Slashdot Mirror


History of Slashdot Part 3- Going Corporate

When we last left off we were in early 1999- Slashdot had a small business behind it, known as Blockstackers Intergalactic. But we knew that we would need real infrastructure to handle the ever increasing traffic and needs of our readers as well as our employees. A number of suitors approached us with deal of varying sizes and shapes, and we settled on one nobody had never heard of: Andover. (As a reminder don't forget to get your charity bid up ... some items are still reasonably priced! But the EFF always needs cash!)

Nobody had ever heard of Andover, and from our perspective, that was kind of the point. We had talked to companies that sold Linux distributions as well as a number of web network type organizations, but at the end of the day, we decided that we had to go with someone that would guarantee us editorial independence, and not create serious conflicts of interest by forcing us to favor some particular distribution. Likewise we didn't want to get into a situation where we were 'just part of a network' using all our stories to plug other network sites. Andover was not really a Linux company, so we were able to get a deal that met our needs.

I vividly remember the day we closed the deal. We went to some law firm high up in a huge skyscraper in Boston. Hemos & I signed papers lined from one end of a conference table to the other, along with Bruce (the pres of Andover). After that we went to the boston aquarium for a bit, and went out to dinner with the entire Andover staff at some seafood place that apparently is well known but I'm not a boston person so I don't really know what it was. I remember wanting to just read my email and being incredibly uncomfortable the whole time. I've never been a good person dealing with meatspace crowds. I was on the verge of panic the whole night. I had scallops and tried to smile and be polite when I just wanted to hide in the corner. I've still never really dealt with my ability to deal with crowds.

Following the sale, I found out what it meant to work for a large company. I joined the board of directors of Andover, but soon after realized that corporate boards are probably not the best place for me to spend my time. During that time we hired Jamie, Timothy, Michael and the company hired Pudge, Wes, and a number of other folks who initially worked for other parts of the company, but later came to work for Slashdot. Also we were able to give a paycheck to people who had, up until this point volunteering for Slashdot. Among them was Jon Katz who continued to write for us for a number of years until he decided it was time to write about dogs instead.

Besides an HR department, health insurance, 401k, and that other stuff, having a large corporate backer made a number of things possible. We actually migrated from just 2 boxes to like a half dozen. We chewed through a number of load balancing techniques and were able to scale up from a half a million to multiple million daily page views. We spent literally years getting by on minimal hardware. We spent years optimizing the code, adding layer after layer of caching. I still have mixed feelings on this matter. Had the corporate overlords given us a dozen machines, we could have been free to write a lot of new user features during that time. But instead we used the same database for nearly 5 years.

For me the biggest transition was offloading tasks to other people. With people on payroll, I was able to finally have engineers working on things instead of me doing most everything by myself. It took several years before I trusted the staff enough to take away my own CVS access, a decision that is really necessary. For years I was (fairly) mocked by Slashdot readers for my terrible way of developing code- I'd just write the code live on the site. When it worked, I'd just overwrite the old code live with almost no testing. On several occasions a typo resulted in a hundred emails in my box with readers reporting that Slashdot was no longer compiling. Under the corporate umbrella there was CVS committing, rollbacks, and scheduled deployment of code. I still get impatient with all this overhead to this day, but I know everyone prefers it this way. It's better, but it's definitely less 'Fun'.

Around this time a box arrived on our doorstep containing a bunch of glasses and t-shirts. They were unusual because they were clever and of good quality. When you do this long enough you really can tell when you're getting garbage, and when the people behind the work are smart and clever. The website was ThinkGeek. I brought them to Andover and pushed to have us acquire them. I shoulda got a commission off that deal... now they have like 30 employees and do millions of dollars in business. Most of the people that started the thing are still there (just like Slashdot!) and they are still doing great things (also just like Slashdot!) I still feel a strange connection to ThinkGeek... I think of them as my younger sibling... except that while I sit in the back of the class or maybe play on the chess team, they are starters in all the sports teams and get straight A's.

My first, last, and hopefully only ever COMDEX was in Las Vegas (although I went to Vegas countless times since for fun- NYC, Las Vegas and Tokyo are the 3 cities I love to visit). We had a crazy booth. It was absolutely huge, with bean bags and a plasma TV. ThinkGeek had this little niche in the corner. We had nerf guns. We had a install race- VA gave us a few machines, and we had people race to install Linux distributions on them. Patrick Volkerding. himself represented Slackware, and his machine had a faulty CD drive. It was hysterical watching him come in last. Some (shall remain nameless) distribution had a booth across the aisle from us, and speakers that were inappropriately loud. They would have constant presentations that were deafening throughout the conference hall. So we hooked up our own speakers and starting yelling at them and telling them their distribution sucked and making fun of their catch phrases... after you'd heard the speech 50x, it was pretty easy to mock. At least it was a distro nobody liked in the first place. My punishment for my bad behavior was catching the worst flu of my life. For some reason we flew into chicago, a 3 hour drive home. CowboyNeal and I were both on the verge of passing out, hallucinating with flu, singing at the top of our lungs just to say conscious.

Looking back, I think it interesting that the moment in my life where I most experienced the excesses of the dot com boom was followed by probably the single most terrible bouts of illness of my adult life. Kathleen took care of me for days as I couldn't leave the bed.

Along the way Andover went public in a dutch auction style IPO. I don't have much to say about it except that I think it was the right thing to do, even if long-term it didn't much work out for me personally nearly as well as I had dreamed at the time. No personal jet. No military style compound. But a nice house isn't a bad way to start off your adult life.

Just as I was getting used to flying to boston regularly for board meetings (and racking up crazy frequent flier mile status in the process, getting nearly constant first class upgrades) the 'Merger' between VA & Andover came along. I wasn't surprised when it happened, and at the time there was a lot that made sense. VA had SourceForge (and we had the competing Server 51 project) as well as Linux.com. There was a fairly intense rivalry between a number of people at the companies, although I never really felt it. The bubble that Slashdot has always tried to stay inside has insulated from corporate politics- something that is usually true today as well. I knew the contract we signed guaranteed me the editorial control Slashdot needed regardless of ownership, and I was confident enough in the leadership of VA that I would not have problems with people trying to wreck the site.

Of course all of this happened during the bubble burst where we all went from thinking we would retire by 30 to realizing that we might be broke and jobless within a year. I'm still amazed that Slashdot has survived. From Blockstackers, to Andover, to Andover.net, and then to VA Linux Systems to OSDN to VA Software to OSTG to SourceForge. I've had a lot of different business cards. The names have changed, and a few faces have changed as well, but the core the site, the attitude and spirit remain the same.

Part 4 will run next week where I'll talk more about present day Slashdot operations and philosophy.

126 comments

  1. What Happened To Michael? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    During that time we hired Jamie, Timothy, Michael and the company hired Pudge, Wes, and a number of other folks who initially worked for other parts of the company, but later came to work for Slashdot

    Anybody know what happened to Michael?

    He was one of the most abusive editors ever, using slashdot as his own personal blog, posting wrong stories, posting political articles that suited his viewpoints, and mod abused people who called him out.

    One day, he mysteriously disappears into the ether without notice. Did the slashdot brass kick him to the curb?

    1. Re:What Happened To Michael? by soulsteal · · Score: 4, Informative

      He fell victim to a hybrid petrified-Natalie-Portman/grits avalanche set off by the flapping wings of a solitary penis bird halfway around the globe.

      Thanks chaos theory!

    2. Re:What Happened To Michael? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      He was one of the most abusive editors ever, using slashdot as his own personal blog, posting wrong stories, posting political articles that suited his viewpoints, and mod abused people who called him out.

      One day, he mysteriously disappears into the ether without notice. Did the slashdot brass kick him to the curb?


      he now goes under the name kdawson.

    3. Re:What Happened To Michael? by julesh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Anybody know what happened to Michael?

      He was one of the most abusive editors ever, using slashdot as his own personal blog, posting wrong stories, posting political articles that suited his viewpoints, and mod abused people who called him out.

      One day, he mysteriously disappears into the ether without notice. Did the slashdot brass kick him to the curb?


      I hope so. I've still got a moderation ban from when I moderated a comment he left as offtopic, many many years ago.

    4. Re:What Happened To Michael? by JNighthawk · · Score: 4, Informative

      He resigned or was fired. As far as I know, it was a combination of his abusive tactics here at Slashdot and his debacle in censorware.

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
    5. Re:What Happened To Michael? by eshefer · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm glad to see someone modded this up to funny after someone without humor modded it down to troll. if I had moderation points now - I'd moderate it informative* as well.

      * I kid! I kid!

    6. Re:What Happened To Michael? by mce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're not the only one. A single idiot can do more damage than 10 wise men can repair.

    7. Re:What Happened To Michael? by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      Even if you didn't like his editing, you cannot deny his contribution to Slashdot culture. Truly an American icon.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    8. Re:What Happened To Michael? by wdr1 · · Score: 1

      I heard he's avoiding Slashdot parties, lest he find himself a piñata.

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    9. Re:What Happened To Michael? by nerdacus · · Score: 1

      He was one of the most abusive editors ever, using slashdot as his own personal blog, posting wrong stories, posting political articles that suited his viewpoints, and mod abused people who called him out.

      And that's different from the other editors *how*? Okay, some are worse than others, but it's fun to say anyway. But all of the editors do these things in varying degrees, especially posting wrong/abusive/lame stories. Hence slashdot's reputation for sloppy "journalism".

  2. Re:Oh Please by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And yet you read and post to it. Does that say more about Slashdot or about you?

  3. Heh by orclevegam · · Score: 2

    Likewise we didn't want to get into a situation where we were 'just part of a network' using all our stories to plug other network sites.

    The occasional slashvertisment not withstanding. To be fair though, I'm sure those aren't corporately mandated which was the point of that sentence, just people (ab)using Slashdot to generate some traffic.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  4. Fret not! by CaptainZapp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No personal jet. No military style compound. But a nice house isn't a bad way to start off your adult life.

    Taco, as a fairly long-time reader and contributor of comments, let me add the following statement:

    You gained something more important then that and that's despite all the pissing, moaning and shoveling dreck into your general direction: Credibility & integrity and that's not a bad feat after being scrutinized to hell and back for ten years.

    Congratulations to the whole team!

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

    1. Re:Fret not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Credibility & integrity and that's not a bad feat after being scrutinized to hell and back for ten years.

      yeah, mod points being removed from people who don't do the slashdot goosestep and the known abuse of the under and over rated mod system. that's what i call integrity and credibility.

      you're a brown noser.

    2. Re:Fret not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the known abuse of the under and over rated mod system

      where are these known abuses documented?

    3. Re:Fret not! by cweber · · Score: 1

      Totally agree! Well said!
      I'm really enjoying this series. It brings back many fond memories, and some less fond ones also.

    4. Re:Fret not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, why don't you just bend over and let Taco fuck you in the ass too? Fucking cunt.

    5. Re:Fret not! by gadders · · Score: 1

      Not only that, you are (as far as I can tell) earning pretty decent living doing something you love. That's not to be underestimated.

    6. Re:Fret not! by Epi-man · · Score: 1

      Taco, as a fairly long-time reader and contributor of comments, let me add the following statement:

      You gained something more important then that and that's despite all the pissing, moaning and shoveling dreck into your general direction: Credibility & integrity and that's not a bad feat after being scrutinized to hell and back for ten years.

      Congratulations to the whole team!


      Interesting to see the sub 100k userids come to say the same. Seems like a lot of us (relative) old-timers are really enjoying this series and reliving the past. I can't believe I have at least checked the headline of just about every story over the past 8 years. Granted I will miss some on the weekends, or manage to resist the urge to review when I go on vacation, but I really enjoy the quick synopsis of things going on I wouldn't hear about otherwise being available anytime (what a messy sentence, sorry). Taco, just in case you weren't aware, there are literally (hundreds of?) thousands of us that greatly appreciate the work you do every day, but I suspect you knew that.
    7. Re:Fret not! by baptiste · · Score: 1
      Here here! While not a sub 100k, I've been reading Slashdot for many years, commenting here and there, and reading almost every headline that comes across, more so than any blog or web site. I always chuckle at the trolls who mock anyone who posts an Ask Slashdot question about something that doesn't rise to the level of quantum theory. Yet as an IT professional, I've discovered a number of new technologies, if not directly from a /. story, than from the inevitable net searches that a story may trigger and may point me in an entirely different direction. That's not a bad thing. Sure - if you take your advice verbatim from a bunch of /. commentors - you deserve what you get. But many of us find /. to be at times a very useful resource and at others, just fun to read.

      Thanks for 10 great years Taco, even if I was a couple years late to the party. The day /. dies is the day the tubes cease to exist.

    8. Re:Fret not! by Alex · · Score: 1


      Interesting to see the sub 100k userids come to say the same. Seems like a lot of us (relative) old-timers are really enjoying this series and reliving the past. I can't believe I have at least checked the headline of just about every story over the past 8 years. Granted I will miss some on the weekends, or manage to resist the urge to review when I go on vacation, but I really enjoy the quick synopsis of things going on I wouldn't hear about otherwise being available anytime (what a messy sentence, sorry). Taco, just in case you weren't aware, there are literally (hundreds of?) thousands of us that greatly appreciate the work you do every day, but I suspect you knew that.


      Yeah - best series for years, reminds me of the labs at Uni where I started reading /.

      Alex

  5. Fortress /. by J4 · · Score: 1

    So _that's_ why you guys had the cubicle walls at LWCE Javits 2k. ;)

    1. Re:Fortress /. by NighthawkFoo · · Score: 1

      Wow...that was a long time ago. It seems like yesterday Emmett was serenading the /. booth with Clash's "Should I Stay Or Should I Go" on his accordion.

      Hey Rob, I'm still waiting for my "Sounds of Slashdot" CD that you promised me :)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
      - Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  6. Jon Katz is Gone? by Roofus · · Score: 5, Funny

    And all this time I thought I was just blocking his stories!

    1. Re:Jon Katz is Gone? by unitron · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but can you believe that they were paying Katz, and not the other way around ?!?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:Jon Katz is Gone? by loftwyr · · Score: 1

      Funny, I only found out he'd left when I went to update my preferences and his name (and the blocking of) had disappeared.

      I sat there wondering how long he'd been gone before I noticed.

    3. Re:Jon Katz is Gone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's ok Junis... Jon is gone but not forgotten.

      The ability to write well is meaningless if you don't actually have knowledge of your subject.

    4. Re:Jon Katz is Gone? by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2, Funny

      My memory of Jon Katz consists primarily of "In this post-9/11 world ..."

    5. Re:Jon Katz is Gone? by Quay42 · · Score: 1

      Is there anybody who _didn't_ block Katz's articles?

      --
      "Has anything you've done made your life better?" - American History X
    6. Re:Jon Katz is Gone? by mbspweb · · Score: 1

      My memory of Jon Katz consists primarily of "In this post-9/11 world ..."

      Don't forget "In this post-Columbine world..."
      and "... writ large"
      Two of my favs

    7. Re:Jon Katz is Gone? by Paradoks · · Score: 1

      I loved reading Jon Katz's stories; his splendid writing ability really brought you into whatever concept he was trying to get across.

      Of course, I stopped reading him after I read a few of his stories(such as the one positing the Spiderman franchise as the newer generation's Star Wars franchise), and realized that, while his writing was great, his logic was on par with my cat's ability to speak(and she can't even meow).

  7. I actually like version control by cerberusss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I still get impatient with all this overhead to this day, but I know everyone prefers it this way. It's better, but it's definitely less 'Fun'.
    It's funny but I actually like version control. I'm a "tools" kind of guy, during college I picked up using CVS and have always liked using it. When SVN came along, I picked that up too.

    For some people, this distracts from coding. For me, besides the initial learning curve, it doesn't. What distracts me most is pointless meetings, traveling to the other office, etc. With travelling and testing, sometimes a week goes by without touching any code.
    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:I actually like version control by witte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Heh :)
      Doing anything having to do with software for businesses without traceability, version control, etc. is seriously beyond stupid.
      Every time I join a project and I learn they don't know what version control is or simply don't want to use it, I consider myself stuck in deep, deep shit.
      I like good procedures and the supporting tools, they helps keep things organised and complexity manageable. A lot of devs or pm's don't seem to grasp it...

    2. Re:I actually like version control by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Sometimes bad version control is almost worse than no version control. My current job is using some horrible system called PVCS. And don't even get me started on their "deployment" procedure, it's a joke.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    3. Re:I actually like version control by spiralx · · Score: 1

      Ha, I used that in my first job 9/10 years ago... and yes, it sucks. Then again, the ancient version of Surround I'm using at my current place isn't much better :(

    4. Re:I actually like version control by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1

      Well, I gather that you never had to deal with ClearCase?

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

    5. Re:I actually like version control by quanticle · · Score: 1

      Hear! Hear!

      My company uses ClearCase, and it combines the worst aspects of text-based config files and graphical, menu-based systems.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    6. Re:I actually like version control by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. I'm a unix guy and the companies I worked at, engineers were in control of the toolstack. So I "missed" the chance to work with ClearCase and other commercial version control tools. I had a very short project using the Java client of Perforce, though....

      You might think that I'm a bit overdoing with the engineers vs. management, however in my experience managers have lost the experience to see through a learning curve and see stability, robustness etc. What is done then is that the tool with the nicest GUI is picked up. That's where the commercial version control tools shine, as a (admittedly very rough) rule.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    7. Re:I actually like version control by witte · · Score: 1

      I agree on PVCS. There's much better tools for version control, and cheaper too. PVCS is unwieldy, slow and bloated.
      For small to medium sized dev shops, tools like SVN or Perforce are adequate, with plenty of plugins for tracking tools, Eclipse, etc.
      Bigger dev shops usually don't have a choice and are already stuck with some vendor specific closed-source monstrosity that only interfaces correctly with that vendor's other tools. (Read: vendor lockin is teh suck.)

      Tangentially, I heard there is a new version control feature in Visual Studio that's supposed to be the bees knees... (but I wouldn't hold my breath - after seeing MS's previous VC tool (VSS) fall over and die, corrupting the whole source repository in the process... Painful! *cough* backups *cough*.) </ramble>

  8. Listen to You? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I note by your UserID# that you joined Slashdot exactly when it was exploding in membership, like when AOL gatewayed to the Internet. That ought to make you an expert in how Slashdot got worse when it went from "word of mouth" to mass popularity. But by the same token, not worth listening to your opinion about it. Especially when you're trashing a site you post to several times a day. Who's taking themself too seriously again?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Listen to You? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, my low digit ID is all Trolled-up.

    2. Re:Listen to You? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation -2
          100% Troll

      TrollMods say "Troll" means "I disagree with you, but can't argue".

      Maybe that OP was right.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Listen to You? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      TrollMods say "Troll" means "I disagree with you, but can't argue".

      Though as you know, /. doesn't allow moderation and posting to the same discussion. Therefore "Troll" could also mean "I disagree with you, but I want to use my mod points instead of saying why in a message".
      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    4. Re:Listen to You? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The two meanings are not mutually exclusive.

      But what's clear is that such a baseless, anonymous, unexplained mod was more important to the modder to make than actually arguing with something they disagree with.

      A good improvement to the Slashcode would be requiring negative moderations to include a hidden, but viewable, reason why. Including a checkbox next to a definition of "Troll" or "Flamebait" to indicate the modder is explicitly saying that the post meets that definition. It wouldn't eliminate the committed trollMod, but it would make it easier to disagree with their abuse in a response, which would be a service to metaMods and readers. Oh, and give metamoderation some real teeth that the persistent plague of bad mods proves it lacks.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Listen to You? by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      I actually think you could accomplish this by doing away with negative mods altogether, and increasing the positive "ceiling" -- to, say, 10 or 15. Wouldn't this work, or am I missing something?

          - Alaska Jack

    6. Re:Listen to You? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      2007........1997
      Offtopic....Troll
      Troll.......Flaimbate
      Flaimbate...Funny
      Funny.......Interesting
      Interesting.Insightful
      Insightful..OffTopic
      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:Listen to You? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Same difference, with the range just shifted arithmetically up to zero. Only if there were some multiplicative or other dimensional scaling would that change make a difference.

      The problem is that we want to give a linear grade to nonlinear judgements. What if I want to look at "funny flamebaits"? By linearizing the system, we make it fail to reflect what it's describing. Which is the basis for system gaming. There are other nonlinear, but problematically combinatorial, features of moderation, like the prohibition on moderating a thread in which the moderator has commented, even if the two comments are in distant subthreads. That's why I patch the problem with more feedback. But I don't expect it to happen: the Slashcode seems to be static except for superficial bells/whistles like the new threading and tagging features. Compared to the coding history Taco recounted in this story, it seems like the Slashcode is set in stone.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:Listen to You? by sharp-bang · · Score: 1

      Or, we can live with the minority percentage of mods who abuse the ability to mod posts negative out of spite, malice, immaturity or laziness, and take our karma only as seriously as it should be, and not more so.

      IMO the best filter for this sort of behavior is to let it roll off, rather than increase the number of carping, acrimonious meta posts about moderation, which I have apparently just incremented, dammit.

      --
      #!
    9. Re:Listen to You? by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's truly karma - I think a negative mod should effect the karma of BOTH the poster and the moderator. Those of us who sparingly mod would have nothing to worry about - and the mod trolls would slowly be eaten away with their own bile.

      I've been on /. for 9 years and I think we're at another low point in moderation.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  9. Re:Oh Please by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    And yet you read and post to it. Does that say more about Slashdot or about you?

    Slashdot, specifically that it was worth enduring that jackass because the rest was so good. Besides, the inevitable flamewars in reaction to stories like "George Bush Admits Torturing Kittens" (when the linked article was about farm subsidies or something else totally unrelated) were usually pretty entertaining.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  10. Re:Oh Please by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    Ignore that. Discussion2 seemingly reparented your post to one about "whatever happened to Michael", and that's that I thought I was responding to.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  11. Drive back from ORD.. by grandrollerz · · Score: 1

    For some reason we flew into chicago, a 3 hour drive home. CowboyNeal and I were both on the verge of passing out, hallucinating with flu, singing at the top of our lungs just to say conscious. That drive back to West Michigan from Chicago is hell. It's fine until you near the Michigan/Indian border and then it's all down hill from there. My things is having all four windows down, middle of winter, dead of night...it's cold, but I'm awake....the wife doesn't like it so much though, she might prefer it to my singing.
    1. Re:Drive back from ORD.. by n9uxu8 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The radio on the drive back to Michigan from chicago is HELL unless you like Delilah (does anyone actually like Delilah)?!?!? Thank god for satellite!

    2. Re:Drive back from ORD.. by chazzf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which is appropriate, given the black hole of suck that I-94 is.

      --
      No statement is true, not even this one.
    3. Re:Drive back from ORD.. by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      I remember making that Chicago-Ann Arbor drive one night in the dead of winter about 15 years ago, and the snow was coming down so hard you could only drive about 25-30 MPH and see about 30-40 feet ahead of you. Of course being a poor college student I didn't have the cash to get a room for the night, so I just pushed on. It was past midnight so there were few, if any, other cars on the road and the drive seemed like it was never going to end...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:Drive back from ORD.. by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      That drive back to West Michigan from Chicago is hell. It's fine until you near the Michigan/Indian border and then it's all down hill from there.

      Really? Actually I used to find that was roughly when the drive improved since the Chicago traffic started to subside, especially once past I-65, and there weren't any more stupid toll booths. I still didn't like the drive but I didn't dislike it as much as driving through Chicago. Admittedly that was partly my fault since the first time I did it, being an ignorant foreigner, I had no idea that speed limit signs like "Maximum 55 mph" near Chicago actually meant "Minimum 55 (and for safety 60+)". Chicago is still the only place I've ever driven when I felt that driving at the speed limit was dangerous because I was going far too slow!

    5. Re:Drive back from ORD.. by gmrath · · Score: 1

      Umm . . . as a veteran city-of-Chicago highway driver (meaning any driving on Chicago tollways and Interstates is done only when absolutely necessary and then only aggressively for self-preservation - average speeds 70 to 80 mph bumper-to-bumper - what 55 mph speed limit?) I must say I found the several times I drove through Nashville and Atlanta much faster and much crazier, though I imagine that's because being in a strange town and trying to pay attention not to get lost tends to make things seem worse. . . Seriously, though, the stretch of I80-94 south of Chicago proper from, say, I294 to I65 in Indiana has got to be the most traveled stretch of road in the world: anything driving east or west on the Interstates in the upper third of the US Midwest must go around Lake Michigan and this route is how they go. This infamous "Borman Expressway" was recently and extensively widened during a multi-year project and do you know what? Remember the line from some movie, "build it and they will come?" Well, they built it and, damn, if the traffic didn't come. It seem just as crowded now as it was as a two-laner in the past and, as usual, most of the traffic is 18-wheelers. There's been talk about constructing a parallel Interstate route south I80-94 through the Crown Point, Indiana, area but for political reasons, sort of like Chicago's proposed new "third" airport south of the city, this project will never see the first shovel-full of dirt turned over until sometime in the next century.

  12. Basic Development Practice by Womens+Shoes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...CVS committing, rollbacks, and scheduled deployment of code. I still get impatient with all this overhead to this day

    That's got to be more with the specific setup you had than with the philosophy in general, no? A good development sandbox setup where you can do dramatic changes, quickly test, and push to a generally stable live environment increases fun for most developers I know...

    --
    Does your significant other love shoes? ;)
  13. Oblig. karma whoring by IHSW · · Score: 3, Informative

    A Brief History of Slashdot Part 1, Chips & Dips
    http://meta.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/02/1553218

    A Brief History of Slashdot Part 2, Explosions
    http://meta.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/10/1445216

    Quite interesting.

    1. Re:Oblig. karma whoring by fbjon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quite interesting. Indeed. I expect this as a theme once the series gets to 'S'.
      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  14. Interesting by whackco · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What is interesting is your choice in corporate partners. I wonder if you ever regret not taking one of the other deals that might or might not have made you much more wealthy. Again: Might not have ;)

  15. It's been fun by snowbrdr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just wanted to say thanks for the ongoing story of how /. got started up. I've been coming to this site at least 5-10 times a day since 2000 when I graduated HS and have yet to be disappointed in the material I find on the main page. Keep up the fantastic work and I can't wait to see what the next 10 years has in store for /.! -a

  16. Anybody want to out the Linux distro? by Evets · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Are there any old timers here who might want to out the linux distro from comdex? That part has me very curious. I'm thinking some sort of Lindows-ish distro.

    1. Re:Anybody want to out the Linux distro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Coming from old-timer #666, the distro was Caldera.

  17. Seafood Place by Se7enLC · · Score: 4, Informative

    After that we went to the boston aquarium for a bit, and went out to dinner with the entire Andover staff at some seafood place that apparently is well known but I'm not a boston person so I don't really know what it was. I remember wanting to just read my email and being incredibly uncomfortable the whole time. I've never been a good person dealing with meatspace crowds. I was on the verge of panic the whole night. I had scallops and tried to smile and be polite when I just wanted to hide in the corner. I've still never really dealt with my ability to deal with crowds.

    It was probably Legal Seafoods. That's right near the aquarium.

    1. Re:Seafood Place by B3ryllium · · Score: 5, Funny

      As opposed to Illegal Seafoods. That's right IN the aquarium, but only after-hours and with an accomplice on the inside.

    2. Re:Seafood Place by machinecraig · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing - and Legal Seafoods is pretty popular for business lunches \ dinners where you have a dozen or more people to seat.

    3. Re:Seafood Place by HyperbolicParabaloid · · Score: 1

      Anthony's Pier Four

      --


      -------------------------
      A person of moderate zeal
    4. Re:Seafood Place by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      some of the worst seafood i've ever had too... and WAY overpriced.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    5. Re:Seafood Place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Union Oyster House.

      I was actually working at Andover at the time... Shared a cube with Taco himself when I was but a wee 17 year old Perl monkey.

    6. Re:Seafood Place by tgd · · Score: 1

      And its awful, centrally prepared frozen crap that only a tourist would like.

      Bleh.

      Kudos to Taco for forgetting who it was.

    7. Re:Seafood Place by glwtta · · Score: 1

      It was probably Legal Seafoods. That's right near the aquarium.

      Ugh.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    8. Re:Seafood Place by mwigmani · · Score: 1

      The Union Oyster House is notable as it's the oldest restaurant in the U.S..

      I like their chowder...

    9. Re:Seafood Place by timothy · · Score: 1

      Also good have been Durgan Park ... a place I've been to once, and enjoyed, but found pretty overrated for the price.

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    10. Re:Seafood Place by slackeress · · Score: 1

      It was Anthony's Pier 4. I was there and distinctly remember that the guests of honor spent part of the dinner conversation talking about what it would like if their spines were made of springs.

    11. Re:Seafood Place by lbjay · · Score: 1

      Chi-chi? Is that you?!?

      --
      really? wow... that's reallywow.
  18. PT Cruiser? by Skater · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Whatever happened to the Slashdot PT Cruiser? Did someone win it? Did they drive it with the Slashdot logos on it?

    1. Re:PT Cruiser? by Skater · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just found this comment that answers some of my questions - apparently it still is on the road.

    2. Re:PT Cruiser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see it all the time in Walnut Creek, CA. It still has all the logos. I don't know who owns it.

  19. Re:Oh Please by rk · · Score: 1

    Y'know, it's pretty easy to bash slashdot and I've been guilty of it myself from time to time. But, even with the trolls and vitriol that gets spewed here, compared to most sites, especially with sites that have issued a million plus accounts, Slashdot reads like de Tocqueville in comparison.

  20. The Katz era... by MythMoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Among them was Jon Katz who continued to write for us for a number of years until he decided it was time to write about dogs instead. Jon Katz's articles polarized your audience. What did you think about that?
    --
    --- These are not words: wierd, genious, rediculous
    1. Re:The Katz era... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They liked the idea so much, they hired Keith Dawson

    2. Re:The Katz era... by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      If you think he polarized slashdot, can you imagine how dogs and their owners are in an uproar over being written about by Katz?

  21. The seafood place by lbjay · · Score: 3, Informative

    It was Anthony's Pier 4, yo.

    --
    really? wow... that's reallywow.
  22. In the movies? by Schnapple · · Score: 3, Interesting
    My first, last, and hopefully only ever COMDEX was in Las Vegas
    Was this the same convention where you were filmed and later put in the documentary Revolution OS?
    1. Re:In the movies? by debianlinux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pretty sure that was the LinuxWorld Expo, IIRC.

  23. No personal jet? by iknownuttin · · Score: 1
    But, there's naked super models and Playboy Bunnies...right? Please, say it's so!

    Otherwise, I'm leaving this dot-com thing I'm doing and I'm shaving the rest of my hair off and becoming a Buddhist Monk!

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    1. Re:No personal jet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bye

  24. ability? by airdrummer · · Score: 0

    > I've still never really dealt with my ability to deal with crowds.

    i think he means _in_ability;-)

  25. CmdrTaco loves the pain! by AdamThor · · Score: 1

    I've never been a good person dealing with meatspace crowds. I was on the verge of panic the whole night. I had scallops and tried to smile and be polite when I just wanted to hide in the corner. I've still never really dealt with my ability to deal with crowds.

    and then...

    (although I went to Vegas countless times since for fun- NYC, Las Vegas and Tokyo are the 3 cities I love to visit)

    umm. because you are a masochist?

    --
    -- "Oh. This guy again."
  26. cannot parse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...one nobody had never heard of"

    Does this mean if you have not heard of it, then you are a nobody? Or does it mean that it was generally unknown (assuming they meant ever instead of never).

    Also, what is the deal with ending a sentence with "of"?

  27. Joke not gotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=110181180432#qanda

    The correct answer is that Soviet Union delivers to YOU!

  28. As seen on TV? by sootman · · Score: 1

    "...My first, last, and hopefully only ever COMDEX was in Las Vegas... We had a crazy booth. It was absolutely huge, with bean bags..."

    I remember in the movie Revolution OS there was an interview with one of the Slashdot crew, at a tradeshow, in a beanbag chair... was that the same tradeshow? Which staffer was it?

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:As seen on TV? by chrisd · · Score: 1
      The one on the inflatable couch was Taco.

      --
      Co-Editor, Open Sources
      Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
  29. hopefully only ever COMDEX by wiredog · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Since COMDEX is no more, probably 'only ever'

    I remember that booth. Not on the show floor, over in the 'Linux Pavillion' which, that year, was in a hotel attached to the LVCC. The BSD crew was there too. And the Caldera guys across the way making too much noise.

    The only time I've met any of the /. crew IRL.

    1. Re:hopefully only ever COMDEX by mbrod · · Score: 1

      I remember their setup in the "Linux Pavillion" that year. I think they had a flat screen with /. on it behind them and small laptops they were using to access /. read submissions, etc. I was too intimidated by their awesomeness to chat with them though.

    2. Re:hopefully only ever COMDEX by hawk · · Score: 1

      >Since COMDEX is no more,

      And here in Las Vegas, we only have one thing to say about that:

      Thank God.

      Seriously. We had wanted it gone by the early 90's, but even then, there was place else that could host something that large.

      It tied up facilities without the usual economic impact. The city was overrun with incredibly lousy tippers who didn't gamble . . . There were constant complaints of hotel "gouging" during Comdex but that wasn't really the case. Prices certainly went up (tripled in some cases), but it was at the opposite extreme from gouging: it was really an attempt to keep the comdexers away, so that they would stay somewhere else, leaving the rooms available for gamblers.

      hawkk

  30. Re:Oh Please by Monkey · · Score: 1

    Why don't you go drink a big cup of ... oh... never mind.

  31. 10 years of slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and still the nested page views doesn't work! (duplicate content over multiple pages)
    taco sux0rs. :D

  32. the old days by Red+LaRoux · · Score: 1
    I remember when there was so much computer knowledge shared, and less gee whiz /. vs Digg going on...

    is there any waay to roll back the clock?

    1. Re:the old days by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2

      Yeah: submit a lot more tech stories and comments yourself, and urge your friends to do so.

      That's what an open blog is like.

      Or maybe another tech market crash to make geekery unpopular again and drive off the posers.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:the old days by RedCard · · Score: 1

      If you hang around long enough it looks like digg is in the process of rolling it all back for us, by stripping off most of the non-technical users.

  33. Ah... Jon Katz by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

    Among them was Jon Katz who continued to write for us for a number of years until he decided it was time to write about dogs instead.


    Good for us /.-ers. Bad for dogs.
  34. Who hired Zonk? by fm6 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And why?

  35. Conflict of interest by WalterGR · · Score: 1

    ...we decided that we had to go with someone that would guarantee us editorial independence, and not create serious conflicts of interest by forcing us to favor some particular distribution.

    Given your current Corporate Overlords (stock symbol LNUX, owners of linux.com etc.,) how do you feel about conflicts of interest?

  36. Seriously under-resourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still have mixed feelings on this matter. Had the corporate overlords given us a dozen machines, we could have been free to write a lot of new user features during that time. But instead we used the same database for nearly 5 years.

    So for the sake of six machines, how many potential features have been lost and how much of your time has been wasted writing boilerplate caching code? I feel furious reading this and think you / we've been seriously neglected by Anderson. It's like hiring Leonardo da Vinci and only allowing him six pencils a year. What miserly, penny pinching idiocy.

    Does any one share my feelings here?

  37. In other words the dog owners want to... by markov_chain · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...rein in Katz on dogs!

    *rimshot*

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  38. Sourceforge's Stock Price by OakLEE · · Score: 1

    No personal jet. No military style compound. But a nice house isn't a bad way to start off your adult life.

    For those of you wondering where those dreams went, I give you a graph of VA/OSDN/Sourceforge's stock price.

    Weren't you worth a couple hundred million at some point Taco?

    (Note: I'm not trying to disparage or flame Taco, I'm just trying to use the graph illustrate to all the young-uns how insane dot-com bubble was. And people think the current housing bubble is bad!)
    --
    The sun beams down on a brand new day, No more welfare tax to pay, Unsightly slums gone up in flashing light...
  39. Re:The New Interface by D4rkn1ght · · Score: 1

    While this is offtopic, I don't see where else to post what the parent said. I agree that the new interface need work. It is too slow and some things don't look right.

    I think the all-minified.js script is too brutal for some browsers to load. It will also be a good idea to validate the site. That'll take care of the typical problems.

    I just hope that /. doesn't become like Google about validation.

  40. On a non-geek note... by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    "Kathleen took care of me for days as I couldn't leave the bed."

    Now that's true love. (No joke. Taking care of a sick person is one of the least-fun things you can do.)

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:On a non-geek note... by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      It's also one of the most rewarding I think.

      Me and my family took care of my dying grandmother at home for 6 months before she passed away.
      It's one of the most gruelling experiences of my life with a bitter ending.
      But in the end I felt good about myself (how weird that may sound)that all of us did it, even if it almost destroyed us as well.
      She was so loved by us right until the end and where ever she is now, I know she is looking down on us with the same love.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  41. incredibly lousy tippers who didn't gamble by wiredog · · Score: 1

    We didn't gamble because most of us had enough math to know that ,in the long run, the House always Wins.

    1. Re:incredibly lousy tippers who didn't gamble by hawk · · Score: 1

      True. Which makes you a poor customer for a hotel that exists to accommodate gamblers . . .

      hawk