Slashdot Mirror


NFL, MLB Accused of Bogus Copyright Claims

P Crewe writes "A complaint filed by the Computer & Communications Industry Association accuses the NFL, MLB, and a number of studios of deceptive trade practices, saying that their far-reaching copyright claims systematically misrepresent the rights of consumers to use copyrighted material. 'According to the complaint, such warnings "materially misrepresent" US law. Fair use is given short shrift, and as a result, consumers are left with the impression that any use that the rights-holders do not expressly approve is illegal. "Consumers have the right to use the content in legal, non-infringing ways," CCIA spokesperson Jake Ward told Ars Technica. "Putting these warnings on broadcasts, videotapes, and DVDs is both misleading and threatening."'"

37 of 116 comments (clear)

  1. Obligatory Youtube Video by dknj · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Obligatory Youtube Video by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Funny

      While this little clip attempts to prove a point, actually watching it is akin to being tied to the back of a bulldozer as it drives 50 miles down an unpaved road.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    2. Re:Obligatory Youtube Video by Mr2001 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's a string bet -- not allowed. Take back your raise, sir; the bet stands at "back of a bulldozer".

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    3. Re:Obligatory Youtube Video by nmb3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Disney teaches Copyright

      Haha!

      "The public domain is a disgrace to the forces of Evil."

      That line alone made the video worth watching. However... if... I had... to... watch... much more... of... that... I think... I... would... go... insane... and start... killing... people... just to... make... the pain... stop.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
  2. The complaint is with FTC by mi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A complaint filed by the Computer & Communications Industry Association [...]

    The write-up forgot to mention, who the complaint was filed with. It is with the FTC.

    "Putting these warnings on broadcasts, videotapes, and DVDs is both misleading and threatening."

    I don't think, it is illegal to mislead (other than in advertising) or even to threaten (other than with violence). Would be nice, if FTC stops it somehow, of course, just to keep things cleaner...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:The complaint is with FTC by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 5, Insightful
      so instead someone has to take the risk of:
      • Ignoring the notice
      • Being taken to court
      • Losing by default when they run out of money
      • And getting massive damages because they were warned on the disc/tape and chose to ignore the warnings
      • Being bankrupt for the rest of their life
      ? Because if that's what the law says then the law needs to change.
      --
      FGD 135
    2. Re:The complaint is with FTC by sinrakin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why wouldn't publicly claiming legal ownership of something that you don't actually own (total, unrestricted rights) and threatening punitive action if these illegally claimed rights are violated should fall under fraud or extortion laws?

    3. Re:The complaint is with FTC by coldmist · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html#512
      Section (f)
      (f) Misrepresentations. - Any person who knowingly materially misrepresents under this section ... shall be liable for any damages, including costs and attorneys' fees, incurred by the alleged infringer, by any copyright owner ... who is injured by such misrepresentation...

      If they ask a content provider to remove it, and you have to hire a lawyer to keep it up, then they are liable for your legal fees.

      It isn't criminal, but it is illegal.

      --
      Don't steal. The government hates competition.
    4. Re:The complaint is with FTC by laughingcoyote · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You may unfortunately be correct that it's not illegal, but realistically it should be. Most people don't know enough about the law or fair use to say "Hey, I can poke fun at you with a parody without violating the law" or "It's perfectly legal for me to use a short excerpt to illustrate my critical commentary on the work."

      I've even heard of sports leagues trying to claim that statistics are copyrighted. A collection of statistics is a purely factual work with no creativity involved, those types of works are not copyrightable. But the way they put it, you'd think you have to pay royalties every time you mention how many home runs someone's hit this season.

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    5. Re:The complaint is with FTC by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It would if you were Jimmy the Local Neighborhood Thug, but if you're a major corporate interest with lots of dollars and plenty of bureaucrats and politicians willing to suck your figurative genitals for a share of the pie, it ceases to be. Remember, the only thing that matters in this world is how much money you have. The more you have, the less the law applies to you, until finally, when you're a Very Large Corporation, the law is a meaningless abstraction that has little effect other than keeping legal departments employed.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:The complaint is with FTC by mikee805 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it is illegal why did they wait "decades" as the article even points out to do file the complaint?

      --
      B5 71 ED FB 55 D6 4E 68 07 25 E2 FA CA 93 F0 2F, is mine! All mine!
    7. Re:The complaint is with FTC by xZoomerZx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most people don't know enough about the law or fair use to say...
      And that is what is wrong with the American justice system today. This country was founded on the idea that a (truly) free people would require few laws and would therefore be knowledgeable of the laws in their entirety. (Since they were to be self-governing) Unfortunately, a long time ago politicians, the vast majority being lawyers themselves, realized that more laws would benefit them and their lawyer brethren.
      Doubt me? How many pages alone is the federal tax code again? (it's 13,458 pages in total)
      The only real solution to these shenanigans is a re-vamp of the entire legal system top to bottom. But I wouldn't hold my breath if I was you.
      --
      Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
    8. Re:The complaint is with FTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's true that 'notice and takedown' misrepresentations can get you in trouble, but the claim here here is different.

      It isn't that these content providers are violating the copyright laws. These companies are violating consumer protection laws, which say you can't make "unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce."

          http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/us c_sec_15_00000045----000-.html

    9. Re:The complaint is with FTC by CowboyCapo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ahh yes, this brings us back to Natural Law vs. Relativistic Law again.

      I reiterate the Rule of Saint Augustine once more. "An unjust law is no law at all."

  3. About time! by wnissen · · Score: 5, Informative

    MLB even tries to tell you that descriptions of the game are under their copyright, the lying needs to stop.

    1. Re:About time! by jguthrie · · Score: 5, Informative

      But their "descriptions and accounts of the game" are protected by copyright. If you went to a game and described the game, your description would also be protected by copyright, but the copyright on your description wouldn't belong to MLB.

    2. Re:About time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I were the judge I would rule that all their copyrights on past works are now expired as punishment for misleading the public. That would teach them fast.

    3. Re:About time! by ToastyKen · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the grandparent post was referring to how the MLB tried to convince the courts that player stats are under copyright.

    4. Re:About time! by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Funny

      If we could just get a few thousand people to send this letter once a week for a year, that B.S. would stop:

      Dear Major League Baseball,

      I was talking to my friends last night and they brought up the subject of a game they saw last week, [X vs. Y]. I remembered reading at the start of the game on TV that any depiction of the game requires the express written consent. May I have permission to talk about this game with my friends?

      Sincerely,
      [Child's name], age 10

      Dear Major League Baseball,

      Last night, my friends started talking about [X vs. Z]. May I have permission to talk about that game with my friends as well?

      Sincerely,
      [Child's name], age 10

      ...and so on. For just $21 a year---little more than the cost of a cup of coffee at Starbucks---you can help rid the world of copyright tyranny.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  4. Family guy already covered this by ArcadeX · · Score: 2, Funny

    I loved the episode where agents of ABC stormed the house and shot up the VCR when Peter tried to record an NFL game.

    --
    An I.T. motto in the hands of an idiot is a dangerous thing...
  5. Government and Businesses... by no_pets · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Government and businesses love to stretch their rights and power unless called on it. If they get away with expanded rights/powers long enough they tend to become real or legitimate.

    --
    "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." - Shepard Book Quoting Malcolm Reynolds
  6. Are You Kidding? by Vengance+Daemon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These guys are complaining to an agency of the United States government! Do they expect their complaint to receive any kind of responsible hearing? This is the United States, for heaven's sake, we don't have intelligent, fair representation any more; the NFL will just grease a palm here and there, and get whatever they want. Sheesh, why get all fussed and bothered?

    1. Re:Are You Kidding? by Admiral+Justin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Some of the members of the CCIA can spare a dime or 2 to grease the same palms. Google, for instance. I heard somewhere that Google has like, $0.53 cents they can spend on lobbying. I may be off, though, yanno. It might be slightly more.

      --
      You will be baked, and there will be cake.
  7. Seems to me... by Raccroc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It has always seemed to me that the root of such behavior is that they are allowed to continue to operate as monopolies.

    Because there is no competition to professional football it allows the NFL to become bullies and make outrageous demands. Not just with TM and copy write, but with players/coaches contracts, advertisers/sponsors, broadcast providers, etc. I just don't get is how they can continue not getting thumped for anti-competitive practices. Hell, it constantly amazes me one of the extremely rich players who gets suspended doesn't ever raise a stink about it...After all, it's not like he can get a job playing for someone else.

    (MLB is a congressionally protected monopoly, at least from my understanding.)

    1. Re:Seems to me... by phantomlord · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because there is no competition to professional football it allows the NFL... After all, it's not like he can get a job playing for someone else. Vince McMahon attempted to do just that in 2001 with the XFL. It died because people didn't want to watch it. They preferred the already established NFL with the marquee names. Many cities enjoy semi-pro leagues, Canada has the CFL, and for the last 16 years, there was also NFL Europe.

      Whether or not a pro-football player can get a job playing football is similar to the whole **AA thing. Complain that their business model (aka job) changed and they were unable to adapt so they're owed something. Thousands of kids go to college on football scholarships hoping to make it pro but never will. What do they do with the rest of their lives? Maybe become an actor, a cop (one of my high school football coaches is a police officer and former member of the Seahawks), a doctor (eye doctor in town is a former nfl player), etc. Most of them go to college for four years, often for free, why feel bad if they didn't use their opportunity to get an education in case things didn't pan out with pro football?

      Not just with TM and copy write Pet peeve here... it's copyright (copyrighted)... as in the right to copy something. A copywriter is a person who basically writes up advertising. There's no such thing as copy write or copy written.
      --
      Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
  8. I care more about the MPAA ads on DVDs by claytongulick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It drives me insane (and my wife, because she has to deal with me yelling at the screen) every time I see one of those DVD anti-piracy ads, the ones that go "You wouldn't steal a car... blah blah blah.... buying pirated movies is STEALING. STEALING is against the LAW."

    Those ads are factually incorrect and misleading. Buying pirated movies may be copyright infringement, but thats quite doubtful since the purchaser is not responsible for proving that the CD/DVD is authentic and the doctrine of first sale still applies to DVDs/CDs. The infringer, in that case, would be the person knowingly selling pirated materials, not (necessarily) the person buying them.

    Even if it was copyright infringement, that is wildly different than STEALING, since no one is being deprived of a physical possession, which is why they are separate areas of law and until recently copyright infringement was mostly considered a civil issue, except for extreme cases.

    I get infuriated at the blatant and deliberate misrepresentation of fact in those ads. They are untrue and intimidating, and I would love if a lawyer here would tell me if a lawsuit would have any grounds to get them stopped. I dontate to the EFF, maybe they would take up the case.

    Does anyone know if a case like this would have any teeth?

    -Clay

    --
    Drinking habits can be dangerous. You can choke on the cloth and the nuns will wonder where their clothes are.
    1. Re:I care more about the MPAA ads on DVDs by Don_dumb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't care about the content of those, I care that I can't skip them. I care that I paid for a DVD and it has these adverts that I have to endure.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
  9. that is correct, sort of by tacokill · · Score: 2, Informative

    Major league baseball is a protected monopoly. At least in that it is protected from anti-trust suits. Link here.

    I can find no information on the NFL and I am suspicious of that one because of the XFL, USFL, etc. There have been football leagues in competition with the NFL. Not so for baseball, unless you count the negro leagues.

  10. Disregard all FUD by metoc · · Score: 3, Informative

    By default, once I see inaccuracies or crap in those copyright warnings I disregard all of it. As a Canadian, the FBI is as important to me as the RCMP is to Americans. If the copyright warning specifically mentions Canada (and not as an after thought) then I will pay attention.

    The American media should be more than aware of the fables like Chicken Little, and Crying Wolf.

    1. Re:Disregard all FUD by markbt73 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "The American media should be more than aware of the fables like Chicken Little, and Crying Wolf."

      We're aware of them, but Disney copyrighted them, so we have to wait for a special edition re-release of the DVD to actually see the stories.

      --
      "Oh boy! Are we going to try something dangerous?"
    2. Re:Disregard all FUD by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "As a Canadian, the FBI is as important to me as the RCMP is to Americans."

      Yeah we get FBI warnings in Australia and they are similarly meaningless. What pisses me off the most is that these rude (and largely hollow) threats are always attached to media I PAY FOR. They hijack my DVD and even in the fucking theater I have to PAY FOR and sit through someone lecturing me with "the FBI will get you if you don't watch out" - what's next - make us all stand up for the FBI like we used to do in the 60's to "god save the queen".

      It's not the warning itself I object to, or even the hyperbole contained within, but the fact that their ogliopoloy makes it such that( like the guy in clockwork orange with his eyelids wired open) I am "forced" to watch their bullshit "message".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  11. Congressional Protection by SoapBox17 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The NFL received an "anti-trust" exemption from congress (in the 60s) exchange for (among other things) guaranteeing access to all games by all Americans. This all worked out fine until DirecTV's Sunday Ticket came along. Since the deal is exclusive to DirecTV, if you can't get DirecTV (which is a lot of people, anyone near trees, hills, buildings, idiot neighbors) you are pretty much screwed.

  12. corperate violence. by Original+Replica · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "or even to threaten (other than with violence)."

    But couldn't the threat of being sued for more than you are likely to make in your lifetime a form of "financial violence". Yes the term sounds like a stretch, but when you consider the potential for life altering harm and combine it with the outcome of suit being more influenced by who can afford what lawyers over who is right, well it resembles violence in every way in which violence is used to threaten and subdue. Perhaps it should be illegal for corperations to threaten legal action when no law has been broken.

    --
    We are all just people.
  13. Re:Don't you mean "Hear, hear!" by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I dunno. On the web, where all information is specified by its location (url), I think "here here" is rather apt.

  14. Re:They have been saying in Broadcast. by Boogaroo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just because a problem has been going on for a long time is no reason to ignore the problem.

  15. I'm a Pirates fan... by JJRRutgers · · Score: 2, Funny

    MLB can copyright everything that it wants. The baseball season is always irrelevant to me by mid-May.

  16. Copyfraud... by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess this would be a good instance of copyfraud... where people are marking as copyrighted things that aren't.