Slashdot Mirror


Birthplace of Silicon Valley in Shambles

CowTipperGore writes "Founded by William Shockley in the mid-50s, Shockley Semiconductor Lab is generally credited with starting the Silicon Valley boom. When he was unable to lure his former Bell Labs coworkers to join him, he filled his ranks with the best and brightest engineering school grads, including Gordon Moore and others who later went on to form Fairchild Semiconductor and Intel. The building at 391 San Antonio Road, Mountain View, California, is the original site of the company but, unlike the HP Garage, this building has received little protection or preservation. It recently housed a fruit stand, where visitors could find a small display about Shockley above baskets of fruit. The fruit stand is now closed, leaving the future of the building in the air."

157 comments

  1. Opening bid... by beckerist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do I hear 100$?

    1. Re:Opening bid... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of that auction scene in Groundhog Day, where that one guy was being auctioned off and nobody wanted to bid, and finally was sold for two bits.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Opening bid... by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      Can they be one or zero? I'm a little short on one bits at the moment but I can spare a bid of two zero bits.

  2. Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the Wikipedia link:

    Instead he founded the core of a new company in the best and brightest new graduates coming out of the engineering schools.

    Only a year later the staff was already fed up with Shockley's increasingly bizarre behavior. In one famous incident Shockley's secretary accidentally cut her finger and he became convinced it was a plot against him. He then ordered everyone in the company to take a lie detector test to track down the culprit. It was later demonstrated she had cut herself on a broken thumbtack and Shockley calmed down, but the damage was already done. This had proven to be a decisive example to several key personnel of Shockley's increasing paranoia, and a group of eight engineers decided they had had enough.


    As for the building itself, I always have a bit of a struggle in deciding how to approach potential landmarks. The problem is that every time we reserve land as a "landmark", we reduce the ability of that particular area to advance. That land could be used for a larger, more modern building supporting new and exciting development. And yet, what would we lose to history if it was torn down?

    In the end, I think there must be a balance struck. Unless the site is incredibly valuable to history, it should be thoroughly documented (including the transfer of any and all objects/materials related to the site to a historical society) and then allowed to be replaced or torn down.
    1. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by jfengel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I often hang around with a historian, who loves to stand in the places where historical events occurred and soak up the atmosphere, in a sense peering into the past. It gives her a perspective of the place, and perhaps an insight into the minds of those who shaped history there.

      I like to think I'm immune to such things, but on some of those trips I find myself similarly taken in. I didn't really need to see the Magna Carta or the Rosetta Stone or the Codex Hammurabi; I can read the texts more clearly and get better views via photographs. But on the other hand it's the FREAKING MAGNA CARTA and it's right there in front of me.

      I'm afraid that fruit stand isn't going to mean much to me, but I can see it meaning a lot to somebody else.

    2. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I grew up in that general area and, trust me, there are a hundred thousand banal light industrial buildings just like the one mentioned in TFA, many of which had equally important industrial advances made in them. That hardly merits spending a single dollar to protect any of them. If the building has some architectural significance, it might be worth saving but if it's just another tilt-up/concrete block box, I say go ahead and raze the thing if there's a good reason.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    3. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by evw · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unlike the HP garage, which behind a reasonably cute house in a reasonably cute neighborhood (and HP has put up the money to buy and restore the house and garage), Shockley Semi was in a very unremarkable building. It's great to have a landmark sign there but do you really need to preserve the cheap building?

      Just a few blocks away is another notable site:

      http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/default.asp?page_id=21522

      NO. 1000 SITE OF INVENTION OF THE FIRST COMMERCIALLY PRACTICABLE INTEGRATED CIRCUIT - At this site in 1959, Dr. Robert Noyce of Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation invented the first integrated circuit that could be produced commercially. Based on 'planar' technology, an earlier Fairchild breakthrough, Noyce's invention consisted of a complete electronic circuit inside a small silicon chip. His innovation helped revolutionize 'Silicon Valley's' semicondutor electronics industry, and brought profound change to the lives of people everywhere.
      Location: 844 E Charleston Rd, Palo Alto

      It's also in a pretty unremarkable building.

      Just a few blocks from the HP garage is another interesting site:

      NO. 836 PIONEER ELECTRONICS RESEARCH LABORATORY - This is the original site of the laboratory and factory of Federal Telegraph Company, founded in 1909 by Cyril F. Elwell. Here, Dr. Lee de Forest, inventor of the three-element radio vacuum tube, devised the first vacuum tube amplifier and oscillator in 1911-13. Worldwide developments based on this research led to modern radio communication, television, and the electronics age.
      Location: In sidewalk, SE corner of Channing Ave and Emerson St, Palo Alto

      That building is already long gone. Unless there's something remarkable about the building or you have a sympathetic property owner, I say let progress march on.

    4. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think there is an issue of scale...I mean, standing in George Washington's home, or standing on the Pyramids, contrasted with a dinky fruit stand that was really more like the building that housed the first failed startup (complete with hellish boss) that contained a group that moved on to do great things.

      It's pretty slim.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    5. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. Our government here is hallmark-crazy. I mean, I can see why a cathedral or some castle is worth being kept in shape, repaired and yes, those things need a lot of space and have no "sensible" use. But they're part of our heritage, and let's not forget tourists.

      But it doesn't end there. Pretty much every house where some unknown composer of the 18ish century was born, died or took a leak is a landmark now. Can you imagine downtown being pretty much a museum?

      And, let's be honest here, in 100 years nobody will know that guy anymore. I mean, I didn't know him 'til now and I spend my life in front of, around and if I could inside of computers.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by CowTipperGore · · Score: 1
      He certainly was a strange one. The sign outside the building doesn't even have his name on it because the city council didn't want to honor him.

      In the end, I think there must be a balance struck. Unless the site is incredibly valuable to history, it should be thoroughly documented (including the transfer of any and all objects/materials related to the site to a historical society) and then allowed to be replaced or torn down. While I found the issue interesting, I actually agree. The building itself seems to offer little historical value and has no apparent architectural interest.
    7. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by schlick · · Score: 1

      Yeah he was a nutcase, but whatever. If I had cash to burn I'd buy the place and turn it into a video arcade called "Flynn's"

      --
      "It's because they're stupid, that's why. That's why everybody does everything." -Homer Simpson
    8. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

      For me, seeing these things in person (I grew up in DC, so I ended up seeing lots of these things) made them more real for me. Reading about the Constitution from a textbook makes it seem like a bit of an abstract concept. But seeing the thing right in front of me reminds me of how it's a paper document that people wrote by hand.

      I agree with the GP that a balance has to be kept. In this case, if it's so far gone as to be a fruit stand, it's probably best torn down and replaced with a new research lab.

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    9. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by corbettw · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid that fruit stand isn't going to mean much to me, but I can see it meaning a lot to somebody else.

      But if that's the rationale used to preserve locations, then nothing can ever be torn down. Pretty much every building on the planet is going to have some meaning for someone, somewhere (or might in the future). The balance is to find something that has significant meaning for a large population of people. And if the population in question is large enough, they can just buy the land themselves and preserve it, without forcing anyone else to do so.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    10. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Scholkley is an interesting character. Back when I was a geneticists (in the 80's), he came to speak at CSU. While I would have preferred that he spoke about his famous contributions to society, he instead chose to push that "blacks were genetically inferior to whites who were gentically inferior to asians". Basically, he mis-applied logic to test results to come up with this. All in all, he was a bright guy who suffered from arrogances of his ideas.

      With that said, we really should save his building. He is a core to one of the better places in AMerica.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    11. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by jackbird · · Score: 4, Informative
      Can you imagine downtown being pretty much a museum?

      Come visit Philadelphia sometime. It's nice.

    12. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep the fruit stand I would like to visit it one day!

    13. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by jfengel · · Score: 1

      I concur; I didn't mean to sound like I was campaigning for any effort to preserve the place. There are a very few objects and places which manage to rise above the logic that we can't preserve everything just because something happened there once. An industrial park in California is not the Magna Carta.

    14. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here, Dr. Lee de Forest, inventor of the three-element radio vacuum tube, devised the first vacuum tube amplifier and oscillator in 1911-13. Worldwide developments based on this research led to modern radio communication, television, and the electronics age.
      Location: In sidewalk, SE corner of Channing Ave and Emerson St, Palo Alto

      You mean the same Lee DeForest who couldn't explain how his amplifier worked? It's certainly historical as a monument to big money and the ability to obtain priority of a patent from the rightful inventor. I am referring of course, to Edwin H. Armstrong. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Armstrong

      A building is just a building, unless it's the Pyramids, Stonehenge or a cathedral, it's not worth preserving just because some event took place there. It's the people who created that event that count.

    15. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by hey! · · Score: 1

      I'd say that historical sites are worth preserving if they are either instructive, or if they prove an important point, ideally both. Documentation is important, but it is not the same as demonstration. You can go to Monticello, see so many of the fruits of Jefferson's genius, then go out back and see that yes, he kept slaves. It makes a point that you can't make in any better way. When it comes to history and historians, future historians are wise to "trust but verify" their present day colleagues, which is simply a nice way of saying "don't trust".

      For both proving a point and being instructive, a site like the HP garage is probably worth preserving. It uniquely illustrates a point about the power of ingenuity and entrepreneurship at a certain point in American history.

      The Shockley site may or may not be interesting; it needs to be evaluated. Right off the bat, a quick look at the building shows it appears to be a fairly unremarkable commercial building. Your basic all purpose box.

      While the events in the building may have been important, there is probably not much remarkable about them happening in this kind of building. If the site were intact, or if it could be restored with original equipment and furnishings (or close reproductions), then there might be some point in preserving or restoring it.

      Shockley himself was a rather unattractive character; paranoia being just one of his unpleasant characteristics. But he was undoubtedly an important historical figure, and in fact the negative aspects of his character are clearly important in the foundation of the second important Silicon Valley tech site, and so are worth documenting. However it sounds unlikely that he left his imprint on the site.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    16. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by khallow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Keep in mind the dinky fruit stand was home to a business failure that did a lot more than the Pyramids did. I think it would be very educational if the building were restored to what it looked like when it was used by Schockley and his surly staff.

    17. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by merreborn · · Score: 1

      As for the building itself, I always have a bit of a struggle in deciding how to approach potential landmarks. The problem is that every time we reserve land as a "landmark", we reduce the ability of that particular area to advance. That land could be used for a larger, more modern building supporting new and exciting development. And yet, what would we lose to history if it was torn down?


      In this case, it'd be no loss. The building being a landmark wouldn't be preventing progress, by any stretch of the imagination -- it's obviously a really low-rent area, or a fruit stand would never be able to afford to open up there.

      This place is right next to a strip mall. Not a very good one at that -- check the satellite view -- the parking lot on that end of the mall is empty, and always is. I've visited this shopping center hundreds of times, and never even noticed the building. It's near the least-frequented area of the mall. There's a Ross and a Sears auto center right there, both of which are very low traffic. You can see the main sears building in the background of the picture on El Reg; below it is the aforementioned empty lot. Turns out the Sears just shut their doors 2 weeks ago.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Antonio_Shopping_ Center

      So, no, in this case, there will be no "larger, more modern building supporting new and exciting development". I can tell you what's been in there in the past: A plumbing shop, a car stereo shop, and this fruit stand. It's right next to a crappy Mexican takeout place, and across the street from a laundromat.

      Hell, I was even *in the Shockley building* once, as a kid, somewhere around 15 years ago, and never realized it. It was a car stereo place, at the time. The fact that I'm a local geek, and never even noticed "The birthplace of silicon valley" in *hundreds* of passes through the area seems like a bit of a shame.
    18. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by merreborn · · Score: 1
      Also, the reg article closes with:

      The fruit stand proved a fitting replacement for Shockley's lab, and we're anxious to see what will sprout up on the site next. Let's hope it's not a Burger King or the like


      There's been a BK just past the sears, closer to the corner of El Camino and San Antonio. Also really low traffic. Even for a BK.
    19. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Plutonite · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have stood on the great pyramid and have been in Alexander's room of enlightenment, and Saladin's wall of Cairo, and the scenes of many great battles where tens of thousands died. Let me tell you: it's all a dinky fruit stand. Chirping crickets, blowing sand. We just like to fool ourselves.

    20. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Paranoid and Racist.
      I know several Nobel Laureates in the chemistry world and each of them have their quirks and issues. They are smart and brilliant in their field but they are lets put it "socially challenged". Unlike Bill Hewlett and David Packard, which they where not Nobel Laureates, they build a large and successful company in Silicon Valley.
      Some Nobel Laureates have great ideas but running a business in the world needs a business plan, organizational skills, financial stewardship and much socialization with many people and some Nobel Laureates are not good at and should in product development which they are well suited.
      Shockley should have either be the president of development rather than the person running the company. His is not crazy but is socially inept and schizophrenic. But even his engineers, which were Caucasians, left him because of his schizophrenic behavior.
      We, in United State of America, have honored worst people.

    21. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by rlp · · Score: 1

      The Magna Carta and Rosetta Stone are in London. In the British Library and British Museum respectively. Where is (a copy of) the Codex Hammurabi?

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    22. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by jfengel · · Score: 1

      The Louvre, in Paris. It's not one of the things they really draw attention to. I didn't really need to see the Mona Lisa or the Venus de Milo (for which there are signs pointing you at them). I'd have walked right past them if somebody hadn't told me that they were big deals. (A bit like the article in the Washington Post yesterday, about a massively famous violinist being ignored when he dressed down and played in the subway in DC.)

      But the Codex Hammurabi.... I can't read it, so I wouldn't know its significance without being told, but dude... it was the freaking Codex Hammurabi. One of those rare times in my life when I really felt that just seeing something with my own eyes was really more important than just knowing what it was.

    23. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      It's all a dinky fruit stand. And it all is Cheop's Pyramid. On a purely material level, the battlefield of Gettysburg is no different than the field in the suburban park nearby. On a mental/spiritual (ick - I hate the fact that "spiritual" has been largely coopted by quacks and cooks) though, they are miles away. One is the location of a defining moment in American history. The other... is a field. One connects you to a significant event, the other... connects you with kids playing in the grass.

      It's the difference between being home and just living in a place.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    24. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      No, he's a looneytunes White Power fanatic. That he had a good idea is overshadowed by his inability to lead or follow up or even not be crazy during workign hours.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    25. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by rlp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thanks, I didn't know that. BTW, if you get to Cambridge University, the library has (on display) a draft copy of 'Principia Mathematica' with written annotations by Isaac Newton. Much more recent, but still worthy of a geek pilgrimage. (A copy of a manuscript of "Winnie the Pooh" is in the same room).

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    26. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by dsanfte · · Score: 1

      There's a part of our psyches whose power can be harnessed through non-substantative belief in ideas and principles. There's no shame in admitting that. The best kept secret is that this part of our minds does not require religion to function. Anything will do.

      For me, it's the fallen glory of a united world with a single, near-universal language. For others it might be the purity of the dawn's light, or some shit like that. It's all fine.

      So, "spiritualize" on, my friend.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    27. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I often hang around with a historian, who loves to stand in the places where historical events occurred and soak up the atmosphere, in a sense peering into the past. It gives her a perspective of the place, and perhaps an insight into the minds of those who shaped history there.


      And sometimes the past gets squashed like a cockroach: http://clearblogs.com/heritageusa/39088/Tech+Giant +Crushes+Lilliput.html

    28. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by tingting · · Score: 1

      Oh yes! I agree, this guy needs to be recognized and honored! I am surprised to know about the founder and am sure that there might be other people out there who wud not know who was the founder and from where! The building shud be preserved and protected too! Now I learned something new!

    29. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Shockley may have a place in history (both good and bad), but not everything he touched does. This isn't the place where he said, "Eureka! A vacuum tube without a vacuum!" It's just a place where he briefly ran an unsuccessful business. TFA's claim that this is "the birthplace of Silicon Valley" is just a cheap attempt to catch eyeballs.

    30. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      That story is far from the strangest Shockley story I've heard. Did you know that when he was small child, he got a splinter in his foot, extracted it, measured, labeled it, and filed it away? It turned up in his effects when he died, along with a lot of other stuff any sane person would have thrown away.

      One biographer quoted a Shockley acquaintance (no friends, alas) as saying he had "Negative Charisma." Interesting interview here:

      http://www.abc.net.au/rn/inconversation/stories/20 06/1678241.htm

    31. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die."

    32. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      To be fair to the guy he was actually a looney tunes Yellow Power fanatic, since he believed Asian > Whites > Blacks.

      He also invented race based trolling. So without him not only we have no computers or internet, we'd have no GNAA or most of Encylopedia Dramatica.

      "And I want three graduate students. At least two of them Asian"
      Some mad professor in Futurama, or maybe the Simpsons.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    33. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I read his bio - he seemed like a one trick pony that went off on a tangent that was mostly unproductive, then spent as much time as possible leveraging his one cool thing into personal power and control. Until he finally drove too many people off. Woops.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    34. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Apart from the obvious Wargames reference, that would be clever on another level, since Shockley believed in Dysgenics, and some people believe that dysgenic effects are cancelled out by the Flynn effect.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    35. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Must say, the guy sounds thoroughly unpleasant. He was obviously very smart at least as measured on an IQ test, but not so smart in other ways. He was also a raving elitist, to the point of believing in eugenics, i.e. sterlising people who don't do so well on IQ tests.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    36. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahaha, you pretentious fop.

      I have spent many a night evacuating in Marriott executive suite bathrooms, and dug holes in the ground five hundred miles from nowhere, and let me tell you, they're all thrones.

      I fear your ha'penny denouement of Man's condition woos many a fool.

    37. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! I just saw that (Magna Carta) two days ago in Salisbury cathedral. It looks like it was just printed on a good laser printer, even though it is nearly 800 years old. Much kudos to the scribes who wrote that copy - beautiful neat writing.

    38. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paris is pretty nice, too.

    39. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Plutonite · · Score: 1
      From AC:

      I have spent many a night evacuating in Marriott executive suite bathrooms, and dug holes in the ground five hundred miles from nowhere, and let me tell you, they're all thrones. I agree that when you're sufficiently high/intoxicated, sitting in a hole you dug 500 miles into the wilderness feels like a darn throne :)
    40. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Or pretty much any European city...

      Not all of them, some places were completely destroyed in World War II, but of couse that itself might be museum-worthy. Think Rotterdam or Dresden.

    41. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind the dinky fruit stand was home to a business failure that did a lot more than the Pyramids did.

      The Pyramids will still be there when the Internet will be dead and long gone. You think it's gonna last forever? Watch, you may learn something...

    42. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by mpitcavage · · Score: 1

      Apart from the obvious Wargames reference
      How is it obvious that the arcade from Tron was in WarGames?
    43. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by khallow · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter. That Schockey business has already done more for humanity than the Pyramids ever will. That's my point.

    44. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Fucksocks.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    45. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by CxDoo · · Score: 1

      You must be cooler than cool if the pyramids are just a fruit stand for you.
      They're a bit more than a site where you need to read the plaque to understand what is so special.

      --
      "Blah blah blah." - [citation needed]
    46. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by unitron · · Score: 1

      Allow me to submit my usual plug for the Armstrong biography Man of High Fidelity:Edwin Howard Armstrong by Lawrence Lessing.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    47. Re:Sounds like a guy worth honoring... by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      No, he's a looneytunes White Power fanatic.

      Hmmmm. After thinking back to then, the talk and even listening to him after the whole thing calmed down (just about a dozen of us), I had the sense that he was not really a KKK type. Somebody else said that he suffers from paranoia and I think that would probably better describe it. Such as he had no issue with mixing asian and whites but he thought that asians would be better off not doing so. I really think that he was just a paranoid bastard who allowed his thoughts to run wild.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  3. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's just a building. Fuck it.

    Should we preserve the garage where the first shoelace was invented? Should we go back and make a museum out of every little place a startup was born?

    It's a fruit-stand. let it go. Stop living in the past.

    1. Re:wtf? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 0

      Actually, yes we should. Its a crime how eager we are to burry and/or tear down our history in this country. Just think if the Romans decided to tear down the Colleseum when they were finished with it, like so many demolished stadiums in the US (including some architecturally significant ones, like Mellon (formerly civic) arena in Pittsburgh, destined to become a parking lot.

    2. Re:wtf? by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your comparison is wholly incongruent. The ancient architecture that defined a civilization is remembered by visiting the historical sites of Rome. What, exactly, would future generations gain from visiting this former fruit stand? There is nothing of specific significance to what happened there. It deserves a marker on a post (which it got), the building itself lends nothing to history.

    3. Re:wtf? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You think the Romans wouldn't have torn it down if they could have? It's not like they had reliable explosives to make it collapse like we do now. Imagine you'd have to tear down that stadium with pickaxes.

      The collosseum was abandoned (or rather, ceased to be used) because they switched to the Christian faith and those games were seen as heathen. Do you REALLY think they would not have torn it down if they had any chance to? We have a rich history of destroying 'heathen' places of worship, you think some huge reminder of that time like the collosseum would have survived if they saw any chance to actually destroy it?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:wtf? by KenshoDude · · Score: 1

      Comparing this building to the colosseum in Rome is quite a bit absurd. The colosseum has a much greater cultural significance than this building. Not only that but it has architectural significance as well. I hardly see how this compares to an office building, even if it once housed the business that would encourage the growth of a "tech sector" in that area of the country.

      Comparing the building to modern sports arenas is perhaps more on the level. Its no longer out of the ordinary to have super structures like these in major cities. Not only that, these venues are no longer as dominant in culture as they were back when the colosseum was active. The majority of fans now enjoy watching sports from the comfort of their own sofas or their favorite pubs.

    5. Re:wtf? by jhfry · · Score: 1

      I would hesitate to suggest that 'we' are eager to "burry and/or tear down our history". In fact, if you were to actually look into it, I would bet that the US has a great record for preservation in comparison to most countries.

      Sure there are countries with many amazing artifacts, however, most of these were not preserved by their respective governments... they were preserved by the church, private collectors, business owners, or passed on through generations.

      The government actually stepping in to preserve history, other than a few cases in fewer countries, only became common relatively recently. I would bet that if you compared our track record to many other countries since then, you would find our record is better than most.

      Historical significance is always hard to gage... however I don't think that any of our modern stadiums will ever hold the significance to earth's future inhabitants as the Colosseum does for us. For the Romans, the Colosseum was a tremendous feat of architecture and engineering... for us, Mellon arena was, perhaps, simply better than average. Beautiful to be sure, but certainly not a great indicator of what our society is capable of creating. To that I look toward skyscrapers, bridges, and space travel.

      Another difference is that our history has a far greater chance of being preserved through alternate methods. For example, photography, videography, architectural drawings, newspaper archives, books, and so on. Why save a building when you can record it's history more vividly than what the building itself can portray.

      I am not suggesting that it is not worthwhile to preserve some structures, but there are very few truly worth preserving... none will ever have the historical significance of the Colosseum or Pyramids, as they are simply too easy to create with modern building technologies.

      Save the statue of liberty, a couple of presidential memorials, maybe the Empire State building or Sears Tower, the Golden Gate bridge, and the White House. Beyond that there is not much of historical significance that cannot be passed through the ages digitally.

      If I had to choose between preserving a rundown building because something important happened there, or preserving some undeveloped land, I say let the developer destroy the building.

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    6. Re:wtf? by Samrobb · · Score: 1

      Just think if the Romans decided to tear down the Colleseum when they were finished with it...

      Bah. The only reason that anything like the Colosseum survived was because (a) it was extremely well-built and (b) it would have cost too much to tear it down and replace it with something else. If either one of these hadn't been true, then it would have been destroyed in one of the periodic conflagarations that Rome seemed to enjoy, or it would have been razed by an emperor who would then have gone on to build something bigger and better. The fact that it's an interesting piece of architecture is just a bonus for us. The Romans of the time would have gladly demolished the thing if it were to their advantage to do so for some reason.

      That's just the way it is. Buildings getting torn down is something that happens, time after time, regardless of race, culture, or geographic happenstance. Someone builds something, and if it lasts at all, in a few hundred years it's just another building to be pulled down before the latest and greatest marvel goes up.

      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
    7. Re:wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what if they did tear down the Colleseum all those centuries ago? Obviously it is an incredible piece of history and I would love to visit it one day, but I don't see how our world would be much different if the Colleseum had been torn down. Besides, there is a difference between preserving one of the most monumental architectural achievements in human history and preserving a tiny shack of a building whose most recent occupant was a fruit vendor. What's next, are we going to encase in carbonite the first shit Steve Jobs took in Apple's bathroom? I bet it was the prettiest piece of shit ever.

    8. Re:wtf? by Ana10g · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so quick to defend the Romans and their historical landmark preservation strategies... If I recall correctly (from a recent History channel show), they built the Colosseum on top of Caligula's gardens, which, given the reign of insanity he put forth, could have been preserved to say "never again", but instead, it was better to raze them and put something else in their place.

      --
      just an analog boy living in a digital age.
    9. Re:wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caligula had the thing built in the first place, so I imagine he didn't mind.

    10. Re:wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for playing, but construction was begun under Vespasian over 30 years after Caligula's death. Caligula -> Claudius -> Nero -> Galba -> Otho -> Vitellius -> Vespasian.

    11. Re:wtf? by SirMeliot · · Score: 1

      You think the Romans wouldn't have torn it down if they could have? It's not like they had reliable explosives to make it collapse like we do now. Imagine you'd have to tear down that stadium with pickaxes.

      Buildings didn't get torn down and the rubble carted away like they do now. That would be far too much work. Instead they simply got used as quarries for new buildings. It's a lot easier to bash niceley squared stone blocks off an old building than it is to dig new ones out of the ground.

      Thus buildings would slowly 'evaporate' rather than be demolished.

    12. Re:wtf? by istartedi · · Score: 1
      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    13. Re:wtf? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Considering we live in an era where people deny both the moon landing and the holocaust, I can see that our world WOULD be a different place if we recklessly abandon our history. Thats not to say every little thing is worth saving.

  4. Seems fitting by 0racle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reading about his paranoia makes leaving the place in shambles seem almost fitting.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:Seems fitting by Glytch · · Score: 1

      Having a memorial to one fruitbasket right above another seems rather appropriate. Sure, he did amazing work early on, but the dude was grade-A crazy.

  5. Day workers by willie_nelsons_pigta · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do they have people standing out in front of the place with signs saying "Will code HTML for food".

    Otherwise, the situation may not be as dire as presented.

    1. Re:Day workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cifrará el HTML para el alimento

  6. Wow it's tiny. by CyberSnyder · · Score: 1

    I guess necessity is the mother of invention. If they were in a huge lab, we may never have seen microelectronics. Ha!

    1. Re:Wow it's tiny. by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      NOW it makes sense that the best microelectronics comes out of Japan...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Since it is a "tech building" by session_start · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why not preserve its memory in a virtual world. That way you could use the physical land for something more useful, and still have the digital landmark for everyone to tour... I'm sure someone could make it happen and even profit from it...

    1. Re:Since it is a "tech building" by BSAtHome · · Score: 1

      The virtual memory lasts only as long until the harddisk crashes. That would make it a virtual teardown then.

    2. Re:Since it is a "tech building" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should just put the property under version control. That way they can make a new build without fear of overwriting the old one.

    3. Re:Since it is a "tech building" by WeblionX · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "Until the RAID dies and the backups were accidently degaussed."

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
  8. Who cares? by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can we all just grow up and stop being attached to physical buildings? Who cares if it's "historic"? Push the fucker down and build something useful there. At what point do we not let every square foot be taken over with a building that has some significance to someone in the past but no tangible use in the present? The fact that we're wringing our hands over a tech building rather than sacrificing it to progress is ironic.

    1. Re:Who cares? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      To me, it depends on if it's a genuinely good building or not. The Colisseum, the Empire State building, Neuschwanstein castle, etc. are marvelous buildings which should be preserved not because of any historical significance, but just because they're great buildings. This office seems to be just a piece of crap, so it should be razed.

      If these preservationists had their way, no new buildings could ever be built because we'd have to preserve all the crappy old shanty houses, warehouses, Wal-Mart buildings, etc. ever built, leaving no room to build something newer and better.

    2. Re:Who cares? by Teancum · · Score: 1

      I would have to agree here. Perhaps an example of an olde tyme log cabin would be useful as a singular example of primitive frontier construction techniques, but you don't need to preserve a whole subdivision of the things.

      I will say that there is a historic district in the city where I live that has some absolutely classic homes, including a home built (in part) by Frank Lloyd Wright. The house is a masterpiece and should be saved. But a house two doors down is also protected even though it is a very ordinary middle-income house built in the late 19th century. And just a block further down is a four-plex that was clearly built in the mid 1970's. The four-plex is protected under the same historical easement, BTW. That makes no sense to me, and I wouldn't cry if the ugly orange and brown (with purple trim) paint job was changed either. Unless you really want to remember how bad some people had it for fashion taste during that period of American history.

    3. Re:Who cares? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I think every ugly 70s building should be torn down right away; I don't think there was a single attractive building built in the US during that decade. As you say, perhaps preserve just one of the hideous things as a warning to future generations.

      What the hell was wrong with people in the 70s, anyway? The buildings were ugly, the cars were ugly, even the people (esp. men) were ugly with their crappy haircuts and ugly clothes. It's not a modern vs. historical thing, either; there's all kinds of great aesthetic stuff from the 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, even the 80s and 90s. But the 70s really stand out for everything being butt-ugly.

      As for FLW, all his buildings should be preserved. They weren't just ahead of their time, they're ahead of the present day as well.

    4. Re:Who cares? by Teancum · · Score: 1

      Not to disparage the loss of life on 9/11, but I think Al-Queida did the USA a huge favor by tearing down the WTC. Architecturally the twin towers weren't exactly the most graceful things in the New York skyline. And a classic icon of the mid 1970's as well.

      I would dare say, however, that the WTC was the best of the style that came from that period of time. There was much else that was even worse.

      I lived through the 1970s (as a child) and when looking back on older photographs of myself, I still wonder what I or my mother was thinking of with some of my clothing.

      Even the cars were hideous, although I do own a 1977 Datsun B-210 in my garage and I was thinking of applying for some "horseless carriage" antique auto plates for the thing mainly as a joke. Being older than 40 years officially classifies it as a vintage automobile in my state and gets special tax breaks. It still runs, but getting parts for the thing is harder and harder to do now. There is an antique car rally in my home town where some truly magnificant cars are displayed, like the 1957 T-Bird or some Model "A" Fords, and it just seems bizzare to see a Datsun B-210 right beside those as something in auto history and not a beat up tin can that a couple of college students (myself, my wife, and some of our friends) kept going with bailing twine and bubble gum.

    5. Re:Who cares? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have to agree about the WTC. Those were some pretty bland and boring-looking buildings. But I think knocking them down like that was definitely wrong (aside from the obvious loss of life); I think an exterior "face-lift" of sorts would have helped a lot. Then again, I think one of the features of those towers was that most of the structure was on the outside like an exoskeleton, so a facelift might not have been feasible.

      The Empire State building and Chrysler building are far more attractive buildings. But the Sears tower in Chicago isn't anything special, either.

  9. "The Fruit Stand Is Now Closed." by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    "The fruit stand is now closed."

    Most. Surreal. Slashdot. Summary. Ever.

  10. Nooooooo! by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not the fruit stand! Please say the fruit is ok!!

  11. Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've never heard of any important Silicon Valley history centered around anything called the "Shockley Semiconductor Lab." The HP Garage is, in fact, the generally-acknowledged birthplace of Silicon Valley. There can be only one of those.

    It's true that Shockley was a co-inventory of the transistor, but that happened on the East coast, at Bell Labs. (Shockley was also a racist fucktard of the first magnitude, a genuinely-unlikable sort who managed to alienate pretty much every professional colleague he ever had.)

    If Shockley's lab in California gets replaced by a parking garage or whatever, I'm sure it's no great loss. HP is, and was, where it all got started.

    1. Re:Um by jhfry · · Score: 3, Informative

      After reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_Valley I wouldn't really give the HP garage that honor.

      Considering that "... it was Shockley who first brought silicon to the Santa Clara Valley..." [wikipedia], he is indeed what started Silicon Valley. However, if he had never started his lab, with the number of high-tech companies already in the area, and the likely switch from germanium to silicon by the industry, Silicon Valley would probably still have earned its name.

      Sure HP was the first startup to open in the area as the result of Terman's efforts to encourage local college graduates to start companies locally instead of moving to LA. However they were not into silicon until after Shockley came. I would argue that the valley should be renamed to honor Terman, as it was his ideas that led to the valley becoming the high-tech center that it is.

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    2. Re:Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >HP is, and was, where it all got started

      You're kidding me, right? Where "it" got started? All HP ever did was to be the first company the put transistors in a product that joe schmoe could afford. Transistors were going in calculators before they arrived. They were no more innovative than the Japanese were by making what someone else made, but cheaper and better. Now all they're good at is promoting idiots.

    3. Re:Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yuo fail at teh history of technology.

  12. Lol by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think we should tear it down so future generations can imagine it to have been an amazing place, instead of just another chunk of disposable cinder block.

    Seriously. While I'm all for preserving historic architecture this place is a fricking dump...It was a dump even when it was new, just the kind of place that you would expect to house a startup that was run by a crackpot who only hired kids straight outta college (because his former colleagues refused to work with him).

    Tells you something about the place that during the 50s a bunch of kids right out of school were so fed up that they quit in a group after one year. Think how likely that would be today, and imagine what it would have been like back then, when you expected to stay with a company much longer.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:Lol by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Seriously. While I'm all for preserving historic architecture this place is a fricking dump...I

      Talk to Steve Jobs about that...

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  13. Re:Let's honor someone else. by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

    Eugenics is an interesting mixture of "science" and "metaphysics." Unfortunately, I don't think most people learn about the eugenic stuff that led up Hitler's mindset about people.

  14. I Liked That Fruit Stand by KaiserSoze · · Score: 3, Informative

    I lived up the street from that joint for about 10 months. I loved that place; cheap fruit, and an extra bonus of shopping in the birthplace of silicon valley. Also: they sold odd foreign fruits that people from Wisconsin hadn't often seen before.

    --

    "What we elect to call imagination is mere combination of things not heretofore combined." - Frank Norris

    1. Re:I Liked That Fruit Stand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The future of the building is IN THE AIR!! Incredible!! Flying buidings! What will they think of next?

    2. Re:I Liked That Fruit Stand by fizzup · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's it! I propose the Wisconsin 100-point scale for measuring the oddness of foreign fruit: the percentage of people from Wisconsin who have seen the fruit three or fewer times.

      Due to the expense of polling, we will only ever know Wisconsin numbers for very few fruits, and those will be known only to very low accuracy. Many of them will really only be wild guesses. For example, did you know that the kumquat is a 62 on the Wisconsin scale?

    3. Re:I Liked That Fruit Stand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're called bananas, cheesehead.

    4. Re:I Liked That Fruit Stand by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      Also: they sold odd foreign fruits that people from Wisconsin hadn't often seen before.
      Like... bananas?
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    5. Re:I Liked That Fruit Stand by KaiserSoze · · Score: 1

      No way! I passed kumquats in the store today in Madison! Now your myriad middle eastern yam varietals: THERE'S some foreign tubers. Wait, but I shop at the Co-op on Willy Street. Yeah, kumquat is probably 80+ on the Wisco Scale.

      --

      "What we elect to call imagination is mere combination of things not heretofore combined." - Frank Norris

    6. Re:I Liked That Fruit Stand by KaiserSoze · · Score: 1

      Pretty much everything that wasn't an apple, yes. Or a pear. Nice spice section, and you could also buy Mexican cheese (Marquez Brothers!) QUESO FRESCO!

      --

      "What we elect to call imagination is mere combination of things not heretofore combined." - Frank Norris

    7. Re:I Liked That Fruit Stand by Technomancer · · Score: 1

      Well, Milk Pail Market and Dietmar's Deli are still there near this building so who cares about stupid fruit stand?

    8. Re:I Liked That Fruit Stand by KaiserSoze · · Score: 1

      People who care about where silicon valley was invented, er, or something! I guess.

      --

      "What we elect to call imagination is mere combination of things not heretofore combined." - Frank Norris

  15. No by wandazulu · · Score: 1

    To answer your question: No, we cannot stop being attached to physical buildings. It's impossible; building are just a larger manifestation of the objects we project feelings onto because of something special. What is a house to the passerby was a home to somebody who would think of all the good and bad things that happened there.

    I grew up in a house that was 200+ years old. It had been in my family for generations. Because of circumstances, we had to move out and the house was purchased by the city and deliberately burned down for fire fighter training; it was deemed "no historical value".

    What means nothing to you might mean the world to someone else. Maybe Shockley's building doesn't enlist more than casual, curio-type feelings from the majority of the world, and maybe it's not worth saving; I don't know, and I don't care, I've never been to California, and that wasn't ever on my list of sights-to-see, so to me I have no emotional interest in this particular place. That doesn't mean it doesn't enlist strong feelings to someone else. And if that someone else can raise the $$$ to save it, hey, great. Maybe open a vegetable stand or something.

    But to your original point, it's not a sign of "growing up" that you stop caring about something. If anything, as you get older you start caring about a *lot* of things; maybe too much. :)

  16. Continue the technology timeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe that fruit stand should follow the trend, and switch to selling Apples?

  17. One idea by nizo · · Score: 1

    Maybe it could be bought for the purpose of housing out of work tech weenies whose jobs have been outsourced? The irony factor alone would be worth it.

  18. Apple Joke by Ageing+Metalhead · · Score: 1

    With all the talk of fruit stands, there has to be an Apple joke in there somewhere!

    --
    The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. - HGTTG
    1. Re:Apple Joke by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Funny

      The building where PCs were born, now only stocks Apples.

  19. Book boy by pacopico · · Score: 1

    Damn, that writer guy's wife IS hot. http://www.theduckrabbit.com/?page=about

  20. Preserve history and its dreams please by JavaManJim · · Score: 1

    I am taken aback by most comments on this topic that want to tear the building down. To me that is one of the better moments of Silicon Valley history.

    But I must admit I am kind of a Luddite myself. I love technology and history at the same time.

    One history moment that stuns me is standing on the site of the first space launch down at KSC. To think humans had the audacity to to go into space on that tiny vehicle? I think that someday some kid not yet born might stand on that site and be inspired to weave string theory into viable interstellar travel.

    I would like to see the building restored to its seminal or best moment in time. Complete with the old cars out front. Likewise this site might inspire another kid to do great things.

    Thanks,
    Jim

    1. Re:Preserve history and its dreams please by echo_kmem · · Score: 1

      I would like to see the building restored to its seminal or best moment in time.
      Bah, Bulldozer it. If we can not be bothered to save Rainforests because we want fuel, nor can we stop ourselves from throwing the Elderly on the street because we want a freeway off-ramp right there their home is, then why save this building? If no one has had a use for it in the last 6 months, get rid of it.
  21. Fruit stand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one, am sick of all this Apple bashing.

  22. The place is a dump by dwbryson · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to work in this building about 8 years ago. There was an ergonomic furniture company, and I did their IT as a part time job during college break. Inside it is basically just a large warehouse, with concrete floors and a leaky roof.

    The place was a posterchild of those California "This location contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer." From what I remember when they were developing the IC with all the various chemicals that entails they would just dump the extra chemicals in back(there is a parking lot there now).

    When I was there the owners of the company had a half-hearted attempt to get the property designated as a landmark, as others have suggested. But I assume that it all fell through given the current circumstances.

    --
    - "Never let a computer tell me shit." - DelTron Zero
  23. Never Noticed... by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

    That's right by where I get my groceries... Kind of sad that I never noticed.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  24. Shockley and Eugenics by heartsurgeon · · Score: 1

    "In the 1960s Nobel Laureate Wiliam Shockley (1910-1989), a physicist at Stanford University who advocated programs of voluntary sterilization of people with lower than the average IQ score of 100'

    he's a more complex individual than you kids know about...

    1. Re:Shockley and Eugenics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what? There's a reason I choose to be an AC to say this, but I really don't understand what's so wrong with that. It's voluntary. At worst, it's an ineffective use of public funding (if that's what is meant by "programs"). Everything else I can see wrong with this is just slippery slope. Maybe I'm missing something? Could somebody enlighten a poor coward?

  25. Smart but messed up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Problem being how do you acknowledge Shockley Semiconductor and all of the good that Bill Shockley did whilst minimizing all of the, well... "not good" that he did?

    Do some reading - he was a brilliant but utterly offensive man who had one idea in his head (Shockley diode) at Shockley Semi which he stubbornly kept to, basically forcing himself out of the business and his engineers to start their own companies.

    So his role in the creation of Silicon Valley was twofold - he planted the original seed, then forced his own people to leave and start their own (competing) companies in the same area, obsoleting him and his ideas.

  26. move it to shoreline by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    seriously.

    shoreline park (mtn view) already has one relocated historic site.

    so it IS possible to 'relo' things like that. and in fact, its only a few miles away!

    put the sign post where the original building is (fine) and then relo the remains and restore it over in shoreline park, somewhere.

    that's a neat area and has/had many famous companies there, including google (who now has the old SGI building), Sun used to be there, SGI had a huge campus there, once (sigh) and I think adobe was there, as well.

    maybe someone should contact the shoreline park guys and see what it would take to get this structure some shoreline park land allocated for it. (probably easier said than done?)

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:move it to shoreline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I think adobe was there, as well.

      Yup. They were on E. Charleston south of the current Google/former SGI campus in the mid/late 80's.

  27. Nostalgia by sakusha · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.

  28. Evil Lair by GammaKitsune · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Shockley" sounds to me like some kind of super villain name. Like he should be called Dr. Shockley, and have energy-based powers derived from an accident while working as a scientist at the power company. Or something. This coupled with charges of racism and paranoia makes it even better.

    I say we save his Lab, and "restore" it so that it takes the shape of his head. Put a deathray in there, and have tours. I'd go see it.

    --
    Gamertag: WyleType
  29. It is really the birthplace of by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

    vaporware. He promised a four-layer diode:

    http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_3/chpt_7/3.htm l

    and never delievered on it. Some samples were made, but it never made it to production.

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  30. Meh, not everything needs to be preserved... by AtlanticCarbon · · Score: 1

    The history's out there right? Is there anything about this place that is notable besides its original use and purpose? If not, put up a plaque or sign and move on. It probably makes sense to consolidate exhibits from the dawn of the computer in purpose-built museums.

    1. Re:Meh, not everything needs to be preserved... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let it go. Seriously, let it go. Its a warehouse. With chemicals. Tear it down/blow it up, remove the structure, clean up/detoxify the site, and let someone else use it (perhaps they will do something more profound with it). Schockley gave us the silicon diode. Nice. Thanks. Now move on. The technology has been used, improved upon, and surpassed the invention created there. Transistors came before this building (he helped with that at Bell Labs several thousand miles away). The ideas were great. The building is not. Let it go.

  31. Still near a local landmark! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dittmer's German deli is right across the street.

    http://www.dittmers.com/

    Their smoked turkey is the best I've ever tasted... Ummm!

    1. Re:Still near a local landmark! by senahj · · Score: 1


      Ditmer's Gourmet Meats and Wurst Hause on San Antonio
      is one of the best things about living in Silicon Valley.

      _Real_ bratwurst, schinken, weisswurst,
      jaegerwurst, kassler ripchen, mettwurst.
      Gold medal award plaques line the walls.
      Real Bayerische sourdough rye in kilo loaves.
      German potato salad. Emmentaler.

      Say hi to Herr Bubert for me.

      --
      Wait a minute. Didn't I say that on the other side of the record? I'd better check ...
  32. First transistor by jackstack · · Score: 1

    It's good to see Shockley getting some press considering that the transistor is one of the most fundamental building blocks of modern technology. To get some perspective, take a look at the first transistor:
    http://www.britannica.com/eb/art/print?id=16247&ar ticleTypeId=0

    Notice the tranangular shape? This is where we get the symbol for transistors in circuit diagrams.

    Also another interesting bit of trivia: the three terminal transistor was discovered *before* the two terminal diode.

    1. Re:First transistor by John+Miles · · Score: 1

      Also another interesting bit of trivia: the three terminal transistor was discovered *before* the two terminal diode.

      Well, not really. The first three-terminal transistor was probably a crude FET built in the 1920s by Lilienfeld. And the first practical diodes would have been the cat's-whisker detectors used around the turn of the century in early radio work.

      Shockley's post-Bell Labs work was notable, but none of it was anywhere near as critical to the Valley's development as the founding of HP or even Apple Computer.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  33. Easy Answer... by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    There's an easy answer to this problem.
    Give Shockley a sledgehammer, point him at the building, and tell him the building was saying bad things about him.
    In an hour or two, this entire argument would be pointless. :)

    "Raaaawwwwrrr... Shockley CRUSH!"

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  34. Re:wtf? Coliseum recycled too by hguorbray · · Score: 1

    Actually, Rome has been in a constant state of urban renewal for thousands of years -many buildinngs that would probably be considered architecturally and historically important were torn down and recycled

    the coliseum like many other buildings that were no longer in use (abandoned temples etc) provided building materials for new churches and other buldings.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Coliseum

    there's a pretty good book about michaelangelo and the sistine chapel which gives a good account of the terrible condition that many of Rome's buildings were in at that time -many of the buildings were just allowed to fall apart because they were considered to have been profane, etc and due to lack of civic government, etc

    http://www.amazon.com/Michelangelo-Popes-Ceiling-R oss-King/dp/0142003697

    It also has a good mixture of history and politics of the time as well as the technologies used to paint the symbol and how frescoes are made (way different than regular painting by the way, due to the fact that the color is applied to moist plaster)

    -I'm just sayin'

  35. This just in... by umbrellasd · · Score: 1
    Tropical rainforests in shambles. Now replaced with corn field and little plaque mentioning historical significance of the site. We care so much and hold on with such fervor to the things that don't need to last, and we punt on the things that do.

    Dumb.

    1. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should just have a computing museum... I mean nothing is living in the house besides cockroaches, and the HP Garage is there. It also looks like crap... I'd want my descendants to think I was a rich scientist, who had his choice of expensive items, even if I'm in reality coding from my apartment and barely able to make rent.

    2. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We care so much and hold on with such fervor to the things that don't need to last

      Who is this "We" that you speak of and what is the correlation between the items you mentioned?

  36. He may have been a Nobel prize winner... by hemp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But when he died, Stanford didn't even have a memorial for him due to his insistence on correlation between white skin and intelligence and advocation of eugenics to weed out the undesirable darker skinned races of the world.

    http://www.pbs.org/transistor/album1/shockley/shoc kley3.html/

    --
    Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    1. Re:He may have been a Nobel prize winner... by turing_m · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wikipedia has an article on him.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Shockley

      The PBS article is a hit piece. In the controversial area of race/IQ/dysgenics, you will notice that there are no quotes from Shockley. Instead there is negative value judgment after value judgment without any references or specifics.

      Even with the wikipedia references, I notice that there are very few quotes to be found amidst many value judgments about his "(ob)noxious racial views". Surely if they were indeed that horrible they could treat the reader to a direct quote or two?

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    2. Re:He may have been a Nobel prize winner... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      But when he died, Stanford didn't even have a memorial for him due to his insistence on correlation between white skin and intelligence and advocation of eugenics to weed out the undesirable darker skinned races of the world.

      Hey, Stanford is all about the Marketplace of Ideas and Free Expression ... if they're the popular/"correct" ones.

      Lots of brilliant people tend to go insane past middle age. I'm not sure why they can't say, "This guy made some major contributions to Human Knowledge, changed the course of history, and (hurriedly) then turned into a rotten SOB."

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  37. Historical preservationism run amuck by LionMage · · Score: 1

    Totally agree: historic architecture needs preservation, but not necessarily the one-room shack where someone made history.

    Case in point, MIT built a bunch of throw-away housing (read: barracks) and research buildings during World War II. The buildings were scheduled to be razed, and then that was halted because someone decided that they were a historical landmark -- because that's where RADAR was invented.

    The buildings were still an eyesore when I was a student back in 1988-92, though there were ongoing projects to refurbish them and make them not quite so dumpy. ROTC was still using one of the buildings. But it would have been so much better to build some new, modern structures instead of preserving the old ones.

  38. Five steps for more publicity by freshmayka · · Score: 1

    1. Form the "Birth of Silicon" foundation 501c(3). Mission: To share with future generations the magical birth of the Silicon Valley. 2. Build two replicas in Second Life, one of an active and equipped lab and the second of the fruit stand. 3. Contact Wired and just tell them you used Second Life to do something cool. 4. The embedded Second Life employee at Wired writes an article about it - the article gets on /. 5. non-PROFIT!!!

  39. Don't forget the taqueria right by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the corner of San Antonio and California. Really nice tacos and torta de pierna.

  40. It was a really uninspired fruit stand too :-) by billstewart · · Score: 1
    There's a much better fruit stand around the corner - Milk Pail Market, which has fruits, veggies, and a really wide variety of cheeses, and is one of those semi-outdoor designs that work well in California-like climates, plus there's a Trader Joe's and a Safeway in the same complex, and there used to be an Albertson's.


    The folks who did the fruit business in Shockley's old place must not have done much market research - they didn't have the quality to compete with the fruit stand for people who like that kind of shopping, or the interesting selection of other products that attracts customers to Trader Joe's, or the conventional supermarket breadth of products that the two big commercial markets had, and there's a Mexican market (mostly a carniceria) on the opposite side of the complex next to the mainly Mexican residential area nearby so they'd also lose the walking-distance traffic (and Safeway and Milk Pail would absorb anybody walking from the prefab-condo-commuter residential area on the other side.)


    I think the building also used to be a back-support-products store, but that moved to Palo Alto a few years ago.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  41. Similar buildings at Berkeley by billstewart · · Score: 1

    There were probably similar WWII-temporary-shack buildings at Berkeley when I was there in ~1979, which didn't get nuked until a number of years later. I don't think that was about historic preservationism, though - the buildings were cheap, they needed the space, and they had lots of other construction projects going throughout the 80s and 90s, some on formerly-unbuilt ground and some where other buildings deserved to be demolished or rebuilt. And this being Northern California, as opposed to Boston, they didn't need to spend that much heating the things.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  42. Re: Day workers in Silicon Valley by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Actually, the day workers are over on the other side of the shopping center, and they're mostly Mexicans who actually *will* work, unlike the sign-holders who don't want to work. The local cities sometimes harass them, and sometimes cooperate with local Catholic churches that have organized day-worker centers. I've occasionally hired them when I had furniture moving to do, and there used to be more construction and building-refurb business for them. There's a not-quite-dead-yet Sears on the same side as the dead fruit stand, which Home Depot wants to take over, in which case there'll be more demand for workers over there.


    The coders who want to do temp work usually hang out on the net, or deal with different kinds of temp agencies. You make a bit more money, and get to work inside, but otherwise it used to look pretty similar, and you're also usually really fluent in languages that the people doing the hiring don't actually understand so you sometimes need help translating to them as well.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  43. The fruit there was never more than OK :-) by billstewart · · Score: 1

    There's a much better fruit stand (Milk Pail Market) around the corner. The fruit at this place was sometimes cheaper, not usually very good, and usually not organic, and there was almost never a reason to shop there as opposed to Safeway, unlike the good fruit stand. I only went there once or twice - the main attraction was that it had a different ethnic group running it (I forget if they were Arab or Persian), so sometimes they'd have a bit different collection of fruits and veggies that they liked, but mostly it just wasn't that hot.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  44. Who cares? by BarnabyWilde · · Score: 1

    Really.

  45. Building looks ok; just really unexciting by billstewart · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell from the uninspired collection of businesses that have been there over the years, the building's probably fine (though for all I know it could have leaks or other problems.) It looks better when there isn't paper covering all the windows - it's basically a glass-fishbowl front retail section and a big warehousey back section, cheap uninspired commercial real estate that's not on a corner, doesn't get walking-by traffic because it's on the wrong side of the shopping center, and doesn't get as much drive-by shopping traffic as most of the other uninspired commercial real estate nearby.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  46. Could not take the fruit competition by avante · · Score: 1

    It doesn't look like anyone wants to talk about what the real issue is. The International Produce Market is right across the parking lot from The Milk Pail, which has a much larger selection of higher quality produce and more competitive pricing. The Milk Pail also carries a larger variety of "specialty" goods, such as European cheese, local ice cream and in particular a wide selection of Russian food imports which makes it even competitive with Samovar Deli and Bakery right across the street! The quality and price of Milk Pails produce even makes it stand up again "The Big Boys" as it has outlasted an Albertson which died in the same lot and an bustling Safeway across the street.

    Before people start moaning about the loss of this "Silicon Valley Great", they should understand that if The International Produce Market wanted to keep going as the inheritor of Semi-conductor history, it maybe should have stocked more stuff, maybe some Middle Eastern or Indian specialties (because who wants to drive to Sunnyvale?), to that it could have attracted more visitors. Basic market economics here!

    1. Re:Could not take the fruit competition by adrianmonk · · Score: 1

      It doesn't look like anyone wants to talk about what the real issue is. The International Produce Market is right across the parking lot from The Milk Pail, which has a much larger selection of higher quality produce

      Not to mention some damn fine (real) vanilla extract! Yummmmm....

  47. Stereo store? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember I bought my speakers at a stereo store along San Antonio back in the early 90s. Does anybody know if that's the same building?

  48. from dust thou wert created by senahj · · Score: 1


    this is entirely appropriate, that 391 decay into irrelevance

    just as every organization,
    every business dream in silicon valley
    decays eventually into irrelevance.

    Tandem Gould SEL Xidex System Industries
    Atari National Semi Zilog amdahl 3DO
    Netscape Monolithic Memories HAL
    Wyle Silicon Graphics Diamond Borland

    only Computer Literacy and Fry's were created immortal --

        [ and the owners of Computer Literacy traded their heritage
            for a mess of Barnes and Noble pottage
              and did become greatly enriched thereby ]

    If there's ever a "Here's Where Silicon Valley Started"
    brass plaque, it arguably belongs at the former site of
    The Wagon Wheel bar'ngrill on Middlefield, where aerospace and
    electronic engineers went to drink beer and draw boxes
    and arrows on the backs of napkins.
        [ Moria on Middlefield in Sunnyvale gets honorable mention.
              Rosotti's. The Oasis. St. John's. ]

    And if there's ever a "Here's Where Silicon Valley Got Drunk"
    brass plaque, it arguably belongs at the former site of
    St. James Infirmary, on Moffett Blvd not far from the 101 Club.
    I miss their hot wings, and the 100 beers on tap, and the
    giant fibreglass statue of Wonder Woman looming over the
    dance floor. And the free peanuts. And the hot wings.

    gone, all gone, all dust in the wind

    --
    Wait a minute. Didn't I say that on the other side of the record? I'd better check ...
    1. Re:from dust thou wert created by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Except Zilog's far from gone. I have a few chips on my work bench which were manufactured by them less than 6 months ago.

  49. Not a garden of Eden... by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    I started a .COM company during the .COM boom, and our investors wanted us to have a Silicon Valley presence, so we set up a "head office" there. (A mistake, for several reasons, but that's beside the point.) Anyhow, during my trips down to the area (and some previous trips, visiting Netscape headquaters during its heyday), I was always surprised at the area. It wasn't a Garden of Eden, but a sprawling semi-commercial area, with some major historical tech landmarks, but also some areas where I made sure my doors were locked. A lot of them, actually. So the fact that one building happened to have some exciting stuff happen, then turn into a fruit stand, then close down in a shambles, isn't shocking, interesting, nor particularly newsworthy to me.

    Living elsewhere, one pictures Silicon Valley as having a certain glamour to it; a bit of an "Hollywood/L.A. Syndrome." They sound glamourous to outsiders, but it's not as pretty and glamourous as it might seem, once you're checking it out in more detail. (I found the same of New York; exciting to finally see it, but even in front of a site such as the famed Ritz Carleton, I was surprised that the streets are still as filthy as elsewhere, with scary neighborhoods around every turn.)

    Things such as the HP garage have a lot more local character than this, and are more notable, IMO.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  50. Transistor by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    One tidbit not mentioned in the summary, was that Shockley was one of the co-inventors of the transistor. Despite a lot of controversy around the guy, that is quite worthy of mention. It has turned out to be a somewhat useful component of electronic goods. :)

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Transistor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way ! How could no one have mentioned this?!?! There we all were, reading the article and wondering who the hell this Shockley guy was and what relation he had to a fruit stand. If only you had been here earlier to edumucate us bumpkins, we could have surely saved ourselves a lot of time and trouble. Damn!

  51. You think that's bad by jchernia · · Score: 1

    They want to turn IBM Building 025 (the south San Jose campus where the hard drive was invented) into a Lowe's

    http://www.preservation.org/ibm25_background.html

  52. Re:Let's honor someone else. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    The damage done by Shockley's IQ assertions was immeasurable. Even if it turns out someday that - say - people with large index fingers are smarter than people with small index fingers, on average - is this a useful result? What should we then do, measure index fingers during job interviews? One can draw no conclusion about an individual from an average. "Research" of this nature simply creates prejudice and encourages discrimination.

    The idea that some identifiable groups might have a lower IQ than average is sort of Gödel sequence for modern multicultural societies I think.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  53. huh? by swschrad · · Score: 1

    deForest was hinking around with carborundum detectors in the early 1900s and built a business selling them around 1903. there's your point-contact diode right there. long before the transistor.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  54. Feature request by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Can Slashdot simply pre-tag every article with slownewsday, rather than forcing us to do the grunt-work?

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  55. Birthplace? by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

    Wow, you guys scared me, I thought maybe something dreadful had happened to the actual birthplace of Silicon Valley.

    I refer, of course, to the REAL birthplace, which was the garage in Menlo Park, sort of, and the industrial park in and around Stanford University, for real.

    Shockley, and his demented personna, arrived twenty years later.

    When I think of "the Valley" I know we are talking about 'Santa Clara', but Portola Valley could qualify, too. But the reality is that it started around Stanford University, extended to the companies out near Moffet Field (Ford Philco, Varian, Sylvania, Lockheed, etc), and the 'new' guys... the Amazons and Apple, set up shop in what was then, the low rent area...Sunnyvale, Milpitas, Mountain View, etc.

    If you are in the 'neighborhaood' where the founders 'lived', drive east, take a right at El Camino, go to Page Mill Road, take a right, get out of the car, look around... you are now at the real center of the start of what became known as Silicon Valley. If you're in the modern "Silicon Valley", drive west, take a right at El Camino, turn left onto Page Mill, etc, etc, and voila, you are there. "Really" there. To hell with Shockley.