Slashdot Mirror


DoS Attacks on Estonia Were Launched by Student

As_I_Please alerts us to the fact that a 20-year-old Estonian student has been fined for participating in DoS attacks against various Estonian political and governmental websites last May. The situation was notable because it escalated tensions between Estonia and Russia when the latter was accused of initiating the 'cyber-attack'. Quoting: "The fact that a single student was able to trigger such events is particularly ominous when you consider just how many potential flashpoints exist between various countries all over the world. The DoS attack against Estonia is an excellent example of how a cyberattack carried out by a 20-year-old student in response to real-life events further exacerbated an existing problem between two nations."

184 comments

  1. In Soviet Estonia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Computers launch students... into space like great hero cosmonauts!

    1. Re:In Soviet Estonia... by d0cu · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You should keep yourself up to date with news. Soviet Estonia has not been around for ~17 years http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estonian_SSR

    2. Re:In Soviet Estonia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dmitri Galushkevich used his home PC to launched a denial-of-service attack that knocked down the Web site for the political party of Estonia's prime minister for several days, said Gerrit Maesalu, spokesman for the Northeast District Prosecutor's Office in Tallinn, Estonia's capital."

      The name Dmitri Galushkevich is definitely not Estonian. There are plenty of Russians in Estonia and elsewhere who do not even want to be a part of the country they are living in and would love to see Russia expand and take over the former glory of the USSR.

    3. Re:In Soviet Estonia... by MacarooMac · · Score: 1
      --
      "He Who Dares Wins" ...or gets twenty-to-life for totaling their Bimmer on a poodle parade
    4. Re:In Soviet Estonia... by d0cu · · Score: 0

      Link me one comment with Score 5 which makes the joke: "In Soviet US ..." and I'll admit my ignorance.

    5. Re:In Soviet Estonia... by RaNdOm+OuTpUt · · Score: 0

      Though "gaüti pea suu ometi" is.

      (It roughly translates as "shut all yer lousy traps NOW!")

      --
      13. Any legal action is absolutly excluded. (Pi World Ranking List rules)
  2. Much worse article at News.com by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Funny
    I read this article at news.com earlier & am now a little bit stupider. Check out this line:

    The distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, which some security experts have alternatively called a flash mob or the first-ever cyberwar,


    WTF? A DDOS is a flash mob?
    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Much worse article at News.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Could you explain that please with a car analogy?

    2. Re:Much worse article at News.com by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sure ... when everybody on a crowded highway suddenly decide to get off at the same exit to go lynch somebody.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Much worse article at News.com by bladesjester · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've always thought a flash mob would be interesting, but I would think the cops would be suspicious of a large group of people in trench coats suddenly starting to gather... :P

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    4. Re:Much worse article at News.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I read this article at news.com earlier & am now a little bit stupider.

      Wow, you're right! Your grammar proves it!

    5. Re:Much worse article at News.com by 200_success · · Score: 1

      At one point, there was speculation that the DDOS was a grassroots effort rather than the work of an individual. "Flash mob" would be an appropriate term for that.

    6. Re:Much worse article at News.com by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 1

      So it's not a herd of co-eds running around showing their breasts to unsuspecting people? Damn.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
  3. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    it was found that the recent DoS attempt against arstechnica was launched by slashdot users everywhere

    1. Re:In other news... by beav007 · · Score: 1

      So the Slashdot effect is caused by a flashmob of geeks and nerds?

  4. An exellent example... of what? by gnud · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The DoS attack against Estonia is an excellent example of how a cyberattack carried out by a 20-year-old student in response to real-life events further exacerbated an existing problem between two nations.

    Eh. How about the _only_ example?

    1. Re:An exellent example... of what? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      Greetings Professor Falken. Would you like to play a game?

      Okay, so it's a fictional example, but it's an example.

  5. Nashi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who wants to bet that this guy was a Nashi member?

  6. Russia accused... by unbug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So on what basis did Estonia accuse Russia of staging those attacks? This story was picked up all over the world and nobody bothered to check if they actually had anything resembling a proof?

    1. Re:Russia accused... by tehbunneh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe if you would knew a bit of that situation you wouldn't say that. Because the one who got caught was also an ethnic Russian. Born in Estonia to Russian parents. And he said he got the idea from various blogs and forum posts which called people to attack Estonian servers. These blogs and forums were in Russian servers. Besides the IP addresses showed the majority of the attacks to be from Russia. The guy in Estonia was just easier to arrest.

    2. Re:Russia accused... by Krneki · · Score: 0

      Probably most of the zombi computers were located in Russia, this is why they blamed them.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    3. Re:Russia accused... by unbug · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe if you would knew a bit of that situation you wouldn't say that. Because the one who got caught was also an ethnic Russian. Born in Estonia to Russian parents. Ah, I see. This, of course, proves beyond any doubt that he was a sleeper agent planted in Estonia by the KGB. Also, it is a well-known fact that every ethnic Russian is directly controlled by the Russian government anyway.

      And he said he got the idea from various blogs and forum posts which called people to attack Estonian servers. These blogs and forums were in Russian servers. Right. It is safe to assume that this entirely non-obvious idea was planted on those blogs by Russian secret services. Only their weird minds could have conceived of something like that.

      Besides the IP addresses showed the majority of the attacks to be from Russia. The guy in Estonia was just easier to arrest. I sincerely hope that the valiant Estonian government will ultimately manage to get them all. As a first step, I'd suggest arresting the Estonian prosecutors who are obviously just Russian puppets. Why else would they say that "they have no other suspects" and that "the attacks were botnet-driven and launched from servers all over the globe"?
    4. Re:Russia accused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's get it all together. The Estonian government takes an action that is doomed to cause civil unrest both within the country and abroad. Royally pisses off about 140 mln. of Russians. In addition to protests and demonstrations in the city itself and in front of Estonian embassies in some countries, Estonian Internet sites are being flooded. World-wide hysteria about "Russia starts cyber-war against poor tiny Estonia" starts based on the fact that several attacking IPs belong to some state institutions. Estonian police identifies and fines someone participating in the attack, funny enough, he's from Estonia itself, and this indeed shows that Estonian government's actions were at best irresponsible, at worst provocative since they created great tension within their own country. Now, according to the TFA, police is looking for other attack participants. But so far that guy was the only suspect. And the TFA is worded as if he was THE guy behind all this (personally, I don't think so; more looks like a scapegoat so that police could show their effectiveness; he is probably young enough to have done something silly like use home computer etc).

      So, as an earlier thread asked, yes, all of this is an excellent example... of what?

    5. Re:Russia accused... by tehbunneh · · Score: 1
      http://www.mi2g.com/cgi/mi2g/frameset.php?pageid=http%3A//www.mi2g.com/cgi/mi2g/press/300507.php

      ...perhaps as many as one million slave computers in places as far away as North America and the Far East -- to amplify the impact of their assault. In a sign of their financial resources, there is evidence that they rented time from trans-national criminal syndicates on Botnets. Even more, the Russian secret service didn't need to be involved in it, all they needed to do is accuse the Estonians in a major newspaper and the people who had the knowledge and resources would act themselves.
    6. Re:Russia accused... by unbug · · Score: 1

      http://www.mi2g.com/cgi/mi2g/frameset.php?pageid=http%3A//www.mi2g.com/cgi/mi2g/press/300507.php Who or what is mi2g? What credentials do they have beyond a dubious website?

      Even more, the Russian secret service didn't need to be involved in it, all they needed to do is accuse the Estonians in a major newspaper and the people who had the knowledge and resources would act themselves. Are you saying that the terrible Russian attack on Estonia was actually an accusation in a major newspaper? That's all?
    7. Re:Russia accused... by crapdot · · Score: 1

      So on what basis did Estonia accuse Russia of staging those attacks? Because they did!

      I'm an Estonian and at the time worked ... in affected area (IT department and under fire) :)

      The pressure and agitations have been going on for years, it just was the first successful attempt. The removal of the statue was decided precisely for the reason to lessen the attack ground in the long run.

      Now, the article ...
      * Dmitri Galushkevich is not an Estonian name (just in case anyone wonders).
      * He lived in Estonia and was therefore the only one so far that could be dragged to the courtroom.
      * Pretty much all from the ddos attacks did come from Russia (including, for some bizarre reason, some from kreml) - forcing us to close the "net borders" (inbound).
      * Dmitri Galushkevich was insignificant, however ... he WAS NOT cut off by the "net border" and used that ability to do something _incredibly_ stupid.
      * "The fact that a single student was able to trigger such events is particularly ominous" - i don't know what the author was smoking when he wrote that. That's just retarded.

      In other words - business as usual, another craptastic crapdot news article.
    8. Re:Russia accused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on what ?

      Mainly on the fact that some of the computers involved in the attack had IP addresses assigned to Kremlin (the Russian Administration).

      And also later refusal of Russians to cooperate in investigating the part of attacks coming from Russia.

    9. Re:Russia accused... by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Estonia accused Russians of staging the attacks. This perpetrator was an ethnic Russian, just like the rioters. Therefore the Estonians were spot on with their accusations. You also seem to be missing the fact that there wasn't just one cyber attack, this was just one of many.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    10. Re:Russia accused... by emilper · · Score: 1

      Most of the attacks on my network come from network addresses registered in US, then comes Poland, then Korea and China. When I send notifications, only the Poles care to answer and say "thank you for letting us know we have a bot in our network". What should I do about the rest ? Declare war ?

      "Dmitri Galushkevich is not an Estonian name (just in case anyone wonders)." He might be Pole, Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian, Chech, Slovenian, Slovakian, Rumanian or Bulgarian. Oh, he lives in Estonia, he's not called Habermann, Hippius, Peterson or Lepikson, so he must be Russian ...

    11. Re:Russia accused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am an Estonian living in Tallinn so take this as you want.

      Although there is no proof that it was a Kremlin sanctioned attack (see: Politkovskaya) there is little doubt here that it was. But the thing is that when we say it was the Russians who did it, we don't always mean the Kremlin. What we mean is the Russian people, the people who are a bit crazy in their interpretation of history saying that Estonia was "liberated" by the Russians and other nonsense. These are the people who rioted in April. These are the people who think Estonia should still be part of Russia and hate the idea of an independent Baltic State. These people are Russians. They are the Russians that conducted the cyber attacks and although a IP trace will not be able to distinguish a users nationality, are you seriously going to believe they where not Russians?

      disclaimer: I don't hate Russians, just these people. In Estonia, we call them "tiblad". I love my Russian girlfriend and have a good time hanging out with my Russian friends.

    12. Re:Russia accused... by tehbunneh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe I could explain this with a Mass Effect analogy. Let's imagine that the Russian media is the Fox Network. Like the Fox Network it has its target demographic which in this case are the Russians, but in Estonia the ethnic Russians follow the Russian media to and almost (i said almost) exclusively. So when someone in Russian media makes a false statement (like the one made by the Fox Network against Mass Effect) the ethnic Russians are more likely to listen to that information. For instance, the protesting began because someone made a claim that Estonian authorities are trying to move the statue without proper ceremonies and they are doing it right now, which was completely false(the decision to move the statue quickly came later when the riots had already started). Now when the Russian media claims that this was the plan all along Russian people who felt that their national pride had been insulted took action, which didn't require any interference from the secret service or Kreml (but it doesn't rule their involvement out, especially in publishing the false information in the first place).

      The idea was to distribute enough FUD for people to act, which was like the with the Mass Effect discussion. Even though this was for different reasons, and it is likely that the Fox Network made the false claims unknowingly and for the sake of having a news article.

      If you still think that I need my tinfoil hat, then please tell me so.

      Yes, I know, this analogy needs more cars.

    13. Re:Russia accused... by kuratkull · · Score: 1

      If you don't consider the facts that this was done at the time when Russia was upset about Estonia removing a statue from the Soviet times AND a large number of attacks were based from Russian government servers AND there were calls in Russian forums to download a certain client program, that would make large numbers of request to Estonian government servers, AS "proof", then I don't know what else to say. Estonian...

    14. Re:Russia accused... by Ossifer · · Score: 1

      So on what basis did Estonia accuse Russia of staging those attacks?

      Becuase *other* attacks provably originated from IP addresses within a bank allocated to Russian government agencies.

      This *one* conviction does not account for all the pathetic Russian cyberattacks on the entire country of Estonia.

    15. Re:Russia accused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, 'Dmitri' is a Russian name.

      If he was Bulgarian, that would have been 'Dimitar'. If he has Romanian, 'Dumitru', etc.

      None of the nationalities you enumerate there are using 'Dmitri'.

    16. Re:Russia accused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he was Slovenian he would have been 'Dimitrij'. If he was Bosnian or Croatian or Montenegrin or Serbian, then 'Dimitrije'

    17. Re:Russia accused... by emilper · · Score: 1

      You kinda missed my point: how about all those famous Estonians that have German or Swedish names ? Are they less Estonian ? If a woman called Nadia or Ekaterina would have been arrested instead of this guy, would you have said it was not Estonian ?

      Unless you're living in a ethnically cleansed world, you might have known that people do name their children in more than the government approved manner, and in most countries in Europe there is no list of preferred spellings for names, so Dimitri/Dmitri might be used. Also for your information, there are Russian speaking minorities in Rumania too (mostly religious refugees from the late XIX-th century), and Dimitri/Dmitri is used.

    18. Re:Russia accused... by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      It's Estonian government. They spent last twenty years doing nothing but blaming Russia for everything from sky's blue color to water being wet, passing nationalistic laws, celebrating Nazi, telling their sob stories to EU and trying to become better US sycophants than Poland.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    19. Re:Russia accused... by gdy · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you would knew a bit of that situation you wouldn't say that. Estonian goverment accused Russian authorities so your comment is pointless.

    20. Re:Russia accused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For your information, those Russian-speaking "old-believers" communities in Romania are much older than you think (beginning of the XVIII-th century or so). Unfortunately, most of them have different names on their ID and on the church baptismal register ;-). Usage of their own spelling/version of names and surnames was reserved in Romania only to first-tier minorities (Hungarian and German).

      And your point is moot anyway. What if tomorrow Texas will become part of Mexico again, and some Anglo Texans will bitterly resent being forced to learn Spanish, having their history rewritten, the San Jacinto monument scrapped, etc and take violent action against that ? Would you still pretend those people are actually Mexicans with English names, not Americans ? It's absolutely ridiculous.

    21. Re:Russia accused... by emilper · · Score: 1

      mmm ... right now I doubt there is a "national" language in USA, and it's residents are not forced to learn English and the citizenship exam does not require 6 months of learning.

      About Texas and Mexico: if that would ever happen, and if the Anglo-Texans would be forced to learn Spanish, have their history rewritten and the San Jacinto monument scrapped, I would not think evil of them if they would be less than polite about the whole issue, but I hope the people in charge would be wiser than that, and realize that self-interest would achieve the assimilation much faster than persecution, and that the San Jacinto monument might draw in tourists from all over Grand Canada :-P.

    22. Re:Russia accused... by unbug · · Score: 1

      This doesn't answer my question. Every countries on Earth distributes FUD and propaganda, that wasn't the issue. The Estonians accused Russia of a very specific thing and now it turns out that, apparently, these accusations were quite groundless. In the modern world, this is not unusual. The really interesting question is why those accusations have been picked up and presented as the absolute truth by the media.

  7. Not Acting Alone by mandelbr0t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While they may not have found evidence of any other people involved, it's unlikely that a single person could establish a botnet large enough to overwhelm anything on his own. The only answer I can think of is education - botnets exist because the owners of the zombie PCs simply don't recognize that it's a zombie. There is certainly an overall lack of regulation, too. As a domain owner, I see lots of abusive traffic and have absolutely no legal recourse to punish a perpetrator. Responsible network owners often help, but there's so few networks that are responsible that I usually assume they're not, forcing me to do what little I can at my own site to prevent further abuse.

    For the student's part, he was only fined (I couldn't find how much in TFA). Not much deterrent to prevent him from doing it again. No leverage to find out who he was working with. The lack of clear laws in any country makes prosecution of such actions impossible. As a domain owner, I'd like to see civilized countries show some direction toward making prosecution of such activities a reality. Until then, it's "you hack me, I hack you" which is completely counterproductive.

    --
    "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    1. Re:Not Acting Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While they may not have found evidence of any other people involved, it's unlikely that a single person could establish a botnet large enough to overwhelm anything on his own.

      I disagree. He wouldn't necessarily have to do anything to build a botnet himself, just have access to a C&C network built by someone else. He could gain access by renting the network, or even stumbling on an unprotected C&C server. There's a few out there, believe it or not. So yeah, other people may have created the botnet, but he still could have been acting alone when launching his attack.

    2. Re:Not Acting Alone by penix1 · · Score: 1

      You mean to tell me there is no way for a network admin to tell when a computer on their network is an infected botnet drone? I claim poppycock on that. Comcast and others for example detect BT networks enough to disrupt them why can't they do the same for the botnets? Oh, their isn't a threat of lawsuit in botnets....I see...

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    3. Re:Not Acting Alone by dissy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean to tell me there is no way for a network admin to tell when a computer on their network is an infected botnet drone? I claim poppycock on that. Comcast and others for example detect BT networks enough to disrupt them why can't they do the same for the botnets? Oh, their isn't a threat of lawsuit in botnets....I see... I, and anyone familiar with the BT protocol, can describe how to detect the BT protocol.
      Would you mind sharing with us the 'botnet' protocol?
      I realize there is no botnet protocol, but actually hundreds (or thousands) of them, each different, for one type of botnet drone software. These also change, in that new ones are introduced, and old ones updated. I realize that, and hope you see it now too.

      What exact type of traffic are you claiming can be detected?
      The 10 or 20 packets sent once that went towards the DoS attack? You realize you made more http requests than that just to load the main slashdot page?

      A few packets that look like any other coming from one machine, that after added with the traffic from the other millions of drones becomes signifigant.. I still fail to see how you claim these are detectable?
      Concidering the only traffic a drone has to make can be hidden with the real network traffic of that computer, so that it is not possible to tell the difference between it and the computer users own actions.

      There might be certain patterns right now that are detectable, but any of them would be trivial to hide if that was the botnet admins desire (which seems a logical one to assume, as a detected infection is less useful than an undetected one)

      I'd be willing to bet that most likely your PC right now performs actions over the network that will make it appear to be part of a botnet. Checking a server at regular times (system and app updates) over an SSL connection, check. Sends out a few http requests now and then, check.
      Yup, detection shows your a drone.

    4. Re:Not Acting Alone by milsoRgen · · Score: 1

      If my understanding of Botnets is corrected IRC is heavily involved in the issuing of commands... And considering some of the stuff I used to see on DALnet a few years back... Nasty stuff. Maybe it's time we just get rid of IRC altogether? Is it truly serving a purpose in this day and age?

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask where they're goin' and hook up with 'em later.
    5. Re:Not Acting Alone by d0cu · · Score: 1

      For the student's part, he was only fined (I couldn't find how much in TFA) He was fined ~1500$ (same as maximum fine for drunken driving). He wasn't event expelled from uni for that.

      Not much deterrent to prevent him from doing it again In one interview he claimed that He felt like the act wasn't really a crime (he didn't kill anybody, did he). He (and many others) did it because many internet sites recommended doing it. Those sites were put up by main organizers of riots. Main organizers themselves are currently prosecuted
    6. Re:Not Acting Alone by neumayr · · Score: 1

      Of course IRC is serving a purpose - it's often the main way for people to get support for free open source software.
      And of course to hang around and chat - people still like to do that, and why wouldn't they?

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    7. Re:Not Acting Alone by dissy · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's time we just get rid of IRC altogether? Is it truly serving a purpose in this day and age? Yes it is.

      And just to be sure to remove all command channels there could be, you should get rid of irc, aim, hell all IM, email, the web, ftp, and most importaint, have the ISPs block ALL inbound ports, and block all outbound.

      That will solve the problem, but noone will be here to enjoy it.
  8. The War on Cyber-Warfare by T-Bone_142 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is it just me or have there been a lot of stories about "cyber wars", "cyber-attack"... lately (especially on slashdot). Is this going to become the next big thing, "The War on Cyber-Warfare" with new laws contently coming in place to help protect everyone from evil "hacker" teenagers bent on destroying the world, which no doubt will take away even more of the dwindling freedoms the american people still have left?

    --
    "In Soviet America, Passport Stamps You!"
    1. Re:The War on Cyber-Warfare by Shados · · Score: 0

      They should really just be done with it and make a law saying that we'll all live in pods connected to a computer Matrix-like controlling everything, including our mind.

      Save us a hundred years of time wasted on passing laws. We know it will end up there anyway, just do it already.

    2. Re:The War on Cyber-Warfare by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      freedoms the american people still have left?

      You know something? The world does does revolve around the american people and their whims.

    3. Re:The War on Cyber-Warfare by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      That should read "does not"

  9. The chaos of words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know I read this story and am reminded of Ronald Reagan's off the cuff but not off the air comment on an imminent nuclear strike on Russia. Sometimes a butterfly can cause a typhoon on the other side of the planet.

  10. oh come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    surely 'wargames' has been translated by now

    Free kevin

  11. Re:"Particularly ominous"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In case you wondered why it got flamebait

    the 10 word in the quote was changed

  12. Obligatory Soviet Russia Jokes Thread by Gazzonyx · · Score: 4, Funny
    I hereby declare a single thread dedicated to "In Soviet Russia..." jokes; we might as well keep them all together, as there's too much material for them in this story. I'll kick it off.


    In Soviet Russia, you attack Estonia!


    What do you guys got?

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    1. Re:Obligatory Soviet Russia Jokes Thread by quanticle · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, computers hack YOU!

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    2. Re:Obligatory Soviet Russia Jokes Thread by david_craig · · Score: 1

      In the U.S.A., you make jokes about a political regime that no longer exists.

      Whoops, did I do it wrong?

    3. Re:Obligatory Soviet Russia Jokes Thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Estonia was part of Soviet Russia.

    4. Re:Obligatory Soviet Russia Jokes Thread by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      yourdoinitwrong.

    5. Re:Obligatory Soviet Russia Jokes Thread by tokul · · Score: 2, Informative

      What do you guys got?

      In Russia you always fight people that are not in your weight category.

      In Russia you are the bully.

      Estonia is not fighting Soviet Russia. It is fighting imperial ambitions of Russian Federation. These ambitions are continuously fueled in Russian media. How many jokes Russians have about conflicts with Georgia or Estonia? If you know Russian, find Zadornov new year's show for 2008. Russians occupied independent countries for more than half of century and expect people of those countries to like them.

    6. Re:Obligatory Soviet Russia Jokes Thread by amirulbahr · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Soviet Russia denial services you!

    7. Re:Obligatory Soviet Russia Jokes Thread by sp00n3r · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russian, youtakewhatigiveyouandlikeit!

    8. Re:Obligatory Soviet Russia Jokes Thread by Sawopox · · Score: 1

      In Estonia, the juice weases YOU!

      (Horribly weak Encino Man reference, I apologize.)

      --
      [http://it-tastes-so-good.blogspot.com] Are you hungry?
    9. Re:Obligatory Soviet Russia Jokes Thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what she said.

    10. Re:Obligatory Soviet Russia Jokes Thread by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Russians occupied independent countries for more than half of century and expect people of those countries to like them Kind of like Americans, huh?
      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  13. Not the first time by r_jensen11 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How was it that the United States got involved in Iraq, exactly?

    1. Re:Not the first time by schnikies79 · · Score: 2, Informative

      By Saddam Hussein invading Kuwait.

      Say what you want. Thats where it all started.

      --
      Gone!
    2. Re:Not the first time by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      By Saddam Hussein invading Kuwait.

      Say what you want. Thats where it all started.


      I'm sorry, this is slashdot. Please keep the facts out it, would you? Next you're going to cite the fact that it was Bill Clinton's stated policy to see Saddam removed from power, too.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you're going to go that far back, just go back a little further when we got involved with entangling alliances in the region and meddling in the affairs of foreign governments. Had we not armed Saddam Hussein, for example, he might not have been strong enough to invade Kuwait. But we had to arm him, because the Shah of Iran, whom we propped up, got toppled by the Ayatollah who came to power by exploiting the dissatisfaction with the corruption of the US backed Shah, and we feared him spreading his power and influence.

      People seldom dig deeper into events than is necessary to support their programmed partisan viewpoints.

    4. Re:Not the first time by ptbarnett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Next you're going to cite the fact that it was Bill Clinton's stated policy to see Saddam removed from power, too.

      Along with just about everyone else on both sides of the political aisle.

      I've noticed that now there's a "study" about all the lies that the Bush administration told about Iraq, back when almost everyone else was apparently telling the same lies, or at least believing them.

      There's an excerpt on Yahoo News of an interesting interview from "60 Minutes", with the guy that interrogated Saddam after he was captured. According to this interrogator, Saddam said he didn't believe that Bush would actually order the invasion -- he thought that there would be a few days of air strikes, and it would be over. Saddam survived it when Clinton tried that, and Saddam thought he could survive it again. And he admitted that's why he continued to let everyone believe that he had various weapons of mass destruction.

      I always wondered why Saddam behaved like he had something to hide, when he really didn't. I guess he thought the WMD threat would discourage his enemies -- which included most of the Middle East, various Western democracies, and a large percentage of the people in his OWN country.

    5. Re:Not the first time by blirp · · Score: 5, Informative
      I've noticed that now there's a "study" about all the lies that the Bush administration told about Iraq, back when almost everyone else was apparently telling the same lies, or at least believing them.

      'Everybody'? I don't know what planet you where on back then, but most people in Europe didn't buy the theory of a link to Al-Qaeda. Most governments of Europe also wanted the weapons inspections to continue instead of invading.
      Personally, I expected an invasion to become the quagmire the current Vice President of USA predicted. And I, along with a lot of people, expected it to only enrich certain oil companies. I even participated in a protest march for this.

      M.

    6. Re:Not the first time by asc99c · · Score: 1

      Even most people in the countries (country?) who supported USA didn't believe the link - at least in the UK for the people I know. And given the 'Sorry, World' apology from the US, I'd guess the situation was pretty similar even there. But I guess most of us don't get the same sort of say as big oil in these matters.

    7. Re:Not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to go that far back, just go back a little further when we got involved with entangling alliances in the region and meddling in the affairs of foreign governments. Had we not armed Saddam Hussein, for example, he might not have been strong enough to invade Kuwait. But we had to arm him, because the Shah of Iran, whom we propped up, got toppled by the Ayatollah who came to power by exploiting the dissatisfaction with the corruption of the US backed Shah, and we feared him spreading his power and influence. People seldom dig deeper into events than is necessary to support their programmed partisan viewpoints.


      While it's easy to sound smug and say something like this, it's a bit disingenuous to take things and remove them from the context they existed in.
    8. Re:Not the first time by laejoh · · Score: 0

      Say what you want. Thats where it all started.

      Naaa, this guy started it all. If he didn't leave with three boats the US would never have invaded Iraq!

    9. Re:Not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      By Saddam Hussein invading Kuwait.

      IIRC he asked the US ambassador if that was all right first, and they said no problem. Oops. She was probably some newbie political appointee who couldn't find Iraq on the map before being sent there...

    10. Re:Not the first time by chthon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a read an explanation over at The Strategy Page. For him, it was a bluffing to win at two fronts. Iraq and everything west of it is Arab, at the east you have Iran. Arabs live in fear of the Persians. This dates back more than three thousand year.

      Having his war at the beginning of the eighties with Iran gained him much respect in the Arabic world, because he stood up to them. The bluff with the WMDs was in the same category, it was to scare off the Iranians and give confidence to the Arab world that he would stop them if they would move.

    11. Re:Not the first time by Cigarra · · Score: 1

      Even most people in the countries (country?) who supported USA... Countries. Don't forget Poland.
      --
      I don't have a sig.
    12. Re:Not the first time by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Wonder how they're viewing the documents being released that outline exactly such a relationship?

    13. Re:Not the first time by sheph · · Score: 1

      I know this is getting off on a tangent, but here's a scary thought: maybe he did have something to hide. Maybe his goons moved the WMDs to another country (like Syria), or gave them to a terrorist organization for use at an opportune time when we think all is well, or burried them somewhere we haven't looked yet. I seriously doubt that we've dug up every square foot of the country. There's a very real posibility that we may still be waiting for Sadam's last laugh while we sit smuggly by claiming victory. We had no interest in messing with Sadam until he started kicking the UN out, and violating the treaties he had signed. We had plenty to do in Afghanastan right about then. What Sadam did caused a great deal of alarm, but just maybe we played right into his hands. Maybe that was the whole point; to spread us thin and make it more difficult for us to fight against the Taliban. I'm playing devil's advocate here, but the truth is that we really don't know. I find it hard to believe that so many were convinced on both side of the political isle that he had WMDs if there really wasn't something there.

      --
      I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
    14. Re:Not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...in '91...

      Did Saddam or Iraq do something in or near 2003 that was in any way different from the past decade or so?

    15. Re:Not the first time by Azar · · Score: 1

      Well, no, that's not where it all started. Perhaps you are too young to remember but there was something known as the Iran-Iraq War in which the US (among others) supported Iraq against Iran (with Hussein in power) largely to end the conflict and to attempt to bring stability to the region. But our interest in Iraq probably dates back even further to 1958 when the Iraqi army performed a coup d'etat of the government and became friendly with the Soviet Union.

      But if you're talking about modern events only, Hussein invading Kuwait played a major role.

    16. Re:Not the first time by ptbarnett · · Score: 1

      Everybody'? I don't know what planet you where on back then, but most people in Europe didn't buy the theory of a link to Al-Qaeda. Most governments of Europe also wanted the weapons inspections to continue instead of invading.

      I was referring to the existence of WMD, not the link to Al-Qaeda. I also thought the latter was dubious. But in the US, there were very few high-ranking politicians that opposed the former -- including some that are running for President now and are claiming otherwise.

      You have to remember: the "governments of Europe" aren't considered to be credible in US politics, just as I doubt the the US government is respected in European politics.

      Personally, I expected an invasion to become the quagmire the current Vice President of USA predicted.

      So did I. Earlier, someone posted a brief history of the region that was mostly sarcastic, but pretty accurate. Historically, the only "peaceful" times have been when a strong-man ruler has kept all the various factions from killing each other.

    17. Re:Not the first time by baffled · · Score: 1

      I even participated in a protest march for this. I may have heard of this.. the largest anti-war protest in the history of the world
  14. There's another, I think by Gazzonyx · · Score: 3, Interesting
    What about that guy back in the 80s who got half an inch away from the Pentagon?


    He was using a TR(A)S(H)-80 from Radio Shack, IIRC. Probably a 1200 baud modem (not even Hayes compatible!), 64K of RAM and a CLI... He was probably a Real Programmer. Sadly I was born in '84, so I don't really remember it happening.

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    1. Re:There's another, I think by the_cowgod · · Score: 5, Funny

      There was another kid in the 80s who used an IMSAI 8080 to break into the WOPR over at NORAD... It almost caused a global thermonuclear war.

    2. Re:There's another, I think by Gazzonyx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fortunately, the only winning move was not to play (tic-tac-toe!), and it all ended well!

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    3. Re:There's another, I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah YES! Just like the movie!!!!

  15. I'm curious about all these racist/Ron Paul posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/10/paul.newsletters/
    Are racists all illiterate?? I thought that was just a myth...

  16. Cue the Hollywood self-adulation... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Remakes of Hackers and The Net, anyone?

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  17. The War on name calling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still have the freedom to call T-bone a noodle head. What am I missing?

  18. Recent attacks on US DoD 'puters, "from China" by gr8scot · · Score: 1

    Also annoyed kids, maybe? There are a lot more Chinese than Estonians. Maybe it all originates in one little shit-hole village. I don't know.
    http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/17/1936236
    And even if not, maybe national security information doesn't belong on public networks, including the Internet. Just a thought.

    --
    All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
  19. Well by markov_chain · · Score: 1

    Not to knock on anyone for being frugal, but they should really upgrade to something more secure than DOS.

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  20. Interesting... by Warbothong · · Score: 1

    Do stories like this make any "Nobody cares what happens on the Internet" skeptics of Anonymous's recent communique change their minds?

    1. Re:Interesting... by doombringerltx · · Score: 1

      A bunch of anime nerds and trolls on a forum talk bad about Scientology and some of them take it too far and make a press release? I think I'll file that in the "don't care" bin. Its pretty sad how people can take the *chans seriously, almost as sad as when anon takes itself seriously

  21. In Estonia, students hack you! by freaker_TuC · · Score: 2, Funny

    in Estonia, students hack you!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  22. flash mob by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 4, Funny

    Then, following a pre-agreed signal, they all simultaneously open their trench coats and show everybody a confusing web GUI full of rounded corners and running on top of a proprietary plug-in.

    1. Re:flash mob by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Then, following a pre-agreed signal, they all simultaneously open their trench coats and show everybody a confusing web GUI full of rounded corners and running on top of a proprietary plug-in.

      Ack. Thanks for the image.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  23. Re:probably a linux fag by calebt3 · · Score: 1

    Well, considering that it would be rater difficult to get Windows to do it...

  24. Headline *very* misleading! by minimum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Only one kid DDOS'ed goverment and news sites and created that mayhem? Right. So nobody bothers to mention that the student who was arrested had a Russian name - Dmitri Galushkevich ? Sure he may have the citizenship but he's not really Estonian. Just offspring of an immigrant. And he wasn't the only kid around here who helped to DDOS.

    1. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure he may have the citizenship but he's not really Estonian. Just offspring of an immigrant.

      That's racist. Or fascist. Or whatever, but it's a bad attitude, dude.
      And that's exactly what gets Estonia into trouble with Russia.

    2. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by Max_W · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ah yes. National-socialism. A son of an immigrant is not a true citizen. Only particular ethnicity is honored in the National State.

    3. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by karolo · · Score: 1

      And that is precisely the attitude that makes me have no sympathy whatsoever for the Estonians. They destroy the graves of the soldiers that kicked the Nazis out and then go around trying to bring back some kind of pure Estonian "Lebensraum". I am well aware of what Stalin did afterwards, and the introduction of Russian people to dilute the Estonian population, but I am also aware of the collaborationist past of the Estonians with the Nazi occupation, so I don't see that the Estonians can really give lessons to anyone.

    4. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nazis were long gone (couple of days) when those Russan "liberator" soldiers arrived. Raping and murdering our people. Jesus christ how well the Russian propaganda mahicne works.

    5. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by karolo · · Score: 1

      Oh, yes, and I guess the nazis had left out of their good heart, not because the red army was coming? And to think that I celebrated when the baltic republics got independence, it really scares the shit out of me what you guys are becoming.

    6. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by emilper · · Score: 1

      ... what you guys are becoming.

      My guess it's just "nation building".

      Most of the people in Eastern Europe and FSU are quite indifferent to national/ethnic issues (except when directly asked "Are you a good [insert official nationality here]") and given a chance would gladly help US re-anglicize the southern states by emigrating there and spicing a little a "melting pot" that lately looks like it's cooking only taco. The only chance the bureaucracies in the little states of the Eastern and Central Europe have to keep their jobs on long term is to raise hell and mobilize their subjects against whatever imaginary enemies they can find. Even Russia is doing it right now by getting mighty righteous about the missile interceptors US talks about putting in Poland, even if those anti-balistic-missile rockets did not work in tests. China gets its own subjects worked up by reminding them of the Nanking Massacre, even if the Chinese warlords did worse things to their own people during the same period. EU bureaucracy is attempting to divert some loyalty from the nation states by playing the Greenie card even if by doing that it's blowing holes into it's own economy.

      I would look into what would the local government gain by having Russian Estonians stigmatized: my guess is there is some economic trouble brewing, and it's better to keep the good people of Estonia entertained by lynching "Russians" than asking questions about inflation and jobs.

      From some banker's blog:

      Estonia's inflation rate rose in December to a nine-year high, led by food and housing costs. But we can already see that producer prices (lead by export producer prices which have been falling since the summer) have started to ease in October and November. This could be read as a first indicator for what is to come, since if there is a hard landing inflation will not be sustained.

      GDP growth, which was of course strong, is now slowing, and unemployment, which has been trending steadily downwards, should really start to increase at some point. This will mean, basically, that the days when Estonia urgently needed to import migrant workers to try and avoid the huge spike in wages and prices which we have seen is now largely passed.

      Some contributors to this thread mentioned IP addresses belonging to Kremlin being used in the attack against Estonian sites. If KGB is that stupid, then nobody should worry about them.

    7. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by GottMitUns · · Score: 0

      Let's split hairs here. Names ending with -evich are not traditional proper Russian names. Most likely his ethnicity is Byelorussian. There is a difference - look up the Belarus. Ironically, that country president's name: Lukashenko is not Byelarussian but Ukrainian. Generally, in modern Russia what is considered "Russian" is often an intermix of many nationalities that populated the Empire. Just like anywhere, those truly Russian are the ones who consider themselves Russian.

    8. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by Marcion · · Score: 1

      If I got an American passport so I could make more money, but refused to learn or speak English, refused to use any of your cultural institutions, shops, etc. Refused to learn the anthem or talk to any American outside work.

      Would I be really American?

    9. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by Malevolent+Tester · · Score: 1

      The Russians went to all the trouble of invading their country, committing mass rape, murder and looting, deported thousands to the gulags and attempted to destroy their language, culture and history and the Estonians don't even feel grateful. It's a disgrace.

      (Incidentally, why is it that Russians promote positive actions of the USSR, such as destroying the Nazis, as Russian, and negative ones, such as the gulags, as Soviet?)

      --
      If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
    10. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Just offspring of an immigrant."

      i am sure lots of americans will love you for saying that.

    11. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're quite right, the problem was that Estonia didn't expel all the occupiers and their families when the occupation ended. They were trying to be nice, attempting to integrate. Yet Russians being Russians, they assume they still have some sort of supreme power, the same power they had for 50 years so that didn't quite work out as expected.

      Of course had they expelled them, you'd be here sniffling about the poor people kicked out of their homes, where will they go? Putin enacted a support program to pay for Russians to return home, find them housing, jobs, etc. Yet the same (tens of?) thousands of people who decry the Estonian government at every opportunity, pledge their support for Russia, etc - guess how many of them took up that offer? I believe the number was around 30.

      So yes, nationalism it is, but just like in the USA and anywhere else in the world, people accept other people who are willing to integrate and live as proper citizens of the state, and shun those who do the opposite. Doubtful an american would think much of a chinese guy on the evening news who doesn't speak a word of english shouting about how China should occupy the US.

    12. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually in Estonia there isn't such thing as honoring any particular ethnicity. There are just some people, who mostly happen to be Russians, who are not interested in migrating and learning/using Estonian language and customs. It's not goverement's problem if someone doesn't want to be a citizen.

      Luckily problematic Russians in Estonia are in minority (but they're much more noise than others)

    13. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by Freultwah · · Score: 1

      Cut it out. It's because of people like this who sit on a high horse and label other people ours enough" and not ours enough" that the country has those problems. Damn, we're a sorry bunch of idiots who deserve all kinds of shit if we keep thinking that way.

    14. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't Stalin have some sort of a program to assist Estonian immigration to Siberia? I believe they too were offered jobs, free housing, food, medical care, and free one-way tickets.

      Yet for some reason the Estonians didn't feel like leaving their homes voluntarily?

      Anyways, if you hate it in Estonia so much why don't you go back to Africa, monkey boy?

    15. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      I recently stopped trying to read a book about Ukrainian history, because it was so full of painstaking attention to facts like those. I just want to salute you for the attempt to introduce more of the relevant facts to such a vitriolic topic, because I know it's such an uphill struggle. I wish I had something better to contribute than mere thanks.

      Every subsequent disagreement about the eastern part of the former Roman Empire is so full of changing names and cultural rivalry, I lament in advance all discussions of their place in history. What a mess!

      Do western Europeans generally understand eastern European history better than Americans? The names are just so much different than the Latin- and Germanic-derived names I'm accustomed to seeing, and there are so many disagreements about the 'correct' name for everything, it's indecipherable from here.

      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    16. Re:Headline *very* misleading! by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      "Just offspring of an immigrant."

      i am sure lots of americans will love you for saying that. I am sure lots of communists, and other party-line-voting US Democrats will love you for saying that.
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
  25. Two words by whichpaul · · Score: 1

    Plausible Deniability

  26. Probably not. by jd · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Before that, the USA was arming Iraq to fight Iran. Some time prior to that, Iraq went through numerous coups, a British invasion, two monarchies and a partridge in a pear tree. Prior to the pear tree, Iraq was owned by the British. Actually, two distinct regions (Basra and Baghdad) were owned by the British. To save on ink, when drawing maps, they called the group "Iraq". Before that was the Ottoman Empire, who - ultimately - can be blamed quite reasonably for most of the current blood-feuds in Europe and the Middle East. Before that were the Mongols, who can be blamed for just about everything else. Before that, the Islamic forces of Khalid ibn al-Walid decimated the area and took it out of Persian control, who in turn invaded before they even became Persians. Nothing like getting ahead of themselves! Some time before that, Alexander the Great made a royal mess of the area. Before that, there were endless wars between the Assyrians, the Akkadians, the Sumerians (who were largely obliterated), assorted other nomadic and semi-nomadic tribes, and whatever culture lived there first of which there is almost no trace left.

    In other words, there is no meaningful "first", unless you want to go back around 10,000 years. Almost everything that happened after that point was in direct retribution to what had happened before. That's one reason it will take a lot of effort to calm the region down - ten thousand years is a long time to build up grdudges and resentments -- and don't think a single one of them has been forgotten.

    Getting back to the main topic, just as an aside, this is why societies can't survive for very long on a diet of paranoia, fear and resentment. Sooner or later, you'll get people who hate each other less than they hate some imagined collective enemy, and the shit will hit the fan at a speed approaching mach 2. I'm surprised that this sort of thing doesn't happen more often - students get an even rawer deal than most, even at the best of times, naturally form into groups, and generally have significant combined intellect and skills. This is probably the worst group to infuriate and should really be the first group to focus on getting support from.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Probably not. by octal666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just one thing, Alexander the Great was after the Persians. And I think you forgot Babylon. But yeah, in essence, Iraq is the craddle of civilization, writting was discovered there and probably the first war that deserved that name was also fought there. What a place to invade!

      --
      DON'T PANIC
    2. Re:Probably not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly spelling wasn't invented there though.

    3. Re:Probably not. by unbug · · Score: 1

      Just one thing, Alexander the Great was after the Persians. Later, after the Macedonians, Mesopotamia again became part of the Persian empire.
    4. Re:Probably not. by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      Alexander the Great was after the Persians.
      Alexander and the Selucid empire that followed him came after the Achaemenid Persians but before the Parthian and Sassanid Persians. The last Persians to rule Iraq were the Islamic Safavid dynasty who lasted well into the 18th century. As for Babylon, it was founded and run by the indigenous people of the area until Cyrus II captured it and the Selucids later emptied it.
      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    5. Re:Probably not. by jd · · Score: 1

      Neither the Sumerians nor the Semitic people who founded Babylon were indigenous. The Semitic peoples, who later also founded Ur and other major cities in the area, basically ripped the Sumerians a new one, keeping only the technologies of writing (they borrowed the Sumerian "alphabet"), mythology and some technology, but destroyed pretty much everything else. The Sumerians had been raided for centuries by nomads, some of whom conquered Sumeria for a while, so genetically speaking the Sumerians weren't even (biologically) Sumerians by the time of the rise of Babylon.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:Probably not. by jd · · Score: 1

      After that, it was occupied by members of The B52's, who were in pursuit of the third pyramid.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  27. You know what would be funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone should create a mockumentary where a couple of hackers destroy worldwide economy and bring about the end of civilized life. They should do so using only tools that any hacker would know to be completely inadequate to do the job. Use vim, show screenshots of obfuscated perl scripts (especially variants of "Hello, world!"), and explain the dangerous uses behind commands like `kill|killall`, `dos2unix` (= denial of service 2 US networks integrating x86), mogrify and crash (because they sound menacing), and of course `php` (preferred hacking protocol). Make the whole thing extremely serious, demand that governments do something to protect citizens against these vulnerabilities, and see how much chaos you can cause.

    1. Re:You know what would be funny? by Gigaflynn · · Score: 0

      I reckon you could at least cause a couple of airstrikes on a small, impoverished, neutral state.
      At best you could hope for global thermonuclear war, since all the tensions are up.

      --
      "Neo, follow the white rabbit"
      "Can i eat the white rabbit?"
      "No, there is no spoon to eat it with"
    2. Re:You know what would be funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Internet Explorer and moderate knowledge of URL based exploits could screw up servers just as easily.

  28. HEY KID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've got a job at my company.

    Please contact me at my IP address through whichever exposed port is most convenient for you and we can set up a meeting.

  29. Speaking of Soviet Estonia by hax0r_this · · Score: 0

    Who here agrees that this is probably either a) A Putin-backed operation to get the blame off of Russia, or b) A joint effort of factions in the Estonian and Russian governments trying to "put that incident in the past". And/or bribes. I'm sorry, this whole thing is just a little too convenient, considering we're talking about an ex KGB guy who doesn't seem to have ever moved beyond plotting and assassinations.

    1. Re:Speaking of Soviet Estonia by emilper · · Score: 4, Insightful

      doesn't seem to have ever moved beyond plotting and assassinations have any proof ? I mean proof, not allegations.
    2. Re:Speaking of Soviet Estonia by mike2R · · Score: 1

      I'm normally ready to believe most allegations against Putin, but I think we do need a little more evidence in this case - someone credible making the allegation at the very least.

      Your option b) would be my favourite if there is more to this than there appears, but I remain to be convinced.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    3. Re:Speaking of Soviet Estonia by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Proof that Putin was involved in the Estonia attacks or proof that Putin plots against and assassinates his opponents?

      Given Putin's other sneaky behavior, it seems reasonable to infer that Putin's government may be involved. And even if he's "innocent", who cares? Russia deserves serious sanctions for Putin's other atrocities, so if this is what gets him, GREAT.

    4. Re:Speaking of Soviet Estonia by emilper · · Score: 1

      ... Putin's other atrocities

      OK, you used plural, so name two of Putin atrocities.

      ...

      fine, I'll be generous today: name one, I'll name the other. Still, I bet you're just improvising.

      Growing up across the fence (for those not in the know, there were and still are fences - double fences + barbed wire + plowed ground so the tracks will be seen if somebody crosses - on the borders between the communist countries) from SU, I am as Russophobic as the next man, but get a grip of yourself. If you want your allegations to stick, make sure you provide arguments, and unfortunately I am afraid you have not much arguments.

    5. Re:Speaking of Soviet Estonia by rtechie · · Score: 1

      OK, you used plural, so name two of Putin atrocities. How about three?

      Rigging elections.

      The political assassinations of Anna Politkovskaya and Alexander Litvinenko, as well as numerous other journalists and political opponents.

      Mass killings, rape, torture, and other atrocities in Chechnya.

    6. Re:Speaking of Soviet Estonia by emilper · · Score: 1

      Rigging elections.

      Elections still pending, so you have to wait a bit before making up your mind.

      The political assassinations of Anna Politkovskaya and Alexander Litvinenko, as well as numerous other journalists and political opponents.

      Have you got any proof ? Besides articles in BBC News, I mean ...

      Mass killings, rape, torture, and other atrocities in Chechnya.

      ... I did not know that Putin was a Chechen separatist ... or do you mean that he was in charge during the first conflict in Chechnya ? The last one, which began with the Chechens attacking Dagestan when Putin was not yet in charge, was at least as clean and at least as humane as the wars more "civilized" countries waged during the last century. The Chechen troubles might have started as "freedom fighting", but ended as filibustering, with enterprising Islamists attempting to carve a nice state for themselves from what they supposed to be the corpse of the Soviet Union. Should he let them do it ?

    7. Re:Speaking of Soviet Estonia by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Elections still pending, so you have to wait a bit before making up your mind. Which elections are you talking about? I'm talking about the 2004 elections in Russia and Chechnya. Both were pretty obviously rigged.

      Have you got any proof ? Besides articles in BBC News, I mean ... I'll take the BBC over Putin's WORD any day. Alexander Litvinenko was obviously assassinated, in a brazen manner, by the Russian government. Putin refuses to extradite the poisoner.. Officials in his government have claimed that Litvinenko "deserved" to be killed.

      The last one, which began with the Chechens attacking Dagestan when Putin was not yet in charge, was at least as clean and at least as humane as the wars more "civilized" countries waged during the last century Two wrongs don't make a right. Just because the Nazis built concentration camps doesn't mean it's okay for anyone else to do it.

      Should he let them do it ? Obviously, yes. They have the same right to independence that all the former Soviet republic had/have. The Soviet Union was illegitimate and all claims based on the Soviet territory are void.

  30. The guy is Russian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That 'Estonian student' is Russian by nationality (surname is Russian).

    For americans - in CEE countries citizenship and nationality are two different issues.

    What I understand from the article (and the article isn't good journalism at all) prosecutors NOW have only one suspect (others are not identified - for comparison - how many spammers go to court in US comapred to all the spammers in a wild)

    BTW a number of Russians in Baltic states (especially in Latvia and Estonia), even when they have local citizenship, they are not loyal to local governments, they are true "fifth column" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_column).

    Cudos to Estonian ciber police for nailing down at least one of the crooks.

    1. Re:The guy is Russian by emilper · · Score: 1

      BTW a number of Russians in Baltic states (especially in Latvia and Estonia), even when they have local citizenship, they are not loyal to local governments, they are true "fifth column"

      "not loyal" as in being denied civil rigths in the country where they were born unless they positively prove they are "loyal" ?

    2. Re:The guy is Russian by harshipper · · Score: 1

      What on earth are you on about? Do you even know anything about the topic? No civil rights are being denied to citizens. Been listening to too much Russian media? And I must say, if you think that the fact that they have to know the language of the country they reside in is repression, then wow, that's a bit ignorant. Because that's what most of them are fighting against, having to learn the language. That's where all this 'proving they're loyal' crap comes from. And if they've been given citizenship already then no one is doubting their loyalty anyways because being loyal to the country is one demand in the citizenship law.

    3. Re:The guy is Russian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, don't blame the estonians just because Russia doesn't have any civil rights.

    4. Re:The guy is Russian by emilper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Last time I checked, which was during the early '90s, getting Estonian citizenship depended on passing some sort of language test, and that despite the fact that there are Russians on the territory currently controlled by Estonia ever since the Swedes lost it to Russia 200 years ago.

      "this 'proving they're loyal' crap" is exactly what is happening now: you raise up some hell, then have your subjects choose sides. There is no other way anybody can "prove" loyalty to anything. Unfortunately for the Estonians that speak Russian at home even if their family lived in what is now Estonia for 12 generations, and for those whose families lived there only for four generations, too, there is no human being on God's Earth that has only one set of loyalties, and by messing up with the monument for the army that pretty much prevented them from being exterminated as "untermensch" the Estonian government demands of them to renounce a part of their identity and choose sides. Only somebody who does not understand at all, or somebody who understands it perfectly, what did the WWII mean for any Russian (Veliko-, Malo- or Bielo-, or living in any other part of the Europe that was occupied by the Nazi), would mess with a symbol of their survival.

      The Estonian government it very lucky indeed not to have faced French-style rioting and mass migration of Russians out of Estonia: that would shoot down the "Baltic tiger" sooner than the currency pegged to the Euro or the export oriented economy would. Right now, I guess Russia would be extremely grateful for an influx of skilled laborers that already speak Russian and have legitimate reasons to have a grudge against their previous homeland.

    5. Re:The guy is Russian by harshipper · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but basing your statement on 15-year-old info, that I'm not entirely sure is correct does not make your point valid. I do not understand why it seems so strange for you that people have to pass a language test to become citizens of a country. (of course, the test has other parts, for example questions about history etc, but the language part is the most important. Also, if you are born in Estonia then you are automatically granted citizenship, the people who claim to be oppressed right now are the workers and their families that came to Estonia during the Soviet times. (Their kids who were born after Estonia became independent have citizenship by default). So the problematic group are the people who have come to Estonia, lived here for 20+ years and have not bothered to learn the local language (some can't even manage at the shop). I'm sorry, but I do not see why they should be given citizenship! About the bronze soldier. That was pure provocation. I'd suggest you look over some news about the meetings of the Russian government, for example how they felt threatened by the fact that Estonia was making the effort of reburying their soldiers whose coffins were directly under a bus stop. (What was what the bronze soldier actually marked.) The 'messing' with the soldier meant, that Estonia identified the bodies (since Russians weren't sure who were actually buried there) and buried them to soldiers' cemetery where I honestly feel they belong. And the statute was moved there, to the cemetery, where it belonged to guard over them. I don't see error in that. And what the WWII means to Russians? Do you know what the aftermath of WWII meant to Estonians? Thousands upon thousands sent to Siberia, murders, constant fear, talking Estonian was forbidden, etc. Surely you must see that Estonians do not see Russians as 'liberators'. Also, riots? The thought makes me laugh. Have you heard about Putin's program to bring back Russians who reside in other countries? it does apply to the Russians who live in Estonia too, the Russian government is willing to pay the fees of moving back to Russia. Yet only a few hundred (200) people have applied for it, though Estonia has a Russian population of 400 000. Seems they do like it after all, if they have the chance to go back but choose not to. Mustn't be too bad here then!

    6. Re:The guy is Russian by emilper · · Score: 1

      Seems they do like it after all, if they have the chance to go back but choose not to. Mustn't be too bad here then!

      Yeah, I heard that argument a lot in my life when I did not agree with the common opinion: if you don't like it, why don't you leave to your country, whichever that is (the oldest mention of my surname, which is quite rare, is in a marriage contract in Sweden in 1840, then some places in Austria, then Austrian Poland, then ...).

      So, 200 people chose to part with their friends, with their homes and jobs, to go to a place they have not yet seen or seen 30 years before ... yeah, that's relevant. Did Putin promise them jobs and new homes in place of those they left ?

      The Baltic states are expecting their Russian-speaking minority to give them positive proof of their loyalty (yes, the language and history exam is requiring positive proof, since I don't think they can choose interpretations, and my guess is they would fail the exam if they would quote from Ernst Gellner or Eric Hobsbawm or Georg Iggers) instead of letting them prove disloyal first, and this makes it evil. If the system was not much different from what happened in my country, those "Russians" that ended in Estonia did not choose to go there, but were given the choice to take that job there or starve. I wonder, did Estonia take it's share of the Soviet Union foreign debt? Since it did not dismantle the factories built there during the SU time and did not burn the railway wagons built in other parts of the Soviet Union and did not invalidate the diplomas the true Estonians got in SU universities, I wonder why would they question the right of Russian speaking people that lived in Estonia in 1990 to be considered true Estonians by default.

      The 'messing' with the soldier meant, that Estonia identified the bodies (since Russians weren't sure who were actually buried there) and buried them to soldiers' cemetery where I honestly feel they belong. And the statute was moved there, to the cemetery, where it belonged to guard over them. I don't see error in that.

      Did they announce it in time, ask for opinion and input, even for a mixed team to do the job and perform the ceremonies ? Or just cordoned the place, started digging and bagging/tagging the bones etc. ?

      (Their kids who were born after Estonia became independent have citizenship by default)

      Should I understand that the kids that were born in Estonia and of Russian speaking parents before Estonia became independent did not receive citizenship by default ?

    7. Re:The guy is Russian by harshipper · · Score: 1

      The topic of relocating the bronze soldier got widespread news coverage starting in January. It was actually moved in the end on April. Announced 4 months before, so I don't think it was that big of a surprise. Also, before the 'digging' begun, priests preformed the necessary religious ceremonies. Citizenship was given to those whose parents or grandparents had been Estonian citizens during the first Estonian republic (before 1938). People who wished to be citizens were given a green card to simplify the citizenship process. No, people born during soviet time were not given citizenship by default (which I think is even legally impossible, since Estonia as a republic did not exist, it was a part of the SU), but according to Estonian laws people under the age 15 can get citizenship more easily, so the people in the gap (1939-1984) have to go through the process of getting citizenship as it's done nowadays. That means that the people who don't have citizenship have had at least 15 or more years to learn the language. Sorry, but I feel no sympathy for them if they haven't tried.

    8. Re:The guy is Russian by Freultwah · · Score: 1

      First off, harshipper is misinformed at best and overly nationalist (or a moron, I cannot tell) at worst. Children born in Estonia sadly do not become citizens automatically unless one of their parents is a citizen (and until -- I believe -- 1995 it had to be the father, go figure the paternalistic XIX century ius sanguinis system).

      I also agree that citizenship should be more readily available. However, I do not think language restrictions are too harsh. Although it is decidedly wrong to point to other countries in that respect, I believe only a handful of countries agree to grant citizenship without prior language exams (Sweden and the Netherlands, but correct me if I am wrong) and even there they are turning the clock back, as they are coming to realise that the new citizens that cannot speak the language are just not participating in the society, hence invalidating their need to be a citizen. (Which almost always really boils down to the right to elect one's leaders. And having a passport that guarantees as many visa-free border crossings as possible. But I shall come to that later.)

      I do not consider the requirements to be too harsh, but I do see how they can be a problem. It boils down to the Estonian governments indecisiveness in the nineties as to what to do with all the Soviet time immigrants. The right thing to do would have been to win them over, so to speak, make them feel wanted in that new social setting where they could no longer be a majority. Instead, the government slept on it and kept people in the dark. It did not help that it was the Pro Patria party that was in charge back then. So people chose their side and now it's already quite late to try to win them over once again. See, the language itself is not the problem, the issue here is the willingness to learn it or the lack thereof.

      The language, however, is the bulk of the identity. If somebody from the outside of the ethnic community learns it, he or she is automatically highly regarded unless his/her actions prove otherwise. (See Dmitri Klenski.) I think it is comprehensible why Estonians so eagerly demand that every citizen be able to speak their language. Estonian culture's position in the globalising world is not overly strong, so the people cling to it.

      Estonia's political elite has only recently realised that the Soviet era immigrants are in Estonia to stay, at least those who aren't using the country as a trampoline to the rich EU or USA, but they are sadly reaping the fruits of their own prior actions.

      The bronze soldier debacle can be partly attributed to extremely poor PR on the Estonia's government's side. The other part comes from Russia's elite's wish to recreate a stronghold in its former occupied territory, for which the statue was reinstated as holy through a carefully orchestrated campaign that started sometime after Putin's rise to power. (The statue had been all but forgotten in the nineties.)

      As for the SU's foreign debt... Do we really need to go into that? When will Croatia pay the Austro-Hungarian empire's foreign debt? Or will Namibia cough up the dough for South Africa? Probably not. The factories, yes, were built. If you compare Finland and Estonia pre-war, Finland was lagging way behind. Enter Soviet times and Soviet factories being built, but not in Finland. Finland is arguably better off these days. Military factories were installed in all SU, their workers came from Russia and the products went back there. It wasn't beneficial to the local economy and quite many of them were dismantled when the industry left.

      Uh, must run. We can continue later. By e-mail, even.

    9. Re:The guy is Russian by emilper · · Score: 1

      The language, however, is the bulk of the identity. If somebody from the outside of the ethnic community learns it, he or she is automatically highly regarded unless his/her actions prove otherwise. (See Dmitri Klenski.) I think it is comprehensible why Estonians so eagerly demand that every citizen be able to speak their language. Estonian culture's position in the globalising world is not overly strong, so the people cling to it.

      I have no bone with Estonia wanting it's citizens to speak Estonian. The issue is what is reasonably to expect from those that were trapped in Estonia when SU broke down: damned if the left (become homeless and be rejected by the other Russians as "Estonians", the way it happens with the Transylvanian Hungarians in Hungary, or with Moldavians in Rumania), damned if the remained in Estonia (become second-class citizens at best, with their loyalty permanently questioned). All over Europe minorities (still not sent packing or sent digging their own graves) are used that way: when there is some sacrifice to ask, they are fine citizens, when there are benefits to distribute, they are foreigners who have to prove their loyalty.

      What ticked me off was the knee-jerk reaction: D.G. has a Slavic name, so he must be Russian, so he must be used by KGB in their attempt to ... do what ? Seriously annoy Estonia ? I have not found any details about what kind of DDOS attack Estonia was subjected to. Was is syn flooding ? Were there attempts to gain access? Were they simply bombarding the servers with ping requests ? Or maybe what really happened was the "Slashdot effect" when the whole world became interested in the fate of the poor small Estonia in it's conflict with it's big and bad neighbor and servers that did well servicing less than 2 mil. people buckled under the curiosity of 20 millions ?

      The Baltic states are perfectly justified to regard Soviet Union as a conqueror and the occupation as illegitimate, but I think the rest of the former SU subjects, including the Russians, can raise the same claims: that they were enslaved by the Communists against their will and against their fierce resistance. After all, the Russians provided the bulk of the resistance against the Communists during the Civil War of the 1918-1921, and suffered the most because of Communism. Maybe it would be more appropriate for the Estonians to blame France and England for their suffering: had not the Antante insist on Russia staying in the war, Lenin and it's pals might have been known only to historians interested in the Socialist movement of the early XXth century, since most of the people that at first volunteered for the Bolshevik armies only wanted to get away from the meaningless slaughter of the Eastern front.

      When will Croatia pay the Austro-Hungarian empire's foreign debt?

      If I am not mistaken, it got discounted from the war reparations owed to Serbia :-P.

      Enter Soviet times and Soviet factories being built, but not in Finland. Finland is arguably better off these days. Military factories were installed in all SU, their workers came from Russia and the products went back there.

      The products went not only to Russia, but also to the Korean war, the Vietnam war and the Afghanistan war ... when I see the Americans weeping their eyes off because they lost the Vietnam war, I can only think about the resources our countries wasted there and smile ... bitterly, since in fact the Communist camp might have won one battle, but it lost the Cold War: the Communists built mostly military industry because they were permanently supporting one war or another, and in doing so wasted resources they could not really afford to waste.

  31. Just as I said by saikou · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just as I said when original discussion happened, Russian government was not responsible. Now, is Pentagon still ready to bomb cyberattackers? If yes, then next student with a grudge will finish off a country or two before we have a chance of intelligent machines or human-made bacteria to kill us all.

  32. What A Crock by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quote: "The fact that a single student was able to trigger such events is particularly ominous when you consider just how many potential flashpoints exist between various countries..."

    What nonsense. If governments put important messages on such "secure" places as roadside billboards, for example, then they should expect "hacks" like moustaches drawn on them, etc.

    Others are not to blame if the government is clueless. The fact that it was so easy to do is a great indication that the government was in fact clueless. If they want to put something important somewhere and keep it "secure", then they are responsible for taking at least minimal measures to make sure that it is, in fact, secure.

    They are just looking for someone to blame for their own incompetence.

  33. Blame the geek by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

    Now they are trying to back out of an international embarrassment by blaming the geek. Classic...

  34. Re:probably a linux fag by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

    Well, considering that a breeder would have rater too little time on his hands to do it... with his wife and all his kids.

  35. Re:What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is USA a real country?

  36. bad information. by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    THis is what they want us to believe.

    Sacrifice one student to the great god of world peace.

  37. Giving weapons to the irresponsible by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    It won't be popular here, but I will say it. The greatest risk to stable society is its young men. It's not surprising that Australian first peoples used to put a lot of effort into controlling them, that the Amish let them live outside their society till they get it out of their system, and that other societies have put them into armies under strict discipline. The combination of increasing strength, hormonal confusion, and social pressure makes them volatile and dangerous. Fifty percent of us have been through it, 100% know about it, but in Western societies we continue to give them dangerous weapons knowing that they are not mature enough to handle them. That includes cars, guns, and computers.

    Once, the damage that young men could cause was limited because weapons were limited. Mind you, a machete is a pretty hazardous weapon. But give them RPGs or botnets, and the ability to cause a lot of damage escalates.

    At the end of WW2, a lot of allied soldiers were traumatized because they had to shoot adolescent males. This is because they were equipped with weapons like fausts, and were totally irresponsible. They were simply emotionally and intellectually unequipped to understand what they were doing. They would surrender and then try to kill people. If they were treated kindly, they would take it as a sign of weakness and attack again. (I'm not suggesting that only adolescent males do malicious things on the Internet, but at least professional criminals want as few people as possible to know what they are up to, and are unlikely to cause public mayhem.)

    The long term consequences of this could yet be that the irresponsible behaviour of the few will affect the many, when societies decide to block access to most of the Internet to all except an approved few. I don't have a clue what the right answer is, but if the IT community cannot come up with a means of regulation, governments may yet take its toys away.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Giving weapons to the irresponsible by celle · · Score: 1

      What a lot of bull! Those young men that you like to talk about are often incited by a lot of old men(Asama, others). Young men are the strongest and most manipulatable group, thats why they're in armies and cannon fodder. And lets not forget some of our best creations were done by young men starting with the internet that was created by college kids. The arts is obvious. Without the young we'd be an indifferent and stagnant culture and thats assuming the control games of the old didn't get us all killed. If you need proof just look at our current political mess, that shit isn't being done by the young.

      Your WW2 example is weak as those young fighters knew nothing else but about the one country they grew up in. The were taught total obedience and support to the state. You kill what tries to destroy your home, if not to stop it, in revenge. That goes for either sex at any age(current terrorists). Why do you think our legal system is so busy. You do realize that the young are in prisons but the old that started it all and keep the crimes going are still loose. who's fault is that?

      You did leave out one thing. The Young often create, thats their game. The old do everything to control and will sacrifice anything to achieve it, especially the young, simply because thats their game. Just remember the young are the way they are somewhat because of the old who made the environment they live in that way.

      We have managed to get this far just fine, stop nitpicking with your incorrect self-serving views, you old fart.

      disclaimer, I'm not young either.

    2. Re:Giving weapons to the irresponsible by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The greatest risk to stable society is its young men.

      Young unmarried men. People who have a family to worry about are a lot less likely to do something stupid than the ones who don't, and of course it also helps to have an outlet for those surging hormones. That's one of the reasons why most ancient societies advocated marrying young, and why a married couple is sometimes still considered the basic building block of the society.

      The best way to keep people from doing stupid things is to make sure that they have a lot to lose; and that is only possible if they have a lot, period. That's one of the reasons why having a large middle class tends to stabilize society.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  38. Minor correction by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    Writing was not discovered, it was invented.

  39. Russia told the truth by GottMitUns · · Score: 0

    I wonder how this will affect the Litvinenko case? Just the same pile of bullshit unfounded accusations against Kremlin!

  40. Stalin and Hitler both divided and occupied Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The life of the Baltic states would not have been better regardless of which army occupied it. As a result these states have been occupied by the USSR for 50 years.

    Let's not forget that Russia did not exactly bring freedom to Baltic States. They were independent before the war, but not after it. And many people died deported to Siberia, including infants most of whom died on the way there. Those are the facts.

  41. Where are those easy days ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    .. where you can hack your way out just by playing games!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  42. Re:The War on Cyber-Warfare WoW is blocked by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Maybe they will think that all those kids learn their evil hacking ways playing too much MMPORG
    and will ban WoW, ...er..wait I still have an active account....

  43. Is this meant to be disagreement? by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    I agree with almost everything you say, including that I am an old fart, but your remarks ADD to my observation, they don't counteract it. It is absolutely true that the old men manipulate the young ones for their ends. It's old men that put guns into the hands of young ones. It's the old men in the NRA that resist gun control, the old men in the tribes that arm the child soldiers in Africa. Agree, agree, agree.

    It is also true that a lot of creativity comes from the young, especially in mathematics and the sciences. Middle aged people have children and big physical assets to manage, they don't have time to be as creative as someone who is still probably financially dependent on their parents, bursaries etc., though people who are ruthless enough manage to overcome that (Picasso, for instance.) I agree.

    However, it is still true that adolescent males, through no fault of their own are more likely to have hormonal problems and a lack of knowledge of the world that makes them potentially more dangerous than other groups. If my original post is flamebait, then explain to me why insurance premiums for young male drivers are so high? It isn't old men forcing them to drive dangerously. And why do we use the term "script kiddies"?

    The Estonian is not unique. We have just seen an IT guy (read the reports) in his twenties in a French Bank lose nearly 5 billion Euros after he, apparently, disabled the controls on the upper limit of his trading. Now tell me that events like this will not cause the (middle aged) bankers and politicians to start considering how this kind of downside risk can be minimised. Good for creativity and technical progress? No. Good for security? Apparently yes. Does the IT industry need to get its head out of the sand over botnets, Internet crime and general malice and find a fix before the politicians think they've found one? I think yes. And I would think you actually agree with me, except that anyone who thinks we have got this far just fine obviously doesn't read what's going on.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  44. The historical background. by CryptoEngineer · · Score: 2, Informative
    The attacks occured in the aftermath of another Estonian/Russian diplomatic incident. A bit of history:


    During WW2, Estonia was annexed by the Soviet Union under the Molotov-Ribbintrop pact, which carved up eastern Europe between Stalin and Hitler. Hitler later reneged, and invaded the area assigned to Stalin, taking over the Baltic States (Estonia, Lativa and Lithuania). The Russians later retook Eastern Europe, and re-occupied the Baltics. They didn't leave until the early 90s. Many Russians resettled in Estonia during the occupation, mostly taking lower level jobs - the standard of living has always been better there than in Russia. They now form about 1/3 of the population.

    In central Tallinn (the capital of Estonia) the Soviets set up a war memorial to the Soviet 'liberators' who died driving out the Nazis. To the Estonians, however, the 'Bronze Soldier' just commemorated a second occupation - one that went on for nearly 50 years. In 2007 the now-independent Estonian government decided to move the statue to a Soviet military cemetary in the edge of town. The ethnic Russian Estonians objected, as did Russia, and Putin personally called it a desecration. There were riots, and even one death in Tallinn.

    The statue was moved, and it was at this point that the cyberattack was launched.

    The kid accused is a Russian Estonian. It remains unclear who ordered the attack - Putin's gang could easily have provoked otherwise uninvolved hackers in the Russian diaspora to act.

    The attack certainly served Russia's interests at the time, punishing a tiny, resented upstart for daring to act with sovereignty. That there is plausible deniability doesnt clear Putin and his ex-KGB cronies.

  45. Correction accepted by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    Quite right.

    I remember all too well one of our apprentices who had what I can only describe as a remarkable car at the age of 21. How he afforded the insurance I have no idea. Then for some reason a remarkably attractive girl took a fancy to him. Six months later he was presented with an ultimatum, and a week later he turned up for work in a Renault Clio.

    The power of love. And sex...from what I heard from the other apprentices, lots and lots of sex.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  46. Possible motivation for the attacks by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    For those of you who don't know, about 25% of the population of Estonia is ethnically Russian. These people do not see themselves as Estonian citizens, but as Russians who happen to live in Estonia. Russian is no longer an official language there. Note that the Russian population doesn't want to leave as life in the EU has a lot of advantages over life in Russia, but they hate the Estonian government. The Russians conveniently overlook the fact that their government forcibly incorporated Estonia into the USSR and the locals actually actively resisted with a guerilla movement into the early 1950's (look up Forest Brothers sometime at Wikipedia). The USSR resettled Russians and Ukrainians into Estonia to dilute the local nationalism and made Russian the official language. So it's no surprise that upon gaining independence that the Estonians dropped Russian as an official language. To become Estonian citizens, people had to take a test in Estonian, which kept a lot of Russians away from citizenship as they never bothered to learn Estonian in the USSR days. I would bet almost anything that the student involved is an ethnic Russian student. If you ever have a chance to talk to Russians from there, it's quite amazing what lengths they will go to to justify the USSR's barbaric policies against Estonia.

  47. Chain Reaction by Kwesadilo · · Score: 1

    Even if this guy had no close conspirators, which isn't known at this point, it's been reported previously that there were a lot of participants that got riled up by some of the maybe more influential people. This article says that there were a bunch of script kiddies who took their cues from more experienced attackers. Dmitri Galushkevich probably did not mastermind all of that stuff. It's still unclear what exacly went on, as far as I can see.

    --
    This space reserved for administrative use.
  48. Ron Paul: racist, racist-enabler and bad liar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paul told CNN's "The Situation Room" Thursday that he didn't write any of the offensive articles and has "no idea" who did.
    - Ron Paul on CNN

    My wife Carol, and our children and grandchildren, join me in wishing you and your family a wonderful Christmas and a Happy New Year. May we start to confound the plans of the Trilateralists.
    - mysterious non-Ron Paul racist author whose identity Ron Paul is completely unaware of, signing off for "The Ron Paul Report"

    The libertarian punchbowl has been polluted indefinitely by the Ron Paul turd. He did for Goldwater-style conservatism what Osama bin Laden did for Islam. Nobody's going to take those ideas seriously for quite a while, if ever.
  49. It was not just a "Soviet Era Memorial" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am very surprised about how the media shows this situation. It was not just a "Soviet era memorial". That was a tomb were soldiers who fought against Hitler were buried. The Estonians decided to take the bones and move them out of the city. Of course the Russians were upset, the graves were being violated.
    It is worth noting that the soldiers were reburied in a cemetery and the Estonian prime minister put flowers on the new tomb, but still many people in Russia were angry.

  50. Re:The guy is Russianxz by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked, which was during the early '90s, getting Estonian citizenship depended on passing some sort of language test, and that despite the fact that there are Russians on the territory currently controlled by Estonia ever since the Swedes lost it to Russia 200 years ago.
    I may be wrong, but I seem to recall something about how all residents of Estonia who before the formal declaration of independence formally supported the then-illegal independence movement (e.g. by joining the pro-independence parties) were granted citizenship without any test. It's just that so few Russians did so.

    by messing up with the monument for the army that pretty much prevented them from being exterminated as "untermensch"
    The fact remains that German occupation was far less damaging to Estonia than the preceding and the following periods of Soviet rule. The Germans were mostly after the Jews, and they've got their toll same as everywhere else (though due to the very small number of Jews present, around 5,000 if memory serves me right, it was enough for Estonia to get a dubious honor of being the only country declared "Judenfrei" by the Reich). In contrast, the Soviets hauled over more than 50,000 to the labor camps in the first few years, most never to return.

    Only somebody who does not understand at all, or somebody who understands it perfectly, what did the WWII mean for any Russian (Veliko-, Malo- or Bielo-, or living in any other part of the Europe that was occupied by the Nazi), would mess with a symbol of their survival.
    And there you go next, trodding over Ukrainian and Belarusian nationhood by calling them "malorussians" and "byelorussians". Are you aware that it is outright offensive, about the same as calling Russian a "Muscovite"? As for what WWII meant for them, why, you might want to ask some veterans of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army.