Slashdot Mirror


Serious Magnet Failure at CERN's New Accelerator

GrepNut writes "CERN is reporting that the giant magnets that steer the particle beam in the new and highly anticipated Large Hadron Collider have just failed catastrophically in a stress test, apparently due to a design oversight. It doesn't help that the magnets were designed and built by CERN's US competitor Fermilab." While safety precautions were followed, and no one was injured nor were any rifts in the space-time continuum opened, it's still a rather large setback for the project.

39 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. What actually happened by DJCacophony · · Score: 5, Funny

    The part was destroyed and subsequently compressed into a singularity by the black hole that the device created.

    --
    Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    1. Re:What actually happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Uh...it's probably not a problem...probably...but I'm showing a small discrepancy in...well, no, it's well within acceptable bounds again. Sustaining sequence...

    2. Re:What actually happened by tsajeff · · Score: 4, Funny

      Weren't they warned never to cross the streams??

  2. There were no injuries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But all credit cards within a 10-mile radius were erased.

    1. Re:There were no injuries by JackMeyhoff · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nevermind that, my metal impants caused me to be stuck to the ceiling for hours until it was finally switched off!

      --
      http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm
    2. Re:There were no injuries by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wouldn't strong magnetic fields, like one powerful enough to affect objects miles away, have an effect on organisms? In Larry Niven's Known Space universe (I'm thinking especially of "The Ethics of Madness" in Neutron Star ) Bussard ramjets take a long time to get off the ground since the magnetic field involved would kill the pilot. But Niven never points to any real research into this, so I never knew if it was true or just a convenient plot point. Can any particle accelerators on Earth generate a magnetic field high enough to kill people?

    3. Re:There were no injuries by WoLpH · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It would just make us start floating I assume, atleast they were able to let a number of things float because of an intense magnetic field over here: http://www.hfml.ru.nl/froglev.html

    4. Re:There were no injuries by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Funny

      MRIs have pretty strong magnetic fields & don't hurt you

            Provided the EMT doesn't forget to take the oxygen cylinder out of the room....

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:There were no injuries by John+Courtland · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or you carry a loaded firearm into the chamber:

      http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/full/178/5/10 92

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    6. Re:There were no injuries by RMB2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I actually just spilled paint on my jeans this morning. I'd like to replace them with a pair of your "metal impants", they seem to have extraordinary properties

      --
      [/sarcasm]
    7. Re:There were no injuries by MrYotsuya · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or your doctor shoots you in the face.

      Dr. Cheney, I presume?

  3. Just reverse the polarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and make sure there aren't any redshirts around the next time you install it.

  4. Important safety tip by rheman1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    How many time do I have to tell you: Don't cross the streams!

    1. Re:Important safety tip by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Funny

      Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light. Total protonic reversal.

      Right. That's bad. Okay. All right. Important safety tip. Thanks.

  5. Oddone will speak again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where would someone called Oddone work if not at a place that creates black holes.

  6. Fidgeting magnets... by wakaranai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hmm.... sounds nasty.

    Each of the ~1200 superconducting magnets is about 50 foot long. There's a photo here showing one being put in place (March 2005):
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7119458/

  7. Not Magnet Failure by AmIAnAi · · Score: 5, Informative
    From TFA:


    "The failure does not concern the magnets or the cold masses themselves, but rather their assembly in the cryostat."

    I know we don't read TFA here, but is it too much for the submitter to get past the first paragraph.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
  8. Apparently... by DiamondGeezer · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...they're going to boost the mass spectrometer to 105% (for the extra resolution). It should be fine just so long as they follow standard insertion procedure...but you don't need to know that - everything will be fine.

    --
    Tubby or not tubby. Fat is the question
    1. Re:Apparently... by StarfishOne · · Score: 2, Funny

      If only they had rerouted auxiliary power via the main deflector dish this wouldn't have happened.. don't they teach anything in high school anymore? =/

  9. Oh, crap. by swschrad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Fermilab has built electromagnets for many particle accelerators, including SLAC. They are apparently the only source. If you want something else, you have to go to TDK in Japan for fixed-intensity ceramic magnets.

    According to an old neighborhood buddy of mine who is at SLAC, when he was in redesign of the linear accelerator in the 80s, those were the only two bids. For flexibility, they went with Fermi and electromagnets.

    And they haven't failed yet.

    While we're whining about cars, you can't keep headlamps and taillamps in a VW, wiring issues burn 'em out. nobody's perfect. that's why you negotiate warranties in the contracts for stuff.

    no wonder you don't dare sign your name. which, BTW, is quite imperfect in itself. Can't stand on the courage of your convulsions, as a rabid right-wing wacko radio commenter used to say.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  10. It all started when... by kpainter · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...research associate Gordon Freeman pushes a crystalline specimen into the beam of an over-charged anti-mass spectrometer, the experiment triggers a resonance cascade, which causes severe structural damage to the entire facility and severs communications with the outside world, and within much of the facility itself..." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Mesa_Research_F acility#.22The_Black_Mesa_Incident.22

  11. Intelligent design at work! by master_p · · Score: 4, Funny

    God does not want us to dig a hole into His universe! that's why the new accelerator will never work!

  12. It was a... by master_p · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...resonance cascade failure! :-)

  13. Anti US Slant by laing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article seems to place the full blame on Fermilab's poor design. I will withhold judgement until all the facts are known. Did CERN provide specific requirements for asymetric load bearing capacity? If there were no requirements provided to Fermilab, then it would seem to me to be a problem at the CERN end.

    1. Re:Anti US Slant by Asic+Eng · · Score: 3, Insightful
      No, putting the blame for a specific problem on some US organization is not "anti US". Everybody makes mistakes, and it's good engineering practice to accept responsibility for them when that happens. Fermilab thinks that the problem occured on their side, and they are trying to solve it.

      Working in a multi-national company with multi-national customers and designing safety-critical systems, I have some experience with handling mistakes. The best approach solving these technical issues, is to keep political games at bay as much as possible. Investigate thoroughly, take responsibility if you own the problem, then work on solving it. Once you start thinking "it's just that the other guys hate us" you've already lost. Any discussion will turn into a political slugfest, and lots of time will be wasted. The flipside is that you also need to keep good records - if someone tries to blame you for something you didn't do, you should have material to nip that in the bud. That works much better once you've gained a reputation for owning up to your own problems, btw.

    2. Re:Anti US Slant by Asic+Eng · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Putting the blame on another organization without having conducted a thorough investigation _is_ "anti US".

      At the very most it would be "anti that other organization".

      Actually - Fermilab thinks no such thing.

      Yes, they do. It's their press release, and their current thinking is that it's their fault. They may be mistaken, and probably hope they are, but they think it's their fault.

      CERN _is_ making gratuitous :anti US" statements.

      As pointed out many times in this discussion: the text posted at CERN's website was written by Fermilab. That's indicated by the title "Fermilab Statement on LHC Magnet Test Failure".

      CERN *had* to have reviewed the magnet design

      Well, I'm not familiar with the processes they use, but in my field a review is a way to help the designer, the designer still owns any defects which were not found in the review. In any case, CERN is not playing political games by posting Fermilab's statements.

  14. Re:Got what they deserved by gathas · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think the 2+ miles under the harbor was actually the most trivial part of the project, being completed well ahead of and opened earlier than the rest of the project. The real challenge was building the new underground roads and associated bridges, ramps etc. while keeping the existing transportation infrastructure operational (albeit in a limited form). They had to deal with building close to existing subway tunnels, dealing with soil that was all landfill, and hitting archaeological sites. The project was certainly wrought with corruption, but to imply that it was somehow inefficient by comparing the length of the roads developed makes little sense.

  15. Not Magnet Failure?? by IvyKing · · Score: 4, Informative
    I've been involved in the design and construction of several magnets for NMR use - and the supporting structure is usually considered to be part pf the magnet - including the cryostat used in supercons.


    The interesting part of the article was that the cryostat design was reviewed by CERN personnel, so the issue of asymmetric loading on the cryostat was overlooked by more than just Fermilab. Sounds like and "Oh shit - nobody thunk of that" moment.

    1. Re:Not Magnet Failure?? by kestasjk · · Score: 5, Funny

      An "Oh shit - nobody thunk of that" moment which building a particle accelerator.. Promising.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  16. Give me a break by stox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The forces induced in these magnets during a quench is obscene. Given the size of the LHC, I would guess that these are the largest such magnets ever fabricated. When pushing the envelope so hard, failures are going to happen. It amazes me that the public's quality expectations are so high for such work. If Windows was built to the same standards, it would have uptimes measured in centuries.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Give me a break by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it's why software engineers aren't just programmers. The problem is that large mechanical engineering is done to standards that are well-understood and don't change that much. Software is much more of a moving target. Eventually, though, computing will become more mature, more stable ... and the job of engineer will take on more of its traditional meaning when applied to software development.

      Of course, at about that time we'll have invented a true AI and people won't be programming anymore. Hopefully I'll be retired by then and can take up programming as a hobby.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Give me a break by Theaetetus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Windows is far, far more complex than a magnet, or any other physical thing ever built.

      I disagree, and offer the ISS, the Internet, the Pentium that Windows is running upon, an Oil drilling platform, CERN, etc.

      The point is, software programming is at the stage where electrical engineering was a century ago: tinkerers, with no real standards, trying new things. Sometimes they work, sometimes they explode. It was an exciting time, but it wasn't engineering. That didn't happen until standards came about, and at that point, we went from lightbulbs to radar installations.

  17. Need more coffee by neildiamond · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did anyone else read that as hardon collider?

  18. Re:Got what they deserved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't these people know the 6+ mile Boston "Big Dig" with only 2+ miles under the harbor has so-far cost almost as much as the 31-mile Chunnel?

    Hrm, maybe that has something to do with that the Chunnel is 2 miles of interesting parts and 29 miles of a simple tunnel? Not to mention that the Big Dig was a complete renovation of an old infrastructure while keeping the city running at the same time.

  19. redundant by smoker2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Who the fuck tagged this "news" and "science" ?

    It's on a news site in the science section !

    WTF ?
  20. Re:kinda funny, really... by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Funny

    so why wasn't this tagged "ha ha" ?

          We're saving the ha-ha for when Switzerland disappears and the remaining crater is filled with a large strawberry shortcake with extra anchovies.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  21. Re:worst case scenario by l0cust · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I was agreeing with you before your post went crazy like Tarantino midway through 'From Dusk till Dawn'.

    Human's in their everlasting quest for knowledge and other 'enrichment' seems to be consistent in messing things up that work perfectly and make it a dangerous object. It happens at home when the man of the house thinks he can fix his own brakes and then seems to be messing around with it for several hours to the collection of us sentient beings messing up all types of natural systems including our own food and other supply chains (water, air, ...)
    Do you mean to say everything was perfect before humans started tinkering with things trying to understand how they work? As much as I am a pro-nature guy, I hate when people try to paint humans as the root of each and every problem and something which was thrown right in the center of this nature circus from some Alien world. We are a product and one of many parts of this very natural system, and through us its the system which is trying to understand itself.

    Its ironic how you gave that example of a man trying to fix the brakes on his own, if it was not for people like him we would still be swinging from tree to tree. Not a bad life except that you wouldn't have the option of complaining about it on some internet forum.
    --
    Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
  22. Re:worst case scenario by scheme · · Score: 4, Informative

    The difference is that the closest black hole in the universe is lightyears away (at least that is the current conception) and the universe seems to be balanced out perfectly so all the dangerous stuff that is floating around doesn't consume the whole universe. It's a careful setup of universal laws that keep it together, just like the ecosystem on earth did for thousands of years.

    There are cosmic particles hitting the atmosphere with more energy than the LHC will produce. If the LHC were going to cause a rift in the space time continuum, these particles would have done the same in the last 6 billion years that they've been hitting the atmosphere.

    --
    "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
  23. Re:kinda funny, really... by barakn · · Score: 4, Informative
    Such chicken-little-the-sky-is-falling hysteria is unwarranted. The collision energies in the LHC are expected to be 14 TeV when using protons. The flux of cosmic rays of energy greater than 1 TeV is 100 per year per square meter of the Earth's surface. That works out to about 1.6 billion such cosmic rays per second around the globe. The collision energies in the LHC are expected to be 1,150 TeV for lead. The flux of cosmic rays of energy greater than 100,000 TeV is one per century per square kilometer of the Earth's surface. With a surface area of ~500,000,000 km^2, that's 5 million cosmic rays per year with energies at least a hundred times greater than the LHC collision energy.

    Nature has been performing experiments in our atmosphere for 4.55 billion years at energies much higher than we could hope to attain in a collider. If it was possible for a black hole spawned in one of these event to swallow the Earth (or whatever other nightmare scenario you've envisioned), it would have already happened and you wouldn't be around to discuss it.

    Reference 1
    Reference 2

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show