Slashdot Mirror


Record High Frequency Achieved

eldavojohn writes "Researchers at UCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science managed to push our control of frequencies to another level when they hit a submillimeter 324 gigahertz frequency. As any signal geek out there might tell you, this is a non-trivial task. 'With traditional 90-nanometer CMOS circuit approaches, it is virtually impossible to generate usable submillimeter signals with a frequency higher than about 190 GHz. That's because conventional oscillator circuits are nonlinear systems in which increases in frequency are accompanied by a corresponding loss in gain or efficiency and an increase in noise, making them unsuitable for practical applications.' The article also talks about the surprising applications this new technology may evolve into."

141 comments

  1. In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    The article also talks about the surprising applications this new technology may evolve into

    Like making your dog's head explode.

    1. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by JMcWright · · Score: 1

      ...if your dog happens to have a high frequency radio receiver implant in his brain.

    2. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Funny

      The article also talks about the surprising applications this new technology may evolve into

      Like making your dog's head explode.


      The article talks about the military being interested in acquiring the technology so they can see through peoples clothes, and that was the best you could come up with?

      That's weak.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    3. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Egads, now I will need to wear tinfoil clothing to go with my tinfoil hat.

    4. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can already see through people's clothes with backscatter X-Ray.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Because the wavelength is submillimeter, you may image through people's clothing," Chang said. "For example, it would be possible to remotely view if some civilian walking up to you has plastic explosives hidden under his coat."
      Yah. I know that's what I'd use that technology for.
      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    6. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      Whoa whoa whoa, slow down...Slashdot submissions have articles now? I only started reading the summaries last week!

    7. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bah, just give them a few drinks and you'll get all of their clothes off the old fashioned way.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    8. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by rwyoder · · Score: 3, Funny

      The article also talks about the surprising applications this new technology may evolve into
      Like making your dog's head explode. I usually just use a Slim Whitman album for that.
    9. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by Cctoide · · Score: 1

      Except this story isn't about a wonderful new date rape drug. :P

      --
      "Let's face it, it's a good story. Accuracy would kill it."
    10. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by gb506 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this will mean the return of the codpiece industry... Check out my metallic codpiece!

    11. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      And the old Sony Handicams.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    12. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by jesdynf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, is that what that is? I just thought you were putting some Vienna sausages in the refrigerator.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    13. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by s_p_oneil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What site do you think you're on? This is Slashdot, where most of the submitters can't even get a girl to accept a drink. ;-)

    14. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by Verte · · Score: 0

      I guess we will all need to re-tune our tin hats, too.

      --
      We at slashdot are scientists, specialists and kernel hackers. Your FUD will be found out.
    15. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by vtolturbo · · Score: 1

      some of us have no problems in this area. the problem i find is figuring out how to get rid of the chick after i realize that she's just a lush and not worth my time.

    16. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      As the winner of the International Pimp of the Year award for the past 4 years, I find your response amusing.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    17. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why would you want to see a guy with plastic explosives drunk and naked?

    18. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      I said "most", not "all", and I think my point is still valid. I'm married with kids, so I'm out of the race entirely. I just can't believe my previous post has an "Insightful" rating.

    19. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by fuego451 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It was Martians, not dogs, but I'd still mark you 'Funny' if I had points. I guess Slim still doesn't get any respect in the US and all the UK mods must be asleep, or too young to remember.

    20. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just can't believe my previous post has an "Insightful" rating.

      I'd say "You must be new here." but obviously you aren't.

      For the record I'm happily married with kids too. Fortunately, there are women out there who can appreciate nerds for what they are.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    21. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      Now that was insightful. ;-) I've seen it happen on plenty of other posts, but that 's the first time I've noticed it on one of my own.

    22. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! You really are new!

    23. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by AmiAthena · · Score: 1

      Ohhhhhhh! I thought the parent was trying to get the *dogs* drunk so they'd disrobe. Good luck with the girls thing, I hear it's harder.

    24. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I, for one, welcome our new dog-head exploding overlords!

      .....You know, the more I reread my comment before posting, the more I want to kill myself.

    25. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is a girl?

    26. Re:In other news, dogs in the area go berserk by EricTheO · · Score: 1

      Pah.... the ability to see through things has been around for years. http://www.tomheroes.com/Comic%20Ads/classic%20ads /x-ray_glasses.htm

      --
      -Eric
  2. Nooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Think of the bees :p

    1. Re:Nooo! by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or worse, the dogs with bees in their mouths and when they bark they shoot bees at you.

    2. Re:Nooo! by rizole · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads!

    3. Re:Nooo! by cafucu · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, don't laugh! That actually happened to Winnie the Pooh...

      --
      :%s:work:/.:g
    4. Re:Nooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be worse: They could release the ROBOTIC RICHARD SIMMONS!

  3. First Guess: +1, Patriotistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    New weapons for the military-industrial-Congressional complex.

    War mongeringly yours,
    George W. Bush

    1. Re:First Guess: +1, Patriotistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Only at /. does "paranoid conspiracy theory" get +1 interesting...

  4. How they did it by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The researchers first generated a voltage-controlled CMOS oscillator, or CMOS VCO, operating at a fundamental frequency of 81GHz with phase-shifted outputs at 0, 90, 180 and 270 degrees, respectively. By linearly superimposing these four (or quadruple) rectified phase-shifted outputs in real time, they ultimately generated a waveform with a resultant oscillation frequency that is four times the fundamental frequency, or 324 GHz.
    Sounds like there's room to scale, using this method.
    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:How they did it by ToxikFetus · · Score: 5, Informative

      The researchers first generated a voltage-controlled CMOS oscillator, or CMOS VCO, operating at a fundamental frequency of 81GHz with phase-shifted outputs at 0, 90, 180 and 270 degrees, respectively. By linearly superimposing these four (or quadruple) rectified phase-shifted outputs in real time, they ultimately generated a waveform with a resultant oscillation frequency that is four times the fundamental frequency, or 324 GHz.

      This sounds a lot like a phased-lock loop. And yes, from the article, it appears as though this does have pretty good scalability. TFA said 600 GHz is achievable. 324 GHz a nice because fog is transparent at that frequency.
    2. Re:How they did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "TFA said 600 GHz is achievable. 324 GHz a nice because fog is transparent at that frequency."

      So in twenty years time cars will have an anti-fog display on the windscreen (which will have the ability to switch between transparent and display mode), which will make travelling through fog much safer at high speeds (let's just accept that cars will not have an auto-drive mode by then, eh?).

      On the downside, many crashes will occur because pedestrians on the sidewalk will appear to be naked! Perverts will be making the school run even worse as they hang around outside schools. And we'll all accept it as the price to pay for safety and anti-terrorism requirements.

    3. Re:How they did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You can't generate new frequencies by linearly superposition. This means that all they did was cancel low harmonics of a not-so-sine wave to "see better" some high harmonic. But this high harmonic was already present in each individual oscillator, so one could say that the frequency was already "achieved".

    4. Re:How they did it by zippthorne · · Score: 1, Informative

      Mod parent down. You can indeed do this. They superimposed rectified quarter-phase signals. In fact, it is a pretty common effect that has been known about since at least the invention of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectifier>rectifier.

      Long story short: a full-wave rectified sine wave will have 2x the frequency of the original. Even if the original is a PURE SINE WAVE. The output however is no longer a pure sine wave. You can get a pure sine wave if you have the right filters, but you're going to lose quite a bit of gain.

      No amount of filtering can extract a "higher harmonic" from a pure sine wave. Perhaps you could filter out any harmonic frequency you desired from a square wave, or sawtooth wave, but it's going to have terrible gain, and I don't think that's what they did: a square wave superimposed with itself pi out of phase and rectified is a constant voltage.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:How they did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can indeed do this.
      No linear combination of terms of the form sin(a*x+b) can give you a term in sin(c*x) with c != a, but feel free to try.

      They superimposed rectified quarter-phase signals
      So that's the not-so-sine wave I was talking about. How about we mod *you* down for misrepresenting a post just so you can tear it apart and appear knowledgeable?
    6. Re:How they did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GGP (presumably you) said, "But this high harmonic was already present in each individual oscillator, so one could say that the frequency was already "achieved"." That is wrong - the harmonic was generated by the rectifier, which comes after the oscillator. The oscillator itself could generate a pure sine way.

    7. Re:How they did it by leighklotz · · Score: 2, Informative

      This sounds a lot like a phased-lock loop
      It doesn't sound like a PLL to me; a PLL has VCO in it, and this is a VCO, but the VCO is just the oscillator part.
      I.e., where's the phase comparator?

      It sounds more like a quadrature oscillator with 4 outputs. Oscillators have an inherent need for a 180 degree phase shift, and a quadrature oscillator gives you two outputs 90 degrees out of phase. This one gives you 4 outputs 90 degrees out of phase, which seems a bit of a trick.

      It may be some variant on the Bubba Oscillator, which uses 4 stages to reach the 180 degree inversion, but of course the output of each of those is 45 degrees.

    8. Re:How they did it by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      >This sounds a lot like a phased-lock loop.

      There's actually no indication of feedback at all here (which is the whole point of a PLL). In general, actually, feedback slows systems down. They do mention that they are using a VCO -- also used in PLLs -- but I get the impression that the purpose here is to, say, generate frequency modulated radio signals; such a modulator would be an open-loop system.

    9. Re:How they did it by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's actually no indication of feedback at all here (which is the whole point of a PLL). In general, actually, feedback slows systems down. They do mention that they are using a VCO -- also used in PLLs -- but I get the impression that the purpose here is to, say, generate frequency modulated radio signals; such a modulator would be an open-loop system.


      Perhaps the technique is standard frequency mixing, a standard technique used in practically every radio receiver these days. It's basically a three terminal device - you feed in two signals, and a third one appears. If the mixer is your standard physics lab ideal mixer, you get the sum and difference frequencies at the output. (In reality, you get the sum, difference, and a bit of bleed through of the original signals). It's used by radio receivers to downcovert the original signal to a 10.7MHz IF (which is how things like "radar detector detectors" work - by detecting the VCO output which would be the expected frequency plus or minus 10.7MHz, and how some radar detectors use non-standard IFs to prevent this). So they'd have three mixers, which can be completely passive devices, first two combine two to get the doubled frequency, then the last one to get the quadrupled one.

      All it really needs is a non-linear device to make mixing happen. If you've every been near a transmitter and heard the radio go nuts, it's because the local transmitter is causing the input amplifier to go non-linear and mix its signal with your desired one, also known as intermodulation distortion.
    10. Re:How they did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I just use my flashlight and get frequencies in the Thz!!!!

    11. Re:How they did it by TerranFury · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps the technique is standard frequency mixing [wikipedia.org], a standard technique used in practically every radio receiver these days.

      Aye, the heterodyne radio receiver. Yeah, I could see them using a mixer! That doesn't mesh with what's described, but, then, (unless I am missing something), what's described doesn't make a ton of sense:
      From TFA:

      The researchers first generated a voltage-controlled CMOS oscillator, or CMOS VCO, operating at a fundamental frequency of 81GHz with phase-shifted outputs at 0, 90, 180 and 270 degrees, respectively. By linearly superimposing these four (or quadruple) rectified phase-shifted outputs in real time, they ultimately generated a waveform with a resultant oscillation frequency that is four times the fundamental frequency, or 324 GHz.
      How can any linear system create an output frequency unequal to one of the input frequencies? I could see rectification as providing a frequency doubling -- but that's old, old news, generates horrid output, and is probably not what's referenced here.

      So maybe the article gets it wrong, and you're right?

      If somebody else could shed some light on this, that'd be cool.

    12. Re:How they did it by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A full-wave rectifier works like a frequency doubler, and the article makes it sound like they've extended that to get a frequency quadrupler.

      One significant point here is that the FCC only claims jurisdiction up to 300 GHz.

  5. Hardly the highest frequency! by oskay · · Score: 5, Informative

    Precision phase coherent control of lasers has become possible in the last ten years- Laser beams at frequencies exceeding 1 PHz (10^15 Hz) have been precisely controlled, phase locked, and tuned to have frequencies that are *exact multiples* of our best microwave frequency standards (e.g, cesium). It works the other way too-- our most precise microwave-frequency signals come from divided-down optical frequency references now! See also: 2005 nobel in physics.

    1. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by alexj33 · · Score: 0

      Maybe it just needed to be mounted on the head of a shark.

    2. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by niro5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I agree, my girlfriend reached a far greater frequency when she found a spider in the bath tub. Old news.

    3. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by insignificant1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, people have achieved higher frequencies, and controlled them very precisely, as you point out; however, such oscillators aren't CMOS oscillators. That's the news, that they've built a CMOS oscillator at such a frequency, not that they have achieved the highest frequency ever to be controlled (which would be a joke). Not exactly what the /. headline implies, though.

    4. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was able to get your girlfriend to emit some fairly high frequencies also, and it had nothing to do with a spider.

    5. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by jcorno · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's an optical frequency. Well, UV, but still, totally different from what they're talking about. Your example has to do with electronic states of matter. They're talking about circuitry.

    6. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by oskay · · Score: 4, Informative
      The work with the CMOS circuits is clearly an important achievement.

      However, both the Slashdot title ("Record High Frequency Achieved") and summary ("...managed to push our control of frequencies to another level ...") do seem imply that frequency control has not been possible at frequencies that high before. So, it's important to point out that while it's a record, it's only a record within context. (Records within context are fun; you can do anything with them. For example, I hold the bicycle land speed record for all persons with my SSN.)

      In any case, it's *not* totally different. Both are examples of frequency control, which is it's own discipline that spans precision timing and applications in all frequency ranges, from RF (on chips and in free space) to optical (on chips, in fibers, and in free space) and beyond.

    7. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by TheMadcapZ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a high frequency of laughter whenever you take it, out at best!

    8. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by inviolet · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a high frequency of laughter whenever you take it, out at best!

      Or the frequency of reciprocations of his right hand... which are, likely, sinusoidal.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    9. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by YourMotherCalled · · Score: 0

      Duh GP! Don't you know???

    10. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      Well , at least he's not insulting people while hiding behind anonymity , like you did in the above post.

    11. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by revengebomber · · Score: 1

      I was able to get your girlfriend to emit some fairly high frequencies also, and it had nothing to do with a spider. You're posting on Slashdot.


      Stop lying.
      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    12. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by drolli · · Score: 1

      Not even electronically detected or generates this is the highrest frequency. Superconducting SIS mixers and Jopsephson junction local oscillators achieve a phase-locked operation up to 500GHz.

    13. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by alexj33 · · Score: 3, Funny

      This thread so far reads like the end of your typical "Star Trek: TNG" episode-

      Wesley Crusher: Of course! We can defeat the aliens if we hydrogenate that wormhole near the stellar core whatchamajigger, since superconducting SIS mixers and Jopsephson junction local oscillators achieve a phase-locked operation up to 500GHz.

      Geordi LaForge: That could destabalize the laser beams at frequencies exceeding 1 PHz (10^15 Hz) which have been precisely controlled, phase locked, and tuned to have frequencies that are *exact multiples* of our best microwave frequency standards.

      Wesley: Right. Just like in the academy.

      Picard: Make it so.

    14. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by master_p · · Score: 1

      What, you stopped giving your credit card to her?

    15. Re:Hardly the highest frequency! by drolli · · Score: 1

      The alien lifeforms however seem not to adapt to the googlar emmitting entropic pulses of electromagnetic radiation in the near infrared. The linea doti perimeter confines their brain by the colorful object in front of each.

      Excuse me, i laughed my ass off, but my comment was on topic. If a 15 year old technology seem to you like star trek, i am not sure what you would say to the things investigated now....

  6. That's nothing by lelitsch · · Score: 3, Funny

    More than 15 years ago, quite a few of the students at the physics lab I was teaching had their oscillating circuits reach 483 terahertz and more pretty easily. For a short amount of time that is.

    1. Re:That's nothing by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      and you know what, I've done even better. I can generate a pure sine carrier with an infinite frequency: It's a generator that generates 0V DC. Beat that!

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:That's nothing by dougmc · · Score: 1

      My flashlight achieves orders of magnitude higher frequencies in a snap! Hell -- my body emits radiation that's orders of magnitudes higher. Not as high as your flashlight (at least not in any significant amount) but still much higher. I haven't found an effective way to modulate it at a high rate of speed, however.


      The remote for my TV also uses frequencies orders of magnitude higher than those in this article. And it even modulates the signal! Perhaps they should not think quite so much about electronics, and think more about optics ...

  7. This makes me wonder ... by LaughingCoder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... how they are able to visualize such high frequencies. How do they know they succeeded?

    --
    The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    1. Re:This makes me wonder ... by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 3, Funny

      They got a Vista score of 5, so obviously it's running at 324GHz

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    2. Re:This makes me wonder ... by pclminion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "High frequencies?" We're not even talking terahertz here. The frequency of VISIBLE LIGHT is about a million times higher. This frequency is "high" in the sense that it is one of the highest frequencies ever achieved with an oscillating circuit. It's nowhere near the highest frequencies humans have ever produced or measured. So how do they "visualize" these frequencies? Probably with the same techniques they use to visualize frequencies trillions of times higher?

    3. Re:This makes me wonder ... by m0nstr42 · · Score: 1

      .. how they are able to visualize such high frequencies. How do they know they succeeded?
      As mentioned in one of the other replies, there are lots of measurement devices for very high frequency stuff. I'm sure they used something far more precise than this, but here's a couple relatively simple ways to measure a signal that you can't capture on a scope: - use a frequency counter to count the number of zero crossings against a known, calibrated, time-base - use a signal multiplier to multiply by a lower-frequency signal of known, calibrated frequency and filter out the summed component.. repeat as necessary.. eventually you can work your way down to a low enough frequency to view on a scope. You know what frequencies you multiplied, so you can work back the frequency of the original signal. This is how AM radio works, as well as MRI machines and lots of other stuff.
    4. Re:This makes me wonder ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think that was rather the point.


      Or to put it another way: don't you find it intriguing that the parent post immediately made you think of the frequency of visible light?

    5. Re:This makes me wonder ... by Idbar · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about the same. If it is really complex to do so, how did they measure that frequency, and better, how do they know the wave form. Was it sinusoidal? They might as well created a squared signal (which I think is a higher achievement) and they can only put a filter to obtain a harmonic waaaay higher.

  8. So you're saying... by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 3, Funny

    They found frequencies... they didn't even know existed?!

    +1 funny
    -8 bad movie
    -9000 overrated

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  9. Sorry, been done before and topped... by AetherBurner · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out http://www.arrl.org/qst/worldabove/dxrecords.html for the Amateur Radio DX records. This was achieved long ago and at higher frequencies. Highest RF frequency used for a confirmed two-way communication was 403 GHz between WA1ZMS/4 (FM07ji) and W4WWQ/4 (FM07ji) on 21-Dec-2004 over a distance of 1.42 kilometers. Achieving a frequency is one thing but being able to use it is another.

    1. Re:Sorry, been done before and topped... by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      I can't help but think there's a world of difference between how DX stations work and how these CMOS chips work, but I don't think I'll have the time to figure it out before someone more versed in the topics can give a brief rundown.

      One thing that sticks out is that this CMOS variation seems to allow for finely tuned control of the frequency, which allows them to use it regularly and reliably, but I could be way off.

    2. Re:Sorry, been done before and topped... by insignificant1 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I'll post this again: The news is not that they've built an oscillator at the highest frequency ever (think: LASER is much higher frequency); the news is that it's the highest-frequency CMOS oscillator built to date. (Which I can't confirm, but it sounds right to me.)

    3. Re:Sorry, been done before and topped... by fotbr · · Score: 1

      RF Communication generally needs stable waveforms to be carriers. So no, the end result between a "dx station" and these cmos chips wouldn't really be all that different -- stable waveforms at high frequencies.

  10. Re:VA Tech shooting 22 dead 28 injured. by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Did they use computers, the internet or any other geek method to kill? No? Freakin' lasers on their heads?

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  11. T-rays by kebes · · Score: 3, Informative

    This technology is another step along to road to widespread technology exploiting Terahertz radiation, which is the region of the EM-spectrum between IR and microwaves. Near the end of the article, they mention the possibility of creating imaging systems that can, for example, see through clothes. These applications of so-called T-rays have in fact already been demonstrated. For example, the image in this article shows a man concealing a knife, which is easily visible in the T-ray image. (See also some other pictures here.) T-rays reflect strongly off of metals but can penetrate to varying extents through things like clothing and tissue. The military and security applications are obvious. However it would also bring up new kinds of medical imaging, and has been investigated for quality control, too (for example, scanning the inside of foods in assembly lines, etc.). In the previous link I put, there is an example of scanning through a Hershey bar, where you can see the positions of the nuts.

    Suffice it to say this is an area of active research that may have many, many applications.

    1. Re:T-rays by badfish99 · · Score: 1

      This is scary stuff. If metal knives and guns can be so readily detected when hidden in clothing, I'm going to have to keep mine in a metal container next time I go out on a killing spree.

      Then someone would have to go to the trouble of inventing a metal detector to detect my knife.
      Oh wait...

    2. Re:T-rays by AGMW · · Score: 1
      for example, see through clothes. These applications of so-called T-rays have in fact already been demonstrated.

      Of course, now we have the T-rays we really want the C- and A-rays to go with it!

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    3. Re:T-rays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For example, the image in this article shows a man concealing a knife, which is easily visible in the T-ray image . . . In the previous link I put, there is an example of scanning through a Hershey bar, where you can see the positions of the nuts.


      The jokes just write themselves!

    4. Re:T-rays by Tribbin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Too bad you can camouflage the reflecting T-rays by wearing a T-shirt.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    5. Re:T-rays by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      >In the previous link I put, there is an example of scanning through a Hershey bar, where you can see the positions of the nuts.

      Since these can see through clothing...
      oh, man, I can't bring myself to say it.

      Anyway, tinfoil! It's not just for hats anymore!

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    6. Re:T-rays by put_the_cat_out · · Score: 1

      Just read the comments left by /. denizens and you'll know exactly where all the nuts are.

    7. Re:T-rays by virgil_disgr4ce · · Score: 1

      OK, checking out your links ... AAAAGGH!!! WTF!! http://www.thznetwork.org/wordpress/wp-content/gal leries/THz-Images/images/stmmwave.avi/ WHY!!!!!!!

    8. Re:T-rays by jsiren · · Score: 1
      Reveals the positions of the nuts, huh?

      In the next election, I'd like to have each candidate checked with one of these devices, please.

      --
      Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
    9. Re:T-rays by cbacba · · Score: 1

      Another step?

      Over 10 years ago there was a cover story in RF & Microwave News with a cruddy b&w picture of light plane on a runway on the cover. The story was using passive microwaves for imaging and most of the magic was in some silicon wafer antenna array or something of the like.

      300ghz is not something to sneeze at and doing so with cmos is a breakthrough. Note that the typical phaselocked loop device tends to run at frequencies somewhat higher than the target - usually - but not in this case.

      Being able to see hidden things like weapons and suicide bombs will start to help end the rain of suicide terrorists. Such views are also evidently possible in moderate IR spectrum as well - to a lesser extent. Neither are harmful like frequent x-ray scans could be - as in that schwartzeneger movie where arnie goes to mars (or at least has a virtual vacation).

  12. If aliens are calling... by JAB+Creations · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If aliens are calling then they'd probably be using frequencies along those lines. The logic would be that if they found using such frequencies to be technologically challenging to use why would they bother to communicate with an abundance of lesser civilizations when they could potentially benefit from communicating with equal or superior civilizations across the cosmos?

    1. Re:If aliens are calling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If aliens are calling then they'd probably be using frequencies along those lines. The logic would be that if they found using such frequencies to be technologically challenging to use why would they bother to communicate with an abundance of lesser civilizations when they could potentially benefit from communicating with equal or superior civilizations across the cosmos?

      Because if they are anything like humans, they would pander to the lowest common denominator.
    2. Re:If aliens are calling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if those frequencies stood out against the background well and weren't heavily attenuated. But then again, an advanced civ would see the value in finding any life and wouldn't act like galactic snobs now would they?

  13. Short amount of time??? by msauve · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Red/orange LEDs typically have a lifetime measured in the 10,000+ hour range, when reasonably driven. A $1 blue LED will provide a reliable 600+ THz.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Short amount of time??? by daverabbitz · · Score: 1

      Yes but how wide is the -20dB noise envelope on your blue led?

      I'm guessing it would probably be greater than the frequency that this oscillator is running.

      --
      What could be better than a jet powered motorcycle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8l6GTHLSWE
  14. signal geeks don't post on slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pearls before swine

  15. Re:VA Tech shooting 22 dead 28 injured. by vertinox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    1. Every news channel is reporting it right now.
    2. Slashdot has a 24 hour story submission turn around time (I submitted a Garry Kasparov storry and they didn't post another submitted one on same topic til the next day)
    3. It is a tragedy and saddening, but again more people will die in Iraq today (and tomorrow) and in the scope of things it isn't the end of the world as we know it and may not be on topic with Slashdot at this point. Too much speculation of what happened as it is...

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  16. That's nothing by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My flashlight achieves orders of magnitude higher frequencies in a snap!

  17. Re:VA Tech shooting 22 dead 28 injured. by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 1, Funny

    What were their majors? May affect the job market. If they were going into Law or Marketing, we already have enough of those.

    --
    0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
  18. That's nothing by wsanders · · Score: 1

    My device runs at 500+ THz for several hours on one set of batteries, fits on a keyring, and I bought it at Fry's.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  19. Is this really new? by mack+knife · · Score: 1

    Didn't they create and usefully apply terahertz frequencies four years ago? Terahertz > 190 gigahertz, right? What's the big deal?

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/02/11/184824 7

    1. Re:Is this really new? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      The big deal was that it was done by a CMOS oscillator, i.e. something that can be fabbed in today's semiconductor factories in mass, not something that's limited to the laboratory.

  20. Re:VA Tech shooting 22 dead 28 injured. by alienmole · · Score: 1

    Well, my young fella-me-lad, with your 800K+ uid you may not remember this, but there once was a Slashdot contributor named Jon Katz who would have found a way to make this about geeks, no matter what contortions were necessary. Katz was a master of modern journalism: if a story wouldn't cooperate, he just keep pounding at it until he made it his bitch -- or vice versa, didn't really matter.

  21. In other news..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    People across the nation began shitting themselves for no apparent reason. Victims recall feeling an unusual vibration in their bowels before immediately discharging feces. Some believe an evil genius may have finally discovered the "brown note". For Action 11 news I'm....oh god.....>PPHHBBBBHHTTHHHHH!!!!!

    Take that Mythbusters!!!

  22. MP3 by wilsonthecat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Where can I download the MP3

  23. pulse by null-sRc · · Score: 1

    *buys a lot of red tape*

    it keeps them out you know

    --
    -judging another only defines yourself
  24. They've been beaten years ago. by The+Relentless · · Score: 1

    My late dog, Rover (may he rest in peace), had his head explode when my sister put on a Mariah Carey CD.

  25. Not what I expected by Gramie2 · · Score: 0

    I had thought the article would be about a breakthrough in Slashdotter's wanking techniques...

  26. "submillimeter" by ebcdic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sincer "submillimeter" implies a frequency greater than 300GHz, it makes no sense to talk about "usable submillimeter signals with a frequency higher than about 190 GHz".

    1. Re:"submillimeter" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the medium. If the medium they're transmitting through has an index of refraction n=1.6 then c / (n * f) = 0.98 mm.

      But yeah, for n=1 it's nonsense.

  27. ouch by Floritard · · Score: 1

    "Because the wavelength is submillimeter, you may image through people's clothing,"

    Another menacing blow to the psyche of cutoff-loving never-nudes everywhere. Time to buy plastic underwear.
    1. Re:ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Another menacing blow to the psyche of cutoff-loving never-nudes everywhere. Time to buy plastic underwear."

      Plastic underwear? I was assuming it would be tin foil.

  28. Re:VA Tech shooting 22 dead 28 injured. by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    Oh man, I haven't thought of Katz for ages. Because of that cartoon back then (when Foxtv was cool), I always viewed his posts through squiggle vision.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  29. audio frequence research by purpleraison · · Score: 0, Troll

    While conventional oscillator circuits may be nonlinear systems, submicron research has been performed at the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) and has focused on hemi-quazmatron acceleration under free radical assignment projection. While this sounds like a lot of bunk terminology, it is actually where the future lies for this field. The UCLA HSSEAS has often proven a valuable partner in this research, and has taken a slightly different approach this to research.

    Regardless, pushing sub-millimeter frequency into the audio sphincter is always difficult because it runs counter to the way it should be. Simply put, things should be emitted FROM the sphincter, and not entered into it. However, when using sub-millimeter waves, the sphincter cannot contract. The scientific name for this is an 'audio rim jobe' -- after Dr. Heigh Liek ScrimJobes from the Netherlands.

    Furthermore, research has shown that massaging the audio sphincter often causes it to relax. The only problem is that Dr ScrimJobes discovered the audio sphincter is in his pants, and that only women can massage it.

    --
    I am open source, and Linux baby!
  30. I must not be a nerd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am familiar with all of the words in the summary, yet I am unable to comprehend it.

  31. Tricorder by metoc · · Score: 1

    The size of the circuits and ability to penetrate materials makes this technology part of a future Tricoder type device.

  32. Nice try by Headcase88 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This post was clearly planted by the U.S. government.

    --
    "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  33. Sounds like extension of the push-push oscillator by MetaDFF · · Score: 3, Informative

    What they did sounds like an extension of the technique used in push-push oscillators to "double" the oscillation frequency.

    The basic principle behind a push-push oscillator is that two out-of-phase signals of fundamental frequency f_o are combined such that the fundamental signal and the odd harmonics cancel, while the second harmonic at 2*f_o add constructively. In the case of a push-push oscillator, you only need two signals 180 degrees out of phase. This could be generated with a differential VCO.

    Using a push-push oscillator is a well known technique for increasing the frequency of oscillation of a VCO beyond the fMAX of a transistors at a given process node.

    The only disadvantage with push-push oscillators is that you end up losing a lot of power as the second harmonics's power will always be much smaller than the power in the fundamental frequency of the VCO.

  34. ET pissed by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    These higher frequencies are pissing off all the stealth flying saucers in the area. They use the frequencies that humans don't use, but their range gets smaller and smaller as we move up the spectrum. They will retaliate with more ubductions and anal probes. You've been warned.

    1. Re:ET pissed by nsillik · · Score: 1

      ubductions? seriously?

  35. How they did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFA: "The researchers first generated a voltage-controlled CMOS oscillator, or CMOS VCO, operating at a fundamental frequency of 81GHz with phase-shifted outputs at 0, 90, 180 and 270 degrees, respectively. By linearly superimposing these four (or quadruple) rectified phase-shifted outputs in real time, they ultimately generated a waveform with a resultant oscillation frequency that is four times the fundamental frequency, or 324 GHz."

    That's cheating!

  36. Re:VA Tech shooting 22 dead 28 injured. by pclminion · · Score: 1

    It is a tragedy and saddening, but again more people will die in Iraq today (and tomorrow)

    The latter is, sadly, not news. The former is. Honestly, the original poster's comment was the first I'd heard of it.

  37. red utility tape by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    Buy some now.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  38. new clothes by mekane8 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So will we now start seeing tinfoil underwear to go with the hats?

  39. M$ was waiting for this ... by garry_g · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... as it will finally allow a PC processor to run at the speeds necessary to have fluent Vista GUI ... now if someone would invent the 16TB ram chip, so that the also necessary 64TB of main memory could be added to said machine ...

  40. Re:VA Tech shooting 22 dead 28 injured. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    more people will die in Iraq today

    And the US! Even if you only count accidental deaths, there are about three times as many automobile-related fatalities in a single day than what happened there. The national murder rate per day is about equivalent to the number of deaths in this shooting. In the grand scheme of things, it hardly makes a bump.

  41. Antenna Design by hisstory+student · · Score: 1

    This is going to be a problem for quarter-wave diapole fabrication.

    --
    Heard any good sigs lately?
  42. Re:VA Tech shooting 22 dead 28 injured. by coopex · · Score: 1

    Damn you! I thought I'd never have to hear about JonKatz again! Curse you for soiling my mind!

    --
    The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
  43. Not a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just send your kid to school with tinfoil underwear.

  44. Big deal by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can create an even higher frequency for a fraction of the cost.

    (Turns on flashlight)

    I can even send information.

    (Blinks flashlight)

    I admit the data capactity needs work, though.

  45. So What? by sycodon · · Score: 1

    No one over 40 will be able to hear it anyway.

    I guess it could be a new Ring Tone.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:So What? by dougmc · · Score: 1

      No one over 40 will be able to hear it anyway.
      Considering that it's electromagnetic waves rather than sound waves, nobody under 40 will be able to hear it either. Not with their ears, anyways.


      And the `Mosquito' that you're alluding to isn't so imperceptible to adults as people would lead you to believe. I have no trouble hearing it, and I'm only 38. I don't think that two years will make the difference ...

      I guess it could be a new Ring Tone.
      Perhaps for Bender ...


      In any event, at a high enough intensity, you could probably feel it -- it would likely feel warm, or hot, or instantly incinerate you -- it just depends on just how high the intensity is :)

    2. Re:So What? by sycodon · · Score: 1

      and I'm only 38

      Ha! Only two years left. Enjoy it while you got it!

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  46. Frequency of what? by StarkRG · · Score: 1

    Light? Sound? Processor cycles? Faps?

    If it's Faps then that must have been some mighty bad chaps they had at the end... Either that or they were able to invent some extremely low friction lube...

  47. Record High Frequency Achieved by ScrewMaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think pot usage must be on the rise.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  48. Usage by miltary foot soldier by w_lighter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Imagine this, Your whole squad have this "special" goggles. And in battle you see hundreds... nea~ THOUSAND of naked man running around with thier dick swinging around likes its a pendulum or something and balls jumping up and down uncontrollable. I tell you man... someone going to fall down and broke into laughter and get shoot for it. And laughter spreads like virus too...

  49. Ahh Grasshopper, naw, really? by wilec · · Score: 1

    "Not exactly what the /. headline implies, though."

    Ahh Grasshopper, naw, really? With a UID of (872511) your not exactly new here. So I guess you must actually have a life. But just so you know, wink, wink, such is pretty common here,and getting more so every day. Remember this in a few weeks when the same topic is submitted again. ;)

    Wabi-Sabi
    matthew

  50. No high enough ! by OricAtmos48K · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Will this 324 GhZ Pentium be enough to run VISTA ?