Slashdot Mirror


GPS Trackers Find Novel Applications

Pickens writes "Inexpensive GPS devices like the Zoombak (which costs just $200 plus $10 a month) have becomes so prevalent that some people are using them routinely to keep tabs on their most precious possessions. Kathy Besa has a Zoombak attached to the collar of her 5-year-old beagle, Buddy. If Buddy wanders more than 20 feet from the house, she gets a text message on her phone that says, 'Buddy has left the premises.' The small size made possible by chip advances over the last two or three years is enabling many novel uses of GPS tracking. An art collector in New York uses one when he transports million-dollar pieces, a home builder is putting them on expensive appliances to track them if they disappear from construction sites, a drug company is using them after millions of dollars in inventory turned up missing, and a mobile phone company is hiding them in some cellphone boxes to catch thieves."

185 comments

  1. GPS bug detector? by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, say I'm paranoid. Is there anything on the market that can detect these devices?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:GPS bug detector? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Informative

      GPS is passive so probably not. You might be able to detect it sending but if it uses GSM or the old pager network you'd be flooded with noise.

      You could (if you are that paranoid) block GPS traffic.

      http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.3623
      http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.8758

    2. Re:GPS bug detector? by Technician · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ok, say I'm paranoid. Is there anything on the market that can detect these devices?

      Use anything that can detect a nearby cell signal. If you think your car is bugged, take it through a few tunnels or parking structures so it re-connects to a cell tower. (turn off you phone first) You can only detect these either by the GPS Local Oscillator (if you know the frequency) or detect them while they re-connect to a cell tower. Detecting the local oscillator of the GPS isn't easy as it isn't strong and is often well shielded. The cell module on the other hand is designed to transmit a signal to a cell tower, but it isn't on all the time. The trick is to make it turn on so you can find it. Causing a signal loss and then returning to cell tower range is a way to get these to announce to a tower, I am here. That's how you find them.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:GPS bug detector? by shawn443 · · Score: 1

      Only RMS can detect this. You can find one here.

    4. Re:GPS bug detector? by BForrester · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say "what is a global positioning satellite?"

      I'll take "ridiculously easy questions" for 400, Alex.

    5. Re:GPS bug detector? by DustyShadow · · Score: 1

      You could (if you are that paranoid) block GPS traffic. Why not block cell traffic too?

      http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.4355
    6. Re:GPS bug detector? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Though GPS as a system is passive, GPS receivers themselves are NOT completely passive. They use superheterodyne receivers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superheterodyne) which produce a detectable radio frequency radiation (and at a fixed frequency).

      You'll need a fairly sensitive radio to detect it from more than several centimeters, but it's certainly possible.

    7. Re:GPS bug detector? by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ... which is how radar detector detectors worked. :)

          I haven't used a radar detector in a long time, because in my area they were using switched radar units. I had a better chance of visually spotting a speed trap than detecting it first. One thing I had observed though was, some of my radar detectors would have false alarms because of other radar detectors. Some of my friends and I had tested it, where we'd turn our units on and off to see who's would set off false alarms based on who's units. We concluded that yes, some units would make other units beep that there was a radar source present.

          The same applied to some home alarms, and automatic doors. I had more false alarms than real detection, which was another good reason to stop using them.

          Building a GPS receiver detector would be a bit trickier, because the designs are so varied. I would think the best way to detect one would be a wide radio spectrum analyzer, and a very careful examination of the object you think may have a tracker on it. I believe you'd be looking for the same or similar frequency as the GPS signal is, and you'd always have some signal from the satellites. A very directional antenna may help.

          It was my understanding that every cell phone sold in the last few years had GPS capability for e911 service, although they may disable the GPS service for any user interfaces.

          I found this page which says Verizon Wireless has GPS service in all wireless voice devices, to assist 911 operators in finding a victim. I know this isn't exactly true though. My stepson had a medical emergency about a year ago in the car (see my journal). I called 911 from my Verizon Wireless phone. I knew what road I was on, but since I was in the middle of my trip, I wasn't absolutely sure what the last exit I passed was. I gave the road, direction of travel, side of the road I stopped on, and a close reference to the nearby exits. I gave it to them within a couple miles. I was on the side of an interstate, with clear view of the sky in all directions, and there hadn't been any clouds in the sky all day. You can't ask for better reception for GPS.

          We waited 15 minutes, with no callback and no emergency vehicles showing up. I gave up, decided he was stable enough to transport, strapped him back in the car, and drove as fast as I could for help. There was one of the radar speed signs on the side of the road, which flashed 99 as I passed it. I was going for help, and would have been satisfied to get pulled over.

          I found a deputy with a DUI pulled over, and he helped us. He called for an ambulance, and apparently emergency ops didn't know where we were. No one had been dispatched.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    8. Re:GPS bug detector? by kaiser423 · · Score: 1

      There's probably an oscillator in the GPS unit that's going to have some leakage, and that should be standard across nearly all devices. Really narrowband, so easy to detect.

    9. Re:GPS bug detector? by Crackez · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry that you had to deal with that...

      Blame Verizon, because the technology to do this very well (without GPS infact) is out there: http://trueposition.com/

      Shame on them... But Verizon's A-GPS is a neat technology too, it's just too bad that you need a handset that supports it. Luckily GSM users are covered by something better than GPS for E-911 positioning (see above link)...

    10. Re:GPS bug detector? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're paranoid.

      Also: http://www.zoombak.com/products/pet/?ls=true

      I don't think you could detect GPS reception, but if the device emits RF, which it must, then there must be a way to detect it...

    11. Re:GPS bug detector? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Building a GPS receiver detector would be a bit trickier, because the designs are so varied. I would think the best way to detect one would be a wide radio spectrum analyzer, and a very careful examination of the object you think may have a tracker on it. I believe you'd be looking for the same or similar frequency as the GPS signal is, and you'd always have some signal from the satellites. A very directional antenna may help.

          It was my understanding that every cell phone sold in the last few years had GPS capability for e911 service, although they may disable the GPS service for any user interfaces. As for GPS in every mobile, nope. All that is required is a some sort of locating method, so cell tower triangulation is enough. Naturally the precision depends on the density of cell towers, but in most cases this is enough if the caller can give some reference. Nice way of demonstrating this the much hyped iPhone, which only has this sort of locating available and displays it visually on the map.

      As for detecting a GPS receiver, I'd say tricky at least. The interference you'd get from the receiver would be very low. Even GPS signal itself is very low, actually below the level of background noise. That's why GPSs need the processing power to be able to dig the signal out of the noise. But in theory, I guess it could be possible...
    12. Re:GPS bug detector? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Ok, say I'm paranoid. Is there anything on the market that can detect these devices?

      I'm not paranoid - I'm greedy. I want to be able to detect these devices so that, should I choose to change my phone, I can go to the mobile phone store, scan the (desirable) phones in their boxes until I find one which contains a very small, long-battery-life GPS/ GSM combination device, then buy that particular phone and walk off with two nice packages of electronic goodness under my arm.

      Once they lose several thousand of these, they'll re-think their economics.

      My suspicion would be that they're actually putting these devices into PALLETS of mobiles asthey're shipped from manufacturer to distributors. If a pallet gets stolen en route, then whenever the pallet "sees the sky" (GSM still doesn't work terribly well through the steel roofs of lorries), it stores a location and later sends a message home. (Being in GSM coverage at the same time as seeing the sky is not guaranteed.) By the time the thieves get the pallet dismantled and distributed to the extent of finding that one of the boxes contains a GPS instead of a phone, a stream of locations has gone to the security people.
      (Obviously, if the delivery gets to the distribution centre unmolested, then the people at the distribution centre find the GPS device - probably from it's serial number on the outside of the box, maybe from an RFID, maybe simply from it's weight, who cares? - and return it to the manufacturer for re-use. The match to a mobile in it's box doesn't have to be exact if it's buried in the middle of a pallet of similar devices.)

      One of the first mobile phones I ever saw was one of those Motorola "brick" phones on the dash of a lorry while I was hitch-hiking. The driver was showing it off to me, so I asked the obvious "why?" - it seems that he was carrying a load of about 2 million pounds worth (4,000,000 USD, approx) of toys and his haulage company had had a lorry hijacked a few months previously. The insurance company had insisted on the phones being fitted.
      The problem hasn't disappeared.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    13. Re:GPS bug detector? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think this is trakcing you the government mandated TPMS sends RF signals from your tires that can be tracked!!!111 EVERYBODY PANIC

    14. Re:GPS bug detector? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably from it's serial number
      simply from it's weight
      a mobile in it's box

      "its".

      The problem hasn't disappeared

      "reappeared".

  2. $200 + $10/mo!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Isn't this the goal of RFID, to be able to track all your things.. but much much much cheaper than the zoombak's nutty price.

    1. Re:$200 + $10/mo!?!? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      An RFID tag can't be used to track something very far from the RFID tag reader, let alone globally.

    2. Re:$200 + $10/mo!?!? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Only if there are RFID detectors within close proximity to the 'package'. RFID would work great in a factory tracking a pallet of parts that goes along a routine path.

      If someone steals that pallet then you're SOL. Even if it does pass near another RFID detector that person won't know immediately that it is yours and full of Widget A.

    3. Re:$200 + $10/mo!?!? by jandrese · · Score: 2, Informative

      You've been reading too many nutty conspiracy types about those RFID chips. They're basically just a slightly better barcode, not a movie style locater where someone with a box can pinpoint where you are from halfway across the city.

      The box listed above is pretty much the minimum you need for a global tracking system for your stuff. A GPS receiver, battery, and one way pager (the one-way in this case is out! Probably is actually a stripped down cell phone sending SMS messages). It also won't work if the thief brings your stuff inside, and is iffy in cities or around lots of trees. Still, even a few hits could go a long way towards figuring out where your stuff is.

      $10 a month seems a bit high for something that's almost never going to send data. I'd prefer something like $0.10 per message (which is pretty outrageous for the amount of data sent) with no fixed cost. Although if you can use the same account for a whole bunch of the receivers (probably not) it might not be so bad.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:$200 + $10/mo!?!? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      One of the ideas might be that you have a RFID detector of sufficient power at the exits, so when your pallet of Widget A hits the gate when it's supposed to be heading for storage area C you know something is up.

      At $200+$10/month fee, it's definitely cellular in nature and only worth it for *expensive* items, or at least when you know you have a theft problem and catching a relatively few number of thieves would stop a lot of theft.

      Like the appliances at job sites problem - Figure $400-800+ each per appliance, with a 'couple times a month' theft problem. 1 recovery would cover the $200 purchase cost plus several months of subscription service. Then there's the sheer satisfaction in catching the criminal who's been robbing you of your livelyhood.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    5. Re:$200 + $10/mo!?!? by torkus · · Score: 1

      In a perfect world...but they DO want to make their money somehow, eh?

      Besides, each SIM card (each unit has one) represents a phone line which means an open, active cell line. 10 bucks a month honestly seems pretty fair given the current cellular market in the USA.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  3. Keys? by ThatFunkyMunki · · Score: 1

    I wish I could have something like this for my car keys... I lose those damn things all the time!

    --
    If patriotism is racist, is racism patriotic?
    1. Re:Keys? by Xandar01 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Need one for my mind, I feel like I am loosing that all the time.

      --
      Life moves pretty fast; if you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it. -FB
  4. Inexpensive? by g_adams27 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Inexpensive GPS devices like the Zoombak (which costs just $200 plus $10 a month)

    $200 + $120/year? Not "inexpensive" enough for me to stick onto my dog!

    1. Re:Inexpensive? by TRS80NT · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, and that's dog dollars. So that's like what, over $800 a year?


      --
      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
    2. Re:Inexpensive? by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everybody is not you. And jeez, $120 year is not that much when you consider the other costs of keeping a pet: vet bills, cleaning, paying for boarding or sitting when you're on vacation... And that's if you have some mongrel that you just keep for company.

      I had this cat I was very fond of. Disappeared one day, and I never found out what happened to him. That was years ago, and I still miss the dude. That experience makes the Zoombak sound pretty cheap.

    3. Re:Inexpensive? by edmicman · · Score: 1

      Just another thought relating to using it for pets....

      I'm all for gadgets and whatnot, but getting a text message saying your dog is more than 20ft away from the house isn't going to do much if he runs into the road and gets hit. There's just not enough time to react. Owners *really* need to monitor their pets, and ideally have them on a leash or enclosed in some area when their outside to keep them safe.

    4. Re:Inexpensive? by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 3, Funny

      I feel really terrible about your lost cat, and have a card that may help you.

      http://www.someecards.com/upload/flirting/owning_a_cat_lowers.html

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    5. Re:Inexpensive? by jasontromm · · Score: 0

      But it might be worth it to keep track of my 4-year old son who has a tendency to wander off when he's playing outside.

      --
      "Politicians always tell the truth, when they're calling each other liars."
    6. Re:Inexpensive? by legojenn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Owners *really* need to monitor their pets, and ideally have them on a leash or enclosed in some area when their outside to keep them safe. Spoken like a person with no experience with a beagle or other scent hound. I recently lost a beagle because a window in my house was open an inch. He managed to open the window and vanish. Some dogs are clever and quick. A GPS device might not stop a dog from running into the street, but it might make it easy to track him down instead of walking, biking or driving up and down every bloody street in the neighbourhood screaming the dogs name those rare ocasions he does a runner.
      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    7. Re:Inexpensive? by Fuji+Kitakyusho · · Score: 0

      What does a new dog cost?

    8. Re:Inexpensive? by value_added · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not "inexpensive" enough for me to stick onto my dog!

      Seems like a fair comment, but if the dog gets lost, you'll need to figure in the cost of a reward and/or the time and resources required for putting up all those flyers. Then there's those emergency vet bills (if the dog gets into an accident), lawyer and court costs (if the dog bites the good samaritan trying to catch it for you), the loss of mail delivery to your home and cancellation of homeowner's insurance and a lawsuit (if the dog bites the mailman), or, if all goes well and the city finds your dog for you, the animal shelter fees. And this is all assuming it's not your wife's dog, or that you have kids whose questions you need to answer.

      Beagles, incidentally, are notorious (bred, actually) for running off to hunt something down they find interesting, and then expecting you to catch up.

      GPS sounds like an ideal solution for pet owners.

    9. Re:Inexpensive? by Blimey85 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dog has left the premisses.

      Dog is traveling north bound on Cedar Street.

      Dog crossing st##$#$@@$$%

      Dog no longer moving.

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    10. Re:Inexpensive? by Blimey85 · · Score: 0

      If you need one of these to keep tabs on your 4 year old son, you should really call CPS and explain your situation. I hear they have programs for parents like you.

      Jesus people. Is it really so hard to WATCH your kids? Relying on something like this to keep your kid from wandering into a street and getting hit and injured or possibly killed isn't going to work. You need to actually supervise your child. This also won't work when your kid falls in the pool and it shorts out.

      Honey, where's Billy? Oh I'm sure he's around here somewhere... haven't gotten a page saying he's left.

      What the bloody fuck?!?!?!

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    11. Re:Inexpensive? by starm_ · · Score: 1

      DriveOk makes similar units that are a bit less expensive and more mature in their functionality: http://www.driveoktracking.com/products.php

    12. Re:Inexpensive? by jasontromm · · Score: 0

      I guess it's hard to read humor from just straight text. It's just a joke for crying out loud.

      --
      "Politicians always tell the truth, when they're calling each other liars."
    13. Re:Inexpensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dog dollars ... yet another currency poised to surpass the greenback

    14. Re:Inexpensive? by DKP · · Score: 1

      its less expensive then paying the fine when my dog gets out usually at least once a month

    15. Re:Inexpensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No kidding, I wouldn't pay more than $2.99/lb for a dog.

      Unless it was marbled exquisitely.

    16. Re:Inexpensive? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Okay I have a dog and a fenced yard. Guess what. That dog has dug under my fence more than once. I would love to have one of these. It would be I would rather have it tell me when she is under ground level so I could catch her digging.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    17. Re:Inexpensive? by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I still miss my dog and he died seven years ago at the ripe old age of 15. He and I literally grew up together.

      It's easy to get attached.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    18. Re:Inexpensive? by edmicman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just a follow up reply. Yes, I have a dog, and I still don't buy the excuses. Ehhhh, maybe it's because the wife is a vet and we're more cautious/overprotective of the dog or something.....but even with a fenced in yard we're pretty much monitoring her while she's out there. Dog digs under the fence? Bury the fence. I'd bet 90% of the troubles dogs can get into can be prevented by owners paying attention to whats going on. Just my $.02 :-P

    19. Re:Inexpensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm not sure that using GPS to locate the ruined corpse of your beloved pet would really be that satisfying.

    20. Re:Inexpensive? by bladesjester · · Score: 5, Funny

      Beagles, incidentally, are notorious (bred, actually) for running off to hunt something down they find interesting, and then expecting you to catch up.

      It's even better when you have a dog like the one I grew up with. He was half beagle and half border collie. He'd run off, track and chase down whatever it was he was after and then herd the damn thing(s) until you got there.

      It didn't even seem to matter what it was - cows, chickens, my little cousin...

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    21. Re:Inexpensive? by kvezach · · Score: 1

      No, you've got it wrong. Dollars are now dog Euros.

    22. Re:Inexpensive? by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      about $2.49 a pound

    23. Re:Inexpensive? by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd bet 90% of the troubles dogs can get into can be prevented by owners paying attention to whats going on.
      90% of the troubles that dogs get into can be avoided by the owner having chosen something other than a beagle.
      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    24. Re:Inexpensive? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      my little cousin...

      Not necessarily a bad thing...

      My mom told me that when I was little I'd encourage the dog to dig under the fence. Then I'd use the hole to get out of the fence, at which point the dog would start barking at me. She was perfectly willing to dig for me, but knew we weren't supposed to be out of the yard... ;)

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    25. Re:Inexpensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shock collars are cheaper (no monthly fee) and work better.

    26. Re:Inexpensive? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Feh, apparently you don't love your dog enough! Now, excuse me while I finish washing my dog's sweaters and cooking him a steak for dinner.

    27. Re:Inexpensive? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      May you be cursed by having a kid like I was. Absolutely fearless and sneaky as heck. Somebody asked her a question, she turned her head to look at him and I was gone before she looked back. They found me going through the cafeteria line...

      Making a unit such as this water resistant isn't difficult either. There are seperate pool alarms you can get as well, for families that have pools.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    28. Re:Inexpensive? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "
      Beagles, incidentally, are notorious (bred, actually) for running off to hunt something down they find interesting, and then expecting you to catch up."

      yes, and as such the owner should take proper precautions.
      The GPS doesn't stop any of those things from happening. Or am I supposed to believe the person that can't secure the pet will be consistently and reliable waiting for an email about said pet?

      "GPS sounds like an ideal solution for unprepared pet owners."

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    29. Re:Inexpensive? by Jerry+Beasters · · Score: 1

      These jokes would be funny if the dollar was actually doing horrible. I wasn't aware the dollar being lower than it has in a while means its value is actually shitty somehow.

    30. Re:Inexpensive? by torkus · · Score: 1

      Erm, you've any idea how much purebred dogs cost? Heck, even a small mutt probably EATS more than 10 bucks a month in food.

      Taking it a step further, if you LOST a pet...$10 per month doesn't seem like much to *greatly* increase the chance of getting it back.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    31. Re:Inexpensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like you are the one with little beagle experience...

    32. Re:Inexpensive? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      That's nice. What do you do during the day when you're both at work?

      I'm lucky. One day the gardener left the gate open. When I came home, I found the dog on the front lawn, waiting for me to let him into the house. He could have gone wandering around and gotten lost or hit.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    33. Re:Inexpensive? by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Indeed. It was actually quite nice because we knew the kid was perfectly safe as long as my dog was there. Very friendly dog (and extremely intelligent), but you better feel sorry for anyone other than me or my family who tried to mess with what he was herding (or anyone raising their voice at me for that matter).

      However, it was absolutely hilarious to watch him herd chickens and the cows just kind of looked at him like "WTF??" as he moved them to where he wanted them.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    34. Re:Inexpensive? by torkus · · Score: 1

      Does anyone understand that accidents happen? Seriously...there are irresponsible people who 'watch' children by turning on the TV and go smoke crack...and then there are careful pet owners that have something unexpected happen.

      Heck, your house should be properly secured against fire right? So I guess you don't need smoke alarms then.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    35. Re:Inexpensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nu?

    36. Re:Inexpensive? by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      Beagles, incidentally, are notorious (bred, actually) for running off to hunt something down they find interesting, and then expecting you to catch up. Screw the text message to the phone....
      Instead have the thing attached to a shock collar which sounds a tone, then starts zapping the farther from the house it is. You won't even need fences after a while. ... and hope that the government doesn't reactivate selective availability!

      Dog: "No, I don't want to go for a walk!"
    37. Re:Inexpensive? by Jaqenn · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that using GPS to locate the ruined corpse of your beloved pet would really be that satisfying. Actually, if I could reclaim/reuse the chip without too much gore, the emotional closure of a decent burial could be worth it.

      Plus the fact that I have a chance to reach my pet before they die.
      --
      You are awash in a sea of fiercely stated opinions. Obvious exits are: 'File->Quit', 'Reply', and 'Page Down'.
    38. Re:Inexpensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These jokes would be funny if the dollar was actually doing horrible. I wasn't aware the dollar being lower than it has in a while means its value is actually shitty somehow.

      The US dollar is now 98% of the Canadian dollar. That doesn't speak to you?

    39. Re:Inexpensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you shouldn't have a dog.

    40. Re:Inexpensive? by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      if you really want to make sure your pet never runs away try this service.

      --
      We are all just people.
    41. Re:Inexpensive? by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      Jesus people. Is it really so hard to WATCH your kids?


      Righeous indignation aside, yes. That is to say, it's impossible to do anything perfectly 100% of the time, always. No matter how hard you watch the kids, there will always be that one time when you're momentarily distracted and you look back and your kid isn't in sight anymore. At that point, you have to run around looking for them, hoping that you'll find them in the next few minutes because the more time that passes, the farther away they could be.


      GPS is probably overkill for home, but I can certainly see the use of it in a crowded theme park, etc.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    42. Re:Inexpensive? by fm6 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Fuck off.

    43. Re:Inexpensive? by aclarke · · Score: 1

      Remember that not everyone's situation is like yours. Until last weekend I was on a 100 acre farm probably 200 metres from the road. The problem with our young German Shepherd wasn't that he ran onto the road, but that he would run to the neighbour's farm to play with their dog. He'd stick around outside the house for an hour or so until you got your guard down and stopped checking every two minutes, and then he'd just take off.

      We'd have done a better job training that out of him but since we knew we were moving and it was mostly an issue of just living where we were we just dealt with it. I don't think I'd buy this gadget either but something like it might be useful.

    44. Re:Inexpensive? by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      As a beagle owner, this is completely true.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    45. Re:Inexpensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucktard!

    46. Re:Inexpensive? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      The dam things worth $200 of course you want to find it.

      ~Dan

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    47. Re:Inexpensive? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      cows just kind of looked at him like "WTF??" as he moved them to where he wanted them.

      But they moved, didn't they?

      Herding dogs is an interesting behavior and I wonder where the baseline for the behavior came before selective breeding enhanced it.

      BTW, live brains are better for knowledge transfer. ;)

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    48. Re:Inexpensive? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      And what's the battery life?

      Do they expect us to stick our pets on charge overnight?

      ~Dan

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  5. For civilians by Voltan42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They have had tracking devices around for a while now. Are these just the first designed for non-police or non-military?

    --
    That's enough out of me.
    1. Re:For civilians by psychicninja · · Score: 1

      They have had tracking devices around for a while now. Are these just the first designed for non-police or non-military?
      Sounds like someone is pissed that fido doesn't have to wear that bulky ankle bracelet...
  6. Insurance by e03179 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $10 a month? I wonder if I put one in my car if I will get a $10 a month break in my car insurance bill.

    --
    -516
    1. Re:Insurance by the_wesman · · Score: 1

      good question - my friend bought a jetta (this was years ago) and the salesdork offered his something - I can't remember what is was called - loadjack or freejack or carjack - but it was, essentially, a GPS unit for the car that could be used in the event it was stolen - I can't remember if the guy hinted that this would provide an insurance break, but it wouldn't seem that far fetched to me

      -w

      --
      calling all destroyers
    2. Re:Insurance by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Lo-Jack.

      Yes, that's what it does. If your car is stolen, it can use satellites to relay the position to the Lo-Jack folks.

      It's easy to put the system on a car since you can get the 12V 1A power easily and the smoke-detector-sized transmitter isn't adding much weight to the car.

      The devices in TFA are probably pager or cellular tech. You can get smaller satellite transmitters but they would be quite expensive. I built one board that's about the size of a Bic lighter and is suitable for implanting into a duck but that's the limit. IIRC, the four prototypes cost the customer $150k. Note that when you send data to a satellite, the satellite also knows the approximate GPS location of the transmitter.

      Satellite transmission is always expensive. An eight-byte message costs about $5. (You would use this in an emergency.) Normal traffic is about $1 for the same message.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    3. Re:Insurance by Blimey85 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's called LoJack and I have it installed in both of my cars. You get a break on your insurance and in the even the vehicle is stolen and not recovered within 30 days you get a refund of the purchase price. However, they have a very good track record of recoveries, usually within a couple hours. I talked with two police officers before buying it and they both said it was great to have. Only works if the police closest to your car have the equipment but it's become standard with most cop shops so that shouldn't be a problem.

      They also have an early warning system which I have on one of my cars and it's more annoying than anything. Basically if your car moves without the little box you keep on your key chain being present within the vehicle, you get a phone call / email / or text message (your choice) alerting you. The only problem is you have to change the battery every couple of months or you get false positives.

      After having my neighbors truck stolen from right next to my open bedroom window one night, I decided I wanted something more than just a normal alarm (he had an alarm, his truck was locked, we never heard a thing and he never got his truck back) so I went with LoJack.

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    4. Re:Insurance by redxxx · · Score: 1

      the name you are looking for is LoJack. Most of the satellite systems, such as OnStar, do this as well.

    5. Re:Insurance by catch23 · · Score: 1

      It would be great for motorcycles! Back in Atlanta, motorcycle theft is pretty rampant. LoJack for motorcycles is pretty expensive, so this is a great solution for inexpensive scooters & mopeds. Also great if you happen to own a moderately expensive carbon fiber bicycle too.

    6. Re:Insurance by cleatsupkeep · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Additionally, one of the studies mentioned in Freakonomics was that having LoJack in just some of the cars in a city made cars less likely to get stolen, as you don't know if you are stealing the one with LoJack or not - and car theft rates for the whole city went down. Something like a network effect.

    7. Re:Insurance by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Even better, just get a LoJack sticker.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Insurance by modecx · · Score: 1

      It's called LoJack(R), and it doesn't work by using satellites in the least. It's a little device that gets installed into a car, in one of several places, and even the owner isn't told where it's at. It's silent (radio wise) until the police activate it when you report your car stolen. At that point, it starts emitting a radio signal to allow the car to be tracked. Any cop car within a 2-3 mile range, which has a LoJack tracker will be automatically updated so that the car may be tracked.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    9. Re:Insurance by Jeff_Jones2008 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are other options to LoJack that are much less expensive. I bought a GPS tracking unit from DriveOK to track our 3 cars. They are under $200 and the monthly service is low.

      The problem I found with LoJack is coverage area and it was really expensive to install. I was able to install the DriveOK units myself and I can go online to see where my cars are. If they are stolen I can call the police and give them the exact address my car is at and they can go recover it.

      A good friend of mine is a cop, checked out the system and thinks it will perform better than LoJack in the long run.

    10. Re:Insurance by Mr3vil · · Score: 1

      Lo Jack only works if you're in a city that's covered by their service. AFAIK it does not use GPS location at all but rather a Proprietary RF network setup by LoJack that activates a homing beacon in your car. When you report the car stolen the Lo Jack device in the car activates and any LEO with the tracking unit in his patrol vehicle will get an alert and a bearing when the stolen car is nearby. However, a smart car thief could just load the stolen vehicle in an RF shielded trailer and then move outside the coverage area (which is more limited than iDen cell phones). One advantage Lo Jack has over GPS trackers is that it works even inside most structures. Unfortunately as I mentioned earlier it'll only work inside LoJack's coverage zone. Once the car leaves that zone there's no way to track it. It's also dependent upon all LEOs in the area having the tracking unit in their cruisers. GPS doesn't have a coverage area, but does require a relatively unemcumbered view of the sky in order to give you a location. Bring the car indoors and the GPS is no longer able to get a fix on its posistion. So you might get a good idea of which building your car is in, but no guarantee. Neither by itself is a perfect solution, but if LoJack would expand their coverage (maybe licence some of that TV spectrum *nudge nudge*) and incorporate a GPS tracker it would make a much better retrieval system and give you the best of both.

  7. This has absolutely... by suparjerk · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... no potential for abuse whatsoever!

    --
    I caught the Mountain Wumpus! He gave me his treasure chest ($100) to let him go free again.
    1. Re:This has absolutely... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      I had a similar thought, but for different reasons.

      Remember those "silent" car alarms that were on the market years ago? You carries a pager with you, and if someone messed with your vehicle, the pager would go off, allowing you to call the police in safety.

      Riiight.

      Reality was that most people bought them so that they could go Chuck Norris on whoever was jackin' their ride. Unfortunately, the general fate of those who did respond in person to an attempted car theft was pretty poor - getting dead or injured to save your second hand IROC-Z wasn't a good trade-off after all.

      The New Millennium version of this has "bad idea" written all over it.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  8. Microsoft does the same thing by katterjohn · · Score: 2, Funny

    to their employees. If any of them get to close to things like OSCON, Ballmer comes after them with a chair.

  9. What's Wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    How come there is no first post? I'm confused.

    1. Re:What's Wrong? by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone should have attached a GPS tracker to it

  10. Millions of dollars in inventory turned up missing by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mahalik: She told me that she heard a zombie going through her trash the other day. The next morning, she turned up missing.

    C. J.: What? Okay, back up. How in the hell do you "turn up missing"?

    Mahalik: 'Cause nobody knows where you are when they realize you ain't there!

    C. J.: So you telling me that you can appear and disappear at the same time.

    Mahalik: No, man. You can't appear and disappear at the same time. The bitch ain't David Copperfield!

    C. J.: Mmm. No, no. But you can't be gone from one place and show up somewhere else entirely. So when you turn up, you're never missing. And when you're missing, you never turn up.

    Mahalik: Unless... you a zombie.

    C. J.: Damn! Hey, that's some plausible shit right there. You should blog about that.

    Mahalik: I'm gonna put that on MySpace.

    C. J.: You do that!

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  11. Old people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is a great opportunity for nursing homes to track old people when they wonder off

    1. Re:Old people by compro01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      actually, the nursing home my grandma lives in uses this sort of thing for their advanced alzheimer's patients. they implemented it after one of them wandered out last winter and died from exposure.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:Old people by Technician · · Score: 1

      actually, the nursing home my grandma lives in uses this sort of thing for their advanced alzheimer's patients. they implemented it after one of them wandered out last winter and died from exposure.

      Many nursing homes do that. Instead of the cost of a cell subscription and tracking, and recharging batteries, they typically simply use it for perimeter control. It works like store anti-shoplifting tags. They put them in the shoes, so if the shoes try to cross a mat at the door, the alarm at the door goes off notifying the staff.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Old people by CowboyNealOption · · Score: 1

      So as long as the alzheimers patients put their shoes on, they can't wander away? Or maybe the staff just ties the knots really tight so they can't get them off.

    4. Re:Old people by Technician · · Score: 2, Informative

      So as long as the alzheimers patients put their shoes on, they can't wander away? Or maybe the staff just ties the knots really tight so they can't get them off.

      Many elderly patients have tender feet and don't make it past the parking lot. Most all always wear shoes. As part of my old tech job service calls was part of the job. I have seen it in action. The patients rarely venture off the carpet or tile without shoes. The hardier patients simply get the tags in other clothing items, walking aids, wheelchairs, or other essentials, but most monitoring can be done with the shoes and this reduces the tag inventory needed. It's very rare for patients to wander off without clothing or walking aids.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    5. Re:Old people by stuff+and+such · · Score: 1

      One of these systems I know of is called "WonderGuard". I'm too lazy too look anything up about it, but I liked the name.

      --
      my UID occurs in pi starting at the 384,199 digit after the decimal point.
    6. Re:Old people by HypotenuseMan · · Score: 1

      Eh, that's nothing special; it just only lets you be hit by super effective moves.

      --
      Doing the things a hypotenuse can.
  12. I used to do this stuff by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work for what's left of a company that actually managed to go bust developing this stuff.

    We faced several challenges with the technology. Power consumption gave us ulcers, as did mobile network coverage. This is a non-issue in the city, but just wait until you're out of town.

    GPS wanders around enough from fix to fix, even with WAAS, that it can be tricky to compare fixes to detect movement, or to track movement of less than 50 meters. Oh, and the GPS needs to be able to hear satellite signals. Good luck on that.

    Finally, once you have a fix back at your server, you need to make it meaningful to the user. They do not generally want a bare latitude and longitude. They want to know what street their car is on. When the parents want to know if the kids take the car too far from home, they want to enter a street address, not a latitude and longitude. This is harder to get right than it looks.

    Favourite application: tracking sub-prime used cars so repo men can find them.

    ...laura

    1. Re:I used to do this stuff by denis-The-menace · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks to Google maps half the work is done.
      It does take bare latitude and longitude coordinates and displays you a map.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    2. Re:I used to do this stuff by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

      Very cool. I do this right now. We track races with the stuff. Presenting nice data for the user is definitely the hardest part of the equation. Oddly enough all of our custom hardware is likely to be replaced by your average cell phone in a few years.

      If you ever feel like chatting about things im me and say hi!

      From another GPS data slave... ;)

    3. Re:I used to do this stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be extremely easy to convert long/lat to streets using the Google Maps API? I thought this was possible using geocoding, maybe it only works the other way around. (Street to longitude/latitude).

    4. Re:I used to do this stuff by Technician · · Score: 2, Insightful

      GPS wanders around enough from fix to fix, even with WAAS, that it can be tricky to compare fixes to detect movement, or to track movement of less than 50 meters. Oh, and the GPS needs to be able to hear satellite signals. Good luck on that.

      Check out the demo of how it works. They only give a location to the nearest intersection. This isn't very useful if your kid was abducted and whisked away into a large apartment complex. You know he is around somewhere, but out of sight. These would be much more useful for recovery of stolen property if in addition to the intersection, it gave the last 100 actual GPS coordinates. From there, you may be able to trace the direction to one block of apartments prior to loss of signal from going indoors. The last 100 fixes before signal loss would be very useful in tracking a stolen pet, child, or BMW.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    5. Re:I used to do this stuff by Technician · · Score: 1

      Finally, once you have a fix back at your server, you need to make it meaningful to the user. They do not generally want a bare latitude and longitude. They want to know what street their car is on.

      Actually a good map with the real coordinates is much more useful than just an intersection. Interfacing with Google maps for example can pinpoint the stolen car in that 2 car garage, instead of just letting you know it's at 119th and Maple. Frustrated users who can't tell which backyard their pet is in will demand better resolution data. I hope raw data is an option. With a hand held GPS, I can punch in coordinates and locate a pet in the park or someone's backyard.

      Favourite application: tracking sub-prime used cars so repo men can find them.

      A fix to the nearest intersection is good enough for this. It's either an employer's parking lot, owner's home garage, or on nearby on street parking. A stolen jet ski or pet hidden in a garage is not as easy to find without a better GPS fix.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    6. Re:I used to do this stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Favourite application: tracking sub-prime used cars so repo men can find them."

      Surely if you've hidden the damn thing, you'll have done it somewhere where they'll have to break in to remove the vehicle; which, short a court order (in which case it'll be bailiffs, not repo men), they can't do, (ref: MBank El Paso v. Sanchez).

    7. Re:I used to do this stuff by Jaqenn · · Score: 1

      Dude, you just made the former owner of that busted startup cry. You should feel ashamed.

      While the rest of us laugh.

      --
      You are awash in a sea of fiercely stated opinions. Obvious exits are: 'File->Quit', 'Reply', and 'Page Down'.
    8. Re:I used to do this stuff by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      Dude, you just made the former owner of that busted startup cry. You should feel ashamed. While the rest of us laugh.

      Actually, mapping wasn't the problem. We had good solutions. When we started Google Maps didn't have terms for commercial use, so we used another package. It worked fine.

      ...laura

    9. Re:I used to do this stuff by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      This isn't very useful if your kid was abducted and whisked away into a large apartment complex.


      Knowing which building to look in is still way better than "he could be anywhere in the state by now"....

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    10. Re:I used to do this stuff by slashtivus · · Score: 1

      What kind of GPS units were these? We ship out $50.00 units and I can calculate direction of movement by simply walking down the hall with an enabled laptop (I compare present & last position and calculate based on that). Ours can project your location down on a shape file to usually within a few feet.

    11. Re:I used to do this stuff by Technician · · Score: 1

      Knowing which building to look in is still way better than "he could be anywhere in the state by now"....

      How do you know which building to look in. The fix is a location of an intersection such as 12th Street and Elm Avenue. On one corner is a large block of apartment complexes facing another set on the other corner. On the other side of the street, there is a row of townhouses.. On the 4th corner is a 7-11 and strip mall. The signal could have been lost when the kid was picked up an but in a van at the 7-11. Pray tell, which set of doors would you start with? It is better than anywhere in the entire state, but it isn't good enough to start pounding on doors.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    12. Re:I used to do this stuff by Hari+Kant · · Score: 1

      Hi, I also do this stuff with modern hardware at www.georadius.in username: demo password: tracking harikant@nms.co.in Would love to interact. Hari Kant

    13. Re:I used to do this stuff by Aldric · · Score: 1
      Should have got an off-the-shelf mapping solution for your reverse geocoding. Send lat/lon to webservice, get back address.

      As for the GSM/GPRS coverage, heh. I'd like to see someone getting a hybrid Iridium/GlobalStar/Inmarsat unit into THAT form factor!

    14. Re:I used to do this stuff by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      Should have got an off-the-shelf mapping solution for your reverse geocoding. Send lat/lon to webservice, get back address.

      We did. It worked well. We weren't totally stupid.

      As for RF, we worked with 1X CDMA (worked well, but expensive to use), ReFLEX (two-way paging; cheap, worked well) and GPRS (lousy hardware, RF coverage issues).

      ...laura

  13. hiding them in some cellphone boxes? by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Insightful
    and a mobile phone company is hiding them in some cellphone boxes to catch thieves

    Am I missing something here? Don't mobile phones already have GPS (at least here in the USA)? And unique ID numbers burnt into them? Sure, another always-on GPS device could be handy for as long as the battery lasts (which begs the question of why can the battery last longer in the tiny GPS bug than it lasts in a consumer targeted GPS unit), but it would seem that most mobile phone thefts that could be caught with this GPS bug would be caught and tracked down as soon as the thief or buyer of the stolen property tried to use the phone anyway, and the phone could either be made useless (greatly reducing the incentive for theft) or let working (to help track down whoever has it, just as the GPS bug would do).

    This sounds like something that was invented by the Department of Redundancy Department.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:hiding them in some cellphone boxes? by daranz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm assuming they're shipping cellphones that haven't been sold yet, and don't have any numbers tied to them (and so, they cannot send data over the network). Even if they had GPS receivers, they would have to be configured for the network, and then reset at destination. Even if this only involved inserting a sim card, it'd still be a bother, especially if you had to recharge the phones before putting them up for sale

      Having a device that you can move between boxes as you ship them might be easier to do.

      --
      This is a sig. It is appended to the end of comments I post.
    2. Re:hiding them in some cellphone boxes? by hguorbray · · Score: 1

      2 things:

      1. the GPS trackers are probably "always on" whereas phones in the box are turned off -this allows tracking of things like a case or pallet of cellphones that go missing from a truck or warehouse.....and end up in a flea market somewhere.

      2. cellphone 'gps-like location service' is done by tower triangulation and won't work where there is no reception -this is why GPS on cell is still more useful -if you are lost in the backwoods cell triangulation will probably do you no good whereas GPS could save your life.

      I'm just sayin'

    3. Re:hiding them in some cellphone boxes? by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and a mobile phone company is hiding them in some cellphone boxes to catch thieves

      Am I missing something here? Don't mobile phones already have GPS (at least here in the USA)? And unique ID numbers burnt into them?

      Yes, mobile phones (some of them) have GPS. Yes, mobile phones have unique ID numbers. What you are missing is that "mobile phones" are not the same as "mobile phones in boxes" - as the former (generally) have their battery charged and installed and are powered up, while the latter are inert and those fancy functions don't work.
       
       

      it would seem that most mobile phone thefts that could be caught with this GPS bug would be caught and tracked down as soon as the thief or buyer of the stolen property tried to use the phone anyway

      Using the phones built in features allows you to catch a single end user - once the phone has trickled from thief to fence to dealer to end user. Using a GPS bug you can track the phone through the entire chain and catch the guys at the start of the chain rather than catching the guys at the end and working up. From a LEO and a Loss Prevention point of view, this is much more efficient and effective.
    4. Re:hiding them in some cellphone boxes? by Blimey85 · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is that if you are going to have access to a pallet of cellphones to steal, you're probably also going to have a truck to move them in. Then if you are smart, you've prepped said truck to block any and all signals from within the trailer which means this thing won't work.

      Similar to how expensive cars get stolen and can't be easily tracked with things like LoJack. It's very easy to convert a trailer into a mobile Faraday (sp?) cage. Would probably even easier just to use cheap radio that could transmit enough watts to block everything. That too would be mobile so you could take it from truck to truck.

      It always amuses me when a chop shop gets busted due to LoJack. I heard about that happening in Olympia, WA when I lived just north of Seattle. You'd think if they are smart enough to steal really nice cars, they'd be smart enough to setup something to block LoJack and the like.

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    5. Re:hiding them in some cellphone boxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You'd think if they are smart enough to steal really nice cars,"

      Whatever the rest of this sentence is, it's tautological.

  14. Dear Ms. Besa by Sensi · · Score: 2, Funny

    For $200 I will sell you a really nice leash. That will stop that pesky beagle from getting away.

    1. Re:Dear Ms. Besa by AdamTrace · · Score: 1

      I'm selling mine for $180!

    2. Re:Dear Ms. Besa by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      While I appreciate the funny in your post, I immediately thought "gee, I'd love one of these for MY dog" when I saw the article. My dog's a relaxed quiet animal until she gets a chance at an open door, like when a visitor comes over and one of us isn't there. Lily can clear a 6' fence without slowing down, and can run just under 30 miles an hour for an amazingly long time (until she's distracted by a cat or a garbage can.) If I see her escape I have a chance, if I can get on my road bike, because then I might be able to track her when she's running through people's yards, but finding out where she's gotten to when I'm not right there to see her go would be awfully nice.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    3. Re:Dear Ms. Besa by peragrin · · Score: 1

      exactly. My brothers Husky had the habit of opening the Sliding door and running out. Most of the time he just wanted to run but a couple of times we did have to chase him down.

      The worst was when he bolted one night during deer hunting season. He chewed through his choker collar that night. part of it was still on his chain. a GPS locater that night would have made us all a bit happier.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:Dear Ms. Besa by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I'll sell you both parts of my Labrador Retriever's leash for a dollar.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  15. W.T.F. ? by Kartoffel · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's funny how the Times' editors felt it necessary to punctuate each letter in "G.P.S.". What is this, the Man from U.N.C.L.E.? Maybe some year they'll realize that GPS is regular everyday stuff. You know, like A.T.M. machines and D.V.D. players.

    1. Re:W.T.F. ? by disciple8959 · · Score: 1

      This sounds more like a sales pitch... kind of cool, but a sales pitch nonetheless.

    2. Re:W.T.F. ? by tomtomtom777 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know, like A.T.M. machines and D.V.D. players.

      A.T.M. machines? What are they? Machines that make Automated Teller Machines or something? Not so regular where I come from...

    3. Re:W.T.F. ? by Kartoffel · · Score: 1

      They're those machines that ask for your P.I.N. number ;)

    4. Re:W.T.F. ? by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      De-acronym-ization? (is that a cromulent word?)

      Any grammar nerds/nazis know how a word stops being an acronym? I've always wondered how S.C.U.B.A became scuba and L.A.S.E.R. became laser.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    5. Re:W.T.F. ? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when will the time catch up with your lazy ass way of writing? L.o.L

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:W.T.F. ? by Spasemunki · · Score: 1

      I believe you just remove the full stops between each letter.

    7. Re:W.T.F. ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... they'll realize that GPS system is regular everyday stuff.

      Just to be consistent with your ATM machine ;)

    8. Re:W.T.F. ? by Kartoffel · · Score: 1

      I LOL laughed.

    9. Re:W.T.F. ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What sort of Automated Teller Machine does your machine make?

      What type of Digital Versatile Disc does your player play?

  16. Quick read at work by Lunch2000 · · Score: 1

    I read this as

      GPS Trackers Find Novell Applications

    My thinking was that it was some kind of subtle joke...

    1. Re:Quick read at work by LarsG · · Score: 1

      My first thought was: "NDS got geolocation support? Duh, that would be silly."

      My second was: "Ah, so obvious - they just added a GPS to Netware servers. Now we won't have to trace the ethernet cable to find that 10 year old server that suddenly went down."

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  17. APRS leading the way by Average · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been wondering how long this would take to get into a more public role. I've had ham radio based APRS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_Position_Reporting_System) installed in my cars for a while. When I show people a publicly available map of my travels, reaction ranges from salivating impressed (it's probably been ham radio's last "killer app"), to absolute horror ("you mean, you don't care if people know where you are?").

    But, I think a lot of people would willingly turn on such a feature (say, on a mobile phone with a GPS chip and a GPRS connection.

    1. Re:APRS leading the way by tomtomtom777 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We're developing a system which makes this very easy and free (except phone bill) on bliin.com (or m.bliin.com on your mobile), and we've noticed that people are rarely bothered by the privacy issue. The coolness of seeing yourself and your friends live on the map tends to outweigh paranoia.

    2. Re:APRS leading the way by backwardMechanic · · Score: 1

      But, I think a lot of people would willingly turn on such a feature (say, on a mobile phone with a GPS chip and a GPRS connection.

      Sadly, that's the problem. Once 'most people' already use self-tracking, it becomes suspicious not to. I don't have anything to hide (honest), but I want to make sure some people have the option of not being tracked. Some of them want to steal cars. Others want to make political protests. I think it's worth putting up with the former to allow the latter.

      It's still a neat gadget though...

    3. Re:APRS leading the way by Zoxed · · Score: 1

      > ... we've noticed that people are rarely bothered by the privacy issue. The coolness of seeing yourself and your friends live on the map tends to outweigh paranoia.

      All the same, I would suggest *not* bothering spending your advertising dollars on Slashdot :-)

  18. So it works under cars? by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Funny
    According to the article. I am a little surprised by this, because steel is quite good at blocking RF, and those satellites are up there, not down in the gutter. I am sufficiently nerdish sometimes to check the accuracy of my own GPS, and it can degrade very badly in cities. It's also a fact that the kind of places that get the best GPS reception are often the least good for cell phone reception, and vice versa. The benefits of using it for long distance tracking like stolen paintings are obvious - except that they probably travel in a windowless van - but tracking a beagle to a few metres seems a little unreliable.

    Anyway, I read the article to our beagle and asked her opinion. She points out that beagles do not run away, they are called away on urgent tracking business. She feels that any human that hangs out with beagles and wants to attach tracking boxes to them is a distrustful person who possibly lacks the right spiritual qualities. She also reminds me that she can detect a beagle treat coming out of the bag across three fields, and that in any case anyone who has trouble with beagles taking off is simply not taking them for sufficiently long walks. She thinks I should notify the ASPCA before relations completely break down between this unfortunate beagle and its lazy, distrustful owner.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  19. solution: by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    satellite mounted high power rfid readers

    i am of course joking but i just scared myself thinking about the spy agency/ military bureaucrats who would actually sign off on this concept

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:solution: by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Yes. That thought was pretty scary. Even for you.

  20. Keeping track of photos by AaronW · · Score: 1

    I got a GPS unit that connects to my camera. I use it to keep track of my photos by embedding the location inside the EXIF information in the photo. That way if I lose it, I know where to go to find it again. Oh, wait. Nevermind. Though it is useful for geocaching.

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  21. Tiny GPS For Cat Tracking? by MBCook · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of a tiny GPS logger that could be used for tracking cats?

    I have a co-worker who has a couple of outdoor cats, and one often goes on trips for a day or longer, not coming home. When he comes back she wonders where he has been (and the rest of us are a little curious as this seems to happen relatively often).

    I would be great to have a little GPS logger that would just keep track of where he had been so we could try to see what he's been up to. The device mentioned in the article is interested, but it's quite expensive (due to the active nature requiring the monthly subscription). The other devices I've seen are either custom built or not very small (more like standard GPS handheld size).

    Does anyone know of any small (small enough to put on a grown cat) and inexpensive (under $200) boxes that would fit the bill?

    Pet tracking would be quite a bit of fun, especially with pets that seem like they might have a large home range they run around. Heck, it's geocaching with a moving target!

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Tiny GPS For Cat Tracking? by ObjetDart · · Score: 1
      I don't think these exist (yet), because the GPS + cellular hardware necessary is still too big and heavy for a typical cat to carry around on its neck.

      There is a radio-based cat tracker called the CatLocator, but it won't keep a real time log of where your cat has been. It's only good when you need to find the cat...and then you have to walk around like a dork with big attenna and a box that goes "doot...doot...doot... doot doot doot doot"

      --
      I read Usenet for the articles.
    2. Re:Tiny GPS For Cat Tracking? by BBandCMKRNL · · Score: 1

      The downside to this idea is cats need to have breakaway collars so they don't hang themselves when they get their collars caught on underbrush, etc. So such a device would have to be not much more expensive than the collar itself, no more than $10, so you could afford to replace the unit on a regular basis.

      Given the lack of precision in GPS units, the resulting track might be rather boring. If the location can only be tracked to a radius of 25 feet, it might show the cat moved 25 feet, stopped moving for 10 minutes, moved 25 feet, stopped for 5 minutes, etc. It's also why altitude might sound interesting to see when the cat climbs a tree or other object, but in reality, it would rarely show any change in altitude.

      --
      Without the 2nd Amendment, the others are just suggestions.
    3. Re:Tiny GPS For Cat Tracking? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much exactly what I've been looking for my parent's dog. Being a beagle, sometimes she'd just drop whatever toy she was playing with and run off after a scent. The area might be perfectly safe for her, but she can still be gone for over an hour at a time.

      Real-time tracking would be even more fun, but these devices tend to be too bulky and/or expensive, like the Garmin Astro or the thing from the article. The GPS logger, as you suggested, is the next step down and I think it could still be very interesting. I too found a couple of such devices, but they too seem to be rather poorly matched for the task, either due to their size, infrequent logging intervals, no waterproofing, etc. If anyone knows of something useful, I'd gladly have a look at any suggestions.

      Contrary to one of the other posters, I've found the GPS accuracy to be pretty good in the area, as my Garmin unit usually reports ~3m accuracy. Sure, the dog/cat could crawl under a rock or something, but most of the time I'd imagine the accuracy would be good enough.

  22. Personal tracking/emergency notification devices by Liam · · Score: 1

    For providing people the ability to summon help or provide their whereabouts, there are things like SPOT which is less expensive than the system mentioned in the article, both for purchase and maintenance. For purely emergency use, the Personal Locator Beacons are more expensive to purchase but require no service fee. However, there's no way to send non-emergency or "I'm here" messages.

    --
    Liam Healy
  23. Trackers find Novell's applications by spk037 · · Score: 1

    Im just glad someone found Novell's applications. I haven't seen any in years............... *chirp *chirp........... thank you ladies and gentlemen, I'll be here all week

  24. Ham radio alternative by Rorschach1 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    People have been doing this stuff in the ham radio world for years - it's called APRS for Automated Packet Reporting System. I run a small business (www.argentdata.com) developing low-cost hardware for it.

    The advantage of using dumb old radios is that you can operate independent of any fixed infrastructure, so it's usable even where you don't have cell coverage.

    Tracking something small like a dog (I've had inquiries about kangaroos, too) introduces the problem of antenna placement, though. APRS is typically used on the 2-meter band, which means a quarter-wave vertical antenna is half a meter long. I did once put a passive data logger on my cat, and found that she roams a little more widely than I thought, but that doesn't really count.

    The advantage of relatively low frequencies and high transmit power is that you can cover a radius of 20 miles from one mountaintop digipeater (equivalent to a cell site), and they're not difficult to make solar powered.

    There's a nationwide digipeater network in the US, and most of Europe is covered as well, along with much of New Zealand, Australia, and many other countries. I think there are at least two APRS-capable satellites on orbit too, though PCSAT-1 is dying. Internet gateways are all over the place, so you can map APRS stations online, and not have to maintain any receive-side hardware of your own.

    I'm constantly surprised by the applications people come up with for this stuff. The most recent I heard was someone with a cable TV company who found that he could drive around and transmit at low power every couple of seconds and use a receiver back at the headend to plot ingress leaks in the cable system.

    Add to that the fact that you can do two-way text messaging, weather, and telemetry, and it's more than worth the hassle of taking a simple multiple-choice license exam. It's this sort of thing that's going to save ham radio (if anything can) - talking to people around the world just doesn't interest people as much these days, when it's so easy to do on the Internet or the phone.

  25. free advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice zoombak plug! (which costs JUST $200 plus $10 a month)

    If you would like to better hide your advertising in an 'article', don't use JUST when describing the price. It makes it sound like an infomercial.

    1. Re:free advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A nice plant perhaps from the Liberty Media conglomerate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Media, perhaps they want to sell advertising on your dog too.

  26. you're a heartless bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    my dogs (which are the ages of 13, 11, 2) are worth a lot more to me than the $400 a year it will cost me to keep track of them, god forbid they get out. i'll piss away $400 in a weekend. to some of us they're more then justs "pets" and "man's best friend".

    and no... i'm not with peta and i eat meat. i just love my mutts.

  27. Cat Cam by MonkeyBoyo · · Score: 1

    While it is not GPS, you can attach a Cat Cam to a cat to get a time lapse record of where the cat has been.

  28. Re:Millions of dollars in inventory turned up miss by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0362120/quotes

    Indeed. I pondered on that point for a moment or two.

  29. Zoombak Ad by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    These applications aren't that interesting for geeks, even if the basic tech is. This story is just an ad for Zoombak.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  30. sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds great for keeping tabs on my future wife...

  31. Uses T-Mobile, so it's essentially useless by Radi-0-head · · Score: 1

    It's unfortunate that this device is hobbled by the crappiest network in the US. They should have picked Verizon or AT&T.

  32. Considering it's a beagle.. by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    He's going to rack up a helluva SMS bill considering they love to roam.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  33. Not new by starm_ · · Score: 1

    The more mature and somewhat cheaper DriveOk http://www.driveoktracking.com/products.php devices have been available for a while now.

  34. Galileo by MrSteveSD · · Score: 1

    The signals from the Galileo Positioning System are supposed to be able to penetrate buildings and that would be a vast improvement over GPS. It's not ready yet of course.

  35. Another enabling technology - oh boy by Whuffo · · Score: 1
    They make this little device sound so cute and fluffy; how could you not like something that lets you find your lost dog?

    But what they've actually developed is a small, inexpensive GPS tracking device. Small enough and cheap enough so that almost anyone can track almost anything. As production ramps up they'll get even smaller and cheaper.

    I can imagine all the fun and thrills: track your kids, your spouse, your employees - what fun! This isn't some cheap RFID solution; this little beauty will find them across town or in another state. I'll bet our government would love to embed these little goodies in every new car produced (without saying anything). After 10 years or so they'd be able to track virtually every vehicle in real time; with that ability it'd only take a little time for creative bureaucrats to find ways to monetize the data.

    Hmmm; distance / time calculations are cheap; car 298576893 covered 1.4 miles on I-15 in 58 seconds so look up the registered owner and mail them an automatic speeding ticket. Don't forget to also automatically notify their insurance company; they'll pay well for this data. Heck, the little tracking device could also forward marketable data such as what radio station is tuned in, what CD is playing, how many people in the car, etc.

    Hey; that would be pretty easy - we've already got switches in the seats to detect occupants for seat belt chimes and airbag control, so if the GPS location is a car pool lane and there's not enough people in the car - mail the registered owner an automatic ticket for a carpool violation.

    Systems like these NEVER make any mistakes, you know - and if you're doing nothing wrong you've got nothing to worry about, right? And just imagine how those bureaucrats would love to see that extra revenue coming in - and what they're likely to do to make this wet dream come true.

    1. Re:Another enabling technology - oh boy by shentino · · Score: 1

      Especially going to nail those that just use a seat to carry a heavy package.

      You just know that's good grounds for an appeal in traffic court.

    2. Re:Another enabling technology - oh boy by Whuffo · · Score: 1
      Maybe so - but first you'd need to overcome the prevalent perception that if a computer says so, it must be true.

      If you ever have a free day with nothing to do - sit in on a session of traffic court and see what passes for justice. The judges do a pretty good job all things considered, but if there's a machine involved (breathalyzer, radar gun, photo radar, etc.) then it's considered to be reliable evidence and you're in a heap of trouble if it's wrong.

      It's a small step from tracking cars / people to when a burglary / robbery happens, check to see what cars / people were in the vicinity at the time and bring them in for "questioning". People lie, but the computer is always right, you know.

      An example I just discovered today - I'm in a small rural town south of San Jose, CA. I was playing with my iPod Touch and hit "locate" in the maps application. It found my "location" - somewhere in the middle of Kansas. Theoretically that can't happen; MAC addresses are unique, aren't they? But in a not too distant time I'd be worried - if there was a murder in the middle of Kansas then the computers would spit me out as a prime suspect. And what kind of defense could you mount? The system positively matched your MAC address to the location in Kansas where a murder happened. Try claiming that the MAC address, breathalyzer, radar gun, photo radar, red light camera, etc. is wrong and see how much good that does you.

      If you really want to have something to think about - consider this technology along with wiretapping, email snooping, and all the other stuff that's going on these days. I'm not going to ask if you trust your current government - I'll just point out that once this technology is in place it'll be there for future administrations as well. Would this technology be abused? It's not a question of "if", it's a question of "when". What would J. Edgar Hoover have done with this info? That'll give you nightmares...

    3. Re:Another enabling technology - oh boy by simong · · Score: 1

      I'd loosen the band on that tinfoil hat if I were you.

      Governments don't need to be secret about these things: UK.gov, our wonderful ill-advised tech-obsessed leadership, has proposed universal road pricing in the past, which would require GPS/black box based tracking everywhere. Of course they were quick to point out that there would be no threat to privacy, but 18 months later the Metropolitan Police is requesting access to the records for the Oyster stored value travel card used by Transport for London to track people's movements, so in the end it can just be done in plain sight.

      Our attitude to surveillance can be summed up by a frame in the original comic version of 'V for Vendetta' (not sure if it's in the film), where, after the security cameras have been disabled by V, a woman says that she misses them moving about as they felt familiar. That tinfoil might still come in handy.

    4. Re:Another enabling technology - oh boy by shentino · · Score: 1

      Er, it seems like you failed to notice the sarcasm I was using...

      Honestly, when it comes to automated technology being used to serve as judge, jury, and executioner in a criminal case, I wouldn't trust it farther than I could throw it.

  36. Easy to Block by protolith · · Score: 1

    Just put yer tin foil hat on it.

  37. Spot Satellite Messenger by ModemRat · · Score: 0

    Spot Messenger is a PLB that doesn't rely on cell towers. Good for being in remote areas in case something goes wrong. Friends or family can track your progress (if you let them) and you can send out a distress signal if you need help. http://www.findmespot.com/

  38. losing altitude by trb · · Score: 1
    I would rather have it tell me when she is under ground level so I could catch her digging.

    GPS is not designed to provide an accurate measure of altitude. There are altimeters you could use to see if your animal got under a fence or up a tree, but GPS wouldn't be ideal for that purpose.

  39. Re:Demo of raw data use on Google by Technician · · Score: 1

    If you just used an intersection, you might not be able to find you pet here. With Lat and Lon, Google maps can show you your pet is here;

    http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&safe=off&q=Finding+lat+lon+on+google+maps&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wl

    Just plug in the coordinates in the map search bar as "44.077967 -121.314898" using format Lat.XXXXXX in decimal and Lon.XXXXXX in decimal. Use a minus for South Latitudes an West Longitudes. The above example is in a golf course in Bend Oregon USA. You wouldn't see your pet from the nearest intersection the service would provide.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  40. Is there a way to do this for free? by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    How do these devices work? I know the GPS part is free, but how is the tracking communications done?

    Can I do this without paying someone $10/month?

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:Is there a way to do this for free? by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      Two ways: APRS, as already mentioned, or look for open WiFi and use it.

      We tried the latter. It almost worked.

      ...laura

  41. Poor Buddy... bad cell phone messages... by tjstork · · Score: 4, Funny

    My GPS Tracker sent me this, about Buddy:

    "Buddy has left the preferences"
    "Buddy is in the neighbor's trash"
    "Buddy is running into the street"
    "Buddy is in the same position as a Chevy Suburban"
    "Buddy is stopped on the street"
    "A google satellite photo is attached with a picture of Buddy"
    "Google Adwords has selected "Shovel" as something that you might need with Buddy."

    --
    This is my sig.
  42. "Novel" applications? by timeOday · · Score: 1
    Is it just me, or do all these applications sound like the same thing, namely "tracking items."

    I feel a raft of very bad patents coming on...

  43. $200? Inexpensive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You people need to learn a little humility, if you consider $200 for a lame-ass gps toy 'inexpensive'. I bet you have iphones and other apple equipment, too?

  44. Better yet, MS should attach them to chairs by kalpol · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Chair has moved 20 feet outside conference room window"

    --
    12:50 - press return.
  45. This is like Vodaphone's iKids phone (Australia) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Similar deal (but in Aussie $'s):

      About $200 for the phone (limited to dialing up to 5 parent-/owner-set tel.no's; can be tracked on user's cell-phone (newer model, on which a map can be displayed) or by a tracking centre, that owner can contact - for a fee, eg, it the child or - here - asset goes missing).

      The monthly fee can be higher, here: just under Au$ 30.00 / mon

    (There's also a pre-paid option... cost...? We don't use 'em...)

  46. Holy syntax Batman! by Monty_Lovering · · Score: 1

    Okay, so I'm a word nerd, but "millions of dollars in inventory turned up missing" is just a foul use of the language. How in the name of sweet little baby Jesus nailed to a tree can something "turn UP missing"? It's like proving god doesn't exist. Logically, you can't prove god doesn't exist, nor can things "turn up missing". "Turned out to be", "was shown to be", etc., it's not rocket science.

  47. I have one attached to my cat, Elvis by maroberts · · Score: 1

    It tells me when Elvis has left the building

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  48. Scare the soon-to-be-ex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A buddy of mine was looking at getting a divorce, but hadn't said a word to the wife. Then, one day, he was balancing the checkbook and discovered a purchase, for a few hundred dollars, from a creditor he didn't recognize. When he looked online, he found that the company sold GPS tracker units, and provided a website which would allow you to see where the tracker had been for the last 48 hours or so.

    He cracked her password on the site and saw that she'd been tracking his whereabouts for over a week. He dug through the car and found the tracker.

    The next day, during his lunch break, he drove to the office of a notorious divorce attorney, and sat in the parking lot for about 45 minutes. He didn't actually go in and talk to the divorce attorney; he just sat in the parking lot. Then, he drove to one of the larger gun stores in the area, and sat in the parking lot for half an hour.

    His wife as "extremely nice" when he got home, that day.

    When he finally told her that we wanted a divorce, he cited her "suspicious nature" as part of his reasons. When she acted clueless, he went to the car, got the tracker, brought it in and showed it to her. Then, he logged into the website and showed where he'd been for the last few days. Finally, he smashed the tracker, in front of her.

    I can seriously understand putting one in a car with a teenage driver, though. You would, of course, have to make sure they didn't know about it. Otherwise, they'd just ride with someone else who isn't being watched (or ditch/disable the tracker).