Slashdot Mirror


The Internet of Things - What is a Spime?

CoolVibe writes "From the abstract in the talk: "World-renowned Science Fiction writer and futurist Bruce Sterling will outline his ideas for SPIMES, a form of ubiquitous computing that gives smarts and 'searchabiliity' to even the most mundane of physical products. Imagine losing your car keys and being able to search for them with Google Earth." It's a very interesting lecture given by Bruce Sterling about something we might see in the near future. The lecture can be viewed here on Google Video."

141 comments

  1. What are car keys? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By the time any of this technology could ship we'd probably have thought controlled car locks. No need for keys then.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:What are car keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cars? What are these ancient devices you speak of?

    2. Re:What are car keys? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Cars were ground-only conveyances, which typically hurtled towards each other at very low speeds along pathways where opposite directions of traffic were separated by only a few meters. Absurdly high accident and fatality rates, very wasteful of time and energy because they couldn't follow direct vectors to their destination, it's astounding that people put up with them as long as they did.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:What are car keys? by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      Get the units right. Cars in opposing lanes will normally come within two metres and very often less than a metre. "A few meters" refers to distances greater than 3m or 15 feet, which is a large separation (enough for another lane in between).

    4. Re:What are car keys? by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      These cars you speak of had feet?

    5. Re:What are car keys? by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      By the time any of this technology could ship we'd probably have thought controlled car locks. No need for keys then.

      Then they'll just track YOUR BRAIN.
    6. Re:What are car keys? by jftitan · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the World of Tomorrow!!!!

      --
      "Don't Forget to Salt the Fries"
    7. Re:What are car keys? by LuitvD · · Score: 1

      Note to self: become a hypnotherapist, to be able to steal cars in the future

    8. Re:What are car keys? by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      Don't joke! I'm still waiting for my personal hover car that was promised to me 30 years ago. They said it'd be here for the end of the 20th century.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    9. Re:What are car keys? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Three meters is fifteen feet? You wanna check that math again?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    10. Re:What are car keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in a few years, we'll all be using transportation devices that use a renewable energy source, and which keep their passenger suspended a few feet off the ground, away from puddles and dust. These devices are called horses.

    11. Re:What are car keys? by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      By the time any of this technology could ship we'd probably have thought controlled car locks. No need for keys then.

      Can you imagine how much wear and tear your door locks would get if you had a grand-mal seizure?

      This would also seriously change the pick-me-up...

      Guy: Hey babe. You know what would look even nicer on you than that beautiful dress?

      Girl: Silence

      Guy: Me!

      Girl's car CLICK!

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    12. Re:What are car keys? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Renewable, maybe, but when cars were introduced they were considered to be cleaner than horses for one very simple reason: Nobody likes to deal with horse poop.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    13. Re:What are car keys? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny
      Three meters is fifteen feet? You wanna check that math again?

      Good to see a rocket scientist who can get unit conversion right...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    14. Re:What are car keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wondering...
      Can OnStar lock your car doors too?

    15. Re:What are car keys? by ak3ldama · · Score: 1

      Hey ... running along down the /. rabbit hole. Don't mind me.

      No one responded to your JE entry about the 'Rage Against the Machine' song I am pretty sure it's a self titled album. 'Killing in the Name' is a great tune. That song single handedly made me start playing guitar. I made a JE post a while back about a rage song too and no one replied. Shame on me for being offtopic on this discussion but /. doesn't allow posting on old Journal Entries. (I disabled my Karma Bonus bump so hopefully i won't get modded down.)

      --
      "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
    16. Re:What are car keys? by smithmc · · Score: 1

        By the time any of this technology could ship we'd probably have thought controlled car locks. No need for keys then.

      Well, maybe by then we'll be able to use Google to locate our thoughts!

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  2. If I have to wait for the future ... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 0

    ... to find my car keys I'm never going to be able to make a beer run tonight.

  3. damn, why not now? by alta · · Score: 1

    I've been looking for my cell phone for the last 30 minutes. Checked the office, checked the car, had the wife check the house. Been calling it! Can't find it!

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:damn, why not now? by SilentUrbanFox · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth signal triangulation?

    2. Re:damn, why not now? by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      Hmm... if calling the phone doesn't work, I can't imagine that Bluetooth signal triangulation would. For that to work, you would need the phone to be (1) powered on, and (2) within Bluetooth range. Assuming that the phone isn't on silent (and why would you be calling it otherwise), and assuming that Bluetooth range is shorter than earshot, you wouldn't have a whole lot of luck. My guess is the phone is lost, or the battery is dead.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    3. Re:damn, why not now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's under the couch cushions.

    4. Re:damn, why not now? by delvsional · · Score: 1

      phone search: error. 32412 results in 'downtown Boston'

      --
      Oh Crap, I'm an optimist.....
    5. Re:damn, why not now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my guess is, its probably stolen

    6. Re:damn, why not now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tell yourself that now would be a good time to enjoy some privacy from the rest of the world. without your phone, people wont be able to bother you regardless of where you are.

      once you become happy with this fact, your phone will immediately ring within earshot.

  4. I didn't view the *&^%(*& Video.... by Fysiks+Wurks · · Score: 1

    I didn't VTFV but I have strong opinions on this matter....{add your own rant here}

    --
    P226
  5. Utopian privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Imagine losing your car keys and being able to search for them with Google Earth."

    Imagine a thief doing the same?

    1. Re:Utopian privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Imagine Googlebots indexing your keys before you lost them.

      robots.txt
      User-agent: *
      disallow: /pants

      User-agent: girl-next-door
      disallow: /wallet

    2. Re:Utopian privacy by mrogers · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the location of your keys will be protected by a state of the art security system. To find out where you left your car keys you'll have to enter a 64 character pass phrase and swipe your RFID-enabled driver's license. To find out where you left your driver's license you'll have to enter a 128 character pass phrase, submit to a retina scan, present an X.509 certificate signed by both Bruce Schneier and Phil Zimmerman, and swipe your RFID-enabled car keys.

  6. Reverse by students · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Imagine letting anyone who wants to steal your car be able to search for your keys on Google Earth.

    1. Re:Reverse by geekoid · · Score: 1

      and....what?

      They going to risk breaking into your home to get keys to steal your car?
      A car thief does not need keys to steal a car.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Reverse by russint · · Score: 1

      Imagine the cops finding your stolen car on Google Earth.

      --
      ^^
  7. I haven't seen read TFA yet by thewils · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But if I can imagine finding my lost car keys on Google Earth, I sure can imagine trying to find someone else's car keys on Google Earth.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    1. Re:I haven't seen read TFA yet by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      I sure can imagine trying to find someone else's car keys on Google Earth.

      I wonder how "do no evil" would reconcile with making the ultimate stalker/big brother tool.

      --
      We are all just people.
    2. Re:I haven't seen read TFA yet by Runagate+Rampant · · Score: 1

      I wonder how "do no evil" would reconcile with making the ultimate stalker/big brother tool.

      ... yeah I wonder how it does?

  8. "my fucking keys" by G27+Radio · · Score: 4, Funny


    Imagine losing your car keys and being able to search for them with Google Earth.

    http://static.flickr.com/108/261905722_d2912c0465. jpg?v=0

    Still waiting for them to add it to Earth.

    1. Re:"my fucking keys" by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Imagine losing your car keys and being able to search for them with Google Earth

      Great! It's narrowed it down to a pixel the size of my apartment. Thanks Google Earth, you've been a big help!

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  9. google 2084 anyone? by wizardforce · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:google 2084 anyone? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Interesting. So, in 2084, we'll be able to watch the meta-watchers watch the watchers watching us?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  10. Very fascinating by palladiate · · Score: 4, Insightful
    We might as well still hope for flying cars though. Sure, multi-linking normal objects is cool, but there are probably much easier and simpler solutions we haven't though of yet. Futurism is fun, I remember the old Futureland at Disney world. It was a ghost town, and the animatronics were creepy, but it was fun as a giant walk-in time capsule.

    But, all I could think about the whole time is about those darn car keys. I kept hearing in my head my parents calling me: "Son, I need you to come look at the computer. Google keeps telling me my car keys are in the house, but I've looked all over for them. I think Google is broken again."

    1. Re:Very fascinating by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      I don't think you'd look for them - you'd have your fourth-gen Roomba get them for you.

  11. Someone is watching by bigmiken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First car keys, then a small injection when you are born and now 'Big Brother' knows where you are.

    1. Re:Someone is watching by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Which is OK, if there are strict elgal guidelines to it's use.

      Most of which should be that a case gets thrown out, and all evidense in inadmissable for future cases if they are violated.

      WHen you make it so they can not achieve there goal by breaking the rules, they will stop breaking the rules.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Someone is watching by secondhand_Buddah · · Score: 1

      IF you carry a cell phone, Big Brother can locate you anyway, and track where you have been. Not to mention traffic cams that can ID number plates, or payments made via credit or debit cards, or Passports or numerous other technologies that timestamp your location.
      The mark-of-the-beast thing is so out of date. Someone came up with this meme +- 2000 years ago and it seems to scare the vast majority of western civilization shitless. Many aspects of our civilization have changed since then, including the advent of Democracy which at least ensures some modicum of freedom for us. With the democratic process we can choose our own level of freedom as a nation.

      --
      Participatory Governance : The only feasible option for a real democracy, where everyone really does have a say.
    3. Re:Someone is watching by Magada · · Score: 1

      You are a moron. I hope that you live to see the day when such a policy is implemented and that you experience its effects firsthand.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  12. The "future" by RJBuild1088 · · Score: 1

    Isn't this the beginning of the huge "everything will have a computer in it" world that we have expected? I know that technology can sometimes go to far, but something like this, if implemented correctly, could actually be extremely practical.

    1. Re:The "future" by kylemonger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yah, practical for our future overlords. Run.

    2. Re:The "future" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most everything already DOES have a computer chip in it. Desktop computers make up .1% of the computer market, supercomputers are even less - everything else is embedded. Your alarm clock has a computer or two, your car has several (emissions control, sound system, power locks/windows, the remote entry/start-up system, etc.)

      There's just NO NEED to connect all this stuff together in a way that allows it to connect over the Internet.

  13. I'm all for it by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Funny

    As long as you can reticulate them, of course.

    1. Re:I'm all for it by jhfry · · Score: 1

      Great reference to Sim City... except, they are splines, not spimes.

      But I'd still mod you up if I could!

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
  14. We already have this technology, implemented. by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's called RFID chips. Of course it doesn't have the long range abilities the summary seems to suggest, but it's still pretty close. And they are cheap.

  15. SPIME = Exploit, phishing, & surveillence heav by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Imagine losing your car keys and having someone else find them with Google Earth. Imagine someone without a warrant keeping track of your car keys.

    I don't usually wear a tin-foil hat, but this idea has exploit written all over it.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  16. What if I lost my computer? (n/t) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  17. S.P.I.M.E. - I know what it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Super Powerful Intelligent Monster Elephants

    1. Re:S.P.I.M.E. - I know what it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our plans are finally coming to fruition...

  18. A designer's opinion... by tubapro12 · · Score: 1

    IANAMA but how often do designers predict technology accurately?

    And I'd expect better chairs at Google...

    1. Re:A designer's opinion... by treeves · · Score: 1
      IANAMA = I am not a major asshole

      IANAMA = I am not a marketing astroturfer

      IANAMA = I am not a metallica aficionado

      IANAMA = I am not a mighty amazon

      IANAMA = I am not a mechanical automaton

      IANAMA = I am not a middle-aged artist

      None of the above?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    2. Re:A designer's opinion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close... you just mixed it a little:
      IANAMA = I am not a mechanical asshole

    3. Re:A designer's opinion... by YourMotherCalled · · Score: 1

      IANAMA = I Am Not A Mature Asian

  19. Imagine what?? by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    imagine losing your car keys and being able to search for them with Google Earth."

    That's as useless as mammary glands on a bull.

    google earth has this flashing Dot on my house. with a arrow, "your keys are here".

    DUH!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Imagine what?? by Abuzar · · Score: 1

      google earth has this flashing Dot on my house. with a arrow, "your keys are here".

      No dude, by then they'll have x-ray photos of all our houses.

      But don't worry, the arrow will point to the pocket of your wife's pants as they lay on the floor beside your best friend Big Google's bed.

    2. Re:Imagine what?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's fine as I'm boning his wife, being a swinging couple rocks!

  20. Appropriate name by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Spi Me. If you can find your carkeys on Google, then so can Google. And if Google can, the government you're under can find your carkeys too. Normally you're near where your carkeys are, or maybe your cellphone, or maybe the governmental id card.

    1. Re:Appropriate name by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you can find your carkeys on Google, then so can Google.


      That depends where the logic is that identifies a particular electronic identifier as your carkeys; done properly, other people might be able to locate an object with a particular identifier, but not know that it is the keys to your car. Or get no information at all about it.

      But for ubiquitous computing to not be a giant gaping security hole, we're going to need ubiquitous encryption and a whole generation of new tools to manage it and partition information.
    2. Re:Appropriate name by anomalous+cohort · · Score: 1

      This is already happening but not by google.

    3. Re:Appropriate name by popejeremy · · Score: 1

      But! If it's a publicly accessible resource like Google is, and it allows the government to spy on us, it would also allow us to spy on the government.

    4. Re:Appropriate name by mrogers · · Score: 1

      done properly, other people might be able to locate an object with a particular identifier, but not know that it is the keys to your car

      If they could watch an object leaving my house, getting into my car, driving to work, going to my desk, going out for lunch, returning to work and later returning home, I wouldn't particularly care if they knew whether they were tracking my car keys or my socks.

    5. Re:Appropriate name by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      If they could watch an object leaving my house, getting into my car, driving to work, going to my desk, going out for lunch, returning to work and later returning home, I wouldn't particularly care if they knew whether they were tracking my car keys or my socks.


      I think you misunderstood the "...or get any information at all about it" part; its all a matter of access controls and how information is partitioned;

      I'm not disputing that there are privacy implications if things like this are done wrong, just that the answer to that is to make sure that they are done right, not hope they aren't done at all.
    6. Re:Appropriate name by zobier · · Score: 1

      Spi Me. If you can find your carkeys on Google, then so can Google. And if Google can, the government you're under can find your carkeys too. Normally you're near where your carkeys are, or maybe your cellphone, or maybe the governmental id card. Um, the government already knows where your cellphone is and they can listen in on you with it too.
      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  21. Great Idea... not by kjzk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Imagine the government being able to find your exact location using Google. Err, I mean your car keys."

  22. When I Google Earth it says, "Wish you were here." by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I got up one morning and couldn't find my socks. So I called Information. She said, "Hello, Information." I said, "I can't find my socks." She said, "They're behind the couch." They were. -- Steven Wright
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  23. No thank you. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Do you really want google to know where your car keys are?
    That's pretty personal there folks. Think about it.

    1. Re:No thank you. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Do you really want google to know where your car keys are?

      I don't have a problem with google knowing where car key number 0A:93:67:22:FE:A4:12:E4 is. If they know enough to associate that key with me, then it's an issue.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:No thank you. by Caffeinate · · Score: 1

      I don't have a problem with google knowing where car key number 0A:93:67:22:FE:A4:12:E4 is. I'm sorry, don't you mean key number 09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B:D8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0?
      --
      Godless heathen.
    3. Re:No thank you. by jcr · · Score: 1

      No, I think 32 bits should be enough to identify a car key.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:No thank you. by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      Missing the point. HD-DVD ring any bells?

      In any case, while 32 bits might do it for all sets of car keys, will they do it for everything that needs to be indexed? IPv6 should be our rolemodel in this.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    5. Re:No thank you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a problem with google knowing where car key number 0A:93:67:22:FE:A4:12:E4 is. If they know enough to associate that key with me, then it's an issue.
      Really, think about the vast amounts of personal information you give away in ordinary conversation.

      Sure, right now there's no way to tie it all together, but with the spime concept it's fairly simple. Get the make & model of your car if you've ever complained about repairs online, learn what city you live in, what game console you prefer, and what kind of restaurants you prefer to eat at--all information people are likely to give away without thinking about it, only with spimes the data can be mined to produced a few dozen (or few hundred)likely candidates.

      Then narrow it down more by monitoring when you're posting on the internet, and in a few weeks pretty much any cyberstalker can pinpoint you in meatspace.

    6. Re:No thank you. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Missing the point

      No, just a bit tired of an overdone gag.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  24. crime:criminal::spime:spiminal by njchick · · Score: 1

    Who would you call people looking for your keys on Google Maps? Spimers? Spimps? Spiminals?

  25. Amateur... by eln · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Any self-respecting drunk will make sure he always lives within staggering distance of a liquor store.

  26. Alarmists can fuck off, k by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is nothing about being able to use Google Earth to find your keys which implies by its very nature the ability for Google itself to find your keys, any more than the ability for Google Desktop to find your pr0n implies by its very nature the ability for Google itself to find your pr0n.

    I want my home computer to be able to have disconnected local extensions enabling me to perform searches on things which Google itself doesn't consider relevant.

    If I really wanted to, I could (right now!) go out to radioshack and get everything required to set up a Home Positioning System- like a GPS, but with less G. I could then interface the data from that with Google Earth using its existing extension mechanisms and- without Google knowing a thing about it get Google Earth to tell me where my keys are.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    1. Re:Alarmists can fuck off, k by ari+wins · · Score: 1

      Or, you can go to the local dollar store and buy a keyring that will respond with a beep when you whistle, or clap. I'd imagine it's much cheaper, and privacy issues are non-existent, since it's a 1970's technology.

      --
      Don't worry if you're a kleptomaniac, you can always take something for it.
    2. Re:Alarmists can fuck off, k by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      you're missing the majority of the point :)

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  27. Besides... by sczimme · · Score: 4, Funny


    Imagine losing your car keys and being able to search for them with Google Earth
    ...
    By the time any of this technology could ship we'd probably have thought controlled car locks. No need for keys then.

    If I end up so far from my car keys that I need GOOGLE EARTH to find them, I have failed miserably...

    Or had a really good time. I suppose it could go either way (or both).

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Besides... by Caffeinate · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or had a really good time. I suppose it could go either way . . . To: The World
      Fr: Caffeinate

      This is the only time that the phrases "go either way" and "good time" are to ever be combined.

      That is all.
      --
      Godless heathen.
    2. Re:Besides... by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps if you were more open minded, you'd have more good times....

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    3. Re:Besides... by gomiam · · Score: 1

      Open minded is not exactly what I would say ;)

    4. Re:Besides... by cooley · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if I lose my keys somewhere other than Earth? WHAT THEN, Mr. Bruce "Sparty-pants" Sterling?

      Where is your Google NOW?

      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    5. Re:Besides... by projektdotnet · · Score: 1

      Well by then we'd have Google Universe

      --
      Forty-Two
    6. Re:Besides... by corbettw · · Score: 0

      "My ex-girlfriend used to go either way. Man, was she ever a good time!"

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  28. Re:SPIME = Exploit, phishing, & surveillence h by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

    Imagine being able to find, not only anyone who stole your car, but anyone who stole your car keys.

    I think a SPIME-rich world would present a lot of challenges to all but the cleverest of thieves.

  29. No spime needed, PFN does me just fine by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    I need my car keys, I call a number and this loon screams at me that they're under my dresser or something like that, sprinkled with expletives and mutterings about the John Birch Society, Freemasons, and IRS and I have my keys just like that. Of course, the Psychotic Friends Network isn't for everyone, but it doesn't involve RFIDs and notoriously insecure web systems either.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  30. Great idea!! -- Awesome technology!! by Abuzar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll be able to enjoy spam 24hrs/day and 7days/week, targetted specifically towards my taste in women, tool sizes, drugs, and vista preferences... all through my car keys, my nail cutter, my shaving appliance, my dishes, my glasses, my boots, and my underwear. I can hardly wait.

    1. Re:Great idea!! -- Awesome technology!! by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      "You're buying -what- size underwear? Ok, we'll lay off the Viagra spam for you. Not like you're ever likely to need it."

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
  31. Don't you people read books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shaping things! great book, but so 2005! And here i am reading /. to stay up to date...

  32. Not soon, if ever by 14erCleaner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll be more enthusiastic about "ubiquitous computing" when I see something that economically and pleasingly replaces the paperback book. Not even close yet.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
  33. WTF???? by laserbeak43 · · Score: 1

    Why the hell are people so comfortable with themselves and everything they care about being able to be located at the push of a button!?!?!?!?!?!?!

    If you can find it, your enemies can too. and if you think you don't have enemies, your a fool.
    Take it personal if you want....

    1. Re:WTF???? by PPH · · Score: 1

      If you can find it, your enemies can too. and if you think you don't have enemies, your a fool.


      You misspelled you're.


      There. Now I have one more enemy.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:WTF???? by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Paranoia may destroy ya. Of course, you're probably too busy hiding from your enemies to realize it.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    3. Re:WTF???? by laserbeak43 · · Score: 1

      that's not the point. everyone has the right to privacy. this will minimize that right. we'll be living like lab rats.

      oh and your statement was very macho. my compliments

    4. Re:WTF???? by laserbeak43 · · Score: 1

      hehe no you don't cause you realize how silly your reply is, no matter how true.

    5. Re:WTF???? by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      He also should have used the word "personally."

      I'm still trying to figure out why my "enemies" would care about where I left my stuff.

        "FINALLY we can steal his FAVORITE PEN!"

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  34. Ob. Zim quote by billcopc · · Score: 1

    "AAAARGH!! My SPIME!"

    Invader Zim, best cartoon ever!

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  35. This reminds of the time by geekoid · · Score: 0

    we were looking for my moms keys.

    So my brother called 411 (information, usually phone numbers)
    They said they were under the couch...They were.

    true story.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  36. More importently by geekoid · · Score: 1

    can you use triangulation to find your mod points?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  37. In other news... by ozbird · · Score: 1

    ... you can crack nuts with a sledgehammer. Film at 11!

  38. Wind Bag by FoolishBluntman · · Score: 1

    This guy is the biggest wind bag I've ever heard and I've sat through many a University colloquia. I can't believe Google put this guy on. This guy's picture is next to the definition of pompous.
    Oh yeah, Just a second hun, I lost my keys, let me ping them on the net.
    Do you put them into the DNS?

    1. Re:Wind Bag by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I can't believe Google put this guy on. I agree, he was awful. Even more embarrassing was the presentation by his professor buddy. "So, umm, we have some half-assed ideas that some grad students thought of, not tied together in any coherent way, and umm, could you give us some money and work for us? Umm, thanks for listening." *runs off stage*

      Google should fire whoever brought these jackasses in.
  39. In the Future! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the future...

    - Separatism will be forgotten!
    - No more wars!
    - Parents and their kids will get along better!
    - Enough stuff for everyone!
    - Flying cars!
    - There will be more of this but less of that!
    - Time won't be the same!
    - People will vacation on Mars!
    - No one will be ill!
    - We won't need money!
    - Everything everywhere will be ok!

    - People will be writing even more articles about the Future which will turn out to be at least partially incorrect and more often entirely incorrect!

  40. Google's probably on it by captain0captain · · Score: 1

    I asked a Google Earth person a few years ago at the Accelerating Change conference about whether they were experimenting with this idea, and she just smiled slyly. It's right up their alley of making your information accessible and searchable.

  41. George Kayatta's Spime Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should have chosen a different name for this. Spime is the name of a cutting-edge mathematical theory by George Nayef Kayatta, the Foremost Renaissance Man of our age and a Megagenius in the Arts and In The Sciences. It's bad enough that his groundbreaking research has been suppressed for so long, but to give something else the same name is a slap in the face.

    Is this any way to treat the megagenius who created the monumental work The Holy Bible in Verse?

    1. Re:George Kayatta's Spime Theory by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      -1, Babbling TimeCube-Grade Lunatic

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  42. Pronounce it Spy-Me by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

    tag: spyme

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  43. the future by razpones · · Score: 1

    I hope by that time there won't be cars or keys anymore.

  44. I foresee trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "World-renowned Science Fiction writer and futurist Bruce Sterling will outline his ideas for SPIMES, a form of ubiquitous computing that gives smarts and 'searchabiliity' to even the most mundane of physical products. President : "I never had sexual intercourse with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky"

    Slashdotter : "But Google-earth says your sperm..."
  45. All that is old is new: by Hartree · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think Vernor Vinge called it a localizer a number of years back.

    Not sure what Drexler et al were calling the idea in the late 80s, but they were talking about much the same thing as well as general assemblers and such things as utility fog that could do the same thing.

    People have been working on ubi-comp for a long time.

  46. My keys are easy to find... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they are right in my stolen car. Thanks google!

  47. "The Internet of Things" is not new by toplus · · Score: 1

    I am not very sure if Mr. Sterling is using this "Internet of Things" short phrase as something he has conceptualized, imagined or otherwise invented. But the terminology "Internet of Things" has been used many years before Mr. Sterlings' book was published, to refer to a global network of EPC (Electronic Product Code)-based RFID tags and the infrastructure that supports it, the EPC Network. Actually you can see reports of as soon as January 2001, by the then Auto-ID center, now Auto-ID Lab MIT, mentioning the "Internet of Things".
    My point is that the concept Mr. Sterling is talking about is not new, not even from 2004. Finding out the location of RFID tags (those tags being attached to any type of object) is part of the envisioned EPC Network functionalities, not only Supply Chain Management or Product Lifetime Management. Many people have been working on that for very long time (no real global working solution yet though).

  48. Where did I put those...? by manif3st · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah...

    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

    *ducks*

    --
    http://www.collude.biz - Ignore this, it's for Project Honey Pot.
  49. most misleading headline....EVER! by ssintercept · · Score: 0

    no where in that article was any reference to porn! NONE! WTF?

    --
    "You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."-- Fred Hampton
  50. Real Use Cases by dircha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you're having trouble thinking of realistic use cases, the key is to work from the assumption that rfid and rfid scanners are ubiquitous. Think of things in your home or in your place of business. Now, ask yourself what would it mean to you if you could uniquely identify that item and track its location anywhere in the building, and what if you could do that remotely (with proper safeguards for privacy)?

    Now couple this with ubiquitous eletronic mapping of your home and the buildings you spend your day in.

    Your Dinner Plates Are Trackable
    It's time to do dishes. You have a glass and a small plate at your family computer from that snack you ate while reading the news after work. You have two glasses on the coffee table and one on the sofa from the guests you had over last night. Your son has three plates, a bowl, flatware, and a few glasses up in his room. You left a drinking glass on the washroom counter.

    But you don't know that they are there yet! Sure, you could walk into the family room and look around and pick up any you see, but you can do better. Open up your mobile, direct the interface to show the location of all diningware in your home. Now filter that to exclude diningware not already in the kitchen. How do you do that? I don't know, maybe it's as direct as typing "diningware +home -kitchen" into a prompt. But however you do it, now you see on your mobile a layout of your home with red dots indicating the location of diningware you need to round up to wash.

    Your Refrigerator Is Queryable
    Only it isn't that clunky Refrigerator of the Future you saw in that magazine article.

    You're at the grocery store. You're out of milk, low on soy sauce, and out of eggs. But you can only remember the eggs! Open up your mobile. Query "groceries +refrigerator +out" to get a list of groceries that belong in your refrigerator that you are out of: "1. milk, 2. eggs". How does it know what you are out of? After all, if you are out of it, it isn't there. AI? Of course not. It gives a list of groceries that have recently been in your refrigerator but aren't now.

    But wait, what about the soy sauce? Well, it's still there, so your query for things you are out of didn't catch it. How can it know you are low on it? Does the soy sauce bottle have a amount remaining meter that can be read? Of course not, let's be realistic! What you did is designate to your fridge when you set it up that the bottom door-shelf is for things you are running low on. You put the soy sauce bottle there last night after the meal to be sure you'd remember - or rather so it would remember - and your fridge has rfid scanners with sufficient granularity to know what is on this shelf. So you rewrite your query: "groceries +refrigerator +out +low" and you get "1. milk, 2. eggs, 3. soy sauce". Aha! Soy sauce, that's what you were missing. Because you configured your fridge like this when you set it up, when you query "low" in the context of "refrigerator" that's becomes an alias for "top left shelf".

    Your house would have more rfid scanners than electrical outlets. And everything from a carton of milk to your cat's collar would have an rfid tag.

    Other good examples once you make these assumptions? 1) Tracking locations of projectors, televisions, and media carts in the office or school. 2) Tracking locations of books in a library. 813.11A. Where the heck is that? Instead of asking the librarian or following signs through the winding maze of shelves until you find 800xxx, just query it in your mobile and it will show you exactly where it is in the electronically mapped library. Just walk over and pick it up.

    1. Re:Real Use Cases by dircha · · Score: 1

      Or let me correct that last sentence:
      "Because you configured your fridge like this when you set it up, when you query "low" in the context of "refrigerator" that becomes an alias for "bottom door-shelf".

    2. Re:Real Use Cases by danpsmith · · Score: 1

      But you don't know that they are there yet! Sure, you could walk into the family room and look around and pick up any you see, but you can do better. Open up your mobile, direct the interface to show the location of all diningware in your home. Now filter that to exclude diningware not already in the kitchen. How do you do that? I don't know, maybe it's as direct as typing "diningware +home -kitchen" into a prompt. But however you do it, now you see on your mobile a layout of your home with red dots indicating the location of diningware you need to round up to wash.

      Or you could just put the dishes in the sink after you are done eating.

      You're at the grocery store. You're out of milk, low on soy sauce, and out of eggs. But you can only remember the eggs! Open up your mobile. Query "groceries +refrigerator +out" to get a list of groceries that belong in your refrigerator that you are out of: "1. milk, 2. eggs". How does it know what you are out of? After all, if you are out of it, it isn't there. AI? Of course not. It gives a list of groceries that have recently been in your refrigerator but aren't now.

      Or you could just make a grocery list with a .02 pencil and a mini sheet of paper.

      Americans spent millions to engineer a pen that writes upside down for space travel. Russians just used a pencil. Remember to do these simple little things and you won't need a god damned database to remember for you to pick up the eggs. Maintenance on this shit alone sounds like it would require a full time maintenance man because every little bit of electronics that can be is manufactured in a 3rd world country for 2 cents an hour whose workers definitely just write a grocery list instead. If this envisioned future of yours is why we need all this technology, people are retarded and ruining the globe with electronic waste as a means to a very complicated way to complete already obnoxiously simple tasks.

      And what a model we are setting for the 3rd world countries to grow to...One day, you too might require an oracle database and millions of dollars of infrastructure to buy groceries!

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    3. Re:Real Use Cases by odyaws · · Score: 1

      Americans spent millions to engineer a pen that writes upside down for space travel. Russians just used a pencil. While your point is valid, this anecdote is an urban legend. Both the Russians and the Americans used pencils until Fischer developed the space pen on their own dime. Using pens alleviated the safety problem stemming from the debris associated with pencils, and ever since both the Americans and Russians have used pens.
      --
      Still trying to think of a clever sig...
    4. Re:Real Use Cases by adelord · · Score: 1

      But wait, what about the soy sauce? Well, it's still there, so your query for things you are out of didn't catch it. How can it know you are low on it?
      There could be a scale on each shelf that takes a mass reading, and "mass when empty" could be one of the values on the soy sauce RFID. Hell put a scale & RFID on the bottom of each potted plant you have so your 14th gen Roomba will know when to water them.
      Your point, which I totally agree with, is that once everything that isn't instantly disposable gets a chip a million minor daily chores will go away.
      They could even make tracking, organizing, and querying legos far easier. And collectible cards. And all other hobby supplies, including those you don't want the in-laws to find when they come up to visit.
      --
      Eugene Debs: "Money constitutes no proper basis of civilization"
  51. I watched the video... by d474 · · Score: 1

    So this "internet of things" idea of tagging everything and having metadata about all things physical...

    For this to create a "sustainable" framework, all objects when broken down to be recycled would have to be worth something. If my TV (or whatever) has 4.2 million tagged parts in it, everything from the logo down to the solder on the boards, the only way that TV is going to get recycled and reused in manufacturing is going to be if:

    A) There must exist an automated way for the TV to "disassemble" to those parts
    B) Those parts/materials are all reusable
    C) I get paid for every single one of those parts (or get a little more in "credit" if I buy from the same manufacturer)

    ISSUES:

    Tag spammers. If manufacturers can put tags on everything, what's to prevent "spammers" from spraying their nano tags on everything. What about people that place fake tags on objects to make them seem more valuable or just to confuse the "system". However, maybe the system would have a way of tossing out bad tags by using some sort of "hash" or something along those lines. Privacy? No longer exists.

    PLUSES:

    All theft would be traceable. Unfortunately that also makes you 100% traceable even if you aren't a criminal. Insurance companies would begin associating risk with the types of tags you are in close proximity to. Heck, as you walk down the street, you might get real time "danger assessments" on some sort of meter depending on who is near you, what products are near bye...You could plan routes to avoid those areas that statistically are more dangerous. The possibilities are endless.

    The amount of information and metadata this "internet of things" would create are mind boggling. I guess that's where quantum computers will come in handy.

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  52. Mod parent up - Funny by __aawkdb2598 · · Score: 1

    This one's too good to stay hidden.

  53. Re:SPIME = Exploit, phishing, & surveillence h by TehDuffman · · Score: 1

    Imagine this same response being modded up 4 times...

  54. Mod parent up - Insightful. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

    Just sayin'...

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  55. Ah - he's been reading AmbientFindability! by gilgongo · · Score: 1

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0596 007655/findability-20/

    This book has been shaking things up a bit in some circles in the same way as The Tipping Point did.

    And Stirling's quoted on the book's blurb. Bit of a giveaway.

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    1. Re:Ah - he's been reading AmbientFindability! by mrogers · · Score: 1
      Findability is interesting, but speaking as a paranoid basket case I'm more interested in unfindability. It strikes me that there's a widening gap between findable and unfindable information, and the defining feature of that gap is names. Whether they're URLs or sets of googleable keywords, names have become vastly more useful - and more powerful - in the last ten years. If you know the name of something, it's now a trivial task to find information about it. But if you don't know the name of the concept you're searching for, you're stuck with 20th century methods of searching.

      Here's an example: I came up with a statistical tool that's a simple modification of a standard statistical tool, and I wouldn't be surprised if someone has thought of it before. But if they did, I have no idea what they called it. So to find out whether it already exists I have to resort to 20th century search tools: experts and libraries. I have to find someone who's well-versed enough in the area to have come across the idea if it exists, but not so well-versed that my assinine beginner's question will just annoy them. I have to borrow textbooks from the university library and page through them looking for a description that matches my idea (or points me to another book where I might find out more).

      These are both valuable exercises that can lead to unexpected and useful discoveries, and when I call them "20th century search tools" I don't mean it in some condescending Web 2.0 way, but there's an undeniable and growing difference between those methods of searching and the methods I would have used if I knew the name of the concept.

  56. More importantly by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    By the time any of this technology could ship we'd probably have thought controlled car locks. No need for keys then. Presumably we'd still have tangible friends and enemies (as opposed to the virtual kind). Being able to find them by Google Earth would be useful. Of course, that could lead to a whole new twist on privacy & related issues (stalking, for instance).
    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  57. Re:Very fascinating - Google-Roomba-Grandkids by ancientt · · Score: 1

    Close. I'd call my grandchild to have him/her talk to the Roomba and if Google is broken again, I'd call the same kid. I'm soooo looking forward to being able to blame being a jerk on age and senility.

    --
    B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
  58. Recycling is the ket to all this by IckySplat · · Score: 1

    What is the RFID tags had no unique ID in them?
    Instead a Datablock describing, who made the item
    what raw products the item contains etc...

    Then you could build a 'cheap' sorting unit that recycling centers could
    use to sort the junk into the appropriate bins for melting back down into raw products

    Simple example...
    Glass here, Plastic here, Metals here, etc...

    MOST of the stuff that goes into landfills can be recycled one way or another.
    the rest in generally organic anyway so composting it isn't too hard.

    --
    Help! help!, the termites are eating my DRAM!!!
  59. What is Spime? by dintech · · Score: 1

    A stupid name for something.

  60. Reality Check - 101 by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
    Sorry to be the realist here, but if you go back and examine the studies Gladwell cites in his book, you will find they have been mostly disproven and invalidated quite some time ago.

    And while I personally have nothing against Sterling, he is the most unimaginative, super corporate author around - while he is espousing those most silly futurist predictions of his (he is both soooo glib and gullible) - reality is constantly passing him by. No critical thinker is he......

  61. no, it's fine... by Jippy+T+Flounder · · Score: 1

    we're used to rocket scientists being unable to handle metric / imperial conversions. mars missions, anyone?

    hmmm. would it be possible to mess with someone using google earth to track things down and convince them that they're located in a different area... have them running around their office like crazy while you're standing outside holding them :D

    --
    ---- I was woken up this morning by a face full of fur. Damn cat thought my head made a good pillow.
  62. Some of us will need more entries than that. by pragma_x · · Score: 1

    User-agent: wife
    disallow: /pr0n

  63. All over it. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    What if I lose my keys somewhere other than Earth? WHAT THEN, Mr. Bruce "Sparty-pants" Sterling?

    Where is your Google NOW?
    http://moon.google.com/

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."