Slashdot Mirror


Blizzard Seeks to Block User Rights, Privacy

An anonymous reader writes "In the overlooked case between Blizzard and MDY Industries, the creator of the WoWGlider bot, Blizzard is arguing that using any programs in conjunction with the World of Warcraft constitutes copyright violation. Apparently accessing the copy of the game client in RAM using another program infringes upon their rights. Under that logic, users do not even have the right to use anti-virus software in the event that the game becomes infected. Furthermore, Blizzard's legal filings downplay the role of their Warden software, which actively scans users' RAM, CPU, and storage devices (and potentially sensitive data) and sends information back to Blizzard to be processed."

49 of 639 comments (clear)

  1. I have the right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If I want to do something to my copy of the game, I can do so just as I can make any 'mods' I want to a cookbook or one of my C++ library tomes which are also copyrighted. I haven't affected anybody else's copy nor have I affected the master copy so Blizzard needs to quit bitching.

    1. Re:I have the right by dreamchaser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And they have the right to ban you for life if and when they catch you. You agree to their terms when you play. Violating those terms should be punishable somehow.

      No, I'm not sure that it's copyright violation and in this case I'm not sure the end justifies the means, but the *end* is a good one. Stopping cheating is a good thing.

    2. Re:I have the right by s_p_oneil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the bot just simulates input devices (i.e. keyboard and mouse actions), then I doubt it infringes on the copyright. If they actually reverse engineered it to the point where they can make calls to functions inside the application itself, then they have broken the law. Remember all the crap the creators of the first x86 clone had to go through to prove that they hadn't reverse engineered it?

    3. Re:I have the right by jswigart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow this is some bullshit logic. I hate cheaters too, but if I were to follow your ridiculous advice and not play games with cheaters that would cut out any and every single multi-player game in existence. Real good idea there. Cheaters should be shut down, period. To imply that they should be allowed to run rampant in the name of their 'freedom', is really stupid. "Freedom" from what? To make the game miserable for others? Anyone is free to cheat in their copies of single player games, but in multi player games it is expected and should be enforced by the developers and or anti-cheat software that the players are competing on their 'skill' only, and not some wall hack, aim bot, etc doing the important work for them. Likewise for MMO games everyone should be on relatively equal levels. It feels good every time Blizzard or another developer bans x-tens of thousands of accounts. The fact is, you DON'T have the freedom to cheat freely and get away with it, so yes, stopping cheating is a good thing, though unfortunately like piracy it will never be eliminated completely. Even if every game turned into dumb terminals cheaters are already inventive with how they automate the input process, or give other advantages, spiked models, wall hacks, etc. That doesn't mean they shouldn't bother. Cheating should be stopped because it ruins the competition of the games, because it makes any real skill some players may have mean nothing, because it invalidates organized competition(clans, ranked matches, contests, etc), because it's griefing anyone that plays the game as intended, because it gives the cheater an unfair advantage(obviously), and last but not least, because it's common fucking sense. Those good enough reasons for you?

    4. Re:I have the right by fortiguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now that would be something! The first virtual Warcraft player - a robot who sat in front of the screen hour after hour playing the game non stop except for maintenance breaks and possibly some down time to cool down from overheating. That sounds more like real life than you'd first think! But is there a moral dilemma with us creating artificial lifeforms that already have one of our worst addictions? Would you want a puppy to born into the world with a snausages snack dependency? While it might have its uses in training and controlling a pet, how about the ethics?

      --
      You want what? by when? Sorry we haven't finished the time travel project yet... that's next week.
    5. Re:I have the right by passthecrackpipe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Furthermore, the game does allow programmable keystrokes - the Logitech G15 is fully supported by Blizzard (bespite much FUD to the contrary) - Blizzards stance is not against automation per-se, its against unattended play. The tweaks and changes they make to the macro system reflects this attitude - for example, you used to be able to automate hunter kiting with auto-jumps-shots, but the macro system has been changed to prevent this.

      Blizzard doesn't really want to own you system, they just don't want you to play unattended. The whole point of WoWGlider is to set your toon to run around somewhere, and kill the same mobs over and over again, grinding for you. At the end of the day, the experience is much the same as buying a lvl 70 toon of EBay: a whole bunch of clueless players running around in end-game content that requires a lot of detailed knowledge about your game and class mechanics. Blizz would much rather have you do quests and actually consume the content they designed for you - if everyone sits on end-game content, you'd get bored pretty soon.

      --
      People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
    6. Re:I have the right by Alioth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Power. It's all about power. It's the same reason why there are so many asshats wanting ops on IRC - they get some kind of self-gratifying power over other users on the channel.

      MMORPG users want to automate it because the automation can probably do it faster and quicker than they can, leaving them with some kind of wizard character they can use to push around other players.

    7. Re:I have the right by Afecks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If playing WoW is "an ability that has been acquired by training" then so is jerking off. And in the words of Carlin "at least I have a little something to show for it when I'm done".

    8. Re:I have the right by SL+Baur · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the game already has a built-in macro system, so I don't think blizzard would take issue with this. The in-game macro system has designed built-in limitations, such as forbidding macros that require waiting for something to happen (like a spell cooldown), so you cannot chain spells together. This WoW Glider seems designed to specifically circumvent that. I'm not surprised they got sued.

      Read Blizzard's response in the court docs. I largely agree with them, as much as I hate the implementation of the Warden. I hate cheaters more.
    9. Re:I have the right by GrievousMistake · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe because they have some interesting places/stories/gameplay/people, but buried in a ton of grinding, back-and-forth travel and miscellaneous cheap crack. Applies to most online games I've played, really. Especially annoying is the keep-up-with-your-friends-who-play-twice-as-much-a s-you incentive, that eventually turns me off most MMORPGs. Or that explorating and taking interesting quests often gives almost no XP compared to grinding.
      I've played a lot of games that were mostly fun, but had minor or major elements of tedium that I wish were automatic.

      Not that I doubt that some chess entusiast out there gets off on watching his computer play with itself...

      --
      In a fair world, refrigerators would make electricity.
  2. What is at stake here? by KeyThing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are many programs that (programatically) do what the glidebot does. Like Spyware protection, antivirus, etc. There are "add-ons" to popular programs that make them more userfriendly by interacting with them.

    I think Blizzard is approaching this case wrong. The bottom line is that they consider people using the glidebot to be cheating the system. Personally, I don't use it mainly for fear of having my account canceled. I'd much rather have something else go thru the grind for me than have me sitting in front of the game for hours on end. While such programs are prohibited by their AUP, I think they're going too far on this one.

    --
    --- http://www.keything.com
    1. Re:What is at stake here? by tbannist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I agree with you about the tedious grinds (Kill 20,000 Furbolgs to get the useless Furbolg Trinket). Botting
      pisses off people who have a life as well. People who bot make it harder for everyone who don't bot because the botting is there all the time killing the same mobs over and over again. While your bot is killing those furbolgs, or elementals, or undead the other players who are trying to earn their rep, gold, or materials the honest way get screwed over by your bot.

      The problem is an intractable one in WoW. Most players are prevented from effectively griefing bots by the normal game rules, but there's nothing that prevents bots from griefing other players by scouring an area clean of mobs. I've seen situations where there were 4 separate bots killing the mobs in the same field.

      The solution? Don't play WoW. The game is mostly an endless grind fest. It's the timesinks that make botting popular even though it can and does get your account banned. Of course, on the flip side Blizzard is extremely slow to ban botters. I've seen bots still operating more than a month after I first reported them.

      I've been much happier since I quit.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  3. Re:It's simple by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Including grossly abusing the law?

    Sorry, but if we have to pick between expansion of copyrights and some people cheating at a stupid game, I'm going to side with the cheaters. Preventing cheating in an online game is not a cause worthy of limiting access to general purpose computing for.

  4. Re:It's simple by QuijiboIsAWord · · Score: 1, Insightful

    WoW !> Civil Liberties.

    --
    -Hmm...I got a G+ invite, better remember to remove the request from my sig...-
  5. In Summary.... by MrLizard · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Waaaah! Blizzard won't let me cheat!"

    Drug tests for athletes aren't invasions of privacy. Cheat programs in online games are the same thing. You want to cheat? Play "Oblivion" and use all the mods you want. In any kind of multiplayer environment, the use of third-party programs must be verboten. Don't like it? No one is forcing you to play.

    1. Re:In Summary.... by Zephyros · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even if this is cheating, the claims of copyright infringement and DMCA circumvention are a disturbing extension of those already-disturbing areas of law. Blizzard's well within their rights to stop cheating, I think, but not like this.

    2. Re:In Summary.... by nukeevry1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have to admit, it's sad that this is the approach their legal team is taking. In that respect, it makes Blizzard look a bit lazy -- I mean, who actually drudges through the mid/lower levels of this game and doesn't get the idea to write a bot to do the dirty work? Isn't that what computers are for, anyway? They had to see this coming, right? And this was Blizzard's contingency plan -- to sick their lawyers on people? That's what strikes me as lame about the whole thing.

      If you want to make a drug analogy, then do so the right way -- killing demand is the way to truly solve the problem. Not killing supply. A better analogy for this whole situation are bid sniping tools for eBay -- what Blizzard really wants is for things to be fair for paying patrons of their service. If there's enough demand here for a Glide bot, though, maybe they should rethink the design of the game. What are the elements in the game would create demand for such a bot? What are ways around that?

      With most games, this whole concept is completely nonsensical, but their game's design does make a very compelling argument for these types of programs. It's why I stopped playing -- and not that anyone still playing WoW cares, but there are a lot of people who stopped playing for the same reason. The burden here is on Blizzard and other successful MMO game developers, and as someone who freely and openly stopped playing WoW for this very reason, I can tell you that I honestly think that Glide/farm bots are a good thing for Blizzard and MMO -- they'll force designers to come up with better games in the end.

      Blizzard would do well to learn from this in the future and keep their legal wolves at bay. It's getting old, people go to lawyers to help them "protect" their interests, and all the lawyers do is use scare tactics and set these confusing, logic devoid precedents to sway public opinion and create fear to do anything creative. Isn't that the exact opposite intent of a copyright?

  6. Re:It's simple by ajs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow Glider = Cheating, therefore Blizz should do what it can to keep it out of the mix. WoW Glider use is cheating. WoW Glider itself is just a program.

    The problem is that Blizzard (and their legal department have always been MUCH less cool than their coders, sadly) has decided to try to use the law to force people to not cheat. This is dubious at best, the way they're trying to do it, and sets frightening legal precident if they win.

    If they win, then any attempt to analyze and modify a running program would constitute copyright violation. That means that programs which debug, dissassemble and tweak performance of running programs would no longer be allowed on 3rd party software. It would also bring into question the relationship between emulators and the software they run. Mame, Wine and a number of other projects might be useless if this becomes precident.

    Cheating in WoW is one thing. Setting precident that hurts consumers is another.
  7. Noone bothers to see what Warden Does by Direwolf20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everyone complains about Warden, but noone knows really how it works. Heres the basic gist:

    Warden uses something similiar to a HASH function to get information about the processes run on your computer. Warden sends the HASH home. The HASH is compared against a list of known hacking processes, like WoWGlider, and if theres a match, you're being very naughty!

    Is that REALLY the end of the world? NO! Blizzard can NOT discern any information from a HASH.

    Heres an MD5 HASH of a file on my desktop, what is it? Quick, get my personal informationz!

    070A3B2AF0070DE30B1931B9F2590510

    1. Re:Noone bothers to see what Warden Does by thenextpresident · · Score: 3, Insightful

      again as a developer have unique abilties to do whatever i want....if I was perhaps busy working on cleaning up a work project using visual studio developer and also playing the game, then I guess I was a bad person because the fact that the hash sent back saw that I had the VS open capable of reading the stack etc... I would get banned....good thing I know about this now.... Did you even read what was posted? It compares the hash to a known list of bot programs and its ilk. Unless VS is suddenly a botting program, it's not gonna put up a red flag.

      This is just another case of blowing shit out of proportion. I mean, seriously, try thinking logically for 2 seconds. It might help.
      --
      Jason Lotito
  8. Re:It's simple by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe so. But copyright doesn't apply here.

    Here's a thought: what if I run WoW in a VM? We should be able to do that soon, the hardware and software are certainly getting to that point. Now that would impose a whole slew of issues to WoW, since they'd have no control outside of their sandbox. They really don't have that control now, honestly, but it's more work than most are willing to put in to make it happen.

    The real answer is for Blizzard to make the game enjoyable to play, instead of rewarding "face time grinding".

    Disclaimer: No, I don't play WoW, and never have. It didn't interest me in the least. I did play EQ, and tired of its mindless grind. None of the other MMOs seemed any different, not even Eve. I used to play and code for a mud (pre EQ, way way pre) which was quite a bit more fun as being an imp (GM would be the closest thing in MMOs these days) allowed you quite a bit of freedom and create spontaneous changes. Usually that was in concert with players - it gave them a new challenge or two, and kept things fresh. Things like surprise trap door mobs was one of my favorites.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  9. Regardless.... by Himring · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No matter how the suit comes out (and I'm all for sticking to "the man") using a bot in an online game where other people are involved is cheating, and it kills the very nature of what the game should be all about for everyone: fun.

    This is why I will never, ever, play another FPS, online ... that is, a current PC-based FPS. Xbox live? Sure. No cheating there (yet) and that's good.

    I have admined many game servers (q1, q2, cs) and worked hard to stop cheating with all the tools (punk busters, etc.). I even ran an anti-cheating game site years ago (anyone remember slipgate central? no I didn't run that, but one of my little sites was listed).

    I also did an write-up on the zbot in q2. I installed and used it. I pwned players effortlessly. It was disgusting. I ran around gathering health and power-ups and the bot did all the work while the whole server tried to kill me. It was sick fun, but it's lame.

    Showeq was the first big exploit for mmorpgs. It was lame. With it, the punk could get any unique mob in a zone before anyone else. How is that fair? How was it fair for the people without a 2nd computer, or without linux knowledge to set it up?

    This article may be all about the legal ins and outs of who has access to what in ram, but the bottom line is, cheaters blow. If you cheat you blow. You're feeding a primal part of the human psyche at the expense of others and undermining the entire event. When it all crumbles and dies, you are to blame.

    Using a bot to lvl or farm in wow is lame. Don't do it. Let this guy's work die on the vine....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    1. Re:Regardless.... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then you should know that it's utterly futile to ask or expect people not to exploit. The only - the only - solution is to design out the possibility of exploits. Any game that relies on the actioning entity's actions alone to determine an outcome is always exploitable. Always.

      That's not very cheery news, but it's the way that it is, and I do wish everyone involved would skip the hair pulling and wailing and just accept it. You're always going to be playing catchup with the exploiters, and the more successful your game, the further behind you're going to be.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:Regardless.... by electrosoccertux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Using a bot to lvl or farm in wow is lame. Don't do it. Let this guy's work die on the vine.... How about: wasting your life on something you've already done once is lame. Don't do it.

      Blizzard just needs to let you create maxed or almost maxed characters if you already have a level 70 instead of forcing you to level through the same material over and over. If you could start a new character at level 50, that would give plenty of room to learn how to play the class. That's all they have to do to reign in the botting. You could make all the money you need from leveling alts to 70 and then doing the quests for gold.
  10. Anonymous Reader eh? by pslam · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I'm guessing it's that asshole author of the WoWGlider bot, actually. Quite an evident bias and quite blatant half-truths in that summary. It's the same for every anti-Blizzard story that comes out about WoW - usually it's the virtual gold industry posting anonymous stories about how great they are and how Blizzard is being heavy handed on their poor, innocent selves. Rubbish.

    He's ruining the game so he can make some profit out of it. I have absolutely no sympathy whatsoever, even if what Blizzard is doing is dubious. He certainly doesn't have clean hands himself.

  11. Re:It's simple by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh whatever. A lot of people get enjoyment out of the game already...in those terms its a great success; you'll never be able to make it so exquisitely enjoyable that no one will want to cheat.

    The whole idea that cheaters are a game flaw is absurd; if a game has goals, there are people who will want to take a shortcut. They'll do it for greed, they'll do it because they're lazy, and they'll do it because they want recognition that they haven't earned.

    What's the solution? To have a game with no goals? It'd be like Tetris but you couldn't have a score, because then people might want to cheat for a higher score. Couldn't even have levels, because people might want to cheat to say they got to a higher level!

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  12. Bots vs. anti-virus by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Anti-virus software is a special case. It has always been against the law to reverse engineer software protected by copyrights. Yet anti-virus writers are allowed to reverse engineer viruses and malware. Why? Because viruses themselves are illegal, and therefore can't be defended in court by a copyright. That would be like person A calling the police because person B stole his crack.

    If these bots are accessing memory inside WoW while it is running, then someone has reverse engineered WoW, and that is against the law. WoW is not a virus, and it is protected by copyright laws. This isn't about expanding copyright law. This has been illegal since before many Slashdot readers were born.

  13. So don't play it until they change by nightsweat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You don't have to play WoW. Really. You lived without it before and you'll live without it after. Politely tell Blizzard why you are leaving them, and then leave.

    If you're not willing to do that, this obviously isn't THAT important to you.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    1. Re:So don't play it until they change by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. Remember there's no spyware in nethack. No cheating either.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  14. Re:It's simple by phasm42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In backgammon, you can usually take measures against people who cheat (anything from a good kickin' where it hurts to not playing with them anymore). In WoW, you don't have that option.
    Well they could, oh, I don't know, terminate their account. Nah, that wouldn't work.

    Seriously, there's no reason to get the law involved and set bad legal precedent.
    --
    "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
  15. Re:A friend of Mine. by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If Blizzard does not want people using bots/mods, then they should put it in the EULA, and if anyone violates that, handle is accordingly.

    It's already in there, don't worry. Apparently, Blizzard is just looking for a bigger stick to wave at potentian cheaters.

    A good friend of mine is "addicted" to this game. He has been playing for over a year now, and has leveled up 2 characters to level 70.

    Only ?

    So he uses a bot, to gather some experience. If it wasnt for the bot, he probably wouldn't be playing anymore.

    If he finds the game tedious, why doesn't he play something that's actually fun ? I dunno, but seeing "Level 70" on the screen doesn't really sound like fun. So he wants to make a third character, but he doesn't want to play through all the lower missions.

    I doubt he's seen all of them with just two characters.

    is he interfering with other peoples play? no., so wtf?

    Heck yes he is. Maybe some legit players want to farm, too. Having to compete against dozens of farm-bots in addition to the Chinese farmers sucks big time.

    WoW is a cash cow, and they are just trying to milk it to the Max...those bastards...

    If they were trying to milk anything, they'd have the game mechanics set up so that having a second account with a buffbot (which is different from a real active bot, because its only purpose is to be parked in a safe spot) is a must, and be running an items-for-cash service.

    Right now, Blizzard is far from being in the "milking" phase, in contrast to some other MMOs.

  16. Cheaters == terrorists? by dabadab · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is a really interesting theory you propose: those who cheat in a game should be subject to a different set of laws than others.
    I know that in the USA it's a popular opinion in certain circles that suspects of terrorism should be stripped of all of their rights, but to extend it to cheaters is something really new.

    Seriously: a groundless lawsuit is a groundless lawsuit even when the defendant is a slimeball. In the USA's precedent based-system this is even more important since the precedent set by this lawsuit will apply to non-slimeballs, too.

    --
    Real life is overrated.
  17. Challenge to the community by Shoten · · Score: 4, Insightful

    (I know, it's a bit long, but give it a try.)

    Okay, so here's how I see it all unfolding. Blizzard comes out with World of Warcraft, which immediately becomes a hugely successful MMORPG. And not only is it hugely successful, it happens to come into being at the same time that the real-world economy starts interfacing directly with the virtual economy of the MMO world. As a result, there are services that offer gold for cash, leveling services, etc...all of which incur unintended (and even destabilizing) economic effects on the virtual world. A rough analogy would be if people could sell their souls for sudden wealth or fame here, in a very literal sense of the world; something not of this world is being traded in return for something of this world, and giving those people a leg up over everyone else.

    So, Blizzard has to figure out how to fix this. Obviously, they've done things to make it harder to goldfarm, in some respects. Fishing, which is an obvious activity that requires little input, is made harder to automate based on the requirement that you click on the fishing lure (which lands in a random location in front of you every time) when and only when it has a fish on it (which happens at a random interval after the time you cast the lure, or not at all). Combat is set so that if you're at a higher level than the thing you're killing, you get less credit for it; if there's such a difference that it's a ridiculously easy kill, you get nothing at all for your trouble.

    But still, there are ways that something watching variables in memory could help a cheater. All you have to do is watch for the change in a variable, or the triggering of a function, when the fishing lure makes that splashy noise, and read (direct from RAM) the coordinates where the lure is, and you can have a piece of software click on it for you. I'm something of a WoW noob, so I'm sure there are other ways as well, including manipulation involving mining, auction house market manipulation, etc. Heck, if you had computers work together in concert, you could have a whole group of low-level characters team up on one larger-level NPC and kill it for a big bounty in both XP (for sale as a leveling service) and silver/gold (for sale as gold). The reason the maximum party size that can do quests/gain XP is 5 is just this, and it's not at all hard to imagine circumventing it by coordinating the systems to work together, where one online character is human-operated and the others just follow him automatically, attacking whatever attacks him.

    So, Blizzard has a problem to fight. Since pretty much all of these techniques require a lot of manpower (which adds significantly to the labor cost of the goldfarming/leveling service and eats the profit) or reading variables from RAM, Blizzard decides to prohibit this tactic. But it's the same old situation in computer security, when it comes to things with tangible economic gain in the real world; the bad guys will evolve at least as fast as the good guys. So there needs to be a way to gather intel, to find out what the latest tricks are which are being used. And so Blizzard has Warden.

    Now, a lot of people get up in arms about private corporations and privacy, and rightly so. There are numerous companies that maintain databases of our information, selling it to whoever wants it. Even worse, the organization that can harm us the most by invading privacy...our government...has been purchasing that information, conveniently skirting around the limits placed on them by law. But Blizzard isn't keeping a database of our personal information. We may happen to be doing online banking while WoW is idling in the background, but they're not culling/recording that information. And unlike the metaphor used in the article on Warden, no human being will ever see it. It's more like the person behind me at the checkout, or the cashier, being able to see my credit card when I take it out of my wallet to swipe it. I don't have a problem with that; I'm one of millions of people who d

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  18. Is this really a surprise? by Marsala · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, like... did you not read the EULA they force you to agree to every time there's an update?

    The one that basically says, "You're paying us a monthly fee for a license to access the game, but in reality we own your characters, all the gold they have, and all their equipment". They told you up front that you have no rights and that they'll come after you (at worst) or shut down your account (at best) if you do anything they don't like. If you don't like it, stop giving them money.

  19. Summary Incorrect by fleck_99_99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At risk of being repetitive here, the issue at hand is not that accessing WoW in RAM is a violation of copyright. The argument Blizzard is presenting is that:

    - Loading WoW into RAM is creation of a copy.
    - Your right as a user to create this RAM copy is pursuant to the ToS and EULA.
    - Using cheating software violates the ToS/EULA.
    - Therefore, a user no longer has the right to create the RAM copy of WoW while running WoWGlider.

    Therefore, the DMCA/copyright slant is:
    - WoWGlider is a tool that is defeating The Warden access control scheme with the sole use of creating a copy of WoW that infringes upon Blizzard's copyright.

    This may or may not be a valid claim; the status of RAM copies of software is not entirely settled, but tends towards "it can be an infringing copy."

    All of this would probably not have led to a lawsuit, except for the fact that WoWGlider is sold, for real money. Blizzard is trying to both destroy that particular cheating mechanism, and attach all of the profits made from it -- assuming the behavior is in fact ruled to be infringing.

    --
    seven two six five
    seven four six one seven
    two six four two e
  20. Re:Misleading. by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The trouble is, people have been expanding the DMCA to cover things like ink cartridges and garage door openers when it actually is very limited in scope. The DMCA prevents you from making or distributing technological means of circumventing a copyright protection schema. This specifically means that it would cover the case of someone trying to duplicate the client CD's. It does not cover cheating.

    Blizzard / Vivendi is trying to extend the DMCA to mean that any application scripting and macroing is illegal. This means that not only would you be banned for doing something the game developer doesn't like, but that their decrees would have a jail sentence behind it. This seems wrong to me, both morally and legally.

    Now, as a game developer, I think WoW cheaters should be hit hard and fast with the banstick, and think that MMO's should consider gathering together to create clustered bans... I.E. get banned from one MMO, and you're out of most of them. I hate online cheaters with a passion reserved for those who have to deal with them. But I don't think that constitutes legal grounds to send people to jail for the DMCA-specified term of 10 years.

    You have the right to script your computer. And they have the right to never let you play their game again. But they don't have the right to incarcerate you for years for it. So guard your rights, or any time any company asks you not to do something they'll be able to throw you in jail for it.

  21. Elaboration? by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Remember all the crap the creators of the first x86 clone had to go through to prove that they hadn't reverse engineered it?

    Can someone elaborate for the ignorant: aren't you supposed to prove that you *did* reverse engineer it, not that you didn't? Since the copyright only covers duplication of code, not duplication of functionality?

  22. Y'all are missing something by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Vivendi/Blizzard is claiming that the WowGlider program accesses their servers in an unauthorized fashion, and imitates their intellectual property to do so. They aren't claiming the right to tell you what you can and can't run on your PC willy-nilly. They are claiming the right to tell you what software environment they want connecting to their servers. Much like your boss requires you to have or not have certain programs running when you access their VPN (at least mine does, and if your IT department is at all security conscious it does as well)

    WoW allows mods, hell, it encourages them. However, any mod that makes it so you can "play the game" without being at your PC is explicitly forbidden. They've banned users of fishing bots before. You're supposed to be playing the game by sitting at your computer, and actively killing things. Yes, it's a time sink. All recreation is. If you're not having fun with it, go and do something else.

    Glider bots/farmer bots do harm those who aren't using them. They consume server resources, making the game less responsive for everyone. They tag rare mobs, denying that kill and the resulting loot to "honest" players. They mine rare resources, again denying them to "honest" players. And the effects they have on the marketplace are demonstrable. For example, about a year ago, a botter discovered a speed/teleportation hack that made it possible to farm 16-slot bags (the largest bag in the game at the time). Instantly, the auction house price on those dropped from 30-40 gold to 5 gold. And there was no longer any market for any smaller size bag, which made it difficult for aspiring tailors to sell product (their bags). Similar hacks were found for other items.

    Ban em all, find the people running them, and execute kill -9's on them. I don't mean their process, I mean them.

  23. Re:DOA by Goobermunch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fortunately, Blizzard isn't suing teenagers, they're suing a company that produces a piece of software, which it sells to permit said teenagers to cheat.

    If you're going to go to war against a company like Blizzard, you should make sure you've paid your lawyers' retainer first. I have no pity for the folks that produce WoWGlider. They've brought this on themselves.

    --AC

  24. Sad by ildon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's sad that people can't just either play and enjoy the game the way it's intended or simply not play. That they have to cheat, and then when Blizzard tries to protect the integrity of their game, come up with bullshit like this to try and justify their cheating. It's just a game. If you really feel you have to cheat at it, you should simply not play, because it defeats the purpose of the game. You destroy the experience not only for yourself, but you cheapen it for those around you.

    It's one thing to cheat, but then to turn around and try to morally justify it like this, is just pathetic. This has nothing to do with software freedom. Blizzard is simply using the tools before them to try and protect the integrity of their game.

  25. Re:Pot Vs. Kettle by Rustitobuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As you log in, you are given some text to read, and than you click Accept. The text includes this:

    5. Consent to Monitor. WHEN RUNNING, THE GAME MAY MONITOR YOUR COMPUTER'S RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (RAM) FOR UNAUTHORIZED THIRD PARTY PROGRAMS RUNNING CONCURRENTLY WITH THE GAME... http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/legal/eula.html

    That constitutes authorization.

  26. But you don't have the right by Samari711 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to distribute the derivative work you've just created, which is why Blizzard is suing (among other reasons). The logic Blizzard is using is almost exactly the same logic that the FSF uses in the GPL when it comes to linking. WoWglider is useless without WoW. It has specific knowledge of what WoW.exe looks like in memory and feeds it input based on the state of the game. Anti-Virus software applies the same generic algorithm to wow.exe as it does to firefox.exe.

    --

    I never said I was smart, I just said I was smarter than you

  27. Why they are taking this position by RaigetheFury · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Let me be clear in this. I'm involved heavily in banning people that "cheat" the system, "hack" the game, or try to sell me gold for US$$. Why do you play the game if you instantly want a lvl 70 character. What's the point? The fact that it takes time to get to 70 instantly means that you have better skilled players at higher levels. You want an easy game go play diablo 2.

    Blizzard isn't really after you guys though. It's after all the botters that farm gold and sell it for $$. It's after the people who use the speed hacks. I have mods that instantly tell me (http://wow-en.curse-gaming.com/downloads/details/ 4150/spamsentry-anti-goldspam/). Two clicks and GM's don't. They LOVE IT. On average if get 15 a DAY and I play at most for 6 hours if at all.

    It's a huge war and people are making profit off of things that diberately violate the EULA, and makes the game shitty for those of us who follow the rules. Nothing pisses me off more than watching some guy attack me and when he's about to die he zooms off at ungodly speed.

    WoW has embraced the mod community like EQ2 should have. At the same time they are trying to defend everyone and while this case is stupid on their part because they won't win from the point they are taking. They are making it clear they aren't taking it lying down.

    Hell they banned what 110,000 chinese farmer accounts now?

    You have to look at the problems they face

    1) They cannot ban IP's. You can use anonymous proxies
    2) You cannot ban anonymous proxies as some of us use them without knowing
    3) You cannot ban ISP's because they'll switch.
    4) You cannot ban subnets because like #1... they can spoof their IP
    5) Because of the above, you cannot ban "chinese" players from playing on US servers as it wouldn't stop the problem, only innocent people.
    6) You cannot just ban accounts that spam out websites because many times they are compromised accounts. They spam on average 1000 people. If 1... and I mean 1 person buys gold out of that thousand... they made their money back.
    7) You cannot set a server side filtering system for messages because that would be a tremendous resource hog.

    So far the only solutions are client side mods. Like the one I listed above. I never see the message. Only a quick warning and it doesn't even affect my /reply. Couldn't ask for more.

    They are fighting a very difficult war and are fighting it well. While this battle may be a lost cause it opens the door for legal action in the future and costs the defendent money. I wouldn't say RIAA tactics, but close to it done with good morality based decisions.

  28. Another approach: WHY are people cheating? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's look at it this way: Why are people cheating? Why are they using those programs? Generally, I've run across a lot of cheaters, and there are generally 3 kinds of cheaters.

    First the "I wanna win" cheater. You find that kind usually in shooters, using aimbots, wallhacks and other tools to balance their lack of skill. Now, a cheat like that would be of little use in MMORPGs. Your toon hits or misses based on some mathematical probabilities, not your aim. At best, it could be used as some kind of "radar" to find some mobs faster, which is (unless we're talking PvP here) more something that I'll discuss with the third kind.

    Then there's the item and money grabber. The person using bots to get money or items. Which basically is quite pointless in WoW, because any item you could farm alone is pretty much worthless in the long run. At best, this would be interesting for plat farmers, but not for "normal" players who'd actually like to play the game.

    Which gets us to group 3, which is IMO also the group using glidebot mostly: The "get me outta the grind hell and let me finally play the game" players. And that is not only the player's fault. If a game only offers you interesting and sensible content after 2-3 months of mindless grinding, I wonder if it's worth playing.

    So the suit of Blizzard is understandable: That bot "costs" them 20-30 bucks per toon a player levels, since that much longer they'd play without Blizzard having to offer them any new bones to chew on.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  29. Shouldn't less people be playing by GregPK · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WOW, has literally changed our society. I see so many people addicted to the game and investing hundereds and hundereds of dollars into it. I wouldn't be suprised if it dropped the national IQ by 15 points and medical expenses for people with butt blisters from playing it so much. I think its time for people to realize the extent of what WOW is doing to thier lives. I've seen it breakup relationships and even prevent them from starting. People just don't leave the damn computer. Save the people, End the WOW.

  30. Stop wasting your time by __aailob1448 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Telling people not to cheat because it's lame is tantamount to telling thieves not to steal because "it's wrong".

    They know it harms other people and they do NOT care. No amount of words is going to change that and there is no point bothering. Cheating is a fundamental part of human nature. Maybe it's a good thing. A small amount of cheaters forces the rest of us to create protections, increase security, be more vigilant and "arm up". It makes us as a society more resilient and better prepared just as germs made us develop an immune system.

    Diversity is vital to the survival of a species as anyone who's taken a biology course knows. Some of that diversity means cheaters, psychopaths, rapists and lawyers. They are a necessary evil and their contributions are vital to the very survival of the human race. They day everybody stops cheating, we should all be scared, very scared.

    In conclusion, we really should be thanking cheaters for their invaluable services.

    And right after we thank them, we should hang them. Afterall, if they got caught, they're weak and deserve to die.

  31. Re:Misleading. by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And it's hard to see how they're wrong in that

    Simple - The "access" they wish to block, they don't control.

    If they want to test the integrity of their program and its memory, fine. If they want to TOS people for certain behaviors, fine. But they don't own my keyboard, mouse, joystick, or OS. If I want to run a program to stuff my keyboard buffer, Blizzard has NO right to do a goddamned thing about it other than ban my account. They don't have the right to run spyware on my machine, they certainly don't have the right to actively kill processes or delete files, and trying to invoke the DMCA boogeyman, well, I can't wait for that one to get laughed out of court.

    Hard to see how they have it wrong? No, hard to see how they can make such claims without bursting into laughter halfway through.

  32. Leading headline by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Blizzard Seeks to Block User Rights, Privacy"

    Now that's not a leading headline. Thanks for telling me what to think, Slashdot!

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  33. Oh please. You don't HAVE to grind by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh please. I've yet to see any level range or class on WoW that _needs_ to grind at any point. (Outside what used to be the level 60 end-game grind. More about that one later.) Invariably there's some "but I really wanna have everything" type that's creating an imaginary grind trap for himself.

    Grind... what? XP? Take it from first hand experience, there are plenty of quests and instances to get you from level 1 to 70. I can't say any of my characters ever had to start mindlessly grinding NPCs for XP.

    The ones who grind there, are simply grinding because of their own "I _must_ get to level 70 _fast_" delusions. A lot of people seem to have this crazy idea that the game starts at level 70 (or previously 60), and that everything before it must be skipped as fast as possible. Guess what? That's wrong. Levels 1 to 69 are the actual game. Level 70 is where the game _ends_. That's it. You finished it. You've seen all the content. Go out, do something else, or start a new char.

    So all these people who try to skip levels 1 to 69 are really skipping the whole goddamn game and content they've bought. Whether by getting power-levelled or by spending hundreds of hours mindlessly slaughtering wolves and boars, that's what it is: skipping the actual story, quests, everything that was the actual game on that DVD.

    That's all that such bots do: allow you to skip the actual game. Congrats. You're now level 70, you skipped the "grind", except there's no more game for you to actually play at that point. That "grind" was the actual game, or rather a piss-poor substitute for it. You just bought a game for your bot to play. I hope you liked that bot a lot, at least, because it had the fun you were supposed to have.

    And blaming it on Blizzard just takes brain-damage to whole new levels. Blizzard sure as heck didn't force them to skip 99% of the content in the game.

    Grinding for money or equipment? Again, sure as heck noone forced them to. It _is_ possible to play the game without buying a new set of blue-quality equipment every 2 levels. Replacing a sword with one that does 1 DPS more won't really make you T3H UB3R-W4RR10R. Replacing a +10 int robe with a +11 int one won't make you the uber-mage.

    Stick with that equipment until the upgrade is really worth the cost. Don't think in terms of "is a +11 int robe worth 10 gold." Think in terms of "do I want to pay 10 gold for a 1 point increase over what I already have?" You'll find your expenses might actually go down a helluva lot.

    In fact, if you really want to, you can get to level 70 without using anything more than drops and quest rewards.

    Again, people just create that illusionary trap in their own mind, and get stuck in it. They end up enacting a bad case of consumerism in an online world. They think there's some _duty_ to keep up with the Joneses, when most of the time noone will give a damn about whether your robe is 1 point weaker than the Joneses' robes. Cue farming for gold, or buying gold, just to blow it at the AH on stuff they don't even really need.

    Again: not because Blizzard somehow forced them to grind, but because of something that exists only in their own head.

    The exception to both, as I was saying, was the crap level 60 endgame grind. Guess what? That was after the game had actually ended. It wasn't the meat of the game, it was one last dry bone for people who didn't know when to quit. The actual game had pretty much ended, the content was over, you had already done the quests and seen the zones. All that remained was doing the same pointless raid again and again, just so you can pay Blizzard for another month.

    Skipping (by grind, PL, or bot) the levels 1 to 59 just to get stuck into the MC grind was one of the most idiotic things one could do. It was akin to having a bot finish Oblivion for you, just so you can view the endgame credits again and again for 6 months straight. That stupid.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.