Slashdot Mirror


EBay Abandons Plans For PayPal Monopoly

An anonymous reader writes "eBay's has lost its fight to ban all payment methods except PayPal. When Paypal originally announced the scheme it was to be global, but they began with a dry run in Australia to test the reaction of government and consumer authorities. In the public slanging match that followed between eBay and the regulatory ACCC, eBay spammed users claiming it was fighting for 'safety benefits for consumers.' Fortunately the consumers won. Conceded eBay vice president Simon Smith, 'While we disagree with the ACCC's draft notice, we have decided to withdraw the notification to stop any further confusion and disruption among the eBay community.' Nevertheless eBay insists PayPal is now always offered as a payment option. Have big corporations finally learned that they can go too far? More chillingly, if eBay had launched the scheme in America would they have gotten away with it?"

59 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. Paypal only by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Then I would leave e-bay, after being there since 1996

    1. Re:Paypal only by AmigaMMC · · Score: 5, Informative

      I was there since 1997, but I stopped selling on ebay several months ago. Their new policies, higher prices and impossibility for sellers to leave any negative or neutral feedback has driven many people away. Just read the ebay forums, the Front Porch, and you will see hundreds of angry people. What's even worse, go to Seller Central forum and browse the last pages... ebay had moved to the back of the list some important threads where people were complaining about the new policies. Last Feb. when sellers called for a boycott and stopped selling for a determined amount of time ebay posted hundreds of thousands of fake listings to show that their numbers were not down (it's all documented in the forums). Nowadays, me and many other ex ebayers moved to iOffer.com and it's like heaven compared to ebay. No listing fees, lower final value fees, proper feedback (and you can transfer your rating from ebay), free pics and free store. As of this week there are over 4 million listings on iOffer.com

    2. Re:Paypal only by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 5, Informative

      Then I would leave e-bay, after being there since 1996

      Amen. I personally have experienced the famous Paypal shaft. Froze my account for no reason and blackholed all my communications, just like so many other people. When I finally did get access to my money again after many months of frustration and runaround, I closed the account I was stupid enough to give them access to and left Paypal for good.

      Paypal is an unregulated scam.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    3. Re:Paypal only by van+da+man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      just visited this site hadn't heard of it til I saw your post. this sounds like a good site in general, but the large amount of bootleg computer software that I've already seen on the site such as the Microsoft Office 2007 blue edition found here http://www.ioffer.com/i/MS-Microsoft-Office-2007-Blue-Edition-Very-Rare-36496701 and the windows xp black edition found here http://www.ioffer.com/i/Windows-Xp-Pro-SP3-Black-Edition-2008--56542416 or even the Windows Vista Ultimate SP1 Preactivated http://www.ioffer.com/i/Windows-Vista-Ultimate-SP1-Preactivated-FREE-SHIP-43585521 sorry to break it to ya folks but all of these are hack jobs and not legitimate product from microsoft. I wonder how long until microsoft lowers the boom on ioffer for allowing these kinds of auctions to remain listed.

    4. Re:Paypal only by Pseudonym · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, the purpose of negative feedback is to stop being getting screwed over by bad actors.

      There are several ways that a buyer can scam a seller. They can, for example, claim that the item is not as described, and then return something else (e.g. buying a new diamond ring and returning a cheap cubic zirconia, or buying a new laptop and returning an old one). eBay and PayPal will honour proof of postage as "proof" that the correct item was returned, even if it wasn't.

      In those situations, negative feedback was the only recourse that a scammed seller had.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    5. Re:Paypal only by mea_culpa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      eBay was good when it was Auction Web. Almost like craigslist where anything and everything could be auctioned and the listing fees were reasonable. The interface was simple and straight forward, now it is as bad as godaddy.com 90% garbage 10% substance.

      BTW I sold my 1997 account for $1500.

    6. Re:Paypal only by cheater512 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I do think that the buyer was fair to give you negative feedback.
      He had just won the auction, and you said that you decided that you dont want to sell it after all.
      Posting a auction requires you to accept a legal agreement which outlines that.

    7. Re:Paypal only by GAB_cyclist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The winner called me up, told me to piss up a rope, and left me negative feedback because he said he knows I can't do anything about it." Why are you complaining...it was a bad sell, hence the negative feedback. Try to see this from the buyers point of view, but still... with 177 good and 1 bad review most people will still buy items from you On subject, I've been on Ebay since 1998. I understand that strict rules are necessary on such a huge market but I've left ship a long time ago because I love the simplicity of smaller sites

    8. Re:Paypal only by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In those situations, negative feedback was the only recourse that a scammed seller had.

      Er, what about a lawsuit?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    9. Re:Paypal only by JuliaNZ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Close, wrong country though. Trademe is great but it's a New Zealand site.

    10. Re:Paypal only by Dan541 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You should have sold what you listed.

      It's people like you who do stupid things that give us sellers a bad name.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    11. Re:Paypal only by mollymoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You should have had negative feedback for cancelling the auction so close to the end. It was a negative experience for the bidders. It sounds like the winner might not have left negative feedback for you if he knew you could retaliate in kind, which suggests eBay's new rules are working perfectly.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    12. Re:Paypal only by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Fair enough, if enough people did that, eBay would either have to reconsider their decision or lose a lot of income.

      For once, I think the free market argument works here, why should anyone else other than eBay and their customers be involved?

      It's not like eBay provide an essential service like water or electricity or something, if you don't want to buy/sell your stuff there, just don't use it.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:Paypal only by c1t1z3nk41n3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For better or worse some sellers screwed the rest over. People started sending out emails saying that if for any reason you left a neutral or negative feedback they would leave negative feedback on you. It discouraged honesty from buyers. I myself ended up leaving a positive feedback with negative comment attached after buying a cell phone that had been misrepresented.

    14. Re:Paypal only by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In those situations, negative feedback was the only recourse that a scammed seller had.

      Wait, so eBay takes proof of shipment that you weren't scammed out of a diamond ring, and you feel that is 100% ok, as long as you can leave negative feedback? I think that the fact that they take shipment records as "proof" of contents of the package would be the issue, as opposed to negative feedback that was overwhelming used as blackmail. I guess blackmail was perfectly fine, as long as it gave you a chance to lash out at a loss eBay asserts you didn't suffer.

  2. A dumb end to a dumb arguement. by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More chillingly, if eBay had launched the scheme in America would they have got away with it?"

    EBay is a medium to connect buyers and sellers, nothing more. They can't regulate the actual terms of a transaction. All the parties have to do is accept "cash/check" as the method of payment and then go to Google/Western Union/whathaveyou and send the payment that way. Seller gets money via "unapproved" method. What's eBay going to do? Stop him from shipping the item?

    This was a non-issue from the start.

    fp?

    1. Re:A dumb end to a dumb arguement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That doesn't work when the only option presented to users is paypal, the eBay system wont let you finalise auctions until PayPal processing has occurred and eBay start removing listings that don't conform.

      And no, you didn't get first post you idiot.

    2. Re:A dumb end to a dumb arguement. by Stanislav_J · · Score: 5, Insightful

      EBay is a medium to connect buyers and sellers, nothing more.

      That's the mantra eBay has often chanted (usually in the context of somebody wanting to hold them responsible for some fraud that has been perpetrated), but the fact is that they have gradually done everything they can over the years to insert themselves between buyer and seller, and to be directly involved in every phase of the transaction. They have already previously tried to ban or at least discourage other forms of payment -- this is nothing new. They tried several years ago to force all sellers to complete transactions through eBay's own "Checkout" system, and only backed down after mass bitching by some very high volume sellers. They try to intimidate you into using only eBay's own on-site message system to contact bidders instead of e-mailing them directly.

      The problem with these measures is, while still technically "optional," eBay does nothing to encourage such "rogue" behavior, and many (maybe most) users, both sellers and bidders, who have come aboard after these "options" were implemented are under the impression that they are mandatory because eBay pushes them constantly while burying the more seller-centric options in obscurity. Consequently, many bidders no longer understand the "eBay is only a venue" schtick, and believe that they are dealing directly with eBay. After all, when your messages all come through the eBay site, and you pay by clicking on buttons on the eBay site, you lose track of the fact that there are thousands of individual sellers who are the actual merchants. I've had problems with more than a few bidders who refuse to answer my e-mails or to pay me directly instead of through eBay's Checkout because they think it's not "official" otherwise, and that I am trying to pull some sort of scam on them.

      --
      "Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket." -- Eric Hoffer
    3. Re:A dumb end to a dumb arguement. by no-body · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A - EBay is a medium to connect buyers and sellers, nothing more.

      B - This was a non-issue from the start.

      Dream on...

      A - Ebay is a money making machine and de-facto monopoly on online auctions.

      B - Ebay owns PayPal - their auction interfaces are strongly interlinked and incentives in PayPal "Buyer protection" are predominanty shown on every(?) auction.

      Look at 10 auctions and count non-PayPal (quick - CC) payments accepted - I found NONE!

      They can easily effort dropping enforcement of PayPal - they get it anyway.
      Maybe it was dumb to try it in that manner.

    4. Re:A dumb end to a dumb arguement. by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      EBay is a medium to connect buyers and sellers, nothing more.

      EBay is a way of profiting from a sale without actually selling anyting.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    5. Re:A dumb end to a dumb arguement. by Stanislav_J · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have to sympathize at least a little with those users. I recently bought something on ebay, and I have no less than 7 emails about it in my in-box, from 5 different addresses.

      That doesn't even make sense, and assuming you aren't exaggerating (no one on Slashdot ever does that), clearly this is a seller who is at the very least disorganized. There are thousands of sellers on eBay who conduct themselves in a very organized, professional manner. When eBay was still relatively new (and less obtrusive), it was merely a means for such sellers, small and large, to have a well-publicized venue in which to conduct business, without having to go through the expense and bother of maintaining one's own website.

      When one of my auctions ends, the bidder almost immediately gets an e-mail from me with clear, detailed instructions on what they owe, shipping options, payment options, etc. And yet, so conditioned are bidders now to think of eBay as the entity they are dealing with, and not the seller, even though this professional-looking and intelligent e-mail arrives within minutes of the end of the auction, goes to the e-mail address that the bidder has registered with eBay, references the item number and title, reflects the final bid amount, and is clearly indicated as coming from the eBay seller (moi) by name, I still have people who either do not respond to the message or don't even read it at all, because since it doesn't come through eBay, it must be a scam.

      Part of the problem is that there are tons of eBay phishing scams out there, and the average user cannot or will not learn how to discriminate between those and a legitimate e-mail from a seller, so they ignore or delete ANY e-mail with eBay as a subject. Of course, if you cannot distinguish between my End of Auction message, and the for the most part blatantly obvious phishing scams (come out of the blue, often to an address you don't even use on eBay, reference auction numbers and items that are either totally fictitious or some item you never bid on, written in broken English, and containing embedded links that go to some website in Russia, Romania, or some "Whatever-istan"), then you shouldn't be on eBay to begin with (or, indeed, on the Internet at all).

      --
      "Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket." -- Eric Hoffer
    6. Re:A dumb end to a dumb arguement. by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it is very easy to rip someone off using loopholes in paypal's system.

      I can place an auction for an item which i claim to be in the US, and when you win it i can ship it from the US and make you submit payment to an email address via paypal, where the account is actually registered in australia (tho you obviously cant see this based purely on the email address).
      Then i send you a brick or some other heavy junk from somewhere in the US...
      You receive it, get real angry and file a paypal claim...

      I can then try all the tricks in the book, i can say there's been an error and we shipped the wrong item, and if you cancel the claim we can proceed to send you the right one (if you cancel the claim you can never open it again)...
      Before you file a claim i can delay you with talk of slow shipping and false promises that the item will be with you soon etc, you only have 45 days to file a claim, if i delay you that long there's nothing you can do.

      If you do file a claim, and paypal finds in your favor they will ask you to send the item back to me using a shipping service with online tracking... This is where the "heavy junk" comes in, it will cost you a lot to send the heavy junk to Australia with tracking, especially since you need to use a fairly fast shipping method to avoid the paypal claim expiring... You are expected to pay for this yourself, and paypal wont refund what it cost you to send the item back.
      And yes, despite the fact the item originally came from the US you will be forced to send it to australia because that's where the paypal account is registered.
      Also if you already sent the item back (ie during the negotiation phase i promised to deal with it if you returned it) you wont be able to send it with tracking and will thus have the claim rejected by paypal.

      And throughout this process, paypal will help the unscrupulous seller.

      See http://www.ev4.org/wordpress/category/fastmemorymanscam/ for details of how someone scammed me and many others using this method, and google for fastmemoryman - my site is the first hit nowadays, a LOT of people have been screwed by him.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  3. Duh, Yea! by WarlockD · · Score: 3, Insightful

    More chillingly, if eBay had launched the scheme in America would they have got away with it?

    Yes:P There aren't any wildly accepted payment processors you can go with with ebay. While I don't like the arbitrary way Paypal handles accounts, its hard for me to go back to mailing a check or money order with its convenience. I doubt enough Americans would care one way or the other sadly.

  4. Just cancel your eBay account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I quit eBay (Canada) the day that they forced Canadian sellers to accept Paypal. Also, the fact that they'll withhold payments to me for 21 days without paying interest didn't go over so well either.

    Shame to let all that good feedback go but I won't bend over for corporate raping.

    1. Re:Just cancel your eBay account by InlawBiker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have sold a lot of stuff on Ebay too, but I quit in favor of Craigslist. This Ebay maneuver was just a calculated way for them to muscle sellers into giving Ebay a bigger piece of the pie. It's the 'ol "gain monopoly then exploit" plan. There needs to be a name for it. There probably is but I can't think of it...

      Also here's the obligatory grammar gripe. "Have big corporations finally learned that they can go to far." Where is this "far" place and how do I get there?

    2. Re:Just cancel your eBay account by mfnickster · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Also here's the obligatory grammar gripe. "Have big corporations finally learned that they can go to far." Where is this "far" place and how do I get there?

      "A. You can NEVER go to far."

      "B. If I'm gonna get busted, it is NOT going to be by a company like eBay!"

      (see also: "Goto-far Statement Considered Harmful")

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  5. As an Australian by renegadesx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I applaude the ACCC on this move but I wish somebody would have told me this was going to happen sooner. I requested them to shut down my eBay account in protest a month ago. eBay rationalized this by saying they were acting in the interests of consumers despite consumers said very clear they were against this.

    This was about monopoly and eBay getting paid twice per transaction (more money for them). They spammed me MANY times trying to say "this is for your own good". I had customer representatives hassling me all the time when I requested my account be closed and they were going "you can sign up to paypal" and I said "I dont want a paypal account" and after 5 repeated attempts, they still havent shut it down but say "its in the process of being shut down"

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
  6. A few questions by snl2587 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I understand that the real aversion to this plan comes from the "mandatory" part, but why is PayPal a bad thing? Personally, I like having a middleman shield my credit card information from the seller, and I like some of the other protections that using PayPal can afford.

    And, frankly, what's so wrong about having a specific method of payment used throughout a website? If eBay had their own internal payment system identical in every way to PayPal, would there be as much fervor?

    1. Re:A few questions by EsonLinji · · Score: 4, Funny

      eBay already has their own internal payment system identical to PayPal in every way. It's called PayPal.

      --
      Considering Phlebas, whoever the hell he is.
    2. Re:A few questions by FSWKU · · Score: 5, Informative

      And, frankly, what's so wrong about having a specific method of payment used throughout a website? If eBay had their own internal payment system identical in every way to PayPal, would there be as much fervor?

      A specific method of payment is not the issue here. The issue is that eBay owns PayPal, making the whole "we're doing this to protect YOU" argument rather spurious at best.

      eBay takes a commission on each item sold through their site. Paypal takes a chunk of every transaction that goes through. So it works like this. Person A puts up an item for sale. Person B is the winning bidder. Person A now owes eBay X amount of money based on the final price of the item. This comes out of what they receive in payment from Person B. Person B sends the money through PayPal, which takes a percentage of the transaction, Y. If the item sold for Z dollars, person A will only ever see Z-(X+Y). Essentially, eBay gets paid twice for the same auction. THAT is where people are getting (rightfully) peeved.

      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    3. Re:A few questions by Bieeanda · · Score: 4, Informative

      PayPal has a long history of closing accounts, dipping into bank accounts that are associated with accounts, freezing assets without recourse and generally being really shitty corporate citizens. Their status as an effective middleman is middling at best.

    4. Re:A few questions by nolife · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have a separate bank account with "totally free checking" at a local bank and only use it for Paypal. Nothing else. When I need to use Paypal, I deposit money in that account by check from my other bank or using their ATM out front and walk in and deposit it. If some of the horror stories I hear about Palpal freezing accounts or people being scammed happen to me, I will only loose access to a couple of dollars.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    5. Re:A few questions by Iamthecheese · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You do all that to avoid being stolen from, and you still do business with paypal? If your fruit vendor threw a nasty one at you every fifth visit would you just start wearing a raincoat?

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    6. Re:A few questions by Eth1csGrad1ent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And, frankly, what's so wrong about having a specific method of payment used throughout a website?

      ..the same thing that wrong with Microsoft bundling Internet Explorer with every copy of Windows. Its leveraging one monopoly to increase market share and decrease competition in another market.

      Its anti-competitive and would probably fall foul of antitrust laws in many countries as well.

      They bought Paypal with the specific intention of limiting the payment options of their existing user base and give them (eBay) complete control over ALL transactions.

      Its not just limiting buyers and sellers to a particular payment method, its restricting them to ONE COMPANY.

      Its the equivalent of one chain owning 90% of all supermarkets and refusing to take cash or credit,
      instead forcing you to buy groceries with a credit card OWNED by the supermarket chain.

      Sure, you can refuse the 45% interest rate and shop somewhere else, but the nearest one not owned by the chain is 60km away. But theres a catch: because the monopoly chain will blacklist any supplier who sells to an independent supermarket, even when you get there, you may be disappointed with whats on offer. (Forgot to mention the chain also owns all of the petrol/gas stations between you and the independent supermarket and, you guessed it, you need a store OWNED CC to buy fuel) Best of luck with that.

      Personally, I honestly can't believe the eBay management-drones thought this had any chance in hell of getting up ? Even if it did get through...they're lucky it got knocked on the head. eBay would have been dead in the water within 2 years of this being implemented. They may be the defacto standard, but they don't own the concept of an online marketplace.

      If eBay had their own internal payment system identical in every way to PayPal, would there be as much fervor?

      If they were deliberately switching off all pre-existing and established forms of payment at the same time for $$$PROFIT$$$ ? YES.

  7. Paypal monopoly in America by markov_chain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wish they did do it, so that Google could finally put up Google Auctions and we finally got rid of eBay.

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  8. Ebay auctions are not a necessity of life by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > More chillingly, if eBay had launched the scheme in America would they have got away
    > with it?

    Probably, because while people like you would have whined and moaned about the evil of it all you would have kept right on doing business with them. You recite high-sounding phrases about your rights, but you value convenience more.

    Try to get a grip. There are lots of other ways to buy and sell things. If Ebay management wants to act like a pack of fools it's between them and their shareholders. They need customers more than the customers need them.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  9. I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why is there no competing online fleamarket to eBay? We all know eBay sucks ass! I want my competition!

    Yes, yes, I know, build it and they will come...

  10. In the US... by mysidia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The outright banning was perhaps a red-herring, i.e. an "It can be worse" program to distract people from other anti-competitive measures they were taking at the same time.

    People will remember only that they were considering to ban the competitors outright, they have withdrawn that. Hence, they have succeeded. The public (the news media) will now ignore the more important changes -- the new requirement that paypal be offered on all listings.

    Think of the auction bidding strategy that involves conspiracy: the highest bidder will confer with a third party to "accidentally" make an obvious bidding error, like bidding 100000 on a $100 item. The high-bidding conspirator will withdraw their bid (based on it being an obvious error), with the second-highest bidder getting the item for a ridiculously low price.

    Banning non-paypal services outright is the distracting (erroneous bid). Making it mandatory to offer a Paypal option on all listings is the lower bid that still gets the item (eBay merchants' payment processing business).

    They've also basically gotten away with it by banning their potential biggest competitor (Google) early.

    Justifications are only to save face. The real reason they want to ban new non-Paypal services should be obvious.

    By having pay-by-PayPal-through-eBay's-site required to be an option for all actions, the other payment methods will begin to be marginalized.

    Because they will be less convenient.

    By "not banning them" eBay will pretend to be placating them and allowing competition, where in fact, it will be harder for competitors to compete than before.

    Now by withdrawing their "ban on alternate payment services", many people have by now forgotten or won't notice other changes...

    They'll think eBay learned their lesson and will play nice, when it couldn't be farther from the truth.

  11. Australia is a good common ground. by catwh0re · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Australia is a good test bed for consumer goods. Australia is relatively isolated with a limited population of first world consumers. The Australian consumer is typically a spoilt one (with no offense intended, it's just a marketing term for the consumer-climate) This means bad ideas sink very quickly and only the very best ideas will gather the momentum & critical mass for financial survival.

    Australian law lays between the consumer-driven EU laws and the company driven-US laws.

    The ACCC is an independent government body specifically designed to prevent US-style corporate bastardisation. It's significantly resistant to US-style lobbying and has the power to stop company mergers, monitor and investigate pricing, regulate telecommunications companies, make unfair company policies illegal to enforce and works via a complaint system. (Meaning that individuals have the power to enact a government body to look into unreasonable practices.)

    The ACCC is the reason why the iPhone is available on all competent Australian telecoms, why banks had to pass on savings to consumers and why ebay couldn't impose their paypal policy.

    The smaller nature of the Australian population allows for this kind of organisation to exist, so I'm not confident this would scale without corruption to larger countries.(There is also an organisation which deals specifically with corruption.)

    As with any system, there is an appeals process, many companies don't take this route (such as ebay) as the ACCC are usually just enforcing the existing fair trading & trade practices laws.

    1. Re:Australia is a good common ground. by RodgerDodger · · Score: 3, Informative

      Technically, not correct. It is true that only three networks are offering the iPhone. However, as per ACCC policy, they have to offer a way to buy the iPhone by itself, unlocked and able to be used on any network. For example, Optus is selling the iPhone on the prepaid plans and offers an unlocking service (at a cost - just factor that into the price if you don't want to use Optus).

      The ACCC could not force Apple to offer the iPhone to multiple networks; they could have just approached, say, Telstra. However, the ACCC could force Telstra to offer it unlocked, even if they were the only reseller.

      My guess is that the terms & conditions offered by Apple to sell the iPhone weren't attractive enough for the 2nd tier providers (the ones who don't actually have their own networks fully in place; 3 is sort of in-between; they have their own network covering major urban areas, but fallback to the Telstra network elsewhere). Of course, these terms & conditions are secret, so unless you're a major telco executive, there's no way to know.

      --
      "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
  12. All I can say is... by Zouden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It feels great to be an Australian.

    --
    "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
  13. Gotten away with what? by bigdaddy25fb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here in the good 'ole capitalist USA (not to say that's a bad thing) we don't punish Corps. for actions like this anymore. If that is what you have to do to make a buck then go for it. I think the best example to date is AT&T's immunity from any and all lawsuits during the wireprobing debacle. Free Market was a bad idea...it should have been Fair Market (in the sense that you should be fair to your consumers).

  14. Obvious by BCW2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "More chillingly, if eBay had launched the scheme in America would they have got away with it?"

    Depends on whether they bribed enough of the right people or not. Simple and obvious to anyone with knowledge of our system.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  15. Umm.. it's not a freaking charity people ... by dnadig · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I run a grocery store, I'm allowed to say what kinds of checks I'll take.

    If I run a coffee shop, I get to decide who'se posters stay on the bulletin board.

    If I run an actual, physical auction house, I'm allowed to say "all payments run through the house." In fact that's what all physical auction houses DO say.

    There's nothing "free as in speech" about a service like eBay. It's a commercial enterprise. They could demand payment in chickens and the ONLY right anyone has is to simply say no and not use them.

    1. Re:Umm.. it's not a freaking charity people ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Legal Tender...
      While it's legal(in some places[in the U.S]) to not accept legal tender, it is required you accept any form of legal tender where debt exists.

      Auction on something, you win, you now owe x dollars. Hello debt.

    2. Re:Umm.. it's not a freaking charity people ... by Nazlfrag · · Score: 2, Informative

      Australia doesn't have free speech anyway, except that hinted at in the Magna Carta and common law. Still, there is a freedom at work, it's free as free market, in consumers expectation that a competitive, free and open market exists. We have a Trade Practices act that defines most of the behaviour required, play by the rules or face stiff penalties.

      The ACCC acts in the interest of this competitive free market by protecting the consumer from abusive monopolies and similar extortion. Restricting ebays ability to force a monopoly on payments enables freedom of competition in that sector. Nothing charitable about it, severe abuses of monopoly and anticompetitive behaviour are unacceptable in our version of a free market.

    3. Re:Umm.. it's not a freaking charity people ... by F'Nok · · Score: 2, Informative

      If I run an actual, physical auction house, I'm allowed to say "all payments run through the house." In fact that's what all physical auction houses DO say.

      There's nothing "free as in speech" about a service like eBay. It's a commercial enterprise. They could demand payment in chickens and the ONLY right anyone has is to simply say no and not use them.

      When you deal with a physical auction house your transaction is controlled by them, they are responsible if something dodgy happens during it.

      When you deal with Ebay they have consistently maintained that they are only helping buyers find sellers (and vice-versa) and that thus they are not responsible for what may go wrong.

      You cannot have your cake and eat it too.
      Even ignoring the monopoly effects here, ebay would need to choose either:

      • To be responsible for transactions, thus able to specify payment methods
      • To be merely helping buyers and sellers find each other, thus not involved in payments at all; unless the seller specifically takes advantage of some other service Ebay offers to do such (like PayPal)

      So no, I don't think your comparison was accurate.

  16. Ebay killed me by Marty+Yinzer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have earned my entire (significant) income selling IT infrastructure and biopharma research equipment on ebay for years. All the changes they have made in the past 6 months have utterly killed my business. I went from supporting my family and many people that worked for me to ruin. They have completely killed ability of small people to compete (in my arena, at least.) I'm a lucky one because I just landed a kick-ass job doing what I actually like to do (consulting and IT) - but I know several others who are not so lucky. People that are about to lose everything, and who didn't have a high-paying skill to fall back on. This might be a bit off-topic so far, so I'll add in something that is on topic: this paypal only thing really probably wouldn't have made much more for paypal. Speaking from my focus (IT and Scientific equipment) virtually all transactions are paid by paypal anyway. We accept credit cards, wire, checks, Hell- on many items I;d take *anything* as payment (I'd even take an old HP-3000 or Vax!) The thing is, everyone has any payment choice they desire with us, and out of every $100 well over $99 comes through paypal. In fact, if we were rounding properly to integer values, $100 our of $100 comes through Paypal. So, if my focus holds true for other types of sales on ebay, the security thing might actually have been true in this case. Now, all that said, "Ebay, I hope you die a quick but painful death...the same you inflicted on me and so many others who worked our guts out to build a business on your platform. Die, you bastards."

  17. I only use PayPal by Ngarrang · · Score: 2, Informative

    I only use PayPal and will not deal with any seller/buyer that does not accept PayPal. I don't trust 'the check is in the mail', or 'I will wire the money to you tomorrow'. I am especially wary of sellers that offer me a discount if I pay them direct to avoid additional fees. By using PayPal, every step of the transaction is recorded and logged for reference.

    The one time I was warned that a seller had been removed from eBay due to suspicious sales -- and I had already completed the sale -- I filed with eBay and PayPal. I got nearly all of my money back. The seller had gotten to his bank account and removed some of the money first.

    Don't like the fees? Then charge more for your auction or go to another auction site.

    --
    Bearded Dragon
  18. Nothing to do with Government by duncan+bayne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why the hell has the Government got to anything do with this? If eBay customers don't want to use eBay because they're mandating PayPal, they have the right to go elsewhere.

    It's a sad day for liberty when the customers of a company get to use force to determine the policies of that company.

  19. Paypal Doesn't Protect You From Scammers. by plasmacutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I only use PayPal and will not deal with any seller/buyer that does not accept PayPal. I don't trust 'the check is in the mail', or 'I will wire the money to you tomorrow'. I am especially wary of sellers that offer me a discount if I pay them direct to avoid additional fees. By using PayPal, every step of the transaction is recorded and logged for reference.

    The one time I was warned that a seller had been removed from eBay due to suspicious sales -- and I had already completed the sale -- I filed with eBay and PayPal. I got nearly all of my money back. The seller had gotten to his bank account and removed some of the money first.

    Don't like the fees? Then charge more for your auction or go to another auction site.

    I'm sorry to say paypal doesn't protect you from scammers. Read the fine print. Trust me, i was defrauded for 500 bucks by a seller who had 1000 positive feedback ratio (all VERY well astroturfed).

    The truth is any service which allows you to use a major credit card will allow you to recover defrauded funds by disputing the charge. Don't make the mistake of thinking PayPal or some other service of its sort actually gives a damn, use your credit card's dispute service like I have since that time (recovering a further 1500).

    This said, Ebay is on its last legs, at least when it comes to electronics. At least 30% of its listings are hong kong or nigerian scammers running hijacked accounts saying "e-mail me for 'buy it now' price!".

    I really do feel for the legit sellers who are left. I honestly think Ebay drove off enough of their peers to make the online auction scene incredibly seedy.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  20. Re:PayPal is a sucky middle man by plasmacutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And I had all the money I paid for a second hand laptop stolen from me because paypal's dispute service took so damn long, and the perp was allowed to close the account.

    I had no recourse. Looks like paypal protects nobody then.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  21. I prefer PayPal by blind+biker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am a European eBay buyer. From the posts in this thread, this seems to put me in a firm minority on Slahsdot. Anyway; I much prefer PayPal to bank transfer because in case of fraudolent, forged or non working product (or simply if the item was never sent), I have an avenue for recourse. With wire transfers I have no way to recover my money.

    Also, in case of overseas payments, PayPal is _way_ cheaper than wire transfer.

    Just my 2 cents (or a Euro). Resume your cheering.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  22. Ebay giving up? NOT by Slashdotgirl · · Score: 2, Informative
    The latest story according to "The Sydney Morning Herald an Australian newspaper situated in New South Wales, States that Ebay is continuing to enforce it's Crap System 'Paypal' sucks! on us. SMH

    For instance it is reported from the article that "Sellers are reporting that eBay is systematically deleting auction listings from sellers who state in their item descriptions that they "prefer" to be paid with non-PayPal methods, such as bank deposit."

    This sordid story is not over and us Aussies can be 'Real Right Bastards' when we are not given a fair go.

    --
    The more I know, the less I know
  23. "Fighting for" by Arancaytar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    eBay spammed users claiming it was fighting for 'safety benefits for consumers.'

    But the consumers decided they wanted to keep them.

  24. Aussie pride by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 2, Funny

    It feels great to be an Australian.

    ...were his last words before the box jellyfish, funnel spiders, Tasmanian devils, great whites, and inland taipans overtook him.

  25. Still happening - just yesterday, in the UK by onlyconnect · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I posted an MP3 player for sale. I was told I must offer PayPal and ONLY PayPal.

    See here for screen grab:

    http://www.itwriting.com/blog/708-ebay-insisting-on-paypal-only-in-the-uk.html

    Tim

  26. Why negative feedback? by sjbe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can you explain the use of negative feedback against buyers?

    • Some buyers are extremely rude or difficult to work with just like with any retail or mail order business.
    • Many don't bother to actually read the terms of your auction and then act surprised (and rude) when you will not deviate from them.
    • A significant number of buyers cannot be bothered to pay for items they have one. I typically had to send payment reminders to about 2-4% of buyers and about 1% never pay.
    • Some buyers are outright thieves or deceptive.
    • Some buyers insist that you are overcharging for shipping even when you charge UPS standard rates.
    • Most often though negative feedback is left in retaliation for negative feedback left by the buyer. Sometimes justified, sometimes not. I've had buyers leave negative feedback about shipping speed 20 minutes after the auction closed and before they had paid for the item. Clearly unreasonable. I've also had buyers leave negative feedback for me when I darn well screwed up and deserved it.

    The long and short of it is that sometimes sellers deserve negative feedback and sometimes buyers deserve negative feedback. There are plenty of good reasons in each case.

    It seems that if they didn't pay that would be an issue you would take to Ebay, not something you'd complain about on their feedback page.

    You can run through the non-paying bidder process but it has no teeth unless the buyer is a multiple time offender. eBay does not and (apparently) cannot make buyers pay - they only can kick them off eBay. Being able to tell other sellers about a problem buyer is one of the few defenses sellers have to recognize when a buyer is likely to be a problem. If a buyer has a history of negative feedback sellers sometimes can protect themselves. After all, if you are dealing with a known problem customer it should be my right as a seller not to deal with them.

  27. Honest buyers? Are you kidding? by sjbe · · Score: 3, Informative

    It discouraged honesty from buyers.

    Honesty from buyers? My guess is you haven't sold a significant amount of stuff on eBay. I have over 10,000 feedbacks with a 99.7% positive rating and have seen just about every buyer scam in the book first hand. I'm an optimistic person by nature but when you've had people try to burn you as much as I have you cease being so optimistic about the "honesty from buyers". Most buyers are fine but a very significant percentage are not and making it impossible for sellers to respond to the bad ones does not help anyone.

    The vast majority of feedbacks are either content free ("A+++++ BEST SELLER EVER!!!!") or simply rude responses from people who couldn't be bothered to resolve a problem civilly. I particularly love getting negative feedback from buyers who can't be bothered to actually read the auction terms. Happens ALL the time.

    While I'll be the first to admit there are a lot of scummy sellers out there there are at least as many scummy buyers. eBay's change in policy is an attempt to assure buyers that eBay is safe (it isn't) so that they don't take their business elsewhere.