Slashdot Mirror


SCO Wants Summary Ruling, Wants To Appeal Unix Ownership Decision

An anonymous reader writes "SCO is asking the court to enter a final judgment on the Unix ownership issues so that it can seek an immediate appeal. The logic for this, according to Groklaw Editor Pamela Jones, is that SCO would rather appeal right away so it can try all its claims at IBM, should it successfully appeal the judge's order. 'Otherwise, SCO has to wait until Novell goes through trial to a verdict and then appeal, and while it is in the appeal process, IBM would go forward in its now much smaller version, based on the August 10th ruling ... The trial starts, though, in less than a month and it will last less than a week, so none of this makes any sense if you look at a calendar. I think, therefore, it must be about FUD, so it sounds like SCO is on the move again.' The text of the request is available online. "

83 of 111 comments (clear)

  1. Settlement by COMON$ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is NO WAY a settlement could possibly pay for the cost of this legal fiasco. SCO's dignity was shot a long time ago, even if they do prove their case they will still look like an ass and their ship will sink.

    --
    CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    1. Re:Settlement by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not about the company any more making money any more. Bankruptcy is pretty much a foregone conclusion at this point. However, the longer the company holds on, the longer the money it technically shouldn't have any more can be spent on executive salaries (and bonuses--Darl has earned all sorts of bonuses for his "creative" approach to company management).

    2. Re:Settlement by COMON$ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly, I am not a business guru, but the only positive I can see with that company is padding the executive's pockets. If I were an engineer or dev at SCO I would be fleeing.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    3. Re:Settlement by mandolin · · Score: 1
      Any engineer or dev worthy of the title should have fled SCO years ago, or at least tried to (maybe the Lindon, UT job market is really awful, or something).

    4. Re:Settlement by WPIDalamar · · Score: 1

      I'd love to get on any project at SCO with a 6 month+ timeframe.

      You wouldn't have to do anything!

    5. Re:Settlement by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

      If I were an engineer or dev at SCO I would be fleeing. That's the case for years now - how long is this madness going on now?
      --
      Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Re:for fucks sake by TheLazySci-FiAuthor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just SCO away already! ;)

  4. Patents? by Hyram+Graff · · Score: 1

    Why is this marked as patents? There is nothing about patents in the case, it's all about copyright and contracts.

    --
    0*0
    00*
    ***
    1. Re:Patents? by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      I believe that IBM picked four of it's patents and used them as part of their counter claims. Not entirely sure what became of that part of the case however.

  5. Stick a Fork In Them by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can't SCO just die already? Hey, don't worry, their stock is around 60 cents and was at 44 cents. If they drop below a quarter a share, they get delisted (just like SGI). As far as Wall Street (and investors are concerned), you might as well be dead once that happens.

    You can tell how much each of their moves is worth by watching their stock. Lose the Unix case, your stock drops from $1.56 to $0.44. Make a shill appeal and win back 16 cents. Laughable at best.

    Annoying? Yes. Something to worry about? Not at all in my opinion.

    These have been considered junk stocks for awhile. Now they're simply laughable junk stocks. Expect to see them in your spam e-mails with scams claiming they'll be opening at a nickel and closing at a dime.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by joeldg · · Score: 1

      they are probably doing a hail-mary to try and keep from being de-listed ;)

      hehehe.. I like the thought of them being de-listed ... oh' glorious day that will be..

    2. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, penny stocks are not the worst investments you can make. You can net a "pretty penny" if you have a good sense of timing.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      These have been considered junk stocks for awhile. Now they're simply laughable junk stocks. Expect to see them in your spam e-mails with scams claiming they'll be opening at a nickel and closing at a dime.

      I guess this means it's too late to sell and make a few bucks?

      Yes, that was a joke ;-)

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    4. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey, don't worry, their stock is around 60 cents and was at 44 cents. If they drop below a quarter a share, they get delisted (just like SGI). As far as Wall Street (and investors are concerned), you might as well be dead once that happens.

      You can tell how much each of their moves is worth by watching their stock. Lose the Unix case, your stock drops from $1.56 to $0.44. Make a shill appeal and win back 16 cents. Laughable at best.


      SCO is the perfect example of how the stock market makes no sense. After the judge ruled that SCO didn't have the copyrights to Unix, their stock plummetted to about 50 cents from being worth over a dollar a share. As I right this, 15 minutes ago (I'm using free trackers which lag behind the market by 15 minutes), SCOX is trading at 68 cents a share. This means that SCOX has actually gained in value since it got hammered. Does that make any rational sense? It doesn't to me, yet there appear to be many people out there who still think that SCOX has value.

      Actually, stocks get delisted if they trade for under a dollar a share for a long enough period. SCO already faced a delisting action, but they did a reverse split where they converted 3 old shares for 1 new share. It's an artificial way to pump up a stock's value and it almost never works, yet in this case it did. I wouldn't be surprised to see SCO do yet another reverse split if necessary to get the share price back over a dollar and there would be somebody stupid enough to buy it.

      I have 2 friends who several years ago got out of the stock market permanently. It was stuff like this that just defies all logic that made them decide that the stock market was too much black magic for their tastes.

    5. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by rtechie · · Score: 1

      I think the other poster was on the right track. Clearly the management at SCO doesn't give a damn about the company and are operating in cahoots with the lawyers trying to bleed what's left through salaries and legal fees. They're probably shorting the stock too. At some point maybe the shareholders thought they could get some value out of the company through IP, but now it's just about the executives getting paid to do essentially nothing.

    6. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by nuzak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > there appear to be many people out there who still think that SCOX has value.

      Las Vegas is proof that people think slot machines have value. It's speculation, not a value investment.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    7. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by hawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe if you make that "Indian casinos".

      Las Vegas is not in the same business as Indian and other local casinos and lotteries. They are in the gambling business, while we are in the fantasy business.
      -
      People play there trying to win; people come here (typically) knowing how much they will lose (with a hope to beat the odds). They get off the plane or climb out of the car, and for however many days, they're in a fantasy world.

      The best example may be the guys that would never step foot in a bimbo joint, but that take their wives to a "topless revue"--and she enjoys it! Look at the lines for those--they're generally not a bunch of guys, but primarily couples.

      For vegas, gambling is a major part of the shtick, but it's just a part of the alternate world of the fantasy.

      hawk

    8. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by twistedcubic · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Does that make any rational sense? It doesn't to me, yet there appear to be many people out there who still think that SCOX has value.

      Actually, for those who bought at $0.44/share, their investment is worth $0.68/share now-- a 54.5% increase in value, in about a week. There are lots of investors who buy when they think the stock is at its lowest possible value (short term or long term). Yes, they're taking a risk, but whether they think SCOX "has value" is irrelevant. I think history tells us that SCO always does a stunt to raise its stock price after a crisis, so some people might think you're foolish not to invest in SCO at $0.44.

    9. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      their stock is around 60 cents and was at 44 cents.

      Holy shit! It's going up!!

    10. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by pal3f · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's not such a bad idea: get your upgrade now, and then you end up not having to pay all those months of maintenance and service that you contracted for!

    11. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't worry, their stock is around 60 cents and was at 44 cents. If they drop below a quarter a share, they get delisted (just like SGI). As far as Wall Street (and investors are concerned), you might as well be dead once that happens.


      Really, they stop taking you seriously if you go under $1 a share. You might not be delisted, but "penny stocks" are rarely given serious consideration by anybody but fools and scammers.

      Chris Mattern
    12. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      are they crazy?? rich russians may or may not be more Family than Comrades (so how do you say Speak Softly Love in russian?)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    13. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      Hey, penny stocks are not the worst investments you can make. You can net a "pretty penny" if you have a good sense of timing.
      The main obstacle is the hyper-volatility of penny stocks... since things can change so fast it's almost necessary to be able to execute trades in real-time.

      Another problem that plagues a lot of penny stocks is a lack of liquidity with the brokerage firms.
      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    14. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Especially if their ticker changes back to SCOXE. It rhymes with a well known horror-show website that describes what will happen to Darl soon.

    15. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by BlackRookSix · · Score: 1

      Aha! We've now discovered what SCOX employees are doing with their workdays!

    16. Re:Stick a Fork In Them by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1

      Does that make any rational sense? It doesn't to me, yet there appear to be many people out there who still think that SCOX has value.

      So who do you imagine thinks SCO has any value?

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
  6. Wrong, ill tell you what SCO want by unity100 · · Score: 3, Funny

    they want a good old fashioned beating with baseball bats or whips. preferrably in amish country.

    1. Re:Wrong, ill tell you what SCO want by CheddarHead · · Score: 5, Funny

      Am I the only one wondering what the hell being in amish country would have to do with this?

    2. Re:Wrong, ill tell you what SCO want by Stanistani · · Score: 5, Funny

      Strong arms from butter churning.

    3. Re:Wrong, ill tell you what SCO want by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is that the Amish are "non-resistant". That means they don't beat people up, even when those people attack them.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    4. Re:Wrong, ill tell you what SCO want by FlatLine84 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that comes from a movie... I think something with Harrison Ford.

    5. Re:Wrong, ill tell you what SCO want by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      Strong arms from "butter churning".

      Is that what they call it these days?
      I guess all those one handed surfers are Amish.

    6. Re:Wrong, ill tell you what SCO want by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

      i thought the were in mormon country...

      how would that be called ? mormonia ? mormoland ?

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    7. Re:Wrong, ill tell you what SCO want by JesseL · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's what they tell you.

      The fact that you never hear from the people who survive an Amish beat down is proof of just how brutal they really are.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    8. Re:Wrong, ill tell you what SCO want by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 1

      how would that be called ? mormonia ? mormoland ? Utah.
      --
      Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
    9. Re:Wrong, ill tell you what SCO want by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one wondering what the hell being in amish country would have to do with this?

      Easy access to buggy whips close at hand. Ever try to find a buggy whip at Walmart???

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    10. Re:Wrong, ill tell you what SCO want by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      i thought the were in mormon country...

      how would that be called ? mormonia ? mormoland ?


      Last I checked, they simply called it "Utah".

      Chris Mattern
  7. Ruling by halcyon1234 · · Score: 5, Funny
    SCO: We want a summary judgment!

    Judge: Fine. In summary, shut the fuck up.

    1. Re:Ruling by Slicebo · · Score: 5, Funny

      SCO: We want a second opinion!

      Judge: Fine. Your tie is ugly, too.

  8. "Dead Cat Bounce" by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Even a dead cat dropped off a roof will bounce a little" The stock will bounce up a little bit with the announcement and the investors will have a chance to mitigate their losses slightly. Yawn. /sbin/shutdown -h now

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:"Dead Cat Bounce" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      On a SCO OpenServer system your suggestion produces:

      /sbin/shutdown: not found

      Metaphor?

    2. Re:"Dead Cat Bounce" by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      "Even a dead cat dropped off a roof will bounce a little" The stock will bounce up a little bit with the announcement and the investors will have a chance to mitigate their losses slightly. Yawn. /sbin/shutdown -h now

      Problem with that is that you know these clowns will surface again, buy some formerly well reputed company with a shaky claim against some cash-rich company, and try the same basic shakedown.

      So it's more like: /sbin/shutdown -r now

    3. Re:"Dead Cat Bounce" by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      I wished I were that clever....

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    4. Re:"Dead Cat Bounce" by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Problem with that is that you know these clowns will surface again, buy some formerly well reputed company with a shaky claim against some cash-rich company, and try the same basic shakedown.

      I thought Darl & his buddies were just scammin up all the bonuses they could sink their claws into just to not have to actually go to work again.

      It'd be funny if all their bonuses were in SCOX stock with a contract to not sell before the legal system was through chewing them up & spitting them out...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    5. Re:"Dead Cat Bounce" by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Have you tested that? I'd imagine that if the cat has been dead long enough, it would land with a sort of damp splat.

  9. Of course, they have no choice by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They HAVE to appeal. Everything else would be suicide. It's all they got. It's like not appealing a death sentence. Not appealing it means that you already lost. What could they lose? Nothing. What could they gain? Survival.

    Did anyone really think they wouldn't?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Of course, they have no choice by Kandenshi · · Score: 1

      [Matthias is about to be stoned to death]
      Matthias: Look, I don't think it ought to be blasphemy, just saying "Jehovah".
      [Everyone gasps]
      Jewish Official: You're only making it worse for yourself!
      Matthias: Making it worse?! How can it be worse?! Jehovah! Jehovah! Jehovah!
      (Shamelessly stolen from Life of Brian) Sorry, you just reminded me of that scene and I agree with both you and Matthias. You might as well appeal that death sentence/court judgement. As is now, they'll almost certainly burn. A small chance of success on appeal sure, but they might as well. Appealing is unlikely to land them in jail after all.
    2. Re:Of course, they have no choice by trifish · · Score: 1

      What could they lose?

      Nerves, money for lawyers, come to mind as first.

    3. Re:Of course, they have no choice by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Appeals cost money and where is the money coming from? Investors are not irrational people...they know when to cut their loses and retire from the field.

    4. Re:Of course, they have no choice by geekoid · · Score: 1

      well, they would save that sliver of dignity they have left.

      OTOH:
      Dignity -- Always a little left to loose.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Of course, they have no choice by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Nothing about this case is appealing (it's rather rather appalling) but lots of appealing is going on.

  10. This is SCO stalling for time...again by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    SCO knows their appeal has about as much chance as being stuck in a snowstorm on sunny July day in downtown Dallas. This is SCO trying to get the trial date pushed back far enough they can suck as much cash value out of the company as possible before filing for bankruptcy protection.

    If they lose now they'll leave behind a chunk of cash.

    Hopefully the appeals court opts not to review the case and SCO is dead by Christmas. What a nice present that would be for the holidays.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:This is SCO stalling for time...again by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      There was a filing in the IBM V TSCOG case if the judge agrees with IBM filing then TSCOG can fail to appeal the IBM case at the same time.
      the question was given the PSJ filings what is left in the TSCOG V IBM case (since the matter has overlap)

      IBM : Nothing left

      TSCOG: the Dog ate my homework
      i would expect a PSJ filing in the IBM case oh say friday at 05:00 EDT so whats the line on SCOX being delisted by next tuesday (i would bet on a STOP TRADE order by 03:00 on next monday)?

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    2. Re:This is SCO stalling for time...again by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      and SCO is dead by Christmas. What a nice present that would be for the holidays.

      All I want for Christmas is Darl's two front teeth.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  11. SCO's lawyers should stop bilking SCO by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    I mean come on guys, haven't you lead them on enough already?

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  12. The Gift of the SCO Lawsuit by fishyfool · · Score: 5, Funny

    In which we find out just how long one can beat a dead horse in the US Court System..

    --
    Enjoy Every Sandwich
  13. IBM dropped their patent counterclaims by stites · · Score: 4, Informative

    "I believe that IBM picked four of it's patents and used them as part of their counter claims. Not entirely sure what became of that part of the case however."

    IBM dropped their patent counterclaims some time ago.

    -----------------
    Steve Stites

  14. If this is granted by Kilz · · Score: 2, Funny

    The next move from SCO will be a motion to stay everything while they appeal. That will delay everything, which is exactly what SCO wants. They should be made to wait and appeal after they have lost everything.

    --
    I trust Microsoft as far as I could comfortably spit a dead rat
  15. Mormon != Amish by sadler121 · · Score: 1

    for the last time Mormon != Amish

  16. I, for one, by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    am impressed.

    Bet you thought I was going to say something else, huh?... Gotcha.

    Anyway, if nothing else, they are tenacious. A rather virtuous trait in most instances. Forget all that crap about dignity and credibility. This is about money. And somebody's doing pretty well for for it. So get some more popcorn, sit back, and enjoy the show. This is what IP law is all about. I'm not sure what else you could expect, but this is what you get from it.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:I, for one, by fritsd · · Score: 1

      If you're an USian, you might as well sit back and enjoy the show -- your tax money paid for it!

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  17. Timing by RelliK · · Score: 1

    SCOX has just filed this motion. Novell gets 15 days to reply, which puts the deadline in the second week of september. Then SCOX gets 7 days to reply to Novell. But the trial is scheduled to begin on september 17. The easiest thing for the judge to do is deny SCOX's motion as moot and say "don't worry, you'll get your final judgment soon enough".

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  18. What do SCO execs do all day? by astrashe · · Score: 1

    If you're in upper management at SCO, what do you do all day? Wait for the lawyers to call with an update about how it's going?

    If they didn't appeal, I guess the people still on staff would have to go out and get new jobs. That seems inevitable, but I guess they want to put it off.

    It must be a really strange place to work now.

    1. Re:What do SCO execs do all day? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "If you're in upper management at SCO, what do you do all day? "

      If I had a job that paid well and required little, I'd enjoy the paycheck "all day".
      If I'm not personally breaking any laws, what do I care what happens to the company?
      Companies are expendable.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  19. a good bargain by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

    $0.46 a share !!!

    It's time to start framing the certificates and moving
    them on eBay for $10 each !

    1. Re:a good bargain by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's my idea! I posted it anonymously a few weeks ago, I'm going to sue!

      It's buried somewhere in the original post announcing SCO's losing - go and get me all the comments and I'll show you it in there somewhere. Obviously, it's just a couple of lines...

      --
      FGD 135
  20. Amish update. . . by Slicebo · · Score: 1

    I dated an Amish girl, and let me tell you, it wasn't a butter churn that gave her those foreams, if you catch my drift.

    Those calluses chafed, though.

  21. Re: delisting by durdur · · Score: 1

    A buck is the threshold for delisting, not $0.25. But the exchange can agree to delay the delisting. It is not automatic.

    Also this is the least of SCO's worries. Quite a few companies have been delisted, at least temporarily, and survived. It doesn't change their finances in any direct way.

    The real problem is, SCO may wind up owing Novell the money they obtained from selling licenses to Sun and Microsoft - money they no longer have. Then they are bankrupt.

  22. Best. Tag. Ever. by David+Gould · · Score: 1

    undeadhorse This is the first time I've wished I could mod a tag "+1, Funny". (Or should that be "Insightful"? Damn, I can never decide.) Whoever did that, thank you.
    --
    David Gould
    main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    1. Re:Best. Tag. Ever. by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. I used to use "hellnoiwontsco" as my tag for sco related fudicles, but undeadhorse is so much better.

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  23. Stalling for time? by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Is there anything else to stall for?

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  24. Your Ideas Intrigue Me & I Wish to SUBSCRIBE by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    d00d, i see you're a subscriber. Yeah, the $5 was a lot. I mean, it was a lot! Nearly broke me if I recall. Then I had to go into my user preferences and set it to never use my subscription pages. What brown nosing work! That one time fee of five American dollars is quite the payment, but I think if you ask them real nice, they may be able to work out a payment or leasing plan for you. Look into it.

    i just wanted to know, can you tell me what it's like to be a complete fucking limpwristed brown noser? Somedays it's really really hard. I mean, I think to myself, "How can I add to the conversation surrounding this story?" More importantly, I try to make it a rule to post only once to each story because if someone can refute my ideas then I should have prepared for that. I don't just value the ability to hold an opinion, but more so the ability to see all points of view and take them into consideration on your initial assessment of the situation. I'm a big fan of General Buck Turgeson and so I "Hate to judge before all the facts are in," and therefore, I consider my best comments to be those with little or no responses. I've been wrong thousands of times, was even wrong in the above post in that I thought delisting status came at under a quarter, not a dollar. But, hell, someone corrected me, good for them. Can't argue stuff like that. A lot of times, I don't even post I just read others comments because I really don't have anything to add (imagine that!).

    As for my limp wrists, I'm quite sensitive about that and I would appreciate it if you left that out of the conversation. I had a freak teapot lifting accident when I was 8 and ever since then, I haven't been able to lift my knuckles above my ulnae & radii. Go ahead and laugh, all the kids did, I've learned to deal with it and push on. Oftentimes when I look in the mirror I see a fat, slower, stupider Lance Armstrong looking back at me. If Lance beat cancer, I can with God's help beat this horrible limp wrist affliction. Don't even get me started on the birthmark on my nose.

    you're so fucking pathetic that it nearly makes me ill. Well, go ahead and add me to your foes and give your foes a -5 modifier. You'll never see my comments again. You do know that Slashdot has that feature, right? I don't understand why it makes you ill. Did I crawl the intarweb to your computer and force you to read my comments and apply them to your skin or else you get the hose again? Truly baffling to me that my posts have the power to be an ailment.

    So tell me, oh valued Anonymous Coward, what did you add to the conversation with your comment?
    --
    My work here is dung.
  25. Oblig. LOTR quote by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

    "He twitched because my axe is embedded in his nervous system!"

  26. I better call my broker by 517714 · · Score: 1

    I better latch onto some of that SCOX stock before it the run-up.

    --
    The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
  27. yeah and I would like to appeal my ownership of... by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    I would like to appeal my ownership of Microsoft.

    If SCO can convince a court that they own UNIX, then I can convince a court that I own Microsoft.

    I once decided that I owned Microsoft.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  28. Bring out your dead! by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Funny

    SCO: I'm not dead!
    Nasdaq: What?
    Groklaw: Nothing. Here's your ninepence.
    SCO: I'm not dead!
    Nasdaq: 'Ere. He says he's not dead!
    Groklaw: Yes, he is.
    SCO: I'm not!
    Nasdaq: He isn't?
    Groklaw: Well, he will be soon. He's very ill.
    SCO: I'm getting better!
    Groklaw: No, you're not. You'll be stone dead in a moment.

  29. NOW IBM might finally have a reason... by ardle · · Score: 1

    ... to buy SCO out ;-)

    1. Re:NOW IBM might finally have a reason... by elronxenu · · Score: 1
      If IBM buys SCO then IBM becomes responsible for the lawsuits ... not good. And SCO's shareholders get enriched ... also not good.

      No, IBM's best course of action is to keep going and eventually the court will judge in favour of IBM and award IBM anything remaining from the dust which is SCO. It is likely however that Novell will claim all remaining assets first, so IBM will not be able to recover the many millions it spent in legal fees (and the cost of the time spent answering discovery requests and so on, too).

  30. Re:Your Ideas Intrigue Me & I Wish to SUBSCRIB by joss · · Score: 1

    I like the way you think. You could probably get a good job with the Administration if you're interested.

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
  31. SCO wins? by bvimo · · Score: 1

    What if SCO wins? How will it affect me a Kubuntu user?

    --
    In either case, here at Microsoft, we feel standards are important. And we have fun, too. Doug Mahugh, Microsoft
    1. Re:SCO wins? by JoelKatz · · Score: 1

      The short answer is that this won't affect you. You only have to respect patents and copyrights. Third parties can basically ignore contractual obligations.

      If you look closely, you will see that SCO is making all kinds of allegations. But it's not saying "Linux violates our patent number X,YZT,ABC" or "Linux contains code that we hold copyright to". It's saying, "other companies violated their contracts with us".

      These kinds of claims have no effect on innocent third parties, unlike patent and copyright claims.