Slashdot Mirror


OpenDNS Says Google-Dell Browser Tool is Spyware

PetManimal writes "David Ulevitch, the founder of OpenDNS, claims that Google and Dell have placed 'spyware' on Dell computers. Ulevitch made the claim based on his observation of the behavior of the Google Toolbar and homepage that comes preinstalled on IE in new Dell machines. He says that a browser redirector sends users who enter nonexistent URLs to a Dell-branded page loaded with Google ads. Another observer, Danny Sullivan, says that this is a different result than what happens on PCs without the redirector. However, the original article notes that Ulevitch has a vested interest in the results of mistyped URLs."

188 comments

  1. Instructions to Remove by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative
    Anyone who's looking for a way to remove this, Dell's support site gives these instructions:

    To uninstall the Google URL Assistant, perform the following steps:

    1. Click Start and select Control Panel.
    The Control Panel window appears.
    2. Select Add or Remove Programs.
    The Add or Remove Programs window appears.
    3. Select Remove a Program.
    The Add or Remove Programs utility window appears.
    4. Click to highlight the URL Assistant program and click Remove.
    5. Follow the instructions on the screen to complete the removal process.
    However, a user on the bottom of one of the links reports a way to disable it (but leave it on your machine) if you want to keep it:

    In Internet Explorer, click on Tools,Internet Options,Programs, Manage Add-ons. Look for the CBrowserHelperObject published by Dell, then disable it.
    Personally, I've bought two computers from Dell a long time ago and the first thing I did, like a good little Slashdotter, was format it and install a real operating system. When my friend bought a Dell, I brought a case of beer over and we took his Windows install disc and we re-installed Windows. Why? Well, just because of all the crap software like this that somehow magically is installed on a new box. If I recall, he had a 30 day trial version of Norton Antivirus, a trial version of Nero, quicktime crap, one of the most heinous media applications I've ever witnessed (due to his sound card) & to top it all off they had some 30 startup entries in msconfig--over half of which I couldn't tell what they were!

    Now I work for a fortune 500 company and guess what we do with every box we get from Dell? Re-image it.

    Now, for the 99% other Dell customers, this is just purely unfortunate because I'm not so naive to expect everyone to know how or why they should take the above actions. I hope that all the virus scanning apps (HiJackThis, Lavasoft's Adaware, etc) get this thing because Adaware is about the most useful thing I can show my family how to use frequently enough to keep the computer protected.

    This sounds a lot like something the old Gateways would do. Huh, I never would have thought Dell would reach that level but, well, here we are. The important thing is to factor this in when you're thinking about a new computer. Hopefully some competition will spring up for Dell and, you know, quality of the software (not just the hardware) will start to matter for Dell.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Instructions to Remove by daeg · · Score: 2, Informative

      That goes double, or triple, for Dell laptops. I've never seen so much sh*t installed on them. It started appearing about 2 months ago, and despite contacting various account reps, they have no idea what I'm bitching about. Very few of the programs uninstall cleanly, either.

      Of course, nothing can come even close to the pile of crap called "ConfigFree" on Toshiba laptops. Dear God that software is awful! Remember kids, when you are looking for badly written, badly tested software to hijack network connections, think ConfigFree!

    2. Re:Instructions to Remove by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      I truly, truly don't understand the fuss with the preinstalled crap. I've just bought a Dell with Vista preinstalled for my gf and I boot it, menu -> Control Panel -> Add/Remove Programs. Remove crap. Install Firefox, remove the IE icon. Done.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    3. Re:Instructions to Remove by cmorgan47 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      hen my friend bought a Dell, I brought a case of beer over and we took his Windows install disc and we re-installed Windows.

      i with you on the rest of the post, but as a good little Slashdotter you should know that the friend buys the beer.

      --
      no i have not shot my gun in the air and gone 'Ahh!'
    4. Re:Instructions to Remove by MobyDisk · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can give multiple examples of this kind of stuff. I know of 2 Dell PC's purchased a year apart, and both of them came with 3 CD burning programs, all of which ran in the background, and none of them worked because they conflicted with each other. So right out of the box you could not burn CDs. That's unacceptable.

    5. Re:Instructions to Remove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      i with you on the rest of the post, but as a good little Slashdotter you should know that the friend buys the beer.
      Computers are the new automotives. I used to work with my dad on cars when I was younger and we used to drink beer while replacing someone's break pads/cylinders, changing their oil or rotating their tires. Sometimes we'd get daring and tighten someone's serpentine belt pulley.

      Haggling over who buys the beer when it's a prime excuse for some guys to just sit around and shoot the shit isn't worth it. I'll buy the beer and I'll make sure it's something you've never had ... like a variant of Leinenkugal's or a nice Belgium White Wheat brew, you know something exotic. These days, a case of beer is a trivial amount of money for me but not for all my friends.

      Computers are the new excuse to sit around and "bond" as corny as that sounds--like fishing or camping. Enjoy the excuse to stop and upgrade someone's ram, it'll make you feel useful. I'll bring the beer since I'm the one getting something out of the deal. If you haven't seen a friend in years, call them up and talk to them. If you want to hang out, ask them if their computer's running alright and offer to come over and help them out with the problems, everybody has them.

      America has become too centered on who pays for what, I say relax and enjoy life before you die.

      OT eldavojohn
    6. Re:Instructions to Remove by fenrisulfur · · Score: 1

      It is hard to put these things any better, amen brother.

    7. Re:Instructions to Remove by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That goes double, or triple, for Dell laptops. I've never seen so much sh*t installed on them. It started appearing about 2 months ago, and despite contacting various account reps, they have no idea what I'm bitching about. Very few of the programs uninstall cleanly, either.
      If it started 'appearing' two months ago on a laptop you purchased before then, it very likely has nothing to do with Dell, and quite possibly more to do with the things you're picking up/installing yourself (albeit inadvertently).
    8. Re:Instructions to Remove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I work for a fortune 500 company and guess what we do with every box we get from Dell? Re-image it.

      You know, for larger customers, Dell can put your image on the computer for you before it ships.

    9. Re:Instructions to Remove by DoohickeyJones · · Score: 1

      Damn, and me without mod points.

    10. Re:Instructions to Remove by Some+Kind+Of+Record · · Score: 3, Funny

      Says the guy who bought a laptop with Vista.

      --
      Are you geeky enough to attend your local BarCamp??
    11. Re:Instructions to Remove by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      No, it's a desktop. Sorry, I don't think I understand your reply. What are you trying to say?

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    12. Re:Instructions to Remove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

    13. Re:Instructions to Remove by HeroreV · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dell Windows computers come with a program that updates some of the Dell crapware. I've heard this updater has recently starting installing new crapware without user confirmation.

    14. Re:Instructions to Remove by TheLink · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Now I work for a fortune 500 company and guess what we do with every box we get from Dell? Re-image it. "

      If you are buying a bunch of boxes I heard you can send Dell your preferred image, and they'll image all of them for you.

      --
    15. Re:Instructions to Remove by WGFELyL5 · · Score: 1
      Users started noticing crap on Dell installs a while ago.

      The PC Decrapifier is designed to remove a specific list unwanted software in an unattended fashion. Before running, the user may select exactly what software should be removed. Currently, it is targeted for use on most Dell machines; however it will theoretically run on anything that has the software listed below. http://www.pcdecrapifier.com/
    16. Re:Instructions to Remove by operagost · · Score: 1

      Naturally, the shrill harpi... I mean WOMEN criticize these male traditions as foolish time-wasters-- probably because they can't drive to the mall to spend your money while you're chillin' wit da homies.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    17. Re:Instructions to Remove by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Now I work for a fortune 500 company and guess what we do with every box we get from Dell? Re-image it.

      Not buying it. Companies that buy in any kind of bulk can get a custom setup from Dell (or any other big vendor) pretty easily. Heck, my wife's business just bought 20 Dells directly (the boss likes Dell for whatever reason), and with a single phone call all 20 machines were shipped sans crapware.
       
      So either a) your company is screwing up pretty badly, or b) you re-image simply because it makes you look good (either to yourself or your bosses). Possibly both.
    18. Re:Instructions to Remove by peekitty · · Score: 1

      Correct, we used this option with Dell two years ago. We built the image, shipped it to Dell, and they shipped us 400+ systems with our image installed. Actually, they shipped us about 200 systems with a modified version of our image that was not quite the same as the one we approved. The other ~200 were also a Dell-modified version of our image, but with major configuration differences and much Dell branding.

      The next 400 machines came from HP and we imaged them ourselves.

    19. Re:Instructions to Remove by netdur · · Score: 1

      and then you had sex?

      ps, sometimes I do

      --
      "Steve Jobs invented the world" -- Bill W. GATES
    20. Re:Instructions to Remove by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Why? Well, just because of all the crap software like this that somehow magically is installed on a new box.

      This is one of the ways dell can afford to undercut whitebox vendors. If advertisers are subsidizing the cost of the unit by preloading cruft, dell can make a bit of profit even if they lower the price.

      Everybody wins. Advertisers win because they reach an audience. Dell wins because they can capture more sales, and undercut competition. Savvy consumers win because they can get the hardware for less, and blow out the cruft software immediately after it arrives.

      Un-savvy consumers lose, its true. But then, they always lose. Caveat emptor and all that.

    21. Re:Instructions to Remove by daeg · · Score: 1

      "Appearing" as in appearing on new laptops we order. Older ones do not contain as much junk as the recent ones. It also appears on laptops that go in for servicing and come back re-imaged.

    22. Re:Instructions to Remove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not always that easy, see this comment

    23. Re:Instructions to Remove by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Wow. They took the extra effort to annoy their customers?

      Kinda surprised - that's crazy.

      Only excuse I see was if somehow your image didn't work on their hardware- but the idea is the hardware you used to make the image from is identical to the other 400.

      Then if it's windows you run that NewSID stuff on all of them. Of course you also need the corporate version of windows :).

      --
    24. Re:Instructions to Remove by mistralol · · Score: 1

      I assume you also used the .inf files for the driver to that you don't have to run each setup program to install their crappy programs again for various bits of hardware that function perfectly fine with only the vendor driver being installed. eg a sound card.

    25. Re:Instructions to Remove by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Dell Windows computers come with a program that updates some of the Dell crapware. I've heard this updater has recently starting installing new crapware without user confirmation. Curious if there's anything to substantiate this? I have a dell myself, but the first thing I do is reformat it with the 'clean' OS (and uninstall the extra crap that comes even on that disk).
  2. Can you really blame google by Organized+Konfusion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This seems like junk that Dell have installed to make some cash one the side. If firefox bundled the same dns hijacker then who would you blame? Firefox or google?

    Just because google make the tool doesn't mean its their fault that it is installed by default in a spywareish fashion.

    1. Re:Can you really blame google by ronadams · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Parent wasn't trolling; he made a very valid point. Google made the tool, Dell configured the machine. Dell turned the software to spyware. Google has, AFAIK, no under-the-radar delivery system for any of their software, including the URL redirection tools they've made (there's a few). However, system configurators like Dell have been doing this crap for years. Our sniper's scope should be aimed towards Round Rock, not Mountain View.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    2. Re:Can you really blame google by B'Trey · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How did Dell turn the software to spyware? They installed in on the machine, yes, but Google created it and dictated it's behavior. It allows Google to track every website you visit, even if you never intentionally use Google at all. It can be removed, but it's certainly not user friendly for a non-techie. You have to go through Control Panel, and the name is hardly intuitive (again, for a non-techie.) At the very least, there should be a simple "Uninstall" entry in the Start menu. Spyware? Eh, that's probably pushing it a little bit. But Google and Dell are pushing the edge of responsible, ethical behavior too.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    3. Re:Can you really blame google by Mountaineer1024 · · Score: 2, Informative

      As I understand it, Mozilla DO do something like this with firefox.

      When you perform a search with the default firefox screen (with it's Firefox customised Google) Google is notified of this fact and kick back some money to Mozilla.

      When you perform a search from Firefox's search box you'll also notice that it's identifying you as a Firefox user, here take a look:
      http://www.google.com.au/search?q=test&le=en&sourc eid=mozilla-search&start=0

      Note the sourceid in the querystring.
      Nefarious? That's for you to decide.

    4. Re:Can you really blame google by ronadams · · Score: 1

      The software Google wrote replaces the 404 page. There's no mention in TFA or elsewhere that it "allows Google to track every website you visit". Regarding the removal via the control panel interface, that's Dell's end, not Google's. The program has an uninstall entry in Add/Remove Programs.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    5. Re:Can you really blame google by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 2

      Depends very much on where it is directing you to. The article said it directs you to a "Dell branded page full of google adds." If the page it redirects you to is in google's domain (i.e. - maybe has a URL of google.com/delladpage), then google will in fact be monitoring and tracking your traffic as you hit their servers. If the page it redirects you to is in Dell's domain, then Dell will be able to track your traffic. Either way, one of them can see you hit that page, and of course if you visit any of the google links, google will see that too. So in fact there is a way for them to see at least your immediate hit and possibly subsequent traffic/browsing decisions, because they did just toss you into their domain.

      --
      Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
    6. Re:Can you really blame google by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Yea, but they get that from your UA string anyway. And google can track you going on their site. It's the toolbars that track you on other sites + Google Analytics/Urchin ad/tracking cookie mix that would be worse.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  3. When I work on a Dell ... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

    ... the first thing I do for my clients is either clean up all that crap or reinstall the OS (depending on which one will be faster and cheaper for them). I doubt Dell installs this kind of sh!t (and all that other crapware) on the computers their employees use ... Google probably doesn't either.

  4. Obligatory Google Reality Check by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Google is a publicly traded company and as such here's what's important to them.....

    Making money for their stockholders.

    That means doing things like creating spyware if it helps their bottom line. The mantra of "Do no evil" becomes null and void once you become a publicly traded company. They should change their motto to "We do less evil than everyone else".

    Google is going to do what is best in their corporate interest. Surprised? Don't be. It's business

    1. Re:Obligatory Google Reality Check by gnud · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some would argue that doing no evil will prevent alienating consumers and customers, and thereby keeps the bottom line from dropping.

    2. Re:Obligatory Google Reality Check by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

      They should change their motto to "We do less evil than everyone else". We would need some proof of this. The cynic in me is waiting for some story to break involving the credit card companies, travel agencies, book stores and the government.
      --
      Bearded Dragon
    3. Re:Obligatory Google Reality Check by medlefsen · · Score: 3, Informative
      Google is not a "normal" publicly traded company. The power structure where insiders hold the special class B stock that has 10 times the voting power of the public class A stock means that they're aren't subject to the whims of public investors. Brin and Page have 30% of the power alone. Here's a quote from Google:

      "We anticipate that our founders, executive officers, directors (and their affiliates) and employees will together own approximately 84.8 percent of our Class B common stock, representing approximately 83.6 percent of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock,"
      On the flip side it's also true that a couple VC's have over 20% of the total power, but they were old investors of google and have always had a lot of power in the company.
    4. Re:Obligatory Google Reality Check by popejeremy · · Score: 1

      And your idea is borne out in reality. That's why companies like Wal-Mart and McDonalds totally fail to make a profit.

    5. Re:Obligatory Google Reality Check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Google is a publicly traded company and as such here's what's important to them.....
      Making money for their stockholders.
      That means doing things like creating spyware if it helps their bottom line. The mantra of "Do no evil" becomes null and void once you become a publicly traded company.

      Something like this is trotted out so often, we should make it a FAQ.

      Actually, Google's obligations on becoming a publicly traded company are to behave according to the prospectus. Many (most) companies' prospectus say things like "we will maximise our profits", because they're basically boilerplate and that's what most shareholders want. However, if you actually read Google's prospectus, you'll find that it has quite a different slant. So Google is not obliged to maximise profits at all costs; it's obliged to adhere to the principles of the prospectus - which enshrine the "do no evil" philosophy.

    6. Re:Obligatory Google Reality Check by nphase · · Score: 1

      Although, seeing as they have a multi tiered share system, one could argue that they are in fact, not feeding the shareholder. I see those privileged shares as a big "F off" to the stock holders in terms of control over the firm and it's actions, to make sure that it doesn't pander to the shareholder.

    7. Re:Obligatory Google Reality Check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someday, somewhere, an old experienced Google hand might take a newbie aside and explain:

      In Googlisiness, doing no evil is everything- Once you have learned how to fake that, you have it made.

    8. Re:Obligatory Google Reality Check by epistemiclife · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should change their motto to "See no evil." In all seriousness, though, this kind of software should not be terribly surprising, when it comes from a company which catalogs incredible amounts of data about one's personal online habits, through its various services, such as Gmail, Google Search, etc., which is then mined. To Google's credit, it has recently given some assurance that it will delete said data after a certain period of time. However, I think that people are remiss when they start trusting corporations too much, lest we forget the AOL Search debacle from not long ago.

    9. Re:Obligatory Google Reality Check by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I thought that a publicly traded company had to act in the best interest of their stockholders. Now one would presume that this is always to make as much money as possible no matter what, but that isn't necessarily the case. Google in particular could argue that given their company motto of 'Due no evil', that they could legitimately expect their shareholders to feel that doing the right thing is MORE important than making as much money as possible. Thus, doing evil to make money would be counter to the best interest of their shareholders, and open them up for lawsuit. Isn't it illegal for public companies to lie to their shareholders in an attempt to prop up their price?

  5. OpenDNS is bummed by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The issue here is that Google / Dell beat OpenDNS to the punch. Both accomplish the same purpose: when a user types a malformed URL into the address bar, they get an "enhanced" experience.

    OpenDNS is bummed that Google figured out a way to make money off the proposition. OpenDNS should have thought of that first.

    --

    To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    1. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by Catil · · Score: 1

      OpenDNS is bummed that Google figured out a way to make money off the proposition. OpenDNS should have thought of that first. No, actually OpenDNS is bummed because they already make money this way - Malformed URLs like slashdoz.org leads to this page with sponsored links. Note that it's powered by Yahoo.
    2. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OpenDNS did think of it first, but the Google software is one step closer to the browser, so it trumps the DNS redirects which OpenDNS uses. (OpenDNS offers an alternate resolving DNS server which corrects minor typos by guessing what you meant and directs you to a landing page with ads if there is no similar real domain name.)

    3. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by dpninerSLASH · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      OpenDNS is bummed that Google figured out a way to make money off the proposition. OpenDNS should have thought of that first.

      OpenDNS has been doing this for some time, so you're just plain, embarassingly wrong. I use OpenDNS as my forwarding DNS servers and I enjoy their automatic redirection feature, but I always have the option of switching away to other forwarders. Dell's deal is much more stealth and they haven't been nearly as up-front about it.

      Huge difference.

    4. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by bodan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think he just meant that OpenDNS dislikes the sudden (and advantaged) competition. Anyway, I'm not sure I'd call "stealth" a page that has the owner's (Dell's) branding. It's not even hidden, it's just automatic. (Yes, if you're a beginner you don't know that it's optional, but that's true of WMP, the Flash plugin and Java, too.) Nevermind, that wasn't why I answered. When you say you "have the option of switching away to other forwarders", do you mean there's something like OpenDNS that doesn't do that messy redirect? I want a DNS that tells me when it doesn't find something, not try guessing. It's hugely annoying when the Java applications I work on (or SSH for that matter) try to connect to the OpenDNS search engine whenever I mistype an URL. My ISP provides absolutely abysmal DNS service (it takes it a minute to find Google...) so I resorted to using the DNS of a random ISP I found by accident. But I don't have any guarantee that one will hold, and it's pretty far anyway.

      --
      "I think I am a fallen star. I should wish on myself."
    5. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by neoform · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't the very nature of a 'toolbar' to in fact *be* spyware?

      They all track what you view and send that info back to home base.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    6. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by monsted · · Score: 1

      Dell is doing the exact same thing as IE already does, except they point it at their site instead of msn.com.

      A quick test on my danish IE sent me to http://sea.search.msn.dk/dnserror.aspx?FORM=DNSAS& q=slashdoz.org which doesn't have ads but still gives MS info about my browsing habits.

    7. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you use a WRT54g home router (or one of the many similar routers which can use the same enhanced firmwares), you can use that as a DNS resolver. Or you could run a resolver on your computer. With broadband, the latency on the last hop isn't so bad, so a remote recursive resolver isn't an advantage anymore. A local resolver gives you full control over DNS: you can add local domains if you want, you can avoid DNS censorship and you can ignore caching directives as YOU wish (absolutely no caching for your dynamic DNS names, for example).

    8. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Informative

      no, a toolbar is just a place to locate lots of tools and usually a nice visible logo for the company that made it, nothing more is implied. in some cases using browser tools causes interaction with the hosting site, but this is not the same as saying that the toolbar should necessarily be involved in other web browser functions such as intercepting bad domains. the old google toolbar only connected to home base if you did a google search with it or if you turned on the pagerank display

    9. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by bodan · · Score: 1

      But unless my understanding of how DNS works is much worse than I thought, don't I need another DNS server to connect my resolver to? I can't connect it to the root servers directly, can I?

      --
      "I think I am a fallen star. I should wish on myself."
    10. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, you can. (The following explanation is simplified but good enough for resolving purposes.) DNS is a hierarchy. The root servers know the IP addresses of the domains servers for the top level domains. The top level domain servers know the IP addresses of all second level domain servers in their TLD. Almost all of these servers don't do recursive lookups, which means they will only respond to queries for the information in their own domain. That's why you need a recursive resolver. When you ask a recursive resolver for www.slashdot.org, it asks one of the root servers for the address of the .org nameserver. Then it asks the .org nameserver for the address of the slashdot.org nameserver, then it asks the slashdot.org nameserver for the www.slashdot.org address. BTW, all of these responses get cached, so you rarely need to contact the root servers. These lookups each take some time, which is longer if there is a high latency link between the resolver and the nameserver, which is why people on dialup like to use better connected computers to do these lookups for them and return only the final result. But there's no technical reason why you can't request these lookups yourself and with today's networks it is not slow at all. Try it yourself: MaraDNS windows binary. Run the resolver with run_maradns.bat and set your DNS to 127.0.0.1. That's all there is to it.

    11. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by bodan · · Score: 1

      I'm not using Windows, and I already have a DNS resolver which I've been using only as a cache for other DNS servers.

      Somehow it never crossed my mind that it would be actually possible and reasonable to connect to the root DNSs. Thanks!

      --
      "I think I am a fallen star. I should wish on myself."
    12. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just make sure that you don't try to use the root servers as recursive resolvers. That won't work. You need an actual recursive resolver, which does the lookup process itself, not just a DNS cache (of which there are also many), which will forward all requests to a recursive resolver and cache the responses.

    13. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by bodan · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think I got it now. Thanks!

      --
      "I think I am a fallen star. I should wish on myself."
    14. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by neoform · · Score: 1

      what do you think happens when it gets the page rank? you think google doesn't keep track of that page after you requested it's rank?

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    15. Re:OpenDNS is bummed by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      what do you think happens when it gets the page rank? you think google doesn't keep track of that page after you requested it's rank? that's why i said "the old google toolbar only connected to home base if you did a google search with it or if you turned on the pagerank display." in configuration for that toolbar pageranking of pages was defaulted to OFF and in the place where you enabled it they clearly mentioned that it works by contacting their servers.
  6. OpenDNS is not open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dell is "monetizing" mistyped URL traffic, like OpenDNS. The customer has a choice which DNS server he uses and which preinstalled software he gets with a new computer (by choosing different vendors). Both do the same, for the same purpose. If I had to choose between the two, I'd choose Dell. At least they don't fly under a false flag, like OpenDNS, which only claims to be Open for marketing purposes.

  7. Kinda fitting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    http://www.iwebtool.com/domain_lookup?domain=www.g oogle.com

    Age of domain 9 year(s), 9 month(s) and 9 day(s) - Online since: 15-Sep-1997

    P.S. Roll your monitor 180 degrees.

    1. Re:Kinda fitting by charlieman · · Score: 1

      That means today their evilness grows 3/2 of normal?

    2. Re:Kinda fitting by kestasjk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Some may say that was coincidence. Well here's the creepy part:

      Take the number of days Google have public (2321), multiply by the number of Chinese people imprisoned thanks to Google (7), multiply by the number of web pages that Google indexes (11,029,291,583), divide by Nostradamus' number that he foretold would mark the beginning of the end (10,392), and round to the nearest 6 (6 as in 666). Now simply base64 encode the number, and you get DLOeVFT0501l==, rearrange the letters and you get "D0LOTSOFeV1l".

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  8. This has nothing to do with Google toolbar... by LLKrisJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... Or at least _not only_ The same behaviour happens on my company issued Dell D820. It comes loaded with IE6 and NO Google toolbar and yet when I mistype a URL I do not end up at the MSN search page like on any other IE installation! Instead IE redirects me to a Dell branded Google search page full of Google commercials.

    1. Re:This has nothing to do with Google toolbar... by cerberusss · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dell uses the Internet Explorer SDK to adjust IE on a number of points. Lots of big companies do this as well, it's noticeable in the title bar of IE, which will say something along the lines of Internet Explorer presented to you by MegaCorp or something. At which point I start FireFox.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    2. Re:This has nothing to do with Google toolbar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dell Business notebooks (especially the Latitude Series) does not come loaded with a bunch of crap. Inspirons are the worst in that perspective.

    3. Re:This has nothing to do with Google toolbar... by Briareos · · Score: 1

      That's funny - mine says "Intranet Exploder". And that's all I use it for... :P

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

  9. Claim is complete FUD by Odiumjunkie · · Score: 4, Informative
    The gist of the 'Spyware' claim comes from OpenDNS claiming the error redirecting service from Google

    has no clear name and is very hard to uninstall
    Complete FUD. The service is called "Browser Address Error Redirector" - which is a completely accurate and clear name for the service, and to remove it, you uninstall it from the Add/Remove Programs dialogue, as you would any regular peice of software.

    I'm sure slashdot denizens will have a good time discussing how useless the bundled software and trialware that comes with Dell computers is, and how the sensible thing to do is reinstall from scratch, but that's been the case for a while. There is zero story here.
    1. Re:Claim is complete FUD by wwmedia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Browser Address Error Redirector"

      yea do you HONESTLY think that you average Joe user would uninstall a program with such a scary name? thats if they even understand 1 of the 4 words in that name!

    2. Re:Claim is complete FUD by Odiumjunkie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If average Joe user speaks the English language, then I imagine he'd be able determine what the service did. There's really no jargon. What does the service do? It redirects addresses that contain errors when entered into the browser. It would be irresponsible to call it something like "Google Search Helper" because then even techies won't have a clue what it does.

    3. Re:Claim is complete FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The story is that one mistyped-url-redirector service complains about another service doing the same... wait, you're right, there is no story.

    4. Re:Claim is complete FUD by hclyff · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are you being sarcastic?

      Browser - "What's a browser? You mean, like, the internet?"

      Address - You are telling me that people who can't tell difference between a search bar and an address bar know what an internet address is?

      Error - Sounds scary...

      Redirector - "Redi-what?" (I very much doubt average user knows what's a redirect, you can as well tell them it polynormificalizes their antroendoretarterons, it does the same effect)

    5. Re:Claim is complete FUD by ajs · · Score: 1

      Thanks, you beat me to the obvious anti-fud post. I hope people actually read it. That said, Dell is not above exploiting a captive audience, so even though one guy cried wolf here, that doesn't mean we shouldn't keep a close eye on what their machines ship with.

    6. Re:Claim is complete FUD by asninn · · Score: 1

      What would your proposal be for a better name, then? One that doesn't confuse the average Joe even though it's still concise...

      I'm sure Dell is listening.

      --
      butter the donkey
    7. Re:Claim is complete FUD by jackbird · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about "Google Website Address Assistant"? I don't know about you, but my add/remove programs list gets very long very fast, and something that fits into an alphabetical scheme with a clear indication of who put it there seems better than what they're using.

    8. Re:Claim is complete FUD by Odiumjunkie · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're reducing the level of average Joe user's intelligence to such a level as to render meaningless your point. The type of person you describe is incapable of performing even the most trivial of computing tasks. The type of person you describe will not realise that a custom Google ad-laden error page is not the normal result of a mis-typed url or a bad link. The type of person you describe will believe that is just how the internet works, and will have no need or desire to disable such a page.

      However, a person of reasonable intelligence who is capable of determining that the custom Google error page they see on their computer is not normal, and is resourceful enough to find an online resource that explains the problem and gives the name of the service they need to uninstall should be fully capable of disecting such a clear name.

      "Browser" - Not terribly technical. "To browse the internet" is a very common phrase even amongst non-technical folks, and if one resorts to a dictionary compiled in the last four years the usage in reference to a computer program used to surf the internet will be noted.

      "Address" - One hardly needs to have a degree in computer science to conflate the everyday usage of "address" to the technical usage - someone who has already realised that the problem arises from a bad link or a mis-typed URL should have no problems understanding this usage of "address".

      "Error" - Once again, a completely clear, non-jargon usage of the word. It refers simply to a mistake in an entered URL ("address"). Very relatable for non-technical people.

      "Redirector" - Are you kidding me? You think most people can't determine what "redirect" means? It's lifted directly from everyday usage, it's a perfect, clear, relatable term. Traffic is redirected, people are redirected - and a user is redirected if they mis-type an address. If I am giving directions to a typical person over the phone, and say "Oh, hang on, I forgot that Foo Highway is closed for repairs, I'm going to redirect you via Bar Boulevard.", they do not flap their mouths gormlessly like the lobotomised moron you describe.

      The name is as clear as it could possibly be. Anybody capable of diagnosing the problem and determining to fix it should be able to dissect the name very easily. It is not obfuscated in any fashion.

    9. Re:Claim is complete FUD by davidu · · Score: 1

      As it turns out, this part might not be true -- It might be even harder to uninstall. And remember, lots of people aren't comfortable adding and removing software. That's what Google is betting on here. We've heard more than enough reports to believe that there are multiple names for this software, including the infamous "Browser Helper Objects" that are put into IE, outside the Add/Remove Programs arena.

      But that's not the point here. This might not be spyware by your definition, but as someone else mentioned, it's certainly not friendlyware. And what do I expect of Google?

      --

      # Hack the planet, it's important.
    10. Re:Claim is complete FUD by stubear · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I recently purchased a Dell M2010 and noticed this "problem". It bugged me but I found no obvious way to shut it off, including the add/remove programs suggestion mentioned in the article. After reading this article I did a little more poking around and discovered that Dell is now utilizing a browser add-on called CBrowser Helper Object (or something close to that) to perform this functionality, which I promptly disabled. The point is this is not an obvious fix and Dell shouldn't be doing it anyway. PC manufacturers need to really stop loading the system up with crapware and silly little "branded experiences". I have utility programs on my Dell that basically mimic the basic functionality for some things already available in Windows. The biggest difference is Dell has their programmers "design" hideous interfaces that make absolutely no sense whatsoever and redirect the user to these utilities at every chance, just to get in yet another "branded experience". My experience thus far has been great computer, now how can I go about obtaining another clean copy of Windows Vista Ultimate to replace the shit Dell installed.

    11. Re:Claim is complete FUD by davidu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wrong.

      It's highly unusual for a piece of software to not mention who put it there. Look at your other Google software you have installed. Do you have "Desktop" installed or do you have "Google Desktop?" Does it say "Toolbar" or does it say "Google Toolbar?"

      Oh wait, I know what kind of software hides things like that... software that is trying to be opaque and hidden.

      -davidu

      --

      # Hack the planet, it's important.
    12. Re:Claim is complete FUD by davidu · · Score: 1

      Bingo. We found out about this yesterday, AFTER the blog post.

      --

      # Hack the planet, it's important.
    13. Re:Claim is complete FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly I am sick of hearing this crap from People. Dell can install anything they want on a PC they sell to you. You have a Choice not to buy Dell. Apple does shit like this all the time that is Apple and everyone is OK with it. Why not with any other PC Maker. Folks you vote with your Dollars. This whole Point is Stupid OpenDNS is pissed cause they got circumvented by Dell. So I provide a Service that stops your Service. Dell's service provides Dell with more money on Dell's Bottom Line This allows Dell to Sell PC's Cheaper, and still make Reasonable Profit. Error redirection is big money if Dell doesn't do it OpenDNS does if they don't do it Microsoft does. I mean who really cares. When all is said and done this is One company Crying because another company is circumventing their service.

    14. Re:Claim is complete FUD by Nappa48 · · Score: 0

      ...wait what? Windows Vista Ultimate, shitty Dell software. (SDS)
      So let me get this right:
      Vista > SDS...

      wha..eh...
      ERROR: DOES NOT COMPUTE *explodes*

    15. Re:Claim is complete FUD by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      Is it clear whether Google or Dell wrote this piece? In IE's addon manager it says it's a Dell product. Regardless, OpenDNS is a for profit company that has nothing to do with openness, and they are just pissed that this service competes with them by default. There is a huge bias that the author completely ignores.
      Regards,
      Steve

    16. Re:Claim is complete FUD by stubear · · Score: 1

      There are a few problems with this. First of all, the M2010 is a rather unique computer. It's a great portable workstation (sold as a laptop but at 18.5 lbs, I don't think so) and has been invaluable at work on a recent project where I just so happened to have After Effects and Audition on it and only Flash MX on my G5 at work. The project would have been an absolute nightmare had I only been able to work in Flash.

      Second problem is the number of system builders who do this. Hunting down white box system builders in my area who I can trust is bad enough. Try finding people who build laptops. You can't which means you have to go to the Dells and Gateway's of the world.

      Sure, Dell is more than welcome to put whatever crap they want on their systems but that in no way means I have to like it and be content with a system loaded with silly crap like this.

  10. Not spyware by mysidia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fact that it sends you to a custom page if you make a URL typo does not mean it is spyware. That's a visible change, and you would be hard-pressed not to notice the effects of the software, or the fact that it sends you to a Dell branded page.

    Since Dell ships it to you that way, you have no meaningful opportunity to establish an expectation that the Dell system behave differently. I.E. Since the software "comes that way" for you, it's not as if the software made a change to your computer without your permission.

    So not only is it not spyware, it's not malware, or software that secretly modified your system without authorization (because, you see, your system came that way in the first place).

    1. Re:Not spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has non-standard behavior and results in software leaking information without a user's EXPLICIT permission (even if only once prior to being uninstalled). This is spyware. Whether you know it is on your machine or not is irrelevant to the nature of spyware. A visible camera in the ceiling is no less a spy than an invisible one (although the latter may be a more effective spy). Further, it is not known whether this handles typos or not. Ntent iss haard too jahge.

    2. Re:Not spyware by Dancindan84 · · Score: 1

      it's not malware That I take issue with. It's displaying information that is -not- part of the site I typed in. How does it decide that I typed it in wrong? Do they consider http://moogle.net/ as a mistyped google? I want them to show me the site that I typed in, regardless of whether they think it was a mistake or not. If they don't, they're software is causing IE to not function as intended. I consider that malware.
      --
      "Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much." - Oscar Wilde
    3. Re:Not spyware by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      How does it decide that I typed it in wrong? If the address doesn't resolve, you typed it in wrong. That's it.

      If they don't, they're software is causing IE to not function as intended. What's funny is that IE functions like this already - it brings you to an MSN search page. This is just Dell sending people to Google instead.
  11. Don't Be Evil (unless the shareholders say so) by einer · · Score: 1

    Google is beholden to capitalism. No longer a private organization, its board can be sued for making decisions that negatively impact the value of the stock.

    Google's motto should now be "Don't be evil, unless it increases our stock price."

    Face it geeks, your idols have jumped the shark.

    1. Re:Don't Be Evil (unless the shareholders say so) by GTMoogle · · Score: 1

      Companies are beholden to their stakeholders, not capitalism. Over 80% of Google's voting power is still in the hands of the founders, who are idealists, and so rich as to be unbribable.

      Read all the replies to this guy who said the same thing you did: http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=235955&cid =19250783

    2. Re:Don't Be Evil (unless the shareholders say so) by Vexorian · · Score: 1

      I just don't get it why some people feel so threatened about the "don't be evil" motto. It is just a motto! getting tired of guys that do all the efforts possible to demonstrate it is not true...

      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  12. Charter do it too by ByteofK · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I got broadband from Charter they changed my 404 settings to go to some Charter-specific search page and I had to go through some hyperlinked hoops to change it back to just plain old 404. I didn't look to see if they were earning from the pages.

  13. Decrapifier by astrogirl2900 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lifehacker recently had an article on a piece of software called the PC Decrapifier. I haven't tried it, but it seems relevant to this thread.

    1. Re:Decrapifier by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ran this on my Father-in-Laws spanky new Dell. Clean as a baby's bottom after doing so. Dunno if this specific piece of software was on this system tho (did this over Christmas). But, a VERY good piece of software whether it's a Dell, HP, Sony or other manufacturer to take your system back to the way it was before they got their hands on it :-)

      --

      To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

  14. a way to test by DaMattster · · Score: 2, Informative

    This claim may very well be FUD but there is a way for people to test. Just download a network packet capture program and look at the traffic being sent. I did this myself and didn't see anything untoward being sent nor did I see any gibberish traffic to indicate encryption. But, that isn't to say that I didn't miss anything when scanning the log of the output. Basically, anything offered by a for profit company for free, really is not. If the service were entirely gifted, the company would rapidly drift into the red. Also, read the EULA. I get scared by long convoluted statements which can be subjected to interpretation. I do like Dell hardware but the first thing I do when I get my dell is to delete the partitions, re-partition, and format the HDD. I recommend everyone doing the same.

  15. Decrapify it by spectrokid · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you don't want to reinstal: http://www.pcdecrapifier.com/ My mother in law bought one. Now I am used to your anti-virus no longer getting updated if you don't pay. But when her spamkiller expired, her email stopped working . And I can assure you there is NO WAY she would have been able to fix that herself without paying.

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  16. David Ulevitch is a hipocrite by binaryspiral · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Using OpenDNS redirects mistyped URLs to their own site.

    http://www.opendns.com/faq/#how_does_opendns_make_ money

    How does OpenDNS make money?

    OpenDNS makes money by offering clearly labeled advertisements alongside organic search results when the domain entered is not valid and not a typo we can fix. OpenDNS will provide additional services on top of its enhanced DNS service, and some of them may cost money. Speedy, reliable DNS will always be free.


    Now, to be fair I use OpenDNS at home, but I find it hard to take this kind of warning from a person who makes money the same way.

    1. Re:David Ulevitch is a hipocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets be fair. Opendns is free, and quite costly to run. In exchange, when it cant find something and its going to show a 404 page it insteads shows something a little different, with ad's.

      You bought the pc from dell... and there software overrides your dns default behaviour by the sounds of it. Thats dodgy. Its up to your dns server what to do when it doesnt intially find a domain name, not Dell's software.

      But the article does read a lot like "Breaking news, Dell install bloatware"

    2. Re:David Ulevitch is a hipocrite by mithras+invictus · · Score: 1

      exactly,
      Also while admitting he was criticizing the competition he stated "We don't make a dime when we correct typos. We do make money on full-word searches, but those aren't impacted by this"

      I think Opendns IS a better service than Dell's, but they're being far too aggressive toward Google here.

    3. Re:David Ulevitch is a hipocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Their product seems to use e.g. resolver1.opendns.com (208.67.222.222).
      If I use that as my DNS, and do a lookup for www.google.com, I get
      redirected to a CNAME of google.navigation.opendns.com.
      What's up with that? DNS hijacking, anyone?

    4. Re:David Ulevitch is a hipocrite by bradt · · Score: 1

      Not only do they redirect mistyped URLs to their own site, THEY ARE REDIRECTING GOOGLE! dig @208.67.220.220 www.google.com ; > DiG 9.2.2 > @208.67.220.220 www.google.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 27571 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.google.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.google.com. 30 IN CNAME google.navigation.opendns.com. google.navigation.opendns.com. 30 IN A 208.67.219.230 google.navigation.opendns.com. 30 IN A 208.67.219.231 ;; Query time: 75 msec ;; SERVER: 208.67.220.220#53(208.67.220.220) ;; WHEN: Thu May 24 07:31:11 2007 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 104 They are probably upset because someone else is harvesting Google's search data before they can get to it! ;-)

  17. They're not by mithras+invictus · · Score: 2, Informative

    AFAICT Google is just used by Dell on the Dell search page, thats all.
    This wouldn't have anything to do with opendns being powered by Yahoo, right?

  18. Obligatory Google FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From Google's IPO letter:

    n the transition to public ownership, we have set up a corporate structure that will make it harder for outside parties to take over or influence Google. This structure will also make it easier for our management team to follow the long term, innovative approach emphasized earlier. This structure, called a dual class voting structure, is described elsewhere in this prospectus. The Class A common stock we are offering has one vote per share, while the Class B common stock held by many current shareholders has 10 votes per share.

    The main effect of this structure is likely to leave our team, especially Sergey and me, with increasingly significant control over the company's decisions and fate, as Google shares change hands. After the IPO, Sergey, Eric and I will control 37.6% of the voting power of Google, and the executive management team and directors as a group will control 61.4% of the voting power. New investors will fully share in Google's long term economic future but will have little ability to influence its strategic decisions through their voting rights.

    While this structure is unusual for technology companies, similar structures are common in the media business and has had a profound importance there. The New York Times Company, The Washington Post Company and Dow Jones, the publisher of The Wall Street Journal, all have similar dual class ownership structures. Media observers have pointed out that dual class ownership has allowed these companies to concentrate on their core, long term interest in serious news coverage, despite fluctuations in quarterly results. Berkshire Hathaway has implemented a dual class structure for similar reasons. From the point of view of long term success in advancing a company's core values, we believe this structure has clearly been an advantage.
  19. OpenDNS uses javascript for its spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


    they track everything you do on their "guide" from what links you click on, when you exit the page, uses hidden iframes, the list goes on all 50+kb of script to help you just like Verisigns sitefinder helped,
    what they do deserve credit for is convincing people clever enough to change their DNS settings that somehow breaking DNS in exchange for seeing adverts is a worthwhile tradeoff, just like spyware/adware convinces a user that viewing adverts for getting weather is somehow a good thing.

    perhaps they should team up with new.net as they do the same just using a binary to help change those pesky dns settings

    here's how to stop their crap

    add this to your hosts file
    127.0.0.1 guide.opendns.com

  20. shortcuts? by LordGlenn · · Score: 1

    anyone know if this breaks open dns's "shortcut" capability? if it does then it could be classed as malware.

    1. Re:shortcuts? by LordGlenn · · Score: 1

      OK, yes I should have rtfa. so it is malware IF you are using opendns.

    2. Re:shortcuts? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      That's utter crap. I have Winamp on my system, which has a couple of global hotkeys. Some of these conflict with Photoshop hotkeys. Tell me, is it Winamp, or is it Photoshop, that is the malware? After all, one of them breaks functionality of the other, so one has to be malware.

      Or the two services/software could be incompatible. Yeah, that has a ring of possibility to it, a little more realistic than "OMG MALWARE!"

    3. Re:shortcuts? by LordGlenn · · Score: 1

      uh...you could always turn off either photoshop or winamp.. of course you can also just turn of the browser plug-in,or use a different browser, so you have a point. not quite malware, just annoying-ware.

  21. So did Google actually write this? by deadsquid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm wondering who actually developed the software. Was it Google who developed it for Dell, or was it Dell who developed it internally and called it the "Google URL Assistant" because it redirects traffic to serve up Google ads which I presume it gets a cut off of. It's not clear if the name of the app means it was written by Google or if it just refers to what service Dell is redirecting to.

    --
    Idiot, n. A member of a large and powerful tribe whose influence in human affairs has always been dominant
    1. Re:So did Google actually write this? by deadsquid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ahh... the links to the OEM pages below probably mean it is an app developed by the folks in MV. Never mind, then.

      --
      Idiot, n. A member of a large and powerful tribe whose influence in human affairs has always been dominant
  22. earthlink takes it to another level... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This same thing happens at level of ISP - so bravo to Dell for taking advantage of it at computer level and using the leader in search relevance to give users something relevant. Anyone notice that the links offered on the Doogle page are EXACTLY what the user intended??

    I recently moved and switched from VerizonDSL to Earthlink Cable (actually Road Runner with lower earthlink charges - which is actually Time Warner, etc.) and if I send a bum URL, I get an Earthlink-branded page that apparently is actually a 'myaccount' page. I have never installed anything from Earthlink on either of my computers and this happens automatically.

    Talk about spyware, this redirector happens who knows where - Time Warner,RR,Earthlink, etc. - so clearly someone is spying on me:) although it only works on structural URL typos. if I put the examples used in articles (digg.xom and http://microsoft/ I get earthlink redirect and IE error page, respectively. This page source has to come from somewhere. Heck the /microsoft/ example is even better the Doogle way - at least it shows MS as top links...

    And OpenDNS seems more like a cyber-squatter of typo-domains, who's tryin' to make a dime off it. ANd boohoo - have you seen opendns homepage? it is identical to Doogle page, except it is OpenDNS brand at top insted of Dell. They even use Google!!!

    1. Re:earthlink takes it to another level... by Zonk+(troll) · · Score: 1

      Talk about spyware, this redirector happens who knows where - Time Warner,RR,Earthlink, etc. - so clearly someone is spying on me:) although it only works on structural URL typos. if I put the examples used in articles (digg.xom and http://microsoft/ I get earthlink redirect and IE error page, respectively. This page source has to come from somewhere. Heck the /microsoft/ example is even better the Doogle way - at least it shows MS as top links.. Earthlink does it at their DNS servers. I'm currently using Earthlink and find this rather irritating. However, they do provide a way around it. It's documented here: DNS Opt Out Servers.

      If you don't want to bother reading the article, here's the important part:

      In rare circumstances DNS error page routing may cause problems for some EarthLink customers running various specialty programs or services. As a work around, EarthLink provides two DNS addresses that do not route to our EarthLink/Yahoo! error page. These DNS addresses can be used as a means of opting out of the error re-routing service.

      207.69.188.172 (East Coast)
      207.69.188.171 (West Coast)
      --
      "The Federal Reserve is a fraudulent system."--Lew Rockwell
      End The FED. -
    2. Re:earthlink takes it to another level... by HeroreV · · Score: 2, Informative

      This Google+Dell spyware comes preinstalled and is purposely more difficult to uninstall than it should be.

      OpenDNS provides DNS service (duh!) which is often much better than users' default DNS service. OpenDNS doesn't come preinstalled. Users have to willing chose to set it up and can just as easily disable it. The pages it shows for malformed URLs can even be turned off if you have a static IP address.

      It makes absolutely no sense for you to say "bravo to Dell" for "using the leader in search relevance to give users something relevant", yet describe OpenDNS as a "cyber-squatter of typo-domains".

  23. This really is not evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it really bothers me seeing Geeks misappropriate words for propaganda purposes because it debases the word itself. Think about the word "innovate" since Microsoft started describing everything they did as innovative.

    There is nothing evil in this particular story. As far as I'm aware Google has never performed an evil act. You might not approve of, for example, the decision to launch their search engine in China and comply with the laws of the local government even when that meant censoring search results. You might feel that given China's less than stellar human rights record operating in China at all is a bad thing (though you might also like to wonder if Google should be operating in America given the international outrage that is gutananimo bay and the process of "extraordinary rendition"). But to describe this evil blinds you to proper examples of corporate evil like, say Microsoft's actions towards Netscape, or Microsoft's actions towards Go, or Worldcom).

  24. Hi, I wrote that post... by davidu · · Score: 3, Informative
    Hi guys,

    Yesterday I got a lot of feedback from people who just assumed I was biased and an underdog out to complain about Google. This is not what it's about!

    Here's what I mean:

    Use the smell test. Does what Google is doing smell bad? Is it giving users a good experience?
    Compare:

    (and if you want to see ours)

    If you just compare what google is doing to their own users you'll see that they are showing a terrible experience to the users who are Locked-In versus the users who have the choice to use any search service.

    Thanks,

    davidu
    --

    # Hack the planet, it's important.
    1. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      users who are Locked-In versus the users who have the choice

      That's what it's really about, isn't it? You're jealous that you have to bullshit people into breaking their own DNS resolving while Dell can just preinstall Google's software. Fact is, the Dell/Google software changes it where it should be changed - in the application - while all DNS resolver services break DNS functionality for almost all applications besides web browsers. The user experience on all these pages is horrible, if you ask me, because none of them look like error pages. I would expect a big fat red border to alert me that I am not where I wanted to go. All pages look way too much like domain squatter pages (which they almost are, so no surprise there). The rest are minor differences. All pages show the correct URL, all pages show lots of paid-for URLs besides that.

    2. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by forand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Okay so you have showed that some people dislike the results that google provides to is BRANDED websites. First off how much of that is Google and how much is the BRAND? Second what you describe IS NOT SPYWARE!! Where did that claim come from?

    3. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      If you just compare what google is doing to their own users you'll see that they are showing a terrible experience to the users who are Locked-In versus the users who have the choice to use any search service.

      What, exactly, locks people into using the Google toolbar pre-installed with the default settings on Dell machines. That is a instance of bundling, but I don't see how it is a lock-in in any way. What prevents users from migrating to a different toolbar or just a different toolbar config? Are you sure you know what "lock-in" is?

    4. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by lightversusdark · · Score: 1

      Bloody hell, 2 digit UID!

      --
      "There is nothing nice about Steve Jobs and nothing evil about Bill Gates." - Chuck Peddle
    5. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by 1000Monkeys · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thanks for responding to this, but claiming that your monetized URL typo page is better than Google's hardly justifies your claims of spyware or lock-in. Every discussion of this article has been filled with stories of people who have removed the browser redirection. Let's face it, the sort of people that aren't afraid to use custom DNS servers usually also aren't afraid to remove programs from their computer. In fact, it seems like you used a lot of inflammatory language to mask what boils down to a simple advertisement.

      And lost in all this is the fact that you seem to be redirecting google.com to your own servers. I really liked OpenDNS when it was just a DNS server, please trust your users to be able to follow instructions and stop intercepting their google queries.

    6. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by metamatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, yours gives me a totally blank page, because I have JavaScript turned off by default. So it's not clear to me that yours is a big improvement...

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    7. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by kindbud · · Score: 1

      This URL shows a blank page when the browser (Firefox) has Javascript disabled:

              * http://guide.opendns.com/?url=microsoft.xom

      What kind of user experience is that?

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    8. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 1

      OpenDNS is intercepting Google queries? Where did you get that from? I'm using OpenDNS and have no such trouble.

    9. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by davidu · · Score: 1

      How do you live in this web2.0 world? Seriously.

      We'll do something to fix that though. Thanks for pointing it out.

      --

      # Hack the planet, it's important.
    10. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by pecosdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I second that! OpenDNS has worked great for me.

      I'm firmly in the "If it aint broke don't fix it" school on DNS. Verizon's DNS is broke, bad, OpenDNS lets me browse the web without every 3rd query being a man in the middle.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    11. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      How do you live in this web2.0 world? Seriously. The OP is probably one of the clueful group of people who run firefox with noscript - a firefox add-on that helps prevent crime2.1.

      Are you seriously running around with Javascript turned on all the time?
    12. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by Xenophobe · · Score: 1

      This guy says it better than I can:

      http://www.xs4all.nl/~sbpoley/webmatters/whatnojs. html

      There are plenty of reasons to browse without Javascript. And, if you use Firefox with noscript, you can control which scripts are allowed to run and which ones aren't.

    13. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by arrow · · Score: 1

      The page should now work without JavaScript. Sorry about that.

      --
      symetrix. We are building a religion, a limited edition.
    14. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, with OpenDNS every query goes through a man in the middle. Much better, eliminates the uncertainty.

    15. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by kindbud · · Score: 1

      How do you live in this web2.0 world? Seriously.

      The NoScript extention makes it easy to deny Javascript and embedded objects by default, then allow temporarily or permanently when I visit a site that doesn't work without it. It prevents Web2.0 ambushes, flash ads, popups, and all the rest of those Web 2.0 annoyances.

      Why does a search results page need "Web 2.0?" It's just a list of links. Browsers have been able to follow links since Web 0.1alpha.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    16. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by kindbud · · Score: 1

      Yes it does. Thanks.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    17. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by davidu · · Score: 1

      It's a bug, apparently. I'm told our page worked fine until about two weeks ago. :-/

      Anyhoo... We're fixing it. Nobody told us it was broken until this thread, so thanks for the report.

      --

      # Hack the planet, it's important.
    18. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... by 1000Monkeys · · Score: 1

      Sorry, should have posted a link. The OpenDNS forum thread about this is here.

  25. Same as Microsoft? by scuba0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Internet Explorer has always redirected you to Microsofts homepage in some way, why shouldn't Dell/Google be allowed to do the same?

    1. Re:Same as Microsoft? by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      always?

      You must be a young one. I still remember the IE 2 piece of shit that sometimes came with Windows NT, then IE 3 that came after it which was only marginally better. Of course back during that time I used Netscape. Then when it became unbearable I was already using the Mozilla Betas, I never found a reason to go to IE. Since switching to Linux only back in 2000 I don't really have that option.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    2. Re:Same as Microsoft? by scuba0 · · Score: 1

      You could see the trend pretty early in Internet Explorer but I have no experience to say when it was that it started, and it was probably a specific date (update) not a certain version (1,2,3,..) that started with it.

      I wonder who actually can stand Internet Explorer, I do not use Internet Explorer if the setup gives me a choice.

  26. Re:David Ulevitch is a hypocrite by davidu · · Score: 1

    We have a vested interest in this space, that's also how we figured out what Google was doing. And we have a vested interest in giving people a great experience. I don't think I'm being hypocritical in my post at all. Go to the dell page and search for microsoft.xom, then go to Google and search for microsoft.xom. When users are trapped and locked-in, they are taking advantage of them. When users have choice (like on google.com) they are given a great experience.

    I'm not being a hypocrite. Everyone who uses OpenDNS is doing it by choice which means we have to deliver a fantastic experience. And for the record, when you type microsoft.xom into your browser when using OpenDNS, we just correct those kinds of typos automatically. We don't make a cent on 'em, and that's fine. Most of those corrections are corrections to trademarked words and it gets scandalous to try and take advantage of 'em.

    Compare things side by side: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dannysullivan/5107389 62/

    -davidu

    --

    # Hack the planet, it's important.
  27. That is why... by Vrykoulakas · · Score: 1

    when I consult with my customers on Dell purchases, I advise them to bring it to my shop to work on first thing. I boot it up, go through the setup for them, and remove Google desktop / toolbar (why IE7 has pop up blockers, anti phishing, and a search bar, and Firefox has all that and more) and then towards the bottom of a fresh Dells add remove programs list is "Search Assistant." Remove it, because an end user doesn't need the extra junk installed.

    --
    I'm like a superhero, but with no powers or motivation.
  28. Deceptive article! by argent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Setting aside the fact that using IE at all is the best way to get infected with spyware in general[1], the alternative to Dell's site is NOT Google's normal page.

    The only way to get to Google's page from Internet Explorer in its default configuration is to explicitly go to google.com, and with the redirector in place you still get to the regular google home page if you do that.

    If you open up Internet Explorer without the redirector and type a "keyword" into it, you normally end up on Microsoft's search engine.

    Given the alternative of going to MSN.com or a Dell-branded google.com, I know which one I prefer.

    [1] If you care you should be using Firefox which (for all its flaws) has a design that's many times more secure than IE...

  29. Re:David Ulevitch is a hypocrite by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Quite whining David. You have a good product. But, your comments sound like some kid whose toys were taken away.

    Looks to me like you need to partner with someone to be bundled with their stuff. Can you get integrated into an application like Firefox that everyone needs? Or, can you partner with, say HP, to provide this functionality?

    How 'bout some constructive suggestions?

    --

    To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

  30. Google/Dellbar also overrides company Intranet by pazu13 · · Score: 1

    I had to do some network setups of new Dell machines with the toolbar preinstalled. The redirector was actually a huge headache because it overrode the instructions issued when a machine was attached to the server. So instead of automatically redirecting users to the company's intranet, they found themselves getting sent to the Google/Dell custom page. Definitely did a number on my trust of Google.

    --
    It wasn't me, it was the one-armed .sig!
  31. Sounds like evil to me by pacalis · · Score: 1
    What else is there to say?


    Are you seriously using the 'just because they make the cigarettes, doesn't mean that they're forcing people to smoke them' arguement???


    Pay attention fanboys!

  32. Just another Arugment... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Just another argument...
    for FireFox.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Just another Arugment... by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      ....on a Linux system.

      (I use OpenDNS because Verizons DNS sucks hardcore)

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  33. What smells bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It might not smell bad to you, but from the examples you've given, the OpenDNS page shows nothing if I have JavaScript disabled. Now, I've never had search results require JavaScript to show up so this looks very suspicious to me. I might be a little paranoid; that seems far more worse to me than a few text ads and a Dell or Sony logo.

  34. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... Pot-Kettle by TreZ · · Score: 1

    Read your own privacy policy and then evaluate if calling your own service "spyware" is appropriate.

    http://www.opendns.com/privacy/

    It appears to me by using your dns service instead of the one provided by an isp, I forfeit the ability to have my dns lookups remain anonymous. That seems to fall closer to the definition of spyware in my book.

    I certainly hope you have insurance against a disgruntled worker replacing www.mybanknamehere.com with www.myphishingsite.com

  35. Re:Hi, I wrote that post... Pot-Kettle by davidu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It appears to me by using your dns service instead of the one provided by an isp, I forfeit the ability to have my dns lookups remain anonymous. That seems to fall closer to the definition of spyware in my book.

    Your DNS requests are not anonymous right now. Don't mislead yourself into believing they are. Even if you run your own resolver that talks to the roots. DNS is one of the most tapped, mined and inspected pieces of the infrastructure I can think of. People do it for profit (domainers) and for research (security folks).

    We're clear on how we use it (which is to say, we don't use it for anything personally identifiable or to target ads to you).

    -david

    --

    # Hack the planet, it's important.
  36. Re:you mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >I've always flattened mine first...

    I've tried various methods of flattening my computer as well, but they always end up non-functional. What's your secret?

  37. WTF--insightful?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More like profoundly naive.

    You know how Dell makes money doing this? They get paid by Google and take a cut of the ad revenue--the result of an agreement with Google.

    If you think Google just made a nifty tool and Dell decided unilaterally to use it, then I've got a fine, fine piece of real estate to sell you in Florida. Or maybe you'd like to buy into my Nigerian venture? It's cheap and easy and guaranteed to make you a bajillionaire in minutes flat!

  38. Re:David Ulevitch is a hypocrite by TheHorse13 · · Score: 1

    "Everyone who uses OpenDNS is doing it by choice which means we have to deliver a fantastic experience."

    You guys do make me laugh and I mean that in an endearing way. Sadly, the catchy buzz words and individualist mindset of the dot.bomb era are long gone. In case you guys are still handing out free mountain dew to your coders and allowing people to skateboard around the office, the cold steel bottom line of net profit now dominates all things Internet. It sounds to me like a small time niche VC startup (OpenDNS) is upset that the (inevitable) actions of the large players (Google/Dell) has eaten into the primary cash flow of the business and you're pissed about it.

    Now the question begs, what other "fantastic" services are your users/customers willing to pay for? I have a feeling that Google/Dell doesn't give a sh** about putting you out of business in the wake of their toolbar deal.

  39. Not the same by Comboman · · Score: 1

    Oh no, Google knows that I'm using Firefox! That narrows it down to me and 199,999 other people. Not exactly personally identifying information.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:Not the same by weicco · · Score: 1

      Yeah but that's so hideous and embarassing thing which should be kept hidden so that even Google shouldn't know about it ;)

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
  40. Re:David Ulevitch is a hypocrite by davidu · · Score: 1

    Hold on, let me take out my iPod earbuds and get off my scooter. :-)

    Ok. Done.

    Google isn't impacting our revenue, read the post. They are just being lame to their users. They are putting their partnership in front of user experience, for the first time. Hence the title of my blog, "Google has turned a page."

    --

    # Hack the planet, it's important.
  41. Re:David Ulevitch is a hypocrite by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

    You may correct the user's misspelling and send them merrily on their way - you still get the data.

    You get a LOT of data on users DNS usage which would be worth a lot of money to a lot of people. You may or may not be using it - but it's there.

    I'm not much of a Google fanboy but this criticism is hypocritical.

  42. Way too many typosquatters by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative

    Way too many people are into typosquatting now. From OpenDNS to the "toolbar" guys to the guy who paid off the government of Cameroon (try anything in ".cm"), there can now be several layers of typosquatting between the user and the actual domain. At least we got Network Solutions to back off from their attempt.

    Search may be coming apart. There are too many people trying to "game" the search systems now. "Search engine optimization" used to be viewed as evil and was done by low-rent operations. Now we have publicly held companies (Marchex, ticker symbol MCHX) formed just to create dummy domains. Collactive, the Digg spammer, just got venture capital from Sequoia Ventures. Computer vendors load up their preinstalled machines with unwanted "toolbars", which, as this article mentions, produce mostly user-hostile information. All the sources of information which drive search engines, from inbound links to user ratings, are now being spammed by sizable companies. It's a big change from the situation two years ago, when the troublemakers were all little guys with limited resources.

    It's going to get worse before it gets better.

  43. Why Dell Software Quality Has Degraded by serodores · · Score: 1

    Dell adds these software packages because the software companies offer kickbacks to Dell, enabling them to lower the price of the hardware. It's factored into the price. That's also why their bundles are cheaper than buying parts individually. They assume that most people don't want to reimage their computer, or don't know how, or don't want to spend the time to do it, which is why the software companies push for the software to get preinstalled in the first place.

  44. Re:David Ulevitch is a hypocrite by davidu · · Score: 1

    You can call me a hypocrite the day that I sell or share the data with a third party. Until then, I suppose you'll have to settle for calling me a "potential future hypocrite." I can live with that. We get phone calls all the time about buying our DNS data. For lots of money. We've never once even considered selling it. This is a core belief we have at the company.

    --

    # Hack the planet, it's important.
  45. yea by waspleg · · Score: 1

    but not the people in management; they tend not to think unless it involves their stock options, and the status quo is fuck the world show me the money.

    waspleg

  46. Re:David Ulevitch is a hypocrite by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

    Fair enough, and I applaud you if it's true - but I have no way to verify. So I always assume people will do what it takes to make money and lots of it while still attempting to do "the right thing". But in the end, money most always wins.

    Oh, while I have your ear (eye?) - opendns is a great service, kudos to you and your company.

  47. OpenDNS hijacks www.google.com by JackHoffman · · Score: 1

    Go to this page: http://google.navigation.opendns.com/
    I hope you can see that that isn't Google.

    If you know how DNS works and look behind the curtain, you'll notice that the OpenDNS resolvers don't return A records for www.google.com, but a CNAME (alias) record "google.navigation.opendns.com", which makes the resolver lookup that name instead. That resolves to 208.69.34.231, which is in an OpenDNS network range of IP addresses. That's the server you connect to when you use OpenDNS and go to www.google.com. The URL bar won't change because according to the OpenDNS resolver, 208.69.34.231 is the IP address of www.google.com, which is just a non-canonical name of that IP address, and that is a BIG FAT LIE.

    Show of hands: Who uses OpenDNS and is aware of that hijacking? Now who's the spy?

    1. Re:OpenDNS hijacks www.google.com by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 1

      I did an nslookup of Google.com and did not get that address.

      The DNS server is of course my router, which passes it on from there to my internal DNS server which is then routed out to OpenDNS.

      trip@trip-laptop:~$ nslookup google.com
      Server: 192.168.11.1
      Address: 192.168.11.1#53

      Non-authoritative answer:
      Name: google.com
      Address: 72.14.207.99
      Name: google.com
      Address: 64.233.167.99
      Name: google.com
      Address: 64.233.187.99

      Those sure don't look like 208.69.34.231 to me... That said, perhaps you have some other way of exhibiting this behavior that I'm not familiar with. I'm not that into the DNS system.

    2. Re:OpenDNS hijacks www.google.com by JackHoffman · · Score: 1

      To be sure that you talk to their DNS server, use "dig @208.67.222.222 www.google.com" (or "nslookup www.google.com 208.67.222.222", if you must use nslookup). This gives the following results:

      www.google.com. 30 IN CNAME google.navigation.opendns.com.
      google.navigation.opendns.com. 30 IN A 208.69.34.230
      google.navigation.opendns.com. 30 IN A 208.69.34.231

      or from nslookup:
      www.google.com canonical name = google.navigation.opendns.com.
      Name: google.navigation.opendns.com
      Address: 208.69.34.230
      Name: google.navigation.opendns.com
      Address: 208.69.34.231

    3. Re:OpenDNS hijacks www.google.com by JackHoffman · · Score: 1

      And here's a way to check this from a different network: http://www.simpledns.com/lookup.aspx

      DNS Server IP: 208.67.222.222 (that's one of the two OpenDNS resolvers)
      Domain Name: www.google.com
      Record Type: Any (*)
      Request Recursion: yes

    4. Re:OpenDNS hijacks www.google.com by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 1

      DiG 9.3.4 @208.67.222.222 www.google.com
      (1 server found)
      global options: printcmd
      Got answer:
      HEADER opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39034
      flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

      QUESTION SECTION:
      www.google.com. IN A

      ANSWER SECTION:
      www.google.com. 604528 IN CNAME www.l.google.com.
      www.l.google.com. 267 IN A 64.233.167.104
      www.l.google.com. 267 IN A 64.233.167.99
      www.l.google.com. 267 IN A 64.233.167.147

      Query time: 79 msec
      SERVER: 208.67.222.222#53(208.67.222.222)
      WHEN: Thu May 24 14:36:16 2007
      MSG SIZE rcvd: 100

      ---

      I still don't see it. I'm seeing direct links back to Google. Are you sure your DNS is okay? Because mine doesn't redirect me to an OpenDNS server at all as far as I can tell.

      I removed some semi-colons to get past the lameness filter. I also had to remove some other symbols and spaces. Let's see if it'll post now...

    5. Re:OpenDNS hijacks www.google.com by JackHoffman · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're giving different answers to different geographical regions, or maybe you have a transparent DNS resolver in your network path. Try from a different network. I've already posted one webinterface to check from in a sibling post to yours. Here's another:

      http://www.kloth.net/services/nslookup.php

      I'm sure you can find more.

    6. Re:OpenDNS hijacks www.google.com by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 1

      I tried both. Both went straight to Google's IPs.

    7. Re:OpenDNS hijacks www.google.com by JackHoffman · · Score: 1

      I see. You're lying. Read this.

    8. Re:OpenDNS hijacks www.google.com by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 1

      Or, maybe if you read the article you linked me to, you'd find out that I'm not lying.

      From the forum post linked:

      "We're going to fix this ASAP. This happens if you have shortcuts enabled in your account."

      I have that feature disabled. I just checked my settings at OpenDNS.

    9. Re:OpenDNS hijacks www.google.com by JackHoffman · · Score: 1

      Neither of the two web services has an OpenDNS account and they do report the CNAME response. Their resolvers are not influenced by your account settings, so I know you are lying if you say you got the actual Google addresses from these two services. This discussion is over. To everybody else: See for yourself.

    10. Re:OpenDNS hijacks www.google.com by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 1

      Ah! There it is. I left out the www as I'm not in the habit of putting it. It slipped by me, sorry.

      That is rather disquieting to note. I'll have to keep an eye on this one.

  48. Use PC Decrapifier by doug141 · · Score: 0, Redundant
  49. Re:David Ulevitch is a hypocrite by TheHorse13 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, but if they are being lame to their users, and you guys are providing the same "fantastic" experience, then doesn't 1 + 1 = 2? You have to know how your position sounds to anyone who reads your FAQ on the OpenDNS site related to revenue and then your blog on the "lamers" over at Google/Dell. It reminds me of the episode of COPS where the crack addict calls the cops because the dope dealer stole her $20. ;-)

  50. Re:David Ulevitch is a hypocrite by rhizome · · Score: 1

    You can call me a hypocrite the day that I sell or share the data with a third party

    Are you implying that you wouldn't sell any derivatives of that data?

    --
    When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  51. Re:David Ulevitch is a hypocrite by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    Frankly, I don't give a damn whether or not you sell or share the data. What I do care about is that you hijack requests for valid domains and redirect them to your own servers. OpenDNS tells me that the IP addresses for "www.google.com" are 208.67.217.230 and 208.67.217.231, which is a flat-out lie. Those addresses are actually your own machines which are proxying traffic between me and the real Google servers. At the very least this gives you data on my search habits. Your servers could easily change the data that Google returns to insert your own ads in the results.

    Google is merely redirecting typos to the clearly labeled pages of their affiliates. This is in no way deceitful. What you're doing, on the other hand, is. OpenDNS is silently intercepting all of their customers' traffic to Google with absolutely no indication that this is going on. That's not merely hypocritical, that borders on criminal.

    I'd never heard of OpenDNS before this article. I'm glad that now I have. Now I can clearly recommend staying as far away as possible from your so-called "enhanced user experience".

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  52. Re:David Ulevitch is a hypocrite by davidu · · Score: 1

    Are you implying that you wouldn't sell any derivatives of that data?

    You mean like selling domainers a list of all unregistered domains?

    Correct, we will never sell that kind of data. It's not the right thing to do. It also doesn't make any business sense. If the data has so much value to someone else that they're willing to pay a large price for it then it probably has value to keep to yourself. That's not our entire rationale, but it's a part of it. It's a bad PR move, it's a bad business move to do. Etc.

    I can't think of every example, but I can say we've never sold our data, or any derivative of it to date. If we do, we'll probably do it in a public way. Like share some DNS data with researchers. If we do that, we'll make sure not to cause any AOL Search-style disaster. But even sharing with researchers has never happened.

    I do want to do some personal research on the .cm thing -- and publish the results though.

    --

    # Hack the planet, it's important.
  53. This crapware matters because... by gjuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... not all users know how or what to uninstall - and some of it is virtually uninstallable.
    By way of example; my Grandmother got a Dell. She's 80 odd, but can use a browser, email, etc. Her Dell was great - but she couldn't wo rk out why she wasn't able to receive emails. Time and again, she, or her friends would, with or without telephone support - would configure Outlook Express correctly - only to find that that it kept changing the POP3 server URL. I gave her remote assistance - and could swear it was working; but every time she told me it wasn't owrking, sure enough - the POP3 details had changed. Eventually, I tracked it down to McAfee which had a year's subscription to anti-virus; but 30 days' subscription to an entirely unnecessary spam blocker. A bug in their spam blocker meant that it correctly diverted all attempted POP3 connections to itself; but then screwed up the address of the actual POP3 box and couldn't actually connect. Of course, it only inserted itself at boot time - so every time I'd fixed it by remote desktop it looked great; till Gran rebooted...
    I disabled this - but only after Gran had basically been emailless for 3 weeks. Lo and behold! On day 30 - it suddenly prevented here using email again - this time because its license had expired - so it refused to allow her to use her email app - even without it! Cue - Add/Remove Programs. Only it wouldn't allow itself to be removed because its AntiVirus companion was running... it took me hours to clear out this crap. And yet - without me doing it; Gran couldn't get her email, first because of their sloppy coding - and then because of their "license expiry" hijack.
    That's why crapware preinstall should be banned. By all means - include a CD or a link to a website where I can choose to download trials - but preinstalling them is outrageous. Imagine if a car came with a pre-installed alarm system which wouldn't let you drive the car without getting out your credit card or a screwdriver?

  54. This was a result of this same article! by Aero+Leviathan · · Score: 1
    As a user of OpenDNS, I didn't believe your post at first, but I verified it for myself:

    $ host www.google.com
    www.google.com is an alias for google.navigation.opendns.com.
    google.navigation. opendns.com has address 208.67.217.230
    google.navigation.opendns.com has address 208.67.217.231
    www.google.com is an alias for google.navigation.opendns.com.
    www.google.com is an alias for google.navigation.opendns.com.
    So I went searching around OpenDNS's support areas, and found this thread in their forums in which users are complaining about this issue.

    Digging deeper, I found that the answer to why they're doing this is in fact in TFA linked to this same Slashdot story (emphasis mine):

    The solution to this problem was to route Google requests through a machine we run to check if the request is a typo or one of your shortcuts. If it is a typo or shortcut then we do what we always do, just fix the typo or launch your shortcut and send you off on your way. If it's not one of those two things, we pass it on to Google for them to give you search results. This solution provides the best of both worlds: OpenDNS users get back the features that they love and Google continues to operate without problems. Interestingly, OpenDNS does not capture the user's redirection to the Dell page, or else neither I nor any other OpenDNS user would be able to get to this example. The only reason they're doing this is to apparently keep their 'typo correction' and 'shortcuts' features, which immediately send you on your way without showing any ads or anything. So basically, OpenDNS is only attempting prevent the toolbar from breaking their free, non-advertisement services, which is a nice gesture considering they'd never get to show ads to these Dell users who use OpenDNS, and hence not make any money from them.

    However, as seen in the forums, this little workaround seems to be breaking other things for other users, and is simply disconcerting to users such as myself who didn't know the reason for it.

    Here's a temporary workaround for their workaround: go to 'google.com', no 'www'. On OpenDNS, this resolves normally:

    $ host google.com
    google.com has address 64.233.187.99
    google.com has address 64.233.167.99
    google.com has address 72.14.207.99
    google.com mail is handled by 10 smtp4.google.com.
    google.com mail is handled by 10 smtp1.google.com.
    google.com mail is handled by 10 smtp2.google.com.
    google.com mail is handled by 10 smtp3.google.com.
    I wouldn't be surprised if OpenDNS is still working on it, though. They seem to be very conscious of their technically-minded userbase.
    --
    ~ Aero
  55. Re:you mean... by verucabong · · Score: 0

    Driver Genius. It's not free (but cheap) and before you flatten it, it'll suck out all the drivers for you hardware and make an executable that you can just run and it'll install all the drivers you need. Thus, you've got yourself a clean system that's fully functioning :)

  56. Re:David Ulevitch is a hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half a page of sponsored links vs. silently fixing the typo and sending the user on their way is 'the same'?

  57. Re:David Ulevitch is a hypocrite by TheHorse13 · · Score: 1

    Scoping my statement is a very cute way to respond. I like that. Upper managment has made scoping an artform. LOL. Let's have a closer look here... Now, you may argue that people proactively use your service while Dell/Google customers don't get to make that choice - ok. However, uninstalling the toolbar (or disabling the BHO) is very simple and the user can proactively stop using the Dell/Google toolbar the same way they can proactively modify DNS settings to use your service. So now we're down to one thing - the silent fix which Google/Dell does not do. That's pretty nice of you guys to do especially since it's done for free. But are you going to tell me that OpenDNS does not select which fixes to make? Of course not. You have to select which fixes to make so this means you know exactly when you're going to fire up the "fantastic service" for your users, which is the exact same framework as the Dell/Google "fantastic service". Your FAQ on your site says this is exactly what you do to make money. So, do you back what your FAQ states or what your blog says? Ya can't have it both ways and expect people to not call you on the carpet for sounding like a hypocrite.

  58. End of all problems by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

    Just format drive C:. No more of this 'spyware' business you Windows users speak of.

  59. Always hated Google by xinjiang77 · · Score: 1

    Google plans to take over the internet like Wal-Mart took over retail. You cant easily boycott it, its everywhere, everyone uses it, and it kills smaller competitors like human vs. ants. And its based on capitalism, which Bit-Torrent users everywhere grimace at.

  60. Ummm... pot, kettle? by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    I use OpenDNS at home, because I find it faster than my ISP DNS, and I don't really mind the siteminder-like tricks they play with mis-typed URLs for two reasons - first, I find their search results to be accurate (I think they mus be powered by Yahoo or Google). Second, I installed them *myself*, and I cna uninstall them myself.

    But seriously - this Dell/Google thing is the EXACT same idea. It is easy to uninstall and I can see no one hiding it's existance. If OpenDNS has any complaints about it it is just because they were not chosen for the factory install!