Slashdot Mirror


Goatse.cx Is For Sale

fm6 writes "The domain goatse.cx is being auctioned. Bidding, at the time of posting, has reached $15K after 109 bids (with 6 days to go). Some of you will recall that this site used to be linked in a lot of Slashdot articles, despite having only a few pages. Boing Boing, with their usual creativity, has managed to depict Goatse's most commonly linked photo while still remaining within the bounds of good taste."

80 of 211 comments (clear)

  1. Advertising by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    You could put google adds on it but I shudder to think what it would advertise. Probably make a lot of money, though.

    1. Re:Advertising by hankwang · · Score: 4, Informative

      You could put google adds on it but I shudder to think what it would advertise

      AdSense program policies: no pornography, adult, or mature content. But of course there are plenty of other advertising companies.

    2. Re:Advertising by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Funny

      They could always advertise Preparation H.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    3. Re:Advertising by jorgevillalobos · · Score: 5, Funny

      They could always advertise Preparation H.

      I have to agree, Preparation H feels good on the whole.

    4. Re:Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Probably make a lot of money, though.

      A buttload.

    5. Re:Advertising by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      They could always advertise Preparation H.

      Only if you find an "after" picture, because the first one is definitely a "before".

  2. Re:its bad enough by mushadv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like it or not, it's internets history. It's especially relevant to /. for the reason you stated (trolling).

  3. Re:its bad enough by Broken+scope · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sadly goatse is part of the history of the internet.

    --
    You mad
  4. Site seems to be down :-( by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unfortunately, it appears the the goatse.cx site is down. Fortunately, there's a mirror available at goatse.ch and goatse.cz.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Site seems to be down :-( by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bet you have been waiting years for a chance to post those links.

    2. Re:Site seems to be down :-( by dsanfte · · Score: 2, Funny

      If ever there was the time for the Foe feature, this is it.

      I challenge thee to a duel of honour. Be our differences resolved in like fashion.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    3. Re:Site seems to be down :-( by Xyrus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Somewhere, a demon in the 7th circle of hell just snorted battery acid and gasoline all over his keyboard.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
  5. Re:its bad enough by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

    Clearly, seeing as he doesn't even know the difference between moderator and, *cough*, editor.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  6. Re:Yikes! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who the hell is paying over 30 million dollars for a stupid domain name??!

    $30000050...even the number is funny. 30000000 to get attention, 50 being what it is actually worth. Probably somebody from around here :)

  7. Re:its bad enough by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i thought it was all done through firehose now.

    No. If it was done that way there would be 6000 articles in the queue like on digg and it would be impossible to get anything decent posted.

  8. Unfair by Sam+H · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone else finds it pretty unfair that the registrar took the domain back from its owner, then allows someone else to buy it for hundreds of dollars? Pretty close to stealing if you ask me.

    --
    God, root, what is difference ?
    1. Re:Unfair by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anyone else finds it pretty unfair that the registrar took the domain back from its owner, then allows someone else to buy it for hundreds of dollars? Pretty close to stealing if you ask me. If they did it once, they can do it again. Why would I want to pay out tens of thousands of dollars for a site when that could happen?

      Even if I got that money returned, I'd assume that someone willing to spend that amount of money would have spent more money on, or be receiving more income from the site which they *wouldn't* get back.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  9. Re:its bad enough by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sadly goatse is part of the history of the internet.

    You'll be surprised how many people, making millions on the Internet, have no clue what it is. The people familiar in details with all the shock sites are a certain subculture, and certainly doesn't make up the history of the Internet.

  10. Re:its bad enough by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

    What, you think this is Kuro5hin? No, there's still people who are paid to read submissions and decide what best "represents Slashdot".. and yeah, they never read the site themselves, so they have no idea what is on Slashdot.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  11. Re:its bad enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder what that other famous site would cost.

  12. Re:Jokers appear to have hijacked the bidding by Sam+H · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, you needed to look at the vote pattern to infer that the $20M bidders can't possibly be serious? :-)

    --
    God, root, what is difference ?
  13. Re:Jokers appear to have hijacked the bidding by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope they did it anonymously. Puts me in mind of the episode where Homer Simpson donated $10 MUSD to a telethon.

  14. the ancient cult of goatse.cx by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Informative

    i was surfing about.com's list of religious symbols awhile back and found out, much to my shock and amusement, that the goatse.cx guy is an ancient celtic god

    (link is pretty safe for work)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Frankly, I wouldn't follow any links from this article. Last time I looked at the goatse.cx image was about 5 years ago, and it is still burned in my head. I can't go through that trauma again.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    2. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think my best goatse.cx memory is showing it to a guy who seemed to be the crude, dirty type and who had spent much much time on the internet's dark corner, and him responding "I have to go throw my hard drive in clorox"

      Yeah, it stays with you for a while...

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    3. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      Hey, say what you will about goatse.cx guy, he's a hundred times better than tubgirl.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    4. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by fm6 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, you need to learn the difference between a vulva and an anus. Getting them mixed up can really get you in trouble!

    5. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      that the goatse.cx guy is an ancient celtic god

      With gods like that, who needs devils?

    6. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by Raenex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Last time I looked at the goatse.cx image was about 5 years ago, and it is still burned in my head. I know you said you wouldn't follow any links, but I think this comic depicts your pain amusingly: http://www.vgcats.com/othercomics/?strip_id=10

      I got it from Wikipedia. It's safe. Trust me! No really, I'm not kidding, it's funny. Seriously, I'm not trying to fool you. Ah well, you'll never believe me :)
    7. Re:the ancient cult of goatse.cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...or in deep shit.

  15. Re:its bad enough by Broken+scope · · Score: 5, Funny

    That would be true if high schools didn't have computer labs. I know many who don't know the name, but it will be a cold day in hell before they will every be able to remove that particular image from their brain.

    --
    You mad
  16. What's it worth? by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't see a large opening for sites with names like this.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:What's it worth? by archeopterix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't see a large opening for sites with names like this.
      I believe there is a wide gap between your assessment and the market value.
    2. Re:What's it worth? by TempeTerra · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can't see a large opening for sites with names like this.
      I believe there is a wide gap between your assessment and the market value.
      So in your opinion, there is a void that must filled?
      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
    3. Re:What's it worth? by Xyrus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that your final analysis, our do you need to do a wider search. You may need to dig deep, as assumptions are detrimental to ascertaining whether you have the whole truth or not.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
  17. teh interweb by owlnation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is that the entrance to one of the series of tubes?

  18. The end is near... by DrYak · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet you have been waiting years for a chance to post those links.
    ...AND to get those links deliberately modded +5 Insightful by anyone with mod points : Priceless !
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:The end is near... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...AND to get those [Goatse] links deliberately modded +5 Insightful by anyone with mod points : Priceless !

      I wonder if I can get modded up for pointing out the state of the art way to post goatse to slashdot is to put the obfuscated version of the URL with in a comment with a tempting bait like this?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  19. Re:its bad enough by linvir · · Score: 2, Funny

    BAWWWWWWWW

    Awww, it's awright, I bwoughted your butt-medicine for you! Here, you take a liddel sip and then you go sleepy-byes!

  20. .cx domains are worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Goatse was a culturally significant internet meme and the domain was suspended (revoked) because some kook at the registrar found the content tasteless. There's plenty of content I find tasteless online, Goatse was nowhere near as offensive to me as the GWB presidency yet I'm not about to start pressuring ICANN to withdraw the domains registered by pro-bush news sites.

    Dot cx (now CIIA) set a dangerous precedent in revoking the goatse domain, content regulation via DNS is nothing more than an abuse of power. cx domains are worthless, the registry has established it will pull domains if they don't like the content. Avoid.

  21. Goatse is for sissies by bersl2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tubgirl is so much better than Goatse.

    And by "better", I mean "more thoroughly disgusting". The latter makes me laugh; the former turns my stomach.

    1. Re:Goatse is for sissies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tubgirl's gross-out value was slightly ruined for me after I found out it's actually an orange juice enema she's expelling, rather than liquid poop, which is the instinctive assumption.

    2. Re:Goatse is for sissies by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm Goatse makes you laugh? I present the 8 stages of Goatse: http://www.the-elite.net/ClarkPage/Phases/

  22. Re:its bad enough by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it's bad enough when someone does a first post to goatse.cx, why the heck is this making news? internet shock sites should not be posted on popular forums, it's stupid, why do we get a news article about shock sites

    Methinks thou doth protest too much. That's really your ass in the picture, isn't it?

    i always thought the /. community of moderators were a little more mature.

    That's a joke, right?

  23. Re:goatse on the cheap by masterzora · · Score: 5, Funny
    open goatse variants

    Did you really have to say "open goatse"? You're only making this worse!

    --
    Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
  24. Oh for the love of... by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Funny

    So much for that deal with Satan specifying he could take me the day a post with a goatse link on Slashdot was modded +5...

    1. Re:Oh for the love of... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      So much for that deal with Satan specifying he could take me the day a post with a goatse link on Slashdot was modded +5...

      Hope you like the Beowulf cluster of hells.

  25. Re:its bad enough by mushadv · · Score: 3, Funny

    You don't sound like you're too up on your internets history, friend.

  26. Re:its bad enough by linvir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The people familiar in details with all the shock sites are a certain subculture, and certainly doesn't make up the history of the Internet.

    As I understand it, back in the early days of the internet, the kind of enthusiasts who make up today's subculture were a significant proportion of the userbase. Just by being there, they were a target market, and helped the whole thing to grow. Just because AOL came along and reduced them to a subculture doesn't mean they aren't part of the internet's history.

    And besides, who cares about the internet's ability to concentrate even more wealth into even fewer hands? I can guarantee that in 300 years, the history teachers won't be telling their classes about how the internet was really profitable and made a select few very rich. They'll tell of how it connected the world and got us all communicating at an unprecedented level (assuming they even mention it at all).

    Sure, the signal-to-noise ratio sucks, and half the time all we're communicating is a picture of a guy stretching his ass with his hands, but at least that's more interesting than some dotcom's record quarterly report.

  27. The price has since gone up! by toetagger1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Current bid amount: $5.02402e+11
    How awesome is that?
    --
    who | grep -i blond | date cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleep
  28. Re:fun bidding.. by QuickFox · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes you do. They are very serious about that. They will track you down. If you don't have the money you can expect serious trouble.

    Good luck.

    --
    Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
  29. No one is paying by mangu · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It has now become a contest of who is able to write the largest number. I tried bidding 9!!!!!!!!! just to see if they understand what a factorial is, but it required me to log in. I'm not going to create a fake account just for that lame joke.


    Anyhow, there's a good moral lesson here. The .cx domain registrars revoked the site name just because they didn't like its content. Now who would want to buy a domain name they can lose anytime at the registrar's whim? As in any business, there is a question of trust here, if you can't trust the registrar the domain is worthless.


    Besides, it's not as if there didn't exist plenty of sick sites out there. I don't like those, but who am I to judge? As long as it's nothing criminal, let it be...

    1. Re:No one is paying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The .cx people didn't pull goatse.cx just because they didn't like the content. From my understanding, they pulled it after a formal complaint, from a Christmas Island resident (named Rhonda Clarke), who complained very specifically about one thing - the link to dolphinsex.org. Without said link there would have been no basis for it being pulled, but bestiality is illegal in .cx, thus this link contravened the T&Cs of domain registration, so it was pulled.

      *makes sure he checks "Post Anonymously"*

  30. Re:its bad enough by mickwd · · Score: 2, Informative

    "You'll be surprised how many people, making millions on the Internet, have no clue what it is.

    Check out this set of pictures (or here) of people finding out exactly what goatse.cx is, while some nice person photographs the expression on their face.

  31. Goatse.cx is everywhere by khendron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Those Boing Boing links are hilarious.

    I've recently noticed that the Toastmasters (safe link) logo has more than a passing resemblance.

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    1. Re:Goatse.cx is everywhere by matlhDam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've recently noticed that the Toastmasters [toastmasters.org] (safe link) logo has more than a passing resemblance.

      There's been more than a few people suggest that Westnet, an ISP here in Perth, could have thought through its new logo a little better, too.
    2. Re:Goatse.cx is everywhere by damncrackmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      wow, you guys are really stretching it

  32. Re:its bad enough by GeneralAntilles · · Score: 4, Funny

    Clearly, friend, you've failed in your attempts to stretch your sphincter as wide as the goatse.cx gentleman and are lashing out at us because of it.

  33. Re:its bad enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    On one hand, it should be obvious that his link directs to some kind of shock image. On the other hand, he just posted a Tubgirl picture to Slashdot and got modded interesting. Indeed.

  34. Enough by Jotii · · Score: 2, Informative

    $5.02402e+11 ought to be enough for anybody. It's $1e+12 now. Why do they even allow bids that big? It can't be serious.

    --
    [sig]
  35. Re:its bad enough by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Informative

    internet shock sites should not be posted on popular forums, it's stupid, why do we get a news article about shock sites
    You apparently don't remember the good old days when you could still post inline images in Slashdot comments and there were no registered accounts, you just typed in whatever name you wanted to post under or just left it the default of Anonymous Coward.
  36. Re:its bad enough by mr_shifty · · Score: 2, Funny

    You must be new here.

    --
    And the circle of life continues to spin, occasionally wobbling on its axis thanks to the weighty presence of dumb.
  37. Money != Knowledge by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You'll be surprised how many people, making millions on the Internet, have no clue what it is.

    The people "making millions on the Internet" right now tend to be pornographers, spammers, scammers, and botnet owners. They probably don't know anything about Vint Cerf, ARPAnet, the IETF, or BBN either...

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  38. Re:goatse on the cheap by mr_shifty · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Open Goatse" sounds like some sort of FOSS operating system, probably based on BSD.

    --
    And the circle of life continues to spin, occasionally wobbling on its axis thanks to the weighty presence of dumb.
  39. Anyone notice the seller? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's being auctioned on SEOBidding.com - as in, Search Engine Optimization - not the nice, XHTML+accessibility+no-broken-links kind of SEO, but the scum-of-the-earth kind that snaps up a domain where the registration has lapsed, and puts up a site with a) ads and b) links to other sites, so they can steal the page-rank.

    As for the auction, I hope they choke on it.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:Anyone notice the seller? by Lehk228 · · Score: 4, Funny

      i hope their assholes get ripped open in the auction

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  40. And your punishment is... by mangu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Living in this house for the rest of your life on Earth. After you die, well you know...

  41. open goatse by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now the true significance of the BSD demon mascot is finally, terrifyingly revealed! His reign shall be merciless, and pointy! There shall be much wailing and frantic pressing of "Back" buttons, but it shall avail them naught, for even should they close one window will two more appear, and more, and more, until their screens shall be covered in it, such that all the lab may see. And they will laugh, or call campus security, or file a lawsuit. Yea, these are dark times.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  42. Re:Ya right. by QuickFox · · Score: 2, Informative

    They'll do what they always do when someone can't pay the entire sum that he owes. They'll get as large a portion as they can, by arranging personal bankrupcy, confiscation of assets with executory auction, confiscation of future income, and so on.

    Debt is a serious matter.

    --
    Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
  43. typo by fellip_nectar · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you click the 'Place Bid' button without logging in to the site you are instructed:

    "Please login to your accunt first."

    --
    Worst. Signature. Ever.
  44. Re:its bad enough by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Funny

    Theo, I herd u liek mudkips. If not, please make yourself an hero.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  45. TOS by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anyone else finds it pretty unfair that the registrar took the domain back from its owner, then allows someone else to buy it for hundreds of dollars? If the original buyer agreed in the TOS that the domain can be seized and resold if obscene content is posted, then it's fair.
  46. Re:But which is it? I challenge you to answer! by mangu · · Score: 2, Funny
    the "guy" at goatse was a hermaphrodite and that people were too shocked to realize that they were looking up a vagina


    Well, there's also the people who notice the guy has a wedding ring. Anyhow, examining the goatse picture closely enough to find remarkable details, well, I confess I haven't got to that stage yet...

  47. Re:its bad enough by bazorg · · Score: 2, Funny

    from now on you can explain your grandchildren that there was a time when the internet did not have many ads, websites were made only of HTML and tubgirl was not mainstream.

  48. Re:goatse on the cheap by 6Yankee · · Score: 2, Funny

    What if one were to buy all of them? Are they cheaper holesale?

  49. Re:Jokers appear to have hijacked the bidding by Omestes · · Score: 2, Informative

    $1e+12 now...

    Wow... I am glad it does exponents...

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  50. For once... by ndogg · · Score: 4, Funny

    For once, I wouldn't blame anyone for not RTFAing.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  51. Re:No Goatse guy by UnCivil+Liberty · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've heard site maintenance is a real pain in the ass.

    --
    Distributed proteome folding @ WorldCommunityGrid.org
    Team Slashdot - Members:#1 Run Time:#1 Points:#1 Results:#1
  52. Re:its bad enough by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 3, Funny

    Putting off registering an account as long as possible is probably just good sense.

  53. Re:No Goatse guy by Jotii · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've heard site maintenance is a real pain in the ass.
    It's open source.
    --
    [sig]