Slashdot Mirror


We Know Who's Behind Storm Worm

jmason reminds us of a story from a few weeks back that got little attention, adding "This doesn't seem to be just bluster; as far as I can tell, everyone who knows the RBN now agrees that this seems likely." Brian Krebs's Security Fix blog at the Washington Post carried a story about the Storm worm containing some pretty staggering allegations. "Dmitri Alperovitch [of Secure Computing] said federal law enforcement officials who need to know have already learned the identities of those responsible for running the Storm worm network, but that US authorities have thus far been prevented from bringing those responsible to justice due to a lack of cooperation from officials in St. Petersburg, Russia, where the Storm worm authors are thought to reside. In a recent investigative series on cyber crime featured on washingtonpost.com, St. Petersburg was fingered as the host city for one of the Internet's most profligate and cyber-crime enabling operation — the Russian Business Network. Alperovitch blames the government of Russian President Vladimir Putin and the political influence of operatives within the Federal Security Service (the former Soviet KGB) for the protection he says is apparently afforded to cybercrime outfits such as RBN and the Storm worm gang. 'The right people now know who the Storm worm authors are,' Alperovitch said. 'It's incredibly hard because a lot of the FSB leadership and Putin himself originate from there, where there are a great deal of people with connections in high places.'"

169 comments

  1. no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just don't believe it. This is a lot about nothing. There are much more important issues in Russia that need attention. They're probably just concentrating on those, and laugh at the "internet crimes" some keep pestering them about.

  2. It's official... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    Now we know, it's official:

    S are belogn to us!!!

  3. Surely You Jest by rshol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Corrupt Russian Government officials in collusion with shady Russian underworld types? Who'd a thunk it?

    1. Re:Surely You Jest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because no other country has corrupt government officials.

    2. Re:Surely You Jest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah because by saying "russian government officials corrupt" you deny any other country having corrupt governments. One does not exclude the other, you know.

    3. Re:Surely You Jest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is why you have the operations directorate of the CIA... if you know who they are and they are dangerous you send a couple of guys and put a bullet in their heads.

      Saves a ton of paper work.

    4. Re:Surely You Jest by joeytmann · · Score: 1

      Where is Jason Bourne when you need him?

      --
      Insert funny smart-ass comment here.
    5. Re:Surely You Jest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "russian government officials corrupt" isn't that like a double negative or something?

    6. Re:Surely You Jest by Danathar · · Score: 1

      I thought the corrupt Russian Gov officials and the Russian underworld types were one and the same?

    7. Re:Surely You Jest by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can't seem to remember.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  4. cronyism by wealthychef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shocking! You mean the criminal friends of powerful politicians don't get prosecuted in Russia? Good thing that never happens here!

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
    1. Re:cronyism by BosstonesOwn · · Score: 1

      Around here , we have good guys like "dead eye" dick who take their "friends" hunting , and talk to them about their issues before they go for prosecution.

      --
      This package Does Not Contain a Winner
    2. Re:cronyism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as always, he didn't do his job throughly.

    3. Re:cronyism by c6gunner · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Shocking! You mean the criminal friends of powerful politicians don't get prosecuted in Russia? Good thing that never happens here!
      Oh, where do you live? Tehran?
    4. Re:cronyism by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Instead we find them prosecute and find them guilty and then they get pardoned! Oh wait...

      --
      That is all.
  5. maybe i'm on drugs by blhack · · Score: 0

    To me, the internet looks like a big ecosystem. Things have become overpopulated, and as a result, the storm disease is keeping the population in check. It should kill off a chunk of the population, and then it will disappear.

    Part of me doesn't WANT to see storm go away...maybe its just because i'm that big of a geek...the worm is actually really impressive and kind of cool to me.

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    1. Re:maybe i'm on drugs by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Uh, yes, actually, yes you are.

    2. Re:maybe i'm on drugs by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean like this?

      The problem with that thinking is that this ecosystem is entirely created by humans, and that there are no limits on population in the first place. The internet's not like an enclosed valley which can support 300 sheep no matter what. The limits on what the internet can handle are constantly expanding, and so far there's been little to no strain.

      As for whether the worm is cool and impressive, well, that depends on what you think cool and impressive are. It's extremely well built, runs quite well and is hard to catch once it's entrenched. It's a lot like the mafia, and if you're like the rest of the US, that is cool. Also like the mafia, it's really only cool if you're the one running the show or you have little to no experience with it.

    3. Re:maybe i'm on drugs by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      To me, the internet looks like a big ecosystem. Things have become overpopulated, and as a result, the storm disease is keeping the population in check. It should kill off a chunk of the population, and then it will disappear. Unfortunately it's not actually keeping the population in check as that would imply those infected with it are somehow killed off at some point which they aren't. Now, if ISPs started reacting to systems infected with storm by cutting their internet connection, then yes, it might function to keep the population in check. As it is, it's a bit more like the common cold, a major nuisance for those infected, but not really anything major otherwise, and serves very little purpose (except perhaps to encourage better "immune systems").
      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    4. Re:maybe i'm on drugs by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      It's not culling the population, it's making them disabled, and ruining the overall ecosystem. Instead of a smaller, more efficient internet, the Storm "Worm" brings us an Internet with the bandwidth of the "overpopulation" (the clueless masses who get infected), and _its_own_ bandwidth. Instead of I-CM, we have I+S. Even worse, Storm doesn't just live to propagate, it _does_ things... usually bad things.

    5. Re:maybe i'm on drugs by Rogue+Pat · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean like this?
      Man, i need to get a life!! I start to recognize the xkcd cartoons by their number and smile before clicking on the link :/
    6. Re:maybe i'm on drugs by Paridel · · Score: 1

      In real life, when overpopulated organisms are hit be disease they die off. This doesn't kill them off. To stick with the organism paradigm, it just turns them into zombies. So, your big ecosystem view isn't quite valid.

      -paridel

    7. Re:maybe i'm on drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about time one of you xkcd faggots realized that you're living a meaningless existence.

    8. Re:maybe i'm on drugs by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      He's still orders of magnitude better than you, anonymous trash-talker.

      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    9. Re:maybe i'm on drugs by gr8scot · · Score: 1

      The internet's not like an enclosed valley which can support 300 sheep no matter what. I agree. The problem is one of quality, not quantity. It used to be a productive tool. Now, they'll let any sort of rubbish in.
      --
      All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
    10. Re:maybe i'm on drugs by andreiutz · · Score: 1

      Good

  6. INVADE by Bastardchyld · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I say we invade...

    U.S. authorities have thus far been prevented from bringing those responsible to justice due to a lack of cooperation from officials in St. Petersburg, Russia...

    No seriously though. This is no suprise. We can pretend that the US and Russia are the best of friends but in reality these kinds of situations will continue to happen. What is the Russian Governments incentive to take care of this issue. Like it or not it is good for their economy.
    --
    $diff terrorists hippies
    $
    $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    1. Re:INVADE by Quadraginta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's more complicated than that. There are actually pressures that the US could bring to bear on the Russians, but they've chosen not to deploy them in this case, and have chosen to merely rely on asking for cooperation, because it isn't that big a deal to the US economy or other national interests, either.

      Personally, I don't think the solution lies in national-level action. It lies either in economics -- making the business unprofitable -- or if you really want to have James Bond fantasies, in using the very lawlessness of Russia against them. I don't doubt there are hitmen in St. Petersburg who could be hired to finish these folks off in a particularly gruesome way for what by Western standards would be quite modest payment. Certainly within the means of a large community of pissed-off Internet users. It would take an unusually bold person to organize such an...er...extralegal form of negative reinforcement of the meme, but if I saw one, I'd hit his PayPal button.

    2. Re:INVADE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't doubt there are hitmen in St. Petersburg who could be hired to finish these folks off in a particularly gruesome way for what by Western standards would be quite modest payment.

      Actually, it's difficult, expensive, and extremely dangerous to get hitmen to take out other mobsters. The mob tends to retaliate big time.

    3. Re:INVADE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of invading, I would suggest that if the Local Governments are not willing to assist in apprehending these criminals, we should completely isolate Russian's IP Blocks from the rest of the world. Lets see how they would perform when they are disconnected from the Internet for good.

    4. Re:INVADE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say we invade...

      Yeah, because that strategy has worked beautifully for us already, why not try it again? Thanks for the input W, I didn't realize you posted to Slashdot.
    5. Re:INVADE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't doubt there are hitmen in St. Petersburg who could be hired to finish these folks off in a particularly gruesome way for what by Western standards would be quite modest payment.


      Actually, it's difficult, expensive, and extremely dangerous to get hitmen to take out other mobsters. The mob tends to retaliate big time.


      Perhaps we just need a well trained group of Jihadist Engineers.

      Recuiter: Eugeene. You body may die, but because of your selfless act your soul will rise to heaven where it will find a dedicated T1, and 74 well stocked BT peers.
      Eugeene: Hot digity! Whose this Rus-sian Mofioso you want me to blow up?
    6. Re:INVADE by Russell2566 · · Score: 0

      Has the cold war restarted yet? It seems like both parties are still pretending it hasn't. Russia has not been cooporative in any means on any subject for years now...

    7. Re:INVADE by Dramacrat · · Score: 0

      The mod points have spoken!

      --
      There are over 36 million lines of COBOL code in the world, and they are all raping children.
    8. Re:INVADE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well look who's running the country. Putin would love nothing more than to instate dictatorship and return to the times of the Cold War. He's a complete freak, and a completely freakish freak at that.

    9. Re:INVADE by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      Sounds self-contradictory. Why would the mob invest in maintaining a group of scary retaliators unless they needed them on a regular basis? Perhaps you've been suckered by their FUD? If I were they, I'm sure I would promulgate the rumor -- anonymously, of course -- that our vengeance is too terrible to contemplate. Even cheaper than a stable of button men.

      Say...maybe you work for them?

    10. Re:INVADE by jamie(really) · · Score: 0, Troll

      Indeed. Because the US Government would never involve itself in any operation overseas where virtual property is lost or stolen. No, the US administration prefers to make sure *actual* property and *actual* human life is lost or stolen, and then give out contracts to its buddies to rebuild.

      While you're worrying about your mom getting a virus, think about the parents in Iraq worrying that their kids will be catching one of the unexploded cluster bombs, or getting raped by some US soldiers.

      What is the US's incentive to take care of this issue? Like it or not, its good for their buddies in halibur^H^H^H their economy.

    11. Re:INVADE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right... The pressuring is to be used only for russian licensed music distributors... aka allofmp3

      Protecting a couple of powerful-lobbyst-supported companies is much more important than protecting everybody else...

    12. Re:INVADE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until someone "finds out" that Russian government agencies are using Storm for attacking U.S. government networks.

    13. Re:INVADE by jamie(really) · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, calling for an invasion in response to network attacks "seriously" is "Insightful", but pointing out that we're already doing much worse is "Troll".

    14. Re:INVADE by riseoftheindividual · · Score: 1

      You body may die, but because of your selfless act your soul will rise to heaven where it will find a dedicated T1, and 74 well stocked BT peers.

      You had me at "T1". *sniff*

      --
      Patriot - A fan of expanding government power and spending while not wanting to pay higher taxes.
    15. Re:INVADE by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      It would take an unusually bold person to organize such an...er...extralegal form of negative reinforcement of the meme, but if I saw one, I'd hit his PayPal button.

      Really? Have a taste for polonium, do you?

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    16. Re:INVADE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Feds may know who is behind it but they are not going to do anything about it because they fear the rath of the Storm creators!

    17. Re:INVADE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, let's get into ANOTHER endless war based on half-assed speculation!

      What if it's all bullshit? Every time news of a cyber-attack breaks in the US, they fum-fuh around for a while and then take the default cop-out of "blame-the-Rooskies". If the Cold War taught us anything, it showed that it takes two to tangle. What has the US government done to buckle down on our own home-grown cyber criminals lately?

      Hell, we're the ones coddling Microsoft, without whom these attacks would not be possible in the first place.

    18. Re:INVADE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lmao how can the USA invade arent they already setting up IRAN for another middle east scam!!

  7. Reminds me of the '20s in the US by coolmoose25 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except in this case the Federal Gov't doesn't send in Elliot Ness... It sends in... well... nobody.

    --
    Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
    1. Re:Reminds me of the '20s in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ah, you know Snake's already been dropped in to take care the problem. Ocelot is probably slowing him down.

  8. General Patton laughs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somewhere, General Patton is feeling very vindicated for his statements of 1945-1946 about invading Russia.

  9. It's Russia !! What do you expect !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful


    It's Russia !! What do you expect !! American ideals and values ?? It's full of wussies looking for their daily bread, and couldn't care less about anything but that !!

  10. The CIA's been making some noises about 'cyberwar' by KublaiKhan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does this count as 'cyberwar'? I see great potential for making lots of money^W^W^W^Wpatriotically serving the country by grafting in a Bureau of Cyberdefence into the Department of Homeland Security...

    --
    In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
    A stately pleasure dome decree
  11. Re:In Soviet Russia... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More like:

    In Soviet Russia, the RBN owns the government!

  12. St. Petersburg... by MiniMike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to Google maps, St. Petersburg is well within 220 miles of international waters...

    If they can get exact coordinates, I can think of a (firing) solution

    1. Re:St. Petersburg... by Sta7ic · · Score: 1

      Fun, but a projectile traveling at Mach 8 will take out the windows in most of St Petersburg, including any and all churches. It'd likely also take out three or four buildings before coming to a stop ... a little much collateral damage to whack someone running a botnet.

    2. Re:St. Petersburg... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I would highly recommend against it for certain good reasons. Russia is not a true superpower anymore, but it's certainly not (yet) a paper tiger, either.

  13. Is this cyber warfare? by RLiegh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seriously ...could the whole point of this -from the Russian perspective at least, be that they can use or hire their local blackhats to wreak economic and/or civil damage (eg what happened to estonia) pretty much at will?

    I'm not saying that's what Russia is actively doing -but what incentive would Putin have to dismantle a tool that could be used so effectively against his -and russia's- enemies?

    1. Re:Is this cyber warfare? by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm not saying that's what Russia is actively doing Actually, I'd go ahead and take that step if I were you. Allofmp3 was shut down by the Russians for doing something that was borderline legal in Russia. We have hackers doing something that (I presume) is illegal in Russia not being shut down by the Russians. While it's possible that it just so happens that a group of hackers working for the Russian mafia just happened to create a worm with great strategic importance to the Russians, great enough to withstand pressure from the international community, I find it more likely that they actively supported it.
    2. Re:Is this cyber warfare? by Nero+Nimbus · · Score: 1

      What you have to realize is that the Russian mob pretty much IS the government of Russia, in a lot of ways. The Russian gangsters in general are a whole different breed, too, because while your stereotypical mob guy dropped out in grade school, the typical Russian gangster has at least one college degree. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the mob was responsible for Storm, the RBN, and basically every other cybercrime-related thing that's come out of Russia in recent history. They also happen to be pretty violent, even as far as organized crime groups go.

      This is sort of the same principle as hacking carrying the death penalty in China, and yet we've had stuff like Titan Rain happen. The only big difference is the country of origin.

    3. Re:Is this cyber warfare? by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 1

      The 'attack' on estonia turned out to be by a 22 year old estonian which probably had no involvement whatsoever with the Russian government. Sorry no link read it in my local deadwood news source.

      --

      ---
      "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
  14. If they know where it is originating from... by bagboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    why not blackhole the source IP blocks?

    1. Re:If they know where it is originating from... by bastafidli · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with this approach. Honestly how many websites there are in Russia majority of users in US us?. Unless they are Russian expats the number is very low. I think ISPs should provide this feature when by default certain high risk regions would be blacklisted by default. Users who are still interested in accessing nodes in these regions could opt-in an be placed on some kind of VPN isolated from other users of that ISP. By letting ISPs deal with this, US goverment can also wash their hands since this is a private business decision of organization they cannot control.

    2. Re:If they know where it is originating from... by genericpoweruser · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that when you say blackhole you mean block their IPs throughout the US. Actually I think that's a pretty decent idea--far better than killing people. However it's not that simple because the viruses have already spread, so we'd need to come up with a way to stop all of those, which can be done. The trouble is that we would also have to convince other countries to block them too or the attackers might use a proxy from them.

      --
      A fool and his lamb are worth two in the bush.
    3. Re:If they know where it is originating from... by EriDay · · Score: 1

      At this point it's not about stopping existing malware, it's about getting the Russian government's attention. When Putin's mistress can't buy her bling on ebay. She won't be happy. When Putin's mistress isn't happy, nobody's happy. Multiply this by 10,000,000.

    4. Re:If they know where it is originating from... by witherstaff · · Score: 1
  15. In the same way a T-Rex is cool by emj · · Score: 1

    It's very cool in a museum, but in real life it's not that fun to be stomped down by one. So yes worms and carnivores as massive as these are pretty cool, at a distance.

  16. Re:INVADE - Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Provide RBN with Windows Vista
    2. RBN gets slowed down repeatedly clicking "Da, continusky"
    3. Battle over.

  17. These sorts of stories... by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...are always a little suspicious. Either the person/gang is pretty obviously a very minor fish in a pond filled with Megalodon sharks, or the person/gang is conveniently impossible to reach. Not that this won't happen, but it's pretty much public knowledge that international gangs operate in the US and Europe with impunity. The odds that this one gang only exists in this one place doesn't fit what is known about Russian gangs or, indeed, what is known about cyber organizations of any kind. This sounds far too much like a call to inaction, a bid to avoid doing anything serious.

    (Besides, if a minimum level of computer security was mandated, and critical machines were kept off public networks, cybercrime, worms and viruses would be reduced in quantity and effectiveness. The Government has a position open for Internet Czar - why is it not filled and why isn't it being used to push the importance of network security? Hell, I'd put in for the job if I thought I'd have a whelk's chance in a supernova of either getting it or getting heard afterwards.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:These sorts of stories... by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They also have many of the earmarks of urban legends. "We know exactly who is responsible" -- OK, then, what are their names? Where are their photographs? Surely the Russian government wouldn't deny a simple request for criminal conviction records, if we asked nicely. If that's too much to ask, then what are the names of the agents at the FBI and other U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies who have information on the perpetrators? Are they unwilling to speak anonymously, even?

      Just because a few people conspired to do something doesn't mean your explanation is not just another conspiracy theory.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:These sorts of stories... by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      They also have many of the earmarks of urban legends. "We know exactly who is responsible" -- OK, then, what are their names? Where are their photographs? Surely the Russian government wouldn't deny a simple request for criminal conviction records, if we asked nicely.

      What makes you think their names will get released? They could be employees of the Russian gov't and if so Putin will want them protected and not cooperate but he'll know whether we are on the right track when we ask. Publically releasing their names could allow some vigilante who knows the authors to do something to them which could prevent the US from arresting and prosecuting them. Or if they aren'r gov't employees and their names are released then they will flee St. Pete, if that's where they are, in order to avoid capture.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    3. Re:These sorts of stories... by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Which is why I said that it does indeed happen. It really does. Government activities, especially, tend to be highly secretive and Governments around the world have all been guilty of crimes. The British Government last year admitted to torturing and murdering German civilians in an undisclosed prison in London shortly after World War II. Notice the "after" bit. At least one political refugee in London has been killed by a poisoned needle on an umbrella. The South African Government provided a journalist's children with poison-soaked t-shorts. (Rest in peace, Donald Woods.) Then there's the drug-dealing that was used to help fund the arms-for-Iran fiasco.

      The idea that a cyber-attack, whether a worm against individuals or an attack on infrastructure, could be Government-based is not therefore absurd. Clearly, Governments do very nasty things, have very few scruples and are not as accountable as they like to claim. But is it reasonable to blame them?

      Not necessarily. Russia is run as much by crime syndicates as by the Government there. Big businesses can hire all kinds of people most would not want to associate with. We can't be sure where the worm comes from - the American Government has admitted it mistook an NMap probe for a Russian attack one time, why should we trust this "knowledge" any more than any of the claims we now know were totally false? And even if the origin was correctly identified, is that the origin of the worm, the hosting country for some zombies, or where someone ssh'ed into?

      Even if someone 'fesses up, the number of exaggerated and fraudulent claims made to boost reputations is countless. We can't trust an admission and more than enough time has passed for someone to reverse-engineer the code, so even asking someone to duplicate the worm wouldn't prove a damn thing other than the person has a good memory... or the interrogator ensured the right answer was given. Easy to do, with subtle hints and the careful application of pain.

      In short, we will never know the truth of the matter. Consensual reality is the only "reality" we can ever be certain of, including the fact that we can be certain that it's not (objectively) real.

      Does it even matter, though? Not really. Better host-level and network-level security would significantly reduce the risks of any future problems. There are plenty of intrusion detection systems that look for abnormal activity and plenty of active HIDS/NIDS that can shut a firewall on an intrusion being detected. Plenty of other ways to keep worms out (or isolate an infected machine).

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  18. Upcoming season of 24! by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    Now we know where Jack Bauer's headed next. Unfortunately, there's a lot of vodka available there. Hmmm. Dangerous! Just Jack's style.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  19. Paranomocracy: Criminal Rule by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Paranomocracy" is rule by criminals, as first used by Russian Ouspensky in a 1919 letter describing what he also called "kakourgocracy" the new Soviet rule by criminals.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  20. Brillant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! It was right in front of me the whole time. If I want to avoid getting in trouble for downloading music, I just need to move to Washington, D.C., reinstall Windows and put in my name as "Karl Rove", and use an open wireless connection!

    SWEET!

  21. Yup by bogie · · Score: 1

    Russia is pretty much telling the US and everyone else to go F*** themselves these days. There was that slight glimmer of hope that things would work out not too long ago, but alas that didn't come to pass. Hey, but at least we both believe in having a strong President who wields unlimited power. That's a good thing, right?

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Impeach Clinton. Yup.

    2. Re:Yup by malkavian · · Score: 1

      Actually, they're not telling anyone where to go.. Instead they're making sure they control as much of the energy supply as they can (a significant amount), and work with as great a versatility as they can. Think the US a hundred or so years ago. Large amounts of lawlessness, no real restrictions on doing things, people were trodden on in the path to making a fast buck.. Part of that shady history meant that people could copy ideas, and make them better, with no real downside (patents? Copyright? Pfft!) and certainly no cost. Russia has very little right now apart from large amounts of raw reserves, and a hell of a lot of top notch talent. Russia doesn't need to tell anyone where to go.. The politicians are largely scared because there is nothing they can do against the new, fiscally aware Russia. Sanctions won't work (it controls energy to too many neighbouring countries, and has a significant stake in Europe), it's not signed up to all the trade treaties, so they don't really apply.. Legal pounding won't work. And invasion (as I've seen many advocate) simply won't happen because escalation to nuclear is likely and everyone loses. For the moment, they're happy using their botnet to make money. Which means leaving the 'host' economies well alone, and hoping they prosper, as like any parasite, they get most gains from a healthy host. Really upset them to the point of wanting to lash out, and I have the nasty suspicion they could do some real damage to completely unexpected areas.. Enough to wipe out percentiles from the stock markets. Which is probably the large reason nobody's going in heavy handed. At the moment the 'status quo' still exists. I'd really hate to see this get nasty.

    3. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, compared to a drunken sod who gave everything of value to his olicharg friends I think it's a turn for the better. Compared to a dick who stuck his dick in places where he shouldn't, I'm not so sure.

  22. Gee, imagine that by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative

    We have high level gov. officials who are corrupt. Welcome to America^h^h^h^h^h^h^h France^h^h^h^h^h^h China^h^h^h^h^h Russia.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Gee, imagine that by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      We have a government consisting entirely of corrupt officials. You Americans and Frenchmen are so behind the times. :)

  23. News flash 100 years from now by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    100 years in the future:

    The Freedom of Information Act has finally made available the reason by the mysterious disappearence of the Storm Worm Botnet. We learned today that operatives from the CIA, the Navy Seals and Mossad took down the Russians responsible for the botnet; all without Russia ever knowing. How this feat was accomplished is even more amazing then the fact that it was. More at 11.

    1. Re:News flash 100 years from now by Teflon_Jeff · · Score: 4, Funny

      In unrelated news, there are troubling reports of a new Storm Worm coming from mars. Random slashdot posts have appeared stating "In soviet Mars, The planet reddens YOU"

      Agents are exploring a correlation. Slashdot has already modded them down as trolls.

      --
      "Teach a man to build a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life."
  24. in soviet russia by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    your computer GIVES viruses!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  25. Malware is not like drugs by 00_NOP · · Score: 1

    I'm sure I read recently that most of the machines infected by the worm were in the US. So trying to cut off Russia isn't just stupid, it's not going to fix the problem.

    But malware is not like drugs - no user of an infected machine is hooked or needs malware. So they have a direct incentive to fix the problem. Especially if their ISP started to get heavy with them. We can kill this off at source.

    For sure, zero day exploits are another matter. But one thing at a time.

  26. From Luscia with Rove? Or... by davidsyes · · Score: 0

    From Russia with Love?

    (NKB, NSB)

    Spasibo, and dasvidanya, baby...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  27. Naah, isolate instead by gorbachev · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've said this before, so excuse me for sounding like a broken record.

    What needs to happen is cutting Russia completely off the net. Cut them off at every peering point they have, and if someone (China) still continues routing Russian network traffic, block the Russian network traffic where it's being passed onto the responsible part of the Internet.

    The reason why I'm advocating this is because what the Russian cybercriminals are doing is not just criminal, but more importantly threatening the Internet infrastructure itself. There just has to be a better way of protecting the network from bad actors who are hellbent on destroying it.

    Since that's unlikely to happen unless the Russian criminals do something extraordinarily stupid (like successfully attacking several Western states directly), the next alternative is diplomatic isolation. They don't do something to curb the fastest growing criminal activity in the world, well, gee, Vladimir, you don't get to sit on the Security Council, ballrooms in Geneva and you can most certainly kiss that EU membership you so want goodbye forever. And don't even think of vacationing on those nice ski resorts on the Alps Russians are so fond of. Visa denied.

    The state sponsored welfare program for the benefit of Russian mafia gotta stop. Every year billions and billions of dollars of OUR money is being transferred with the silent blessing of Russian Government to the Russian mafia and other criminal elements in Russia. I don't know what else to call that but a global welfare program.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    1. Re:Naah, isolate instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they reroute through africa, europe, asia. You're going to cut all of them off? Eventually you just end up cutting yourself off and then you've caused more damage to yourself than any criminal hacker gang could. And I don't really see cutting off all of Russia from the world stage because of some PC crime. Get real. How about the US gets cut off for our massive drug rings? US PC users are too imcompetent or lazy to secure their PCs so we put all of the blame on the Russians. Not unlike how we buy all the drugs and blame the Bolivians and Columbians. Pass the buck.

      What is this "global welfare program" you cite? What billions of dollars? You mean the money they get for selling gas and oil (gazprom)? That is called capitalism my friend.

      Nothing to see here, move along.

    2. Re:Naah, isolate instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      solves nothing - they simply move to another country for their base of operations where laws are equally lax and governments as easily corruptable.
      Taking the blacklisting approach would mean you have to blacklist sizeable chunks of this planet. Sort of defeats the purpose of a 'world wide web'

    3. Re:Naah, isolate instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of pomposity tells you that you may read this article and I may not? Let me guess: "let's disconnect russian folks because there are criminals among them, lets kill Iraq women because there are terrorists among them..."
      No one can agree to cut off all cables at our borders. ISPs can only try to use IP filtrations. This way they will restrict access to usual folks - children, students, buisnessmen. All gray folk will still have free access via proxies, VPNs and whatever exists. I guess in this case they'll do thier best to make maximum damage to ifrastructure of countries, who insist on that ostracism - as a way to protest and to repay.
      Now think, who would be hurt on both sides. Law? Hardly. Criminals? Surely no. Only simple people on both sides will suffer from the cyberwar that is sure to come in this case.
      Barafu aka Albino Cheetah, Moscow

    4. Re:Naah, isolate instead by umghhh · · Score: 1

      Besides the fact that blocking whole countries is a bit over the top how on earth are you going to convince anybody of power to do such a thing?
      There are chances that USA may have to be acting alone. Even if all western countries kept together the whole world of internet is now much bigger than that. Considering the fact that Puttin or generally Russia is on a shopping spree and buy western politicians when it fails it blackmails them into submission. It does not even cost so much to buy say a german chancellor - previous one was relatively cheap and not ashamed of this so we know that he got 300kE/year from Russia on top of what he got from German state after the nation decommissioned him.

    5. Re:Naah, isolate instead by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What needs [my emphasis] to happen is cutting Russia completely off the net. Cut them off at every peering point they have, and if someone (China) still continues routing Russian network traffic, block the Russian network traffic where it's being passed onto the responsible part of the Internet.

      Really, do you actually think about the practicality or plausibility of implementing your ideas in the real world?

      This not only *won't* happen (as you acknowledge) but *can't* heppen without locking down the US's (or whoever's) part of the Internet so much that the cure will be worse than the disease. Even if you stop direct links to the US net, you won't be able to stop every peering point between Russia and elsewhere. It's going to be impossible to stop indirect traffic. Criminals will just figure a way around your idea of blocking Russian traffic that hides their true location. Since they have access to lots of compromised PCs in numerous countries that's one obvious route. The other obvious solution is to cut a deal- "legal" or "illegal" by whatever measure- with a third party in a third country that isn't blocked. Good luck figuring which connections are legitimate and which are proxies for the criminals.

      And even if you block all *those* countries, they'll do it in two hops via a fourth country- so unless you have a 100% agreement between "good countries" and they have a 100% watertight block against traffic from the "bad" countries, you can't do it.

      I'll tell you now that (a) You won't get such an agreement and (b) If you did, you still wouldn't be able to make sure that those countries' defences were watertight to your standards. So the only way to get what you want is to block all non-US traffic (assuming you live in the US) to an incredible degree. And this still probably won't work.

      Your naivety and the flaw in your argument can be summed up by this phrase:-

      the responsible part of the Internet

      As if the Internet can be obviously (and easily) partitioned off into "responsible" and "irresponsible" parts! Even if it could, so long as either "part" is too big too isolate completely from the other, you can't stop traffic flowing. Therefore, there's only *ONE* Internet.

      And it's not like that; the whole thing is just shades of grey; the US part might be more "responsible" by your measure, but it's still far from perfect.

      There just has to be a better way of protecting the network from bad actors who are hellbent on destroying it.

      Yes, and your easier-to-come-up-with-on-Slashdot-than-it-is-to-actually-implement-it idea isn't one of them.

      the next alternative is diplomatic isolation. They don't do something to curb the fastest growing criminal activity in the world, well, gee, Vladimir, you don't get to sit on the Security Council

      Yeah, it's that simple when you're a tough-talking behind-the-keyboard would-be-diplomat/politician.

      Bottom line, I'm not justifying what Russia is doing, or how they're behaving, but your solutions are naive and clumsy in the extreme. The West isn't going to isolate Russia further (which Putin would probably be quite happy with) and risk escalation of political and military tensions simply to stop some crime which- although admittedly serious and large-scale- still doesn't warrant anything like that risk.

      ballrooms in Geneva and you can most certainly kiss that EU membership you so want goodbye forever. And don't even think of vacationing on those nice ski resorts on the Alps Russians are so fond of. Visa denied.

      Oh noes!!!!!11111

      And that's why you're neither a diplomat or a politician. You think that such petty retribution would work and Putin would say "You're right! I'll do exactly what you say". Not a bloody chance. This is just the Slashdot equivalent of some guy down the pub/bar saying how he'd put the world to rights.

      Putin would set his face against the West further (wh

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    6. Re:Naah, isolate instead by gorbachev · · Score: 1

      "And they reroute through africa, europe, asia. You're going to cut all of them off? "

      Well, no. If you had read what I wrote I said you cut Russian network traffic at those points.

      "What billions of dollars?"

      *sigh*

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    7. Re:Naah, isolate instead by gorbachev · · Score: 1

      I'm fully aware nothing that I propose is ever going to happen (unless the Russians do something REALLY stupid). We will continue bleeding money to Russian criminals, who give some of that corrupt Russian politicians, who in term protect them from prosecution from the victims. I suppose everyone's just gonna be happy about us feeding the Russians.

      However, I'm just gonna pick a few things to comment on from your response where I disagree.

      I understand your points about the difficulty (impossibility) of cutting Russians of the net. The proxy solution with deals with rogue networks can not be stopped 100%, but as SpamHaus has shown it can GREATLY reduce the effectiveness of the criminals. The point is to make it more expensive for the criminals to operate. The collateral damage from blocking regular Russians access to the net would be added pressure. You don't have to be 100% successful with cutting them off the net. Just enough so that it's going to be very inconvenient for Russians to access anything outside of Russia.

      As for putting diplomatic pressure on the Russians over an issue like this. At what point do we stop accepting their harboring of their criminals? There's gotta be a line somewhere. The line probably hasn't been crossed yet, but what do we do when the line is crossed? Ask them nicely, if they would please stop being dicks and stop leeching on us?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    8. Re:Naah, isolate instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe needs Russia for oil. Don't think the U.S.A. is the only country that can 'encourage' countries to cooperate.

    9. Re:Naah, isolate instead by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm fully aware nothing that I propose is ever going to happen Sorry to break this to you, but whilst political apathy on this issue may be a problem, it's not the main reason your suggestion should (and would) be ignored. It's because it's badly thought out and unworkable.

      You don't have to be 100% successful with cutting them off the net. Just enough so that it's going to be very inconvenient for Russians to access anything outside of Russia. I don't believe that you'll be anywhere near 100% near successful; I believe that you'll just succeed in blocking everyday Russians, and the criminals will pay money to people to get them through.

      Putin and the like will be quite happy to see ordinary Russians cut off from external sources of information; they've already tried to shut down as many dissenting voices as possible, but the Internet is harder to deal with. They'll also be able to paint it as Western aggression and mistreatment when they don't get things their way. Double whammy for them!

      So even if you think that inconveniencing ordinary people in this way will indirectly pressure the Russian government, it won't. Quite the opposite.

      At what point do we stop accepting their harboring of their criminals? There's gotta be a line somewhere. As I said, you assume criticism of your solution == non-acknowledgement of problem. This is not the case.

      My post was a criticism of a transparently bad idea, and I had the gut reaction that it would be taken (by you or someone else) as a rejection of the problem itself.

      Simply going with a bad and workable "solution" simply for the sake of doing something in the absence of a better idea is A Very Bad Thing. As I already pointed out, your solution would be *worse* than the problem anyway.

      I suspect that people have already come up with better ideas than yours, which they (having greater insight into the issues) nevertheless concluded were flawed.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    10. Re:Naah, isolate instead by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right, let's cut off Russia. And when the bot operators move to china then let's cut off China. And when they move to the US, then let's cut off the US!
      Amazing idea, very well thought out.

      Oh wait, I have a different idea.
      How about forcing Microsoft to finally secure their goddamn OS so that this worm-crap just can't spread like hellfire?

    11. Re:Naah, isolate instead by Wo1ke · · Score: 1

      Flamebait, if I ever saw any. Russia is by no means the world's largest cyber-criminal mating ground; that would be the U.S.A. You speak of blocking Russian traffic that's comming through China, a country that not only has a far larger internet-crime fingerprint, but also the one that is, infact, "threatening the Internet infrastructure itself." China breaks the fundemental law of the internet: freedom. They censor their people, they censor their websites, they censor everyone who tries to speak to them, and yet you advocate encouraging them just to take care of a couple of hundred of hackers. Are you even trying to use logic? The second part of you arguement, as impossible as it may seem, is even worse than the first. Guess fucking what? Vladimir, as you kindly call him, has one of the worlds largest stockpile of nukes, one of the world's largest natural gas and oil reserves, and as a matter of fact, is the president of the world's largest fucking country. I shit you not, Russia (*gasp!*) is actually as big as they draw it on maps! Oh, and incase you are 100% oblivious to the real world, Russia doesn't want to join the EU, they are political opposites. That, of course, by does not mean that the EU would risk putting any kind of real pressure on Russia, as they are supplied most of they natural gas, and a lot of oil from Russia. Hey, look! A russian can't go to the alps to enjoy a nice winter resort! Not only would that benefit internal tourism, and thus the Russia economy, it would also end up with the residents of the Alps being unable to support *any* tourism, due to lack of fuel. Fuck, the best the EU could do to harm Russia, is invite it to join! Thirdly, I hope you weren't serious with the UN remark. Let me repeat this: Russia has one of the worlds largest nuclear supplies, as well as militaries. Even in the midst of the Cold War, the US (the only country that has a more powerfull military than Russia, in case you are as clueless about that as you are about Russia) did not oppose Russia being in the security council. Of course, a couple of hackers who hijacked your machine are worth fucking over global politics... My god, you are pathetic!

    12. Re:Naah, isolate instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What needs to happen is cutting Russia completely off the net."

      Didn't we already do this once with usenet?

    13. Re:Naah, isolate instead by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What needs to happen is cutting Russia completely off the net. Cut them off at every peering point they have, and if someone (China) still continues routing Russian network traffic, block the Russian network traffic where it's being passed onto the responsible part of the Internet.
      So, you're essentially proposing for the USA to build the Great Russian Firewall from the outside, which is something the Russian government itself is still planning to do... why, thank you... there are very few trustable information sources here as it is, and what you propose would result in a Cold War era information vacuum. And make no mistake, the Russian government would be delighted at such a turn of events - not only they get all the 'Net censorship they want, but they can blame it on the "corrupt Western plutocracies bent on destroying Russia" as well!
    14. Re:Naah, isolate instead by chord.wav · · Score: 1

      Supposing that you could actually isolate Russia off the net...What will you do next when infected bots running in computers located in every other country, including US, attack? Isolate them as well? If you isolate everybody, you isolate yourself.

      Besides, I don't think banning the entire population of a country because a tiny portion of them do something illegal is going to help anybody. Where do you get those ideas from anyway? Mein Kampf?

      Listen to you people! Invasion? Yeah, now tell me Chavez and Castro are the masterminds behind Bonzi Buddy so you have to invade!! What a pathetic excuse. You sure sound like Nazis saying that.

  28. Those Cagey Bees! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Don't they know America has tougher TLA's than they can hope for? The US will be able to beat em at this game forever!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Those Cagey Bees! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Dmitri Apterovich is a russian name. One russian spy blames another. It looks like russian internal affair:)

  29. Knowledge over security? by esocid · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that the spread of these malicious worms is more due to a person falling into the trap of actually getting the worm or trojan installed in the first place. Far too many people are click-happy in their emails about whatever the catchy subject might be, and hey look there's an attachment too. I'm not saying I've never gotten something installed but it was due to my acknowledgment that where I was traveling could contain something malicious:warez. Security could help the problem but there will always be new tricks to circumvent (can't help thinking of Gob there) that security. You just need to keep pounding it into the minds of the not-so-tech-savvy that you can't just open anything you like without knowing the consequences. Start instating a punishment of using a typewriter and see if people start paying attention.

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
  30. Re: USA and white countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA bombed Serbia. Both Russia and Serbia are mostly Slavic countries. Another question is impossibility to predict outcome. Do you want four random unfriendly countries get nuclear weapons at once?

  31. Wrong city? by greg_barton · · Score: 1, Troll

    Redmond was fingered as the host city for one of the Internet's most profligate and cyber-crime enabling operation...
    1. Re:Wrong city? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, how un-hilariously predictable. You must be the only original thinker at Slashdot.

    2. Re:Wrong city? by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      Malkovich?

  32. Russian Law? by rueger · · Score: 1

    Ok, I actually read TFA, and what's not mentioned is whether or not these actions are even illegal in Russia. Just because something is against the law in the U.S. does mean it's illegal everywhere in the world.

    1. Re:Russian Law? by rueger · · Score: 1

      Damn! Preview THEN submit.....

      Just because something is against the law in the U.S. doesn't mean it's illegal everywhere in the world.

    2. Re:Russian Law? by russ1337 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, I actually read TFA, and what's not mentioned is whether or not these actions are even illegal in Russia. Just because something is against the law in the U.S. does mean it's illegal everywhere in the world.
      yet.
    3. Re:Russian Law? by bjmoneyxxx · · Score: 1

      my common sense filter must have been on, thats what I read when I saw the GP.

    4. Re:Russian Law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to Russian Law involvement in writing a definitely harmful software is the criminal case.

  33. Don't be stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If I were FSB and I knew the identities of the Storm botnet herders, there's little doubt that I would simply take over the botnet. Perhaps even employ the guys if they were not the staffers to begin with. Very large botnet is an EXTREMELY valuable data mining resource. It just makes zero sense to any intelligence agency, Russian or not, to shut the botnet down if you can take over it.

    1. Re:Don't be stupid by Quadraginta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good grief, don't let's give the geeky profession airs. The FSB has a lot better resources than a few thousand compromised Windoze machines. They're going to spam somebody to death? Raise next year's black budget by running a few dozen phishing scams? Sheesh.

      Besides, this kind of goofball techno stunt isn't the Russian style. They excel at the basic ancient human-centered form of espionage and security compromise. If you think they want to penetrate your bureaucracy, then don't waste your time changing your AOL password weekly or carefully not opening e-mail attachments. Instead, be cautious about that hot blonde at the gym who confessed a lifelong sexual weakness for balding guys trying to work off the desk paunch and who expresses a sweet naivete and engaging curiosity about how, precisely, you do your job.

    2. Re:Don't be stupid by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apparently the Storm worm is the world's fastest supercomputer. And even if it weren't, funneling whatever attacks the FSB might be likely to do through the Storm botnet would provide excellent plausible deniability.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Don't be stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, this kind of goofball techno stunt isn't the Russian style. So, that is why the machine in the presidential office was part of the Estonia botnet. FSB don't care if the VIPs travel details leak to any criminal organizations, Islamic militants or to a random pissed-off former communist loner.
    4. Re:Don't be stupid by Viceroy+Potatohead · · Score: 1

      Instead, be cautious about that hot blonde at the gym who confessed a lifelong sexual weakness for balding guys trying to work off the desk paunch and who expresses a sweet naivete and engaging curiosity about how, precisely, you do your job. Umm... ahh... Would you mind asking her if she has a sister?
    5. Re:Don't be stupid by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      My friend, you need to watch less movies.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  34. Re:It's Russia !! What do you expect !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's Russia !! What do you expect !! American ideals and values ?? It's full of wussies looking for their daily bread, and couldn't care less about anything but that !! Funny, I thought those were American values and ideals. Although, to be fair, here in America we expect circuses with our bread.
  35. A horrible thought just occurred to me by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    If the US government took down the people controlling Storm, wouldn't the US government then be in control of Storm?

    *gulp*

  36. Isn't it Kuvayev and company? by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had read through the Wikipedia page on Leo Kuvayev that he may be (one of the?) main guy(s) behind the storm worm botnet.

    Here's the reference to Leo Kuvayev having a role with the storm botnet. Considering the massive amounts of spam that is pumped out for domains that he purchases, it wouldn't surprise me in the least.

    Though according to his Crooked Registrar Partners, he apparently lives in Finland. Though I somehow doubt that he really owns an entire Finnish city, as his address would have you believe.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Isn't it Kuvayev and company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "he apparently lives in Finland" and "owns an entire Finnish city" were good ones. Tell me more. I am interested.

      I highly doubt that he owns anything in Finland. ( http://www.tekes.fi/eng/news/uutis_tiedot.asp?id=2018 )

      He could be living in Finland, as it is near the Russian, but could you give other sources than Wikipedia?

    2. Re:Isn't it Kuvayev and company? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      He could be living in Finland, as it is near the Russian, but could you give other sources than Wikipedia?
      I was trying to find a public WHOIS server to refer to, but that is easier said than done. The speculation of him living in Finland is based on the registration data that he provides to the registrars when he sets up a new domain for his software piracy / counterfeit drugs / replica watches / internet porn businesses.

      For example, a couple of the domains he has registered recently are "nnowsoft.com" and "softfactorysale.com". You can check these yourself via a WHOIS service and you'll see what I am referring to.

      He has been providing the Finnish city of Lappeenranta as his residence for some time. Previously he would give a post office box as his address, but his most recent registrar partner-in-crime has allowed him to simply state the city as his address. As I stated before, I highly doubt that he owns the entire city, which of course means he is not providing sufficient registration data. But yet his registrar friends don't seem to care.

      I have more information on his latest registrar friend in My Journal entry on another spam-friendly registrar.

      I highly doubt that he owns anything in Finland.
      I agree with that speculation entirely. I like to believe that nobody in Finland is willingly aiding a criminal spamming enterprise. I do suspect that the registration data provided by Kuvayev for his domains is completely bogus, but his registrars don't seem to care because they are making money off the deal as well.

      This is part of why I chose "Damn_Registrars" for my slashdot name. I truly believe that a big part of the spamming problem lies in complacent registrars and an ICANN that is not willing to take action against them.
      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  37. You've heard of Germany, right? by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    Americans killed millions of Italians and Germans in World War II. Can't get much whiter than Germany.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:You've heard of Germany, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't invade they defended.. learn to fucking read.

  38. What's it like... by jotok · · Score: 0, Troll

    What's it like being Russian or Chinese, and working at an ISP or in law enforcement?

    What's it like having some of the worst spammers and for-crime hackers living in your country, not giving a shit, and having the world think you're a bunch of assholes?

    In the States we have our own problems, mostly the fact that our society is so open that law enforcement is not able to go after everyone (for now, anyway). But you just know that the equivalent entities in China or Russia just don't care. Homegrown hackers are dicking with competitor nations? Nice one, comrade!

    Our shenanigans are cheeky and fun, while theirs are cruel and tragic.

    1. Re:What's it like... by Shados · · Score: 3, Funny

      and having the world think you're a bunch of assholes
      Well, technically in America we're familiar with at least THAT one too...
  39. Don't forget though .. by apankrat · · Score: 1

    .. that you are in a firing range of nuclear missiles.

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
  40. In Siviet Russia, we dont pwn worms, worms pwn US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hehe

  41. This is not really news by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that the authorities have known who was behind it for a while now. It's not that hard to figure out. I mean, it takes time to reverse engineer it and/or gather the data at the various points needed to trace it back to the source, but this botnet has been around for quite a while. It would've been news if they still had no clue who was behind it. Heck, it would've been big enough news to prompt me to try to reverse engineer it myself.

  42. The Wormsign! by zaguar · · Score: 1
    We all know who is behind the Worm

    It is the Muad'Dib!

    --
    "Sure there's porn and piracy on the Web but there's probably a downside too."
  43. I know who it was by jrothwell97 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mrs White didit, with the candlestick, in the drawing room.


    (Or perhaps it was Mr Putin, with the laptop computer, in the server room.

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
  44. international whac-a-mole by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Personally, I don't think the solution lies in national-level action. It lies either in economics
    I agree with you on that one. Spam is an economic problem, and as I've said before it needs an economic solution. We can keep playing whack-a-mole with the spammers and their spam, or we can actually do something to get them out of the spamming business.

    So far, whack-a-mole as been the much more popular option, based on the enormous number of spam filtering programs on the market right now.
    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  45. Like the Russians Are the First.... by queenb**ch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, how many of you see all kinds of stuff coming out of China, Korea, Nigeria, etc.?

    NONE of them get prosecuted either....

    2 cents,

    QueenB

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/
    1. Re:Like the Russians Are the First.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And most of it actually originates from criminal organizations in the US

    2. Re:Like the Russians Are the First.... by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The reason this is news worthy is it appears to be more of a willful act to block prosecution, where as the ones over in Nigeria (although probably not China) are more a case of the local infrastructure and police not being capable of tracking these people. The other factor is one of organization and impact. Sure, a few Nigerians spam the hell out of people and manage to do some 419 scams, but all in all it's a few individuals doing it and they don't get all that many hits. The Russian group behind Storm on the other hand is a well organized group not random individuals, and they impact hundreds of thousands (millions?) of individuals.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    3. Re:Like the Russians Are the First.... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "The reason this is news worthy is it appears to be more of a willful act to block prosecution, where as the ones over in Nigeria (although probably not China) are more a case of the local infrastructure and police not being capable of tracking these people."

      You have a Cold War propaganda perspective on the functionality of the Russian government.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:Like the Russians Are the First.... by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      You have a Cold War propaganda perspective on the functionality of the Russian government. Actually I have no perspective on the functionality of the Russian government. My statement was based on the article. The article speculates that the people responsible are known to reside in Russia, but that the Russian police are refusing to help with the investigation.
      What I do have a perspective on is the relative difference in impact between Storm, and Nigerian scammers, and I stated as much in the second part of my post. Also having read articles in the past about how the scammers and police in Nigeria function I have some idea as to their capabilities, and think they have very limited ability to track those responsible. I have no idea about the Russians, but I suppose it's possible that their police are incapable of tracking down individuals on their networks, although I would be very surprised to hear that.
      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    5. Re:Like the Russians Are the First.... by soulfury · · Score: 1

      Because in Soviet Russia, viruses infect YOU, duh.

    6. Re:Like the Russians Are the First.... by billcopc · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much of that is caused by current US foreign policies, and the common distaste other nations have for American affairs. China won't give us the time of day, unless there's a lucrative business deal tied to their cooperation. They open and close their borders as they see fit, ignoring the rest of the world whenever they don't feel like dealing with the problem. They know the US government has no balls because our retail economy is so sickly dependent on Asian imports.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  46. Intrinsic freedoms/crime problem by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    It seems that at the current level of the developed countries they achieved the balance between the level of organized crime and necessity for maintaining freedoms. In other words, you cannot more successfully fight crime without suspending some liberties.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  47. Seems like it's at least tolerated by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 1

    If not actually protected. There have been situations where sites critical of the Russian government have had some pretty major DoS attacks launched against them. Why have the government do it when a gang you're ignoring will do it for you with the merest hint from some official? They do seem to care about plausible undeniability, at least to spare the sensibilities of Western Europe.

  48. da it true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we are russian wussies and proud to be wussie of russia. daily bread, nyet, daily vodka, da.

    1. Re:da it true by emilper · · Score: 1
  49. be careful what you wish for. by goga_russian · · Score: 1

    "I don't doubt there are hitmen in St. Petersburg who could be hired to finish these folks off in a particularly gruesome way..." you are misinformed, there have been a few spammers beaten to death and some shot. look it up some made the news because of the amounts of blood and guts that were left all over the place. oh, welcome to Russia :)

    --
    Dont Judge The situation by the Misfortunate. Goga.
    1. Re:be careful what you wish for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that it turned out to be pretty much not true.

    2. Re:be careful what you wish for. by goga_russian · · Score: 1

      do you live in the city where the events have occurred? or even been to Russia?

      --
      Dont Judge The situation by the Misfortunate. Goga.
  50. Get the MPAA, I mean US government, to take action by dmarti · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Since it's just regular people's computers getting attacked, no big deal. If you want the US government to take action, just rent some time on the botnet to distribute copies of a movie. Threats don't count until they affect the people who have Senators' private lines on speed dial.

  51. But that could apply by msimm · · Score: 1

    to any government.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  52. Government by Plugh · · Score: 1

    There are only two differences between Government and any other armed gang of thugs:
    1. Every few years, you get an insignificantly small fraction of a say as to which of the gang members assumes control of the organization
    2. The "Government" gang is believed to be perfectly legitimate by most of the populace

    1. Re:Government by dwye · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Governments also engage in civil engineering activities.

      So that is three differences.

  53. "Putin himself comes from there" by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh, please. This is just another bullshit neocon attack on Putin because he chased the oligarchs out of Russia and refused to kowtow to Bush on Iran and the phony European "missile defense" crap.

    How much money stands to NOT be given to a bunch of war profiteering Bush/Cheney cronies if the US doesn't put a missile defense in Europe? Compare that to however much the Storm Worm takes in. There's no contest. Let alone how much money the oil companies stand to make if Bush starts a war with Iran and the oil price spikes to $200/barrel.

    This is a joke.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  54. Just release the info by KevMar · · Score: 1

    Just make the info public and we will see how long it lasts.

    I bet we could create all kinds of nice thank you messages for them.

    --
    Im a gamer, not a grammer major. This post is full of spelling and grammer mistakes.
  55. What happened to Slashdot? by peccary · · Score: 1

    It used to be that even the n00bs knew a little bit about technology.

    Let me explain something to you in one little word: dialup.

    How do you propose to cut off all delivery of trojans and worms, while permitting international telephone calls to continue?

    Once you've figured that out, think about postal mail of CD-ROMs.

  56. Re:The CIA's been making some noises about 'cyberw by Jeian · · Score: 1
  57. I know who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its the usual suspect: kaiser suze

    just saying ;-)

  58. Don't be stupid by gr8scot · · Score: 1

    Instead, be cautious about that hot blonde at the gym who confessed a lifelong sexual weakness for balding guys trying to work off the desk paunch and who expresses a sweet naivete and engaging curiosity about how, precisely, you do your job. Look around the gym. That hot blonde would rather be with an über-geek than a brainless, 'roided-out meatsack. She really is that sweet, and probably even more curious about me than she seems.
    --
    All 19 hijackers were known terrorists 09-10-2001. Lack of FBI intelligence does not justify warrantless wiretaps..
  59. A complex pattern of incentives by Budenny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One imagines there may be a complex pattern of incentives. RBN for these purposes should be considered a deniable branch of the Russian state.

    The incentive to do it is to try out net sabotage techniques for possible later use in a controlled and deniable way. You don't have the potential embarrassment of trying to do it clandestinely and getting caught. You do it openly but deniably.

    The incentive for allowing it is the hope that practice in defense will be more valuable than practice in attack, and that the net will evolve more robust defense systems than if you adopted state measures to prevent it. If you could even find any.

    However, what should be somewhat alarming here is that a regime most of whose officials came out of the Soviet equivalent of the Abwehr or the SS should now be in power and conducting a sort of guerrilla war on the West. Never forget, the organizations these guys came out of murdered several times the numbers the Nazis did and operated a camp network many times the size of the Nazi one.

    They are not people like us.

  60. what concerns me .... by WindBourne · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    is that you may be wrong about us. The fact that W. gagged Sibel edmunds (in particular to hide that top republicans were traitors and sold our nuclear secrets to iran, turkey, and pakistan), and has one of the most corrupt admin of all time is horrible. I even know that the republican congress would overlook all this. But the dems are now in control and have done nothing. They told sibel that one they controlled congress that she would be ungagged. None of it is true. Heck, they are debating to allow W, his admin, and the telcos off of illegal wiretaps (china style; everybody monitored and all information passed to the DOJ, FBI, and white house). IOW, they are no different than the pubs.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  61. You must be sick in your head ... by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 1

    ... to even suggest going to war with Russia over something this trivial.

    As are the folks that moderated you insightful, I'm lost for words here.

    Even killing these Russians for this, as one of the other ppl in this thread suggest is seriously f**ed up.

    I hope it's only your age showing ...

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
  62. Another viewpoint.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Kaspersky believes it is even possible that one of the most notorious cybercrime groups, the Russian Business Network, may have been backed by Russians living in the US." http://business.theage.com.au/russian-call-for-internetpol-to-fight-cybercrime/20080128-1oma.html

  63. so they know who they are.... by widget54 · · Score: 1

    publish their names and addresses and let the users sort it out.....

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  64. Non-US country with nuclear ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    ... arsenal large enough to sterilise the land surface of the planet ... doesn't give a shit about what the American government or population think.

    Film at eleven.

    Best argument for nuclear proliferation I've heard so far.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"