Slashdot Mirror


23,000 Linux PCs For Filipino Schools

Da Massive writes "Speaking at the linux.conf.au event in Melbourne, Australia, independent open source consultant Ricardo Gonzalez has told of how he has helped bring 23,000 Linux PCs to over 1000 schools in the Philippines: 'Ministers in the Filipino government now understand Linux can do so much for so little outlay.'" The slow process of educating a government that knew only Microsoft is especially well described in this piece.

142 comments

  1. don't hate me by blhack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let me preface this by saying that I am one of the biggest linux geeks you're ever going to meet. I run gentoo on my laptop, as well as on my Desktop at work. I have installed Ubuntu on my sisters' laptops and my mom's Desktop. I do graphic design work in scribus and inkscape.

    I'm a linux geek....but

    If the true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace, then is linux really the best method of doing so? Isn't the school in some way doing its students a dis-service my training them on a computing method that they will very likely never use again?
    As much as i DESPISE some of microsoft's products (i admin a damn win2k3 server...do i really need to explain WHY i hate microsoft?) i understand that in order to function in a modern workplace, the ability to navigate microsoft windows is almost as essential as any other office skill.

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    1. Re:don't hate me by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 0, Troll

      This kinda reminds me of all that Mac training I had to do when I was in school. While I was using Mac at school, my family had Microsoft products at home. Which do you think I spent more time on and retained more about? If you guessed Windows, you get the grand prize. In retrospect, all that time spent on an Apple II was really a waste. I don't know a thing about Mac anymore.

      --
      The game.
    2. Re:don't hate me by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Linux isn't used as much as it could be, because everyone knows Windows. If you train the next generation in Linux, businesses will have a greater incentive to switch, which means there'll be a greater incentive to develop software for Linux.

    3. Re:don't hate me by cheater512 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am also a Gentoo guy.

      It doesnt matter what OS or software they use.
      Typing up a document or surfing the net is nearly identical no matter what you choose.

      Also hopefully some of these kids will go on to management and instead of being tied to Windows they will lean towards Linux instead.

      I really want to shoot the managers who think "Windows works well on my desktop. Lets make all our company servers run it too!"
      Thats a effect of Microsoft being in all the schools.
      In Australia, Microsoft actually gives away all their software to schools in a effort to make sure everyone is brought up with their software.

    4. Re:don't hate me by corsec67 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pretty much *any* software you are going to teach in school is going to be obsolete by the time they are "in the workforce", so it would be better to teach concepts as opposed to steps to follow. Teach them how to learn, not how to memorize, and they will get much further.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    5. Re:don't hate me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't understand this. I think school should teach how to use computers - not to use some specific tool. If the kids learn spreadsheets by using OpenOffice.org I am 100% sure they will know how to use Excel as well. However, the plus side is that while learning OO.org, they are very likely to learn that MS Office is not the only option. Most people who use MS Office are not aware of OO.org or any other options. OO.org users are aware of MS Office though. This applies to Linux vs. Windows discussion as well. Teach the kids Linux and they will learn that world is not black and white (concerning the tools available to get the job done). I argue this because Linux users are mentally prepared to face different kind of computers.

    6. Re:don't hate me by DaHat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Funny... that's just what Apple was thinking in the mid to late 90's when Macs were most of what you saw in schools... what happend? Those folks ended up using PCs once they went on to college and real jobs.

    7. Re:don't hate me by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

      Pretty much any software knowledge one gains when they are young becomes deprecated when you go into the real world. I actually grew up with DOS and Windows and allot of it now is junk as things have moved on.

    8. Re:don't hate me by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I used an Amiga with Word Perfect at school, and DOS with Word Perfect at home.

      Fortunately the skills were useful for Word at a later point, and understanding how directories (now folders) work.

      Many people I work with (as customers) don't understand how to download something from the internet (or an email attachment) and find it at a later time. This is a useful skill that is very cross platform. As are typing, google, webmail, and even spreadsheets.

      If someone can learn enough to type as quickly as fast handwriting, use the internet, send an e-mail, and save a file for later retrieval they are much better off than one who can't.

      Spell check, and spreadsheets are bonuses.

      It could also reasonably be argues that the purpose of computers in school is to save money by not needing encyclopedias and other types of expensive books, and to augment the ability to teach certain types of subjects.

      I say this as someone who set up a Xubuntu computer at my wife's work for a summer internship for high-school students that had very little computer experience (they could use a mouse and type, and certainly knew how to find myspace instead of work though). They would stay after they could leave to use the computer to type essays and learned how to enter data into a spreadsheet along with basic (very basic) spreadsheet concepts like sorting and dragging down a column to repeat a pattern. These are the types of things that will help them be more qualified in the workforce even though they gained no Windows experience.

      Software like the test builder/taker in Edubuntu could be a great bonus to a school poor school and could easily save a school dollars a test (goes somewhat to paying for the computers).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    9. Re:don't hate me by GaryPatterson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, all those Mac-only programs like Word and Excel, well there's no way I can use that knowledge on a Windows machine now. And those Mac-only programming languages like BASIC, C, C++ and Pascal. Useless now that I use a Windows machine at work. Even those Mac GUI concepts like copy and paste are un-transferable to Windows.

      Stupid Apple. Stupid schools.

      All that time spent learning apps and stuff on a Mac was totally wasted.

    10. Re:don't hate me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      linux is all you find at my workplace...

      the difference is pretty much in the apps for the end user and you will find these to be inconsistent in the future regardless of platform. office 2000 vs 2007 for example

      Besides with more web based apps it makes even less of a difference in the long term....

    11. Re:don't hate me by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      no, they are not doing a disservice

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    12. Re:don't hate me by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

      At the end of the day drag and drop and clicking on icons or menu's is pretty much the same on any OS.

    13. Re:don't hate me by Shimmer · · Score: 1

      The true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace

      No, that's the goal of a vocational program (like shop class).

      The goal of a typical computer class is the same as that of school in general: To educate citizens so they can successfully assume responsibility for running their country in the future. This is reason we have public education.

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    14. Re:don't hate me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace, then is linux really the best method of doing so? Isn't the school in some way doing its students a dis-service my training them on a computing method that they will very likely never use again?


      This "soundbite" and others like it are very much in Microsoft's best interest to put out there.

      The reality is that running several applications ... such as Firefox, Thunderbird or OpenOffice ... is identical no matter if you run that application on Windows or on Linux. Other applications are Windows-only, but have equivalents in Linux that are very similar to operate. Also, there is nothing to stop vendors of applications which are currently Windows-only to port those applications over to Linux once those software companies begin to realise that the move to Linux is now gaining significant momentum.

      There are some desktop applications that are currently Windows-only (such as microsoft Office) ... but there is barely any practical difference between those and OpenOffice. If you have learned how to use OpenOffice Calc, and you know what that application can do and can be used for, it isn't at all difficult to use Excel.

      Notice the way that I turned that last thought around, opposite to the way this thought would normally be written? I did that deliberately, just to try to demonstrate the way that Microsoft gets these "soundbites" into the public vernacular. Microsoft want people to think that it is "normal" to run Excel, and to run anything else requires additional training. The fact is that people have to have at least a little training for anything they use in the workplace, it won't be exactly the same as they were used to at school. This applies just as much to Microsoft software as to any other.

      It is, in fact, probably easier right now for an ex-student who was trained on OpenOffice at school to move to a job where the software in use is Office 2003 than it would be for another ex-student who was trained on Office 2007 to move into that exact same job.

      You don't actually HAVE to run Microsoft software, despite what Microsoft would dearly want you to believe.
    15. Re:don't hate me by rts008 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Teach them how to learn, not how to memorize, and they will get much further."

      Talk about hitting the proverbial nail on the head....with a sledgehammer!!

      Sadly, that method of teaching is not as prevalent as it should be.
      When I was in college, one of the most important things I was taught is the concept of knowing where to find 'the reference materials needed' instead of a crapload of by rote memorizing.

      I got my AAS in Veterinary Technology (think Registered Nurse for Critters), and while I was doing that, a BS in Biochemistry just kind of fell into the mix with no additional effort. (Vet Tech is TOUGH!)...No way to memorize all of the needed info, but knowing when and where to find the info needed made the big difference.
      Medical Terminology, Pharmacology, and Anatomy(leg bone connected to the hip bone...by what? and by which attachments?!...hint: there are 27 major attachments to the scapula-shoulderblade to be learned- How's that for a non-sequitur?) are all brute force memorization, but after passing the classes it is just a PDR away (PDR=Physician's Desk Reference). Many times I have thanked the head of Murry State's head of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine's Dr. Kay Helms for this little bit of insight.

      This concept applies readily to any tech field, and many more. *disclaimer: this could be a more cogent post if I was not into my second beer! (9.5% alcohol by volume, 40 oz.)*

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    16. Re:don't hate me by ozphx · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that in a real developing country MS practically gives out Windows licenses. I really doubt that the cost Windows is more than 5% of the hardware...

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    17. Re:don't hate me by cduffy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Those folks ended up using PCs once they went on to college and real jobs.
      Ehh? I haven't seen a decent university-level computer science program yet that isn't mostly using UNIX, and there're plenty of "real jobs" for folks who know something other than win32.

      Even for those that do go on to work with Windows, though, having used more than one UI is a Good Thing for a reason: The more of them you learn, the better able you are to notice and generalize the common concepts, and the less limited you are to only being able to use the individual UI you learned on.
    18. Re:don't hate me by filesiteguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace, then is linux really the best method of doing so? Isn't the school in some way doing its students a dis-service my training them on a computing method that they will very likely never use again? As much as i DESPISE some of microsoft's products (i admin a damn win2k3 server...do i really need to explain WHY i hate microsoft?) i understand that in order to function in a modern workplace, the ability to navigate microsoft windows is almost as essential as any other office skill

      Actually this is a fallacious argument.

      I just pointed out yesterday that kids can learn any OS. Keep in mind that I (along with all my peers) grew up in a world without windows and yet still managed to learn. In fact, I didn't even see windows until I was 19 and in college. That's when Win 2.0 came out and I thought it was - erm - mostly harmless.

      My seven-year-old and five-year-old sons have no issues moving from my Vista laptop to my wife's Win2K desktop to my openSUSE laptop and desktop and to my mom's openSUSE desktop or to my father-in-law's Macintosh. Unless you're gonna teach kids how to administer Win2K3 workstations, then there's no issue.

    19. Re:don't hate me by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      In school I used WordPerfect 5.1, Quattro Pro, MS Works, Filemaker Pro, QBasic, MS-Dos, and CorelDraw, along with a bunch of programs that were so obscure, I can't even remember the name of them. Up until high school, the only computer I had ever used at school was an ICON. I don't use any of that anymore. However that hasn't stopped me from becoming quite proficient with computers. I'm a computer geek, so I did some learning on my own, but nobody I know from school has any problems using computers in the slightest. Any program you learn in school now will be out of use in 5-10 years. So the real answer is, instead of trying to focus on what a software is being used, try to teach the kids concepts, instead of trying to teach them exact sequences of buttons to press that will only ever work in the exact version of the software you are "teaching" them on.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    20. Re:don't hate me by wizardforce · · Score: 1

      then is linux really the best method of doing so? Isn't the school in some way doing its students a dis-service my training them on a computing method that they will very likely never use again?
      Can you think of anything in Windows that couldn't be figured out by someone who has been trained on Linux? My point is this, the sheer amount of software available out of the box in many linux distros allows you to use many different software programs [open office, Koffice etc..] so after a while, you generally get to understand the general workings of different programs making learning new ones easier. That would as far as I'm concerned, be an advantage. To be able to figure out new software that is similar to what you're already familiar with rather than being trained in one specific program on one specific OS is an advantage not a deficit.
      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    21. Re:don't hate me by schon · · Score: 2, Funny

      all that time spent on an Apple II was really a waste. I don't know a thing about Mac anymore Uhh - if you learned computing on an Apple II, and you're wondering why that didn't translate to knowledge of the Mac, you have bigger problems than just wasting time.
    22. Re:don't hate me by webmaster404 · · Score: 1

      Most people use Windows yes. However with the GUI changing (just look from XP to Vista), training students on an outdated platform of Windows is worse then teaching them *NIX. Because most Linux/Unix GUIs don't need to be new for the sake of being new, most skills acquired on KDE 1 can be transferred to KDE 4 with little problems, and the same with Gnome. Secondly, most basic Windows concepts can be accurately emulated by having a Windows-like WM or theme on the desktop environment of your choosing, I have seen people think that Linux is just like XP whenever an XP theme is installed and therefore can get around in Windows. Most workplaces/schools don't want people to have admin privileges so all the talk about knowing how Windows works and how to admin it is null and void. Also, Linux can be an easy way for students to get into computer programming/repair/systems administrator jobs that require little college training and have relatively high pay, everyone knows Windows however *NIX skills are essential to get beyond a data entry position in trying to get a technical job. Also, many offices are going to mixed OS environments with some OS-X systems, a lot of XP systems, a few Vista test systems and some Linux systems. Schools should not take a risk with MS's products becoming obsolete whenever the students graduate, most Unix skills are here to stay and can save a student a bunch of money (either spend $1000 on a desktop with Vista or spend $400 for a Ubuntu desktop for the same performance not to mention the save on the cost of proprietary applications and anti-virus/spyware) and gives them skills needed. Think back to the old DOS skills and Apple ][ skills, now they are not needed anymore, a few wasted cells in your brain, today if you learned Unix back in the '80s running OS-X or Ubuntu in 2008 will be second nature to you, take someone brought up on Windows 98 and sit them down on a Vista machine, they would be confused because they were learned on 98 and now its Vista and everything looks different! Unix is stable, secure and chances are (with the lack of OS innovations and the rapid adoption of OS-X and Linux) the future platform. MS products are a dead end, they only end up in another $50 MS tax with another $100 for your Office tax not to mention your $150 Anti-virus/spyware tax and your super new top-of-the-line-won't-be-able-to-run-Windows-7 desktop that could cost $600 upwards. Unix/Linux helps you get ahead, with Windows your just another consumer.

      --
      There is no "disagree" moderation, and troll, flamebait and overrated are not valid substitutes
    23. Re:don't hate me by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just don't look up anything in a reference book in front of your patients (or in the case of a vet, the owner of your patients). My boss is a pilot, and he told me a story about how he took up a friend for a flight once, and when coming in for the landing, he got out his checklist to go through the proper landing procedures. The guy got all freaked out because he thought that he was looking in a manual, and didn't know what he was doing. I'm a software developer, and I spend a lot of my time looking up the right answer in various places, rather than trying to come up with it on my own. It's often faster, easier, and more reliable to look up the answer somewhere else, rather then try to solve a problem yourself.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    24. Re:don't hate me by corsec67 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hah, put "Landing for Dummies" on the cover of the landing checklist.....

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    25. Re:don't hate me by webmaster404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, think about the pricing, you could get an expensive (yet easy-to-use) Mac or you could get a cheap PC with DOS that no one really liked but it was there OS. Most businesses and people chose the cheaper route and got a PC, today we have the opposite, with Linux being cheaper yet not as (seemingly) easy to use as the Windows and Mac computers. I expect that because of the price point alone (and easier to use distros, Vista becoming ME II and OS X being popular) Unix/Linux will become the most used platform.

      --
      There is no "disagree" moderation, and troll, flamebait and overrated are not valid substitutes
    26. Re:don't hate me by amirulbahr · · Score: 0

      Training != Education

      Unfortunately schools and most higher education institutions are all about training work-bots and getting them deployed ASAP.

    27. Re:don't hate me by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      i understand that in order to function in a modern workplace, the ability to navigate microsoft windows is almost as essential as any other office skill.


      And what will they learn in those classes? They'll learn how to use a mouse, they'll learn how to cut and paste either with the mouse or with control keys, they'll learn how to navigate in a GUI. Then they'll learn how to use a word processor and a spreadsheet. The techniques will be exactly the same as they'll use in the Real World if they end up using Windows, except, possibly, for the arrangement of some of the menus, or the exact set of features available. Even so, they'll understand what's going on and find it easy to adapt, and that's the important thing.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    28. Re:don't hate me by webmaster404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly, and why does everyone think that it has to be MS to create those concepts? I bet that if you go to a school today most people wouldn't know how applications are launched, or even how simple parts of the computer's OS works, and probably 98% think that the GUI==the OS. Most kids know how a program works by launching it from Start-->All Programs--->Games--->Minesweeper and not how the OS really works. MS always ends up creating new "buzzwords" to make their OS/Program seem new just think of the "ribbon" on Office 2007 (if you are unlucky enough to have used it) or "Shortcuts" rather then links, MS has a way of making anything that seems like a computer concept be totally linked to Windows and totally foreign to Mac or Linux, that's how I am sure they manage to keep market share from people looking at Mac/Linux who panic when they can't see a C drive.

      --
      There is no "disagree" moderation, and troll, flamebait and overrated are not valid substitutes
    29. Re:don't hate me by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      You got it so spot on. These school kids are going to need real Windows(r) skills when they're ready for work in five to ten years.

      So will the next generation and the generation after that. I learned all about registry hacking when I was in grade 3, 1982 I think, and boy, I'm so glad I did.

      What's the use of Linux desktops? If windows has been good enough for the last thousand years, it's good enough for the next thousand years.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    30. Re:don't hate me by webmaster404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But the hardware is tied to the OS. If you were to get Vista you would probably pick out a new computer with a dual or quad-core processor with 2-3 Gigs of RAM, a nice DRM-compliant video-card for Aero, then of course the average person needs to spend about $300 on anti-virus/spyware, MS office, new versions for programs that MS broke backwards compatibility with, ETC. For a school they can probably get licenses very cheap, however when the student ends up going to college, they can either pay the $1000 setup with Vista, over-the-top hardware, and all the proprietary software Windows needs to patch its flaws or the kid can buy a decent $300 computer with Linux installed because they learned about Linux and all the software is just a click or apt-get away. MS teaches kids to be dependent on one provider (MS) for their software therefore paying excess to third parties for hardware to just run the OS, also because the kid hasn't learned really how a computer works, any chance of a sysadmin job or other high-tech job disappears unless the kid learns a whole lot in college (or there is a giant breakthrough in software) and ends up being dependent. The kid who learns Linux and how the computer actually works can buy cheaper hardware, and can easily become a sysadmin or other high-paying tech job and nearly all software will be free. Now, even with cost not the option, does the school want to teach their students to be dependent or independent?

      --
      There is no "disagree" moderation, and troll, flamebait and overrated are not valid substitutes
    31. Re:don't hate me by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are some majors where rote memorization is good. When you're in the ER and you just reacted to some drug and you're going into cardiac arrest do you want the doctor to go "Hold on a second let me let me look this up."

      I'm an engineer and my sister is a pharmacist. I don't interact with people and nothing needs to be known NOW. Heck I sat in a meeting where we had 5 engineers around the room and I was the youngest and we all broke out our Fluids books to figure out some mass transfer through a pipe.

      On the other hand I just got out of ACL surgery. I wasn't feeling any effect from the Oxycotin (naturally high tolerance to all drugs) so I called my sister. She knew off the top of her head what would react with it and how much more I could take. Granted she also knows where to find the stuff if she doesn't know.

      As I see it:
      Engineer: Where to find it>What it is
      Doctor: What it is>=Where to find it

    32. Re:don't hate me by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
      If the true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace, then is linux really the best method of doing so? Isn't the school in some way doing its students a dis-service my training them on a computing method that they will very likely never use again?

      Um, No. A wide range of enterprise servers run Linux or gasp Unix based Operating Systems. Knowing your way around the shell, and administration is a major asset. Never use again, are you kidding me. If they grow up learning linux you think they will chuck it to buy Windows? You think there are no jobs for linux users? You think you cannot install linux on your office machine? Some places this may be true, I try not to work at those places.

      A PHP programmer is a PHP programmer, Ruby, Java, C++ the same. Many of the systems these children will learn about will out last the education their windows counterparts were suckered into. Don't believe me, I used a Apple IIs in school followed by IBM PCxt with dos and then 3.11. Besides copy paste little of that knowledge is of any practical value whatsoever. Later I took classes in a Unix environment, I use those commands to this day and see no end of life to their needs.

      Teaching kids on systems with an understood planned obsolescence is abhorrent and should be outlawed. Good on you, Mr Gonzalez.

      And shame on you Win Admin. How many times have you had to refresh your knowledge to do your job. Learning how to learn is far better than memorizing for a test. Unless oof course you just want your MCSE. You have my pity, and you should really say something about your company putting mission critical application in the hands of MS. At least put it in a VM for cripes sake.

      --
      OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    33. Re:don't hate me by syousef · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just don't look up anything in a reference book in front of your patients (or in the case of a vet, the owner of your patients).

      I'm actually encouraged when a doctor looks something up. It means they're not just guessing or relying on memory of a similar case they came across a long time ago. The only GP I currently trust proverbially as far as I can throw is one who when I presented a medical problem offered to do some research and ring me the following night from home.

      My boss is a pilot, and he told me a story about how he took up a friend for a flight once, and when coming in for the landing, he got out his checklist to go through the proper landing procedures. The guy got all freaked out because he thought that he was looking in a manual, and didn't know what he was doing.

      Your boss' friend is an ignorant idiot. Not only does this friend not know that checklists are common in aviation, but he decides to freak out when the pilot's workload is highest. My response in your boss' shoes would be to politely explain how it works, then lose the friend (certainly never take that friend flying again).

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    34. Re:don't hate me by fwarren · · Score: 1
      Spell check, and spreadsheets are bonuses.

      I have found spell check on Slashdot next to impossible.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    35. Re:don't hate me by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1


      > If the true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace, then is linux really the best method of doing so?

      It's not the worst - where kids can't do much of ANYTHING on computers (i.e. only run office and some ed games) because the educators are so afraid the computers will break.

      > Isn't the school in some way doing its students a dis-service my training them on a computing method that they will very likely never use again?

      Many of us long-time geeks learned on Apple ][s, Commodore PETs, VIC-20s (Some guy named Linus got his start on a VIC-20 once), Commodore 64s, and TRS-80s, did it seem to hurt their career? I think those systems, being so open to exploration, probably did a lot more for us kids back then - than them not being (non-existent) Windows machines.

      > As much as i DESPISE some of microsoft's products (i admin a damn win2k3 server...do i really need to explain WHY i hate microsoft?)

      Well at least explain why you think schools should LIKE Microsoft, and your next generations should also like Microsoft.

      > i understand that in order to function in a modern workplace, the ability to navigate microsoft windows is almost as essential as any other office skill.

      I'm sorry, what is this Microsoft Windows curriculum? Is it like spelling, grammar, math, computer skills, TCP/IP? Microsoft is a company, they sell software that does common things. Just like there are many math books and many books on English there are many software makers that sell/distribute common things like office suites and web browsers as well as servers and other fine things in the world.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    36. Re:don't hate me by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      If the true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace, then is linux really the best method of doing so?
      Isn't the school in some way doing its students a dis-service my training them on a computing method that they will very likely never use again? ...the ability to navigate microsoft windows is almost as essential as any other office skill. 1) The purpose of an eucation is not to train users to use a particular product, but to learn particular skills

      These skills may include :-To use an operating system, to use a word processor, to learn programing languages, to learn how to acquire information and apply it.

      To promote good values such as honesty and integrity. Some of the things you should learn in school.

      2) Teaching useless skills, yes it could be a disservice , but to take myself as an example I learnt word processing in several programs wordperfect51 abiword word97, 2000 star office, open office, wordsworth, and several more.

      The actual programs and versions are unimportant really I can use them all and so can everyone reading this, even the ones they never heard off. Because you do not learn Word version x you learn how to word process.

      Is Linux the best way, of course it is no need to pirate the software, several alternatives to achieve a particular task some better than others, you learn to evaluate the tools available and select what meets your requirements. IT is not set in stone, software hardware changes, the most important skill is to be adaptable.

      When it comes to the workplace and training on particular systems and software thats a whole different ball game
      because that is training to do a particular job at a particular company at a particular time.
    37. Re:don't hate me by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Well said!
      Hear! Hear!

      The root of the problem (no pun intended) is the inability to break out of the MS mindset of how to do anything.
      Claiming that due to MS's coverage of the market making it the standard is all BS, and admitting defeat.

      Save all of the 'but I have to use windows at work" whining. So what! Use something else at home. Get your kids involved in MS alternatives. Our generation is too hooked on the MS Koolaid.
      Kudos for you doing so....how do we get the rest to do so.

      Teach your kids to learn, not memorize 'by rote' steps!!! *thinkofthechildren*tag (that;s almost getting to be as bad as the Nazi/Goldwin shut-down on an argument!!!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    38. Re:don't hate me by merc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace, then is linux really the best method of doing so? Isn't the school in some way doing its students a dis-service my training them on a computing method that they will very likely never use again?

      Your question is quite valid, and worth consideration. However, the inverse could also possibly be true, and one of the core disputes I have with community colleges and many high schools of today, that being:

      How much are we teaching the IT leaders of tomorrow about computer science and technology by making them Windows centric end-users? I fear sometimes that all of the Visual Basic and Java is going to create a layer of abstraction over basic computer science comprehension (this has, of course also been discussed on slashdot).

      I think the answer is simple -- don't teach platform specific technology, or cover a few of them.
      Give a well rounded education but most importantly cover the computer science concepts.

      --
      It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
    39. Re:don't hate me by cbdougla · · Score: 1

      One thing to bear in mind is that it's not always about learning computers but learning ON computers.

      What made the Apple II such a great machine back in the day wasn't its standard interface that a student could learn and use in the workplace but the wealth of educational software used to teach them something using the computer interactively.

      Math, spelling, and reading comprehension don't care what OS you run.

    40. Re:don't hate me by chuckymonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Therein lies the key. You leared how to use an OS and computer, most people learn "if you click this that will happen" and cannot handle having things happen outside their little bubble of knowledge. I personally think that every school should have a decent mix of different types of computers, that way kids will learn the actual core skills to use a computer and not the other way. I'm teaching my two year old right now how to use windows and linux, soon Mac when I get the iMac for my wife. I want her to have a base knowledge about these things.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    41. Re:don't hate me by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Personally I don't despise Microsoft however I would not trust them. Actually some of Microsoft's products are quite good and definitely integrate well with Microsoft software but just try to get other software to integrate.

      I am not overly surprise with the "Oh it's not like Microsoft" attitude it is always interesting how people will say they have a Microsoft product that does not have an equivalent Linux (note I did not say open-source) product and I normally take great delight in pointing out a commercial Linux product which in many cases is cheaper and is functionally equivalent. A good counter is to ask the Microsoft software supporter if they have paid for a legitimate license and then when they wipe the shock-horror look of their face tell them about the commercial software for Linux (Google's your friend here).

      From the Article I noticed they talked about Fedora 5 which is really fairly old now and if they wanted Fedora I would definitely recommend Fedora 8 and is the one I use which has much better wireless support (if needed). Choice of distribution aside Open Office is a must and will do pretty much everything a student requires. You can even used "Dia" as a Visio replacement and for those people who want to do programming the development tools are excellent.

      I know I will most likely get people pointing out some commercial software is much better than Linux software but before anyone replies please make sure you have legitimately purchased the your software and if you have I can normally point out commercial Linux software that will be functionally equivalent. People also need to keep in mind that the Philippines is a poor country and Linux can save the country a considerable amount of money. In addition Linux will help train computer people to understand the fundamentals of computers since the Linux source is open. This as far as I am concerned is more important than just learning how to use a web browser or so called Office Productivity Tools.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    42. Re:don't hate me by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      And KDE or Gnome is just as easy and intuitive to use as an end-user as is the windows interface.

      And with KDE being ported to Windows, surely the battle is starting to turn?

    43. Re:don't hate me by robo_mojo · · Score: 1

      If the true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace, then is linux really the best method of doing so? Isn't the school in some way doing its students a dis-service my training them on a computing method that they will very likely never use again?

      Anything a kid can learn about one system can be adapted and applied to another similar system.

      The teaching should not be focused on any particular implementation. Leave the specifics to the vocational training if the kid just wants to learn how to do one thing only.

      Otherwise you are just stuck with circular logic. You despise Microsoft, but you want to keep kids learning it in schools so they will succeed. This assumes the kids aren't adaptable. And it results in furthering Microsoft's exposure which leads to an even bigger and focused market which means kids will keep learning it and etc.

      What we need instead are smarter kids.
    44. Re:don't hate me by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Can you point to me how using, say Firefox and OpenOffice.org are somehow non-transferable skills? It's not as if IE and Firefox are so different, or that KDE is somehow some quantum-leap from Windows, or that OpenOffice.org is some radical departure from the Office 97-2003 suites (that's reserved for Office 2007).

      Virtually every GUI out there is an iconified program launcher with some pretty picture file manager. Some details may be different, but I have a hard time believing that young Abdul who learns on an Ubuntu Gnome desktop is going to sit down at a Windows workstation and be completely lost.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    45. Re:don't hate me by sgtsqh2o · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Microsoft doesn't give a crap about the Philippines. Manila isn't listed as a timezone (and Pyongyang). Where is Sri Jayawardenpua anyways? Move along now. Nothing to see here.

    46. Re:don't hate me by arcade · · Score: 1

      I haven't used microsoft products since 1999.

      I even work with computers. :P

      So no - the ability to navigate microsoft products is not essential.

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    47. Re:don't hate me by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1
      Education might not be about training, but about teaching.

      One trains animals, one teaches people. One trains Office, one teaches text processing.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    48. Re:don't hate me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have the right idea but ask yourself how many times you took sides on things?

      Nvidia or ATI? AMD or Intel? Sony PS3 or Xbox360 or Wii? Apple Mac or PC? Coke or Pepsi? Toyota or Honda? Ford or GM or Dodge?

      You probably had to choose one or the other of those things, at some point in your life. If not those things, then name two sports teams or two brands of ketchup or whatever.

      At some point you have had to choose. How many of those choices were made because you "knew" one was better than the other without ever trying it or perhaps without ever trying either one?

      You just KNOW in your head or heart that one is better than the other, without even trying it. And you might even get on message boards and flame people who stand for the other side. You might not be a Mac user and might not have ever used one, but you might trash them in the name of XP or Vista until the end of time.

      If not you, other people will do it.

      Because NOBODY has a truly open mind any more. They want to choose sides, decide A is better than B, though they have never used A or B, and then fight for it.

      Such it is with operating systems. People haven't used linux but they know, somehow, that Windows is better, or Mac is better, or whatever. And they've closed off their minds to any other way.

      Open minds seeking knowledge are a myth. If you just want to KNOW, then you never close your mind to anything. This is why we can never know the universe: the quest to KNOW is endless, yet humans seek to know only "enough" and then all else is ignored.

    49. Re:don't hate me by wwwillem · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No I don't hate you. :) And I think you deserve at least the +3, but not moderated as "Funny", because the issue you raise is serious enough.

      Eight years ago, I was planning for my wife (a health care professional) her first PC, and I thought that the purchase of an iMac would be the most user friendly and logical choice. But her criticism on that plan was (along the lines of your story) that at work she would need to use a Windows PC, and then with a Mac at home she would only get confused. So, I got her a Windows 98 desktop and with only using Outlook Express and Internet Explorer, she lived "happily ever after" for the next 8 years.

      But last Xmas holidays that setup really became outdated and needed a refresh. So I installed a RedHat based system and converted her IE and OE to FireFox and Thunderbird. And I simply told her, if you still like it a week from now I will put it on your desk (instead of the old box) otherwise we'll go to the store and go buy some new Windows PC.

      Let me tell you, I wasn't pushing, and she wasn't biased !! I got a few questions during the first 3 hours and then it was "business as usual". Today's desktop GUIs have become so similar that for the casual user it doesn't matter anymore if the underlying technology is Windows, Linux or Mac. It's all the same.

      So, making school-kids ready for their Windows dominated future workplaces, can pretty well happen by letting them use Linux while in school. For them the difference will be as big as switching from a Nokia to a Motorola phone. Or from MySpace to FaceBook.

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    50. Re:don't hate me by cheater512 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers."

      The little guys count more than you imagine.
      If every insignificant country switched to Linux overnight, Microsoft would be screwed within months.

    51. Re:don't hate me by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      If the true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace, then is linux really the best method of doing so? Isn't the school in some way doing its students a dis-service my training them on a computing method that they will very likely never use again?

      As a (future) educator, I think that this attitude is actually the greatest disservice both to students and to schools.

      No, the computer program is not supposed to prepare the students for their workplace. Especially not in the sense of teaching them to use a certain bunch of programs that they are going to use once they get a job, and even more especially not in primary school.

      Computer classes, just like physics or chemistry or maths or language classes, are not there to prepare kids for any kind of workplace — they are there to teach them some more-or-less basic facts. Of course businesses would like to dump the workforce training costs off to schools or anyone else, but different jobs require different skills; no business can expect that any school's students will be trained exactly to cater to their needs. You don't learn a job before you start doing it anyway.

      Computer classes are there to teach kids not to fear computers, not to fear programming (as programming is the only way of truly utilizing the computer and understanding its capabilities) and to teach them some basic paradigms. Not to teach them a certain version of a certain OS, which they will never ever see again after leaving school, as it will have been surpassed.
      Do you think I ever saw MS-DOS 3.30 after leaving high school?

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    52. Re:don't hate me by rohan972 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can you think of anything in Windows that couldn't be figured out by someone who has been trained on Linux?

      Why do people use this? :)

    53. Re:don't hate me by rts008 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Granted she also knows where to find the stuff if she doesn't know."
      This was my major point. There is WAY too much to know and remember...ask your sister.

      Education and experience will let you know what to remember and what to look up, but in your reply you raised valid points:"There are some majors where rote memorization is good. When you're in the ER and you just reacted to some drug and you're going into cardiac arrest do you want the doctor to go "Hold on a second let me let me look this up." Absolutely!! The point I failed to elaborate on. To know the difference between memorizing 'this' and 'that', compared to the ability to look 'it' up was my point. I apparently failed to adequately express my point of view here. (no sarcasm...I'm serious here).

      Some info needs to be almost 'hard-wired' for instant recall, but some info just needs to be ' a reference away' for most situations. (for example: as a Vet Tech in Oklahoma, do I REALLY need to remember the scientific name of an internal parasite (worm) in the Ethiopian River Rat that is not a medical problem in the USA?- but I can tell you for certainty that if your 'sight hound' [greyhound, afghan hound, borsai, etc] have had aspirin recently...LET YOUR VETERINARIAN KNOW before there is any general anesthesia involved. Aspirin is a protein-binder that will cause an anesthetic overdose in 'sighthounds' if not accounted for, and the tolerance for lidocaine for local anesthesia in llamas is 2.5 mg/kg- if this is exceeded, the said llama will go into some spectacular seizures!)

      As an engineer, you should maybe look at this method. (not trying to be an asshat here) Do you memorize every engineering table you are exposed to, or do you only memorize the relevant ones to your work?...and have a clue as to where other relevant tables could be found?

      YMMV, Proceed with caution, and the best of luck to you. :)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    54. Re:don't hate me by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the good post. :)

      It's astounding the number of people get locked into the mindset of doing things *only* a specific way.
      If the thought is taken to paranoid extremes, it makes one wonder how we will advance as a civilization at all.
      My stepdaughter can use any PC as she has been exposed to not only MS crapware, but Linux, and OSX to get things done.

      It doesn't have to be a religious OS matter, just a practical matter.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    55. Re:don't hate me by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well, we learned wordperfect for dos at school, by the time we entered the workplace there was no wordperfect for dos to be seen.
      You really need to teach concepts in school, teach the kids what they're looking for rather than where specific apps keep those options. Whatever they learn in school today will be obsolete by the time they start work anyway.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    56. Re:don't hate me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the ability to navigate microsoft windows is almost as essential as any other office skill.

      Then all those students who learned Office 1997 to 2003 have wasted their time because 2007 is nothing like that. What will children of 10 or 12 find when they reach the workplace ? Who knows, but it won't be Vista or Office 2007 and probably nothing like those.

    57. Re:don't hate me by owlman17 · · Score: 1

      If the true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace, then is linux really the best method of doing so? Isn't the school in some way doing its students a dis-service my training them on a computing method that they will very likely never use again? I do agree in principle, that is, if one happens to live in a developed country with a stable IT-infrastructure, well-entrenched in Microsoft products. A lot of small to medium business here in the Philippines use pirated MS XP+Office (plus other MS-based products) but an awareness about piracy and open-standards has been steadily growning. When there was an anti-piracy crackdown a couple of years back, quite a number of those companies made the switch to Linux. Some were partial conversions, the others went all the way. I personally converted one company's group of about 8-10 workstations, plus got my friends to do the same. The company I work for started on Ubuntu 5.10 from scratch. (Roughly 50 workstations, we've maintained a few windows boxes for that odd application or two, or for some esoteric file conversions.)

      Asus Eees are selling like hotcakes and they're now very hard to find in stores. I'll go out on a limb here and say that when these kids grow up, it'll be mostly a Linux workplace, at least on this part of the planet. I've heard the jokes about 'The Year of Linux on the Desktop' etc, but somehow I have this feeling that if such a time would come, it would start from developing countries like ours.
    58. Re:don't hate me by freeasinrealale · · Score: 1

      Having been in the IT for some 50+ years now and retired, I can say that no software 'environment' is ANY guarantee of a reasonably 'secure' career, even one based on m$ wares z?. I can see this one coming... the end of the m$ hegemony. All the m$ money backing losing causes such as HD-DVD, buying off officials to prop up a product that isn't all that good (windows et al) spells the end of the m$ empire. At least French SUN kings and perhaps mssr Gates, who is now bailing from his company, can repeat the same phrase - Apres moi - le deluge.

      --
      A man spends the first half of his life accumulating stuff, the second trying to get rid of it all.
    59. Re:don't hate me by Martian_Kyo · · Score: 1

      If by using linux they learn about dependencies, compiling, advanced use of CLI, proper system of permissions and the advantage of proper documentation. I think they'll do just fine with the 'next...yes I agree...next...next...finish why the hell doesn't it work' nature of windows.

      The best thing about linux, is that encourages you to attempt to solve the problem on your own.

      When a problem occurs on windows, and you don't have an internet connection to search the forums, you're pretty much screwed.

      After few months of forum search for linux problems, I was able to solve problems which I hadn't encountered before, because I knew where to start looking.
      After years of forum searching for windows problems, I am still clueless about it. but that's just me.

      Linux might not be ready for your secretary or clueless business manager, but it sure as hell is ready for the classroom.
    60. Re:don't hate me by angus_rg · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about vi, the greatest HTML editor ever.

    61. Re:don't hate me by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      As an engineer, you should maybe look at this method. (not trying to be an asshat here) Do you memorize every engineering table you are exposed to, or do you only memorize the relevant ones to your work?...and have a clue as to where other relevant tables could be found? I don't even memorize the ones relevant to my work. There's no reason to, they're huge. Some of us kept our engineering books (I resold mine but I'm considering picking up some old editions on half.com). Some of the stuff from freshmen year that we've used every year since has stuck around. F=ma, V=IR, rho*g*h, Water is 1000 kg per cubic meter, and the likes.

      But absolutely nothing on the scale of my sister (or my Aunt that's a dermatologist, or my uncle that's an ER doctor).
    62. Re:don't hate me by symbolset · · Score: 1

      If the true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace, then is linux really the best method of doing so? Isn't the school in some way doing its students a dis-service my training them on a computing method that they will very likely never use again?

      Yeah, these kids need to know a lot of stuff Windows will teach them:

      • Programming is not a normal task.
      • If there's no button, the feature is absent.
      • All document formats expire in less than eight years so forget everything.
      • Patch tuesday, debug wednesday and remove malware all the rest of the days of your life.
      • Don't click that! The Internet can break your computer with the slightest misstep.

      Seriously, your assumption is not valid. Most of the people who administer Windows now did not grow up with Windows. By the time these kids get to the workplace Windows skills may be as obsolete as DOS skills are now.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    63. Re:don't hate me by ZekeSpeak · · Score: 1

      In school I used WordPerfect 5.1, Quattro Pro, MS Works, Filemaker Pro, QBasic, MS-Dos, and CorelDraw, along with a bunch of programs that were so obscure, I can't even remember the name of them. Up until high school, the only computer I had ever used at school was an ICON. I don't use any of that anymore.
      When I was at high school, there was one computer shared between 3 schools, a WANG. You used basic to program it (stored on audio cassettes.). When we didn't have the computer, we used to transfer our programs (FORTRAN) onto punch cards, sent them away to a mainframe to run, then got the paper run sent back to us for debugging.

      At University we had the VAX/VMS Minicomputer and at home I had an old PC-Clone 80286 (cost me a fortune!) running MS-DOS 3.3, which I used to dial up my university account on the VAX via a 2400 baud modem for access to the internet (such as it was in the late 1980s, early 90s). It was the most stable Microsoft OS I've ever run. Now I run Gentoo Linux.

      Kids have it easy these days. Up until midway through High School we didn't even have pocket calculators. All computations had to be made by pencil, paper and brain (we didn't even have ballpoint pens until I was ten years old).

      The world changes and we have to change with it or die.
    64. Re:don't hate me by jonathan21 · · Score: 1

      I see this argument being a big issue soon even though its not.the issue being what OS should be taught in schools. I use ubuntu linux and its not that much different from windows only difference is what hardware is supported.if more people use linux that will change so soon that won't be a problem.for me it does no matter what they use as long as people are able to learn to use a pc and thats all that matters

    65. Re:don't hate me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fedora 8 is still running a 2.6.23 kernel. Wireless should be significantly better with the 2.6.24 kernel. F8 will probably still get 2.6.24 at some point, but it might be better to plan on using F9. (Rawhide is already using a 2.6.24 kernel.)
      Another thing to consider is that with Fedora, you'll probably be rebuilding the machines once or
      even twice a year. This might be too much effort, in which case CentOS might be a better option.

    66. Re:don't hate me by mspohr · · Score: 1
      Thank you for explaining why I can't get a job in 'hi-tech'. I spent all of my time in the 70s wiring up a 8008 and programming it in assembler. Then I moved on to an 8080 with CPM. Later I had an Apple II and an Apple /// and a TRS-80. The trail continued for years with a whole string of now useless computers (anybody want an Osborne?).

      I now know that I was wasting my time with all of those obsolete luser computers and that they have prevented me from getting that high paying hi-tech job that I've always wanted. I should have studied and earned my Microsoft certifications; then I would be on easy street... oh, wait... I retired 15 years ago with more money than I know what to do with... never did find a hi-tech job... just started a hi-tech company or two.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    67. Re:don't hate me by Yfrwlf · · Score: 1

      And I should know, I'm fortunate enough to be in one of those jobs that is 100% Linux, but I agree that learning several kinds of computers/OSes can certainly be helpful. :)

      Have to watch out for those companies that try to change that by using terminology which is only applicable to their own software though, but I've never really seen this strategy work very well as everyone hates it or ends up simply learning aliases.

      --
      Promote true freedom - support standards and interoperability.
    68. Re:don't hate me by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Most people use Windows yes. However with the GUI changing (just look from XP to Vista), training students on an outdated platform of Windows is worse then teaching them *NIX. Because most Linux/Unix GUIs don't need to be new for the sake of being new, most skills acquired on KDE 1 can be transferred to KDE 4 with little problems, and the same with Gnome.

      Given the differences in look and feel that can exist between KDE installations *of the same version*, your assertion is ridiculous on its face. Anyone stumped by the "GUI changes" from XP to Vista (heck, from Windows _95_ to Vista, given it still has the same fundamental look and feel that was introduced 12 years ago) is going to be completely and utterly lost with the changes from KDE1 to KDE4.

      Think back to the old DOS skills and Apple ][ skills, now they are not needed anymore, a few wasted cells in your brain, today if you learned Unix back in the '80s running OS-X or Ubuntu in 2008 will be second nature to you, take someone brought up on Windows 98 and sit them down on a Vista machine, they would be confused because they were learned on 98 and now its Vista and everything looks different!

      Idiotic comments like this merely demonstrate how little experience you have with Unix (or anything, really). You couldn't even transplant the average Linux user onto a Solaris system _today_ without them having some serious usability problems, let alone a UNIX box from the 80s.

    69. Re:don't hate me by MatB · · Score: 1

      I don't think it matters too much about what they're likely to use, two reasons. 1) When I went to school, UK schools were mostly still using BBC Micros, mine had weird older Research Machines kit, IBM PCs were almost unknown, let alone Windows.

      IT literacy means, and should mean, just that, basic functions are these days cross platform, etc.

      Besides, you're assuming that when they leave school they'll go into Windows environments, but if Linux use becomes more general in their country they may move into Linux environments and some of them will go onto be the opinion formers that build up a Linux environment.

      Knowledge that MS isn't the only option is almost certainly a good thing, if nothing else it forces MS to compete more effectively. Besides, in a country such as the Phillipines, price matters much more, and encouraging Open Source usage in developing countries will have very good long term benefits to all of us (cf speculation that the supposed greater proportion of Brit programmers is due the the much greater success of ZX Spectrums et al over here when I was a kid compared to much greater console/video game use in the US, etc.)

      --
      Mat Bowles
    70. Re:don't hate me by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Schools are supposed to be educating, not training people to click on widgets like monkeys.

      Someone who knows the general concepts will find they easily transfer to Windows or Mac OS X. GUI driven operating systems all work pretty much the same way. Writing a document in OpenOffice isn't appreciably different than in MS Office. The concepts are exactly the same, only the widgets are slightly different.

      Linux is the best method of doing so because it will free up money that can go to paying teachers.

      Your argument can easily go a stage further; for instance, since Microsoft occasionally completely change the GUI for MS Office, then surely if you've learned Office 2003, then your skills are totally useless for Office 2007? Not at all. And neither are skills learned using OpenOffice useless when using MS Office.

    71. Re:don't hate me by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Not to discredit your relatives who are doctors and pharmacists, but I imagine if you were to ask them seriously, they look up much more than you imagine. Sure your uncle in the ER with the cardiac arrest knows what to do, so probably would a pediatrician, because although it sounds complicated to a lay person, it's pretty straight forward while the patient is in arrest.

      However, ask your uncle what he would do if a patient presents partial paralysis and a MRI or CT scan show negative? Chances are he won't look it up in a manual, but will seek a consult from a specialist.

      Or your aunt the dermatologist, if whatever condition she is treating in a patient isn't responding, there's a good chance that she is going to have to look up something for an alternative course of action.

      Even your pharmacist sister, if you start to ask her about the safety of taking multiple medications, particularly if one or more are not common, she, too, will probably look it up (although most pharmacies do that automatically on computer when the prescription is filled).

      Furthermore, all of them, I am sure, keep updated in their fields by constant journals and research papers. Kind of like reading the manual before the patient presents.

      Again, this is not meant as any disrespect for your relatives, but just to point out that as much knowledge as they have in their fields, what they have memorized is what they need and use daily, just like the rest of us. Granted, they may need more, in their selected fields, but those fields are much larger, too (which is why, for instance their are specialists to narrow the scope). However, there is much more in their fields that they don't have memorized and for that they do look it up (or call for a consult).

    72. Re:don't hate me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to know how you learned registry hacking in 1982 -- Windows 1.0 was released in 1985/86 and the registry wasn't introduced in any form until Windows 3.x.

      Are you sure you weren't actually editing /etc/profile or \AUTOEXEC.BAT?

    73. Re:don't hate me by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      Can you think of anything in Windows that couldn't be figured out by someone who has been trained on Linux? The Registry. Though to be fair, even people who have been trained on Windows can't figure out the Registry. Heck, I don't know of anybody with any amount of training in anything that can figure that mess out.
      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    74. Re:don't hate me by masdog · · Score: 1

      If every insignificant country switched to Linux overnight, Microsoft would be screwed within months.

      Hurt? Definitely. But screwed? I doubt it. Remember, Microsoft is sitting on mountains of cash, and they can go for a couple of years without the sale of a single product before that cash reserve runs out and a market where Windows and Office are often sold for $1 per license or pirated. I doubt they would be hurt that much if those countries just switched over to a Linux stack.

      Microsoft's cash cow is Windows/Office/Server/Exchange for business, and its not likely that businesses would just chuck that solution overnight.
    75. Re:don't hate me by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I'm still confused for by the application menu in KDE 4.

      stuff scrolls right and left. Sometimes when I go back to it, the same catagory is open, so I have to go button -> left -> scroll up and down for what category I want (defaults to very small) -> click catagory -> click application

      Due to it's memory what I am looking at is slightly different every time I do this, and because it scrolls up and down, I can't to it by muscle memory at all. It is a change more jarring than from XP to Vista, though not as bad as XP to 2007 (office).

      From what I can tell in KDE4 (someone please correct me if I am wrong, because I hate it and can't find the setting), the desktop is a completely different type of thing than from any OS I have used since Apple Classic (8.x I think).

      Drag a file to the desktop, it's a link, well OK, not really a link so much as a widget. Want to drag you file somewhere, well make sure to unlock you widgets, oh, and it won't really act like you are dragging a file.

      Don't change KDE to "show icons" on desktop, well then your file in the desktop folder are completely hidden.

      It may not be different for differences sake (they may have all been well researched choices), but it is a harsh transition that feels like when gnome went hyper conceptual in design. That does leave me high-hopes, because after a lot of weirdness, gnome ended up much better.

      What I want (and probably should make) for KDE 4 is a "traditional desktop" widget. It should allow me to draw a shape (at the very least and arbitrary rectangle) and treat that part of the desktop as a "normal" desktop. This would allow me to separate my files from widgets, create file icon widgets on the rest of my desktop if I pleased, but still be able to dump and play with files on the desktop. I would probably prefer that to a typical dektop even, with the ability to put widgets around the perimeter and files in the center. Until then KDE3 and Gnome it is.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    76. Re:don't hate me by hey! · · Score: 1

      I lived through this, being an IT directory in the late 80s and early 90s, through the transition from typewriters and interoffice mail to computers, LANS, email, and finally Internet.

      Back then, you frequently saw Macs on the top management's desk, and PCs everywhere else. That was because you literally were buying computers by the truckload. You were going from no computers on peoples' desks to as close to everybody having a computer as possible. Most people knew, of course, that going by TCO it was cheaper to buy a Mac, even through it cost twice as much, although they often brought up stupid arguments like "GUIs are toys."

      The real reason you bought truckloads of PCs was this: you only had so much money to spend each year. Faced with a choice of equipping everybody in a department this year with a PC, or half of them this year with a Mac, what would you do? Having all of your users equipped negated a lot of the TCO argument in the Mac's favor, a lot of the TCO differential was not in this year's budget.

      Things would have ended up very different if two parameters had been changed in the 80s. First, if the Mac cost no more than ten or fifteen percent more than a PC. Second, if Lotus 1-2-3 (yes, believe it or not) was available on the Mac. Alter those two things back in the 80s, and the story would be very different. Just think of all the money that went into just getting around the 640K barrier. Or the money that went into learning to program practically on bare metal on a processor that could only efficiently address 64K or contiguous memory. Remember NEAR or FAR?

      In the end, the same logic that led IT managers away from buying Macs lead Apple away from addressing the concerns of IT managers. Everybody in the business was making money, right now. It was easy to make money. In order to be competitive in the IT market, Apple would have had to cut its profits.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    77. Re:don't hate me by HiggsBison · · Score: 1

      There are some majors where rote memorization is good.

      I make a distinction between rote memorization, and understanding what one memorizes. I can memorize a few things without understanding them, but generally nothing sticks unless it makes sense. For the stuff that doesn't make sense, I need to shore it up with a bunch of mnemonic devices. For example, to remember that hepatic refers to the liver, I have to keep the mnemonic "Hep cats eat liver" floating about in my memory.

      For stuff like 1+2+3+4+5+6+7=28, I can think "Wait, is it 21 or 28, there are four odd numbers so it must be the even one, or just ... uh seven times half of eight, yeah, 28" and I understand it.

      I think this is part of the problem with our educational system today. Facts are being memorized, and test scores improve, yet there is less understanding. If there is no pat answer in the manual, nobody knows what to do.

      --
      My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
    78. Re:don't hate me by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      You used an Amiga at school? Where did you go to school?
      Wordperfect was never very popular on Amiga, people tended to prefer graphical apps like Kindwords, Wordworth and Final Writer... The Amiga as a whole was generally geared towards graphical apps.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    79. Re:don't hate me by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Screwed in that they would never be able to hold back the tidal wave of people, companies and governments switching to Linux.

      Of course they would still be twitching for awhile but their cash reserves cannot hold out forever.

    80. Re:don't hate me by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      If the true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace Nope. The true goal of a computer program in school is to teach students how to program a computer.

      Do you have any idea what Filipino schools are like? The private school I sent my stepson to for first grade had a "library" of five books, one of which was a college-level introduction to Shakespeare. (The local public was slightly better, but its library was still a sad, mostly empty room).

      I hit the roof twice that first year. The first time was when their school-wide fundraising drive was to buy a tent. A bloody tent. The second time was when at the end of the year, my stepson was denied honors because of a less-than-enthusiastic donation to said tent.

      (Bad experiences not-withstanding, I'm still going to keep my kids in school there, California schools are far, far worse).

      Moving on to colleges, the only degrees available are 1 to 2 year "professional" programs designed specifically to export bodies to work overseas, usually at what most of you would consider slave wages. The most lucrative "career path" is to go somewhere like Japan or Singapore and get into the "entertainment" business.

      Computer access is relatively available to almost everyone even in the jungle at numerous internet cafes. Young boys tend to be game players, young girls are heavily into the social network scene like Friendster. There is more of a problem keeping children away from computers. It is against the law for a child of school age to set foot inside an internet cafe during school hours.

      The Philippines has made huge strides in understanding open source software economics in the time I've lived there. The profit margin on internet cafes is so low that necessarily every single seat you see is pirated (as are the available games). This program is indicative to the fact that the government is starting to figure out that teaching kids to steal Microsoft software when a reasonable alternative exists is Not A Good Thing.

      This program is great and very badly needed. In my opinion as a parent with school children in Filipino schools.
    81. Re:don't hate me by cichlid · · Score: 1

      > If the true goal of a computer program
      > for a school is to ready its students
      > for the workplace

      It's an education project, not a laptop project.
      Think electronic book...

    82. Re:don't hate me by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I went to a small private K-8 school with under 100 people when I started and under 200 when I was done.

      We had C64s a bunch of Amigas in a large keyboard and a couple that looked like a desktop computer. the best we had was an Amiga 3000.

      I am pretty sure it was word perfect we used primarily (to write, sim city may have been the primary app), it was definitely not very graphical. Sometimes our teacher would put together our stories using some page layout program and publish a book.

      We also would use Deluxe Paint (4 maybe?) to do pictures and animations. We pretty much would spend hours trying to make the best warp coil animation.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    83. Re:don't hate me by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      Let me preface this by saying that I am one of the biggest linux geeks you're ever going to meet. I run gentoo on my laptop, as well as on my Desktop at work. I have installed Ubuntu on my sisters' laptops and my mom's Desktop. I do graphic design work in scribus and inkscape.

      I'm a linux geek....but

      If the true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace, then is linux really the best method of doing so? Isn't the school in some way doing its students a dis-service my training them on a computing method that they will very likely never use again?
      As much as i DESPISE some of microsoft's products (i admin a damn win2k3 server...do i really need to explain WHY i hate microsoft?) i understand that in order to function in a modern workplace, the ability to navigate microsoft windows is almost as essential as any other office skill. If you only look at the world as it is today, you could argue that we should teach our children MS products. But, what people use is what people know and teaching our kids Linux and Open Office will change the workplace.
      Most employers I know don't use MS Office because they think it's better, they use it because that's what people know.
  2. About fucking time! by sgtron · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Philippines is such a poor country, it's about damn time they wised up and chose the free option. Although, I can't help to think that with so much corruption in every aspect of the government and business over there. I'll be surprised if this pans out in the end.

    --
    No todo lo que es oro brilla
    1. Re:About fucking time! by kramulous · · Score: 2, Informative
      FTFA

      ... so after a successful deployment of 13,000 Fedora Linux systems from a government grant, plans are underway to roll out another 10,000 based on Ubuntu.
      13000 already done. Time to be surprised.
      --
      .
    2. Re:About fucking time! by owlman17 · · Score: 1

      Poverty, corruption. Yes, speaking of which, that's a pretty frightening combination. I just hope MS doesn't "buy off" the people in power here to keep using the unfree option.

    3. Re:About fucking time! by sgtron · · Score: 1

      Which is my point. This sounds nice now. And I wish them well, but from experience I know how these things can end up. Graft, corruption and greed invariably take their toll. Poor countries like the Philippines should rushing to use Free Software, not encouraging its citizens to purchase expensive crapware. Let's give this some time and see what happens. I hope things will go well. I hope Free Software will take over the world. But... let's just see what happens...

      --
      No todo lo que es oro brilla
  3. Nobody is perfect by edwardpickman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yeah but can it eat up 10 gig of hard drive space and 50% of the available ram?

    1. Re:Nobody is perfect by Aetuneo · · Score: 1

      Well, my Ubuntu system has around >90% of the RAM used right now (mostly Caching files - almost 75% of the RAM is being used to Cache stuff), and I suppose that you could cat /dev/random > /root/largefile if you really wanted to use up 10GBs of hard drive space (or have it download movies for a few days, or install every package available through apt-get). So, yes, Linux can eat up >50% of the available RAM, and 10GB of space on the hard drive. However, you have to put in a fair amount of effort for the hard drive. Windows, on the other hand, does all of that - and more! - out of the box! For example, when hooked up to a network, a vanilla Windows install will download viruses, while a vanilla Linux install will just sit there, wondering who keeps on pinging it.

      --
      Everything is subjective.
  4. The best decision for the officials by hackingbear · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Look! We didn't waste more of tax payers' money and we didn't violation any US copyright laws. Those pirate Windows installed? Oh... they were installed by the kids. We can't take blame for that.

  5. It would have gone faster... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...but the Government Ministers kept asking how well these "Li-nux" PCs would run Vista Ultimate...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  6. at least, this is a step in the right direction by RuBLed · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I RTFA because I live in the Philippines and I could agree with the last paragraph..

    "If Linux and open source wants to take hold in the education market it must deliver course material for high schools and elementary schools."

    Most of the public and private schools here only computer textbooks that is only related to MS products. What I find funny is that, they can't afford to buy those Office suites and operating systems in the first place, yet they are teaching them. There is nothing wrong with teaching it but then again it boils down to the fact that they had to pirate these software just to be able to practice what they teach \ learn.

    Recently, BSA had been hot on companies and large educational institutions here, I have seen some smaller educational institutions switch most of their OS to Fedora since they could only afford to show a number of licenses. There are also raids conducted on local internet cafes but the rumor is that, they are not BSA but the local NBI units trying to make some money. Because of these factors, most cafes that only offer printing and internet surfing switched to Linux also. The only cafes I know in our area that run windows are those gaming cafes and those located at known malls.

    Yes, we had been pretty much dependent on MS as a nation. At least this is a good step in the right direction. Even though DSL is pretty much affordable by middle classes here, the combination of OS and Office seems to be much, many just pirate them leading to numerous unpatched systems that are always online, coupled with users who only know the basics.

    On second thought, we should really do something about the whole educational mess we are right now. Not just regarding computers / technology.

    Or is resistance futile?
    1. Re:at least, this is a step in the right direction by OneInEveryCrowd · · Score: 1

      Here's some background on what the parent poster is talking about:

      http://digitalfilipino.21publish.com/janette2/archive/2005/09/01/1ib3vbfqkvzhv.htm

      Note that one of the people who respond to this blog entry claim that neighboring countries who *don't* collaborate with the BSA get huge discounts from Microsoft.

      While this was going on, the big complaint from my friends over there who use internet cafes wasn't that linux was bad or hard to use. The complaint was that the linux version of yahoo chat didn't allow the use of webcams.

  7. She by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    She can still hear the rebel yell just as loud as it was.

  8. Me FOSS by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

    only wive dolla

    1. Re:Me FOSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STOP EMAILING ME.

  9. Where can I sign up? by module0000 · · Score: 1

    Where can one sign up to work/help for these folks?

    --
    Trackball users will be first against the wall.
  10. Ballmer will be flying out there next week by HangingChad · · Score: 0, Troll

    The Steve will roll the corporate jet out there and drop some democracy on them...I mean meet with the leadership and promise them $3 XP, hand out some training coupons, take them out to a strip club and get them good and boozed up. They'll come crawling back.

    Oh, yeah.

    I've used Linux for years and no one has ever flown out here and taken me to a strip club. Not once.

    Humph.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  11. My only concern by pembo13 · · Score: 1

    Is how they are going to maintain what are essentially 4 different distributions, fairly fast moving distributions -- although, if the machines worked when they were deployed, they should not decay very quickly.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
  12. Re:Filipinos? Where the hell are they from? by dino213b · · Score: 1

    I am sure no one is seeing what I am seeing, but, this advertisement is so unbelievably inappropriate underneath the troll message.

  13. Good move by jantoxicated · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a Filipino - and by the way, the comments here are very very disturbing - I am happy this is pushing through. If you are living here, Microsoft Windows IS the most dominant OS around here, with a few exceptions of other who used Macs. The only Linux users I knew are those that belong to my local Linux user group and programmers like me. But ever since the crackdown of BSA on schools regarding pirated copies of Windows and others, schools here (or at least in my city) reacted by moving some of their machines to Linux, using OpenOffice.org and using Firefox. Of course Windows machine didn't evaporated overnight but at least we are on the right track.

    --
    God gave Linux, the devil gave BSD, and a hacker gave Bill the MS-DOS - anonymous
    1. Re:Good move by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      What comments do you find disturbing? I read one about corruption in the Philippines - is that what you had in mind?

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    2. Re:Good move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great news for us Filipinos

    3. Re:Good move by craagz · · Score: 0

      It is not only in Phillipines, I bet it is everywhere. Even in my country, India, most basic users, new to Technology don't know or ask how the Operating System got on their PCs in the first place.

      Most system assemblers just load the PC with a pirated version of WinXP. It would be a much different scenario if these assemblers could take that effort and just load the system with some Linux flavor, atleast for the "ignorant" users.

      I've been trying my hand at some linux flavors after the problems Vista has run into, but am unable to convince my dad to adopt Linux as he confesses "it is difficult to change at my age"

      Also there are far less applications in Linux that suit his needs as well as the needs of people on the other side. Yahoo Messenger with voice, Google Talk, Skype etc.

    4. Re:Good move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is probably talking about the comment where the troll uses the "N" word and deriding Filipinos.

    5. Re:Good move by fritsd · · Score: 1

      As a Filipino - and by the way, the comments here are very very disturbing (...)
      If you're a Filipino, what is your opinion of this disturbing approach by Microsoft to the Filipino press:

      ZDnet Asia about MSOOXML

      I had to laugh at the quote

      With OOXML, one can use Notepad or just about any productivity software like Microsoft's rival OpenOffice, to open a file that's saved in Microsoft Word document. OOXML, Microsoft says, is backward-compatible and future-proof...meaning, it can open all previous and future versions of Microsoft document formats.
      but I wonder if people (i.e. policymakers) in the Phillipines would believe this.

      Maybe this explains the presumed wine & dine:

      The Philippines is one of the countries that voted "no", which partly explains why we were invited to attend the press briefing.

      If MS Windows is dominant, then maybe that also implies that people tend to believe what Microsoft says, because they're used to using their products and the brand name is familiar. I find it difficult sometimes to keep faith that policymakers and journalists the world around will listen to their own voice of reason instead of claims like "it can open all previous and future versions of Microsoft document formats. Would you like to visit us so we can explain this to you?".

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  14. A solution that they own. by DrYak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In addition to that, it might be more rewarding in the long term to tech the student solution that they can own themselves.

    Teaching Microsoft in 3rd world countries, mean creating a new generation of users that will completely dependant on an foreign solution, and that one day, the workforce of the country will spend significant amount of money which will be spent overboard and will go to the pocket of a foreign company.
    This guarantee future bleeding of money : you have a nice new emerging IT environment that strives to develop, and most of the earned money will exit the country in term of license.

    On the other hand, teaching open source software will help the new generation realise that these solution exist, and that they can take them as their own. Instead of having a Microsoft unleashing BSA-like dogs to crackdown on unlicensed copies, they have access to FSF software whose philosophy is "do whatever pleases you with it *AS LONG AS* you keep guaranteeing the same freedom when you passes it around".
    Once this generation grows and enter into the workforce, a lot of busyness opportunities may appear that don't depend on foreign companies. Thanks to OSS, local solution my be developed, with new emerging companies basing their solution on infrastructure they can own themselves. The earnings from such companies will stay inside the country and help stir up the economy.

    Free software empowers emerging countries, whereas proprietary software represents one additional way to lock them into a permanent dependence on foreign companies that will bleed out of the country the earning of emerging IT busyness.

    That doesn't matter much for rich countries. But learning that you don't necessarily need to depend on some US company is very important in emerging markets.

    Also, as you said, given the difference between Office 2007 and, let's say, Office 97, and given that these children will also be at least 10 years away from entering the workforce (and much more for those few who'll manage to go to universities) learning a specific interface implementation is completely pointless. What they need is to learn some basic concept in computing (what is word processing vs. which button should be clicked). And Linux is just as good as anything else for that.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:A solution that they own. by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Let's not pick on or exclude first or second world users. For open source software there is nor first, second or third world. Your contributions are purely valued on their own merits.

      Of course open solutions created or contributed in the third world not only means they will be save money but they will also be able to achieve a more competitive status, in first and second world technology.

      The important part of open source is to create an effective ecosystem for it, with it being taught in primary and secondary schools, being researched and contributed to in universities and the being applied and extended in business and government. This effort is then expanded beyond a countries borders and shared as a global effort, with benefits accruing to all computer users, regardless of race, colour, creed, age or especially wealth.

      Closed source proprietary software, creates, and enforces the digital divide, leaving peoples as well as countries at a permanent disadvantage with what is becoming an integral part of any countries infrastructure and economy.

      At the end of the day the current monopoly in operating systems and office suites, only suits once city, in one state, in one country, for every other person, in every other city, in every other state, in every other country it is a wasteful, pointless, dead end.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:A solution that they own. by chuckymonkey · · Score: 1

      Or they torrent the files that they need and don't give a crap about paying the fee.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    3. Re:A solution that they own. by GamerCowboy · · Score: 1

      I argued almost this same point in an email I sent to the Dubai Cares charity yesterday. It's probably not big news outside of the UAE but it was announced yesterday that Dubai Cares is partnering up with Microsoft to provide technology to kids in developing nations.

      It seems futile to bring up the dangers of lock-in -- especially by companies such as Microsoft -- to those who still associate free software with freeware. But I'm glad that, at least in my home country, open source software is gaining a foothold.

      --
      void
    4. Re:A solution that they own. by Locklin · · Score: 1

      A pirate is still dependent on foreign innovation. A growing industry with open/free tools is able localize, make their own... etc.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
  15. Supporting a local distro? by earthforce_1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is good news, yet I wonder why they went with Fedora instead of a localized distro?
    ( http://bayanihan.gov.ph/ )

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:Supporting a local distro? by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Well, forgetting that they also went with Ubuntu, Kunbuntu and Xubuntu... Fedora is currently a high customizable distribution which seems to be very good at being an upstream distribution. (probably Ubuntu is as good, I am not qualified to say). So a local org can and should start, at the very least, a SIG in Fedora to make and support local spin of Fedora.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    2. Re:Supporting a local distro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because it's slashdotted....

    3. Re:Supporting a local distro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think because most Filipinos understand English better than the national language Filipino (based on the Tagalog language with parts of Bisaya and other thrown in). Most everyone here can understand spoken common street Tagalog, but most speak Bisaya, or Ilonggo, or any of the hundreds of other dialects of the 7000+ islands, and learn English as a second language almost immediately after starting school. Reading tagalog for a non-native speaker (me for example) is tedious at best and downright incomprehensible at worse.

      (im Filipino -- Bisaya to be particular.)

  16. Early Exposure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One reason I like to see Linux rolled out to younger students is that when they later get exposed to winders they will really see the difference. From that point on they will aways want a Linux box handy to do their stuff, whether they are forced to use winders at uni or work or wherever.

    AC

  17. Dude... by bjmoneyxxx · · Score: 1

    you're getting a Dell!

  18. The Philippines can only afford Linux by nicodoggie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Philippines is pretty low on budget. Not because we lack certain industries or we have a crappy economy, but because those dumb-ass politicians we have keep most of our tax money in their pockets. Mostly, they don't start projects they wouldn't profit from. When a certain amount of money is alloted to a certain project, they find ways to cheapen the price and keep the change for themselves. They see Linux as their cash-cow. They get praise for computerizing the public school system (which gets them votes) and they keep the remaining amount of money they save from not purchasing licenses from Microsoft.

    Anyway, in the Philippines, Computer Gaming/Internet shops are quite ubiquitous. These shops are often jam-packed with students of all ages from different walks of life who play MMOGs for 20 pesos an hour (about 50 cents). And the kids with computers have cheap 100 peso (a little over $2) pirated copies of Windows in their systems. This already provides them with enough Windows know-how.

    Linux is really a lot better anyway, and the kids here today have to learn to realize that.

  19. Di bale kita, di bale by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    much has been written about the internet's anonymity exposing truckloads of mindless negativity

    that some of it should reveal itself as racism isn't surprising in the least

    don't feed the troll, nor even be disturbed by his presence

    browse comments above the 2 or 3 threshold, or get some mental bleach ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  20. Who knows what students will use in the future? by slocan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the true goal of a computer program for a school is to ready its students for the workplace, then is linux really the best method of doing so? [...]

    Well, Linux in such a context ("to ready students") isn't a method. It can be a tool (and so can Windows) of a given method. And the method can be adequate or inadequate.

    As to the method, who knows what students will use in the future? At work or at home?

    Schools (if they are not to be short-sighted) should enable students with skills that will allow them to use any tool, existing ones and specially future ones, unknown ones. Training to use one program instead of another based on current market shares is short-sighted.

    I read a circa 1969 book by Lauro de Oliveira Lima commenting on a 1960 text by Marshall McLuhan. Both wrote how education would (or should) be in the future (and wrote about the future itself). Lauro de Oliveira Lima made quite a compelling argument about how education is about the future and the unknown. For the students are supposedly being prepared for a future life, work and a society that is unknown and unpredictable.

    My point is, training someone to use Windows or Office is short-sighted education (and possibly inadequate education, if the student doesn't develop skills to learn to use any tool he may encounter. And he may encounter Windows, Linux, Solaris etc).

    But the point of using gnu/linux or any other free or open source software in an education context is goes beyond the possibility of using certain tools. It's about the possibilty of understanding those tools, modifying those tools and creating new tools. It's about empowerment. And even if it remains as an unfulfilled possibility it remains as a door that can still be opened.

    From such a point of view the use of linux, inkscape etc in an education context could be part of an open-ended education effort which aims at the future. And then comes to mind a Robert Heinlein quote:

    A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.

    Education should not be about Windows or Linux, but about being able to use any one of them, understand the differences, be prepared to choose and to deal with whatever the future brings.

    Cheers,

    P.S.: I use Ubuntu at home since 2004. And before that Gentoo and Debian.

  21. Beautifull Quote: by AndGodSed · · Score: 2

    'Ministers in the Filipino government now understand Linux can do so much for so little outlay.'

    There. That just about sums it up.

  22. Re:Hooray for the most corrupt country in asia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know why that was modded flamebait; it's not flamebait, it's just wrong.

    I'm from Viet Nam and my gf is a Filipina, and I can tell you that Viet Nam is way more corrupt than the PI. You haven't seen corruption done right until you've lived in a communist country. The PI would probably make it to a top 10 list of the most corrupt countries in east Asia, but number 1? No way. It's about middle of the pack.

  23. bloodless revolutions - and linux by Christoph · · Score: 1

    The bureaucracy and corruption is stifling, but I give Filipinos credit for some progressiveness.

    Specifically, they had two bloodless revolutions (EDSA I and II, ousting Marcos and Estrada, respectively). Manila is catching up with India as a location for call centers (kahit sino diyan alam mag English/everyone there knows English). There is a wind farm in northern Luzon, where a coconut biofuel plantation is going in, too.

    PS. Mr. Ricardo Gonzalez, post here if there's anything stateside people can do that would be helpful.

    1. Re:bloodless revolutions - and linux by owlman17 · · Score: 1

      Specifically, they had two bloodless revolutions (EDSA I and II, ousting Marcos and Estrada, respectively). Someday we'll oust Ballmer and gang too. No shedding of blood of course. :)
  24. Niceee by marco916 · · Score: 1

    Reading most of the posts, everybody is for getting one thing, you need to upgrade Windows every few months with another sloppy update and patch here and there. Windows XP support will end soon, and then Vista support will end and so on and so on. when you get free working computers with Linux installed, that's all that matters, and the fun part comes later when you can figure out what you can do with a Linux box and all the potential it has to run loops around a Windows OS. You have unlimited software distributions, free most of the time. If you don't like Ubuntu, download and install Fedora, don't Fedora, install Red Hat. At least with a Linux OS you can run it on older boxes for a few years without much hardware upgrades.

  25. You hear that Mr. Ballmer? by turing_m · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "We wanted to use Fedora 5 and it went all the way to office of [the Filipino] President and they kept passing it around saying 'why would they offer something for free, and how would they support and teach it'," Gonzalez said. "The project dragged on for four to five months to a point where Microsoft matched the price by offering Windows XP for $US20 a copy and throwing in Office for $US30, but we still came out cheaper. Microsoft was also providing free training to high school teachers."

    That is the sound of inevitability.

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    1. Re:You hear that Mr. Ballmer? by owlman17 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      $20+$30 is still expensive. That's about 1/4th the monthly salary of the average worker here. The OEM version of XP is roughly $100 when converted. Basic Office (no Powerpoint) costs around $200-300. Don't even get me started on Vista Ultimate (and the hardware upgrade that comes with it). If people in the US think its robbery, its practically a small fortune over here. OTOH, Linux would run on machines we already own.

    2. Re:You hear that Mr. Ballmer? by dn15 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, any price is too expensive when you're a relatively poor country spending taxpayer dollars on software. As has already been pointed out, it's the concepts of computers that are important, not the memorization of exactly which icon to click.

  26. Re:Filipinos? Where the hell are they from? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

    Advertisement? You must be new here.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  27. You are not one of the biggest linux geeks, by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    And given the fact that you miserably fail to grasp the benefits to deploy Linux as an optimal option to teach general computing skills, it is hardly surprising that you fail to understand the general objectives of a school.

    Schools are centers of education, introduction to science, culture, civic duties and general betterment of the individual.

    Schools are not peddlers of the flavor of the day when it comes to technologies. And for goodness sakes, do not tell me that moving icons, cutting and pasting, is a skill that can be learned in a computer platform.

    In Linux the sky is the limit, curious kids can go as far as time and skill will allows them. In Windows you can go only as far as the licensed software allows you to go.

    Wake up people, even if your ultimate goal in life is to be proficient in Windows (shudder) you can get proficient at general computer skills in any modern platform. Stop drinking the damn expensive Windows Kool Aid.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  28. Re:In case you missed it... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    I think I'm going to be sick.

  29. Won't make any difference by kurokaze · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having been born in the Philippines and still have most of my family there (last time I was there was 2006), I can tell you that it's not going to make any difference.

    Every business is still tied to windows, and every kid's PC at home is still windows (God forbid you give them a PC that can't play Ragnarok!)

    Trying to find a computer reseller that will sells pre-loaded boxes with linux is needle in a haystack work.

    If you want to really effect change, then you need to change the thinking of the chinese filipinos, they are really the ones running the country (seriously!), not the locals.

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. They tried that! by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    That's the funny part -- Microsoft did offer them dirt-cheap Windows and training programs, damned near everything but the strip club. Linux still came out cheaper.

    Which means they can afford to go to a strip club anyway.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  32. Many unis use Windows now :) :( by curri · · Score: 1

    Actually, you may have a different definition of decent, or just haven't been around many unis recently. I teach CS classes at SPSU, (we're a second-tier public uni in GA, decent geeky university, not ivy league, but our program is ABET accredited :). Most of our profs use Windows mostly (we use Linux a little in one of our intro classes). Keep in mind SPSU doesn't mandate Windows, it's just what most profs use (we use Java and C++ in our intro programming classes). I think most unis (even GA Tech) around us are the same.

    This has probably changed over time. When I was a grad student at Tulane, we had mainly Sun workstations. When I came back to defend my dissertation a couple years later, there was a (mostly empty) sun lab and a Windows lab. Linux may have reversed the trend a little, but just a little.

    Just in case you care, I use mostly OSX and Linux, and usually require my students to put their work on a Linux server I control.