The Most Annoying Software Out There

superglaze writes "ZDNet UK has a very entertaining round-up of the most annoying software out there, and everything from RealPlayer and Adobe Reader to Java and Norton Antivirus gets a kicking. 'The internet has brought us many joys. It's rewritten the rules of business and pleasure. And pain. For it allows what may have seemed like bright ideas at the time ('let's use it to make sure our customers have the latest software', for example) to turn into a stinking pit of misery — usually, but by no means always, after marketing gets its fangs in.'"

Comments

Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[elrous0]

Print Version (unless you want to click through about 10 pages)

And I agree with most of these, particularly Apple. I recently spent several hours trying to remove Quicktime from my system and replace it with Quicktime alternative. I had to go in and hand edit the registry. The damn program was incidious about wriggling it's way back into my system tray and running processes if every single reference to it wasn't removed from the registry. That will be the last piece of Apple software I ever install on my system.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[BadAnalogyGuy]

Worse than that, actually. If you try to delete qttray.exe, the quicklauncher app that sits in the task tray and eats up memory for no other reason than giving QT a minor boost on startup, the quicktime application will detect this on system reboot (because it is registered as a startup application) and recreate the qttray.exe executable file from a stored version somewhere in its own bowels.

That's right. If you delete qttray, Quicktime opens its maw and barfs up a new version of it. Then it turns it on and puts it back in the task tray.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[RetroGeek]

I recently spent several hours trying to remove Quicktime from my system and replace it with Quicktime alternative. I had to go in and hand edit the registry.

You should try to remove Norton virus checker. It has pieces of itself everywhere, and it over writes Windows system files with its own.

So you get a brand new machine, and during the first login, the Norton installer runs. You have NO choice in this. Some deal was reached between the machine distributor and Norton, and that is just the way it is.

If you make a mistake, the entire Windows system goes sideways. We alway do an image FIRST, then try to remove it. That way if something blows up you have a fallback. Then we make an image for the rest of the same type of machine, and we re-image every new one that comes in the door.

Hey Norton: go stuff it!

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[Ollabelle]

So don't delete it. Just run msconfig.exe and disable it.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[tha_mink]

Yeah, and the Safari "update". If I wanted yet *another* browser, I'd have installed it myself. Don't include it as a quicktime update. WTF? Seriously apple, WTF?

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[BadAnalogyGuy]

Why should I change my usage? They're the ones that suck.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[carpe_noctem]

(unless you want to click through about 10 pages)

I hope I'm not the only one struck by the irony of this article formatting given that this it is criticizing bad UI design...

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[AndrewNeo]

This is a very good example of why I just reinstall with a normal Windows CD instead of the retail version. I even have an OEM version of XP handy so I don't get the junk from a 'restore' CD.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[Keruo]

Removing Norton is simple, it just takes few steps.

Just open Start->Settings->Control Panel->Add or remove programs and uninstall it. Reboot.
If the install asks for password, the password is symantec.
After reboot uninstall Live-Update, also from control panel. Reboot.
Then download norton removal tool and run it to make sure it's gone.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[pnewhook]

Because you're doing it wrong??

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[nmb3000]

Then download norton removal tool and run it to make sure it's gone.

What irritates me is why the hell do they have an uninstaller if it, you know, doesn't uninstall the damn thing? I suppose if they're going to put removal tools for viruses on their site they may as well include one for their own "products".

The only people who write worse (un)installers than Symantec is Adobe. I truly think they have nothing but brain-dead chimps on their install team.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[gaspyy]

No - if you disable it instead of deleting the entry, it'll stay away.

It's the first thing I do after installing stuff - disabling stupid startup items.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[FredFredrickson]

You're right, that is simple.

I work in computer repair, and on more than just a few occasions, the actual uninstaller for norton doesn't work. In fact, it takes very little effort to get a copy of norton to stop functioning properly. The security center will warn that certain parts of the software aren't working properly- and when you try to fix it, they just don't work. So then you try to uninstall it, and it comes up with an error.

So, I'd like to correct your few steps:

Step 1. Run the Norton Removal Tool. Don't waste your time with any of the other steps.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[ceifeira]

Simple?! Two reboots, a non-disclosed password (as far as I know), and an additional removal tool just to uninstall a piece of software?

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[The Great Pretender]

I know that I'm going to get panned for this by the fruit lovers, but here goes:

Leopard I hate you!

I have ubuntu at home, I have Vista at home, they make me use a MBP with Leopard at work. Vista, most likely due to it no having to connect to any sort of server, works beautifully. It runs on a many year old Dell 8300 Dimension, streams netflix to the TV, acts as a home office computer and I re-boot it once every 3 weeks, not because it needs to, but because I feel like I should. Ubuntu is on an old Dell 1100 Inspiron upstairs, it acts as my streaming jukebox from my network drive and on-site webbrowser, so we don't have to go downstairs to the mancave or open the work laptops. My work laptop, with Leopard, is the most unstable, constantly updating, out of control, mind-of-it's-own POS that I've ever worked with. Now don't get me wrong, I love the interface, Apple got this OSX thing right, but the machinations underneath the surface just ruin the experience. Most times I 'sleep' the computer I need to restart. Multiple monitors at work? I need to restart. Two days of intense document construction? "Out of memory" and I need to restart. After 2 days the cursor becomes jumpy, I need to restart and the list goes on and on and on. I would like the OSX inteface on a computer that lets me work, using simple productivity packages, day after day after day with no failures - is that too much to ask Apple?

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[nawcom]

assuming you're runnning teatimer since every windows user should, permanently reject permissions for qttray to get added to the startup apps in the registry the next time it tries to.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[greetings programs]

You can avoid installing QT by using QT Alternative here http://www.free-codecs.com/download/QuickTime_Alternative.htm All the goods without the bloatware.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[p0tat03]

Most times I 'sleep' the computer I need to restart. Multiple monitors at work? I need to restart. Two days of intense document construction? "Out of memory" and I need to restart. After 2 days the cursor becomes jumpy, I need to restart and the list goes on and on and on.

May I suggest that this may be a hardware issue? I run a MBP with Leopard and have had none of these problems. In fact multiple monitors is one of the great things about running a Mac :) It just works, and it remembers all your settings to boot. Connect it to your work external monitor and blam, one desktop, connect to home, blam, another. I've also seen problems on MacBook hinges that prevent proper sleep, maybe this is the case.

Take it into your local Apple Store, this just ain't right.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[Jesus_666]

Safari updates are obnoxious, regardless of the OS. On Windows they sneak them in through the back door, while on OS X Safari updates for some reason require you to reboot the computer.

Yes, I have to reboot a Unix box because I update a web browser. I don't know what came over Apple to make that decision; the only reason I can think of is that Safari hooks into the kernel - and quite seriously, a kext for a browser is a pretty bad design choice.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[Kelbear]

I've wondered this for awhile, what advantage does quicktime provide that causes people to continue to use it? I'm not being snarky, I'm genuinely curious.

(For that matter, why were people using Realplayer?)

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[Dahamma]

It's a piece of shit program that happens to be required/automatically installed with iTunes (which is slightly less annoying software in itself that unfortunately is a must have for those little trendy devices called iPods...

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[Colonel Korn]

NOT in order of annoyingness:

Quicktime - It's both a terrible media player and it is insanely unwilling to be removed. Apple's central design concept seems to be preventing the user from doing what he wants. If I delete qttask.exe, it means I don't want that file anymore, not that I want it to be resurrected. If I disable it in msconfig, it doesn't mean that the next time Quicktime runs I want it to get a new startup entry.

iTunes - ituneshelper.exe is about the same as qttask, and iTunes is even worse at playing music than Quicktime is at playing movies. It's the single most bloated piece of software I've ever used. The iTunes store is another reason to avoid it, not to use it. It also crashes way too much on a new MacBook Pro, and since I don't know what Apple compatible software is a good replacement for it, I can't just replace it for my friend as I would if he had Windows.

Apple Updater - Everyone I know just installed Safari. They didn't mean to.

Flash - Thank you, Flashblock, for making the internet useable again. Thank you, bad web designers, for sticking retarded flash "intro pages" on your sites so I can see that they've been blocked and then avoid your company on principal.

HP Printer Philosophy - Thanks to you, too, HP, for making a printer that needs an IP to be set via a web interface in order to access that same web interface. Thanks to my neighbor for having a parallel cable sitting around so I could access it in a more traditional way.

Windows Desktop - Why do you lose my icon placement every time your resolution changes? Luckily, there are countless little freeware apps to save icon positions.

Real Player - You basically invented the Apple "if you uninstall me but I will grow more powerful than you can possibly imagine" routine, so you get extra evil points for originality.

Logitech Mouse Drivers - My mouse drivers are now 100 megs. Finally they fixed the two year problem of needing to run them manually after booting (running on startup caused them to fail), but they still involve two separate taskbar icons and take up a ton of RAM.

Word - I know how to make you do what I want, but it took years to learn how to both stop your autoformatting and then put in the formatting I want. I hate the way you place images. I hate the way you resize my stuff after I've already locked it down.

Verizon Phone UI - My phone had a great UI and lots of nice capabilities when it was made. You removed bluetooth file transfers so I'd have to pay you to get photos off my phone, and you made the interface ugly. You removed the ability to vibrate and ring at the same time. I'm glad my phone was so easily hackable.

Flash (again, but bear with me) movie players - The only reason you exist is to keep me from saving video to my hard disk. Guess what. I can still do it. Meanwhile, you're slow, often not resizable without using a magnifying tool to manually zoom onto your little box, and you require me to enable flash.

I know how to fix or replace all of you, but you kill me every time I have to use a new PC and wade through your bloated code again.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[Zanth_]

I use Windows at work, I have a Debian server and a Ubuntu desktop at home and I own a MBP dual booting Leopard and XP SP2. Windows is easily the most frustrating out of the ones I use but my response is mainly an enquiry regarding your mac.

I run dual monitors (24" Dell) with my MBP, I run VM Ware Fusion with 1 GB of RAM allocated to the machine (I run a 2G MBP so it is capped at 2 Gigs of Ram). I have Fink installed and when compiling I can still have the VM up and all the while not having any stability issues. I hardly have any updates (and I check weekly). I've never experienced nor heard of anyone in my circle (we are about 20) who have had issues with Leopard. Despite it being a bit sluggish compared to a well setup Ubuntu install or a stripped down XP SP2, I would say it is more stable than the other two over time. I do get the "sleep" problem you mention though, but that seems to be endemic across laptops and OS'. For whatever reason, no one has perfected awaking from sleep yet.

I'm wondering if your laptop might not have some serious issues. What you describe seems out of the ordinary. You might want to send it off for a checkup. Perhaps you have dying RAM? I've never had to restart Leopard safe for a major update (usually a security patch) and certainly never when plugging in a second monitor. I plug it in and it just works.

Sure, myself and the 20 folks I work with are a small sample size and therefore this is mostly anecdotal, but just in case, you may want to get it looked at.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[encoderer]

You can also delete it and then create a text file and name it qttray.exe.

It will pass the generic:

if(!exists(qttray.exe))
{ // recreate
}

check but when it tries to execute it it just fails silently.

More on point, though: By deleting the file (or doing this little hack I proposed) you're still "changing your usage." It would be easier to just disable it in msconfig.

Of course, even that is fallible: Next time the app updates itself it'll be re-enabled.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[MPAB]

Many cameras take videos in .MOV instead of .AVI; Joe User is told he needs to download QT in order to view his homemade videos and he does.

OTOH, editing a .MOV file with QT pro takes 1/10 of the time needed to edit it with most non-dedicated video editors.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[Colonel Korn]

More on point, though: By deleting the file (or doing this little hack I proposed) you're still "changing your usage." It would be easier to just disable it in msconfig.

Of course, even that is fallible: Next time the app updates itself it'll be re-enabled. Removing all Apple software is a good first step in prepping any Windows computer for use. When Apple has no attack vectors into your system you don't have to worry about qttray coming back at all.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[ttldkns]

not a kext, Webkit. When they update safari they also update webkit. Lots of system apps use the webkit engine. Dashboard is the one i think of right away. Mail renders HTML Email using webkit. In fact im sure the QuickLook Server uses webkit to preview web pages on disk. I think they make you restart because they are taking the easy way out instead of calling for a restart for all webkit apps.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[mrraven]

teatimer was using 5 to 10% of the processor on my Core2DUo laptop with XP sp3 and 2 gigs of ram. That's worse than even a pig like Norton, so I deleted it and run Windows defender which does behave. I hate giving M$ more support but alas teatimer is not the answer, at least for me.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[supun]

Nice reference to Office Space. :)

Samir: No one in this country can ever pronounce my name right. It's not that hard: Samir Na-gheen-an-a-jar. Nagheenanajar.
Michael Bolton: Yeah, well at least your name isn't Michael Bolton.
Samir: You know there's nothing wrong with that name.
Michael Bolton: There was nothing wrong with it... until I was about 12 years old and that no-talent ass clown became famous and started winning Grammys.
Samir: Hmm... well why don't you just go by Mike instead of Michael?
Michael Bolton: No way. Why should I change? He's the one who sucks.

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[hudsucker]

Jeez, do guys you turn off lights by hitting the switch with a hammer? Why not just use QuickTime's control panel to tell it you don't want an icon in the notification area? Then it will never return.

1. Right-click notification area icon, select Settings.
2. Select the Advanced tab.
3. Under Tray Icon, turn off the option "Install QuickTime icon in system tray".

Re:Print Version (and my Apple woes)

[toddestan]

Because the icon is only a symptom , the real problem is all the worthless processes Quicktime spawns. While that option does get rid of the icon, that's all it does.

Norton Products...

[DaRat]

The worst has to be the Norton XXXX products. I installed Norton 360 v2 on my laptop as an "upgrade" to Norton AntiVirus 2007, and I think that intentionally installing a few viruses and malware would have resulted in better overall system performance.

Symantec tech support was, of course, useless:
"Sir, you have a virus or malware."
"Yes, I know: the malware is called Norton 360 since my problems didn't appear until I installed your product. What I want to know is how to stop Norton 360 from using 100% of both cores and incessently accessing the DVD drive for no apparent reason."
"Sir, you need to run a scan for virus and malware."

At least I got the damn thing uninstalled and got a refund. Never again...

Re:Norton Products...

[The Living Fractal]

Repeat after me:

AVG Free.
AVG Free.
AVG Free.

You should start to feel better soon.

Re:Norton Products...

[Richard Steiner]

The decline of Norton is a sad story. I remember when Norton's Disk Doctor for DOS was cool, and when it was fun to watch Speedisk shuffle the clusters on your FAT filesystem all around. And it actually worked as advertised! :-)

What was the last good version? Norton Utilities for DOS 6.01?

Re:Norton Products...

[gravyface]

While I'm a regular AVG user (Free Edition at home, and Network Edition for my clients), the interface is attrocious, the malware encyclopedia is next to useless, and the bizarre update/error-state notices are a nuisance. Version 8 improved the admin console a bit, but not nearly enough.

Re:Norton Products...

[MrMr]

I'd say around 1990 or MS-DOS 5.0, when Peter norton sold his company to Symantec.

Re:Norton Products...

[geekoid]

I just installed AVG free 8.0 and it immediatly told my I had a virus in an email and deleted my whole inbox.

Just an FYI

Re:Norton Products...

[Hankapobe]

My brother in law "all of a sudden" lost his internet connection on his computer. After testing the connection, I ran some diagnostics. Guess what? Norton AV was blocking port 80.

But wait! it gets better. You cannot uninstall it through the remove programs. You have to go into safe mode and uninstall there. Otherwise, you'll just get error messages - regardless if you use Norton's uninstall or Windows.

What a kick in the balls!

Re:Norton Products...

[KlomDark]

It's so much more fun to say "Avast! Avast! Avast!" - I've used AVG for years, but am finding Avast even better with a far better GUI. (Although shut off the audio alert "Virus Database Has Been Updated", especially when you have the speakers set for loud and then thing goes off at 4AM or when you're busy with your girlfriend. Scares the hell out of you!) http://www.avast.com/

And they had 64-bit support before AVG, that's why I switched.

Re:Norton Products...

[FredFredrickson]

I've seen this, and can confirm this behavior, but I think you're a bit mixed up... I work in computer repair, and yes, by default it should block port 80, unless you're running a webserver.

What you meant to say, is that it blocks internet access- and this is true. Norton Internet Security's default install would block any and all internet access. I think they finally put out an update that fixed it, but during one or two months in 2006ish/2007 we had about 15 computers come in with the same symptoms - no internet. Took us very little time to figure out that it was the NIS firewall's default settings. Bloody stupid if you ask me.

Re:Norton Products...

[TheLinuxSRC]

If you are using Thunderbird/Mozilla mail this is a fairly common occurence with any virus scanner. Apparently these scanners are smart enough to be able to quarantine single emails from Outlook but cannot do it for a file format that has been used for 10+ years . You can restore the inbox (after making a copy of your current inbox and deleting the associated .msf file). You can then delete the offending email and copy the email from the inbox that was used during the interrum back into your restored inbox.

Re:Norton Products...

[Nimey]

There's a setting in T-bird for this: Tools->Options->Privacy->Anti-Virus->Allow anti-virus clients to quarantine individual incoming messages

Winamp becoming Damned Irritating

[Toreo asesino]

I've noticed recently it's wanted to update itself about once every two weeks, which would be fine if it was a FireFox type update - nice and clean, restart app & done, but instead the update mechanism is something like the following:

Click on "omg! Update me!" big window.
Browse through newly openeded browser window.
No, just the free one, no shitty MP3's thanks.
Download. Click install.
No ffs, don't take control over all my media types.
No, keep your shitty ad-ware.
Die Winamp agent; if you're not the default for everything it's for a reason.
Yeah, same settings as last time (it's an update ffs).
Oh right, you changed a bunch of setting anyway, thanks.

There's just a tonne of questions that are so unnecessary for a minor update, which seem to come thick & fast these days. Thanks a bunch AOL; you've created the least smooth updating process i've seen in a while.

Re:Winamp becoming Damned Irritating

[MBCook]

WinAmp 2.95 was perfect. Small, wicked fast, just about perfect.

WinAmp 3 was an unnecessary rewrite, and I didn't like it much. Felt slower for no real benefit to me. It was about this time I went over to iTunes (mostly due to iPod).

Then they later released 5 because of all the complaints. 2 (the good version) + 3 (the recent version) = 5 (the new version). Never tried it, WinAmp had lost all mindshare by that point.

So much good software just bloats past what it needed and into death. Reader used to be pretty good. Norton wasn't the amazingly bad program it is now, it was once the best.

Honestly, these problems are solveable

[It doesn't come easy]

Adobe Reader - Using open source PDF reader "Evince Document Viewer" instead. Result? Software does not annoy.

Apple iTunes - Using open source music program "Amarok". Result? Software does not annoy (and works much better than iTunes as well).

Windows Update - Using Genuine Linux Distro "Ubuntu". Result? No licensing restrictions, no DRM, no repeated system restarts, no service packs to fix the previous service pack, that fixed the previous service pack, that fixed months old critical bugs.

RealPlayer - Avoiding RealPlayer like the plague it is (using "Amarok" for the same functionality, if not the same file format). Result? No privacy leaks, no ads, no reporting back to Real on what I listen to or where I visit on the web.

Java - Using Sun's Java without the Yahoo toolbar. Result? Java is reasonably well behaved. Looking forward to truly open-sourced Java in the near future.

Yahoo - Use Yahoo's maps to check up on Google results. Use Yahoo throw-away email when I need to be a little bit stealthy. Otherwise avoid Yahoo.com like the plague it is. Result? Happy camper.

Norton Antivirus - Using upgraded OS "Linux" so that viruses are not a problem. Result? Viruses? I don't have no stinking viruses!

Preinstalled software bundles - Using upgraded OS "Linux" so that preinstalled software bundles are not a problem. Result? Preinstalled software bundles? I don't have no stinking preinstalled software bundles!

Outlook/Exchange - Using "Evolution". The jury is still out on whether "Evolution" is worth using verses online calendar and scheduling web sites.

Flash - Using...nothing. Avoiding flash based websites like the plague they are. Results? Fast web page loading, no privacy issues, no vector for malware installation, only see web pages that actually provide links to relevant content.

Re:Honestly, these problems are solveable

[Anonymous Coward]

Adobe Reader - Using open source PDF reader "Evince Document Viewer" instead. Result? Software does not annoy. Yeah, too bad nothing other than the Adobe version can support Reader plugins. Document signing, etc.

Apple iTunes - Using open source music program "Amarok". Result? Software does not annoy (and works much better than iTunes as well). You can buy stuff from iTunes in Amarok?

Norton Antivirus - Using upgraded OS "Linux" so that viruses are not a problem. Result? Viruses? I don't have no stinking viruses! Not yet anyway.

Preinstalled software bundles - Using upgraded OS "Linux" so that preinstalled software bundles are not a problem. Result? Preinstalled software bundles? I don't have no stinking preinstalled software bundles! This I don't even know what you are talking about. Hell, Ubuntu comes with a shitload of preinstalled stuff.

Outlook/Exchange - Using "Evolution". The jury is still out on whether "Evolution" is worth using verses online calendar and scheduling web sites. Evolution sucks donkey balls. Thunderbird is better (PKCS#11 support, smartcards, etc). There is no good calendering unfortunately (Sunbird maybe some day).

Flash - Using...nothing. Avoiding flash based websites like the plague they are. Results? Fast web page loading, no privacy issues, no vector for malware installation, only see web pages that actually provide links to relevant content. You would have to be an idiot to ignore YouTube and sites like it. I'm not talking about all the stupid crap on there. I'm talking about the tutorials and such. The instructional value is off the charts.

Re:Honestly, these problems are solveable

[Oxy the moron]

Apple iTunes - Using open source music program "Amarok". Result? Software does not annoy (and works much better than iTunes as well).

This one needs some clarification... Remember not to buy your music from the iTunes store or using Amarok doesn't help much. Buy from a vendor that does not use DRM-laden music downloads (such as Amazon), use Amarok, and annoyances are no more!

Re:Honestly, these problems are solveable

[gmuslera]

Flash- Using NoScript to decide which pages/sites could show me flash content. Only see what i want,

Re:Honestly, these problems are solveable

[SirGeek]

Adobe Reader - Using open source PDF reader "Evince Document Viewer" instead. Result? Software does not annoy.

For Linux, Agreed. But when is Evince going to work in Windows ? Oh. Never ?? So what choice does a person using windows have ?

Apple iTunes - Using open source music program "Amarok". Result? Software does not annoy (and works much better than iTunes as well).

For Linux, Agreed. But when is Amarok going to work in Windows or with people's iPods? Oh. Never ?? So what alternateive choice does a person using windows have ?

Windows Update - Using Genuine Linux Distro "Ubuntu". Result? No licensing restrictions, no DRM, no repeated system restarts, no service packs to fix the previous service pack, that fixed the previous service pack, that fixed months old critical bugs.

No repeated system restarts, but none ? What about when your kernel is updated ? What about VMWare needing to be recompiled once you HAVE rebooted ?

RealPlayer - Avoiding RealPlayer like the plague it is (using "Amarok" for the same functionality, if not the same file format). Result? No privacy leaks, no ads, no reporting back to Real on what I listen to or where I visit on the web.

See above comments for Amarok.

Java - Using Sun's Java without the Yahoo toolbar. Result? Java is reasonably well behaved. Looking forward to truly open-sourced Java in the near future. True.

Yahoo - Use Yahoo's maps to check up on Google results. Use Yahoo throw-away email when I need to be a little bit stealthy. Otherwise avoid Yahoo.com like the plague it is. Result? Happy camper. You are kidding right ? What do you do when you have a company that USES Yahoo for its "approved" IM provider ?

Norton Antivirus - Using upgraded OS "Linux" so that viruses are not a problem. Result? Viruses? I don't have no stinking viruses!

True. However if you do filesharing with Windows, you should consider something like Avast which has a free Windows AND Linux version.

Re:Honestly, these problems are solveable

[pdusen]

"Stop using Windows" isn't a bugfix.

Re:Honestly, these problems are solveable

[theaceoffire]

I don't like your flash solution, so here is mine: Firefox + Flash Block.

I get all the benefits of no flash, but can still watch youtube and all the rest if I change my mind with no hassle.

Re:Honestly, these problems are solveable

[unformed]

On Windows, use Foxit PDF Reader. It's not open-source, but they do have a free version for non-commerical purposes. It's fast, it's small, and they have it available in a ZIP so you don't have to run an installer.

Re:Honestly, these problems are solveable

[ChrisMaple]

Conporate quarterly conference calls are generally available only in Windows Media Player and RealPlay formats. Under Linux, this means RealPlay only. Fortunately, Linux RealPlay seems pretty benign.

Re:Honestly, these problems are solveable

[Nimey]

Piss off, troll. Some of us use Windows for our own reasons, and OS advocacy doesn't add anything to the discussion.

Re:Honestly, these problems are solveable

[Digana]

You can buy stuff from iTunes in Amarok?

No, but why would you want to? It defaults to Magnatune, which has a much nicer business model than iTunes. No DRM, more formats including patent-free Ogg Vorbis, artists gets half of what you pay instead of only 10% or less, you pay whatever you think is reasonable, and you're allowed, nay, encouraged to share. I think you can also get other music stores like Jamendo for Amarok, but I personally use Gnome's Rhythmbox, which has plugins by default for both of these stores. Sure, you won't find Britney Spears selling her stuff in Magnatune, but the quality of the music is not bad at all, even if it's not what's currently playinig in MTV.

Personally, iTunes was the biggest reason why I installed Debian etch on my mom's laptop. She doesn't know her own root password, of course; I'm the one adminning it for her. A bit of a hassle for me to set up at first, but now it works fine, and it has the rock solid stability of Debian. She loves it, and in her own words, "a lot less bullshitty than that other thing." She doesn't know the other thing is called Sony Vaio's default Windows XP install with all that crapware it comes with out of the box.

Re:Honestly, these problems are solveable

[manwal]

...it's many.

Bloody Adobe Reader

[tempest69]

I have no clue as to why this program takes upwards of a minute to read a simple pdf file that is mostly text. It really boggles my mind as to what the computer could be doing with that time/cycles.. Where as foxit can load the same pdf in a blink of an eye.. but microsoft loves to revert the extentions to adobe, unless I march through a convoluted maze to revert it back. never let your well-meaning friend install adobe on your box, it's a nightmare to remove.

Storm

Re:Bloody Adobe Reader

[MBCook]

I've been using FoxIt recently which is quite nice. That said, Reading is an amazing piece of software.

It's slow. Really slow. Amazingly slow. It uses tons of memory. It's just atrocious. But I was used to it on Windows (before a friend pointed out FoxIt which I switched to immediately).

Then I switched to OS X and got to use Preview. It's wicked fast. It's like opening a 1kb text file in Notepad on Windows. It's almost instant. It's easy to use, no crazy interface, not 6 updates to the updater each time I open it.

Then I installed CS 2.

Soon I tried to open a PDF and thought my computer locked up because the file didn't pop open. After a bit the loading screen popped up and loaded. Then the program, then the document. It was terrible.

So I went and changed the file association and now Preview handles them again and my system works.

I remember when I had a full copy of Acrobat (not reader, Acrobat) and it opened about 10x faster than Reader does on the relatively high-end (multi-core, 2GB+ RAM) machines I've been forced to use it on.

Almost everything on the list was good at one time or another. RealPlayer, while not perfect, was small and fast. Norton (the first version for 95) was quite good, even on my slow 386 (yes... 386). Outlook used to be WAY faster than it is now. On my nice desktop it feels like I'm running it through VirtualWindows on a 500MHz G4.

Flash it's self isn't bad. But so many people seem to not use delay loops and let it run at 600 FPS and suck up all the CPU. Combine that with the terrible and slow interfaces people use it for and it gets a bad rap. Flashblock is your friend here.

Re:Bloody Adobe Reader

[Thaelon]

I have no clue as to why this program takes upwards of a minute to read a simple pdf file that is mostly text. It really boggles my mind as to what the computer could be doing with that time/cycles.. Where as foxit can load the same pdf in a blink of an eye.. but microsoft loves to revert the extentions to adobe, unless I march through a convoluted maze to revert it back. never let your well-meaning friend install adobe on your box, it's a nightmare to remove.

Foxit has already gone the way of Adobe Reader, updating, slow loading, and a nice little "advertising toolbar" for you.

The cool kids are using Sumatra now.

It's a little sparse on features (like remembering page view settings), but it makes even Foxit look slow.

Re:Bloody Adobe Reader

[darkwhite]

Use Sumatra PDF, or kpdf/whatever on Linux. Finally, an Adobe-free existence!

Why just Windows Update?

[hyperz69]

I think they could have just said VISTA... Done! Though seriously this app misses, a few apps. Mainly... GOOGLE BAR? Dear god, does every application on the planet now try to install google bar? Completely removing it requires a virgin, 2 brillo pads, a priest, plus 6 gallons of goats blood.

Re:Why just Windows Update?

[eln]

Please do not speak ill of Google Bar. Google does no harm to anyone, and all of its software is useful and error-free. Speaking negatively of Google is unwise. Remember, they know where you live.

What?

[Daimanta]

No Microsoft Bob?

Please let Apple software update be on there...

[shawnmchorse]

I'm almost to the point where I want to remove Quicktime from all of my machines, because I'm so tired of being asked to "upgrade" to Safari and iTunes.

Takes one to know one

[Roger W Moore]

Since they were including companies as well as just software I hereby nominate ZDNet for most annoying website. Why can't they stick the 11 short paragraphs making up the article on ONE PAGE!

My vote: HP

[truthsearch]

We have one of those all-in-one HP printers at my office, where we're all on Macs. When we first got the printer I installed the disk with the Mac drivers. It also installed a bunch of utilities. Playing around with these utilities I found a tedious maze of buttons and windows. I couldn't even find the most obvious features, like where to see a scanned document.

But I also noticed my computer was running slower, even when no HP utilities were being used. So I looked at the Activity Monitor and found the HP background applications were permanently taking up 10% CPU, even if nothing was ever printed or scanned. So I removed all of the HP utilities and drivers and found a driver built into OS X which was for almost the same model number. I have no problems at all printing and my CPU is back to normal utilization.

Not only do these HP utilities suck, but they're annoying when you're not even using them.

Re:My vote: HP

[Mordok-DestroyerOfWo]

We were on on offshore survey in the Gulf of Mexico when one of our computers died. No problem I thought, I threw in a spare laptop SATA and reinstalled Windows and the survey software. When it came time to download the printer drivers from HP they came in at a whopping 135 MB! For a damn driver! We were on a satellite linkup and downloading that one driver to print out the results cost over $100.

Re:My vote: HP

[nine-times]

Oh, I really really hate this. When will printer manufacturers learn that I don't want to install your stupid little utilities?!

Give me plain, unadulterated drivers, not software installs. Give me a PPD/INF/whatever that I can point my OS to and use all of the built-in OS printing functions. That's all I want.

Same with cameras, scanners, and pretty much any other hardware out there. Give me the driver and leave me alone.

Update apps...

[Bert64]

Update apps are a pain in the backside, but they are a symptom of the way windows and osx are designed...

There's no question that your system should be aware of what software is installed, and what the latest version is, and make the user aware too and give them the option to install the updates.

On linux you rarely, if ever, get problems like this because the updates are handled centrally.

The problem with windows and osx, is that there is no central way for third party apps to register to the automatic update mechanism, the supplied update functions are only for the original vendor's apps, not third parties, meaning every third party has their own update service wasting memory and informing/annoying you in different ways.

The linux approach is orders of magnitude better, centralised package repositories, a centralised method of informing the user, you can choose how to be informed of updates, and you won't be hassle any other way. To further help matters, the package manager knows of packages you don't have installed too, giving you single click access to the latest versions of a whole host of additional applications.

Re:Update apps...

[FredFredrickson]

AND HOW! Nothing's more annoying that typing an email- or a slashdot comment, just to look up and realize nothing you typed made it to the textbox. Why? Because an update alert just popped up and stole your focus. Or even worse- Windows Automatic Update has alerted you that you have 30 seconds before it restarts your computer. Your only options: Restart now, or Restart Later. That's it.

If you're away from your desk for a minute or two to go to the bathroom, and you didn't save your documents- shame on you, Microsoft decided that their software updates are more important than the productivity of the person using the software, which is absolute crap. It restarts without prompting for saving. It forces a shutdown. Does this on Server2003 too- REAAAAL good for production environments (and yes, automatic updates is off... not even sure how it got started )

What about Lotus Note?

[paradoxSpirit]

How could they have forgotten Lotus Note?

Article is a Troll

[teknopurge]

The Exchange/Outlook comment? I mean come on. The author, in order to prove how bad outlook is, pimps Online Free email services? Who the hell is this guy and why is he writing articles on the topic if he's never worked(obviously) in a corporate environment? His best quip is that Outlook doesn't have threaded views? Is he for real?

Regards,

ARGHSFARGH!

[Aquaseafoam]

The most annoying thing for me? The stupid little bubble that pops up to inform me that wireless networks are in range, even when I am running through a wired connection. The only way I've found to really get rid of this is to disable the connection, a hassle for whenever I try and go anywhere. Of course, this particular annoyance only really hits me nowadays when I need to boot into my small windows partition. Ubuntu FTW.

Re:ARGHSFARGH!

[Anonymous Coward]

\\HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Advanced\

Create DWORD called EnableBalloonTips and call it 0.

Is there a similar setting in gnome/ubuntu? The balloons there are just as annoying, and I haven't found any way to turn them off besides running a chmod -x on some executable or another...

A hearty welcome to our latest new member

[zappepcs]

Welcome elrous0, to the 'what were they thinking? anti-software fan club'

Here we will help you commiserate as you belch out the pains brought to you by software that is premised on the thought that ALL users would surely want this software until the day they die.

With the mentality (and social skills) of clippy, these coders work double time to ensure that your experience with their software will be never ending. What could possibly be worse than malware you might ask. How about software that has an uninstall feature but won't do so?

I'm wagging my finger at you AOL, Apple, MS... you, antivirus guy in the back snickering, you can STFU too.

We're glad to have you as a member, and look forward to your votes in the awards ceremonies next year. Note that Internet infamy is your for the taking if your right up for nominees is both exacting and excoriating.

I'm still investigating, but the OOo quickstart on XP may get a nomination. HP printer driver division has a place on my list too.

Anyway, mill around, meet the other members, enjoy....

Re:A hearty welcome to our latest new member

[raddan]

Speaking of Apple, has anyone ever noticed that under Mac OS X, there isn't even a built-in function to remove an application? At least Windows pretends to. And before you mention, "just drag the application icon to the trash"-- what about the dotfiles, preferences, tempfiles, and other miscellaneous shit that applications spew around the system? E.g., Dreamweaver, the only application I've found so far to be completely unmanageable with radmind, thanks to these assholes?

Acrobat Reader on Linux

[Anonymous Coward]

I've appreciated that Adobe has provided Reader for Linux for quite some time now. Until I tried their latest a number of months ago (version 8? or 9?).

It insisted upon putting a bunch of worthless crap in my ~/.kde and ~/.local directories, overriding my MIME types and replacing KDE's PDF icons (which looked consistent with all the other KDE icons) with its own icons, which clearly were out of place.

Of course, it also decided to set itself as the preferred reader for PDFs, contrary to my preference. It would have been annoying, but bearable, had it asked me about this before it made invasive changes, but simply running the program was enough to wreak havoc.

So fuck you Adobe, I'll continue to use kpdf, which doesn't feel the need to take over my desktop. As an added bonus, kpdf doesn't have a million worthless plugins that slow down application startup, either.

Re:Did they mention linux firefox?

[pdusen]

If Firefox had widespread problems like this, it wouldn't be installed by default on so many distros. Either you broke something or you're a troll.

Left out Top Ten Slideshows

[rocketjam]

What about "top ten slideshows" on big media websites that present their "top ten" on eleven or twelve separate pages, each filled with more ads and other distractions than the actual "content" you've been directed to via Slashdot?

Yeah, I know they're not "applications" but, the annoyance factor is right up there.

Flashblock FTW

[snarfies]

Too many websites lean on Flash too heavily. You'll have a lot of trouble getting by without it on a lot of websites. Its obnoxious, and what's more, there's more and more Flash-based advertising appearing on various websites (yes, I'm glaring at you too, Slashdot). But there is a way to make Flash be a little more well-behaved: http://flashblock.mozdev.org/

Best Firefox extension EVER. Works on Seamonkey, too, which is what I use at home.

It's Not Always the Software Per Se

[FurtiveGlancer]

Sometimes it's the exclusive distribution method or the update method that truly irks.

Google's Sketch-up Pro is available only by download. Not a problem in the US, but on a remote US base in Afghanistan? A CD/DVD option would have been most helpful.

As already pointed out above, updaters can be a significant issue even if the software itself is acceptable. The status quo should be maintained for settings, file associations and preferences, TYVM.

Advertise on the web and through the quality of your product, not via the update process.

Re:Did they mention linux firefox?

[Uncle Focker]

In this very article, when I click the red arrows to go to the next page, they go backwards. They don't for me and I've just tested it on 5 different boxes running Linux.

Plus the images? don't show up at all. Are you running no script or something else that could be blocking them? They show up just fine again here.

Firefox is shit in linux. You keep stating this and then giving examples that I can't reproduce on any available machine.

I have been using it for years and it sucks. Bullshit. If you had such severe problems as you claim you'd have stopped using it unless you're just an idiot. Since you're just trolling, though, it matters not. Get some better material next time.

The answer is right there in front of you

[HungWeiLo]

Look at the top of your window:

"The Most Annoying Software Out There - Mozilla Firefox 3 Beta 5"

I didn't say it - the browser did!

Re:The answer is right there in front of you

[JimR]

Hmmm, the title bar on my browser window says:

Slashdot | The Most Annoying Software Out There

Re:The answer is right there in front of you

[oodaloop]

Mine says The Most Annoying Software Out There - Microsoft Internet Explorer. I'd kill to have any veriosn of Firefox here at work.

Re:The answer is right there in front of you

[Guanine]

I can help you with that. Grab the latest version of Firefox at Portable Apps -- I would have gone crazy at work long ago without Firefox Portable. The way it works is it installs software to a USB drive, i.e. only to one directory. You miss out on browsing history and page caching (to avoid wearing out your USB memory), but I've used it for 9 months without problems or headaches. Anyhow, I put my FF Portable on a USB stick and start it off that each morning. If you can't mount USB drives, you can run the software off your desktop. If you can't access that website, you could attach the exe file to an email to yourself, renamed to something like firefox.ppt -- enjoy Firefox at work!

Java update process needs fixing

[schwit1]

Some of my users' add/remove programs have a half dozen separate Java installs. And they all install in separate folders.

Java(tm) 5 update 6
Java(tm) 5 update 11
Java(tm) 6 update 1
Java(tm) 6 update 3
Java(tm) 6 update 4
Java(tm) 6 update 6

I concur

[Finallyjoined!!!]

And will not be re-visiting the ad-laden abomination that is ZDNet UK ever again.

They should have included themselves on the bloody list.

worse than annoying for someone like me

[spirit_fingers]

Unfortunately, I'm the IT Manager for the ad agency of one of the most annoying programs mentioned in that article (I won't mention which one). So I'm in the unhappy position of having to install our client's software on all of our computers. Would I use that software if the company weren't our client? NO FUCKING WAY! If there is a hell for IT support people, I'm in it. I not only have to support this crapware, but I have to pretend that it's the greatest thing since oral sex.

Right on the money

[H0p313ss]

Usually I disagree with these rather non-technical whiners, but I found this to be right on the money this time. Besides, there's some wonderful British humor there:

Acrobat Reader
"a reputation for being as welcome as a flatulent camel in the kitchen"

Windows Update
We've been kind and not talked about Vista.

RealPlayer
"If this software turned up at your door, you'd call the police."
"... we were given software to install. 'Disable your firewall', it commanded. 'Drop dead', we replied."

Java
"Programming languages are like sewage plants: if the average user becomes aware of them, something's gone wrong."

Yahoo
"And yes, when I ask to exit the software, that's because I really want to, not because I'm having a crisis of doubt."

Flash
"There's nothing wrong with Flash, provided you don't use it to construct web sites where people want to find information..."

Make Microsoft Look Good day?

[Futurepower(R)]

I like this quote from the article, about Apple QuickTime: "... what is this, Make Microsoft Look Good day?"

Re:Make Microsoft Look Good day?

[tobiasly]

I like this quote from the article, about Apple QuickTime: "... what is this, Make Microsoft Look Good day?" Personally I enjoyed the sentence before that: It spends half its time trying to sell us stuff and the other half trying to stop us [from] using it.

Re:Make Microsoft Look Good day?

[mdwh2]

I disagree. Most people won't have a friend with a Mac that they look closely at enough to see how Quicktime works. What they will see is that the thing causing problems on their machine is an Apple product - which will make them doubt the "But, but, Apple just works" claims so often made of Apple's products.

I remember recently here someone telling me how Apple just works, and insisting that my PC would always distract me, or be "noisy" (I'm not quite sure what he meant), giving examples such as watching a DVD. Needless to say, he didn't believe me when I told him my PC just worked too (and does more than simply working).

But funnily enough, the next day I did have distractions when trying to view a video - because it was a quicktime movie, and I couldn't get it to do basic functionality, such as full screen mode. So I have to concede he was right after all - my computer doesn't just work, when it's running Apple software at least.

Re:Did they mention linux firefox?

[clarkn0va]

...Windows fonts are not available on Linux...

http://corefonts.sourceforge.net/

Or apt-get install msttcorefonts for debian/ubuntu users.

db

Yup, HP has lost the plot

[Kupfernigk]

Even though I think HP Printing System for Linux is really rather good.

I tried to get an HP A3 inkjet going the other day, using an old P4 box as the print server.
I do not consider 100% CPU utilisation while trying to print a PDF to be acceptable, nor do I consider that having to reboot to clear a stuck job is a good idea. And this from a driver of nearly 100MBytes.

There are several other recent HP gripes that are causing me nowadays no longer to recommend HP printers. I guess it will take many years to recover from Fiorina.

Re:For those who use Adobe

[CelticWhisper]

No.

I'm sorry, but as nice as some of Foxit's features were, the two things that irritated me about it were first that you still had to pay to get the full featureset, and second that it kept altering the goddamn context menu option. "Foxit Reader, Best Reader for Everyday Use!"

How's 'bout just "Foxit Reader." *Regedit*

2 reboots later...

"Foxit Reader, Best Reader for Everyday Use!"

No, your name is "Foxit Reader." That's...fucking...it. You don't tell me what you are, I tell you what you are on MY computer. And stop expanding out my context menu with a name 3 times longer than any of the other options contained therein.

*Regedit*

2 reboots later... Ad nauseam.

Try SumatraPDF if you just need to read documents. It's super-lightweight, which does unfortunately mean it lacks some features of Foxit, Evince, and others, but I find that I'm usually only interested in reading documents anyway and for that, Sumatra is excellent.

You haven't seen some of the alternatives

[Moraelin]

You haven't seen some of the alternatives, then.

Some years ago, for example, sick and tired of Norton, I went and bought McAffee's anti-virus. In fact, I figured I'd go for the full monte, including firewall, "privacy" stuff, you name it. I can't be arsed to dig up the CD and find out which year it was, and I wouldn't know if it got any better in the meantime. (Though I would be surprised.)

The first funny impression was when trying to update it. As is the craze in the last decade, it couldn't just have either a URL to their download page, or a neat little downloader program. It just had to launch an ActiveX control in a browser to do the actual download and install. It launched whatever browser you had configured as default. E.g., for me it was Mozilla. It only actually worked in IE.

But wait, the patcher was more stupid than that.

I didn't have too much space left on C:, but I had vast amounts of space on my slower D: drive. So I refuse to install it to the default location, and install it to D:.

Then I run the updater. It installs the updates to the default location on C:. Literally, it was too fucking stupid to either ask, or figure out where its own installer had put those programs.

It gets funnier. Presumably because it couldn't figure out where they were, it didn't uninstall or at least disable the origina, unpatched version on D:. It just let it run too.

If you think one anti-virus is a resource and CPU hog, now picture twice that. It felt like I had downgraded back to my trusty old 486.

Now I don't know how good their virus protection was, I didn't actually have a virus. Their privacy stuff, though, now that made most sites that required a login, no longer work. And it made some schizophrenic: they thought I was simultaneously logged in _and_ not logged in. It was giving me some insight into what Schroedinger's cat must have felt ;)

To cut a long story short, and skip over a few more faults, after a few days I uninstalled it.

The uninstaller, though, only got rid of the new patched copy from C:. It left the one on D: as it was, and loading itself in memory anyway. Trying the uninstaller from D: didn't seem to work either. I had to manually mess with the registry to get rid of it.

On the whole, it left me the impression that it makes malware look good by comparison. Ok, so you have to mess with the registry in safe mode too, to get rid of it, so it's a tie there. Most viruses don't use as many resources or interfere with your daily use of the computer half as much, though.

Flash! Aaaaaaa!

[Dachannien]

I'm really glad they mentioned Flash. It's become a horrible malware vector, which is largely Adobe's fault. But worse yet is how some web designers use Flash.

Flash is too often used for creating website navigation widgets, or worse yet, for encapsulating entire websites. And even worse than that are the horribly annoying Flash version-checker scripts, which demand that you will install or upgrade Flash before viewing this site, because "I spent fifteen minutes on those fancy Flash-based site nav buttons, and you damn well better look at them" even though virtually all of the site's actual content is in plain HTML.

What's more, I don't need or want a Flash widget to view a series of JPEGs. Just show me the damn images - I'm perfectly capable of clicking by myself to move on to the next one, thanks.

Resident processes for no reason!

[Hankapobe]

Many programs have these resident services (Windows) that sit there and just take up memory and CPU for no reason.

For example: Quickbooks. Why does it have to have (IIRC) three services running EVEN IF QUICKBOOKS ITSELF IS NOT RUNNING!? One of them is for updates. The other two I have no idea, but all three sure bogged my system down. I uninstalled Quickbooks and it took Registry Mechanic to get rid of everything. I tell you with this and other problems I've had with Intuit, if I see that company's name on something , I refuse to buy it.

Back in my day, when we had to program in the snow, uphill both ways, we would check for updates upon startup AND allow the user to turn it off.

Folks, just because there is a feature for programs or cool way of doing something, does not mean it's a good design.

Now about Windows registry and the fact that it only grows.....Never mind. I need a drink.

My vote: The Browser

[postbigbang]

I know the history of it intimately. Because it wasn't well though through, it's a miserable user interface. Yes, it seems flexible, and it's nice that the W3 specs are there, but they're not well thought-through, either. Whether it's Java, php, or another language, the pallette called the 'browser' is the biggest, most anarchistic piece of junk I've ever seen. Plug-ins are great.... there are many good things. But the screen real estate, and the number of ways that it can be buggered are just insane. As a GUI, the browser totally sucks. If you don't believe what I'm saying, try to remember "The Frames Era".

A good UI shouldn't have to have users embedding markup language manually. It shouldn't have to trouble you about fonts, re-sizing your window widths. It shouldn't have ways that browser makers can bugger up wysiwyg information in so many ingenious ways.

Mark me as flamebait if you want, but the browser is a disaster, years after its invention, and constant reinvention.

Re:Flash! Aaaaaaa!

[oahazmatt]

I can only blame the web designers so much for that practice.

I ditched my last professional web design job. It was for a paintball site. I presented samples of effective navigation from other sites (some related, some not) and had a discussion about directing visitor traffic and what needs to be emphasized.

Then he starts showing me this flash app that resembles the Windows XP start menu, where all the options are buried. Whenever you click on one, it would just load a different HTML page...in a new window.

I must have tried to reason with him for an hour. I tried to explain to him how I (in a professional capacity) did not feel it was beneficial and would turn visitors away. He eventually told me I didn't know what I was talking about, and started showing me even more "better-looking" sites, all contaminated with flash menus that didn't even work together.

I had the chance to walk away from that job. Not all web designers do. If your project manager wants flash, either you can do it, or his nephew can.

ANY Enterprise AntiVirus

[NumbDr9]

Norton may be the worst, but 2 days ago I had to spend approximately 90 minutes disabling McAfee's enterprise AntiVirus system on my company computer. The thing wanted to do a scan of every file on my computer any time it was accessed (read or write access). And thus my quest began.

I started by attempting to reconfigure the software to scan on write, but some dickhead in corporate IT had decided to disable all user-configuration. Next I searched the internet for helpful advice on how to change the permissions on the admin console. I found instructions on McAfees tech support site, and followed the instructions. I quickly found that the enterprise version of their product let me change the permissions, but then ignored any changes that I made. Next I had a look at the registry. I thought I might be able to tweak the settings by hand; but of course, the software went out of its way to obscure the registry settings. An internet search on specific registry keys yielded a handful of hits, but they were all in Chinese, so no luck there.

OK, so now I'm to the point where I've given up reconfiguring the software, and I just want to disable it. Easy enough, right? Well, not quite. I attempted to disable all the start-up processes, and this was partially successful, but I couldn't figure out how to stop the main scan process from starting. OK, no problem, I'll just kill the process. Well, what do you know, windows task manager doesn't allow me to kill the process. So I hit google again, and I find a third party kill application. This app advertises 16 different methods for killing a process. I boot up the app, and start firing, the first 5 kill methods fail, but number 6 does the trick. Yeah, it's dead. Rename the executable on the filesystem, and I'm done.

Thing is, I would have been happy to run the software if the settings were sane. But since the software sees me as the enemy, I now find myself not running the software at all. Sometimes the cure is worse than the disease.

Re:ANY Enterprise AntiVirus

[Nimey]

The non-self-important-dipshit course of action would be to talk to your IT person. There's a reason (corporate policy) why your computer is set so.

Besides, the damned thing isn't your property. It's your employer's, so it's not yours to fuck with.

SAP?

[satmd]

I don't see any 'enterprise software' in there. For example: SAP. I've been working 2 years in the software development for business customers at a big German Telco and I had to work with SAP and Java on a daily base - I had to WORK with it, not look at it's "nice" results (which we could have cheaper and quicker otherwise, another story). The SAP suite is built around big interconnected databases with a nice and shiny gui. That's the nice part. For the bad side: Max of 7 windows (regardless of system specs). Slow. Error messages are non-descriptive, the detailed messages a repetition of the error message itself. Sometimes produces non-deteministic (as documented) output. Uses a COBOL like programming language for anything that can't be done by drag & drop, called ABAP. VERY expensive. Needs consultants for maintenance (often because programmers CANNOT guess how to do it right from the docs). Makes dependant (easy to import data, but no way out). In the place I worked, we had SAP for about anything: bills, salaries, configuration of ports/switches/isdn/dsl. My favorite error: In december I was 6 days ill, returned the 7th day. My salary report said: 28 days ill and I got a very reduced salary (Hint: there's no 28 days work in December) My favorite documentation: For OOP there was a section that read like: Abstract Classes and Methods work completely orthogonal. Or very similar. SAP is being sold to big companies, by seducing managers with lies like it would be complete, needs near to no maintenance, ... They do this very tricky so managers don't ever back off until they depend on the software and it's too late. A very successfull concept actually. Managers, ask your employees before deploying this BS in your company. Will save you big bucks. REALLY big bucks. Or at least make sure you have a contract that lets you back off from it if it doesn't fulfill your requirements. Don't be fools: shiny BS still is BS.

Re:It's for multisession CD-R.

[tepples]

The CD's are individually shrinkwrapped.

The program doesn't know that.

People were used to dragging files on and off a 1.4 MiB floppy disk. As the floppy began to disappear around the time of Windows 98 and the iMac, floppy formats from Iomega and Imation with nearly a hundred times the capacity enjoyed some limited success because the file manager treated them just like floppies. Some CD mastering apps tried to emulate floppy use cases by loading the existing sessions off a CD, mapping a temporary folder that imported the previous sessions, and writing the changes to a .iso and then to the CD once the user started to eject the CD.

But in the ISO 9660 format, the starting sector number of each file depends on the number of sectors in previous sessions, so building an image can't happen until the mastering program knows how large the previous sessions are. And because the mastering application doesn't know that your CDs are straight from the shrinkwrap until it reads the disc, it doesn't build the image until then. Sure, they could have put in a checkbox to turn multisession recording on and off, but that would not have increased hardware sales or software license revenue compared to the increased support costs from inexperienced users who mistakenly uncheck that box and try to add a session.

foxItPDF fixIt

[Forget4it]

Two grumbles for the latest FoxItPDF:

• the icons don't look red enough to be pdf.
• It insists in changing the register value for .fdf every time it launches. So if you like to create a new folder by Right-Click N F it no longer works.

Anyone know how to banish shellNew permanently from the Reg? Temporary solution is (last line sets the icon back to adobe's)

REGEDIT4
[-HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\.fdf\ShellNew]
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\FoxitReader.Document\DefaultIcon]
@="C:\\Program Files\\Adobe\\Acrobat 7.0\\Reader\\AcroRd32.exe,1"

pages

[Quiet_Desperation]

What's the software that spreads an short article across a dozen, ad laden pages like the site in this story. I vote for that.

Not software, but what it does

[Anonymous Brave Guy]

I think we could distill the kinds of annoyance exhibited by your list and those of others here into a fairly concise list of "bad behaviours":

• Software that phones home or automatically updates without permission (numerous media players, Java...)
• Software that installs stuff you don't want, or stuff you want where you don't want it (anything that puts icons on my desktop, new auto-start things that live in my system tray, new entries on my Start menu buried under several layers of company branding...)
• Software that interrupts what you're doing (Clippy, anything that steals the focus, and especially that damned "Windows needs to be restarted" dialog that keeps popping up and trying to steal a keystroke until either you give in or you happen to be hitting the wrong letter when it pops up and it goes anyway)
• Games that only let you play on-line if you install spyware pretending to be anti-cheat software (I'm looking at you, PunkBuster)
• And of course, the one we all love to hate: software that meddles with your system beyond its remit (Why does Adobe Creative Suite need to splat crap all over my boot sector and mess up my dual-booting? Applications have no business doing that, particularly not without warning!)

In other words, software that can't just do its job and leave everything else well alone.