Slashdot Mirror


Old Islamic Tile Patterns Show Modern Math Insight

arbitraryaardvark writes "Reuters reports that medieval Muslims made a mega math marvel. Tile patterns on middle eastern mosques display a kind of quasicrystalline effect that was unknown in the west until rediscovered by Penrose in the 1970s. 'Quasicrystalline patterns comprise a set of interlocking units whose pattern never repeats, even when extended infinitely in all directions, and possess a special form of symmetry.' It isn't known if the mosque designers understood the math behind the patterns or not."

82 of 538 comments (clear)

  1. Why wouldn't they? by nebaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems fairly self important to assume that they didn't understand the math behind the tiles. They generated them, didn't they? Islamic culture was well considered to be centuries ahead of Europe during that time period. They had access to some of the ancient Greek writings that Europe only rediscovered years later. My question is, and I don't mean to troll, what happened? From my perspective, it seems that many people almost disdain the idea of progress in culture and arts now.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:Why wouldn't they? by kestasjk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well the tiles are just.. tiles. Just because someone uses a curvy shaped dome on top of their mosque doesn't mean they knew how to calculate its surface area or volume using integration.
      Maybe they just thought it was a pretty shape?

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    2. Re:Why wouldn't they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm pretty sure either aliens or reptoids built it, just like with the pyramids.

    3. Re:Why wouldn't they? by grimdawg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most patterns are discovered before the mathematics behind them is fully understood.

      A child draws a cube without realising its rotational symmetries are S_4, and draws a circle without knowledge of its useful properties. In the case of decorations, aesthetics tend to come first. When did you first draw a spiral? Did you realise it was fractal?

      Hell, most modern mathematics comes from the investigation of an object we thought we knew all about.

      It's more than likely the pattern was designed for aesthetic reasons. I'm not trying to run down the guys, but the kind of insight we're talking about here appears at face value to require a long academic tradition. It's not the kind of thing you're likely to stumble on.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary, and nine other kinds of people.
    4. Re:Why wouldn't they? by pfafrich · · Score: 4, Informative
      There are basically two forms of tilling patterns, the periodic patterns which have been known for many years, and aperiodic ones, which have only been recently been discovered. For many years it was thought that only the periodic patterns existed, and in particular there were no patterns with five fold symmetry.

      The patterns shown in the article are not true penrose patterns, it exhibits two lines of reflection, horizontal and vertical and the pattern does not repeat indefinitely.

      --
      There are four sorts of people in the world: fools, lunatics, idiots and morons. - Umberto Eco, Foucaut's pendulum.
    5. Re:Why wouldn't they? by MicrosoftRepresentit · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I was three I drew the Mandelbrot set in crayons and moments later modelled part of the quaternian Julia set out of plasticine. It wasn't until I was 9 that I understood the maths behind it, which I think proves your point.

    6. Re:Why wouldn't they? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My question is, and I don't mean to troll, what happened? From my perspective, it seems that many people almost disdain the idea of progress in culture and arts now.

      The funny thing is that, approx. 1400 years after the death of Jesus we also had our period of intolerance (did you say Inquisition) and of stalling progress. The Renaissance appears to be a flourishing era because of the giant leap that has been made in paintings but in terms of sculpture, architecture or litterature, the trend was to come back to the "classic style" : an aggregation of roman and greek techniques 1000 years old and considered perfect. It is at this time also that we began to see scientists opposing Church dogmas whereas before this time scientists were often also religion scholars.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    7. Re:Why wouldn't they? by grimdawg · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know the feeling. I proved the Poincare Conjecture when I was 8, using a balloon a stapler. Unfortunately, I assumed it was trivial and never went public.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary, and nine other kinds of people.
    8. Re:Why wouldn't they? by matlhDam · · Score: 4, Funny

      I proved the Poincare Conjecture when I was 8, using a balloon a stapler. Unfortunately, I assumed it was trivial and never went public.

      Ah, I see. Proof by explosion.
    9. Re:Why wouldn't they? by procrastinx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      May be they didnt know the terms 'integration' , 'surface area' and 'volume ' , but they might have understood the real *usefulness* behind those concepts.

    10. Re:Why wouldn't they? by fub · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While the letters we use right now are Latin, the numbers are Arabic. What tells you that about the mathematical abilities of the middle east in those times, compared with the european insight?

    11. Re:Why wouldn't they? by kestasjk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The number system we use is actually originally derived from Hindu numerals. They were the first to use the number '0' to create a positional number system, which is what put it head and shoulders above the Roman one.. But that's besides the point.

      I'm not saying Muslim nations weren't, in many respects (especially maths and astronomy), the most advanced nations around at the time. What I am saying is that it's a bit of a leap from "they used this shape" to "they knew all the advanced mathematics that can be derived from studying this shape."

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    12. Re:Why wouldn't they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My mother fed me from a Klein bottle.

    13. Re:Why wouldn't they? by God'sDuck · · Score: 5, Informative

      The interesting thing about quasicrystal (and 2d mapping thereof) tilings is that they are emphatically *not* regular -- so at any given vertex you can put in any number of available tile shapes, and all might appear to work, until you get 100 tiles further along and find you've backed yourself into a corner where nothing fits.

      there are rules (now) that Steinhardt and his colleagues (including my wife...which is why I know something here...heh) have developed which can tell you what shape should come next to prevent backing yourself into the corner, but they have taken years to develop -- not because they're mathematically complex, but just because it takes a looooong time to try all the possible combinations, and then recognize what happened at each vertex.

      my assumption is the same as the parent's -- that the Muslim artists simply "brute forced" these -- that is to say, put down random tiles, took them back up when they created bad spots, and patted themselves on the back when it all worked and looked pretty -- and then jotted down what the pattern looked like. having helped my wife do the same thing early in her thesis work -- let me tell you, it's a pain in the arse with these shapes -- but by no means impossible, and the results are always impressive.

    14. Re:Why wouldn't they? by radtea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The patterns shown in the article are not true penrose patterns, it exhibits two lines of reflection, horizontal and vertical and the pattern does not repeat indefinitely.

      Even the fact of local five-fold symmetry is interesting, although I agree these are not true Penrose tiles, which typically use only two shapes (I count at least three or four in the picture) each of which have a reflection symmetry but no rotation symmetry.

      The tiling shown in the picture with the article looks quite a lot like a Kepler Tiling, with its local five-fold symmetry and use of five hexagons to fill out the pattern. I have no idea where Kepler got the idea from--he lived in the 16th century, about a hundred years after the Arab tilings the article talks about.

      In any case, the practical arts routinely outstripped scientific and mathematical understanding until very recently, and even now we do sometimes see science playing catch-up with empirical ability. It is doubtful that anyone at the time understood very much about any of these tilings in the way a modern mathematician would. But by the same token science and mathematics would have a lot less interesting stuff to work with if artisans didn't explore empirical possibilities for their own reasons.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    15. Re:Why wouldn't they? by JDevers · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, alien's built my house and it doesn't use any funky math...oh wait, you mean a different type of alien...

    16. Re:Why wouldn't they? by 4solarisinfo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While the letters we use right now are Latin, the numbers are Arabic

      and interestingly, the Arab world now uses indian numbers...

      -----------
      sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and sometimes it's a big black d**k
      -george carlin

    17. Re:Why wouldn't they? by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I solved the halting problem when I was 11 and went on to overturn the second law of thermodynamics. But my dog ate the homework assignment before I could turn it in.

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    18. Re:Why wouldn't they? by EatHam · · Score: 2, Funny

      That they couldn't do math, and the arabs couldn't write. They got together and made the Reese's Peanut Butter Cup of math and english, which is what the SATs are based on to this day.

    19. Re:Why wouldn't they? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They may very well have understood them...You have to remember, the Dark Ages for us was the Enlightenment for them. They were doing a lot of interesting math, and building architecturally advanced structures embodying complex mathematical concepts when we were wallowing around in superstitious ignorance.

      Just because things have swung back the other way today, doesn't mean they won't swing back again tomorrow...That's the real lesson to learn from all the fundamentalist chrsitian movements...A society that doesn't appreciate some form of spirituality is pretty empty, but a society to embraces spirituality above all other things is hardly removed from barbarism.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    20. Re:Why wouldn't they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You read the wrong FA. Typical slashdot, using Reuters or the Wall Street Journal or Fox or some such nonsense for a science or mathmatecal FA. Here's a FA that actually answers your question and explains why they had to have had advanced math to construct these things.

      The dome shape was explained in (of all places) an undergraduate art history class I took thirty years ago. Those domes are imposible to construct without advanced geometry (and other advanced disciplines as well).

    21. Re:Why wouldn't they? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A society that doesn't appreciate some form of spirituality is pretty empty

      What is your definition of "empty?" I'm sincerely curious. For that matter, what do you mean by "spirituality?"

      Would you describe the Star Trek society (secular, cosmopolitan, humanist) as "empty?" Humans don't believe in any sorts of spirits or other supernatural creatures in Roddenberry's vision of an ideal society.
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    22. Re:Why wouldn't they? by opec · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In case you didn't realize, Star Trek isn't exactly the most realistic simulation of reality.

    23. Re:Why wouldn't they? by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was the Persians who did this - frequently under Arabic honorifics, so this stuff is always called "Islamic".

      Persian mathematicians invented Spherical Trig, etc.

      Persian architects built the Taj Mahal for Shah Jahan.

      Persian astronomers developed the systems and observations of Indians and extrapolated complete mathematical systems, that were the basis for both Newton and Leibnitz.

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    24. Re:Why wouldn't they? by Poltras · · Score: 2

      How is that different from what he said?

    25. Re:Why wouldn't they? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In a nutshell, I think that a society that is purely physicalist in its view of living things is...problematical. By those standards stomping on an alarm clock, a flower, and a puppy are all pretty much the same thing, because living things are no different from non-living things.

      Now Star Trek is an interesting case (despite what others seem to think) because they embrace some of what I would think of as "the divinity of man"...They have very strong beliefs about not only the intrinsic value of life, but also the value of things like art, literature, science, and the uplifting of the human condition, as well as a sophisticated value system dealing with the sort of things that are ethically "desirable" in an individual.

      So, when I say, "Spirituality" I'm definitely not talking about anything supernatural per se, but more about an appreciation of the value of things beyond the actual physical substance of the world. Religion is a form of spiritualism, though not one that appeals to me personally because I feel it often misses the point, and because it tends toward anti-intellectualism.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    26. Re:Why wouldn't they? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, to nitpick, they really only obey what I'd consider to be the important commandments...Kill, Steal, Lie, Covet, Honor yer Parents, and Adultery (in the sense of not cheating on your spouse but not in the sense of extramarital hanky panky)...They skip sabbath, idols, blasphemy, and one god only.

      Personally, I think that a society who follows those tenets because they believe them to be right, rather than because that's what their god supposedly wants, is a more enlightened society.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    27. Re:Why wouldn't they? by Youssef+Adnan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seriously.. Do you know what the source of the word "Algorithm" is?
      Read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithm#Etymology
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_ibn_M%C5%ABs %C4%81_al-Khw%C4%81rizm%C4%AB
      And then, after you read where the source is, maybe it would be time to know where Algebra came from:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebra
      Some architecture info can be found here: http://www.islamicarchitecture.org/architecture/in dex.html

      Pretty shape!!!

    28. Re:Why wouldn't they? by turbidostato · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I've heard a rabbi comment on that... He said that following some principles because you believe them to be right is easy; following them just because your god commands you is hard."

      And he is right indeed. But he cheated you a bit. He didn't told you *why* it's more difficult.

      I'll do: it's more difficult because we are intelligent beings and irrationalism is against our highest nature. In other words: it's difficult because it's stupid, and being conciously stupid it's hard.

    29. Re:Why wouldn't they? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I realize that without society, my life would be miserable. For that reason, I cherish the things that make society possible and pleasant. This includes valuing human life, science, philosophy, art, economics, law, personal liberties, and many other things.

      The reasons I cherish these things have nothing to do with spirits, magic, gods, auras, karma, superstitions, or other spiritual concepts. A society composed of people with these values would flourish and be far from "empty."

      So I really don't agree that spirituality makes society whole. I think social values make society whole. Unless you mean to say "all social values are a form of spirituality," which is an unusual definition of the term, then I just don't think your view is well supported.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  2. Tasty thoughts by tinkertim · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since it isn't known (as TFA points out) if they fully understood the mathematics behind the designs, we could have a bit of fun speculating, yes?

    I am no expert on Islam but I really like to read and study up on various forms of encryption. I'm not a crypto genius by any means, I don't endeavour to break codes, I just like to be able to recognize them.

    If I am not mistaken (flog me if I am), the mural depicted could in effect be a key to a cipher, and one's starting point applying that mural as a key would be very important. In fact, perhaps a key with infinite grooves and landings that fits a lock with only a few tumblers.

    Now, if that structure was destoryed during war (many were), and that key easily re-created from mathematical notes, that would be something. The notes themselves would be useless to pretty much anyone else at the time.

    I don't think they understood the math behind it was we do (or better wording would be the significance of the math beyond their application of it) but I do think they understood quite a bit more about cryptography than we previously thought.

    Of course, it could just be that the design held some spiritual significance. A lot of trouble to go through, however.

    1. Re:Tasty thoughts by networkzombie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oooh, look. That looks like a watch. There must be a watchmaker.

    2. Re:Tasty thoughts by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just add a harvard symbologist, a beautiful egyption female mathematician, and a one-armed assassin for the plot of a Dan Brown book.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Tasty thoughts by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Funny
      After decades of arduous archaeological work, months of supercomputer time (including hundreds of CPU years using a popular new BOINC module) and the lifetime work of more than a dozen mathematicians, cryptologists, experts in medieval Arabic and early second millenium Muslim culture (which in many ways led the world in science, math, astronomy and philosophy), the incredible Mosque mosaics were finally decoded:

      Don't forget to drink your Ovaltine.

      Youssef Abu Sufah, a British scholar of 12th century Muslim architecture and amateur mathematician summed up the almost unanimous response of the scientific, mathematical, and historical communities with the following observation:

      Son of a bitch!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  3. Close, but no cigar? by glittalogik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well it's pretty, I'll give it that. TFA's a bit light on details though, and "tantalizingly close to having the structure that Penrose discovered in the mid-70s" isn't exactly awe-inspiring; maybe a few more examples would have been in order before they published?

  4. headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    medieval Muslims made a mega math marvel
    Asinine alliterations alienate audience
  5. Re:It's a pattern? by Scarblac · · Score: 5, Informative

    See Penrose tiling on Wikipedia.

    They really have cool properties - you can tile an infinite plane with just two different tiles, in such a way that the pattern never repeats; the ratio of the frequencies of both types is exactly the golden ratio. There's a lot more, see the article.

    Apparently they found actual Penrose tiles, hundreds of years old.

    --
    I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
  6. Re:Not Surprising by anaesthetica · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Arabs got zero from the Indians through their trading contacts actually. See the Wikipedia entry: History of Zero.

  7. Another Islamic math-art mystery by sky7i · · Score: 5, Informative

    The recent documentary by Oxford historian Brittany Hughes, When the Moors Ruled in Europe , revealed (among many other very surprising findings) that the strikingly gorgeous Alhambra Palace also contains a very interesting mathematical curiousity within the design of all of its walls and floor patterns. (I won't spoil it for people who want to watch the documentary, which is available in its entirety on Google Video.) Also, many more Islamic patterns from throughout the Muslim world are available on flickr's Muslim Cultures group for those intrigued by the sort of artwork mentioned in the article.

  8. The Catholic Church happened. by Flying+pig · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The last time I suggested white Western civilisation might be less than perfect I got modded to hell, but who cares? It was no less a person than Roger Bacon who said that every educated person needed to know Arabic, but then he was interested in the science and technology of his day, unlike most of the Church. The peak of that Islamic civilisation seems to have been the Kingdom of Granada in Spain, which had an advanced society, religious tolerance (not only were Jews and Christians welcome, but a Hebrew prayer book for women has been discovered there) and advanced technology. There is some evidence that they learned more from the Hindus than the Greeks, as books on the history of numbers point out. There are writings from that society that sound almost modern in outlook.

    Unfortunately their civilisation was destroyed by a European power under the aegis of the Catholic Church. For much of recent history, Christian societies have attempted to control and dominate Islamic societies. Since the socially mobile tend to follow the ways of the dominant power, Islam has become increasingly a religion of the poor and ill educated. (I know this is a simplification, but it is a useful simplification.) We are now seeing the effects of creating a society of poor and ill-educated people with ready access to cheap weapons.

    On the broader point, I tend to disagree. It is easy to blame television, the movies and the music industry for the destruction of "high" culture, but of course we don't know what "low" culture was like in largely preliterate societies. I suspect the reality is that high culture is more disseminated and understood than ever before, but whereas in the Middle Ages it might have been available to 0.1% of the population, now it is available to, say, 2%. Because mass culture now has access to the media, this fact is concealed in the sheer noise of low culture.

    A genuine example, from the 1500s. A footnote to an edition of Rabelais reveals that at one public fair in France, the prostitutes wanting to operate their trade had to take part at the start of the fair in a naked public footrace. This operates on a number of levels. It would tend to discourage unhealthy or diseased prostitutes. It constituted a form of advertising. And it provided entertainment. But it also shows that, no matter what you think of current entertainment standards, they were just as bad in the 1500s.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
    1. Re:The Catholic Church happened. by pato101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If I recall correctly (I'm a mess in history and dates, please correct if I'm wrong) Granada was taken by catholics in 1492, the same year America was discovered by Cristobal Colon. The same year Jews were told to leave "Spain" - there was no concept of Spain yet-. Islamic people lived in "Spain" during 8 centuries before 1492, and left a deep footstep in art, language, tradition, diet, ...

    2. Re:The Catholic Church happened. by morgdx · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is no coincidence that Algebra comes from the "Al-jabr" the Arabic word for reunion, and Algorithm comes from al-Khwarizmi a Persian mathematician living in Baghdad(!). Kind of makes TFA seem a bit patronising.

      --
      http://jfin.org/jFin pure java open source financial library
    3. Re:The Catholic Church happened. by denoir · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Unfortunately their civilisation was destroyed by a European power under the aegis of the Catholic Church.
      Although the crusades made a deep political impact and united the Muslim world, they managed to self-destruct all by themselves. The reason was the teachings of one al-Ghazali, the most influential thinker in Islamic history. His religious views became law and are still dominant in the Islamic world.

      Briefly put, his ideology was that science is intrinsically evil because it proposes that there are natural laws and that would limit the power of God. When an object drops to the floor it doesn't do so because of gravity, but because God wills it. Every event is a singular expression of Gods will and cannot and should not be analyzed and explained.

      As you can imagine this did marvels for science in the Islamic world. From being world leader they by their own doing they removed themselves from the game completely. And we have the same view today. In the Muslim world, technology is seen as OK but science as bad. Thanks to that plainly idiotic view they have blocked their own development. There are more books translated in Spain to Spanish than there have in the Arab world translated into Arabic since the 7th century.

      Really sad given how great their contributions to early science were. They were centuries ahead of the Europeans but blew it all. It is easy to blame the crusaders but in fact they were only enablers - to kick them out, the Islamic powers all united under one ruler and a single political system.

    4. Re:The Catholic Church happened. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Sack of Baghdad was much worse for medieval Islamic culture than anything the Europeans did.

      Baghdad was much larger and wealthier than any other city in the Middle East, in Europe, or in Africa. It was almost completely destroyed by the Mongol army.

    5. Re:The Catholic Church happened. by Weedlekin · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think he was referring to Islam in Spain as the civilisation that got destroyed, because Spanish Muslims had diverged significantly from those in Africa and the Middle East (or more correctly, African and Middle Eastern Muslims had diverged from them), so they can justifiably be regarded as a distinct civilisation with a unique culture. Unfortunately for them this meant that they were basically caught between a rock and a hard place, with Catholic Europe on one side who regarded them as enemies, and a stricter, more fundamentalist Islamic culture in Africa (i.e. the other side of Spain) that had also regarded them as enemies since at least the 11th century. What's surprising therefore is not that they ended up getting destroyed, as that was obviously inevitable, but rather that they lasted as long as they did when surrounded by such powerful and fanatical opponents.

      NB: although it ended up being Christian rulers who destroyed the Spanish Muslim civilisation, the original poster's claim that this was done "under the Aegis of the Catholic Church" is unjust. As has often been the case, the Catholic Kings used religion as a political and propaganda tool very effectively, but the conquest of the Muslim kingdoms in Spain was really about territory, and their subsequent persecution of Jews and Muslims had a lot more to do with eliminating possible sources of dissent together with jealousy (jews in particular occupied important administrative positions that Spanish nobles wanted for themselves) than real religious differences. There's no better evidence of this than the fact that many Spanish Jews fled to Catholic Italy, home of The Vatican, where they not only managed to live without many problems (i.e. some people had personal prejudices against them, but there was ittle if any persecution by either the Italian political authorities or the Church), but were also able to obtain important administrative posts and teach in universities, where their translation of ancient Greek works that had been preserved by Spanish Muslims into Latin became a key factor in the subsequent European Renaissance.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    6. Re:The Catholic Church happened. by Weedlekin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "If we generalize this to the field of anthropology, it might explain our modern astonishment at finding more evidence of intelligence and intention in our ancestors the closer we look... The Ice-Man's tattoo of acupuncture therapy is one example."

      It's not so much astonishment, but an ingrained prejudice that renders many people incapable of accepting the fact that ancient peoples were _not_ less intelligent than us. It's therefore easier for them to believe that Atlanteans (who are inevitably portrayed as being white!) or aliens were responsible for gigantic and impressive structures from thousands of years ago than what they think of as "a bunch of ignorant wogs who didn't have TV and cars". Furthermore, the fact that (for example) the ruins of ancient Zimbabwe were attributed to Phoenicians, Hebrews, lost tribes of white men, etc., etc., because "darkies" were incapable of such architectural feats shows that archaeologists and anthropologists haven't always been immune to cultural prejudices.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    7. Re:The Catholic Church happened. by Iloinen+Lohikrme · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Others have already posted to your comment so I will keep it short. First of all, no civilization was wiped out when Moors where removed from Spain, what happened was the removal of governing Muslim elite and replacing it with a christian king and nobles. What stayed the same were the peoples, their language and their habits and culture which in any case were there before Moor conquers. It should be noted that civilization, religion, nation, language i.e. don't mean the same thing. Civilization can be mix of many religions, nations, languages i.e. that are bond together. In Spain, the majority of people where Christians, they spoke the same language and had similar habits, which in later terms made them a nation that can be counted to western civilization.

      Also on a note Europe and western powers made a rise because of their highly organized states and armies, more evolved banking and finance sectors, appraisal for knowledge and education and on a later date ability harness finance&scientific knowledge to serve industrialization. This was which raised western civilization from the drain. You also note that christian societies have attempted to control and dominate Islamic societies, but you forget that in 19th and 20th century the focus of European imperial powers was to control and dominate the whole world, not just Muslims. And before that if you make a note about crusades, you should understand that crusades were an attempt to take back old christian lands from Muslim conquers. In the view of these, there isn't any grand christian plot to suppress Muslims as you try to suggest.

      Also on a note when you say that the socially mobile tend to follow the ways of a dominant power, you should also understand than in previous times there were no immigration. When Europe and west started to raise, that didn't succumb able part of other cultures to Europe because there still was religion, language and ethnic barriers. What we have seen in Islamic societies in middle east, in last 1000 years are the effects on what it does when the leading elite doesn't embrace trade, banking, formal organization of government, formalization of armies, science, knowledge and education of masses. What happened to Islamic civilization was not that it failed in absolute terms, it just didn't keep up with the rest and thus in 18th and 19th centuries was very much behind western world.

      Just to give you example on what I am discussing in practical terms. In example in Finland Mikael Agricola, a priest, formed the Finnish written language in 16th century which teaching was started even to the simple masses. Of course the literature rate didn't rise quickly, but in time of several centuries it made quite big part of Finnish able to read and write, which in turn made possible to further educate more and more people. Also in western Europe kings and nobles started to understand the practically of stable banking and finance sectors and in time became more tolerant and took more responsibilities to pay their debts and not just wipe out debts to bankers. The fact that western civilization got first to industrial revolution and later on became first modern and birth cradle for global civilization is nothing to do with suppressing or exploiting other civilizations, it's everything to do on using own strengths and continues building and evolution of everything in societies.

    8. Re:The Catholic Church happened. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Have you actually read al-Ghazali?

      No, but the quotes I've seen don't really support scientific inquiry very well: "...our opponent claims that the agent of the burning is the fire exclusively;' this is a natural, not a voluntary agent, and cannot abstain from what is in its nature when it is brought into contact with a receptive substratum. This we deny, saying: The agent of the burning is God, through His creating the black in the cotton and the disconnexion of its parts, and it is God who made the cotton burn and made it ashes either through the intermediation of angels or without intermediation. For fire is a dead body which has no action, and what is the proof that it is the agent? Indeed, the philosophers have no other proof than the observation of the occurrence of the burning, when there is contact with fire, but observation proves only a simultaneity, not a causation, and, in reality, there is no other cause but God."

      This is called "Occasionalism".

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    9. Re:The Catholic Church happened. by silentounce · · Score: 3, Funny

      Others have already posted to your comment so I will keep it short. THAT was short?! You must be new here.
      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
    10. Re:The Catholic Church happened. by TerranFury · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >Algebra comes from the "Al-jabr" the Arabic word for reunion

      IIRC, algebra was like the 'Arabic numerals' (which other posters have mentioned) in that it came to the Arabs through trade with India.

      Then, thanks to the Arabs, algebra was developed and preserved, and then communicated to the West. Then, when the British colonized India, they presumably set up schools that taught the subject... (Funny, these circles).

      Algebra survived because the societies that understood it stayed in contact with one another; this was necessary in order for it to spread. Knowledge get passed around -- and each society that holds the baton for a bit tends to add something useful to it.

      Moral of the story: extroverted societies learn more; xenophobia hurts knowledge.

    11. Re:The Catholic Church happened. by SengirV · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can also point to Al-Ghazali - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Ghazali - as the destroyer of the enlightened Islamic dynasty as it was known. 100 years before Roger Bacon's time, Al-Ghazali lead a "Cultural Revolution" in islam which forbad any and all thought that men determined their own fate. All actions were a direct act of God and free will was non-existent. Thus, any teachings of Aristotle, Plato, etc... were heresy. Islam turned from a pinnacle of intellectualism to a parasite living off the advances of the west, biding it's time until their sheer masses can subjugate the rest of the world into their way of thinking through violence and intimidation.

      --

      Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

    12. Re:The Catholic Church happened. by t0rkm3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting. As I remember it Muhammed required extra taxes from Christian and Jews (people of the book) when he was feeling merciful, and something less savory when he was not.

      I am an atheist, but it seems odd that a religion whose own founder required the death of unbelievers on several occasions and also had sex with a child is compared to a overall harmless pacifist. It's like comparing Hitler to Gandhi. Seems perverse to me.

      Muhammad was a warlord. A warlord who founded a religion of peace? What need would a warlord have for his people to be pacifistic to his own motivation and conversely hold nothing but mild tolerance or animus for all others?

      As a curiosity, could someone with a deeper knowledge of theology, provide a list of pacifist sects of Islam compared to pacifist sects spawned by Chistianity? Buddhism beats both of the former hands down, more than likely...

      "Muhammad is the Apostle of Allah. Those who follow him are merciful to one another, but ruthless to unbelievers" Sura 48:29. "Kill the Mushrikun (unbelievers) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush..." Sura 9:5

  9. Re:Not Surprising by value_added · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Arabs got zero from the Indians through their trading contacts actually. See the Wikipedia entry: History of Zero.

    Nah, that was just one of the first examples of outsourcing.

    A more interesting link.

  10. Tells us almost nothing. by Ace905 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would be nice if the article actually identified why these patterns have to be based on a complicated mathematical principle, and if they're not - how they could have been made and still represent that mathematical principle. According to the article, the patterns aren't even exact but quasi-crystalline-structures.

    I can do a quasi-fractal-pattern by accident if I have enough time to create random patterns, like say an entire country's worth of structures covered in patterns.

    Can some statistics-guru figure out the odds of this being a random accident, considering how few examples they have, and how the examples aren't even exact representations of the mysterious mathematical formula(s) they mention? I really don't get why this is believable based on the article.

    ---
    Pre-Roman Crystalline Structure Dance

    --

    Ace
    1. Re:Tells us almost nothing. by Napoleon+The+Pig · · Score: 2, Informative

      The whole reason these patterns are attracting so much attention is because they don't explicitly repeat themselves yet they still show a rotational symmetry. Making crystaline structures isn't very difficult mathematically. Crystals are very ordered and neat, repeating themselves ad infinitum. Quasicrystals on the other hand are very complex mathematically because of their aperiodic structure.

      The patterns found on the structures would be even more incredible if they were just random accidents. The pattern on the shrine mentioned in the article is a near perfect match to the mathematical model, the chances of that happening are very very slim. I'm not saying that this proves they knew the math behind the patterns, I'm just saying that they deliberately created the patterns in such a way that we can't rule out that they didn't.

      Check out http://intendo.net/penrose/info.html for more on the math behind the patterns.

  11. Not Surprising by LordLucless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I suppose it's not really surprising that Muslim architecture is going to uncover these sorts of complex patterns. As I recall, the Quran prohibits art depicting humans (or possibly anything created by Allah, I can't recall exactly), and as a result, Islamic art tends to the more abstract. Without the devotion to realism that characterised Western art through much of history, it makes sense that they'd develop the more abstract art to a greater complexity.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  12. Interesting definition of "rediscovered" by Viol8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Presumably in this case it actually means resdiscovered-by-western-academics since presumably these patterns have been looked at by thousands of people everyday for hundreds of years as they went to pray. I can't think of any other reason why despite millions of arabs looking at these patterns over the years they were considered "lost" to mankind until "rediscovered" by an english professor.

  13. Escher by Soepkip · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Recently I visited the Escher museum (http://www.escherinhetpaleis.nl/) in The Hague. They have a statement of Escher on the wall in which he expresses his he expresses his sadness that Islam didnt allow depiction of anything else other than abstract patterns. Apparently Escher works of interlocking creatures were inspired by his visits to the mosques in Spain (?)... Guess Penrose wasn't the only one in "the west" to have discovered those mathematical qualities.

  14. Nice Work - but NO evidence of mathematics by hackershandbook · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have an ongoing debate with a friend who is both a philosopher of science and a mathematics teacher.

    Suffice it to say that I wish he had taugh me mathematics (and algebra, geometry, calculus) rather than the teachers I had ..

    One of the things that come up in our discussions is the idea the the Ancient Egyptians knew about PHI and PI - as can be seen from the structure of their architecture - and that the builders of Stonehenge also had working knowledge of trigonometry.

    But as a mathematician - he denies that the there was any knowledge of "mathematics" because the principles were never described "mathematically" - just used in an "intuitive way".

    "Without the maths", he said, "You can't argue that they understood the maths" and, he continued, "if they never expressed their finding in mathematical terms (i.e. in formulas with proofs) - then it isn't maths anyway - its just architecture"

  15. Re:Thats a curious intepretation of history by pato101 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Do you consider a country "own" after 8 century "invasion"?

    During those 8 centuries Moors and Christian and Jew people lived together. They had their spaces, but also had interaction, trade, ... . Christian were not obligated to convert to Islam, etc. After Christian re-conquest Moors and Jew were ejected from the territory (or obligated to convert to Christianism- nevertheless I'm not sure they had the same rights than Christians after doing that)

    I suggest you go and read some history books

    Tell me, who did write those books?
  16. Re:Thats a curious intepretation of history by Alphager · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >Do you consider a country "own" after 8 century "invasion"?

    Yes. And obviously the spanish did too.
    Ah, yes. BTW, i hereby call all native americans to reclaim their country from the US-Invaders!
  17. Prior art in Kleenex patent dispute?? by wwwrench · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mmmh, if this is true, maybe it counts as prior art in his patent dispute with the makers of Kleenex. They were using Penrose tiles because the quasi-periodic structure makes it less likely that the overlapping of the pattern will cause ridges to form. Math patents!!

    --

    Deconstruct the State
    1. Re:Prior art in Kleenex patent dispute?? by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 2, Informative
      From TFWikipediaA:

      Pentaplex Ltd., a company in Yorkshire, England controlled by Penrose, owns the licensing rights to Penrose tilings. Penrose and Pentaplex filed a lawsuit against Kimberly-Clark for breach of copyright. Kimberly-Clark had allegedly embossed Penrose tilings on Kleenex quilted toilet paper in the UK. SCA Hygiene Products later came to control Kleenex products and reached an agreement with Penrose and Pentaplex on the Penrose tiling issue. SCA is not involved in the copyright dispute.
      --
      My first program:

      Hell Segmentation fault

  18. Re:Thats a curious intepretation of history by blictrix · · Score: 5, Informative

    So you wouldn't mind if the indians decided to drive the white invaders out of America? After all, the whites have been living as invaders there for less than 5 centuries, much less than the muslims in medieval Spain.

    And saying that the spanish wanted them out is misleading, the catholic kings and the church wanted them out, what the people wanted is anybody's guess. Spain didn't exist at that point, the christian part was divided into three parts, the kingdom of Navarra, the kingdom of Castilia and the kingdom of Aragon. And although the Kingdom of Navarra came under the control of the catholic kings (Ferdinand and Isabella) it wasn't until the 19th century it became officially a part of Spain. And when the Moors came to the Iberian peninsula, it was under the control of the Visigoths and they didn't put up much of a fight, so "invasion" is maybe stretching it a bit. Besides, it was at a time when the people of Europe were wildly "invading" each other, none of the nations we know today actually existed at that time. You're obviously prejudiced against the muslims, but the truth is that Al-Andaluz was the most civilized part of Europe at that time.

  19. Re:Not Surprising by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Odd. A document released recently by a Muslim group in Britain said schools shouldn't force Muslims to draw pictures of humans:

    "In Islam the creation of three dimensional figurative imagery of humans is generally regarded as unacceptable because of the risk of idolatress practices and some pupils and parents may raise objections to this. The school should avoid encouraging Muslim pupils from producing three dimensional imagery of humans and focus on other forms of art, calligraphy, textile art, ceramic glass, metal/woodwork, landscape drawing, paintings, architectural representations, geometric figures, photography and mosaic art."

    Muslim Council of Britain

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  20. Re:Thats a curious intepretation of history by flickwipe · · Score: 2

    Umm, ACTUALLY their civilisation was destroyed by the Spanish reclaiming their own country that had been conquered by the Moops.

  21. Almost needs a "patents" tag by digitig · · Score: 4, Informative

    But I suppose "tantalisingly close" isn't enough to prove prior art on Penrose's U.S. Patent 4133152.

    If I recall correctly, the proof that Penrose tiling is aperiodic depends on projection of a line marked out in intervals representing an irrational number onto a line marked out in uniform intervals. According to Wikipedia (hey, this isn't an academic paper, so I can cite Wikipedia, right?) the first reference for irrational numbers was in the Indian Sulba Sutras composed between 800-500 BC, so the fundamental knowledge was available in plenty of time for these tilings. And because irrational numbers were arrived at geometrically I can imagine that the ancients could indeed have understood the math.

    There's more information about the ancient tilings here, which shows that the Islamic tilings break down into five basic tiles, and that each of those five tiles can be broken down into Penrose tiles. So it looks as if they beat the first modern aperiodic tiling, Berger's initial one, which needed 20426 tiles, but didn't get as far as cutting it down to Penrose's two.

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  22. Penrose was a the CO-discoverer of aperiodic tiles by notthepainter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is little know that Robert Amman co-discovered one of Penroses aperiodic tiles. Amman was am amatuer mathematician in the United States. See his wiki page.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Ammann

    I knew Bob Amman. I shared an office with him in my first job out of college. He was doing minor programming work for a small network/modem company in the early 80s. His white board always had tiled diagrams on it. I graduated from MIT but he was probably the best example I knew of a prodigy.

    The curious thing about Amman was how poorly he dealt with life. A man of his genius should not have ended up at the post office.

    I never knew he was famous until years later when something must have happen to Penrose (quasicrystals?) and Amman was in the local paper. I couldn't believe the guy I worked with traveled in these circles. One of the scientists I worked with at Kodak had a book on tiles. I checked the index, Amman was all over it, using cited by other mathematicians "unpublished personal correspondence."

    It makes one wonder what other geniuses are out there sorting mail.

    Paul

  23. Re:Giving rise to the question: what don't *we* kn by LittleBigLui · · Score: 5, Funny

    What might be the "???" ?


    Nobody knows, but the step after that will be Profit!
    --
    Free as in mason.
  24. Al Ghazali & Ahmed Sirhindi by vakibs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Al Ghazali was indeed a very influential philosopher who brought in umpteen damage to the scientific inquiry of the Islamic world. But the real damage was done by another person called Ahmed Sirhindi. In simple words, what he has said was that human brain is futile. Any effort to understand nature/God through reasoning and thought is a waste of time. The only way salvation could be obtained is through studying the Kuran (the unmorphed message from God) and the Hadith (stories about the life of Mohammed). Without the use of Mohammed, man is inherently powerless to understand Nature or God ! In his philosophy, the biggest evil were the Greek & Hindu philosophers. His philosophy sounded the death to the movement of Sufism (mysticism and philosophy) in Islam. At the same time, it put an end to the systematic enquiry of science. Ahmed Sirhindi became the Mujaddid (the equivalent of the pope in Islam) and he convinced the Ottoman empire to use his methods. He convinced the Mughal empire in India to use his methods. Consequently, India and Arabia were mired in dark ages ever since 1000 AD.His influence is strongly felt in the later and the final Mujaddid - Wahhab of Saudi Arabia. The major school of Islam in Pakistan and India is the Deoband school, which is drawn from the ideas of Wahhab & Sirhindi. These are the seeds of Islamic fundamentalism. It is no wonder that all glories of Islamic mathematics, medicine and astronomy were reached before 1000 AD.

    1. Re:Al Ghazali & Ahmed Sirhindi by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Consequently, India and Arabia were mired in dark ages ever since 1000 AD.
      ...
      It is no wonder that all glories of Islamic mathematics, medicine and astronomy were reached before 1000 AD.
      You should have stopped before saying that.

      If you had RTFA, you'd have noted that these Penrose patterns showed up after 1000 AD and over the next several hundred years, became more and more elaborate.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  25. from the original journal by Tzinger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The newspaper article hardly tells the story. Here is the abstract from Science

    The conventional view holds that girih (geometric star-and-polygon, or strapwork) patterns in medieval Islamic architecture were conceived by their designers as a network of zigzagging lines, where the lines were drafted directly with a straightedge and a compass. We show that by 1200 C.E. a conceptual breakthrough occurred in which girih patterns were reconceived as tessellations of a special set of equilateral polygons ("girih tiles") decorated with lines. These tiles enabled the creation of increasingly complex periodic girih patterns, and by the 15th century, the tessellation approach was combined with self-similar transformations to construct nearly perfect quasi-crystalline Penrose patterns, five centuries before their discovery in the West.

    If you care to look at the article, it has some very interesting pictures and explanations in the "supplement". Peter Lu, et.al. Science 315, 1106 (2007)

    --
    "If all the American people want is security, let them live in prisons." Eisenhower
  26. Re:If they actually did it, great for them by xoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

    And so he did. But he did it 500 years later.

    Your argument was that Muslim architecture was in most part due to their policy of leaving societal elites in place, including architects, during the conquest. You go on to support this argument by pointing to the careers of two Ottoman architects Sinan and Mehmet Aga, and claiming that most of the mosques in Istanbul were built therefore by Christians. From this you draw the conclusion that muslims in the 11th century did not have the mathematical skills required to build large domes in the 11th century.

    Your argument fails in a number of respects:

    * The architects you reference flourished some 700 years after the first Muslim empire
    * They were both active in a country that was not part of the Muslim Empire
    * The Ottoman empire had been established for 200 years by the time of Sinan's birth, so he was not conquered
    * Both architects were trained by the Ottoman army, so their skills were not acquired before a Muslim conquest
    * Both architects were converts to Islam, not Christian as you state.

    In addition, Islamic mathematicians were intrigued by the properties of Spheres, see, for example the work of Al Sijzi, who was active in exactly the time frame you claim Muslims were mathematically ignorant: http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biogra phies/Al-Sijzi.html

  27. Re:Thats a curious intepretation of history by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Their life is that way because of their own choices. Sure you can go back a hundred years or so and say this or that happened. But today, they have the same opertunities as anyone else. Even moreso then most, especialy the iner-city folks we refere to as the welfare clans. (notice, I'm not refering to blacks, hispanics or anyone because of race. You will always have poor people living next to poor people in some of the worst neighborhoods availible).

    While there has been challenges in the past, the bigest limiting factor is a culture that refuses to be part of the success around it. And this goes to the inner-city clans too. Far too many people fail to shine because it just isn't hip! Those who do succed get ignored while everyone concentrates on those losing at life (and no i didn't call anyone a "loser" I said they weren't succeeding). But thats what happens when the government "keeps" people dependent on them, too few look at taking care of themselves.

  28. Geometric Analysis by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I haven't visited the Arabic world but my encounters with Moorish craftsmanship in Spain have been awe-inspiring.

    Don't miss Granada's Alhambra, a breath-taking treasure and not just for the intricate artwork.

    There are a number of books, I'll let you browse Amazon at your leisure, on the beauty of Islamic art. One I purchased explores the mathematics behind the designs, Keith Critchlow's "Islamic Patterns: An Analytical and Cosmological Approach". It explains how patterns emerge from arcs and intersections of polygons. Further, Critchlow argues that for the Muslim these patterns displayed a spiritual aspect, that the wonder experienced at looking at these patterns pales in comparison to the complex thoughts behind their creation.

    Alas, if only there were more hours in the day I'd try reproducing them via Java2D or OpenGL. Fascinating stuff.

  29. No, Islam happened. by d3ac0n · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As to what happened to the high point of Arabic culture, thats easy, we destroyed it in The Crusades.


    Except for one fact: Europe LOST the crusades. Yes, they held an area of land approximately equivalent to modern day Israel for a short period of time, but most of Arabia was still dominated by Islam. Yes, "The Caliphate" as Mohammad's original empire was known was gone, but it had been in serious decline for some time due to internal strife, the slow march towards religious extremism and traditional tribalism for years by that point.

    The only real "advanced" Islam was the one destroyed years earlier in the Grenada area. The only reason they were advanced was their rejection of Fundamentalist Islam, and the creation of a more modern more egalitarian society that viewed Christians and Jews as, if not equals, valuable citizens. Most of the advances IN that society were brought to it by the Jews and Christians living within it. Not the Muslims themselves. Of course, all that was gone by the time of the crusades due to the destruction of that society by greedy Kings using Christianity as an excuse to take land.

    The point is, Islam as we know it today has brought nothing to the table to advance society. While I am all for giving people their due, Modern Islam is owed no credit for any discoveries (unless you consider suicide bombers a discovery), and trying to credit them for this smacks of Political Correctness gone awry.
    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    1. Re:No, Islam happened. by corbettw · · Score: 2, Informative

      At no point in the Koran does it say killing non-believers is acceptable.

      You're either misinformed or lying. I'm going to assume you're misinformed. Here are some quotes from the Koran to help enlighten you.

      "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and his messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be to be killed or crucified, or to have their hands and feet chopped off on opposite sides, or to be expelled out of the land. Such will be their humiliation in the world, and in the next world they will face an awful horror." (Koran, 5:33-34)

      "When we decide to destroy a population, we send a definite order to them who have the good things in life and yet sin. So that Allah's word is proven true against them, then we destroy them utterly." (Koran, 17:16-17)

      "Remember Allah inspired the angels: I am with you. Give firmness to the believers. I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: you smite them above their necks and smite all their fingertips off of them." (Koran, 8:12)

      While it's also true that you can find commands from God to kill people in the Bible, all of those quotes are in the Old Testament. The New Testament does not contain any commands to kill, though it does give warnings to people who reject God. But their punishment will be meted out by God in the next life, at no point are Christians told to exact that punishment themselves. In fact, they're specifically told not to do it.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  30. Oh, please... by Venik · · Score: 2, Funny

    We all know it's pure chance they stumbled into these mathematical patterns. What can Arabs possibly know about algebra and numbers in general? Oh, wait...

  31. Actually the Mayans did this first. by jdb2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The first usage of zero as an actual numerical quantity occurred in the Mayan vigesimal numbering system around 36 BCE. (see the Wikipedia article on Mayan numerals ) Some people postulate, although, that this was derived from the older Olmec numbering system, which could have gone as far back as 1200 BCE. If this is true, then it means that the Olmecs discovered zero 1828 years before Brahmagupta re-discovered and formalized it in 628 CE in India. jdb2

  32. Islam and independent thinking by free+space · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Quran even declares independant thinking illegal, and "a sure road to hell". See Quran 33:36.


    What drove you to that conclusion?

    Here's a translation of the verse in Question (I also read it in the original Arabic): "It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger to have any option about their decision: if any one disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he is indeed on a clearly wrong Path"

    It roughly means "believers are not to disobey Allah or his prophet". Why does that makes you think it prohibits independent thinking?

    There are may verses of the Quran and many quotes of the prophet that encourage thinking and reasoning (for example Quran verses 4:82, 47:24, 16:11 to 16:13).

    In fact, a complete branch of Islamic studies is called Ijtihad, which is all about independent thought.

    to quote an online Islamic site: "A scientific approach has been encouraged in the Qur'an with the objective of ascertaining its truthfulness. It provides man with a chance to verify its authenticity." so in Islam, independent thinking is in fact an essential part of the religion.
  33. The perfect example: the Fibonacci sequence by feranick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People say that it's a coincidence. What Lu and Steinhardt are demonstrating is deep knowledge of advanced math. The best example of quasiperiodic tiling (as they are called), is the Fibonacci sequence. To build it you need to differnet tiles (say a long segment "L" and a short segment "S") and two combining rules:

    1. at every S you change it with a L
    2. at every L you change it with LS

    so you build the different generations of the sequence as follow:

    S
    LS
    LSL
    LSLLS
    LSLLSLSL
    LSLLSLSLLSLLS
    LSLLSLSLLSLLSLSLLSLSL
    etc...

    You can go at infinity with this. You won't find periodicity or a pattern that repeat itself. Now to the point: does this means that you take the two segments and you put them together randomly you get the F. sequence? No, by any chance. The rules are simple (and the Fibonacci sequence is old (~1200), so I would not be surprised if the Islamic mathematicians were aware of it, so they "ported" it in 2D (the Penrose tiling is the 2D version of the F. sequence).

    By the way the story goes even back in time further: the ratio between the number of L and S for a significantly large sequence, is tau, the golden mean (again the same is true for the Penrose tiling). The golden mean was a key number (sqrt5+1)/2~1.6... in the greek world, where it was used as a proportion standard to build building and temples. It's also a key element in fractal growth, in key dimensions of our body, etc.

    So the Islamic artists (scientists?) of the time were a bit like today's scientists. they gathered previous studies and assembled together using some new insights.

    Why don't give them credits for it, instead of stupidly saying: "well they just got lucky?".

  34. I wouldn't be so sure. by feranick · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can use brute force to form pseudo quasiperiodic tilings. However they are not really quasiperiodic, they are "approximants". So if are patient enough you can get to a point where you have a large pattern, but not necessarily being quasiperiodic. So to a degree of trial and error the Islamic artists must have developed a degree of knowledge which you seem to underestimate. point in case: the Fibonacci sequence and the golden mean. Simple mathematical rules at the base, not impossible to grasp with the arabic knowledge of math of the time. The 2D mapping may just have been their "next step". There have been long speculation of the fact that Islamic art was for long considered just a coincidence. The article here present the prove that this may indeed be not true. Disclaimer: I (not my wife) did my PhD in quasicrystal tiling.