Slashdot Mirror


Fun and Profit With Obsolete Computers

An anonymous reader writes "C|Net has a story about the value of aging computer hardware, and the subculture of people who collect them. The story details some of the more enthusiastic collectors currently participating in the hobby, as well as their old-school beautiful hardware. '[Sellam Ismail] recently brought a quarter century-old Xerox Star computer back to life to be used as evidence in a patent lawsuit. The pride of his collection is an Apple Lisa, one of the first computers (introduced in 1983) with a now standard graphical interface. Such items sell for more than $10,000. In an old barn in Northern California that also houses pigs, Bruce Damer, 45, keeps a collection that includes a Cray-1 supercomputer, a Xerox Alto (an early microcomputer introduced in 1973) and early Apple prototypes. '

186 comments

  1. 30 years from now by jumper7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think it would be a good idea to save my current computer in a warehouse for the next 30 years.

    1. Re:30 years from now by catxk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, you'd have to get the first MacBook (the black one, obviously, and no Core 2 cheating), or maybe one of those Acer Ferraris or something. It would have to be something that is unique, yet popular and the most expensive first version. A custom built PC or a Dell is simply out of the question.

      --
      Don't be crazy anymore!
    2. Re:30 years from now by King_of_Prussia · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's almost what Rusty Foster from kuro5hin has been doing. He runs the site on old donated computers (some positively ancient) using some very specialised code. You can read a little about it here (you may need to be logged into k5 to see that properly, scoop gets some weird issues with anonymous users).

      --

      Making the moon less necessary since 1998.

    3. Re:30 years from now by charlieman · · Score: 1

      Remember, you have to keep pigs, Bruce Damer and 45 there to be successful!.

    4. Re:30 years from now by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends on what you want to do with it. If you just want the old hardware to put on a shelf and show off, then the uncommon machines might be better. If you want to have something that'll boot up and allow you to do things with it, then that custom built or common Dell (plus several donor machines in the closet) might be a better choice. Looking at how the typical computer is built nowadays, I'm going to guess that getting one to boot up in 30 years might be a bit of a challenge.

  2. Aha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've got a 23+ year old genuine Apple RF modulator. Take THAT, suckers. The "switcheur" troll would gladly suck my cock for this piece of Apple antiquity.

    1. Re:Aha! by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      I've got a 23+ year old genuine Apple RF modulator. Take THAT, suckers. The "switcheur" troll would gladly suck my cock for this piece of Apple antiquity.


      But I didn't think those assmuppets acknowledged anything Apple that wasn't Mac.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Aha! by master_p · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ha! that's nothing! I've got a genuine 6,000 year old Apple! I didn't eat it all back then!

      -Adam

    3. Re:Aha! by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      heh - I actually have one of those - always though of selling it on ebay to see what apple fanboy would want for it.

    4. Re:Aha! by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....I've got a 23+ year old genuine Apple RF modulator.....

      One Upmanship! I'v got a 28 year old DEC LSI 11/23 computer and a VT100 terminal. When put into storage about 17 years ago it was still working with RT-11. The old DEC OS manuals are still with it also. Maybe I'll dig it out and see if it will still run off same of those old 8" floppies that are with it. It even has a 20Mb (fancy that!) HD in a separate big heavy box.

      --
      All theory is gray
    5. Re:Aha! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I have a PDP-11/73 in an OEM case with a couple of RL02s and a couple of internal RDxx drives. It runs RT-11 with TSX+. From the dates on some components I suspect it was built in about 1986. At some stage I'll hook a couple of the terminal ports up to my server and let people log in for a play.

    6. Re:Aha! by pentalive · · Score: 1

      I'll see your Apple RF Modulator and raise you an apple IIc+, external floppy drive, external dual 5 1/4" floppy (the IIc+ has an internal 3 1/2" drive), Imagewriter printer and the "model correct" monochrome video monitor. (as well as a modern color tv)

      pthhh!

      (not to mention the Radio Shack Model 102, and the Apple Mac Classic)

      : ^ )

    7. Re:Aha! by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      Newbie. Apple //e, 4-digit serial number. Purchased February, 1983. Mac Plus.

  3. classiccmp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No article such as this is complete without a link straight to the Classic Computer Mailing List, with its high volume of discussions, finds, swaps and technical solutions.

    A couple of years ago I was involved in the dissemination of a collection in the south-east of England. From the PDP-11/43 that had people offering to drive over from northern Europe, to the blue Intel MDS to Spain, the old Dragon to America, the stalwart CJE Micros grabbing up the BBC's Torch coprocessor, to the steady stream of people each collecting a VAX, it was amazing to see the interest and enthusiasm.

    Three nice things about old machines:
    (1) Simple enough that a single human can understand how they work;
    (2) Scaled such that this same human can fix problems in his garage;
    (3) Sufficiently well built that (2) can sometimes be unnecessary even after 20 years.

  4. For Our Retirement by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 5, Funny
    That's what I keep telling my wife -- all those old Amigas are an investment.

    Plus, Lemmings looks surprisingly good on the big TV in the living room.

    1. Re:For Our Retirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because the amiga is what it was originally developed for

    2. Re:For Our Retirement by oofoe · · Score: 1

      Funny, when I read that, I thought "that sounds like Ray..." And so it was! Jos'h

      --
      Curse you plastic mold maker!
    3. Re:For Our Retirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Something sorely lacking from nearly every other port of lemmings is the amiga's two-player-simultaneous lemmings. That was really great fun (the amiga could handle two mice, you see, at the time most other platforms couldn't.) If you think lemmings was fun, imagine two teams of lemmings blowing the crap out of eachother. :-)

    4. Re:For Our Retirement by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 2, Funny
      That's the main reason why our oldest A1000 is, as I mentioned, hooked up to the TV: My wife and her mother love the two-player mode.

      Many is the morning I have woken up to the sound of my wife yelling at her mother, and her mother cackling with glee in return, over some sudden trick which has allowed her to "steal" her daughter's lemmings.

  5. Oh yeah, get a load of this! by voodoo+cheesecake · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I still have a Commodore Plus 4. And before I got the disk drive, I had to retype all my programs in. That's how I learned to type faster. But anyway, think about how many XP users will hang on with a death grip! I'm a news director at a radio station and I love to talk about how Microsoft is screwing the consumer! It's so easy to do when Microsoft keeps providing such excellent examples such as Vista! After all, aren't they a part of the dumbing down of America. I then talk about Linux, which keeps getting better all the time.

  6. Creepy by stewbacca · · Score: 5, Funny
    So THAT'S what the creepy math teacher at my school does with all those old computer parts he hoardes.

    Frankly, I don't get the collector (cough, mental illness hoarding, cough) mentality. I suppose I'll sit back and watch this thread for awhile and feed my 30 cats.

    1. Re:Creepy by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

      Ahem... I'm still waiting...

  7. Oldies by Spacejock · · Score: 1

    I have a large collection of Sinclair gear, from a bare ZX80 though a number of ZX81s (with and without Rampacks) to most models of the ZX Spectrum, from the original 16K to the +3 with built-in 3" disk drive. Microdrives, tapes, ZX and Alphacom printers, light guns, Currah u-speech and on and on.

    It's purely nostalgia, not a money-making venture. My first computer was a ZX81, saved up for and bought new 24 years ago, and I still remember it like it was yesterday. (In fact, I still have it.)

    1. Re:Oldies by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Money making shouldn't be the goal because there's a good chance that it would fail at that. That is the nature of all forms of collecting.

      It is often hard to predict what will succeed. If it's an interesting but rare device, then there are chances. If it's interesting but not so rare, then your only chances to make money are if there's demand because there's a common failure mode and hope that yours doesn't succumb to that failure. If it's just rare, then there's little chance unless you find a collector that wants to complete a series of that type of device for some odd reason.

    2. Re:Oldies by davemc168 · · Score: 1

      In another 30 years your machines will fail because you cant get an analogue TV to show them on, the frequencies will have be re-used and everything will be digital. There may well be a DRM busting convertor which it will be illegal to own though :(

    3. Re:Oldies by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tell me about it - I have one rubber key Spectrum, two Spectrum+ and a toast-rack 128K Spectrum. I had to repair the rubber keyed one and one of the Spectrum+ machines - both had bad 4116 (lower RAM) chips and bad keyboard membranes. By the way, you can buy brand new Spectrum keyboard membranes and rubber mats for a very reasonable price from http://www.rwapsoftware.co.uk/ . He's just had another run of them made.

      I still enjoy many of the Spectrum games. This month, by the way, is the 25th anniversary, and I bought a T-shirt for the occasion :-)
      http://www.alioth.net/tmp/25YrsOfSpectrum.jpg

      I'm such a geek...

    4. Re:Oldies by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 5, Informative

      In another 30 years, many of these oldies will have died (if they haven't already) due to a variety of reasons. Mostly plain mechanical parts (cheap plastic, foil keyboard switches, rubber rolls crumbling and so on). Also think of programmed parts (EPROMs, programmable microcontrollers included for a specific task etc) that go into an erased state after a long, but finite time (usually several decades).

      But if your machine still works after 30 years, plugging it into a monitor won't be the hard part. Last time I checked, even many of the latest LCD TV's have a variety of analog inputs. Why? Because analog inputs are often useful to hook up monitors to the widest possible variety of replay equipment. Even if many modern equipment is 'digitised', you're a fool to think that the option to display analog signals will disappear completely. Think of analog signals in general as a lower-level thing than most digital signals, meaning it's easier to do something with it, and easy to include in display equipment at near-zero added cost.
      With audio, things are even easier/simpler.

      For example this Sinclair ZX81 produces a TV UHF signal, but it's easy to pick up a plain composite video signal from its insides. Some soldering of wires might be required, but I expect you'll have a hard time finding a brandnew LCD TV that is not capable of producing an image with that.

      One thing I personally like about these early Sinclair machines, is that they're built simple enough to recreate them with plain discrete logic, and perhaps a few analog parts. No complex video circuitry, no audio, a well-understood CPU and so on. Enough for instance to program a FPGA to behave like a ZX81 (try Google if you're interested). Also makes these machines relatively easy to repair. For ZX81: if you got the time, tools and knowledge, you can repair/keep these machines running as long as you want. I myself own 2 of these, last time I checked both were still working. 25 years old by now, and I'm pretty sure I can have these in a working state longer than a PC bought new today.

    5. Re:Oldies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but is the piece of card still wedged between the ram pack and the back of the zx81 (to prevent rampack wobble and the inevitible reset) ???

    6. Re:Oldies by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1

      Cool shirt!

      BTW: The image on that screen behind you looks fimiliar... yup !!

    7. Re:Oldies by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 0

      If they did that shirt in blue or tan I would so buy one :)

      --
      I like muppets.
    8. Re:Oldies by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      No need to wait for that... my old Timex Sinclair 1000 is dead as a doornail... maybe I shouldn't have kept it in the attic for 20 years where the temperature can be as high as 120 in the summer and below freezing in the winter.

      Of course, my Atari 1200XL seemed to survive just fine... go figure!

      Thanks,

      Mike

    9. Re:Oldies by smchris · · Score: 1

      Me too (ZX81).

      I have about every mod I could find in books: hardwired a keyboard, metal keyboard case, power switch, power LED, reset button, even added a joystick port for a modified Commodore stick for the flight simulator. Hardwired in the 16K module so I could mount the bus out for expansion. Sound card, printer, and something called a "stringy floppy" -- a video tape micro-cassette drive that was about as fast as a Commodore 5-1/4" floppy. Love to show you a picture on my vanity DSL server .... but you know. Do wish now that I had kept the genuine ZX81 intact and used a Timex 1000.

      Had access to ZX magazine and it was great. A few of the programs were distinctly superior to what was sold on cassettes here. Still have a couple years of copies
      .

    10. Re:Oldies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find most lcd monitors won't render as low as tv rates (31.5 kHz interlaced?). I wish they would.

    11. Re:Oldies by loimprevisto · · Score: 1

      Even if many modern equipment is 'digitised', you're a fool to think that the option to display analog signals will disappear completely.
      Unless the option is legislated away, in an attempt to close 'the analog loophole'. I wouldn't put anything past the current members of the telecommunications subcommittee...
      --
      Much Madness is divinest Sense --
      To a discerning Eye --
      Much Sense -- the starkest Madness
    12. Re:Oldies by tsdw · · Score: 1

      I was 'supposed' to get a Timex Sinclair ZX80 (maybe 81) in 1982 for christmas - its what I asked for after seeing it on that show about hackers ..umm can't remember the name, however my step mother got me a Tandy CoCo II (16KB) instead.

      That computer was awesome, I wonder if I would be where I am today if I had gotten the Sinclair instead? .. membrane keyboard, limited basic, etc..

      Today I have 3 CoCo's due to some unfortunate newbie EBAY bidding :)

  8. There is a down side by edwardpickman · · Score: 4, Funny

    The problem with firing up the Cray 1 in my garage is the power it draws. It is fun to watch the power meter spin around and smoke though.

    1. Re:There is a down side by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Just run it in the winter, unless you live in the tropics :)

    2. Re:There is a down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      According to my textbook, a Cray 1 draws .15 MegaWatts (that may not even include the heat exchanger and cooling tower, or the IO processor and disk drive system). I'm not sure the power feed to a typical neighborhood block can support that, much less your power meter.

  9. Oh my God! ...s'full of post-its!!! by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Bruce might want to snatch up those 6,400 Post-it notes, stuck to the windows of the E2 building @ UCSC by a bunch of frats in an attempt to recreate the first level of Donkey Kong...would look great stuck up on the inside of that tech-retro barn!

  10. Crap.... by Cyno01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just checked e-bay. Apple IIgs and a complete set of acessories, SIGNED BY WOZ!... $41.:( Well, back to number munchers, hyperstudio and oregon trail. I still want a Cray-1 for a couch in my basement whenver i buy a house.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Crap.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I still want a Cray-1 for a couch in my basement whenver i buy a house."

      A couch? The outwardly-curved shape seems a little impractical.

      However, you could probably use it as the central heating system :-)

    2. Re:Crap.... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Apple IIgs and a complete set of acessories, SIGNED BY WOZ!... $41

      At the risk of stating the obvious, the first 10000 had Woz's sig silkscreened on them. They're not exactly rare (except maybe by eBay's standards for "rare", which say that something's "rare" if it wasn't on the shelf at the local Wal-Mart five minutes ago).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  11. Best for learning programming by iamacat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    An original IBM PC would be perfect for teaching someone advanced programming.

    • Interrupt handling - Check
    • Instruction timing-based optimization - Check
    • Drawing lines by directly altering video memory - Check
    • Disk and memory data structures - Check

      On a modern computer, everything is wrapped into so many of abstraction that you can not discover how it works. It will take someone 3 years of experience to create a device driver or a graphics library that can be understood in 3 weeks on an old PC.
    1. Re:Best for learning programming by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      You know, these new-fangled computers that we have can be started in 16-bit mode thereby acting just like an original IBM PC, but gigahertz faster. What you mean to say is that modern operating systems abstract everything for you. You can still boot these new computers into DOS if you wanted to and remove all of that abstraction. On the other hand, there's a good reason most people left DOS behind...

    2. Re:Best for learning programming by iamacat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These gigahertz are actually a problem when learning certain topics in programming. How can one explain the value of Bresenham's line algorithm when a for loop using floating point appears just as fast? There is a huge learning value in running into limitations of the hardware and either optimizing your code or redefining its goals to solve a simpler problem. Something Vista engineers need to learn to avoid making a dual core machine crawl.

    3. Re:Best for learning programming by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Probably best to go for even simpler than that - an old Sinclair Spectrum does all of the above, and it's small enough to be completely understandable in a short period of time. Plus Z80 assembly language is a bit nicer than 8088 (even though the ISA is related).

    4. Re:Best for learning programming by fabs64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      yes but these gigahertz cpu's also have gigabyte sized memory that you can chew through to see optimisation effects. The funny thing about complexity is it always scales

    5. Re:Best for learning programming by romiz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      To learn system programming, it is a bad deal compared to a microcontroller with an emulator, or even a refurbished GBA with a flash card:

      • Interrupt handling - Check
        With only 15 interrupts lines, cascaded into 2 8-lines banks, the IBM PC is quite limited, and you still have the trouble to handle the cascaded handlers.
      • Instruction timing-based optimization - Check
        But if the 8086 processor understands a subset of the complete assembly language from the current PC, the timings constraints are completely different: the cost of an instruction for a 8086 accessing directly the main memory completely changes as soon as you have cache, which is essential for modern computers. And with the mess that x86 assembly is, I'd prefer dabbling with ARM assembly instead.
      • Drawing lines by directly altering video memory - Check
        OK - but it is not alone on that segment.
      • Disk and memory data structures - Check
        Disk structures ? The cylinder/head/track abstraction that come with the floppy disks is compulsory on old IBM PCs. The LBA method is much more straightforward. No one should need to learn a complex, obsolete abstraction that doesn't even correspond to the reality anymore.
      • And in complement to that, it is impossible to debug from the outside. With embedded platforms, you can write the code with your PC, test it in an simulator, and then test it on the platform with an In-Circuit Emulator to check for bugs. You can't do that on an old IBM PC.
    6. Re:Best for learning programming by arivanov · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You missed one of the GP points: instruction timing based optimisation. You cannot teach that on a modern machine (most you can no longer turn off the cache) even if you boot it in 16 bit mode. The last machine to allow this and have a well published instruction set was 286. 386SX was still useable, but the stuff started getting muddled. 386DX (all but the earliest cacheless samples) - unusable for this.

      Similarly, from Pentium 3 onwards the APIC has changed drastically so the interrupt controller handling is no longer the same. Granted, you can run it in backwards compatible mode, but it is not the same.

      Similarly, IO on PCI devices is clearly nowhere near the original IO on x86. While there is some backward compatibility present, you have to go and do at least some bridge programming to get anywhere. That was not the case with any of the 8 and 16 bit IO on systems all the way up to the early 486-es. You could manipulate every device separately ignoring most bus issues.

      Overall, nowdays if you want to teach anything low level you have to go to a simpler architecture like one of the 32 bit MIPS architectures. x86 in its current form is too complex to be useable even for an advanced college level architecture and drivers class.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    7. Re:Best for learning programming by pipatron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or ditch all that Z80 and 8088 crap and get a Commodore 64 running a 6510 - with infinitely better graphics and sound as a bonus.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    8. Re:Best for learning programming by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      But clockcyle counting has ceases to be a sensible optimisation strategy a decade ago. From dsps to portable hardware, _everything_ uses caches , OOP or other stuff that suxxors it.

      its like whining that nobody in the aviation industrie learns how to paint a zeppelin or something.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    9. Re:Best for learning programming by TheMoog · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In the computer games industry it still pays to know your way around cycle counts, pipelines and caches. Just because your device has a cache, and you're coding mainly in an OO language, doesn't mean to say you've left the world of cycle-level optimisation behind. And particularly on Sony machine it's almost a requirement to fully understand the various hardware interactions in order to get a decent turn of speed out of it.

      As an industry we're now finding it very hard to employ people who know this kind of stuff. Most graduates are taught Java or C++ and have no decent experience at the assembler or hardware level. Now I'm not saying that we spend all day hand-crafting assembly code - games are just far too big nowadays - but every now and then you'll get an unusual crash which can only be debugged using knowledge of the hardware. In my experience CS graduates just freak out when you show them a disassembly of their code!

    10. Re:Best for learning programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    11. Re:Best for learning programming by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Given some of the theories about the demise of the Hindenburg, that's probably for the best.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    12. Re:Best for learning programming by wumpus188 · · Score: 1

      Maybe coz there's no value in Bresenham algorithm on the modern hardware? Just saying...

    13. Re:Best for learning programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or ditch all that Z80 and 8088 crap and get a Commodore 64 running a 6510 - with infinitely better graphics and sound as a bonus.


      Screw that.. 6809E (or even a Hitachi 6309) and OS9 bitches!

      Sorry. I couldn't contain myself.
    14. Re:Best for learning programming by arivanov · · Score: 1

      That is perfectly fine and you are correct as far as industry is concerned. We are talking about teaching students, not industry practices. It is sometimes essential to work out examples on a simple system so that people can understand the whole picture in more complex systems later on. Once upon a time a PC could double up as such a simple system for educational purposes. Now it cannot.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    15. Re:Best for learning programming by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      As an industry we're now finding it very hard to employ people who know this kind of stuff. Most graduates are taught Java or C++ and have no decent experience at the assembler or hardware level.

      On the other hand, in my experience electrical and computer engineers (i.e. hardware engineers) are getting this sort of low-level experience, albeit without the higher-level abstract programming science that a computer science major (i.e. software engineer) would receive. Thus, at least at my company, the hardware engineers will do that low-level programming work.

      In other words, there is a market for people who know how to do that sort of programming. Given that Slashdot seems mostly filled with software engineers, keep in mind that you could expand your marketability with low-level programming techniques, and fend off yet another group that's "moving in"* on your job space.

      * (Though I think the hardware engineers were there first, and technically you're just "moving in" on their turf. Either way, you're welcome to it; I'd rather be designing a piece of hardware than programming it.)

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    16. Re:Best for learning programming by Nigel+Stepp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is why I was glad to see a new CS class get of the ground at Carnegie Mellon a few years back. CS grads from CMU will have probably gone through a low-level programming course which involves a lot of work in assembly. When I took it, we used alpha assembly code, but the concepts transfer well, even to CISC.

      We had projects like, take this assembly and produce the C it came from (graded with diff), and the "bomb" which was an executable we had to trace through to figure out what number it wanted as an answer to a random int. If we guessed wrong it "exploded" (i.e. emailed the grader).

      Hire people from CMU. :)

      --
      4096R/EF7BAFA6 79E1 DF98 D09D 898F 9A11 F6F0 DDDC 23FA EF7B AFA6
    17. Re:Best for learning programming by Diabolus777 · · Score: 1

      Surely there are emulators for these old architectures.
      I'm graduating this summer in Soft Eng. and people cringe whenever i mention I'd like to have advanced assembly as a choice for optional classes. Working in an emulator would be very instructive I would think.

      I'm going to look for some right now. . .any links?

      --
      We should have been
      So much more by now
      Too dead inside
      To even know the guilt
    18. Re:Best for learning programming by mackyrae · · Score: 1

      They teach reverse engineering? Neat! At GWU, we're required to take Computer Architectures 1. 2 is an elective, but that's where you get into ASM. I intend to take it.

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    19. Re:Best for learning programming by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      google: qemu

      --
      moo
    20. Re:Best for learning programming by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      moslo? DOSBox with the cycles turned down to 500?

    21. Re:Best for learning programming by professorfalcon · · Score: 1

      Cooperative multitasking - priceless

    22. Re:Best for learning programming by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Drawing lines by directly altering video memory - Check

      Okay, but make it at least an EGA adapter. It would be cruel to force students to have to deal with CGA's 2-bit color palettes in graphics mode, 'snow' artifacts from reading and writing single-ported video memory simultaneously, and bizarre interlaced VRAM layout.

    23. Re:Best for learning programming by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Oh well, there is no snow in graphics modes and avoiding it in 80x25 mode is a good exercise in understanding hardware and instruction timing. As I recall, you need to use xchg instead of mov to write a character+attribute during horizontal retrace to avoid a pipeline stall at inconvenient time. EGA on the other hand is even more confusing in native graphics modes. The effect of memory reads and writes depend on the state of bit plane registers and, in one mode, has nothing to do with data being actually written! VGA was the only PC adapter with a straightforward memory mapping in its 320x200x8 mode. It could be made a bit higher resolution on some monitors, at the cost of sacrificing said memory mapping.

      But I still say it's a better learning platform than trying to program 2D acceleration features of one of a today's graphics cards, without really understanding what they do to VRAM.

    24. Re:Best for learning programming by Prof+Kayyos · · Score: 1

      Excellent comment! Having spent 20 years in the prog business I always look back to the days of Turbo Basic, Pascal, Assembler, and Prolog on my trusty Compaq suitcase as the good old days of programming. Armed with a copy of a few different Peter Norton books as well as a Comp Sci degree in pc's made my job something to look forward to getting to everyday. Today, ????? Well, I'm 53 and retired. The newer client-server models and the amount of abstraction in every modern language just serve to confuse and frustrate. It's just no fun anymore is it? Again - thanks for your great comment...

    25. Re:Best for learning programming by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Oh well, having spent 20 years in programming business, starting from copied PDP-11s and 8086s in Soviet Russia, I am now 33 and nowhere close to retirement. I am currently trying to fight the pull of slashdot to write some yucky J2EE code :-)

  12. Old DEC gear by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...used to sum up my job. We used to get spare PDP/11 parts from people like the those in the article. The DEC maintenance guys at the time told me about a factory they knew about which relied absolutely on a PDP/8. Service calls there were a challenge, to say the least.

    Towards the end of my stint at Vic Roads the foam padding stuck to the top of the slide out boxes on the 11/84's had turned to dust and collected around the base of all the mux cards where they go into the backplane. Swap out a card and spend the next couple of hours vacuming out the backplane to get it working again. Installing a SCSI card was a challenge. You slide out the CPU box and get yourself organised by lying flat on your back underneath it. Like taking the transmission out of a car. The you identify the wire wrap cable for the slot which is going to take the card and repatch the appropriate interrupt line. On some of them you were lucky, there would be little shorting patches which you could pull off, like on the back of an IDE disk. Don't muck up the backplane in the process because people need traffic lights, you know.

    I've got an ohio scientific superboard 2 in my spare parts cabinet. As long as I can still find a TV which listens to an RF modulator I am free to run up the micro assembler and hack away. My son is 5 now. In 7 years he will be the same age as me when my dad built that machine up.

    1. Re:Old DEC gear by Dadoo · · Score: 1

      I've got an ohio scientific superboard 2 in my spare parts cabinet. I've got a C4P, myself, but it's just the cassette version. It still works, but it takes a couple of hours to "warm up", for some reason. I'd love to get a hold of the floppy version of the C4P, or better yet, a C2-OEM - the one with the 8" floppies. :-)
      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    2. Re:Old DEC gear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old DEC gear never dies!
      I have a KS10 (PDP-10) in running condition. I turn it on every few months and run it through diagnostics to make sure it stays alive. If I ever find a massbus disk drive, it's going on the internet...

    3. Re:Old DEC gear by fabs64 · · Score: 1

      Ha, great comment, and of COURSE it had to be VicRoads ;-)

    4. Re:Old DEC gear by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Do I know you?

    5. Re:Old DEC gear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Reminds me of the time I was working on a major defence radar site. The main array was steered by an ancient 6800 microprocessor based system built around a backplane. A couple of hours before the airforce was due to do an exercise I made the mistake of pulling a card out of the backplane (we were reverse engineering it to modify the software, whose source had been lost in antiquity). It turned out the backplane had hairline cracks all though it due to the flexing caused by plugging and unplugging cards over the years. When I put the card back in the system failed to boot.

      I was frantic as the radar was absolutely cactus. This microprocessor routed *every* signal to and from the main antenna array and a front line early warning radar system spanning a continent was dead in the water. I ended up fixing it by simply inserting and removing the card lots of times. With minutes to go, I fluked it that the system booted (meaning the hairline cracks were closed). I then *very carefully* put the front panel on and walked away from it. A few minutes later the airforce people walked in and started their exercise. As far as I know the system is still in that state.

      The joys of ancient backplanes.

    6. Re:Old DEC gear by fabs64 · · Score: 1

      I very much doubt it, my judgement of the state of vic roads is based purely on a "user" perspective ;-)

    7. Re:Old DEC gear by femto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to work with someone who previously worked in AWA, the manufacturer of such traffic light controllers. He was in the group that designed traffic light controllers. Eventually they modernised these controllers. How? By building an integrated circuit version of the PDP and running the unmodified software on it!

    8. Re:Old DEC gear by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      By building an integrated circuit version of the PDP and running the unmodified software on it!

      Sounds like a card we were plugging into DOS boxes in the 1990's to replace a PDP/11. The application in our case was SCATS, which does all the coordination between the signal controllers.

  13. Old Computer Worth More For Software. by chromozone · · Score: 1

    My Gateway 500S that cost $1250 in 2002 won't even bring $100 on ebay. I haven't tried to sell mine but I watched a lot of others try and fail. I think after 3 or 4 years the computer is only worth about what the software might cost new. Speaking of which, I was reading that XP won't be sold next year and maybe that will boost the price of some of the old machines since people might want XP again. I can't speak for all of Gateway's computers but the 500S was a stud (and Consumer Reports best buy) and mine still works great. I might pick up a couple more since they cost about what a copy of XP home would cost new anyway. I still don't even have to activate with Microsoft when I reinstall my XP from the 2002 Gateway so I was wondering if its easy to transfer OS to new machine. Old versions of XP might be nice to have.

    1. Re:Old Computer Worth More For Software. by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      I don't think your computer is even in the same category as what the article is about. You're talking about a perfectly useable machine that I would be glad to find in a dumpster (as a matter of fact, I already found better computers in the dumpster)

      These people are talking PDP machines, Crays, and more in the home segment Commodore 64, Apple Lisa, Sinclair QL, Sinclair ZX, etc... Perhaps even stuff like the SparcClasic or an Octane. Perhaps the original XT is of insterest to them or even an MCA PS/2....

      I used to have a few old computers (namely a SparcClassic, a Sinclair QL and an IBM PS/2 Model 50). I all gave them away to a teacher that wanted to start a computer museum. Why? Because, they take place in my basement.... I would have loved to use them, but I'm married and have other priorities.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    2. Re:Old Computer Worth More For Software. by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Oh, and about the software. That XP that came with your Gateway is an OEM version tied to your machine. Even if you manage to transfer it to another machine, you are pirating it. OEM XP is pretty much worth nothing.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    3. Re:Old Computer Worth More For Software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have loved to use them, but I'm married and have other priorities.

      Your marriage replaced your hobby? That's sad.

    4. Re:Old Computer Worth More For Software. by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      I think you don't really understand what family is about...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    5. Re:Old Computer Worth More For Software. by chromozone · · Score: 1

      It's $89 at Newegg (OEM version)

    6. Re:Old Computer Worth More For Software. by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      The OEM version you buy at newegg is not equivalent to the OEM version that comes with your Dell/Toshiba/Gateway. Those OEM versions are tied to the hardware they are sold with. This means that you cannot transfer your Windows XP that came with your Gateway to the new machine (sans OS) that you just built.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  14. Re:ATTN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I realize it's utterly pointless to respond to an automated bot, but aren't Xcode and IB NeXT inventions?

  15. Old Machines by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

    However impractical they may become there is just something cool about old machines. I remember when the cool old things of today were the dorky new things we complained about. But now that they're old they seem really classic and cool somehow...

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
    1. Re:Old Machines by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I still miss my Commodore SuperPET. I saw one when they first came out, and had to have one, as it was the only machine I'd ever seen that could run APL using the actual APL character set. It also had 1MB floppies (back when the PC had just switched from 160 to 180K). It was also the first dual-processor machine I ever saw (had both a 6800 and a 6809, I believe).

      Twenty or so years later, I picked one up for $50. Hauled it home, fumbled with the not-quite-GPIB cables, finally got everything hooked up, and booted it up. Played with APL for a couple of nights, sketched out some code for a shared-memory multiprocessing scheme (6809 could pass tasks off to the 6800, communicating via a bank-switched block of memory). But then I got tired of all the limitations. While it had impressive performance for a machine of its day (its disk I/O was at least twice as fast as my 200MHz PPro's floppy), its day was long past, and when you got right down to it, I just wasn't that nostalgic for a machine with a firmware monitor. I was when I was debugging VB code, but not when I actually had a spare minute to go play. So I finally sold it when it was time to move (got my $50 back!), but I still wish I had kept it. Now, if I could find an original TRS-80 (my first computer), I'd definitely pick that up...

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
  16. Use them around the house. by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    I was running my webserver on an IBM thinkpad, P90 with 32Megs and 1gig harddrive but I just found an old rack mount server which is an old Pentium 133 with the F00F bug, it has 32Meg and a 4 gig drive. It's used to feed static web pages and as a picture and file server. It's a generic rack mount of some sort. Eventually it will get gutted and made into a more modern media server with a terabyte of storage. Unless someone offers me 10k.

    The Thinkpad may be left unmolested though I'm considering making it a digital picture frame.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    1. Re:Use them around the house. by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, that all fun... I do the same thing, but this is not the category of machines that these people collect. Wintel machines aren't even in the picture. Sure, I had a P-166/256Meg RAM functioning 24/7 as a home server. I decomissioned it when motherboard/cpu combos became so cheap that I could replace it with modern components for pretty much no money. Today my home server is an AMD64 2800+/512Meg RAM. It also doubles as a space heater ;-)

      Today, I wouldn't even spend money on such a machine because I started to find very capable computers in dumpsters. P-III 1GHz become very common (my parents server is a P-III 800MHz, which was my old desktop). The occasional Athlon and P-IV can be found too. x86 machines are so ubiquitous that they are not worth collection in any way. If you still have one, it is either your primary computer or you have a small home server.

      The newest computer in my household is a laptop: barely 3 months old and bought before the release of Windows Vista. Why? Because it was on sale ;-) My wifes desktop is from late 2003 and mine from early 2003 (though I invested in a workstation class machine, not a consumer-end machine) Neither machine is even planned for retirement. I maxed both out on RAM and they shug along just nicely for all our tasks. Mine runs Debian, my wifes machines runs Windows XP Pro.

      I know as a matter of fact that Windows XP Pro runs fine on a P-III 600MHz/512Meg RAM for mundane tasks. That's what my mother in law uses and that is what my last laptop was.

      My baseline for "old" in the x86 world is a P-II class machine. Not that they are not capable of doing any worthwhile work, but because there are faster machines available for 0€. Those machines and below are only worth to be deposited in a dumpster. Now, non-x86 machines... Those are pretty much all collectible ;-)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  17. Collecting... by ms1234 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, a co-worker of mine keeps a "museum" of old hardware, that is, he likes to collect crap and keep it around instead of throwing it away :)

  18. Canadian Alliance, pwned! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are going to sell your old computers make sure you erase the hard drive first. Don't be like this clueless former Canadian Alliance party member who sold an old Powerbook that still contained party membership lists and other confidential info.

  19. Demo scene by cerberusss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These oldies are regularly used in the demo scene. A colleague of mine regularly visits demo parties where up to 250 geeks gather to show each other their demos. He owns a souped-up atari with a custom board driven by a custom-made FPGA containing 2 Gb memory.

    Although reportedly, even in the demo scene there is an on-going shift to PC hardware. The Amiga and Atari lovers are getting smaller.

    On another note, he told me that when his group returned from a recent demo party by car, they noticed the little mileage markers (marking every 100 meter on European highways). They drove and counted 133.5, 133.6, and then saw that 133.7 was gone :-)

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:Demo scene by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Starting to use PCs? There has been 4 and 64K demo scenes for x86 for the longest while (at least mid 90s if not earlier).

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Demo scene by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's why I didn't say 'starting to use', but 'ongoing move'.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    3. Re:Demo scene by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 1

      Yep, I'm just back from breakpoint in bingen (close to frankfurt) germany (swede myself) last easter.

      There was one demo for atari vcs, two for zx spectrum, one for atari xl/xe, one for the msx, one for ti-83 but also newer consoles as nintendo ds, gameboy advance, xbox 360 and psp etc... And in amiga there were 8 demos and 8 intros (6 64kb and 2 4k limits) and in the c64 there were 6 demos... check them out at http://www.pouet.net/party.php?which=450&when=2007

      But of course there are also pc competitions, and the one that stood out was debris

      Demoparties are mainly a european happening, even tho there are visitors from all over the world. Especially to breakpoint and assembly.

      The demoscene is a place for hobbyists that compete in different skills of using a computer, may it be coding, music, graphics or the combined (demo/wild etc). We do it all for the fun and the friendship. Please join us if it feels like your thing.

    4. Re:Demo scene by Animaether · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed, the PC (IBM AT compatible blabla) demo scene has been *extremely* active for as long as there have been PCs. Check www.scene.org for details/demos.

      However... there's no longer such a thing as 'The PC Demo Scene'; even those who claim there is are realizing it is rapidly degenerating. The reason for this is the extensive hardware acceleration of any type found in PCs these days. It used to be a challenge to stick a procedurally generated 3D scene with an 8-track MOD in a small exe and have it run fluidly on a 386 with a basic VGA card and a SoundBlaster. Nowadays one just takes the regular 3D scene along with an MP3 and feed it to the graphics card and through a simple decoder straight to audio.

      From the Gravis UltraSound to the S3, every hardware development was greedily taken advantage of by showing new things that could be done on that hardware... but they've reached a saturation point several years back. If you want to pump the best results out of a graphics card now, you're not doing so in a demo.. you're doing so for profit on a major game engine.

      What is left, then, is a limited form of a PC Demo Scene.. demos under 4k, 16k, 32k and 64k (existed before, but these are still challenging now even with all the hardware).. demos that must run on older hardware.. self-imposed restrictions like "no using pixel shaders", etc. But these are all highly artificial limits and no longer push the boundaries of what one can do on the hardware as is... it's pushing the boundaries of what one can do within those artificial limits.

      To some that is the same spirit, to others it's nothing alike at all.

      =====

      To see what people are doing with PC demos nowadays, Farbrausch's debris is a nice one to check out. You don't need the hardware to run it, there's videos made of the things.
          http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=30244

    5. Re:Demo scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Amiga and Atari lovers are getting smaller. Indeed, I'm less than a metre tall by now!

      (Sorry, sorry, shouldn't pick on non-native english speakers. It was just a really funny image - Amiga sceners getting smaller and squeakier, waving their hands frantically, as their once-dominant position in the demo scene erodes).

    6. Re:Demo scene by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      *laughs* Good catch.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    7. Re:Demo scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gimli, is that you?? :)

  20. Re:ATTN by jumper7 · · Score: 1

    Interface Builder is practically the same applikation in Tiger as in NeXTSTEP. Xcode however was not introduced until Apple released Panther. Project Builder on the other hand would be considered as a NeXT invention

  21. Tell me about it... by Alioth · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have:

    four Sinclair Spectrums (rubber key 48K, two Spectrum+, and a toast rack Spectrum 128)
    a MicroVAX
    a Sun Ultra 5 (used as a server)

    Out of all of them, the Sinclair machines are the most fun.

    A little song that sums up why the Speccy was (and still is!) so much fun:
    http://www2.b3ta.com/heyhey16k/heyhey16k.swf (warning, flash)

    1. Re:Tell me about it... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that one!

      Absolutely lovely and sooooo true.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    2. Re:Tell me about it... by sa1lnr · · Score: 1

      I remember when I bought my first Spectrum 48k.

      When I brought it home the wife said "Why can't you buy something all the family can use". Within three days I couldn't get near the damn thing.

    3. Re:Tell me about it... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      About a month ago, I bought a Sun Ultra 10 on eBay. An 8 year old 64-bit computer puts out a good deal of heat.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:Tell me about it... by yppiz · · Score: 1

      Oh boy, here we go.

      The rarest machine in my collection is an Apple ///+ - this was the model that supposedly addressed the overheating problems of the ///. I picked it up for free from a Berkeley yard sale in the late 90s.

      My other odd machine is an IBM PowerPC laptop, from the brief period in the mid-90s where Apple and IBM and I think Motorola were making CHRP (common hardware reference platform) machines. The laptop runs AIX, but I believe there was also a version of Windows NT for PowerPC for it.

      Other machines:

      TI 99 4/A, Atari 800, TRS-80 Model I, TRS-80 Color Computer, Timex Sinclair 1000
      Apple ][, Powerbook 170, iBook clamshell, B/W G3, Apple Newton Messagepad 2000 and 2100
      NeXTCube, NeXTStation

      At one point I had a Symbolics Lispstation 3400? (the first dorm-fridge one that came after the massive 3600) and an ARS-33 teletype, but neither made the move out to the west coast.

  22. n00b: Me too! Me too! *waves hands* by rts008 · · Score: 3, Funny

    2 ea 8086's, 4 ea 8088's, 1 ea 386, 3 ea 486's ( one is even a DX!!!!), 1 ea cyrix 5x86 133, 2 ea p75's, 3 ea p133's, 2 ea p166's, 2 ea pII 266's, and the MASTER: 1 ea pIII slot 1 500....all rolled into one.

    I have Caldera OpenLinux Base 1.1 installed on all, with Sun's Distributed Computing software, and I STILL can't get WoW or City of Heroes to run....guess I need to go RTFM AGAIN!!!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  23. They're not worth the space they take up by Kris_J · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I used to collect this stuff. Well, not Crays, but retro computer hardware. Fun as it is to buy for $5 a Sun Sparc server that would have cost more than $10,000, there's a reason why this stuff is being chucked out. It's a waste of space. And if you plug it in and turn it on, it's also a waste of power.

    Now, if people have enough space to start their own personal museum, I'm not going to tell them not to. But if you're an ordinary person with an ordinary house, you're better off putting them on the verge for the next council bulk rubbish collection.

    1. Re:They're not worth the space they take up by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a waste of space. And if you plug it in and turn it on, it's also a waste of power.

      Well, for certain limited purposes they can be useful. I've got a Mac SE/30 running as my vanity page webserver. What exactly are the odds of somebody writing an automatic exploit for an obscure httpd running on a (relatively) obscure OS on an obscure hardware platform? The only way someone's going to break into that thing is with a custom exploit, and there's no point in spending that kind of effort.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    2. Re:They're not worth the space they take up by turbobrat · · Score: 1

      Well i picked up a dozen Mac Plus from a dumpster and made a wall of macs.

      I just tell everybody it's modern art :-)

      Or is that vintage art?

    3. Re:They're not worth the space they take up by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Someone with a large collection shouldn't running all of them, but except maybe against current notebook systems, the older computers don't necessarily consume that much power. Many of them didn't even have fans, nor did they need them. Someone playing a game on some Apple II is going to be using a lot less power than a person with a desktop computer playing a current 3D game. If it makes you happy, then the Apple II is probably a lot higher on the entertainment per watt bracket.

      A Cray 1 would be an entirely different story, not worth the power consumption to run, but still good for grins.

  24. Obsolyte! by tekrat · · Score: 4, Informative

    As a collector of some of this old hardware (See my website, http://www.obsolyte.com/ ), I can tell you that for every "gem" you find, you also aquire about 2.5 tons of useless crap. It's very difficult to figure what machines will become the iconic collectables, and which ones will just be considered trash.

    The Apple Lisa is highly prized (although at one point, Apple was filling landfills with 'em and Sun Remarketing was selling what remained for $200 a pop), but the Mac 512k is pretty much ignored (although the original 128k Mac is valuable).

    I have no idea what my old NeXT-Station is worth, but, it'll never be worth what the original Cube is. I have a pretty decent collection of SGI gear, but, does anyone care about SGI at this point? If you look on ebay, people can't even give that stuff away.

    And while the Amiga may be the greatest computer ever made, you'd have trouble these days selling your A2000, no matter how tricked out it is (free Video toaster!). The Amiga collector market is saturated, anybody that wants an Amiga probably already has more than 2.

    And you'll still find the venerable C=64 and Apple // at garage sales across the country, although, very likely missing key components.

    Of course, should you have an original Altair in your basement, that's another story entirely.

    TTYL
    Brian Cirulnick

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Obsolyte! by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      if only that were the case here in AU with apple II's, c64's can still be found pretty darn easy, but I've been looking for an apple II here for a while and they seem damn near impossible, probably because not that many were sold here to start with I think.

    2. Re:Obsolyte! by 87C751 · · Score: 1

      Of course, should you have an original Altair in your basement, that's another story entirely.
      Altairs suck. I have an IMSAI.
      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    3. Re:Obsolyte! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And while the Amiga may be the greatest computer ever made, you'd have trouble these days selling your A2000, no matter how tricked out it is (free Video toaster!).

      You're joking, right? While I don't follow A2000s, an A3000 with Video Toaster Flyer just sold for $600 on ebay last week. That's quite a bit.

    4. Re:Obsolyte! by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      IMSAI supported USB? Wow, they really were ahead of their time. If I plug it into my Mac will it "just work"?

    5. Re:Obsolyte! by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      re: the NeXTstation - depending on what model, about 300 dollars

      http://blackholeinc.com/

      The cube is worth more certainly, but it's getting harder to find one not scuffed up (that paint was terrible). I've only come across them in Colorado (where BlackHole Inc is located) and here in the SF Bay Area where plenty of techies have gotten their hands on one since they were built here. Last cube I saw was from someone who used to work in the factory. The monitors are a pain since early ones got dimmer over time because of the oxide used.

  25. 1. Old Computers by eonlabs · · Score: 1

    2. Fun
    3. ...
    4. Profit!!!

    --
    I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
  26. no need.. by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

    Just come back for it like John Titor did for his IBM 5100 computer.

    --
    waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
  27. Comment Analysis by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1, Informative

    Comment analysis:

    [x] Promotes Linux
    [x] Bashes Microsoft and/or Vista
    [ ] Bashes the MAFIAA
    [ ] Mentions Apple
    [ ] Defends individual rights and liberties
    [x] Calls the American public dumb
    [x] Pines for the good old days

    Hmm... Good, but definitely could be better.

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    1. Re:Comment Analysis by nevermore94 · · Score: 1

      Better update that. The Apple Lisa was mentioned several times ;-)

      --
      Nevermore.
  28. I Haven't Got The Patience by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    I'm not in the same league with the guys that collect the old Crays and DEC PDP11s but I went through a phase about 4 years ago of collecting both Sinclair ZX Spectrums and Commodore Amigas from eBay, both machines that I owned during my younger years - I even got given an Acorn Archimedes and a RISC PC by people who heard I was into old computers.

    For a while it's great fun sorting through boxes of Spectrum tape software and Amiga disks and reliving some good gaming memories - but when you get to 25 "TAPE LOADING ERRORS" in a day, in can get a bit wearing.

    Suffice it to say, about 2 years later I sold it all back on eBay for about the same money I paid for it. I still love the old games on those machines, as well as the C64, but these days it's far easier to play them in a PC emulator.

    I admire the guys who collect as a hobby but I couldn't find enough hours in the day to do it.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:I Haven't Got The Patience by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't have the time anymore. It's hard work being a full time employee for the man and raising a family and commuting an hour to and then from work because the man doesn't pay enough to live close to work (yet he pays himself enough to live in the most expensive suburb, another rant entirely).

      I used to collect Commodore and Nintendo stuff. I have a pretty good collection of Nintendo hardware; NES, SNES, N64, a handful of games, extra controllers, light guns, the works. I even have the beginnings of a Sega collection. It's all operational as well after a lot of cleaning and TLC. It takes a lot of time to resurrect the older hardware and make it functional. If you don't have the tech skills to replace fried components or even repair damaged PCBs and connectors its really not worth doing. You often buy two or three dud machines to turn them into one functional one.

      There's no point having a machine if you don't have a decent collection of software to run on it. Sure, you can often download the software illegally but for cart-based systems then you need to find a working cart emulator, assuming one existed for your platform and you still can't play anything with SuperFX-type addons on cart emulators.

      Collecting the retro stuff is also time consuming. You have to be on the lookout everywhere. Ebay is good, but there's a lot of crap on there that people are trying to flog off for more than it's worth. I see a lot of stuff that says "condition unknown" then with a min bid of $50. That could mean it's totally fried but you have to decide whether to take that gamble. There's always stuff advertised in the local trading rag and the local news, as well as other websites and swap meets that come and go. If you don't keep abrest (all you nerds tremble before the breast) of current prices you're lialbe to get royally screwed.

      I sorely miss being able to play some of the games that I played as I was growing up, but I remember back to when I used to play. We'd sit up all night hammering away at the game. That was the only way. When you're on a limited time budget (as you are when you're working for the man and have other commitments) you can't do that anywhere near as often as you'd like.

      Good luck to those who want to get into the collection hobby. It's fun and rewarding. If you just want to hoarde junk stay for the sake of being able to say "i have that" without ever actually doing anything with it then you should probably find another hobby; there are some of us who like to restore hardware and it's difficult to do unless you can get enough bits. If they're getting snapped up by hoarders then it takes the fun away for a lot of us.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    2. Re:I Haven't Got The Patience by phrasebook · · Score: 1

      So, how many hours of television do you get in each week?

    3. Re:I Haven't Got The Patience by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      Television? What's that?

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
  29. Doesn't work for me by owlstead · · Score: 1

    I've got stacks upon stacks of grey boxes, but somehow I cannot sell them for the world.

    1. Re:Doesn't work for me by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      They aren't PS3's, are they?

  30. "Custom" Spectrum by lbbros · · Score: 1

    Among the computer antics I own (not many actually) there's a "custom" ZX Spectrum +. Why custom? Because my father was fed up of me and my brothers hogging the TV with that thing, so he bought a 10" monitor. Of course it couldn't be attached directly, so he got an I/O interface and by soldering cables directly on the mainboard(!) he got the video signal in a cable that he connected into the I/O interface. As well he did the same for the mic in and ear in inputs. The I/O interface had a DIN-like connector that was compatible with the monitor, but the signal was poor, so he added a power supply to the I/O to reduce the signal decay.

    This thing worked perfectly until I stopped using the Spectrum in 1988.

    --
    A CC-licensed illustrated horror novel
  31. wrong by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

    A custom built PC or a Dell is simply out of the question

    Wrong

    Well, not about the custom PC, but very much so in the case of the Dell.

    You know what makes something interesting/valuable to collectors? Rarity. If millions of people chuck their Dells, but you keep yours, especially if you keep a set that shows the incremental development of the desktop PC over a few years, then that's a collectable.

    A lot of people let old hardware slip through their fingers without wondering whether it might be significant. We are alive at the birth of the information age. And just as people happily threw away comic books for decades (Hugo Gernsback's back catalogue ended up being used as ballast in trans atlantic shipping, can you beleive that!), we're chucking out 'useless' hardware now.

    God I wish I still had my 3DFX Voodoo 1.

    1. Re:wrong by rbanffy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It must be rare _and_ interesting.

      A dull Dell box (pun intended) is not interesting unless it has a unique form factor.

      That 21 inch screen notebook monstruosity is such thing. Buy it and keep it functioning for the next 30 years and you will have something. There was also a Compaq desktop with a built-in LCD. I have a Monorail PC that still boots - it had it's HD and CD-ROM changed because they no longer worked. There is also a Sony Vaio whose keyboard folds up to cover half the screen as it becomes a stereo. There were a couple Compaq models with integrated monitors that were interestingly iMac-like.

      Those are interesting PCs. No grey box, no matter how rare it is, will ever become interesting.

      Anyway, most interesting computers are not PCs. A Sparcstation 1 is interesting as is a Voyager. Just about every SGI box is somewhat unique. If you are shopping today, buy a Tezro. If you want a Sun, buy a desktop SPARC (the amd64s are just PCs). IBM RS/6000s are a bit on the PC side, but are OK. Apples are very diverse and an interesting piece of study. The "flex-chassis" series is very interesting because of the modular mobos. The tower G3 is interesting because every time you open it, it draws blood from your hand. An IBM 3290 terminal is unique as it had a red plasma screen. An NCD 16 X terminal is interesting because of the square CRT. Any Lisp Machine is worth having. The Convergent non-PC x86 machines are very interesting as is their OS.

      Rarity is for newcomers that don't really get it. It is a tool for those who can't see the other forms of value and for those who do to get rid of rare and dull hardware.

    2. Re:wrong by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

      The tower G3 is interesting because every time you open it, it draws blood from your hand.

      I beleive that's the 8500 you're thinking of.

    3. Re:wrong by sootman · · Score: 1

      There was also a Compaq desktop with a built-in LCD.

      The Presario 3020 and 3060. The 3020 was a P166, the 3060 was a P200. Both had 12.1" LCDs, 800x600; 4-disc 6x CD-ROM changers, 4 or 6 GB HDs, 24 MB RAM, 28.8 or 33.6 modems. (Came with fax software, and you could run a virtual 1024x768 desktop that would slide around as you got the mouse close to the edge. Oh yeah, and really good JBL speakers built-in, and a mic, which worked great with some old PC-phone software I had--GREAT sound quality.) All this in mid-1996, two solid years before the original iMac in late 1998, which came with a 233 MHz CPU, 32 MB RAM, and a 13.7" CRT.

      The problem was, laptops at the time were expensive ($3,000-$5,000) and this thing--with a nice expensive laptop screen, back before you could even really buy an LCD screen if you wanted one--retailed at over $3,000, back when you could buy a conventional computer and 15" CRT for less than $2,000. (A few months later was when the first sub-$1,000 PCs came out.)

      I always liked them--we had one at work--and I bought one, used, for a few hundred bucks a few years later. The funny thing is, that thing was staggeringly reliable, with Win950a, Office 97, and MSIE 5.5. (And Winamp, and Napster. :-) ) I finally wrote a bootlogger that basically did 'date >> boot.txt' at each boot and confirmed my suspicions--this thing ROUTINELY clocked a MINIMUM of 30 days uptimes, and that waw my wife's day-to-day, do everything machine.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  32. Profit, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can guarantee you that maintenance of such machines over 30 years has cost more than $10,000. If for no other reason than the real estate that they occupy. It is Silicon Valley after all. Rent out that room or shed you keep those heaps of junk in and you'll have $10,000 in 2 years rather than 30.

    Think of it this way. If I told you that I wanted you to keep your current computer and all related peripherals for the next *30 years*, in working order, how much would I have to pay you to do that? I bet you'd ask for a lot more than $10k.

    Same goes for any "collector's" item. People are amazed that a #1 issue of a golden age comic book will get $5,000 and up, and talk about it like it's an extraordinary profit for the seller. Ok, here's $5,000 -- now keep this piece of paper in pristine condition and obsess over it for the next 30 years. Sound like something you'd want to take up?

    Yes, the prices are high but that doesn't imply profit by any human measure of economy.

    1. Re:Profit, really? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      "I can guarantee you that maintenance of such machines over 30 years has cost more than $10,000. If for no other reason than the real estate that they occupy"

      Yeah, but people don't run their homes like businesses. They don't maximize the profitability of every square inch. If you didn't have an old computer there, you would be spending $10,000 to house a lamp, a box of old papers, or absolutely nothing. It's a sunk cost.

      Unless you keep the machine running 24/7, then you have to factor in the electricity. Same with a lamp, though. But I doubt that people keep old machines running all the time.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  33. Re:Oldies OOOooooh that brings me back!!!!!!!!! by 1mck · · Score: 1

    I had the Timex Sinclair Z80 with the 16K Ram Pack, and I still remember spending hours typing in the code for "Dragon Fight" from Compute magazine. Of course, it was mainly the frustration of accidentally touching the Ram Pack, and having the computer reset, and the lengths I went to so that I wouldn't hit it!lol I used a toothpaste box, and tape to protect it from being bumped...which was a lot and darn it if it didn't work! I also had to raise the computer up on a "Hardy Boys" book as well to prevent it resetting. Man, when I finally finished the program....I was actually disappointed because it made it out to be like it was going to be the shit...nope, but it was fun finally getting it together!lol Thanks for bringing me back, man!

  34. I found an IBM 5150 by Traf-O-Data-Hater · · Score: 1

    ...being thrown out on a council rubbish collection. It was the original version, with cassette interface and heavy keyboard. I later acquired a CGA colour display at a fleamarket, and collected a bunch of old PC-bus cards. By the way this was in 1996 or 1997, so even back then I realised it would be worth something someday. I've never even attempted to plug it in. What I did was wrap it carefully in plastic and seal it up so it was airtight, then packed it away. It's still waiting for me to take a look at it, however that may be in many years from now as I have too many other projects.

  35. Grrrr .. by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, tell everyone and make it harder for the 'non profit' collector.

    Bastards.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  36. Re:hey linux fags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates'?

    Oh, sorry, that'd be you windoze fags.

  37. Sun Sparc pizzaboxes are still quite useful by wizman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a thing for Sun Sparc 20's -- they are VERY upgradeable and extremely reliable. Two of mine have quad 150mhz Ross processors making them snappy ehough to serve out some Apache/PHP/MySQL, host a little e-mail for a few domains, and do some secondary DNS. They're small, don't use a TON of power, and just plain cool.

    Oh, and they'll run Linux or a few of the BSD's just fine..

    Here is the uptime of one of my production Sparc 20's hosting a bit of email and DNS:

    [matt@darkside]$ uptime
      9:43AM up 953 days, 16:03, 1 user, load averages: 0.11, 0.11, 0.08

    It would be well over 1,000 if a UPS hadn't needed replaced 953 days ago.

  38. run Linux for a greener earth by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    I have ipcop running on a pentium 133 laptop as my gateway/firewall. The battery holds enough charge to stay up for a few minutes when the power flickers. With the display built right in I don't need a monitor sitting there. I can turn off the display when I don't need it. I leave it on 24/7. It consumes about 13 watts of power at idle (via Killawatt*). It's a little pokey on the web pages, but uses very little CPU otherwise.

    I was using a P266 laptop behind the 133 for a while and stripped down a knoppix install to run:
    - httpd
    - sshd
    - samba
    - openvpn
    - fetchmail
    - dovecot
    - spamassassin

    I adjusted most of the config files to lighten the load on the 256M of ram, but as I added more services it was just too much for it and stuff was getting sniped by OOM killer; nice experiment for a couple years though. Linux is adjustable for old crappy hardware which cant be said for windows (or apple for that matter).

    [*] - http://www.smarthome.com/9034.html

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    1. Re:run Linux for a greener earth by TClevenger · · Score: 1

      Just so you know, in case you want to upgrade later, a Pentium M 1.2GHz with the lid closed draws about 15-16 watts at idle according to the Kill a Watt. I got a Latitude C610 with a broken screen for a song from eBay (with two batteries!), put in a 60GB 5400 RPM drive, attached a monitor long enough to configure CentOS, and now have a rock-solid, quiet and very low-power server.

  39. SGI, anyone? by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    Don't know about you guys, but I keep a Silicon Graphics Indigo2 R10K 195MHz/MaxImpact workstation under my bed for my own nostalgic purposes. Back in my college days, the machines were so obscenely expensive (around $40,000 per unit), you had to have special security clearance just to get near one, let alone the room with all eight units.

    Of course, the system itself has lost much of the luster over the years, when you consider that current desktop computers (and even game consoles) are able to do in realtime what would have taken several days/weeks to achieve on the older hardware.

    Yet, it's still satisfying to know I finally have one of the very machines I once envied others for having access to.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  40. So, what's an HP-150 with Touch Screen worth now? by ivi · · Score: 1, Interesting

    She works (or did, last time we tested her) & we may have some accessories & software for her, maybe even a few manuals...

    TIA

  41. recyclers and colector items. by 3seas · · Score: 1

    Pretty much if you go to an electronics recycling event and see what others are tossing it'll probably make you see that you've collected alot of junk. But the important thing is to recycle the junk properly.

    That can be hard to do even if you find a free recycling event as they may be limited to once a year and only for a part day (not 8 hours).

    If you are a serious collector then you've done your research as to what is worth keeping and know the cost of maintainance as moving hardware components can deteriorate over time and non moving components are subject to deterioration too, just takes longer.

    But what is really needed is a fast and small OS that can easily be ported to the otherwise "junk" to bring a bit more life and use to it before its final destination of landfill of recycling by better methods.

    There are some small and fast OS... More than the ones I know about, Minix 3, AROS, Damnsmall Linux, etc.. and there is new hardware that allows FPGA programming of emulations of some of the old system, hardware such as the C=ONE.

  42. I still use my first computer. by Gangrif · · Score: 1

    Though its not ancient by any means, i still have my old 486DX2-66 from 1995 running. It runs an old BBS. :) Maybe it 10 or 20 more years, i'll get some money out of it. Ha!

  43. 8 bit is where its at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently (well 12 months ago) moved house interstate. Having lived in the same house for a loong time, and only short moves before, I had hoarded a large collection of old computer crap. If I saw something for sale, and it was old, I would buy it assuming the price was right. I quite enjoy making old, dead, or forgotten hardware work as it was intended. Some machines were older than me. I had 3 very old washing machine style DEC computers I scored at a hospital auction (12$aud for the pallet).

    Anywho, in preparation for the move I put as much of it on ebay as I could. The 8-bit home computer era stuff sold really well, one dude paid for shiping over 30 kilos of the stuff across the country. The very old stuff was too heavy to really ebay, I did manage to shift a little to some local nerds. Anything PC, later than 286, earlier than p3 didn't sell. Amiga crap of the same era sold without trouble. I couldn't give away the pile of 3dfx cards. There was a cubic meter of 32pin sims that didn't get any interest. I guess this isn't a big suprise, I had to take 6 trailer loads of PC crap to the recycling center (I bet a bunch of it is still there).

    Suprises:
        Newton OMP didn't sell, but cassiopeaia E-10 did
        A classroom worth of perfectly good and well setup Apple PPCs ended up being donated, later somebody discovered the CPU fans were uber quiet and junked them all for the fans :(
        One dude paid top dollar for all the C64s (regardless of condition) and had me remove all the SID chips and send him just those.

  44. Old Sun by raal · · Score: 1

    I keep a Sun 3/470 around that I resurrected after being saved from a big dumpster. Not overly quick, but it does keep the room warm when running.

    I did actually use it several years ago while in school to have something that was slow enough that I could see differences in algorithms for a couple of my CS classes.

  45. For sale.... by CelticLo · · Score: 1

    One original programmer from Elliot Automation.
    Only one previous owner.
    Has wear and tear.

    I am so dead if my Dad finds /. and sees me trying to pimp him out.

  46. The really hard part of acquiring old computers by newandyh-r · · Score: 3, Informative

    is not finding the hardware - there's more of that around than you might expect.
    There are even a lot of manuals floating around ... "real programmers" tended to
    keep a manual or two when the machine was replaced.
    However, the software - which is perhaps the heart of the machine - and the cables
    tended to get thrown away separately as soon as the CPU was closed down.
    For example for the most popular mainframe in the UK in the 1970s - the ICL1900 series -
    most of the small machine software (the operators Executive; the operating systems
    George I & II; and the compilers that were used on the small machines like the 4K
    versions of Algol and Fortran) seems to have been lost. It is lucky that one project
    has managed to preserve the large system operating system (George 3) and some
    related software ... tho' discovering where to download the emulator and software
    is tricky, to say the least.
    I have also seen no evidence that anyone has preserved the GeCOS operating system
    from the large Honeywell systems (6000, and its successor the Level 66). OK, it is
    not so "special" as Multics, which ran on similar hardware, but still does contain
    many interesting features - most notably in file handing. For that matter has the
    B programming language (predecessor of C, designed for large-word oriented machines)
    been saved anywhere?

  47. Lesson #1: missing the point by freeweed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The profit doesn't come from some company who shrewdly warehoused all this vintage stuff 30 years ago in pristine condition. No one does that, no one claims that as a good profit making gesture. Your comic example is exactly right, but you entirely miss the point:

    The profit comes when you discover this stuff 30 years later, in good condition, by chance - and everyone else threw theirs out. Not that you stored it personally, yourself, all this time.

    Incidentally, you can rent climate controlled storage space large enough for a computer system for maybe $5/month. $60/yr * 30 yrs - $1800. Much less than $10,000. You'd be stupid to, because no one knows what will be rare and valuable in 30 years time.

    In short, your rant was more of a "well, no shit sherlock" kind of post.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Lesson #1: missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Invest $2313.77 now in some relatively safe investment yielding 5% annually and you'll have a relatively guaranteed $10,000 in 30 years.

      It isn't much trouble when you relocate, either.

  48. IS the hardware... by DrYak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe coz there's no value in Bresenham algorithm on the modern hardware?


    No, because the modern hardware IS a Bresenham algo - it's called a graphic card.
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  49. How the prices have dropped. by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    So I followed the link to the hard drives. And IBM 3340 cost $7.81 per meg.

    The 2GB of RAM in my computer only cost 6 cents per meg. And the hard drives, well lets look at that.

    You can score a 500GB SATA drive for about $100 now. If my math is right, that's less than a penny per meg.

    And we're seeing the price of static RAM drop like a rock too. You've already got 320GB SSD's out there.

    1. Re:How the prices have dropped. by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      SSDs arn't using static ram. They use flash or DRAM which is much slower than SRAM

  50. Famous words from... by Mathness · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Historically, there is a lot of stuff that is significant in here," Ismail said. "People are going to understand why I did this."

    Famous words from a

    - genius
    - mad genius
    - evil mad genius
    - visionary

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  51. A sad loss by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    For a number of years the Retro Computing Society of Rhode Island was building a nice collection of old iron.

    It was very DEC centric in some respects, but had other oddities like a Packard-Bell 250 that used acoustic delay lines for registers. The KL-10 was a beautiful beast too, it's ancestry included belonging to Sikorsky for some time.

    But gentrification had its way with the society. The web site is gone and the collection had to be moved at least once because of rehabilitation of the building that I'd predicted a number of years earlier. Now I have no idea where it is.

    But I did get to play on a PDP-12, and my find was a Honeywell-6 micro.

  52. SID Chips by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

    Those SID chips are still in big demand, especially in the garage music scene (as thewre are a bunch of custom 64s and SID powered music boxes. If you are going to part out a 64, best to get all the 'big chips' which includes the processorr, video, sound, and interface chips (as us old timers need those for repair parts).

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  53. Re:hey linux fags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a "linux fag", but I am a unix girl. Is it OK if I suck dick?

  54. not quite that old... by whitroth · · Score: 1

    My CoCo is long gone, and even my beloved 286 has been recycled, but I have sitting here at my feet a (re)Pentium 200, circa '94-'97, with the new used $3 hard drive (shipping companies who *don't* bubble wrap, even when they're asked to, and hard drives do *not* get along...), and a used $10 CD drive, that I use for a Linux-based firewall router. No X, no compilers... and once I get it back up, it'll do the work it's been doing for seven or eight years.

    Tell me why I need a new, fast machine for this purpose....

          mark

  55. I live this stuff every day. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    I have hundreds of old PC's stacked to the ceiling in every room.
    I have a warehouse full of PC's. I have a fully operational ROLM phone system configured to handle 10,000 (ten thousand) lines. I have a Data General Mini Computer. On and on and on.. So many CRT's I can't count them all. Dot matrix printers the size of golf carts.
    What ya need that's obsolete? I got ya covered.

  56. Collect laptops... by jhoger · · Score: 1

    I limit my vintage computing hobby to laptops. The main reason is that each laptop is the pinnacle of engineering in its day. Some aspects of vintage laptops, like battery life, boot time (if any) stand their ground against modern laptops and in important ways surpass them (Model 100 series, Cambridge Z88, NC100, NEC-8500...)

    Laptops are easy to store, so you don't have a big physical space issue like you do with some of the minicomputers and even some micros. Earlier vintage laptops don't require special power supplies, and some run off off-the-shelf alkalines or rechargeable batteries.

    Anyway, the place for Model 100 users to find the community is http://club100.org/

    -- John.

  57. Stupid rat race. by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

    I laugh my ass off every time someone wastes big $$ to buy a new computer that has enough power to be called a supercomputer a few years ago and now is barely capable of being a glorified word processor (thanks MS, thanks MS OFFICE!). I have 2 computers - an Atari 800XL, I use it to type up some texts and run statistical simulation (I'm a research mathematician) and a Powermac 7100 av I got for free from the university (hate the damn thing but have to use it to access the Internet). I prefer to work in the country side but sometimes I go the city to pick some atari software (there is a lovely scene in Helsinki, hi Mikko!)

    --
    US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  58. Poor Investments by giminy · · Score: 1

    Making the claim that there's any 'profit' involved with these old systems is kind of silly. The Lisa originally sold for $9,995. Assuming you bought one years later for $3k, you'd still only be looking at ~4.5% interest over the 20-some odd years of the "investment." Compare that to the S&P500s average return over the last 40 years, and you'll probably say "oh, I should have done something different with that money."

    Collecting old computers is all about the fun. Unless, of course, you find some obsolete hardware that your work is throwing away, and that you can ebay for a few grand...

    Reid

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  59. Not only the hardware- THE DATA, THE DATA!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the hardware of course is historically significant and may contain some feature forgotten or unused in today's computers that could still be useful...

    THE DATA can be recovered from the memory, the hard drives, even things like the modems or graphic cards can have everything ever stored on them restored for enough $$$, who knows if your old dusty XEROX machine could rewrite history?

  60. hum.. by Z80a · · Score: 1

    can someone get a Commodore PET with 14" screen,write POKE 59458,PEEK(59458)OR 32 and youtube it please? :3

  61. FOUR?? by vivin · · Score: 1

    Four?! Wow - I only have one ZX Sinclair Spectrum. My dad got it in the early 80's and I remember we'd play games on our TV using the tape-recorder attachment. The games came as tapes. It was pretty awesome. It stayed in the closet for years, gathering dust. I took it with me when I left for college because I was sure it would eventually have some "antique value". It's a fun piece of hardware.

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
    1. Re:FOUR?? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      By the way, I use my PowerBook as the world's most expensive Spectrum tape recorder - I use 'playtzx' to play TZX files to the machine (basically, a TZX file allows a Spectrum program to be encoded in a file in exactly the same way it was on a cassette, including flash loaders and other fancy loaders)

  62. Save for the future... by Hyperspite · · Score: 1

    Just in case the tinfoil hat scenarios pan out and the doomsday trusted computing initiatives become reality...

  63. Check out this classic Amiga demo on C64. by antdude · · Score: 2, Informative

    Speaking of old demos and computers, check out Desert Dream on a Commodore 64. Amazing port.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  64. NO - DON'T DO IT !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Commodore Pet had a hardware bug that if you poked a certaing address you would kill the computer.

    I doubt anyone alive knows how to fix them.

    No - this is not a joke - I'm being serious here

    1. Re:NO - DON'T DO IT !!!! by Potato+Battery · · Score: 1

      More detail here.


      From TFA:

        History of 'the killer poke'

          When the first PETs (small 9" screen) models came out, the display wasn't all
          that fast.


      The old PETs were slow because the print character ROM routine
          waited for the interval between screen scans before updating the screen
          memory. This reduced conflicts over the screen RAM which would have resulted
          in random pixels (snow) being illuminated on the screen. There was an input
          on one of the I/O chips which was hooked up to the video circuitry and told
          the routine when to access the video RAM.


      It wasn't too long before someone learned they could impove the
          character display speed via a poke to location 59458; which would set the
          video controller to update more readily. It was a noticible improvement of
          speed on programs using PRINT often, it was kind of like a free upgrade.
          It was mentioned in a few publications and used in many programs that relied
          on printing to the screen. I had learned of the poke through Cursor
          Magazine, a monthly tape-based publication. They printed the command in one
          of the 'newsletter' flyers included with an issue which you could insert
          into their game "joust" to make it play faster.


      Later on, when Commodore released the larger display (14") PETs, they had
          improved the display controller which made that POKE unnecessary. An
          unfortunate side effect was that the POKE to 59458 affected a different
          register which adjusts one of the newer screen display capabilities, which
          could result in damaging the PETs video curcuitry when left running. I
          discovered it by accident after our school received some large-screen 4016s.
          When active, the screen starts to warp after about the third line and the
          display stops around the fifth, the keyboard is also unresponsive. When a PET
          is in this mode, the only solution is to turn it off, FAST! Fortunately none
          of the school's PETs were damaged due to this POKE. Later Cursor Magazine
          published a 'fix' that would allow older PETs to use the poke and keep the
          large-screen units from frying. Unfortunately there are still many programs
          that do not have this fix.


      Prevention

          Make sure to check BASIC programs (especially games) when running them on a
          large-screen PET and be ready with the power switch when you first run it.
          I have usually found the 'killer poke' statement looking like this:

          POKE 59458,PEEK(59458)OR 32. It will always be a POKE to 59458, the
          remainder of the POKE may vary.

  65. question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how much $ could a 1984 mac fetch?

  66. Sun ULTRA 1 by Nonillion · · Score: 1

    I love old hardware, it's nearly unbreakable. Like this Sun ULTRA 1 Creator 3D I'm using right now. 384 megs of RAM, 36 gig 10,000 rpm HD, Sun 21' monitor all running on SuSE Linux 7.3 (Sparc version).

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
    1. Re:Sun ULTRA 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want something a little newer on that box (2.6 kernel, kde 3.5, etc), take a look at Gentoo. It'll work a lot better if you have another faster box do the compilation for you, but it can still be built on that box. I have a Classic, an IPX and a pair of V210s running Gentoo, all working quite nicely (the 210s cross-compile for the little boxes, no way would I ever try and build something like glibc on them :))

  67. C64 Programmer's Library by rbakerpc · · Score: 1

    I used to do a lot of writing for various Commodore magazines, managed news areas on QuantumLink, PC-Link, America Online, Delphi and others. I had so many requests recently for information from my past articles and programs from my older C-64 Programmers Library that I put a copy online with a small token fee to access the files to help cover my internet access & hosting costs. It's amazing how much interest there has been in this old material.... for anyone interested, see http://home.comcast.net/~c64proglib/ for sample articles and more info..... Robert Baker

  68. I wonder what this stuff will be worth in 30 years by CompMD · · Score: 1

    - Sun SparcStation IPC, 25MHz, 24MB RAM, 270MB HD, cgthree fb, Redhat 5.3
    - Sun SparcStation 10MP, 4x55MHz Ross Hypersparc, 128MB RAM, 9.1GB HD, Solaris 9
    - Sun 3/80, 25MHz 68030 (I think), 68882, can't remember the ram, no HD at the moment
    - Sun Ultra 1 Creator 3D, 200MHz Ultrasparc I, 192MB RAM, 4.3GB HD, Aurora Linux
    - Sun Ultra 10 Creator, 333MHz Ultrasparc IIi, 576MB RAM, 6.4GB HD, Solaris 10
    - SGI Iris Indigo, 33MHz MIPS R3000, 16MB RAM, 420MB and 1.2GB HD, 8-bit graphics, Irix 5.3
    - HP Apollo DN300 (can't remember the specs, sitting in the garage), Domain/OS 10.3 I think
    - IBM AS/400 9406-500, 1 RS64 CPU, 3 DASD, 8mm drive, OS/400 V4R3
    - IBM AS/400 9402-400, 1 RS64 CPU, 2 DASD, big tape drive, OS/400 V4R4
    - Compaq Portable III, 16MHz 286, 1MB RAM, 40MB HD, 5.25" floppy, 2400bps modem, orange plasma screen, windows 3.0
    - Panasonic Sr. Partner, 4.77 MHz 8086, 512K RAM, 20MB HD, 5.25" floppy, green screen, internal thermal printer, DOS 3.3
    - Packard Bell Legend 300CD, 60MHz Pentium (I have a 66MHz spare), 32MB RAM, 430MB and 1.2GB HD, Windows 98
    - Apple IIc, RF modulator box, nuff said
    - Tandy TRS-80 with assembly editor cartridge

    There's been more, but my parents had a tendency to throw out stuff I left at their house. Pretty much if I know the specs for the machines above, I use them. All of the above work, and when they act up, I fix them. The SGI does some CAD work, the Ultra10 does computational fluid dynamics, the Ultra1 does finite element model postprocessing and visualization, the IPC has to have its NVRAM programmed every time I boot it (I've got the commands down by heart), I'm still learning the AS/400s, the IIc gets used at 80's night parties for games, and some intrepid programmer managed to get some entertaining movies (yes, real, honest to goodness video) to play at a decent framerate on the Panasonic Sr. Partner.

  69. I could cry by mdhoover · · Score: 1

    And here I drove my Vax 11/750 complete with 4 RA81 hard drives (all working) onto the rubbish dump because I couldn't even give it away (advertised free to good home for 2 months)...

    *Sob*

    Still have all the Digital folders that came with it though...

    I'll be showing this article to my girlfriend though, will stop her bitching about the pile of ancient Sun gear in the back room (affectionately known as "The Ton of Sun", still running a sparcserver 1000 w 6 attached SSA's, the old Sun3's still work too )...

    My friend however is on a goldmine. His "Stack of Mac" takes up most of his house, and I know for a fact there are 2 Lisas (in working order) in there along with at least 1 of everything apple has ever produced (he still uses his newton and a DuoDock...)

    Lesson to be learned here, never throw anything away...

  70. Heathkit H89 by ricklg · · Score: 1

    Nobody mentioned this venerable computing apparatus. The one I bought in 1979 for $1,500 came with a dazzling 16KB RAM, 1200 baud audio tape storage, 2 MHz Z80 CPU, and a fantastic 80 character, 25 line screen. The Apple I at the time only had 40 character, 12 or so lines and a 1 MHz CPU. This was clearly the superior computing machine so I bought it. The only thing was that you had to solder components to the board, make the cables, and basically put all the parts together. Heathkit was nice though. The CPU board and the monitor board were pre-wired. They were multilayer and ham-fisted amateurs like me would probably screw them up.

    I have serial number 188. Never buy anything with a serial number below 1000. There were a few "features" in the early machines :-) I immediately upgraded to two hard sectored 160KB floppies and added RAM (to 48KB) so I could run HDOS.

    One of the "features" included adding the second (external) floppy drive. The first one was internal. The mod kit came with shims for the rear hinges of the case to create a gap for the ribbon cable to get out. Later versions actually had connectors for this! Such sophistication was not for me :-)

    I knew the monitor ROM (now called BIOS) inside and out. I had to to get things to work. Nothing was standard including the floppies. I found a copy of CPM that the H89 could read and my horizons were lifted. I still had to enter the CPM programs in split octal (like hex only weirder). Anybody but me know what split octal is?

    I finally ended up with a whopping 1.6MB storage on 5 floppies (each using its own standard), 64KB RAM (max), and a graphics card that was compatible with nothing. I did enjoy drawing sin(x)/x though. It took about a day. By the time I bought my 286 in 1989 I had invested $5,000 in this puppy. I still consider it a good investment for a hardware oriented RF engineer who didn't have a clue what these new fangled computers were all about and was working with computers.

    It's still in working condition (as of 15 years ago). It's in a garbage bag in the basement for the moment. I have all the floppies, but it's hard telling if bit rot has killed them. I keep wanting to fire it up again. Procrastination and the fear of black smoke has delayed my experiment.

    Ah the good old days :-) I've got 7 computers running on my home network now. I have no idea what's in their ROMs and I'm still learning Linux. My last compiler was Pascal (I learned Algol 60 in college) so I might be a bit behind the times programming wise :-) Still not bad for a retired hardware RF engineer who never did RF in a 29 year career with the US Government.

    Rick
    WA3VTF

    1. Re:Heathkit H89 by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      I still have my Heathkit H89. Not sure what the serial number is, but it came with the shims, rather than a connector for the external floppies. I even have a spare CPU and terminal board in need of repair.

      When my wife asks why I keep it around, I tell her it's the cost of admittance into the "Old Programmer's Home", when I retire.

      B.t.w. Mine did emit smoke the first time I turned it on. I quickly turned it off and inspected it for damage and didn't find anything. I worked with the 2nd power on. Years later, I was working on a different problem (bad 5v regulator on the CPU board) and I found a burnt out trace on the PC board between the +5v and ground lines. It was a self correcting design flaw.

      There's another design flaw. If you power the machine up with the external hard sectored floppies unterminated/unpowered, and a boot disk in the internal bay, the internal floppy drive will go into write mode, and most likely overwrite the boot sector.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    2. Re:Heathkit H89 by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      Oh, the memories. Just after Asteroids came out and I was addicted, but didn't have a lot of quarters, my dad bought one of these. After he put it together, it had a whopping 32k of RAM and a single hard-sectored disk. My first conversations about the H-89 with my dad went something like this:

      Me: "Dad, can I play games on this computer?"

      Dad: "No. They don't make games for it"

      Me: "Well, could you program one for me?"

      Dad: "No. I don't have time"

      Me: "Well, could I program one?"

      Dad: "I don't know, but I don't think so."

      A year later, I have a fully working version on Pac-Man and knowledge of 8080 assembly (the crappy HDOS basic was useless). The tricky parts of the game was dealing with the 9.6 serial line between the terminal and the CPU, the lack of addressable video RAM. It was like programming Pac-Man for a telnet session. The hardest part, though was the monster AI. I could only have 2, because of the 9.6 limit, so I had to make them bad-asses. My dad helped me with a 128 bit shift-register random generator which made my 2 monsters as hard as the arcade games 4. I also spent a lot of time on game play, ensuring the controls worked exactly like the arcades.

      Thats how I go started. Now I read /.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  71. my 1st root access by airdrummer · · Score: 0

    was on that box...wrote a PVD overlaid on ONC flight charts to display radar tracks i scarfed from EADSim logs... showing entity state PDUs was cheatin;-)

    fun times...

  72. Help me build my collection by ygthb · · Score: 1

    I want a few things for my collection...

    Panda Project archistrat (http://www.byte.com/art/9510/sec6/art7.htm) Cant find

    Panda Project Rock City (2, 1 original, and one for the case to build in) (http://www.g4tv.com/techtvvault/features/4244/I_w as_wondering_if_any_PC_manufacturers_are_going_to_ build_an_iMac_rival.html) can hardly find pictures anymore and no idea where to get

    a maxed out TI-99 4a (I know where to get these (http://www.99er.net/)

    All the old TI cartridges

    ART

    --
    Create like a god, command like a king, work like a slave. -Guy Kawasaki
  73. the exception by u8i9o0 · · Score: 1

    Those are interesting PCs. No grey box, no matter how rare it is, will ever become interesting.
    A grey box is interesting if and only if the owner is interesting. Computer data can shed light on the owner's personality, sort of like an autobiography. The owner is what can make a grey box rare and interesting.

    I know the discussion is about the equipment itself, but old PCs usually offer much more value than other tech.
    --
    This is not my sig
  74. YES!!! by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    What eerie timing! I just got back from lunch with an old friend, and we were reminiscing about the delightfully evil brutality that was multiplayer Lemmings on the Amiga. I mentioned that, having played Lemmings on every platform for which it exists (got the classic GameBoy cartridge for Christmas!), all versions are a pale shadow of the Amiga version.

    I come back to the office and check Slashdot, and here's another reference! I'm gonna have to dig out my A1200 and see if the wife will let me hook it up to the TV.

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!