Slashdot Mirror


Nintendo - "Everyone is a Gamer"

There's nothing that excites gamers like statistics; pie charts and graphs dominated the opening of Nintendo's E3 conference. Fortunately, the event had more than just business to discuss. They unveiled a 'Wii Zapper' housing that allows the Wiimote and Nunchuck to combine into a light gun, which will retail for about twenty bucks. They showed off a number of third party titles to prove the outside-the-company commitment, such as a Soul Calbur and Medal of Honor (which will be playable online) designed specifically for the console. Hardcore gamers were the focus of the early portion of the conference: Smash Brothers Brawl has a launch date of December 3rd in the US. They heavily hyped online play, with several EA titles and a Pokemon-like Dragon Quest title. Mario Kart for Wii will be launching early next year, will be playable online, and will have a Wiimote driving wheel housing packaged with the game. With the hardcore discussed, the attention shifted to mass market games. A new channel, 'Check Mii Out' will allow for a HotorNot-style voting mechanism and contests to make the most realistic celebrity Mii. There was much discussion of the Nintendo approach to expanding audience; Super Mario Galaxy was brought up as bridging that gap, as a second player can 'assist' the primary player in various ways. Galaxy will be launching on November 12th. Targetted more directly at this 'outside the norm' group was WiiFit, which uses a dedicated device called the Wii Balance Board. It allows for a daily exercise routine, can track data over time (and compare it to other family members) and includes some simple minigames like a soccer heading game. The press conference ended with Reggie Fils-Aimee revealing Nintendo's goal to make videogaming one of the pre-eminent forms of entertainment, across all age groups.

67 of 354 comments (clear)

  1. What gamers? by also-rr · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's nothing that excites gamers like statistics; pie charts and graphs

    That's just outreach to all the hardcore gamers in accounting, obviously. Feel welcome guys!

    1. Re:What gamers? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's just outreach to all the hardcore gamers in accounting, obviously. Feel welcome guys!
      Nah, accountants build their own games in Excel, such as the ever-popular hits:

      Function Call of Duty
      Age of Accruals
      The Balance Sheets of War
      Extreme Audit III: Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:What gamers? by the+dark+hero · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget EvE Online. A Giant spreadsheet...in space.

      --
      You constantly struggle for self improvement - and it shows.

      Hooray for bad Engrish on fortune cookies

    3. Re:What gamers? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought hedge funds were games?

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:What gamers? by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't knock Excel, I've once seen Pac Man implemented as an Excel sheet with full graphics and everything. It certainly was more accurate than the Atari version I grew up with.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    5. Re:What gamers? by LokiSnake · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's a blog that talks about Pacman in Excel. And here's the link to the original Japanese page.

    6. Re:What gamers? by __aawbkb6799 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Extreme Audit III: Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance
      I literally shit my pants!
  2. Re:wow by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 3, Funny

    The proper reference is Voltron.

    Or Beowulf clusters if you want to strech it out a bit.

    --
    "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  3. Two years ago by yanos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember when the big 3 was announcing their forthcoming console. The Xbox 360 press event made it to slashdot's front page. So did the PS3, while the Wii was tucked away in the game section. Forward two years from then, and it's Nintendo press conference that made it to the front page, while Sony and Microsoft are nowhere to be found. How things changes...

    1. Re:Two years ago by Osty · · Score: 4, Informative

      Forward two years from then, and it's Nintendo press conference that made it to the front page, while Sony and Microsoft are nowhere to be found. How things changes...

      Nowhere to be found, eh? Microsoft's conference was last night. Nintendo's was this morning. Sony's is next. Slashdot will cover all three.

    2. Re:Two years ago by Selfbain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Nintendo keeps focusing on innovating and making games fun while Sony/Microsoft keep focusing on making the same thing more powerful, I think Nintendo will do quite well.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    3. Re:Two years ago by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm betting that Nintendo is a one trick pony

      Considering that both the Wii and the DS are smash hits at the moment, I'd say that Nintendo is a "Two Trick Pony". Unless you count the continuing success of the Gameboy Advance. In which case Nintendo is a three trick pony. That is, unless you also count their unrivaled success with the Super Nintendo. In which case they're a four trick pony. Oh, but what about the original Gameboy? Make that a five trick pony. Six if you count the market-reviving, competition-stomping powerhouse that was the NES. Oh, but what about the games?!? Donkey Kong, Super Mario Bros., Mario 3, Zelda, Metroid, Starfox, DK:Country, Mario Kart, Link to the Past, FZero, Mario 64, Starfox 64, Ocarina of Time, FZero X, Metroid Prime-- oh to hell with it. I'll just give you a grand total.

      By my count, Nintendo is a 3,421,978 trick pony.

      I can certainly see your point. By my count Sony has innovated much more than Nintendo with a grand total of... erm... two tricks. 1.5 if you believe in Sony's (rather confusingly put) "more than 10 years" philosophy of console design.
    4. Re:Two years ago by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, in just 2 years the PS3 will no longer have bugs. Perhaps it will be playable?

      In my circle one of the reasons to even get a wii was SSBB and MarioKart. The wii is just about to hit it's stride.

      the reasons to have the systems:
      wii - cool controls, generally social atmosphere. Warioware/Mario Party, SSBB, and Wii play/sports.
      PS3 - probably going to have the best RPGs (Assassin's Creed will likely jump start sales)
      Xbox 360 - lock self in room and frag things online (Halo, Metal Gear Solid, it came out strong)
      Computer - adaptable interface, the best graphics, Spore

    5. Re:Two years ago by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I remember when the big 3 was announcing their forthcoming console. The Xbox 360 press event made it to slashdot's front page. So did the PS3, while the Wii was tucked away in the game section.

      Your memory is apparently doing you a very poor service.

      Speculations about Nintendo's controller where all over the news (before they have shown the controller). When they announced the controller with photos, doubly so.

      We had fanboys making fake "Nintendo Revolution" videos about what the console might look like.

      Then later, when Nintendo announced how they *called* their console, it was all over the news for weeks again.

    6. Re:Two years ago by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hate to say it but that really sounds like wishful thinking.
      1. The PS3 may not really be more powerful than the 360. You can have a very fast system but if it is too hard to program for you will loose to less powerful systems in the long run. Just as Intel about that. They have learned that lesson a few times. The 360 is much easier to program for and has a much larger installed user base currently. Game producers have to look at the number of games they can expect to sell and the cost i.e. "difficulty" of producing them. The PS3 has the smallest customer base and the highest development costs. The only market that the PS3 outsells the 360 is Japan and as far as I can tell the Wii outsells it in every market. Also the Wii has the lowest development costs.
      2. Nintendo a one trick pony? Well as the DS has proven a good innovative UI can beat shear horsepower. Sorry but that pony has shown many tricks over the years.
      3. Nintendo is currently making money hand over fist with the Wii. The PS3s sales went up after the price cut but what will that do to Sony's profits? I still predict that Nintendo will offer the Wii HD in about two or three years. It will play all the old wii and GC games but will offer higher resolution graphics and a faster processor speed. No one will really care about there "investment" in the orginal Wii being usless since they didn't pay nearly as much for there Wii as the PS3 or 360.
      4. It's the games. The Wii has more fun games than the PS3. It will keep selling for a good long time.
      5. Nintendo can cut the price tomorrow if it wants to and still make money. So it will be a popular "why not" console.
      6. I get the feeling that even Sony isn't all that thrilled with the PS3 as a platform. Why are they still making and selling the PS2? Nintendo killed the GC and Microsoft killed the XBox. Also why did God of War II come out for the PS2 and not the PS3?

      The PS3 may pull out of it's current problems and do well. The odds of becoming the number one selling console I see as being slim to none.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:Two years ago by LKM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I am absolutely sure that Sony isn't thrilled with the PS3, I see no problem with them continuing to sell the PS2. It's making them a shitload of money, and it's a console sale that doesn't go to the Wii.

    8. Re:Two years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Vagina.

      (Posting anonymously because not everyone will get it, and I don't feel like being marked Troll today.)

    9. Re:Two years ago by LordVader717 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Vagina.

      (Posting anonymously because not everyone will get it, and I don't feel like being marked Troll today.)


      Just to clarify. (and maybe there's a bit of Karma Whoring too)

      But that was actually only one year ago. Two years ago Nintendo had barely shown the casing, and the big mystery about the controller was left for a few months.
  4. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "It has gotten to the point where I feel like I am forcing myself to turn it on once a month or so. It does get the occasional use when someone comes by and they haven't seen the system yet, but the number of people who haven't heard about the Wii is pretty small now. And it seems like most people are extremely interested at first and then their interest rapidly diminishes to zero."

    I think it also depends on your age group. If not for /. I'd probably not know what a Wii was. Most people I know my age are too busy to mess with gaming much. And in their free time, they like to spend it out..dining out, seeing a movie...clubs, bars...festivals, etc.

    When I want to veg out at home...I like to just veg, which means listening to the stereo, or watching something on the projector (movie, tv show)...veggin' to me is a passive thing.

    When I want action...I go out.

    I used to like computer games, and I think I might still play the occasional one if I thought of it. But, back when I used to play them alot, while I had more free time, I also had less income to go out and do things. Now I can afford to go out and do things, which eats up more of my limited time I have these days.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  5. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by Mr.Dippy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am the same way to a certain point. However, I've been more interested in downloading the classic games and that is where I spend 90% of my Wii time. I had the same attitude with my DS when it first came out. I played it for about a month or two and then it sat on my desk collecting dust. Then games like Meteos, Kirby, and Castlevania came out and I started playing again. The Wii has the problem right now where there are no new good games. Give it till the end of the summer when metroid comes out.

    --


    -Dipster
  6. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by GweeDo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I still play WiiSports with my nieces all the time. I still play Mario Party 8 with my wife often. Resident Evil 4 is even more fun then when I played it on my cube and I just got a few new VC games with some gift cards from a few friends.

    So in short: yes.

  7. Re:wow by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Depends. Do they grow 50 stories tall after they link up?

  8. Not bad by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Didn't get to watch it live since Gamespot was having some kind of issues with their live stream and I couldn't find another one for free. Guess I'll have to check on google video for it later. I did read through about five different live blogs to get a good feel for the presentation though and overall I think they did alright.

    I would have liked to see more focus on some of the third party exclusives that were being brought to the Wii, something that seems a little lacking. I know that a lot of companies have pledged support and are releasing games, but a lot of them turn out to be crappy ports that no one's interested in. They probably should have shown something from Square Enix in more detail.

    I'm glad that Mario Galaxy and Smash Bros. are dated now and it'll be nice to finally have some AAA games coming out. Hopefully, I'll be able to stand the wait between now and then. Announcing Mario Kart for 1Q 2008 also helps to let everyone know that there won't be another gaming drought, at least not for a while. Hopefully there will be some good AAA third party releases by then to start picking up the slack.

    I'm glad they made some announcements about expanding online play in games on the system, but I still want to know more about it and how all of it will work. I'm not a huge fan of friends codes and would prefer that they used a set-up more akin to Xbox Live. At least they're finally catching up to Sony and Microsoft in terms of online play.

    The Balance Board and their new light gun look like some interesting additions. I can see how the light gun adaptor would help to break down some of the barriers between casual and hardcore gamers. I also suspect that WiiFit will do a lot better than most people will give it credit for.

    I'm going to go see if I can find a stream for the Sony conference now.

  9. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by DrXym · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the conference is anything to go by, their strategy is to produce a continuous stream of add-ons. Gun "zappers", steering wheels, balance mats and so on. The wheel was just silly, the gun zapper wasn't much better since aiming down the barrel isn't going to work plus the awkward position of the nunchuk. I could see a mat that could weigh you and do other things having potential though.

  10. Same Message, Different Reception by pokerdad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The press conference ended with Reggie Fils-Aimee revealing Nintendo's goal to make videogaming one of the pre-eminent forms of entertainment, across all age groups.

    Revealing? They said the same thing last year (and I think they said it two years ago too), but I suspect the number of people who are taking them seriously has increased a hundred fold.

  11. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by shoptroll · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As someone who grew up with the NES and SNES, Nintendo has always been "gadget-happy" and looking for alternate interfaces. I know back home I have the following:

    NES: Zapper, Power Pad, Advantage (Arcade joystick styled controller), Max ("Analog" style controller.. also has wings like a PlayStation controller)
    SNES: Mouse, Super Scope

    More Nintendo peripherals isn't anything new.

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  12. I find myself less and less interested in Nintendo by hudsonhawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...because they seem less and less interested in me.

    And as someone who has owned literally every Nintendo console ever (yes, even the Virtual Boy, though not yet the Wii as it hasn't yet sold me) that makes me pretty sad.

    Of course I understand why they're doing this from a business point of view. But as a long-time, moderate gamer, I don't really care - I'm a fan of their games, not their business - I just want good, engaging, and deep games to play. And that's not the direction they're going. I have seen the future and it's a collection of mini-games.

    Sorry Nintendo, but Wii Yoga isn't going to win me back. I see a lot of new experiences for non-gamers, but for all its promise the Wiimote has yet to really add anything compelling to traditional gaming (waggle doesn't really count). I didn't see anything in that conference to convince me otherwise.

  13. More than the base by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The rest of the show was about how people who don't normally game were getting into the Wii and DS.

    Maybe they're finally realizing that there are a lot more would-be customers out there who want to play console games but can't last 30 seconds in games designed for the hardcore. My wife spends far more on console games than I do, and does so in hopes that she'll have fun ... and then invariably discovers that she has no idea how to play these convoluted things and lacks the years of experience necessary to do so with agility. Upshot is potentially lucrative enthusiastic customers are discouraged from continuing before they reach the critical mass of fun that will propel them into the "hardcore" realm.

    You're a hardcore gamer. You're going to buy more games. There are more games coming for you. You're not going away anytime soon.

    For just one conference, they decided to focus on trying to attract and retain more customers. You may sneer at Wii Fit, but that (a typically lame attempt at reaching out to the luddites) is a step toward figuring out what non-"gamers" want in a game.

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
    1. Re:More than the base by demi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd love a Myst-like game for the Wii, and my wife probably would, too. Limited-scope, mini-game style games are okay for a while but it would be nice to have something to sink your teeth into that wasn't a twitch adventure.

      --
      demi
  14. Re:NinTardDuh by VJ42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Artificial demand? Looking at the numbers I think that the problem is just that they can't get them out the door fast enough. They've almost sold as many as the 360 which had a yeas lead over them. In fact on closer inspection you can see that the 360 gets a boost due to the launches of the Wii and PS3. Without that effect (essentialy help fro Nintendo and Sony) they would have already sold more.

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  15. Re:A pretty dull presentation by MBCook · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I kind of agree with the steering wheel and the zapper shell. The wheel looks more advanced (has buttons and such), but it's still just 'meh.'

    The platform on the other hand, is HUGE. Look how many "non-gamers" like the Wii. Now give them an exercise device that is kind of fun to use, lets you do step-robics. It's like the mat from the NES days, but updated. Having all the balancing mechanics in it can open some more very interesting possibilities. It may die a quiet death, but it may be another game changer.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  16. Mii Hot or Not? by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe this sounds racist but I think most Miis look pretty much the same. I don't own a wii so maybe it's been updated since the last time I've played with it but the options seem pretty limited. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy it for what it is and I made one with a beard that looked halfway like mine but if they are going to make a contest on creating the most "realistic" celebrity I think we're going to see a whole lot of nearly identical miis that don't look all THAT much like any particular celebrity.

    It's a very rough caricature. How realistic can people make them? Someone will make Madonna and when it's pointed out I might even agree that it kind of looks like her but if I would never have looked at the mii and immediately thought MADONNA!

    My nephews own a wii and they created a mii for everyone in our extended family. They did as good a job as anyone could do but I couldn't pick out who people were because the options would have to be a lot more detailed to distinguish between my nose and my brother's nose, for instance. So how are people going to vote on celebrity miis? This one's head is a LITTLE bit bigger. That one has a slightly darker skin color. How do you decide which is better when they are all nearly identical?

    1. Re:Mii Hot or Not? by the+dark+hero · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      You constantly struggle for self improvement - and it shows.

      Hooray for bad Engrish on fortune cookies

    2. Re:Mii Hot or Not? by porcupine8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It certainly seems like it should be. Heck, they could even start selling upgrade packs on the VC - $1 here for ten new noses, $1 there for ten new hair styles...

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    3. Re:Mii Hot or Not? by shoptroll · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ugh. It's like someone mixed "The Sims" with XBox Live.

      Personally I'd hate that. I still don't see the benefit of micro-transactions other than as a way to fleece a couple extra bucks out of the customer.

      --
      Insert Sig Here
  17. Re:NinTardDuh by vigmeister · · Score: 2, Informative

    Interesting observation: PS3 has been selling at the same rate as the XBox360 if you look at the initial as well as current slopes. And the Wii has been selling roughly more than twice as fast. Which essentially means that the revenue generated by the Wii is probably comparable to that generated by the PS3 and the Xbox. Of course, MS and Sony have been taking losses on their console sales while Nintendo has been making a profit.
    Cheers!

    --
    Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
  18. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by shoptroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On the flip-side:

    Look at DDR and Guitar Hero. Both feature accessories that are incredibly limited in scope. Yet Harmonix and Konami are raking in cash with them. Which you pointed out.

    Also, a lot of arcade games these days center around non-traditional input devices.

    Talk to HCI people and I think they'll agree that custom inputs will always be preferred to a general device by users. Especially if it maps a lot better to the task at hand. If the game industry wants to expand beyond the core audience, they need to break down the barrier between the game and the user. Which means, doing away with the abstract link between pushing buttons and what happens on screen. Which is pretty damn evident when you look at the near universal appeal of something like Guitar Hero.

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  19. Overlooked real target for the fit board by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did no one else look at this thing and instantly think "Tony Hawk"?

    Come on - medium sensor board, that's light and wireless, detects weight and pressure both?

    Slap a shock-absorber attachment on the bottom so that it doesn't snap in half when you come down on it and you have an instant virtual skateboard. Hell you could even make a velcro attachment to the WiiMote so you could strap it to your leg to mimic pushing off.

  20. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find it interesting that the preceding post got 5 points for being "interesting" -- come on, the guy is just talking about getting outside once in a while instead of staying indoors, continually mesmerised by some vapid gaming console! Really, it's not all that unusual! This is news to you kids??

  21. Hardcore Gamers don't really matter by LKM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nothing Nintendo has shown today really rekindled my interest in my, dusty, Wii.

    Mario Kart Online? No? really?

    I can't really imagine what they could come out with for the system that will bring back that hype I felt late last year.

    I think you're missing what created the hype in the first place. It wasn't you. It wasn't the gamers. It was the old people playing videogames for the first times in their lives. It was the parents, gaming with their kids. It was the kids, getting off the couch and jumping around. It was was the soccer moms, touching a videogame controller twenty years after they last played Pong.

    The Wii Fitness thing may very well be huge. This may be the next Nintendogs, the next Brain Training, the next Wii Sports. The fact that most "hardcore" gamers don't really care doesn't factor in at all.

    Metroid, Mario Kart, Super Smash Bros, Mario Galaxy may all seem like important games, but it's possible that they won't be able to compare to the importance of something casual like the Wii Balance Board.

    1. Re:Hardcore Gamers don't really matter by Brickwall · · Score: 2, Informative
      It was the old people playing videogames for the first times in their lives. It was the parents, gaming with their kids. It was the kids, getting off the couch and jumping around.

      Spot on. My two girls, 10 and 13, got a Wii about 3 weeks ago. They will play for two or three hours at a stretch, and yes, they jump and shout and twirl, and generally have a great time. They have plenty of games for their computers, but they rarely play those anymore; they prefer the interaction the Wii gives them.

      And I've enjoyed playing with them as well. The sports pack is fun, and I've even tried Mario Party Pack 8.

      The girls are already planning "Wii" parties for their friends; I doubt our machine will be gathering dust any time soon.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
  22. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was offered $450CAD by somebody who was having trouble finding one in the stores and literally bit their hand off.

    And some people thought the PS3 cost an arm and a leg

  23. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by El+Gigante+de+Justic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've used mine just about every night in the last 3 weeks, mostly for Wii Sports (yes, it still hasn't lost its appeal even after 6 months), since I can just turn it on, play a few games and then turn it off again. I have plenty of games for PS2 and X-Box I could work on finishing, but I love being able to just turn it on, play for 20 minutes and turn it off. Sure there have a been a couple of stretches where I didn't use it much for a while, usually because I had a new PS2 game or something, but I always come back to it later. I can't think of any reason for any Wii to be getting dusty, especially since RE4 was just released, unless of course you're a student or unemployed so you have more than 2-3 hours of free time a day. Sure Wii has had a lot of mini-game type stuff released for it, but that's because its fits the casual gamer target audience. You could just as easily argue that the XBox360 has too many FPS games on it and are there really more worthy titles out for the PS3 at this point as compared to the Wii? Smash Bros and Mario Galaxy alone should be worth hanging onto your Wii for. 3rd party support is definately coming - it's just taking a while since a lot of developers anticipated the sales of PS3 and Wii to be switched and they have to figure out what to do with the new controllers. I think a lot of hardcore gamers and PS3/XBox fanboys fail to realize that part of the reason the Wii is selling so well compared to those is because a Wii is cheaper than both systems, works on a standard TV, and just about anyone can pick up the games and play. Would I like a PS3 eventually? Maybe, but it would cost me about $1500 to make it worthwhile even after the price drop because I, like most households in the US, don't have an HDTV yet, and other expenses have to take priority. No point in paying for a system with all those fancy graphics if I can only view them at 480i. Just an aside to anyone whining about the presentation this year being about business - that's what E3 is now. If you're looking for a presentation aimed at hardcore gamers, wait until TGS.

  24. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by Zaatxe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore?

    Are you kidding? In some days I have to fight people at home to play on a PSOne! We would kill one another if we had a Wii...

    --
    So say we all
  25. Different Market by LKM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But every PS2 is also a sale that "could" be going to the PS3.

    I doubt it. People buying a 100$ console and people buying a 500$ console are an entirely different market, I think.

    I don't think the PS2 is competing with the PS3. If anything, it's competing with the Wii.

    GOW2 seems like a big hit for Sony. But why isn't it a big hit for the PS3? I doubt that every PS2 sold is a lost Wii sale. Nintendo last time I looked was selling every Wii they made.

    Which actually means that a lot of people looking for a Wii may end up with a PS2 instead. They wouldn't pay twice as much and buy a PS3, but they might pay half as much and buy a PS2. I doubt it happens often, but it seems more likely that the PS2 is stealing from the Wii than from the PS3.

  26. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by MeanderingMind · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some of us find the abstract concept of "outside" very fascinating. Maybe one day we can design experiments to yield observable results that might prove the existance of "outside". Until then, we can only speculate as to its nature.

    --
    Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
  27. Re:A pretty dull presentation by C0rinthian · · Score: 2, Funny

    yoga...

    ...not much of a stretch. I would be inclined to disagree...
  28. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by ihatewinXP · · Score: 4, Informative

    The "given up on it gamer"........

    Which as the article states is the audience they are now going for.

    I totally hear your sentiment, I was one of them too. Hell, I even picked up Zelda and was disgusted after spending 30 minutes to get a goddamned fishing rod and threw it out... But Tuesday night mahjong in Beijing with my far ranging expat crowd has now been replaced with Tuesday night Wii bowling league or Wario Whatever madness.... Laughing the whole time about how my bowling alley serves the finest wine and provides footwear par excellance ;)

    Have you actually played this thing? One of our friends just got back from a 4 week stint in the States and it was the first thing she mentioned. I cant even make the word of mouth marketing on this thing up.

    Sorry, im sold. This thing is Just Plain Fun -

    --
    ---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
  29. Re:'twas lame by jayhawk88 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate to break it to you, but Nintendo has realized that there is far more money to be made doing exactly what they're doing, then catering to the "hard core gamer", and looking at how things are going it's hard to argue with the strategy. What you call a lame/pathetic DDR style game is going to be a humongous hit with all those people who've never heard of DDR.

    Is this wise? Again, time will tell, but hard to argue with the results so far. It's clear Nintendo has tapped a new market here, though, and personally I think they're onto something. Web games have shown us the future; it's important to realize that "fun" is defined very differently for this type of gamer.

  30. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by scarpa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, I play mine almost every day. My wife also plays it often, she is a sucker for anything Mario Bros. and loves Super Paper Mario. I currently have a stack of games that will take me at least 2-3 months to burn through.

    I almost feel like the Wii was made just for me. I burnt out on the hardcore online gaming scene about 5 years ago, and haven't been able to keep interest in any serious games since then. It's not that I don't like new games, it's that I no longer have hours a day to invest in a game that takes 60 hours to complete. My gaming time has been cut down to an hour, hour and a half at a time max.

    I even thought for a couple years that I was no longer a gamer, until the DS rescued me from that dark vision.

    I guess if I was still a "hardcore" gamer and was into online play and FPS or MMORPG games I'd be underwhelmed by the Wii. But I'm not, my glory years of gaming are in the past and now I feel like there's a game company that understands that.

    In short, I've become an old man.

  31. Re:I find myself less and less interested in Ninte by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course I understand why they're doing this from a business point of view. But as a long-time, moderate gamer, I don't really care - I'm a fan of their games, not their business - I just want good, engaging, and deep games to play.

    Well, at least you understand why they're doing it.

    As someone whom gaming has been steadily leaving behind in terms of skill dexterity (and patience), I'm glad to see someone is accounting for the fact that old geezers like me still want something to pick and play with in short bursts, and doesn't need 40 hours/week to play or preternatural dexterity to control 15 buttons simultaneously in a fast-paced game. I last about 10 minutes on a modern game, get frustrated, and stop playing it altogether.

    Nintendo does seem to be abandoning you as a segment. But, in order to sell more games with a wider appeal, they're focusing more on other segments (those without l337 gaming skills). Give it time, if the Nintendo platform keeps selling as it has been, the other game makers will have to start releasing their more "hard core" games on the platform.

    Unfortunately, the choice seems to be between "amazing graphics but unplayable for many people" or "moderate graphics, but playable by anyone". There's obviously more people interested in the latter category.

    Cheers
    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  32. Re:balancing pad by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe if it was an FPS where you rode a heavily-armed Segway around...

    Actually, that sounds like it might be fun.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  33. Re:I find myself less and less interested in Ninte by porcupine8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't understand how a "long-time moderate gamer" who has owned every Nintendo console (a description that nearly fits me) could say that a company that's releasing Twilight Princess; Mario Galaxy, Party, Paper, and Kart; Super Smash Brothers; and Wii Sports (have you actually played it?) is "ignoring you." What exactly do you WANT?

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  34. Re:Expanding audiences again? by ShaggyIan · · Score: 2, Informative

    From personal experience, I know of five purchased Wii's, my own included. Two own another console, and the non-me one is my brother in law who is a huge Nintendo fanboy.

    One of them is my 74 year old father, who plays more than I do. The only consoles he ever purchased before were for me. He hasn't played one since the Atari 2600.

    Actually, I'd bet a significant number of purchasers would say the 2600 was their last one, same sort of appeal.

    --

    This sig was generated randomly by one million monkeys with Speak 'n Spells. . .
  35. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by grammar+fascist · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry, im sold. This thing is Just Plain Fun -

    Yeah, if you have friends.

    You types creep me out.
    --
    I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  36. A Heretic by Telepathetic+Man · · Score: 3, Funny

    Kill the non-believer!

    --
    Just because you can, does not mean you should.
  37. Re:I've still never even seen one by ctid · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know where you are in the world but in the UK there are a few sites which do online stock-checking for Nintendo Wiis. Over the last month or so, availability seems to have improved significantly. For example if you just want the console there are several places where you can get one. There are even more if you are prepared to spring for a bundle. I've been in several stores recently where they have had signs up saying that they have Wiis in stock. This is in Manchester in NW England.

    --
    Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
  38. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the mat will definitely have applications for skate or snowboard games.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  39. Hardcore Gamers are idiots by Rosebud128 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    2004- When the DS was revealed, they laughed at it. PSP would destroy it, and Nintendo would go third party.

    2005- When the "Revolution" was revealed, they laughed at it. "Nintendo cannot compete." Meanwhile, they went 'ONE CONSOLE FUTURE' to the Sony Killzone 2 trailer and Microsoft's Xbox 360 showing.

    2005- (TGS) When Nintendo revealed the Wii controller, they laughed at it. They compared it to the Powerglove and that it would flop. They hailed Xbox 360 launch as start of 'high definition' generation.

    2006- When the Wii name is announced, hardcore gamers laughed and considered the Revolution to be 'dead' on arrival. After all, who would play the 'Wii' when there were much cooler names like Playstation 3 and Xbox 360?

    2006- Nintendo's excellent E3 showing was not worth thinking about, they said. After all, Nintendo fans go ballistic on every Nintendo E3 presence. PS3's brand name would sail it past very fast. And while PS3 was expensive, you got so much value in it! Wii wasn't future proofed.

    2006- Wii's $250 price shocked them and they declared it too expensive for any reasonable person to buy. The bundling of Wii Sports would destroy third party software sales. Don't bother pre-ordering since you can walk in the afternoon and buy it anytime.

    2007- Wii is still selling out. Obviously, it must be a fad. A novelty. Hardcore gamers believe they are the mainstream after all. PS3 is not 'dead'. It is just 'slow' in starting. It will overtake the market in time. It just has too.

    2007- Wii Balance Board? "Nintendo is DEAD as a gaming company!" they proclaim. "I don't even turn on my Wii anymore," they keep telling us. Obviously, the end of Wii had come and everyone will rush to get Xbox 360s and PS3s.

    The pattern shows that Hardcore Gamers have been 100% wrong on Nintendo ever since the DS. Why should we listen to them now? They're wrong then, and they are wrong today.

    Hardcore gamers say, "I understand Nintendo trying to expand the audience. But why don't they listen to us?" It is because hardcore gamers ARE the problem with gaming. Microsoft and Sony listened to them and look at where that got them. The more Nintendo defies the hardcore, the more their success.

    1. Re:Hardcore Gamers are idiots by grumbel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hardcore gamers care about games, not how much money Nintendo can make with the Wii and in terms of games so far the Wii is far away from being impressive.

  40. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by DrXym · · Score: 2, Informative

    Aiming down the barrel won't work because the wii remote simply isn't accurate enough to do it. It might be more or less correct, but if you stand up or move, or if you hold the gun to your shoulder and sometimes hold it by your waste it will lose calibration. And even when calibrated it could still be off by a good margin depending on factors such as your distance from the set, position and so on. I bet games using the zapper still feature an onscreen crosshair.

  41. Played The Godfather? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I see a lot of new experiences for non-gamers, but for all its promise the Wiimote has yet to really add anything compelling to traditional gaming (waggle doesn't really count). I didn't see anything in that conference to convince me otherwise.
    Have you played The Godfather? For me that's the best use of the Wii's controls in a "traditional" game so far and it is very compelling (and by a third party developer). It helps that it's a very "hands on" game (by which I mean the protagonist does a lot with his hands) making coherent Wii control movements reasonably obvious and "true to life". I defy anyone not to grin manically the first time they physically "throw" someone off a roof or through a window.

    Other games may not have functions that are so clearly mappable to hand movements and therefore any movements they have might not be so obviously compelling. However I think that motion controls will (assuming they are usable, obviously bad controls of any sort can ruin a game) provide a more enjoyable experience over-all, if for no other reason that physical activity helps good things happen in the brain.
    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  42. Re:Does Anyone Really Use Their Wii Anymore? by BakaHoushi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Personally, I'm a solo gamer (I live in a small, middle-of-nowhere town where vidya games and them thar compooterizing things are new fangled gizmos), and I haven't really played mine in a while. I mean, I've used it to finish up some old Gamecube games I didn't complete...

    But I'm still happy with my Wii. I don't expect a new Must-Have game every month. I enjoyed the hell out of Zelda, Trauma Center, DBZ: Budokai Tenkaichi 2, and Super Paper Mario. It also gave me a chance to relive some classics from my youth, like Streets of Rage 2, Super Mario World, and Zelda: Link to the Past.

    And coming soon, I get another Smash Bros., I'll try to pick up Wario Ware, and I'm awaiting a few more titles for the Virtual Console (namely Mario RPG).

    Really, considering it's not even been a year, I think that's a good deal. I may be what I consider a "hardcore gamer" but I don't expect my entire free-time to revolve around one system. Plus, the little multiplayer time I've had has been a blast. If Nintendo can get some decent online matching up, it'll be worth the wait.

    Besides, if you're a "real" gamer, I'm sure you've got a backlog of games for other systems. I know I do. DS, PS2, PC, GCN...

    Please note, this does not mean I didn't wish there weren't more immediate goodies, but... Jesus, patience, people.

  43. Re:The preeminent form of leisure entertainment? by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Wii isn't designed to replace bars, parties, and hot sex. It's designed to replace "400 hundred channels and there's nothing on!!" or "Dude, I'm so bored" or "Let's go to the movie theater". I'd go out on a limb and say that that's the nightlife for most people 4-5 nights a week. The only people I know with a life like you describe every single night are college kids failing their classes.

    (Disclaimer: I am not you. You might have a life where-in you do go out or have sex every night of the week. If so, congratulations. But that's not typical).

  44. Casual gamers are the REAL gamers by Rosebud128 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The purest gamer are these new casual players who are only looking for fun. They don't make top ten lists. They don't put photos of Japanese vending machines on a blog. They don't try to analyze the industry. They don't try to imagine games as a type of 'high art' like literature.

    They are much more picky with their time. It is easier to make a game for a hardcore player than a casual player. As you said, most people in the games industry are hardcore players. So all they have to do is make a game for themselves. But that is the route to failure.

    Movies began to suck when Hollywood began making movies for *themselves* rather than the mass population.

    Most books suck because the writer will write for himself/herself instead of for a mass population.

    Games began to suck when programmers and all began making games for themselves. Iwata's first speech as president was the "Heart of the Gamer" where he asks, "Are we just making games for ourselves?" One of the Oliver twins echoed the same thing telling todays game designers that they must make games outside their own narrow interests.

    And Miyamoto is not a hardcore gamer. He is probably a bored gamer. If people are tired of playing the same games with fancier graphics, don't you think guys like Miyamoto are tired of making them? For all we know, part of the reason why Wii was made was because Nintendo got bored.

    Console gaming is supposed to cater to the casuals. Atari 2600 appealed to everyone. The NES was a family console. Only as time went on, the consoles catered more and more to the hardcore. They were the fools with no lives spending fortunes on getting every system, every hot game, buying new home theaters and tvs just for their game console, and even willing to pay half a grand for a game console. Sony and Microsoft view hardcore gamers as 'useful idiots' where they can trojan in all their REAL non-gaming crap from Blu-Ray to downloadable movies.

    Nintendo is the true gaming hardware company right now. It is Sony and Microsoft pursuing the non-game route. Hell, they don't even call their systems "game consoles". To them, they call it 'computer entertainment systems'.

    It was the casual games that defined this industry. Casual Pong made this industry, not hardcore Computer Space. Pac-Man was huge. Beserk was not. Super Mario Brothers was huge. The 'epic games' on the computers then were not. Tetris was huge while other games, with far superior graphics, were not. Wii Sports is huge while Gears of War was nothing but a fad. And don't get started on computer gaming with huge hits like The Sims or Myst.

    Casual gamers are the true axis in which this industry revolves around. Hardcore are not in the center but on the far edges.

    1. Re:Casual gamers are the REAL gamers by ben+there... · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Movies began to suck when Hollywood began making movies for *themselves* rather than the mass population.

      Most books suck because the writer will write for himself/herself instead of for a mass population.

      It's funny, because after my rather vitriolic diatribe, I started thinking about why I was so angry about someone saying that casual gaming was going to supplant hardcore gaming. And it came down to this: when casual music listening (pop/easy listening) became mainstream, look what it did to our radio stations. Look what it did to music in general. Creating artistic works for the lowest common denominator is almost always a Very Bad Thing.

      Console gaming is supposed to cater to the casuals. Atari 2600 appealed to everyone. The NES was a family console. Only as time went on, the consoles catered more and more to the hardcore. They were the fools with no lives spending fortunes on getting every system, every hot game, buying new home theaters and tvs just for their game console, and even willing to pay half a grand for a game console.

      Most hardcore gamers that are my age had an NES, an SNES, and an N64. Some of the few who were lucky enough to have parents that were into family gaming at the time also had an Atari. Not to mention Sega Genesis and the other systems. They were hardcore gamers at the time when those were the only systems and genres of games you could buy. The games you mention as hardcore gaming are all fairly recent. Most hardcore gamers remember those old school games fondly.

      It was the casual games that defined this industry. Casual Pong made this industry, not hardcore Computer Space. Pac-Man was huge. Beserk was not. Super Mario Brothers was huge. The 'epic games' on the computers then were not. Tetris was huge while other games, with far superior graphics, were not. Wii Sports is huge while Gears of War was nothing but a fad. And don't get started on computer gaming with huge hits like The Sims or Myst.

      Again, lowest common denominator. Also, to even play games then was hardcore enough. We didn't really need a separate designation. Huge games now include WoW, Counterstrike, Halo. Even Civilization and most of the similar strategy games are primarily hardcore gamers, just in a different genre.

      Casual gamers are the true axis in which this industry revolves around. Hardcore are not in the center but on the far edges.

      I don't appreciate your trivialization of hardcore gamers, who were hardcore gamers when they played the first game that defined each genre of the many genres of games we have now. I think as games become mainstream, many of these casual gamers will try to convince everyone that their style of gaming is the center of the universe, regardless of the rich history of gaming. And I don't want to see the industry dumbed-down and watered-down like that. Like pop music.
    2. Re:Casual gamers are the REAL gamers by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's funny, because after my rather vitriolic diatribe, I started thinking about why I was so angry about someone saying that casual gaming was going to supplant hardcore gaming. And it came down to this: when casual music listening (pop/easy listening) became mainstream, look what it did to our radio stations. Look what it did to music in general. Creating artistic works for the lowest common denominator is almost always a Very Bad Thing.

      Well, radio(radio predates TV[which supplanted it] for going mainstream, and only really film predates it of the modern media) has more to do with media consolidation than anything else, and you can still get a ton of variety on things like NPR and college radio in terms of music(no radio plays anymore though really, outside NPR). No, it's not always a very bad thing. It's almost always a good thing. When a medium goes mainstream it begins to fufill every niche(except where restricted by law). I guarantee you someone puts out at least one movie a year that you like. It may not be hollywood, it may not have a huge budget, it may be filmed on Super 8 in someone's basement with a moneys dredged up by relatives and staring friends, but someone probably puts one out. Someone puts out a novel you'd like every year. Some DJ sneaks a song that you like onto the corporate approved playlists every year. The exception might be TV, but gaming is and never will be TV.

      That isn't the case with gaming right now... there are certain genres and certain types that are catered to, and well, that's about it. If you solely follow the hardcore enthuisiast media, you won't even hear about the few things that might cater to your niche. Adventure games, for example, were all but dead, with the exception of the odd year where we'd see a few(and none in the style of the old LucasArts games until the DS and episodic content on the PC).

      Most hardcore gamers that are my age had an NES, an SNES, and an N64. Some of the few who were lucky enough to have parents that were into family gaming at the time also had an Atari. Not to mention Sega Genesis and the other systems. They were hardcore gamers at the time when those were the only systems and genres of games you could buy. The games you mention as hardcore gaming are all fairly recent. Most hardcore gamers remember those old school games fondly.

      Yes, something had to get you started. Were you really a "hardcore" gamer in the days of your first console? Or did it gradually grow on you? The same will probably hold true for a section of the casual and new gamers entering the market.

      Again, lowest common denominator. Also, to even play games then was hardcore enough. We didn't really need a separate designation. Huge games now include WoW, Counterstrike, Halo. Even Civilization and most of the similar strategy games are primarily hardcore gamers, just in a different genre.

      There wasn't a seperate distinction because there weren't a ton of people running around in full blown panic mode about it. You either played games or you didn't. Now people feel the need to draw this distinction out of I guess... elitism? Leftovers of feeling grown up because you don't play Mario?

      I personally blame the gaming media, which not only sucks, but is composed of neckbeard enthuisiasts. Those guys are going to be out of jobs soon enough though. I don't care about what IGN(you can't spell ignorant without it!) has to think about Drake or Galaxy, I can view gameplay footage and video and evaluate it for myself.

      I don't appreciate your trivialization of hardcore gamers, who were hardcore gamers when they played the first game that defined each genre of the many genres of games we have now. I think as games become mainstream, many of these casual gamers will try to convince everyone that their style of gaming is the center of the universe, regardless of the rich history of gaming. And I don't want to see the industry dumbed-down and watered-down like that. Like pop music.

      You weren't a

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."