Slashdot Mirror


Driver Update Can Cause Vista Deactivation

KrispySausage writes "After weeks of grueling troubleshooting, I've finally had it confirmed by Microsoft Australia and USA — something as small as swapping the video card or updating a device driver can trigger a total Vista deactivation. Put simply, your copy of Windows will stop working with very little notice (three days) and your PC will go into "reduced functionality" mode, where you can't do anything but use the web browser for half an hour."

71 of 875 comments (clear)

  1. Fool me once..... by budword · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fool me once...shame on you......fool me twice.....shame on me. If you use vista and it bites you in the ass....well.... you deserve it.

    1. Re:Fool me once..... by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When was the "fooled me once" time? I don't think it's twice yet.

      XP activation issues?

    2. Re:Fool me once..... by PDoc · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's all very well if you have the choice - like it or not, some people *have* to use Vista. I pity them, but the poor b@$tards don't need any more difficulties like this!

      --
      Give a man a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)
    3. Re:Fool me once..... by twoboxen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I didn't see Vista as any sort of gain when I first started using it (before switching back to XP) on my gaming PC, but now as a developer who has been forced to port applications to the platform I all-out loathe it. It is a disaster to use. I've developed a lot on linux, a lot on windows, and a little on Mac. I've never seen anything like this. The issues you run into--really dumbfounding. People complain about the extra web development time IE causes... Vista is almost as bad from XP! Think about that for a second. This isn't trying to use a bunch of cute IE tags. This is a new version of a "backwards compatible" version of an operating system. Thanks, Bill!!!

      --
      TODO - Insert Creative/Witty Signature
    4. Re:Fool me once..... by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's all very well if you have the choice - like it or not, some people *have* to use Vista. I pity them, but the poor b@$tards don't need any more difficulties like this!

      If the user doesn't have a choice, it's usually because they're using it in a corporate environment, meaning that someone else is the person actually dealing with issues like these, not the user.

    5. Re:Fool me once..... by yancey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It may be the corporate IT staff who are "dealing" with it, but the user still has to wait until their computer is fixed before they can get any work done.

      --
      Ouch! The truth hurts!
    6. Re:Fool me once..... by budword · · Score: 4, Funny

      Microsoft has been screwing over it's customers for quite a while now. (Customers=people who give them money.) Anyone who has been paying attention has noticed. They do this in part to help content providers. (People who don't give them money.) The rest I figure is neurotic control issues. So, the summary for those of you who are a little slow (Vista users), they screw over people who give them money to help people who don't give them money. Sell the damn stock now, before everyone notices.

    7. Re:Fool me once..... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You need to port applications from XP to Vista? Microsoft is normally very good about keeping backwards compatibility - indeed, the need to stay compatible with old badly-written apps is the cause of much of the cruft in Windows. Do you have any examples of software that works in XP and needs rewriting for Vista?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    8. Re:Fool me once..... by fuzz6y · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Name one. No one *has* to use anything. The definition of "have to" you are using is so narrow it is meaningless. You don't *have* to breathe oxygen. Unless you want to live.
      --
      If you're going to be elitist, it would help to be elite.
    9. Re:Fool me once..... by Bryansix · · Score: 5, Informative

      Many programs written for XP will not install on Vista. This is mostly if you try to launch them from the desktop because Vista automatically gives programs launched from there less rights. Vista moved the location of user profiles. If "Documents and Settings" was hardcoded in an application and now doesn't exist that screws the pooch. Next when it comes to actually running programs again user rights come into play. Even users who are Administrators do not have full administratove privilages. You still have to modify shortcuts to apps to have them run as the SYSTEM Admin.

      Programs that were at one time affected: Adobe Reader Install Blackberry Sync LogMeIn.com Client Cisco VPN Client

      Those are just the ones I come in contact in my job. I work for a Mortgage company and I can tell you that we may never use Vista. Hopefully we can hold on to XP long enough for Microsoft to pull it's head out of its ass.

    10. Re:Fool me once..... by LearnToSpell · · Score: 5, Informative

      Are you serious? 2 seconds searching brings up something like this.

    11. Re:Fool me once..... by ObjetDart · · Score: 4, Informative
      You need to port applications from XP to Vista?

      I'm also a developer who has had to port apps from XP to Vista, and trust me, the GP is right, it's a nightmare. Most of the problems stem from the "improved" security. Vista locks down certain parts of the system pretty hard (e.g. the registry), in theory to block malware, but they wound up taking out (I'm guessing) about 75% of commercial apps along with it. Just for example, under XP, most application operations that require elevated privileges (e.g. writing to Program Files) will simply work if the application is being run by an admin. Under Vista, the OS will block the operation until the admin approves it, even though the admin is already running the app. That might be OK if it were handled transparently, but the application has to be rewritten to handle this case explicitly.

      Any substantial commercial XP application that has been around for any significant amount of time will almost certainly run into problems under Vista. Perhaps in theory a 100% perfectly well behaved Windows application that doesn't do one thing even slightly wrong anywhere might have a chance of working immediately under Vista, but how many real world applications are 100% perfect?

      --
      I read Usenet for the articles.
    12. Re:Fool me once..... by andy9701 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If "Documents and Settings" was hardcoded in an application and now doesn't exist that screws the pooch.


      While technically "Documents and Settings" doesn't exist anymore (user profiles are in C:\Users, which is amazingly easy type given typical MS paths), they put a (hidden) link at C:\Documents and Settings that points to C:\Users so that programs of this nature won't break. Whether they should have done that or not is another topic.

      In response to the GP, basically anything that is security related could potentially need to be rewritten. A lot of this stems from the fact that, by default in XP all users were Admins (yes, not secure...but that is how it is/was). In Vista, even if you are an Admin you don't have full admin rights without jumping through hoops.

      For example, the application that I work on sometimes needs to spawn a child process that requires full admin privileges (the app itself can run as a normal user). In previous versions, we were calling CreateProcess() to start it, and redirecting standard output to retrieve the results of the child process. However, for whatever reason, you can't use CreateProcess() to start a child process with higher rights than the original process - that doesn't trigger the consent (Allow or Deny) dialog. You need to use ShellExecute() for this, which (helpfully) doesn't allow you to redirect standard output.

      This is just one example of the many small, annoying "features" we had to work around in order to correctly work on Vista.
    13. Re:Fool me once..... by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Funny

      The definition of "have to" you are using is so narrow it is meaningless. You don't *have* to breathe oxygen. Unless you want to live. I have a homebrew methane hack I'm working on. Pretty soon I'll be able to tell Big Oxygen to go take a flying fuck.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    14. Re:Fool me once..... by jimstapleton · · Score: 3, Informative

      Interesting. I've litterally worked with hundreds of people who have not had issues with Windows machines with a good internet connection, and machines that are up between 8 and 24 hours a day. Probably less than a third have had any serious issues with Windows 2000 or XP.

      The trick?
      1) Don't download and run random crap - that goes for any OS.
      2) Sit behind a decent firewall - that also goes for any OS.
      3) Don't have a blank or stupid password - hmm, again, good advice for any OS.
      4) Get security updates regularly - again, same for any OS, though it happens more often for windows.
      5) Don't use IE unless necessary - I'd say "same for any OS," but it is hard to violate this one on other OSes.

      So, 5 is the only serious difference.

      Oh, and since the other relpy was a bit of an ass - regarding NT - saying Windows NT is like 98 with better networking, is like saying MacOS X is like MacOS 9 with better networking - in both cases it is a completely different OS, that happens to have quite a number of backwards compatibility features.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    15. Re:Fool me once..... by Ravenscall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's okay, I do. Every time I upgrade any hardware in my machine, I have to call MS to reactivate my copy because it tells me the key has been used to many time. Luckily, the nice ladies in India never have a problem giving me an activation code. However, I shudder to think what is going to happen the first time I upgrade after they EOL XP.

      --
      You say you want a revolution....
    16. Re:Fool me once..... by Nazlfrag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You'll become enlightened to the fact that that cracks have legitimate purposes too.

    17. Re:Fool me once..... by caluml · · Score: 3, Interesting

      C:\Users I didn't know that. Now, if they can just move crucial binaries for system operation to c:\bin, other binaries into c:\usr\bin, and install applications in c:\opt, we'll be getting somewhere.

      (Let's not confuse them with sbin dirs - just yet.)

      What was that quote about understanding, and reinventing - badly? Next they'll do away with the registry and go back to config files, not require a GUI for some server type stuff, and improve their cmd.exe.....
    18. Re:Fool me once..... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anybody want to address whether you can move "C:\Users" to its own partition - so you don't have to worry about losing profiles when you reinstall the OS?

      Thought not.

      See here for issues with even trying:

      Biggest problem with backups on Windows - Documents and Settings. Why? Because if you try to back it up, you get errors because Windows has open files in there that you can't touch from within the OS.

      Can you say STUPID? I knew you could.

      Try backing up /home from within Linux. Problems? Nope.

      Try reinstalling Linux with your /home on another partition - the preferred "best practices" setup on Linux. Problems? Nope.

      And if anybody at Microsoft from 1990 on had any clue, they would have looked at how UNIX did this simple stuff. It isn't rocket science, it's common sense and experience running an OS from the 1970's.

      And Microsoft ignored all of it.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  2. I've already experienced this... by Hanners1979 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I had to reactivate my copy of Windows Vista Ultimate after updating an NVIDIA network controller driver via Windows Update. Not a huge pain, but it simply shouldn't happen. Ever.

    1. Re:I've already experienced this... by RudyHartmann · · Score: 5, Informative

      I just added some more memory to my machine and I had to re-activate. I had 1G and added another 1G. Then it started nagging me about re-activating. I couldn't believe it. Really lame.

      --
      Oh, yeah! Wise guy, huh? Woob woob woob woob! Nyuk! Nyuk!
    2. Re:I've already experienced this... by varmittang · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not a pain now, but when you update your drivers for something else like NIC card, well, reactivate again. Then the video card so you can play that new game a with some better frame rates, reactivate again. Upgrade the BIOS on the Motherboard, reactivate again. This will become a huge pain once you have to do this a bunch of times over the life of your computer. And as an IT worker who sometimes have to do these driver updates or BIOS updates for flaws in them that cause problems, especially BIOS updates on laptops to get the fans or docking stations to work properly, this will become a real pain when the Vista upgrade comes.

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    3. Re:I've already experienced this... by snark23 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had Vista running in vmware. Changing the virtual machine's allocated memory from 512 to 768 also forces reactivation... what a pain in the ass.

      The advantage of doing this in a virtual environment is that "pkill -9 vmware" in a blind rage is a lot cheaper than throwing your computer out the window.

      ("Windows, meet window!")

  3. To all potentials looking to Vista as a solution.. by Tastecicles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...to a question that was never asked: Don't say we didn't warn you.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  4. Pirated version? by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is there a decent pirated version of Vista yet? I usually use the pirated version of software, even if I have paid for it. Everything works better that way... games don't need disks inserted, XP doesn't need activation or WGA, etc. The pirates have a better product.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    1. Re:Pirated version? by digitalunity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I do this as well. My computers came with Windows XP and a bunch of OEM crap on them. I downloaded a cracked version of XP to avoid the OEM crapware, advertising, 'free' promo software and the bullshit of Windows itself forcing me to reactivate it after making hardware changes.

      So, I paid for XP, and I got XP. I'm happy.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    2. Re:Pirated version? by richie2000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      But isn't it possible the pirated versions might also come with a pre-installed root kit? What, Sony pirates Windows XP now?
      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    3. Re:Pirated version? by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you don't like their rules, don't play their game. Why?

      Seriously, why let them set the rules?
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Pirated version? by LordSnooty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because it's their product? You have choices.

    5. Re:Pirated version? by The_Noid · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except it's not stealing, it's copyright infringement.
      "They" really like it if you make that mistake, but there is a big difference between the two.

    6. Re:Pirated version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, I paid for [a locked version of] XP, and I [stole an unlocked version of] XP. I'm happy.

      I edited your last statement for accuracy.

      If you don't like their rules, don't play their game.


      Please look up the definition of theft. I'm sick of people who think that copyright infringement is actually stealing. While they are both illegal, they are two distinct concepts. And if you actually know the difference, shame on you for propagating the lie that copyright infringement equals theft. Especially in a post that presumes to correct the accuracy of another.

    7. Re:Pirated version? by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is there a decent pirated version of Vista yet?

      Nope. Pirated or not, Vista is still indecent.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  5. I don't get it... by oldosadmin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What other industry is there that abuses their customers like this? I feel like I'm being accused of criminal activity from the first second I install a MS product now.

    --
    Jay | http://oldos.org
    1. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I feel like I'm being accused of criminal activity from the first second I install a MS product now.

      Likewise. This is why I refuse to install Vista on any new PC I'm putting together, or to accept the "upgrades" to things like Media Player that make them worse. I don't even have to jump to an alternative platform such as Linux or Mac, nor do I need to break the law and pirate something: I just buy XP instead. As long as people keep doing this, retailers will get the message and keep supplying it. When enough big retailers are losing out on profits because of Vista, they will make their feelings clear enough to Microsoft, and either the problem will go away or the Microsoft executives responsible will start going away.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    2. Re:I don't get it... by budword · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Neither will happen. Microsoft has a monopoly. They are completely insulated from the consequences of their actions, know it, and act accordingly.

    3. Re:I don't get it... by jimicus · · Score: 5, Funny

      What other industry is there that abuses their customers like this?

      Prostitutes specialising in S&M?

  6. A similar experience is what drove me away from by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Windows for good. I had bought a retail copy of XP(not cheap!) and installed it on my laptop. However, a bug with XP caused it to crash before I could activate it(hell, before I even knew I had to) and managed to reset the clock to 1980. Usually this would just be a minor annoyance, but it turns out that if you monkey with the clock before you activate XP(and maybe even after, I don't know), they assume you are trying to pirate it and refuse to let you do anything. So after I plunked down $200 for the thing, I had to go call their number(and this was overseas, so there were some language issues to boot) and take a half hour out of my day to prove to them I didn't steal the thing I just bought. It was at that point I realized there are other OSs out there, and I have been Windows free for 4 years and couldn't be happier.

    This problem is hardly unique to Vista, and is just going to drive more and more people away from Microsoft. Microsoft still acts like they are the only game in town. They just refuse to accept that the competition has improved significantly from the time XP was released....

  7. Windows Zenith by suso · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Your mouse moved, click here to re-register Windows Zenith. Make sure you have your birth certificate and blood sample ready. Or click cancel to go into RTFM"

  8. Steve Jobs... by youthoftoday · · Score: 5, Funny

    This wouldn't happen on a Mac. 'Cos in most of them you can't even get in there to change the graphics card.

    --
    -1 not first post
  9. Makes OS X and Linux look all the better by TibbonZero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If Vista had actually done all of the things it promised, and didn't do any bullshit like this then it might actually be a decent operating system. Microsoft's viability might have actually been there.

    Main differences being vs Linux/Apple is that Apple is a hardware company and could care less if a small fraction of their user base pirates an operating system as long as they are buying hardware and are spreading the good word, and linux makers... want either support contracts or nothing.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
  10. And by ktappe · · Score: 4, Insightful
    And in completely unrelated *cough* news, Apple said yesterday that 50% of Mac sales are to those who hadn't used Macs before.

    No, seriously folks, at some point these stories about Vista have to lead to a stampede away from the product. Just watch for the signs....like the one above.

    --
    "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
  11. Notice? by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Funny

    your copy of Windows will stop working with very little notice (three days)

    I don't know about anyone else, but if my OS stopped working after three days I'd definitely notice.

    1. Re:Notice? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know about anyone else, but if my OS stopped working after three days I'd definitely notice.

      That's because, most likely, your OS is not a Microsoft one.

      In all thruthyness there's not much difference between a working Windows install, and a non-working one. In both cases, both user and the computer are un-productive, but in the case of a non-working install only more so.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  12. Re:Wow by AVee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Good reason to use open-source software. Or at least software from a company that doesn't treat it's customers as criminals by default.

    But hey, it's your money, your PC, your loss.

  13. Yes, but... by Xeth · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...this minor inconvenience is clearly offset by the massive benefits inherent in a new GUI skin.

    --
    If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
  14. Cost of Vista's copy protection by sfranklin · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those that haven't yet seen the reason why changing hardware hoses your Vista and are interested in the details, I highly recommend this:

    http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html

    It's all about the DRM.

    --
    Skip Franklin
    It's always darkest just before it goes pitch black. -- despair.com
  15. Well they made their beds, so now ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ... they should sleep in it.

    When MSFT was touting the The Total Cost of Ownership studies, did anyone ask, if the costs included reacting to unwanted updates? How many times people have spoken about vendor lock and the risk of putting all your eggs in one basket? Trashed everyone as MSFT hate-mongers. It will only get worse. If the revenue stream is threatened MSFT will slip in another forced update make it more and more difficult to switch to alternatives. Because, get this, MSFT can charge you all the way up to your switching costs. The only way it can increase revenue is by increasing your switching cost.

    Put yourself in MSFT's shoes and imagine what you would do. A security issue crops up. One team comes back with a solution that does not break all the competitors products. The other team comes up with a solution that incidentally breaks competitors products. Which one will you pick as "critical security update"? MSFT is doing exactly what it should rationally do, given its market share. It is the customers who are irrationally picking MSFT solutions against their own best interests.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  16. Reduced functionality? by bareman · · Score: 5, Funny

    "reduced functionality" mode, where you can't do anything but use the web browser for half an hour."

    For a percentage of the users being able to use the web browser for half an hour is all they want and need. Not being able to run spyware/malware for that half hour might make this "Desired functionality" mode.

  17. You don't get it. by Organic+Brain+Damage · · Score: 3, Funny

    "What other industry is there that abuses their customers like this?"

    Been on a commercial airliner lately? How about 8 hours on the tarmac without airconditioning strapped into a seat that's 2" too narrow with 300-lb companions on either side of you and crying toddlers behind and in front of you. Vista won't seem so bad after you get off that plane.

    How about Tobacco? They don't abuse their customers, they just cripple and then kill them.

    Meat packing? Widespread E-coli outbreaks. At least Vista doesn't give you gut-wrenching bloody diarrhea (although I hear MS Reasarch is working toward this goal).

  18. Feature? by ilovegeorgebush · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wasn't this an advertised feature of the OS back before its release? Either that, or it was an EFF warning.

    Sure I've heard it somewhere, though.

  19. Re:Wow by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From what I've heard, Mac OS doesn't do this kind of stuff either. It's a little different, since it requires specific apple hardware to run the OS, but there's nothing stopping you from running out and getting a pirated copy of Leopard once it gets released, and running that on your older Mac. I understand how stopping pirates is a good thing, but it should never be done at the expense of your paying customers.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  20. Sneezing can cause deactivation... by benmhall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Or at least is seems like that some times.

    At work, I have a laptop (ThinkPad T60) that dual-boots Ubuntu and Vista. Vista is on there only as a way to force myself to get used to it, as I have to support it. Early after Vista's release, an update _from Microsoft_ caused it to be deactivated, had to call MS. (This was later an acknowledged bug that they patched.)

    More recently, I used Ghost to go from a 120GB drive down to an 80GB. This too knocked out the activation and the system went into reduced functionality mode. I had to call MS, eventually got someone in India (who I have to admit was very polite and spoke very well.) I had to read off what seemed like a 40 digit code _twice_. Once to the voice-activated system and then again to the person. (No, they apparently couldn't cache this very annoying and labourious bit of data entry.)

    I told him why I was having to call and also warned that, as a SysAdmin, I do this kind of thing all of the time and that I was sure I'd be calling again with this exact same Microsoft-imposed problem on this exact same system. I was politely told that this is how the product works and that there was no way around this.

    This from an MSDN-issued Vista Business edition. Ugh.

    Thankfully, installing Ubuntu on it didn't knock out activation, though I wouldn't put it past MS in the future. If I didn't have to support it at work, I wouldn't touch Vista with a ten foot pole. My hope is that MS eventually tightens the screws enough to push everyone away. So far though, people seem to be much more tolerant of this sort of thing than I would have hoped.

  21. I've posted about this before by kimvette · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've posted about this issue before but was accused of making shit up just to slam Microsoft.

    Wrong. I used to be a die-hard Microsoft fan, until they introduced the broken Activation scheme. Even back in the days of Windows XP. driver upgrades or reinstalls could de-activate Windows. This is why I am so adamantly against Activation schemes - at least schemes which do not allow for license transfers. It sucks, too. If delivering a bunch of workstations to a client where the client wants them pre-activated and added to their domain, you have to activate the system. Now, sometimes one will run into incompatibilities and have to upgrade a wireless driver or video driver (or add additional hardware - and yes, I've even seen USB device driver upgrades trigger deactivation) and if you've got the OEM version, guess what? You need to wait on hold with Microsoft to re-activate the system.

    Granted, it doesn't happen often. It does have a knack of happening at exactly the wrong time.

    Microsoft: you own the market. Drop the activation scheme. Also, where XP is nearing end of life, isn't it time to follow through with your promise to release a patch which will eliminate the need to activate Windows XP? I mean, Vista has been out for nearly a year now. . .

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  22. Re:How much Apple and Red Hat stock does Bill have by J0nne · · Score: 4, Funny

    5 bucks says that china and microsoft will control most of the world in 20 years. wouldn't surprise me a bit to learn that all government machines using vista suddenly shut down when china invades. I'd take you up on it, but i doubt $5 will be worth a damn in 20 years, especially if you're right...
  23. Timing by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    Put simply, your copy of Windows will stop working with very little notice (three days) and your PC will go into "reduced functionality" mode...

    Would this be a bad time to mention that Leopard has 300 new features?

    Or that you don't even have a serial number to enter, much less activation concerns?

    Windows guys, if you are tired of Mac "fanbois" kicking you in the rear stop issuing us steel-toed boots and bending over with a big target taped to your posterior!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  24. Re:Linux will never do this by discord5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linux will never do this. Ever. Period.

    Oh really? Never say never. ;)

  25. Crippleware by Enrique1218 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft has been doing this for years with XP. Now, it seems the company has taken it to the next level with Vista and make it more annoying. Activation is really just a nuisance, but one that illustrates the relationship MS has with its customer. Namely, everyone is a pirate and must be controlled and customers start to believe it themselves! At my school, I need to rebuild the XP Pro on a school computer but I don't have the media. I call the schools IT department and they told me that Microsoft has told them that too many computers have the same license and are hesitant to give me the media. However, the computer came with Windows XP Pro and has a sticker right on the side. Should it really matter under what license the OS is installed? When a company treats you like a criminal and constricts your productivity with draconian policies, its is time to look for an alternative. Let's hope you are lucky enough to not need Windows.

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  26. Re:biggest mistake ms ever made by plague3106 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hmm.. do you tell your friends, family or clients that you're not using it because you can't steal it yet? Or do you leave that part out?

    I imagine it wouldn't scare them at all if you told them the full truth. Nobody is going to NOT buy a car because you can't steal it..

  27. Re:Wow by xeoron · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well... look on the bright side, if you have to run Vista, you can always install cygwin and run Wine to support more of the programs that Vista just does not want to continue to support.... or turn Vista as large thin client and run those must have software on another Windows box or virtual server instance. May not be a pretty solution, but at aleast people have options.

  28. Re:deactivated? so? by sherpajohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Did you miss the part of the article where its clearly stated, he could not reactive it without calling MS support to get a new code? Happened to my wife with XP, what a freeking pain.

    --

    Going on means going far
    Going far means returning
  29. Something is Wrong... by BoRegardless · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I as a customer have to pay for the OS, and then have to put in my own time at $xy per hour to "fix" the OS, when routine actions occur, as described elsewhere.

    Top management decisions at MS are loading up their legitimate customers with extra work, lost income and frustration. Frustration is what doomed T-Mobile's relationship with me, and I dumped them in spite of their cancellation fee (reduce my "plan" and they automatically tack on another 2 year minimum period before I could cancel for free - that is the definition of CRAP.).

    Not all the frustrations come from DRM. For heaven's sake, Registry glitches and other things that don't or stop working are a pain in XP. My WiFi on XP simply disappeared as an option in the Networking section. That has NEVER happened on my Macs.

    If I ever get a chance to run SolidWorks on something other than Windows, I'll be one of the first to jump ship from Microsoft...forever.

  30. And one of those choices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    is to hack the product YOU BOUGHT so that you can use it properly.

    If MS doesn't like it, they can try not selling their software. They have choices.

  31. Re:biggest mistake ms ever made by Drachemorder · · Score: 3, Informative

    That BIOS hack works quite well and even makes Vista believe it's activated. It bypasses all these activation issues quite nicely. Even if your copy of Vista is legitimate, it's worth using the crack just to ensure that you don't get bothered by activation nonsense.

  32. Acrobat by PadRacerExtreme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    as a result Adobe Acrobat and Distiller doesn't work unless you have 7.2 or later - kinda annoying for people that have acrobat 5/6 and have been happy with it for a while .. and no Adobe didn't release a fix allowing them to work in vista.. Adobe's fix is for you to buy the latest version .. Hmm... An application from 2001 (5) or 2003 (6) doesn't work on an operating system that is from 2007? And the company doesn't want to support an application that is 3 versions and 6 years old? Gee, that is a shocker.

    Are you asking for bug fixes in a Linux kernel from 6 years ago? Nope, And Linus wouldn't give release them anyway. But I don't hear anyone yelling at about that.....
    --
    Just remember - if the world didn't suck, we would all fall off.
    1. Re:Acrobat by TheGeneration · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree, you can't blame Adobe for not wanting to fix a 5 year old application which is 3 versions out of date. You can blame Microsoft though for breaking it. If it worked it should continue to work.

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
    2. Re:Acrobat by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree, you can't blame Adobe for not wanting to fix a 5 year old application which is 3 versions out of date. You can blame Microsoft though for breaking it. If it worked it should continue to work.

      I find myself doing the unusual position of supporting MS here. A lot of applications did things The Wrong Way or used undefined, undocumented behaviors that they should never have relied upon.

      An example for coders: imagine a system function named "foo" that returns 0 on success or nonzero on failure. The XP implementation happened to return 1 as its specific, unchanging value of nonzero, although that was never documented anywhere. It just did. In Vista, foo is modified so that it still returns 0 on success, or one of many defined constant values specifying exactly which error occurred. Finally, imagine that lazy programmers who should've been writing

      if !foo() { handle error }

      were instead writing

      if foo() == 1 { handle error }

      because those two have been functionally identical for a few years.

      In that all-too-common scenario, what is MS supposed to do? Their main options are:

      1. Revert to the old behavior, preventing all new software from benefitting from that functionality.
      2. Keep the new, better behavior but endure endless whining from people using fundamentally broken software.
      3. Change the program loader to wrap each executable and library with checks like

        if progname == 'adobeBrokenv1.3' { use old api }

      I don't envy them the hole they dug for themselves. They would have been far better off if long ago they'd made it clear that their published API was a contract. If you follow it to the letter then your programs would continue to work. If you break with it, all bets are off. Everyone else does this. If you link against GNU libc and your software suddenly crashing, its maintainers would look at what you're doing and either fix libc or tell you that you'd screwed up and to fix your software to follow the published docs. Instead, MS once again used a greedy algorithm to optimize in the short term for developers! developers! developers! no matter how badly that screwed up their underpinnings.

      Honestly, I think .NET is perhaps their last chance to get this right. I think they should take a hardline and change constant values and randomize undefined return values and otherwise deliberate tweak things so that API-compliant software would still work fine but everything else would crash horribly every other month or so. It'd be a painful transition for people used to the idea of MS doing the work of fixing vendor software for the rest of eternity, but maybe they could finally get rid of the backward bug compatibility albatross around their neck.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:Acrobat by gmack · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you asking for bug fixes in a Linux kernel from 6 years ago? Nope, And Linus wouldn't give release them anyway. But I don't hear anyone yelling at about that.....

      Linus won't what?
      The latest 2.4 version of the Linux kernel is: 2.4.35.3
      The latest prepatch for the 2.4 Linux kernel tree is: 2.4.36-pre1
      The latest 2.2 version of the Linux kernel is: 2.2.26
      The latest prepatch for the 2.2 Linux kernel tree is: 2.2.27-rc2

      Ok so linux 2.2 and 2.4 are still being actively maintained.. how old are those?
      Jan 28 1999 linux-2.2.1.tar.gz
      Jan 30 2001 linux-2.4.1.tar.gz

      So your wrong.. you can get Linux kernel patches from 5 year old versions and older.

    4. Re:Acrobat by TheGeneration · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see a compelling reason for maintaining both of them.

      I said they should deprecate it, which means they aren't maintaining it, or supporting it, they are merely keeping it for the purpose of not breaking everything that was written to the way it used to work.

      I know in my work as a software engineer that I would literally by thrown out on my head if I went through our code and started modifying existing methods so that they had "better output" without fixing everything single method that referenced it to deal with this new "better output." It's much better to just deprecate the old method and inform all the people down the line of the new method to replace the now deprecated method.

      We're not talking a tiny change here to an existing method that nobody ever uses. We're talking a tiny change to an existing method that every program in the universe and across all dimensions of time and space use. People in the 10th dimension are seriously WTFing Microsoft right now. Hardcore multidimensional WTFing.

      pew pew pew!!!

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
  33. Follow the money. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    MOD PARENT UP. Quote: "Any substantial commercial XP application that has been around for any significant amount of time will almost certainly run into problems under Vista."

    Follow the money. Microsoft apparently wants you to pay, and pay, and pay again. Big commercial software companies will advertise Vista if it is necessary to buy a new version of their software to use with Vista.

    Apparently to Microsoft the user is not the customer. Microsoft apparently considers the user just a dog on a leash.

    I suppose the constant negative stories about Microsoft make it difficult for Microsoft to hire the really good programmers. If that is true, expect more unfinished products with poor characteristics in the future.

    People think that Microsoft is a software company that is routinely abusive. But maybe it isn't. Maybe Microsoft is an abuse company that uses software as a means of delivering abuse. If you look at it that way, Microsoft is excellent at what it does.

    We seem to live in a society dominated by abusers. For another example, Cheney and Bush, who with their friends and family have a long history of oil and weapons investing, are allowed the conflict of interest of deciding to have wars to get control of oil supply. The result is that the value of your money is falling. Rich people who are heavily invested in companies that can raise prices want inflation partly because inflation causes the value of the money they pay employees to drop.

  34. This happened to me this past weekend by farbles · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I had my Vista drive booted up to update drivers and try out the new video card.

    Warning! Warning! You have three days to activate Vista or it will be in reduced functionality mode.

    WTF? The video card was the first hardware change in six months. And WTF is with the three day warning when I can run Vista as a non-registered user for weeks??

    *Fine* I click on the activation icon and get told my license is already in use so I have to do the telephone activation.

    I hate the telephone activation. First you have to phone them up and type in the 46 number sequence (WTF, am I arming an ICBM here?) then they always tell you that you'll have to talk to a representative who asks you for the 46 number sequence again since the last machine just went and chucked out the one you just spent ten minutes reading into the phone. Then you have to type in a different 46 digit ICBM arming code to use the OS you already paid money for. The call cost $5 on my friend's pay-as-you-go cell phone.

    Hey, Microsoft! I paid $300 for your POS OS. If I had pirated it I would have none of this bullcrap but no, I had to be an honest customer and this is my reward. Do you wonder people hate you?

    And this is caused by driver updating yet. The one thing a Vista user has no choice but to do is update all multimedia drivers every few weeks as new releases come out to fix the previous releases problems with Vista.

    Amazing business model there, Lou. You guys think of this by yourselves, did you?

  35. Re:biggest mistake ms ever made by Deadplant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    LOL! you're kidding right?
    dude, the deactivation/re-activation hassles are for paying customers only.
    If you pirate it then you use an activation crack.