Slashdot Mirror


Jack Thompson Decides He's In GTA IV

gzerphey writes "Outspoken anti-games lawyer Jack Thompson has decided that a representation of a 2nd amendment lawyer in GTA IV is a mocking version of him. He has declared that if the representation is not removed he will attempt to block the release of the game. Excerpt from GamePolitics: 'The showcasing play of the game to Game Informer revealed that the first killing mission of the hero of the game, Niko, is to kill a certain lawyer. When Niko comes into this lawyer's office, having used subterfuge to do so, Niko pulls a gun on the lawyer who says, that the firm supports the second amendment and that 'Guns don't kill people. Video games do.'"

35 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. I thought parody was OK? by Winckle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lots of games parody high profile people, with little repercussions.

    1. Re:I thought parody was OK? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's only true if it's not Jack Thompson.

      QUICK! TO THE BANNEDWAGON!

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:I thought parody was OK? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      But Jack Thompson is already a parody of himself, and a second parody would violate that quantum mechanics law on two bosons in the same place -- or something like that, I am sure I have the name wrong, IANAQMP. His lawsuit will be thrown out for being in the wrong court. It should be in Mother Nature's court, since he is suing for a violation of one of the fundamental laws of nature.

    3. Re:I thought parody was OK? by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd be 50% satisfied if someone would toss JT into a Schrödinger box.

      --
      +0 Meh
    4. Re:I thought parody was OK? by quantum+bit · · Score: 5, Funny

      I dunno, I don't think I could tell you whether I were satisfied or not until someone opened the box.

    5. Re:I thought parody was OK? by witte · · Score: 5, Funny

      In honour of Jack Thompson, could we please name one of those new elementary particles "morons" ?

    6. Re:I thought parody was OK? by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

      second parody would violate that quantum mechanics law on two bos^H^H^Hmorons in the same place


      There, fixed that for ya.
      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:I thought parody was OK? by ArcadeNut · · Score: 5, Informative

      This was already decided by the Supreme Court:

      Larry Flynt won an important Supreme Court decision on February 24, 1988,[6] after having been sued by Jerry Falwell in 1983 over an offensive ad parody in Hustler that featured Falwell. The ad suggested that Falwell's first sexual encounter was with his mother in an out-house. Falwell sued Flynt citing emotional distress caused by the ad but lost in court. The decision clarified that public figures cannot recover damages for "intentional infliction of emotional distress" based on parodies.

      Source:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Flynt

      A parody is a parody....

      --
      Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
    8. Re:I thought parody was OK? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just leave him in there long enough and the cat will have clawed him to death.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  2. Parody is protected speech by netsavior · · Score: 5, Funny

    But what if you parody someone who is already a parody of himself. The deepness is as unlimited as the psychosis.

    1. Re:Parody is protected speech by TibbonZero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's only in favor of the 2nd amendment, not the first one. Duh!

      --
      Tibbon
      tibbon.com
    2. Re:Parody is protected speech by jawtheshark · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which is aptly mimicked in the video game, isn't it?

      People like him are so grotesque that their parodies look too much like the real thing...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    3. Re:Parody is protected speech by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Funny

      But what if you parody someone who is already a parody of himself.
      You get sued for copypatent infringement.
      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
  3. what's next... by downix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The irony of this of course being that by making the claim, he just verified it....

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    1. Re:what's next... by Skreems · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think they should sue Jack Thompson for illegally reproducing their fiction character... in real life...

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
  4. I'm in the Game Too! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...The fact that the lawyer, killed on Niko's first mission, would bring up video games, makes it clearly a reference to me... And the fact that Niko is a regular guy just looking to make some money & very eager to kill a certain lawyer to start off his career makes it clearly a reference to me!

    Can I join you in this suit, Jack? Perhaps a class action lawsuit? I'll meet you in your office tomorrow at noon using methods of subterfuge ... er I mean when you invite me up to discuss this lawsuit.

    What was your address again? "The magical man, from Happy Land, who lives in a gumdrop house on Lolly Pop Lane?" It's so very hard to remember when you're all over the road.

    P.S. I hope the president has gotten back to you about your appeal to him. Your entertainment is endless & I highly value it, it would be a shame to have men in clean white suits censoring your communications to the outside world. Truly, it would.
    --
    My work here is dung.
  5. plonk zonk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    from the i-bet-i'm-in-there-toooo dept.

    I hope you are, Zonk. ::grabs molatov cocktail::

  6. What the... by pieaholicx · · Score: 5, Funny

    But wouldn't Jack Thompson had to have played the game to know that the game has a parody of him? Is that hypocrite I smell?

    --
    http://blog.heavensdomain.net
  7. Enough already. by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is pointless articles like this that give that ridiculous man publicity (which he seems to thrive on). I don't want to read any more about it, stop posting on /. and he will be forgotten. Nobody is taking him seriously anyway (not anyone that counts at least - e.g. courts).

    I must admit that the in game parody sound good though. But still, not newsworthy.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Enough already. by Shaterri · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Unfortunately, quite a few people *do* take Thompson seriously -- he's still used regularly as a talking-head on news programs talking about video game violence (or at least was, before his recent crazy-turn; that my have been the nail in the coffin). He's dangerously effective at manipulating the media to listen to him, and I for one like to keep on top of what he's up to.

    2. Re:Enough already. by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Who cares, it's good for a laugh. If he's really one of those 'Any publicity is good publicity people' then cracking jokes at his expense are really the best service we can do him and everyone else, by giving him publicity and making him out to be about as knowledgeable as Bozo the Clown.

      As for the actual argument, I think we all know that Jacky was going to try and stop GTA IV's release already, no matter what cases are currently centered around him (wasn't there a case to stop him from preventing GTA IV's release?) This is nothing more than a silly excuse for him to continue his attacks on video games, now only is the lawyer not clearly Jack Thompson (he's a person who thinks video games are evil, and happens to be a lawyer...I can think of half a dozen people who fit that mold. It's only Jack Thompson if, A: The person looks exactly like Jacky and quotes him or something, or B: The person playing the game thinks the best RL example is Jacky.) but even if he was parody is legal so Jack wouldn't even have a case then.

      No, this is nothing more than an attempt to gain some publicity (I'm sure at least some of the big papers will play up how the gamers are getting their revenge somehow or something like that) and give him an excuse to try and stop the game's release beyond his tired old 'videogames are evil' routine.

      Anyone else find it amusing that Jack Thompson seems to think a lawyer who says 'Guns don't kill people, Videogames do' is him? Kinda gives a little insight into what he thinks about the matter now doesn't it...

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
  8. Reminiscint... by wamerocity · · Score: 5, Funny

    I recall a funny statement about how GTA4 was going to be placed in an alternate universe NYC, to which some idiot congressman replied, "placing GTA in New York City is like placing Halo in Disneyland" (because New York is supposedly the safest big city). Well that got everyone thinking, "you know what? That would be the COOLEST BOARD EVER, to play in Disneyland". In a likewise fashion, I would like to make a mod for unreal tournament 3 (since they are much friendlier for user created mods than microsoft) where everybody is Jack Thompson. Who wouldn't want to have a death match of you versus 15 Jack Thompsons??
    Hmmm... maybe if I could kill him in Disneyland, that would be even better!

    --
    "Thank you for using Stop-n-Drop, America's favorite suicide booth since 2008"
  9. wait... by blackcoot · · Score: 4, Funny

    people still listen to what this guy has to say? simple solution: by his logic, surely real lawyers can sue for an injunction against jack thomspon ever speaking again since he is clearly a representation of them...

  10. Easy by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm sure there's more than one lawyer in Manhattan that likes the GTA series. If any of you read this, send Rockstar a letter inviting them to use your name and likeness in the game. You get to put screenshots for publicity while at the same time stick it to Thompson.

    Imagine the interviews. Jack Thompson claims the lawyer is him, then the camera cuts to you: No, it's me. Look at this screenshot. Here's a signed affidavit saying it's me!

    Pity I'm not a lawyer, I'd go for it.

  11. Bully... by Devir · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had no interest in "Bully". THe plot concept didnt apeal to me. The name was simple and basic.

    Jack made me buy it.

  12. Precedents by Wordplay · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if it is a bald-faced parody, sounds like a certain crazy lawyer needs to read up on Hustler Magazine v. Falwell.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell

    1. Re:Precedents by krog · · Score: 5, Funny

      I read wikipedia for the articles.

  13. Carly Simon by Speare · · Score: 4, Funny

    And in other news, Carly Simon finally admits that Jack Thompson was the object of her scorn in her old hit song, "You're So Vain (You Probably Think This Song is About You)."

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  14. Re:Previous Settlement by C0rinthian · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think it's pretty obvious that Thompson doesn't feel hindered by silly laws.

  15. Be glad, Jack.. by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...that I'm not the lead designer on that game.

    There would be a 10 minutes hidden scene where the Tom Jackson character is repeatedly raped by an enormous number of large farm animals.

    The he'd be forced into oral copulation with filthy homeless guys who have genital sores as yet unidentified by science.

    And it would just go downhill from there.

    Finally, Dexter would show up and end Tom's pain.

  16. A Modest Video Game Proposal anyone? by Jabrwock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Take Two makes a game where a New York lawyer who works for a firm that believes that "guns don't kill people, video games do" gets killed. Jack Thompson doesn't live in New York, doesn't work for a legal firm, and has never uttered that quote, and I'll bet the lawyer in the game doesn't even look like or sound like him.

    Jack Thompson proposes a video game where a CEO of New York-based "Take This" called Paula Eibel gets murdered for creating violent videogames. Lawyers who work at "Blank Stare" are also massacred. Paul Eibel was the CEO of Take Two at the time, and their headquarters is in New York, as is Blank Rome, the legal firm that they employ.

    Jack's stuff is parody (his claim), but GTAIV is a death threat?

    Please.

    --
    Magic doesn't work in my presence. My power of disbelief is too strong.
  17. Does Take Two employ Jack Thompson? by jinxidoru · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't help but wonder, with all of the free publicity he has kindly given to GTA, if he isn't on Take Two's bank-roll. Seriously, this is great advertising. I'm sure they intentionally released this information about the game simply to get JT to put up a stink. What brilliance on their part!

  18. Re:Didn't he dare them to? by Jaegar · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few months ago, didn't JT dare R* to make a game depicting him being "taken out"? or something like that, my memory is fuzzy... Actually, the challenge was contained in an open letter. His "Modest Proposal" outlined the plot for a game. If it was made, Thompson would donate $10,000 to the charity of the CEO of Take Two's choosing. It was eventually made, but of course Thompson didn't pony up. Gabe and Tycho from Penny Arcade ended up donating the $10,000.

    Of course that compelled Wacky Jacky to send a fax to the local police department asking for assistance in halting the nefarious activities of the two web comics.

    The whole story here
  19. Definition of Jack Thompson by Mingco · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because of Grand Theft Auto 4, a 3rd rate lawyer whines about a 2nd Amendment lawyer in a video game and tramples the 1st Amendment in order to earn zero respect.

  20. No! Keep the box closed... by n+dot+l · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then we could be both satisfied and dissatisfied at the same time.

    Which is good because we'd get the satisfaction that he's in the box, but we don't know that he's dead so we can still ridicule him for being a moron.