Slashdot Mirror


China Says It Lacks Skills To Hack US Systems

ScentCone writes "A spokesman for China's foreign ministry says that — China being the 'developing nation' that it is — he doubts that his country has the sophistication to hack foreign systems. This in response to statements by two congressmen regarding apparent probing by China-based crackers into congressional systems for information about communication between US officials and activists in China."

109 of 507 comments (clear)

  1. South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    How would we, chinese people with leetle leetle penises have the courage to do something like that against big americans with big penises?

    1. Re:South Park defense by datan · · Score: 4, Informative

      it's a polite way in China to receive a compliment

    2. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean dumb Americans who can't spell "lead" or "debt" and can't construct a logical paragraph? Why would they think that?

    3. Re:South Park defense by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      How would we, chinese people with leetle leetle penises have the courage to do something like that against big americans with big penises? God, that's the very first line that went through my head when I read the summary. The second line was Americans saying "Aw, shucks, you don't have to be much of a hacker, we don't know anything about system hardening."

      Of course, the really ironic thing would be if the Chinese were hacking the American systems to turn them into zombies to spam out ads for penis enlargement pills.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:South Park defense by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Informative

      China is an amazing culture with lots of fantastic history, and racism/culturalism is bad. That does not mean that taking stereotypes and portraying them as ridiculous is, and most of your "facts" are silly.

      China does get into wars (though historically with itself, and is claiming areas taken by the Mongols(Tibet is not historically part of China). Though "The Art of War" advises against fighting, it was not written because of a history of peace.

      People started moving out of caves 8,000 years ago, with the advent of agriculture in the fertile crescent.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    5. Re:South Park defense by ivanmarsh · · Score: 5, Funny

      That is an asshole thing to say, first of all + SouthPark? Imo, @ least, is a show for small minded idiots, period...

      The Chinese ARE a great culture with over 5,000 yrs. of recorded history behind them (when the caucasian race was still in caves that people were already culturally & scientifically advanced, by way of comparison), the only OTHER like it, is India, afaik!


      I bet the Chinese have a better sense of humor than you.

    6. Re:South Park defense by alexborges · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Racism and culturalism is bad.... for OCCIDENT. Chinesse have NO PROBLEM with being chauvinistic, ultranationalists, kind of like the japaneese.

      China is the longest living civilization/culture of earth. I would say that they are the most succesfull example of a civilization that the eyes of the world has ever seen.

      In 5k years of empire, they got to fuck arround with most of asia, all the way down to indochina, and all the way to the east till japan.

      What they are answering now, comes from a culture that is very, very, very smart. Old. Intelligent.

      This only is "plausible deniability" at its best. And kudos to the chinesse,they did it very well.

      --
      NO SIG
    7. Re:South Park defense by Yetihehe · · Score: 4, Informative

      What they are answering now, comes from a culture that is very, very, very smart. Old. Intelligent.
      Yeah, especially after cultural revolution (1966-76), when they effectively removed scientists from public life and science never quite reborn after this. Very smart indeed.
      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    8. Re:South Park defense by gnick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If each nuclear warhead we have were to kill 125,000 people, they'd still win. I categorically reject your implied definition of "win".
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    9. Re:South Park defense by kiehlster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, they're hacking American systems to find out the real secret behind our big penises. Obviously the guinea pigs they get for their enlargement pill experiments are not showing the promised results they expected while attempting to perfect their own pills.

    10. Re:South Park defense by TheSync · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "They still would have a population greater than our own and the `fight` in them would be far greater as we would have attacked and wiped out 600,000,000+ citizens."

      On the other hand, if we closed down the port of Long Beach, China would be bankrupt in a few months.

      Well, I suppose we'd also have to refuse to pay back US Treasury Securities owned by the Chinese government.

      Hmmm, then we'd probably be bankrupt as well as the world would refuse to purchase any more of our government debt.

      Prices at Wal-Mart would double as well.

      I hope we can all "just get along!"

    11. Re:South Park defense by pragma_x · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree.

      The only way to win is not to play.

    12. Re:South Park defense by Carewolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nonsense. China banned science and innovation more than 500 years ago, and science and technology has not since been more accepted and applied than recently under the so-called communist regime.

    13. Re:South Park defense by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Informative

      You have to consider this - does China get into wars? No... they're NOT that stupid!
      You must be Chinese because you know nothing of Chinese history. How about the Korean war? And Tibet? China is still slaughtering peaceful political dissenters. And as a Chinese person you probably know nothing of the slaughter of dissenters at Tiananmen Square.

      China gets in wars/military actions like anyone else, but when they do it, the purpose is to take away freedoms.
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    14. Re:South Park defense by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly.. as it says later,

      "The chinese will say they cannot do something even when they can."

      They are just being modest.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    15. Re:South Park defense by squozzer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did someone forget to translate "The Art of War" into Chinese?

    16. Re:South Park defense by smclean · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right click it, do 'Copy Link Location', paste it in your address bar, hit alt-enter to open in new tab.. :)

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    17. Re:South Park defense by Slime-dogg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. The only way to win is not to play. Sometimes playing is unavoidable.
      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    18. Re:South Park defense by joeman3429 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's been my experience that small minded idiots are the one's who think that South Park, The Simpsons, Family Guy and other such shows are for small minded idiots, and don't understand the depth of intelligence and humor hidden inside of them.

      It's not just small minded idiots, of course. Other, more intelligent people also mistakenly think this way for some reason.

    19. Re:South Park defense by PachmanP · · Score: 3, Funny

      The only way to win is not to play. See it's exactly that kind of pussyfooting around that's causing this "global warming" thing today. They knew back in the 50s and 60's that fossil fuels would cause warming,and they pushed it to counter the nuclear winter!
      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    20. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China was not an Empire for 5000 years. In fact China held most of China for maybe 1000 years in total, but in that time are many epics of fragmentation, and then there is the total Mongol conquest of the country.

      If you measure success as length of existance, you could say they are the most successful I guess. I think most folks add many more requirements for 'success' however.

    21. Re:South Park defense by alexborges · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What part of textbook mcarthism did you get this from?

      UNderestimating an enemy is stupid. Underestimating the eldest civilization on earth, borders on the insane.

      --
      NO SIG
    22. Re:South Park defense by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      and coming up next...The War on Thoughts. Help stamp out ThoughtCrime today!

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    23. Re:South Park defense by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Funny

      They should have got the genuine penis enlargement pills then, instead of their own cheap Chinese knockoff equivalents.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    24. Re:South Park defense by gnick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. The only way to win is not to play. Sometimes playing is unavoidable. But, in such situations, winning is often unfeasible. Victory just means losing less.
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    25. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." - Mark Twain

    26. Re:South Park defense by just_another_sean · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hot, deep, who knew linking can be such a turn on?!

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    27. Re:South Park defense by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I said nothing of the USA's military action. I merely refuted one of your false statements.

      You have another false statement now, too. China is currently attempting an occupation--Tibet.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    28. Re:South Park defense by dshadowwolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Plus? You have to consider this - does China get into wars? No... they're NOT that stupid!

      Then what do you call the massive flood of chinese troops and equipment into Korea when the UN had pushed past the 38th parallel?


      China most certainly does "get into wars"

      If you can't take an opponent directly? Stir up crap between HE & his biggest opponent, & watch them BOTH "take a dive", while you end up the victor mopping up the spoils of war/walking out of the saloon with the wench over your shoulder & jug of wine in the other hand, is what I suspect this REALLY is... apk

      And guess what - the thing you describe was first used and put to paper more than 2000 years ago by Sun Tzu. It's part of "The Art of War". I'd suggest you go read it.


    29. Re:South Park defense by Bazar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've done this argument before many times.

      US Congress didn't declare war, what they did was that they gave authorization for Bush to use armed forces in defense of USA and for enforcing UN policies. Thus Giving Bush under conditions, the right to send America into war.

      Now heres where things get interesting.
      Firstly with Iraq, you were not at peace, you simply had a cease-fire arrangement. Peace was never officially declared after the Gulf war in 1990.
      Thus by UN standards, USA never started a war, they simply resumed the Gulf war many years later. Thus they were in compliance with UN requirements

      As we know, Saddam broke many un policies, including allowing UN weapon inspection teams.

      Because of the refusal in compliance to UN policies, and the authorization from congress a year earlier in defense of UN policies, Bush had legal entitlement to used armed forces.

      Thus we find that by legal UN loopholing, and by a no balls/brains congress, Bush legally sent USA into war.

      What i also find interesting, is that the USA are still at war with N. Korea, since they never made peace there either, its still a cease-fire arrangement after several decades...
      I guess Bush just had his hands too full with Iraq during his terms in office.

      --
      To avoid criticism; Say nothing, Do nothing, Be nothing.
    30. Re:South Park defense by ravenshrike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eh, the Eurocrats and Brits'll get there well before us.

    31. Re:South Park defense by vuffi_raa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I bet the Chinese have a better sense of humor than you. I am Chinese and I don't find it amusing (the post- not south park- though I think it has gotten really stale as of late).
      Honestly there are a lot of us- not just Chinese, but all Asians that get pissed off a lot because it's not okay to use the 'n' word or make black jokes or use derogatory terms for Jews or Hispanics- but I hear Gook and Chink and Slant eyed or and every other term in the book thrown around (my favorite was being called "indian nigger" when I was in the midwest) not to mention the lame assed white guy Chinese accent and it's just fine according to society. Honestly as much as I am not a fan of china (my dad escaped after the revolution) I honestly think it's funny that they are kicking our ass economically and love the fact that Japan and South Korea put our tech to shame because we are so afraid to get our heads out of our asses in this country and take anyone seriously who isn't white.
      I couldn't believe the other day I was flipping channels and "mind of mencia" was on and he had some rant about how stupid and dirty chinese people were and seriously, I was really offended. I mean if you were to put any other race in that rant of his most people would be angry, but chinese people *pfft* who cares right? they won't complain, they are a "model minority" because they don't say anything and are good at math (which I am not, really- I work in legal tech but have a degree in fine arts and have taught post graduate studies in design and audio composition and engineering).
    32. Re:South Park defense by vuffi_raa · · Score: 2, Informative

      China gets in wars/military actions like anyone else, but when they do it, the purpose is to take away freedoms. one word
      nanking
      look it up and shut your face
    33. Re:South Park defense by Nazlfrag · · Score: 2, Interesting
      They are all broad sweeping generalisations that have little bearing on the reality of the man on the street. Cultures are different, none better, none worse.

      Your assumption that democracy is inherently better than dictatorship only holds for your cultural values. All political systems or cultures are better than dystopia and all are worse than utopia, they all have benefits and flaws, yet while there are more similarities than differences we tend to ignore the familiar (including our own flaws) and divide the world into false dichotomies, black and white, good and bad, or in this case better or worse.

      Even if we take it for granted that dictatorship is a bad thing in and of itself, culture embraces far more than merely internal politics. Living under democracy might be great, but what if that democracy was overthrowing other democracies and installing dictators in those countries? Would that culture be better or worse than one that was a dictatorship that openly embraced democracy in a former territory that had been democratic for around 99 years? It's not so black and white as it first appears.

    34. Re:South Park defense by sydneyfong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You must be Chinese because you know nothing of Chinese history. Heh. And you're the expert now?

      How about the Korean war? As I understood it, it was the "western powers" who decided to invade Korea to install a puppet government, and their troops got dangerously close to the Chinese borders. At that time China was considered a "hostile commie state" and if China didn't do something about it there was a high risk of being invaded next.

      And Tibet? There wasn't a "Tibetan war". You may be right on a forced occupation, but it wasn't war.

      China is still slaughtering peaceful political dissenters. Source? Imprisonment yes, but I've yet to hear people actually being "slaughtered" over this...

      And as a Chinese person you probably know nothing of the slaughter of dissenters at Tiananmen Square. And how is this related to "war"? If you're insisting on viewing the Chinese government as evil animals, it still doesn't refute the GP's argument that China isn't *stupid*. I'll give you a view consistent with both -- dissenters are easier to slaughter than militants of hostile enemy states.

      China gets in wars/military actions like anyone else, but when they do it, the purpose is to take away freedoms. As I understand it there's no ulterior intent of China to invade other countries just to take away freedoms. That's just plain stupid, and that's what the GP is trying to refute. I don't mind people saying China is "evil" (many governments are), but I really can't stand it when stupid people assume that the Chinese government (and the Chinese in general) are as stupid as they are.

      Of course, that being said, I have no idea what the GP is trying to say in general... (sounds like a rant by a drunken troll on crack) But the precise sentence you quoted is spot on. The point is it seems that people assume that China, when it gets "strong", would involve itself in stupid wars on intangible "ideologies", like "depriving other people of freedom", "anti-democracy", "evil oppression", etc. That's just bullsht.

      If China was really that war-mongering, it'd have invaded Taiwan already. Instead, it's going through negotiations to improve cross strait relationships (as long as the Taiwanese government isn't pressing for outright "independence", whatever that means) ... if it's not invading Taiwan, why on Earth would it try to invade other countries?

      Please enlighten me.
      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  2. so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They threaten to hack the universe and boast about hitting powerplants and such.. then a month or two later they get accused of hacking an important computer system and they suddenly don't have the sophistication to do so?

    1. Re:so.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh, I thought it was Dodgeball.

      Look, if you're really trying to get nerdy, you're just going to have to go ahead and make some kind of comparison to Star Trek. Just correcting people about South Park isn't going to cut it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. China lacks the skills? by AmazingRuss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lacks the skills to lie convincingly to anybody it doesn't have the power of life or death over, more like.

    1. Re:China lacks the skills? by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not a lie, it's a strategy to receive compliments. Clearly Chinese men have issues with very low self esteem. I wonder what that could be based on?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:China lacks the skills? by datan · · Score: 4, Informative

      it's part of the Chinese culture. The polite way to receive a compliment is to be modest; in fact it's bad manners to receive a compliment without protest...so in this case, the Chinese foreign ministry is merely being polite

    3. Re:China lacks the skills? by tirerim · · Score: 5, Funny

      Right, because lying in the course of giving compliments, as Americans do as an integral part of our culture, is so much better.

    4. Re:China lacks the skills? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The OOC is as morally bankrupt as the Chinese Government. They just don't have the same goals or political power.

    5. Re:China lacks the skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      it's part of the Chinese culture. The polite way to receive a compliment is to be modest; in fact it's bad manners to receive a compliment without protest...so in this case, the Chinese foreign ministry is merely being polite I think you're confusing Chinese culture with Japanese. While effusively praising others is an intrinsic part of life both nations, the excessive personal humility the permeates all aspects of Japanese life isn't really common in China.

    6. Re:China lacks the skills? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Part of the Chinese culture? That little tradition used to be polite behaviour in the west too.

    7. Re:China lacks the skills? by aplusjimages · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe its true. Maybe they hired the CIA to spy on those two Congressman to make sure they weren't going to do anything to embarrass the Chinese Government during the Olympics.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    8. Re:China lacks the skills? by Maestro485 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They don't lack skills...

      ...they rack disciprine

    9. Re:China lacks the skills? by value_added · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Part of the Chinese culture? That little tradition used to be polite behaviour in the west too.

      Not to the extent it is elsewhere.

      A friend of mine told me a funny story years ago of his parents when they first arrived in the US. His mother received an invitation from the neighbours for a housewarming dinner. When she arrived, the hostess came up to her and suggested she help herself from the buffet. The conversation proceeded along the following lines:

      "No, thank you."

      "You really must."

      "I'm sorry, but I really shouldn't."

      "I insist."

      "Thank you for your hospitality, but I really can't."

      "Ok. Suit yourself, then."

      When his mother returned home in tears, her husband asked her what had happened. She said she had never felt so insulted, and didn't eat a thing. When he asked why she didn't eat anything, she replied, "The hostess didn't insist the third time!"

    10. Re:China lacks the skills? by gnick · · Score: 3, Funny

      Part of the Chinese culture? That little tradition used to be polite behaviour in the west too. Indeed - In fact my politeness excels beyond that of nearly all others because of my great humility. I may be the most humble person I know - Which is even more impressive because I have so little to be modest about and so many great qualities that I politely refrain from boasting.

      To attempt to quote an old Mac Davis tune that I remember from the Muppet Show:
      Oh Lord it's hard to be humble when you're perfect in every way
      I can't wait to look in the mirror 'cause I get better lookin' each day
      To know me is to love me, I must be a hell of a man
      Oh Lord it's hard to be humble, but I'm doin' the best that I can
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    11. Re:China lacks the skills? by eatfastnoodle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Japanese culture is Heavily influenced by China, You would be amazed by how many Chinese characters there are in Japanese. Chinese who speak no Japanese and Japanese who speak no Chinese can communicate with each other using pen and a piece of paper. As for the statement, They just don't think it's a matter worthy of serious response. Of course they know nobody would believe it, modern Chinese culture are very pragmatic and very goal-oriented, they don't like to infuse too much morality into their discussion. In their view, everybody spies on everybody else, it's just how things work, they didn't whine to CNN or the statement department about CIA spying on China. why did the USãmake such a big deal out of it?

    12. Re:China lacks the skills? by rworne · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's a big difference between a phonetic alphabet and an lolograph based language.

      To English and German, an "A" is an "A" and really does not mean anything in and of itself. The alphabet denotes sounds that when strung together have a meaning.

      In Chinese and Japanese, each character has a specific meaning in itself. It is that meaning that carries between both languages - one does not even need to know how to pronounce the character to understand its meaning.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    13. Re:China lacks the skills? by suggsjc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Chinese who speak no Japanese and Japanese who speak no Chinese can communicate with each other using pen and a piece of paper.
      I think just about any two people on earth can do that...its called drawing.

      In America, we even have a game where thats all you do. Its called Pictionary. Except that neither side can speak Chinese or Japanese.
      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    14. Re:China lacks the skills? by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe its true. Maybe they hired the CIA to spy on those two Congressman to make sure they weren't going to do anything to embarrass the Chinese Government during the Olympics.

      More likely that our intrepid congressmen were engaged in a lengthy session of viewing some "non-work-related sites" (i.e., "browsing porn") and managed to snag a worm. Rather than demonstrate any personal responsibility, they picked the first easy target.

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    15. Re:China lacks the skills? by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right, because lying in the course of giving compliments, as Americans do as an integral part of our culture, is so much better.
      Hmm... Kudos. That is very insightful of you.
    16. Re:China lacks the skills? by waspleg · · Score: 2, Informative

      i was taught to only ask 2x, refusal once is polite.

      times they are a changing?

    17. Re:China lacks the skills? by vuffi_raa · · Score: 2, Informative

      yes, but if you can write katakana, there is a good chance of communicating in english with someone who can't speak it in japan- if you use simple enough language most words when written with the japanese enunciation have at least a common slang meaning in conversational japanese.

    18. Re:China lacks the skills? by sydneyfong · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm Chinese, and I can read Chinese without any problems.

      Depending on the number of Kanji in a piece of Japanese text, I can extract the meaning sometimes better than automatic online translations. I don't know any Japanese, but experience is that most of the important words are written in Kanji, while the Japanese characters are usually there for grammatical purposes.

      Usually the problem when reading Japanese is the heavy use of Katakana, due to Japanese adopting a lot of western terms (even for things not of western origin).

      For meaning of the characters, I can tell you that they aren't exactly the same, but are similar enough that usually Chinese are able to extract the general idea. The fact that Kanji was introduced to Japan a long time ago isn't really relevant. With a little bit of training a person who's proficient in (modern) Chinese can read ancient Chinese texts up to 2000 years ago (in its original form) without problem. The Chinese language has been remarkably stable/stagnant in the past 2000 years...

      I'm not sure whether the Japanese could read Chinese without training though, I think they learn less Kanji than Chinese learn Chinese characters, and a difficult piece of Chinese text might be indecipherable...

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  4. Bald face liars. by alextheseal · · Score: 5, Funny

    So who did it then, elves?

    1. Re:Bald face liars. by BulletMagnet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No the Network Gnomes and Fairies did it....you know, the ones that make backups go bad, servers tip over in the middle of the night, when they get really drunk, they make your data magically find ways into the hands of the evil Chinese hackers.....

      Apparentely this foreign minister needs to go back to Marketing 101 - he missed the week where "how to lie convincingly" was taught.

    2. Re:Bald face liars. by InlawBiker · · Score: 5, Funny

      If a teenager from Seattle can hack WOPPER with an acoustic modem and 8-bit computers....

    3. Re:Bald face liars. by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      China loves using this "developing nation" bullshit whenever it wants to try to elicit sympathy or otherwise justify their actions. Want to pollute as much as you want? "We are a developing nation!" Want to not have to play by WTO rules? Again, "Developing nation"

      If China actually WERE a developing nation, that stuff wouldn't be so bad. But China has 0 problem throwing its weight around places like Sudan where it uses its ginormous reserves of foreign currency and military know-how to help the Sudanese slaughter their own citizens in exchange for oil.

      China, if you want the benefits of being one of the big boys, you are going to have to pay the costs as well. This whole "we are a developing nation when it suits us" bullshit has got to stop, but unfortunately anyone who is actually in a position to make them play by the rules is either a cheater themselves or just so hypnotized by the theoretical promise of China that they refuse to do anything about it.

    4. Re:Bald face liars. by SportyGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe you mean WOPR (War Operation Plan Response), but I'll forgive you ;)

    5. Re:Bald face liars. by Drathos · · Score: 2, Funny

      It was WOPR, then McKittrick said to "beef up" the security and it became The Whopper®. He's just at some mid-point.

      --
      End of line..
    6. Re:Bald face liars. by WGFELyL5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the one benefit of being the big boy is to make his own rules
      ...
      China wants to supplant the US as the biggest boy.
      ...
      Why so riled up? Because every indication is that China's rules will be worse for the world?
    7. Re:Bald face liars. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the last time I checked, more people believed US is a bigger threat to world peace.

      And what has that got to do with reality? More people believe in God than don't, but that doesn't make God any more factual. Get off your anti-U.S. pulpit for a moment, and grasp that the United States has been far more of a stabilizing factor in world affairs than otherwise. That's because any would-be Hitlers out there know very well what would happen if they tried anything nasty on a significant scale. Nobody but the Russians really tried to match us militarily, and they failed. However, that's in the process of changing.

      Face it, China has the same aspirations towards world domination as Russia does, and I can pretty much guarantee that at some point within the next decade even people practicing hard-core denial like you will sit up and take notice. Unlike Russia, there's a damned good chance that China will be able to pull it off: they're not making the same mistakes as their Soviet neighbors. We won't be able to outdo them on military spending because a. they're gradually taking over supplying our military and b. have successfully decimated large portions of our manufacturing sector. Once China finally turns on us and stops providing us with critical manufactured goods we're as good as dead. We may very well see a repeat of the collapse of the Soviet Union, only this time it will be us. It doesn't have to be that way, but it will because they've found our weak spots and are exploiting them viciously.

      That may not be a good thing for the rest of the world, no matter how much they may hate the U.S. at the moment. When China finally goes on the warpath, you'd better hope that the United States is still capable of taking them on. I don't think we will be: if nothing else China's government is almost preternaturally patient, and they'll bide their time until we're too weak to stop them.

      The European Union had better take note: the United States' days are numbered. Start looking to your own defense because sooner or later, you're going to need it. Bigtime. We never went on an empire-building spree in spite of having the most powerful military force ever assembled by a single nation, but I do not believe that China will exercise the same level of restraint.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  5. Yeah, right by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China has the money and skills to build the Great Firewall. They are clearly capable.

    1. Re:Yeah, right by hardburn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not to mention that a lot of the key mathematics that broke MD5 was done by Chinese cryptographers, among quite a few other mathematical and scientific breakthroughs over the last few years. Saying they don't have the capability is absurd.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    2. Re:Yeah, right by chthon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are certainly capable. I have here a stack of magazines, dating from 1978. One article shows a Chinese computer designed back then. If China is a developing nation, then so where the US and the USSR in the 1950's.

    3. Re:Yeah, right by Chris+Burkhardt · · Score: 2, Informative

      among quite a few other mathematical and scientific breakthroughs over the last few millennia.

      There, fixed it.
      --
      "And there be unix which have made themselves unix for the kingdom of heaven's sake." - Matt. 19:12
    4. Re:Yeah, right by flosofl · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yes it was broken.

      On 1 March 2005, Arjen Lenstra, Xiaoyun Wang, and Benne de Weger demonstrated[8] construction of two X.509 certificates with different public keys and the same MD5 hash, a demonstrably practical collision. The construction included private keys for both public keys. A few days later, Vlastimil Klima described[9] an improved algorithm, able to construct MD5 collisions in a few hours on a single notebook computer. On 18 March 2006, Klima published an algorithm[10] that can find a collision within one minute on a single notebook computer, using a method he calls tunneling.
      The concern is less for password hashing than for cryptographic signatures based on MD5. It destroys one of the principles of a crypto signature: non-reputability. By being able to create an arbitrary collision, that is removed.

      Here's a good site to give you an overview.
      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
  6. Could have fooled me.. by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 2, Funny

    The guy that delivers my chinese food seems to be pretty computer savvy, he farms WoW gold on his time off :)

    Okay.. flame away :P

    --
    I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    1. Re:Could have fooled me.. by TheLazySci-FiAuthor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll warm myself with these flames, thank you.

      I think your point (intentional or not) is in fact quite valid. In a country of billions how could there not be at least a few with the innate talent needed to accomplish this?

      Given, skill and talent are seperate but related things - talent you have or don't, skill you use or lose - yet with the right amount of inherent ability and the drive to learn, what isn't possible?

  7. He then followed... by MrBippers · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...they generally outsource all their hacking in exchange for WoW gold.

  8. step 1, hide source by Keruo · · Score: 4, Informative

    For talented crackers, it would be relatively easy to cover their tracks by using several compromised machines as proxies for their attack.
    China has large internet user base and the average Jin would likely secure their home machine as well as average Joe across the ocean.

    --
    There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
  9. Well... by geekmux · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...you do have the Great Firewall thing going for you...which is nice.

  10. Re:Beowulf Cluster by fprintf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just like in Bug's Life. If we let the ants know how powerful they are, they will crush us!

    --
    This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
  11. Re:whats more likely by jimbobborg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read the fine article. Quoted from second article:

    "The extent of the intrusions on Capitol Hill, which officials said began in August 2006, was unclear, although Rep. Frank R. Wolf (R-Va.), whose office had four computers affected, said that other members of Congress were targeted, as well as at least one congressional committee. "They got everything," Wolf said at a news briefing, describing the attack on his office systems.

    Wolf said that after one of the attacks, a car with license plates belonging to Chinese officials went to the home of a Chinese dissident in the Washington suburbs and took photographs of it."

  12. If they're not sophisticated enough by anglico · · Score: 5, Insightful

    then how did one of their submarines pop up in the middle of one of our Navy carrier groups undetected?

    1. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by tzhuge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Didn't South Africa pull off the exact same feat against some NATO naval forces during an exercise?

      If anything, it's probably an indication of just how much Western military forces oversell the effectiveness of high-tech toys.

    2. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by Mikkeles · · Score: 5, Funny

      Buoyancy.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    3. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      then how did one of their submarines pop up in the middle of one of our Navy carrier groups undetected? Buoyancy. With all the lead that goes into the typical Chinese product? Really?
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by 3.14159265 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly. Buoyancy should be made illegal.

  13. Re:Considering the age of China.... by Paranatural · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why would they need to have any skill at it at all? They have no independent news sources. It's all state propaganda machines. After 50 years of that nonsense the average Chinese citizen has no real ability to question authority, thus the ability of people in authority to convincingly lie is lower.

  14. The Jar Jar Defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Weesa nots smart enough for yousa craaazy Americans with your knock-off Cisco boxes...weesa kinda sold you.

  15. They ough to hire Tariq Aziz! by Dareth · · Score: 3, Funny

    If they can get the US to let him go, Tariq Aziz, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariq_Aziz would make the perfect spokesperson for the Chinese denial of attacks.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  16. Not just educated there... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Remember, they readily come here to get educated at our grad schools as well. Not only could they have learned there, they could have learned HERE as well.

  17. Right... by JakeD409 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm far too simple-minded to post a satirical comment on Slashdot.

    1. Re:Right... by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ya know, a bunch of us were just talking about how simple minded JakeD409 was, but couldn't quite come up with a defining statement -- "too simple minded to...?" Someone suggested "Pour piss out of a boot with the instructions printed on the heel", but that was overstating things a bit - and nobody was really sure you could read so having the instructions printed might not help you much. Someone else thought "Eat a box of chocolates (My momma says, 'Life is like...')", but, while getting closer, just didn't quite state the obvious strongly enough. Imagine my delight when I went to slashdot and found the perfect defining statement!

      I'm far too simple-minded to post a satirical comment on Slashdot.

      Thanks, JakeD409 (cause the world ain't ready for 410!)!

      disclaimer: no actual humor was used in the making of this post, although I did hit my funny bone while typing that bit about the box of chocolates.

      PS. I don't know JakeD409. He just put the "kick Me" sign on and bent over and I could not resist.

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
  18. Obligatory by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nothing to see here, western capitalist lackeys. Move along.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  19. Re:Oh come on. by cmacb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You forgot one:

    Are the target systems largely running stock versions of Windows?

    *check*

    ------

    For those that consider this Microsoft bashing substitute the following:

    Are the target systems running large, complex, "user friendly" operating systems with more permutations of options than you can shake a stick at and lots of known vulnerabilities that can only be fixed by downloading updates from a commercial source who is picky about who is allowed to download those updates?

    *check*

  20. DAMN YOU! by db32 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I almost died! I almost choked on my lunch reading this summary. I sit down...take a bite, open slashdot, and nearly choke! Damn you editors!

    I propose that stories with claims THAT ridiculous this should have title and summary hidden with a warning so that readers eating or drinking can be prepared! I mean really...think how many geeks you might endager with a headline of "Openly Gay Republican Elected to Office"

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  21. Ah, naivety at its finest by biolysis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "then how did one of their submarines pop up in the middle of one of our Navy carrier groups undetected?"

    It didn't, that's what the Navy said to convince people like you to give them more money.

    And you fell for it.

    1. Re:Ah, naivety at its finest by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      that's what the Navy said to convince people like you to give them more money

      No, that's what the Navy said to make the Chinese feel overly confident and to underestimate our ability to track them. Classic move... make your opponent complacent enough that you can then later make them completely doubt their ability to do anything when you rip the rug out from under them, as the situation warrants. Nothing makes people doubt their abilities more than the sudden discovery that they've been completely wrong about their own success. We should know (as should the former Soviets and everyone else), since it's happened to us, too.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Ah, naivety at its finest by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

      American XO: here he comes.
      American CO: wait for it ...

      [Chinese sub pops to the surface]

      American CO (over radio): Lordy! Where do you come from?
      Chinese CO: Where did you come from? I hope I am not interrupting anything?
      American CO: Oh, nothing important. You sure surprised me, popping up out of nowhere like that!
      Chinese CO: Did I? Please excuse me! We had no idea anybody was up here. We're having a little trouble with our engines!
      American CO: Do you need help?
      Chinese CO: Any chance you could give us a jump?

      [American XO and CO exchange looks]

      American CO: Uh, sure, can you take 440 volts?
      Chinese CO: One moment, I check with engineer...

      [sounds of argument in Chinese]

      Chinese CO: So sorry. My Engineer says 440 volt no work!
      American XO: That's not right, they should have...
      American CO (cutting in): Uh, don't you have an operators manual or something?
      Chinese CO: Engineer says cook used pages to wrap leftovers. No problem, I fix

      [sound of large spanner being whacked against steel hull of sub]

      Chinese CO: Hah! Now engines go!
      American CO: That's very amazing! You fixed your boat by whacking the hull with a spanner?
      Chinese CO: Oh, yes, you know us primitive Chinamen. Our boats are junk! Get it? Junk! Ha ha!
      American XO and CO: Ha ha!
      Chinese CO: Well engine make go now, so we leave. We be lucky to make back to Hainan without sinking.
      American CO: I'll be lucky to make it back to Honolulu without having a heart attack. You took ten years off my life, popping out of nowhere like that! I honestly had no idea there was anybody else in the area.
      Chinese CO: Sorry! We not know you here, really. You know Chinaman navigation equipment! No good! We go in straight line until bump into something!
      American CO: Sorry to hear that. I hope you stay clear of us, we run into things all the time, since I dropped my sextant.
      Chinese CO: Me too, since lousy Chinese boat leak on my chronometer! I go now! Bye!
      American CO: Bye!

      [Chinese sub submerges]

      American CO (under breath): Asshole.
      Chinese CO (under breath): Asshole.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  22. Re:Considering the age of China.... by chthon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hah, I just saw some unique pictures on television. In the vicinity of the last earthquakes, people lost their kids in school. A Belgian reporter was with some parents, and those people are mad at the Chinese government, and there are accusations of corruption. A local official and a policeman tried to remove those people from around the school, got scolded by their citizens and left with their tails between their legs.

  23. Hate to spoil the punchline... by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Informative

    I mean really...think how many geeks you might endager with a headline of "Openly Gay Republican Elected to Office" Just for the record, this openly gay man was elected to Congress after coming out, and at the local level there are probably quite a few folks like this guy.
  24. Developing nations dont have a space program by alanshot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry, the Developing nation excuse is lame. Developing nations dont produce and design electronics devices, design and build ICBMs, submarines, warships, launch GPS satellites, etc.

    And using thier logic, the USA is also a developing nation. Maybe we are a little more developed, but we still have a way to go and are making progress.

  25. Re:whats more likely by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The obvious question I haven't heard anybody ask: why did these congressmen have sensitive information on machines connected to the Internet?

    In spy stories you commit things to memory because they're too dangerous to write down. Have we degenerated to the point where you not only write things down but you put them on the Internet with a big sign saying "steal me?"

  26. Not quite as impressive as you suggest. by Drenaran · · Score: 2, Informative

    While the "Great Firewall" is expansive within China's borders, it isn't all that technically impressive. There are internet gateways leading in and out of the country - you already have to have hardware managing that as those pipes lead downwards to major infrastructure backbones, government networks, individual ISP's, etc. Not particularly difficult a step to add filtering/blocking/poisoning to internet requests from the subsidiary networks (not to suggest that it isn't a lot of man hours/hardware involved, but it isn't exactly rocket science - just extensions off of established filtering techniques).

    Most of the filtering isn't even being handled by the "Great Firewall" but is instead handled by individual ISP's instituting their own filtering methods and complying with government issued blocklists, as well as citizen self censorship. While I don't mean to suggest that China doesn't have the programming talent to attack other nations networks (especially our American soft and squishy ones), but the "Great Firewall" is hardly a golden example of technological achievement.

    (Wikipedia has a fairly good outline of China's known practices, those interested might want to take a look at it before doing some more in-depth research: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_the_People's_Republic_of_China)

  27. Re:Beowulf Cluster by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally! We have used a pixar movie for our wisdom. I'm glad our kids are watching these things. Now to find a "Cars" reference...

    --
    Disclaimer: I am not god.
    We may not be created equal
    But we can be treated equal.
  28. The Scorpion and The Frog by UttBuggly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My company is expanding into China in 2009-2010. Over 100 locations with Windows boxes acting as POS terminals (Point Of Sale and Piece Of Shit both apply here, unfortunately), connecting back to our network infrastructure in the U.S.

    I'm a Network Systems Analyst, but not in a Information Security role. Still, I felt it prudent to ask recently; "so, how are we hardening the systems going into China?" only to be met with the deer in the headlights look. I pointed out the inception of this story and then went on to describe how people could buy in iPhone 1.0 in China last year...30-60 days before last June's U.S. launch. And the fact that virtually ANY software you wanted was available, for pennies, in China. Hacked, cracked, and pre-loaded with malware galore in many cases, to be sure, but available nonetheless.

    I didn't get the sense my comments got anyone in power even a little concerned. Luckily, I can retire in Fall 2009. I'll get to read about this upcoming disaster in the easy chair with a cup of joe. I may even think it funny since I won't have to do any mitigation of the virtually guaranteed compromise(s) that will occur.

    Underestimating the potential threats in this part of the world is painfully stupid. Which explains the idiot who left an unsecured laptop unattended in a foreign country that isn't exactly an ally, economic or otherwise. There are several firms in that part of the world that offer services to Fortune firms doing business in Asia BECAUSE of the increased risks.

    Disingenious? Naw...this is an outright lie, plain and simple.

    --
    I am my own gestalt.
  29. Sun Tzu by lufo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    18. All warfare is based on deception.
    19. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; [...]

    The art of war, Sun Tzu (6th. cent. B.C.), I.18 and 1.19

  30. I'm skeptical by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't buy China's official story on this one.

    Damn you, falling U.S. dollar!

  31. China holds a trillion dollars of US debt by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting." Said over 2500 years ago. That's before Jesus Christ superstar, btw.

    You should all read Sun Tzu and have a bash at playing "Go" as well.

    --
    Deleted
  32. firewall logs by raind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what are they just practicing on my Pix?

    --
    Get up!
  33. Thanks by roystgnr · · Score: 2, Funny

    A direct click-through worked for me when I tried it from the "Preview" page for my comment, but I guess my browser must have just been pulling the file out of cache rather than hitting up the server again.

    Also, I notice that between the two of us we've currently received three "+1, Informative" moderations for helping people hear penis jokes in exaggerated accents. Thanks for helping me do my part in making the internet such an amazing informational resource.

  34. 5,000 years, and yet by Phoenix666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Chinese have yet to invent anything remotely resembling a decent breakfast. (Thin rice gruel does not count)

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:5,000 years, and yet by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure I'm not getting it quite right, but Dennis Miller once pointed out that Eskimos eat blubber not because it's delicious but because it's the only thing on the Arctic buffet. Obviously this is a bit of an exaggeration (they can eat fish on occasion, too) but close enough to the truth for our purposes here today.

      If you think the big swinging dicks (figuratively in this case, obviously) running China are eating rice gruel for breakfast, you have another fucking think coming. On the other hand, they're probably not having Eggs Over My Hammy, either.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:5,000 years, and yet by sydneyfong · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess you might be kidding, but have you tried "dim sum" for breakfast?

      And well China is a geographically vast place. Different places have different preferences for breakfast, I'm just talking about the local tradition here.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.