Slashdot Mirror


Non-Compete Agreement Beyond Term of Employment?

stellar7 writes "I work in IT for a large company. They have recently asked me to sign a new non-compete and confidentiality agreement. I signed an agreement when I began employment, but now they want me to sign an updated one. Behind the link are a few paragraphs from the new agreement. It states that the company has a royalty-free license to any 'Invention' I create including up to six months after leaving (and the company fully owns any Invention that relates to the company in this same period). Has anyone signed a similar agreement that reaches beyond the end of employment and includes things not related to the business?"
A. Employee shall promptly and fully disclose in writing to [Company] any inventions, improvements, discoveries, operating techniques, or "know-how", whether patentable or not (hereinafter referred to as "Inventions"), conceived or discovered by Employee, either solely or jointly with others, during the course of Employee's employment with [Company], or within six (6) months thereafter.

B. Employee shall, on the request of [Company], and hereby does, assign to [Company] all of Employee's right, title and interest in any of the Inventions which relate to, or are useful in connection with, any aspect of the business of [Company], as carried on or contemplated at the time the Invention is made, whether or not Employee's duties are directly related thereto. [Company] shall be the sole and absolute owner of any of the Inventions so assigned. Employee shall perform any further acts or execute any papers, at the expense of [Company], which it may consider necessary to secure for [Company] or its successors or assigns any and all rights relating to the Inventions, including patents in the United States and foreign countries.

C. [Company] shall be the sole judge as to whether the Inventions are related to or useful in connection with any aspect of the business of [Company] as earned on or contemplated at the time the Invention is made and as to whether patent applications should be filed in the United States or in foreign countries.

D. [Company] shall have the option of taking a permanent, royalty-free license to manufacture, use, and sell any of the Inventions conceived or discovered by Employee during the course of Employee's employment with [Company], or within six (6) months thereafter, that are not assigned to [Company] under paragraph B. of this Agreement.

18 of 778 comments (clear)

  1. ask a lawyer by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, ask a lawyer, not slashdot. I highly doubt a contract like that is enforceable (seriously, they own work you create for your next employer?) but I would talk to a lawyer. And I wouldn't even think of signing it.

    1. Re:ask a lawyer by belmolis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The answer is going to vary from state-to-state and presumably from country to country. California, for example, has laws that greatly reduce the effect of non-compete agreements, but many other states do not. Furthermore, the question of whether they can insist that you sign a new agreement as a condition of continued employment will depend on whether you are in an "at will" jurisdiction or not.

    2. Re:ask a lawyer by imp · · Score: 5, Informative

      While the answer varies from state to state, I'll quote what my lawyer told me when I took him one of these employment agreements. "Warner, never hesitate to sign a vague, badly drafted employment agreement." Basically, for my situation, the upshot was that the agreement was so vague as to what it covered that read literally one would have to tell the company everything I ever thought. New idea for a flavoring for brownies, tell the company. New sexual position to try with the wife, tell the company. Plot for a sitcom staring 13th century spanish cardinals talking about the philosophical conundrum the Islamic occupation of the Iberian peninsula presented, tell the company. Clearly, no court in its right mind would enforce such an over-reaching and broad contract.

      In addition, certain states, such as California, have laws that say, as a matter of public policy, that if you do something on your own time with your own resources, you own it.

      Also, since you didn't post the entire agreement, there's no way to know if there's anything else in it that might be bad, or worse than what's presented here.

      However, without having both a license to practice law, or the entire text of the document in question, the above is prelude to the following non-legal advice: See a lawyer. It cost me about $300 when I needed to get a couple of different documents reviewed.

    3. Re:ask a lawyer by stormj · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not enforceable in California. Bus & Prof Code Section 16600.

    4. Re:ask a lawyer by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have dealt with some smaller music contracts that are 25 pages. 5 of those pages are definitions. Definitions are where artists either get screwed or get well-paid.

      I have had glimpses of financial deals between large (Fortune 50, yes, five zero, not five hundred) financial institutions. One contract ran 30 pages. The definitions for it ran almost 100 pages.

      The point is, talk to a lawyer. It is worth the $300-$500 it will cost.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    5. Re:ask a lawyer by Garridan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yup. I saw that in a contract, told my soon-to-be boss that there was no way in hell that I'd ever sign such a thing, he talked to his lawyer, and we got it stricken from the contract. That easy.

    6. Re:ask a lawyer by daVinci1980 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      God, I hate that. It's she.

      You must not write on the tubes much. Newsflash: if you go to a site that has 95%+ male readership and are surprised when people assume you're male when you have (at best) an ambiguous handle then... Well, I have nothing. You probably get surprised easily. Boo. Did that surprise you? I expect it did.

      I must believe you don't work in USA then

      I work for nvidia. My employment contract said:
      a) Any inventions I invent on my own time with my own equipment are mine.
      b) Any inventions I invent on their time and/or with their equipment are theirs.
      c) I can leave nvidia whenever I want (duh) and go work for whomever I want, on whatever project I want.

      All they ask is that if I'm thinking about leaving, I let them know so they can see if they can make the reason I want to leave go away.

      You can have my job when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
      --
      I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
    7. Re:ask a lawyer by stellar7 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm the original poster. I spoke to a lawyer, and he told me that in my state this type of contract would hold and that the employer can punish employees in any way for not signing. So, I'm thinking I just need to find a better employer.

    8. Re:ask a lawyer by Lwood_at_COG · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or a better state...

      In Ontario, this might be construed as "constructive dismissal". From what I've experienced here, signing any employment contracts is a bad idea. Without an employment contract, you'd be covered by common-law, which is generally favourable to the employee regarding severance amounts, etc. Employment contracts usually replace all that with explicit terms that favour the employer.

      IMHO, you'd have to be NUTS to work as an employee in high tech outside of government or unionized employers. Ontario's labour laws are terrible for "technology professionals". As unemployment rates are very low, and there is plenty of unfulfilled demand for skills, you're far better off subcontracting, where the legal relationship is between corporate peers. Some of the rights you retain as a subcontractor include:

      - pay by the hour, if you so arrange. No unpaid OT.
      - the right to conduct business with other clients

      normal employer rights that are NOT applicable in contracting:
      - the right to supervise and direct
      - the right to set hours of work (duration and timing)
      - exclusivity to all the employee's production, intellectual or otherwise, regardless of whether the efforts were during paid working hours.

      There is a lot more variation and flexibility in terms, and you still have to keep your clients happy - i.e. they won't be happy if you openly compete against them and work 3h/week, and your contract will be cancelled.

      If you are a non-unionized employee, remember, the only real power you have is to quit.

      --
      "Beware of all enterprises that require new clothes." --Henry David Thoreau
    9. Re:ask a lawyer by torkus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My Suggestion:

      Require an additional clause added where they guarantee you 6 months severance pay should you leave the company for any reason while that agreement is still in effect.

      Yes...refuse to sign. Or better - just ignore it. Put it off, defer them, 'will get around to it'...till they either forget or you find a new job.

      New job...good call. On your exit interview point out that you're leaving because the company clearly has no interest in treating people fairly or even caring in the slightest bit about them.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  2. Not Enforceable in California (for the most part) by triclipse · · Score: 5, Informative
    California Business & Professions Code 16600 states:

    "Except as provided in this chapter, every contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is to that extent void."

    The rest of the relevant chapter addresses mainly those instances where one sells an interest in a business. In those cases noncompetes are enforceable.

    California courts routinely void noncompetes under B&P 16600.

    --
    No Inflation Taxation without Representation
  3. Re:Take it home. by hcmtnbiker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cross out the parts you think are ridiculous.

    Sign it.


    Last I knew all that achieved was voiding the entire contract unless they initialed all the parts you crossed out. And I assume the old one would still be binding in that case.

    --
    If i had one dollar for every brain you dont have, i would have $1.
  4. Re:What do you get in return? by renegadesx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd sign it if they agreed to pay me for 6 months after employment, otherwise I would tell them to get stuffed

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
  5. I got one and didn't sign it. by wrook · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of the companies I used to work for tried to get me to sign an "updated" contract.

    I told them, "I already have a contract and I'm happy with it. There are termination measures in the contract, but I don't think any of the issues apply (gross incompetance, etc)."

    Legal freaked out. They told me I must sign the new contract or else my employment would end. I said, "The contract I am working under has no expiration date and I don't see any provisions for updating it. As I said, I'm happy with this contract, so unless you offer me large concessions I don't really feel it's in my best interest to sign another one".

    Legal freaked out again. They said, "Everyone has signed this contract. You are the last person. You must sign it."

    I asked, "Are you saying that you will fire me if I don't sign this contract?"

    "Well, no."

    "Good because I like the old contract better."

    End of story. Never heard from them again.

    1. Re:I got one and didn't sign it. by oxygen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's shocking how few people realize that this is an option. There may be consequences for your actions such as termination, but you do have the option to not sign it.

      I had the same thing happen to me a few years back. I had an NDA/non-compete dropped on my desk by the HR manager and I looked at it and handed it back to her and said no. She said I had to sign it, required, firings, I looked back and said Okay and put it in my trash.

      A few hours later my boss came over and asked why I didn't sign it. I explained my issues and after three rounds with legal, they came back with a very narrow agreement that I was willing to sign.

      Later on, I was talking with some other employees and happened to mention what happened and they were all shocked.

      --
      Why is it that its easier to write a huge comment here, but I still can't write the first paragraph of that english st
    2. Re:I got one and didn't sign it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'll do you one better. My last job fired me a month ago for the neurotic reason of missing a meeting. Not an important meeting. Not even a one time meeting. Just a routine Friday morning meeting which never divulges any useful information what so ever and is pretty much a waste of an hour. Now that's not the amazing part.

      The amazing part is sitting there the Monday morning after the meeting listening to HR read me the termination letter. They've brought in the previous HR lady AND the company lawyer (which they don't routinely do) because they're scared of me. Mysterious powers of network admins, I guess. Then after reading me a specially written termination letter (this is a company with a 100%+ yearly turnover rate, so their typical letter is a form to save time) the HR lady has the following to say:

      "Typically, when we hire an employee, they sign a confidentiality agreement."

      "OK."

      "You don't have one in your employee file."

      I begin to smell where this is going, but due to sheer disbelief, I play dumb, "OK. Are we done?"

      "Could you please sign this one now?"

      Yep. They actually asked it. WHILE they were firing me. I didn't know which impressed me more... the amount of nerve it took them to tell her to ask me that, or the stupidity it would require to believe in a million years somebody might comply. "Uh, no?" I responded.

      Now at this point, the lady seems visibly shaken. The big wigs watching her are obviously not pleased that she couldn't work a miracle. "Is there uh... is there a particular reason why you don't uh... don't want to?"

      A million things run through my mind. Illegal things they've done, mostly. But I decide it's best not to let them know what I know and respond, "Beside the fact that you're asking me for a favor as you fire me? I just don't feel like signing anything right now."

      Still makes me laugh. I've never worked at a more neurotic, incompetent, worthless company in my entire life. Had a previous employer before the last one that tried to float a non-compete to all the employees after we were working there. We got together and all said "Nah, we don't like the terms. We're not signing." and they never asked again.

      But asking someone while you're firing them to sign a confidentiality agreement? Amazing.

  6. You can't force a free mind by Quadraginta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know a lot of people will advise you to consult a lawyer, but my advice, as one who has consulted lawyers far more often than I'd wish to have had, is not to.

    First of all, the law is not nearly as clear-cut as geeky programmer types think it is. As a rule, the law is roughly speaking some mash-up of what the legislature wrote, what the judge thinks ought to be so, and what a jury of random folks majoring in theater and journalism at the local community college think it ought to be. Hence a good lawyer is probably not going to be able to give you an precise and definitive answer on all your what-if scenarios. Instead, he'll probably agree with you on general grounds that the contract is evil, vicious, and you are a noble person dreadfully wronged blah blah (this is just advertising, an appeal to your vanity, so you won't forget him when you someday need a lawyer). If you press him on specifics, the most he's likely to do is tell you roughly how he would argue the case against the contract if he needed to, but he's unlikely to guarantee it will work.

    Secondly, aside from satisfying your injured pride, what would be the result of asking a lawyer and setting yourself back $500 or so? Suppose the lawyer agrees it's a smelly contract, and a court might rule this or that aspect unenforceable, if push came to shove? What are you going to do with this information? Go to your boss and say Ha! All your base are belong us! and he's just going to say Curses! Foiled again! and tear up the NDA, maybe give you a raise for showing initiative and helpfully pointing out the folly of the company's ways? I mean, as opposed to marking you down as a pain in the ass who needs to be shitcanned at the first opportunity, like maybe right now? Your feelings would probably be more effectively soothed if you spent that $500 buying pretty girls drinks in a club.

    Finally, if you just have enough mental discipline to keep your mouth shut when you need to, this doesn't matter anyway. Suppose you do have some kick-ass wonderful idea while you're working for this bunch, and you decide you want to take it elsewhere. All you need to do is not keep notes on your idea in your office (duh), not work on it using company computers and networks (duh), not talk boastfully about it around the water cooler -- this is the hard part -- and just generally keep your thoughts to yourself as long as you work there and for six months afterward. When your killer idea takes the world by storm it's going to be up to your former employers to prove in court that you had the idea eight months earlier, when you still worked for them. But without the evidence you've carefully avoided providing, they're screwed. They can't read your mind.

    As for the ethics involved: anyone who gives you a contract like that to sign has made their lack of morals completely clear. You owe them no consideration in return whatsoever. Indeed, if you used them to pay your rent while secretly working out your brilliant idea at home, they'd have only gotten what they deserve.

  7. It may backfire. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had the same type of agreement when I was at MSI. When the workers comp. insurance turned me down -- claiming that the injury was not solely from work, I used that agreement to argue that all computer related work belongs to my employer, therefore work related.