Slashdot Mirror


Putting Canadian Piracy in Perspective

An anonymous reader writes "Over the past year Slashdot has pointed to many industry claims and governmental pressure over Canada piracy issues. Canadian law prof Michael Geist has produced Putting Canadian 'Piracy' in Perspective, a video that demonstrates how the claims are hugely exaggerated. For example, it shows how despite the MPAA's claim of movie piracy, Canada was the industry's fastest growing market last year. Similarly, while the recording industry says Canada is the world's top P2P country, the data shows that the Canadian music industry is experiencing record gains and that most of the decline from the major labels is due to retail pricing pressures."

188 comments

  1. Yarr! Eh? by darth_MALL · · Score: 0, Funny

    Gimmer Yer Loot! If it's not too much trouble! Yarr! Sorry!

    1. Re:Yarr! Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada has a pissload of territorial waters, but almost no one navigates there because it's damn cold.

    2. Re:Yarr! Eh? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1
      They don't say Yarr, they say Eyyyyyh! Instead of scurvy dogs or scalawags, they call people "hoser".

      Eyyyyyyh! I'll give ye hosers aboot one minute to surrender. We're keelhoulin' yer booty!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    3. Re:Yarr! Eh? by zodiaccat · · Score: 1

      Yeesh. A post about Canadian Piracy, and no one's mentioned The Arrogant Worms yet? Shameful.

      A bridge outside of Moosejaw spans a mighty river;
      Farmers cross in so much fear their stomachs are a-quiver;
      'cause they know that TRACTOR JACK! is hiding in the bay;
      I'll jump the bridge and knock ;em cold and sail off with their haaaaay!

    4. Re:Yarr! Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to keelhaul some booty.

    5. Re:Yarr! Eh? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1
      I prefer the next verse:

      Well, Mountie Bob he chased me, he was always at my throat
      He'd follow on the shoreline 'cause he didn't own a boat
      But the cutbacks were a-comin' and the Mountie lost his job
      So now he's sailing with me and we call him Salty Bob
      A swingin' sword, a skull-and-bones, and pleasant company
      I never pay my income tax and screw the GST (Screw it!)
      Prince Albert down to Saskatoon, the terror of the sea
      If you wanna reach the co-op, boy, you gotta get by me! (Arr!)
  2. So ... in other words ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    the media companies are lying to us.

    That's a huge surprise.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:So ... in other words ... by Original+Replica · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It might be lying or it might be delusion, it's probably both. The music giants are falling, but they don't understand why. They got rich running things a certain way, and they are still running things that way, but now they are losing money. They are desperate to find a reason for this that still allows for their huge paychecks. If they could charge $25 for a CD in 1997 why are people saying that's overpriced in 2007? It must be the pirates. if they aren't stealing the music why do they care if it's copy protected? They must be pirates.

      --
      We are all just people.
    2. Re:So ... in other words ... by Alphager · · Score: 1, Redundant

      It might be lying or it might be delusion, it's probably both. The music giants are falling, but they don't understand why. They got rich running things a certain way, and they are still running things that way, but now they are losing money. No, they are _NOT_ loosing money. Sony BMG hat over 5 Billions in revenue in 2005 (http://biz.yahoo.com/ic/135/135429.html)
    3. Re:So ... in other words ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Revenue = profit garners a +1, insightful on Slashdot these days? Where's the -1, ignorant?

      With that logic, the US government must be making INSANE profits these days.

    4. Re:So ... in other words ... by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Loosing money == decreasing share price. If the share price decreases the people that own the company are losing money, even if the company is only earning money at a slightly slower rate.

      Looking at SONY/BMG is a little tricky because the parent companies do a bit more than music. However, if you look at how EMI has done in the last 5 years (and I'd argue that SONY/BMG has probably performed similarly): http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=EMI&t=5y you'll notice that if you owned stock you would have lost money even if revenues have always been positive.

    5. Re:So ... in other words ... by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      Revenue is not profit or loss, and I couldn't find expense numbers to figure out if they are or are not making money. Also, 2005 numbers are a bit dated.

    6. Re:So ... in other words ... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Revenue is not the same as profit. Some time ago I heard (but I can't back it up with sources) that Sony's games division was their only division that was making a profit.

    7. Re:So ... in other words ... by Alphager · · Score: 1

      Stock-price does not depend on the business at all (look at the inflated stock-prices for some of the new startups); using it as a measurement of a company loosing money is stupid. Also, the distinction between "business is loosing money" and "shareholders are loosing money" has to be made.

    8. Re:So ... in other words ... by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      It might be stupid, but for a publicly traded company a share holder is at best only indirectly interested in things like revenue, profits, and market cap.

      In other words the only reason that the people controlling the direction of the business will make a change is if they foresee a decrease (or not rapid enough increase) in stock price. The question ultimately isn't will this make us money, the question is will this change cause our perceived value to increase.

      The start up example is a bit of a red herring, in that case the market value is related to the speculated future value of the company, current revenue is essentially irrelevant.

      Yes, there is an important distinction between share price and revenue, but when the cards are on the table a business acts on the former. Ok, so maybe the business of SONY/BMG isn't losing money, but the owners are - and that is important.

    9. Re:So ... in other words ... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Take a look back for EMI around 1999-2001... notice that 2000 had a MUCH larger drop than they are having now, and notice that it rocketed right back up.

      There is no way we can know if that will happen again... or at least that I know of. But I'm not even a novice when it comes to finances.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    10. Re:So ... in other words ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but now they are losing money.

      I would like to commend you on your ability to spell "losing" correctly. Unlike 99% of slashdot, you realise that "losing" only has one "o". I salute you sir!

  3. Don't let the truth... by gomiam · · Score: 0

    ...get in the way of a good story, or accusation in this case.

    1. Re:Don't let the truth... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't let the truth get in the way of a good story, or accusation in this case.
      I'm not even sure what the parent post is alluding to.
      Is he talking about:
      A) "the truth" as told by the movie getting in the way of the **AA's accusations?
      B) "the truth" as told by the **AA getting in the way of the movie's accusations?

      Since when did vague, contextless comments count as +1 Interesting?
      And by contextless I mean, 'what truth' and 'what facts support it'.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Don't let the truth... by gomiam · · Score: 1
      ...a video that demonstrates how the claims are hugely exaggerated...

      I hope that snippet from the Slashdot article provides enough context.

    3. Re:Don't let the truth... by Atragon · · Score: 1
      C) The getting in as told by the truth is the **AA's accusations of the movie.

      </Captain Sparrow>
  4. Tell that to Sam the Record Man by Futaba-chan · · Score: 0, Redundant
    That may be true, but Toronto's biggest retail music store just went out of business due to competition from online sales (iTunes) and from downloading. :-(

    Yes, the RIAA and MPAA exaggerate just about everything... but that doesn't mean that everything is all roses north of the 49th parallel.

    1. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by brennz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Competition from online sales is not a piracy issue you cretin.

    2. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sorry if they have an outdated business model, but that doesn't mean people aren't buying the music and movies. Most people I know get their music from either iTunes or from Amazon or other online stores. It's much easier and often cheaper to get the stuff online. STRM closed because they have no more image with the young people of today. Their stores are few and far between, and they don't advertise to the people or even attempt to have their name known. HMV on the other hand has stores on every street corner, and has partnered with Amazon to give themselves a name in the online business. STRM failed to adapt and that is why they are closed, not because people aren't buying music.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by sayfawa · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sam the Record Man was bought out years ago before this downloading hysteria. If I remember correctly, it almost went out of business then, but changed hands instead. The form it existed in for the past several years was a watered down version with much less selection. The initial downfall was not because of downloading, legal or otherwise.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    4. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toronto is 43 N, maybe that's why.

    5. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by FreeKill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The reason stores like Sam go out of business is because people aren't interested in paying insane prices for albums of mostly songs they will never listen to repeatedly. The old CD and Album model is out of date, and some stores that absolutely refuse to adapt are going to suffer as a result. The fact that in the face of competition Sam the Record Man couldn't compete has nothing to do with Piracy.

    6. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that doesn't mean that everything is all roses north of the 49th parallel.
      I thought the 49th parallel is only the border on the west coast.

      The East coast borders (like between New York and Ontario) fall lower than that. Toronto, for example, according to Wikipedia, is near the 43rd.

      By the way, now that we've got geography worked out, your post is full of crap.
    7. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by slazzy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yup I think that's very true. I know I get tired of mainstream music after hearing the song on the radio 10 times I'm sick of it - no need to buy it or bother to download. Good indy music I'm willing to pay for and support the little guy.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    8. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by aynoknman · · Score: 1
      Your sig says:

      /. articles have the day of week, month, day of month, and time. But no year. How to find out the year? Thx. It's accurate to within an average of a seven year period. Should be close enough. After all Columbus discovered America on Wednesday, October 12, 1498, didn't he. . . . Just a minute, I forgot the Gregorian-Julian shift. It must have been Monday, October 12, 1498.
      --
      We need a "+1 -- nice sig" moderation.
    9. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by agaznog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, CastrTroy is spot on. Sam's was an icon to previous vinyl/cassette buying generations but they failed to evolve. It's sad that this Toronto landmark on the busiest retail strip along Yonge will soon dissappear, but unfortunately that's what it has become--a garish nostalgic symbol of yesteryear. I feel bad for the dedicated employees, but they should be pissed at their bosses for not running the business better.

    10. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You could easily blame the demise of STRM to places like Futureshop (Best Buy) who sell CDs for $10 just to get people into the store to wander around in front of huge markup items like TVs. There is a niche record store in Vancouver who specialize in classical music and they are doing extremely well. If you are STRM and think you can compete on PRICE with the big local merchants you are delusional.

    11. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by sayfawa · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I understand what you are saying, but my complaint is this: sometimes I'll see an old slashdot article where how relavent it is depends on the year it came out. Sometimes I look at the old ones in the 'hall of fame' just for fun, and would like to know what year I'm going back to for context.

      Ha! and now, looking for examples of what I mean I've finally noticed that the date is in the actual URL for all the stories! That's embarrasing.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    12. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by ResidntGeek · · Score: 1

      You can change the date/time format in your preferences, under "homepage".

      --
      ResidntGeek
    13. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by fluffman86 · · Score: 1

      >>but that doesn't mean that everything is
      >>all roses north of the 49th parallel.

      49th parallel? What the hell happened "Fifty-Four Forty, or Fight"?

    14. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      Well its not that the CD is obsolete, its that the business model is obsolete. If the music industry would push to find more musicians who will put 70 minutes of good music on a CD and not just 10 minutes across two songs and an hour of crap songs, people will buy the CD's more, especially if its cheaper than buying all the songs individually online. I still buy CD's because I found groups that will fill the disk with stuff I like to listen to, and most of these groups are very successful because of it.

    15. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Sam The Record Man = A giant condominum on YOUNG...

      I think we can all do the math and let the conspiracy theories go...

    16. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by sayfawa · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    17. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by CompleatGentleman · · Score: 1

      Yes. 49th parallel. A large part of the US-Canadian border is along the 49th parallel; from BC to Manitoba (a couple thousand kilometres).

    18. Re:Tell that to Sam the Record Man by shikadi · · Score: 1

      Blame the democrats of 163 years ago for not actually wanting to fight for it.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_boundary_dispu te

  5. Canada . . by Chikenistheman · · Score: 5, Funny

    . . . Living the American dream.

    --
    If a million people jumped off a cliff, it'd only be a short time until I landed in a nice soft mountain of bodies.
    1. Re:Canada . . by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      I prefer our own dream where courts determine the value of damages when someone is sued and political asshattery gets you a pie in the face.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    2. Re:Canada . . by phatvw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I prefer the dream where the Prime Minister punches a reporter in the face and breaks his camera and the whole country cheers!

      Wait... that really did happen. Man Canada is such a cool place!

    3. Re:Canada . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Which prime minister are you refering to? I can't find any references to a Canadian PM punching a reporter. The only remotely related thing I can find would be the British Deputy Prime Minister Prescott punching a reporter. He wasn't Canadian.

    4. Re:Canada . . by digidave · · Score: 4, Informative

      Jean Chretien didn't punch anybody, he choked a protester.

      http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/05/17/po litics.fights/index.html

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    5. Re:Canada . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may have been referring to Jean Chretien's choke-hold on an anti-poverty protester:
      http://radio.cbc.ca/programs/asithappens/asithappe ned/asithappened_010218.html

    6. Re:Canada . . by phatvw · · Score: 2

      Oh crap, you're right! I owe you +3 karma!
      Seems like my mind is going to mush ever since heading down to Yank-controlled territory.

    7. Re:Canada . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Jean Chretien have to choke a bitch?

  6. A bit offtopic by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Years ago, I found my sister buying Audio CD-Rs. I asked her why she bought those to burn her music, after all a normal CD wouldn't make a difference and the Audio CD-Rs were more expensive due to the levy of the music industry. Turned out she didn't know that data CDs could be used to copy music. I explained her that the only reason Audio CD-Rs exist is for non-computer burners and that she pays a "tax" by buying those.

    The reaction was: Hey, that's cool... because of this tax my pirating is legal

    Now aside form how true that statement is, my sister is an actual music lover and now that she is employed, she is in the process of buying every single CD she copied (and liked, of course) in her student years. Did I mention that she's an audio engineer now?

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:A bit offtopic by Steve+Newall · · Score: 2, Informative
      I believe that audio CD-R's were more expensive simply because not so many were produced. There is a levy on ALL blank recording media sold in Canada

      See http://www.cb-cda.gc.ca/news/c20032004fs-e.html for the list from copyright board of Canada.

    2. Re:A bit offtopic by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      Audio CDRs cost more because the record industry got them taxed extra due to the claim that they facilitate pirating of music, the extra cost is returned to some music industry association. Audio CDRs only differ from data cdrs in the cost. There is no physical difference at all. Any data cdr will work in an 'audio' burner.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:A bit offtopic by StillAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Is this actually being paid out by manufacturers/importers? I ask because I keep seeing CD-R media for extremely low prices which makes this hard to believe. From the link you provided:

      In fact, in volume terms, most CDs used to copy music are "ordinary" CD-Rs and CD-RWs (subject to a levy of 21c), not "Audio" products (subject to a levy of 77c).

      But just a cursory look shows that you can buy CD-Rs for $0.264 each, meaning that they're actually selling these discs for 5.4 cents each, assuming that the levy has been passed onto you. Is this correct?

    4. Re:A bit offtopic by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Actually Audio CDRs are different. They support the Serial Copy Management System. Certain stand alone CD recorders only work with these CDRs and you can not copy the copy on these recorders.
      See http://www.ioproducts.com/digaudcdrmed.html for example

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    5. Re:A bit offtopic by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Yes, although the comment "The reaction was: Hey, that's cool... because of this tax my pirating is legal" was echoed by the Supreme Court in their decision regarding filesharing.

      The recording industry has their cake, but don't have utensils--yet. (I guess that makes us the sneezeguard?)

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    6. Re:A bit offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I LOVE having to pay the recording industry everytime I backup MY work onto CDR...

  7. Finally we have proof by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Finally, we have proof. Ok, not really proof, but here's some data to back up what we've been saying all along. Piracy is not the opposite of a healthy media marketplace. It actually helps to improve the market place. Piracy gives people better access to media that they would otherwise not get to see. They see it, and sometimes buy a legitimate copy. Many times they don't buy a legit copy, but if they never knew about it in the first place, then you can guarantee that they aren't going to buy it.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Finally we have proof by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Piracy gives people better access to media that they would otherwise not get to see.

      Assuming they're not just pirating the stuff they know and like, that is (most people are very conservative). IMO sites like Pandora are much better in this regard.

      Many times they don't buy a legit copy, but if they never knew about it in the first place, then you can guarantee that they aren't going to buy it.

      That's actually my argument against piracy: top 50 music, expensive full release films and television shows are heavily advertised already, to the point where you practically have to live in a cave to avoid them; mainstream media also accounts for the bulk of material on file sharing networks. I can watch Lost on free-to-air or cable, I can record it if I can't see it when broadcast or even buy the DVDs, so why do I need to be able to download it via any one of fifty P2P networks as well, and why should commercial production companies get free advertising using other people's resources? Independents who don't have distribution or big advertising budgets can certainly benefit from file sharing, but if they're releasing material onto P2P networks for free then it isn't piracy; viewed this way, legitimate file sharing equates to diversity, while piracy is just redundancy.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:Finally we have proof by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.
      See, once you start to look into that quote, you'll see exactly why DRM technologies are terrible, and why copyrights are all messed up right now. The whole "limited time" thing is a sham. The media companies have push to have copyrights extended way beyond their usefulness. Now you can write a single song when you're 20, and royalties will still be going to your grandkids when you die. How does that promote the progress of useful arts, if you can live off the royalties of a single book,song,album, or whatever. People with these talents should be driven to create more music, by having their copyrights expire. Software with a 75 year copyright is like the worst idea ever, where it might as well be perpetual copyright, because how many people really care about running 75 year old software (there currently isn't any). I'll agree with you that there's a lot of people just mooching and stealing music, it would be nice if it would stop. However, the answer isn't stronger copyright infringement laws, sue all your customers/listeners, or putting DRM on the disk so that the people who did pay for it can't execute their fair use rights. The media companies need to wake up and realize that the entertainment budget has been stretched by video games, cable TV, Cell phones, and a whole bunch of other things that people didn't spend money on 30 years ago. They need to make the music more accessible and more affordable to give people a reason to buy it. Charging $37 for a Phantom of the Opera CD (as another poster pointed out) is not the way to draw in customers. The music should be cheap, so that people don't have to think about whether or not they should buy it. If they started selling CDs for $5 I would buy about 5 or 6 a month, because there's a lot CDs that are worth that much. But at $15 a pop, well, I'm sticking to indy music on emusic, because it seems they are the only ones charging reasonable prices.
      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Finally we have proof by thc69 · · Score: 1

      Ok, not really proof, but here's some data to back up what we've been saying all along. Piracy is not the opposite of a healthy media marketplace. It actually helps to improve the market place.
      Finally, someone other than me who has observed that revenues and profit follow piracy.

      Your observation is correct, but I think your theory is a little off. Sure, piracy introduces people to some music they haven't heard; but in my experience, it's a more general excitement about music and about acquiring music. I know that when Napster came out and I started downloading stuff, I got very excited about music and constantly bought lots of it. Now that I fear losing my house if I get caught pirating, I don't use P2P, and I'm just not excited about music anymore. I listen often, but I don't bother acquiring any new music.

      In the US market, here are my observations:
        - When piracy went up, revenues and profits went up
        - When piracy was at a record high, so were revenues and profits
        - When they started to see reductions in piracy resulting from suing their customers, they also saw revenues and profits start to fall
        - When they announced that they have piracy under control a few months ago, revenues and profits were at a low

      This thing about Canada having loads of growth in the industry, where "piracy" is legal and taxed by extra taxes on blank media, is additional data to back that up.
      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    4. Re:Finally we have proof by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      That's actually my argument against piracy: top 50 music, expensive full release films and television shows are heavily advertised already, to the point where you practically have to live in a cave to avoid them;

      I guess I live in a cave. I own somewhere around 500 legitimately purchased DVDs. The VAST majority of them I had no idea existed before I purchased them. I use peer recommendations and the Internet to get suggestions and then go read a bunch of reviews so see if I think I would like it. I buy them because I like the idea of collecting them and because I work long hours during the week and like to sit at home during the weekend watching movies in the comfort of my living room.

      Movies move to DVD so fast now that they're usually hyped up heavily for 2 weeks and then you never hear from them again. They're advertised on television and in movie theaters. The last movie I saw in a theater was "Clerks II" and the last movie before that was over 2 years before. I don't watch very much TV at all and when I do I flip channels during the commercials.

      Also, the majority of movies that get hyped up heavily are huge hollywood blockbusters. I do admit to enjoying and owning a few of them but most of my collection doesn't fit into that category. Although I would still call it "mainstream": movies like Dare Devil, Sin City, Rounders, The Bourne Identity, Spanglish etc. all in my collection and all of which I did not know existed until they were out on DVD.

      mainstream media also accounts for the bulk of material on file sharing networks. I can watch Lost on free-to-air or cable, I can record it if I can't see it when broadcast or even buy the DVDs, so why do I need to be able to download it via any one of fifty P2P networks as well, and why should commercial production companies get free advertising using other people's resources?

      The more important question, IMO, is why should commercial production companies COMPLAIN when they get free advertising on other people's resources ? As a self employed business owner I can tell you that I only dream of that kind of free exposure.

    5. Re:Finally we have proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOUR interpretation of this is not relevant so I don't want to hear it. Only the Supreme Court's is, ...

      Thank g*d the courts' opinion means more than yours.

      Software != music

      But you raise a good point. So lets pretend they are similiar and drop the copyright period to something like 11 years, same as a patent. Sounds *GREAT* to me. Was this what you meant?

      If we imagine if the recipe for steel or cement had been patented in perpetuity. Can you imagine the troubles with building cities? At a higher level, how about telephones? Endless monopolies are bad.

      Software copying *is* a crime, and there's plenty of argument over these rules as well.

      China is a huge market - last I checked, the markets are pretty darn excited about china.

      Just because you don't approve, doesn't mean the existing rules shouldn't be changed. From your writing, I think your opinion is an excellent argument for updating the rules. Maybe if we simplified the situation for you, it'd be easier to understand.

      *BTW I think software patents are a bad idea too.

  8. Let's not forget the retail pressure from HMV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    three doors down from Sam's either.

  9. Exchange rates... by going_the_2Rpi_way · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unfortunately I was unable to view the video at work, however it's worth noting for those that may not realize it that even a Canadian 'market' with no growth at all is probably almost 10% larger this year than last, when valued in U.S. dollars, by virtue of the change in exchange rates.

    1. Re:Exchange rates... by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      Why is this rated funny? The CDN $ is literally 10% higher than it was 6 months ago.

      --
      Jeremy
  10. Obligatory... by Tarlus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Putting Canadian Piracy in Perspective Yaaarrrrr, eh? *Runs away*
    --
    /* No Comment */
    1. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine yourself being chased by ninjas with maple leaf symbols on their forehead protectors...

      (Funny, my captcha was "lawful"... are the captchas assigned based on content?)

  11. A Public Relations Ploy by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's all RIAA/MPAA-manufactured crap to convince shill politicians to pass pro-MPAA/RIAA laws. Here's a story published in Australia yesterday accusing it of the same thing:

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/digital-music/pirates-l ike-us/2007/07/11/1183833529685.html

    China has the right idea. Keep a steamroller mothballed, ready to pull out for the bi-annual "Drive over some CDs" Show.

  12. I do not know about you... by megaditto · · Score: 1

    ...but I am worried that in 10-20 years my kids would have to sneak across the border to Canada to do "the jobs Canadians will not do," just to escape the excruciating poverty, violence, and corruption that I see growing stronger by the day in this 'Land of the Free' here.

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    1. Re:I do not know about you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to worry. Canadians will probably buy Japanese robots to do those jobs.

    2. Re:I do not know about you... by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      These robots will no longer be produced in Japan due to high labour costs, but instead will be made where the populace is routinely starved and beaten down by the ruling elite: the USA!

      US geeks celebrate your assured high tech future relevence!

    3. Re:I do not know about you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like sneaking across the border to find something to eat. Peak Oil is here.

  13. It's time to buyr Sam and move on by WebCowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Selling media content on little plastic discs is obsolete and as such is a shrinking industry. When the pond gets smaller the fish must ether get smaller or some fish must die. That is just life.

    Look what happened when computers with word processing software made typewriters obsolete. Should we have had our governments spend millions to prop up the Smith Coronas and Olivettis and Underwoods and enact legislation to restrict the use and functionality of word processing software, or put a tax on computer software to fund concessions for ailing typewriter companies? Of course not, that's a stupid idea and very backward thinking.

    That is why Sam died--the "selling plastic discs with music on them" pond is slowly shrinking and Sam was a big old fish set in his ways. Other fish in the pond like HMV ate too much of Sam's food and Sam starved to death. That's just life. Some of those little fish will live on, eking out a modest existence in a little puddle and other fish will evolve into amphibians and hop into another bigger pond with fresher water.

    The thing is, things in Canada ARE very rosy indeed relative to our southern neighbours. Our economy is more robust at the moment and demand for media content is obviously strong enough to support some kind of healthy music industry--it's just going to look different. Yes, Sam was an icon of sorts and it's never nice to see an old friend die...but it happened to other old names like Eaton's and the sky didn't fall.

    1. Re:It's time to buyr Sam and move on by Frohboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      but it happened to other old names like Eaton's and the sky didn't fall. Of course, Eaton's just went out of business because they kept mailing Maple Leafs jerseys to kids in small-town Quebec.
    2. Re:It's time to buyr Sam and move on by billcopc · · Score: 1

      After the Nordiques folded, I wouldn't be surprised if there were more than a few Quebecers rooting for the Leafs. The Canadiens are a bunch of lazy marketroids that can't win a goddamned game when it matters, and the Senators always get to finals or semis and then replace their entire roster with chia pets. In contrast, the Leafs are fairly consistent and typically enjoyable to watch.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    3. Re:It's time to buyr Sam and move on by sayfawa · · Score: 1

      Just in case you didn't get the joke (I also often use any excuse to rant about sports teams that piss me off) the line was a reference to The Hockey Sweater.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    4. Re:It's time to buyr Sam and move on by oldgeezer1954 · · Score: 1

      "the Leafs are fairly consistent"

      As a Leafs fan my whole life I have to agree with you completely.

      Forty years of no Stanley Cup in my 53 years of living is consistent.

      In terms of piracy, up until this past year I've never downloaded a single song and, as well, I've actively encouraged others to not do so (or encourage their kids not to do so).

      If I average out my collection I purchased about 45-50 cd's per year once they hit the market. The reality is though that I've bought less than 10 in the past four years total. Some Nickelback, Theory of a Deadman... That's pretty much it.

      I would have no problem with buying at my previous rates if there was content I wanted to have.

      With that said I prefer music/concert dvd's now but ones I would like to have are still hard to find... May not ever exist for that matter.

      I've downloaded the entire collection for three groups over the past year (it's legal here!) but I pretty much have them on either tape, vinyl or cd. There was one album of one group that I had on order from two different music chains for a number of months. I finally gave up and downloaded their catalog, the rest of which I had. A final note though is even the one I wanted to purchase I had previously bought three times on vinyl.

      In short I don't doubt the industry may be hurting on some scale but they aren't providing products I want at least... Not even when they exist and I ask for them.

    5. Re:It's time to buyr Sam and move on by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Considering how much the media industry spends on lobbying it's very easy for governments to confuse the industry with the musicians and even with the arts.

      I'd be willing to deal with a complete meltdown in the music industry to revamp it, but maybe we won't have to. That should be our line, seperate the two and don't confuse them. Piracy -> Copywrite Violation, and anti-media-industry sentiment starts to make sense to everyone.

      Artists are trout feeding on flies and minnows, the industry are Pike, if we tighten our belts the top of the food chain will suffer most... and more quickly.

      I think boycotting the industry is a really good idea, if we're right the industry will die... wrong and the arts will dry up... if the latter happens we can recover anyway. The former and everyone wins.

    6. Re:It's time to buyr Sam and move on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Selling media content on little plastic discs is obsolete

      For listening to some rubbish on little headphones or dodgy computer speakers yeah.

      But for listening on high end stereo systems, the CD (and other "little plastic discs") is king.

    7. Re:It's time to buyr Sam and move on by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

      But for listening on high end stereo systems, the CD (and other "little plastic discs") is king.

      What you are describing is the "niche market"--the stagnant little puddle. A high bitrate MP3 is of adequate quality for 95 percent of the population, even on quality equipment (and these days quality stereo systems with signal-process away much of the effects of MP3 compression). Then there are 4 percent of people who are quite particular, and their needs can be met with uncompressed digital audio, or lossless compression like FLAC--that media is NOT on little plastic discs and is IDENTICAL to CD in quality (it could even be better if the bitrate is higher). Music CDs are OBSOLETE--period.

      There is 1 percent who are audiophiles with OCD--they are so obsessive that they spend tens of thousands to buy stereos made with discrete elecrtonics (sometimes even pre-transistor technology!) and insist that ALL digitally encoded music sounds "cold and tinny". These nuts have record turntables that are spring-mounted and precision-balanced, with ultra-fine diamond styluses and have all the classics on big black vinyl LPs.

      If we continue comparing with the typewriter industry, right now there is literally a total monopoly on the manufacture of manual typewriters: Olivetti is the ONLY company on the planet that still builds andsells new manual typewriters, and it is a very tiny part of their business now. Some day that will happen to "little plastic disc distributors" too--either there will be one company that represents the entire industry and even they just do it as a side business, or the industry will be represented my a number of "little minnows", like crunchy-granola-cafes that sell old books off a shelf in the corner.

  14. Tower by phatvw · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Tower records either.

    Face it, Sam's sucked well before the IPod, Napster and the rest became popular.

  15. Record gains? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    So this is why most of music releases are being overcompressed to the hilt. Producers are trying to match the Canadian records' gains!

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    1. Re:Record gains? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Our bits go up to 11!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  16. Killing the Goose by EEPROMS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The record and movie industry in my view in their attempt to control "all culture" at the same time have basically been shooting themselves in the foot. Im a perfect example, I dont have time to listen to the radio anymore so I download podcasts then listen to them when I get the time. Thhe media companies have restricted music to such a degree on podcasts that I now dont have a clue what the latest music trends are. If your name or brand or your product isnt being hear or seen by the consumers your dead in the water. Im not surprised in any way that P2P downloads increase music sales because often people dont want to take a chance on a unknown band and fork out the inflated price for CD without some pre existing listening time.

    1. Re:Killing the Goose by billcopc · · Score: 1

      No kidding... I actually keep on top of trends by watching what flys through the piracy cloud, thanks to release sites like NForce. I don't care to download them, because I have better things to amplify than some rap producer's mono-note and snare, but it's just about the most efficient way I can think of to watch the latest releases.

      Online stores are too busy drumming up the hype, passed down to them from the MAFIAA itself. "What's Hot" is rarely an indicator of actual popularity and has far more to do with which product the cartels want to push at that particular point in time. The pirates don't care about these petty capitalist concepts, they just want to download EVERYTHING the very minute it becomes available.

      I've lost count of the numerous products I've acquired because I heard about them through the warez vine. Software releases, hard-to-find albums, books, or anything else that's poorly promoted in this ADD-world.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  17. Tubes by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    I'd been looking for a Tubes album for a couple of weeks and tried HMV and a few other stores. Most of these stores didn't even have a Tubes section, but I could special order only *some* of their discs (surprisingly, the price was only about $13, with a 6 week wait).

    Eventually, on a lark, I dropped into a smaller store that I was sure wouldn't have it but I ending up getting what I wanted for seven bucks.

    Oops, I figured that I should add this for the younger ones: The Tubes

    1. Re:Tubes by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      That's a nice story grandpa... Anyway, you'll often find less popular or older stuff at smaller record stores. However, there's a lot of stuff that's at the big chains that you won't find at the smaller stores. International music and kids music comes to mind. Although you'll find your fair share of Barney on emusic.com, most smaller record stores either specialize in something like classic rock or punk, that doesn't get any attention in the larger stores, and that people will go looking for. While smaller record stores are good for some things, there's a lot of things at the chain retailers that you'll never find in a smaller store.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  18. Media Tax by Propaganda13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought Canadians were already paying media tax on blank media (cdr, hard drives, etc) to make up for piracy. In that case, you should be able to pirate in Canada. Otherwise, CRIAA is just making money off you for no reason.

    1. Re:Media Tax by phatvw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its actually a levy, not a tax. Tax implies a payment to the Government whereas a levy is a payment accepted by the government on behalf of a 3rd party. I know, its kinda dumb.

      More info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_copying_levy

    2. Re:Media Tax by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

      "CRIAA is just making money off you for no reason" not if you keep your movies/music on USB keys, flash cards or hard drives, which aren't taxed (yet) you have to burn stuff to over-priced CD's to be a legal pirate in Canada.

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    3. Re:Media Tax by FreeKill · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's true! The tax is something like $0.21 a CD/DVD and I believe that portable music players like ipods are also taxed. The tax rakes in a huge amount of cash too, something in the neighborhood of $150 million a year. That's equivalent to roughly $5.00 a year per Canadian citizen. I also believe the amount they take in is quite a bit more than the estimated losses due to piracy, but I am not 100% sure on that...

    4. Re:Media Tax by djmurdoch · · Score: 1

      Not hard drives, and not to make up for piracy: as compensation to the artists for the right to make private copies. You can't legally pirate music in Canada, but you can legally make copies for your own use. (Piracy would be making copies to sell.)

      And CRIA doesn't get the levy (though its members get a small proportion of it). Mostly it goes to the artists' collectives, such as SOCAN, etc., and some proportion of it is eventually distributed to the artists.

      Mod this redundant, because I've posted it before.

    5. Re:Media Tax by billcopc · · Score: 1

      What's irritating is that this levy is artificially inflating the cost of blank media. Logically, if a spindle of 50 blank CDs costs me 15.99, but 10.50 of that is the levy, that means the actual disc would have cost 5.49 without the levy.

      In practice, the price hasn't risen that much, it's the quality that has dramatically plummeted as disc manufacturers struggle to protect their sales volume and profits. It doesn't matter where the money goes, if you triple the price of a commodity, people will stop consuming it, so the factories do what they can to keep the retail price within the comfort zone, at the expense of the product's durability and reliability.

      I'd like to see the disc manufacturers print information on the package about exactly how much money goes to the CPCC, in the hopes that it will bring attention to the scam and incite some of the more voracious among us to tell our MPs exactly how we feel about the issue. It's not like the levied funds get very far, with the many middlemen involved, each taking a cut for "administrative expenses".

      I'm all about helping human beings, but corporations get no sympathy from me. I'd rather buy someone a round at the pub than give even a dollar to these bureaucracy machines.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    6. Re:Media Tax by dufachi · · Score: 1

      A rose by any other name...

      You're still paying someone for the pleasure, regardless of who is actually the recipient of the funds.

      --
      -Kinsey
    7. Re:Media Tax by dryeo · · Score: 1

      My son got a cheap MP3 player for last Christmas. Noticed it came with one song on it so it is not blank media.
      I'm sure lots of small artists would happily allow their music to come preinstalled on blank media just for the exposure.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    8. Re:Media Tax by edjs · · Score: 1

      The Government has mandated we fork over additional money when we buy stuff. Tax or levy, whether it passes through the government's coffers first or not is a legal distinction lost on the common folk.

    9. Re:Media Tax by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Its actually a levy, not a tax. Tax implies a payment to the Government whereas a levy is a payment accepted by the government on behalf of a 3rd party. I know, its kinda dumb.

      Semantics aside, as a consumer, it increases my cost at the cash register.

      Tax. Levy. Cash Grab. Extortion. WTF do I care what they call it? It feels like tax in that increases my overall costs and is mandated by the friggin' government and enforced by law.

      The fact that a 'trade group' managed to convince my government to impose it for them still chaffs just as much. Doubly so since none of the CDs I buy are used to do anything but make fair-use mixes of stuff I've legitimately bought, and none of the lousy artists who are getting compensated by this 'levy' are the ones I'm listening to anyway -- and, I can guarantee this is primarily applied to big 'blockbuster' acts who I all think suck anyway.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  19. Re:So what? by Sigma+7 · · Score: 2, Informative
  20. Canadian Piracy, eh? by teebob21 · · Score: 1

    I'm glad I RTFA this time around. I'm headed to Vancouver in a week, and I had been wondering what sort of measures I need to take against all these swashbuckling Canucks. Thankfully, it seems the problem is smaller than anticipated. Still, I wonder why the customs agent kept saying "Yarr..." during our phone conversation.

    --
    khasim (12/9/06): In a blind taste test, more people preferred Coke over the Pepsi that I had previously pissed in.
    1. Re:Canadian Piracy, eh? by eyendall · · Score: 1

      A. Pirates are rife in Canada B. Naah, only whores and hockey players come from Canada A. But my wife comes from Canada. B. Oh...so what team does she play on?

  21. Canadian subsidies by MushMouth · · Score: 4, Informative
    Don't forget that canada has a whole lot of controls to make sure that the canadian musician gets more airplay, and has more subsidies than they do in the US (The government will sponsor your tour, and the radio must play X% canadian music). Sadly due to the polarization of the US culture such grants can't really be given. I can already hear the howling from the bible belt if someone like Stephan Merritt received a subsidy for 69 Love Songs, let alone someone like Ludicris, or from San Francisco if Amy Grant were granted cash for one of her bible records.
    Also the current crop of Canadian musical talent/popularity (not necessarily the same thing) is higher than it has been at any time since Rush, Loverboy, and Gordon Lightfoot stopped making records (at least south of the border, I don't know what is going on North of it, other than everyone likes The Tragically Hip and Sloan).
    Some bands that have taken off in the past few years include, but are not limited by (mostly of the "indie" variety, and in SF will sell out at least a 1000 seat venue)....
    • Arcade Fire (Currently HUGE, although not as canadian as they would like you to believe, as the main songwriter is from Texas, and they recorded their first record at his grandparents summer home in midcoast Maine, but they still qualify for subsidies)
    • Broken Social Scene (also include many of their side projects other than those listed below)
    • Feist (she is a part time member of above, and is currently selling out her US tour)
    • New Pornographers (also members A.C. Newman, and Destroyer)
    • Stars (big last summer)
    • Metric (big last summer)
    • The Dears
    • Wolf Parade
    • The Constantines
    • Death From Above 1979
    • Tegan and Sara
    • Nickleback (while I don't know what they sound like, they do seem to be on HDNet all the time)
      On top of that there are another slew of bands quite popular up there, (they can actually make a living playing music) that rarely make it down here.
    1. Re:Canadian subsidies by Durrok · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the music suggestions, I'm going to go check and see what I can download. Don't worry, I'm not Canadian so I won't contribute to your hideous piracy rate. :p

      --
      I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
    2. Re:Canadian subsidies by shma · · Score: 1

      Arcade Fire (Currently HUGE, although not as canadian as they would like you to believe..)

      You know, I'm not sure how it works in the US, but once someone moves to Canada, and lives in Canada, and marries a Canadian , we tend to treat them as if they were Canadians. Not to mention that most of the band is from Canada. Besides, you could easily make the same argument about the New Pornographers, seeing as vocalist Neko Case is from the US (she even has her own solo career).

      Sorry about the rant, but as a Canadian, I'm proud of our independent music and the success they've found. Not to mention I love or at least respect almost(see below) all the bands you've mentioned. You might want to check out some of the side projects. Emily Haines from metric has a solo career, Torquil Campbell from stars has another band (called Memphis), and Dan Boeckner from Wolf Parade just started a new project called the Handsome Furs.

      On the other hand, our mainstream music is as crappy as the worst the US has to offer. Avoid Nickelback at all costs.

      --
      I came here for a good argument
    3. Re:Canadian subsidies by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Nickelback is what would happen if you took the guys from Creed/Alter Bridge, Staind, and 3 Doors Down... tossed them all in a blender, and poured the viscous heterogenous mixture into a pop-rock mold.

      They're catchy, and they're disgustingly self-righteous. They also have only one sound, constantly recycled around different lyrics but it's all the same crap over and over.

      It's not that Canada doesn't have good bands, it's that we don't overpromote them as much as the states. We just get stupid shopping mall promos and local TV contests, so many of the good acts never get known outside our borders.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    4. Re:Canadian subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Props to Canada's Shout Out Out Out Out from Edmonton, AB... reminds of Daft Punk... those guys rock live:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LX9i5hhVJ5Y - first video
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xFZgo5i6is - check out the crowd at the live gig!

    5. Re:Canadian subsidies by MushMouth · · Score: 1

      Is that you Winn?

      I know you like the idea of being Quebecois, but you aren't and never will be Leonard Cohen, your just a dude that is really tall and stole some guy's basketball in Berkeley. BTW you should have claimed you are a Mainer, that is so much cooler.

      Last time I check Wayne Gretzky lived in Arizona and is married to an American woman.

    6. Re:Canadian subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rush stopped making records? When did that happen?

    7. Re:Canadian subsidies by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      There's no difference between mainstream music in the US vs Canada. The most popular music has rarely equated to the best music. The best music coming out of the states is most certainly not the most mainstream stuff, similar to Canada. It's just that the market in the states is 10 times the size as it is in Canada, so for every one mainstream band in Canada that is actually good, there are ~ 10 good mainstream bands in the states that are good. There is still much better music to be found on either side of the border outside of the mainstream though.

      Point being, just as in the states, if one were to judge their countries musical capabilities based on the mainstream, one would have to be utterly embarrassed. Nickelback sucks ass plain and simple.

      --
      No Comment.
    8. Re:Canadian subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah.. as my friend puts it "Theory of a CreedBack".

      Try it, play a creed song, one by Theory of a Dead Man, and then Nickelback. same sound.

      As a side note: other good canadian bands... Finger 11

    9. Re:Canadian subsidies by Ertman · · Score: 1

      I have this feeling that the people who whine about how Nickleback has only one style are the same people who whine when U2 releases an album that isn't a clone of The Joshua Tree.

      They found success with a style, fans demand more of the same, and they delivered. Kinda like Austin Powers 2.

    10. Re:Canadian subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nickelback sucks. How did you include an RIAA radio-friendly band with a homogenistic sound that flows through each and every song, so much so that you can have two different Nickelback songs on your right and left audio channels and not notice the difference?

      Have at thee!

    11. Re:Canadian subsidies by Larmal · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, Death From Above 1979 broke up last summer.
      http://www.aversion.com/news/news_article.cfm?news _id=7019

      Too bad, too - DFA's live shows were some of the best I've ever seen. Ridiculous sound and energy generated from 2 guys.

      If you're new to DFA and you acquire You're A Woman, I'm a Machine, try and keep in mind that there's only 2 musicians and instruments in this band - drums and bass - and they'll rock your testicles right off.

    12. Re:Canadian subsidies by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Well then those fans should be pelted with Timbits!

      A sign of maturity in a band, or any art form, is evolution and experimentation. If you cease to innovate, you cease to be an artist. If the only motivation is selling more copies, then it's just a product, and they are not a band but merely manufacturers.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  22. Re:Competition isn't piracy. by Technician · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Competition from online sales is not a piracy issue you cretin.

    Absolutely true. The prices for music has continued to skyrocket in spite of competition for the entertainment dollar.

    I graduated HS in 1975. I bought a few records, but very few because they were expensive. There are many things
    to spend entertainment dollars on now besides a few records (CD's now) that didn't exist then. I do spend my money on these items instead of CD's.

    1 Internet access
    2 DVD's Sometimes 4 for $20!
    3 Games, Game PC's & Upgrades E6700 Core 2 Duo Woo Hoo
    4 High priced gas from 50 cents to 3 dollars
    5 Day admission to State and Fedral Parks Now $5/day was free
    6 MP3 player No longer stuck with radio station commercials all day
    7 Camcorder
    8 Digital Camera
    9 Photo printer
    10 GPS and associated Maps
    11 Nice car

    Somehow the music industry thinks their slice of my entertainment dollar won't shrink if they raise prices to cover lower sales volume? They added DRM & copy protection to make the product more valuable to me so I'll run
    right out and buy a copy?? Yea Right!! DRM and copy protection reduces the value of their product. If I can't
    load it on my media server to put on my MP3 player or stream in the house, I can't use their version of the CD. I look elsewhere. DRM increases piracy as the legit product doesn't work.

    The only movie I have ever downloaded on P-P is Open Season. That was until I found I could call them and get a replacement DVD for my defective by design one. The extra copy protection is why I went elsewhere to load it on
    the media server for the kids.

    I was in Wal-Mart a few weeks ago. Just for grins I looked for Phantom of the Opera. I have heard many dirivative works including MIDI files and Karaoke files and decided to check it out. The CD for just the music in the US is over $30.. What are they smoking?
    http://www.amazon.com/Phantom-Opera-Original-1986- London/dp/B00004YTY2
    List price 37.98
    In a nutshell, I bought Fiddler on the Roof DVD and Sound of Music DVD and Sister Act DVD instead with about the same money.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  23. Canada No. 1? by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Canada is number 1 for piracy? Funny thing is, a couple of days ago the Australian media ran a story that ranks Britian 1st, Australia 2nd and the US is 3rd in online piracy. And I personally think that none of those countries could hold a candle to some of the eastern countries - china/thailand/etc. Maybe that's a new strategy!

    Step 1 : Get the local media of each country to tell the people that they are the worst pirates in the world
    Step 2 : ??
    Step 3 : Profit!

    1. Re:Canada No. 1? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      You haven't been paying attention.

      Step two is "embarrass/lobby/pay the local government into changing the laws (and their enforcement) to favour the big labels even more"

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    2. Re:Canada No. 1? by iogan · · Score: 1

      You know, that's funny, because in the last couple of days there's been lots of stories that my country is the worst for piracy (Sweden). Anybody read Chinese well enough to see what crap they're being fed?

    3. Re:Canada No. 1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      new strategy to get more people pirating maybe...

      "Shit, everyone else is doing it in my country, why shouldn't I?"

    4. Re:Canada No. 1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a Southpark reference actually, from the episode with the Underpants Gnomes.

      Step 1: Collect underpants.

      Step 2: ???

      Step 3: Profit!

      This is the sort of thing you'd expect the /. crowd to pick up on instantly.

    5. Re:Canada No. 1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naturally, since we can't tell what's being shown on other countries' news programs.. and even on the web there's the language barrier. "those stupid fools will believe anything as long as they don't hear an opposing opinion"

  24. More p2p in Canada please by future+assassin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >Similarly, while the recording industry says Canada is the world's top P2P country

    Since I paid those starving musician wages when I purchased blank cd's to backup my photos and my server data I sure as hell will be downloading LEGALY all the music I find worth downloading.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:More p2p in Canada please by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      Heh, even as one of these "starving musicians", I actually completely fucking agree. After all the stacks of CDRs I've paid a levy on (oh which BTW my band has not seen a penny of despite being SOCAN members and having an internationally-sold CD), these anti-piracy types can go to hell.

    2. Re:More p2p in Canada please by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      Hi I personally have no problems giving money to people for their hard work that creates music, movies and any other service item that I purchase. After all were all here to make money and we've all chosen one way or another to do this. What I do have a problem with is blanket levies on items that probably are used more for things other then what the levy is trying to compensate for. For example CDR's. Normally when I go out on a day shoot I have two 512MB CF cards. After processing the images on my computer from RAW to TIFF(With layers) to web sized JPG files I eat up about 300-600mb of space on my HD. I then burn these files onto a cd or two and keep a copy on my HD which I work with. Now when I bought those cdr's I paid insane amount of money to SOCAN. They basically took money from me and gave this free money to Brian Adams or any other has been artist. So this has been artist just receive a portion of my income so that I could backup up my photos or burn a distro or anything else non music related. Yes my own money went to a music artist for free. Now if I was downloading music left and right and burning it to cd's then I have to right to complain here. I got what I paid for fair, square and legaly.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  25. Better music from people who *want* you to hear it by Safiire+Arrowny · · Score: 1

    There is so much better music imo from independant and small labels and musicians that I don't have time to listen to or even consider buying almost anything from the companies that make up the RIAA.

    There's an entire internet covering an entire planet of millions of talented musicians who would be ecstatic over the idea of you downloading their mp3s and listening to them completely for free.

    I am going to stick with the people *want* me to hear their music.

  26. Re:Better music from people who *want* you to hear by MushMouth · · Score: 1

    I hope you choose to download bands/musicians who make it totally clear that they want you to download their work and not "guessing" their intentions. (and claiming that their label forces their hand, that don't count, most of these guys still have a sampling, and are free to record stuff on their own dime for you to download)

  27. RIAA/MPAA maths prove Canada's "mass piracy"... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Funny

    We all know from past news stories that, according to RIAA/MPAA, having 4 32-speed CD burners actually equates to having 128 CD burners, so...

    1. Population of the USA: 295,734,134 (July 2005 est. (CIA World Factbook)).

    2. Population of Canada: 32,805,041 (July 2005 est. (CIA World Factbook)).

    3. Ratio of Canadians to Americans: 1:9.015.

    Therefore, according to standard RIAA/MPAA accounting practices, every act of Canadian piracy equates to over 9 acts of American piracy.

    Now you know why they're so damned worried about Canadian file sharing...

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  28. Re:Better music from people who *want* you to hear by Safiire+Arrowny · · Score: 1

    I'm replying to myself here, but you have no idea how satisfying it is to really like a track, and be able to add that person to your friends list on some site, or write them an email telling them they kick ass and end up getting a grateful reply back.


    Not every act can be small, and cost $10 if they have a million fans and put on an expensive and amazing show. An artist's ability to get big like that will grow as their fans and their career grows. This being 'discovered' or 'assembled' by the music industry, then loaned money to make a plastic disc no one wants anymore, and then exploited by a middle man who commodities their music, is fucking bullshit and it needs to stop.

    I think we'll see current signed musicians and new independent musicians doing business for themselves in the future, the death of the album and it's often-times side effect filler music, and the death of commodity music pretty soon.

  29. Re:Better music from people who *want* you to hear by Safiire+Arrowny · · Score: 1

    I actually spend a lot of time on sites dedicated to making music, and the musicians there regularly post what they have made, and so do I.

  30. Hey, wait a sec... by 58797A7A79 · · Score: 1

    Isn't Canada one of those countries that has extra royalties that consumers pay when buying storage devices, because they can be used to store pirated data? If so, than they really shouldn't be going after software/music/movie pirates, because all Canadians have already paid the "piracy tax." If they're still going to go after them, then they'd better stop charging said royalties, because that's tantamount to fraud.

  31. I see bread...where is the meat? by gordgekko · · Score: 1

    > For example, it shows how despite the MPAA's claim of movie piracy, Canada was the industry's fastest growing market last year. Similarly, while the recording industry says Canada is the world's top P2P country, the data shows that the Canadian music industry is experiencing record gains...

    So how is any of this exclusive of each other? Canada could be experience a quickly growing market and rampant piracy and it could be the top P2P country while enjoying strong sales.

    --
    You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    1. Re:I see bread...where is the meat? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Ah, but those are possibilities the RIAA REALLY doesn't want you to consider.

    2. Re:I see bread...where is the meat? by caranha · · Score: 1

      [quote]So how is any of this exclusive of each other? Canada could be experience a quickly growing market and rampant piracy and it could be the top P2P country while enjoying strong sales.[/quote]

      This is absolutely true, but if that is the case, it kinda flies in the face of common affirmations from the RIAA/MPAA like: "Waaah! Waaah! Unauthorized Copying and P2P hurts our sales! Won't anybody think about the artists?"

  32. Powerpoint Alert by pkulak · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unless I get popcorn at my next meeting, that wasn't a "movie".

  33. So what if we can't afford fancy hats? by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 1

    Canadian piracy in perspective:

    Two drunks in a canoe with a pet whisky jack perched on one shoulder, mooning the beach. I think we've proven that we deserve to be taken seriously.

  34. Re:Competition isn't piracy. by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I can't load it on my media server to put on my MP3 player or stream in the house, I can't use their version of the CD.

    I have the same CD/DVD usage problems, too, with one difference: I'm 70% deaf. I can't use their product in a normal stereo or DVD player at a level *I* can hear without drawing noise complaints from neighbors. However, they've decided for me that I can't watch/hear it on my PC with headphones. Why? Because they're worried Billy Jo Ray Jim Bob Roy is P2Ping his entire collection of bad porn, Rob Schneider movies, and 1970's country-western to the world...

    In short: Wal-mart doesn't pat me down every time I leave their store, nor WILL they. RIAA's shooting themselves in the foot by mistakenly assuming I'm a criminal.
    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  35. Yarrrrg, Eh? by Muckluck · · Score: 1

    Coo Loo Coo Coo Coo Coo Cooo Cooooo... Me mateys. Avast ye hosers.

    --


    --I like turtles...
  36. hypocrites I tell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Enough.

    Why does the slashdot community continually support this criminal BS of pirating music and slamming more than the RIAA's tatics, but even their right to protect their intellectual property? When did theft become cool? Oh ya, I remember. From the first time I heard about it, I thought Napster's rampant copying and theft was not cool and revolutionary, but more like the punk ghetto kid who suddenly became popular with everyone - by selling drugs. It's ridiculous.

    If you do not think that THEY have a right to keep you from copying and YOU have no right to copy, at least in the U.S. then perhaps you have forgotten that our most fundamental law states that Congress has the authority "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." YOUR interpretation of this is not relevant so I don't want to hear it. Only the Supreme Court's is, and if you have a problem with that, good luck with your constitutional amendment or revolution.

    On the other hand, if you are going to advocate socialism, please be consistent. There are a lot of software developers here. How do you expect to make money if everyone copies your work? Are you going to make money on product support? Tell me, how much money have you spent on product support in the last few years?

    If you have a problem with the RIAA's tactics, fine. I do not have a problem with the articles and the outrage. But what point is this article trying to make? It's easily refuted with one simple counterexample which is self evident: China.

    The slashdot groupthink on this subject is off the charts. A lot of folks here could benefit from a realistic and balanced discussion that properly respects the right of others to protect their property and the right of government to implement public policy according to properly established authority as provided by the people.

    1. Re:hypocrites I tell you by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1
      I know, I know, feeding the troll and all...but I just had to jump on one thing:

      ...the punk ghetto kid who suddenly became popular with everyone - by selling drugs.

      So you equate copyright infringement with a crime that gets people on both sides of the transaction killed? Seriously dude, no one died over a copied CD or DVD, but every day drug pushers and drug users die as a direct result of their illegal activity. What's that? They got what they deserved? Probably, but they are still human beings. I guess their lives mean nothing next to the RIAA members losing a few dollars though. Carry on with your crusade, Herr AC.
    2. Re:hypocrites I tell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I was making a dramatic point to get some attention. However, I did not make a direct claim of equivalence between drug dealers who kill people and copyright violators. That is a straw man and selective reading argument. (And I strongly disagree with you for offtopic reasons - I support drug legalization.)

      Call me a troll if you will, but my point was about the rule of law and stands firm.

    3. Re:hypocrites I tell you by Hucko · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, if you are going to advocate socialism, please be consistent. There are a lot of software developers here. How do you expect to make money if everyone copies your work? Are you going to make money on product support? Tell me, how much money have you spent on product support in the last few years?
      Ummm... you do realise you are talking to the people most likely to give the support? Sometimes they are even paid to do so?

      The corporate groupthink on this subject is off the charts. A lot of folks out there could benefit from a realistic and balanced discussion that properly respects the right of consumers to use and distribute their legally obtained property any method they so choose.
      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    4. Re:hypocrites I tell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ummm... you do realise you are talking to the people most likely to give the support? Sometimes they are even paid to do so?"

      I have no idea what you are talking about here. The money they are paid most likely came from the payment for copyright protected commercial software ... so we should respect copyrights, right? Are you agreeing with me on my point or just pointing out that the audience won't be receptive? (BTW- I've been programming for 26 years, and I run on open source, so don't wait by the phone for that support call)

      Perhaps you did not notice that the article was about Piracy, with the implication that it's not so bad. Thats what I have a problem with.

      The artice was not about "the right of consumers to use and distribute their legally obtained property any method they so choose."

      Nice Try.

    5. Re:hypocrites I tell you by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Okay, you shut me down good. :) I'll rethink my position. Thanks

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    6. Re:hypocrites I tell you by arkhan_jg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Slavery was once perfectly legal in the US. Not that I'm comparing slavery to indefinite extension of copyright terms ; I'm pointing out that just because its a law does not mean its a just or fair law that should be supported. Rosa Parks is another example where an unjust law was challenged and eventually defeated by public flouting of it.

      A lot of folks here could benefit from a realistic and balanced discussion that properly respects the right of others to protect their property...

      Thats your mistake right there. Copyrighted material is not property. No matter how many times people like you say 'intellectual property' it doesn't make it true. Copyrighted works are in the public domain* - its just that for a limited time, in order to get more material into the public domain, authors are supposed to have a limited exclusive time of distribution. Its NOT ownership of property, it never was - ideas, stories, music, cannot be owned - it belongs to all in the public domain.

      This idea is being lost. Its time we restored it, banished the fiction of 'intellectual property', got rid of copyright altogether and looked to a different method of promoting progress in science and the useful arts. And you say 'china' like its a bad thing. I see china, where copyrighted works are used and shared by all for minimal cost, benefiting the society and users rather than big corporations and I see a good thing much closer to the original copyright ideals than our current twisted approach in the west of lock it up, deny it to the public and keep it hidden.

      How much music has re-entered the public domain since copyright began? How much instead has been locked up, mouldering away in vaults? How much has passed several release dates, only for copyright duration to be extended again, and again, and again keeping it locked away? The public is being stolen from. Its time we took it back.

      *the reason all this material is in the public domain by default is for one main reason; free speech. You can't prevent someone repeating or sharing an idea, story, music etc because they have a free speech right to do so. Sharing flames with tapers etc. Copyright temporarily removes that free speech right, in order to reward authors sharing their material with a short period of exclusivity before it returns to the public domain covered by free speech. Current copyright approach ignores this entirely, and effectively will extend copyright duration forever, thus eliminating the whole point of copyright, that of a full and healthy public domain of material freely shared and built on in new works. BSD (and to some extent GPL) software is much closer to the original plan of copyright than closed commercial software development.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    7. Re:hypocrites I tell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but every day drug pushers and drug users die as a direct result of their illegal activity

      You should have said:

      but every day drug pushers and drug users die as a direct result of the illegality of their activity

      The vast majority of the injury, thieving, etc. associated with drug use only happens because drug use is illegal. Criminalising drug use has turned a tiny problem into a massive problem. It has fucked up countries as far apart as Afghanistan and Columbia. It denies cheap effective opioid pain relief to the vast majority of the world's population. Indeed, the latter is one of the greatest evils rich nations have perpetrated upon the world. Our drug policy is abhorrent.

    8. Re:hypocrites I tell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does the slashdot community continually support this criminal BS of pirating music and slamming more than the RIAA's tatics, but even their right to protect their intellectual property? When did theft become cool? Theft? Calm down, no intellectual property was stolen. The RIAA still has it, and uses it to sue people around.
    9. Re:hypocrites I tell you by sulfur_lad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On the other hand, if you are going to advocate socialism, please be consistent. There are a lot of software developers here. How do you expect to make money if everyone copies your work? Are you going to make money on product support? Tell me, how much money have you spent on product support in the last few years?

      You're missing the point I think. What you're seeing is the AAs trying to affect Canadian federal policy, and that's dangerous. You know how people keep talking about corrupt governments all over the world? Well guess what, a lot of that is because they get corporate donations in exchange for favorable policy on doing business in that country, and the governments will bend over backwards for the benefactors at the expense of their own citizens. As a Canadian, I don't really want a corporate entity to dictate our laws. This "You need to change or else" attitude should be replied to with a nice moon and a wave.

      You also forget (in your post) that we actually already are a socialist nation (note to commie bashers: that doesn't mean we're communist!). You even see Canadian artists talking out against our government listening to the AAs, it's just plain ridiculous. As for your flogging of the software developers, there are two distinct views:

      1. Consumer software - higher risk of piracy. Why? It's easier for the individual to hide. 90% of the people with Windows machines on here have free Windows.
      2. Corporate software - lower risk of piracy, because businesses are much more inclined to follow the letter of the law, and are much more likely to spend the money (and have it in the first place), or the software in question is not something that will really be useful to the general public.

      If you make consumer software, you just have to accept that it's part of doing business, sorry to burst your idealistic bubble. You can go some distance to combat it (e.g., online games where each numbered client talks back to the server and needs to be granted access), but in the end lots of them get hacked. As for corporate software, a big part of corporate licensing includes support. At my old company, selling the RIS/PACS systems we built was just the start of the business; and anyways, it wasn't like the general public was going to be interested in a scalable RIS/PACS system. At my current company, we give the software away 'free' with our hardware, even though we know that one of our biggest differentiators to our competitors is that software; people choose us based on it.

      I don't want a corporation to dictate the laws of my country. "It's a crime though!" Well, nobody ever died from a mp3 (unless you were unfortunate enough to use an iPod in a thunderstorm) or software piracy (unless you count Die Hard 4 ... which I saw in the THEATRE in CANANDA with NO CAMCORDERS, *gasp*). I'm going to see Sloan at the Stampede and get some food on a stick, and that'll cheer me right up.
    10. Re:hypocrites I tell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine. You have made a good argument that the law should be changed for the benefit of society. I agree with this to some extent and I respect the basis for your opinion.

      You haven't implied that breaking the law is not so bad or the proper way to object public policy.

    11. Re:hypocrites I tell you by mcvos · · Score: 1

      at least in the U.S. then perhaps you have forgotten that our most fundamental law states that Congress has the authority "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."

      Limited times, so doesn't that mean that the current practically indefinite extension of copyright is unconstitutional? Okay, 120 years is still limited, but as long as Disney survives, that will become 150 years, 200 years, 10,000 years. How limited is that? Copyright for 30 years is fine. For 120 years is not.

      There are a lot of software developers here. How do you expect to make money if everyone copies your work? Are you going to make money on product support? Tell me, how much money have you spent on product support in the last few years?

      I make money writing Open Source software. Go ahead and copy it if you like. It's a heavy duty, scalable enterprise CMS, and you can find it here. We make money with custom implementations, support and consultancy. We're doing very well, thank you.

      If you have a problem with the RIAA's tactics, fine.

      Well, I have. RIAA is destroying their own market by treating their customers as criminals, even if they aren't, and spending money on lowering the value of their products. Considering all that, it's really no surprise to me that some people in the music industry are struggling. If they were to focus on lowering prices and increasing value, I don't doubt their revenue would go way up. It's really simple business sense.

    12. Re:hypocrites I tell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> If you make consumer software, you just have to accept that it's part of doing business

      >> Well, nobody ever died from a mp3 (unless you were unfortunate enough to use an iPod in a thunderstorm) or software piracy

      >> I don't want a corporation to dictate the laws of my country

      I'm sorry, but I cannot help but translate your entire post to: "I disagree with the these laws or the way they were made therefore I do not respect them."

      You see, when you do not like a law, there are a number of things you can do to work towards changing it. Posting an objection on slashdot is a small fraction of that and will not grant you ethical immunity.

    13. Re:hypocrites I tell you by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      I personally do it because I consider scarceness to be a prerequisite for property. Unfortunately anything digitized is no longer scarce if it gets out even once. I believe they have the rights to extract money as best they can but not with a government granted monopoly. If they want they can use as much DRM as they want but without any protection from the law. If that leads to problems for some content then so be it. If the users/consumers don't want to pay then there will be less time for the artist to perform his art if at all.

    14. Re:hypocrites I tell you by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      "Why does the slashdot community continually support this criminal BS of pirating music and slamming more than the RIAA's tatics, but even their right to protect their intellectual property?"

      Maybe because of the levies I pay on blank media. Effectively, Canada treats me as a downloader whether I actually download music or not. Whether you agree with piracy or not, treating all citizens like criminals = instant reason for someone to NOT feel wrong about downloading music.

      "There are a lot of software developers here. How do you expect to make money if everyone copies your work? Are you going to make money on product support?"

      I think any mature/experienced software developer will be well aware that people are going to pirate their software. There will still be sales regardless, or the software industry wouldn't exist. Sure, your argument makes sense from some kind of "everyone pirates everything" kind of viewpoint, but that strays well from reality.

      People (individuals) who pirate software likely would not have purchased it anyway (whereas businesses essentially have to pay for their software since they would be SCREWED if they got busted). Just like a lot of the games I've pirated over the years - I just wouldn't have played them if I wasn't able to download them. But, because I was able to, I played the games, told my friends about them, took screenshots to send to friends online, posted about the games in forums, and generally *improved the popularity of the games*.

      On a larger scale, thousands+ of people doing this is KILLER MARKETING/publicity for software that most people will pay for anyways (because frankly it's a lot easier than figuring out fucked up P2P software, configuring your router, burning an ISO, finding a crack, etc.)...

      I do acknowledge that it's a bigger problem for business/development software where very small businesses and entrepreneurs can pirate their development suites with effectively no risk of ever getting caught, but there's almost no solution for it.

      A friend of mine who went to a Macromedia seminar some time ago recalled how the speaker said something like "How many of you have the new Dreamweaver?" Most people put up their hand of course. Then he asked "How many of you actually bought it?" (in a humorous manner). I'm pretty sure developers are well aware of this phenomenon and willing to accept it as "part of doing business". Those who get super uptight about it are wasting their time/effort to try and tackle down something they'll never be able to prevent.

  37. On the other hand... by macraig · · Score: 1

    I saw a rip of Sicko in a torrent that was in Canadian PAL format. Do Americans rip in PAL?

    1. Re:On the other hand... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I saw a rip of Sicko in a torrent that was in Canadian PAL format. Do Americans rip in PAL?

      We use NTSC in Canada.

      Here's a nice graph for your future reference.. Please print it and tape a copy to your monitor. Preferably in front of the screen.

      Thank you.
    2. Re:On the other hand... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Eh? Canadians also use Never Twice the Same Colour same as you. Your RIP must have been from Europe, SA or Aus.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    3. Re:On the other hand... by macraig · · Score: 1

      Whoops, sorry guys, I'm just a stupid geo-centric American.

    4. Re:On the other hand... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I saw a rip of Sicko in a torrent that was in Canadian PAL format. Do Americans rip in PAL?

      Ummmm ..... Canada uses the same NTSC format as Americans. PAL is NOT a Canadian format, our TVs and DVDs are pretty much identical.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:On the other hand... by macraig · · Score: 1

      I know, I know! Didja read the other replies beforehand? I already stood corrected at least twice. Trust me, I won't forget, no need to beat the stiff horse.

    6. Re:On the other hand... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I know, I know! Didja read the other replies beforehand?

      Actually, from my perspective, when I started responding to you, nobody else had done so yet.

      Wasn't intended as a "me too" gang up on you. :-P

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  38. I think it needs to be made clear... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    Competition from iTunes and other online stores is good. We can allow newer forms of distribution to compete on equal terms, and hopefully the free market will spit out an amiable compromise between the two, at the price of some of the retailers.

    Competition from illegal downloading is not good. There is no way that any music store (online or not) can compete with free works. If they were legal, and the free market worked as it usually does, eventually a huge majority of people would use it, and only a tiny minority would be able to resist the convenience and price in favour of morals. The artists and record companies would pretty much go broke.

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    1. Re:I think it needs to be made clear... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to figure out how do you have an illegal internet connection to do illegal downloading. Unless you mean illegally hacking into itunes and downloading music but that wouldn't be much different then downloading from a peer to peer program.
      Anyways I doubt many people in Canada have an illegal internet connection to download music and I don't see how that would be any different anyways from legal downloading. You do know that downloading music is legal in Canada don't you? It is only illegal to distribute music in Canada.
      In other words in Canada you can come to my house and copy every CD I own legally but it is illegal for me to make copies for you. And connecting to my computer and copying music from it is just as legal.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    2. Re:I think it needs to be made clear... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      You do know that downloading music is legal in Canada don't you? It is only illegal to distribute music in Canada.
      No, I had no idea. Are you sure that something like P2P, or even just a straight download off a network isn't considered distribution?

      Anyway, the legality isn't really the point, rather the effects on music producers and distributors, having to compete with something that's as culturally unsustainable as piracy. If copying laws are indeed as liberal as you make them sound, perhaps it's worth looking at their effect (or lack-thereof) on copyright holders, and the culture in general?
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    3. Re:I think it needs to be made clear... by dryeo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well the Supreme Court of Canada seems to think that peer to peer file sharing networks do not infringe copyright. Even having your shared folder accessible is not infringement. One good summery is found here http://www.bereskinparr.com/English/publications/u pdate/update-mar-31-2003.html.
      Also in Canada there is a levy on blank recording media such as CDRs where money is collected and divided up amongst the artists so every time I back up to CDR or copy my digital pictures they get a cut.
      Seems to be pretty good for the copyright holders as they seem to be making more money than ever. And very good for our culture as more things are shared.
      Culture should be spread.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re:I think it needs to be made clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats the attitude of people who copy copyrighted music.

      Ooooh, I just can't resist. I know I should.

      So here's the the attitude of the RIAA:

      We will charge whatever we want no matter how cheap it is for us to produce. Our outrageous prices will not be circumvented by any means. We control the market so there are no competitors that can charge less.

      We think ALL of you are criminals, even if you've been buying music since the 1970s or earlier and never downloaded a single copyrighted song in your entire life. (We will blame every cent lost on piracy.) Thus, we will load music cds with DRM that will only enable you to play the song on a cd-player (assuming our DRM doesn't somehow muck things up so it won't play -- and if it does, sucks to be you). We will impose any other limitations we want, any time we want to.

      We will rip off the artists left and right, so in the end they wind up owing us money. In fact, we're starting to force them to sing contracts that give us a nice, big cut of their concert earnings as well. If they or you don't like it, suck it.

      We will pursue any online business model only so far a sit allows to implement stringent DRM and work with companies that will DRM files so they will only play a few times, and then charge you again for the exact same file. And then charge you again. And then charge you gain. And then....

      We own many of your lawmakers and are buying more of them every day. We make the law and will have the most draconian copyright laws enacted before you know it. In fact, we can have any draconian law we want enacted any time we want to.

      There's probably more that I've missed, but it's late and I need to go to bed.

    5. Re:I think it needs to be made clear... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      We will charge whatever we want no matter how cheap it is for us to produce.

      Sure. You can choose to pay for it or not. However, I think you'll find that, after factoring in risk management and losses from other failed enterprises, the prices are generally quite reasonable.

      Our outrageous prices will not be circumvented by any means. We control the market so there are no competitors that can charge less.

      Not quite. They don't control the music market. There are independent labels out there, and you can get your music there.

      We think ALL of you are criminals, even if you've been buying music since the 1970s or earlier and never downloaded a single copyrighted song in your entire life.

      No. They suspect everyone is a criminal. There's a big difference. One sounds evil, the other sounds pathetically paranoid. Unfortunately it's not exactly paranoia, since there are so many people out to get them.

      (We will blame every cent lost on piracy.)

      And why not! Even if the revenue wasn't lost directly to piracy, the piracy movement will have played some part. The conflict between the RIAA and pirates has been bad publicity for the RIAA, resulting in less sales. Some of the pirates have justified their takings by declaring that the RIAA produces nothing of quality (and thus doesn't deserve to exist), which would also hurt sales. The RIAA has been producing music as it always has for a large variety of markets, some of which is very good. It makes little sense to blame the drops in revenue on dwindling quality.

      Thus, we will load music cds with DRM that will only enable you to play the song on a cd-player (assuming our DRM doesn't somehow muck things up so it won't play -- and if it does, sucks to be you). We will impose any other limitations we want, any time we want to.

      Consumers will buy what they want, any time they want to. If they don't like DRM, they don't have to put up with DRM.

      We will rip off the artists left and right, so in the end they wind up owing us money.In fact, we're starting to force them to sing contracts that give us a nice, big cut of their concert earnings as well. If they or you don't like it, suck it.

      Times have been tough. Anyway, as unfair as they sound, the artist only has themselves to blame if they sign a contract like that. They could always defect to a different label, one that isn't so hell-bent on DRM. Hell, they could even just sign with EMI, and enjoy DRM free distribution through some vendors!

      We will pursue any online business model only so far a sit allows to implement stringent DRM and work with companies that will DRM files so they will only play a few times, and then charge you again for the exact same file. And then charge you again. And then charge you gain. And then....

      That's unfair. Number one, as I just stated, EMI doesn't stress DRM like it used to. Number two, the restrictions vary from store to store. Some stores do rent music, often at an attractively low price. Others you pay full price for unlimited plays. They are two different things. One is a product, the other is a service. The service, like other services, requires continuous payment.

      We own many of your lawmakers and are buying more of them every day. We make the law and will have the most draconian copyright laws enacted before you know it. In fact, we can have any draconian law we want enacted any time we want to.

      Well, this is a tricky subject. The corruption of governments and corporations is considered a flat given. Twice recently I've read people claiming that the government is hopelessly corrupt as the unbiased truth, but I'm not so sure. I think the assumption about corruption comes, in part, from a flawed perspective on public opinion. Many people labour under the impression that democracy is designed to do what's best

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  39. Re:Competition isn't piracy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One would think they'd pay YOU to watch Sister Act...

  40. Forget America being highly divided on music by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Some of us, quite sensibly, would wonder why the heck its the government's business that Avril Lavigne is getting less airplay than her corporate backers paid for. (Oh, these grants were supposed to be given to struggling small artists, as opposed to the folks who pay the lobbyists. Right. Sorry about that. OK, why the heck should the government support Working Mothers of Slamdancing Elephants? Its not like we are suffering a market failure of undersupply of music. There is plenty of it out there, for every taste, and we should let prospective producers concentrate on producing rather than concentrating on working the bureacracy to wheedle out extra airtime.)

    1. Re:Forget America being highly divided on music by kent_eh · · Score: 1
      The reasoning behind the Canadian content rules for radio goes something like this:

      If we don't do something to give our homegrown musicians some help being heard over the noise coming from south of the border, then they'll all starve.


      Or something like that.


      Back when these rules came in, there was no Canadian music industry. only Canadian branches of American music companies. Their job wasn't A&R. They were strictly about promoting the artists that they already had signed.
      All the A&R was happening in New York, California, Nashville, and Memphis.

      The government decided that if Canadians were ever going to be able to be professional musicians, then they needed a bit of help getting heard.

      Given the long list of Canadian artists this thread is listing, it seems to have worked.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  41. Arrr, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canadian pirates?

    Barrett's Privateers?

    http://www.geocities.com/~elainedues/lyrics.html

  42. Re:Competition isn't piracy. by pokerdad · · Score: 1

    While your point is valid - entertainment dollars are split more ways today than ever, I must disagree with some of you specific examples:

    2. Valid when talking about the steady decline of movie goers, but since you are talking about music, I think this likely is a money savings; seeing movies cost people per viewing 30 years ago.

    4. On average gasoline prices have not kept pace with inflation

    6. Really just a new version of the record player.

    8. Film cameras cost more in the long run

    11. Might be new to you, but not new to society

  43. Re:Competition isn't piracy. by Technician · · Score: 1



    While your point is valid - entertainment dollars are split more ways today than ever, I must disagree with some of you specific examples:

    2. Valid when talking about the steady decline of movie goers, but since you are talking about music, I think this likely is a money savings; seeing movies cost people per viewing 30 years ago.

    4. On average gasoline prices have not kept pace with inflation

    6. Really just a new version of the record player.

    8. Film cameras cost more in the long run

    11. Might be new to you, but not new to society


    I grew up in the country. These items are not generalizations. These are specific to me.

    2) I got to see an in theatre move about twice a year which is about the same as now. Nothing has changed except I also buy a stack of DVD's since what's on over the air TV is crap.

    4) True, but I lived walking distance from work. Now I have a 30 mile commute each way.

    6) Instead of 1 record player in the living room shared by the family, we need several with each at about the same price of a record player. In addition we have a couple tape decks, a linear track turntable, and nice sound systems for the cars. It's no longer an AM radio and a record player for the family.

    8) Instead of a 8 shot poloroid, a 12 shot point and shoot with roll film, or a 24 or 36 exposure roll for the 35mm, we shoot everything, delete the duds, make prints and send them to friends. Overall the number of prints made remain about the same.

    11) Used to drive beaters while single, male, under 25, 30, 35 etc. when reliable transportation wasn't a requirement. My first car cost $600. Insurance about killed me till I paid it off and dropped finance company reqirements for full coverage. Single, Male, Under 20, and out of state is a killer combo to buy full coverage insurance in the 70's. I stuck to beaters for a long time so they didn't need financed and full coverage. A replacement car was cheaper than a year's full coverage insurance.

    I'm married now and don't suffer single male status anymore. I can afford full coverage on a nicer car. So I bought a Prius, the first car I spent over $5,000 to purchase. Car payments do cut into the entertainment budget.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  44. Yeah nothing to see here move along... by sm4096 · · Score: 0

    NAFTA does not cover songs, music and TV. (Canada has CRTC - Canada's regulator for telecoms, radio and television services). It protect our culture from the infernal Yankee Influences... RIAA and appearanlty too much prime time American content. Canada can always alter how many foreign shows (and we do) are allowed on our stations /and or during peak periods as well as tegulate sales of foreign content. I do not think the RIAA will get far threatening Canada.

    I do not RIAA has not managed to slip anything in the middle of the night past our legislators and it leaves most Canadian citizens alone. I think they have a idea that if they pushed things here the kind of ruling the courts would make and they do not want that example getting around especially given the taxes on blank media.

  45. HMV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Her Majesty's Video?

  46. Re:Competition isn't piracy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In short: Wal-mart doesn't pat me down every time I leave their store, nor WILL they. RIAA's shooting themselves in the foot by mistakenly assuming I'm a criminal.

    Youve never had someone ask to see your reciept as you walk out the door ?

  47. Re:Competition isn't piracy. by UncleTogie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Youve never had someone ask to see your reciept as you walk out the door ?
    Sure have. Kept walking, as I know I have my receipt....but I'm the kind of guy whom, when asked by a security guard for his ID, responds "May I see your identification as a peace officer of (or for) the state of Texas or any local or federal agency?"

    Jus' 'cause the Sheeple buy that sort of treatment doesn't mean the rest of us should.
    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  48. Re:Competition isn't piracy. by Rhipf · · Score: 1

    Come on! Asking to see your reciept(sic) is not the same as being patted down. Usually (at least when it has happened to me) the person at the door just takes a quick look at the receipt and maybe a quick look through the bag. I have never (at any retail store) had some one actually pat me down prior to allowing me to leave the building. For that matter I have never been patted down before (or after) entering (leaving) a theater. Now you may want to take exception the the original premise that DRM is similar to being patted down but that is another discussion entirely.

  49. Actually, its the internet, by crovira · · Score: 1

    and the fools are still in print.

    We can SEE all these #1 ratings, (in localized e-copies of 'print' issues,) all contradicting each other, so we can deduce that we're being fed a load of crap.

    And then the **AAs wonder why we don't believe them... :-)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  50. The perspective is... by taskiss · · Score: 1

    There are only 1/10th the number of people in Canada.

    That means that there can only be 1/10th the amount of piracy if there is a similar percentage of the population pirating music, movies, etc.

    --
    - real hackers don't have sigs -
  51. This perspective is crap by Orig_Club_Soda · · Score: 1

    Come on guys. Stick to logic. People buying movies and music does not represent piracy. Sales can be at all time highs while piracy is at all time highs. Sales growing represents economic prosperity and is a function of the economy. Sales will grow and diminish regardless of the level of piracy.

  52. good by yahurd · · Score: 0

    these nails are fine, but the coffin needs a FINAL nail

  53. More to the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What the hell happened "Fifty-Four Forty, or Fight"?

    In terms of the RIAA and the CD industry it is 16 44100 or fight.

  54. Right, so the revolution begins.... by tacokill · · Score: 1

    YOUR interpretation of this is not relevant so I don't want to hear it. Only the Supreme Court's is, and if you have a problem with that, good luck with your constitutional amendment or revolution.

    You are exactly right - it's already decided. And that is precisely why you are witnessing a "revolution" in this area. Unenforceable laws are MORE dangerous than enforceable ones because they allow for selective enforcement. Just like we are seeing now.

    The only way to fight is through civil disobedience -- and that's exactly what you are seeing. No more. No less. It's just a fact that people are NOT willing to pay $17/cd anymore. No matter how hard you legislate that. Methinks you misunderstand what you are seeing here. It's not a case of simple "stealing". There is much much more going on here.

    1. Re:Right, so the revolution begins.... by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

      The only way to fight is through civil disobedience -- and that's exactly what you are seeing. No more. No less. It's just a fact that people are NOT willing to pay $17/cd anymore. Civil disovedience is breaking the law for the purpose of being the poster boy on getting it changed. Doing so requires you to overtly break the law, such as going to the doorsteps of Microsoft corporation with a sign stating you are installing a pirated version of Windows Vista.

      Most people who are doing "piracy" are either doing it because:
      - They feel the work isn't generating revenue for the copyright holder anymore (as with "abandonware".)
      - They want to gain access to a specific work without paying for it.
      - They don't know any better (e.g. children.)
      - They want to leechfest.

      Right now, iTunes is selling music for lower amounts (although some are DRMed.) There's also second-hand stores where CDs are much cheaper then factory sealed packages. In either case, it's easy to get music for less than $17 for a CD's worth of music.
  55. Outadeted perhaps - but also bad service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outdated and more...

    I don't know how it was in Toronto, but here in Montreal STRM was also an institution. But the employees always made you feel like some musical imbecile.

    After hearing an incredible song on a Blues compilation I asked an employee about not finding the band X in the Blues section (in case it might be in another section).

    In several phrases he made me feel like an idiot to look into the Blues section since "everybody knows this is a rock band". He finished his last insult walking away not even pointing me in the right direction.

    HMV was barely a street corner away. They got my business from then on and STRM closed 5 or 6 years later.

    Getting insulting attitude from a face-tatoed-pierced-ears-bad shirt-makeup wearing guy who hates anyone not wanting punk albums is not a good customer relationship in my book.