Slashdot Mirror


NAO Humanoid Robot Set To Hit the Market

KentuckyFC writes "Earlier this year, Paris-based Aldebaran-Robotics picked up $8 million in venture capital funding to help commercialize its NAO humanoid robot. The target market for this device is research labs working on the next generation of robotic hardware and software. Today, the company has posted a detailed spec of NAO on the arXiv saying that it expects the robot to cost about $15,000 each. That's cheap compared to other humanoids. Fuitsu's HOAP humanoids cost $50,000 each and various estimates price Honda's Asimo at $1 million per bot, although they are not for sale. Aldebaran-Robotics says that NAO's cost should come down to about $6,000 as production ramps up."

191 comments

  1. Posterity will condemn us... by Stanistani · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A hundred years from now, whether the readers are C or Fe, they will get a feeling of nausea reading about the 'retail prices' of 'humanoids.'

    1. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 5, Funny

      A hundred years from now, whether the readers are C or Fe, they will get a feeling of nausea reading about the 'retail prices' of 'humanoids.'

      No, because it will be illegal to talk about the robocaust.

    2. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by CogDissident · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be fair, even natural-born humans have a price, 5.1 million dollars if I remember right, according to the US government.

    3. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get a feeling of nausea reading your posts. But the meds should be good enough in 100 years to make that slightly dirty feeling go away.

    4. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Funny

      To be fair, even natural-born humans have a price, 5.1 million dollars if I remember right, according to the US government.

      The subtlety being in the word 'retail'. The US government doesn't sell people in "people stores".

      Or does it?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    5. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by megaditto · · Score: 1

      No, you gotta go to K-street for that

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    6. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, because it will be illegal to talk about the robocaust.

      You sound like a Robocaust denier!

    7. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by Godji · · Score: 3, Funny

      Indeed it does not. One can only get a person through the OEM channels.

    8. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by swarsron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      not yet. But since one can use bodyfat to create biodiesel and with the rising cost of oil, an unbalanced budget ...

    9. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      5.1 million dollars if I remember right, according to the US government.

      It Depends.

      If you're being poisoned by air pollution, it's $6.1 million dollars (down from $8 million in 2000) but if a company is dumping poison in your water supply, it's $8.8 million dollars. If you need to know how much more to pay for little rubber caps to make your Pinto not explode, the DoT suggests $5.8 million, but starting this year wants everyone to analyze their work at $3.2 and $8.4 million, just to be sure. $5.8 million is also used by the FAA.

      Laura Taylor of North Carolina State University, said her figure was lower because it emphasized differences in pay for various risky jobs, not just risky industries as a whole.[emphasis mine]

      Anyone have a link to the actual study? I've found all sorts of people pontificating on whether it's done right or even the right thing to do, but not the study itself. I'm interested in knowing whether these "various" risky jobs included illegal immigrants in jobs like meatpacking or whether certain very dangerous and well-paying jobs were left out (surely an accidental oversight), similar to how energy and food costs are too "volatile" (read: embarrassing) to consider in inflation.

    10. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      > > You sound like a Robocaust denier!

      > Robocaust? What robocaust? I've never heard of a robocaust before. It sounds like something made up by a /.er.

      Due, how can you not know about the Robocaust? There was even a great fictionalized documentary about it that won all sorts of awards several years ago. I think it was called "Azimov's List" or somesuch.

    11. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by Trespass · · Score: 1

      Probably for our naivete, though.

    12. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by operagost · · Score: 1

      So where will the line be drawn? Is the robot a humanoid once the order is placed, or once it comes off the assembly line? Or when the warranty runs out?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    13. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /. headlines 100 years from now:

      Troll patents haptic sensors in soft-tissue orifices, Sues all Sex-bot manufacturers for infringement.

      MIT Media Lab announces One-Child-Per-Laptop human re-population program

      Duke Nukem Forever to release this December

    14. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by bondjamesbond · · Score: 2, Funny

      And you won't be politically correct to say the "R" word... but it's OK for Robots to say it.

    15. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

      According to the EPA, and even with pseudo-science, you still need arbitrary numbers to plug in.

      --
      Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    16. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by Emperor+Zombie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Robocaust? What robocaust? I've never heard of a robocaust before. It sounds like something made up by a /.er.

      Yeah, everyone knows the correct term is Robocalypse.

      --
      I'm so excited I just made water in my pantaloons!
    17. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      "..The US government doesn't sell people in "people stores"

      GW Bush has not yet finished unilaterally repealing the constitution. He still has a few months left to finish so maybe he'll start working on the 13th amendment next. Who knows

      For those not from the US the 13th starts off with the words "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude..." Repeals the 13th and then we could see "peole stores" again. We had then here before 1865.

    18. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      No, that was RoboSanta

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    19. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      Does that mean that every country that's lost people to Extrodinary Rendition can bill the US govt...?

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    20. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by s0l1dsnak3123 · · Score: 1

      Especially now that the government in cooperation with the Robotics Industry Association America is cracking down on robosharing.

    21. Re:Posterity will condemn us... by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

      Wow, posterity will say, only three posts to Asimov's Law.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
  2. Not soon enough! by __aailob1448 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want my robot NAO!

    1. Re:Not soon enough! by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Ok .. then I'll have it. You were mixing in Portuguese weren't you???

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Not soon enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nope, Btardian.

    3. Re:Not soon enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. OP wasn't AC. ;)

      Also, WTF is a B?

    4. Re:Not soon enough! by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      ***whooosh***

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  3. Science Fiction to Science by Van+Cutter+Romney · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Somewhere in the back of my mind I have this strange feeling that we are slowly heading into Asimov's world. And all the problems (and benefits) that come along with it ...

    --
    Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
    1. Re:Science Fiction to Science by mimada · · Score: 1

      I heard there are going to be twelve models but the final five won't be reveal until the fourth season.

    2. Re:Science Fiction to Science by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

      Somewhere in the back of my mind I have this strange feeling that we are slowly heading into Asimov's world. And all the problems (and benefits) that come along with it ...

      We were promised our own robots back in the 1950's. So, we finally have them. Now where is my flying car?

      --
      Bearded Dragon
    3. Re:Science Fiction to Science by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Somewhere in the back of my mind I have this strange feeling that we are slowly heading into Asimov's world. And all the problems (and benefits) that come along with it ...

      Since a core feature of that world is that certain behavioral constraints favorable (in general terms) to humanity were features of robotic brains, not because they were designed that way, but as a matter essentially of natural law (in Asimov's works, the laws of robotics were discovered, not designed), I somehow doubt that we are heading into anything much like Asimov's world.

    4. Re:Science Fiction to Science by TheSync · · Score: 2, Interesting

      where is my flying car?

      Try a Powered Parachute - no license to fly a single-seater, and they can be had for a little over $5000. With an airspeed of 30 MPH, you will easily outpace most rush hour LA freeways :)

    5. Re:Science Fiction to Science by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Asimov's universe has robots being banned on Earth, robot colonies dying, and robotics itself dying as well, with R. Daneel Olivaw being the only remaining robot in a galaxy with no non-human sentient life (except on Gaia, where everything is sentient).

      I think Asimov's robots will be about as like the real future's robots as his Multivac is to the internet. I don't see robots being banned.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    6. Re:Science Fiction to Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

    7. Re:Science Fiction to Science by Scotteh · · Score: 1

      I think he's referring to I, Robot (book, not movie), not Foundation. In that book, the laws of robotics conflict to potentially cause harm to mankind.

    8. Re:Science Fiction to Science by Stanistani · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think we are more likely to be governed by these Three Laws:

      1. A citizen may not criicize the government or, through inaction, allow the government to be criticized.

      2. A citizen must obey orders given to it by the government, except where such orders would conflict with corporate profits.

      3. A citizen must protect itself from unregulated media as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

    9. Re:Science Fiction to Science by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      in Asimov's works, the laws of robotics were discovered, not designed

      Is that statement really true? It contradicts my knowledge. One example I could think off was ths short novel "Little Lost Robot" where the first law is modified.

      I have to admit that I am a little rusty on this topic as it is a long time since I read Asimov.

    10. Re:Science Fiction to Science by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is that statement really true? It contradicts my knowledge. One example I could think off was ths short novel "Little Lost Robot" where the first law is modified.

      Apparently, we're both right; Asimov's portrayal of the laws is inconsistent -- they are at times (particularly in later works) portrayed as fundamental and inherent in the nature of the positronic brain, and at times (particularly in earlier works) portrayed as alterable, engineered safeguard's. Wikipedia gives a rationalization of this (without citation, perhaps OR) that, given that the earlier-later distinction follows both the history of when they were written and the place the stories have in the continuum, its arguable that the laws were original engineered but later so basic to the extraordinarily complex designs that you'd have to throw out centuries of the mathematics of positronic brain design and start over to build robots without them, so they were in effect set in stone. Given the historical inconsistencies in the series, though, I don't know that this rationalization is particularly necessary or convincing, but its out there.

    11. Re:Science Fiction to Science by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      By the time he'd died, Asimov managed to tie the "I, Robot" universe to the Foundation universe. In the last few books in the Foundation series, R. Daneel Olivaw was found to be behind Hari Seldon's "psychohistory". Daneel was a central figure in the Elija Baily books, where robots were pretty much banned on Earth.

      Asimov was always my favorite writer. His death IMO was a blow to mankind.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    12. Re:Science Fiction to Science by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      They all take place inside of the same "universe" though, the reason robots die off is because R. Daneel Olivaw decided it's best for humanity that they do.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  4. Before anyone asks.. by Blice · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, it does run Linux.

    1. Re:Before anyone asks.. by rhartness · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Actually, the front page of the company answers your question-- Yes!

    2. Re:Before anyone asks.. by heitikender · · Score: 1

      on introductory picture it has an arrow pointing to its leg and caption says 23 inches. Is that newsworthy article linked on any site that has female readers?

  5. Why humanoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't see the appeal to having a humanoid robot. The robots in Wall*e for example were all designed for a function.

    I think of any robot as a machine. They are there to serve a purpose. Even the IVR systems make me angry when they imply "I'm sorry. I didn't get that". No, the computer didn't recognize what I said. And "you" aren't sorry.

    Anthropomorphizing robots, cute as they are in Wall*e, is insulting to the beauty of that which is life.

    1. Re:Why humanoid? by Wiarumas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just to bring up an interesting point, in the Animatrix's story about the rise of power of machines, they start out as humanoid (as we designed them that way) and evolve into insect-like creatures by the end as they continue to improve upon their robotic designs.

      --
      I will bend like a reed in the wind.
    2. Re:Why humanoid? by Brigadier · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Somewhere in my head I'm picturing you in some basement building some contraption and talking to it as if Dr Einstein.

      Your zealousness is disconcerting. somewhere, in another time there is a small boy, and a machine and an angry mom pointing a rifle straight at your head.......

    3. Re:Why humanoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why humanoid?! Well, DUH!

    4. Re:Why humanoid? by Gat0r30y · · Score: 1

      see sig-

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    5. Re:Why humanoid? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anthropomorphizing robots, cute as they are in Wall*e, is insulting to the beauty of that which is life.

      That's only when the robots look like robots. When the robots look like hot chicks that are anatomically correct (if well-endowed), then it's a complement to the beauty that is life.

      And by a complement, I mean that I want two of them. One to complement each arm.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    6. Re:Why humanoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone on /. you should see the utility of such advancements.

    7. Re:Why humanoid? by pitchpipe · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't see the appeal to having a humanoid robot.

      Sex.

      Anthropomorphizing robots, cute as they are in Wall*e, is insulting to the beauty of that which is life.

      Anthropomorphizing robots is all about what my previous statement was about. Fuck the beauty of life, we're talking utilization here.

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    8. Re:Why humanoid? by Kingrames · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Fuck the beauty of life,"

      I am intrigued by your ideas and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    9. Re:Why humanoid? by Sethumme · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are right that robots are built to serve a specific purpose, but keep in mind that most robotic functions are ones that were previously done by us humans. So it's quite possible that one day we will want a robot that performs some human task that requires human proportions, such as carrying our bags while at the same time navigating stairs and fitting through doorways or even into cars.

      Of course, we could also want robots for companionship, in the same way people find comfort in pets. But in that case, we'd design the robot to look like Robin Williams.

    10. Re:Why humanoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Specialized robots are useless outside their function, and are thus just expensive deadweight when not in use. For example, a Roomba is great at vacuuming a floor, but when the floor is clean it can't do anything else. It can't carry boxes or wash dishes. You'd need additional robots for those specialized tasks, and they're going have the same "deadweight" problem as the Roomba too.

      A humanoid robot would be able to do any physical job that a human could do. Such robots would be versatile enough to be useful all the time. A single humanoid robot vacuums the floor, then it carries boxes, and then washes dishes, and then etc etc etc. A humanoid robot would always be useful in some way, and thus more efficient in the long run.

    11. Re:Why humanoid? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And by a complement, I mean that I want two of them. One to complement each arm.

      FWIW, I'm not sure using them as arm-candy would be the best use. You wouldn't be utilizing the "anatomically correct" portion of the design, which means they'd be over-engineered for your intended purpose. :)

      Personally, I'd like anatomically incorrect female robots. I don't want something that feels like the real thing, I want something that feels *better* than the real thing. But maybe that's just me.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    12. Re:Why humanoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Which part of life do you find so beautiful? Is it when a female mantis bites off the head of the male as his body keeps copulating? Perhaps it's the birds that nest so close to each other on cliffs that sometimes when a mother isn't looking a neighbor will lean over and eat her chick as a nice tasty meal that didn't require the other mother to leave her own nest. Or maybe it's the Cuckoo bird which leaves its egg in the nest of another bird and after hatching pushes all the others out of the nest and kills them. No, I bet it's when a new male lion takes over a pride and kills all the cubs before they can get old enough to challenge him. How about various parasites that take over a host body and make them more apt to be eaten so the parasite can gain entry to a new species of stomach. No wait, it must be because embryology is so finicky that many children are born freakishly disfigured and get to live a brief agonizing existence before being killed by their own bodily dysfunctions.

      People need to get over this naive idea of nature as pure and beautiful. Some parts of it are very beautiful but not all of it. It's the same idea as the noble savage. As if modernity hadn't screwed everything up we'd still be living in a natural paradise like Eden.

      Guess what. It's just not true. The universe and nature in general doesn't give a damn about us.

    13. Re:Why humanoid? by e2d2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Think of it from the perspective of immortality and it starts to make sense. They want to eventually put a person's "self" into a robotic body. That's my opinion at least. Some have claimed it's for understanding, others claim it's because everything is designed for humans now so it would be most useful. But the man in me yells out ROBOPUSSY!

    14. Re:Why humanoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the Asimo presentation, they point out that the robot would be used in human-made and human-use environments (such as a home), with stairs, appliances that are made for human hands and positioned for human access, built on a human scale, and so on. For a general-purpose tool in a such an environment, humanoid form may be the most appropriate design. Or so the argument goes.

    15. Re:Why humanoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Perhaps you should try the real thing first before you start coming up with improvements?

    16. Re:Why humanoid? by Mike1024 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't see the appeal to having a humanoid robot.

      Because we want them to operate in a world that (1) humans are well adapted to and (2) that has in places been adapted to be specifically human-compatible.

      Functional designs like the roomba are all very well, but can they ascend stairs? Operate a door handle? Press buttons positioned for humans to use? Pick up a variety of objects without needing special manipulators?

      And that's just what you'd need for a robot to go to the coffee machine and bring me a coffee, stopping off at the mail room to get my mail.

      No doubt, if you want to travel fast wheels are better than legs. But to do human-like tasks in human-adapted buildings, you've got to expect to end up with some human-like design elements.

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    17. Re:Why humanoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would not a slave be better? It's renewable, green and doesn't pollute.

      Granted you'd have to look at them as less than human but that has been easy for so many over time.

      Instead of being black they could be out of sight, say in China.

    18. Re:Why humanoid? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I'll take an Alyson Hannigan and a young Lucy Lawless please! And can you imagine the lines? if you thought it was a long line for an iPhone...

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    19. Re:Why humanoid? by jason.sweet · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who feels like taking a shower now?

    20. Re:Why humanoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they could be out of sight, say in China.

      That'd be a helluva long vacuum handle.

    21. Re:Why humanoid? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Actually, when I look at the hands I'm not very believing. They look rather incapable. Also, if it's 23 inches tall (I'm not sure what the 23 inches label referred to) then it's not going to be very capable of many human tasks.

      OTOH, this is an alpha model (I think the label said 0.0.1alpha), so one may well expect many improvements before it reaches beta. Including even massive changes in the C&C interface.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    22. Re:Why humanoid? by Emperor+Zombie · · Score: 1

      Would not a slave be better? It's renewable, green and doesn't pollute.

      All of us at the Martian Liberation Front are deeply offended by this statement.

      --
      I'm so excited I just made water in my pantaloons!
    23. Re:Why humanoid? by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the Uncanny Valley Brothel.

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    24. Re:Why humanoid? by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      A robot who vacuums the floors will still need a vacuum cleaner. If you could make a robotic vacuum cleaner as small as a regular vacuum then it would make sense.

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    25. Re:Why humanoid? by glittalogik · · Score: 1
    26. Re:Why humanoid? by glittalogik · · Score: 1

      Is it when a female mantis bites off the head of the male as his body keeps copulating?

      Yeah, actually that bit's kinda hot.

    27. Re:Why humanoid? by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      Sex is not just about finding something groovy to rub against our genitals. The fun of sex is the physical mixed with the mental - the connection with another person, be that love, whatever kinky power game your are into or whatever... The point is it's the connection to another person (people if you get your kicks that way) that makes it a powerful experience.

      Masturbation is just masturbation no matter how good your props are.

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    28. Re:Why humanoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, I'm confused...I thought that's what people got married for?

      Although some just have kids to fill this function -- you know, to teach em discipline!

    29. Re:Why humanoid? by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      How in the fuck is my post flame bait? Stating the obvious, that humanoid robots are likely to be used as sex toys, is a flame? No man, that's called reality.

    30. Re:Why humanoid? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Wow. Someone used up all their mod points to drive this down from a +3 funny to a -1 flamebait. I guess the lesbians don't like the idea of a guy touching Lucy Lawless. But when they gynoids hit the stores you and me are going to have it out,because I AM getting a Lucy lawless Damn it! Go it a Gabrielle! Lucy is not just for lesbians!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  6. 23 Inches by Chameleon+Man · · Score: 1, Funny

    The picture states that the robot has "23 inches" and points to a questionable area...

    1. Re:23 Inches by tb()ne · · Score: 3, Funny

      The picture states that the robot has "23 inches" and points to a questionable area...

      Whoever annotated the photo apparently felt obliged to graphically tie every feature to a part of the robot. So, in addition to the impressive 23" (which apparently ends mid-way down the thigh), the robot has emotions in its head, an embedded CPU in its mouth, and Linux in its belly.

    2. Re:23 Inches by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      The picture states that the robot has "23 inches" and points to a questionable area

      The handyman's creed (as seen on a tshirt I just bought at a garage sale)- "If at first you don't succeed, use a bigger tool!"

      the robot has emotions in its head

      Does it have a pain in all the diodes down its left leg?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:23 Inches by Scotteh · · Score: 1

      and Linux in its belly.

      Oh no! Poor Tux...

    4. Re:23 Inches by El_Ehmenopio · · Score: 1

      Ooooh Bad bad bad darth vader blog reference. i must commit seppuku for knowing what you refer too!

    5. Re:23 Inches by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Actually the reference was to Marvin from Douglas Adams' Hitcher's Guide to the Galaxy. It's one of the funniest book series I've ever read. If you haven't read it I urge you to visit your local library and check a copy out.

      Marvin never complained about his diodes in the movie version, to my great dissapointment.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    6. Re:23 Inches by El_Ehmenopio · · Score: 1

      Oh. I had forgotten that Marvin had prior art on the diode leg pain. Commits seppuku, blood sprays like a gallager watermellon

  7. Obligatory obscure Simpsons reference by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    Quick, somebody wake Jasper up!

  8. Wow... $6,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The company that manufactures Real Dolls better watch out.

    1. Re:Wow... $6,000 by PoliTech · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A partnership is more likely next.

      Roboticized "Real Dolls" for the lonly slashdotter in your life.

      There are already a number of USB cybersex devices on the market right now.

      Actually I think that a Roboticized "Real Doll" device would be of great benifit to those suffering from dementia, mental retardation, the infirm, and even for old or ugly people who may not have any other form of companionship.

      Wasn't there some announced pilot study on the use of dolls for people with dementia a couple of years back?

      The Roboticized "Real Doll" idea is not as crazy as some might first think.

    2. Re:Wow... $6,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those suffering from dementia, mental retardation, the infirm, and even for old or ugly people who may not have any other form of companionship. Yep, sounds like the typical "lonely slashdotter" to me!

    3. Re:Wow... $6,000 by aoeu · · Score: 1

      citation needed

      --
      All your database are belong to U.S.
    4. Re:Wow... $6,000 by PoliTech · · Score: 1

      citation needed

      teledildonics

      The Miss Kanna case mod

      The Katsuya Matsumura Anime girl computer case mod

      Just like a woman

      Real Doll

      Boy Toy Dolls

      Programmed for love

      Therapeutic 'doll therapy' for dementia seems the most accepted by the medical community and is still controversial, there are other therapeutic studies going on, but I only a spent minute or two googling.

    5. Re:Wow... $6,000 by PoliTech · · Score: 1

      Crap: I forgot to add the NSFW tag to the Real Doll and Boy Toy Doll links ... so be warned!

  9. french robots by heatseeker_around · · Score: 1

    Will the robots smell cheese too ?
    - from a french guy :)

    1. Re:french robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, but they are programmed to surrender.

    2. Re:french robots by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Ah, so they run Novell, not Linux. /duck

  10. nethack.alt.org? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why do you need a humanoid robot to play Nethack?

    1. Re:nethack.alt.org? by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

      But on an even more serious note, has anybody found out wat NAO actually stands for?
      Looks like a TLA, but it's a french/freedom company, so it could be... anything?
      Nothing on their website about it, googling NAO will get you lots (incl. stairs down;),
      but nothing relevant AFAICT.

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    2. Re:nethack.alt.org? by IsisTheDamned · · Score: 1

      it's the best method to test his patience unit

  11. NAO robots alright.. by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

    I'm so excited I... wait a minute, damn it! These aren't the driods we're looking for.

    That really grinds my gears.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  12. The technical specs (yes, it runs linux) by __aailob1448 · · Score: 4, Informative

    For all the details, hit this PDF

    NAOs head is equipped with an x86 AMD GEODE 500 MHz CPU motherboard with 256 Mb SDRAM. An additional 1Gb Flash memory is available. Communication with the robot is possible through WiFi 802.11g protocol and through Ethernet port. The CPU manages audio, video, and WiFi and other advanced modules. One ARM7-60MHz microcontroller located in the torso distributes information to all the actuator module microcontrollers (Microchip 16 bit dsPICS) through a RS485 bus (throughput of 460[Kbits=s]). There are two RS485 buses, one that connects the ARM7 microcontroller to the dsPICS modules of the upper part of the body, and the other that connects the ARM7 to the dsPICS modules of the lower part of the body. This bus partition permits to increase the data throughput.

    The ARM-7 microcontroller communicates with the CPU board through a USB-2 bus with a theoretical throughput of 11[Mbits=s]. It can be used to control the robots stabilityusing the inertial unit. The operating system is based on Linux, but the whole system can be modified.

    Sensors:

    30 FPS CMOS videocamera 1
    Gyrometer 2
    Accelerometer 3
    Magnetic rotary encoder (MRE) 34
    FSR 8
    Infrared sensor (emitter/receiver) 2
    Ultrasonic sensor 2
    Loudspeaker 2
    Microphone 4

    1. Re:The technical specs (yes, it runs linux) by Thelasko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the WiFi is the best part of the specs. You can have the robot run around with all of the complex computing done by a cluster of high end computers in another room.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    2. Re:The technical specs (yes, it runs linux) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So theoretically, you could build a beowulf cluster of these?

    3. Re:The technical specs (yes, it runs linux) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "robot wash the dishes, and download some pr0n while you are at it"

  13. Submission by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

    Thusly, I greet our robotic humanoid overlords with bowed neck and outstretched palms.

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:Submission by ntshma · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Thusly, I greet our robotic humanoid overlords with bowed neck and outstretched palms.

      "You are not needed. Report to termination facility 44657."

  14. How humanoid is she? by sm62704 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ok, this is quite unlike me but I clicked the link and... Terminator 0.0.1 (alpha) looks like a robotic clown. She has no breasts, looks like sh'e made of HARD plastic, and doubtless has no vagina.

    I'm going to pay $15,000 for that? Come on, dude, I want one like Data's daughter! What are you guys smoking? Speaking of smoking, I can get a real twenty five year old human crack whore for twenty bucks.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:How humanoid is she? by strelitsa · · Score: 1

      Call holding on Line 1, Hard Plastic Anti-Defamation Society. They say its urgent.

      --
      No mod points, no meta-moderating/Firehose/all the other free work Slashdot wants me to do.
    2. Re:How humanoid is she? by PoliTech · · Score: 1

      $15,000 for a (fake) female that never talks back, won't steal from you, won't wreck your car, won't come home with another guy ... won't take off with one (unless stolen), and won't care if you forget an anniversary ... sounds cheap!

    3. Re:How humanoid is she? by sm62704 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Very good points. The cheapest sex I ever had cost me a draft Budweiser, but the most expensive cost me a house, a car, and part of my pension.

      The trick to dealing with prostitutes is not letting them in your house. Twenty bucks is the going price here, but you have to know that; some of them tell me they get hundreds from politicians, and they name the politicians! And they laugh about how the stupid dweebs overpay like that. Fifteen grand will buy a lot of hookers. They don't talk back, either.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    4. Re:How humanoid is she? by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm going to pay $15,000 for that? Come on, dude, I want one like Data's daughter! What are you guys smoking? Speaking of smoking, I can get a real twenty five year old human crack whore for twenty bucks.

      Well, you get what you pay for, I guess.

      Skanky crack whore. $20, but nasty at any price.

      Real doll. $6000, but really interactive.

      Hard-plastic humanoid with no sexy bits. $15000.

      Sentient, intelligent android with positronic brain and capacity to learn. Priceless.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:How humanoid is she? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Real doll. $6000, but really interactive.

      Doh!! That should be "NOT really interactive".

      Fixed that for me. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:How humanoid is she? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Speaking of smoking, I can get a real twenty five year old human crack whore for twenty bucks.

      Along the unadvertised free "extras". I won't be happy until the experience is fully replicated -- they need to make an anatomically correct robot with herpes and gonorrhea resevoirs.

      When sex with an android can result in me pissing guacamole, then I'll know that humandoi robotics has fully arrived.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    7. Re:How humanoid is she? by pragma_x · · Score: 1

      Seeing as how some weddings cost that much, it's real cheap.

      I'll take two.

    8. Re:How humanoid is she? by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      Yeah but try explaining her to the TSA when you try to take her to Cabbo and she barely fits on the baggage scanner conveyor belt thingy.

    9. Re:How humanoid is she? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Always wrap it when dealing with a professional. Unprotected sex is for monogamous relationships.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  15. Too Short by ta+ma+de · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it can't reach the beer in the fridge, then who really cares.

    1. Re:Too Short by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Happy Birthday Paulie!

    2. Re:Too Short by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      her breasts could be full of chilled bear waiting to be suckled...

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    3. Re:Too Short by Kaffien · · Score: 1

      If it can't reach the beer in the fridge, then who really cares.

      It's arms are modular according to the pdf. Allowing for further evolution / longer arms and thus beer getting ability!

    4. Re:Too Short by The+Gaytriot · · Score: 1

      ...chilled bear waiting to be suckled...

      I don't think polar bears appreciate being suckled.

      Not in my experience anyways.

      --
      Srsly u guys. U guys, srsly.
  16. Anti-trustbots by oneal13rru · · Score: 1

    Wait til Microsoft convinces them to bundle... at least once a day the robot will jump off of a 3 story building or equivalent height, and when you ask tech support, they'll tell you to run Microsoft update to get the security patch that makes it possible for other people to make it jump off a bridge as well.

    --
    Never disregard the raw power inherent to stupidity... they call it "dumb luck" for a reason...
  17. neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say pieces on a board, make each a pair with another piece.

    like...

    |55|44|66|
    |44|66|55|

    so figure out how a piece can move.

    pick any piece, try to move it somewhere.
    when you move a piece you have to move it's pair at the same time.
    when you move to a piece it's pair has to move at the same time too.
    a piece always becomes a pair with the piece it moves to.
    no matter how many pairs, there's only one answer to how a piece can move.

    A common problem, I forget what it's called.

    There's only one answer for how any piece can move.

    A piece always goes where a piece leaves.

    No piece can move to where a piece moves back where it came from.

    No such thing as a free space, a piece always moves to another piece.

    A pair never moves to a pair.

    so try this...

    draw for each piece a line from one piece to another that connects each piece to move from the first piece until the last piece that goes back where it starts.

    see this as a machine diagram.

    move a piece then figure the machine diagram again, it's the same machine.

    that's a machine getting work done...

  18. unemployment is rising, and they want robots by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Brilliant. Not.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:unemployment is rising, and they want robots by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you have a job that can be replaced by a robot we can assume two things:

      1. Its boring
      2. Its going to be replaced by foreign labor anyways.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  19. Description by Subm · · Score: 5, Funny

    FTA: "Initially, delivered with basic behaviors, the robot will be, at its market introduction, the ideal introduction to robots. Eventually, with many improved behaviors, it will become an autonomous family companion. Finally, with more sophisticated functions, it will adopt a new role, assisting with daily tasks (monitoring, etc.)"

    Will, it, have, full, comma, functionality?

    1. Re:Description by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      No. But I hear it will have genuine people personalities.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Description by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Finally, something that can assist me with my daily monitoring tasks!

    3. Re:Description by ignavus · · Score: 1

      FTA: "Eventually, with many improved behaviors, it will become an autonomous family companion."

      Hmm, sounds to me just like raising a child.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
  20. What does its brain run? by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 1

    Does it run Linux? And if it takes a core dump, does it know that it should use the toilet? And will it fight for recognition as a sentient life form?

    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
  21. digging a deeper grave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That blog is shit. The author did not even bother to run a spell checker. He obviously can not spell. If no one bothers to even help give an ounce of credibility to things posted here, the site is total bullshit.

  22. Boston Dynamics Big Dog is the best by MrSteveSD · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1czBcnX1Ww

    Why can't someone make a bipedal robot as impressive as bigdog?

    1. Re:Boston Dynamics Big Dog is the best by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Although big dog is great (and I was amazed at its abilities), I pissed myself laughing at this one instead: Another big dog robot

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Boston Dynamics Big Dog is the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do the oompa-loompas inside ever get tired?

    3. Re:Boston Dynamics Big Dog is the best by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      wow

      That thing, it moves amazingly swiftly and aptly. It's basically indistinguishible in its abilities from an average quadruped, except for the fact that the front legs bend the wrong direction. In any case, this BigDog is something special. It's frighteningly good.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  23. But the HOAP units by monopole · · Score: 1

    Have styling by the same Mecha designer as Patlabor easily worth the added $35,000 for your own Alphonse. On the other hand the Hyper Operating System is almost as bad as Vista.

    1. Re:But the HOAP units by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought the same thing, relating it to patlabor. The main character's name is Nao also.

      In the robot world this isn't really news so much as a press release. There are a lot of humanoid robots that one can purchase with similar feature sets. It's not going to change the landscape of robotics, but it is a cool tool/toy.

  24. First ones to the wall when the revolution came by shogun · · Score: 1

    Am I alone in having 'Aldebaran-Robotics' making me think of 'Sirius Cybernetics'?

    1. Re:First ones to the wall when the revolution came by charlesj68 · · Score: 1

      No, but it did appear to me to be "Alderaan-Robotics", which led to a quick double-take.

    2. Re:First ones to the wall when the revolution came by rossdee · · Score: 1

      Aldebaran is a lot further away than Sirius. If you order one of these now, you'll get it in about 130 years or so.

  25. Robo-clone by Smivs · · Score: 2, Funny

    A humanoid robot that looked like me would be great, not just 'cos it looks like me (poor thing!), but I could send it to work and stay at home all day reading /.
    Oh, hang on, I do that anyway. Oh well!

  26. Emotions? by devotedlhasa · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think you ought to know I'm feeling very depressed...

    1. Re:Emotions? by jasmak · · Score: 1

      Marvin: You can blame the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation for making androids with GPP...
      Arthur: Um... what's GPP?
      Marvin: Genuine People Personalities. I'm a personality prototype. You can tell, can't you...?

      --
      It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
  27. Am I missing the point here? by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So.. let me get this straight: It costs $15,000USD, is approximately the size of a six-month old baby, and looks like some plastic toy? Sure, I read another of the comments here describing what hardware and software it's running, and that's all cool and everything, but seriously: what is it good for other than it's value as a very expensive high-tech toy? It's too short, and I'm sure, too weak and/or clumsy, to do anything really useful for you in your day-to-day life? Seriously, I may be missing an important point here, but I don't see where someone would want to pay so much money for what seems to amount to a very expensive hackers toy.

    1. Re:Am I missing the point here? by Singularitarian2048 · · Score: 1

      The summary says the target market is research labs. It's not a toy. Its use is for robotics research, perhaps for trying out different algorithms and things like that.

    2. Re:Am I missing the point here? by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's mainly for researchers to devise the best techniques for a humanoid, and then apply them to the real world using "real" robots that are yet to come. Think about it, all of the flaws you mentioned are the same engineering challenges they need to meet in future robots. This robot is simply a cornerstone to get started thinking about those problem sets. The solutions start in research labs and makes their way to commercial applications slowly but surely. But this is almost always the first step. Robotics is a new field after all, regardless of what the movies tell us.

    3. Re:Am I missing the point here? by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, I read another of the comments here describing what hardware and software it's running, and that's all cool and everything, but seriously: what is it good for other than it's value as a very expensive high-tech toy? Seriously, I may be missing an important point here, but I don't see where someone would want to pay so much money for what seems to amount to a very expensive hackers toy.

      This is Slashdot. People who are will to pay so much money (or at least, wish they had the money free) for a "very expensive hackers toy" aren't really a rare commodity here.

  28. The value of the humanoid robot by Terwin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even in Sci-fi, the value of the humanoid robot is cost-savings.
    If the brain of a general purpose robot is significantly more expensive than any body it will be put into, then you want that body to be able to handle as many tasks as possible, thus you make it to use all the tools that already exist for humans to use.

    Until the brain is capable of handling all the tasks needed for operating as a semi-autonomous manual laborer, then a humanoid robot is just a nifty gadget with no real place in industry or other areas of production where we use specialized industrial robots today.

  29. Let's hope they're in talks with Abyss Creations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We suggested robotics to Abyss back in the '90s. They told us they were working on it.

    Speaking of Aldebaran, wasn't that the star system Lovecraft's Old Ones were supposed to have come from?

    Wait. I can see it now: Shag-Niggurath, Robotic Black Ho of the Woods with a Thousand Orifices....

  30. Cheap for a humanoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "it expects the robot to cost about $15,000 each. That's cheap compared to other humanoids."

    Gosh, yes. Have you seen the costs of raising kids?

    1. Re:Cheap for a humanoid? by hypergreatthing · · Score: 2, Funny

      .25$ a day?

      Well i guess it depends where and what you mean by raise

  31. Robotnet by Botia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now instead of worrying about being attacked by botnets, we'll have to worry about getting attacked from robotnets. Wonderful.

  32. Humans for wholesale by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

    That raises an interesting question:
    Do you come with a return policy?
    Your post was not as funny as previously advertised.

    1. Re:Humans for wholesale by Godji · · Score: 1

      We'll let the omniscient Slashdot decide that one. Besides, my warranty must have expired by now.

    2. Re:Humans for wholesale by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      Well, most of the male humans I meet seem to be obsessed with attempting to return at least a portion of their being - though usually to a different retailler...

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
  33. Toy sized again... by Necron69 · · Score: 1

    Why is it that all humanoid robots to date are tiny? Is it just for cost or what? To me, it seems that most people will consider these things to be an expensive toy, as long as they are the size of a toy.

    When the robot can take a verbal command to go to the kitchen and get me a beer, _and_ it is tall enough to reach everything in all the cabinets, then it will be useful.

    - Necron69

    1. Re:Toy sized again... by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is it that when robots don't act like something out of a fantasy movie people are a little disappointed? Get a grip on reality man. There is obviously a huge disconnect between the reality of robotics and fantasy.

      Think of it this way - you're wondering why you can't get the really slick aqua theme on your desktop when the people writing the actual software are still working on getting a working 3-color display!

    2. Re:Toy sized again... by Khashishi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably weight. A human-sized one would probably take a crane to move.

  34. Try to imagine. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a soviet cluster of beowolves on that Natilie.

  35. They should go virtual by Dex5791 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just as with architecture and automotive engineering task, they need to do robotics with virtual systems, using physics models instead of using hardware.

  36. Humanoid Robots? by thenewguy001 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Boy I can't wait until i can get my own Marilyn Monroebot!

    1. Re:Humanoid Robots? by mjwx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Boy I can't wait until i can get my own Marilyn Monroebot!

      You can have her, I want the Jessica Albot.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  37. Videos from RoboCup by Falkkin · · Score: 4, Informative

    The RoboCup 2008 world competition just finished in Suzhou, China -- new this year was a league where all the teams must use the Nao robots. The top two teams were from the University of Newcastle (Australia) and a combined Carnegie Mellon/Georgia Tech team. The final game was scoreless and decided by penalty kicks. Full results are here:

    http://www.tzi.de/4legged/bin/view/Website/NaoResults2008

    I wasn't at the competition but it's clear due to the scores that the league is still in its infancy, with scores being few and far between. As with any humanoid robot, falling over is a huge problem. I'm sure there will be some videos of the competition online once all the teams get home and have time to edit and upload them.

    Here's a video of the robot walking, from the 2008 RoboCup US Open (where there was no competition but a couple small demos for the public.)

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=N7USdkA0My8

    1. Re:Videos from RoboCup by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      falling over is a huge problem

      Wow, it sounds pretty authentic to me! Just like real soccer!

      The final game was scoreless

      Yup, it rings true. It's amazing how lifelike robots are getting these days.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Videos from RoboCup by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1

      Yep, and now we know where the name comes from - roNAldO!

      Falls over just like the real thing!

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  38. must ..... resist....... by JazzyJ · · Score: 2, Funny

    ....can't......lolcats....too....strong....

    I can has robot NAO?! ^.^

    *gigglefits*

    1. Re:must ..... resist....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dum, and said already.

    2. Re:must ..... resist....... by thedistrict · · Score: 1

      hahah...I was actually thinking it was Leet talk when I read the headline for the first time too.

  39. "Price" of human life by mi · · Score: 1

    humans have a price, 5.1 million dollars if I remember right, according to the US government.

    You are referring to this recent bit of news. The current official figure is, actually, about $7.22 million (you don't remember right).

    However, it is not set by the US government — the government simply researches, what "we the people" are willing to do (how much they are willing to spend, rather) to avoid risks to our health/life. For example, an American, wishing to travel from New York to Boston, can take either a train (about $100 one way) or a bus ($15). The highway vehicles are inherently riskier, but much cheaper. The number of people taking them anyway gives an idea, how much "an average Joe" is valuing their own life.

    By combining various such examples it is possible to come up, with the cost, that's used to determine, for example, whether a particular public policy is worth the expense. See the linked article for more — it discusses both the concept itself and the (usual) condemnations of the current administration for "cooking the books"...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:"Price" of human life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are inherently riskier

      But are the busses faster than the train? Do they stop at more locations? When I choose a method of transportation, "getting me where I want to go when I want to get there" is higher on my list of criteria than "not dying a horrible flaming death." Does that mean less effort should be spent on "not killing me in a horrible flaming death" (or, since the EPA is using these numbers entirely out of context for air pollution control and not vehicular manslaughter, "not giving me expensive lung cancer that the polluter is not going to pay for and therefore driving up the cost of insurance and medicine for everyone")?

  40. Obligatory Futurama quote by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't Date Robots!

    1. Re:Obligatory Futurama quote by cailith1970 · · Score: 1

      You got something against robosexuals?

      --
      I intend to live forever, or die trying. - Groucho Marx
    2. Re:Obligatory Futurama quote by Emperor+Zombie · · Score: 1

      You got metal fever, boy! Metal fever!

      --
      I'm so excited I just made water in my pantaloons!
  41. 15000! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Are they nuts?

    That android:
    http://arxivblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/nao.jpg

    Is not nearly hot enough for that price!

    This is what we want:
    http://www.universeguide.com/Pictures/RommieFace.jpg

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  42. Pris the humanoid? by diegocn · · Score: 2, Funny

    I clicked the link only because I mistaken Paris as Pris, the entrainment model...

  43. Aging populations by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

    I strongly disagree. As the developed world ages (greater fraction of the population living longer and being older), it will be EXTREMELY expensive to take care of them, UNLESS we can have home robotic assistants. And for them to work, it will be important for them to look human so as to comfort the elderly.

    In preparation for this, I have half-jokingly made an agreement with my mom whereby she promises that if I ever "hire" her a "home care assistant", she will only "tip" the "woman" we hired with checks, rather than cash.

    Interestingly enough, I estimated them costing in the $15,000 range, just what they're exptected to in the article, which is quite a bargain for taking care of elderly sick parents! It notes, properly, that they'll get cheaper, but the kind I'm referring to will also have to have a host of medical diagnostics and surveillance equipment (the former, of course, vehemently opposed by asshole doctors that claim it will be unsafe but really just want their cut), as well as e.g. bathing capabilities.

    Give it ten years though, and only legal barriers will stand in the way.

    --
    Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    1. Re:Aging populations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the kind I'm referring to will also have to have a host of medical diagnostics and surveillance equipment (the former, of course, vehemently opposed by asshole doctors that claim it will be unsafe but really just want their cut), as well as e.g. bathing capabilities.

      If your doctor has this attitude, you need to find a new proctologist.

  44. Most parts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess what. It's just not true. The universe and nature in general doesn't give a damn about us.

    That is why I hold to a personal God. One distant, or absent doesn't help the situation.

    As for the things you described, those are just animals and insects acting on instinct, defense and hunger.

    1. Re:Most parts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right. Just keep putting your head in the sand.

    2. Re:Most parts. by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      It's a pity the Christians killed off all the Gnostics they seemed to have a more interesting and realistic view of God, a blind, callous or even evil being who created the world in his image. They thought that outside of the scope of this God was an all powerful being of love.

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
  45. Cool it is LINUX BASED !!! by posys · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Awesome, one step closer to the "ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY" !! http://roboeco.com/oan

    --
    The Future is already here, just unevenly distributed... THE ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY NOW! http://RoboEco.com/slash
  46. Telepresence by dfcamara · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I rather use a robot like this for telepresence. Wish it have stereoscopic vision and not be too slow walking (if it is). AI only needed to assist moving around.

  47. Re:Obligatory hitchhiker quote by The_Rook · · Score: 1

    it's your plastic pal who's fun to be with!

    --
    when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
  48. Ob. xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are sexy, sexy Von Neumann machines.

    PS - Amazing how there's an appropriate xkcd for almost any slashdot discussion. There could be a corallary to Godwin's Law at play here.

  49. SONY has announced a followup... by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...with its Lithium-ion-battery-based Humanoid Suicide Bomber-bot.

    --
    If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
  50. Re:Obligatory hitchhiker quote by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Share and enjoy! .. sounds a bit sick when taken within the context of the parent's request.

  51. The NAO isn't cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The NAO isn't cheap-- that $15000 "is only the first installment". Teams wanting to use that unfortunate winner of the RoboCup tender have to pay almost as much again for the CLOSED-SOURCE SDK and training courses /per programmer/. There were fully free-software tender nominations that were only marginally more expensive (initially, and no hidden charges afterwards), and the predominately University-based researchers just wondered what the hell was going on for NAO to win the RoboCup contract.

    As for the claim of $6000 each 'in mass production'... I can't see the separately-sourced high-quality motors that cost ~$500 each, making up 90% of the materials cost, dropping massively in price when they're already in mass production.

    1. Re:The NAO isn't cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no additional cost for the SDK. RoboCup teams get a discount price significantly less than $15000 each. The motors do not cost $500 each.

      The target price for mass production remains ~3000 euros.

  52. Dave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Nao is crap, dont waste $6000 on it.

    As Falkkin said, it was used in this year's RoboCup.

    While not on the team myself, I spent a lot of time in the last 6 months in the same lab as UNSW's RoboCup team. The Nao's were extremely troublesome. Limbs fall out from the softest fall, the battery lasts about 15 minutes, several times our robots decided they didn't like booting any more and Alderbaran took months to replace them, even in the air-conditioned lab they would frequently overheat and we had to remove their head casing just to get them working for a reasonable period of time...

    Oh and the battery can't charge while it's running off AC power.

    Basically it's a piece of shit. The old Sony Aibo's that used to be used in the competition were much more robust.

  53. This is disgraceful by oodaloop · · Score: 2, Funny

    I read almost all the comments thus far and not a single overlord joke! I, for one, welcome new robot overlord jokes!

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  54. How strong is it? by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

    Before I buy one, I'd like to know how strong and how heavy it is, and in which programming languages it has been programmed. I don't want to be accidentally killed by it, because the software is buggy.

    That's not a joke, I'm serious about this. Once they start to build heavy robots for home use, they better program them in languages like ADA or Eiffel and run the software through a complete set of test suites, or someone will die sooner or later.

  55. Re:Not soon enough! NAO Means Brain in Chinese by AJ+Mexico · · Score: 1

    Nao means brain in Chinese. Seriously.

    --
    Computers obey me.
  56. It's a TRAP! by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    They are feigning weakness to build a sense of Security.

    "They are weak robots" they will say.

    "They can't take over the world if their arms fall off" The news commentators will proclaim.

    Yeah you whole lot will be kicking yourselves when the robot hordes take over the streets and start stealing old peoples medicine for fuel.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...