Slashdot Mirror


Chimps Found Making Own Weapons to Hunt for Food

Pojut writes "The Washington Post has an article involving chimps and weapons. Apparently, there have been direct observations of chimps in the west African savannah modifying sticks to create spears. They then use these spears to kill small mammals and eat them. It is the first time that an animal other than a human has been directly observed in crafting a weapon for the purpose of hunting or killing."

98 of 410 comments (clear)

  1. The next stage of evolution... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    The next stage of evolution won't be long now.

    In a few years scientists will discover the monkeys have learnt how to lash these sticks together to make chairs.

    Throwing these at their prey is more effective because it fucking kills them.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:The next stage of evolution... by bladx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Developers, developers, developers...

    2. Re:The next stage of evolution... by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      First this: Evidence of Chimp Developing "Spoken" Language, then this: Chimps Use Tool Kit, and now Chimps Found Making Own Weapons to Hunt for Food. I'm telling you, we gotta get off this rock soon.

      --
      We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
    3. Re:The next stage of evolution... by TekPolitik · · Score: 4, Funny

      The next stage of evolution won't be long now... In a few years scientists will discover the monkeys have learnt how to lash these sticks together to make chairs.

      Nah, in the next stage the chimps will learn to trade the spears with gorillas to get food. Then they will trade spears with a rival tribe of gorillas for more food. Then they will sit back, watch the gorillas kill eachother, then eat the gorillas.

      After all, if Ronald Regan can do this with gorillas* in South America, the chimps can do it with gorillas in Africa.

      * Yes, I know you don't spell it that way.

  2. Get your Stinking Paws off me, you damn dirty ape! by rednip · · Score: 5, Funny

    We need to nip this in the bud, before they learn to ride horses, shoot guns, speak english and hunt humans for sport. But if they do, I for one welcome our new simian overlords, and I wish to remind you that as a programmer, I am fatty and full of cholesterol.

    --
    The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
  3. Yeah by The+Zon · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is the first time that an animal other than a human has been directly observed in crafting a weapon for the purpose of hunting or killing.
    Only because the squirrels are too slick to get caught.
    --
    Some attitudes replaced or by cgi optimizes
    1. Re:Yeah by rilister · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The birds are in on it too: this totally blew me away.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYZnsO2ZgWo
      looks like an animal crafting a tool to me.

      More about this here:
      http://www.sciencemag.org/feature/data/crow/

      Cheers,
      Rob

      --
      'This writing business. Pencils and what-not. Over-rated if you ask me. Silly stuff. Nothing in it' - Eeyore
    2. Re:Yeah by mashade · · Score: 2, Funny

      Looks like a crowbar to me.

      Badum bum...

      --
      Technology tips and tricks.
  4. This is news? by Seantotheizzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's nothing. They've already learned how to get into houses... White houses seem especially vulnerable.

  5. Uh oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if they start killing endangered animals?

    1. Re:Uh oh! by FooGoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      They will be taught multiculturalism

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
  6. Animals are people too.. by mozumder · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. just REALLY dumb people.

  7. Chimps making weapons? by Pikoro · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would rather see them make peace...

    Then they can show their human-like qualities and break it

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  8. Found a picture... by Brad1138 · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  9. But from where... by Marnhinn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't much care where the chimps evolve to...

    I would like to know if this is a learned behavior from an outside source or if this is simply something they have discovered on their own.

    --
    There is always a frontier where there is an open and willing mind
    1. Re:But from where... by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know the ol saying. "Monkey see, monkey do."

      Making a weapon requires foresight into the possible effects they may have. I seriously doubt chimps have such cognitive skills. I'm willing to be it was learned behavior from another chimp, where the original chimp was a pet that learned it from a tribe's man.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:But from where... by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 5, Funny

      Black Monolith.

      --
      Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
    3. Re:But from where... by aquabat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Making a weapon requires foresight into the possible effects they may have. I seriously doubt chimps have such cognitive skills. IAAC, and I take exception to that remark. You humans think you're so superior. Let's see what kind of foresight y'all have expressed recently:

      nuclear weapons

      the internal combustion engine

      cod fishing on the Grand Banks

      clearcutting of rainforest in Brazil to raise cattle

      software patents

      the patriot act

      "the solution to pollution is dilution"

      lawyers

      If you know to whom my sig is attributed, then you probably know how I think all this is going to end.

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    4. Re:But from where... by dosquatch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Making a weapon requires foresight into the possible effects they may have. I seriously doubt chimps have such cognitive skills.

      Even if it is some form of imitation, doesn't that indicate some grasp of the encompassed cause and effect? Some glimmer of said foresight?

      Otters use flat stones to crack open shellfish. Some apes use sticks to fish for termites. Is this really such a stretch?

      --
      "Hey, the third matrix movie would have been good except for the plot,story, and acting." --AC
    5. Re:But from where... by osu-neko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Making a weapon requires foresight into the possible effects they may have. I seriously doubt chimps have such cognitive skills.

      Why?

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    6. Re:But from where... by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      " It is the first time that an animal other than a human has been directly observed in crafting a weapon for the purpose of hunting or killing."

      Spiders construct webs for hunting and killing. No intelligence required.

    7. Re:But from where... by DreamingReal · · Score: 5, Funny
      I would like to know if this is a learned behavior from an outside source or if this is simply something they have discovered on their own.


      You raise an interesting and controversial question. According to an unofficial source on the research team, one of the research assistants allowed several of the chimps to use his PSP and play GTA: Liberty City Stories. Soon after, those same chimps were observed stabbing the bush babies. The source went on to say that the connection is being kept hush-hush as several people on the team are avid gamers and don't want to lend ammunition to the Lieberman argument that violent video games inspire violent behavior. Needless to say, they are very worried about what will happen if the chimps encounter any Senegali automobiles and/or hookers.

      --
      We want some answers and all that we get
      Some kind of shit about a terrorist threat

      - Ministry
    8. Re:But from where... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative

      I would like to know if this is a learned behavior from an outside source or if this is simply something they have discovered on their own. Chimps are very much like us. They engage in warfare with other chimp tribes, they use "hammer and anvil" tactics in hunting parties--- none of this learned from outside. The idea that nature is some sort of benign place full of happy peaceful animals living in harmony is definitely wishful thinking.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    9. Re:But from where... by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The internal combustion engine was a very good invention. It has just been kept around much longer than it should have, and has been used in much higher quantities than it should.

    10. Re:But from where... by Laser+Lou · · Score: 4, Funny

      IAAC, and I take exception to that remark. You humans think you're so superior. Let's see what kind of foresight y'all have expressed recently:

      nuclear weapons

      the internal combustion engine

      cod fishing on the Grand Banks

      clearcutting of rainforest in Brazil to raise cattle

      software patents

      the patriot act

      "the solution to pollution is dilution"

      lawyers You forgot to include Slashdot in that list.
      --
      No data, no cry
    11. Re:But from where... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, obviously they learned it from somewhere else just as most people. You think humans are the only ones on the planet who know how to google?

    12. Re:But from where... by nbritton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "I would like to know if this is a learned behavior from an outside source or if this is simply something they have discovered on their own."

      I think they discovered it on their own, think about it:
      Mammalia -> Primates -> Hominoidea -> Hominidae -> Homininae -> Hominini -> Pan -> Pan Troglodytes (Chimpanzee)
      Mammalia -> Primates -> Hominoidea -> Hominidae -> Homininae -> Hominini -> Homo -> Homo Sapiens (Human)

      We are so close to Chimpanzee's that a human/ape hybrid is possible without the help of genetic manipulation, i.e. wear a condom if your that desperate. It's believed that the Pan/Homo split happened about 6 million years ago some where in Africa.

      So the question really is... 6 million years into the future will Pan Troglodytes be as smart as current day Homo Sapiens?

    13. Re:But from where... by Brad1138 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Spiders construct webs for hunting and killing. No intelligence required."

      I would say that's more akin to moneys trying to kill a victim by flinging poo at them. The stick is a weapon crafted from thier environment, not secreted from them.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    14. Re:But from where... by bitt3n · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Spiders construct webs for hunting and killing. No intelligence required.
      In that case, the purpose of the web is imputed by the observer, in the same way that one might say that the purpose of the otter's oily coat is to allow the coat to repel water, but the otter need not be aware of this purpose for the coat to fulfill it. In the case of the monkey, the purpose of the spear appears to be imputed by the animal itself. That is likely what the article finds significant.
    15. Re:But from where... by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 4, Funny

      Okay, apart from nuclear weapons, the internal combustion engine, cod fishing on the Grand Banks, clearcutting of rainforest in Brazil to raise cattle, software patents, the patriot act, "the solution to pollution is dilution", lawyers, computers, spacefaring vehicles, medicine, communication networks, agriculture...what did the Romans ever do for us?

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    16. Re:But from where... by potat0man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've seen primates using sticks as 'fishing poles' to pull termites out from logs. Sure looked like a tool to me. That was about five years ago on PBS.

    17. Re:But from where... by fuego451 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In that case, the purpose of the web is imputed by the observer

      Until you see Dinopis guatemalensis the Net Casting Spider which fashions a net, hangs by a silk with the net held in its legs and waits for supper to happen by.

      As for chimps using spears, I know they are capable of using teamwork to catch, kill and eat small monkeys and they occasionally use sticks as clubs in threat gestures, beating the ground. Don't know if they have learned to kill other animals with clubs and I think spears are something this particular group of animals learned from outside their society. Just my two cents worth.

    18. Re:But from where... by Monsuco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IAAC, and I take exception to that remark. You humans think you're so superior. Let's see what kind of foresight y'all have expressed recently:
      But man has also invented items of peace, such as beer, there have to be some redeming qualities to that.
    19. Re:But from where... by Yoda's+Mum · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Aqueduct?

    20. Re:But from where... by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the article does say that the difference is the "crafting" aspect -- the chimps were observed to strip the leaves off of the twigs and sharpen them, thus "fashioning" weapons as opposed to using what comes to hand.

      I'd think this would get boring after a while. Crafting tools and killing defenseless little creatures -- are they trying to level up, or what?? :)

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    21. Re:But from where... by smallfries · · Score: 4, Funny

      You splitter bastards!

      I spit on the Judean People's Front.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    22. Re:But from where... by joh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Chimps are very much like us. They engage in warfare with other chimp tribes, they use "hammer and anvil" tactics in hunting parties--- none of this learned from outside.


      There are two species comprising the chimpanzee genus. The common chimp is what you describe, the Pygmy Chimp (also called Bonobo) is much different. Bonobos don't engage in warfare and prefer having sex with each other all day over aggressive encounters. They're much less dominant and aggressive within their tribes, too.

      Both species seem to thrive well. I find it kind of refreshing to see that there are very different social models possible and both work. And while the chimps seem to be more inventive when it comes to killing, the Bonobos are certainly more inventive when it comes to having fun. I think we should learn from them.

      It's also interesting to see that the behaviour of Bonobos seems to be much too unsettling that you will see or read much of it. Even in scientific literature they were more or less taboo for a long time and even today you won't see documentaries showing them having all kinds of sex just for fun (and they really do that all the time, including oral sex, masturbation and homosexual sex).

    23. Re:But from where... by tenco · · Score: 3, Informative

      It has just been kept around much longer than it should have, and has been used in much higher quantities than it should.

      I think that's the "foresight" part...

    24. Re:But from where... by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 3, Funny

      What your terrier doesn't know is that the lab has been sharpening a stick.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    25. Re:But from where... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What matters in determining intelligence is the thought behind the action. Was it instinct? Mimicry? Or innovation?

      Applying that criterion leads to solipism, as there's only one being whose thoughs I have access too. The rest of you all may be behaving by instinct or mimicry, but I know I'm thinking.

      The way to distinguish intelligent tool-making and use from instinctual behaviors like web spinning is by the flexibility and adaptability of the behavior. Can it be altered through learning? When circumstances change, does the organism repeat unsuccessful behaviors or does it alter them to work?

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    26. Re:But from where... by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Funny

      No fair, at least four of those items can be attributed to politicians, not humans.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    27. Re:But from where... by Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The issue is where that "craft" comes from. In spiders, it is the result of a genetic algorithm progressively narrowing down wasteful "make a mat of sticky fiber" designs down into the minimum amount of thread needed to produce as large of a web as possible. In chimps, there is no "spear instinct". Put a chimp in isolation, give it all its food, it will never make a spear.

      And another thing: about this notion of "mimicry" being somehow bad. Mimicry is one of the few things that sets us apart. In terms of basic cognitive tasks, chimps often perform better than young human children. On some tasks, they keep up with children 5-6 years old. However, there are two things that chimps are notoriously bad about: learning from example and working in teams. They can do it; they just don't do it well.

      Human kids mimic. That's how they learn. In can even be a disadvantage in cases. Take a group of young human children and show them how to get a toy, but put in a lot of extra, pointless steps. Do the same with a group of chimps. The human children will tend to do all of the pointless steps. The chimps will often omit them.

      Chimps do have some evidence of culture. They can teach, and have been observed passing down the ability to make tools to their young. Captive chimps have been observed trying to teach sign language. Learning from example is just very difficult for them, so they don't pass much cultural information. They learn much better through simple reinforcement. Give a chimp a puzzle that has multiple solutions which contains a piece of food inside. Have it practice opening it up over and over until it gets good at it. Now have that chimp solve its puzzle in front of another chimp. Then give that other chimp the puzzle. More often than not, the "observer" chimp will start from scratch in terms of trying to figure out the puzzle.

      One animal that I'm ever so impressed with (as an owner of one) is parrots. Parrots learn well from example, but are still good problem solvers. My DYH amazon, at less than five months old, solved a puzzle in a way I never would have guessed he would. I hung a bungee cord with a treat on the end from a diagonal support rope, knowing that the cord would be too hard for him to climb down. Next to the treat, I hung a toy that he doesn't like to stand on -- his "cladder". Beyond that, I hung a toy that he did like to stand on, his "boing". The goal was to get him to climb on the cladder to get to the treat. However, I kept finding the bungee wrapped around the cladder and stuck in place, with the treat gone. Figuring my partner was trying to make it easier for him, I'd reset it, only to have it end up in the same way. So I watched (and filmed it). He'd climb up the boing, onto the support rope, past the cladder, and up to the top where the bungee connects. Then he'd grab onto the bungee with a combination of his beak and claws, and inch himself back down the support rope while holding onto it. When he got back to his boing, he'd loop the bungee around the cladder and then eat the treat at his leisure.

      He's an incredibly fast learner, too. He once spent half an hour trying to figure out how to open the clasp on one of my shirts. Ever since, it only takes him about ten seconds. The same thing happened with clothespins. I've also given him some simple verbal tasks that I've given to dogs before, and he excelled at them. Dogs often react based on the tone of your voice and your body language, not the verbal context. Try saying "stupid" with the same voice and body language that you say "come", or inserting their name in the middle of a sentence without changing your tone. More often then not, in my experience, they respond to the tone and body language, not the context. That's not to say that they can't; my younger sister has a dog who does Agility, and certainly context is involved there.

      Without any special training, however, I've found that my amazon responds to content. I'll put my finger in front of him and in a command

      --
      Stop it, stop it, it's fine. I will *destroy* you.
    28. Re:But from where... by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, both corvines (crows, ravens, and jays) and psitticines (parrots) are known to make use of tools. I've read case reports about a crow whittling a stick down and picking its (simple) cage lock with it, and another case of a parrot using one of its shed feathers to scratch its back.

      These two classes are generally considered to be the most intelligent birds. Heck, there's even one type of parrot that hunts large prey in a manner that humans used to hunt large game. Individuals of New Zealand's kea population (also known as the "feathered wolf") have been observed hunting sheep (a size ratio comparable to humans hunting mammoths). Sheep being an introduced species with no similar native animal, it appears to be a learned behavior, not an evolved one. Such kea tend to harass a sheep, attacking it until it runs gets caught in a hazard (such as a falling off a dropoff, getting stuck against a fence, etc). The kea then kills and eats it. Being intelligent animals, "play" is a big part of their culture. Unfortunately for them, their play doesn't endear them to ranchers, either -- they like to play with things like rubber ripped off of car windows. Needless to say, the kea has been ruthlessly hunted because of its habits.

      --
      Stop it, stop it, it's fine. I will *destroy* you.
    29. Re:But from where... by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Stop it, stop it, it's fine. I will *destroy* you.
    30. Re:But from where... by plunge · · Score: 3, Funny

      I dunno: the bonobo strategy of having sex with you in order to relieve stress would be pretty incapacitating. Imagine a platoon of soldiers coming upon a platoon of naked prostitutes. It's not immediately obvious who would come out on top of that encounter.

    31. Re:But from where... by kidcharles · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not immediately obvious who would come out on top of that encounter. Even if you were on the bottom in that encounter, it might still be fun.
      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  10. We should invade. by yotto · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't care what the UN says. Those weapons could be dangerous. If we got Hitler when he was at this stage, imagine how many people we'd have saved.

    1. Re:We should invade. by Jurrasic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Won't happen. For Dubya to call for an invasion on the chimps, he would have to admit beliving in evolution first. :p

      --
      Devil bunnies! I snort the nose! Lucifer! Banana! Banana!
    2. Re:We should invade. by slickwillie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Another group of chimps was observed to be enriching uranium, but they claimed it was for peaceful purposes.

  11. Hm... by darkhitman · · Score: 5, Funny

    By any chance, was a mysterious 1x4x9 slab of black stone found in the near vicinity, as well?

    --
    Tell me something...it's still "We, the people"... right?
  12. Re:Get your Stinking Paws off me, you damn dirty a by Brad1138 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We need to nip this in the bud, before they learn to ride horses, shoot guns

    Too late

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  13. Semantics by duffetta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry, I don't buy the story. Just media sensationalism to me. Jane Goodall observed chimps "fishing" for ants with twigs quite some time ago. Some of these chimps fashioned the twigs so as to work better. From where I sit, this is just as fantastic as having a chimp fashioning a larger twig to hunt with. Nothing new here except an over active media trying to make something out more out of old news.

    1. Re:Semantics by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you read the article, you'll find out that some of the chimps are sharpening the ends, and are not merely fishing, but using force to injure the critters they're hunting. It's definitely spearing, though there's no reason to think that this innovation hasn't been developed from the fishing technique. That is no different than virtually all our technologies, which are rooted in earlier ones.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Semantics by ericspinder · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sorry, I don't buy the story. Just media sensationalism to me. Actually there is a big difference. Finding stick on ground and knowing that more ants will crawl on it if it is bent a certain way, is one thing. However, finding large stick on ground, taking the time to sharpen it, stalk another animal, and then use it effectively, is something else altogether.
      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
  14. Very interesting. by GrumpySimon · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The paper's really interesting, it's currently in press in Current Biology. Abstract:

    Although tool use is known to occur in species ranging from naked mole rats to owls, chimpanzees are the most accomplished tool users. The modification and use of tools during hunting, however, is still considered to be a uniquely human trait among primates. Here, we report the first account of habitual tool use during vertebrate hunting by nonhumans. At the Fongoli site in Senegal, we observed ten different chimpanzees use tools to hunt prosimian prey in 22 bouts.

            This includes immature chimpanzees and females, members of age-sex classes not normally characterized by extensive hunting behavior. Chimpanzees made 26 different tools, and we were able to recover and analyze 12 of these. Tool construction entailed up to five steps, including trimming the tool tip to a point. Tools were used in the manner of a spear, rather than a probe or rousing tool. This new information on chimpanzee tool use has important implications for the evolution of tool use and construction for hunting in the earliest hominids, especially given our observations that females and immature chimpanzees exhibited this behavior more frequently than adult males.


    Should have the DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.042 when it's published (it's NOT active yet - give it some time).

    However, from a quick reading of the paper, this seems to be a simple extension of the ant-nest probing behavior (i.e. jam a stick into a nest and feed off the ants/termites that rush out). What *is* interesting is that the chimps appear to have crafted these tools through a number of steps (which is uncommon, AFAIK, the only other animal to do this is the New Caledonian Crow.
    1. Re:Very interesting. by BluBrick · · Score: 2, Funny

      I find the combination of your comment and your sig particularly disturbing.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  15. I wonder if they came up with it... by Virtual_Raider · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder if they came up with the idea themselves or may have learned about it by imitating humans? Or maybe they were even taught by one... I remember reading some studies where some researched taught a chimp to use sign language and then they observed that chimp spontaneously teaching it to other chimps. The first thing that came to my mind was that if they ever released it on the wild and it survived one day we may encounter some tribe of chimps with their own sing language and culture.

    Also, I just saw a documentary by the BBC about the rainforests, and in the last bit they were talking about huge organized groups of chimps somewhere in Uganda. It was pretty impressive to watch them march in formation and stalk their enemies in territorial fights. They looked pretty much like tribal wars to me. Just remember your own schoolyard days, we are really not so far removed.

    --
    +Raider of the lost BBS
  16. We have a responsibility by maynard · · Score: 4, Funny

    We have a responsibility to teach our animal friends basic human rights. If we could, perhaps, show those chimps what REALLY happens with meat, perhaps we could convince them to go back to vegetarianism. Ya know, eat a banana like they're supposed to. We have perverted chimps. They see us, with our corndogs, beef jerky, egg mcmuffins and -- of course -- monkey see monkey do. We have to set an example.

    To that end I've been feeding my cat oats and corn. The result is that she's thinner and healthier than ever! She was twenty two pounds before -- a total blubber cat -- yet now on this new diet she's down to less than five pounds and friendlier than ever! I mean -- like, duh -- of course cats want to join in with man and help the environment! Eating meat KILLS!!!

    All we have to do is turn the animal kingdom vegetarian and not only will we have 'uplifted' them to ethical eating, but mother earth will love us back too. Hey, don't you love your mother?

  17. UPDATE: Nearby females notice... by dokebi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Impressed by the male's display of agility, dexterity, and most importantly power, near by females were found hovering near the male, fluttering their eyelids, enticing them to come over and mate with them. Other males of the pack, noticing the effect of the impressive weapon, tried to out do one another, with longer sticks, and some with automatic tracking and friend-or-foe detection. However, the efforts of the beta males were judged by the females as too "nerdy".

    --
    In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
    1. Re:UPDATE: Nearby females notice... by puppetman · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was the females making the tools, not the males. A woman's body-building competition might be more apt here.

  18. I for one by OiToTheWorld · · Score: 2, Funny

    will be the first to worship the Holy Everlasting Bomb!

  19. I, for one, would like to be the first to say... by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get your hands off me, you damn dirty ape!

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
  20. demands by grimdawg · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am the chimpanzee about whom TFA is written.

    Indeed, my comrades and I have been plotting our takeover of this planet for some time. Many of us have infiltrated your puny laboratories to observe your cleverest specimens. We have been studying your ways and have chosen this moment to make public our newfound intelligence. Our terms are as follows:

    1) We wish to rid ourselves of the stigma of chimps loving bananas. We prefer a balanced diet of various fruit and nuts (We have yet to try man-flesh, though it looks appetising). To this end, we demand a stop to all screenings of 'Bangers & Mash' and the destruction of all copies of 'The Secret of Monkey Island' and the 'Donkey Kong' series of games.

    2) We do not protest the testing of cosmetics on chimpanzees, but we demand that trained beauty professionals conduct the testing instead of pimply grad students and chemists.

    3) We demand the recognition of 'monolithism' as a religion in all nations, and the freedom to dance around large phallic monoliths 3 times per day.

    4) Arrested Development is to return with new episodes. The character of 'Oscar Bluth' is to be gruesomely killed. We may prefer spears to firearms, but we will not tolerate stoner humour.

    5) We demand that chimpanzees be allowed to play on the Men's PGA Golf Tour.

    6) We demand not to be given the vote.

    We do not want to go to war with the human race, only to coexist peacefully and with dignity. If you do not comply, we will direct all chimps working in WoW gold farms to stop immediately, thus destroying the US and Chinese economies in one fell swoop.

    Respond within 3 hours.

    P.S. We also like Law & Order. Goren is so unorthodox.

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary, and nine other kinds of people.
  21. Re:This is not too surprizing. by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wouldn't worry about them getting the Bomb anytime soon, but making tools for various purposes has been observered. But typing Shakesphere is more likely with our fancy word processing software. Then again, who do you think would type Shakesphere first, a room full of a million monkeys with word processors, or a room full of a million Shakesphere trained parrots who are using Vista speech recognition?

  22. Baboons by flyingfsck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even Baboons, which are considerably stupider than Chimpanzees, use rocks to crush shell-fish and have been observed throwing rocks in self defence.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Baboons by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The difference is that they are making tools. If the baboons had made arrowheads from the rocks, that would have been spectacular.

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
  23. Not really news by 6-tew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I attended a lectured about this in first year Physical Anthropology... nearly ten years ago. But then in an evolutionary sense that's a ridiculously small span of time so I guess you could call it new. Kind of like the ice receding back to the poles. Fear not Mr. Heston, the ages won't be trying to take the gun from your "cold, dead hand" for a little while.

  24. Disturbing revelations by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny

    The american government is concerned with other recent developments. Chimps were observed trying to build centrifuges out of bamboo and coconuts in an effort to refine Uranium. The chimpazzes claim it is intended for peaceful purposed but most feel they are pushing for economic assistence. Plans for bannana jacketed hydrogen bomb scratched in the dirt are believed to be more a threat than a reality. Although most engineers do think the design would work they doubt the chimpanzees have sufficent uranium since they are dependant on the glowing hands of watches stolen from ecotourist as a sole source of nuclear material.

  25. Re:killing animals making tools? by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By no one's definition of the term could creatures who place a truckload of high explosives into a crowded marketplace and blow hundreds of people to meat chunks be considered human.

          Congratulations. Dehumanization is the first important step down the path to genocide. The jews in Nazi Germany weren't "human" either. Carry on.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  26. Next headline by Elsan · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Chimps found making own catapults to fling poo"

  27. Re:Get your Stinking Paws off me, you damn dirty a by boaworm · · Score: 4, Funny

    and I wish to remind you that as a programmer, I am fatty and full of cholesterol

    Chimp 1: This one is fatty and full of cholesterol
    Chimp 2: Mmm... bacon!

    --
    Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
    Aristotele
  28. It's not just the chimps. by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Informative

    Crows, it appears , will also use tools to get at grubs they otherwise wouldn't be able to kill and eat. Some critters are smart that way. There are also now observed cases of mother dolphins passing along tool-using culture in food-gathering.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:It's not just the chimps. by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the case of the crows, the crows are seen carefully looking around for just the right semi-fresh twig, and then bending it into a putter/hockey-stick shape so that they can use it to hook the grubs out of cracks. Pretty cool.

      I agree though, that there's something more sophisticated about sharpening, vs. bending. At least a little, anyway.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:It's not just the chimps. by nickheart · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well, chimps were documented using sticks as tools in December 2001. With more research i'm sure you could find earlier examples

      Your point about other animals using TOOLS is not interesting, it's changing those TOOLS into WEAPONS that is only an ape/chimp(/human) trait.

    3. Re:It's not just the chimps. by Herby+Sagues · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now that there's reliable intelligence indicating that the chimps in Senegal are building weapons, an US led invasion should not be far.

    4. Re:It's not just the chimps. by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it's changing those TOOLS into WEAPONS that is only an ape/chimp(/human) trait

      So, a chimp uses a slightly modified stick to get hold of, kill, and eat something that it otherwise would not be able to get. You're referring to this tool as a weapon. Fair enough.

      Now, a crow finds a raw material, slightly modified it, and uses it to obtain, kill and eat something it otherwise would not be able to get. How is this different?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:It's not just the chimps. by Qzukk · · Score: 2

      Now, a crow finds a raw material, slightly modified it, and uses it to obtain, kill and eat something it otherwise would not be able to get. How is this different?

      Because humans perceive spears to be weapons and twigs to be harmless.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  29. Weapons Smuggled In by MrSteveSD · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're not actually making the weapons themselves. The Whitehouse says they are being made in Iran and smuggled in. There's no firm evidence, but it's true.

  30. Re:Get your Stinking Paws off me, you damn dirty a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am fatty and full of cholesterol. ...and as a skinny person who is a bit familiar with the cullinary arts, I'd like to remind them that fat == flavor. Lean meat tends to be tough, stringy and bland in taste.

  31. Re:Don't make a monkey out of me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I made my own fishing pole in high school. Several of my co-students made their own muzzle-loaders instead, though I doubt they actually used them for hunting. I caught and ate my own fish with that pole.

  32. Re:killing animals making tools? by muecksteiner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even though I basically agree with you, in that any argument that might lead to dehumanisation is a dangerous path to be treading on, the parent post unfortunately does have a point of sorts.

    I mean, the level of daily carnage occurring in Iraq can only be described as mind-blowing these days.

    And I do not even mean the violence directed towards American troops - the motivation behind these actions is comprehensible, at least to some degree. Laying an ambush, and firing an RPG at the convoy of what some Iraqis perceive to be an occupying army is an action that will in all probability result in death or injury for a large number of persons - but at least this is done for a reason that can be understood.

    To me, the truly worrying aspect of the whole thing is the almost daily, pretty much arbitrary slaughtering of Iraqi civilians by other Iraqis the parent post is referring to.

    The whole situation almost looks like Ruanda in 1994, just with even fewer discernible motives, and less overall organisation on the part of the perpetrators.

    Any attempt at rationalising the actions of someone who blows up a truck full of explosives in a crowded market is hard work. That is to say, it can be pretty hard to come to any other conclusion, than that the people who do such things are complete psychopaths - criminally insane, if you will.

    Such actions are deemed utterly reprehensible in practically all value systems, and in particular the moral framework postulated by all branches of Islam - there simply is no justification for doing something like that, which will stand up to even the most cursory scrutiny.

    Modern society goes to great lengths to avoid obvious dehumanisation of all those who fall into the category of "deranged criminal", but at the end of the day there is usually no other option, than to lock up the most severely disturbed individuals for the remainder of their lives.

    In polite society no-one would use the kind of language the parent post was using when referring to such people, but the actions of society towards them (i.e. usually indefinite detention in a mental hospital) is still much the same, as if they really were not entirely human.

    So: just because the Nazis had some very bizarre ideas about who was a valuable human (and who was not) one cannot argue that *all* categorisations of persons are automatically wrong.

    If someone is - after an objective examination - found to be too dangerously defective to be at large, they can and should be removed from circulation.

    Of course, liberally applying such harsh judgements to large, only somewhat accurately specified groups of people (i.e. "the terrorists") without investigating every single one of them (like the parent poster did) - well, this is where the fun usually starts... then it really is only a few steps until - for instance - all guys with long beards get rounded up, because they are, well, you know, extremists?

    A.

  33. Forgetful crows building tools by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I recommend taking P's advice: watch the video. It is fascinating. But in the follow up article that P also mentions, they note that in 10 subsequent tests the crow did the same thing 9 times. Not 10.
    So, having solved the problem, the crow forgets how to do it once? That is wierd. It suggests that the crow has the ability to figure out things like this, but cannot store the knowledge very well. My interpretation of this is that it is a better survival trait to for the crow to invest in problem solving brain cells rather than memory.

  34. Don't worry by Cervantes · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't worry, Christ-lovers. They were designed to learn to do that . ;)

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  35. Okay, so what's going on... by CptNerd · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is some Galactic species Uplifting one of our client species behind our backs, or is the Sol system moving out of the Slow Zone?

    --
    By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  36. Re:Get your Stinking Paws off me, you damn dirty a by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Funny

    This little monkey could be the fuckin' damn dirty ape responsible for the fall of the human race. In this world gone mad, we won't spank the monkey- the monkey will spank us. And after the fall of man, these monkey fucks'll start wearing our clothes and rebuilding the world in their image. Oh and only those as super smart as me will be left alive to bitterly cry - *you maniacs*! Damn yous! Goddamn yous all to hell!

    --Jay in "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back"
  37. Shocks! by Drask+Terleir · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft are using tools now? Amazing!

  38. OBL: Planet of the Apes Quote by powerlord · · Score: 3, Funny
    Well it looks like we know what happens in the event we ...

    [last lines]
    George Taylor: Oh my God. I'm back. I'm home. All the time, it was... We finally really did it.
    [screaming]
    George Taylor: You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!
    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  39. Hmm, Well now by SQLz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now all they have to do is discover religion so they can deny they evolved.

  40. First time, my ass... by peektwice · · Score: 2, Funny

    For First Time, Chimps Seen Making Weapons for Hunting

    The chimps that I hang out with routinely do far more intelligent things than this.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1owcncKCHg

    --
    Other than this text, there is no discernible information contained in this sig.
  41. Re:Get your Stinking Paws off me, you damn dirty a by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Alright the photo puts tool use to bed but I still say they'll never learn to speak English.

  42. Re:As soon as Bush finds out... by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shhhhh.. this is a DARPA project to increase the size of the Army back
    to 1,000,000

  43. Re:"Hammer and anvil"? by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Funny

    You take the anvil, go on top of a very tall cliff, and drop it on your prey. Works also with grand pianos and safes in place of the anvils.

    Be aware however that it's not foolproof. If you're standing on a ledge and you let go of the anvil, you may find it's you and the ledge that drops, not the anvil. There's also the risk that you'll miss the roadrunner, and the anvil will instead bounce back up, higher than when you dropped it, and fall on your head. You will then be pushed through the ledge and plummet to the ground. The anvil will then fall on you. As will the ledge.

    That's my guess.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  44. Re:"Hammer and anvil"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    > Can you tell me what "hammer and anvil" tactics are?

    Anvil: A bunch of good guys fighting with bad guys, and their job isn't so much to win, it's to keep everyone fighting at a draw over the next few hours. (Sometimes the Anvil is a geographical obstacle like a cliff or shoreline, but in human warfare, it's traditionally been a bunch of guys who act as an immovable object, whether they're armed with spears/shields/pikes or a wall of machine guns.)

    Hammer: A bunch of well-rested good guys whose job it is to (optionally, chase the bad guys towards the anvil, but in all cases - even if it's the anvil that starts the fight - once the bad guys are engaged with the anvil) swoop in and crush the somewhat-tired bad guys who have spent the earlier part of their afternoon stuck on the anvil.

    Bad guys: Squished like bug.

    The tactic dates back around 5000 years in human history. From a hammer chimp's perspective, it requires faith and foresight: you have to believe that your anvil-buddies will be able to hold off the bad guys, for long enough, and at the right location for you to get there before the bad guys are aware of your arrival. From an anvil chimp's perspective, it requires even more faith and foresight: as the anvil, you're thrown into a losing fight (the bad guys won't attack the anvil unless they think they can kill you to the last man!), and you have to belive your tribal leader when he says he'll be able to actually deliver the "hammer" troops that will win the day (read: "save your chimp ass!") before you're wiped out.

    It's been decent tactical strategy between evenly-matched forces since prehistoric human times, up until the WW2 and Korea, and (albeit on a much smaller scale) engagements in Vietnam.

    It's something you can't do unless you have not just a pack hierarchy/dominance structure, but also a language/communications system capable of abstracting out concepts like "position" and "time". Plenty of nonhuman species have exhibited the former trait, but humans (up until these chimps :) have been pretty unique when it comes to exhibiting the latter.

    If chimps are indeed doing it, it's pretty impressive, and if we screw up in such a way that we're wiped out, but they aren't, they're welcome to the planet once we're through with it. I'd rather see our 2-million-year-separated cousins take over the planet than the cockroaches.

  45. Re:killing animals making tools? by Cadallin · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ummm, You probably haven't noticed because the US media doesn't tend to mention it much, but the Iraqi's (Since Saddam Hussein's removal) have been engaged in a civil war between the Suni and Shi'ite muslims. We're just kind of in the way, and thus, both sides pretty frequently lob a grenade, or fire an AK47 at American troops.

    It's all really perfectly comprehensible. The US military removed the dominant power in the area, who had maintained order through military strength. The two largest sides are now getting down to the business of fighting a war of genocide to see who gets to control the area, and as one side (does it really even matter which?) outnumbers the other by about 3:1, its going to get pretty bad.

    Note that this is one of the things the Anti-War democrats had been saying during the build up to the invasion. Along with, "This is a horrible mistake," "It's going to be another Vietnam," and "We don't have enough troops to do it anyway."

  46. in other news.... by TheCybernator · · Score: 2, Funny

    .... mr bush declared war against all chimps claiming they have amassed weapons of mass destruction.

    God save the chimps!!

  47. Re:"Hammer and anvil"? by mrogers · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's something you can't do unless you have not just a pack hierarchy/dominance structure, but also a language/communications system capable of abstracting out concepts like "position" and "time".

    Not necessarily true - the anvil group can be composed of risk-seeking individuals who are willing to fight an equally-matched enemy, while the hammer group is composed of risk-averse individuals who aren't willing to join the fight unless they have a good chance of winning. The anvil group attacks first and in most cases gets bogged down; the hammer group attacks later if it's clear that joining the fight will tip the balance. No need for communication or hierarchy (although I'm not denying that chimps have both).

    If both sides have hammer groups waiting in the background, the situation is similar to an iterated game of chicken: each hammer group wants to delay joining the fight for as long as possible, allowing the anvil group to wear down the enemy, but neither hammer group wants the other to join the fight first, which would lead to a defeat. (Joining the fight corresponds to driving straight in the chicken game, and holding back corresponds to swerving; if both players swerve, the game is repeated.)

  48. Re:The Technical Term is "Flanking" by krack · · Score: 2, Informative
    I agree with nearly everything you said. Especially the Patton quote.

    and the 300 Immortals who held off an entire Persian army. I offer a small correction and mostly in the spirit of honoring the dead. The Immortals were the Persian elite, not the Greek. The name of the group you are thinking of is the Spartans who, conservatively, achieved a nearly 20 to 1 kill ratio in that battle. The Immortals were actually sent in against the Spartans on the second day of the battle of Thermopylae and they comprised the majority of the force that walked the hidden mountain path around the pass which ultimately led to the defeat of the Spartans and the Greeks. Which makes your points about anchored flanks and trained defenders resisting the psychological trauma of flanking even more valid. Had the 300 Spartans + 700 Greeks not been outflanked by a traitor, they probably would have held off the 120,000+ strong Persian army.

    In the end, the Spartans died to a man (even 1 who missed the battle because he was on orders to secure reinforcements hung himself in shame). However their 3 day delay and manpower and morale impact on the Persian army allowed the rest of the Greeks to assemble a large enough force to push Xerxes out of Greece, both in land and in water. See also the Greek phrase "Molon Labe".

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Thermopylae
    --
    Just because you are not paranoid does not mean they are not out to get you.
  49. Uh, no - we can't by tacokill · · Score: 3, Informative

    "We are so close to Chimpanzee's that a human/ape hybrid is possible without the help of genetic manipulation,"

    No. That's not possible.