Slashdot Mirror


Google Maps Shows Chinese Nuclear Sub Prototype

mytrip writes "An image of what could be one of China's new nuclear ballistic missile submarines is available on the Google Maps and Google Earth satellite-image site, a defense blogger claimed Tuesday. The satellite picture was discovered by Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project for the Federation of American Scientists, and announced Tuesday on his blog. Kristensen believes the picture, taken by the Quickbird satellite late last year, reveals China's new Jin-class, or Type 094, nuclear ballistic missile sub. The new sub class is approximately 35 feet longer than its predecessor, the Xia-class, also known as Type 092, according to two images Kristensen compares on the blog. The Jin-class sub has an extended midsection that houses 12 missile tubes and part of the reactor compartment, Kristensen explains."

83 of 339 comments (clear)

  1. Well... by epiphani · · Score: 5, Funny

    The have the Xia and the Jin class submarines. As long as they don't go Super-XiaJin, we should be ok. /who needs karma..

    --
    .
    1. Re:Well... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Funny

      If he doesn't get the reference, he's not going to know what "DBZ" stands for.

      It's a cartoon named "Dragonball Z", which has an alien race of superheroes named "Saiyans." I'm not a fan of the show, but when the Saiyans get angry, they start glowing or something and become Super-Saiyans. Thus the pun.

      The cartoon was super-popular among people who like really boring, poorly-animated cartoons for a decade. Per usual, since it's a pointless useless topic, there's an extensive Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon_Ball_Z

    2. Re:Well... by Lucas123 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude. I took a closer look at that image and IT IS a Super-XiaJin -- complete with secret seltzer tablet-power technology.

    3. Re:Well... by cylcyl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I understand it correctly
      Not really special, just that the joke only works for people who understand mandarin.
      Basically XiaJin is a (somewhat valid) homonym for penis in mandarin, tho more commonly known as XiaYin or YinJin.

  2. How much do you want to bet... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That the the family of the guy in charge of security just got a bill for a single 9mm round?

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:How much do you want to bet... by jolyonr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um...

      Having a deterrent is pretty pointless unless everyone knows that you have it. I'm sure they wouldn't have left this boat out in the open unless it was their intention for people to see it.

      Jolyon

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    2. Re:How much do you want to bet... by halivar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Parent is correct. The cost of the 9mm round is distributed amongst all the proletariat.

      *ducks* *runs*

    3. Re:How much do you want to bet... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doubt it. China basically builds their nuke subs for the same reason we do: to tell the world, "Hey, don't fuck with us. We can dump a nuke in your swimming pool."

      There is no point in having them if other people don't know you have them. If they really gave a damn about secrecy they'd never leave it docked out in the open. It'd be under cover.

      This is interesting in the same way that a lot of google maps stuff is interesting, but it's not any great intelligence coup.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:How much do you want to bet... by jbeaupre · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let's be clear: You want people to know about your nuclear capability. It's not much of a deterrence if no one knows you have it. In fact, people thinking you have a capability is almost as good as having one*.

      * Example: Saddam's ambiguity eventually bit him on the rear (or neck), but he was quite willing to let his neighbors assume he could produce all sorts of nasty things.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    5. Re:How much do you want to bet... by coredog64 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Under the authority granted me as director of weapons research and development, I commissioned last year a study of this project by the Bland corporation. Based on the findings of the report, my conclusion was that this idea was not a practical deterrent, for reasons which, at this moment, must be all too obvious
    6. Re:How much do you want to bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      That the the family of the guy in charge of security just got a bill for a single 9mm round?

      You are completely ignorant if you believe that. The Chinese don't do that at all. They use 7.92mm.

    7. Re:How much do you want to bet... by Phanatic1a · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doubtful. When you don't want satellites to photograph your subs, you keep them in sub pens or covered (dry)docks. It's not like the orbits of surveillance satellites are unknown, and China certainly has the radar capability to track them and know when they'll be overhead. It's a pretty safe bet that if there's a military asset visible on a satellite photograph, the military in question didn't feel it was worth the trouble to keep that asset concealed.

    8. Re:How much do you want to bet... by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Having a deterrent is pretty pointless unless everyone knows that you have it. I'm sure they wouldn't have left this boat out in the open unless it was their intention for people to see it.

      Yup. Leave them out in the open for all to see, until they put to sea. Then they disappear, nobody knows where they are, and everybody gets nervous. The British did this during the Falklands War: they made lots of noise about subs heading for the South Atlantic, then shut up. The mere fact that subs might be in the vicinity made the Argentine Navy a lot less effective. Knowing that you might get hit by a torpedo at any time, with no warning, would rattle anybody...

      If you look in other places you will find lots of subs tied up at docks in plain view. Try the Russian naval bases north of Murmansk, for example.

      ...laura

    9. Re:How much do you want to bet... by skintigh2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It could even be saber rattling...

      US policy an invasion of Taiwan by China is "strategic non denial" (minus one obligatory Bush gaff). Basically, the world knows what the US would do but there's no need to rub it in China's face. It was never really a threat that China would invade due to the state of their navy -- one nickname for a potential invasion was "the million man swim." Well, China has been beefing up their military at a high speed and now it seems they are raising the stakes.

    10. Re:How much do you want to bet... by cpotoso · · Score: 3, Informative

      And of course a british submarine did sink an Argentinian navy ship (the ARA Gral. Belgrano, I think). This really paralyzed the navy and played a central role in the Argentinian defeat in the Malvinas war.

    11. Re:How much do you want to bet... by TheDugong · · Score: 4, Informative

      However, I suspect it was the fact that one of the subs actually sank a ship (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARA_General_Belgrano ) that really drove the point home.

    12. Re:How much do you want to bet... by inviolet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, China has been beefing up their military at a high speed and now it seems they are raising the stakes.

      A boomer is helpful for ensuring world stability, but it's useless for amphibious assault or even for deterring a US counterattack. You'll know China is getting ready to invade Taiwan when they start investing in their military's sealift capabilities.

      Speaking of which -- I wonder if they could use their many many container ships for that? Container ships probably need a port to unload... but ports can be captured.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    13. Re:How much do you want to bet... by WED+Fan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, because they didn't seem heartless regarding Tianemen, or during the Tibet take over, or in killing Falun Gong members, or...

      Heartless is as heartless does.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    14. Re:How much do you want to bet... by cyclocommuter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes the Belgrano was the first warship that was sunk during the Falklands war... by wire guided torpedoes from a UK sub. After that though it was the Argentine's turn to sink a coupe of UK ships (destroyer Sheffield and some transports) with their daredevil low level attacks and sea skimming Exocet anti-ship cruise missiles.

    15. Re:How much do you want to bet... by Analogy+Man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Falklands were a brilliant case of a military using the media to its advantage. No doubt the British navy was positioned many days before any action was taken. They could say "we are on the way" for some time before they needed to play their hand.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    16. Re:How much do you want to bet... by Jonathan_S · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes the Belgrano was the first warship that was sunk during the Falklands war... by wire guided torpedoes from a UK sub
      Actually, the torpedoes used by the HMS Conqueror were not wire guided. They were an older design, the Mark 8, originally designed in the 1920s. (Although the design had been updated some over the years; the ones used were Mark 8 Mod 4).

      The British captain choose not to use his reportedly trouble prone wire guided homing torpedoes (Mark 24 Tigerfish), and preferred to get close and use the old dependable design instead.
    17. Re:How much do you want to bet... by Foolicious · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I was like 10 I accidentally dumped a nuke in my friend's swimming pool. I tried to play it off like it was this other kid who nobody liked, but everyone knew it was me.

      --
      Please don't use "umm" or "err" or "erm".
    18. Re:How much do you want to bet... by ozphx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you seen the bloody size of Tibet and the huge amount of mineral wealth? Then when you realise it was populated by a bunch of nomad hippies are you even slightly surprised it got annexed?

      Fuck. You can't even mention that shit when you've got the US running around the middle east invading fairly "civilised (they got roads and shit)" countries for oil, terrorists and lulz.

      Falun Gong is basically the asian equivalent of Scientology. Bunch of nutters.

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    19. Re:How much do you want to bet... by mjwx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Exocet's only sunk the British destroyer (HMS Sheffield) because the ship was unable to activate their Electronic Warfare Support Measures (ESM) due to the satellite communications terminal being in use at the time. The other exocet missed the HMS Yarmouth because they were able to deploy chaff.

      The Argentine air force attached the British navy once more using regular iron bombs, some of which had old fuses which failed to detonate. The HMS Coventry was sunk by Argentine Jets using bombs as the was positioned close to land to act as a decoy for the Argentine air force. as a result the ships radar was unable to tell the difference between the land and the low flying Jets, the HMS Coventry used 4.5" guns and smaller armaments against the jets. The Argentine air force lost 20 jest sin their attacks on the British fleet.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    20. Re:How much do you want to bet... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be fair to the French they did give us ( the British ) the full specs of the Exocet and suggested methods of countering them and also didn't sell the Argentines the next version of them.

  3. Chinese submarines by Lucas123 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So is it true that they have screen doors?

    1. Re:Chinese submarines by inviolet · · Score: 4, Funny

      So is it true that they have screen doors?

      Of course not. I invested the better part of my childhood in intensive study of Chinese products, and so I have it on good authority that the submarine's doors are injection-molded plastic, bright red, mounted on long thin metal hinge-pins. The plastic will break after fifty operations, or the hinge-pin will rust out. The damage will not be field repairable and so the sub will sink. However, the entire sub only costs $23.99 ($12.40 wholesale in lots of 10000), so they'll just pick up a replacement on their way home.

      Man, can you imagine getting that thing out of the blister package?

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
  4. the cold war.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    having google maps during the cuban missle crisis or the cold war would've been bad ass...

    "dude....call JFK...I think I see a launcher!"

    *goes back to playing pong*

    1. Re:the cold war.... by Black-Man · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean it could of helped back when GW was proclaiming... "See those vans parked over there next to those 55 gallon drums, thats a chemical weapons factory!!"

  5. Classified? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If this is the kind of thing you can dig up with unclassified satellite imagery, imagine what classified material shows. Google Maps has a picture of my house where you can make out individual people walking down the road. It's not hard to imagine classified satellite imagery that can identify somebody if they happen to be looking upward.

    1. Re:Classified? by evanbd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, yes it is. Advanced adaptive optics *might* correct for some or most of the atmospheric distortion, but they can't overcome the diffraction limit. A 3m lens at 300km altitude can only resolve down to about 9cm resolution. That's way way better than Google Maps, but you can't identify a face that only takes up 4 "pixels".

    2. Re:Classified? by Ambitwistor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Imagine what detail they would get if they had a guy in a van outside your house with a huge zoom lens, I mean they could tell if you picked your nose (yet)! You mean, like this?
    3. Re:Classified? by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Informative

      satellites employed by google are not capable of anything beyond 1m resolution, which would only reveal the fattest of humans

      In other words, Americans, right? ;)

      *duck*, *run*, disclaimer: I am one and can make that joke ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Classified? by DataBroker · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's way way better than Google Maps, but you can't identify a face that only takes up 4 "pixels".

      You, good sir, need to buy a clue! I know better, I've seen CSI!!! Don't you know that they're able to zoom-in, enhance, zoom-in, enhance, and zoom-in, enhance anything? They're able to zoom in (and enhance) on the inverted reflection on the concave of a spoon, which is on a reflection of someone's sunglasses, who is in near-total darkness, and underwater. I've heard they're almost able to do facial biometrics and genetic tests from that same picture!

      Surely if they can do that, they can zoom-in enough to recognize people from a high-tech satellite!
  6. Re:This just in... by vivaoporto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think it would be more likely that the next headlines would read: Google maps satellite suddenly stop working over China.

  7. It's a cardboard diversion by sunking2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's just there to draw our attention from the real threat. Flooding the world with these

    http://www.leftlanenews.com/chinese-sedan-flunks-g erman-crash-test-with-video.html/

  8. This exemplifies a distubring trend by Jaaay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course who cares about the Chinese government but it shows that whilst human nature hasn't changed in thousands of years technology has and privacy is going straight to hell. What used to be non-existant or only available to governments with multi-billion $ defence budgets is quickly becoming available to every man and his dog as Google Earth shows. The bad thing is without human nature changing we're all going to end up in a screwed society where we must all watch our words and actions like politicians in case there being recorded or publically posted in ways that could ruin our careers for the crime of being human once in a while.

    1. Re:This exemplifies a distubring trend by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Well, on the othre hand, it just might mean the end of Jerry Springer and similar "quality" talkshows.

      Just to show that everything can also have some good sides.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:This exemplifies a distubring trend by Shihar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't really find this to be a disturbing trend. The only reason why such a trend would be disturbing is if we try and apply old ways of thinking to the new reality.

      Imagine a world where everything that happens in public space is recorded. We are close to that now with cell phone and security cameras, but as some point it will be even more true as people mount cameras on their bodies and run them non-stop. It is easy to imagine such a world as a nightmare where the most petty of laws are enforced with near perfection and anyone deviating from social norms is ostracized. There is an alternative though.

      Imagine if we could catch every single person who has violated the law. What would happen? Every single one of us would be up to our necks in fines and well over half of the population would be in jail. Faced with such a threat, one would hope that a democracy would respond by rethinking laws. In such a world would you really want marijuana laws that we demand tossing half of the nation in jail? Would a $250,000 fine for downloading copywrite material really make sense if it sent the major of people in the nation into bankruptcy? Would a no drinking before 21 law really make sense if it meant drumming the vast majority of college students out of college?

      There are a lot of dumb laws out there that are tolerated because we fail to catch even a small fraction of the violators. If you could catch everyone who violated the law, many laws would have to be abolished or we would need set up prison states to dump all the guilty.

      So yeah, I can imagine the evil horrible dystopia where everyone follows the massive piles of inane laws that exist to the letter and people get thrown in jail at random for violating obscure laws... but I can also envision a utopia where worthless laws have been tossed, corruption is close to non-existent, hippies don't get their heads busted in for smoking weed in the park, copyright is seriously reworked, and police find something more productive to do with their time then busting under aged parties.

    3. Re:This exemplifies a distubring trend by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Certainly, when a law gets applied to people who wish to be above the law, such laws are sometime weakened. At other time, the laws remain the same, but the enforcement is weakened.

      I have seen the later more than the former, especially on the parent example of drugs. The drug laws do appear to tilted toward heavier enforcement for lower class drugs. Likewise, I see many drug users who can't handle themselves in public school go to private school where they can be "protected", and go to expensive group activities where they can equally be protected. And even if we can see everywhere, are we really going to be looking too closely at the private clubs?

      Not to be a conspiracy theorist, but increased incarceration is only going to cause a problem if the wrong type of people are incarcerated. The US already has a huge number of people in jail for no apparent reason. These people are not, as we read between the lines of the Libby commutation, a danger to society. Many could equally be punished with community service and probation, or weekend jail time. However, for some reason, we want to keep a large part of our population in jail, out of the job market, and off the voting roles. For some reason, this is valuable enough that we spend enormous amounts of money to support the system of incarceration.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:This exemplifies a distubring trend by hercubus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      having a death penalty implies that life is cheap [see China's roving vans of death]

      places where life is cheap tend to not be very civilized [see Baghdad, Darfur, Texas]

      arguments like "if we just kill all the killers, then the rest of us will be safe" (which i believe you are implying) unfortunately ignores the fact that any of us, given the wrong circumstances, is capable of dire deeds

      what the world needs is more compassion, not more death chambers

      and hey, if you're not into compassion (and you don't seem to be), ask yourself this: do you think murderers enjoy being locked up for life or might they prefer a quick out? do you really want to give them what they want, the quick out?

      --
      -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
  9. Karma whoring by l-ascorbic · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...but the article doesn't seem to have an actual link to the map. It's here.

  10. Re:Oh snap! by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I owned that many Treasury bonds AND a nuclear submarine I'd unfurl a big legible banner in English across the top of it:

    PAY UP

  11. A little late, isn't it? by rtilghman · · Score: 3, Informative


    This was on Drudge Report last week... Slashdot's new moniker:

    "all the news that was fit to print yesterday"

    -rt

  12. The real question is... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    how quiet will this boat be submerged? SSBN's are the chickens of the sea - they run away from the slightest noise in order to stay undetected; the attack boats like to trail them in order to kill them if needed. Unless these new ones are extra quiet they'll be less a strategic threat than a symbol of power. They could, for example, be used to try to forestall a US response to move against the Republic of China, depending how credible the US viewed such a threat. For China, it means they've added a new threat to many of their neighbors - it could get a bit busy with Russian, Taiwanese, and Japanese subs and ASW forces looking to track them.

    That said, I'd love to be on the first boat to track one...

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:The real question is... by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IIRC the type 094s are equipped with SLBMs with a reported range of 8000km, as opposed to the SLBMs in their single, older type 092 which was equipped with missiles with a range of 2100-2500km. This means they can roam in a much larger area and still strike the US, and that they needn't go far out of Chinese territorial waters to strike the west coast.

      They can strike Anchorage, AK and Honolulu HI, without leaving port, and they probably can hit Seattle while still in Chinese territorial waters.

      So I'd say that it's at least a pretty credible threat of a first strike, since we can't simply sink any vessel that comes within 8000km of the US. In terms of nuclear deterrence -- well I wouldn't discount their abilities. They're going to have at least six of them, carrying a total of 64 warheads. They only need to have one elude a preemptive attack to provide them with retaliation capabilities. I wouldn't discount Chinese capabilities. They're probably a much more formidable technological opponent than Russia, because of their economic base.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:The real question is... by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back in the nineties I used to hang out with "boomer" commander (a Captain). He said all that Tom Clancy sub hunting stuff was overrated and that boomers on both sides operated with near impunity. He rode boats for two decades and was pinned twice by the Soviets. In fact he felt that it was a waste of money driving boomers with nuclear reactors because it was so easy to make your boat scarce when you had to. According to him the Navy sends the boomers on unecessarily long cruises to justify the use of nuclear power and it negatively affects morale without adding significant strategic advantage. He did approve of nuclear powered attack subs, which benefit from the extra power. At any rate, he said that the Navy was always saying there was a revolution in anti-submarine warfare just around the corner but it never materialized. Neither side could hope to interdict enough of the enemy's boomers to effect a first strike without fear of retaliation. I presume the biggest problem the Chinese have is lack of numbers. Maybe things have changed, but I doubt it. Also, quiet isn't everything. The Soviets never built subs as quiet as ours, but they built ones that could dive deeper.

      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
  13. i love this by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    because i believe the future is not 1984, but instead, reverse big brother

    the standard mythology is that cameras everywhere is all about the government controlling you. but with google maps, with cell phone cameras, etc., we are actually seeing the rodney king effect: that governments suddenly have to get used to a new democratic form of transparency that they never had to deal with before

    george orwell is bullshit. the future of cameras everywhere is that they can be used AGAINST big government

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i love this by sacrilicious · · Score: 5, Insightful
      george orwell is bullshit. the future of cameras everywhere is that they can be used AGAINST big government

      Don't be so hasty in your optimism. The only reason We The People can see google maps is because the government is allowing it; all the govt has to do is make it illegal for the public to access it, and poof the alleged hedge against tyranny evaporates.

      Consider the extensive network of cameras in England. Can anyone see their contents? Nope. Just the government. Wanna bet who'll be able to access the views of the extensive camera network planned for Manhattan?

      And pay attention: police in this country are increasingly trying their hand at suppressing/confiscating/outlawing citizen camera operation. Note the numerous stories about permits being required for operating cameras, about "illegal wiretap" laws being used to incarcerate people using cameras, and on and on.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    2. Re:i love this by tji · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > the standard mythology is that cameras everywhere is all about the government controlling you. but with google maps, with cell phone cameras, etc., we are actually seeing the rodney king effect: that governments suddenly have to get used to a new democratic form of transparency that they never had to deal with before

      While, this is partly true.. "Little Brother" in the form of ubiquitous camera phones provide evidence of a lot of things private, governmental, and natural. But, I don't think orbiting satellites run by governments or wealthy corporations fall into this same category.

      Especially this example in the article.. superpower military vs. superpower military. The reality is that the Chinese submarine must not be considered too secret these days, or they would have built a simple roof structure for it. The Chinese are very aware of the satellite spying capabilities of the U.S. military, which we can safely assume is a whole lot more detailed than the pictures from Google Maps.

    3. Re:i love this by Skyshadow · · Score: 2

      That's a great theory except for the fact that it's crap.

      China is dealing with the fact that their nuclear deterrent is very nearly obsolete -- they've only got about 18 warheads that could reach the United States, and the considerable improvements in the US's precision assault capabilities means that these could be taken out with a minimum of casualties with a very small loss of life (the Union of Concerned Scientists did an analysis -- the US could defang China and only kill a couple thousand Chinese in the process, versus the millions it would have knocked off even in the early 90's).

      Add to this the missile shield, which is designed to knock down a small number of incoming missiles, and it's not impossible to foresee a day where a US President decides to take China out of the nuke game in the name of our own national security -- China is, after all, the emerging superpower of the moment and history says that friction is sure to follow.

      Which is why they need boomers. Or, more accurately, is why they need everyone to *know* and never forget that they have boomers. Sure, it's possible that US fast-attacks that will no doubt follow these guys out of post will be able to sink all them all in the 15 minutes or so they'd need to fire their missiles, but it's also really possible that they wouldn't.

      So this is Google Maps being a tool of China, showing us what the folks who run that country (aka, the people who put the "big" in "big brother") and set their nuclear policy want us to see. The might as well have made a see-from-space banner that says, "You can probably take us, sure, but it'll cost you Los Angeles".

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    4. Re:i love this by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 2, Informative

      Illegal wiretaps for cameramen? I can recall nothing of that nature. You haven't been paying attention, it was on slashdot a few days ago:
      http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/29/188 221&tid=172
      Quote: "A city man is charged with violating state wiretap laws by recording a detective on his home security camera"

      Quick searching turned up a few other cases:
      http://wcbstv.com/keefe/local_blogentry_251081231. html
      Quote: "Before releasing Lee, the police allegedly told him he needed a permit to photograph on New York City streets."

      http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=13834
      Quote: "Cruz said police told him that he broke a new law that prohibits people from taking pictures of police with cell phones."
    5. Re:i love this by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      China is, after all, the emerging superpower of the moment and history says that friction is sure to follow.

      The economic development of China is significant, but still being VASTLY overblown. They are a major economic power, and they have a huge population, but I still see absolutely no reason to believe they will become a superpower. It's a lot of fear from westerners, and of course is being fueled by China at every opportunity.

      Economically, they are still far, far behind Japan and Germany (which are both far behind the USA) and neither of them is considered a superpower. What's more, the economic development of China is highly dependent on the USA and other NATO nations, which will surely cut-off trade and other support should China start pushing for further military development.

      Militarily, China lacks many of the necessary high-tech capabilities needed in the modern equipment and weaponry. They're developing low-tech manufacturing on a huge scale, but are seriously lacking in high-tech development. They make the occasional PR move to try and convince the world they are able to developed advanced technology on their own, but it's commonly based on stolen tech from the west, or extremely primitive by today's standards. They're struggling just to make fuel-efficient engines, and develop pollution controls (rather than having to buy them from western nations).

      Now, it's quite possible (in the distant future) China will make that leap, but it seems rather unlikely, and anything-but a foregone conclusion. I'd give better odds on India making that jump, and before China if at all. Their proximity and totalitarian vs. democratic government makes that a very interesting prospect.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  14. There's nothing to worry about.... by 8127972 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it's like other stuff they make it's likely to get recalled. So no reason to worry.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  15. Ad Space! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    In other news, the Chinese govt just announced plans for the world's largest, submarine-based advertising campaign.

    The 220 foot banners, visible from space and deployed in the world's oceans, will read "Come to Beijing for having best memorable Olympics."

  16. satellite by SolusSD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i wouldn't fly that satellite too close to china. they might shoot it down. :)

  17. Re:This just in... by sethstorm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or "China asks Google to blur region".

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  18. If you look really close... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can see the sailors running around on deck, almost like they're having a fire drill.

    1. Re:If you look really close... by _mythdraug_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Shouldn't they be trying to swim around it before the light turns green?

  19. yes, the standard paranoid schizophrenia by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1984 is not so much a work of intelligence as it is mental pornogrpahy for paranoids

    kind of like ayn rand's work is mental pornography for the simply selfish

    they even have a fancy philosophical term for this selfishness: libertarianism. uh, no, what ayn rand wrote is just about being a selfish dickwad

    1984, atlas shrugged: these 2 works are mythological touchstones for certain subcultures of society. such that i know i am going to be modded into oblivion by saying these words. i know what i say here is deeply offensive to a certain subset of morons and wackjobs

    orwell/ rand aren't enlightening at all. they just reinforce a preexisting bias already present in certain readers, such that those biased readers get really excited about these works. there preexisting biases are radically reinforced. those biases being either:

    1. the government is out to get me. i know it. you say otherwise? you must work for them (1984)
    2. it's ok to be totally selfish. because it's actually a really deep and rich philosophy, not just a shallow shortsighted instinct of the simple minded(atlas shrugged)

    ayn rand and george orwell rank right up there with l ron hubbard in terms of biggest purveyors of pseudoreligious clap trap from the last century. "dianetics", "1984", "atlas shrugged": the 20th century's champs of pseudointellectual, pseudoreligious snake oil

    but don't let my cries of "bullshit" sway you when i point at these hucksters. you may now pillory me with the passion of a scientologist told that there is nothing wrong with psychology

    sorry to rock your mythology, crackpots

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  20. mod parent up by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    paranoid fruit loops are annoying, and need to be made fun of

    but you can ignore my caustic attitude towards you and your 1984 mythology, dear paranoid fruitloops. i'm obviously a secret servant of the illuminati

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  21. Wrong again by DJCacophony · · Score: 4, Informative

    The speed of sound in air is ~760mph.
    The speed of sound in water is ~3,355mph.

    What was that you were saying? Something about blathering about things you don't know about?

    --
    Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    1. Re:Wrong again by modecx · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bet if heard underwater, that comment would sound something like "Zing!"

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  22. well duh by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a cell phone camera or google maps is not the complete answer, just a new tool in a swiss army knife of tools to use against autocracy. you thought that the struggle was ever going to be answered definitively or completely with one technological tool or idea?

    the struggle against those who wish to restrict your rights and freedoms is a struggle that has always been waged, in all societies, and always will be waged, for all time. because you can't use google maps to spy on dick means it's pointless to try? or to not celebrate the transparency these new tools suddenly offer?

    what if activists followed dick around as much as they could everywhere he went with cellphone cameras? you don't think they wouldn't find something embarassing at least once or twice, even with all the secret service flak they would get? you think this struggle requires no sacrifice? you think it's one technological trick or doodad and SNAP, the desire of some assholes to control everyone else will just magically disappear?

    it's a struggle, forever. celebrate the new tool handed you in the struggle. or you don't really understand what is going on

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  23. Re:Oh snap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    China is gonna be pissed.


    You mean, someones going to go ballistic?

  24. Re:Maybe we should sell Taiwan a Los Angeles by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This may have been very true 10-15 years ago, but certainly not now. In fact, millions of Taiwanese (including 5 from my own family) have moved to the mainland to live and work permanently. It's the mainlanders who are the ruthless capitalist running dogs these days.

    Which is the biggest threat to the leadership's control - as more people get money they start to want to do things with it; and get ideas about how the government should deal with them, as opposed to how the government wants to deal with them. Then, those that haven't enjoyed the economic boon start wanting a piece as well while those that have start getting less willing to see more of their money go to the government to be redistributed.

    The Chinese leadership may think they can pull off keeping themselves in power and free up the economy; but given the size and divergent cultures within China I doubt they can pull it off.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  25. Re:Incorrect by Phisbut · · Score: 5, Funny

    and last time I checked, 0.3>0.33>1.

    Then I suggest you check again, because over here, 0.3<0.33<1

    --
    After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
    - The Tao of Programming
  26. Re:bored? Google Earth the Korean DMZ! by vertinox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    having google maps during the cuban missle crisis or the cold war would've been bad ass...

    Check out this one which is about a mile or so from the South side check point of the coastal DMZ.

    Thats a building, but its been painted to match the terrain. I suspect they are afraid of DPRK flying around their border. If you scroll through to the north, you can see the trench fences (the last parking lot) and then opposing that the North Korean side. If you keep scrolling west you can follow the trench fence system to the west coast. There are a lot of interesting things such as trenches and border forts and hidden nooks and cranies you can only see from the air.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  27. Hardly a big deal. by Nim82 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is there such a big fuss over China launching a new boomer?

    China is already in possession of an outdated ballistic missile sub, they are simply building a replacement class. Yet news sites and the 'omg China' crowd seem to be thinking it's a sign of aggression, and similar nonsense. Here in the UK the govenment has recnetly raised a bill for ~£20 Billion for a replacement SSBN system.

    As to it's secrecy, I've seen models and diagrams of it for years on various blogs and military tech sites, the fact they were building a new submarine was not secret. It was also know that it would look (unsurprisingly) just like the current russian boats. All China has managed to do is keep it's construction somewhat secret. China can track satellites, and it's not hard to hide a sub (most facilities have hangers for them) - this is not an intelligence coup, it's simply China showing the West their new toy. We do it via public launches and bottle smashing, China simply parks theirs outside and waits for someone to notice.

  28. Re:Incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    0.3>0.33>1

    ...Only in Soviet Russia...

  29. Re:on the contrary by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...except the video distracted pretty much everyone (especially you) from the full story surrounding this situation. You just fixated on the video. You just fixated on the end of the story and decided to completely ingore everything else. The video is still a big fat red herring, pretty much a complete distraction from any meaningful details of the case.

    Nevermind the high speed chase and the ensuing struggle afterwards.

    If I acted like Rodney King I would expect to get bludgeoned by the police. This is why (as a sensible non-idiot) I choose not to engage in those sorts of anti-social shenanigans.

    This is why a suburban jury didn't crucify the cops involved.

    They considered the fact that the guy was acting like a j*ck*ss. This is something that his "supporters" never bothered to consider.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  30. Re:Not quite by Goaway · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've seen a satellite taken picture of a man reading newspaper at the east germany streetcorner and you can read recognize paper, headlines and pictureframes so that you know then what date that picture was taken.

    I'm pretty sure you haven't. You may have seen such a picture taken from a plane, but not from a satellite.

  31. In totally unrelated news... by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...China is testing anti-satellite laser weapons.

  32. Re:bored? Google Earth the Korean DMZ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was looking around the Google Earth imagery in the DPRK recently. There's weirder stuff than that on the North Korea side -- airports with rows of MIG fighters (real or just props? Why left out in the open instead of in hangars?); half the hilltops near a major towns seem to have trenches and anti-aircraft sites on them, whether there is a military base nearby or not; roads and railways near the border for no particularly good reason go underground (i.e. are covered with thick layers of trucked in-dirt -- I'm guessing they would blow the tunnel with explosives and collapse the transport routes), etc.

    Three things really stood out when I was looking around

    1. In west-central North Korea there is a dam feeding an ENORMOUS irrigation canal that stretches across a quarter of the country -- winding its way over the terrain and through multi-kilometre-long tunnels through whole mountains (yes, those are west and east ends of the same tunnel -- zoom out to see them both -- and there are dozens of tunnels along this thing!). It's one freaking huge and expensive irrigation project.

    The second thing was near one of the military airports where there are 4 huge circular landing pads with 30m-wide helicopters parked in the middle. The blades are so big they could only be the Russian-built Mil Mi-26 or something similar. There are at least a dozen other, smaller helicopters parked in the same area.

    The third weird observation was this set of two enormous mansions tucked away in a forested valley, complete with its own private "end of line" train station, and a double security wall along the crest of the valley ridges. Gee, I wonder who lives there? The contrast with the state of the rest of the country is pretty shocking. I can see why the mansions are hidden away from view in a valley.

    They've got some amazing stuff out in the open. One thing is for sure. This is not a country that should be starving with that much military and other assets out in the open on display.

  33. Something I've always wondered about by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, yes it is. Advanced adaptive optics *might* correct for some or most of the atmospheric distortion, but they can't overcome the diffraction limit. A 3m lens at 300km altitude can only resolve down to about 9cm resolution. That's way way better than Google Maps, but you can't identify a face that only takes up 4 "pixels".

    That's the line I've been giving people too. The Hubble Space Telescope with a 2.4 meter mirror was designed to maximize the mirror size for the Shuttle's cargo bay, and this is the same Shuttle which has launched a KH-12 for the NRO. So the KH-12 probably has a mirror about the same diameter as the HST.

    But then it occurred to me. You only need a big mirror if you're looking at dim objects in space. Stuff on Earth is pretty well-lit, so the only real problem is resolution. If you want resolution, you don't need all that surface area. All you need are two or more smaller scopes separated by a large distance to create an interferometer. The design is tricky since the individual mirrors have to be aligned to within a wavelength of light. But it's been done many times here on Earth. When done successfully, you get a scope with the light-gathering power of just the sum of the mirrors, but the resolving power is that of a mirror whose diameter is the distance between the individual mirrors.

    The Webb Space Telescope will have a 6.5 meter mirror by designing it in separate cells which will fold and stack for launch. Again, since astronomy is primarily concerned with light-gathering ability, and a circle represents the most surface area for a given perimeter, astronomical scopes tend to have roundish mirrors. But a spy satellite wouldn't need light-gathering ability. They could arrange the cells differently, creating a mirror which is wide but narrow. Like the interferometer, resolution along the wide axis would be much higher.

    I am not the conspiracy theory type, but the publicity over HST / JWST strikes me as similar to Asimov's short story, The Dead Past. In that story, [spoiler] the government is covering up a chronoscope, a machine which can view the past, by publicizing it as studying ancient history - ancient Greeks, ancient Egyptians building the pyramids, etc. The deader the better. It turns out that the machine can't view more than several decades into the past. But what the public doesn't realize is that while the chronoscope is useless for studying ancient history, it is the perfect spying machine, able to remotely view events which happened just a few hours or even a few seconds ago.[/spoiler]

    I suspect this is part of the reason for the success (and problems) of Hubble. How the mirror wasn't tested before launch resulting in a near-fatal flaw. (How many KH-11 and KH-12 mirrors were manufactured before Hubble? Surely someone who had overseen construction of those mirrors was given some sort of advisory role in Hubble's manufacture.) How the pictures from HST are released to the public, spruced up in color and saturation so they're beautiful. How we let the gyros die until it was one failure away from uselessness. All this drama and publicity keeps Hubble in the eye of the public, and solidifies the stereotype in everyone's mind that a space telescope has got a big round mirror. Even the final maintenance mission for the HST being canceled, then restored, then funding being lost, and then restored again, serves to put the JWST in the public's mind. It too is a roundish mirror design (hexagonal cells). They even have technically knowledgeable people like us ridiculing movies which show spy satellites with extraordinary zooming capability.

    My hunch is the NRO probably has at

    1. Re:Something I've always wondered about by evanbd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except for the conspiracy about NASA, it's all plausible. I've worked with them; it's way too easy too attribute the Hubble stuff to general ineptness. No conspiracy required.

      Also note, your 10m mirror doesn't get you 1cm resolution just because you use a high res sensor -- the diffraction limited resolution is ~1.22*wavelength*distance/diameter, or 2.56cm at 700nm (red) (again, 300km). It's down toward 1cm in the blue, though. And one other nit -- two mirrors isn't enough; that only gives you good resolution in one dimension. You'd need at least 3 to get both dimensions, which you definitely want.

  34. Advocatus diaboli by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Spending five years as a Lutheran in a Catholic school has made me one of the Devil's most hard-working advocates...

    Yeah, because they didn't seem heartless regarding Tianemen,

    If a host of minority political movements flooded Washington D.C., shut down its legislative branch, and demanded that, not only the administration, but the form of government be changed, I'd expect some heads to get busted. And, I'd also expect a considerable number of dead, even though we, unlike the troops involved in Tiananmen, are properly equipped for riot control. In fact, I'd venture to guess that a large part of the country would support it enthusiatically. Though, whether "a large part" has good judgment in such matters is doubtful (and fairly irrelevant in a democratic republic).

    Political individuals certainly don't have the same avenues for communication to their fellow citizens in China, but that doesn't make the problem any different. Or the solution.

    or during the Tibet take over,

    Alternately, "the liberation of a people under the heal of a backwards, feudal theocracy which used slavery and serfdom into the mid-Twentieth Century." Tibet's suffering through the Cultural Revolution was in many ways no worse than what fell Han China. The big difference is to whom the flotsam and jetsam of these countries appealed. The Nationalists could appeal to our foreign policy and our pocketbook, but, for the average person, they are just the losers in some far away conflict.

    Tibet, on the other hand, has managed to reinvent itself into some kind of New Age Sugarcandy Mountain to the Western Left and as a victim par excellence in the eyes of the Western anti-Communist. According to them, they didn't just annex what had been part of the Chinese sphere of influence since before there was a Dalai Lama, they destroyed a harmonious mountaintop kingdom which had no greater desire than its own and the World's spiritual well-being. Tibet is no longer a physical place; it's an idea. An idea which was created in the image of Victorian pulp literature. The Tibet in exile we now have has turned into a circus which is fully prepared to lie to its strongest supporters about the annexation and the Cultural Revolution's impact on the region--not in a frantic effort to retake the country in which they once lived, but to keep the circus moving.

    Tell me, as a theocrat, would you rather jet-set around the world to be venerated by wealthy Westerns who can be made to believe anything out of their naïve spiritualism, or resume the day-to-day rule of a mountain theocracy which governs the lives of people who've spent the last thirty years in comparative economic, if not political, liberalism.

    or in killing Falun Gong members, or...

    These people follow a man who claims to be "the god of gods," fly, and become invisible at will, yet he doesn't dare return to the Mainland. Can you imagine what kind of person it takes to believe in a religion like that without it being deeply rooted in their culture and daily lives? I don't think we're losing any the great minds of our time with this action, regardless of its heartlessness.

    1. Re:Advocatus diaboli by calculadoru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nice post, but you may want to try again.
      It all boils down to this: tanks versus unarmed people. See the history of every communist dictatorship for examples.
      The thing the left in the west needs to understand is, communism is intrinsically evil and has absolutely nothing to do with the ideals of the left. It's even worse than fascism because not only do the trains not run on time, they will shoot the passengers for sabotaging them.

      --
      The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
    2. Re:Advocatus diaboli by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      GP: "Yeah, because they didn't seem heartless regarding Tianemen, or during the Tibet take over"

      Alternately, "the liberation of a people under the heal of a backwards, feudal theocracy which used slavery and serfdom into the mid-Twentieth Century." Tibet's suffering through the Cultural Revolution was in many ways no worse than what fell Han China. The big difference is to whom the flotsam and jetsam of these countries appealed. The Nationalists could appeal to our foreign policy and our pocketbook, but, for the average person, they are just the losers in some far away conflict.

      Last I saw those arguments supporting Mao's military invasion and the half a century of genocidal occupation was when I read Chinese Communist Party's propaganda leaflets extolling the loving wonderfulness of PPC's military occupation in Tibet.

      Tibet was indeed backwards in many social and technological ways thanks to the country's near-total geographical and self-imposed isolation, no Tibetan has ever claimed otherwise, but they had began reforms already at the beginning of the 20th century and in any case no level of backwardness is an excuse for the destruction and murder in a massive scale that the Chinese immediately embarked upon. The real and total feudalism began with the invasion of Mao's communist troops in 1949. I strongly recommend that you familiarize yourself with the level of brutality and murder of the Chinese occupiers against almost excusively peaceful Tibetan civilians and nuns and monks. Out of Tibet's some 6000 monasteries, which in Tibet functioned both as "churches" and universities, less than ten survived without major damage. Some 6000 were totally destroyed and looted by the Chinese of all their invaluable artifacts and history. Refugees are "flotsam and jetsam" to you?

      Some of my recent posts here (as well as my homepage URL above) have detailed the absolute injustice of CCP's imperial claims over the totally non-chinese people of Tibet, but to understand the devastating effects on ordinary Tibetan humans you need to look up some documentary films or better yet talk to the people who managed to escape from their homeland. Talk to a nun who's suffered enending torture while hung from the ceiling and who's been raped by camp guards and with electric cattle prods. Who can't sleep because of constant headaches and nightmares. Or walk or resume normal life because of life-long pain and physical problems. Look in her (or their) eyes and repeat your rant how you couldn't care less because their homeland in the Tibetan high plateau used be so backward!

      Tibet, on the other hand, has managed to reinvent itself into some kind of New Age Sugarcandy Mountain to the Western Left and as a victim par excellence in the eyes of the Western anti-Communist. According to them, they didn't just annex what had been part of the Chinese sphere of influence since before there was a Dalai Lama, they destroyed a harmonious mountaintop kingdom which had no greater desire than its own and the World's spiritual well-being. Tibet is no longer a physical place; it's an idea. An idea which was created in the image of Victorian pulp literature. The Tibet in exile we now have has turned into a circus which is fully prepared to lie to its strongest supporters about the annexation and the Cultural Revolution's impact on the region--not in a frantic effort to retake the country in which they once lived, but to keep the circus moving.

      What are you on about??

      Tibet has been specifically and against the most basic Human Rights (as declared by the United Nations) seen all its rights of "reinvention" or self-determination ripped away by the occupying Chinese. If spiritualism, as an integral part of Tibetan culture, was practically the only thing the escaping Tibetans could bring along to exile, you're happy to tar it with your Western-style and Western-created "New Age" ridiculism? Western

      --

      Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

  35. It's not a real submarine by mrbluze · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's just a cheap Chinese imitation.

    --
    Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
  36. Put away the tinfoil. . . by Saikik · · Score: 2, Funny

    What do you think they're going to do next poison our dog food??

  37. Stop using word "invade" by deconvolution · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As the U.S. government, the U.N and most of countries in this world stated, Taiwan is a PROVINCE of China. It is separated from mainland China because of a civil war (called the third civil war between 1945-1949). During that time most Chinese people supported the communist party and banished the KMT party the U.S. supported to Taiwan in 1949.

    The communist party were planning to continue attacking KMT in Taiwan as the final war and make the whole China as a single unity. However, the Korean war was broken out and H. Truman asked the U.S. navy _invaded_ (since they did not ask Chinese people if agreed) Taiwan Strait to prevent the communist party's plan. The new government has no choice but sent army to North Korean as a kind of "revenge" leading to a long time hostile status until the end of Vietnam war (all the officers of Vietnam army were trained in China military academies).

    Before 1949 after Japanese force surrendered, every Chinese CAN go Taiwan as a RIGHT as go to everywhere in China. Chinese people, even army coming to Taiwan, are to use their rights. So Chinese people called this "the war of unify". It is nothing about ideologies but similar to the civil war in the U.S. How can we say "invade"?

    1. Re:Stop using word "invade" by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The same way that we said General Sherman invaded the south during the U.S. Civil war. When one group of people shoot everyone trying to stop them from entering somewhere they're not wanted, we usually call it an 'invasion'

      --
      You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.