Slashdot Mirror


Corkscrew Cups Could Keep Space Drinks Flowing

holy_calamity writes "A Canadian chemical engineer has a novel solution to containing liquids in space. He has been experimenting with corkscrews of ribbon-like material that keep liquids suspended in their center while in microgravity. This effect is caused by the surface tension of the liquids. The helical containers allow the fluid to be sucked out of the coil in one go. In more conventional shapes, such as coffee cups, interaction between the container and the liquid's internal pressure makes the beverage break into annoying globules you have to chase with a straw."

181 comments

  1. I'm interested in how they simulated microgravity by kcbanner · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They tested the candidates in a tank that simulates microgravity using two different liquids of equal density. I wonder if the surface tension of those two liquids affects the experiment at all? Thats interesting.
    --
    Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
  2. Globule wars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "In more conventional shapes, such as coffee cups, interaction between the container and the liquid's internal pressure makes the beverage break into annoying globules you have to chase with a straw."

    Yes, but that's half the fun right there of going into space. The other is passing space gas.

    1. Re:Globule wars. by Benaiah · · Score: 1

      I thought it was like in the movies where they just drink out of plastic bags with straws in them?
      Or they just shoot the water/beverage into the air and then proceed to drink from the suspended sphere. :)

  3. Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 5, Funny

    And also begs the question, what shape would the corkscrew opener be for that? the shape of a bottle perhaps?

    1. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by spyder913 · · Score: 1, Informative

      And also begs the question...
      No, it raises the question. =P

    2. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is so useful to me in my daily life. From now on I am going to insist on helical containers for all my micro-gravity beverage needs.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I saw a WeightWatchers commercial a while back that wrongly used "begs the question" as well. So it's not just for those you expect to lack grammar any more.

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    4. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Gewalt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it begs the question.

      No, I don't care if some website says the etymology of that phrase is in some fashion contrary to it's current modern day usage. The mere fact of the matter is that language evolves, and so did that phrase. People look like idiots for suggesting that the phrase was used incorrectly, as that is NOT the accepted definition.

      Quit modding that wrongful correction as insightful. That statement, and its "Insightful" modding is a very good indication that the poster, nor the modder has any insight on the fluidity of language. /soapbox

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    5. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fie! Hast thou not esteem for the sanctitee of the English tonge? Verily, that sufficentlly benefecent to be used by Jesus Christ must needs be goodest enoughtst for you. Getest thee backest to Russia!

    6. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by jesdynf · · Score: 1

      You are not the first person to make the claim that widespread incorrect usage is no longer incorrect. You are not the last person who will do so.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    7. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      The only reason the usage of that phrase ever changed is because large numbers of ignorant people started using it incorrectly, and now we're left without an unambiguous, concise way of accusing someone of assuming what they are pretending to prove. The usage of "begs the question" we are discussing is only standard in the same sense, and for the same reasons, that .doc, Microsoft Windows, and IE's broken implementation of HTML and CSS are standard.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    8. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by necrostopheles · · Score: 2, Informative

      First, read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question#Modern_usage_controversy
      Then follow the link to the article on linguistic prescription and description.

      Personally, my skin crawls whenever someone uses "begging the question" in it's so-called modern sense, but I think that describing an argument as 'circular' is more aesthetically pleasing. So I'm inclined to let the masses beg their questions.

    9. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by agrippa_cash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "You're assuming your conclusion" isn't that many more letters than "You're begging the question." and uses each word as it's currently understood.

    10. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by pushing-robot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are not the first person to make the claim that widespread incorrect usage is no longer incorrect. You are not the last person who will do so.

      And he is not wrong for doing so. How do you think the English language was created? Lexical Engineers?

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    11. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...the fluidity of language...

      And that begs the the question, what kind of wessel would you store it in?

      --
      What?
    12. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by sykodoc · · Score: 1

      You're harshing my buzz, dude.

      Now... pass me that corkscrew full of wine sitting next to you.

      --
      "Our enemies will talk themselves to death and we will bury them in their own confusion!"
    13. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by instarx · · Score: 1

      No, I don't care if some website says the etymology of that phrase is in some fashion contrary to it's current modern day usage. The mere fact of the matter is that language evolves, and so did that phrase. People look like idiots for suggesting that the phrase was used incorrectly... No, the phrase "begs the question" hasn't evolved to mean some other thing. It still means to avoid answering the question no matter how forcefully you insist that it means what you want it to mean. How ironic (and frankly, moronic) that you feel justified in calling people idiots because they know the English language better than you.
    14. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      The only reason the usage of that phrase ever changed is because large numbers of ignorant people started using it incorrectly, and now we're left without an unambiguous, concise way of accusing someone of assuming what they are pretending to prove.


      Someone is singular. They is plural. Only ignorant people use singular they.

    15. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah you and you're wordz and your grammer dont impress me a bit!

    16. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... fluidity of language

      I get it... it's a pun.

      Also in response to the original comment... couldn't you use a slightly larger cup of the same style as it's cover (you know flip it upside down and screw together)and prevent the hassle of opening a cork in space (which wouldn't the cabin pressure make more difficult.)

    17. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Gewalt · · Score: 1
      You mean latin right?

      That phrase is a latin translation, and before it was translated from latin it never meant anything in this language. How ironic (and frankly, moronic) that you didn't know that, but tried to call me out on it.

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    18. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Cecil · · Score: 1

      It'll only legitimately become the evolution of the language when everyone starts to agree with the usage. Clearly, everyone does not.

    19. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 4, Informative

      The singular usage of "they" is attested all the way back to Shakespearean times (in fact, to Shakespeare himself) and has no negative consequences to the language as a whole. The issue here is not that some of us accept that language changes and others don't. The issue here is that some of us prefer to see language be used as eloquently and articulately as possible. Using "raises the question" instead of "begs the question" when one isn't referring to the logical fallacy maintains precision and avoids ambiguity. Similarly, using "they" to refer to a singular person of indeterminate gender is far more elegant than awkward constructions such as "s/he", "he/she", "(s)he", and so forth, while avoiding the ambiguity and gender bias of using "he".

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    20. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by instarx · · Score: 1

      You mean latin right?

      That phrase is a latin translation, and before it was translated from latin it never meant anything in this language. How ironic (and frankly, moronic) that you didn't know that, but tried to call me out on it. God, you're pedantic. Is there a logical point to your apparently nonsensical reference to Latin? Almost the entire English language is based on Latin - so what?

      Trust me, anyone who would write "before it was translated from latin it never meant anything in this language" doesn't have the horsepower to argue the correct use of language.
    21. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Gewalt · · Score: 1

      Your post doesn't make any sense at all. None of it. But thanks for playing.

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    22. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He or she"

    23. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      So stop giving a shit! Seriously, why do people care about these things enough to go out of their way to correct others?

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    24. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Give me a gender-neutral singular pronoun that isn't so unwieldy that it negates the point of using a pronoun in the first place. Then explain why we should invent a new word for this (like "hir") when "they" works just fine.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    25. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Another example of awkward usage.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    26. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by hardburn · · Score: 1

      English speakers can't even agree if "armor" should have a silent 'u' or not. For that matter, in South Africa it's still common to hear "Negro" used in everyday speech. By contrast, the correct usage of "Begging the Question" is debated by very few.

      That said, it's accepted that words can take on different meaning in certain contexts. The layperson definition of "theory" is subtly (but importantly) different from how scientists use it, for instance. If you want to have a different definition for "Begging the Question" in the context of logical fallacies, that's OK, but keep it on your side of the fence.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    27. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Nexx · · Score: 0, Redundant

      That's okay. I saw a Mandarin Oriental Towers advert in an American Airlines magazine that used "it's" as a possessive. I'd like to think something like that, aimed at high net-worth individuals, would hire better copy writers.

    28. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "giving a shiate" you insensitive clod.

    29. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Eivind · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That depends on your outlook, now doesn't it ?

      Who owns english ? Who has the power to authoratively say what is correct english and what is not ?

      In Germany it's simple, most people don't question authority, so everyone accepts that whatever Duden chooses to put in its dictionaries is correct, everything else is wrong. Yes, even if 99% of the population, including linguistically trained people, do it differently.

      You get strange things like; "Everyone says gukken, but it's really kukken that is correct" (for look, glance). If you try asking a Germany -WHY- gukken is wrong if that is what everyone says, you get a bland stare, they don't really even get the question.

      English, and most languages really, are somewhat more open: The *natives* define the language. Those putting out dictionaries merely *document* the language. Yes, there are "common misperceptions", i.e. things that many people do but which are nevertheless wrong and should probably remain so. Those are the things that break the -structure- of the language.

      But stuff like meaning of phrases and/or pronounciation changes meaning over time trough actual use. Also, the same phrase has different (often related, but different) meaning in different fields. A photographer and a filesystem-designer do NOT mean the same thing when both talk about "taking a snapshot".

      Begging the question means one thing in formal logic. In practice, it has other common meanings in everyday english. Deal with it.

    30. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
      Similarly, using "they" to refer to a singular person of indeterminate gender ...

      How about "it"? Too impersonal?

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    31. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Too impersonal and not attested. Making up a new usage is a lot harder and to be avoided when compared to adopting existing usage.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    32. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by jesdynf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Merely because everyone else in the world is wrong is no reason to change my opinion.

      If, as you say, popular usage legitimizes, and if the users of the language have the right to define it... you appear to be forgetting that *I am a user of the language*, and have the right to define it. You don't get to claim that everyone but me has the right to an opinion on the subject. I simply need to change popular meaning and its use in everyday English, exactly like *you* are trying to do by posting in this thread.

      Anyone attempting to construct an argument so rigorous they have cause to use the phrase "begging the question" usually places enough value on words and language to be shamed by their misuse of them when the point is explained. I find that one correction on *this* point usually sticks.

      In fact... thinking about it... I'd be willing to bet karma on the fact that you don't use it, either. Because -- your arguments about "popular usage" aside -- you, personally, know very well that it's wrong, and *you* place enough value on your words not to make such a mistake.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    33. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by fotoguzzi · · Score: 2, Funny

      She + he + it. Now, if only there were a convenient way to contract those.

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
    34. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The only reason the usage of that phrase ever changed is because large numbers of ignorant people started using it incorrectly, and now we're left without an unambiguous, concise way of accusing someone of assuming what they are pretending to prove.

      Try "circular reasoning". Besides, you do realize that "begging the question" is merely a translation of the latin phrase "petitio principii" ? Finally, you could simply say: "You are assuming what you are pretending to prove."

      Really, this whole thing is utterly ridiculous, and begs the question, in both meanings of the phrase, of just why the meaning "circular reasoning" should be the correct one; after all, if mere common usage is not sufficient to make that usage correct, then what is the correctness of that usage based on ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    35. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by greginnj · · Score: 1

      Oh, I so want to be a "Lexical Engineer"!

      --
      Read the best of all of Slash: seenonslash.com
    36. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Eivind · · Score: 1

      You get me wrong. Offcourse your opinion counts too.

      My point is, some things are matters of FACT: How many states are there, in fact, in USA ? Is Earth larger or smaller than Mars ? In such questions it makes no difference what the majority thinks, the truth is the truth regardless.

      But other questions are matter of -opinion-. What meanings do the word "spam" have ? There obviously can be no authoritative source on it, you can't -count- and have an answer, as with the states. Indeed, words would not have meaning at ALL unless groups of people agreed to attach a certain meaning to a certain word. The attachmen it ARBITRARY and can and do change over time.

      My point ? If a group of people agree to attach a certain meaning to a certain word or phrase, then that word or phrase -has- that meaning, to that group. By some collective process we agreed on attaching new meaning to "spam", that meaning wasn't there 20 years ago, but nevertheless, today it's without a doubt in every sense CORRECT to use spam in that new sense.

    37. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by SilentOneNCW · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      '"Begging the question" is a form of logical fallacy in which an argument is assumed to be true without evidence other than the argument itself. When one begs the question, the initial assumption of a statement is treated as already proven without any logic to show why the statement is true in the first place.

      A simple example would be "I think he is unattractive because he is ugly." The adjective "ugly" does not explain why the subject is "unattractive" -- they virtually amount to the same subjective meaning, and the proof is merely a restatement of the premise. The sentence has begged the question.

      To beg the question does not mean "to raise the question." (e.g. "It begs the question, why is he so dumb?") This is a common error of usage made by those who mistake the word "question" in the phrase to refer to a literal question. Sadly, the error has grown more and more ubiquitous with time, such that even journalists, advertisers, and major mass media entities have fallen prey to "BTQ Abuse."

      While descriptivists and other such laissez-faire linguists are content to allow the misconception to fall into the vernacular, it cannot be denied that logic and philosophy stand to lose an important conceptual label should the meaning of BTQ become diluted to the point that we must constantly distinguish between the traditional usage and the erroneous "modern" usage. This is why we fight.'

      http://begthequestion.info/

    38. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by hardburn · · Score: 1

      A sample size of one is not statistically valid, so no, just you saying it doesn't define common usage. Since the number of people arguing against current usage is relatively small, and the people using it "incorrectly" are often journalists, statesmen, or just that one guy from accounting at the water cooler, the definition used within logical fallacies will have to remain a secondary definition that's relatively rare in practice.

      The same goes, much to my sadness, to the definition of "hacker".

      --
      Not a typewriter
    39. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Try "circular reasoning".

      Similar but not quite the same.

      Really, this whole thing is utterly ridiculous, and begs the question, in both meanings of the phrase, of just why the meaning "circular reasoning" should be the correct one; after all, if mere common usage is not sufficient to make that usage correct, then what is the correctness of that usage based on?

      The same principles I've been citing the whole time--unambiguity and precision.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    40. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur. I get particularly frustrated by people who use 'she' inappropriately in order to correct some obscure gender bias they perceive. Every time I read something written in such a style I start to wonder who this 'she' being referred to is, however if written in the more traditional manner, I automatically assume that a 'he' is a third person of unknown gender unless the text specifically identifies that person. I don't see it as a gender bias until some numpty points it out, creating a conflict where none need exist. Surely there are far more important, significant and useful ways you can help rid the world of inequality than by making your writing confusing and hard to read.

      I agree completely with the parent poster. Am I correct in thinking that appropriate use of the pronouns 'they' and 'one' allow description of third parties without any so-called 'gender bias'.

      I am often thankful that we speak a language that doesn't have genders incorporated as part of the language (e.g. French, German). The loony PC brigade must have a field day (although perhaps German, since it includes a neutral gender, for those words that aren't comfortable with the gender originally assigned to them is the most politically correct language of all?)

    41. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      The singular usage of "they" is attested all the way back to Shakespearean times (in fact, to Shakespeare himself)


      Any idea exactly where? I have Shakespeare-loving english majors getting on my case constantly for using the singular "they". It'd be really fun to throw "The Bard" back in their face at them. (Plural this time. Sorry.)
    42. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The mere fact of the matter is that language evolves, and so did that phrase.

      100% correct. Also, the phrase 'computer' has evolved to mean 'monitor'. The phrase 'hard drive' has evolved to mean 'tower'. And the phrase 'CPU' has evolved to mean whatever you happen to be pointing at when you say it.

      Now, do you really mean to say that anything ignorant people say to each other is correct for no reason except that ignorant people use it that way? Are you willing to accept all the consequences that has for our language?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    43. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The layperson definition of "theory" is subtly (but importantly) different from how scientists use it, for instance.

      Which is to say the layperson definition of theory is incorrect and causes confusion. Just like "begging the question" both popular and academic discourse would be improved, and in no way harmed, if everyone understood and used the proper meaning of the terms.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    44. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      For that matter, in South Africa it's still common to hear "Negro" used in everyday speech. By contrast, the correct usage of "Begging the Question" is debated by very few.
      Be serious, will you? The only reason "Negro" isn't used in the USA is that people are afraid to use a perfectly appropriate word. How many Westerners object to being called Caucasian? For that matter, I still can't understand why US citizens of partial Negroid ancestry get to be called "African-American" but no other descendent of any other race gets to be "Korean-American," or "Aleut-American," or (shudder) "Bohunk-American"

      Oh, and I don't debate the "proper" use of "beg the question" any more than I debate "exception that proves the rule." A very few of us take the time to learn and become educated; the rest think it's fine to say "the consensus of opinion was that this very unique item should be given to Jane and I."

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    45. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Actually, German's neutral gender is inappropriate to use with a gendered word, as far as I'm aware. So a computer is "der Computer" (male), and a shirt is "die Hemd" (female), but "das Computer" and "das Hemd" (neuter) would be wrong. Also, the German for "human" is "der Mensch" (male), so German does have the equivalent of an English gender bias there. Interestingly, I don't think the Germans really mind it--they're so used to words being gendered that it doesn't strike them as very meaningful, I suppose.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    46. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 1

      Actually it's das Hemd ;), so die Hemd would be the incorrect usage. But your overall point is absolutely correct, and I think for Germans learning English the whole concept of when to correctly use "he or she" or "they" is likely quite confusing since there does not seem to be very much consensus.

    47. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Gewalt · · Score: 0
      I think you need a lesson in etymology yourself. Go look up the history of those words you gave as examples. You may find each and every one has hundreds of years of history to it, and every usage of the words came from common usage, and they are all different from the current technology word.

      And why aren't you rallying against the common ignorant usage of the word spam?

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    48. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia's got lots of examples.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    49. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Harlequin · · Score: 1

      Seriously? You've never heard someone referred to as "Japanese American" or "Asian American"?

    50. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Harlequin · · Score: 1

      Don't forget 'RAM' meaning 'hard drive'.

    51. Re:Would you need a screw shaped cork for wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      contrary to it's current modern day usage

      "its".

  4. I LOVE.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....sucking coils! mmmmmmmm

  5. whooa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stop it you're totally freaking me out man

  6. Star bucks by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Coffee in space?

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Star bucks by FiloEleven · · Score: 3, Funny

      In space, no one can hear you sip.

    2. Re:Star bucks by Frogbert · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Okay, perhaps it is just an American thing, but it has to be said.

      How the hell can you drink that crap? Starbucks coffee is terrible, and I'm not talking tastes-no-better-then-instant terrible, I'm talking this-coffee-is-burnt terrible.

      How is Starbucks still in business?

    3. Re:Star bucks by Kymri · · Score: 1

      Starbucks is nearly ubiquitous here in the US (and in other places) and is fairly consistent in what you get, regardless of location. This helps (look at McDonald's - I doubt there are many people who can't find a much tastier hamburger nearby, and yet they're quite successful).

      Also, it isn't coffee. They make hot milkshakes. And if you find the (rare) location with a staff that actually cares, they can make halfway decent coffee.

      --
      Evolution ceases when stupidity can no longer be fatal.
    4. Re:Star bucks by Plaid+Phantom · · Score: 1

      I've yet to hear anyone call Starbucks coffee good. A lot of people like their oddly-named milk-based drinks, though. I expect it's because there's so little coffee in them that one can't taste how bad it is.

      --
      All comments are properties and trademarks of the voices in my head. Not like I'm gonna claim them.
    5. Re:Star bucks by AJWM · · Score: 1

      How the hell can you drink that crap? Starbucks coffee is terrible, and I'm not talking tastes-no-better-then-instant terrible, I'm talking this-coffee-is-burnt terrible.

      How is Starbucks still in business?


      You see the success of Microsoft and you have to ask a question like that?

      It's all a matter of marketing. Starbucks takes cheap beans, overroasts them so that nobody can tell the difference, and markets their coffee to those who don't know any better but like to think they do. Then they charge for extra flavorings and sweeteners to make it halfway palatable. Compare that with how Microsoft sells software.

      Both company's HQ's are in the Seattle area. Maybe it's something in the water.

      --
      -- Alastair
  7. Prior art. by bobdotorg · · Score: 4, Funny

    I believe it's called a Silly Straw. I have one sitting right next to my Tang.

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
  8. Does this mean... by gaelfx · · Score: 1

    ...that my crazy straw collection may actually be worth something?

    1. Re:Does this mean... by kcbanner · · Score: 3, Funny

      It means your "Strategically Engineering Anti-Gravity Humanoid Powered Suction Devices(TM)" are worth something, yes.

      --
      Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
    2. Re:Does this mean... by gaelfx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn, I knew i should have invested more in marketing! Do have the number of a good PR rep?

  9. Even better. by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

    Why not just suck water out of a sponge? This is twice as good as a silly straw (aka "corckscrew cup") because you could use it to clean up spills as well as prevent them.

    --
    Just callin' it like I see it.
    1. Re:Even better. by Carnildo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why not just suck water out of a sponge? This is twice as good as a silly straw (aka "corckscrew cup") because you could use it to clean up spills as well as prevent them.


      Bacteria love sponges. All that surface area means they'll hold water for a long time, and it's impossible to clean them properly.
      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:Even better. by ILuvRamen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      because when you squeeze the sponge, liquid droplets would fly EVERYWHERE! There's a lot of holes in a sponge you know. That would be a total disaster. You'd have water droplets flying around for weeks. As for the giant, ridiculously long straw idea proposed in the article, I don't see why you can't just float a sphere of water and take bites out of it like an orange. If you're really, really careful, it shouldn't fragment plus that'd be way mroe fun!

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    3. Re:Even better. by Takichi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Two minutes of microwaving on full power mode killed or inactivated more than 99 percent of all the living pathogens in the sponges and pads... Microwave oven can sterilize sponges, scrub pads
    4. Re:Even better. by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      In addition to the "bacteria love sponges" comment, the helix allows flow, whereas sponges are very good at stopping flow.

    5. Re:Even better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't let anyone tell you that crap. The ONLY proper way to clean a bateria saturated piece of foam (like a sponge ... man even the spelling feels all wrong) is with FIRE or LAZERS. BTW, the first person who even suggests that lazer isn't spelled with a 'z' is going to get all 1.21 gigawatts of my newly purchased death lazer.

      ps. Sorry about the threat with the lazer and all. You see I had an accident trying to attach it to a certain aquatic animal earlier this morning ... you know what never mind.

    6. Re:Even better. by ixtapa · · Score: 1

      Bacteria love sponges... and it's impossible to clean them properly. Impossible? Aren't 99.9% of the bacteria removed by two minutes in the microwave (http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/25/0321251)? I hear the remaining .1% can be removed by scrubbing with a larger sponge.
    7. Re:Even better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No results found for "Lazer"

      Did you mean: Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation?

    8. Re:Even better. by Nullav · · Score: 1

      Yes, and then we'll all clean the soda/juice off of our hands by slapping balls of water.
      Also, wouldn't the helix cup be just as messy? I'm a little worried by how the liquid was bulging out in the first picture.

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
    9. Re:Even better. by Takichi · · Score: 1
      The article I linked was a study out of Florida State University...

      ... the UF researchers soaked sponges and scrubbing pads in raw wastewater containing a witch's brew of fecal bacteria, viruses, protozoan parasites and bacterial spores, including Bacillus cereus spores. Considering they soaked sponges into that soup and were able to kill 99% of the bacteria, I'd say microwaving sponges is pretty effective. Though your suggestion of fire or "lazers" would probably also be effective, this method seems more practical.
    10. Re:Even better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better idea. Syringe drinking?

    11. Re:Even better. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
      Why not just suck water out of a sponge?

      Works for water, but not so much for my Chicken and Noodle soup...

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    12. Re:Even better. by Fizzl · · Score: 1
      ...New here and all that, but:

      ridiculously long straw idea proposed in the article


      The proposed thing in the article is nothing like a straw. Have a look at least at the pretty pictures in the fine article. It really seems quite novel.
    13. Re:Even better. by AJWM · · Score: 1

      If it only kills 99% of the pathogens, they'll be right back where they started in less than four hours. (Given the ability of bacteria to reproduce in about a half-hour in a friendly environment.)

      Obviously there's an upper limit, but if there were sufficient nutrients to support the original population, they'll still be there (some of them in the form of dead bacteria, perhaps) to support the new population.

      --
      -- Alastair
    14. Re:Even better. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      So they overloaded the sponge with bacteria in the first place. Killing 99% of 10 billion bacteria is a lot less impressive than killing 99% of 1000 bacteria.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  10. Nothing new here. by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Re:Nothing new here. by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      If you'd take just a moment's glance at the story page you'd notice that this spiral is completely different.

      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
  11. Capri Sun by Asmor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't a Capri Sun work just fine? Just a packet of liquid with no rigid structure which contracts to always contain the liquid...

    Reminds me of that old (and false) joke about Americans spending a million dollars to invent a pen that can write in space, while the Russians used a pencil.

    1. Re:Capri Sun by Microlith · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did the russians have fun brushing the shavings and graphite dust out of the relays?

    2. Re:Capri Sun by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      no, they bought the fisher space pens at retail price just like nasa. Oh, and an ordinary biro would have worked just as well anyway - you only need a pressurized pen for a de-pressurized area, like an airlock or the surface of the moon. Some people need to watch more QI.

      --
      FGD 135
    3. Re:Capri Sun by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they couldn't find the relays because of all the broken pencil leads in their eyes.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    4. Re:Capri Sun by CriX · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, it wouldn't... that's what TF problem is all about. In micro gravity your capri sun juice would globulize inside the container and your straw would be sucking air and juice intermittently. On Earth gravity ensures that the heavier liquid stays in contact with your straw entrance. Also, this problem isn't as relevant to humans drinking efficiently as it is to mechanical systems that need to transfer fluid around effectively in a micro gravity environment.

      --
      Moderation: +1 pwnage
    5. Re:Capri Sun by rtaylor · · Score: 1

      Which works great right up until a piece of graphite breaks off and floats into a control board causing a short circuit.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    6. Re:Capri Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hmmm... I don't think you get it. These Capri Sun juices come in containers that collapse as you suck the juice out of them. So, as long as no air enters through the interface between the straw and the package (easy to implement) or through the straw itself (probably harder), the situation you mention would not happen.

    7. Re:Capri Sun by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1

      Did the russians have fun brushing the shavings and graphite dust out of the relays? Are you kidding? A Real Russian(TM) just hangs back and grabs the fire extinguisher every once in a while!
    8. Re:Capri Sun by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you're missing the point. As long as a reasonably good seal is maintained (which is usually the case), the drink "packet" will deform as the drink is consumed instead of letting air to fill the void left by the liquid.

      Gravity doesn't even factor into the equation, although getting the last few drops out could prove to be frustrating..

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    9. Re:Capri Sun by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Informative? Do you know what a Capri Sun is?

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    10. Re:Capri Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok Capri is out, let's try an Evenflow baby bottle with a collapsing bag?

    11. Re:Capri Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably don't like Capri Sun juices. I, for one, prefer carbonated drinks.

    12. Re:Capri Sun by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but have you tried to jam that straw through a Capri Sun lately? Now try doing that in weightlessness. Talk about frustration.

    13. Re:Capri Sun by Asmor · · Score: 1

      It's actually not hard when you know how, but there is a definite art to it.

      The secret is to squish the bottom so that the the straw hole is facing vertically. Cover the end of the straw and jam it in-- don't worry about leaking or anything, it forms a remarkably airtight seal (after you drink it, try blowing the thing up with the straw. I blow as hard as I can and can't get any air to leak out around the straw)

    14. Re:Capri Sun by h3llfish · · Score: 1

      No this will never work! Right now, beverage technology only enables us to store two types of beverages in mylar bags: sugary "fruit" drinks that actually contain less that 10 percent real juice, and cheap wine. Can you imaging having to always choose between those two alternatives for a year on the space station?

      Actually, I'd live. Not that big of a deal. Problem solved.

      But in all seriousness, this "problem" is a total joke. They eat their futuristic food goo out of a tube, so astronauts can drink out of a tube (or pouch) just as easily.

      Or the other way to go is to just shoot the beverages at the astronauts in a pressurized stream, firehose-style. I'll have a SuperSoaker full of Sam Adams go, please!

    15. Re:Capri Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      although getting the last few drops out could prove to be frustrating.. Nonsense, that's the most fun part! Plus the noise you make with a capri-sun is even more annoying that the straw at the bottom of a paper cup.
    16. Re:Capri Sun by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

      It's a great joke, but I'm sure everyone else already posted that the graphite shavings get in the equipment, so they actually use a "china marker" (grease pencil).

      --
      stuff |
    17. Re:Capri Sun by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Oh, and an ordinary biro would have worked just as well anyway - you only need a pressurized pen for a de-pressurized area,

      Not so, gravity helps the flow of ink in a biro (ballpoint pen to Americans). Try writing upside down and see how long that works, or even just horizontally (ie, pen horizontal on a vertical surface) if you think it's the gravity pulling the ink away from the tip. The pressurization helps force the ink out in a Fisher.

      Because it's pressurized, Fisher ink is thicker than regular ballpoint ink, but that in combination with the pressurization also lets it write on (through) greasy surfaces and underwater. On the other hand, for regular terrestrial use I prefer something with a more fluid ink, like a Pilot G-2; I find the thickness (viscosity) of Fisher ink makes them harder (more force required) to write with.

      --
      -- Alastair
    18. Re:Capri Sun by AJWM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They eat their futuristic food goo out of a tube,

      Not since the 1970s. Many ordinary foods work just fine in zero-G, so long as they don't produce lots of crumbs (no crackers!) or require too much preparation. It's pretty common to send up a few loaves of bread and a jar of peanut butter (along with other foods) on Shuttle flights, and things like meat spreads, etc. work just fine out of a can -- they'll stick to the can or utensil rather than float around. You can even "glue" the can to a table (wall, etc) with a drop of water, the surface tension keeps them stuck together. (There's some NASA footage of this somewhere on YouTube.)

      Yeah, they still do the reconstitutable stuff in a baggy too, but that's as much for convenience of preparation as anything else. Eating isn't hard in zero-G, but cooking is a bitch (as is the power requirement for refrigeration/freezing).

      --
      -- Alastair
    19. Re:Capri Sun by h3llfish · · Score: 1

      Thanks, some interesting tidbits in there. Since you seem to be well informed on this subject, do you agree that these corkscrew glasses are pretty much nonsense? Mylar bags of beverages seem like the way to go to me.

    20. Re:Capri Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already use something much like the Capri Sun packages but with better seals.

    21. Re:Capri Sun by NotmyNick · · Score: 1

      although getting the last few drops out could prove to be frustrating..
      You really should have read the article. (I know, I know, bear with me) That's the issue being addressed.
      --
      Notmysig
    22. Re:Capri Sun by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, are you denouncing the words of Stephen Fry as untrue? Fool!

      --
      FGD 135
    23. Re:Capri Sun by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Who the hell is Stephen Fry, how many Fisher space pens has he owned, and what (if anything) does he know about the behaviour of viscose fluids in zero G?

      --
      -- Alastair
    24. Re:Capri Sun by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      Stephen Fry is the embodiment of omniscience. Gads, how can you be so ignorant?

      --
      FGD 135
  12. Uh.. Capri Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wouldn't a "Capri Sun" solution work just as easily? Put the liquid in an air-tight bag with a straw.

    Ah, solutions looking for problems.

  13. Let me get this straight by Teflon_Jeff · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you keep the liquid in a tube smaller than the globule it will break into, it won't break into a globule? Next thing, they'll be supplying these "astronauts" with "air" Brilliant!

    --
    "Teach a man to build a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life."
    1. Re:Let me get this straight by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, no. It's even more simple than that. All you have to do is put the liquid in the straw before takeoff, then you don't have to chase the globule down with a straw!

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    2. Re:Let me get this straight by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      And then you can put Guinness into the corkscrew! Brilliant!

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
  14. Man, Those pictures look so cool. by BPPG · · Score: 1

    *coughRTFAcough*

    --
    What's the value of information that you don't know?
  15. Re:I'm interested in how they simulated microgravi by LaskoVortex · · Score: 5, Informative

    Surface tension arises from cohesion and not adhesion. The two types of liquids were probably chosen such that the cohesive forces in the experiment were similar to that for water in air. Adhesive forces may exist between the liquids, but should not affect the experiment. Cohesive forces can be calculated by measuring the angle of the meniscus (if the adhesive forces between the liquid and its container are known).

    --
    Just callin' it like I see it.
  16. garbules. by sh3l1 · · Score: 1

    mmm... garbules.

    --
    Help Me! I'm trapped in the tubes! Oh noes! Here comes a internet!
  17. College students rejoice by gblackwo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like a space-age beer bong

    1. Re:College students rejoice by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a space-age beer bong

      Thank you. I was wondering how far down the page I'd have to scroll to find that joke. :-P

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  18. How do you fill it? by foxxer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's really cool and clever... but how do you fill it on earth with all its delicious gravity? Unless you load it up *in* space, but that doesn't really solve the problem does it?

    1. Re:How do you fill it? by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Duh, the replicator serves drinks in these things. Sheesh - do I have to explain even the most BASIC space technology to you guys?

      --
      FGD 135
  19. Videos of Water in Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This device would ruin all the fun.

  20. Re:I'm interested in how they simulated microgravi by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 4, Funny

    As if we didn't have enough trouble with drunken diapered astronauts, now NASA's come up with a way to have martinis in space! They should have stuck with Jello Shots in a Tube, TangDrivers, and secretly fermenting raisins from their Space Lunches. Not to mention huffing escaping gas from the air conditioning system. Yes, these plain-vanilla pilots and scientists have a wild side. The dewy-eyed novices on all-male flights awarded their first "Member of 50-Mile High Club" patch. The ones with a secret tattoo of Richard Simmons on their lower back saying "Your Space Buddy!" The "NASA Says Save Water in Space, Shower With Your Co-Pilot" ecology program. Oh, the horror. Cover your eyes, children.

  21. What does this do to astronauts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's where I show my ignorance...but what the hey.
    I looked at the pictures--they're double-helixes. I have a few of those in me. Now, I know that my DNA isn't a drinking straw (at least, I think I know...), but I'm curious to know if all that water we're theoretically made of is affected. I mean, does osmosis occur within DNA? If it does, would this do something to our genetic bits and bytes? In space?

    I, for one, welcome our twisted new micro-gravity overlords.

  22. I KNEW IT! by hack++slash · · Score: 1

    The future WILL look like (1977) Buck Rogers and/or (1978) Battlestar Galactica when we get twirly space cups.

    --
    To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
    1. Re:I KNEW IT! by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Funny

      Personally, I'm waiting for them to start cutting the corners off of our paper.

      (The urban legend goes that the production company behind BSG liked the series, but thought that it was too expensive for what it was, and instructed the director to "cut some corners." Not being too happy with this, the director subsequently told his props manager to cut the corners off of every square and rectangular object he could find in his inventory. Oddly enough, this added to the "futuristic" appearance of the props)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  23. News for nerds? by rock217 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Screw that.

    --
    Wah Sig!
  24. In other words ... by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So the solution is to package the liquid in a long, flexible straw, and then coil the straw up into the shape of a cup.

    Clever, clever!

    (Of course, we have had a number of cases where we did extensive research, and when someone finally found a simple solution to a problem, everyone who saw it said "That's obvious." This happened with things like the zipper, barbed wire, and the paper clip, all of which took decades of experimenting before someone stumbled across the simple way to do it. Simple solutions to problems are often much more difficult to see than complex solution.)

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    1. Re:In other words ... by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. It's more like a curly straw with the fluid clinging to the outside of it. Not stored in the middle.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    2. Re:In other words ... by enos · · Score: 1

      Not quite. The liquid is not in a straw at all. It's ON a ribbon that's shaped like a corkscrew. You can see in the pictures how the liquid is bulging out of the corkscrew with only surface tension holding it in.

      --
      boldly going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse
    3. Re:In other words ... by Bazer · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. The solution is to keep the liquid between the inner walls of a helical structure. Picture from the article.

  25. Now all I need is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    two girls, a camera, soothing music, and a space ship.

    1. Re:Now all I need is by Sibko · · Score: 1

      Two girls, one spaceship?

    2. Re:Now all I need is by rizole · · Score: 1

      In fact, forget the space ship!

  26. In all seriousness... by Paranatural · · Score: 1

    This could represent a new way of thinking of just not what our containers hold but how the containers interact with what they hold.

    It probably won't amount to much for terrestrials but who knows? Sometimes it's the seemingly boring inventions which have a wide impact.

  27. sippy cup by kurtis25 · · Score: 1

    Would this work on earth as a sippy cup that won't leak?

    1. Re:sippy cup by TBone · · Score: 1

      You obviously have no kids. If you did, you'd know you're asking for the Holy Grail. :)

      I'd be happy with a sippy cup that had enough resistance to pressure from inside that the cup full of milk we lose under the couch every other month didn't start blowing whey out the spout and making the living room smell like baby vomit.

      --

      This space for rent. Call 1-800-STEAK4U

  28. mod parent up, interesting by fmobus · · Score: 1

    great vid! The water droplets part was amazing!

  29. Chopsticks by ianare · · Score: 1

    No silly, you use chopsticks!

    If you notice the bag of tea is exactly like that - a pouch with a straw.

  30. why not a sponge? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with just sucking the juice in microgravity from a sponge? or from one of those Capri Sun juice bags?

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  31. Brilliantly original. I love it. by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...at least I think it's original.

    I'm just stunned at someone coming up with a totally new way to do something simple (hold liquid) in a simple way (in a container of the right shape) based on a familiar principle (surface tension).

    In a sense, the idea of using surface tension to hold fluids is not new--think of a sponge or a towel--but getting cup-like and pipe-like functionality is.

    I've no doubt that if humans had evolved in zero gravity this would have been discovered back around the same time as clay pots and chipped flint arrowheads, but as it is they didn't.

    It's nice to know there are still inventions to be invented that don't rely on a billion microchips and a million lines of code.

    1. Re:Brilliantly original. I love it. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Here's what I don't get, what's the difference between a tube and a corkscrew that's been wound tightly enough that there are no gaps? If a corkscrew should work, then a tightly wound corkscrew should work, and so should a tube. So if a tube ought to work, then pop a cap on one end and you have a cup. But cups don't work, so tubes probably don't work either. Which would imply that at some point in winding the corkscrew tightly, this surface tension effect breaks down and stops working. When does that happen and why?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  32. Why not .... by PPH · · Score: 1
    ... just use a container like a collapsible juice box?

    Like the ones they use for little kids' drinks, they can contain liquids and prevent spills ....

    .... on second thought, never mind.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  33. Fine until it gets knocked by willllllllllll · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What happens when it gets knocked against something? I bet that you'd end up with droplets all over the place: can just see the astronauts suing because their groins got burnt (shouldn't be putting coffee there anyway).

    It's an open container - so the contents can spill if the container and content experience shear that overcomes surface tension when the fluid is at an exposed edge. and because it's a helix it's all exposed edge!

    I'd go for the squeezy-bulb approach any time. ... Ha! - squeezy.

  34. Remind me, genius by gerf · · Score: 1

    How is that different from straws and containers with lots of surface area?

    Meh, nevertheless, my wife still leaves the wet sponge laying in the sink. Absolutely disgusting. However, we've never gotten sick from it, it just smells bad.

  35. Crazy Straw 3: Electric Boogaloo by byronne · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm gratified to see that Crazy Straw technology has evolved...in space!

    --
    "Look, Smithers! I'm Davy Crockett!"
  36. Fail by zobier · · Score: 1

    No results found for "Lazer"

    Did you mean: Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation? Results 1 - 10 of about 28,400,000 for Lazer
    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  37. easier way by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    When I go to space, I just bring cups with internal centrifuges. Well, that and popsicles. I've never hand any trouble, though I've found it difficult to throw my cups in a straight line.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  38. center? by thirty-seven · · Score: 1
    A Canadian chemical engineer has a novel solution ... that keep liquids suspended in their center

    Shouldn't that be centre. :)

    --

    Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    1. Re:center? by mks113 · · Score: 1

      The great thing about being Canadian is that we can understand both the yanks and brits -- and have our choice as to which terminology to use.

      Center happens to be the usual choice here.

      Good to see my university on here, though I took EE.

  39. Spiral For Strength by pcsourcepoint · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reminds me of a powerful suction effect, similar to a whirlpool or tornado...Similar principles?

  40. why not se something we already have by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

    What about those Gatoraid bottles that have the valve in the cap?
    those don't spill unless you squeeze the bottle, or suck on it hard enough.

    Come on, gatoraid! just make a tang-flavoured valve bottle and score yourselves a nice nig NASA contract.

    (ps. I'm leaving the "suck on it hard enough" line completly open....any takers?)

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
  41. newspeak by Scrameustache · · Score: 0

    You are not the first person to make the claim that widespread incorrect usage is no longer incorrect. You are not the last person who will do so.

    And he is not wrong for doing so. So if you say something incorrect often enough, it'll become true?
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:newspeak by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Not in general, no. Not for matters of fact.

      But the meaning of a word or phrase is not a fact, it is established by common agreement.

      If enough people start using the word "spam" which previously was used for a sort of canned meat to mean unsolicited comercial mail, then yes, after a while one can REALLY say that today spam MEANS that. (in addition to the original meaning, allthough outnumbering that 50:1 I'm sure)

  42. Is it just me... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1
    or did my fellow Canadian just happen to look at the cross section of an Onacup and go "Eureka!"?

    Take a look at this cross-section of one of the more complex models.

    (warning deep linked image from a site which contains NSFW material)

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
  43. Dumbass alert by hampton · · Score: 1

    I first read this as "Cork screwups could keep space drinks flowing".

    It didn't even seem weird cuz a cork screwup would indeed keep drinks flowing in space.

  44. The drinks keep flowing by Teflon_Jeff · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the International Space Station, where the Corkscrew Bar never closes!

    --
    "Teach a man to build a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life."
  45. Treelike networks? by mattr · · Score: 1

    Someone mentioned sponges. I was thinking along a different line, that if you have a long thin straw especially if the reservoir is stiff maybe it is hard to suck it out. So if you had more openings at the mouth end it would multiply the ease with which you could extract liquid (or is it really just herding barely connected globules into the air floating in the middle of the ribbon, in which case not so hard).

    This kind of a tree-like network could be three dimensional, like a rock or well a shower head you stick in your mouth. (Maybe more the size of a thumb, but with holes all over it) and connected to a thin tube that is coiled up, or maybe inserted into a pouch. Or you could do it two-dimensionally, a series of flat tubes that branch like a tree, and then roll that up into a cone (not a hollow cone, more like a stromboli, so it ends with a solid looking spiral of compressed pipe-paper with all the open ends towards the mouth. This might cut the mouth if it isn't made of soft material though.

    Of course not knowing the real issues this could be useless, but if you did have a vessel containing liquid that was not automatically deforming (or it deforms but not so much), then you could accept making it hard to extract the liquid if you also have a system like this shower head drink nozzle that hydraulically magnifies your ability to suck the liquid out. You might even be able to pinch it closed and then when you open it the liquid pours out naturally. This wouldn't work with drinks that have globs of things in it.

    There also is a thing that's a hit on the streets, it's tapioca cubes in ice tea, in a plastic cup sealed with a plastic membrane lid. You stick a very wide straw into it through the lid. Possibly this would work in orbit especially if you could include a cloth spiral inside the straw and curve (coil) the straw once to force globules to follow the path.

  46. this one kind of irks me- by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1
    FTA:

    Space tourists may one day drink coffee served in "cups" made from corkscrews of ribbon-like material that miraculously keep liquid suspended in their centre. space tourists? WTF?
    where exactly is a "space tourist" supposed to go?
    1. it takes around 7 months to get to mars which is the closest planet- I don't know about you, but I hate having to deal with long flights- I go once a year from the west coast to the east coast and I freakin' hate dealing with airports and sitting in a damn plane for hours at a time- I think I would go ballistic after 7 months in a commercial airliner- that's like prison.
    2. what exactly are you supposed to see? putting aside a trip to mars itself, no matter where you go on your "space tour" outside it will pretty much be the same thing.... space and stars- once you get away from earth there really isn't anything that spectacular it just looks like... well, stars. Putting the boredom of the outside world, let's say you built a space station resort- what would be so much better about it that would make it better than a resort on earth? everything will be prefabricated and there will prolly be like, 5 starbucks on it (hey, it's better, it's packed in spirals)if you are tired of the resort there is NO WHERE to go, and if you don't like it it takes you FOREVER to get back home.
    3. cost- no one will be able to afford to go into space ever unless we have some sort of new propulsion device that doesn't cost so damned much and doesn't rip apart the vehicle on takeoff. spaceflight is damnes expensive- the space shuttle costs 450 million dollars per flight- that means in order to break even, if you could cram 450 people on a space shuttle (that is if you ignore the fact that it would have to burn more fuel to pack those ppl in) each one would have to pay 1 million dollars to go... if it were a commercial enterprise, each would more likely pay 2 to 3 million per seat.
    no offense, but I think that considering the comfort of "space tourists" is putting the cart before the horse a bit- we should instead be thinking about how and why we want to get somewhere before how comortable it is doing it.
    1. Re:this one kind of irks me- by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      space tourists? WTF?
      where exactly is a "space tourist" supposed to go?



      Well, there have already been space tourists, but right now the only destination is the ISS. However ..



      1. it takes around 7 months to get to mars which is the closest planet-

      ... it takes just a few days to get to the moon, for example.



      2. what exactly are you supposed to see?



      Earth. From space. I've heard it's quite a view.



      3. cost- no one will be able to afford to go into space



      Why ... there are people making $200M per year. And think about the bragging rights.

    2. Re:this one kind of irks me- by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Two words: Weightless sex.

      All clear now?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  47. The screw : one of mankind's great inventions by g253 · · Score: 1

    I think I arrive too late in this discussion for my comment to be visible, but I'd like to point out that this is just on more application of one of the most important inventions ever (along with fire, the wheel, gears...)

    One more thing we owe to Babylon apparently : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screw#History
    (anyone know wether it also appeared in other civilisations, pre-colombian americas or other?)

  48. Re:If We Follow Your Way by ultranova · · Score: 1

    If I'm in the unfortunate situation of having to explain something that happens every two months, I can try and use bimonthly, but it will immediately be followed by the question: Which definition of 'bimonthly' are you using? The smart one, or the one introduced into the language by idiots?

    You could, of course, say "twice per month" or "once per two months" in the first place and thus avoid the confusion. Now, admittedly, these constructs are hideous abominations and should partyvanned, and perhaps even gendowned, to remove them from the sight of humanity. On the other hand, the price of using a living language is that people use it for actual communication, rather than for displaying their awesome level of sophistication, so they sometimes change it to better suit their needs, or just for lolz. Perhaps you should simply speak in Latin from now on ?

    But remember, these /b/-tards will one day be in the same position as you are now, frothing at the gall the younger generation has in daring to change the language ! And they, too, will be considered lunatics and ignored, besides an occasional sarcastic reply such as this one. Still, you might pause the final infinite loop you have entered to laugh at them for a moment, just like they laughed at you.

    LOL 0wn3d.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  49. Re:If We Follow Your Way by Porsche917K · · Score: 1

    ...to better suit their needs, or just for lolz

    Shouldn't that be 'lulz'? Language is fun :)

  50. a better more obvious solution? by v1 · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why they don't have more of a "juice box" design. Put the drink in a flexible bag with a hole for the straw. There's no air in it, and air doesn't go in when you drink, it just collapses the bag until it's empty. No chasing globs of liquid with the straw. Seems too obvious for them to have overlooked, so why not?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:a better more obvious solution? by binaryspiral · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe not a cardboard juicebox, but more like a foil or plastic bag.... I was thinking the same thing.

      This goes back to the millions of dollars spent researching and developing an ink pen that would write in zero G. The Russians laughed all the way to the pencil sharpener.

    2. Re:a better more obvious solution? by v1 · · Score: 1

      I think the pencil sharpener is what they were trying to avoid. And weight. If you can use a ballpoint pen for two months, or a box of pencils, which is lighter? And the weight of the sharpener? OK a small hand one is a lot lighter than an electric. Then there's the other issue of particulate matter in the space stations. Dust is a big problem there, since it doesn't fall to the flat surfaces, you have to clean EVERYTHING. The occasional escaped shaving would actually cause problems. They try very hard to keep the place spotless because the maid doesn't visit very often. ;) Also when you use the eraser on a pencil, you get those eraser crumbs, so you can't really even use that on a space station.

      I recall reading for one of the shuttle missions, they calculated what each pound cost them to send up, and as a result, one of the female astronauts got her hair cut from long to short, and saved some several thousand dollars for that launch.

      Also NASA's inventions tend to find their way into our lives. Take Velcro for example. I'm sure you're not unhappy that they developed THAT? Zero G pens are good for writing on things above you here on earth, though I personally don't need to do that very often.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  51. The Russians just used a pencil. by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    Exactly the point I was coming here to make.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  52. Pencils in space. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    There are good reasons not to use pencils in microgravity. One of them is that pencils produce graphite dust.

    1. Re:Pencils in space. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever hear of a grease pencil?

  53. Already customers by LumenPlacidum · · Score: 1
    Much of tourism to my eye is the ability to go somewhere relatively exotic and see and do things that are generally not included in your everyday lineup. "Space tourism", oddly enough, would be tourists going to space; I think even being in orbit would qualify as being somewhere relatively exotic, and the views from up there are fairly spectacular.

    Of course it's expensive. However, you underestimate how much some people want to go to space. There have been five individuals so far who have paid their own way to get into space. There are over a hundred people who have placed down payments to reserve seats on the Virgin Galactic suborbital flights. Those aren't EVEN orbital, but you get the view and you get the microgravity, and that seems to be enough to warrant its $200,000 price tag. Don't underestimate a) how much money some people make, and b) eccentric markets.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_tourism#List_of_flown_space_tourists

  54. Re:I'm interested in how they simulated microgravi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to know how they got the beer out of the can and into the corkscrew in the first place. Wouldn't the head kind of get in the way ?

  55. Leave it to a Canadian... by He+Who+Waits · · Score: 1

    ...to not let something like microgravity to get in the way of his drinking. Labatt Blue, anyone?

  56. Re:If We Follow Your Way by severoon · · Score: 1

    Oh, no, sir. You've misunderstood me completely. I'm all for changing the language when it makes it more concise, more expressive, more descriptive...better. I'm against changing it in ways that make it more ambiguous and less clear. I'm not against evolution, because evolution is change that makes things better (on the whole—it's not against trying things out). And people like me ensure that evolution is what we get...not degradation.

    Let's take my attitude to the extreme. Language gets better a lot faster. Let's take the attitude of the poster to whom I was responding to the extreme. We end up with two words that can mean anything at all. (Probably the f-word and dude.)

    Duuuude. That's totally f'd up.

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.