMI and component on your system? You're component input has problems; I've got a Panasonic Viera 32" LCD and there's no visible difference between HDMI and component, except that component is _MUCH_ faster to switch sources with. (And component never blanks out the video on the PS3 or drops the audio on the satellite PVR.) Mind you, that's basically a 720p native screen, I don't have anything that'll display 1080p.

      HDMI is much more convenient than component, but like a good-quality VGA set compared to a DVI set; well, digital isn't everything. If only there was a little box you could get that would prevent HDCP handshake from being attempted, and have it just work like plain ol' DVI. If HDMI didn't have that copy-protection crap in it, I'd want everything on HDMI just for keeping the cabling nice and tidy. (I've always had problems with copy protection interfering with playback; monitors that get messed up by MacroVision in the days of VHS were just the start. Fortunately, my first VCR didn't care about MacroVision....)

    7. Re:DVD Playback + Wii 2.0 by tjansen · · Score: 1

      The colors never look right with analog input (on my Panasonic Plasma, but also on LCD monitors).

      But HDCP does not change the picture. Beside that, DVI supports HDCP as well, and HDMI works without HDCP. There's simply no difference (provided that your monitor supports HDCP at all, and the implementation doesn't have any bugs).

    8. Re:DVD Playback + Wii 2.0 by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Got a source?

      From what I've heard the rumours about the disc spinning constantly or backwards compared to normal drives were myths from the GameCube discs, which turned out to be regular DVDs with a slightly different encoder or something.

    9. Re:DVD Playback + Wii 2.0 by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From what I've heard the rumours about the disc spinning constantly or backwards compared to normal drives were myths from the GameCube discs, which turned out to be regular DVDs with a slightly different encoder or something.

      The backwards spin *is* a myth. However, the Constant Angular Velocity is the encoding of which you're thinking about. When you write a disc with CAV, the data spaces out differently than the more tightly packed CLV technology. However, it's easier on the motor because the motor doesn't have to step up and down speeds so much.

      Here's *a* source: http://www.emulanium.com/gamecube.php
      Another: http://www.wiili.org/index.php/GameCube_Optical_Di sc
      Tons More: http://www.google.com/search?q=Gamecube+Constant+A ngular+Velocity
  7. Whiny! by H8X55 · · Score: 1

    we're not even being told what new features it's going to have.

    Settle down - that means you've still got a while to wait.

    But it's not like they "tricked" you.
    Any early adopter to any platform of anything has got to realize that there will be later, greater versions that come out, for even less money. You buy the console now, because you want it now. Not because they promise to stop innovating for your specified amount of time.

    1. Re:Whiny! by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Any early adopter to any platform of anything has got to realize that there will be later, greater versions that come out, for even less money. You buy the console now, because you want it now. Not because they promise to stop innovating for your specified amount of time.


      Yes ... but traditionally console early adopters have had to deal with possible bugs in the hardware (early 360s bricking for instance), not early obsolescence of the hardware (which has traditionally lasted about 5 years... ~7-10 if you look at the PS line).
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    2. Re:Whiny! by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      So - I bought a network adapter for my gen 1 PS2. Not too long after i got the adapter they released the slim line ps2 for less, with built in adapter. Did I feel screwed? No way. I got to play online before any of those other folks did.

    3. Re:Whiny! by corky842 · · Score: 0

      How is adding more features making the old hardware obsolete?
      What if Microsoft suddenly decided to improve the Xbox 360 with a larger hard drive and a quieter DVD drive?
      And don't forget about those jerks at Apple, with their ipods. I mean, you buy one, and then a few months later they come out with a better screen or bigger hard drive.

    4. Re:Whiny! by LKM · · Score: 1

      Dude. Your Wii doesn't become obsolete just because Nintendo releases a blue Wii with a DVD player. Your freaking first-gen Wii will last as long as the whole Wii platform does. Just get over it.

    5. Re:Whiny! by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Dude. Your Wii doesn't become obsolete just because Nintendo releases a blue Wii with a DVD player.


      You're absolutely right. The Wii doesn't become obsolete until games come out that require a feature it doesn't have.

      Kinda like how the XBox360 Core (sans hard-drive) isn't obsolete until most games that come out require a Hard-Drive.
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    6. Re:Whiny! by LKM · · Score: 1

      Kinda like how the XBox360 Core (sans hard-drive) isn't obsolete until most games that come out require a Hard-Drive.

      What has this got to do with Nintendo? No Nintendo hardware revision has ever broken backwards compatibility. In fact, NIntendo even maintains some forward compatibility between console generations - Lots of GameBoy Color games also worked on the GameBoy.

      Please tell me one example where a Nintendo console became obsolete because a revision of that console contained a feature which was required by games.

  8. Re:nice by trdrstv · · Score: 0
    Maybe they'll include HDMI output, like microsoft is doing for this year's revision of the X360.

    That would actually make sence from Nintendo's 'Keep it simple' philosophy. A Single cable for video and sound as well as auto enable progressive scan (as I have yet to see a SDTV support HDMI).

  9. Re:nice by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe they'll include HDMI output

    I don't think they need a new hardware revision for that. The Wii (like the early Gamecubes) uses a custom cable connector. That connector sends the data in its own format that can then be translated into Composite or Component. (Depending on which "cables" you use.) I imagine that an HDMI "cable" for the existing hardware is not out of the question. Just not very useful at the moment.
  10. Re:Fine Line For Nintendo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    The recent stories, including right here on Slashdot, make it pretty clear that a good deal of the initial hype about the Wii is going away. Too many Wii owners are talking about being bored with the console or talking about how they are playing other consoles after they finished Zelda and grew bored with Wii Sports.


    Well, at least the Wii had initial hype ... The PS3 is DOA

    Looking at the Wii list of games for 2007 to early 2008 it is looking all too similar to the GameCube lineup. Maybe there are some major third party games that have yet to be announced, but right now I can't think of any major non-Nintendo game to really look forward to in 2007.


    Actually the line-up reminds me of the Nintendo DS which is the fastest selling console in history, and is still constantly sold out 2 years after it was released

    With 1080p TV prices in freefall, most likely with sub 1000 dollar sets by the middle of this year, Nintendo really needs to have something ready in the next couple of years because the Wii and HD TVs do not go well together.


    Being that most people who own 1080p sets still watch DVDs and are not rushing out to buy HD-DVD or Blu-Ray players I think the Wii will be fine ...

    Nintendo needs to walk a fine line of not Osbourning the current Wii while getting developers ready to start making games for a new system. Which usually starts to happen over a year in advance of the hardware hitting the shelves.


    Well, I actually think it is the PS3 that is in trouble being that it is selling as badly as the Dreamcast in both Japan and North America

    Enjoy your $600 soon to be dead system
  11. Re:Fine Line For Nintendo by timster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the Wii lineup reminds you of the DS launch lineup, then you are looking at the DS launch through the cloud of nostalgia. There was absolutely nothing to play except for a barely playable port of Mario 64. I thought I had wasted my money for over a YEAR.

    The Wii launch lineup is far better than the DS, or the PS2 for that matter... anyone who disagrees can have my copy of Fantavision.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  12. Ad-whoring jerkfaces... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    GameDaily BIZ: The Wii did quite well this holiday season. At last count Nintendo sold over 3.19 million units worldwide. Did you expect to sell that many or did that level of success surprise you a bit?

    Perrin Kaplan: We actually projected really strong numbers like that before our launch, because any public company needs to do that... But again it was a really high risk to bring out something that innovative and different and we are really kind of in awe that consumers are so high on the product. I mean we had hoped for it, but when you do something that different you never really know how people are going to react, and the fact that everybody--teens, dads, moms, cousins, young kids--everybody is totally into it, and then the DS is selling extremely well... we're kind of in awe of all of it. It's a great, great thing and I think it means a lot of good things for the whole industry.

    BIZ: That was actually something that Doug Lowenstein talked about earlier today in his speech. He said that the industry needs to take more risks, and shouldn't rely on the same type of content over and over. And he specifically mentioned the Wii and Will Wright's Spore...

    PK: Well, consumers are really savvy. They've been enjoying [what the games industry offers] for a long time, but I don't think [purchase patterns] reflected a healthier appetite. Buying games has been sort of staying level, but I don't think people were feeling inspired. In fact, some of the core gamers were like, "I thought I was getting bored and I wasn't sure, and now I realize I was totally getting bored. And I now I feel reinvigorated." And those who've left gaming, we need them to come back in order for the industry to grow, and then those who've never played, we really want them to enter the fold because it's very fun. So yeah, we've got to get risky and get out there, and obviously sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.

    BIZ: Nintendo built up a lot of momentum over the holiday season, but what's the plan to keep that momentum alive and well? Inevitably there's going to be a lull, so how do you keep the buzz around the Wii and people buying it?

    PK: Well, there's various buzz now. If you look on the Internet, there's everything from how to hold your own Wii party to how to do a Mii parade to change Mii codes to how to lose weight... all these different branches that have come off this tree. So the momentum has not slowed down. Conan O'Brien and Serena Williams were just playing Wii Sports tennis on TV the other night; that's the kind of stuff you thought would only happen during launch and it's still fast and furious. There's a lot, a lot of talk about it. You have to remember that even though you played the Wii many months ago, it's still new to a lot of people; there's a lot of "eurekas" to be had by a lot of consumers. So for us I think it's just about continuing to get the product out there, letting people have a chance to touch and feel it themselves and play it, because hearing about it is one thing; seeing someone play it is another exciting thing; and the third thing is if you play it yourself, for the most part, 99% of the time, people are like "I love this!"

    BIZ: How much credit would you give Nintendo's marketing team for this early success? You've had some unique marketing where you took the Wii to an AARP convention, advertised with Oprah...

    PK: Yeah, a lot of that actually started with the DS with Brain Age and Nintendogs and our efforts to try to take those products and populate it into different kinds of audiences. You know, the AARP thing was a little bit tough at first. They were like, "We don't really want to talk to you because we're all grandparents and we already buy stuff for our kids," and so we said, "No we want to talk to you about you." It took several attempts for them to finally say, "So why do you want to talk to us?" And it's because we have products for them as well now; so it really started with the DS and has continued on with the Wii. But I will say, at the end of th

  13. ::sigh:: oh you silly console fanboys... by Pojut · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the world of PC gamers.

    I myself have been playing video games both on consoles and on the PC since the commodore 64. If there is one thing I have learned as an avid PC gamer, it's this:

    Never expect your top of the line system to be top of the line the day after you buy it.

    Technology advances. Things change. New releases are let out, and people buy them because they are better. See, Nintendo released their product, heard what the public did and did not like about it, and are going to change it according to what the CONSUMERS say.

    I don't care if you test something for five years with 10,000 different people doing the testing. Until you truly release your product to the (somewhat ignorant) masses, you will never know exactly what is and is not wrong with something, ESPECIALLY a gaming system.

    Granted, some things such as noise, heat, etc. should be discovered fairly easily in testing...but there are really REALLY stupid people out there (yes, I'm looking at the Wii owners with broken TV's) that testers cannot possibly fathom. They can anticipate a lot, they can't anticipate the level of stupidity that some of their customers have achieved.

    Don't be mad at them for trying to listen to their customers.

    1. Re:::sigh:: oh you silly console fanboys... by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      I have also been a console/PC gamer for a very long time and I would say that I already see the end of the constant upgrade cycle for PCs ...

      I'm not saying it is going to happen tomorow, but I suspect that if you bought a top of the line system that it would take several years before you could no longer meet the minimum requirements of new games. Another thing I noticed is that there are Millions of people who are playing World of Warcraft, which is a 2 year old game that wasn't that (graphically) impressive when it was new, and no one complains about how ugly it is.

    2. Re:::sigh:: oh you silly console fanboys... by Pojut · · Score: 1

      I agree with you for the most part, although in the two years since I obtained my X800xt, it has become basically useless for new games...hell, even in the past year PC hardware (namely, video cards) have come a LONG LONG way...eventually though (and likely not too far ahead), we are going to hit the proverbial ceiling until the next big innovation comes around that changes everything...

    3. Re:::sigh:: oh you silly console fanboys... by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

      "Technology advances. Things change. New releases are let out, and people buy them because they are better."

      Sure, people will buy better hardware when the time and money asks for it. It's not like I should upgrade my graphics card every 6 months just because the manufacturer put out new stuff that is capable of a few more million polygons per second...

      I find the usual 5 year console cycle for hardware technology just right. There's actual effort from software makers to get optimizations out of the aging hardware that simply doesn't happen in the PC World. I can spend money on software rather than annoying and conflicting hardware updates...

      --
      I don't feel like it...
    4. Re:::sigh:: oh you silly console fanboys... by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 1

      I have a P4 2.66GHz, 1gig ram, and a Radeon 9800Pro. I purchased a Radeon X1950Pro yesterday because I'm unable to effectively run Supreme Commander. I'm still able to run things like Half-Life 2, Doom 3(ick) and Farcry on low to medium settings, but I wanted more. Your point is certainly valid though.

  14. Consoles over, but not the games by RyoShin · · Score: 4, Informative

    I DRTFA, but I just wanted to note that just because the Gamecube is no longer being produced does not mean that there will be no more Gamecube games, thanks to the backwards compatibility on the Wii.

    Only last year was the last Dreamcast game released (in Japan), and the system has been out of production for at least four years. Every once in a while a PS1 game is still released, because it can work on the PS2. Since the Gamecube will be cheaper to produce for than the Wii, and there's a fairly good chance that many of the consumers will have the 'Cube controllers or easily get them.

    The PS3 will also see a lot of this with PS2 games, especially with the massive increase of PS3 production costs.

    Gamecube controllers will probably also see continued production by third parties, seeing as how they can be used with VC games and are generally cheaper than the Classic controller.

    It does look like Nintendo is ditching the Gamecube internally, though.

    1. Re:Consoles over, but not the games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only last year was the last Dreamcast game released (in Japan)

      Wrong. There are still more being released.

    2. Re:Consoles over, but not the games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The submitter is probably just quoting the idiotic groupthink from the article Digg linked That story was about new shipments to Taiwan being terminated. The linked article barely mentions the GC.

    3. Re:Consoles over, but not the games by Talgrath · · Score: 1

      Yes, but this is basically an official announcement that the Gamecube is dead. I've considered it to be a dead console for the last year or year and a half, but now we have Nintendo itself essentially dropping support aside from customer support. There won't be any new Gamecubes made according to this statement or any new games made by Nintendo for the system; considering how heavily the Gamecube relied on Nintendo to produce games for it, this is basically the death certificate for the system. I'd only consider one system of the "previous generation" of systems to be alive now, and that's the PS2 (which still has some big name titles coming out for it). The Wii hardware update kinda makes me think I'll wait a bit before purchasing, at least long enough to find out what the updated Wii hardware will do.

    4. Re:Consoles over, but not the games by nuzak · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Only last year was the last Dreamcast game released

      I heard it received rave reviews from both Dreamcast owners.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    5. Re:Consoles over, but not the games by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      I still have a dreamcast, and even better it still works!

      Well, I have to hit it a bit first.

    6. Re:Consoles over, but not the games by merreborn · · Score: 1

      I DRTFA, but I just wanted to note that just because the Gamecube is no longer being produced does not mean that there will be no more Gamecube games, thanks to the backwards compatibility on the Wii.


      I did RTFA, and it ends with this:

      BIZ: My point is that from a first-party perspective, just like Microsoft doesn't put out new original Xbox games, Nintendo is no longer supporting GameCube. Can you confirm that?

      PK: Right, that's correct.


      There will be no more 1st-party games for the gamecube. There *may* be 3rd party games in the works, but:

      BIZ: "Third party support is at a trickle it would seem"


      The fact that game cube was really the loser of the last generation of consoles probably isn't going to aide its longevity.
    7. Re:Consoles over, but not the games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Cube controller functionality of the Wii was designed as its ultimate "safety net" - even if the Wiimote didn't make it an international hit, you would still be able to play games with a traditional controller. Also, the new Smash Bros. for the Wii uses the GameCube controller. I seriously doubt Nintendo will stop making Cube controllers (especially Wavebirds!) any time soon.

      CUBE-WAN: If you strike me down, I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.

      DARTH PS2 beheads CUBE-WAN, who vanishes, leaving only his robes in a crumpled pile at his foe's feet.

      WII: Use the Force, Luke!

    8. Re:Consoles over, but not the games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      | The fact that game cube was really the loser of the last generation of consoles probably isn't going to aide its longevity.

      Define loss in relevant terms.

    9. Re:Consoles over, but not the games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get them for 18 UKP now (with a controller but no mem card), there are a ton of great games available second hand for under 5 UKP each at good second hand game shops or ebay, or you can warez them and play illegally for the price of a CD-R. It's a great super-budget system for people who don't play much or have played everything else. I still have one hooked up, mostly for Rez and Ikaruga, and I got one for my sister a couple of months ago (she asked).

  15. Like Sega Genesis upgrades? by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't think people are getting screwed with a minor update every 2 years. Sega Genesis, Sega CD, Sega 32X, Sega Saturn?

    Now if they release an updated platform every 3-6 months then it is a different story Isn't that what Sony is doing with its PSP?
    1. Re:Like Sega Genesis upgrades? by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      You don't need a DS Lite to play any DS games.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    2. Re:Like Sega Genesis upgrades? by DesertBlade · · Score: 1

      Sega CD and Sega 32x where Add-Ons so they are a different scenario. And If remember they never really caught on.

      --
      Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    3. Re:Like Sega Genesis upgrades? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Too bad, too... Working Designs (RIP) SegaCD games were classic..

  16. You're obviously not a puzzle game fan by tepples · · Score: 1

    There was absolutely nothing to play except for a barely playable port of Mario 64. I thought I had wasted my money for over a YEAR.

    You didn't like matching the panels. I did. I knew I would like it because I liked Tetris Attack.

    The Wii launch lineup is far better than the DS, or the PS2 for that matter... anyone who disagrees can have my copy of Fantavision.

    <sarcasm>You mean the Apple IIGS precursor to Flash?</sarcasm> Still, you didn't like matching the fireworks. I did.

    Point: I agree that it takes a while for any console to build up a variety of titles that everyone can relate to. This is as true for Wii as it is for any other system. I myself am waiting for Animal Crossing Thwii because I beat the GameCube version yesterday.

    1. Re:You're obviously not a puzzle game fan by damiangerous · · Score: 1
      I myself am waiting for Animal Crossing Thwii because I beat the GameCube version yesterday.

      How do you "beat" Animal Crossing?

    2. Re:You're obviously not a puzzle game fan by timster · · Score: 1

      Oh, I love puzzle games; that's why I bought Fantavision. I tried really hard to like it, too. But there wasn't much game there. Too much of the gameplay was a matter of aiming the cursor quickly with the analog stick... heck, it might be a fun game on the Wii. I can still whip out a version of Tetris and be amused for a while, but I doubt that anyone in the whole wide world played any Fantavision last week.

      In fact, it was Meteos which made me feel like the DS might have something going for it after all.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  17. Wii DVD player in US by miyako · · Score: 1

    I hope the Wii with DVD support comes to the US. Personally, I would love to see something like WiiTV with some PVR and DVD support built into the Wii. I realize that nintendo was going for something that was cheap, and was puretly a gaming system- as opposed to the PS3 and 360 that want to be everything to everybody, but with the channels interface and the wii remote as it's controler, I can't think there has been a better fit since peanutbutter and chocolate.

    --
    Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    1. Re:Wii DVD player in US by Elder+Entropist · · Score: 1

      PVR Support? Where would they store the data? Even a 2GB card wouldn't hold a whole movie. Maybe if it supported an external USB drive...

    2. Re:Wii DVD player in US by miyako · · Score: 1

      yes, the current version of the Wii would not be able to store much of anything, but there wouldn't be anything stopping them from releasing a version with a hard drive, or a slot for a hard drive for in case someone wanted to use it as a PVR.

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    3. Re:Wii DVD player in US by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Or even a matching USB hard drive.

      There are 2 USB ports if I am not mistaken, so if one is reserved for the network, there is still space for an HD.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  18. Goomba Color by tepples · · Score: 1

    Is there a flash cart + emulator solution for [GBC games on GBA platform]?

    Yes, you can emulate single-player Game Boy games on a Game Boy Advance or on a Nintendo DS in GBA mode using the Goomba Color emulator.

    I don't even know where to look for that kind of stuff anymore since the evil bastards at Sony summoned Satan all over Lik-Sang.

    Froogle perhaps? What about gbadev.org's list of retailers?

  19. Would you like this Nintendo press release? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nintendo has no plans to leave the video game business at this time, so there will be either a new version of the Nintendo Wii or a new console designed to replace the Wii at some point in the future. The new Wii or the Wii replacement, code-named Armed Insurrection, will have some new features. We will announce those features closer to the release date.

    Oh, and film at 11.

  20. Re: Beating Animal Crossing... by trdrstv · · Score: 4, Funny
    I myself am waiting for Animal Crossing Thwii because I beat the GameCube version yesterday.

    How do you "beat" Animal Crossing?

    You build the biggest house possible, buy at least 1 of every item including all NES games, and owe nothing. At that point the only thing Tom Nook can sell you is time with his wife effectively making Tom your bitch for a change.

  21. Beating Animal Crossing by tepples · · Score: 1

    How do you "beat" Animal Crossing? To beat Animal Crossing Population Growing, plant trees, sell the fruit, and pay Tom Nook 1,413,600 bells through the post office. (This can be done within 60 game days.) Then talk to K.K. the following Saturday night in front of the big golden statue of your character. Or is paying off one's house + expansions just the first mission? What specific missions remain?
    1. Re:Beating Animal Crossing by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      There's tons of stuff to do besides that. Get 100K on your HRA score, collect every fish and insect (which take at least a year to do), get all four golden tools, collect every item in the catalog including every model (which requires getting 999,999,999 bells in your bank account, which takes forever by itself unless you hit it REALLY big in the stalk market). I've hung out on the gamefaqs AC forums, and I'm not sure that anyone has actually completed everything there is to complete in the game, at least not without a whole lotta cheat codes. Although even after you do all that, you can try to max out your HRA score - I think the top on record is 420,000.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    2. Re:Beating Animal Crossing by tepples · · Score: 1

      I've hung out on the gamefaqs AC forums, and I'm not sure that anyone has actually completed everything there is to complete in the game Compare to Super Mario 64: the primary campaign is to get 70 stars and beat Bowser, and another is to get 120 stars and find Yoshi. Also compare to Pokémon Blue: the primary campaign is to get 8 badges and beat the Elite Four, and another is to collect #1 through #150 Mewtwo. What level of accomplishment in ACPG compares to beating Bowser or the Elite Four? And how many memory cards must I use to accomplish this?
    3. Re:Beating Animal Crossing by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      Everything fits on one memory card, except you really need two because some things you can't get without visiting another town (either make your own or borrow a friend's). You could say that paying off your mortgage is "beating the game," but it's more like that's when the game actually starts, because you no longer owe all your money to Nook and can save up and do stuff with it instead. There's no way to save up money until you've paid your mortgage, except leaving $30,000 bell bags lying around. But on the other hand, once you get the biggest house you could complete most other goals in the game without ever paying your mortgage off - you'll just need to find lots of places to put those bell bags.

      The main point is, saying you've "beat" AC is much like saying you "beat" The Sims. Sure, there are goals to be accomplished, and paying your mortgage is the most obvious one - but you don't really ever "beat" it.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    4. Re:Beating Animal Crossing by tepples · · Score: 1
  22. What is a side quest? by tepples · · Score: 1

    You build the biggest house possible, buy at least 1 of every item including all NES games, and owe nothing. The biggest house and owe nothing part is easy and can be accomplished in 60 days. But isn't filling the catalog a side quest? The dialogue in the first hour of ACPG makes it clear that paying off your house (1,413,600 Bells) and getting the statue is at least part of the game's main mission but does not mention any other missions comparable to beating Sephiroth in FF7. (Ignore Uncyclopedia.) Besides, a lot of items just aren't available in your town. In fact, there are four NES games that neither Nook nor Redd will sell.
    1. Re:What is a side quest? by trdrstv · · Score: 1
      In fact, there are four NES games that neither Nook nor Redd will sell.

      Then you STEAL THEM! Anyway, I was joking. I have no idea how you would beat Animal Crossing. I figure it's kinda like Nintendogs (another game I don't own) where it really is a big sandbox game with no real point of closure. You just play to play.

  23. Three things they forgot to ask by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I myself am waiting for Animal Crossing Thwii because I beat the GameCube version yesterday.

    I too am waiting for a Mii-enabled Animal Crossing Three that uses Wii Sims houses.

    But, this makes me realize they forgot to ask some things.

    [from the article] how will Nintendo's online plans evolve?

    PK: Some of that friend code stuff is really built for the mass consumer, not just the gaming world. The Wii has tons of different offerings and a lot of it was brand new. The remote, brand new. The way in which it interfaces with the screen, brand new. The channel concept, brand new. And I think if we launched it and plunked it down and said to the absolutely uninitiated, "Here's 18 things it can do," I can guarantee you it would stay in the box. It's just too intimidating. So we really strategically wanted to roll out having nearly a year talking about the remote and getting people ready, why it's unique, because it is the Einstein of the system.

    And then talking about the different things the box can do and then entering with the Virtual Console piece of it and the Wii Shop channel, introducing the channels one a time--the Mii channel has taken off and people really love that. Then ultimately we did weather, news and there's a lot more to come, but we're kind of rolling it out in a fashion that is consumable for people who are not highly experienced--and also giving you guys a chance to really explore it. And online stuff has come in the Pokemon game that has launched in Japan, and it definitely will come here and I think people will be very pleased with it. But I also think we've seen other companies launch with the entire menu of stuff, and I don't think all of it gets utilized at the start.


    To me, that says that Mii-enabling many games is a prime area.

    So, the three things they should have asked:

    1. What will your 2009/2010 Wii 2.0 for HDTV have for chips and strength?

    2. Will your Wii 2.0 be HD-DVD or will you region-lock it by choosing Sony's Blu-Ray format?

    3. Can we have a Hamster dance-off game? And will there be a sequel to Duck Hunt for the Wii, involving small miniature dogs?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  24. Re:nice by DarkJC · · Score: 1

    If it's setup like the 360, then it would need a hardware revision. The 360 uses a custom cable connector but as of now can only support analog output. I would imagine the Wii is likely the same.

  25. Dog Hunt by tepples · · Score: 1

    I too am waiting for a Mii-enabled Animal Crossing Three I thought Mii clothing could be only one color. Even ACPG allowed up to 15 colors in a 32x32 pixel texture for clothing. I wonder how Nintendo plans to reconcile these, and how it plans to reconcile charging for haircuts in ACWW with the predefined haircuts of Mii Channel.

    that uses Wii Sims houses. If you want The Sims Thwii, you know where to find it.

    And will there be a sequel to Duck Hunt for the Wii Wii Play.

    involving small miniature dogs? Can't say. I tried Dog Hunt in Internet Channel, but it was too laggy.
  26. Re:Dog Hunt, Mii in Wii games by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I thought Mii clothing could be only one color. Even ACPG allowed up to 15 colors in a 32x32 pixel texture for clothing. I wonder how Nintendo plans to reconcile these, and how it plans to reconcile charging for haircuts in ACWW with the predefined haircuts of Mii Channel.

    I think as I read the plans, it sounds like you can Import your Mii into Animal Crossing for the Wii and Sims for the Wii (which I will call Wii Animal Crossing and Wii Sims) - once they are imported, you can modify their clothing (using player-designed patterns and clothing you received as gifts) and hair cuts etc. Expect a limited pallete in Wii Animal Crossing for face structure and hair - much more Mii in feel - but a wider pallete for Wii Sims for face, hair, and body, since that's a big deal in that. I did notice the Wii Sims seemed to all have similar bodies though, it was very much more Wii Animal Crossing in feel, so I'm not sure how much variation you get.

    My question: can you import your Wii Animal Crossing neighbors into Wii Sims as Pets and can you export your Wii Sims Pets into Wii Animal Crossing as animal neighbors? That would be cool.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  27. Re:Wii-tf or when is Wii 2.0? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Thank GOD I read this post. Otherwise I would have been completely off guard with no means of anticipating any further hardware revisions despite (as you said) they have a habit of releasing new hardware in less than 2 years. I wonder when the next one will hit?

    Well, the US won't go to HDTV until 2009, so if I was a marketer or planning person (which I used to be), I would aim for 2009 December release for the next Wii major upgrade - and include HDMI as well as some cool peripherals the after-market had glommed onto.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  28. Goofy vs. Pluto by tepples · · Score: 1

    My question: can you import your Wii Animal Crossing neighbors into Wii Sims as Pets and can you export your Wii Sims Pets into Wii Animal Crossing as animal neighbors? That would break the Goofy-Pluto dichotomy of a lot of furry universes. In the Disney universe, Minnie Mouse is afraid of mice, even though she is drawn with mouselike facial features. Likewise, in the AC universe, there exist both birds that act like IRL birds (which appear on various days) and birds that act like IRL people (e.g. Apollo, Amelia, Robin, Otis, Hank, Rhoda, Ava).
    1. Re:Goofy vs. Pluto by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      True, but as I recall, I have had Animal Crossings villages on my GameCube that had both a cat and a dog as neighbors and they got along fairly well. So I can't see why you can't export both the cat and dog neighbors from Wii Animal Crossings into Wii Sims Pets and also export Wii Sims Pets into Wii Animal Crossing as neighbors.

      But it's possible the other characters - lion, eagle, bear, etc - might not be eligible, even though I've seen a number of people do really lame Sims 2: Pets versions of bears and lions (using a dog or cat template).

      Fur patterns might be difficult though. Spots are ok, but the multi-layer fur settings for Sims 2: Pets might not work in Wii Sims or Wii Animal Crossing.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  29. Re:nice by PayPaI · · Score: 1

    As was hinted at by the other reply, unless there's an HDMI encoder chip on the Wii logic board (there isn't), HDMI isn't gonna happen. Even if it was there, if it could do more than 480p, they would allow more than 480p on the component cables (they don't).

  30. Re:nice by seebs · · Score: 1

    What, you think a $10 cable is doing "conversion"?

    The connector has signal wires for the various parts of component signals. There's no signal wires for digital. Thus, there's no way to do digital out (say, HDMI) without a new connector.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  31. Re:Fine Line For Nintendo by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Kirby Canvas Curse Dude, rocked my little grey box!

  32. Re:nice by krakass · · Score: 0

    Plus the HDMI standard requires the HDMI connector you can't use your own proprietary one.

  33. How about fixing a glaring omission? by steelcobra · · Score: 1

    Like actually putting an ethernet port on the box? I know some people don't mind it being WiFi only, but it's nearly a dealbreaker for me if it's an alway-connected system and I have to pay extra for a dongle to run a Cat5e to it.

    1. Re:How about fixing a glaring omission? by logic+hack · · Score: 0

      Thankyou! I can't even describe how much this bothered me; especially as someone who spent 15 hours in a Canadian November line to get the Wii at launch. I don't even own any online supported games at the moment, but being able to Youtube, etc. from my bed would be great. Finally my prayers were answered when I managed to snag one of the FON wi-fi routers from a recent free giveaway. Nintendo: ETHERNET. PORT. PLEASE. Think of the wired children.

    2. Re:How about fixing a glaring omission? by harks · · Score: 1

      YES! And to add to it, that dongle isn't available at any store I've seen, and on ebay, costs as much as a wireless router.

    3. Re:How about fixing a glaring omission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you'd rather wait a year and possibly pay an extra $50 for a Wii 2.0 instead of getting the system now and spending $10 bucks for a usb ethernet adapter?

  34. Wii Colors. by LordJezo · · Score: 1

    Remember the early shots of the Wii that were in color back at E3 a while ago?

    Yeah, who wants to bet that will be one of the 'upgrades'? Every Nintendo thing has come in multiple colors, I don't see them stopping that now.

  35. huh? by LKM · · Score: 1

    Yeah, because all those new Gameboy games suddenly didn't work on my GBA anymore after Nintendo brought out the GBA SP. Except... they continued working just fine, and you have no point at all.

  36. FREEEDOM!!! ....Wiiwoaded by Akvum · · Score: 1

    I would love to see a nintendo Wii covered in woad. But only if it came with a 'braveheart' game.

  37. Re:Dog Hunt, Mii in Wii games by LKM · · Score: 1

    It's possible that Nintendo will update the Miis to have real clothes (and ears! I want ears!), thereby making it possible to "edit" your actual Mii in Animal Crossing. That would rule.

  38. It's not _that_ bad! by burnttoy · · Score: 1

    You can always flog the old one and get, maybe, 1/2 the money of the cost of the new one if you _really_ can't live without it.

    Failing that they make good hand me downs... err.. presents for siblings or fiends. (I hope my bros isn't reading this. He got my old DS as a prezzy!).

    Also, a lot of people enjoy collecting. I know people who have collected several (or all) variants of a machine just to build a collection and hardware updates especially useful, as Drinkypoo said, is when your SW catalogue isn't made worthless but backwards incompatibility.

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  39. I gotta ask? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    What's the second Turbographx-16? Unless you mean the Duo, or the Japanese version. As far as I knew, there was only ever one form factor/design of the TG-16 in the States. Or was there more than one release in Europe/South America/etc?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I gotta ask? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      AFAIK there were two sold in Japan. Sorry I didn't specify. I was trying to be global :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"