Slashdot Mirror


Evidence of Historical Zombie Attack at Hierakonpolis

sertsa writes "A tongue-in-cheek article just published by the Archaeological Institute of America hypothesizes that the formation of ancient Egypt is linked to recurrent Predynastic zombie attacks due to outbreaks of Solanum virus. 'From the very beginning of Predynastic research, Sir W.M. Flinders Petrie reported several headless, but seemingly intact, burials during his famous excavations at Naqada in 1895. Further excavations at Gerzeh and other sites revealed more of these curious burials, but no satisfactory explanation could be proposed at the time. More recently, excavations in the non-elite cemetery at Hierakonpolis (HK43), undertaken from 1996 to 2004, have uncovered more of these strange headless burials in addition to 21 individuals whose cervical vertebrae bear cut marks indicative of complete decapitation. The individuals include men and women ranging in age from 16 to 65. The number and the standard position of the cut marks (usually on the second-fourth cervical vertebrae; always from the front) indicate an effort far greater than that needed simply to cause the death of a normal (uninfected) person. The standard position also indicates these are not injuries sustained during normal warfare.'"

22 of 244 comments (clear)

  1. Everyone knows it was not zombie attacks by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 4, Funny

    The problem is that the scientist incorrectly classified these as zombie attacks.

    Everyone with an ounce of scientific training can tell that these were actually attacks by ninja pirates, and that the vampire zombies were defending the inhabitants.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Everyone knows it was not zombie attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Everyone with an ounce of scientific training can tell that these were actually attacks by ninja pirates, and that the vampire zombies were defending the inhabitants. "Ninja pirates" is an oxymoron. Ninjas and pirates mix like oil and water. Pirates are holy creatures. Ninjas are devil spawn. Pirates like water (except for bathing). Ninjas are landlubbers. Pirates say 'arr matey.' Ninjas don't say a single Goddamn thing. They are nothing alike! You could try sewing (or bolting) two together but they would soon kill each other--the pirate killing the ninja with his stench and the ninja killing the pirate with throwing stars.
  2. reminds me of..... by edwardpickman · · Score: 4, Funny

    It reminds me of a classic The Onion story about evidence of a race of a skeletons found all over the world. I'm sure creationist would see evidence of a race of skeletons being proof that evolution was false since there is no way a race of skeletons could evolve.

    1. Re:reminds me of..... by phoebusQ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That has to be the hardest I've ever seen someone work to fit an anti-religion message into a post.

    2. Re:reminds me of..... by VultureMN · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anti-creationist != anti-religion

      I'm not religious, but am not bothered by people who are.

      But creationists annoy the living shit out of me because of the tortured "logic" they try to use while attempting to justify their belief that the earth is only 6000 years old.

    3. Re:reminds me of..... by aled · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sure creationist would see evidence of a race of skeletons being proof that evolution was false since there is no way a race of skeletons could evolve.


      That's ludicrous! There's plenty of factual evidence that shows the evolutions of hominid skeleton evolution into human skeleton. Curiously they seem to have inhabited the same places that hominid and humans, but there's not yet enough scientific evidence to prove this theory.
      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    4. Re:reminds me of..... by aled · · Score: 5, Funny

      Go ahead, be the reproductive-system-nazi of this thread if you want. But first answer these questions: If skeletons can't reproduce, why can we find so many of them buried? Where Skeletor does came from? Army of Darkness was better than Evil Dead II?

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    5. Re:reminds me of..... by DigitalWallaby · · Score: 5, Funny

      Skeletons reproduce by jumping each others bones.

  3. hmm by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know why everyone hates on zombies. I mean, zombies were people too.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:hmm by CaptainPatent · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't it obvious!?

      Anyone with half a brain, well...
      is probably being attacked by a zombie.

      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
  4. Proof? by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Funny

    We all know that zombies tend to gravitate towards malls, or high school proms and such. If they found headless remains outside a prehistoric shopping mall, then I'd be convinced.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  5. Lurch post by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 5, Funny

    This lends new meaning to the phrase "walk like an Egyptian"

  6. French Revolution by Aaron+Denney · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, I bet this could also explain the heavy use of the guillotine during the French revolution.

  7. Re:What's the deal with this? by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Plus the site TFA is hosted on is apparently a publication from The Archaeological Institute of America...??

          October, Halloween. Even archaeologists have a sense of humor. Get one today!

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  8. Re:I read this in the Zombie Survival Handbook by mrt181 · · Score: 5, Funny

    you are wrong, oil-thirsty vampires took over the white house in 2001

  9. Young earth by CustomDesigned · · Score: 4, Informative
    6000 years != Creationist

    The young earth theory isn't even classic Christianity, having become popular in the US in the 18th century. The church fathers had a variety of theories, and literally counting the years was a 17th century invention. Augustine noted that time as we know it is itself part of this creation, and therefore the 6 days in Genesis 1 could not refer to time in this universe. He speculated that the 6 days were a 6 day "seminar" where the new creation was was presented and explained to the angels.

    1. Re:Young earth by Penguinshit · · Score: 5, Funny

      We're the result of a 6 day Powerpoint presentation??!?

      That sure explains a few things...

    2. Re:Young earth by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now everything makes sense!

      I mean, look at it. First day, light and darkness, works fine. Reason? Angels were fresh and actually listening.

      And from there on it went downhill, right to the 6th day with human. Now tell me, can you sit through 6 days of a boring presentation? I'm fairly sure by the end of the 5th day, every Angel was just sitting there doodling.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Young earth by CustomDesigned · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While your premise is true, you missed the point that our time is part of the creation - or in computer terms it is simulation time. Simulation time is neither longer nor shorter than time in the host machine/universe. You can run the simulation/virtual machine fast or slow or backward or forward, or restore to a checkpoint. "But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day..." (2Peter 3:8,10).

  10. TFA is hilarious by steveha · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you enjoy understated, dry humor, go read the article. It's wonderful.

    "While it is an attractive idea, no serious archaeologist would hang their fedora on it without further evidence." Sure; every serious archaeologist wears an Indiana Jones hat, goes without saying.

    "Overall, those with cut marks represent less than 4% of the cemetery's population. Thus, one might suggest that the threat of zombification was relatively low, and those manifesting the disease were dealt with swiftly (though in some cemeteries evidence for cannibalism has also been found suggesting that one or two got a good meal first)." It goes on to suggest that the need for swift anti-zombie action may have led to the early invention of government by kings.

    If zombies re-emerge as a threat in modern times: "Almost certainly the first sign of infection will come from the Hierakonpolis team. [...] The unfortunate side effect of the infection starting within this specialized group of researchers is that they are generally the least squeamish about decapitation duty. I know for a fact that Sean Dougherty, a physical anthropologist with extensive experience at the site, wouldn't hesitate to lop off the head of any member of the team at any time, and for any reason."

    Go read it!

    http://www.archaeology.org/online/features/hierakonpolis/zombies.html

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  11. Oi! I'm not a virus!! by solanum · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cheeky sods.

    --
    Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
  12. Re:What's the deal with this? by evilviper · · Score: 4, Funny

    Uhh, am I just missing something here? Is this article a joke?

    No, it's not a joke. It's 100% serious. That's why it was posted under the category "It's funny. Laugh." and the first few words of the summary are "A tongue-in-cheek article".

    That's the sign of a dead-serious story right there.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant