Slashdot Mirror


Berners-Lee Claims Web "Still In Infancy"

eldavojohn writes "The man credited with inventing the Web at CERN, Tim Berners-Lee, has made a statement on the 15th anniversary of the Web's initial code release that the Web is still in its infancy. He also made a pretty insightful comment about CERN's releasing of the code for the Web into public domain: 'If we had put a price on it like the University of Minnesota had done with Gopher then it would not have expanded into what it is now. We would have had some sort of market share alongside services like AOL and Compuserve, but we would not have flattened the world.'"

206 comments

  1. Actually the Web is older than 15 years by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Informative

    I started using the Web in 1992 and it was demonstrated in public then. And in any case the Internet is more like 30 years.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      I started using the Web in 1992 and it was demonstrated in public then. And in any case the Internet is more like 30 years. Are you sure you're not confusing the internet with the World Wide Web?

      Just asking, I don't know the actual "start" dates of either off the top of my head. I believe TBL is talking about hypertext, the first http daemons and browsers, etc. As opposed to tcp/ip and all the applications built on it before the release of the first http aware applications.
      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    2. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a minute. 6 digit slashdot number.

      YOU LIE! You haven't even had your geek card for 30 years.

    3. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by phpmysqldev · · Score: 1

      The Internet can be seen as the networking aspect and the world wide web the interface and software aspect. both of these designs working together is what has made the web overall as successful and available as it is today.
      The world wide web is how documents interact with one another while the Internet is responsible for the transfer of information. Basically what CERN did was invent the document types that the web of today is based off of.

      World Wide Web: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_wide_web
      Internet (capital 'I'): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet

    4. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      The web will always be in its infancy, that's what makes the web what it is. It is constantly changing, adapting, mutating, adjusting to the needs and wants of its users.

    5. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by electrictroy · · Score: 3, Informative

      He's pointing-out that the SUMMARY is wrong: "The man credited with inventing the internet at CERN, Tim Berners-Lee" ---- That's not correct. He invented the web, not the internet.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    6. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by Sique · · Score: 1

      1992 sounds likely to me, I had my first contacts with the Web in 1993, and 1994/95 a friend of mine was maintainer of the Mosaic (TueV).

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    7. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      (ahem)

      I object. Most of the documents already existed before the web existed. I have old email dated 1988 floating around the internet. I was downloading and viewing GIF porn in the 80s. :-o Ditto music files (shhh; don't tell RIAA.)

      WWW did not invent the documents; they are as old as the hills. What the web did was make it easier to access those documents (point-and-click, instead of combing through text menus).

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    8. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by oledoody · · Score: 1

      i started using the web in 1948. It was just a few fibers then but I immediately realized it's great potential to transform the world.

    9. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by phpmysqldev · · Score: 1

      I was speaking more along the lines of HTML, XML, CSS, these files were developed specifically for the task of putting information on the web. You are speaking of media files. WWW documents allow other documents to be linked and found using the Internet. Berners-Lee played a key role in the design and adoption of these standards. You are correct, the WWW made it easier to access those files, but new file types and standards were created in the process.

    10. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by Tom · · Score: 1

      It's not much of a difference. August 6, 1991 was the magic date. But 1993 was more important, with the "free for all" announcement and the release of Mosaic.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    11. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by akuma624 · · Score: 1

      Exactly - TBL invented the "interlinking" of web pages the http protocol not TCP/IP which. The web is only a portion of the larger Internet

      --
      ... if music be fruit of love, play on ....
    12. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      I honestly didn't know there used to be GIF music files. Were they scrolling sheet music or just the lyrics with a bouncing ball over top?

    13. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet, most people in the US refer to the Web as the Internet and claim they invented it. That is not correct.

    14. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by lgw · · Score: 1

      Hypertext, combining rich media presentation and "click to follow the link", were not new in 1993 - that idea had been commercially available for six years before the WWW. TBL had the incremental insight of "hey, it would be neat to link between Hypertext documents on different servers - all we need is a transport protocol".

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    15. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we know this is wrong since as most of us know, Al Gore invented the internet.

    16. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by kjots · · Score: 1

      And we know this is wrong since as most of us know, Al Gore invented the internet.

      Actually, Vint Cerf, who practically did invent the Internet (or at very least the protocol upon which it currently operates) has said that Al Gore really does deserves a great deal of credit for his role in making the Internet available to civilian and commercial use.

    17. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      I don't know if the summary has changed, but for me it reads:

      "The man credited with inventing the Web at CERN, Tim Berners-Lee, has made a statement on the 15th anniversary of the Web's initial code release that the Web is still in its infancy."

      Which seems a pretty accurate summary.

    18. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      Correct. I remember visiting "clickable" BBSes as early as 1990. They used a special protocol to first draw graphics on the screen (very slowly), and then you could move your mouse to a graphic, or highlighted text, and click on it to move to the next section.

      Hypertext is an old tech.

      As for the music files, they were in SID or MOD format. Some were WAVs.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    19. Re:Actually the Web is older than 15 years by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      As for the music files, they were in SID or MOD format. Some were WAVs. Are you sure those weren't VOC files? WAV didn't become popular until Windows caught on.
  2. 15 Years? by Stephen+Oman · · Score: 1

    A bit like most 15-year-olds then...still in their infancy.

    1. Re:15 Years? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Ok mister, I'll get off your damned lawn! Gees! Can I have my ball back?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:15 Years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to make a porn joke but I thought better of it.

    3. Re:15 Years? by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      that age makes more sense to me. Cuz with how much porn there is, it's at least a 12 year old male if not 15 lol.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  3. A couple of things... by eln · · Score: 5, Informative

    First, he didn't invent the Internet (capital 'i' please), he is credited with inventing the World Wide Web. Repeat after me: The World Wide Web is NOT the Internet.

    Also, I think the web has clearly passed the infant stage and is deeply entrenched in the awkward adolescent phase: It has been doing a lot of experimenting lately with new looks and new technologies. Sure, it thinks it looks really cool and edgy with all of its new Web 2.0 gear (probably bought it from Hot Topic) and it probably feels real good smoking all that XML, but in the end it just ends up being slower, less reliable, and just looks foolish most of the time.

    1. Re:A couple of things... by Gewalt · · Score: 0, Troll

      ...didn't invent the Internet (capital 'i' please), ... How about.... HELL NO! There is absolutely no reason whatsoever to capitalize the word internet. /sigh
      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    2. Re:A couple of things... by ari_j · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a proper noun. Capitalize it. Also, the real point here is that Slashdot submitters and editors are apparently no longer capable of distinguishing the Internet from the World-Wide Web. Next up: CPU == hard drive == tower.

    3. Re:A couple of things... by eln · · Score: 1

      An "internet" is a collection of networks. The "Internet" is the particular collection of networks we all surf porn and read Slashdot on, hence the capitalization. Yes, I know the battle is pretty much lost on this one, but what's the point of Slashdot if not pointless pedantry?

    4. Re:A couple of things... by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      probably bought it from Hot Topic That's great. The quickest way to get teens to stop shopping at Hot Topic is for nerds, old people, or old nerds (like yourself) to let them know that they know it's cool. If we could convince the slashdot editors to run a few stories about how cool hot topic is, complete with a strong recommendation to shop there, we could end this menace once and for all.

      Of course, then we'd have to read 350 comments all saying that the article is not news for nerds.
    5. Re:A couple of things... by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Funny

      (capital 'i' please)

      Why? "Internet" is not a proper name, like George or Indiana. It's a common noun, a thing, like "television" or "microwave oven" or "pencil".

      "Ms. Pedant, may we sharpen our Pencils, please?"

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    6. Re:A couple of things... by edalytical · · Score: 1

      Hot Topic sells action figures, anime gear an a variety of other nerd friendly items. Personally I already shop there when I want to waste some money.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    7. Re:A couple of things... by pressman · · Score: 1

      It's also where posers go to buy Slayer, Misfits and Ramones t-shirts. Much safer to go to the mall than risk life and limb wading through the crowds at a Slayer show.

      --
      Pooty tweet
    8. Re:A couple of things... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      First, he didn't invent the Internet
      Right, that was Al Gore.

      (probably bought it from Hot Topic)
      Yeah, and what's with the black hairdye and lipstick, and 20 body piercings, anyway?

      it probably feels real good smoking all that XML
      Smoking XML is out. Hits of RSS are in.

    9. Re:A couple of things... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the availability of the t-shirts at a store in the mall say something about how authentic the image of the bands is?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:A couple of things... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      The term Internet, when applied to the internet commonly used by the majority of people, is most definitely a proper noun.

      It is the same as president versus The President.

    11. Re:A couple of things... by inerlogic · · Score: 1

      and after that: == == = keep your greasy fingers off my interwebs!

    12. Re:A couple of things... by profplump · · Score: 1

      As others noted, at least in the context used here, "Internet" is a proper noun. It describes the particular collection of networks we use to do things like post on Slashdot. It does not describe the interconnection of any set of networks, which would be simply "internet".

      There are many other examples of words that are only proper nouns in certain contexts: I can go to the upper floor of a building in Upper Michigan, or I can travel east to get from the Midwest to the East. Or to use your example: Use a pencil to write a letter your favorite player on the Pencils, our local sporting team.

    13. Re:A couple of things... by inerlogic · · Score: 1
      First, he didn't invent the Internet

      right, as we all know.... academy and nobel award winner Al Gore invented the internet and the Internet

    14. Re:A couple of things... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      "President" is a title, as is "Commisioner" or "Chief Executive Officer". "Internet" is not a title. "The internet" is like "the pencil", even though there is only one internet amd many pencils.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    15. Re:A couple of things... by Neil+Hodges · · Score: 1

      RSS is an application of XML, though. I guess in terms of drugs, you could call it something "derived from XML," despite being structured in XML itself.

    16. Re:A couple of things... by backwardMechanic · · Score: 1

      Erm, but wasn't that correct usage? Equivalence, rather than assignment? Although it's always a little difficult to work out the correct way of writing something wrong...

    17. Re:A couple of things... by Luke+the+Obscure · · Score: 1

      "Slashdot submitters and editors are apparently no longer capable of distinguishing the Internet from the World-Wide Web"

      They ARE the same thing you moron, that's why it's called the INTERWEB. duh.

    18. Re:A couple of things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a proper noun. Capitalize it.
      Yes, just like the proper noun "Telephone." Oh, what's that? You didn't know "telephone" used to be a proper noun before it fell in to everyday use, much like the word "Internet?" Get over it, we have been in a transitional period for some time where the "Internet" is becoming the "internet."
    19. Re:A couple of things... by inerlogic · · Score: 1
      yes, i was mistaken, or maybe it was a self fulfilling prophecy, i got over excited and should've typed:

      "and after that: == = ="

      my meaning was that equivalence and assignment will be incorrectly interchangeable as the words "internet" and "web" have become.

    20. Re:A couple of things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, good luck finding a Misfits or Ramones show to go to, and Slayer doesn't tour all that much anymore.

      (not that I'm buying the Ts anymore, I'm just being difficult)

    21. Re:A couple of things... by pressman · · Score: 1

      TOTAL RANT: you have been warned

      I was too young to go to a Misfits show, but I did get to see the Ramones a handful of times and Slayer numerous times.

      My Ramones t-shirts are long dead. Never owned a misfits shirt and personally just never dug the Slayer shirts. Now the Metallica t-shirts designed by Pushead on the Justice tour. Those were pretty damn cool.

      All I'm saying about the availability of these shirts in Hot Topic is that it gives kids who desperately want cred with certain (stereotypical) groups without them having to actually go to the shows or really even understand what the music is about.

      I see so many kids wearing Misfits shirts and they weren't even alive when Metallica made them popular well after the band had broken up. Hey it's their money and they can spend it however they want, but trust me... the true hessians and punks (if any true punks still exist) will be laughing their asses off at the kid with the brand new Misfits shirt.

      I laugh my ass off at this and when I see wannabe hippies in ragged tie dyes with $150 Birkenstocks.

      Hot Topic and it's ilk are just marketing to kids with low self esteem and a need to feel included by an outsider group to piss off mommy and daddy.

      If they really want to piss off mommy and daddy they'd sneak out, go to the shows and buy their shirts there and maybe set foot in a mosh pit and get roughed up a bit. (How I managed to do this and get straight A's is beyond me)

      I'll stick to my plain t-shirts, jeans and flannels thank you very much. I prefer comfort and warmth over needing to say "I LIKE THIS BAND! PLEASE LABEL ME ACCORDINGLY! I'M EDGY!"

      p.s. The last concert t-shirt I owned was from a Ramones show in 1989. After many years it became my laundry day shirt and it finally fell apart in the dryer in 2007. Talk about a well made friggin shirt!

      --
      Pooty tweet
    22. Re:A couple of things... by slcdb · · Score: 1

      I'd argue though that the people who called telephone "Telephone" were wrong. There never was just one telephone. Maybe there was just one telephone network, but to refer to it simply as the "Telephone" would be ambiguous (it would properly be called the "Telephone Network").

      Anyway, as for the Internet, there is only one global, public, IP-based network and it is called the Internet with a capital "I". Much as the "Pacific Ocean" is not the "pacific ocean" because people have been navigating it for a real long time now, just because it has fallen into common usage is no reason to start calling the Internet the "internet".

      --
      Despite what EULAs say, most software is sold, not licensed.
    23. Re:A couple of things... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Who needs the internet when we have AOL?

    24. Re:A couple of things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The internet" is like "the pencil"

      No. "The Internet" is like "the Earth" or "the World Wide Web" or "the Church" (in reference to the organization, as opposed to a building).

      Wikipedia agrees (and, more importantly, all of Wikipedia's references agree).

    25. Re:A couple of things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a proper noun. Capitalize it. No, it's been lower case since 2004, according to Wired.

      http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2004/08/64596
    26. Re:A couple of things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll stick to using the internet and sending emails.

    27. Re:A couple of things... by pressman · · Score: 1

      That's a great idea! Get all the Linux/OSS people to go buy crap at Hot Topic! That will definitely scare away the mallrats who buy their "alternagear" there! Nothing scarier to image obsessed teens than people in their 20's and 30's buying the same stuff they are!

      Just the other day I saw the single most ridiculous image. Some teenage kid wearing goth makeup, a misfits t-shirt, a bunch of studded leather and carrying an Invader Zim lunchbox.

      The mixture of punk, goth, new wave, metal and cartoon fandom was almost too much for me to handle. When I was a teen, it was such an effort just to keep my eyes peeled open in class let alone go to the ridiculous effort some kids do these days (and even back in my day) just to project a "screw you parental units" image.

      The metalheads and "grunge" era guys had it right. Jeans. t-shirt. Flannel. Jacket of some sort. Boots or sneakers. Hassle free.

      --
      Pooty tweet
    28. Re:A couple of things... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      To be fair, capitalizing Internet is a subject that can be debated reasonably. Wired doesn't have anything to do with it, though, and as others have pointed out the Internet is unique whereas other proper nouns subject to genericide name products that were produced in the millions.

    29. Re:A couple of things... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      To clear up any confusion, I meant that the next thing we'd see would be Slashdotters believing that CPU, hard drive, and tower all mean the same thing and all refer to the computer chassis. But in your response, basically any collection of equal signs with some spaces interspersed among them would have been funny. :)

    30. Re:A couple of things... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Also, the real point here is that Slashdot submitters and editors are apparently no longer capable of distinguishing the Internet from the World-Wide Web.

      I would agree, but then I realized to myself I myself use web interface for both email and ftp these days so more or less the move towards everything on port 80 with a web browser as a front.

      Also... If you have a laptop (which are becoming more popular than desktops these days) then to the average person there is no difference between hard drive and cpu.

      I use to correct friends and family members on the terminology but then I think its pointless after the 100th time. Society is going to bastardize our terminology so point in wasting our time on it.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    31. Re:A couple of things... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      They ARE the same thing you moron, that's why it's called the INTERWEB. duh. If you want to get all fancy about. I just think of it as "teh truck."
      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    32. Re:A couple of things... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      The inroads of the web interface make for an interesting point, but that's not different enough from saying that JC Penney is a telephone for me to accept it as being sufficient. And no, you can't really correct people about anything. As it turns out, that's one kind of generosity that is met with nearly universal ungratefulness. What a load of B.S. I love it when people point out my mistakes - that's how I learn to stop repeating them, and helping me take steps toward perfection is hardly a disservice. :)

    33. Re:A couple of things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they just prefer nice graphics on their shirts rather than wearing plain. And there's nothing less comfortable or warm about those t-shirts than any normal t-shirt anyway.

    34. Re:A couple of things... by blubadger · · Score: 1

      The Economist's esteemed style guide doesn't agree.

      There can be no real ambiguity here. It's a question of style. I say: why be complicated when you can be simple?

    35. Re:A couple of things... by smellotron · · Score: 1

      I do believe that The Internet is a proper noun, in the same that Wikipedia is a proper noun. There can be many other internets (like Internet2), along with corporate intranets (though big companies probably call their own "The Intranet", and rightfully so), and many other wikis or encyclopedias. But there is only one Internet, and it happens to be the biggest internet of them all.

      Gah, I feel like I've just been typing "This is my rifle. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.".

    36. Re:A couple of things... by michaeljpastor · · Score: 1

      First, he didn't invent the Internet (capital 'i' please), he is credited with inventing the World Wide Web. Repeat after me: The World Wide Web is NOT the Internet. Well, while we're being technical, early documents will show that putting "the" in front of the word Internet is just as incorrect as not capitalizing it. Particularly since we're talking about a network of networks, there isn't really any such thing as "the" Internet. It's only slightly less irritating than the phrase "the" Social Graph.
    37. Re:A couple of things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on whether you're talking about *the* Internet (with a capital I) or *an* internet (with a lower-case I; see e.g. RFC1918 for how this term is used).

    38. Re:A couple of things... by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      An internet is a type of thing. The Internet is a specific one of these internets. It's like god vs God.

      We have a company intranet. An intranet is a type of internet, but it is not the Internet.

      Internet2 is an internet, but it is not the Internet, it is the Internet2.

      Enough examples? =)

    39. Re:A couple of things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little story:

      Once, there was a country. It was in an area that had become known as America, and it consisted of a bunch of states, which were united.

      These united states of America needed a name. They could've been called "CoolAwesomeLand". They could've been called "GNABS" (GNABS is Not A Bunch of States). They could've been called "Bob".

      However, The Namers chose to give them a plain, simply descriptive name: The United States of America.

      Once, there was also an internet. Although not the only internet that there could ever be, it nevertheless became the internet that people knew.

      This internet needed a name. It could've been called "CompuGlobalHyperMegaNet". It could've been called "GNI" (GNI is Not an Internet). It could've been called "Bob".

      However, The Namers chose to give it a plain, simply descriptive name: The Internet.

  4. A price on it by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, the government cant resist much longer in taxing the golden goose.

    That and continuing on their pat of regulating it out of existence. ( if most all content is banned, what value will there be for the network )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:A price on it by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the government cant resist much longer in taxing the golden goose.

      What "government" do you refer to? The internet is international, which is after all what "inter" is shoort for (international network).

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:A price on it by Sique · · Score: 1

      It stands for "interconnection of networks" in fact, because the Internet is a connection of about 40.000 different networks, all IP-based.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    3. Re:A price on it by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      All of them. Or havent you been paying attention to world affairs?

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:A price on it by eviloverlordx · · Score: 1

      The internet is international, which is after all what "inter" is shoort for (international network).

      You really are new here. The 'inter' in Internet does not mean 'international'. Internet is short for internetwork, i.e., a network of different networks.

      --
      'Loose' is when your pants are three sizes too big. 'Lose' is when you misuse 'loose'.
  5. Internet != Web by obijuanvaldez · · Score: 1

    Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web. Not the internet. In spite of what iPhone commercials claim, they are not equivalent.

    1. Re:Internet != Web by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web. Not the internet. In spite of what iPhone commercials claim, they are not equivalent. Of course, everyone here knows Al Gore invented the Internet!
    2. Re:Internet != Web by sm62704 · · Score: 1
      The uncyclopedia disagrees!

      Give a man a fish, he is fed for a day. Teach him to use the 'net, and he won't bother you for weeks" ~ Oscar Wilde on the Internet

      "The Internet is a Series of Tubes!" ~ Sen. Ted Stevens on the Internet

      "Ah, the internet. Giving voiceless, pubescent young teens a place to rant about everyone in their lives to a bunch of people who either think it's funny or want to rape them." ~ Unknown_Entity on The Internet

      "Its where we truly belong. We are accepted, not teased or harassed" ~ The Nerd Association on the internet

      "Im a genius!" ~ An Idiot on the Internet

      "It's not all just cybergeeks and girls with their tops off!" ~ Internet Expert on Internet's contents

      "Mmmm...very interesting invention...let's use it to destroy Microsoft!" ~ Steve Jobs on the Internet

      "The internet is for porn" ~ Your Mom on the Internet

      The Internet is a complex system made of, but not limited to, a series of tubes , telegraph wires, pony expresses, hobo signs, tortoise shells, and smoke signals. It was invented by Al Gore and is owned, operated and monitored by the Illuminati. Mostly used for access to porn, theme songs, ultra-porn, and cans of spam.


      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:Internet != Web by pressman · · Score: 1

      http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp

      He never actually claimed to invent the internet, but rather clumsily said that he sponsored legislation and economic incentives to bolster the internet as a communication tool and marketplace.

      His clumsy wording is what everyone gloms onto and misinterprets as him claiming to have invented the internet.

      --
      Pooty tweet
  6. But in internet years... by Zarf · · Score: 1

    ... that's like 105 human years. I mean it's 7 internet years to one human year right?

    --
    [signature]
    1. Re:But in internet years... by coren2000 · · Score: 1

      Its 7 human years to 1 Web year. Considering the Web just turned 2.0.

    2. Re:But in internet years... by Zarf · · Score: 1

      Its 7 human years to 1 Web year. Considering the Web just turned 2.0. Wait, web 2.0 goes slower?
      --
      [signature]
    3. Re:But in internet years... by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      I've been saying that all along, but they said I was mad! Mad! I'll show them, with my genetically enhanced race of 5-assed webmonkeys

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
  7. 15 Years Since CERN Gave Code to Public Domain by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative

    I started using the Web in 1992 and it was demonstrated in public then. And in any case the Internet is more like 30 years. I should have clarified. From this more extensive article it points out that:

    The World Wide Web has many birthdays.

    March 1989, when Tim Berners-Lee handed his boss a short document entitled Information Management: a Proposal, is one.

    Christmas of the following year, when the Web was up and running on two computers, is another.

    But perhaps the most important Web anniversary of all is 30 April 1993.

    That's the day that Cern put the web in the public domain, thereby ensuring that the world would have a single system for accessing the Internet, instead of a Microsoft Web, a Macintosh Web and who knows, perhaps even an Amstrad Web.

    Today, it is hard to imagine a world without the web, yet well into the 1990s, internet access was the reserve of the privileged few, mainly academics.

    Although the internet had been around since the 1970s, accessing documents on remote computers required the mastery of complex protocols. Scientists had been doing that for years, and at Cern, the European laboratory for particle physics in Geneva, they were particularly adept. So, it's the 15th anniversary today of when CERN handed over the code to the public domain (thank god they did!).
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:15 Years Since CERN Gave Code to Public Domain by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the real birthday should be when it reaches self awareness

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
  8. "but we would not have flattened the world" by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    "but we would not have flattened the world" What?! I didn't expect a guy from The Flat Earth Society in a leading position at CERN, of all places. How quaint the world has become, in a Matrix-like fashion.

    1. Re:"but we would not have flattened the world" by EMeta · · Score: 1

      He's referring to the "flattened world" in the sense that Friedman uses it in his book, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_is_Flat. To oversimplify, he says that the world's economic markets have become unprecedentedly more even (more of a level playing field) in the Internet age. Even outside of economics, more people from all parts of the world interact now with significantly less barriers to entry.

    2. Re:"but we would not have flattened the world" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's referring to the wonder and joy of off-shoring all our jobs to India and China. Something I wouldn't brag about to an IT crowd. The term "flat earth" now means one where there are no barriers to where people can work based on location, and comes from a book entitled "The Earth is Flat" that has become popular in business circles in the last few years. I also notice he doesn't credit UI-Urbana for their work on the first browser.

    3. Re:"but we would not have flattened the world" by CTilluma · · Score: 1

      he says that the world's economic markets have become unprecedentedly more even (more of a level playing field) in the Internet age. Explain that to the countries that have stopped export of their food production.
    4. Re:"but we would not have flattened the world" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because there not producing enough food. That has nothing to do with the flattening of the market. In a lot of respects it's because of the flattening world market and the spreading out of 'money' that's adding pressure to the food market..that and biofuels.
      I warned people this would happen, but nobody listens to me.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  9. Who? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tim Berners-Lee? Never heard of him. Everyone knows that Algore invented the Internet.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:Who? by RockyPersaud · · Score: 1

      Gore can't claim to invent it, but it sounds like he was its Godfather.

    2. Re:Who? by mlwmohawk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Everyone knows that Algore invented the Internet.

      I am so sick and tired of this crap. It is nothing less than a republican smear campaign against Al Gore that has been parroted by the puppet media and it has gone on too f*&^king long.

      Al Gore never said he "invented" the internet, but he was instrumental in taking Darpa net public as the internet through legislation and the ability to articulate the vision.

      So, without Al Gore, Tim Berners-Lee would not have had the foundation on which to build the web.

      Al Gore did not "invent" the internet, but it was his persuasion and legislative skills that made it happen. Give the guy a break, he has done some great things and don't let the bogus lies continue to smear him. Take responsibility for your opinions.

    3. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and global warming.

    4. Re:Who? by klenwell · · Score: 1

      Well put. Berners-Lee makes an interesting point about what would had happened had the web gone the privatization route a la Gopher.

      Another interesting question (which I've asked before) is where would the web be without Gore's vision and support? I imagine, much the same place that Berners-Lee imagined.

      --
      Innovation makes enemies of all those who prospered under the old regime... -- Machiavelli
    5. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's your opinion on polar bears, while you're at it...?

    6. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:Who? by maxume · · Score: 1

      When Al Gore says jump, does the internet say "Please don't hit me again Mr. Gore"?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Who? by barzok · · Score: 1

      whoooooooooooosh

      Hear that? That's the sound of a joke flying over your head.

    9. Re:Who? by Telvin_3d · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sometimes the line between telling a joke and being a twat gets crossed. This is one of those times. It wasn't funny. It wasn't funny when the meme first appeared. The poster might have thought it was funny. He is now being told otherwise. Perhaps with work and practice and further negative feedback someday he may actually be funny. That day is not now.

    10. Re:Who? by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      It's a smear campaign along the same lines of the "series of tubes" debacle. Not technically inaccurate--Al Gore did a lot to get stuff going, and the Internet *can* be imagined as a bunch of pipes or tubes--but people love to jump on it. You don't bitch about the "series of tubes" thing because a *Republican* said that.
      They're both Internet jokes... or should I say "jokes on the internets", to parrot another not-incredibly-inaccurate but frequently repeated quote. Al Gore is a pompous douchebag a lot of the time, so it's especially funny to imagine him taking credit for inventing the Internet, even if that wasn't what he was aiming for (I hope).

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    11. Re:Who? by dk.r*nger · · Score: 1

      Ummm... CNN's Wolf Blitzer - the Republican parrot.

    12. Re:Who? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      WE all know it's a joke, but it is damn old, and it has NEVER been true.
      I credit that joke for him not getting a significant mind share.
      All you people who didn't vote for him because of that are the reason we are in Iraq, and have a crappy economy. I hope you're happy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Who? by zacronos · · Score: 1
      Put it in context, please.

      WOLF BLITZER: Why should Democrats, looking at the Democratic nomination process, support you instead of Bill Bradley, a friend of yours, a former colleague in the Senate? What do you have to bring to this that he doesn't necessarily bring to this process?

      AL GORE: Well, I will be offering -- I'll be offering my vision when my campaign begins. And it will be comprehensive and sweeping. And I hope that it will be compelling enough to draw people toward it. I feel that it will be.

      But it will emerge from my dialogue with the American people. I've traveled to every part of this country during the last six years. During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system. [...]

      In context, it's quite clear that he doesn't think he "invented" the Internet, which is what the meme says/implies. He thinks he was instrumental in helping get the Internet going, and as a legislator, he was. The fact that he stutters a little and used a bit of unfortunate wording while responding to an unexpected question doesn't change that.

      This wasn't a prepared speech, this was a live interview. Have you ever said something that came out the wrong way? That's all that happened here, get over it.
    14. Re:Who? by theverylastperson · · Score: 1

      You seriously believe that government intervention was key to the birth and growth of the Web? Honestly, I understand what you're trying to articulate, but it makes as much sense as breaking up AT&T. The theory is good, if you're a socialist or one of those people who thinks we really need Big Brother to watch over everything. I think if you looked at the big picture you might find that with less government intervention things would roll a lot smoother.

      --
      ed duval the very last person
    15. Re:Who? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Finally, a lefty acknowledging his screw-up.

      The point is not that he "stuttered" or "make a mistake". Yeah, right... Did you ever hear politicians making an opposite mistake of not mentioning their "merits"?

      That was some pathetic apology of Gore.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    16. Re:Who? by LoudMusic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Everyone knows that Algore invented the Internet.

      I am so sick and tired of this crap. It is nothing less than a republican smear campaign against Al Gore that has been parroted by the puppet media and it has gone on too f*&^king long.

      Al Gore never said he "invented" the internet, but he was instrumental in taking Darpa net public as the internet through legislation and the ability to articulate the vision.

      So, without Al Gore, Tim Berners-Lee would not have had the foundation on which to build the web.

      Al Gore did not "invent" the internet, but it was his persuasion and legislative skills that made it happen. Give the guy a break, he has done some great things and don't let the bogus lies continue to smear him. Take responsibility for your opinions. He may not have said he invented it, but his words ARE, "I took the initiative creating the internet."

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpxtKcLSFWw

      So from a manager's point of view, sure, he created it. But in actuality all he did was take advice from his technology aids, sign papers, and talk a lot about it. It sounds like he's taking credit for coming up with the concept of what the internet is, and then constructing hardware, software, and protocols that are the internet. None of which is true. He merely realized that there was an existing network that could and presumably should be available to the world.

      His words took more credit than he deserved. I just wish people would use the correct words when making fun of him. He didn't claim to invent anything. He claimed to create it. All he did was rename something and make it public.

      You don't see people making fun of Bill Clinton for claiming to have created GPS. That's because he didn't make that claim. He just took an existing system, renamed it, and made it public. Mr Gore also had hands in GPS, improving its civilian accuracy. But he wasn't dumb enough to claim having created it.

      Just poor word choice. Everyone knows he didn't create the internet. We just like making fun of the silly old man (:
      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    17. Re:Who? by hercubus · · Score: 1

      You seriously believe that government intervention was key to the birth and growth of the Web? Honestly, I understand what you're trying to articulate, but it makes as much sense as breaking up AT&T. The theory is good, if you're a socialist or one of those people who thinks we really need Big Brother to watch over everything. I think if you looked at the big picture you might find that with less government intervention things would roll a lot smoother.


      ask the people who've been harmed or lost loved ones due to funky products coming into the US - should government go away? do we want private industry to sort out all problems? i imagine we all want government to do more to ensure product safety - i know i don't want my safety and health determined by corporate drones looking for the lowest price on goods/sevices and looking the other way on how those goods/services are obtained and delivered

      besides safety, are there other areas where public policy might benefit average people? such as do we want the government to allow ISPs to handle traffic however they like? or do we want a policy of neutrality that all ISPs must follow, whether those ISPs feel like it or not?

      US federal government blows - granted. do we want better government or to just eliminate government? if you want no government, you could give Somalia a try. maybe you'd make a great Warlord, maybe you'd get shot the first day

      wanting a functioning government doesn't make me a socialist, it makes me an overly demanding citizen of a semi-civilized, semi-society. i sure as fuck don't want it less civilized

      stop letting Sean and Rush do your thinking for you - government has a role to play, and we the people of the US of A have a role to play - we should be far more demanding when our government fucks up, for example

      --
      -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
    18. Re:Who? by Bearpaw · · Score: 1

      I have a little list of Slashdot Annoyances. (Who doesn't?)

      "Al Gore invented the Internet, har har!" is pretty high up on the list.

      So are the lamoids who bring up the Hindenburg whenever hydrogen-fueled vehicles are mentioned.

      Actually, that one's a sub-category of people who object to something based on an incredibly simple thing that they somehow think has escaped the notice of people who've been working in a field for 20 or 30 years.

      "Gosh, have they forgotten that hydrogen is flammable?"

    19. Re:Who? by pressman · · Score: 1

      "GORE: Well, I will be offering -- I'll be offering my vision when my campaign begins. And it will be comprehensive and sweeping. And I hope that it will be compelling enough to draw people toward it. I feel that it will be.

      But it will emerge from my dialogue with the American people. I've traveled to every part of this country during the last six years. During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system."


      What he MEANT was that he helped promote legislation that would build infrastructure to allow for greater growth and popularization of the Internet as a communication/educational tool and a global marketplace. Just like Reagan and Bush The First didn't actually tear down the Berlin Wall themselves though they kind of sound like it when they talk(ed) about it.

      Give the guy a little slack for a poor choice of words on a live television program.

      --
      Pooty tweet
    20. Re:Who? by zacronos · · Score: 1

      Finally, a lefty acknowledging his screw-up. [...] That was some pathetic apology of Gore.

      Um, what? That wasn't supposed to be an apology. You really show your bias when you acknowledge that I agree Gore screwed up, but then assume that just because I didn't hold to the right-wing talking points I must be a "lefty" Gore apologist. Here's a bit more info on that.

      Here's a clue: Some people don't hold 100% to either "lefty" or "righty" talking points without critically analyzing them. Some people actually listen to what both sides say (though most of us probably disregard at least 95% of what they hear from boths sides as lies and/or posturing).

      The point is not that he "stuttered" or "make a mistake". Yeah, right...

      Ah, but it is. It's pretty ridiculous to think that Gore tried to claim he is personally responsible for creating the Internet. When you actually look at the context, it becomes pretty clear (to me, at least) that he probably tried to claim only that he was personally responsible for promoting the creation of the Internet, or even only that he was a legislative leader in promoting the creation of the Internet. I think it was a mistake of wording that it came out one way and not the other -- I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt here, because it seems so much more reasonable than the alternative. If he had said "I took the initiative in promoting the creation of the Internet", then it all would have been forgotten long ago. Therefore I think the continuation of this meme is based more on a mistake of wording than on intentional misrepresentation of his merits.

      Did you ever hear politicians making an opposite mistake of not mentioning their "merits"?

      That's exactly my point -- every politician does this sort of thing. The only reason this particular exaggeration gets so much attention is because of the additional mistake made in expressing it. Get. over. it. Or, make as big a deal as possible over anything the "other side" does by viewing it in the worst possible light, even when there's a more reasonable explanation. That's politics as usual, I suppose. You "righty"s do it just as much as the "lefty"s.

    21. Re:Who? by pressman · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone is saying that the government was THE KEY to the internet taking off. It did play a role though and not necessarily a negative one either.

      If you think private industry would have done a better job and would have done anything to make it the least bit open, you're living in a dream world. Private enterprise is about maximizing profit and value for shareholders. End of story. If it weren't for governmental oversight, we would have had child labor and slavery far longer than we did.

      True Laissez-faire free market economics is a utopian idea... just as is the ideal of Greek style democracy and marxist style communism.

      The US government/society is a mish mash of democratic/socialist/federalist/capitalist ideas and practices. Not a single one of those political concepts can work as defined in a society as large as ours.

      The very fact that businesses are run by individuals and groups of individuals with desires for wealth, power and satisfying their own sense of self importance guarantees that business is not capable of running itself with no oversight whatsoever.

      That said, government is populated with the same type of people and they should not have complete power over business either.

      The world isn't as black and white as libtertarians would like it to be and people are not nearly as honest and noble as they would like them to be either.

      That said, Socialists are just as heavy handed in their rhetoric as well and need to realize that not all businesses are inherently evil and looking to constantly screw individuals over.

      These black and white ideologies are passe and downright naive. We live in a connected world where national identity is becoming less and less important and the idea of becoming world citizens, both as business entities and private citizens, is becoming more and more important.

      --
      Pooty tweet
    22. Re:Who? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      "That's exactly my point -- every politician does this sort of thing. "

      And every politician get busted for that type of stupid words. Like CLinton for her Bosnia, like Obama for "bitter". Should i continue?

      The difference is the public wave of left-wing defence for Gore inthe epizode not particularly hurting his carrier.

      The problem is that it makes Gore ridiculous, like a clown, and that's what lefties cannot stand even a little bit.

      Again, that's just plain pathetic.

      By the way, as a Muslim I despise equally both of the idiotic parties.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    23. Re:Who? by zacronos · · Score: 1

      And every politician get busted for that type of stupid words. Like CLinton for her Bosnia, like Obama for "bitter". Should i continue?

      Remember how I said "Therefore I think the continuation of this meme is based more on a mistake of wording than on intentional misrepresentation of his merits."? I think it's perfectly fine that he got some bad press for it at the time. Clinton's Bosnia and Obama's bitter are both less than a few months old; there's no real comparison there. People will get over both those things in a couple years or less, I can almost guarantee it. On the other hand, people still haven't gotten over Gore's misstatement almost 10 years later.

      The difference is the public wave of left-wing defence for Gore inthe epizode not particularly hurting his carrier.

      It didn't particularly hurt his career? Given that he was so close to winning the 2000 election, I think it's hard to say so confidently that the attention paid to the episode didn't hurt his career -- lots of people think Gore's an idiot just because of that episode. The lefties would have voted for him anyway, and the righties would have voted for Bush anyway. But the swing voters, the moderates and independents, who were convinced he's an idiot because of that one misstatement, they might have made the difference between him being president and him being just another also-ran. It's stupid that elections are won and lost based on those sorts of things, but they are (at least in the US).

      By the way, as a Muslim I despise equally both of the idiotic parties.

      Great, at least we can agree on something. I think big time politicians in general are mostly power-hungry, dishonest, superficial elitists. (The rest are probably unrealistic idealists at best.) Those in the big two parties tend to be group-think bureaucrats in addition.

      Though I have to add that I don't really see what being a Muslim has to do with thinking both the Democrats and Republicans are losers. Maybe I just don't have a good understanding of typical Muslim political interests.

    24. Re:Who? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Well, for starters, Muslims believe that laws are given by Allah and political system should be in accordance with Shariah, not "by the people, for the people".

      Second, it is pretty idiotic that every idiot votes. Technocracy makes much more sense.

      Third, it is just plain vanilla unwise that all the plans for the future are heavily biased to 4 years mark.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    25. Re:Who? by zacronos · · Score: 1

      Ok, I can see where you're coming from, though I would argue that your problem is more with the American political system as a whole than with the Republicans and Democrats in particular. On the other hand, Republicans and Democrats are the ones put in power by the current system, and are therefore extremely resistant to any significant change to the way the system works (for fear they won't have as much power in the new system).

      Yes, American politics are broken. Is there an easy way to fix it? No, not really. I fear that things will have to continue getting worse until discontent precipitates a revolution. Unfortunately, that won't happen any time soon, as we Americans (as a whole) have become far too apathetic and content with economic prosperity; a large proportion of people won't be spurred to action until they can't afford the materialistic distractions they've become used to.

    26. Re:Who? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that Algore invented the Internet.

      He also invented a key idea of data processing while playing some music, namely the Al Gore Rhythm.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    27. Re:Who? by theverylastperson · · Score: 1

      So you think there has never been a company in the US, that didn't make a crappy product that might have harmed people? No one said we should get rid of the government. Why is everyone so excited by extremes. I said 'less government intervention', i didn't say no government. However, good old fashioned Free Economy does work. The Soviet Empire fell for a reason, micromanagement doesn't work.

      --
      ed duval the very last person
  10. The Internet is 4w50m3 by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ......but we would not have flattened the world. I can tell you this, I remember when Reagan was shot. I remember teacher strikes in the 70's. I remember Kent State. I remember the first time I every saw Moasaic.

    Too old for GenX, tool old for babyboomer. I can tell you this: I never thought the wall would fall and I never thought I'd read Russian websites/bloggs like they were around the corner or in the next town. The Internet, more specifically the WWW *HAS* flattened the world in that respect. Imagine what "Reporters Without Borders" would be without it? It is hard now for people to imagine the world without it.

    Mr Lee should continue to receive high recognition for what he and CERN have given us.
  11. Bill Gates invented the internet by NealAbq · · Score: 1

    He also invented the PC and wrote the first modern OS. (insert emoticon here)

    1. Re:Bill Gates invented the internet by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      new here?

    2. Re:Bill Gates invented the internet by NealAbq · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Just trying to be funny. Did it come off as offensive?

  12. Bad Summary by 2short · · Score: 1

    Shocking, I know, but the Slashdot summary is somewhat inaccurate on this point.

    It isn't the 15th anniversary of the Internet, obviously. Nor is it the 15th anniversary of the Web, though that's closer. It's the 15th anniversary of the day when CERN put their code for the first web server and browser into the public domain.

    We're still a couple months short of the day I first heard of it, which I assume all will agree is the really significant milestone.

    1. Re:Bad Summary by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      You're right. I always celebrate the anniversary of when you first heard of it. ;)

    2. Re:Bad Summary by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      I look at it this way:

      - Was Windows Vista "born" on the day that Microsoft first announced its existence?
      - Or was it born on the day people got their hands on the program?

      Obviously we celebrate* Vista's release date, and list its age according to that. Likewise the WWW was not truly born until the release date for the first browser that people could buy (or download) and start surfing. 1993 is the date that matters.

      *

      * (I use this term very loosely.) (Aside: I first used WWW in 1994, but had been connected to the internet off-and-on since 1988... back in the days when colorized text was considered an "oh wow" moment.)

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    3. Re:Bad Summary by pressman · · Score: 1

      Does life begin at birth or conception is how I read this post.

      Do we really want to go there on /. ?

      --
      Pooty tweet
    4. Re:Bad Summary by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      It isn't the 15th anniversary of the Internet, obviously. Nor is it the 15th anniversary of the Web, though that's closer. It's the 15th anniversary of the day when CERN put their code for the first web server and browser into the public domain.

      As someone involved in the Web at the time, this really was something of a non-event. There was never a serious expectation that either CERN would attempt to claim proprietary ownership or that it would matter a great deal to the Web if it did.

      CERN was prohibited from commercial exploitation of technology developed at CERN and CERNLIB had been distributed under an essentially open source license for years. The need to make the public domain status explicit only arose after UMichigan declared a proprietary interest in the Gopher code. Up to that point nobody seriously worried about the status of the CERN code.

      The issue was not in doubt for very long and by the time the announcement had come NCSA was already distributing a server that contained no CERN code. If CERN had not delivered it would simply have caused the exodus from CERN to occur a year earlier. The Web was already gaining adoption at a breakneck speed.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    5. Re:Bad Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This 'open source' movement is nothing but sickening experiments on living code.

    6. Re:Bad Summary by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      I don't know when "life starts", but I know we celebrate BIRTH days, not conception days. It makes sense to do the same with other products like Windows Vista (released to the public) or the Web (first browser released to the public).

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    7. Re:Bad Summary by 2short · · Score: 1

      "As someone involved in the Web at the time, this really was something of a non-event"

      Certainly. I had my first job out of college, and my boss tasked me with setting up a fairly complex gopher site, as well as investigating alternatives. (I believe the phrase "this http thing" was used.) The webs technological superiority was so blindingly obvious, the licensing was not even a factor.

    8. Re:Bad Summary by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Certainly. I had my first job out of college, and my boss tasked me with setting up a fairly complex gopher site, as well as investigating alternatives. (I believe the phrase "this http thing" was used.) The webs technological superiority was so blindingly obvious, the licensing was not even a factor.

      Actually to correct my earlier statement. It was a big event for Tim who was pretty much invested in his code (even if he did have to convert it from objective C) and he did not want to see libwww die. But it was not actually an issue for the Web because the Web had already got to the point where it was valuable enough that we could have replaced libwww in short order if necessary.

      Tim always believed that the licensing issue was a big factor in killing gopher. I have had that conversation with him on frequent occasions. I think that he is not quite right. If the Web had not come along and offered a superior design, someone would have produced an open source implementation of Gopher.

      Where the licensing issue was important was in getting the Whitehouse to adopt the Web over other technologies such as Hyper-G which offered much slicker clients at the time. Everyone involved in that decision has told me that the fact that the WH had free access to the technology the federal government paid for developing at NCSA was decisive. Before www.whitehouse.gov went online we found it very difficult to persuade companies that were not in the IT space to deploy the Web. Afterwards it became an instant craze.

      Hyper-G on the other hand was killed by the rapacious licensing terms demanded by the university, or rather the company that the profs had set up to exploit the technology. That is where I think that there is something wrong, if you use public money to develop a technology the result should be public.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  13. don't flatten^Ur yourself, Tim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The web is a tool; a tool to get false or misleading information more quickly, and to order crap to satisfy compulsive purchasing drives more easily.

    It hasn't "flattened" the world - the rich are still getting richer, the poor still live in squalor; good students still use traditional journals to research, mediocre students crib off their peers (whether that's by copying chunks from the guy across the dorm or the undergrad who wrote a Wikipedia entry, the result is the same); wars are still being waged; freedoms are being withdrawn with full force from citizens in Western nations; heavy industry and big pharma is more "closed source" than ever, with everything privatised under the Sun, and the Internet has done little to open up either field.

    TBL's right in one thing: the web is still in its infancy. I've been on the 'net since 1994, aged 13, but I still get almost all worthwhile information from print resources or electronic versions of print resources (few of which are published in HTML). Since the art of writing good documentation has been replaced by the assumption of availability of peer support, problems that could be solved by use of the revolutionary "index" now take hours while I wait for a good Usenet / forum response, so in many ways my progress has become slower.

    The Web is a good time waster, though. Like TV, only I get to be part of the programme-making.

    1. Re:don't flatten^Ur yourself, Tim by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add that the 'web has done nothing about getting those damn kids off your lawn.

    2. Re:don't flatten^Ur yourself, Tim by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      It hasn't "flattened" the world - the rich are still getting richer, the poor still live in squalor; good students still use traditional journals to research, mediocre students crib off their peers (whether that's by copying chunks from the guy across the dorm or the undergrad who wrote a Wikipedia entry, the result is the same); wars are still being waged; freedoms are being withdrawn with full force from citizens in Western nations; heavy industry and big pharma is more "closed source" than ever, with everything privatised under the Sun, and the Internet has done little to open up either field.
      Please provide statistics that show absolute poverty remaining the same.

      Please provide statistics that shows the number of killed in armed conflict remaining the same.

      You will not find any but when you don't, will you change your unfounded negative opinion of the state of the world?
  14. Al Gore financed the InterNet by peter303 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nation Information Infrastructure (information superhway) bill passed in Dec 1991. It bought some optical fiber backbones, encouraged adoption of standards. In the 1980s the "net" was rag-tag collection of suibnets- arpatnet, milnet, NSFnet, BITnet, dialup bboards- etc.

    1. Re:Al Gore financed the InterNet by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      In the 1980s the "net" was rag-tag collection of suibnets- arpatnet, milnet, NSFnet, BITnet, dialup bboards- etc.

      Making their way to a place called...... EARTH?

      Sorry,Cant help myself... BSG last season started and I'm all into it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  15. Im totally on the same page with him by unity100 · · Score: 1

    "What's exciting is that people are building new social systems, new systems of review, new systems of governance. "My hope is that those will produce... new ways of working together effectively and fairly which we can use globally to manage ourselves as a planet." he says. indeed, even now there are many internet communities that users shape up their own opinion about everything, independent of which country they are living in. internet is becoming a super nation
  16. The Leibowitz Photo Session is next by wiredog · · Score: 1

    The Web, topless.

    1. Re:The Leibowitz Photo Session is next by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      That's better than "The Web, goatse"

  17. "inventing the internet" by greenfield · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't the summary read, "inventing the web?"

    --

    --Sam

  18. Of COURSE it's still in its infancy! by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where was the printing press 15 years after its invention?

    Where was the telephone fifteen years after its invention? (Hint: not in many homes)

    Where was the television fifteen years after its invention? It was Commercially available since the late 1930s but when I was a kid in the 1950s there were only three stations in the St Louis metro area, one of the US's larger cities.

    The internet is barely out of the womb,

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:Of COURSE it's still in its infancy! by thanatos_x · · Score: 1

      Just as a note, technology is progressing increasingly fast, as is it's rate of adoption. Cell phones were a curiosity back in the 80's. If in or near a city, you could carry a briefcase sized object to call people. Arcane rituals had to be done to let your home provider know what zone you were in.

      I'd claim cell phones are out of their infancy. Will they continue to improve? Yes. But at this point they're evolving into something far more than phones; they haven't improved much in that regard in years.

      The internet is far more prevalent 15 (or 40) years after its introduction than most of the technologies you mentioned. It's also had far more resources poured into than any of those inventions, so it makes sense.

      --
      I am not an expert. If I am misled in something, please correct me.
    2. Re:Of COURSE it's still in its infancy! by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      But the internet is in most homes (homes being defined as where telephones and televisions are also present) and has greatly affected the way businesses do business. I'm not going to argue whether it's out of infancy, because that's just a subjective term, but according to your definition, I would argue that it has spread far faster than previous technologies.

    3. Re:Of COURSE it's still in its infancy! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Tech always seems to advance faster as time goes on. But with for example, TV, in the fifties almost everyone had a TV even though there weren't many stations to watch on them, they had far smaller screens, and were almost all black and white. They're just now getting higher definition.

      When the last home I owned was built in 1918 it was state of the art; it had both gas AND electricity! There was still a gas pipe on the upstairs wall for a gas lamp. The basement could have been a "museum of house wiring" since it contained everything form the old 1918 wiring to modern wiring.

      But the folks in 1918 surely thought that electricity distribution and house wiring were mature technologies.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    4. Re:Of COURSE it's still in its infancy! by ioshhdflwuegfh · · Score: 1

      I'd claim cell phones are out of their infancy. Will they continue to improve? Yes. But at this point they're evolving into something far more than phones; they haven't improved much in that regard in years. I'd add that one direction of improvement of cell phones is to become more like classical phones in terms of the quality of transmitted sound -- I often hear the other person way better over the cheapest ass classical phone than over my technologically much more sophisticated cell phone.
    5. Re:Of COURSE it's still in its infancy! by ioshhdflwuegfh · · Score: 1

      I'd claim cell phones are out of their infancy. Will they continue to improve? Yes. But at this point they're evolving into something far more than phones; they haven't improved much in that regard in years. I'd add that one direction of improvement of cell phones is to become more like classical phones in terms of the quality of transmitted sound -- I hear the other person way better over the cheapest ass classical phone than over my technologically much more sophisticated cell phone.
  19. The web is a minor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get the pr0n off the web! The web is under 18 and all you blokes looking at nudie pictures on it are looking at under-age porn!

  20. The infancy analogy is apropos... by sinator · · Score: 4, Funny

    After all, we're in the terrible 2.0's right now.

    Someone change the diaper, there's twitter all over the place.

    --
    Three Step Plan:
    1. Take over the world.
    2. Get a lot of cookies.
    3. Eat the cookies.
    1. Re:The infancy analogy is apropos... by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, gotta watch out for those twitter shitters.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
  21. Adolescence by mrrudge · · Score: 1

    Ah! The www is 15, that would explain all the porn, shallowness, obsessive shouting, stupidity and in-jokes? But, maybe more fun than what we've got to look forward to... { I'm 35 tomorrow, so this is indeed bitterness }

  22. As true now as it was then by sootman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Q: Do you wish you'd started the Web as a business?
    A: If I'd started "Web Inc." it would have been just another proprietary system. You wouldn't have had this universality. For something like the Web to exist, it has to be based on public, nonproprietary standards.
    — Tim Berners-Lee, Wired, 1997

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  23. Ok, but what about... by barzok · · Score: 1

    How does Vannevar Bush feel about it?

    1. Re:Ok, but what about... by Kozz · · Score: 1

      How does Vannevar Bush feel about it?

      Probably, "It's dark and smelly in here. Somebody let me out of this box!"

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  24. Nope. by professorguy · · Score: 1
    An "elephant" is a big animal. The "elephant" is the particular animal living with us that we all feed and wash (as in "Who forgot to feed the elephant?"). Notice NO need for capitalization.

    Just because it's the one YOU use, doesn't make it a proper noun.

    1. Re:Nope. by eln · · Score: 1

      The elephant's proper name is not "Elephant". In contrast, the Internet's proper name is "The Internet". It is a proper noun, and most style guides agree that it should properly be capitalized.

      Really, my original argument is not correct, since there really is only one Internet, as the term "internet" is not really used anymore to denote a collection of networks other than the Internet that we all know and love. However, the fact remains that the word should properly be capitalized.

    2. Re:Nope. by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      An "elephant" is a big animal. The "elephant" is the particular animal living with us that we all feed and wash (as in "Who forgot to feed the elephant?").

      The elephant's name is Stampy. The internet's name is the Internet.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    3. Re:Nope. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      I'm looking on the interwebs right now for an adopt-an-elephant program where I can name my elephant "Internet Elephant". I will then refer to him as both Internet and Elephant and note that the associated semantics population has more than trippled in the last few years.

    4. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's say that the elephant's name is "Elephant". If I call it the elephant and you call it the Elephant, we're both right but taking different perspectives. I'm calling it by what it is, while you call it by its proper name.

      But isn't it odd to call it the Elephant if the name is Elephant? People don't talk about connecting to Internet, do they?

    5. Re:Nope. by pressman · · Score: 1

      I prefer Global Interweb.

      --
      Pooty tweet
    6. Re:Nope. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      The elephant's proper name is not "Elephant".

      Maybe your elephant isn't named "Elephant".

      I once had a friend whose cat was named "Bird". She named it that so that when a (prospective) landl{ord|ady} asked whether she had any pets, she could honestly say "Just my Bird". And I have a pet cockatiel named "Three", but that's a much longer story that would be OT here.

      Of course, there are many internets, probably a few thousand of them, but there's only one Internet, whose name is properly capitalized. This is important to the pedants among(st) us.

      And I have one of those t-shirts that asks "Does anal retentive have a hyphen?" And yes, I know the correct answer to that one.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    7. Re:Nope. by smellotron · · Score: 1

      I prefer Global Interweb.

      Obligatory xkcd reference. Someone needs to write a bot that searches slashdot posts for keywords (like velociraptor) and auto-responds with obligatory xkcd references.

    8. Re:Nope. by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      "Internet Elephant" - I thought we were supposed to stay away from things abbreviated IE.

  25. glowbull warmongering nazi DOWntime expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're kind of like the walking dead. souls all blackened, bodies 'running' on greed/fear/ego. see you on the other side of it? let yOUR conscience be yOUR guide. you can be more helpful than you might have imagined. there are still some choices. if they do not suit you, consider the likely results of continuing to follow the corepirate nazi hypenosys story LIEn, whereas anything of relevance is replaced almost instantly with pr ?firm? scriptdead mindphuking propaganda or 'celebrity' trivia 'foam'. meanwhile; don't forget to get a little more oxygen on yOUR brain, & look up in the sky from time to time, starting early in the day. there's lots going on up there.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071229/ap_on_sc/ye_climate_records;_ylt=A0WTcVgednZHP2gB9wms0NUE
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080108/ts_alt_afp/ushealthfrancemortality;_ylt=A9G_RngbRIVHsYAAfCas0NUE
    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/31/opinion/31mon1.html?em&ex=1199336400&en=c4b5414371631707&ei=5087%0A

    is it time to get real yet? A LOT of energy is being squandered in attempts to keep US in the dark. in the end (give or take a few 1000 years), the creators will prevail (world without end, etc...), as it has always been. the process of gaining yOUR release from the current hostage situation may not be what you might think it is. butt of course, most of US don't know, or care what a precarious/fatal situation we're in. for example; the insidious attempts by the felonious corepirate nazi execrable to block the suns' light, interfering with a requirement (sunlight) for us to stay healthy/alive. it's likely not good for yOUR health/memories 'else they'd be bragging about it? we're intending for the whoreabully deceptive (they'll do ANYTHING for a bit more monIE/power) felons to give up/fail even further, in attempting to control the 'weather', as well as a # of other things/events.

    http://video.google.com/videosearch?hl=en&q=video+cloud+spraying

    dictator style micro management has never worked (for very long). it's an illness. tie that with life0cidal aggression & softwar gangster style bullying, & what do we have? a greed/fear/ego based recipe for disaster. meanwhile, you can help to stop the bleeding (loss of life & limb);

    http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/28/vermont.banning.bush.ap/index.html

    the bleeding must be stopped before any healing can begin. jailing a couple of corepirate nazi hired goons would send a clear message to the rest of the world from US. any truthful look at the 'scorecard' would reveal that we are a society in decline/deep doo-doo, despite all of the scriptdead pr ?firm? generated drum beating & flag waving propaganda that we are constantly bombarded with. is it time to get real yet? please consider carefully ALL of yOUR other 'options'. the creators will prevail. as it has always been.

    corepirate nazi execrable costs outweigh benefits
    (Score:-)mynuts won, the king is a fink)
    by ourselves on everyday 24/7

    as there are no benefits, just more&more death/debt & disruption. fortunately there's an 'army' of light bringers, coming yOUR way. the little ones/innocents must/will be protected. after the big flash, ALL of yOUR imaginary 'borders' may blur a bit? for each of the creators' innocents harmed in any way, there is a debt that must/will be repaid by you/us, as the perpetrators/minions of unprecedented evile, will not be available. 'vote' with (what's left in) yOUR wallet, & by your behaviors. help bring an end to unprecedented evile's manifestation through yOUR owned felonious corepirate nazi glowbull warmongering execrable. some of US should consider ourselves somewhat fortunate to be among those scheduled to survive after the big flash/implementation of the creators' wwwildly popular planet/population rescue initiative/mandate. it's right in the manual, 'world without end', etc.... as we all ?know?, change is inevitable, & denying/ignoring gravity, logic, morality, etc..., is only possible, on a temporary basis. concern about the

  26. Re:What the fuck would he know anyway? Cunt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he is so fucken smart, why isn't he rich? What a fucken cunt.

  27. What a cunt. by wombatmobile · · Score: 0, Troll

    He is such a cunt

  28. Yes, it's not 90% spam yet by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    E-mail, a mature technology, is now 90% spam. The Web isn't quite there yet. Another five years, and we'll be there.

    (Thought for today: does the infrastructure required to deliver e-mail spam and Internet ads use more energy than the paper-based direct mail industry?)

    1. Re:Yes, it's not 90% spam yet by PMBjornerud · · Score: 1

      Thought for today: does the infrastructure required to deliver e-mail spam and Internet ads use more energy than the paper-based direct mail industry?

      More energy than chopping down trees to chemically process them to write characters on, then transport them in a car to their destination?
      --
      I lost my sig.
    2. Re:Yes, it's not 90% spam yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer was No in 1978. The answer today is STFU and find the answer to your question. Please don't pretend like your brainless contribution is intriguing.

  29. a lot more to come by sylverboss · · Score: 1

    I also truly believe that there is a lot more to come, and the massive switch of the desktop to the web is only beginning. CC.

  30. Invented the Internet? by jabber · · Score: 1

    He invented the World Wide Web.

    Everyone KNOWS Al Gore invented the Internet! Sheesh!

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
    1. Re:Invented the Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA HA HA HA HA HA.

      What a truly ORIGINAL JOKE. YOU ARE SO FUNNY! In fact, it was even funnier than the OTHER 2342345 'Al Gore/Internet' jokes in this thread.

  31. Yes It Is by aquatone282 · · Score: 1

    Listen up boys and girls. . . I too remember the bad old days before the Information Revolution. The first facsimile machine I used required a single page being mounted on a drum, a phone dialed (with a real rotary dial!), a person on the other end to pick up (in my case I was calling from Olympia, WA to NY, NY), and both parties to place their handsets on their respective machines before hitting the start button. . . The WWW has changed the world and is destroying one of the greatest barriers to over-all well-being of mankind - the ability to share information any time with any one. With the exception of the few remaining totalitarian regimes, government can no longer change and shape information as a form of control. But I think the days of hold-back dictatorships like North Korea and Cuba are numbered and the numbers are dwindling. Because at the end of the day all anyone wants is the freedom to pursue their natural right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Yes It Is by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      With the exception of the few remaining totalitarian regimes, government can no longer change and shape information as a form of control. But I think the days of hold-back dictatorships like North Korea and Cuba are numbered and the numbers are dwindling. I wonder if this article makes it past The Firewall. You know the one I mean.
    2. Re:Yes It Is by rdebath · · Score: 1

      Maybe, maybe not.

      But more to the point a firewall isn't good at holding back an ocean and that firewall doesn't even pretend to be watertight.

  32. If... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If we had put a price on it like the University of Minnesota had done with Gopher then it would not have expanded into what it is now. We would have had some sort of market share alongside services like AOL and Compuserve, but we would not have flattened the world." Isn't this the reason against patents and capitalism?
    Sharing can only increase the well being of everyone.

    34
  33. Of course it's "The Internet" with capital I... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because that's what that globe icon on my Windows 95 desktop says!

  34. free distribution and worldwide use by xPsi · · Score: 1

    Making the web free to use had a vital role in spreading its use worldwide...If we had put a price on it like the University of Minnesota had done with Gopher then it would not have expanded into what it is now The web itself isn't free to use nor is the internet. However, I will agree that CERN's decision to make their web code free to the public did play a role in bringing about an idea whose time had come.

    Still, whether something is free or not doesn't really have an obvious relationship to it spreading (meaningfully) worldwide. For example, I don't think you can say just because something is a proprietary product means it won't spread worldwide. The market is fickle and you never really know what people latch onto. I suspect Gopher failed largely because it just wasn't that great to begin with. But rolling the Gopher:web::UM:CERN analogy to the next level, I have a hunch that if CERN didn't make their web code free, someone else would have created something to compete with it which was free and basically equivalent to it.

    --
    i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
    1. Re:free distribution and worldwide use by inerlogic · · Score: 1
      The web itself isn't free to use nor is the internet.

      while you could argue that "free" internet access at libraries and such is paid for by tax dollars and donations, the web itself is free to use.

      the web originally ran on CERN's internal network, before being released to the wild, you can still use it to share data that way, at home, on a non-internet connected network.
      thereby using the web, for free, without paying any access fees to anyone. and any access fees we pay aren't web fees, they're internet fees.

  35. Not infancy by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 1

    I don't think the internet is still in its infancy. Judging by spelling and grammar found in message board posts, blogs, and myspace accounts (ie: "Teh w3b Rulz!!!11"), I would have guessed it is around age of a first grader.

  36. 15 years? by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    Well, when the internet was 15 years old, which was, what, mid 80s, I don't think the web had even been concieved yet. As for the web, I have been using it for 16 years.

  37. Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the grandparent forgot the ";)"

  38. Internet grows up by Narpak · · Score: 1

    Internet is about to leave it's child stage and enter its rebellious teens. Soon it will be locked in its room playing GTA and Guitar Hero; and it always smells of incense.

  39. EASY explanation of Internet vs. WWW for you kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The WWW was invented by Tim Berners Lee.
    The Internet was invented by Al Gore.

    OK kids, you can now get back from recess with something to impress your teachers.

  40. An opportunity by geekoid · · Score: 1

    for a bunch of people to wave their' I've been using the internet for x years' penis around.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  41. Re:Thought for today by inerlogic · · Score: 1
    i wouldn't think so...
    i can send an email to a friend in Oregon, and she'll get it in a matter of seconds, if not quicker.

    a standard first class letter would take about 4 or 5 days (UPS ground takes 8 days)

    the infrastructure behind electronic mail has been in place for decades, and (hopefully) gets updated periodically, but it serves other purposes as well.

    it is not dedicated just to the sending of electronic mail, unlike the post office whose only purpose is handling mail. (ok, they process the occasional passport request)

    the email infrastructure probably uses more energy, but it is more efficient in terms of speed and volume. it would take MUCH more energy to send a "snail mail" to Oregon from Massachusetts in the same few seconds it takes an email to get there.

  42. It's early days:... by John+Guilt · · Score: 1

    The web exists, but the implants aren't here yet.

    I'm making a joke, and I'm serious: once it's a direct neural access thing, this stuff will look like Victrolas and Stanley Steamers---both excellent technologies, but now they look quaint and limited.

    It won't be easy, but the desires of the military and the handicapped community will make it happen sooner rather than later, even if the initial profit motive should not prove there.

    What's text-messaging compared with something more like telepathy?

  43. WWW, Internet, and Tim Berners-Lee by mi · · Score: 1

    He invented the web, not the internet.

    And even that is a stretch. The "web" he invented at CERN had all of the content sitting on a single server. More like today's Wiki-sites, than WWW. If anybody, it is the creators of Mosaic (at NCSA), who really did it.

    The only people I see pushing this myth about Tim's role being fundamental (rather than "merely" substantial), are those anxious about US' just claim to have created the Internet (and WWW) and given it to the world. Although Tim lives in the US now, he is of British origin, which, somehow, gives comfort to those possessed by anti-American sentiment — at least, they don't owe us anything ;-)

    Imagine a fatwa banning would-be terrorists from using Internet to communicate, organize, and post their videos, because it is an American invention...

    The observed confusion between "web" (for which Tim does deserve plenty if not 100% of the credit) and "the Internet" (for which he neither claims nor deserves any) may very well have been deliberate... In a few more years, the few people, who know the difference will get tired of pointing it out...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:WWW, Internet, and Tim Berners-Lee by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Interesting
      And even that is a stretch. The "web" he invented at CERN had all of the content sitting on a single server. More like today's Wiki-sites, than WWW. If anybody, it is the creators of Mosaic (at NCSA), who really did it.

      Untrue and completely wrong. The Mosaic browser was based on the libwww software developed at CERN. They did not credit the work, but all the major intellectual components of the Web came from CERN: The URI, HTTP, HTML, 404 not found.

      The NCSA group did make a practice of failing to credit Tim's work. In particular the original releases of Mosaic failled to mention the use of CERN code or that it was built on CERN ideas. That is generally regarded as plagiarism. The original Mosaic instructions did not include the string 'World Wide Web' or 'CERN'

      Tim's prior claim is well established, as is the fact that there were Web browsers developed before Tim met the NCSA people.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    2. Re:WWW, Internet, and Tim Berners-Lee by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      The original web browser (WorldWideWeb, written by TBL on his NeXT Cube, which was also the first web server) supported hyperlinks to pages on other servers, and they made the source code available for others to play with so web servers started up in a number of places - one of the first in the UK was a surfing site run by the Physics potgrads at Swansea University. The CERN guys also wrote a UNIX terminal-based client for the web, which was used by a lot more people than the NeXT one.

      The big contribution that Mosaic made was to add the img tag. A feat which they managed to get wrong by having the text representation in an attribute rather than in the cdata so it broke all other existing browsers.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:WWW, Internet, and Tim Berners-Lee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Although Tim lives in the US now, he is of British origin..."

      That basic concept is what Americans are. They are not simply one nation. They are all nations.

    4. Re:WWW, Internet, and Tim Berners-Lee by iminplaya · · Score: 1
      --
      What?
    5. Re:WWW, Internet, and Tim Berners-Lee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So 'Asian-Americans' really is the preferred nomenclature?

    6. Re:WWW, Internet, and Tim Berners-Lee by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      Alright, I was there at the dawn of the third age of mankind.....

      Wait.

      Wrong show. I was there at the dawn of the Web, and my understanding is that CERN was the "birthplace" of the web. They advertised that fact on their webpage as early as 1994, which makes sense because they were the first WWW server.

      MOSAIC was not the first browser... it was merely the first browser available for home PCs (amigas, macs, and ibm/windows compatibles). And of course that took the Web away from academics and put it into the hands of average people. Then Mosaic lost its dominance to Netscape. And then Netscape was killed-off by the Microsoft monopoly giving away Explorer for free.

      That's my understanding of Web history.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    7. Re:WWW, Internet, and Tim Berners-Lee by mi · · Score: 1

      I'll see your "5 Interesting" with my "5 Informative" (hopefully)...

      The Mosaic browser was based on the libwww software developed at CERN. They did not credit the work, but all the major intellectual components of the Web came from CERN: The URI, HTTP, HTML, 404 not found.

      Well, let's check the evidence... The current sources of libwww (version 5.4.0):

      • Bear MIT's and CERN's copyright from 1995;
      • Aknowledge Tim's work at CERN from 1991 (Library/src/HTFile.c says: Feb 91 Written Tim Berners-Lee CERN/CN)

      The (really-really) old version of libwww — still available inside xmosaic distribution also list Tim and CERN as authors — and carry CERN's 1991 copyright.

      So, both Tim and CERN got their credit back then and continue getting it now.

      But libwww only contained 40 '*.[ch]' files, and the entire xmosaic has 137. Of the 40 files under libwww, TBL was only responsible for 6 (HTFTP.c, HTNews.c, HTAtom.c, HTFile.c, HTAtom.h, tcp.h).

      So, any claim, that Tim/CERN are the fundamental "inventors" here is wrong.

      Tim's prior claim is well established, as is the fact that there were Web browsers developed before Tim met the NCSA people.

      References would be useful — maybe, you are referring to Gopher?.. That was, indeed, a nifty system, but it was written in University of Minnesota — in 1991, about the same time Tim was working on the pieces of libwww. Did Tim's pre-NCSA work produce anything better than Gopher?

      But I did not claim, NCSA "invented" WWW either — the term Hypertext, for example, is from 1965... NCSA merely made it widely usable by creating the first browser looking similar to what we still use today.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    8. Re:WWW, Internet, and Tim Berners-Lee by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Well since I was there and you most certainly were not, your reply looks more like a troll to me.

      Your claim that all the CERN content was on a single server before NCSA is simply untrue. There were over 100 Web servers in 1992 before the release of Mosaic.

      While it is true that NCSA did not actually go so far as to remove the CERN tags from the source files, my statement referred to the original documentation. The NCSA documentation did not mention CERN or the Web till I brought up the issue of plagiarism.

      The libwww sources bear the CERN and MIT copyrights as they are the distributors. But the NCSA code split from the libwww trunk before there was any libwww development at MIT so you are looking at the wrong version of the code in any case.

      Mosaic was a significant step in the development of the Web, but to deny Tim's role as you attempt to do here is entirely wrong. Tim designed both the protocol and the original Web browser and server before the NCSA team started work. To assert as you do that Tim 'stole' the idea from NCSA is entirely untrue.

      The principal contribution made at NCSA was actually the addition of the Forms model to HTML. Although NCSA were the first team to implement inline images they were not the first to propose them and in fact there was an active discussion concerning how to introduce images when Marc presented his approach as a fait acompli.

      But the Mosaic browser still misses features that are generally considered to be fundamental. Neither Mosaic nor Netscape were the first browsers with support for the Table model for example.

      You are probably correct in stating that NCSA, Andressen and co now get rather less credit than maybe they deserve. But this is entirely of their own making. People stopped giving them credit after they tried to claim rather too much. Take a look at 'Netscape Time', Jim Clark's history of Netscape, it only mentions Tim three times and he slams him every one of them. Or look at 'Architects of the Web' which is another Netscape book with twelve chapters each describing a 'Web Architect' but no mention of Tim at all.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  44. Considering the amount of pr0n... by dr_turgeon · · Score: 0

    I claim Web 'much closer to puberty.'

    --
    "...objectivity resides in recognizing your preferences, subjecting them to especially harsh scrutiny." -Gould
  45. One thin by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    http://www.slayersaves.com/tour-dates.php

    Take a look-- it should blow your mind..

    look at 2007....

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  46. Berners-Lee's error is not "infancy", but "still" by demon+driver · · Score: 1

    Or does anyone seriously think the more 'mature' the Internet gets, equaling the more commercially exploited, the less infantile it would become?

  47. Gutenburg Bible started out near perfection by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Unlike the Web which started out rather clunky, the Gutenburg starting printing at a very high level. Gutenburg spent decades perfecting his machine in secrecy.

  48. Silly Noobie!! Web is NOT the INTERNET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You youngsters can't think before WWW, but WWW is but a small and insignificant part of this thing we old timers in the know call the internet. Pick up a book, but make sure it wasn't written by YEY ANOTHER NOOBIE!!, noobie.

  49. Experience by boristdog · · Score: 1

    All the "I've been using X for Y years!" comments remind me of a poll my local newspaper did back in 1994 when the Web and Internet were just becoming popular with the masses.

    Over 40% of the respondents (out of over 900 in one city) said they had been using the Internet for 11 years or more. In 1994.

    Um...yeah.

  50. Mod parent up by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Al Gore never said he invented the internet. Al Gore invented the algorithm, and you can plainly see it derives its name from its inventor.

  51. Re:What the fuck would he know anyway? Cunt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck would he know anyway? Cunt.

    Exactly, Tim Berners-Lee is famous for his carnal knowledge of the ladies.

    Wait, is that not what you meant?

  52. Infancy? by JRSiebz · · Score: 1

    It's more like the web is in its terrible twos.0!

  53. Re:Who? who ho. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No!
    That day IS now!

        Well... it was, yesterday.

  54. Something wrong here... by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

    TBL spawned the web right - I use spawned because invented seems odd, and created is not strictly true - which is the most important invention of the 20th century (or at least way up there).

    So why does his office look like a cupboard?!

    He should have huge sprawling office with a desk the size of a football field with naked women everywhere, and six roaring fireplaces and a porsche to get around the place and a cocaine mountain and...

    Wow... he must be humbler than me.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  55. maybe in infancy, but I don't see any big changes by master_p · · Score: 1

    The web may be in its infancy, but I don't see any big changes coming along. I mean, I don't see how the web can be improved so much that it will be radically different from now and transform our lives in another way. Basically, the WWW is a medium where text flows from one place to another, no matter what technologies are used to deliver that text (http, xml, etc). Since text is the primary medium of transporting information (since the dawn of civilization), I don't see it being replaced with anything else. It may become more dynamic, but it's still text.