Slashdot Mirror


USPS Announces Star Wars Stamp Set

morpheus83 writes "After R2D2 letter boxes, the USPS continues the saga, as it unveiled 15 new stamps featuring Star Wars characters at Grauman's Chinese theater in Hollywood where the original Star Wars movie opened 30 years ago. The 41 cent stamps will be released on May 25, and all the 15 stamps will be issued on a single sheet resembling a movie poster."

153 comments

  1. huh? by mastershake_phd · · Score: 5, Funny

    They never even built Reagan's space weapons, how can they put them on a stamp?

    1. Re:huh? by SkyDude · · Score: 1

      They never even built Reagan's space weapons, how can they put them on a stamp?

      That's what they wanted you to think.

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  2. Inquiring minds want to know... by bluemonq · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...will Han be printed first?

    1. Re:Inquiring minds want to know... by WwWonka · · Score: 4, Funny

      well, the US Postal service has thought of that.

      In the 1st series, yes, Han will be printed first.
      In the 2nd series Han is printed second, but only after George Lucas is found dead from licking too many 1st edition Princess Lea in a metal bikini stamps, thus making it the most popular stamp in the series.
      The 3rd series won't really be stamps, but CGI representations that don't quite live up to the first series of stamps.

  3. They did! by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... and the USPS made a comemorative stamp set about them. However the MIB raided USPS warehouses and took everything away.

    I was told this by a USPS worker, but he started getting a bit cranky so I walked away...

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:They did! by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 3, Funny
      I'm going to wait for the "Galaxy Quest" stamps to be released.


      "By Grabthar's hammer, by the sons of Worvan, you shall be mailed."

      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
    2. Re:They did! by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 4, Funny

      And I await the Farscape stamps. However, I suspect they will have to wait for a country like the Bahamas to release them.

      Is George Lucas going to want to revise all these stamps in ten years? Will Stamp Album publishers have to get separate licenses with him to publish the album page with the Star Wars stamps on it?

    3. Re:They did! by GravitySpec · · Score: 1

      I'm going to wait for the "Galaxy Quest" stamps to be released.

      "By Grabthar's hammer, by the sons of Worvan, you shall be mailed." "By Grabthar's hammer, what a savings..." --fixed
  4. Star wars stamps... by physicsboy500 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Made specifically when you're mailing to a C3POBox.

    --
    The original generic sig.
    1. Re:Star wars stamps... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Dont laugh too hard, we have a R2D2 Box downtown.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:Star wars stamps... by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      Are you in Lexington KY? Probably not, but thought I'd ask.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    3. Re:Star wars stamps... by Cef · · Score: 1

      "Downtown" doesn't really give much indication of where. Especially for those of us not in the states. :P

      As an aside, I'm guessing that people in Boston would have never seen one of these post boxes, except mebbe as pieces of exploding shrapnel.

    4. Re:Star wars stamps... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Well, there are reasons im not too specific in my location..

      But ill tell you that its the 'midwest'...

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  5. Still unsatisfied by EvilGoodGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm still waiting for the Leia and Amidala playboy special.

    1. Re:Still unsatisfied by rabiddeity · · Score: 1

      Leia, half-naked!
      Natalie Portman!
      Han Solo petrified!

      I'm sure someone else can fit "Hot Grits" into there somewhere.

    2. Re:Still unsatisfied by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Please make sure that's Leia circa 1977, okay? Please!

    3. Re:Still unsatisfied by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll just include Mae Ling Mak, to be historically correct. Skip the revisionist Portman reference.

    4. Re:Still unsatisfied by aztektum · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can see Amidala, but unless you got yourself a time machine, I'm thinkin' a "Carrie Fisher" Leia spread today would probably be the only issue were guys really do "only read the articles".

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    5. Re:Still unsatisfied by EvilGoodGuy · · Score: 1

      Don't lie, you'd still hit it. At that age, it's a novelty. It's about the status, not the image.

    6. Re:Still unsatisfied by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      I'm thinkin' a "Carrie Fisher" Leia spread today would probably be the only issue were guys really do "only read the articles". Heh. "Leia spread."
      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    7. Re:Still unsatisfied by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Excuse my ignorance, but *who* is Mae Ling Mak?!

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    8. Re:Still unsatisfied by muffel · · Score: 1

      You haven't seen her lately, have you?

      --

      bla
    9. Re:Still unsatisfied by bigdavex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You haven't seen her lately, have you?

      When 50 years old you be, look as good you will not.
      --
      -Dave
    10. Re:Still unsatisfied by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      'Mae Ling Mak, naked and petrified' was one of the earlier troll/crapflood phrases on Ye Olde Slashdot back in the wayback times.

      It doesn't matter HOW low your UID is if you don't remember that era.

      Did she sue somebody? Why did it get switched to Natalie Portman??

    11. Re:Still unsatisfied by Dogtanian · · Score: 1
      That rings a bell now; I knew I'd looked up her name before, but I couldn't remember why. It *was* after reading about the origins Natalie Portman troll... and so your answer still doesn't explain who she is.

      Actually, I tried again and found out that she was (apparently) a columnist for Maximum Linux magazine, and that the troll originated on SegFault. So, she wasn't that famous...

      It doesn't matter HOW low your UID is if you don't remember that era. Ha ha... are you implying that my almost-600,000 ID *is* low? Relative to yours it may be (newbie! :-) ), but it's not really; this account dates back to mid-2002, a few months after I started reading Slashdot. According to this article, the troll had already mutated into the Natalie Portman form *and* become tediously cliched by the end of 2000.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  6. Don't want 'em by L.+VeGas · · Score: 4, Funny

    These aren't the droid stamps we're looking for.

    1. Re:Don't want 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These aren't the droid stamps I'm looking for.

  7. Stamp Images by cmcguffin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a link to images of the stamps themselves.

    1. Re:Stamp Images by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I'm using Lynx, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Stamp Images by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Wait, why are all of them 41 cent stamps? Are we in for yet another stamp rate increase, or do we already pay 41 cents a stamp (I thought it was 39)? I guess they needed another couple of cents per stamp to pay the licensing fees to get Star Wars characters on their stamps...

  8. Lucas did it. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just further proof that Star Wars is, in fact, dead.

    1. Re:Lucas did it. by Trogre · · Score: 1

      A collection of Beatles stamps was recently released. Are the Beatles dead, too?

      Oh. Never mind.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:Lucas did it. by dave420 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seriously! The 1977 cinematic release had no merchandising tie-ins at all, now he goes and does this. Sell-out!

    3. Re:Lucas did it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe Saul and Bingo are still alive.

    4. Re:Lucas did it. by adona1 · · Score: 1

      Are the Beatles dead, too?
      Yeah, they're working on it, halfway there :)
      --
      Between the falling angel and the rising ape
    5. Re:Lucas did it. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Just further proof that Star Wars is, in fact, dead.

      Nonsense! Elvis was put on a stamp after all.
    6. Re:Lucas did it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? You wouldn't want to make money off your movie that stopped making money... considering it was your great Idea and it was a proffitable one....

      LOL OMG SELL OUT star wars was Soooo underground! mannnnnn.

    7. Re:Lucas did it. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Clearly sarcasm is something you're unfamiliar with ;)

  9. What the heck is a "stamp"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the heck is a "stamp" and how am I supposed to fix it onto my email? I mean, shit, if I wanted a Star Wars image in with my mail, I'd just attach one I got online instead of paying 41 cents for it.

  10. Missed opportunity by jolyonr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why on earth couldn't they have launched them on May 4th.

    Jolyon

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    1. Re:Missed opportunity by psaunders · · Score: 5, Funny
      You mean, so millions of geeky fans could send Star Wars stamp-affixed postcards that read "May the 4th be with you"?

      You're right. What a waste.

      --
      Karma police, arrest this man. He talks in math. He buzzes like a fridge. He's like a detuned radio.
    2. Re:Missed opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on that wouldn't have been geeky, you've spelt it out. Geeky is just "May 4th be with you" thus meaning that only the truly sad always remember to put the "the" in. It isn't a sad "in" joke if people with actual lives understand it.

      Bloody newbie geeks

    3. Re:Missed opportunity by sg7jimr · · Score: 1
      It may partly be because the rate change doesn't happen until 10 days later. Is it helpful to have the proper rate stamp in advance? Sure. But it can also imply that the rate change has already happened and cause confusion. Historically the postal service hasn't even been able or willing to supply a stamp with the actual numeric value until a while after a rate change, so people may expect that by the time a 41 cent stamp comes out that's what first class mail costs.

      Perhaps they could have left the number off and just said "first class" as they did for the last rate change, but that's a lot of real estate taken up by lettering on a souvenir stamp. They seem to have abandoned the idea of using an alphabetic character. Probably would have been a bad idea anyway since using the alphabet reminds people they raised the rates once again.

    4. Re:Missed opportunity by dswensen · · Score: 1

      I can't believe you got modded higher for explaining his joke.

  11. I for one welcome our Jar-Jar Binks postage by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Funny

    and look forward to sticking it on postcards to the White House.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:I for one welcome our Jar-Jar Binks postage by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, these stamps will come too late for use on your April 15 income tax return. Perhaps if you've filed for an extension, however...

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  12. Reason: Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The United States Postal Service (USPS) is just trying to get some cash from saps -- like the saps who will buy these Star Wars stamps. The USPS knows that nostalgia has a price tag. Moreover, the USPS is encountering some revenue problems. So, this stamp fixes the revenue problem.

    I just bought a whole box of these stamps. So, I suppose that I am the biggest sap of all.

    "Be a jedi or be not a jedi. There is no sap!" exclaims Yoda.

  13. These aren't the stamps you're looking for... by glomph · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a trap!!!

  14. Is there anything more pathetic by maynard · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    than buying a 'star wars' stamp? I mean, even stamp collectors are going to avoid these. Feh.

  15. I wonder if this has deeper significance? by Dzimas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was discussing the Star Wars post boxes with someone a few days ago. We both think they're extremely clever, but they're also a rather strange bit of corporate advertising by the United States Postal Service. It didn't take long before one of us wondered if this is yet another sign that things have slipped a bit too far in favor of the service sector as far as the US economy goes. After all, the post office really doesn't have any reason to promote a film franchise (yes, I know it's an anniversary celebration and all... but it still leaves a strange taste in my mouth)

    1. Re:I wonder if this has deeper significance? by dennism · · Score: 1

      Another interesting bit -- since when did the USPS start allowing images of people that were still alive on stamps? It's quite obvious that it's Harrison Ford by looking at the stamp. Last I checked, he's still alive.

      --
      dennis
    2. Re:I wonder if this has deeper significance? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      That's not Harrison Ford, that's Han Solo, and this all happened a long time ago. They're all dead.

      I think they died when the Special Editions came out. I know a little part of me did...

    3. Re:I wonder if this has deeper significance? by Kannaida · · Score: 1

      So which came first... the stamp collector or the collectible stamps? I think by the way they're laid out it's pretty obvious these stamps aren't really for mail letters. When was the last time you went to the P.O. and got a book of stamps that came as part of a larger image? The U.S.P.S. has been making stamps for collecting for some time now. I don't think it's the U.S.P.S. promoting a film franchise, but rather using a film franchise to promote postage. I mean, in this day an age with instant messaging, SMS, and email, it's not like postage stamps are flying off the shelves so to speak.

    4. Re:I wonder if this has deeper significance? by OctaviusIII · · Score: 1

      I think that Star Wars has become something of a cultural icon and certainly more than just a brand. Now, the Home Hardware stamps offered by Canada Post a few years ago - that felt like blatant advertising to me.

      --
      What's this? Another weblog? On transit?
    5. Re:I wonder if this has deeper significance? by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Lovely. We've become a third-world banana republic, printing irrelevancies on our stamps to raise funds by selling them to collectors. This used to be the province of places such as Trinidad and Tabago or Bora Bora. My mailbox is so full of subsidized corporate junk that I can barely find the bills, while my mail-carrier won't deliver in winter unless I shovel the snow around the mailbox in a federally-approved fashion as otherwise they'd have to get out of their golf-carts. The entire purpose of the post-office (deliver the mail, anywhere in the country) seems to have been forgotten.

      They should have to offer nothing but Richard Nixon stamps for two years in penance, and publish the Postmaster-General's home number while they're at it.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    6. Re:I wonder if this has deeper significance? by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      They've done it many times, as far back as 1967 (Edward White, the first American spacewalk) and as recently as the 9/11 stamp with the three NYC firemen. The idea is that they don't want to honor living individuals. People who are still alive will sometimes appear when the event is what's important and the individual is secondary.

    7. Re:I wonder if this has deeper significance? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Ha ha... in Britain they really *do* get fussed about the living individuals rule (except for Her Majesty). There was apparently some fuss when a stamp was made commemorating Freddie Mercury of Queen (the band), and their drummer Roger Taylor (not dead) appeared in the background, even though he wasn't the main subject.

      On the other hand maybe you could fiddle that case by saying he was a member of "the" Queen. Erm... then again, maybe not.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  16. too bad there aren't any quotes on the stamps by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Han's should read, "It's not my fault!"

    Luke's, "I was going into Toshi Station to pick up some power converters!"

    Leia, "Will somebody get this walking carpet out of my way?!"

    Chewie, "Mraaaawwwwrrrr!"

    Vader, "I find your lack of faith ... disturbing."

    Obi-Wan, "We'd like to avoid any Imperial entanglements."

    R2D2, *beep* *beep* *whistle* *beep* *splat*

    C3PO, "I didn't know I had it in me."

    For the Falcon, just the tagline: The fastest hunk of junk in the galaxy!

    1. Re:too bad there aren't any quotes on the stamps by Headrick · · Score: 1
      I personally prefer the Han quote "I know" just before he is frozen. One of the best lines in film history IMHO.

      According to http://alek.xspaces.org/2005/09/27/i-love-you-now- i-know-trivia-for-star-wars it was an ad lib and Ford dropped the original line of

      "Just remember that, Leia, because I'll be back" because he was unsure if he wanted to do the third film.
    2. Re:too bad there aren't any quotes on the stamps by zanybrainy941 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Vader: "I am altering your First Class postage rate. Pray I don't alter it further."

    3. Re:too bad there aren't any quotes on the stamps by BVis · · Score: 1

      Hmm, one of the most classic lines from the original trilogy, and Lucas didn't write it.

      Hmm.

      On a related note, any enterprising nerd lawyers want to file an injunction preventing Lucas from writing dialog ever again?

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  17. Chewbacca? by taniwha · · Score: 1

    "15 new stamps featuring Star Wars characters at Grauman's Chinese theater" - you mean this Chewbacca at Grauman's Chinese theater? he gets a stamp?

    1. Re:Chewbacca? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      That's what happens when you don't let the Wookie win.

  18. No reason? by StefanJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These are stamps that people will buy and never use.

    It's a money making venture.

    Last year, the P.O. introduced a line of famous scietist stamps. Here and gone in a month or so. I was really hoping to get a booklet of Buckminster Fuller stamps.

    I guess I'll have to settle for the Lobot.

    1. Re:No reason? by mstahl · · Score: 3, Informative

      Absolutely. Ever wonder why dollar coins are perpetually in short supply? It's because the U.S. government effectively makes money when people hoard them and thus take them out of circulation. Same deal with the quarters with the states on them. People started collecting them, and for each person with a full set, that was $12.50 the treasury department was no longer responsible for in a way.

      The Post Office can pull the same trick with people who collect stamps. It's in their best interest to offer up stamps that people will want to acquire and keep.

    2. Re:No reason? by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      I'll need to get a sheet, of course, but I'm definitely going to need to have at least a hundred Darth Vader stamps for use as well. I don't even write that many letters.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    3. Re:No reason? by shark72 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "It's because the U.S. government effectively makes money when people hoard them and thus take them out of circulation."

      Interesting; the government typically wants us to spend money. If you spend that Sacajawea you get from the stamp machine rather than hiding it away, you'll likely pay sales tax on the item you buy with it, and the person you buy it from will pay income tax on the sale. Various governments might get up to half of that buck back.

      On a macro level, when people stop circulating money, the economy slows down. I don't see how encouraging people to hoard dollar coins would be beneficial to the government.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    4. Re:No reason? by mstahl · · Score: 1

      I don't see how encouraging people to hoard dollar coins would be beneficial to the government.

      That's why it's not done too much. You mention sales tax and income tax, but by getting you to just not spend that dollar coin, if you never spend it ever, the government has effectively earned back the whole dollar. They would, as you said, only get about half of it otherwise. Meanwhile people are spending their paper money just fine. Nobody out there is hoarding Benjamins, so I think the economy is probably going to do just fine.

      Can you imagine if Star Wars stamps were the one thing that brought the US economy down for good?

  19. I haven't done any research on it... by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But I'd be interested to find out who is funding this. 100% of the production cost, distribution, etc. should be borne by Lucas.

    Is this why stamps go up in price? To keep the marketing budget in line?

    I can't get a box from Omaha to Denver in under two weeks by USPS, but they sure have purty stamps.

    They're a monopoly, and should not be allowed to advertise at all. No commercials, no ads, fund from the stamps and add some value.

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
    1. Re:I haven't done any research on it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I can't get a box from Omaha to Denver in under two weeks by USPS, but they sure have purty stamps.

      Are you using the cheapest rate which would be parcel post? if so then it could take as long as you claim. Priority mail costs more but is also faster. Express is guarenteed the next day by noon or your money back.

    2. Re:I haven't done any research on it... by SkyDude · · Score: 5, Informative

      But I'd be interested to find out who is funding this. 100% of the production cost, distribution, etc. should be borne by Lucas.

      The USPS is paying for the entire promo, because the USPS is a business, not a government agency. It's been a business for a number of years. It's just not the typical private sector business.

      Having been involved in the logistics field for a number of years, I know from personal experience that the USPS marketing department has one of the biggest budgets in the transportation industry. When I attended various trade conferences, the biggest and best parties (or receptions as they are often called) were always sponsored by the USPS. And there were often some real nice giveaways too - windbreaker jackets, top notch dinners and other really nice amenities. They do it because they are big and generate lots of money.

      They're a monopoly, and should not be allowed to advertise at all. No commercials, no ads, fund from the stamps and add some value. Well, no they're not. Years ago, sending an overnight letter via Fedex or UPS required the mailer to add first class postage, even though the Postal Service would never touch the thing. That was a ruling by the Supreme Court, if memory serves, due to the Constitutional beginnings of the Post Office. The requirement was done away with years ago, the Post Office became The US Postal Service and they are mandated to be profitable. And they are.

      As someone who regularly shipped thousands of parcels via the USPS each month, if you believe it takes two weeks to go from Omaha to Denver, then you haven't mailed a parcel in a long time. The Postal Service is competitive with UPS and Fedex in nearly every category. The pay scales are competitive with the private companies and they don't charge as much, because they have what the private companies don't have - volume. UPS, Fedex and DHL can only wish they handled as many parcels and letters as the USPS.

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    3. Re:I haven't done any research on it... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      1) They're not a monopoly (Fedex, UPS, DHL, without even bringing up freight carriers)

      2) They operate in the black (and work hard to do so)

      3) I've gotten boxes cross-country with USPS in 4 days

      I mean, seriously, how can you complain about the postal service? I can get a letter across the country for the price of a candy bar. I can get a light envelope to the most remote parts of the world for the price of a gallon of gas or two.

      Lets face it, the price of stamps goes up to deal with the cost of running a distribution network that operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (you don't get mail on Sunday, but they're moving and processing it).

      Quit whinning.

    4. Re:I haven't done any research on it... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      But they still hold a monopoly on regular service. I can't hire UPS to come to my house every day, pick up outgoing mail from my mailbox, and deliver mail to my mailbox. I can't even unsubscribe from the USPS.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    5. Re:I haven't done any research on it... by SkyDude · · Score: 3, Interesting
      No, not true. You open an account with UPS, pay for your shipments with a credit card and they will come to your house and pick up anything you care to ship. Minimum cost for letters is now around $18 for a letter not exceeding 8 oz.
      Of course, it makes no economic sense, so no one will send you your mail that way either. It makes sense to use the USPS for lightweight first class mail. But, there is a choice. It's just not a realistic one.

      You may be surprised to learn that Fedex, UPS and DHL all have arrangements to pick up lightweight mail parcels from businesses and deliver them to the Postal Service who ultimately delivers the parcels to residentail customers. The USPS offers a service called Parcel Select. A carrier or business that generates thousands of small parcels can participate in it. A shipper routes a quantity of small parcels via this service, and the carrier picks up the parcels and delivers them to a Postal delivery unit near the recipient's address. The USPS then sorts the parcel into the regular mail delivery. Very cost effective and further blurs the distinction between the old Post Office and private industry.

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    6. Re:I haven't done any research on it... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      But if I have a mailbox on my front lawn, it's a federal law that only the postal service (and myself) can open it. UPS/FedEx/DHL can't use the Postal Service business model of "put a stamp on an envelope and we'll pick it up" because they don't have the legal right to put mail in anyone's mailbox, or take it out for that matter.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    7. Re:I haven't done any research on it... by SkyDude · · Score: 1
      You are correct, the mailbox on the pole or your front door is Federally protected and is for the exclusive use of the Postal Service. That's a good thing because it gives your mail a stronger layer of protection. UPS, Fedex and DHL don't use a "mailbox" model because it would be a logistical nightmare. Instead, they usually require a signature when items are delivered.

      All in all, the Postal Service, which has never been considered a model of efficiency, actually has become a huge force of change in the letter and parcel delivery business. If you order small items from Amazon, Buy.com or any other major web retailer, there's a good chance it will ship via the USPS.

      "Unsubscribing" from the service is not an issue because it's still Constitutionally protected. You can just ignore it, or go to your local post office and file a stop order. It will expire but why bother? It's free, and think what you'd miss without all of those catalogs and sales flyers!

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    8. Re:I haven't done any research on it... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      You are correct, the mailbox on the pole or your front door is Federally protected and is for the exclusive use of the Postal Service. That's a good thing because it gives your mail a stronger layer of protection.

      It gives a private corporation, the US Postal Service, a stronger layer of protection. Why the law can't be changed to favor mail-delivery companies in general and not the USPS in specific is my question.

      UPS, Fedex and DHL don't use a "mailbox" model because it would be a logistical nightmare.

      They don't use that model because the USPS has a federally-protected monopoly on that business model. If the USPS is profitable running a mailbox model, why couldn't other firms be?

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    9. Re:I haven't done any research on it... by SkyDude · · Score: 1

      In 1781, Congress ratified the Articles of Confederation. Article IX addressed postal issues: The United States in Congress assembled shall also have the sole and exclusive right and power of ... establishing or regulating post offices from one State to another, throughout all the United States, and exacting such postage on the papers passing through the same as may be requisite to defray the expenses of the said office ...

      The above quote is from the USPS website at: http://www.usps.com/cpim/ftp/pubs/pub100/pub100.ht m#thepostal

      There is a write-up on Wikipedia, but you always take Wikipedia with a grain of salt. As for it being a monopoly, the quote explains why the post office was created. The monopoly on first class mail continues because in a competitive environment, many small cities and towns would be under served by other companies. Even now, the commercial carriers impose rural surcharges on nearly 25,000 zip codes to increase their revenue on sparsely populated delivery points. In all US locations the carriers impose a residential surcharge, even though a home may be right next door to an industrial park. Ironically, the determination as to what zip codes are rural and what addresses are residential comes from the Postal Service! Yet, the USPS doesn't impose surcharges and still delivers to every legal address in the US.

      That's why they are a monopoly. And, like any business, their operating costs increase each year, which is why rates go up. But a first class stamp is still a huge bargain, considering what it can do.

      In this thread, I seem to have been put in the position of defending the USPS, which was not my intention. You've raised questions which I, as someone very familiar with the transportation industry, have tried to answer. I won't respond to any further posts on this thread, instead, inviting you or anyone else to seek answers on the web. Competition is usually a good thing, but it wouldn't make any economic sense for a business to take a handful of letters bearing .39 postage several miles to their delivery address. So, a monopoly has to be tolerated to make the system work.

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
  20. Finally! by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 4, Funny

    A legitimate reason to lick Princess Leia

    1. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean we need a reason? Too bad we'll be licking the non printed side this time.

    2. Re:Finally! by ari_j · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean there's a side of Princess Leia you don't want to lick? Hand over your geek card right now, imposter!

    3. Re:Finally! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Don't forget her mom.

    4. Re:Finally! by glwtta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The reason has always been there, it's opportunity that's been sadly lacking.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  21. Don't use the Admiral Ackbar stamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or your mailing will end up in the dead letter office.

  22. Darth Maul!?! by coug_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay, so... there's a Darth Maul stamp, but no Lando Calrissian stamp? How about a Jabba the Hut stamp? He certainly played a much bigger role in the series than Darth Maul did. Darth Maul, as cool as he may have looked, was almost completely insignificant to the story.

    1. Re:Darth Maul!?! by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Rumor has it that Jabba the Hut and StarDestroyers coming out in 5c increments so you can piece them together across the top of the letter and form it.

      PS: I just started this rumor.

    2. Re:Darth Maul!?! by shark+swooner · · Score: 1

      Darth Maul, as cool as he may have looked, was almost completely insignificant to the story.

      Story?

    3. Re:Darth Maul!?! by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      I'd stick it..

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
  23. Actors Are Still Alive by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought there was a rule that no living person could be on a stamp, so how can there be characters on the stamps when the actors are still alive? I found this site that seems to agree with the "no living person" rule, but it isn't an official USPS site. Has this rule been changed or is it OK since they are fictional characters?

    --
    Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    1. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by tm2b · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who is it that you think is still living, Luke Skywalker or Leia Organa?

      I know Slashdot readers often have a hard time telling the difference, but try to stay with us here. These are characters, not people.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    2. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Sure, they're alive now...but do not underestimate the power of the Post.

    3. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by Jazzer_Techie · · Score: 1

      I thought there was a rule that no living person could be on a stamp, so how can there be characters on the stamps when the actors are still alive? I found this site that seems to agree with the "no living person" rule, but it isn't an official USPS site. Has this rule been changed or is it OK since they are fictional characters?
      I believe that rule is true. I'd say that they get around that by the fact that the stamps aren't photos or screenshots, but rather drawings. Now they look nearly identical to the actors who played the characters in the films, but since they're not actual photos of people, I think they're ok.
    4. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm, the poster very clearly referred to the actors still being alive. Maybe you should head back to grade school and work on your reading compression skills.

      But anyway, these stamps also appear to break rule #6 at http://www.usps.com/communications/organization/cs ac.htm -- "Stamps or stationery shall not be issued to promote or advertise commercial enterprises or products".

    5. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      You can make custom USPS stamps at http://www.zazzle.com/custom/stamps and they don't say anything about those limitations.

    6. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought there was a rule that no living person could be on a stamp

            but they
                died a long
                      long time ago on a
                              Galaxy Far Far Away

    7. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by SkyDude · · Score: 1
      The US Postal Service has no restrictions on who appears on a stamp. Several sites on the web allow you to put pictures of your kids, your dogs, cats or significant other if you want on official stamps.

      The postings on here have shown me a lot of old stereotypes still exist about the USPS. They are no longer a sloth-laden government agency, but rather a big, dynamic business - bigger than any Fortune 500 company. It seems they need to do a better job communicating this to the general public a little better.

      While I wouldn't buy these stamps as "collectibles", many people will. Maybe not because they have some intrinsic value, but because it's fun. The USPS has been selling collectible stamps for several years now and it's one of their most profitable products.

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    8. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, but this did happen "a long, long time ago"

      so presumably they are dead!

    9. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harrison Ford is dead? And I was so looking forward to the next Indiana Jones movie...

    10. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by Eradicator2k3 · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm guessing all of the the characters are dead already. After all, the movies did take place "a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away."

      --
      Mr. T pitied this fool on 27 July 1992.
    11. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter if the actors are still alive. They aren't stamps commemorating Carrie Fisher or Mark Hammill, they're Princess Leia and Luke Skywalker stamps. And they're illustrated, so the likeness argument (which isn't part of the guidelines anyway) is moot.

      As to rule #6, it isn't advertising. Stamps of the Star Wars Original Trilogy on DVD would be advertising. LucasArts stamps would be advertising.

    12. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a clause about "American Culture" that allows all the Bugs Bunny and Star Wars stamps in that rule. read on...

    13. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, in that case I guess it's OK.

      I can't wait for the "American Idol" and "Survivor" stamps next year -- they wouldn't be advertising DVDs or other physical products so it's fine, right?...

    14. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by demonbug · · Score: 1

      No stamps "commemorating living people". However, living people can appear in stamps that are commemorating other events (such as movies).

      Actually, the rule these days is probably "whatever sells".

    15. Re:Actors Are Still Alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see no reason it wouldn't be fine. Just because you or I don't like the idea doesn't mean it's not legitimate by the rules.

  24. And he said.... by fishthegeek · · Score: 3, Funny

    Grauman's Chinese theater in Hollywood... you will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.

    --
    load "$",8,1
  25. COLLECTOR'S ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apparently, there is a very valuable sheet of misprinted upside down x-wing stamps out there.

  26. Somewhat obligatory by GFree · · Score: 1

    Putting Chewbacca stamp on letter +

    Tripping and falling on letter +

    Realizing the letter (including stamp) has been crumpled

    = "I bent my wookie."

  27. Star Wars Stamp Collection by rlp · · Score: 1

    I've got you now!

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  28. First to say? by fire-eyes · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope I'm the first to say... That I'm happy that I can finally lick a wookie.

    --
    -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
    1. Re:First to say? by LoveGoblin · · Score: 1

      I hope I'm the first to say... That I'm happy that I can finally lick a wookie.

      Given the type of people that haunt the Internet...I doubt it.

  29. R2 Mail by Voxxel · · Score: 1

    Maybe this would explain why the post office in Royal Oak MI has painted their blue mailboxes to look like R2D2.

    R2D2 Mailbox

    --

    If a million monkeys randomly pounded on keyboards, they would all log into AOL.
  30. I'm a fan by geekoid · · Score: 1

    and so will buy a sheet for novelty.

    I will also buy several sheet to use to send postcards to some SW fanatics I know. Heh, using the stamp will drive them bonkers.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:I'm a fan by zrobotics · · Score: 1

      I'm buying several sheets to send letters to a friend in Iraq. Nothing more embarrassing than being a soldier who plays WoW and gets letters with Star Wars stamps. *evil laugh*

  31. Death Star? by ruiner13 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why no Death Star stamp? I want to put a Death Star on all my bill payments. Something rather poetic, I think.

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

    1. Re:Death Star? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why no Death Star stamp? I want to put a Death Star on all my bill payments. Something rather poetic, I think.

      You can't do that. It's already a registered trademark of AT&T!

  32. Screw the stamps! by Chas · · Score: 1

    I want one of the Artoo mailboxes!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Screw the stamps! by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 1

      I have a spare mailbox. although it doesn't CURRENTLY look like r2d2, it has possibilities. You pay the shipping, and we're golden. It's a bit rusty as I use it for acid storage....

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
  33. Meesa see no Jar Jar?! by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

    One of the most talked about characters in the Star Wars Saga even above Darth Maul!

    Yeah this probably relagates it to a troll post, but I could not resist typing the subject line.

    Though I would have prioritized the super star destroyer far ahead of Darth Maul, and maybe do a montage with anakins/vader instead of just the vader mask. :-)

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:Meesa see no Jar Jar?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Meesa see no Jar Jar?!"

      They're just waiting for the audio stamps, for the full effect. You know, so at first you like the stamp, and then abotu fifteen minutes later you want to burn it.

    2. Re:Meesa see no Jar Jar?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Jar Jar, everybody hates you but me.

  34. No Jar-Jar. That is so lame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not even Ewoks.

    OMG! Ponies on stamps!

  35. Learn something new every day. by artifex2004 · · Score: 3, Informative

    On the dot, today, I learned that rates are going up for mail.

  36. Boba Fett by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's a Boba Fett stamp. What is it with you people and Boba Fett? He's the most popular minor character EVER.

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    1. Re:Boba Fett by alienmole · · Score: 1

      I've wondered about that myself. My theory is that the full-face helmet allows you to project any character you like onto Boba Fett, if you're so inclined. He's the ultimate Rorschach character. People like him because they get to create him themselves.

      Just a theory -- I'm still mystified by it myself.

    2. Re:Boba Fett by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      He also had the best toy collection.

  37. You don't know the half of it by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Sometime in April, they are also releasing three limited edition pre-paid Priority Mail envelopes with Star Wars characters upon them. How many countless $3 envelopes will go unsent?

    Many.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  38. Re:Reason: Money by maxume · · Score: 1

    If you use them, you go from sap to goofball.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  39. re: USPS Announces Star Wars Stamp Set by AncientPC · · Score: 1

    Vote for your favorite Jedi Stamp. (requires e-mail to confirm vote)

    USPS Star Wars web site. (contains vote tally)

    Pictures of said mailboxes.

  40. i never thought i would see the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a bunch of faggots. only 8 year olds and faggots are into star wars. fucking faggots.

  41. nice by johndapunk · · Score: 1

    i like http://www.usps.com/ now. it was lacking that.. amazingness before. think post men should have lightsabers on the 25th?

    --
    Quit yelling.
  42. Artificial Value by synaptic · · Score: 1

    Maybe if the USPS didn't feel the need to come up with a new stamp design every week (with all of the associated expenses), it wouldn't cost 41 CENTS to send a letter. I mean, it's a STAMP. It isn't a modern art masterpiece.

    1. Re:Artificial Value by SlideRuleGuy · · Score: 1

      Look at stamps from 100 years ago. Far more artistic talent employed than just a few minutes in Photoshop like today. And the stamps actually honored real people and real achievements. Today, not only are stamps ugly and cheap looking, but every other one honors some superficial thing from pop culture! It says a lot about where we are as a society.

      But just so you won't think I'm totally humorless here: These are the usual self-adhesive stamps, right? So you don't actually get to _lick_ the _Princess_, you sex-crazed perverts! (However, the Grace Kelly stamp from over a decade ago still had the old-fashioned adhesive. Now _there_ was a stamp!)

    2. Re:Artificial Value by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      They MAKE a lot of money from these stamps; far more than what they're putting into it. In a large way, these bright colorful stamps are SUBSIDIZING your postage rates by many, many of them being bought but never used for anything. If they didn't make things like this the rate might well be $0.50 by now.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  43. Basement dwellers unite by burnitdown · · Score: 0

    More nostalgia unrelated to reality. Enjoy! Oh, but pay full price.

  44. Come to America..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where the only real heros are on celluloid.

    All other countries honor their leaders, artists, scientists, and other great men. Haven't we got any world-class figures? Or do we have our heads so far up our asses that we actually think Luke Skywalker is an authentic American farm-boy hero?

    On second thoughts, don't answer that. We seem to be running our government and foreign policy as an adjunct of Hollywood. You can see that Bush is itching to ride off into the sunset from Afghanistan, because that will take him into Iran!

    1. Re:Come to America..... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we need real heroes on our stamps like James T. Kirk, Spock, and McCoy.

    2. Re:Come to America..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the endless political interjections aren't getting old or anything.

  45. Darth Mail ! by Rastignac · · Score: 2, Funny

    Darth Maul stamp on a letter gives you a Darth Mail...

    --
    -- Rastignac was here.
  46. Yoda stamp for slow mail. by Rastignac · · Score: 1

    With a Yoda stamp, your letter will need 800 years to go to destination !
    (USPS is sometimes so slow...)

    --
    -- Rastignac was here.
  47. Further proof it will live forever by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Lucas may have abused the series in the minds of some people but its a feat bound to never be replicated, at least anytime soon. Still he brought forward an epic dream and who is to say he can't revise parts of it. I have read books that have later versions (some were considered classics) that had revisions or additions.

    and he just isn't Star Wars...

    being on USPS stamps only goes to show he is forever part of our culture

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  48. Hot Grits: The Official Stamp by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    A legitimate reason to lick Princess Leia If you're interested in pursuing this thoroughly unsavory (and pleasant) line of thought, China has already released stamps that not only smell like sweet-and-sour pork on the front, but actually *taste* like it on the back.

    Since this is Slashdot, and we're discussing Star Wars, I think the USPS should do one of those with Natalie Portman, naked and... actually, naked is enough. And since they'd need to know what Natalie Portman (*cough*) tastes like, I'm willing to volunteer my services.
    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Hot Grits: The Official Stamp by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      And since they'd need to know what Natalie Portman (*cough*) tastes like, I'm willing to volunteer my services.

      Grits dude! I thought everyone knew that

  49. In other news... by Praeluceo · · Score: 1

    E-mail is still free.

    --Sig
    Use The Force Luke.

    (I'll even attach a picture of the Death Star if it saves me 41 cents to get in touch with you)

    1. Re:In other news... by redshirt1111 · · Score: 1

      I'm the first one to mention the Palpatine stamp? Dang! I'll be using that stamp for my various angry letters to sundry Government officials. "I will MAKE it legal..."

  50. Re:Actors Are Still Alive -- Characters are Dead by savorymedia · · Score: 1

    "I thought there was a rule that no living person could be on a stamp, so how can there be characters on the stamps when the actors are still alive?"

    It was Long Ago, In a Galaxy Far Away...I'm pretty sure the characters are dead by now.

    --
    1 is the square root of all evil.
  51. For anyone who hasn't seen them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  52. Re:Actors Are Still Alive - Moron Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know redneck Americans are one step down from slime mould in cultural intelligence, but do you really understand how strange the above post makes you sound?

    In your mind, are Mark Hamil and Luke Skywalker one and the same thing? Do you think that once Richard Burbage died noone else could play Hamlet? Do you think that everything you see on the silver screen is true, and that one day Superman will come to save America from a succession of Evil Geniuses (tm)? I know Bush does - I didn't know that this was a general delusion in the US.

    On the other hand, given that Americans think they were responsible for winning WW2 and for every heroic deed done after this, based on Hollywood propaganda, perhaps I shouldn't be so surprised.

  53. wwII by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And who is responsible for ending World War 2. I know in the MOVIES it was the United States that dropped the Atom Bomb on Hiroshima, but apparently, this is just Hollywood LIES. Please, who did bring Japan to it's knees? Was it France? The only thing the French dropped in WW2 was their rifles, right before they surrendered.

  54. I thought it was new low for US philately.... by imaniack · · Score: 1

    until I read this in the FAQ:

    How much did the U.S. Postal Service pay Lucasfilm for the rights to Star Wars?

    Nothing. The U.S. Postal Service does not pay licensing fees or royalties in the administration of its commemorative stamp program and, in this case, did not pay to honor the 30th anniversary of the Star Wars saga. Lucasfilm Ltd. and the U.S. Postal Service are working together without any monies being exchanged.

    The Postal Service has a long tradition of commemorating American history, so in conjunction with the 30th anniversary of the Star Wars saga, this exciting new venture from the Postal Service is providing customers with new and creative ways to do business with us.

  55. Obligatory Tick quote by tm2b · · Score: 1

    Ahah! Modern postism!

    --
    "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  56. 37, 39, now 41? by dfries · · Score: 1
    I'm still using up my 37 cent stamps with some 2 cent stamps. I'm getting so far behind in these rates that I'm wondering if I'll ever get my current stamps used up.

    The postal service could advertise their rates a little better, USPS First-Class Mail Rates no mention of a rate increase, and with it saying 39 cents I was thinking that the slashdot story might just be a typo, but google news had stories on the rate change.