Slashdot Mirror


Hidden Music Claimed In Da Vinci Painting

snib sends us to CNN for coverage of an Italian musician and computer technician who claims to have uncovered a hidden musical score in Leonardo Da Vinci's "Last Supper." Giovanni Maria Pala published this and other findings about the 'Last Supper' painting in his book The Hidden Music, released in Italy Friday. "[This raises] the possibility that the Renaissance genius might have left behind a somber composition to accompany the scene depicted in the 15th-century wall painting. 'It sounds like a requiem,' Giovanni Maria Pala said. 'It's like a soundtrack that emphasizes the passion of Jesus.'"

220 comments

  1. I found Jar Jar Binks... by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure if you look hard enough, you can find anything you want in that painting. Anyways, RMS wants this story to be called HIDDEN MUSIC CLAIMED IN GNU/LAST SUPPER.

    1. Re:I found Jar Jar Binks... by moderatorrater · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly. I just found the words "vote Romney" in ascii values in the value of Pi. My hands are tied...

    2. Re:I found Jar Jar Binks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vampyre_Dark of Shadowrealm and Hollow Earth?

    3. Re:I found Jar Jar Binks... by tacocat · · Score: 1

      This is nothing new. We all know that the real answer is a Rabbit. Hippitus Hoppitus domini

    4. Re:I found Jar Jar Binks... by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

      I am interested in your comments and would like to sign up to your newspaper. Or rather, as I just read from your post, "the cow is in the fourth slipper" - could you elaborate?

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    5. Re:I found Jar Jar Binks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the spoon shall dance with the hats of zeus!

    6. Re:I found Jar Jar Binks... by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      You mean "42", right?

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    7. Re:I found Jar Jar Binks... by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 1

      I was in Hollow Earth for ten seconds, Mr Coward. I saw that 5 people had 5 different ideas of what HE was going to be, so I got out before the insanity. =0) Anyways, Mr Coward, if you're looking for me, you can find me at properlypromoted.com/vb

    8. Re:I found Jar Jar Binks... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      I'm sure if you look hard enough, you can find anything you want

      This is also called the "Infinite Monkey theorem", which states that a monkey hitting keys at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time will almost surely type a particular chosen text, such as the complete works of William Shakespeare.

    9. Re:I found Jar Jar Binks... by angus_rg · · Score: 1

      If you've ever seen History of the World Part 1, you'd know that stenography was used to hide Mel Brooks in the painting.

  2. In other news...minuet found in hamburglar's lunch by mveloso · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This has to be one of the most creative promotional stunts ever. It's difficult enough to get anyone to listen to new music, but tying your piece to the last supper is truly a work of genius.

  3. Why are slashdotters by crowbarsarefornerdyg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So quick to dismiss this? I understand that most of you probably have no particular religious beliefs, or none at all, but what's to say that DaVinci wasn't the kind of man to try to disguise something inside one of his paintings? I still like to think it takes a truly open mind to discover the places technology can truly take us.

    --
    "Slapping lipstick on a pig does NOT make it Natalie Portman. Paris Hilton, maybe, but not Portman." - UncleTogie
    1. Re:Why are slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I still like to think it takes a truly open mind to discover the places technology can truly take us.

      But as Richard Dawkins likes to say, not so open your brains fall out. I'm wondering how long it takes for people to find secret "music" in other paintings and photographs... parodists, start your engines...

    2. Re:Why are slashdotters by MOBE2001 · · Score: 1

      So quick to dismiss this?

      Uh... They're a bunch of stupid geeks? ahahaha...

    3. Re:Why are slashdotters by crowbarsarefornerdyg · · Score: 1

      Did I say anything about having to believe in any religion? No. I only made the comment because religion is brought up in TFA.

      --
      "Slapping lipstick on a pig does NOT make it Natalie Portman. Paris Hilton, maybe, but not Portman." - UncleTogie
    4. Re:Why are slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is CNN. Why do we need a reason to dismiss it?

    5. Re:Why are slashdotters by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Funny
      So quick to dismiss this?

      It can't be music.

      The RIAA hasn't tried to extort money for it.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    6. Re:Why are slashdotters by crowbarsarefornerdyg · · Score: 1

      I think I just discovered a new oxymoron: Stupid Geeks. LOL

      --
      "Slapping lipstick on a pig does NOT make it Natalie Portman. Paris Hilton, maybe, but not Portman." - UncleTogie
    7. Re:Why are slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Did *he* say anything about religion? No, he made a statement that is general skepticism... skeptical, in this case, about a dubious claim of a song. The fact that you generalized it to religion says something about *you,* not *him.*

    8. Re:Why are slashdotters by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      How can stupid and geek belong together? I urge you to return to English class 101.

    9. Re:Why are slashdotters by chuckymonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think that DaVinci was the kind of man to lead a secret society that hides the Holy Grail and the truth behind the sacred feminine. Anyway, I don't dismiss things like this completely out of hand as it's certainly within the realm of possibility. I read the article and they didn't provide a link to the song and I hope that they're not trying to get some kind of copyright on it as there is most certainly prior art(heh heh) here. Also a musician that truely loves his work can find music in just about anything hence songs like Flight of the Bumblebee, Blue Danube, and that one where the whole song tries to sound like a Typewriter.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    10. Re:Why are slashdotters by crowbarsarefornerdyg · · Score: 1

      So I am a religious person. But what was the original context for the quote he used? Arthur Sulzberger made the comment, but about what? It can be applied to anything. And why the anonymous comments?

      --
      "Slapping lipstick on a pig does NOT make it Natalie Portman. Paris Hilton, maybe, but not Portman." - UncleTogie
    11. Re:Why are slashdotters by crowbarsarefornerdyg · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      "Slapping lipstick on a pig does NOT make it Natalie Portman. Paris Hilton, maybe, but not Portman." - UncleTogie
    12. Re:Why are slashdotters by chuckymonkey · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    13. Re:Why are slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm not actually entirely sure that it was Dawkins who originally used the quote. Certainly I'm not the same as the AC who attributed the quote to him above, and I'm posting AC because I chose not to sign in, and I'll stand by that.

      The quote, however it was originally made, applies to everything. It is the general mindset of a skeptic, intended to make you question outlandish claims... you should be open to new ideas, but question them all the same.

    14. Re:Why are slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop trolling. You asked why Slashdotters are so quick to dismiss this on the THIRD POST.

      Why the insistence on being offended and starting a "woe is me" religious debate?

    15. Re:Why are slashdotters by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      Well, it really isn't smart to bite the heads off chickens and such. So I see no logical contradiction.
      From Dictionary.com:
      Geek:
      a carnival performer who performs sensationally morbid or disgusting acts, as biting off the head of a live chicken.


      I urge you to stop urging people to do things.

    16. Re:Why are slashdotters by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      One of the definitions is "Pointless; worthless"

      It is indeed possible for someone to be intelligent and still be stupid or idiotic for that matter.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    17. Re:Why are slashdotters by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Simply because if you let someone define the pattern and then let them have a large enough sample size, they'll always find an example of it. He claims that if you were to draw horizontal lines that the bodies would for musical notes, but for paintings of the last supper, this is incredibly likely to happen, and if you get 15 or so of them together, you're going to have something that sounds decently like music. If he can take that same pattern and find it in more of Da Vinci's work, then he may be onto something. Right now it's just too likely to be a fluke.

      Besides, with the number of times that it was painted over, there's no way to definitively know whether he's even viewing what Da Vinci painted.

    18. Re:Why are slashdotters by niktemadur · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm wondering how long it takes for people to find secret "music" in other paintings and photographs...

      Absolutely. Da Vinci executed his paintings (actually, everything he did) with mathematical precision, and what is music but a mathematical language, Bach being the example that stands out in my mind right now? With sophisticated enough technology, we'll be finding musical notes in Jackson Pollock's paintings - scandinavian death metal, perhaps?

      So Da Vinci was also a composer, yet hid it so well that only five centuries later it comes to light. He really kept that secret close to his breast! Typical MSM fodder, this bit of "news", in line with stories from a couple of years ago: "Coming up, ten ways you and your children are in danger of being killed tomorrow in a terrorist attack, but first, the Da Vinci Code - sinister cover-up or fiction?" All of it light years away from Occam's Razor.

      As one of the members of The Society For Putting Things On Top Of Other Things said: The whole thing's rather silly, innit?

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    19. Re:Why are slashdotters by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because slashdotters are sick of stupidity like "The Da Vinci code"?

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    20. Re:Why are slashdotters by wfberg · · Score: 1

      Apart from the organs, it sounds suspiciously like the score to the SHO series Dexter. (Not the music on the website, the main title music..)

      The one about that serial killer?

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    21. Re:Why are slashdotters by magisterx · · Score: 1

      I don't see what your religious beliefs would have to do with music being hidden in the Last Supper or not. However, while the painting is a true work of genius and one of my personal favorites, it is more likely that there is no music in there. Humans are magnificently good at finding patterns, even where none exists.

    22. Re:Why are slashdotters by venicebeach · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now I see why he hid it.

    23. Re:Why are slashdotters by mrbluze · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So quick to dismiss this? I understand that most of you probably have no particular religious beliefs, or none at all, but what's to say that DaVinci wasn't the kind of man to try to disguise something inside one of his paintings? I still like to think it takes a truly open mind to discover the places technology can truly take us. Da Vinci may not have been religious himself, but he was no fool. He was known to hide riddles in his paintings and painted with his audience in mind - in this case monks. Why wouldn't he have placed something a bit more subtle than just an obviously female looking John and fairly obvious perspective lines and other features which stand out at a glance? The claimed discovery contained more than music - Giovanni Maria Pala also found some ancient Hebrew text.
      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    24. Re:Why are slashdotters by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      I promise you that your excessive use of commas does not make you easier to understand...

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    25. Re:Why are slashdotters by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Absolutely. Da Vinci executed his paintings (actually, everything he did) with mathematical precision, and what is music but a mathematical language, Bach being the example that stands out in my mind right now? With sophisticated enough technology, we'll be finding musical notes in Jackson Pollock's paintings Yes; I'm kind of sceptical of claims such as

      "There's always a risk of seeing something that is not there, but it's certain that the spaces [in the painting] are divided harmonically," he told the AP. "Where you have harmonic proportions, you can find music." Where compositions are methodically laid out in an aesthetically pleasing way, chances are that will lend itself to non-random patterns that sound nice. (And that's on top of everything everyone else said). This really doesn't prove anything in itself.

      Anyway, I've used technology to determine what the lyrics to this piece of music are:-

      Last Supper I Gave You My Heart,
      But the very next day, you betrayed me and had me crucified.
      This year, to save me from tears,
      I'll give it to someone who's special.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    26. Re:Why are slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should we question new ideas?

    27. Re:Why are slashdotters by dangitman · · Score: 1

      I think I just discovered a new oxymoron: Stupid Geeks. LOL

      How is that an oxymoron?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    28. Re:Why are slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +10 insightful.

      But seriously. The fact that it sounds so crappy reduces the probability that it was put there intentionally.

    29. Re:Why are slashdotters by niktemadur · · Score: 4, Funny

      Last Supper I Gave You My Achy Breaky Heart
      But the very next day, you cheated on me and had me crucified

      There, fixed that for you :)

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    30. Re:Why are slashdotters by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have an idea in my head, whenever I see birds on telegraph wires (it's on the Lotus Notes splash screen), that some composer saw the notes he wanted from the pattern they made, but I cannot find a reference for it. Google, of course, just brings up loads of Leonard Cohen hits. Anyone know the piece in question or am I just a crackpot?

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    31. Re:Why are slashdotters by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      But ultimately leonardo's last supper has included tunes .

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    32. Re:Why are slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question everything, except this. Question again if you don't like the answer.

      (You might like Theodore Dalrymple's "In Praise of Prejudice.")

    33. Re:Why are slashdotters by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      You must be a real genius if you can call an Oxford professor who's written several bestselling books a cretin. I bow to your giant intellect.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:Why are slashdotters by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

      Turns out Chales Manson was a big Da Vinci Fan.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    35. Re:Why are slashdotters by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      i heard a rumor there is a secret graphic hidden on the inside back cover of every mad magazine, you should run down to the store and buy one, then come back here and let us know what you found...

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    36. Re:Why are slashdotters by doormat9 · · Score: 1

      It was in a PBS ad. I saw it on KLRU in Austin TX, but don't recall if it was local or national.

      --
      hmm
    37. Re:Why are slashdotters by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I vote crackpot... but getting back to the topic, can anyone answer this question: was the musical notation we're familiar with invented back then?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    38. Re:Why are slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an idea in my head, whenever I see birds on telegraph wires ... And the birds up on the wires, on the telegraph poles,
      They can always fly away from this rain and this cold;
      You can hear them singing out their telegraph code
      All the way down the telegraph road ...
    39. Re:Why are slashdotters by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      You must be effing kidding (and by "you" I don't mean you in person, but rather, in general, and probably mostly the italian dude with the laptop and imagination). That music is really NOT worth hiding! Not in a painting that took many months to complete!

      Or, maybe it was worth hiding...

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    40. Re:Why are slashdotters by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Did you hear that "music"? I say if your toddler (if you have a toddler, that is) would push the keys of a synth randomly, he/she would make a more sensible tune.

      Besides, half a dosen notes doesn't make a musical piece. Or else, I have a symphony hidden in my spaghetti.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    41. Re:Why are slashdotters by Mark+J+Tilford · · Score: 1

      From wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheet_Music http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Supper_(Leonardo)

      There was even machine-printed music 20 years before The Last Supper.

      --
      -----------
      100% pure freak
    42. Re:Why are slashdotters by Warbothong · · Score: 1

      Two words: Pure Data (Google if you don't know what it is)

    43. Re:Why are slashdotters by Popsmear · · Score: 1

      He was a composer, and for those who would care to look instead of posting blind comments on slashdot you might have known that:
      LEONARDO DA VINCI AND MUSIC
      http://www.goldbergweb.com/en/magazine/essays/2005/02/30640.php/

    44. Re:Why are slashdotters by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      But Richard Dawkins is a cretin. Look at his shrill whining when he spots something that doesn't fit in with his particular flavour of crazy religious freakery. Wow, outstanding rebuttal! A complete reasoned refutation of Dawkins' theories, it is. Dawkins is a shrill whiner. My only regret is that now the creationists will use that argument to discredit him. Woe, all is now lost on the side of scientific reason!
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    45. Re:Why are slashdotters by cluke · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because they might be stupid.

    46. Re:Why are slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to defend the GP, but Victoria Kann wrote Purplicious and Pinkalicious, top 5 NYT best sellers - among her many other children's books.

      Anyways, I thought cretins are those crunchy things you sprinkle on top of salads.

    47. Re:Why are slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but this is the da Vinci Coda. Another matter entirely.

    48. Re:Why are slashdotters by WorkerGnome · · Score: 1

      It's a PBS 'Be More' commercial from about four years ago.

      If I am correct, it's "Be More Inspired".

    49. Re:Why are slashdotters by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering how long it takes for people to find secret "music" in other paintings and photographs... parodists, start your engines...

      I must be hanging around here way too much, for I tried to imagine what music could be found in Goatse...

      Alright, enough intertubes for me... gotta go and wash my eyes and ears with bleach.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    50. Re:Why are slashdotters by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      It appears they were. But here is a little question to think about. Being a math genius of sorts, could Leonardo just have drew a few lines, places some random dots in them in order to keep the perspective correct when copying the painting from a smaller draft?

      It would make sense that if he had drew half inch lines that represented larger spaced lines on the actual painting that a portion of it could be considered or appear as a music score. Everything else could be pure coincidental and even chance.

      I would like to find out what the music sounds like and compare it to other music of the time. I would also like to see if anything in other large painting he made carry something similar and if so, what do they sound like in comparison.

    51. Re:Why are slashdotters by pohl · · Score: 1

      No, but you did use the phrase "truly open mind", which is exactly what the Dawkins quotation is about -- not religion. Dawkins commonly uses this saying to encourage people to acknowledge that even something generally good, like "having an open mind", can be taken too far. Apparently, the person who responded to you thought that you were using the phrase "open mind" to discourage skepticism regarding something that warrants it.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    52. Re:Why are slashdotters by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      It was two in the morning. I'm having trouble understanding it too.

    53. Re:Why are slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last Supper I Gave You My Heart,
      But the very next day, you betrayed me and had me crucified.
      This year, to save me from tears,
      I'll give it to someone who's special. Ha; that's hilarious! Listen, everyone, I'm conducting a survey of how many people performed this intellectual work in their heads or out loud. Help me out with the polling by answering a few simple questions. Thanks!
    54. Re:Why are slashdotters by Dracophile · · Score: 1

      So quick to dismiss this?

      It can't be music.
      The RIAA hasn't tried to extort money for it.

      There's very little that the RIAA tries to extort money for that can be called music.
      --
      Athy, athier, athiest.
    55. Re:Why are slashdotters by renegadesx · · Score: 1

      This just in. In light of the new discovery of Da Vinci's musical painting. Mel Gibson has announced he is working on a musical broadway version of "The Passion of the Christ"

      News at 11

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    56. Re:Why are slashdotters by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Woe, all is now lost on the side of scientific reason!

      That's just the point. Dawkins is so far away from scientific reason that he can't poke it with a long stick. The man is a religious fruitcake. He just happens to be fired up with holy zeal about one less god than most of the other religious fruitcakes.

    57. Re:Why are slashdotters by Teilo · · Score: 1
      Well judging from your answer, either:
      1. It isn't
      2. You are a genius at recursive sarcasm
      3. You are not a geek (which would mean that you got lost and landed on Slashdot by accident).

      So I'll vote for #2

      --
      Mir tut es leid, Menschen daß Einfältigfehlersuchenbaumfolgendenaffen sind.
    58. Re:Why are slashdotters by dangitman · · Score: 1

      You are not a geek (which would mean that you got lost and landed on Slashdot by accident).

      No, I don't bite the heads off chickens at carnivals. I thought Slashdot was for nerds.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    59. Re:Why are slashdotters by saramakos · · Score: 1

      what music could be found in Goatse...

      Probably something by Hole
    60. Re:Why are slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nonono, the lyrics are something along the lines of:

      I'm not even angry.
      I'm being so sincere right now.
      Even though you broke my heart.
      And killed me.
      And tore me to pieces.
      And threw every piece into a fire.
      As they burned it hurt because
      I was so happy for you!
      Now these points of data
      make a beautiful line.
      And we're out of beta.
      We're releasing on time.
      So I'm GLAD. I got burned.
      Think of all the things we learned
      for the people who are
      still alive.
    61. Re:Why are slashdotters by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering how long it takes for people to find secret "music" in other paintings and photographs
      Now you mention it, if you take the vowels from your post, they spell out a very catchy piece of music.
    62. Re:Why are slashdotters by instarx · · Score: 1

      With sophisticated enough technology, we'll be finding musical notes in Jackson Pollock's paintings. So Da Vinci was also a composer, yet hid it so well that only five centuries later it comes to light. He really kept that secret close to his breast! All of it light years away from Occam's Razor.

      Not at all. Occam's razor would point us toward recognizing that painting and music are composed of patterns and rhythms pleasing to the human brain. In fact, it would be surprising if we didn't find pleasing auditory patterns in the visual patterns of either Pollack or Leonardo. The real question is did Leonardo know he was composing music as he painted, and even if he didn't, does it matter?

      The interesting part to me is if this unintended music from the great painters' art is better than from ordinary artists. Has it opened a window on why we see some artists as great and others as not so good? If so, can we 1) use the technique to judge paintings in an impirical way, 2) use it to verify the authenticity of some disputed paintings, or 3) use it to enjoy these masterpieces on a very unexpected plane.

    63. Re:Why are slashdotters by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Anyways, I thought cretins are those crunchy things you sprinkle on top of salads.

      That would be crutons
    64. Re:Why are slashdotters by Quinn_Inuit · · Score: 1

      I think I messed up. I didn't find any music, but I did find the opening to "The Wizard of Oz" in "The Birth of Venus." Oh, well.

      --

      Stop learning! Only you can prevent esoterrorism.
    65. Re:Why are slashdotters by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      No, they're Cretans.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    66. Re:Why are slashdotters by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      I just had to have a look at a instant soup package. In Finnish they apparently are "Krutoneita".
      Which, by some quick reverse logic would translate to crutons :P

      (Oh lord, now I will remember this factoid for the rest of my life. I probably forgot how to tie my shoelaces to make room for that.)

    67. Re:Why are slashdotters by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I just had to have a look at a instant soup package. In Finnish they apparently are "Krutoneita".
      You make soup out of Greek-ish people and/or those with an iodine deficiency? Shame on you! That's very naughty.

      Which, by some quick reverse logic would translate to crutons
      In what language? In English those little bits of toast are croutons. I think. I've spent so long the wrong side of the channel that I'm losing the abilty to write my own language. It's a French word anyway, strictly.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    68. Re:Why are slashdotters by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Why should we question new ideas?"

      Because they are not old.

      That neither Plato, nor Spinoza, nor Newton... thought about it makes them questionable.

    69. Re:Why are slashdotters by portmonk · · Score: 1

      I think that was a PBS ad.

  4. Sad story by backslashdot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Da Vinci accidentally misplaced his car keys in the painting too, but died before he could find it.

    True story.

    1. Re:Sad story by Cooldrew · · Score: 1

      Remember Amelia Earhart? Yeah, she's in the Mona Lisa. Just gotta look hard.

    2. Re:Sad story by Incadenza · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Da Vinci accidentally misplaced his car keys in the painting too, but died before he could find it.
      The Great Dutch Master forger Han van Meegeren once hid a tiny bicycle in one of his forgeries. This was only discovered after he confessed to be a forger and pointed it out on the painting.
    3. Re:Sad story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I still haven't found Waldo in the painting, but if you cross your eyes you can see a sailboat.

    4. Re:Sad story by scooter.higher · · Score: 1

      Wow! It's a schooner.

      --
      Ramen
  5. Hmmmm... by FataL187 · · Score: 0

    So if I were to take a photo of this painting is the RIAA going to want royalties?

    -FataL

    1. Re:Hmmmm... by mrjb · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, because Da Vinci wasn't an American artist. Unless upon hearing of the discovery of America in 1492, he sneaked out in his submarine from 1495-1498 to paint the last supper over there. Hm. The timing is actually too perfect for it not to have happened. Go get them RIAA!

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  6. Yeah, try that algorithm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with the 6oats3 picture see what comes out of there. (heh heh)

    1. Re:Yeah, try that algorithm by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      try that algorithm...with the [Goatse] picture see what comes out of there.

      Oh, please don't. If the music is as horrid as the image, our ears will bleed and I'll forever fear clicking on ANY music link.

    2. Re:Yeah, try that algorithm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would just be one long hole note.

      Ha! Get it? "whole" note, "hole" note? Ahh, that's great. I really should start writing down some of these.

    3. Re:Yeah, try that algorithm by glenstar · · Score: 1

      I believe that is how Anal Cunt (not called AxCx) composes their music. Well, that and TubGirl, LemonParty, MeatSpin, etc...

  7. Although maybe not a dupe... by DigitAl56K · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .. the story sounds remarkably similar to this one:

    http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/01/2047212

    I have two comments:
    1) I guess people can interpret music in anything and get some recognition from it.
    2) If there really isn't music intentionally hidden in these works I bet the artists wouldn't be too happy having people alleging that there is, and changing the interpretation of the piece. Honestly, if the artist had some reason to hide a message in a painting, perhaps because of the potential consequences of his speech, wouldn't he do it in a form where the message was intelligible later? Music seems a poor choice, and there really isn't any motive I can easily think of why you'd have to hide a musical score from view. After all, it's not like the RIAA was filing lawsuits back then ;)

    1. Re:Although maybe not a dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > After all, it's not like the RIAA was filing lawsuits back then ;)

      Not lawsuites, and not under that name...

  8. Sim Earth by Dwedit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember that Sim Earth had the ability to play your planet's current statistics as a song, more like a series of notes based on the content of the Y axis. I bet it the hidden song in the painting would be just as nonsensical and unmusical as playing a scatter plot as if it were music.

  9. In Other News... by Talez · · Score: 3, Funny

    The RIAA has launched a lawsuit against the Santa Maria delle Grazie for copyright infringement...

  10. Misleading Tags.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Encryption is changing data; stenography is hiding it.

    1. Re:Misleading Tags.. by Neeth · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the correction, AC. Now please explain what steganography means.

      --
      Yes, I am the one with the legendary sig.
  11. Old News In Roman Catholicism by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you go around determined to see the virgin Mary's face, you'll start seeing something kind of like it in every tree bark, every mildew, every piece of burned toast, every birthmark.

    If you're determined to find hidden messages and keep trying different numerical values, you can pull spooky phrases out of the bible... or indeed the script for Animal House.

    People have long been "composing" music from random number generators and fractals. If a random number generator can be forced in to a musical composition, by definition, any series of values can be.

    I personally enjoy the following algorhythm: Break the image up in to inch squares. For any given inch if the dominant color is red, note the word "this", if it's green, note the word "is", and if it's blue, note the word "stupid". Amazingly, Da Vinci left a message encoded that appears to describe his views on musical analysis of his work.

    1. Re:Old News In Roman Catholicism by ciaran.mchale · · Score: 4, Funny

      I personally enjoy the following algorhythm: Break the image up in to inch squares. For any given inch if the dominant color is red, note the word "this", if it's green, note the word "is", and if it's blue, note the word "stupid". Amazingly, Da Vinci left a message encoded that appears to describe his views on musical analysis of his work.
      I tried that and I found "Stupid, stupid. This this this this this stupid stupid is is is this this is is is is is stupid stupid stupid." Wow. I never realized that Da Vinci had a stutter.
    2. Re:Old News In Roman Catholicism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beethoven's music encodes ASCII pictures of Jesus. It only took one little square of paper for me to discover this.

    3. Re:Old News In Roman Catholicism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Davinci was way ahead of the rest of humanity and had already adopted the metric system.

    4. Re:Old News In Roman Catholicism by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      It's called Pareidolia.

      Try listening to SGU for more examples.

    5. Re:Old News In Roman Catholicism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you go with Photoshop and run it for CMYK values you can get

      C = Conspiracy
      M = Theories
      Y = Abound
      K = Everywhere

    6. Re:Old News In Roman Catholicism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I came up with: This is neat! Why didnt I come up with that??

    7. Re:Old News In Roman Catholicism by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      Great, "thanks" for pointing that out.
      Now we're going to get a book and a movie about "The Animal House Code" to go along with the other nonsense.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
  12. Who'll be the first to find XML in there too? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    nuf sed

    1. Re:Who'll be the first to find XML in there too? by cyphercell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      [sarcasm]xml can be semantic, that's like asking if there's "objects" in the painting [/sarcasm]. Personally, I would let the artist's peers judge him, this is after all a field of professionals and if the music is a good it may simply prove that there is a rhythm to the painting.

      after searching google I found this:

      "There's always a risk of seeing something that is not there," Pala admits, "but it's certain that the spaces are divided harmonically."

      http://www.newser.com/story/11396.html

      Which apparently can be proven mathematically.

      My theory: we can say that Leonardo Da Vinci was smart like Einstein with lots of wide ranging problems rather than a few concentrated ones, and his work will have both breadth AND depth by any typical genius' standards. We're talking people like Einstein, Beethoven, Shakespeare and few others. Now Da Vinci wasn't like any of them, he was a "typical" genius in several fields of study and is known "for" using math in his work http://www.google.com/search?&q=leonardo+da+vinci+math.

      Heres an interesting quote:

      Leonardo invented some of his own mathematical symbols and terms. Many scientists of his time did this because number notation was not standardized until after the invention of the printing press. This made it difficult for scientists and mathematicians to communicate their ideas to each other. The symbols used today for the numbers one through ten come down to us from ancient India by way of Greece, Rome, and the Moors in medieval Spain.

      http://www.hypatiamaze.org/leonardo/leo_vinci.html

      Actually, if he was fond of creating his own symbolism you might find something quite "like" xml in his work somewhere... far smarter than you or I. I wrote a phonetic substitution cipher in fourth grade. It was unique in that you could "speak" encrypted English by most laws of the English language. "Peds oue" means "fuck you" that's all I remember, anyways I'm not far above average intelligence. Da Vinci and the others I mentioned are generally considered to be OFF the charts.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    2. Re:Who'll be the first to find XML in there too? by memojuez · · Score: 1

      MOD Parent up!

      --
      Signature applied for, Patent Pending
    3. Re:Who'll be the first to find XML in there too? by gardyloo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Leonardo invented some of his own mathematical symbols and terms. Many scientists of his time did this because number notation was not standardized until after the invention of the printing press. This made it difficult for scientists and mathematicians to communicate their ideas to each other. I'd be willing to bet that most creative, curious people do this in one form or another. Feynman did (and then mostly abandoned these schemes for the established ones, except for the revolutionary Feynman diagrams); I did (various "easier" symbols for polynomial terms, and oft-used functions; also a phonetic language, with some musical-like notation---I realized in high school that I'd just reinvented Fourier analysis applied to various phonemes); many of my friends did similar things.
            We (my friends and I, at least) gradually abandoned our schemes when we learned that there were already established symbols already used, or that our schemes were efficient but not necessarily good at communicating with others, because one has to explain the efficiencies in terms of the established schematas, and it's often just easier to fall back on the usual notation.
            Perhaps Leonardo simply stuck with his notations because they really WERE better, or because there weren't enough people around to take advantage of other, established notational forms (or, indeed, what became established wasn't so "standard" then and there).
    4. Re:Who'll be the first to find XML in there too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after searching google I found this:

      "There's always a risk of seeing something that is not there," Pala admits, "but it's certain that the spaces are divided harmonically." OR you could've read the article:

      "There's always a risk of seeing something that is not there, but it's certain that the spaces [in the painting] are divided harmonically," he told the AP. "Where you have harmonic proportions, you can find music."
    5. Re:Who'll be the first to find XML in there too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be willing to bet that most creative, curious people do this in one form or another.
      I'd take that bet. None of the creative, curious people I've ever met have ever done that. It might be the ubiquity of the internet - any symbol is only a google search away - or something else, but everyone I've met who's met the criterion has generally known there's pretty much a symbol for everything.
    6. Re:Who'll be the first to find XML in there too? by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      great deduction! spot on chap, sometimes I go straight into research mode, I'll go read it now, does it call BS?

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    7. Re:Who'll be the first to find XML in there too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not "quite" sure what you mean to convey by so frequently putting "apparently" random words in quotes, but I think you should know that whatever you "think" it means, it doesn't. Please get out of this "habit," because it will drive English majors who try to read anything of "length" that you write completely "batshit."

      Thank "you."

    8. Re:Who'll be the first to find XML in there too? by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      "Sorry" it's just emotive, like bold italic or CAPS whatever "...whatever you "think" it means,..." you used it perfectly to call me dumb.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    9. Re:Who'll be the first to find XML in there too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the artist formerly known as prince? ;)

  13. The guy loved tricks, can you say Easter Egg? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We know that modern creators often include Easter Eggs in their products, everything from hidden bits of programming to images etched into the silicone hardware. Why do so many of slashdot readers find it impossible to accept that Leonardo might have done the same in his work?

    We know he had the skill for it, we know he did it in other works, we know he loved tricks.

    Yes, human beings have got a talent for seeing patterns where there aren't any, and slashdot readers got a talent for being a bunch of smartasses who think they know better.

    Personally I would first want to see a picture of the painting, the overlayed musical score (how lenient do you have to be to see the scores, is it ALWAYS the center of the hand or is the note sometimes put at the fingernails and othertimes at the wrist?) and the music itself.

    I am slightly suspicious because it seems all the be explained in a book. MONEY GRABBER! If it was science it would be a in a peer reviewed paper, not in a commercial book. Then their is the claim that this shows Leonardo was a religious person. Eh why? I don't see the connection between hiding a piece of music in a painting and the painters world vision.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:The guy loved tricks, can you say Easter Egg? by DigitAl56K · · Score: 2, Funny

      Da Vinci Easter Egg: Open a copy of any Da Vinci painting in Firefox and quickly tap Ctrl+P then enter. Before you know it, it will appear in hard copy on the nearest printer!

      Known issues: Unfortunately Da Vinci, although a brilliant artist, wasn't so hot at embedded coding back in the day, and occasionally the hard copies will appear in greyscale only.

    2. Re:The guy loved tricks, can you say Easter Egg? by E++99 · · Score: 1

      We know that modern creators often include Easter Eggs in their products, everything from hidden bits of programming to images etched into the silicone hardware. Why do so many of slashdot readers find it impossible to accept that Leonardo might have done the same in his work?

      An Easter Egg is an entirely different concept. If he had hidden a microscopic musical score in some obscure corner of the masterpiece, that would be an Easter Egg. And once it was found, it would be obvious that it existed. This is nothing but the invention of an algorithm to turn the entire painting into a musical score; along with the absurd claim that Leonardo painted the masterpiece with the intention of encoding the resulting musical score.
  14. Silly DaVinci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're going to hide something, use truecrypt.

    If we study more closely, we might find his tax returns as well.

  15. Hiding is the wrong word by mce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If there really isn't music intentionally hidden in these works I bet the artists wouldn't be too happy having people alleging that there is, and changing the interpretation of the piece. Honestly, if the artist had some reason to hide a message in a painting, perhaps because of the potential consequences of his speech, wouldn't he do it in a form where the message was intelligible later? Music seems a poor choice, and there really isn't any motive I can easily think of why you'd have to hide a musical score from view.

    While I agree that it's way to easy to claim hidden messages that were never there in the first place, it's wrong to say that, in case there is a message, the artist was trying - and deeded - to conceal it. People, especially those with bright minds like Leonardo, have been and still are doing this kind of thing for fun and "just because they can" (I know I have done similar things a few times myself, and I'm not a Da Vinci). On top of that, in Leonardo's days there really was a lot more to art than throwing a few buckets of paint against a wall. Weaving in multiple symbolisms that only the initiated would read was "basic painting skill number two" (the actual painting techniques being number one).

    So the message is not hidden as in "concealed because it needed to be", but hidden as in "non-obvious and thus likely forgotten/lost until rediscovered".

    1. Re:Hiding is the wrong word by memojuez · · Score: 1

      ... as in an "Easter Egg" in programming, et cetera.

      --
      Signature applied for, Patent Pending
  16. The video is out! by maciarc · · Score: 1

    They've already released the video for it!

    1. Re:The video is out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so stupid!

  17. This is ridiculous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and makes absolutely no sense. You can't just find notes and say you have a piece of music, because music is more than notes. Assuming this is anything like written music as we know it, which it looks like from the picture, he's missing an awful lot of information. What key is it? What's the time signature? There's no reference point anywhere on there from which to play, and that doesn't even touch on note durations or other playing instructions. "The tempo was almost painfully slow" - how the hell did he figure out how fast he's supposed to play it?

    I know people are kind of enamored with the idea of Da Vinci hiding a bunch of stuff in his works, but come on. At best this guy is completely deluded and is grasping at straws to piece together something he actually thinks is encoded in the painting, kind of like those nuts who rearrange letters in Bible passages to make predictions. At worst he's making it all up and wants to siphon off some attention from the Da Vinci Code.

    1. Re:This is ridiculous... by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

      Modern music notation is not the only musical notation. The article also states that Da Vinci was known for making musical puzzles in his writings, and that he played the lute and designed many instruments, so I really don't think it's out of line for some music to be hidden in a painting, too.

      --
      The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    2. Re:This is ridiculous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, but there's still no reference point. What made him look at a piece of bread or a cross or whatever and decide that it's a G or D or E flat?

      From reading the article, his methodology was this. I'm going to use modern music terminology because it's easier, but it still applies to any other notation system:

      1. Draw five lines on the painting.
      How does he know he got them in the right position? Why is he assuming Da Vinci uses that kind of notation? Why not draw ten lines and do a treble and bass part?

      2. Pick out objects of religious significance, and map them to a spot on the staff. These are notes.
      Without a clef, a staff is totally meaningless and carries no information. Notes aren't just points on a clef, they have information about their duration. Is a hand a whole note, a piece of bread a half note?

      3. Play it, reading it backwards. The tempo is very slow.
      How many beats per measure? How many beats does each note get? What's the tempo? Why did he decided on these values? Did he guess, or did he find some coded hint in the painting telling him all of this?

      The best comparison I can make is this: You find a piece of paper with a bunch of dots on it. You connect them and make a line graph, and arbitrarily assign a scale on the X and Y coordinates. Then you declare that all of the information in this graph you've created was there all along. It's completely ridiculous and baseless, just like this guy's claims.

    3. Re:This is ridiculous... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Without a clef, a staff is totally meaningless and carries no information.

      What? It still carries information -- intervals. I don't think it's complete because not all notes are a whole step apart, but it's still way more than "no information".

    4. Re:This is ridiculous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you're right, but this guy started with the notes and drew in the staff, which is meaningless. Two notes could be a half-step apart, or two steps, or a million steps. If you listen to the MP3, the piece is very sparse and personally I don't think it's complex enough to make a good judgment of scale.

      In other words, his notes are x steps apart because he says they are, not because that information was ever in the painting.

    5. Re:This is ridiculous... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I agree that the claims are probably BS. I saw the article on CNN yesterday afternoon and was skeptical, though not dismissive -- it is definitely not out of the question that Da Vinci would do something like that. But there's a link to a MP3 of the piece above, and that dropped the credibility down a bit IMO. It is very sparse, and from my personal aesthetic point of view... I sorta think Da Vinci could have done a bit better, no? ;-)

    6. Re:This is ridiculous... by philicorda · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the 15th century, key signatures had not been invented yet.
      Accidentals were sometimes written, sometimes not.
      So, without explicit accidentals, to tell what the notes were meant to be they either knew the likely mode, or just guessed them, which is known as 'musica ficta'.
      http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musica_ficta

      The good thing about modes is that any arrangement of notes from the mode will sound pretty much like music.

      In this case, of finding modal music in the 'last supper', it would be hard to make it anything but musical, especially if you finagle the accidentals, timing and direction it so you have more chances to make it work.

      However, in defense of this research, there were a lot of complicated harmonic rules that sacred music would be expected to adhere to, and by following these rules it may be possible to get more informed guesses.

  18. Too classical by Caesar+Tjalbo · · Score: 0

    'It sounds like a requiem,' Giovanni Maria Pala said. 'It's like a soundtrack that emphasizes the passion of Jesus.'
    With Da Vinci in da house ya can bet yo momma's wigglin' ass it wasn't about the passion of Jesus, mo' 'bout the passion of mc Leo da man himself, for real!
    --
    "I'm not much interested in interoperability. I want substitutability. I want to be able to throw your software out."
  19. Wow by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Who'd have thought that you could find order in a picture showing order and transform that order into something resembling music? Mind boggling. For an encore this bozo should be searching for bible codes in Slashdot.

  20. What I Need to Know... by Sawopox · · Score: 1

    is when this track is coming out for Guitar Hero: III on Xbox 360. Also, will it include an achievement? How many Microsoft points will this cost? Seeing as it is Jesus, shouldn't this be a free download?

    I look forward to giving this track a run through on my plastic guitar.

    --
    [http://it-tastes-so-good.blogspot.com] Are you hungry?
  21. Why is there no midi? by pancakegeels · · Score: 1

    Or some sample, surely this is out of copyright by now?

    1. Re:Why is there no midi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The music is, any recent performance ain't.

  22. Vinyl Record by Darren+Foong · · Score: 1

    Maybe one day they realise that it plays a scary piece of music when the painting is put in a gramophone.

    Seriously, these people think of everything!

  23. 40-second music clip by ciaran.mchale · · Score: 4, Funny

    A 40-seconds long musical score is a bit short for a "serious" piece of music. Perhaps it was an advertising jingle instead. I'm guessing the lyrics to go with the music were "Giovanni's pizza are tasty. The extra-large size is so big it's the last supper you will ever need to buy. Tell them Da Vinci sent you to qualify for the 'buy one, get one free' offer."

  24. Slashdot Moderators Aren't Mean Enough by indiejade · · Score: 1

    We're advised and told to be nice and to "promote" rather than "discourage" posts. . . this thread is making this duty especially difficult. . .

  25. FFT by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember a Matlab demo we did in one of my ECE courses. We took the fourier transform of an image of Batman--I think it was an FFT--and after some other processing played it as a wav file. Pretty awesome song, actually.

    Although, to be fair, the image was made for the demo. Still, it was a fair likeness of Batman considering.

  26. You must be confused by Plutonite · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mormons don't use ASCII. Or Pi for that matter. Mormons got Unicode on the continent before it was invented - they found it on buried golden plates, and they gave them back.

    1. Re:You must be confused by laejoh · · Score: 0

      I thought that was EBCDIC. Oh... now I see, you're talking about Mormons, that's ASCII indeed. EBCDIC would be morons!

    2. Re:You must be confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you are a fucking, ignorant racist.

    3. Re:You must be confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought he was a funny witty racist.

    4. Re:You must be confused by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      I thought Ebcidic as well at first, but I think you really have to create a new mapping that takes some of the nomral ascii encodings but injects tons of non sensical, non coherent parts. Like two mappings for the same char, Like the Ascii value for B as well as the ebsidic. But when you put them together you only have 57 mappings and its missing all of the letters in sex, alcohol and caffeine.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  27. Skepticism has its place by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

    Yet there were other abstract things hidden in that work of art, I can think of a respect for the Golden Ratio and an implied dodecahedron, but I'm sure there were others. A work of a master craftsman like Da Vinci shouldn't have Occams Razor applied, for it is not simplistic in nature but harbours deeper meaning.

  28. THIS IS THE WORK OF THE DEVIL! by therufus · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice you have to play this picture music backwards. This may be the first ever use of backmasking, a tool often used to hide evil messages in music.

    Intriguing!

    --
    You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
  29. Re:In other news...minuet found in hamburglar's lu by TBerben · · Score: 1

    Don't dismiss this so quickly as 'another pr stunt'.. DaVinci was a genius and it wouldn't surprise me if it turns out this really is his music. Then again, it won't really surprise me if this is just one extravagant ad either.. We'll just have to wait and see whether this is authentic or a hoax.

  30. Not convincing by SuurMyy · · Score: 1

    Such a simple pattern can be gotten from like anywhere. That's not a song at all.

    --
    The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne
    1. Re:Not convincing by trewornan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's a mistake to think this is just a simple pattern. DaVinci knew a lot about what's pleasing to the eye in terms of proportion, color tone, etc. Lot's of things in nature are based on fractals or the golden ratio (amongst other things) and for some reason we find these patterns pleasant. The human body itself has a fractal pattern to some extent so the last supper must be full of this stuff. If when you take these patterns from a visual medium and convert them to an auditory medium people find them harmonious that's not especially surprising. Why people find these sorts of patterns attractive is however a very interesting question.

    2. Re:Not convincing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "DaVinci knew a lot about what's pleasing to the eye in terms of proportion, color tone, etc. Lot's of things"


      You know what's pleasant to my eye? Spelling "lots" without an apostrophe. Seriously, the other letters won't get offended if the "s" is right next to them. You don't need to protect them from the "s".

    3. Re:Not convincing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, the other letters won't get offended if the "s" is right next to them. You don't need to protect them from the "s".
      I don't know about your assumption there. I have it on good rumor that "r" is currently in court to get a restraining order from "s" as he found out that "s" has been cheating on him with "y" in hopes that she can sometimes become a vowel too.
    4. Re:Not convincing by fat_mike · · Score: 1

      Be honest, you never heard of the Golden Ratio before you read The DaVinci code...did ya?

  31. DaVinci and Music by 6foothobbit · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember hearing that DaVinci made a lute shaped like a horses skull and that he was an excellent musician.

  32. i don't dismiss it, but... by someone1234 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Poor Da Vinci. With modern technology, he could have hidden a whole symphony in a picture, not just a dozen simple tunes.

    --
    Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    1. Re:i don't dismiss it, but... by MrAndrews · · Score: 2, Funny

      The one hidden in the Mona Lisa has lyrics too. Da Vinci was one busy beaver.

  33. Thats wierd by MortenMW · · Score: 0

    I thought that Da Vinci was smart enough to embedd some DRM into his paintings.

    1. Re:Thats wierd by EvanED · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought that Da Vinci was smart enough to embedd some DRM into his paintings.

      Oh, he clearly was; you're just backwards. The Last Supper is actually the song, and the painting is the DRM. It lasted 500 years, which is pretty darn good for a DRM scheme too.

  34. Why golden ratio pleases by SuurMyy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd say that it's because it has a biological purpose. We find symmetry beautiful in everything, but most importantly of all - in the human body - and face. So I believe that we find this sort of ratio pleasant because it's the pattern we use to choose partners to mate with.

    --
    The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne
  35. Easter eggs? by Aphrika · · Score: 1

    It's very easy to shoot this idea down in flames, but he was a smart guy. There's no reason he thought it'd be a laugh to stick an Easter Egg in a painting. After all programmers do it, musicians put cryptic stuff in sleeve notes, writers hide recurring themes in books. Why not a painter?

    Thing is, you can read stuff into anything. So if it is supposed to be musical notes, I'm sure it'll be bloody obvious, otherwise it'll sounds like crap.

    1. Re:Easter eggs? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      Because they weren't using a 5-bar stave in music when DaVinci painted that?

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  36. But when you watch the image in a mirror... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    And superimpose it with an image of Mona Lisa.
    And then, trace an image of the egg over that new image.

    You can clearly see the following words:

    Scanctum Peter Cottium
    Deus in re unium
    hippitus hoppitus reus Domine

    In suus via torreum
    Lepus en re sanctum
    hippitus hoppitus Deus Domine


    Wow! Who would have thougt that Parker and Stone were right (again).

    http://www.southparkx.net/news/1105-fantastic-easter-special-just-aired-on-comedy-central

    Also... when you play the new music backwards, it says who is the final Cylon, explains everything in "Lost" and who shot J.R...
    This last bit is kind of a anticlimax.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  37. and the reverse... by onezan · · Score: 1

    The Aphex Twin (modern electronic musician) took a picture of himself, used audio software to convert the picture to a wav and slipped it into his last album. meaning, if you rip his album to a wav, and then run it through some filters you can get a picture of him.

    1. Re:and the reverse... by onezan · · Score: 1

      here's a link to the musical steganography example... http://www.kempa.com/blog/archives/000083.html

    2. Re:and the reverse... by rollinthunda0ne · · Score: 1

      Trent Reznor (Nine Inch Nails) did the same very recently with The Presence, for his album Year Zero. (image)

  38. Putting him between a rock and hasrd place... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    Someone get the score and set it to music and make both available freely on the internet.

    If he complains of copyright infringement then his book is a fraud.

  39. Re: Found in Pi by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Vote , aka 2215205 occurs at position 29,167,128.
    Obama, aka string 1521131 occurs at position 10,015,199.

    Romney, aka 18151314525, is not anywhere in the early parts of Pi.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  40. Oh no not again by hlope003 · · Score: 1

    First the Di Vinci code, next music hidden in the painting, they need to leave this painting alone already. This smells like a publicity stunt.. I wonder if Dan Brown is going to jump all over this, and write the sequel

  41. And if you believe that... by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    ...then you'll easily believe that Sir Francis Bacon encoded proof that he wrote Shakespeare's plays by having the printer of Shakespeare's plays use two very slightly different fonts of type, and encoding messages in an ASCII-like binary code in which one font of type represented the zeroes and the other represented the ones.

    (No, that's not a joke. That's exactly what Ignatius L. Donnelly claimed in an 1888 book entitled The Great Cryptogram)

  42. Birds on Telegraph Wires by BakerQ · · Score: 1, Informative

    You're thinking of a PBS commercial that runs very frequently. Pianist is trying to come up with a melody and keeps failing only to look out his Window to see a few birds on telephone wires - the simple melody is used as inspiration for a much more complex piece.

    If /. will let me link, it's http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4txDWnSWG9U otherwise, YouTube video 4txDWnSWG9U

    1. Re:Birds on Telegraph Wires by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Though that doesn't guarantee he's not still a crackpot.

      --
      Property is theft.
    2. Re:Birds on Telegraph Wires by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      Except I don't live in the US, so chances are I don't watch PBS. I have visited, but I didn't really watch much TV (surprise, it's not what I went for), and I'm pretty certain I read, rather than saw it.

      I suppose, in a way, it's a fairly obvious idea and more than one person could have used it [insert your own comment on IP law here]

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  43. Rip the music by cybergen007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope that no one gets the idea to rip the music from the painting

  44. Eureka! by memorycardfull · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pala, a 45-year-old musician who lives near the southern Italian city of Lecce, began studying Leonardo's painting in 2003, after hearing...all the media hype surrounding that damned Da Vinci Code book. Eureka! I have found (a paycheck!)

  45. Composition starters by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

    I am a composer and pianist, and one of my favorite ways to start a new composition is to have a friend pick 3 notes at random. As soon as I start playing those 3 notes, my brain fills in the rest of the music suggested by them. In college, I had a friend who composed lyrics the same way. At parties, someone would pick 3 notes at random, and someone else would pick 3 words. Then I would start playing, and she would sing the lyrics - and it would be pretty good. Almost magical even to me as a participant.

  46. Sir, your sig by PMBjornerud · · Score: 1

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:
    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group. Dude, that sig is seriously gross. I got this mental image of a geek group-sexing his MMO pals. Ugh.
    --
    I lost my sig.
  47. Re: Link by spaglia2 · · Score: 1

    I am a classical musician and listened to the sample from the link above. It is mostly monophonic (one note at a time) and given the graceful and harmonious placement of objects in the painting, it is not surprising that when turned into musical notes and played slowly and ponderously on a pipe organ, it sounds like a Gregorian chant. Perhaps what we find here is the natural correlation between graphic and musical art.

  48. There IS something there by wonkavader · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you draw lines across the last supper, you see places where people line up. It's VERY exact. Take a ruler and pass it over you screen. There's something going on there. This is why people get hepped up about it.

    Musical notes? I doubt it. A hidden message? emphatically yes. The most likely message: "DaVinci was really, really ANAL."

    1. Re:There IS something there by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 1

      I don't see how Da Vinci not being a lawyer had anything to do with making straight lines in a painting :/

  49. Re: MP3 Link by spaglia2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am a classical musician and listened to the sample from the link above. It is mostly monophonic (one note at a time) and given the graceful and harmonious placement of objects in the painting, it is not surprising that when turned into musical notes and played slowly and ponderously on a pipe organ, it sounds like a Gregorian chant. Perhaps what we find here is the natural correlation between graphic and musical art.

  50. So remix it. by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Given what they could do with

    Steve Ballmer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ug4c2mqlE_0

    this is music to the spheres.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  51. Hmm by vurg · · Score: 1

    What's gonna be next? They found a diss track hidden in the Mona Lisa. Titled F-Michaelangelo.

  52. Re: MP3 Link by KillerBob · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you'd be the one to correct me if I'm wrong... but didn't they use a 3-line stave around the time DaVinci was active? I thought the 5-line stave didn't get introduced until about the 1600's....

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  53. Wrong key! by LineGrunt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I ran this by my wife who is a professional musician with perfect pitch and a degree in music.

    She says that the recording is in E-flat minor, but that organs at the time would have been in a different tuning standard, roughly one-half step different than the current standard.

    E-flat minor is a very rare key for that time-period (like it wasn't used until Bach) but if you move the snippet a half step, it would have been E minor, a very common key during that period.

    Furthermore, there are intervals in the snippet that weren't in common use in that time period. I couldn't keep my wife's interest long enough to determine if those intervals made more sense if the entire thing was 1/2 a step down.

    Anyhow, my wife's summary: "very pretty, but probably not from DaVinci's time."

    LineGrunt

    PS I may have the exact note names and directions wrong as I'm _not_ a professional musician with perfect pitch... Musicians have their own undecypherable 'geek-speak.'

    1. Re:Wrong key! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong note as well; I'm pretty sure that Peter's hand which holds a knife ought to be sharped.

    2. Re:Wrong key! by spaglia2 · · Score: 1

      The jump of a minor 9th from the tonic actually indicates not a minor key (functional tonality) but, together with the other notes, either Phrygian on Locrian mode (modality). Simply put, F flat does not occur in the E flat minor scale. I'm sure that if your wife would agree if she gave it more than a moment's notice. This F flat is probably what you are referring to as an 'odd' note, but in context of Phrygian mode (like an all-natural E scale), it is quite plausible for the period, especially when you consider it in context of the painting. In regard to the placement of do (do, re, mi, etc), pitch adjustment of 1/2 step upward would place the piece in E Phrygian, the most common placement for the mode possible. I would like to view the extrapolated score. Do you know of a link to it?

    3. Re:Wrong key! by E++99 · · Score: 1
      First of all, the key is arbitrary, since Pala arbitrarily superimposed a 5-line staff over the paining. There is no reason for the staff to be where he put it rather than any number of steps in either direction. Secondly, in Leonardo's time, there was no 5-line standard staff. There were many competing musical notations. Adopting the modern notation for Leonardo's supposed intention is lazy at best. If we're going to do that, I'd say that the hand pointing upward to the right of Jesus, must be indicating an upward bent note, meaning that Leonardo's score is obviously written for electric guitar.

      That you can take any visual proportions that are meaningful to the eye and turn them into aural proportions that would be meaningful to the ear should be obvious. It certainly would have been to Leonardo, who wrote:

      Painting, the servant of the eye, that noblest of the senses, reveals a harmonious proportion similar to the harmonious proportion which results from many voices uniting and singing together, in such a delightful manner that the audience is rapt in intense admiration... ...Do you not know that our soul is composed of harmony, and that harmony cannot be bred save in the simultaneity and the relative proportions of objects which are seen or heard? However, since Leonard considered the visual arts superior to the aural arts, it is pretty absurd to think that he let a musical composition dictate the visual proportions of the objects in his arguably greatest painting.
    4. Re:Wrong key! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First pass filter, when did 5 line musical notation come into use? Was Da Vinci alive then?

    5. Re:Wrong key! by Godless+Conservative · · Score: 1

      All modern pipe organs in churches perform 1/2 tone higher than written. That is, the simplistic sequence of notes in this particular sample has been "composed" and written by its author (whoever he happens to be) in a d-minor key, which would be very common in any age. Yours is a good example of how a wrong theory is built up on a false premise (and immediately propped up by diploma-waving and special ability claim). Also, the recording, as played through my computer speakers, isn't exactly in e-flat minor, either, it's closer to e-minor by at least 1/3 of the tone. And there goes your wife's perfect pitch - if one can define a tonality at all, listening to an mp3 clip through an Internet connection.

      No wonder global warming pays!

    6. Re:Wrong key! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think there is a problem with the key, as it is indeed in E minor, you should have shown your wife the picture of the score. In any case, I think all this is bullshit. For several reasons. I am a musician myself, and I play mostly music from the 1500-1600. The last supper was finished in 1498. I can tell for sure that what is shown as the score is 100% sure not a score anybody could have thought of in 1498. Music was not written that way then. Writing different voices in the same staff, vertically aligned, did not happen until around 100 years later. All of this ignoring the harmonies and intervals that would not happen at that time in history. But you can always argue that Leonardo was a genius, and therefore could know and write all this before everyone else. Bullshit.

  54. anachronisms in the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe to have read that the five line notation system wasn't widely used until 16th century. Why would Leonardo Da Vinci use a system of notation that didn't exist?

    1. Re:anachronisms in the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! They still used the four line choral system in da Vinci's time.

  55. Re:In other news...minuet found in hamburglar's lu by pedramnavid · · Score: 1

    and to think: so far no one had tried to work in the bread loaves.

  56. detailed musical analysis of the article by xPsi · · Score: 1

    I've done a very carefuly musical analysis of the words contained in TFA, and when mapped through the appropriate steganographic filters it sounds shockingly like a 1985 tribute to a 1973 tribute to Roy Harper called Hats Off To Charles Obscure.

    --
    i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
  57. /thread by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas!

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:/thread by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

      Awesome. Or rather, "egads, move that sausage to the phone!"

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  58. M.C. Escher by qzulla · · Score: 1

    He should tackle M.C. Escher next. Take some of his etchings and overlay them with tracing paper then start connecting the intersections of his stairs and whatnot. The result may surprise you.

    qz

  59. Natural beauty of music by GayBliss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think a more plausible explanation, if there are actually musical notes in the painting (which I doubt), is that Da Vinci had an idea that there would be a natural beauty in the music that could be expressed in the painting. He may have been trying to bring together the natural attraction we have in each art form, to create something extraordinary. Perhaps we subliminally see the music in the painting, and it adds some sort of attraction that we cannot describe.

  60. Re: MP3 Link by spaglia2 · · Score: 1

    Well actually, according to Wikipedia, "...The modern 5-line staff was first adopted in France, and became almost universal by the 16th century..." Since da Vinci's dates were April 15, 1452 - May 2, 1519, his use of a 5-line staff is conceivable. Another note: the sample MP3 is in the Phrygian mode (like an all-natural E scale). I haven't seen the actual abstracted 'score'. Could you tell me where I could see it? Is there a link to it?

  61. Re: MP3 Link by KillerBob · · Score: 1

    In TFA, there's a picture of the painting, superimposed with a 5-line stave, and black dots at all of the points in question (hands, loaves of bread). Looks really ponderous, but I've never actually read music backwards. (perfect pitch, I'm one of those weirdos who can be handed a score and hear the music in their head when they read it)

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  62. And if you play the score backwards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... you can clearly hear "I buried St. Paul"

  63. Re:In other news...minuet found in hamburglar's lu by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

    What, like this? http://www.the-martians.co.uk/upgrade/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.20

    Hardly a new idea (see also "Holy Blood Holy Grail") There's pictures and everything on ours though....

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  64. Re: Found in Pi by pklinken · · Score: 0

    He said ascii, not a == 1...

  65. OK I've had it! by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 0

    I'm tired of nutjobs claiming to find a secret code by a man who can't confirm it because he's dead! So I'm going to find the truth at the source. *Searches yellow pages for mediums*

  66. Great, this is dumber than scientology by billcopc · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about they decode the music, then find that "RADIUM" warezed license for Sound Forge in there ?

    Dig that painter up and watch the RIAA sue his decomposed ass.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  67. Fortitu. by tepples · · Score: 1

    You mean "42", right? It depends. Anyone can learn what the question is. But do you have the 42de to speak up?
  68. J.E.B.? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Vote , aka 2215205 occurs at position 29,167,128. Where do "Jeb" and "Bush" show up?
  69. Simply amazing what people will fall for by zajal · · Score: 1

    Ah, yes, the always-reliable Associated Press. Note that the photo caption says "musical notes encoded in Leonardo Da Vinci's 'Last Supper'." Not "allegedly" or "purportedly" or "possibly"...they are encoded ! This is the kind of utter bullshit actual Renaissance scholars have to deal with constantly. I don't envy them. It's no wonder that people who are genuine specialists in the era don't want to talk to the press. Instead, we get a career-enhancing pretender, utterly undistinguished as either composer or scholar, who arbitrarily assigns a grid (staff) to Leonardo's fresco, and announces a miracle. Which happens to coincide with his release of a CD and a book, which is available for sale to the faithful and the terminally credulous. Now that is a true miracle! Well, Sr. Pala is 45, so his revelation came along at a fortuitous time for his non-career. He's not in Wikipedia or MySpace yet, and this is probably his only chance. There are major errors of fact, history, and basic music scholarship - for a start, a musical staff is meaningless without a clef. Which of the dozen clefs then in use was it? If so, why was that particular tonic chosen? And why is the only "authority" quoted not a music scholar, nor even an art historian, but the director of a private for-profit Leonardo "museum" in Vinci? The irony is getting pretty thick here.

    1. Re:Simply amazing what people will fall for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Last Supper, regrettably, was not a fresco. It is tempera which turned out to be a rather lossy codec!

  70. DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its the orginal DRM

  71. and the curious thing about the music by swschrad · · Score: 1

    is that when translated from the Italian, it says, "Everybody's gone surfin'... surf Napoli way."

    hey, I think Leo's on to something...

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  72. You can see any image in the clouds by cybergremlin · · Score: 1

    Any conclusion can be drawn from a sufficiently complex data set. The correlary to that is that it becomes harder to PROVE any one conclusion as the data set becoms more complex, exponentialy so. Add in centuries of signal degridation and you are, basicaly, screwed.

    Just look at how scollars argue not only about what Shakespear was trying to say, but if he actualy wrote the plays in the first place. Untill someone invents a time machine so we can go back and ask the artists what they were thinking, looking for "secret knowledge" in old works is folly. It's more Rorschach test than search for truth. Either put a print on the wall and enjoy it or pick up a paint brush and figure out what YOU have to say.

  73. Here's what the music sounds like: by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

    You can listen to the music here. And going off CNN's picture of the cover of the book, which shows the notes, they don't look particularily well lined up, with things kinda offset this way or that way a little bit. Looks like they definitely had a margin of error they were working with.

    --
    Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
  74. So, when is the RIAA going to look into this? by darkmasterchief · · Score: 1

    When will the RIAA raid Da Vinci's Tomb for further reasearch?

  75. Re:Intervals by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

    If the intervals weren't in common use, moving the key will not make a difference. An interval is a relative distance between two notes, and a key is the set of notes that you're using. If you move the key then you are moving the entire set of notes, so the relative distance between notes will not change.

    It's like this:
    len(a[ (intervalStart + key1) : (intervalEnd + key1) ]) == len(a[ (intervalStart + key2) : (intervalEnd + key2) ])